<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-18-2107-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Eukaryotic
community composition in the sea surface microlayer across an east–west
transect in the Mediterranean Sea</article-title><alt-title>Eukaryotic
community composition in the sea surface microlayer</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Eukaryotic
community composition in the sea surface microlayer}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B.~Z\"{a}ncker et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zäncker</surname><given-names>Birthe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Cunliffe</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Engel</surname><given-names>Anja</given-names></name>
          <email>aengel@geomar.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-1955</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Marine Biological Association of the UK, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4
8AA, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Anja Engel (aengel@geomar.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>2107</fpage><lpage>2118</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Birthe Zäncker et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2107/2021/bg-18-2107-2021.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2107/2021/bg-18-2107-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2107/2021/bg-18-2107-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2107/2021/bg-18-2107-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e112">The  sea surface microlayer (SML) represents the boundary layer at the air–sea
interface. Microbial eukaryotes in the SML potentially influence air–sea gas
exchange directly by taking up and producing gases and indirectly by
excreting and degrading organic matter, which may modify the viscoelastic
properties of the SML. However, little is known about the distribution of
microbial eukaryotes in the SML. We studied the composition of the microbial
community, transparent exopolymer particles and polysaccharides in the SML
during the PEACETIME cruise along a west–east transect in the Mediterranean
Sea, covering the western basin, Tyrrhenian Sea and Ionian Sea. At the
stations located in the Ionian Sea, fungi – likely of continental origin and
delivered by atmospheric deposition – were found in high relative abundances,
making up a significant proportion of the sequences recovered. Concomitantly,
bacterial and picophytoplankton counts decreased from west to east, while
transparent exopolymer particle (TEP) abundance and total carbohydrate (TCHO)
concentrations remained constant in all basins. Our results suggest that the
presence of substrates for fungi, such as <italic>Cladosporium</italic>, known to take up phytoplankton-derived polysaccharides, in combination with decreased
substrate competition by bacteria, might favor fungal dominance in the neuston
of the Ionian Sea and other low-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (LNLC) regions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e129">The sea surface microlayer (SML) constitutes a 1 to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick
boundary layer between the ocean and the atmosphere (Cunliffe and Murrell,
2010; Liss and Duce, 2005; Zhang et al., 2003) with distinct physical and
chemical properties compared to the underlying water (Cunliffe et al., 2013;
Zhang et al., 2003). The SML potentially has a substantial influence on
air–sea exchange processes, such as gas transfer and sea spray aerosol
formation (Cunliffe et al., 2013; Engel et al., 2017; Freney et al., 2020;
Sellegri et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e142">The microbial food web plays a crucial role in ocean biogeochemistry and has
been vastly studied. Despite the fact that microbes in the SML can directly
and indirectly influence air–sea gas exchange, few studies have looked at the
microbial community composition in the SML and have mainly focused on
bacteria (Agogué et al., 2005; Joux et al., 2006; Obernosterer et al.,
2008) with little attention to microbial eukaryotes (Taylor and Cunliffe,
2014). While phytoplankton throughout the water column play an important role
in the ocean as primary producers, phytoneuston in the SML (Apts, 1989; Hardy
and Apts, 1984; Naumann, 1917) might have an additional crucial role by
impacting air–sea gas exchange (Ploug, 2008; Upstill-Goddard et al.,
2003). Early microscopic observations of the SML reported mostly diatoms,
dinoflagellates and cyanobacteria (Hardy et al., 1988). More recent studies
using 18S rRNA gene sequencing found a decreased protist diversity in the SML
compared to underlying water with chrysophytes and diatoms enriched in the SML
(Cunliffe and Murrell, 2010; Taylor and Cunliffe, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e145">Not only phytoneuston, but also zooneuston, bacterioneuston and myconeuston
might influence air–sea gas<?pagebreak page2108?> exchange processes by either parasitizing
phytoneuston and thus impacting the primary productivity or by degrading
organic matter available in the SML and releasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While some
studies have explored bacterioneuston diversity in the Mediterranean Sea
(Agogué et al., 2005; Joux et al., 2006), fungi have not yet been
characterized in the SML in this region. Fungi are however abundant in marine
environments (Gladfelter et al., 2019; Grossart et al., 2019; Hassett et al.,
2019), living a saprotrophic or parasitic lifestyle, and have been found in the
Mediterranean Sea before (Garzoli et al., 2015; Gnavi et al., 2017) and in the
myconeuston studied at other locations (Taylor and Cunliffe, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e159">Phytoplankton and phytoneuston can release precursors such as carbohydrates
which can aggregate and form gelatinous particles such as transparent
exopolymer particles (TEPs) (Chin et al., 1998; Engel et al., 2004; Verdugo
et al., 2004). TEPs contain mainly polysaccharides (Mopper et al., 1995;
Passow, 2002), occur ubiquitously in the ocean (Alldredge et al., 1993;
Passow, 2002) and are an important structural component of the SML (Wurl and
Holmes, 2008; Cunliffe and Murrell, 2009). Due to their stickiness TEPs can aggregate with other denser
particles (Azetsu-Scott and Passow, 2004; Engel, 2000; Passow and Alldredge,
