<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-17-6393-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Lagged effects regulate the inter-annual variability<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?> of the tropical carbon
balance</article-title><alt-title>Lagged effects regulate the inter-annual variability</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Lagged effects regulate the inter-annual variability}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~A.~Bloom et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bloom</surname><given-names>A. Anthony</given-names></name>
          <email>abloom@jpl.nasa.gov</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bowman</surname><given-names>Kevin W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Junjie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7184-6594</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Konings</surname><given-names>Alexandra G.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2810-1722</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Worden</surname><given-names>John R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Parazoo</surname><given-names>Nicholas C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4424-7780</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>Victoria</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Reager</surname><given-names>John T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-2520</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Worden</surname><given-names>Helen M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5949-9307</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Zhe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Quetin</surname><given-names>Gregory R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-5332</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Smallman</surname><given-names>T. Luke</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0835-1003</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Exbrayat</surname><given-names>Jean-François</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-8626</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>Yi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4750-4997</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Saatchi</surname><given-names>Sassan S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>Mathew</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schimel</surname><given-names>David S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-8065</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91101, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
94305, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF,
United Kingdom</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>National Centre for Earth Observation, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, United
Kingdom</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and
Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">A. Anthony Bloom (abloom@jpl.nasa.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>24</issue>
      <fpage>6393</fpage><lpage>6422</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>August</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>September</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 A. Anthony Bloom et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e264">Inter-annual variations in the tropical land carbon (C) balance are a
dominant component of the global atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rate.
Currently, the lack of quantitative knowledge on processes controlling net
tropical ecosystem C balance on inter-annual timescales inhibits accurate understanding and projections of land–atmosphere C exchanges. In particular, uncertainty on the relative contribution of ecosystem C fluxes attributable
to concurrent forcing anomalies (concurrent effects) and those attributable
to the continuing influence of past phenomena (lagged effects) stifles
efforts to explicitly understand the integrated sensitivity of a tropical ecosystem to climatic variability. Here we present a conceptual
framework – applicable in principle to any land biosphere model – to
explicitly quantify net biospheric exchange (NBE) as the sum of anomaly-induced
concurrent changes and climatology-induced lagged changes to terrestrial
ecosystem C states (NBE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We apply this framework to an
observation-constrained analysis of the 2001–2015 tropical C balance: we use
a data–model integration approach (CARbon DAta-MOdel fraMework – CARDAMOM) to merge satellite-retrieved land-surface C observations (leaf area, biomass, solar-induced fluorescence), soil C inventory data and satellite-based atmospheric
inversion estimates of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO fluxes to produce a data-constrained
analysis of the 2001–2015 tropical C cycle. We find that the inter-annual
variability of both concurrent and lagged effects substantially contributes to the 2001–2015 NBE inter-annual variability throughout 2001–2015 across
the tropics (NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 % of total NBE IAV, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  0.76;
NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 % of NBE IAV, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.61), and the prominence of NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV persists across both wet and dry tropical ecosystems. The
magnitude of lagged effect variations on NBE across the tropics is largely
attributable to lagged effects on net primary productivity (NPP; NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV
113 % of NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.93, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value &lt; 0.05), which emerge due to the dependence of NPP on inter-annual variations in foliar C and
plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O states. We conclude that concurrent and lagged
effects need to be explicitly and jointly resolved to retrieve an accurate
understanding of the processes regulating the present-day and future trajectory of the terrestrial land C sink.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e445">Immediate ecosystem responses to external forcings are invariably followed
by time-lagged ecosystem responses, attributable to a continuum of lagged
biotic and physical processes. For example, contemporaneous ecosystem state
changes attributable to disturbances, climatic variability and increasing
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels all induce a temporal spectrum of lagged
processes, such as diurnal to seasonal<?pagebreak page6394?> dynamics in canopy and groundwater
storage and multi-annual changes in mortality rates, and induce ecosystem dynamics relating to species distributions, nutrient availability and soil
properties on timescales spanning from decades to millennia (Schimel et al.
1997; Smith et al., 2009; Reichstein et al., 2013). Conversely, for a given
time span, the sum of these “lagged effects” on ecosystem states ultimately represents the ecosystem dynamics attributable to a unique integrated legacy of past phenomena, spanning from diurnal to geologic timescales, making
lagged effects a ubiquitous dynamical property of any terrestrial ecosystem.
As a consequence, ecosystem function at any given time (such as
photosynthetic uptake, respiration and evapotranspiration rates) is an
emergent consequence of an ecosystem's initial physical and biotic states
and the contemporaneous impact of meteorological and disturbance forcings on
these states.</p>
      <p id="d1e457">Disentangling the cumulative lagged consequences of past phenomena from
contemporaneous impacts of external forcings is a critical priority for
understanding and quantifying the contemporary terrestrial carbon (C) cycle
responses to climatic variability. Global-scale efforts to resolve the state
of the C cycle (Le Quéré et al., 2015) identify the tropical C cycle as a dominant contributor to the inter-annual variability (IAV) of the
terrestrial C sink. Recent efforts to characterize the tropical C sink IAV
have been largely focused on quantifying the role of concurrent responses to
climatic variability, including the contribution of semi-arid ecosystems
(Poulter et al., 2014; Ahlström et al., 2015), ecosystem responses to
drought (Gatti et al., 2014), and more generally continental-scale
sensitivities of photosynthesis, respiration and fire fluxes to concurrent
temperature and precipitation anomalies (Cox et al., 2013; Andela and van
der Werf, 2014; Alden et al., 2016; Jung et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017; Piao
et al., 2019). However, on comparable timescales, time-lagged manifestations
of climatic variability on the state of the terrestrial biosphere have been
extensively theorized and observed (Thompson et al., 1996; Schimel et al., 1996, 2005; Richardson et al., 2007; Arnone et al., 2008; Sherry et al.,
2008; Saatchi et al., 2013; Frank et al., 2015; Doughty et al., 2015;
Baldocchi et al., 2017; Schwalm et al., 2017; amongst many others).
Specifically, lagged relationships between climate variability and the
terrestrial C fluxes – namely mediated through lagged impacts on
photosynthetic uptake and respiration fluxes, groundwater storage, mortality
and subsequent shifts of ecosystem function – indicate that lagged effects
may be a fundamental component in the inter-annual evolution of the
terrestrial C balance. Observational constraints on terrestrial ecosystem
responses to climatic variability further suggest that time-lagged phenomena
are a non-negligible component of terrestrial ecosystem C dynamics on
continental-to-global scales (Braswell et al., 1997; Saatchi et al., 2013;
Anderegg et al., 2015; Detmers et al., 2015; Fang et al. 2017; Yang et al.,
2018; Yin et al., 2020). Therefore, while recent efforts to diagnose
inter-annual variations of the tropical C balance overwhelmingly emphasize
the roles of concurrent forcings, observed ecosystem responses to climatic variability on multi-annual timescales indicate that the tropical C balance
may be substantially affected – if not governed – by lagged responses to
inter-annual variations in meteorological and disturbance forcings across
tropical ecosystems.</p>
      <p id="d1e460">Accurate knowledge of both instantaneous sensitivities and time-lagged
processes of terrestrial C cycling to climate is critical for constraining
model representations of the terrestrial C cycle. Uncertainty in the
long-term terrestrial C flux imbalance and the associated carbon-climate
feedbacks is a prevailing source of uncertainty in Earth system projections (Friedlingstein et al., 2014; Friend et al., 2014), and these are likely
underestimated due to a range of under-represented and/or poorly constrained
C cycle responses to a changing climate (Luo, 2007; Lovenduski and Bonan,
2017). Furthermore, assessments of Earth system projections based on present-day constraints (Cox et al., 2013; Mystakidis et al., 2016) provide
little insight into the integrated roles of largely uncertain process controls, including C flux responses to drought (Powell et al., 2013), under-determined C pool dynamics (Bloom et al., 2016), nutrient dynamics and limitations (Wieder et al., 2015), and higher-order dead organic C
dynamics (Schimel et al., 1994; Hopkins et al., 2014). In tropical
ecosystems, rapid turnover rates of live and dead organic matter pools relative to extra-tropical ecosystems (Carvalhais et al., 2014; Bloom et
al., 2016) imply interactions between uptake, respiration, and fires
(Randerson et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2013; Bloom et al., 2015) on comparable timescales: specifically, given that (a) the mean C residence time in tropical biomass and soil organic matter pools typically spans
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5–50 years and (b) multi-year observational constraints reveal rapid ecosystem vegetation/C responses to climatic extremes (Saatchi
et al., 2013; Alden et al., 2016), sub-decadal timescales are likely
critical for disentangling concurrent and lagged effect impacts on the
evolution of tropical C balance. However, despite numerous studies on the
roles of productivity (Doughty et al., 2015), water stress (Kurc and Small,
2007; Williams and Albertson, 2004), respiration (Trumbore, 2006; Exbrayat
et al., 2013a, b; Guenet et al., 2018) and mortality (Saatchi et al., 2013; Anderegg et al., 2015; Rowland et al., 2015), there is currently a major gap
between knowledge of individual processes controlling the tropical C balance
on inter-annual timescales and the integrated impact process interactions leading to complex net C exchanges represented in terrestrial biosphere
models (Huntzinger et al., 2013, 2017). As a result, while models provide
critical mechanistic insight into complex process interactions, model
representations of the net effect of competing and interacting C flux
responses to climate variability and disturbance remain highly uncertain on
regional and pan-tropical scales. Ultimately, given that tropical ecosystems account for 850 Pg of C and the majority of the Earth's photosynthetic
uptake, plant respiration and fire C emissions (Saatchi et al., 2011;
Hiederer and Köchy, 2011; Beer et al., 2010; van der Werf et al.,
2010), quantitatively understanding<?pagebreak page6395?> the concurrent and long-lived impacts of
climatic variability, drought and anthropogenic disturbance is critical for
predicting their function in Earth system projections.</p>
      <p id="d1e470">Recent inverse estimates of tropical C fluxes from satellite CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements provide much-needed spatial and temporal constraints on
continental-scale net biospheric exchange (NBE; e.g. Takagi et al., 2014, Liu et al., 2014, 2017; Feng et al., 2017, Detmers et al., 2015; amongst
others). Satellite-based NBE estimates – combined with land-surface
observations of solar-induced fluorescence (SIF, Frankenberg et al. 2011),
leaf-to-soil constraints on total C stocks (Saatchi et al., 2011) and
disturbance (Giglio et al., 2013) – provide a unique opportunity for
quantitatively informing terrestrial biosphere model representations of the
tropical C balance; recent continental- to global-scale model–data fusion efforts have demonstrated the synergistic potential of the present-day “carbon-observing system” to resolve the dynamics of the terrestrial C
balance (Liu et al., 2017; Bloom et al., 2016; MacBean et al., 2018; Exbrayat
et al., 2018; Quetin et al., 2020; Yin et al., 2020). Ultimately, model–data fusion representations of terrestrial ecosystem C cycling allow for an
explicitly mechanistic representation of the terrestrial C balance with
in-built states and process parameterizations optimized to represent the observed C cycle variability in the observations; contingent on their
mechanistic accuracy of the C cycle to external forcings, these terrestrial
C balance models can be used to quantitatively diagnose the concurrent and
lagged sensitivities of terrestrial ecosystems to external forcings.</p>
      <p id="d1e483">In this study we present a framework for expressing the ecosystem state
changes in a given year as the sum of (a) “concurrent effects”,
attributable to concurrent forcing anomalies, and (b) “lagged effects”,
attributable to the cumulative impacts of past forcings. We apply this
framework on a data-constrained ecosystem C balance modelling framework to
quantitatively diagnose the role of concurrent and lagged effects on the
2001–2015 inter-annual tropical C balance. Our analysis is motivated by some
key unanswered questions on the large-scale tropical C cycle variability:
for instance, are lagged effects significant contributors to inter-annual
flux variability on pan-tropical scales? Which C fluxes (e.g. photosynthetic
or respiratory) explain the majority of NBE variability attributable to
lagged phenomena? Are lagged effects a ubiquitous property across both dry
and wet tropical biomes? Here we hypothesize that on a pan-tropical scale,
the integrated impact of lagged effects is a critical component of tropical
NBE IAV. To test this hypothesis, we reconcile large-scale C cycle processes
and satellite-based estimates of land-to-atmosphere CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes using
the  CARbon DAta-MOdel fraMework (CARDAMOM) diagnostic ecosystem C balance model–data fusion approach. We outline our method in Sect. 2, where we present an analytical methodology for attributing inter-annual ecosystem state variability to concurrent and
lagged effects; we present and discuss a quantification of the relative role
of concurrent and lagged effects on continental-scale NBE and the attribution of lagged effects to inter-annual variations in C stock and
plant-available water states in Sect. 3; we conclude our paper in Sect. 4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e503">To quantitatively diagnose concurrent and lagged effects on the inter-annual
variability of the tropical C balance, we (i) present a conceptual framework
for attributing annual ecosystem state changes to concurrent and lagged
components, (ii) implement the CARDAMOM model–data fusion framework at a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monthly resolution to observationally constrain 2001–2015 C cycle states, fluxes and process controls, and (iii) attribute ecosystem state changes to concurrent and lagged effects based on
the CARDAMOM 2001–2015 representation of the tropical C balance. In summary,
the CARDAMOM model–data fusion framework (Bloom et al., 2016) employs a Bayesian inference approach to constrain model parameters and initial states
within the prognostic Data Assimilation Linked Ecosystem Carbon model
(DALEC, Williams et al., 2005), based on observation constraints – where and
when these are available. Since DALEC parameters are independently estimated
at each location, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution was
chosen to accommodate recent estimates of land-surface CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO
fluxes produced at the GEOS-Chem atmospheric chemistry and transport model
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid (Bowman et al., 2017; Liu et al.,
2017; Jiang et al., 2017). We implement the CARDAMOM analysis across
tropical and near-tropical latitudes (30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and evaluate the tropical C balance across six sub-continental regions as well as the dry tropics and the wet tropics (Fig. A1 in the Appendix); we chose to focus
the evaluation of our results at sub-continental and pan-tropical scales to
conform with the fundamental spatial resolution limitations of
satellite-based surface CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimates (Liu et al., 2014; Bowman et al., 2017). The following subsections describe a conceptual framework for
concurrent and lagged effect attribution (Sect. 2.1), the DALEC ecosystem carbon
balance model (Sect. 2.2), satellite and inventory-based observations (Sect. 2.3), the
estimation of DALEC parameters and states within the CARDAMOM model–data fusion framework (Sect. 2.4), and the attribution of the observation-informed
DALEC C cycle dynamics to their concurrent and lagged effect components
(Sect. 2.5).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Concurrent and lagged effects</title>
      <p id="d1e610">Ecosystem function – such as photosynthesis, respiration and
evapotranspiration rates – at all stages of ecological succession is both a
consequence of an ecosystem's initial physical and biotic states and the
contemporaneous impact of meteorological and disturbance forcings on these
states. For example, ecosystem water and nutrient availability along with
species demography and species composition – effectively<?pagebreak page6396?> amounting to the
time-integrated ecosystem legacy – will govern an ecosystem's function under
a nominal forcing. The cumulative impact of both episodic or prolonged
variability in external forcings will be “remembered” in ecosystem states,
thus shaping ecosystem function as an emergent property of external forcing
history. Ecosystem states under a constant and perpetual environmental
forcing will follow a trajectory towards an equilibrium state (as has been
largely hypothesized as the typical outcome for ecosystem C stocks; Luo and
Weng, 2011; Luo et al., 2015) or more generally a transient trajectory about a
domain of attraction (Holling, 1973), with stable equilibria, stable limit
cycles, stable nodes and/or neutrally stable orbits as potential
trajectories. Here, we define <italic>lagged effects</italic> as the sum of ecosystem state changes induced
by a reference climatological mean forcing (Fig. 1); these include the
functional responses of ecosystems under climatological conditions (e.g. joint photosynthesis, respiration and evapotranspiration responses to
non-equilibrium plant-available water, leaf area, biomass and dead organic C
states) as well as functional shifts (e.g. succession-induced changes in demography and species composition and consequently changes in
ecosystem-scale photosynthetic capacity). In addition to an attraction
towards a fixed equilibrium or domain, ecosystem states are perpetually
disturbed by exogenous forces, such as meteorological and disturbance
forcing anomalies relative to a climatological mean forcing. Here we define
these <italic>concurrent effects</italic> as all anomaly-concurrent changes to ecosystem states unaccounted for
by climatology-induced state changes (i.e. <italic>lagged effects</italic>); these include functional
responses to anomalous forcings (e.g. drought impact on photosynthetic
uptake and respiration in responses to meteorological phenomena) as well as functional shifts on demographics and species composition induced by
concurrent mortality and disturbance events. The combined state changes
resulting from both concurrent and lagged effects throughout a 1-year time period will in turn propagate into future ecosystem states. In this manner,
forcing anomalies are perpetually propagated into ecosystem states, and
lagged effects in subsequent years represent an aggregate legacy of all
prior phenomena. The choices of (a) “concurrent effects” to describe
effects contemporaneous to a meteorological event and (b) “lagged effects”
to describe all time-lagged processes are consistent with Frank et al. (2015) definitions associated with effects occurring during or after a climatic anomaly. We note a distinction between (i) single-event lagged
effects, which represent ecosystem state changes attributable to a single
past forcing event, and (ii) aggregate lagged effects, which represent the sum and interactions between past single-event lagged effects. For example,
single-event lagged effects might include the ecosystem state changes
attributable to a single drought or disturbance event, while aggregate
lagged effects can include the effects of cumulative drought impacts, the interactions in between dry and wet year events, and the longer-term
succession processes (as described in Fig. 1); we henceforth use “lagged
effects” to refer to aggregate lagged effects throughout the paper. Finally, while in this study we confine our analysis to the estimation of
concurrent and lagged effects on annual timescales, we note that the
conceptual framework presented in Fig. 1 can be adapted to diagnose
concurrent and lagged ecosystem state changes on any timescale of relevance.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e624">Conceptual figure denoting annual ecosystem state changes attributable to concurrent and lagged effects. Throughout a 1-year cycle
(circular arrows), lagged effects  amount to the sum of ecosystem state
changes induced by a reference climatological mean forcing, and concurrent
effects amount to ecosystem state changes solely attributable to a contemporaneous forcing anomaly. The total state changes resulting from both
concurrent and lagged effects will in turn determine the next year's initial
ecosystem states.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Model and drivers</title>
      <p id="d1e641">We use the DALEC model (Williams et al., 2005) to represent the principal terms and major pathways of the terrestrial C cycle. The DALEC model family has been extensively used to
diagnose terrestrial C cycle dynamics across a range of site-level and spatially resolved approaches (Fox et al., 2009; Rowland et al., 2014; Bloom
et al., 2016; Smallman et al., 2017; Exbrayat et al., 2018; amongst several
others). Here we use DALEC version 2a (henceforth DALEC2a): a summary of the
DALEC2a states and processes is depicted in Fig. 2. For the sake of
brevity, we solely report changes in reference to DALEC2 (previously
described by Bloom et al., 2016) and refer the reader to the Supplement (and references therein) for a complete description of the model.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e646">Schematic of the CARbon DAta-MOdel fraMework (CARDAMOM) Bayesian
model–data fusion approach: the DALEC2a model (described in Sect. 2.2) represents the ecosystem C and plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O balance; the dashed
blue boxes denote the observational constraints used in this study (see
Table 1 for abbreviations and details). The solid lines denote C and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes between pools and/or external gains and losses. CARDAMOM is
implemented at a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution across the
tropics (30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). Within each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell, DALEC2a model parameters and initial
ecosystem states are optimized using an adaptive Metropolis–Hastings Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e732">We extended the DALEC2 structure to include the first-order plant-available water (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) pool, where the hydrological balance is defined as the sum
of precipitation inputs (P) and evapotranspiration (ET) and runoff (R)
outputs. In turn, the plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O limits gross primary
productivity through conservation of the inherent water-use efficiency (Beer et al., 2009), where ET is calculated as a function of gross primary
production (GPP) and atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (Appendix B1). Effectively, the interaction between plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, GPP and ET
constitutes a first-order plant–soil carbon–water feedback. We further appended the DALEC2 structure by including a parameterization of soil
moisture limitation on heterotrophic respiration (Appendix B2), given that
heterotrophic respiration dependence on soil moisture remains highly
uncertain (Moyano et al., 2013; Sierra et al., 2015) as well as a dominant source of uncertainty amongst terrestrial C models (Falloon et al., 2011;
Exbrayat et al., 2013a, b).</p>
      <p id="d1e763">Given a range of in situ and continental-scale studies highlighting the uncertainties of fire combustion factors across a range of ecosystems (Ward
et al., 1996; Bloom et al., 2015), the errors involved in representing
fine-scale fire-type variability (Giglio et al., 2013), and spatial variability of fuel loads, we optimize fire C pool combustion factors (in
contrast, combustion factors were prescribed as constants in Bloom et al.,
2016): specifically, we optimize the combustion factors of foliar biomass
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">foliar</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), non-foliar biomass pools (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nfb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), soil C
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the fire resilience factor (we approximate the litter C
combustion factor as the arithmetic mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">foliar</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, given that the DALEC2a litter pool represents both above-ground
and below-ground C reservoirs). Prior ranges for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
fire resilience<?pagebreak page6397?> are conservatively defined as spanning 0.01 to 1. We
implement the ecological and dynamic constraints (Bloom and Williams, 2015)
to ensure that foliar C combustion factors are greater than both non-foliar
biomass and soil C combustion factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">foliar</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nfb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">foliar</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which are comprehensively consistent with detailed measurements of C pool combustion
factors across a range of ecosystem fire types (Shea et al., 1996;
Araújo et al., 1999; van Leeuwen et al., 2014; amongst others). Finally, we also represent the uncertainty in the longevity of plant labile C; specifically, we now optimize – rather than prescribe – the labile C
lifespan used during leaf flushing in DALEC2a (previously all labile C was
used during leaf flush; see Bloom and Williams, 2015). The updated model structure is depicted in Fig. 2. We henceforth summarize the dynamical
description of DALEC2a as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M51" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DALEC</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the ecosystem state vector at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the corresponding meteorological and disturbance forcings
(namely monthly temperature, precipitation, global radiation, vapour pressure deficit, burned area and atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents a vector of
time-invariant process parameters and DALEC2a represents the DALEC2a
operation on states <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In summary, DALEC2a
optimizable quantities consist of 26 process parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and seven initial
ecosystem states (C and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O pools; Fig. 2) at time step <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the sake of brevity, we include a complete description of
DALEC2a state variables, process parameters and diagnostic C fluxes in the
Supplement, except where an explicit mention is necessary in the paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Observations</title>
      <p id="d1e1041">The observations assimilated into CARDAMOM are summarized in Table 1.