1995) and eventually sink out of the euphotic layer into the deep ocean, leading to carbon export (Engel et al., 2004). However, the rate of TEP-related carbon
export does not only depend on TEP production by phytoplankton, but also on
their microbial degradation.</p>
      <p id="d1e163">Few studies have looked at the spatial distribution of the microbial eukaryote
communities in the SML and possible environmental drivers of community
composition in the open Mediterranean Sea, a characteristic low-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (LNLC) region (Durrieu de Madron et al., 2011). The anti-estuarine
circulations at the Strait of Gibraltar and the Strait of Sicily transport low-nutrient surface waters into the basins and deeper waters out of the
basins, resulting in oligotrophic conditions and ultra-oligotrophic conditions
in the western and eastern Mediterranean basin, respectively (Krom et al.,
2004; Mermex Group et al., 2011; Pujo-Pay et al., 2011; Tanhua et al.,
2013). The present study focuses on TEPs as important structural components of
the SML and their precursors, carbohydrates, and microbial eukaryotes
distribution, focusing on the myconeuston community composition in the SML
using samples collected during the PEACETIME cruise in the Mediterranean Sea
during May and June 2017.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e181">Samples were collected on board the RV <italic>Pourquoi pas?</italic> from 10 May to 11 June 2017. Water from the SML and the underlying water (ULW;
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the SML) was collected at 12 stations from 2.9 to
19.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 35.5 to 42.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 1). SML samples were collected from a zodiac using a glass plate
sampler (Cunliffe and Wurl, 2014; Harvey, 1966). The dimensions of the
silicate glass plate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) resulted in an effective
sampling surface area of 2600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> considering both sides. To avoid
contamination during sampling, the zodiac was positioned upwind and in front
of the research vessel. The glass plate was immersed and withdrawn
perpendicular to the sea surface. With a Teflon wiper, SML samples were
collected in acid-cleaned and rinsed bottles (Cunliffe and Wurl,
2014). Approximately 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SML sample was collected in the course
of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sampling times are listed in Table 1. All sampling equipment
was acid-cleaned (10 % HCl), rinsed with Milli-Q and copiously rinsed with
seawater from the respective depth once the sampling site was reached.  The
ULW samples were collected simultaneously with two acid-cleaned and Milli-Q-rinsed glass bottles by immersing the closed bottles and opening them at approximately 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e279">Map of the stations sampled during the PEACETIME cruise in the
Mediterranean Sea in May/June 2017. Stations FAST and TYRR were sampled
twice. Colors represent sampled basins (blue: western basin, green:
Tyrrhenian Sea, red: Ionian Sea).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2107/2021/bg-18-2107-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e291">Name, position and environmental conditions at the stations sampled
throughout the cruise. Temperature and salinity were collected at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water
depth.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Latitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Local time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Wind speed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Water temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Salinity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Irradiation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[PSU]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41.8918</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.3333</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">38.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1297.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.1333</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.6835</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2343.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37.9832</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.9768</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2270.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TYRR_1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.5928</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2253.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TYRR_2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.3398</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.5928</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2311.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">38.8077</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.4997</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">09:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2215.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SAV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37.8401</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.1658</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">38.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36.6035</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.1658</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">07:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">38.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ION_2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35.4892</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.7765</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">09:45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">38.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1235.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36.2103</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.631</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">07:45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2144.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FAST_2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37.946</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.9102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">08:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">36.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">627.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FAST_6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37.0466</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.9168</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">08:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">36.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1787.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Gel particle determination</title>