Following Bloom et al. (2016) we assimilate Moderate Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) leaf area index (LAI) soil organic matter (SOM) from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD; Hiederer and Köchy,
2011) and above- and below-ground biomass (ABGB, Saatchi et al., 2011).
Solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) – retrieved from the Greenhouse Gases
Observing Satellite (GOSAT) – is a<?pagebreak page6398?> robust proxy for photosynthetic activity:
while non-linear inter-relationships at plant level and flux-tower level
have been observed under certain conditions (Verma et al., 2017; Magney et
al., 2017), GPP is observed to be linearly inter-related to SIF at ecosystem and regional scales (Frankenberg et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2017).
Given that SIF : GPP linear relationships are known to vary substantially
across individual species and entire ecosystems, here we solely assume that
monthly SIF provides a constraint on the relative temporal variability of
GPP (following MacBean et al., 2018). The monthly averaged 2010–2015
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SIF values were derived with the
polarizations and selection criteria described by Parazoo et al. (2014).
The assimilation of relative SIF variability is described in Sect. 2.4.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1067">Observational constraints assimilated into the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CARDAMOM simulation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="3cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Observation (abbreviation)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dataset description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Uncertainty<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Number of</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">observational</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Constraints<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Leaf area index (LAI)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MODIS LAI retrievals<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(1.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil organic matter (SOM)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Soil C inventory (Hiederer and Köchy, 2011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(1.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Above- and below-ground biomass (ABGB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GLAS-informed biomass map (Saatchi et al., 2011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>log(1.5)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Solar-induced fluorescence (SIF)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly averaged 2010–2015 GOSAT retrievals of fluorescence (Frankenberg et al., 2011)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fire C emissions (BB)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean 2001–2015 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inverse estimates of fire C emissions (Worden et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al., 2017; Bowman et al., 2017)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Net biospheric exchange (NBE)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly 2010–2013 GOSAT CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inverse estimates of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>terrestrial NBE (Liu et al., 2018)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 gC/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 gC/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1090"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Uncertainties denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log() indicate log-transformed model
and observed quantities (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. 4).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Only mean 2001–2015 LAI is assimilated into CARDAMOM, in order to
mitigate the influence of seasonal LAI
retrieval biases (Bi et al., 2015).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The ABGB estimate is applied as a constraint on the sum of all
CARDAMOM live biomass pools (Fig. 1).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> See Bloom et al. (2016) for details on biomass uncertainties.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Time-resolved SIF is assimilated as a relative constraint on the temporal variability of GPP (see Sect. 2.4).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> See Fig. S1 for observational constraint spatial coverage.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1535">We assimilate the GOSAT-derived 2010–2013 net biospheric C exchange (NBE)
dataset (NBE &gt; 0 for a net biosphere-to-atmosphere flux)
estimated using the Carbon Monitoring System Flux atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
inversion framework (CMS-Flux; Liu et al., 2014, 2018). In summary, total
monthly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes were
scaled using a Bayesian 4D variational (4D-Var) inversion approach in order
to minimize differences between GOSAT 2010–2013 observations and CMS-Flux
representations of total column CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (we refer the reader to Liu et al.,
2018, for additional details on the derivation of surface CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes). Following Liu et al. (2017) and Bowman et al. (2017), we subtract prior
estimates of anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from total CMS-Flux total
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimates, and we assume that prior anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions errors are minimal compared to the biospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes,
given that these are typically much smaller than natural CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes at
a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution across the tropics. We
withhold 2015 CMS-Flux NBE estimates – constrained by Orbiting Carbon
Observatory (OCO-2) total column CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations (Liu et al.,
2017) – to validate CARDAMOM 2015 regional NBE estimates and their
associated uncertainties in the absence of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> constraints (OCO-2 NBE
estimates are therefore withheld from the CARDAMOM NBE assimilation step
described in Sect. 2.4); in effect, we employ the validation of CARDAMOM
NBE predictions against the withheld data effect as a means of evaluating the mechanistic representations of CARDAMOM's time-varying C cycle processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e1680">Finally, we assimilate mean 2001–2015 fire C emission estimates derived from
monthly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> satellite-based estimates of
fire CO emissions (Jiang et al., 2017; Worden et al., 2017; Bloom et al.,
2019): the estimates of biomass burning CO emissions were derived based on an ensemble of atmospheric CO inversions of column CO measurements from the Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument onboard the
NASA EOS/TERRA satellite (Deeter et al., 2014). We refer the reader to Jiang
et al. (2017) for the details of the atmospheric CO inversion using the
GEOS-Chem adjoint model and to Worden et al. (2017) for the attribution of
optimized CO fluxes to biomass burning. Biomass<?pagebreak page6399?> burning CO emission
estimates by Worden et al. (2017) were then used to derive total biomass
burning C emissions based on monthly estimates of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : CO; the approach
is detailed in Bowman et al. (2017). We note that NBE estimates exhibit
substantial spatial error covariance structures across individual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells, and the effective information content of the NBE inversions is larger than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution. To mitigate the spatial error
correlation features identified in the NBE dataset (Bowman et al., 2017; Liu
et al., 2017), we employed a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid-cell smoothing window for monthly NBE estimates, following the approach by Liu et al. (2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Model–data fusion</title>
      <p id="d1e1773">Within each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell, the C cycle
dynamics in DALEC are a function of meteorological and disturbance drivers
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, model parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and initial conditions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (as summarized in Eq. 1). We
use a Bayesian inference formulation to independently retrieve the optimal
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> given observations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell, where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M123" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the control vector  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
prior probability distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is proportional to the
likelihood of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). At any given grid cell, the observation
vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> consists of LAI, SOM, ABGB, SIF, NBE and CO-derived fire CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions (henceforth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAI</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ABGB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIF</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), and – assuming errors are uncorrelated –  the overall likelihood of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> given
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M144" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAI</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ABGB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIF</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2156">For LAI, SOM, ABGB and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> we derive the corresponding likelihood function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAI</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ABGB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M151" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correspond to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th observation and corresponding
modelled quantity derived from control vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the combined errors of model and data, namely the combined
effects of DALEC model structural error, model driver errors and observation
errors. In contrast to Bloom et al. (2016), given that MODIS LAI retrievals have exhibited systematic seasonal biases across the wet tropics (Bi et al.,
2015), we solely use mean LAI as a constraint on the mean DALEC2a LAI values
(therefore, for the derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAI</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">o</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (3) correspond to
the 2001–2015 mean modelled and observed LAI).</p>
      <?pagebreak page6400?><p id="d1e2364">To constrain the relative variability of GPP based on SIF without imposing
constraints on the absolute GPP magnitude, we derive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIF</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – based on
Eq. (4) – by formulating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">o</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M163" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GPP</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIF</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where SIF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are SIF and corresponding DALEC2a GPP values
at time index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> are the corresponding means
during the 2010–2015 time period.</p>
      <p id="d1e2530">We constrain CARDAMOM NBE using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monthly
CMS-Flux NBE estimates, derived from GOSAT atmospheric total column CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrievals (Liu et al., 2018) spanning 2010–2013. At each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> location, we define the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the product of
mean annual NBE and seasonal NBE anomalies using the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M173" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the annual mean DALEC2a NBE value for year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes DALEC2a NBE seasonal deviations from their annual
means; specifically, for a given month <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with corresponding year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M179" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the DALEC2a NBE; observations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were derived identically to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Similarly to Desai (2010), we implement the likelihood function outlined in
Eq. (7) in order to capture both the seasonal and inter-annual modes of NBE
variability; we found that solely minimizing the monthly NBE residuals
following the formulation based on Eq. (4) led to disparate inter-annual
variations between the model and observation-constrained NBE. Effectively
the formulation in Eq. (7) – in comparison to Eq. (4) –  increases the relative
weight of mean annual CMS-Flux NBE constraints on DALEC2a NBE.</p>
      <p id="d1e2986">The uncertainty for each observational constraint (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in
Eqs. 4 and 7) implicitly represents the combined impacts of observational random errors, systematic errors, and model structural error. In the absence
of knowledge on the relative roles of observation errors in the monthly
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observation uncertainties and explicit
knowledge of model structural error, we prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values through
trial and error in order to (a) ensure that model states and diagnostic variables capture the predominant variability of the observational
constraints <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> while (b) ensuring that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are comparable to the observational uncertainty. For all land surface variables (namely LAI,
ABGB, SOM and SIF), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">o</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were log-transformed (following Bloom et al.,
2016). For the mean 2001–2015 LAI constraint, we assumed log-normal
uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> log(1.2); we prescribed a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> log(2) log-normal uncertainty structure for each SIF observation. We approximated the uncertainty of the CO-derived mean 2001–2015 fire C values
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, which is broadly consistent with the
monthly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CO uncertainty estimates and
the corresponding CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : CO uncertainty estimates reported by Bowman et
al. (2017) and Worden et al. (2017). For NBE we prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gC/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; we found that these were suitable for capturing the first-order 2010–2013 seasonal and inter-annual components of continental-scale NBE variability. The uncertainties assumed
for each observational constraint are summarized in Table 1; we note that
these implicitly include the combined assumption about observational random errors, systematic errors, and model structural error. We discuss the
potential impacts of observation uncertainty assumptions and make
recommendations for future efforts in Sect. 3.3.</p>
      <p id="d1e3174">To retrieve the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we employed an adaptive
Metropolis–Hastings Markov chain Monte Carlo (MHMCMC) approach following Bloom et al. (2016) to sample the objective function, namely the product of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); for reference, we list the individual components of
the objective function in the paper's Supplement (Sect. S3). We generally found that the computational costs required to meet the MHMCMC convergence criterion reported by Bloom and Williams (2015) for each
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell were prohibitively expensive. We updated the adaptive MHMCMC to the Haario et al. (2001) MHMCMC approach,
where the MHMCMC proposal distribution is adapted as a function of
previously accepted samples (see Haario et al., 2001, for algorithm details). We ran four adaptive MHMCMC chains for 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> iterations in each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell. We found that the latter half of the chains converged within a Gelman–Rubin convergence criterion value of
&lt; 1.2 in 75 % of the grid cells. For the subsequent analysis, we
use a subset of 500 samples of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the latter half of each MHMCMC chain, totalling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Dynamical formulation of concurrent and lagged effects</title>
      <?pagebreak page6401?><p id="d1e3338">Here we present a dynamical formulation for the derivation of concurrent and
lagged effects on the inter-annual ecosystem state changes. To explicitly
quantify the concurrent effects and lagged effects, we define the trajectory
of the modelled dynamic state variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M216" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the state vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – which is comprised of DALEC2a states at
the beginning of year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – is computed from the DALEC2a model operator
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(), which is a function of the previous state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the beginning of year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the meteorological and disturbance forcing history of the previous year
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and time-invariant ecosystem parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We note that Eq. (10) is
resolved on an annual time step; however, the DALEC2a operator time step is monthly, hence the operator in Eq. (10) is a composite of monthly operators as
denoted in Eq. (1). To isolate the role of concurrent meteorological and
disturbance anomalies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we define the C trajectory under a
reference climatological mean forcing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M226" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3545">Here we define <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the monthly climatological mean of the
2001–2015 meteorological and disturbance drivers and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the corresponding anomaly in year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M230" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3608">With Eqs. (10) and (11), we can define the change in the state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M234" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3724">This formulation allows us to define the lagged effect on ecosystem states
in year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M236" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          the concurrent effect on ecosystem states in year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M238" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          and the sum of concurrent and lagged effects in Eqs. (14) and (15) as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M239" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3864">We conceptually illustrate the derivation of annual concurrent and lagged
effects on a given ecosystem state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 3. Under a climatological mean
forcing (blue line), the ecosystem state trajectory – solely induced by
lagged processes – would diverge from an externally forced ecosystem state trajectory   (black line) and would eventually converge to an equilibrium
state or oscillate about a domain of attraction (Fig. 3a). For a 1-year time span, the change in ecosystem state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be decomposed into a climatology-induced lagged effect change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an anomaly-induced concurrent
effect change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3a, inset).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3934"><bold>(a)</bold> Schematic of meteorology-forced trajectory of ecosystem state
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (solid black line) and trajectory of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> under a climatological mean forcing (light blue solid line). Inset: state trajectory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), decomposed as the sum of climatology-induced
lagged effect vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and anomaly-induced concurrent effect vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(b)</bold> Hypothetical scenario depicting
approximately time-invariant annual lagged effects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue dashed arrows), in reference to changes in transient states <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, etc.; the temporal changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
time interval, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are shown in the
underlying bar chart. In this scenario, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is relatively constant and its variability (denoted as “var()” in the schematic equation) is negligible relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(c)</bold> Hypothetical scenario depicting time-varying annual
lagged effects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in reference to
transient states <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, etc.; in this scenario, the variability of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is comparable to the variability of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4279">From a mechanistic standpoint, the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is independent of meteorological forcing anomalies and
is therefore solely dependent of all ecosystem states <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, in a hypothetical scenario where a climatological mean forcing induces no
net ecosystem state changes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In a more general
scenario, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">constant</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: in this instance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is non-zero but largely
insensitive to variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within a typical range of
ecosystem states <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; therefore, (i) the year-to-year variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is largely dependent on the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and (ii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amounts to an approximately constant offset term (Fig. 3b). Alternatively, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is sufficiently sensitive to the variability of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be a function of
both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: in this
instance, year-to-year variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are influencing both the
sign and magnitude of lagged effects (Fig. 3c).</p>
      <p id="d1e4552">Here we investigate the possible contributions of the annual variability of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 2001–2015 time period across tropical ecosystems.