      <p id="d1e773">The abundance and area of TEP was measured microscopically (Engel, 2009). The
sample volume (10–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was chosen according to the prevailing TEP
concentrations. Samples were filtered onto 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Nuclepore
membranes (Whatman) and stained with 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Alcian Blue solution
(0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Filters were mounted on
Cytoclear<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>®</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> slides and stored at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until analysis. Two filters per sample with 30 images
each were analyzed using a Zeiss Axio Scope.A1 (Zeiss) equipped with a Zeiss
AxioCam MRc. The pictures with a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1388</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1040</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixels were
saved using AxioVision LE64 Rel. 4.8 (Zeiss). All particles larger than
0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were analyzed. ImageJ was subsequently used for image
analysis (Schneider et al., 2012). A filter prepared with 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Milli-Q
water served as a blank.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2109?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Bacterioplankton and bacterioneuston abundance</title>
      <p id="d1e912">Bacterial cell numbers were determined from 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples fixed with
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> glutaraldehyde (GDA, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> final
concentration). Samples were stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and stained
with SYBR Green I (Molecular Probes) to determine abundance using a Becton
and Dickinson (BD Biosciences) FACSCalibur flow cytometer equipped with a 488 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
laser. Bacterial cells were detected by the unique signature in a plot of side
scatter (SSC) vs. green fluorescence (FL1). Yellow-green latex beads
(Polysciences, 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were used as internal standards.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Picophytoplankton and picophytoneuston abundance</title>
      <p id="d1e987">Picophytoplankton and picophytoneuston cell numbers were determined from
2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples fixed and stored as for bacterial abundances. Samples
were filtered through a 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> filter and analyzed with a flow
cytometer (similar to Sect. 2.3). Enumeration of cells was conducted using
a high flow rate (approximately 39–41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The forward- or
right-angle light scatter (FALS or RALS) as well as the phycoerythrin- and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-related fluorescent signal was used to distinguish the cells. Cell
counts were analyzed using the CellQuest Pro software (BD Biosciences). The
method used here (fixative addition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> slow freezing) follows recommendations
by Lepesteur et al. (1993).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Total combined carbohydrates</title>
      <p id="d1e1050">Samples (20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for total hydrolyzable carbohydrates (TCHOs) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kDa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were filled into precombusted glass vials (8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the home
lab, TCHO analysis was carried out using high-performance anion exchange
chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) on a Dionex ICS
3000 ion chromatography system (Engel and Händel, 2011). Prior
to analysis, samples were desalinated by membrane dialysis (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kDa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
MWCO, Spectra/Por) at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hydrolyzed for
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in HCl (0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> final
concentration) with subsequent neutralization using acid evaporation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Two replicates were
analyzed for each sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>DNA extraction and eukaryote 18S rRNA gene sequencing</title>
      <p id="d1e1215">Water samples for sequencing (400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> each) were passed through a
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pore size mesh in order to remove meta-zooplankton that
could dominate the 18S sequences and were subsequently filtered onto a Durapore
membrane (Millipore, 47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and immediately stored
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In order to improve cell accessibility for the
DNA extraction, filters in cryogenic tubes were immersed in liquid nitrogen, and the filter was crushed with a pestle. DNA was extracted according to a
modified protocol from Zhou et al. (1996) by Wietz et al. (2015). The protocol included bead-beating, phenol–chloroform–isoamyl alcohol purification,
isopropanol precipitation and ethanol washing. An additional protein-removal step by salting was used to avoid protein contamination.</p>
      <p id="d1e1274">Library preparation and sequencing was conducted at the Integrated Microbiome
Resource at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, and is described in detail
elsewhere (Comeau et al., 2017). Samples were PCR-amplified in two dilutions
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using the 18S rRNA gene primers E572F and E1009R (Comeau
et al., 2011). Prior to pooling, samples were cleaned up and normalized using
the Invitrogen SequalPrep 96-well plate kit (Thermo Fisher
Scientific). Sequencing was conducted according to Comeau et al. (2017) on an
Illumina MiSeq using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> paired-end V3 chemistry.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2110?><p id="d1e1321"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Sequences were processed using the DADA2 pipeline (Callahan et al., 2016), and sequences shorter than 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, longer than 444 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with more
than eight homopolymers or any ambiguous bases were discarded. Sequences were
aligned with the 18S rRNA gene sequences of the SILVA 132 alignment database
(Quast et al., 2013). Subsequently, sequences that aligned outside of most of
the dataset and chimeras were removed. Sequences were classified using the
SILVA 132 database (Quast et al., 2013) and deposited at the European
Nucleotide Archive (ENA accession number PRJEB23731). Sequences were not subsampled, and sequence numbers per sample ranged from 1063 (S8 SML) to
43 027 (S5 SML). However, for principal component analysis (PCA), all samples
were subsampled down to 1063 sequences.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Statistical analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e1349">Statistical analyses and maps were produced using R (R Core Team, 2014) and
bathymetry from NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). The
enrichment factor (EF) was used to compare the concentration of parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the SML ([<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>SML</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the concentration in the ULW
([<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ULW</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and was calculated as follows (Eq. 1; World Health
Organization, 1995):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M73" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SML</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ULW</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          An EF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 indicates enrichment, EF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 indicates depletion and
EF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 indicates no difference between the SML and the ULW.  The
significance of differences between the SML and ULW and between the basins of
eukaryote sequences and biogeochemical parameters were tested using the
Kruskal–Wallis test and PERMANOVA. Correlations were calculated using
Spearman's rank correlation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS8">
  <label>2.8</label><title>Data obtained from the ship</title>
      <p id="d1e1457">Wind speed, surface water salinity and temperature were obtained at
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth from the RV <italic>Pourquoi pas?</italic> system. Radiation
measurements were obtained with a LI-COR radiation sensor (Li-200SZ) at
wavelengths of 400 to 1100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All parameters were measured every
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during sampling on the zodiac and averaged over the sampling
period for statistical analyses (Table 1).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Microbial eukaryote community composition in the SML and ULW</title>
      <p id="d1e1503">The eukaryotic communities in the SML and the ULW were similar (ANOSIM,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.039</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, differences were detected in the eukaryotic
community composition (Fig. 2) of the basins sampled (western Mediterranean,
Tyrrhenian Sea and Ionian Sea). ANOSIM showed that the differences in the
eukaryotic community composition were slightly larger across basins than
between SML and ULW (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0025</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2263</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, the overall diversity
and evenness (based on Shannon and Pielou indices) were not significantly
different between basins (Fig. S1 in the Supplement).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1556">Principal component analysis (PCA) using the eukaryotic community
composition at the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) level (see text for a detailed description) with
environmental factors plotted. Colors distinguish the three different
basins sampled (blue: western basin, green: Tyrrhenian Sea, red: Ionian
Sea).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2107/2021/bg-18-2107-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1567">Eukaryotic community composition at the order level (taxa over 5 % in at least one of the samples are displayed). Stations ordered from
west to east with brackets indicating the western Mediterranean (blue), the
Tyrrhenian Sea (green) and the Ionian Sea (red).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2107/2021/bg-18-2107-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1577">A total of 16 orders were found in relative abundances over 5 % of the total
eukaryotic community in one or more of all 12 stations (Fig. 3). The
communities in the SML and ULW at most stations were similar, with Dinophyceae
and Syndiniales (Dinoflagellata) and an unidentified Eukaryote class
dominating the eukaryotic community. Zooneuston were found in most of the SML samples but rarely (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the ULW samples. Zooneuston were comprised of
Ploimida (Rotifera), Maxillopoda (Cyclopoida and Calanoida) and Scyphozoa
(Semaeostomeae).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1594">Heat map of fungal relative ASV abundances in all sequences
samples. Color brackets indicate the different basins as in Figs. 3 and
2. Grey corresponds to the absence of the ASV in the respective sample.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2107/2021/bg-18-2107-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1603">Myconeuston and mycoplankton were found in high relative abundances in three
ULW samples and in the corresponding SML samples (stations 7, 8 and ION_2) in