Specifically, we test the following two hypotheses.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4593"><italic>Hypothesis 1</italic>: var<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">var</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this instance, the impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is largely independent of the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; consequently the year-to-year variability of the lagged effect force
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is relatively small, and the year-to-year changes
in ecosystem states, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are dominated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3b).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4690"><italic>Hypothesis 2</italic>: var<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">var</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In this instance, the impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
dependent on the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; consequently, the year-to-year
variability of the lagged effects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is substantial,
and the year-to-year changes in ecosystem states, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are
substantially attributable to both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3c).</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e4800">The mechanistic nature of the DALEC2a model within CARDAMOM (namely the
representation of allocation fractions, residence times, meteorological
sensitivities and explicit representation of dynamical states) allows for a
data-constrained probabilistic assessment of the relative role of lagged and concurrent effects on net ecosystem state changes. The disaggregation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and the associated hypotheses 1 and 2) can be
projected onto any subset of net ecosystem fluxes or additive combination of
gross fluxes. For example, the NBE in year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) corresponds to the
net C loss between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; in turn, NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be decomposed
into its lagged effect component (NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the concurrent effect
component (NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><label>17</label><mml:math id="M316" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4955">NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be directly calculated from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively, and NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By definition
in the DALEC2a model, NBE is the sum of primary productivity (NPP),
heterotrophic respiration (RHE) and fire (FIR) fluxes, where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><label>18</label><mml:math id="M324" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RHE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FIR</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NPP</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <?pagebreak page6402?><p id="d1e5098">In turn, disaggregation of RHE, FIR and NPP into their respective concurrent and lagged components gives

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M325" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E19"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>19</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RHE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FIR</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NPP</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E20"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>20</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RHE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FIR</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NPP</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e5192">To diagnose relative inter-annual variations of a given flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (namely the
2001–2015 time series of NBE, RHE, FIR and NPP), we derive annual anomalies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the mean 2001–2015 flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>,
where, for a given year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E21" content-type="numbered"><label>21</label><mml:math id="M330" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e5258">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> operation in Eq. (21) can be implemented in each term in Eqs. (18)–(20) without loss of equivalence between the left-hand and right-hand
sides (for example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RHE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FIR</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NPP</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e5316">Finally, we diagnose the 2001–2015 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
variability as a function of the inter-annual anomalies in individual
ecosystem states, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, relative to the
mean ecosystem state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. For DALEC2, these consist of annual anomalies in initial C and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O states (see Fig. 2). For a given year, the total
NBE lagged effect anomaly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be decomposed into
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E22" content-type="numbered"><label>22</label><mml:math id="M338" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e5489"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the NBE lagged
effect component solely attributable to an anomaly in ecosystem state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collectively accounts
for the contribution of higher-order interactions between individual
ecosystem states. In other words, given that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is solely attributable to variability of annual initial
conditions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the decomposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
individual pool contributions provides a first-order attribution of lagged
effect IAV to underlying C and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O pool dynamics. The derivation of Eq. (22) is explicitly described in Appendix C.</p>
      <p id="d1e5599">To derive uncertainty estimates for each annual flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or corresponding anomaly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we calculate each term based
on the 2000 samples of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at each grid cell (see Sect. 2.4),<?pagebreak page6403?> and we calculate the corresponding median and inter-quartile range (25th–75th
percentiles) for each term. Inter-annual variations in 2001–2015
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series are reported as standard deviations of median values. We conservatively assume that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> errors are fully correlated
when propagating these uncertainties across each region.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Evaluation of observation-constrained tropical C balance</title>
      <p id="d1e5684">Ultimately inferences about the concurrent and lagged effects on NBE can
only be drawn if the CARDAMOM analysis is able to both (i) accurately
represent observed NBE and (ii) accurately represent underlying states and processes controlling IAV. To assess the CARDAMOM 2001–2015 re-analysis,
here we present an evaluation of CARDAMOM against (a) the assimilated
2010–2013 GOSAT-derived NBE dataset, (b) the withheld OCO-2-derived 2015 NBE dataset, and (c) assimilated and independent datasets of tropical
terrestrial ecosystem states and fluxes.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e5690">CARDAMOM NBE evaluation against assimilated and predicted NBE.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Monthly RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Annual RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Assimilated NBE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Predicted NBE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Assimilated NBE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Predicted NBE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(2010–2013)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(2015)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2010–2013)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SH South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08 (0.84<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08 (0.87<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03 (0.99<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.29 (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06 (0.74<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.13)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04 (0.90)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.37 (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08 (0.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13 (0.78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07 (0.92)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.28 (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Northern sub-Saharan Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08 (0.87<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13 (0.96<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08 (0.99<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07 (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Australia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04 (0.69<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05 (0.88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03 (0.98<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.21 (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE Asia and Indonesia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03 (0.57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05 (0.55)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02 (0.99<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.21 (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.20 (0.51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27 (0.55)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19 (1.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05 (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.12 (0.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14 (0.53)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12 (0.99<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.64 (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dry tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.12 (0.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.20 (0.59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.13 (0.99<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.58 (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e5693"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> RMSE units are PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Prediction RMSE values are equivalent to absolute errors, since only one error value is considered.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Correlation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value &lt; 0.05.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6204">Optimized CARDAMOM NBE (a function of the optimized DALEC2a parameters and
initial 2001 ecosystem states) broadly represents the monthly variability of
the 2010–2013 regional-scale assimilated GOSAT-retrieved NBE (Fig. 4;
Table 2). In individual regions, monthly CARDAMOM versus CMS-Flux NBE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the exception of the South-East Asia and Indonesia region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.57), where the CARDAMOM and GOSAT-retrieved NBE exhibits a relatively small seasonality compared to other regions. Evaluation of CARDAMOM NBE against
withheld NBE estimates from OCO-2 exhibits a degradation in the correlation and RMSE values but agrees favourably on the amplitude and timing of the NBE variability (Table 2). We find that the CARDAMOM analysis is able to
robustly capture the 2010–2013 GOSAT-derived annual NBE estimates at
regional scales (see Fig. 5 and Table 2; regional CARDAMOM versus CMS-Flux
NBE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). On an annual basis, all regional OCO-2 NBE estimates for 2015 except Northern Hemisphere South America are within the 90 % CARDAMOM prediction confidence intervals (Fig. 5); furthermore, all OCO-2 annual
NBE estimates are within CARDAMOM 2015 prediction confidence intervals for
the wet tropics, dry tropics and the entire tropical study region. We
found generally lower seasonal correlations between CARDAMOM NBE and
GOSAT retrieved across <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells (Fig. S2; 25th–75th percentile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19–0.63) and corresponding annual mean correlations (25th–75th percentile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31–0.89) relative to the sub-continental and pan-tropical regions (Table 2); the lower correlative agreement is likely due to the limited
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> information content of satellite-based
NBE flux estimates (Liu et al., 2014; Bowman et al., 2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e6303">CARDAMOM monthly analyses of 2001–2015 median NBE (red line) and
associated uncertainty intervals (25th–75th percentiles in dark
pink and 5th–95th percentiles in light pink). The analyses were constrained by CMS-Flux GOSAT-derived top-down fluxes (Liu et al., 2018) for the 2010–2013 period; CMS-Flux OCO-2-derived 2015 NBE fluxes were withheld for validation. The geographical definitions for each region are
shown in Fig. A1 in the Appendix.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6312">We also evaluate the 2001–2015 CARDAMOM NBE against the inter-annual
variability of the NOAA ESRL surface-based global atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
growth rate observations (<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/</uri>, last access: 5 May 2020;
see Supplement for dataset details). We assume that the
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rate variability – once detrended to remove
decadal trends in fossil fuel emissions and biogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake – predominantly exhibits inter-annual variations of the tropical C balance (Baker et al., 2006; Cox et al., 2013; Sellers et
al., 2018). We find that 2001–2015 detrended CARDAMOM NBE (Fig. 5,
bottom-right panel) exhibits broad consistency with the atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rate; the detrended datasets exhibit comparable levels of
inter-annual variability (atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rate IAV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, CARDAMOM tropical NBE IAV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as a significant correlation between annual NBE growth rate anomalies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.62, pval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e6446">CARDAMOM yearly analyses of 2001–2015 NBE (red line) and
associated uncertainty intervals (25th–75th percentiles in dark
pink and 5th–95th percentiles in light pink). The analyses were constrained by CMS-Flux GOSAT-derived top-down fluxes (Liu et al., 2018) for the 2010–2013 period. CMS-Flux OCO-2-derived 2015 NBEs (blue squares) are withheld for regional and pan-tropical NBE validation. CARDAMOM NBE and NOAA ESRL atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rates were detrended for
inter-comparison (bottom-right panel). The geographical definitions for each
region are shown in Fig. A1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6464">The spatial variability of CARDAMOM state variables and fluxes constrained
by static datasets, namely LAI, biomass, soil C and mean fire C emissions
(Table 1), is broadly correlated with the observational constraints by the CARDAMOM analysis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7–0.98; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. S2); for the
above-mentioned quantities total median errors amounted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,
with the exception of soil C (median error CARDAMOM soil C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %). The
correlation between CARDAMOM GPP and GOSAT SIF is positive and significant
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value &lt; 0.05) in 67 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixels, with higher correlations in the dry tropics (25th–75th
percentile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.41–0.78) relative to the wet tropics (25th–75th percentile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13–0.63); the lower correlations in the wet
tropics are generally expected, given that wet tropical ecosystems
fundamentally exhibit a weaker GPP seasonal cycle.</p>
      <p id="d1e6552">We also evaluate the mean and inter-annual variability of CARDAMOM GPP, ET
and LAI outputs against (i) two independent measurement-based GPP estimates
for 2007–2015 (FLUXCOM GPP, Jung et al., 2020; and FLUXSAT GPP, Joiner et
al., 2018), (ii) two independent measurement-based ET estimates (FLUXCOM ET,
Jung et al., 2019; MODIS ET, Mu et al., 2011) for 2001–2013, and (iii) 2001–2015 MODIS LAI (we note that only mean 2001–2015 MODIS LAI was
assimilated into CARDAMOM; see Sect. 2.3). Dataset details and regional evaluations are included Sect. S2 and Tables S2–S3 in the Supplement. In summary, we find that mean CARDAMOM pan-tropical GPP is within
20 % of both independent estimates and that regional estimates are within 40 % of both independent estimates; regional GPP IAV in CARDAMOM (0.8 %–7.4 %) is broadly consistent with FLUXSAT GPP (1.3 %–10.7 %) and FLUXCOM
GPP (0.3 %–4.2 %). Pan-tropical GPP correlations are positive and
significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value &lt; 0.05) among all three estimates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.69–0.74); regional correlations are by and large positive but not significant. CARDAMOM mean ET values are lower but within 25 % of
independent ET estimates, and differences in regional mean ET are<?pagebreak page6404?> within
50 % of independent estimates; regional ET IAV in CARDAMOM (2.3 %–5.5 %) is broadly consistent with FLUXCOM ET (0.3 %–5.9 %) and MODIS ET
(1.3 %–13.4 %). Correlations between three datasets span positive and
negative values but are mostly not significant; regional CARDAMOM ET
correlations against MODIS and FLUXCOM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.64–0.41) are generally
lower than inter-agreement between the two datasets (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.27–0.94).
Mean CARDAMOM LAI is within 15 % of MODIS LAI across all regions. Regional
CARDAMOM LAI values (1.6 %–4.8 %) are broadly consistent with the range of
MODIS LAI values (0.7 %–5.2 %); none of the regional correlation values
were significant. The notable lack of correlative agreement between CARDAMOM
and independent LAI and ET estimates is potentially due to (a) the lack of
direct observational constraints on the temporal variability of ET and LAI
in CARDAMOM, (b) systematic errors or limitations of independent LAI and ET estimation approaches on inter-annual timescales (Bi et al., 2015;
Pan et al., 2020), and/or (c) fundamental limitations of CARDAMOM ET and LAI
estimates (further discussed in Sect. 3.3).</p>
      <p id="d1e6620">Overall, we argue that (i) CARDAMOM NBE and associated uncertainties compare
favourably against withheld and independent data on seasonal and inter-annual timescales, and (ii) the spatial variability and the IAV magnitude of
CARDAMOM ancillary states and fluxes are in general agreement with a range
of assimilated and independently estimated quantities. We discuss noteworthy
caveats and limitations of retrieved CARDAMOM ecosystem dynamics – and the
implications of inferred variability of concurrent and lagged effects – in Sect. 3.3. We anticipate that the ever-growing satellite CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> record,
along with increasing volume and quality of terrestrial ecosystem
observations, will ultimately lead to improved seasonal and inter-annual
process representations in future model–data fusion analyses of the terrestrial C balance.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e6634">Regional and pan-tropical median annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE (blue bars) and
its attribution to concurrent effects (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, green bars) and
lagged effect (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, orange bars) components. The geographical
definitions for each region are shown in Fig. A1. Error bars denote the
25th–75th percentile uncertainty estimates for each flux
anomaly.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e6685">2001–2015 regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE IAV and corresponding contributions of
concurrent effects (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and lagged effects (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); IAV values are represented here as standard deviations of annual
2001–2015 NBE values; bracketed values represent Pearson's correlation coefficients between total NBE and concurrent and lagged effect IAV. The
regional masks are depicted in Fig. A1.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE IAV <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(as % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE IAV)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(as % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE IAV)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SH South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">107 % (0.81<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">63 % (0.18)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">61 % (0.16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">105 % (0.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">83 % (0.10)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">122 % (0.76<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Northern sub-Saharan Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">74 % (0.70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71 % (0.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Australia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">63 % (0.56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">84 % (0.78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE Asia and Indonesia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">84 % (0.91<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41 % (0.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">79 % (0.89<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45 % (0.63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dry tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">99 % (0.65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">83 % (0.43)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80 % (0.76<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64 % (0.61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Concurrent and lagged effects on the tropical C balance</title>
      <?pagebreak page6406?><p id="d1e7135">The attribution of annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE into its concurrent and lagged
components (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) reveals that both are prominent contributors to regional and pan-tropical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE (Fig. 6). On
a regional scale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV during
2001–2015 amount to 61 %–107 % and 41 %–122 %, respectively, relative to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE IAV (Table 3). Notable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies include (i) the
positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> values in both South American regions during drier conditions in 2005, 2007 and 2010, in contrast with negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> responses during wetter conditions in 2009 and 2011, and (ii) negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> values during the relatively wet 2010–2011
conditions in Australia; both continental-scale responses corroborate the
generally hypothesized responses of tropical ecosystems to wet and dry
extreme events (Lewis et al., 2011; Bastos et al., 2013). For the most part,
both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> contribute substantially to the
year-to-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE  anomaly changes on a regional scale. Across
the wet tropics, the signs of the largest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE  anomalies are predominantly explained by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; in contrast, dry tropics
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV both
substantially contribute to annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE  anomalies. Instances
where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV values amount to
&gt; 100 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE IAV are attributable to regional and
pan-tropical anti-correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>: specifically, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are
anticorrelated across the tropics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05) and all regions except SE Asia and Indonesia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.56–0.14); the consistent anticorrelation
across five out of six regions suggests that lagged effects may
significantly and systematically dampen the impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. On a pan-tropical scale, we found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV are both substantial contributors to NBE IAV (80 %
and 64 %); the relative importance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV relative to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is largest in the dry tropics (83 % and 99 %,
respectively) and remains substantial albeit smaller in the wet tropics (79 % and 45 %, respectively). Uncertainties in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6) are generally linked to confounding NBE trend
uncertainties throughout 2001–2015 (Fig. 4), particularly on a pan-tropical scale, where NBE uncertainties are considerably larger than median NBE IAV. To directly assess the uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV contributions to
NBE IAV irrespective of annual NBE uncertainties, we (a) rank all
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid-cell CARDAMOM samples by their
corresponding 2001–2015 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV and (b) combine CARDAMOM samples by ranking to generate a corresponding ensemble of regional and
pan-tropical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV estimates (summarized in Table S5). We
find that the regional 95 % confidence ranges are all within 50 % of the
median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV values reported in Table 3. Notably, the
ensemble of pan-tropical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV estimates spans 42 %–97 % of NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>IAV (2.5th–97.5th percentile range), indicating that – even under overwhelmingly conservative assumptions about grid-cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV – lagged effects are invariably a prominent
component of tropical NBE IAV.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6407?><p id="d1e7789">Variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout 2001–2015 include a range of lagged processes spanning between (a) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> changes induced by
recent forcing events and (b) the gradual changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> attributable to an ecosystem's approach or oscillation around a domain of
attraction (see Sect. 2.1). Notably, even in the absence of a recent
forcing event, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> will potentially continue to change in
magnitude from year to year as ecosystem states approach or oscillate around
a domain of attraction. We conducted a sensitivity test for the Southern Hemisphere South America region (top-left panel of Fig. 6) to disentangle the range of contributions to 2001–2015 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> values:
specifically, we (a) resolve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the absence of 2001–2015
forcing anomalies and (b) sequentially add 2001–2015 forcing anomalies to resolve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> attributable to annual forcing events (Fig. S6).
In the absence of 2001–2015 forcing anomalies, lagged effects account for a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability in total NBE, explained by an approximately linear <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increase throughout the 2001–2015 time period. The sequential addition of 2001–2015 forcing anomalies indicates the sign and
magnitude of lagged effects are substantially influenced by annual forcing
events; while the inter-annual variability modestly increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, year-to-year changes exceed 0.3 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6). Furthermore, while most years induced relatively short-lived (1–2-year) contributions to subsequent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> values, 2007 and 2010 – both notably dry
years – induced more long-lasting impacts on 2010–2015 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S6). Given the combined importance of short- and long-lived impacts of forcing anomalies on lagged effects, we highlight the need to
further investigate the relative contributions and potential interactions
between single-event lagged effects (e.g. lagged effects attributable to a
single forcing anomaly), their longevity, and their net contribution to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE IAV.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6408?><p id="d1e8035">The decomposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> into constituent fluxes – namely net
primary productivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), heterotrophic respiration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and fires (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>FIR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)  – reveals that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is the largest contributor to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV (Fig. 7;
Table 4), while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>FIR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are comparable
contributors to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Australia. In Northern Hemisphere South America and South-East Asia and Indonesia, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability is a smaller but substantial contributor to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that
the integrated impacts of meteorological and disturbance forcing IAV on
respiration are comparable to those on photosynthetic uptake. In Australia,
the concurrent impact of fires on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is comparable to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 4). Similarly, the decomposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> into
constituent fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>FIR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) reveals that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is ubiquitously dominated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability, followed by modest contributions from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability and minimal contributions by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>FIR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability (see Table 4). The prominence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is attributable to faster continental-scale response of C uptake
following year-to-year variations in initial C and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O states (relative
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating that live biomass dynamics (rather than
dead organic C states) dominate initial ecosystem responses to external
forcing anomalies. The relatively small contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>FIR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> values to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates that the magnitude of fires is, to first order, dominated by variability in the forcing rather than
variability in fuel load within fire-prone ecosystems.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e8459">Concurrent and lagged effect NBE attributed to constituent fluxes (net
primary production, heterotrophic respiration and fires, abbreviated as
NPP, RHE and FIR, respectively): IAV values are represented here as the ratio of constituent flux standard deviation to NBE standard deviations of annual
2001–2015 NBE values; bracketed values correspond to Pearson's correlation coefficients between constituent flux and NBE (“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>” denotes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values &lt; 0.05). The underlined values denote the largest % IAV
contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">IAV as % of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">IAV as % of   <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>FIR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>FIR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SH South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><underline>83 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.46)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">42 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><underline>81 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.62<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">78 % (0.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1 % (0.15)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><underline>159 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.69<inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">115 % (0.23)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11 % (0.59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><underline>116 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.98<inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.34)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.91<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><underline>66 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.74<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">31 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><underline>61 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60 % (0.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7 % (0.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Northern sub-Saharan Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><underline>64 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43 % (0.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38 % (0.47)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><underline>196 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">136 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.20)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Australia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><underline>82 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.71<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15 % (0.05)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74 % (0.05)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><underline>113 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.36)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE Asia and Indonesia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><underline>79 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">67 % (0.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">49 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><underline>112 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">63 % (0.15)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3 % (0.32)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><underline>87 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.64<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">68 % (0.24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 % (0.21)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><underline>147 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.93<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">52 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dry tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><underline>73 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.93<inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.28)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.39)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><underline>102 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.86<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">49 % (0.25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2 % (0.18)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><underline>95 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.86<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52 % (0.18)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28 % (0.43)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><underline>113 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.93<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.49)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e9436">Regional and pan-tropical median annual net primary productivity
(left column), heterotrophic respiration (centre column) and fire (right column) anomalies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>FIR, respectively). Blue bars represent total anomalies and green and orange bars represent the corresponding annual concurrent and lagged effects. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP anomaly signs were reversed such that all anomalies are represented as
positive for net land-to-atmosphere C flux. The sum of annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>FIR is equivalent to annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE values presented in Fig. 6. Error bars denote the 25th–75th
percentile uncertainty estimates for each flux anomaly.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e9502">We find that variability in foliar C, plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and soil C
contributes to the majority of regional and pan-tropical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability (Fig. 8). For example, both the enhanced foliar C
and plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O in 2011 over the Australian continent (relative
to 2010) – attributable to a combination of reduced fires and increased
productivity due to anomalously wet 2010 conditions over the Australian
continent (Fig. S3) – each contributed to a 0.1 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> net uptake increase (i.e. NBE reduction) relative to 2010. Similarly, we found that reduced
foliar C in Southern Hemisphere South America following dry conditions in 2005, 2007 and 2010 induced a 0.1 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> NBE response in 2006, 2008 and 2011,
respectively. We find that the sum of all the pool-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies approximately adds up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3), indicating that – insofar as these are represented in DALEC2a – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is (a) to first order equivalent to the sum of NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivities to individual initial states and that (b) cross-pool interactions (“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” in Eq. 22) are a secondary component of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
aggregate, we find that foliar C variability contributes 41 %–120 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability across all regions and 58 % of the
pan-tropical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Northern Hemisphere sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia and Indonesia are the only regions where inter-annual
variations in soil C and plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (respectively) contribute
more variability than foliar C (Table 5). Notably, our results indicate that under a climatological mean forcing, (a) year-to-year changes in foliar
C and plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O initial conditions are sufficient to induce
substantial year-to-year changes in C uptake and (b) year-to-year changes in soil C are sufficient to substantially influence total heterotrophic
respiration rates; we find that the remaining states (labile C, wood C, fine
root C and litter C) explain &lt; 0.2 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> across all regions. We also find that the sum of regional foliar C and plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O impacts on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8) are
approximately equivalent to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 7); in turn, the
considerable contributions of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> across tropical ecosystems indicate that both climatic variability and initial ecosystem states are substantial contributors to
tropical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP IAV. Inter-annual variations of foliar C, soil C and
plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O states exhibit substantial correlations with their corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> components (Fig. S5): regional
correlations are negative for foliar C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0) and
plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2) and positive for soil C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.0). We note that the general agreement between regional
2001–2015 foliar C IAV (1.1 %–4.0 %), CARDAMOM LAI IAV (1.6 %–4.8 %)
and MODIS LAI IAV(0.7 %–5.2 %) corroborates the estimated impact of
CARDAMOM C foliar dynamics on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast to foliar C and
plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, soil C impacts on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are
predominantly induced by long-term soil C trends rather than year-to-year variability. Soil C regional trend signs (Fig. 7) are generally opposite
to mean 2001–2015 NBE signs within each region (Fig. 5), indicating that
the observed regional C imbalances are substantially mediated by 2001–2015
soil C trends.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e9955">IAV of 2001–2015 regional and pan-tropical NBE lagged effects
attributable to annual anomalies in column-denoted ecosystem states (Eq. 22) as % of total NBE lagged effects (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) IAV; bracketed values correspond to Pearson's correlation coefficients between single-state
NBE lagged effects and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>” denotes
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values &lt; 0.05. The underlined values denote the maximum contribution in each region.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Labile C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Foliar C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fine root C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Wood C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Litter C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Soil C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Plant-av. H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SH South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9 % (0.88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><underline>48 % (0.69<inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 % (0.12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27 % (0.43)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">41 % (0.85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30 % (0.28)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3 % (0.88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><underline>98 % (0.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6 % (0.48)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.91<inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12 % (0.17)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.17)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">28 % (0.45)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 % (0.17)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><underline>41 % (0.69<inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 % (0.66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 % (0.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15 % (0.85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">40 % (0.78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17 % (0.85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Northern sub-Saharan Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35 % (0.45)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">120 % (0.64<inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><underline>125 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">50 % (0.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Australia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8 % (0.71<inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><underline>58 % (0.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10 % (0.17)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">54 % (0.88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE Asia and Indonesia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7 % (0.14)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43 % (0.16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5 % (0.29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35 % (0.07)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">62 % (0.45)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><underline>64 % (0.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8 % (0.66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><underline>99 % (0.84<inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14 % (0.18)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27 % (0.12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">56 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37 % (0.79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dry tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16 % (0.71<inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><underline>47 % (0.70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 % (0.37)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17 % (0.38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13 % (0.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">43 % (0.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tropics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 % (0.82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><underline>58 % (0.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</underline></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 % (0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.51)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21 % (0.23)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">39 % (0.82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e10754">Attribution of 2001–2015 annual regional and pan-tropical NBE
lagged effect estimates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to individual ecosystem state
anomalies (i.e. the lagged effect in year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> solely attributable to anomaly in
ecosystem state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Eq. 22). In addition to foliar C (green circles), soil C (dark pink triangles), and plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (blue squares), the grey areas (labelled as
“Other” in the figure legend) denote the collective range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies attributable to labile, wood, root and litter C.