the Ionian Sea. In the ULW of station 7, fungi made up more than half
(54 %) of the total number of retrieved sequences. The vast majority of
fungal amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) (64 out of 69) belonged to Ascomycota
and Mucoromycota, with the remaining five belonging to the Chytridiomycota
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Basidiomycota and Neocallimastigomycota. All fungal ASVs that were
recovered throughout the cruise and their relative abundance are shown in
Fig. 4. While fungal ASVs made up a significant amount of sequences in the
Ionian Sea (stations to the right of Fig. 4), they were barely detectable at
the other stations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.014</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for differences in fungal ASVs between basins
tested with PERMANOVA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Concentrations and SML enrichments of microorganisms and organic matter</title>
      <p id="d1e1638">Bacterial numbers did not show any significant differences between layers
(Fig. 5a). In the SML, bacterial abundances ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the ULW, bacterial numbers
were on average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1824">Box plots of bacteria <bold>(a)</bold> and phytoplankton <bold>(b)</bold> abundance as well
as area <bold>(c)</bold> and concentrations <bold>(d)</bold> of transparent exopolymer particles (TEPs)
and total carbohydrates (TCHO) <bold>(e)</bold> for each basin in the Mediterranean Sea:
western basin (west), Tyrrhenian Sea (tyr) and Ionian Sea (ion). Blue stars
mark significant SML enrichment/depletion; green stars mark significant
differences between the three basins (Kruskal–Wallis tests used for
significance levels). Significance levels: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Black dots correspond
to outliers and grey dots to the measured values and concentrations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2107/2021/bg-18-2107-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1949">Picophytoneuston (0.2–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> size range) abundance was on average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SML, and picophytoplankton abundance was on average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ULW (range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SML and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cells</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ULW). Overall, cell counts
determined by flow cytometry were significantly higher in the SML than in the
ULW (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 5b).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2111?><p id="d1e2169">TEP concentration averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">particles</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ranging between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the SML. In the ULW, the average
TEP concentration was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">particles</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ranging between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the ULW. TEP area in the SML was on
average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). TEP area was lower in the ULW, with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Both TEP abundance and area were
significantly enriched in the SML (Fig. 5; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively). While irradiation, water temperature and salinity did not
correlate with TEP abundance or area, wind speed did have a significant
negative correlation with TEP abundance in the SML (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and TEP
area in the SML (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the enrichment factor for TEP area
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2603">TCHO concentrations were similar between the SML and ULW (Fig. 5e), with no
significant differences between depths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">778</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">294</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (range 562 to
1684 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the SML and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">605</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (range 525 to
885 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ULW).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Eukaryotic diversity in the surface of the Mediterranean Sea</title>
      <p id="d1e2680">The eukaryotic community composition between the SML and the ULW differed only
slightly, with higher horizontal heterogeneity and significant differences
between the<?pagebreak page2112?> communities of the western, Tyrrhenian and Ionian basins. The
Shannon diversity did not differ significantly between depths or basins; however, a slight decrease in species richness from west to east could be
observed (Fig. S1), possibly related to the transition from oligotrophic to
ultra-oligotrophic conditions given the more pronounced water exchange with the
Atlantic in the western basin (Reddaway and Bigg, 1996).</p>
      <p id="d1e2683">No diatoms were present at high relative abundances in our samples. In
seasonal studies in the Mediterranean Sea, diatom contribution can be
significant during blooms in March and April, but later in the year, as the
water column stratifies, their contribution decreases (Marty et al.,
2002). Even though diatoms most likely were not dominant in the samples, the
extremely low abundance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of diatoms in the samples might
also indicate a bias of the primers used or removal of larger cells and
aggregates during the pre-filtration step. Another potential bias is the
dominance of dinoflagellate genera (Fig. 3). Dinoflagellates have a large
number of 18S rRNA gene copies in comparison to other phytoplankton groups,
and therefore their abundance in 18S rRNA gene sequencing is often
overestimated (Godhe et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e2704">Previous studies suggested various factors that potentially drive the
phytoplankton community composition. In addition<?pagebreak page2113?> to buoyancy of cells, high
levels of UV radiation could potentially cause damage by photoinhibition.