Percentage values indicate the inter-annual variability (reported as
standard deviation) of median foliar C, soil C and plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
states throughout the 2001–2015 period, relative to mean 2001–2015 values
within each region. The sum of annual state-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
values is approximately equal to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. S4).
Error bars denote the 25th–75th percentile uncertainty
estimates for each flux anomaly.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e10883">Overall, our results indicate that (i) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV is a
prominent component of NBE IAV across tropical ecosystems; (ii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV is largely mediated by changes in ecosystem NPP
capacity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV); and (iii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability is
regulated by inter-annual variations in ecosystem canopy and plant-available
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O states. In other words, our results highlight that inter-annual
changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE – regardless of external forcing anomalies – are
substantially determined by inter-annual anomalies in ecosystem H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
canopy states. Lagged heterotrophic respiration responses (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are mediated by soil C states changes and are secondary component
of NBE IAV; the dampened role of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RHE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is likely due to the inherent lags between biomass growth and
subsequent mortality inputs to soil C states, combined with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5–50-year mean dead organic C residence times across tropical ecosystems (Bloom et al., 2016). The relative importance of NPP-mediated lagged effects
in responses to climatic anomalies has also been inferred on from in situ and continental-scale measurements (Sherry et al., 2008; Detmers et al.,
2015; Wolf et al., 2016). Our findings also suggest that tracking the
long-term evolution of tropical ecosystem canopy cover (Saatchi et al.,
2013; Shi et al., 2017) and reducing the process-level uncertainties
associated with foliar C dynamics relationships to meteorological and
disturbance forcings (discussed in Sect. 3.3) are potentially critical for
advancing process-level understanding of tropical NBE IAV. We<?pagebreak page6409?> anticipate
that continued monitoring of NBE (e.g. following the 2015–2016 ENSO event) and subsequent attribution to concurrent and lagged effects will also be
critical to better quantify the longevity NPP recovery (e.g. Schwalm et al.,
2017) and to improve confidence in characterizing concurrent and lagged NPP
impacts on the tropical C balance. Finally, while our analysis is focused on
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity to year-to-year ecosystem state changes, we note that the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is also in principle
dependent on time-varying ecosystem states (Fig. 1); we recognize that
further investigation on whether <inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV is (a) predominantly
sensitive to forcing anomalies, or (b) sensitive to year-to-year ecosystem
state changes, could amount to a critical step towards accurately
characterizing the climate sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Observation and model uncertainty caveats</title>
      <p id="d1e11097">The prescribed observation uncertainty characteristics (Table 1) are
potentially a critical source of error in the data-informed representation
of terrestrial C cycle dynamics and its subsequent partitioning into
concurrent and lagged effects. For example, relative differences in the mean
NBE values retrieved from aircraft and satellite CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements over
the Amazon Basin (Alden et al., 2016; Bowman et al., 2017) highlight the need
to determine the sensitivity of our results to top-down estimates of NBE.
While the uncertainty structures of top-down CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inversion estimates are beyond the scope of our paper, we recognize the need to robustly assess and
characterize uncertainties in seasonal and inter-annual variations in NBE.
Potential limitations in the linear SIF : GPP assumption include (i) systematic underestimations of afternoon GPP stress, given that the GOSAT
overpass time is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 pm, and (ii) uncharacterized biases
emerging from non-linear SIF : GPP under extreme conditions (Verma et al.,
2017). We highlight that recent efforts to merge multiple SIF datasets
(Zhang et al., 2018) and process-based representations of SIF : GPP (Bacour et al., 2019) can together be used to improve the accuracy of SIF : GPP
representation in CARDAMOM. We also note that the CARDAMOM likelihood
function (Eq. 3) fundamentally assumes all errors are independent; however,
commonalities in the derived datasets<?pagebreak page6410?> – such as systematic representation
errors across all datasets and transport errors in the GEOS-Chem-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO emissions – may lead to unrepresented error correlations in
the likelihood functions.</p>
      <p id="d1e11134">We generally acknowledge that more elaborate approaches and a more
comprehensive treatment of model and data error characteristics are
necessary to understand the contribution of individual data stream error (Keenan et al., 2011; Heald et al., 2004; MacBean et al., 2016, 2018).
Specifically, the explicit and accurate representation of model structural
error is critical for both accurate retrievals of physical parameters and
accurate model predictions (Brynjarsdottir and O'Hagan, 2014) and solving
for error model parameters (Schoups and Vrugt, 2010; Xu et al., 2017) is
potentially advantageous for physical parameter retrievals and prediction
purposes. For example, we note that without an error model structure we
cannot explicitly account for cross-correlations in the errors between observations or the impacts of heteroscedasticity (Schoups and Vrugt,
2010). While the identification and optimization of an appropriate
structural error model are beyond the scope of this paper, we highlight that this as an important priority for future CARDAMOM analyses.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6412?><p id="d1e11137">Unrepresented processes DALEC2a model structure – particularly processes
that are potentially substantial contributors to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> – amount to an additional source of uncertainty in our
analysis. Potentially critical processes include time-varying autotrophic
respiration (Rowland et al., 2014), plant C allocation and plant mortality,
as well as explicit representation of coarse woody debris (Smallman et al.,
2017). In particular, given that our results suggest that foliar C is a
major contributor to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE, unrepresented processes relating to tropical
leaf phenology may substantially impact the accuracy of lagged effect
attribution, including phenological processes regulating leaf onset, leaf
lifespan and litterfall seasonality (Chave et al., 2010; Caldararu et al.,
2012; Xu et al., 2016), as well as the time-varying allocation regimes
(Doughty et al., 2015). Furthermore, while the DALEC2a phenology assumes a
time-invariant ratio between LAI and foliar C (i.e. a time-invariant
ecosystem-level leaf carbon mass per area), the joint roles of leaf
demographics and species distribution on the temporal variability of leaf
carbon mass per area could potentially amount to a significant impact on
photosynthetic capacity, and subsequently on the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. We also highlight year-to-year changes in
species composition (such as C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plants) and the temporal
dynamics of vegetation and soil nutrients as potential contributors to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sherry et al., 2008; Schimel et al., 1997) are
potentially unrepresented but critical processes, particularly in fire-prone
regions (Pellegrini et al., 2018) and nutrient-limited tropical forest
ecosystems (Wieder et al., 2015). A potential limitation in CARDAMOM ET
estimates is the assumed inherent water-use efficiency relationship between
GPP, ET and VPD (Eq. B4); recent efforts (Zhou et al., 2015; Boese et al.,
2017) advocate for improved parameterizations for semi-empirical GPP : ET
relationships, which could ultimately impact the sign and magnitude of
inter-annual CARDAMOM ET variations – and the associated plant-available
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O balance – across tropical ecosystems. Finally, we highlight the
need to investigate the sensitivity of our results to the 2001–2015
climatological mean forcing: while to first order the diagnosis of lagged
effect anomalies from the mean (rather than absolute values) are insensitive
to the reference forcing, further efforts are required to determine whether
non-linear impacts of an alternative reference forcing (e.g. a
climatological mean forcing based on a 30-year climate normal) may amplify
or dampen <inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IAV estimates.</p>
      <p id="d1e11272">Our continental-scale results indicate that DALEC2a model complexity is
adequate to both represent NBE variability and accurately predict NBE
outside the training window on a pan-tropical scale (2015), which provides a
first-order assessment of the adequacy of the DALEC2a model structure. A
notable exception is the substantial underestimation of CARDAMOM 2015 NBE
within the Northern Hemisphere South America region (Fig. 5); given the considerable impact of the 2015 ENSO event within the region (Liu et al.,
2017), the biased CARDAMOM NBE prediction suggests that either (a) the
DALEC2a model structure cannot adequately represent NBE responses to
climatic extremes or (b) the 2010–2013 NBE observational constrains are insufficient to accurately inform the regional DALEC2a states and process
parameters. To determine the relative impact of model error, we anticipate
that additional insights could be obtained by retrieving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on alternative DALEC model structures
(Fox et al., 2009; Smallman et al., 2017). The implementation of DALEC2a
assimilation and prediction evaluation across long-term records eddy
covariance CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes would amount to a useful evaluation
of the model structure constrained by multiple data streams (e.g. following
Richardson et al., 2010; Keenan et al., 2013; Smallman et al., 2017), and
the potential sensitivities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to underlying model structures. While there are currently few tropical
ecosystem sites where multi-year NBE constraints are available, we highlight
that the analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at eddy
covariance sites would also benefit from the relative wealth of ancillary
site-level repeat measurements of C and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O states and fluxes, and
would ultimately allow more in-depth evaluation and hypothesis tests on
lagged effect processes and their role on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE dynamics. Finally, to
diagnose the potential role of higher-order process interactions on lagged
and concurrent effects – such as nutrient limitations, ecosystem demography
and explicit representations of carbon–water–energy interactions – we highlight that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> attribution
methodology introduced here can in principle be applied using higher
complexity terrestrial biosphere models (e.g. Huntzinger et al., 2013, 2017;
Macbean et al., 2018; Longo et al., 2019).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e11449">The prominent role of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> across the tropics throughout
2001–2015 supports our second hypothesis (Sect. 2.5), namely that
concurrent and lagged effect variations are comparable on inter-annual
timescales. By constraining a diagnostic ecosystem C balance model with an
array of terrestrial C cycle observations (LAI, biomass, soil C, SIF,
CO-derived fire C emissions and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived NBE), we show that on annual
timescales both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> effects are
substantial contributors to the 2001–2015 tropical C balance. The IAV of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CON</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is largely accounted for by NPP, with sizeable fire
contributions from Australia, South-East Asia, Indonesia and South America and heterotrophic respiration contributions from wet tropical ecosystems. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability is overwhelmingly dominated by the
impact of inter-annual variations in lagged NPP effects, followed by a
modest contribution from the state dependence of heterotrophic respiration. In aggregate, anomalies in foliar C, plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and soil C
were identified as the primary influences on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variability.
Our findings therefore highlight a critical need to explicitly account for
lagged effects when investigating the process-level tropical NBE responses
to climatic variability on inter-annual timescales. Furthermore, our
findings highlight the need to accurately and continuously resolve NBE at
sub-continental scales in order to advance our mechanistic and process-level
understanding of terrestrial C cycling and its evolving sensitivity to
climate.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page6413?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Regional definitions</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e11583">Regional masks used in this study. The 1500 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> precipitation thresholds were based on the ERA-Interim mean annual precipitation rates throughout the 2001–2015 study period.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/6393/2020/bg-17-6393-2020-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page6414?><app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{B}?><label>Appendix B</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e11616">The following sections provide a summary of the process parameterizations
introduced in the DALEC version implemented in the Bloom et al. (2016)
study. For completeness, a full description of DALEC2a is provided in the
paper's Supplement.</p>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>B1</label><title>DALEC2a water balance and GPP water stress</title>
      <p id="d1e11626">The DALEC2a plant-available water balance at time step <inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>1</italic> is derived as
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E23" content-type="numbered"><label>B1</label><mml:math id="M918" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes total plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (in mm H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O storage equivalent) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ET precipitation, runoff and evapotranspiration fluxes
(mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the time period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (d). We note that this equation represents a water balance in the dynamic plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O pool and does not include deep groundwater, confined aquifers or other
unconnected/static storages. Following a generalized non-linear reservoir
formulation, we parameterize monthly runoff losses as a second-order decay
function with respect to storage, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E24" content-type="numbered"><label>B2</label><mml:math id="M928" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a second-order decay constant (mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The dependence of runoff on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – instead of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – ensures that the
fractional rate of plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O loss is proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>;
relative to a first-order linear kinetics model, this provides a better
representation of faster relative plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O depletion
following high precipitation events, followed by slower losses during lower
precipitation time spans (e.g. Matteucci et al., 2015) and serves a functional approximation of both storage-excess and infiltration-excess runoff generation mechanisms in most cases. Following previous results from
land surface model development experiments (e.g. Liang et al., 1994;
Lawrence et al., 2011), we assume that net runoff inputs from adjacent
pixels are a negligible term in the lumped grid-scale H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O budget at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial resolution. By construction,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values predicted at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are unphysically
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while loss rates at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produce implausibly low residual storage
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M943" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values. Therefore, in the eventuality of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we calculate runoff as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, effectively representing a storage-excess overflow mechanism by introducing a transition between a state-dependent
regime to a direct runoff regime.</p>
      <p id="d1e12078">We apply a linear scaling on GPP with respect to the plant-available
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, where
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E25" content-type="numbered"><label>B3</label><mml:math id="M947" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GPP</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GPP</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo movablelimits="false">max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M948" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the plant-available H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O stress threshold;
Eq. (B3) effectively imposes a stress factor on GPP spanning between 0 and 1,
and offers a simplified representation of the integrated effects of
leaf–soil H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O potential differences and their impact on canopy conductance. Evapotranspiration at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is derived as
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E26" content-type="numbered"><label>B4</label><mml:math id="M952" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GPP</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VPD</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M953" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the inherent water-use efficiency (Beer et al.,
2009) and VPD is the vapour pressure deficit derived from ERA-Interim monthly reanalysis datasets. Equations (B1)–(B4) amount to a plant–water feedback parameterization, and together represent a reduced complexity version of the
DALEC water module implemented by Spadavecchia et al. (2011). All
parameters involved in the above-mentioned parameterization – namely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M954" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M955" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – are optimized along with other
DALEC2a parameters in CARDAMOM; the prior ranges are described in Table S1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>B2</label><title>Heterotrophic respiration</title>
      <p id="d1e12259">We parameterize the   meteorological dependence of heterotrophic respiration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M958" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E27" content-type="numbered"><label>B5</label><mml:math id="M960" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M961" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M962" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the monthly temperature and precipitation vectors. We
chose to use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a driver for heterotrophic respiration sensitivity to
moisture, given that (a) the majority of heterotrophic respiration is
expected to occur in the near-surface soil layer, and (b) near-surface soil
moisture strongly covaries with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M964" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – rather than water storage – at monthly
timescales. Previous versions of DALEC solely parameterized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M965" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a
function of temperature (e.g. Bloom et al., 2016 and references therein);
effectively, the formulation in Eq. (B5) induces a joint sensitivity to
relative changes in both temperature and near-surface moisture. The prior
ranges for the respiration temperature and precipitation sensitivity
parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M966" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are reported in Table S1.</p>
</sec>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{C}?><label>Appendix C</label><title>Sensitivity of lagged effects to individual ecosystem states</title>
      <p id="d1e12415">In the DALEC2a representation of the ecosystem C balance, the state vector
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consists of the C and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O pool values at the start of
year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. To diagnose the sensitivity of 2010–2015 lagged effects to the variability of ecosystem states, we conduct a sensitivity analysis to
explicitly quantify the impact of individual ecosystem state
anomalies – relative to their 2010–2015 mean values – on the variability of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M971" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout 2010–2015. To do this, we define the
anomaly of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th individual state in year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M973" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the sum of finite differences
relative to the mean state:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S3.E28" content-type="numbered"><label>C1</label><mml:math id="M974" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M975" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M976" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-element vector of the mean 2010–2015 states; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M977" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
number of model state variables; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M978" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M979" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-element vector
of ecosystem states, where for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M980" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M981" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M982" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M983" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M984" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M985" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M986" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on Eqs. (11) and
(14), we can derive the state change under a climatological mean forcing of
each term in Eq. (C1), and therefore
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S3.E29" content-type="numbered"><label>C2</label><mml:math id="M987" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        <inline-formula><mml:math id="M988" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collectively accounts for the unaccounted contribution of higher-order
interactions between individual pool anomalies [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M989" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M990" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As outlined in Sect. 2.5, the “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M991" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” terms in Eq.<?pagebreak page6415?> (C2) can be mapped
onto any DALEC2a flux variable; specifically, NBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M992" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be defined as the sum of lagged effect NBE components attributable to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M993" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M994" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S3.E30" content-type="numbered"><label>C3</label><mml:math id="M995" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.7}{8.7}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        <inline-formula><mml:math id="M996" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M997" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be directly calculated from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M998" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M999" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. More succinctly, we
summarize Eq. (B3) as
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S3.E31" content-type="numbered"><label>C4</label><mml:math id="M1000" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1001" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the lagged effect anomaly
attributable solely to the initial condition anomaly in ecosystem state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1002" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. By
applying the “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1003" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” operator (Eq. 21) on Eq. (C3), Eq. (C4) can
alternatively be expressed as
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S3.E32" content-type="numbered"><label>C5</label><mml:math id="M1004" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NBE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAG</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e13191">Effectively, the lagged effect partitioning formulation outlined in Eq. (C5)
allows us to quantitatively diagnose the NBE lagged effect dependence on the
inter-annual dynamics of individual C and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1005" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O states depicted in Fig. 2.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e13208">ECMWF re-analysis datasets were obtained from <uri>https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era-interim</uri> (Berrinsford et al., 2011). Burned area was
obtained from <uri>https://globalfiredata.org/pages/data/</uri> (Giglio et al., 2013). MODIS LAI data were obtained from
<uri>https://e4ftl01.cr.usgs.gov/MOLT/</uri>  (Myneni et al., 2015). CMS-Flux datasets are available at
cmsflux.jpl.nasa.gov. Biomass is available from Sassan Saatchi
(sasan.s.saatchi@jpl.nasa.gov) upon reasonable request. The HWSD soil
data was obtained from <uri>https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/global-soil-organic-carbon-estimates</uri> (Hiederer and Kochy, 2012). Gridded GOSAT fluorescence datasets
used in this analysis are available from Nicholas Parazoo
(nicholas.c.parazoo@jpl.nasa.gov) upon reasonable request. Biomass burning
CO fluxes data was obtained from <uri>https://dashrepo.ucar.edu/dataset/CO_Flux_Inversion_Attribution.html</uri> (Bloom et al., 2019). FLUXCOM datasets were obtained from <uri>https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/geodb/</uri>  (Jung 2018, Jung 2020). FLUXSAT data were obtained from <uri>https://avdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/tmp/FluxSat_GPP/</uri> (Joiner et al., 2018). MODIS ET data are available from <uri>http://files.ntsg.umt.edu/data/NTSG_Products/MOD16/</uri> (Running, 2020). The NOAA ESRL dataset was obtained from <uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/</uri> (Dlugokencky and Tans, 2020). The CARDAMOM
results presented throughout the paper are available upon request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e13239">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6393-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6393-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e13248">AAB, KWB, JL, AGK, and DSS designed the research, AAB conducted the analysis, and all the co-authors extensively contributed to evaluation of results and writing of
the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e13254">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e13260">Part of this work was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Part of this study was funded as a
component of NERC's support of the National Centre for Earth Observation.