While dinoflagellates, one of the dominating phytoplankton groups, can produce
photoprotective compounds, including mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs)
(Carreto et al., 1990; Häder et al., 2007), they can still be inhibited by
high UV radiation (Ekelund, 1991). In the present study, inhibition by UV
radiation is not indicated in the data since phytoplankton was enriched in the
SML despite high radiation values (e.g., stations 4 and 7; Table 1).  At the
same time, TEP were significantly enriched during this sampling campaign while
the phytoplankton community did not show significant differences. Previous
studies suggested that TEP can protect phytoplankton and bacteria from UV
radiation (Elasri and Miller, 1999; Ortega-Retuerta et al., 2009). Process
oriented studies would be needed to determine whether TEP production was
higher in the SML due to UV protection of phytoneuston or whether TEP
formation rates were higher in the SML due to wind and wave shear at the
surface (Carlson, 1993; Cunliffe et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Fungi in the Ionian Sea</title>
      <p id="d1e2715">Fungi were prevalent in the Ionian Sea (more than half of the sequences
retrieved at one station), whereas they were scarce in the western basin and the
Tyrrhenian Sea (Figs. 3 and 4). Most of the fungal ASVs present in the Ionian
Sea belonged to Ascomycota and Mucoromycota. The question arises as to what
drives the higher fungal relative abundances in this region of the
Mediterranean Sea. While fungi, like dinoflagellates and other eukaryotic
groups, can have varying amounts of 18S rDNA gene copy numbers, the patchy
distribution of fungi found in this study makes a consistent bias unlikely.
Marine fungi can live a saprotrophic lifestyle, degrading and recycling high-molecular-weight organic matter (Chrismas and Cunliffe, 2020; Cunliffe et al.,
2017) and potentially competing with functionally similar bacteria. Some
marine fungi are also phytoplankton parasites, potentially altering
phytoplankton community composition through selective parasitism (Amend
et al., 2019; Grossart et al., 2019). At present, we have a very limited
understanding of the diversity and functional role of fungi in the SML
(myconeuston). One previous study of the coastal myconeuston in the western English Channel off Plymouth (UK) showed that the SML was dominated by both
Ascomycota and Basidiomycota (Taylor and Cunliffe, 2014), while our results
support the dominance of Ascomycota in the SML.</p>
      <p id="d1e2718">So far, not many studies have looked at fungi in LNLC regions. A global
comparison of fungal distribution (Hassett et al., 2020) has found that fungal
diversity determined<?pagebreak page2114?> by amplicon sequencing varies between different oceanic
regions, with <italic>Exophiala</italic>, belonging to Ascomycota, dominating the
Ligurian Sea and an unclassified Ascomycota being the most abundant taxon in
other regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2724">ASVs identified as Solanales (<italic>Nicotiana</italic>) had quite high relative abundances in
the easternmost stations. Since Solanales are land plants, presence of their
DNA could suggest a terrestrial influence on the Ionian Sea, linked to wet or
dry deposition that occurred before and/or during our sampling period in this
basin. This is also corroborated by air mass trajectory backtracking using the
Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model (Fig. S3), which showed that aerosols were most
likely of continental origin (Fu et al., 2021). This is also confirmed by
atmospheric measurements indicating that chemical composition of dry and wet
depositions were influenced by Eastern European air masses (Desboeufs et al.,
2021).  Station FAST_2 in the western basin
was highly influenced by dust input in the area (Guieu et al., 2020;
Tovar-Sánchez et al., 2020). This coincided not only with a strong
increase in TEP abundance in the SML, but also with a distinct increase in the
relative abundance of unidentified dinoflagellates in the SML (Fig. 3). The
details of the impact of dust input on the organic matter and microbial
community composition in the SML and ULW are discussed elsewhere (Anja Engel
et al., unpublished data). However, no fungi were found at station FAST_2 either in the SML or in the ULW (Fig. 4), showing that dust input does not necessarily
deposit fungi to the surface ocean; this potentially also holds true for the
Ionian Sea. In addition to atmospheric inputs, riverine inputs can also
influence the Mediterranean Sea (Martin et al., 1989). However, the Ionian Sea
itself does not experience vast riverine input, and riverine influence is less pronounced in the open sea, making riverine sources of Mycophyta
unlikely. Ascomycota and Mucoromycota have been recovered from a variety of
marine environments (Bovio, 2019; Grossart et al., 2019; Hassett et al.,
2019), implying that they also might be thriving in the SML of the