SSS and AGK were also supported by NASA through the Earth Science Program. We are thankful for feedback from Michael Keller, Paul Levine, Marcos Longo, Shuang Ma and Alexander Norton. The NCAR MOPITT project is supported by the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA) Earth Observing System (EOS) Program. The
MOPITT team is grateful for the contributions of COMDEV and ABB BOMEM with support from the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and Environment Canada.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e13265">This research was supported by a NASA Earth Sciences grant (no. NNH16ZDA001N-IDS).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e13271">This paper was edited by Andreas Ibrom and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ahlström, A., Raupach, M. R., Schurgers, G., Smith, B., Arneth, A.,
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Canadell, J. G., Friedlingstein, P., Jain, A. K.,
Kato, E., Poulter, B., Sitch, S., Stocker, B. D., Viovy, N., Wang, Y. P.,
Wiltshire, A., Zaehle, S., and Zeng, N.: The dominant role of semi-arid
ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1006" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sink, Science,
348, 895–899, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alden, C. B., Miller, J. B., Gatti, L. V., Gloor, M. M., Guan, K., Michalak,
A. M., van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., Touma, D., Andrews, A., Basso, L. S.,
Correia, C. S. C., Domingues, L. G., Joiner, J., Krol, M. C., Lyapustin, A.
I., Peters, W., Shiga, Y. P., Thoning, K., van der Velde, I. R., van Leeuwen,
T. T., Yadav, V., and Diffenbaugh, N. S.: Regional atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1007" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
inversion reveals seasonal and geographic differences in Amazon net biome
exchange, Glob. Change Biol., 22, 3427–3443,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.13305</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Andela, N. and van der Werf, G. R.: Recent trends in African fires driven by
cropland expansion and El Niño to La Niña transition, Nat. Clim.
Change, 4, 791–795, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Anderegg, W. R., Schwalm, C., Biondi, F., Camarero, J. J., Koch, G., Litvak,
M., Ogle, K., Shaw, J.D., Shevliakova, E., Williams, A. P., Wolf, A., Ziaco,
E., and Pacala, S.: Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and
their implications for carbon cycle models, Science, 349, 528–532, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Araújo, T. M., Carvalho Jr., J. A., Higuchi, N., Brasil Jr., A. C. P., and
Mesquita, A. L. A.: A tropical rainforest clearing experiment by biomass
burning in the state of Pará, Brazil, Atmos. Environ., 33,
1991–1998, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arnone, J. A., Verburg, P. S. J., Johnson, D. W., Larsen, J. D., Jasoni, R.
L., Lucchesi, A. J., Batts, C. M., von Nagy, C., Coulombe, W. G., Schorran,
D. E., Buck, P. E., Braswell, B. H., Coleman, J. S., Sherry, R. A., Wallace, L. L., Luo, Y., and Schimel, D. S.: Prolonged suppression of ecosystem carbon
dioxide uptake after an anomalously warm year, Nature, 455, 383–386,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature07296</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bacour, C., Maignan, F., MacBean, N., Porcar-Castell, A., Flexas, J.,
Frankenberg, C., Peylin, P., Chevallier, F., Vuichard, N., and Bastrikov, V.:
Improving estimates of Gross Primary Productivity by assimilating
solar-induced fluorescence satellite retrievals in a terrestrial biosphere
model using a process-based SIF model, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 124, 3281–3306, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baker, D. F., Law, R. M., Gurney, K. R., Rayner, P., Peylin, P., Denning, A. S.,
Bousquet, P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y. H., Ciais, P., and Fung, I. Y.: TransCom
3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model errors on the
interannual variability of regional CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1008" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, 1988–2003, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002439</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Baldocchi, D., Chu, H., and Reichstein, M.: Inter-annual variability of net
and gross ecosystem carbon fluxes: A review, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 249, 520–533, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bastos, A., Running, S. W., Gouveia, C., and Trigo, R. M.: The global NPP
dependence on ENSO: La Niña and the extraordinary year of 2011, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 1247–1255, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page6417?><ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beer, C., Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Baldocchi, D., Law, B. E., Papale, D.,
Soussana, J. F., Ammann, C., Buchmann, N., Frank,D., Gianelle, D., Janssens,
I. A., Knohl, A., Koestner, B., Moors, E., Roupsard, O., Verbeeck, H.,
Vesala, T., Williams, C. A., and Wohlfahrt, G.: Temporal and among-site
variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB2018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003233" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008gb003233</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais,
N., Rödenbeck, C., Arain, M. A., Baldocchi, D., Bonan, G.
B., Bondeau, A., Cescatti, A., Lasslop, G., Lindroth, A., Lomas, M.,
Luyssaert, S., Margolis, H., Oleson, K. W., Roupsard, O., Veendendaal, E.,
Viovy, N., Williams, C., Woodard, F. I., and Papale, D.: Terrestrial gross
cabon dioxide uptake: Global distribution and covariation with climate,
Science, 329, 834–838, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berrisford, P., Dee, D., Poli, P., Brugge, R., Fielding, K., Fuentes,M., Kallberg, P., Kobayashi, S., Uppala, S., and Simmons, A.: The ERA-Interim Archive, ERA Rep. Ser., 1, available at: <uri>https://www.ecmwf.int/node/8174</uri> (last access: 20 July 2018), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bi, J., Knyazikhin, Y., Choi, S. H., Park, T., Barichivich, J., Ciais, P., Fu, R., Ganguly, S., Hall, F., Hilker, T., Huete, A., Jones, M., Kimball, J., Lyapustin, A. I., Mottus, M., Nemani, R. R., Piao, S. L., Poulter, B., Saleska, S. R., Saatchi, S. S., Xu, L., Zhou, L. M., and Myneni, R. B.: Sunlight mediated seasonality in canopy structure and photosynthetic activity of Amazonian rainforests, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 064014, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064014</ext-link>, 2015</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bloom, A. A. and Williams, M.: Constraining ecosystem carbon dynamics in a
data-limited world: integrating ecological “common sense” in a model–data
fusion framework, Biogeosciences, 12, 1299–1315,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1299-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-1299-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bloom, A. A., Worden, J., Jiang, Z., Worden, H., Kurosu, T., Frankenberg,
C., and Schimel, D.: Remote sensing constraints on South America fire traits
by Bayesian fusion of atmospheric and1140 surface data, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 1268–1274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062584</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bloom, A. A., Exbrayat, J.-F., van der Velde, I. R., Feng, L., and
Williams, M.: The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global
retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 1285–1290,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515160113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1515160113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bloom, A., Jiang, Z., and Worden, H.: Global Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Flux Estimates for 2001–2015, UCAR/NCAR – DASH Repository,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.26024/r1r2-6620" ext-link-type="DOI">10.26024/r1r2-6620</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boese, S., Jung, M., Carvalhais, N., and Reichstein, M.: The importance of
radiation for semiempirical water-use efficiency models, Biogeosciences, 14,
3015–3026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3015-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-3015-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bowman, K. W., Liu, J., Bloom, A. A., Parazoo, N. C., Lee, M., Jiang, Z.,
Menemenlis, D., Gierach, M. M., Collatz, G. J., Gurney, K. R., and Wunch, D.:
Global and Brazilian carbon response to El Niño Modoki 2011–2010, Earth
Space Sci., 4, 637–660, 2017</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Braswell, B. H., Schimel, D. S., Linder, E., and Moore, B. I. I. I.: The response
of global terrestrial ecosystems to interannual temperature variability,
Science, 278, 870–873, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brynjarsdóttir, J. and O'Hagan, A.: Learning about physical
parameters: The importance of model discrepancy, Inverse Problems, 30,
114007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Caldararu, S., Palmer, P. I., and Purves, D. W.: Inferring Amazon leaf
demography from satellite observations of leaf area index, Biogeosciences,
9, 1389–1404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1389-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-1389-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carvalhais, N., Forkel, M., Khomik, M., Bellarby, J., Jung, M., Migliavacca,
M., Mu, M., Saatchi, S., Santoro, M., Thurner, M., Weber, U., Ahrens, B.,
Beer, C., Cescatti, A., Randerson, J. T., and Reichstein, M.: Global
covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems,
Nature, 514, 213–217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13731" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13731</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chave,J.,Navarrete,D.,Almeida,S.,Álvarez,E., Aragão,L.E.O. C.,
Bonal, D., Châtelet, P., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Goret, J.-Y., von
Hildebrand, P., Jiménez, E., Patiño, S., Peñuela, M. C.,
Phillips, O. L., Stevenson, P., and Malhi, Y.: Regional and seasonal patterns of litterfall in tropical South America, Biogeosciences, 7, 43–55,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-43-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-43-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Morton, D. C., Jin, Y., Collatz, G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., Werf,
G. R. van der, DeFries, R. S., and Randerson, J. T.: Long-term trends and
interannual variability of forest, savanna and agricultural fires in South
America, Carbon Manag., 4, 617–638, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.61" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4155/cmt.13.61</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cox, P., Pearson, D., Booth, B., Friedlingstein, P., Huntingford, C., Jones,
C., and Luke, C.: Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change
constrained by carbon dioxide variability, Nature, 494, 341–344, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Deeter, M. N., Martínez-Alonso, S., Edwards, D. P., Emmons, L. K.,
Gille, J. C., Worden, H. M., Sweeney, C., Pittman, J. V., Daube, B. C., and
Wofsy, S. C.: The MOPITT Version 6 product: algorithm enhancements and
validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3623–3632, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3623-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3623-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Desai, A. R.: Climatic and phenological controls on coherent regional interannual variability of carbon dioxide flux in a heterogeneous landscape, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 115, G00J02, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001423" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jg001423</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Detmers, R. G., Hasekamp, O., Aben, I., Houweling, S., Leeuwen, T. T. V.,
Butz, A., Landgraf, J., Köhler, P., Guanter, L., and
Poulter, B.: Anomalous carbon uptake in Australia as seen by GOSAT, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 42, 8177–8184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065161" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL065161</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dlugokencky, E.  and Tans, P.: Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide NOAA/GML; data available at <uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/</uri>, last access: 5 May 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Doughty, C. E., Metcalfe, D. B., Girardin, C. A. J., Amezquita,F. F.,
Durand, L., Huasco, W. H., Costa, M. C., Costa, A. C. L., Rocha, W., Meir,
P., Galbraith, D., and Malhi, Y.: Source and sink carbon dynamics and carbon
allocation in the Amazon basin, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 645–655, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Exbrayat, J.-F., Pitman, A. J., Zhang, Q., Abramowitz, G., and Wang, Y.-P.:
Examining soil carbon uncertainty in a global model: response of microbial
decomposition to temperature, moisture and nutrient limitation,
Biogeosciences, 10, 7095–7108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7095-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-7095-2013</ext-link>,
2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Exbrayat, J. F., Pitman, A. J., Abramowitz, G., and Wang, Y. P.: Sensitivity of
net ecosystem exchange and heterotrophic respiration to parameterization
uncertainty, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
1640–1651, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page6418?><ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Exbrayat, J. F., Smallman, T. L., Bloom, A. A., Hutley, L. B., and Williams, M.:
Inverse determination of the influence of fire on vegetation carbon turnover
in the pantropics, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 1776–1789, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Falloon, P., Jones, C. D., Ades, M., and Paul, K.: Direct soil moisture
controls of future global soil carbon changes: An important source of
uncertainty, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003938" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003938</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fang, Y., Michalak, A. M., Schwalm, C. R., Huntzinger, D. N., Berry, J. A.,
Ciais, P., Piao, S. L., Poulter, B., Fisher, J. B., Cook, R. B., Hayes, D.,
Huang, M. Y., Ito, A., Jain, A., Lei, H. M., Lu, C. Q., Mao, J. F., Parazoo,
N. C., Peng, S. S., Ricciuto, D. M., Shi, X. Y., Tao, B., Tian, H. Q., Wang,
W. L., Wei, Y. X., and Yang, J.: Global land carbon sink response to
temperature and precipitation varies with ENSO phase, Environ. Res.
Lett., 12, 064007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6e8e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aa6e8e</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, L., Palmer, P. I., Bösch, H., Parker, R. J., Webb,
A. J., Cor- reia, C. S. C., Deutscher, N. M., Domingues, L. G., Feist, D.
G., Gatti, L. V., Gloor, E., Hase, F., Kivi, R., Liu, Y., Miller, J. B.,
Morino, I., Sussmann, R., Strong, K., Uchino, O., Wang, J., and Zahn, A.:
Consistent regional fluxes of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1009" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1010" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inferred from GOSAT
proxy XCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1011" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : XCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1012" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals, 2010–2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
4781–4797, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4781-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4781-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fox, A., Williams, M., Richardson, A. D., Cameron, D., Gove, J. H., Quaife,
T., Ricciuto, D., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Trudinger, C. M., and van
Wijk, M. T.: The reflex project: comparing different algorithms and
implementations for the inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model against
eddy covariance data, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1597–1615,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Frank, D., Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Thonicke, K., Frank, D., Mahecha, M.,
Smith, P., Van der Velde, M., Vicca, S., Babst, F., Beer, C., Buchmann, N.,
Canadell, J., Ciais, P., Cramer, W., Ibrom, A., Miglietta, F., Poulter, B.,
Rammig, A., Seneviratne, S., Walz, A., Wattenbach, M., Zavala, M., and
Zscheischler, J.: Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon
cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts, Glob. Change Biol.,
21, 7861–2880, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frankenberg, C., Fisher, J. B., Worden, J., Badgley, G., Saatchi, S. S.,
Lee, J.-E., Toon, G. C., Butz, A., Jung, M.,Kuze, A., and Yokota, T.: New
global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: patterns of
plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L17706, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL048738</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Friedlingstein, P., Meinshausen, M., Arora, V. K., Jones, C. D., Anav, A.,
Liddicoat, S. K., and Knutti, R.: Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections
due to carbon cycle feedbacks, J. Clim., 27, 511–526, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Friend, A. D., Lucht, W., Rademacher, T. T., Keribin, R., Betts, R., Cadule,
P., Ciais, P., Clark, D. B., Dankers, R., Fal- loon, P. D., Ito, A., Kahana,
R., Kleidon, A., Lomas, M. R., Nishina, K., Ostberg, S., Pavlick, R.,
Peylin, P., Schaphoff, S., Vuichard, N., Warszawski, L., Wiltshire, A., and
Woodward, F. I.: Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial
vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1013" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3280–3285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222477110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1222477110</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gatti, L. V., Gloor, M., Miller, J. B., Doughty, C. E., Malhi, Y.,
Domingues, L. G., Basso, L. S., Martinewski, A., Correia, C. S., C., Borges,
V. F., Freitas, S., Braz, R., Anderson, L. O., Rocha, H., Grace, J.,
Phillips, O. L., and Lloyd, J.: Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon
balance revealed by atmospheric measurements, Nature, 506, 76–80,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12957</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Giglio, L., Randerson, J. T., and van der Werf, G. R.: Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth- generation global fire emissions database (GFED4), J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 317–328, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrg.20042</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Guenet, B., Camino-Serrano, M., Ciais, P., Tifafi, M., Maignan, F., Soong,
J. L., and Janssens, I. A.: Impact of priming on global soil carbon
stocks, Glob. Change Biol., 24, 1873–1883, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Haario, H., Saksman, E., and Tamminen, J.: An adaptive Metropolis algorithm,
Bernoulli, 7, 223–242, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Jacob, D. J., Jones, D., Palmer, P. I., Logan, J. A., Streets,
D. G., Sachse, G. W., Gille, J. C., Hoffman, R. N., and Nehrkorn, T.: Comparative
inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE-P) observations
to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxide, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 109, D23306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005185</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiederer, R. and Köchy, M.: Global soil organic carbon estimates and the harmonized world soil database, EUR 25225 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, 79 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2788/13267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2788/13267</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiederer, R. and Kochy, M.:   Global Soil Organic Carbon Estimates and the Harmonized World Soil Database, EUR Scientific and Technical Research series – ISSN 1831-9424 (online), ISSN 1018-5593 (print), ISBN 978-92-79-23108-7, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2788/1326" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2788/1326</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Holling, C. S.: Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Ann. Rev.
Ecol. Syst., 4, 1–23, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hopkins, F. M., Filley, T. R., Gleixner, G., Lange, M., Top, S. M., and
Trumbore, S. E.: Increased belowground carbon inputs and warming promote
loss of soil organic carbon through complementary microbial responses, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 76, 57–69, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huntzinger, D. N., Schwalm, C., Michalak, A. M., Schaefer, K., King, A. W.,
Wei, Y., Jacobson, A., Liu, S., Cook, R. B., Post, W. M., Berthier, G.,
Hayes, D., Huang, M., Ito, A., Lei, H., Lu, C., Mao, J., Peng, C. H., Peng,
S., Poulter, B., Riccuito, D., Shi, X., Tian, H., Wang, W., Zeng, N., Zhao,
F., and Zhu, Q.: The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and
Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and
experimental design, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 2121–2133,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-2121-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-2121-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huntzinger, D. N., Michalak, A. M., Schwalm, C., Ciais, P., King, A. W.,
Fang, Y., Schaefer, K., Wei, Y., Cook, R. B., Fisher, J. B., Hayes, D.,
Huang, M., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Lei, H., Lu, C., Maignan, F., Mao, J.,
Parazoo, N., Peng, S., Poulter, B., Ricciuto, D., Shi, X., Tian, H., Wang,
W., Zeng, N., and Zhao, F.: Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial
carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback
predictions, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 4765, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, Z., Worden, J. R., Worden, H., Deeter, M., Jones, D. B. A., Arellano, A. F., and Henze, D. K.: A 15-year record of CO emissions constrained by MOPITT CO observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4565–4583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4565-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4565-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page6419?><ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Joiner, J., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, Y., Duveiller, G., Jung, M., Lyapustin, A.,
Wang, Y., and Tucker, C. J.: Estimation of terrestrial global gross primary
production (GPP) with satellite data-driven models and eddy covariance flux
data, Remote Sens., 10,  1346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs10091346</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Schwalm, C. R., Huntingford, C., Sitch, S.,
Ahlström, A., Arneth, A., Camps-Valls, G., Ciais, P., Friedlingstein,
P., Gans, F., Ichii, K., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Papale, D., Poulter, B.,
Raduly, B., Rödenbeck, C., Tramontana, G., Viovy, N., Wang, Y.-P.,
Weber, U., Zaehle, S., and Zeng, N.: Compensatory water effects link yearly
global land CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1014" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sink changes to temperature, Nature, 541, 516–520,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jung, M.: FLUXCOM Global Land Energy Fluxes, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17871/FLUXCOM_EnergyFluxes_v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17871/FLUXCOM_EnergyFluxes_v1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jung, M.: FLUXCOM Global Land Carbon Fluxes, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17871/FLUXCOM_CarbonFluxes_v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17871/FLUXCOM_CarbonFluxes_v1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jung, M., Koirala, S., Weber, U., Ichii, K., Gans, F., Camps-Valls, G.,
Papale, D., Schwalm, C., Tramontana, G., and Reichstein, M.: The FLUXCOM
ensemble of global land-atmosphere energy fluxes, Sci. data, 6,
1–14, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jung, M., Schwalm, C., Migliavacca, M., Walther, S., Camps-Valls, G.,
Koirala, S., Anthoni, P., Besnard, S., Bodesheim, P., Carvalhais, N.,
Chevallier, F., Gans, F., Goll, D. S., Haverd, V., Köhler, P., Ichii,
K., Jain, A. K., Liu, J., Lombardozzi, D., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nelson, J.
A., O'Sullivan, M., Pallandt, M., Papale, D., Peters, W., Pongratz, J.,
Rödenbeck, C., Sitch, S., Tramontana, G., Walker, A., Weber, U., and
Reichstein, M.: Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe:
synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach, Biogeosciences, 17,
1343–1365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Keenan, T. F., Carbone, M. S., Reichstein, M., and Richardson, A. D.: The
model–data fusion pitfall: assuming certainty in an uncertain world,
Oecologia, 167, 587–597, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Keenan, T. F., Davidson, E. A., Munger, J. W., and Richardson, A. D.: Rate
my data: quantifying the value of ecological data for the development of
models of the terrestrial carbon cycle, Ecol. Appl., 23, 273–286, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kurc, S. A. and Small, E. E.: Soil moisture variations and ecosystem-scale
fluxes of water and carbon in semiarid grassland and shrubland, Water
Resour. Res., 43, W06416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006WR005011</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S. C.,
Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., Bonan, G. B., and
Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and functional and structural
advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sys., 3, M03001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011MS000045</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Le Quéré, C., Moriarty, R., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Sitch,
S., Korsbakken, J. I., Friedlingstein, P., Peters, G. P., Andres, R. J.,
Boden, T. A., Houghton, R. A., House, J. I., Keeling, R. F., Tans, P.,
Arneth, A., Bakker, D. C. E., Barbero, L., Bopp, L., Chang, J., Chevallier,
F., Chini, L. P., Ciais, P., Fader, M., Feely, R. A., Gkritzalis, T.,
Harris, I., Hauck, J., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Kitidis, V., Klein
Goldewijk, K., Koven, C., Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre,
N., Lenton, A., Lima, I. D., Metzl, N., Millero, F., Munro, D. R., Murata,
A., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S., Nojiri, Y., O'Brien, K., Olsen, A.,
Ono, T., Pérez, F. F., Pfeil, B., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Rehder, G.,
Rödenbeck, C., Saito, S., Schuster, U., Schwinger, J., Séférian,
R., Steinhoff, T., Stocker, B. D., Sutton, A. J., Takahashi, T., Tilbrook,
B., van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van der Werf, G. R., van Heuven, S.,
Vandemark, D., Viovy, N., Wiltshire, A., Zaehle, S., and Zeng, N.: Global
Carbon Budget 2015, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 7, 349–396,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-7-349-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lewis, S. L., Brando, P. M., Phillips, O. L., van der Heijden, G. M. F., and
Nepstad, D.: The 2010 Amazon drought, Science, 6017, 554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1200807</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A Simple
hydrologically Based Model of Land Surface Water and Energy Fluxes for GSMs,
J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14415–14428, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bowman, K. W., Lee, M., Henze, D. K., Bousserez, N., Brix, H.,
Collatz, G. J., Menemenlis, D., Ott, L., Pawson, S., Jones, D., and Nassar,
R.: Carbon monitoring system flux estimation and attribution: impact of
ACOS-GOSAT XCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1015" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sampling on the inference of terrestrial biospheric sources
and sinks, Tellus B, 66, 22486, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v66.22486</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bowman, K. W., Schimel, D. S., Parazoo, N. C., Jiang, Z., Lee, M., Bloom, A. A., Wunch, D., Frankenberg, C., Sun, Y., O'Dell, C. W., Gurney, K. R., Menemenlis, D., Gierach, M., Crisp, D., and Eldering, A.:  Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Niño, Science, 358, eaam5690, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5690" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aam5690</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bowman, K., Parazoo, N. C., Bloom, A. A., Wunch, D., Jiang, Z.,
Gurney, K. R., and Schimel, D.: Detecting drought impact on terrestrial
biosphere carbon fluxes over contiguous US with satellite observations,
Environ. Res. Lett., 13,  095003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad5e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aad5e</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Longo, M., Knox, R. G., Medvigy, D. M., Levine, N. M., Dietze, M. C., Kim,
Y., Swann, A. L. S., Zhang, K., Rollinson, C. R., Bras, R. L., Wofsy, S. C.,
and Moorcroft, P. R.: The biophysics, ecology, and biogeochemistry of
functionally diverse, vertically and horizontally heterogeneous ecosystems:
the Ecosystem Demography model, version 2.2 – Part 1: Model description,
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4309–4346,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4309-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-4309-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lovenduski, N. S. and Bonan, G. B.: Reducing uncertainty in projections of
terrestrial carbon uptake, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 044020, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa66b8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aa66b8</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Luo, Y.: Terrestrial carbon cycle feedback to climate warming, Annu. Rev.
Ecol. Evol. S., 38, 683–712,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Luo, Y. and Weng, E.: Dynamic disequilibrium of the terrestrial carbon cycle
under global change, Trends   Ecol.  Evol., 26, 96–104, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Luo, Y., Keenan, T. F., and Smith, M.: Predictability of the terrestrial
carbon cycle, Glob. Change Biol., 21, 1737–1751, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
MacBean, N., Peylin, P., Chevallier, F., Scholze, M., and Schuermann, G.:
Consistent assimilation of multiple data streams in a carbon cycle data
assimilation system, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3569–3588, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>MacBean, N., Maignan, F., Bacour, C., Lewis, P., Peylin, P., Guanter, L.,
Köhler, P., Gómez-Dans, J., and Disney, M.: Strong constraint on
modelled global carbon uptake using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence
data, Sci. Rep., 8, 1973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20024-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-20024-w</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Magney, T. S., Frankenberg, C., Fisher, J. B., Sun, Y., North, G. B., Davis,
T. S., Kornfeld, A., and Siebke, K.: Connecting active to passive fluorescence
with photosynthesis: A method fo<?pagebreak page6420?>r evaluating remote sensing measurements of
Chl fluorescence, New Phytol., 215, 1594–1608, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Matteucci, M., Gruening, C., Ballarin, I. G., Seufert, G., and Cescatti, A.:
Components, drivers and temporal dynamics of ecosystem respiration in a
Mediterranean pine forest, Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 224–235, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Moyano, F. E., Manzoni, S., and Chenu, C.: Responses of soil heterotrophic
respiration to moisture availability: An exploration of processes and
models, Soil Biol. Biochem., 59,  72–85, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Improvements to a MODIS global
terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm, Remote Sens. Environ.,
115, 1781–1800, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mystakidis, S., Davin, E. L., Gruber, N., and Seneviratne, S. I.:
Constraining future terrestrial carbon cycle projections using
observation-based water and carbon flux estimates, Glob. Change Biol.,
22, 2198–2215, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pan, S., Pan, N., Tian, H., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Shi, H., Arora, V. K., Haverd, V., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi, D., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Ottlé, C., Poulter, B., Zaehle, S., and Running, S. W.: Evaluation of global terrestrial evapotranspiration using state-of-the-art approaches in remote sensing, machine learning and land surface modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1485–1509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Parazoo, N. C., Bowman, K., Fisher, J. B., Frankenberg, C., Jones, D. B.,
Cescatti, A., Pérez-Priego, Ó., Wohlfahrt, G., and Montagnani, L.:
Terrestrial gross primary production inferred from satellite fluorescence
and vegetation models, Glob.Change Biol., 20, 3103–3121, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pellegrini, A. F., Ahlström, A., Hobbie, S. E., Reich, P. B., Nieradzik,
L. P., Staver, A. C., Scharenbroch, B. C., Jumpponen, A., Anderegg, W. R.,
Randerson, J. T., and Jackson, R. B.: Fire frequency drives decadal changes in
soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity, Nature, 553, 194–198, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Piao, S., Wang, X., Wang, K., Li, X., Bastos, A., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P.,
Friedlingstein, P., and Sitch, S.: 2019. Interannual variations of
terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 300–318,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14884" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.14884</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Poulter, B., Frank, D., Ciais, P., Myneni, R. B., Andela, N., Bi, J.,
Broquet, G., Canadell, J. G., Chevallier, F., Liu, Y. Y., Running, S. W.,
Sitch, S., and van der Werf, G. R.: Contribution of semiarid ecosystems to
interannual variability of the global carbon cycle, Nature, 509, 600–603,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Powell, T. L., Galbraith, D. R., Christoffersen, B. O., Harper, A.,
Imbuzeiro, H. M., Rowland, L., Almeida, S., Brando, P. M., da Costa, A. C.,
Costa, M. H., Levine, N. M., Malhi, Y., Saleska, S. R., Sotta, E., Williams,
M., Meir, P., and Moorcroft, P. R.: Confronting model predictions of carbon
fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental
drought, New Phytol., 200, 350–365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.12390</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Quetin, G. R., Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., and Konings, A. G.: Carbon flux
variability from a relatively simple ecosystem model with assimilated data
is consistent with terrestrial biosphere model estimates, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sys., 12, e2019MS001889, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001889" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001889</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randerson, J., van der Werf, G. R., Collatz, G. J., Giglio, L., Still, C.
J., Kasibhatla, P., Miller, J. B., White, J. W. C., DeFries, R. S., and
Kasischke, E. S.: Fire emissions from C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1016" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1017" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation and their
influence on interannual variability of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1018" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1019" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1020" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB2019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002366" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002366</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Myneni, R., Yuri, K., and Park, T.: Boston University and MODAPS SIPS – NASA,  MOD15A2 MODIS/Terra Leaf Area Index/FPAR 8-Day L4 Global 1 km SIN Grid. NASA LP DAAC, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD15A2.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/MODIS/MOD15A2.006</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Ciais, P., Frank, D., Mahecha, M. D.,Seneviratne,
S. I., Zscheischler, J., Beer, C., Buchmann, N.,Frank, D. C., Papale, D.,
Rammig, A., Smith, P., Thonicke, K., van der Velde, M., Vicca, S., Walz, A.,
and Wattenbach, M.: Climate extremes and the carbon cycle, Nature, 500,
287–295, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature12350" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/Nature12350</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Richardson, A. D., Hollinger, D. Y., Aber, J. D., Ollinger, S. V., and Braswell,
B. H.: Environmental variation is directly responsible for short-but not
long-term variation in forest-atmosphere carbon exchange, Glob. Change
Biol., 13,  788–803, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Richardson, A. D., Williams, M., Hollinger, D. Y., Moore, D. J., Dail, D.
B., Davidson, E. A., Scott, N. A., Evans, R. S., Hughes, H., Lee, J. T.,
Rodrigues, C., and Savage, K.: Estimating parameters of a forest ecosystem C
model with measurements of stocks and fluxes as joint constraints,
Oecologia, 164, 25–40, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Running, S. W.: MOD16A_MONTHLY.MERRA_GMAO_1kmALB, available at: <uri>https://files.ntsg.umt.edu/data/NTSG_Products/ MOD16/</uri>, last access: 27 March 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rowland, L., Hill, T.C., Stahl, C., Siebicke, L., Burban, B.,
Zaragoza-Castells, J., Ponton, S., Bonal, D., Meir, P., and Williams, M.:
Evidence for strong seasonality in the carbon storage and carbon use
efficiency of an Amazonian forest, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 979–991, 2014</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rowland, L., da Costa, A. C. L., Galbraith, D. R., Oliveira, R. S., Binks, O. J.,
Oliveira, A. A. R., Pullen, A. M., Doughty, C. E., Metcalfe, D. B., Vasconcelos,
S. S., Ferreira, L. V., Malhi, Y., Grace, J., Mencuccini, M., and Meir, P.:
Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon
starvation, Nature, 528, 119–122, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Saatchi, S. S., Harris, N. L., Brown, S., Lefsky, M., Mitchard, E. T.,
Salas, W., Zutta, B. R., Buermann, W., Lewis, S. L., Hagen, S., Petrova, S.,
White, L., Silman, M., and Morel, A.: Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks
in tropical regions across three continents, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108,
9899–9904, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Saatchi, S., Asefi-Najafabady, S., Malhi, Y., Aragao, L. E. O. C., Anderson,
L. O., Myneni, R. B., and Nemani, R.: Persistent effects of a severe drought
on Amazonian forest canopy, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 565–570, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B., Holland, E. A., McKeown, R., Ojima, D.,
Painter, T. H., Parton, W. J., and Townsend, A. R.: Climatic, edaphic, and
biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 8, 279–293, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B. H., McKeown, R., Ojima, D. S., Parton, W. J., and
Pulliam, W.: Climate and nitrogen controls on the geography and timescales
of terrestrial biogeochemical cycling, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10,
677–692, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B. H., and Parton W. J.: Equilibration of the
terrestrial water, nitrogen, and carbon cycles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
94, 8280–8283, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page6421?><ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schimel, D., Churkina, G., and Braswell, B.: Remembrance of weather past:
ecosystem response to climate variability, in: A history of atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1021" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its effects on plants, animals, and ecosystems, edited by:
Ehleringer, J. R., Cerling, T. E., and Dearing, M. D.,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 350–368, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schoups, G. and Vrugt, J. A.: A formal likelihood function for parameter and
predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic,
and non-Gaussian errors, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aam5747</ext-link>,  2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schwalm, C. R., Anderegg, W. R., Michalak, A. M., Fisher, J. B., Biondi, F.,
Koch, G., Litvak, M., Ogle, K., Shaw, J. D.,
Wolf, A., Huntzinger, D. N., Schaefer, K., Cook, R., Wei, Y., Fang, Y.,
Hayes, D., Huang, M., Jain, A., and Tian, H.:
Global patterns of drought recovery, Nature, 548, 202–205, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sellers, P. J., Schimel, D. S., Moore, B., Liu, J., and Eldering, A.: Observing
carbon cycle–climate feedbacks from space, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 7860–7868, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shea, R. W., Shea, B. W., Kauffman, J. B., Ward, D. E., Haskins, C. I., and
Scholes, M. C.: Fuel biomass and combustion factors associated with fires in
savanna ecosystems of South Africa and Zambia, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 101, 23551–23568, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sherry, R. A., Weng, E., Arnone III, J. A., Johnson, D. W., Schimel, D. S.,
Verburg, P. S., Wallace, L. L., and Luo, Y.: Lagged effects of experimental
warming and doubled precipitation on annual and seasonal aboveground biomass
production in a tallgrass prairie, Glob. Change Biol., 14, 2923–2936, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shi, M., Liu, J., Zhao, M., Yu, Y., and Saatchi, S.: Mechanistic Processes
Controlling Persistent Changes of Forest Canopy Structure After 2005 Amazon
Drought, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 3378–3390,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sierra, C. A., Trumbore, S. E., Davidson, E. A., Vicca, S., and Janssens,
I.: Sensitivity of decomposition rates of soil organic matter with respect
to simultaneous changes in temperature and moisture, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Syst., 7, 335–356, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smallman, T. L., Exbrayat, J.-F., Mencuccini, M., Bloom, A. A., and
Williams, M.: Assimilation of repeated woody biomass observations constrains
decadal ecosystem carbon cycle uncertainty in aggrading forests, J. Geophys.
Res.-Biogeo., 122, 528–545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JG003520</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Smith, M. D., Knapp, A. K., and Collins, S. L.: A framework for assessing
ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by
global change, Ecology, 90, 3279–3289, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Spadavecchia, L., Williams, M., and Law, B. E.: Uncertainty in predictions of
forest carbon dynamics: separating driver error from model error, Ecol.
Appl., 21, 1506–1522, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Frankenberg, C., Wood, J. D., Schimel, D. S., Jung, M., Guanter, L.,
Drewry, D. T., Verma, M., Porcar-Castell, A., Griffis, T. J., and Gu, L.: OCO-2
advances photosynthesis observation from space via solar-induced chlorophyll
fluorescence, Science, 358, p.eaam5747, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aam5747</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Takagi, H., Houweling, S., Andres, R. J., Belikov, D., Bril, A., Boesch, H.,
Butz, A., Guerlet, S., Hasekamp, O., Maksyutov, S., Morino, I., Oda, T.,
O'Dell, C. W., Oshchepkov, S., Parker, R., Saito, M., Uchino, O., Yokota,
T., Yoshida, Y., and Valsala, V.: Influence of differences in current GOSAT
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1022" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals on surface flux estimation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 2598–2605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL059174</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Thompson, M. V., Randerson, J. T., Malmström, C. M., and Field, C. B.: Change
in net primary production and heterotrophic respiration: How much is
necessary to sustain the terrestrial carbon sink?, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 10, 711–726, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Trumbore, S.: Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems–recent progress and
challenges, Glob. Change Biol., 12, 141–153, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Mu, M.,
Kasibhatla, P. S., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Jin, Y., and van Leeuwen,
T. T.: Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna,
forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
11707–11735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Leeuwen, T. T., van der Werf, G. R., Hoffmann, A. A., Detmers, R. G.,
Rücker, G., French, N. H. F., Archibald, S., Carvalho Jr., J. A., Cook,
G. D., de Groot, W. J., Hély, C., Kasischke, E. S., Kloster, S.,
McCarty, J. L., Pettinari, M. L., Savadogo, P., Alvarado, E. C., Boschetti,
L., Manuri, S., Meyer, C. P., Siegert, F., Trollope, L. A., and Trollope, W.
S. W.: Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database,
Biogeosciences, 11, 7305–7329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7305-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-7305-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Verma, M., Schimel, D., Evans, B., Frankenberg, C., Beringer, J., Drewry,
D.T., Magney, T., Marang, I., Hutley, L., Moore, C. and Eldering, A. Effect
of environmental conditions on the relationship between solar-induced
fluorescence and gross primary productivity at an OzFlux grassland site,
J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 716–733, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ward, D. E., Hao, W. M., Susott, R. A., Babbitt, R. E., Shea, R. W.,
Kauffman, J. B., and Justice, C. O.: Effect of fuel composition on
combustion efficiency and emission factors for African savanna ecosystems,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 23569–23576, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K., and Todd- Brown, K. E. O.:
Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient
availability, Nat. Geosci., 8, 441–444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2413" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2413</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Williams, C. A. and Albertson, J. D: Soil moisture controls on canopy-scale
water and carbon fluxes in an African savanna, Water Resour. Res., 40, W09302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004WR003208</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Williams, M., Schwarz, P. A., Law, B. E., Irvine, J., and Kurpius, M. R.: An
improved analysis of forest carbon dynamics using data assimilation, Glob.
Change Biol., 11, 89–105, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wolf, S., Keenan, T. F., Fisher, J. B., Baldocchi, D. D., Desai, A. R.,
Richardson, A. D., Scott, R. L., Law, B. E., Litvak, M. E., Brunsell, N. A.,
Peters, W., and van der Laan-Luijk, I. T.: Warm spring reduced carbon cycle
impact of the 2012 US summer drought, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci., 113, 5880–5885, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Worden, J. R., Bloom, A. A., Pandey, S., Jiang, Z., Worden, H. M., Walker,
T. W., Houweling, S., and Röckmann, T.: Reduced biomass burning emissions
reconcile conflicting estimates of the post-2006 atmospheric methane budget,
Nat. Commun., 8, 2227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Xu, X., Medvigy, D., Powers, J. S., Becknell, J. M., and Guan, K.: Diversity in
plant hydraulic traits explains seasonal and inter-annual variations of
vegetation dynamics in seasonally dry tropical forests, New Phytol.,
212, 80–95, 2016</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Xu, T., Valocchi, A. J., Ye, M., and Liang, F.: Quantifying model structural
error: Efficient Bayesian calibration of a regional groundwater flow model
using surrogates and a data-driven error model, Water Resour. Res., 53, 4084–4105, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page6422?><ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, Y., Saatchi, S. S., Xu, L., Yu, Y., Choi, S., Phillips, N., Kennedy,
R., Keller, M., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B.: Post-drought decline of the
Amazon carbon sink, Nat. Commun., 9, 3172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05668-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-05668-6</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yin, Y., Bloom, A. A., Worden, J., Saatchi, S., Yang, Y., Williams, M., Liu,
J., Jiang, Z., Worden, H., Bowman, K., and Frankenberg, C.: Fire decline in
dry tropical ecosystems enhances decadal land carbon sink, Nat.
Commun., 11, 1–7, 2020.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Joiner, J., Alemohammad, S. H., Zhou, S., and Gentine, P.: A global spatially contiguous solar-induced fluorescence (CSIF) dataset using neural networks, Biogeosciences, 15, 5779–5800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5779-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-5779-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Yu, B., Huang, Y., and Wang, G.: Daily underlying water use
efficiency for AmeriFlux sites, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 120, 887–902, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Lagged effects regulate the inter-annual variability of the tropical carbon balance</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Inter-annual variations in the tropical land carbon (C) balance are a
dominant component of the global atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> growth rate.
Currently, the lack of quantitative knowledge on processes controlling net
tropical ecosystem C balance on inter-annual timescales inhibits accurate understanding and projections of land–atmosphere C exchanges. In particular, uncertainty on the relative contribution of ecosystem C fluxes attributable
to concurrent forcing anomalies (concurrent effects) and those attributable
to the continuing influence of past phenomena (lagged effects) stifles
efforts to explicitly understand the integrated sensitivity of a tropical ecosystem to climatic variability. Here we present a conceptual
framework – applicable in principle to any land biosphere model – to
explicitly quantify net biospheric exchange (NBE) as the sum of anomaly-induced
concurrent changes and climatology-induced lagged changes to terrestrial
ecosystem C states (NBE&thinsp; = &thinsp;NBE<sup>CON</sup> + NBE<sup>LAG</sup>). We apply this framework to an
observation-constrained analysis of the 2001–2015 tropical C balance: we use
a data–model integration approach (CARbon DAta-MOdel fraMework – CARDAMOM) to merge satellite-retrieved land-surface C observations (leaf area, biomass, solar-induced fluorescence), soil C inventory data and satellite-based atmospheric
inversion estimates of CO<sub>2</sub> and CO fluxes to produce a data-constrained
analysis of the 2001–2015 tropical C cycle. We find that the inter-annual
variability of both concurrent and lagged effects substantially contributes to the 2001–2015 NBE inter-annual variability throughout 2001–2015 across
the tropics (NBE<sup>CON</sup> IAV&thinsp; = &thinsp;80&thinsp;% of total NBE IAV, <i>r</i>&thinsp; = &thinsp; 0.76;
NBE<sup>LAG</sup> IAV&thinsp; = &thinsp;64&thinsp;% of NBE IAV, <i>r</i>&thinsp; = &thinsp;0.61), and the prominence of NBE<sup>LAG</sup> IAV persists across both wet and dry tropical ecosystems. The
magnitude of lagged effect variations on NBE across the tropics is largely
attributable to lagged effects on net primary productivity (NPP; NPP<sup>LAG</sup> IAV
113&thinsp;% of NBE<sup>LAG</sup> IAV, <i>r</i>&thinsp; = &thinsp;−0.93, <i>p</i> value&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.05), which emerge due to the dependence of NPP on inter-annual variations in foliar C and
plant-available H<sub>2</sub>O states. We conclude that concurrent and lagged
effects need to be explicitly and jointly resolved to retrieve an accurate
understanding of the processes regulating the present-day and future trajectory of the terrestrial land C sink.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ahlström, A., Raupach, M. R., Schurgers, G., Smith, B., Arneth, A.,
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Canadell, J. G., Friedlingstein, P., Jain, A. K.,
Kato, E., Poulter, B., Sitch, S., Stocker, B. D., Viovy, N., Wang, Y. P.,
Wiltshire, A., Zaehle, S., and Zeng, N.: The dominant role of semi-arid
ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO<sub>2</sub> sink, Science,
348, 895–899, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alden, C. B., Miller, J. B., Gatti, L. V., Gloor, M. M., Guan, K., Michalak,
A. M., van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., Touma, D., Andrews, A., Basso, L. S.,
Correia, C. S. C., Domingues, L. G., Joiner, J., Krol, M. C., Lyapustin, A.
I., Peters, W., Shiga, Y. P., Thoning, K., van der Velde, I. R., van Leeuwen,
T. T., Yadav, V., and Diffenbaugh, N. S.: Regional atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>
inversion reveals seasonal and geographic differences in Amazon net biome
exchange, Glob. Change Biol., 22, 3427–3443,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13305</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andela, N. and van der Werf, G. R.: Recent trends in African fires driven by
cropland expansion and El Niño to La Niña transition, Nat. Clim.
Change, 4, 791–795, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Anderegg, W. R., Schwalm, C., Biondi, F., Camarero, J. J., Koch, G., Litvak,
M., Ogle, K., Shaw, J.D., Shevliakova, E., Williams, A. P., Wolf, A., Ziaco,
E., and Pacala, S.: Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and
their implications for carbon cycle models, Science, 349, 528–532, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Araújo, T. M., Carvalho Jr., J. A., Higuchi, N., Brasil Jr., A. C. P., and
Mesquita, A. L. A.: A tropical rainforest clearing experiment by biomass
burning in the state of Pará, Brazil, Atmos. Environ., 33,
1991–1998, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Arnone, J. A., Verburg, P. S. J., Johnson, D. W., Larsen, J. D., Jasoni, R.
L., Lucchesi, A. J., Batts, C. M., von Nagy, C., Coulombe, W. G., Schorran,
D. E., Buck, P. E., Braswell, B. H., Coleman, J. S., Sherry, R. A., Wallace, L. L., Luo, Y., and Schimel, D. S.: Prolonged suppression of ecosystem carbon
dioxide uptake after an anomalously warm year, Nature, 455, 383–386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07296</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bacour, C., Maignan, F., MacBean, N., Porcar-Castell, A., Flexas, J.,
Frankenberg, C., Peylin, P., Chevallier, F., Vuichard, N., and Bastrikov, V.:
Improving estimates of Gross Primary Productivity by assimilating
solar-induced fluorescence satellite retrievals in a terrestrial biosphere
model using a process-based SIF model, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 124, 3281–3306, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, D. F., Law, R. M., Gurney, K. R., Rayner, P., Peylin, P., Denning, A. S.,
Bousquet, P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y. H., Ciais, P., and Fung, I. Y.: TransCom
3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model errors on the
interannual variability of regional CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, 1988–2003, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002439</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Baldocchi, D., Chu, H., and Reichstein, M.: Inter-annual variability of net
and gross ecosystem carbon fluxes: A review, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 249, 520–533, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bastos, A., Running, S. W., Gouveia, C., and Trigo, R. M.: The global NPP
dependence on ENSO: La Niña and the extraordinary year of 2011, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 1247–1255, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Beer, C., Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Baldocchi, D., Law, B. E., Papale, D.,
Soussana, J. F., Ammann, C., Buchmann, N., Frank,D., Gianelle, D., Janssens,
I. A., Knohl, A., Koestner, B., Moors, E., Roupsard, O., Verbeeck, H.,
Vesala, T., Williams, C. A., and Wohlfahrt, G.: Temporal and among-site
variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB2018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003233" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003233</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais,
N., Rödenbeck, C., Arain, M. A., Baldocchi, D., Bonan, G.
B., Bondeau, A., Cescatti, A., Lasslop, G., Lindroth, A., Lomas, M.,
Luyssaert, S., Margolis, H., Oleson, K. W., Roupsard, O., Veendendaal, E.,
Viovy, N., Williams, C., Woodard, F. I., and Papale, D.: Terrestrial gross
cabon dioxide uptake: Global distribution and covariation with climate,
Science, 329, 834–838, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Berrisford, P., Dee, D., Poli, P., Brugge, R., Fielding, K., Fuentes,M., Kallberg, P., Kobayashi, S., Uppala, S., and Simmons, A.: The ERA-Interim Archive, ERA Rep. Ser., 1, available at: <a href="https://www.ecmwf.int/node/8174" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 July 2018), 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Bi, J., Knyazikhin, Y., Choi, S. H., Park, T., Barichivich, J., Ciais, P., Fu, R., Ganguly, S., Hall, F., Hilker, T., Huete, A., Jones, M., Kimball, J., Lyapustin, A. I., Mottus, M., Nemani, R. R., Piao, S. L., Poulter, B., Saleska, S. R., Saatchi, S. S., Xu, L., Zhou, L. M., and Myneni, R. B.: Sunlight mediated seasonality in canopy structure and photosynthetic activity of Amazonian rainforests, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 064014, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064014</a>, 2015
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bloom, A. A. and Williams, M.: Constraining ecosystem carbon dynamics in a
data-limited world: integrating ecological “common sense” in a model–data
fusion framework, Biogeosciences, 12, 1299–1315,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1299-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1299-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Bloom, A. A., Worden, J., Jiang, Z., Worden, H., Kurosu, T., Frankenberg,
C., and Schimel, D.: Remote sensing constraints on South America fire traits
by Bayesian fusion of atmospheric and1140 surface data, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 1268–1274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062584" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062584</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Bloom, A. A., Exbrayat, J.-F., van der Velde, I. R., Feng, L., and
Williams, M.: The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global
retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 1285–1290,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515160113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515160113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Bloom, A., Jiang, Z., and Worden, H.: Global Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Flux Estimates for 2001–2015, UCAR/NCAR – DASH Repository,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.26024/r1r2-6620" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.26024/r1r2-6620</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Boese, S., Jung, M., Carvalhais, N., and Reichstein, M.: The importance of
radiation for semiempirical water-use efficiency models, Biogeosciences, 14,
3015–3026, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3015-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3015-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Bowman, K. W., Liu, J., Bloom, A. A., Parazoo, N. C., Lee, M., Jiang, Z.,
Menemenlis, D., Gierach, M. M., Collatz, G. J., Gurney, K. R., and Wunch, D.:
Global and Brazilian carbon response to El Niño Modoki 2011–2010, Earth
Space Sci., 4, 637–660, 2017
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Braswell, B. H., Schimel, D. S., Linder, E., and Moore, B. I. I. I.: The response
of global terrestrial ecosystems to interannual temperature variability,
Science, 278, 870–873, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Brynjarsdóttir, J. and O'Hagan, A.: Learning about physical
parameters: The importance of model discrepancy, Inverse Problems, 30,
114007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Caldararu, S., Palmer, P. I., and Purves, D. W.: Inferring Amazon leaf
demography from satellite observations of leaf area index, Biogeosciences,
9, 1389–1404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1389-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1389-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Carvalhais, N., Forkel, M., Khomik, M., Bellarby, J., Jung, M., Migliavacca,
M., Mu, M., Saatchi, S., Santoro, M., Thurner, M., Weber, U., Ahrens, B.,
Beer, C., Cescatti, A., Randerson, J. T., and Reichstein, M.: Global
covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems,
Nature, 514, 213–217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13731" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13731</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Chave,J.,Navarrete,D.,Almeida,S.,Álvarez,E., Aragão,L.E.O. C.,
Bonal, D., Châtelet, P., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Goret, J.-Y., von
Hildebrand, P., Jiménez, E., Patiño, S., Peñuela, M. C.,
Phillips, O. L., Stevenson, P., and Malhi, Y.: Regional and seasonal patterns of litterfall in tropical South America, Biogeosciences, 7, 43–55,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-43-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-43-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Morton, D. C., Jin, Y., Collatz, G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., Werf,
G. R. van der, DeFries, R. S., and Randerson, J. T.: Long-term trends and
interannual variability of forest, savanna and agricultural fires in South
America, Carbon Manag., 4, 617–638, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.61" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.61</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Cox, P., Pearson, D., Booth, B., Friedlingstein, P., Huntingford, C., Jones,
C., and Luke, C.: Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change
constrained by carbon dioxide variability, Nature, 494, 341–344, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Deeter, M. N., Martínez-Alonso, S., Edwards, D. P., Emmons, L. K.,
Gille, J. C., Worden, H. M., Sweeney, C., Pittman, J. V., Daube, B. C., and
Wofsy, S. C.: The MOPITT Version 6 product: algorithm enhancements and
validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3623–3632, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3623-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3623-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Desai, A. R.: Climatic and phenological controls on coherent regional interannual variability of carbon dioxide flux in a heterogeneous landscape, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 115, G00J02, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001423" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001423</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Detmers, R. G., Hasekamp, O., Aben, I., Houweling, S., Leeuwen, T. T. V.,
Butz, A., Landgraf, J., Köhler, P., Guanter, L., and
Poulter, B.: Anomalous carbon uptake in Australia as seen by GOSAT, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 42, 8177–8184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065161" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065161</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Dlugokencky, E.  and Tans, P.: Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide NOAA/GML; data available at <a href="https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 5 May 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Doughty, C. E., Metcalfe, D. B., Girardin, C. A. J., Amezquita,F. F.,
Durand, L., Huasco, W. H., Costa, M. C., Costa, A. C. L., Rocha, W., Meir,
P., Galbraith, D., and Malhi, Y.: Source and sink carbon dynamics and carbon
allocation in the Amazon basin, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 645–655, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Exbrayat, J.-F., Pitman, A. J., Zhang, Q., Abramowitz, G., and Wang, Y.-P.:
Examining soil carbon uncertainty in a global model: response of microbial
decomposition to temperature, moisture and nutrient limitation,
Biogeosciences, 10, 7095–7108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7095-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7095-2013</a>,
2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Exbrayat, J. F., Pitman, A. J., Abramowitz, G., and Wang, Y. P.: Sensitivity of
net ecosystem exchange and heterotrophic respiration to parameterization
uncertainty, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
1640–1651, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Exbrayat, J. F., Smallman, T. L., Bloom, A. A., Hutley, L. B., and Williams, M.:
Inverse determination of the influence of fire on vegetation carbon turnover
in the pantropics, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 1776–1789, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Falloon, P., Jones, C. D., Ades, M., and Paul, K.: Direct soil moisture
controls of future global soil carbon changes: An important source of
uncertainty, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003938" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003938</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Fang, Y., Michalak, A. M., Schwalm, C. R., Huntzinger, D. N., Berry, J. A.,
Ciais, P., Piao, S. L., Poulter, B., Fisher, J. B., Cook, R. B., Hayes, D.,
Huang, M. Y., Ito, A., Jain, A., Lei, H. M., Lu, C. Q., Mao, J. F., Parazoo,
N. C., Peng, S. S., Ricciuto, D. M., Shi, X. Y., Tao, B., Tian, H. Q., Wang,
W. L., Wei, Y. X., and Yang, J.: Global land carbon sink response to
temperature and precipitation varies with ENSO phase, Environ. Res.
Lett., 12, 064007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6e8e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6e8e</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, L., Palmer, P. I., Bösch, H., Parker, R. J., Webb,
A. J., Cor- reia, C. S. C., Deutscher, N. M., Domingues, L. G., Feist, D.
G., Gatti, L. V., Gloor, E., Hase, F., Kivi, R., Liu, Y., Miller, J. B.,
Morino, I., Sussmann, R., Strong, K., Uchino, O., Wang, J., and Zahn, A.:
Consistent regional fluxes of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> inferred from GOSAT
proxy XCH<sub>4</sub>&thinsp;:&thinsp;XCO<sub>2</sub> retrievals, 2010–2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
4781–4797, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4781-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4781-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Fox, A., Williams, M., Richardson, A. D., Cameron, D., Gove, J. H., Quaife,
T., Ricciuto, D., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Trudinger, C. M., and van
Wijk, M. T.: The reflex project: comparing different algorithms and
implementations for the inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model against
eddy covariance data, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1597–1615,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Frank, D., Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Thonicke, K., Frank, D., Mahecha, M.,
Smith, P., Van der Velde, M., Vicca, S., Babst, F., Beer, C., Buchmann, N.,
Canadell, J., Ciais, P., Cramer, W., Ibrom, A., Miglietta, F., Poulter, B.,
Rammig, A., Seneviratne, S., Walz, A., Wattenbach, M., Zavala, M., and
Zscheischler, J.: Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon
cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts, Glob. Change Biol.,
21, 7861–2880, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Frankenberg, C., Fisher, J. B., Worden, J., Badgley, G., Saatchi, S. S.,
Lee, J.-E., Toon, G. C., Butz, A., Jung, M.,Kuze, A., and Yokota, T.: New
global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: patterns of
plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L17706, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048738" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048738</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Friedlingstein, P., Meinshausen, M., Arora, V. K., Jones, C. D., Anav, A.,
Liddicoat, S. K., and Knutti, R.: Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections
due to carbon cycle feedbacks, J. Clim., 27, 511–526, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Friend, A. D., Lucht, W., Rademacher, T. T., Keribin, R., Betts, R., Cadule,
P., Ciais, P., Clark, D. B., Dankers, R., Fal- loon, P. D., Ito, A., Kahana,
R., Kleidon, A., Lomas, M. R., Nishina, K., Ostberg, S., Pavlick, R.,
Peylin, P., Schaphoff, S., Vuichard, N., Warszawski, L., Wiltshire, A., and
Woodward, F. I.: Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial
vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3280–3285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222477110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222477110</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Gatti, L. V., Gloor, M., Miller, J. B., Doughty, C. E., Malhi, Y.,
Domingues, L. G., Basso, L. S., Martinewski, A., Correia, C. S., C., Borges,
V. F., Freitas, S., Braz, R., Anderson, L. O., Rocha, H., Grace, J.,
Phillips, O. L., and Lloyd, J.: Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon
balance revealed by atmospheric measurements, Nature, 506, 76–80,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12957" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12957</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Giglio, L., Randerson, J. T., and van der Werf, G. R.: Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth- generation global fire emissions database (GFED4), J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 317–328, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20042</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Guenet, B., Camino-Serrano, M., Ciais, P., Tifafi, M., Maignan, F., Soong,
J. L., and Janssens, I. A.: Impact of priming on global soil carbon
stocks, Glob. Change Biol., 24, 1873–1883, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Haario, H., Saksman, E., and Tamminen, J.: An adaptive Metropolis algorithm,
Bernoulli, 7, 223–242, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Heald, C. L., Jacob, D. J., Jones, D., Palmer, P. I., Logan, J. A., Streets,
D. G., Sachse, G. W., Gille, J. C., Hoffman, R. N., and Nehrkorn, T.: Comparative
inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE-P) observations
to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxide, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 109, D23306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005185</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Hiederer, R. and Köchy, M.: Global soil organic carbon estimates and the harmonized world soil database, EUR 25225 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, 79 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.2788/13267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2788/13267</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Hiederer, R. and Kochy, M.:   Global Soil Organic Carbon Estimates and the Harmonized World Soil Database, EUR Scientific and Technical Research series – ISSN 1831-9424 (online), ISSN 1018-5593 (print), ISBN 978-92-79-23108-7, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2788/1326" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2788/1326</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Holling, C. S.: Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Ann. Rev.
Ecol. Syst., 4, 1–23, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Hopkins, F. M., Filley, T. R., Gleixner, G., Lange, M., Top, S. M., and
Trumbore, S. E.: Increased belowground carbon inputs and warming promote
loss of soil organic carbon through complementary microbial responses, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 76, 57–69, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Huntzinger, D. N., Schwalm, C., Michalak, A. M., Schaefer, K., King, A. W.,
Wei, Y., Jacobson, A., Liu, S., Cook, R. B., Post, W. M., Berthier, G.,
Hayes, D., Huang, M., Ito, A., Lei, H., Lu, C., Mao, J., Peng, C. H., Peng,
S., Poulter, B., Riccuito, D., Shi, X., Tian, H., Wang, W., Zeng, N., Zhao,
F., and Zhu, Q.: The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and
Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and
experimental design, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 2121–2133,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-2121-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-2121-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Huntzinger, D. N., Michalak, A. M., Schwalm, C., Ciais, P., King, A. W.,
Fang, Y., Schaefer, K., Wei, Y., Cook, R. B., Fisher, J. B., Hayes, D.,
Huang, M., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Lei, H., Lu, C., Maignan, F., Mao, J.,
Parazoo, N., Peng, S., Poulter, B., Ricciuto, D., Shi, X., Tian, H., Wang,
W., Zeng, N., and Zhao, F.: Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial
carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback
predictions, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 4765, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, Z., Worden, J. R., Worden, H., Deeter, M., Jones, D. B. A., Arellano, A. F., and Henze, D. K.: A 15-year record of CO emissions constrained by MOPITT CO observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4565–4583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4565-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4565-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Joiner, J., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, Y., Duveiller, G., Jung, M., Lyapustin, A.,
Wang, Y., and Tucker, C. J.: Estimation of terrestrial global gross primary
production (GPP) with satellite data-driven models and eddy covariance flux
data, Remote Sens., 10,  1346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091346</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Schwalm, C. R., Huntingford, C., Sitch, S.,
Ahlström, A., Arneth, A., Camps-Valls, G., Ciais, P., Friedlingstein,
P., Gans, F., Ichii, K., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Papale, D., Poulter, B.,
Raduly, B., Rödenbeck, C., Tramontana, G., Viovy, N., Wang, Y.-P.,
Weber, U., Zaehle, S., and Zeng, N.: Compensatory water effects link yearly
global land CO<sub>2</sub> sink changes to temperature, Nature, 541, 516–520,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, M.: FLUXCOM Global Land Energy Fluxes, <a href="https://doi.org/10.17871/FLUXCOM_EnergyFluxes_v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17871/FLUXCOM_EnergyFluxes_v1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, M.: FLUXCOM Global Land Carbon Fluxes, <a href="https://doi.org/10.17871/FLUXCOM_CarbonFluxes_v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17871/FLUXCOM_CarbonFluxes_v1</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, M., Koirala, S., Weber, U., Ichii, K., Gans, F., Camps-Valls, G.,
Papale, D., Schwalm, C., Tramontana, G., and Reichstein, M.: The FLUXCOM
ensemble of global land-atmosphere energy fluxes, Sci. data, 6,
1–14, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, M., Schwalm, C., Migliavacca, M., Walther, S., Camps-Valls, G.,
Koirala, S., Anthoni, P., Besnard, S., Bodesheim, P., Carvalhais, N.,
Chevallier, F., Gans, F., Goll, D. S., Haverd, V., Köhler, P., Ichii,
K., Jain, A. K., Liu, J., Lombardozzi, D., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nelson, J.
A., O'Sullivan, M., Pallandt, M., Papale, D., Peters, W., Pongratz, J.,
Rödenbeck, C., Sitch, S., Tramontana, G., Walker, A., Weber, U., and
Reichstein, M.: Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe:
synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach, Biogeosciences, 17,
1343–1365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Keenan, T. F., Carbone, M. S., Reichstein, M., and Richardson, A. D.: The
model–data fusion pitfall: assuming certainty in an uncertain world,
Oecologia, 167, 587–597, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Keenan, T. F., Davidson, E. A., Munger, J. W., and Richardson, A. D.: Rate
my data: quantifying the value of ecological data for the development of
models of the terrestrial carbon cycle, Ecol. Appl., 23, 273–286, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Kurc, S. A. and Small, E. E.: Soil moisture variations and ecosystem-scale
fluxes of water and carbon in semiarid grassland and shrubland, Water
Resour. Res., 43, W06416, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005011</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S. C.,
Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., Bonan, G. B., and
Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and functional and structural
advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sys., 3, M03001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000045</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quéré, C., Moriarty, R., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Sitch,
S., Korsbakken, J. I., Friedlingstein, P., Peters, G. P., Andres, R. J.,
Boden, T. A., Houghton, R. A., House, J. I., Keeling, R. F., Tans, P.,
Arneth, A., Bakker, D. C. E., Barbero, L., Bopp, L., Chang, J., Chevallier,
F., Chini, L. P., Ciais, P., Fader, M., Feely, R. A., Gkritzalis, T.,
Harris, I., Hauck, J., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Kitidis, V., Klein
Goldewijk, K., Koven, C., Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre,
N., Lenton, A., Lima, I. D., Metzl, N., Millero, F., Munro, D. R., Murata,
A., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S., Nojiri, Y., O'Brien, K., Olsen, A.,
Ono, T., Pérez, F. F., Pfeil, B., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Rehder, G.,
Rödenbeck, C., Saito, S., Schuster, U., Schwinger, J., Séférian,
R., Steinhoff, T., Stocker, B. D., Sutton, A. J., Takahashi, T., Tilbrook,
B., van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van der Werf, G. R., van Heuven, S.,
Vandemark, D., Viovy, N., Wiltshire, A., Zaehle, S., and Zeng, N.: Global
Carbon Budget 2015, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 7, 349–396,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, S. L., Brando, P. M., Phillips, O. L., van der Heijden, G. M. F., and
Nepstad, D.: The 2010 Amazon drought, Science, 6017, 554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200807" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200807</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A Simple
hydrologically Based Model of Land Surface Water and Energy Fluxes for GSMs,
J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14415–14428, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Bowman, K. W., Lee, M., Henze, D. K., Bousserez, N., Brix, H.,
Collatz, G. J., Menemenlis, D., Ott, L., Pawson, S., Jones, D., and Nassar,
R.: Carbon monitoring system flux estimation and attribution: impact of
ACOS-GOSAT XCO<sub>2</sub> sampling on the inference of terrestrial biospheric sources
and sinks, Tellus B, 66, 22486, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22486</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Bowman, K. W., Schimel, D. S., Parazoo, N. C., Jiang, Z., Lee, M., Bloom, A. A., Wunch, D., Frankenberg, C., Sun, Y., O'Dell, C. W., Gurney, K. R., Menemenlis, D., Gierach, M., Crisp, D., and Eldering, A.:  Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Niño, Science, 358, eaam5690, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5690" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5690</a>,  2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Bowman, K., Parazoo, N. C., Bloom, A. A., Wunch, D., Jiang, Z.,
Gurney, K. R., and Schimel, D.: Detecting drought impact on terrestrial
biosphere carbon fluxes over contiguous US with satellite observations,
Environ. Res. Lett., 13,  095003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad5e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad5e</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Longo, M., Knox, R. G., Medvigy, D. M., Levine, N. M., Dietze, M. C., Kim,
Y., Swann, A. L. S., Zhang, K., Rollinson, C. R., Bras, R. L., Wofsy, S. C.,
and Moorcroft, P. R.: The biophysics, ecology, and biogeochemistry of
functionally diverse, vertically and horizontally heterogeneous ecosystems:
the Ecosystem Demography model, version 2.2 – Part 1: Model description,
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4309–4346,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4309-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4309-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Lovenduski, N. S. and Bonan, G. B.: Reducing uncertainty in projections of
terrestrial carbon uptake, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 044020, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa66b8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa66b8</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Luo, Y.: Terrestrial carbon cycle feedback to climate warming, Annu. Rev.
Ecol. Evol. S., 38, 683–712,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Luo, Y. and Weng, E.: Dynamic disequilibrium of the terrestrial carbon cycle
under global change, Trends   Ecol.  Evol., 26, 96–104, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Luo, Y., Keenan, T. F., and Smith, M.: Predictability of the terrestrial
carbon cycle, Glob. Change Biol., 21, 1737–1751, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
MacBean, N., Peylin, P., Chevallier, F., Scholze, M., and Schuermann, G.:
Consistent assimilation of multiple data streams in a carbon cycle data
assimilation system, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3569–3588, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
MacBean, N., Maignan, F., Bacour, C., Lewis, P., Peylin, P., Guanter, L.,
Köhler, P., Gómez-Dans, J., and Disney, M.: Strong constraint on
modelled global carbon uptake using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence
data, Sci. Rep., 8, 1973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20024-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20024-w</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Magney, T. S., Frankenberg, C., Fisher, J. B., Sun, Y., North, G. B., Davis,
T. S., Kornfeld, A., and Siebke, K.: Connecting active to passive fluorescence
with photosynthesis: A method for evaluating remote sensing measurements of
Chl fluorescence, New Phytol., 215, 1594–1608, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Matteucci, M., Gruening, C., Ballarin, I. G., Seufert, G., and Cescatti, A.:
Components, drivers and temporal dynamics of ecosystem respiration in a
Mediterranean pine forest, Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 224–235, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Moyano, F. E., Manzoni, S., and Chenu, C.: Responses of soil heterotrophic
respiration to moisture availability: An exploration of processes and
models, Soil Biol. Biochem., 59,  72–85, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Improvements to a MODIS global
terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm, Remote Sens. Environ.,
115, 1781–1800, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Mystakidis, S., Davin, E. L., Gruber, N., and Seneviratne, S. I.:
Constraining future terrestrial carbon cycle projections using
observation-based water and carbon flux estimates, Glob. Change Biol.,
22, 2198–2215, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, S., Pan, N., Tian, H., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Shi, H., Arora, V. K., Haverd, V., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi, D., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Ottlé, C., Poulter, B., Zaehle, S., and Running, S. W.: Evaluation of global terrestrial evapotranspiration using state-of-the-art approaches in remote sensing, machine learning and land surface modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1485–1509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Parazoo, N. C., Bowman, K., Fisher, J. B., Frankenberg, C., Jones, D. B.,
Cescatti, A., Pérez-Priego, Ó., Wohlfahrt, G., and Montagnani, L.:
Terrestrial gross primary production inferred from satellite fluorescence
and vegetation models, Glob.Change Biol., 20, 3103–3121, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Pellegrini, A. F., Ahlström, A., Hobbie, S. E., Reich, P. B., Nieradzik,
L. P., Staver, A. C., Scharenbroch, B. C., Jumpponen, A., Anderegg, W. R.,
Randerson, J. T., and Jackson, R. B.: Fire frequency drives decadal changes in
soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity, Nature, 553, 194–198, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Piao, S., Wang, X., Wang, K., Li, X., Bastos, A., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P.,
Friedlingstein, P., and Sitch, S.: 2019. Interannual variations of
terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 300–318,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14884" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14884</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Poulter, B., Frank, D., Ciais, P., Myneni, R. B., Andela, N., Bi, J.,
Broquet, G., Canadell, J. G., Chevallier, F., Liu, Y. Y., Running, S. W.,
Sitch, S., and van der Werf, G. R.: Contribution of semiarid ecosystems to
interannual variability of the global carbon cycle, Nature, 509, 600–603,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Powell, T. L., Galbraith, D. R., Christoffersen, B. O., Harper, A.,
Imbuzeiro, H. M., Rowland, L., Almeida, S., Brando, P. M., da Costa, A. C.,
Costa, M. H., Levine, N. M., Malhi, Y., Saleska, S. R., Sotta, E., Williams,
M., Meir, P., and Moorcroft, P. R.: Confronting model predictions of carbon
fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental
drought, New Phytol., 200, 350–365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12390" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12390</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Quetin, G. R., Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., and Konings, A. G.: Carbon flux
variability from a relatively simple ecosystem model with assimilated data
is consistent with terrestrial biosphere model estimates, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sys., 12, e2019MS001889, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001889" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001889</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Randerson, J., van der Werf, G. R., Collatz, G. J., Giglio, L., Still, C.
J., Kasibhatla, P., Miller, J. B., White, J. W. C., DeFries, R. S., and
Kasischke, E. S.: Fire emissions from C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> vegetation and their
influence on interannual variability of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup> CO<sub>2</sub>,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB2019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002366" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002366</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Myneni, R., Yuri, K., and Park, T.: Boston University and MODAPS SIPS – NASA,  MOD15A2 MODIS/Terra Leaf Area Index/FPAR 8-Day L4 Global 1&thinsp;km SIN Grid. NASA LP DAAC, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD15A2.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD15A2.006</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Ciais, P., Frank, D., Mahecha, M. D.,Seneviratne,
S. I., Zscheischler, J., Beer, C., Buchmann, N.,Frank, D. C., Papale, D.,
Rammig, A., Smith, P., Thonicke, K., van der Velde, M., Vicca, S., Walz, A.,
and Wattenbach, M.: Climate extremes and the carbon cycle, Nature, 500,
287–295, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature12350" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature12350</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, A. D., Hollinger, D. Y., Aber, J. D., Ollinger, S. V., and Braswell,
B. H.: Environmental variation is directly responsible for short-but not
long-term variation in forest-atmosphere carbon exchange, Glob. Change
Biol., 13,  788–803, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, A. D., Williams, M., Hollinger, D. Y., Moore, D. J., Dail, D.
B., Davidson, E. A., Scott, N. A., Evans, R. S., Hughes, H., Lee, J. T.,
Rodrigues, C., and Savage, K.: Estimating parameters of a forest ecosystem C
model with measurements of stocks and fluxes as joint constraints,
Oecologia, 164, 25–40, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Running, S. W.: MOD16A_MONTHLY.MERRA_GMAO_1kmALB, available at: <a href="https://files.ntsg.umt.edu/data/NTSG_Products/ MOD16/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 27 March 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Rowland, L., Hill, T.C., Stahl, C., Siebicke, L., Burban, B.,
Zaragoza-Castells, J., Ponton, S., Bonal, D., Meir, P., and Williams, M.:
Evidence for strong seasonality in the carbon storage and carbon use
efficiency of an Amazonian forest, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 979–991, 2014
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Rowland, L., da Costa, A. C. L., Galbraith, D. R., Oliveira, R. S., Binks, O. J.,
Oliveira, A. A. R., Pullen, A. M., Doughty, C. E., Metcalfe, D. B., Vasconcelos,
S. S., Ferreira, L. V., Malhi, Y., Grace, J., Mencuccini, M., and Meir, P.:
Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon
starvation, Nature, 528, 119–122, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Saatchi, S. S., Harris, N. L., Brown, S., Lefsky, M., Mitchard, E. T.,
Salas, W., Zutta, B. R., Buermann, W., Lewis, S. L., Hagen, S., Petrova, S.,
White, L., Silman, M., and Morel, A.: Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks
in tropical regions across three continents, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108,
9899–9904, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Saatchi, S., Asefi-Najafabady, S., Malhi, Y., Aragao, L. E. O. C., Anderson,
L. O., Myneni, R. B., and Nemani, R.: Persistent effects of a severe drought
on Amazonian forest canopy, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 565–570, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B., Holland, E. A., McKeown, R., Ojima, D.,
Painter, T. H., Parton, W. J., and Townsend, A. R.: Climatic, edaphic, and
biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 8, 279–293, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B. H., McKeown, R., Ojima, D. S., Parton, W. J., and
Pulliam, W.: Climate and nitrogen controls on the geography and timescales
of terrestrial biogeochemical cycling, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10,
677–692, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B. H., and Parton W. J.: Equilibration of the
terrestrial water, nitrogen, and carbon cycles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
94, 8280–8283, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Schimel, D., Churkina, G., and Braswell, B.: Remembrance of weather past:
ecosystem response to climate variability, in: A history of atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub> and its effects on plants, animals, and ecosystems, edited by:
Ehleringer, J. R., Cerling, T. E., and Dearing, M. D.,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 350–368, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Schoups, G. and Vrugt, J. A.: A formal likelihood function for parameter and
predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic,
and non-Gaussian errors, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5747</a>,  2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Schwalm, C. R., Anderegg, W. R., Michalak, A. M., Fisher, J. B., Biondi, F.,
Koch, G., Litvak, M., Ogle, K., Shaw, J. D.,
Wolf, A., Huntzinger, D. N., Schaefer, K., Cook, R., Wei, Y., Fang, Y.,
Hayes, D., Huang, M., Jain, A., and Tian, H.:
Global patterns of drought recovery, Nature, 548, 202–205, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Sellers, P. J., Schimel, D. S., Moore, B., Liu, J., and Eldering, A.: Observing
carbon cycle–climate feedbacks from space, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 7860–7868, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Shea, R. W., Shea, B. W., Kauffman, J. B., Ward, D. E., Haskins, C. I., and
Scholes, M. C.: Fuel biomass and combustion factors associated with fires in
savanna ecosystems of South Africa and Zambia, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 101, 23551–23568, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Sherry, R. A., Weng, E., Arnone III, J. A., Johnson, D. W., Schimel, D. S.,
Verburg, P. S., Wallace, L. L., and Luo, Y.: Lagged effects of experimental
warming and doubled precipitation on annual and seasonal aboveground biomass
production in a tallgrass prairie, Glob. Change Biol., 14, 2923–2936, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, M., Liu, J., Zhao, M., Yu, Y., and Saatchi, S.: Mechanistic Processes
Controlling Persistent Changes of Forest Canopy Structure After 2005 Amazon
Drought, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 3378–3390,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Sierra, C. A., Trumbore, S. E., Davidson, E. A., Vicca, S., and Janssens,
I.: Sensitivity of decomposition rates of soil organic matter with respect
to simultaneous changes in temperature and moisture, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Syst., 7, 335–356, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Smallman, T. L., Exbrayat, J.-F., Mencuccini, M., Bloom, A. A., and
Williams, M.: Assimilation of repeated woody biomass observations constrains
decadal ecosystem carbon cycle uncertainty in aggrading forests, J. Geophys.
Res.-Biogeo., 122, 528–545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003520" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003520</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, M. D., Knapp, A. K., and Collins, S. L.: A framework for assessing
ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by
global change, Ecology, 90, 3279–3289, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Spadavecchia, L., Williams, M., and Law, B. E.: Uncertainty in predictions of
forest carbon dynamics: separating driver error from model error, Ecol.
Appl., 21, 1506–1522, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Frankenberg, C., Wood, J. D., Schimel, D. S., Jung, M., Guanter, L.,
Drewry, D. T., Verma, M., Porcar-Castell, A., Griffis, T. J., and Gu, L.: OCO-2
advances photosynthesis observation from space via solar-induced chlorophyll
fluorescence, Science, 358, p.eaam5747, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5747</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Takagi, H., Houweling, S., Andres, R. J., Belikov, D., Bril, A., Boesch, H.,
Butz, A., Guerlet, S., Hasekamp, O., Maksyutov, S., Morino, I., Oda, T.,
O'Dell, C. W., Oshchepkov, S., Parker, R., Saito, M., Uchino, O., Yokota,
T., Yoshida, Y., and Valsala, V.: Influence of differences in current GOSAT
XCO<sub>2</sub> retrievals on surface flux estimation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 2598–2605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059174</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, M. V., Randerson, J. T., Malmström, C. M., and Field, C. B.: Change
in net primary production and heterotrophic respiration: How much is
necessary to sustain the terrestrial carbon sink?, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 10, 711–726, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Trumbore, S.: Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems–recent progress and
challenges, Glob. Change Biol., 12, 141–153, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Mu, M.,
Kasibhatla, P. S., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Jin, Y., and van Leeuwen,
T. T.: Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna,
forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
11707–11735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
van Leeuwen, T. T., van der Werf, G. R., Hoffmann, A. A., Detmers, R. G.,
Rücker, G., French, N. H. F., Archibald, S., Carvalho Jr., J. A., Cook,
G. D., de Groot, W. J., Hély, C., Kasischke, E. S., Kloster, S.,
McCarty, J. L., Pettinari, M. L., Savadogo, P., Alvarado, E. C., Boschetti,
L., Manuri, S., Meyer, C. P., Siegert, F., Trollope, L. A., and Trollope, W.
S. W.: Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database,
Biogeosciences, 11, 7305–7329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7305-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7305-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Verma, M., Schimel, D., Evans, B., Frankenberg, C., Beringer, J., Drewry,
D.T., Magney, T., Marang, I., Hutley, L., Moore, C. and Eldering, A. Effect
of environmental conditions on the relationship between solar-induced
fluorescence and gross primary productivity at an OzFlux grassland site,
J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 716–733, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, D. E., Hao, W. M., Susott, R. A., Babbitt, R. E., Shea, R. W.,
Kauffman, J. B., and Justice, C. O.: Effect of fuel composition on
combustion efficiency and emission factors for African savanna ecosystems,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 23569–23576, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K., and Todd- Brown, K. E. O.:
Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient
availability, Nat. Geosci., 8, 441–444, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2413" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2413</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, C. A. and Albertson, J. D: Soil moisture controls on canopy-scale
water and carbon fluxes in an African savanna, Water Resour. Res., 40, W09302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003208</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, M., Schwarz, P. A., Law, B. E., Irvine, J., and Kurpius, M. R.: An
improved analysis of forest carbon dynamics using data assimilation, Glob.
Change Biol., 11, 89–105, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Wolf, S., Keenan, T. F., Fisher, J. B., Baldocchi, D. D., Desai, A. R.,
Richardson, A. D., Scott, R. L., Law, B. E., Litvak, M. E., Brunsell, N. A.,
Peters, W., and van der Laan-Luijk, I. T.: Warm spring reduced carbon cycle
impact of the 2012 US summer drought, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci., 113, 5880–5885, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Worden, J. R., Bloom, A. A., Pandey, S., Jiang, Z., Worden, H. M., Walker,
T. W., Houweling, S., and Röckmann, T.: Reduced biomass burning emissions
reconcile conflicting estimates of the post-2006 atmospheric methane budget,
Nat. Commun., 8, 2227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, X., Medvigy, D., Powers, J. S., Becknell, J. M., and Guan, K.: Diversity in
plant hydraulic traits explains seasonal and inter-annual variations of
vegetation dynamics in seasonally dry tropical forests, New Phytol.,
212, 80–95, 2016
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, T., Valocchi, A. J., Ye, M., and Liang, F.: Quantifying model structural
error: Efficient Bayesian calibration of a regional groundwater flow model
using surrogates and a data-driven error model, Water Resour. Res., 53, 4084–4105, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y., Saatchi, S. S., Xu, L., Yu, Y., Choi, S., Phillips, N., Kennedy,
R., Keller, M., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B.: Post-drought decline of the
Amazon carbon sink, Nat. Commun., 9, 3172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05668-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05668-6</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, Y., Bloom, A. A., Worden, J., Saatchi, S., Yang, Y., Williams, M., Liu,
J., Jiang, Z., Worden, H., Bowman, K., and Frankenberg, C.: Fire decline in
dry tropical ecosystems enhances decadal land carbon sink, Nat.
Commun., 11, 1–7, 2020.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Joiner, J., Alemohammad, S. H., Zhou, S., and Gentine, P.: A global spatially contiguous solar-induced fluorescence (CSIF) dataset using neural networks, Biogeosciences, 15, 5779–5800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5779-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5779-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Yu, B., Huang, Y., and Wang, G.: Daily underlying water use
efficiency for AmeriFlux sites, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 120, 887–902, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