Mediterranean Sea rather than originating solely from terrestrial sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e2730">Overall, the most abundant fungal ASV in the Ionian Sea (ASV 8) was identified
as belonging to genus <italic>Cladosporium</italic>, which has been found in marine
environments before (Cunliffe et al., 2017). Another explanation for the high
relative abundance of fungi in the Ionian Sea might be that they are more
adapted to dealing with the low-nutrient conditions found in the more eastern
basin of the Mediterranean Sea.</p>
      <p id="d1e2737">Bacterial and microalgal numbers determined by flow cytometry decreased
significantly from west to east, with bacteria showing the largest decline
(Tovar-Sánchez et al., 2020). While total microalgal abundances determined
by flow cytometry were low in the SML and in the ULW, they were comparable to
other studies on phytoplankton abundance in the SML of the Mediterranean Sea
(Joux et al., 2006). The microalgal numbers between 5 and 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water
depth (data not shown) were higher than at the air–sea interface. Even though
overall bacterial numbers decrease, further molecular analyses would be needed
to determine if the bacterial community is changing from west to east and if
certain bacterial taxa can benefit from the ultra-oligotrophic conditions. In
contrast to bacteria and phytoplankton, spatial trends in TCHO and TEP, as
well as DOC in the SML and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in the ULW, did not show significant
differences between the Ionian Sea and the other basins (Freney et al., 2020;
Trueblood et al., 2020). TEPs are often enriched in the SML (Engel and Galgani,
2016; Jennings et al., 2017; Wurl et al., 2009; Wurl and Holmes, 2008), in
particular over oligotrophic regions (Jennings et al., 2017; Zäncker
et al., 2017). This is in good accordance with trends observed in the present
study (Durrieu de Madron et al., 2011; Fogg, 1995; Wikner and Hagstrom,
1988). Wind speed correlated negatively with TEP abundance and area in the
SML, showing that wind can negatively affect TEP concentrations at the air–sea
interface as has been previously suggested (Sun et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e2748">Since exchange of water with the Atlantic is most pronounced in the western
basin and an anti-estuarine circulation prevails in the Mediterranean Sea,
nutrient limitation increases eastwards. TEP production has been shown to be
independent of stoichiometric ratios in the surrounding water in a previous
study (Corzo et al., 2000). Since light limitation rarely occurs in the SML
and TEP can potentially protect phytoplankton from light damage (Elasri and
Miller, 1999; Ortega-Retuerta et al., 2009), phytoplankton might still
photosynthesize and excrete carbohydrates that assemble to TEP. This would not
only explain the lack of difference in TEP abundances between basins, but also
TCHO concentrations. TCHO can also be produced by cell lysis (due to nutrient
depletion).</p>
      <p id="d1e2751">TCHO and TEP could also provide available substrate and microhabitats for
marine fungi with reduced competition by bacteria in the Ionian Sea.
<italic>Malassezia</italic> and <italic>Cladosporium</italic> have been shown to assimilate
carbon derived from TEP-associated algal polysaccharides in the English
Channel (Cunliffe et al., 2017), highlighting that <italic>Cladosporium</italic> and
other fungi might be able to profit from the decreased bacterial competition
in the Ionian Sea. Further, previous studies have shown that the eastern Mediterranean Sea contains higher concentrations of organic pollutants
(Berrojalbiz et al., 2011a, b), while a <italic>Cladosporium</italic> strain has the
capacity to degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Birolli et al., 2018),
highlighting another potential substrate for the fungi detected in the Ionian
Sea.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2775">The present study shows that bacteria and picophytoplankton numbers decrease
from west to east in the Mediterranean Sea; in contrast, organic matter such as
microgels and TCHO<?pagebreak page2115?> are still prevalent in surface waters. Our findings from
the Ionian Sea suggest that accumulation of organic substrates in the surface
under oligotrophic conditions may favor certain taxa, such as fungi which can
benefit from decreased competition by bacteria. LNLC regions, where
phytoplankton and bacterial counts are typically low but TEP enrichment is high in the SML, might be a specific ecosystem where fungi are able to thrive
and to control organic matter degradation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2782">All biogeochemical data will be made available at the French INSU/CNRS LEFE
CYBER database (data manager, webmaster: Catherine Schmechtig, <uri>http://www.obs-vlfr.fr/proof/php/PEACETIME/peacetime.php</uri>, last access: 3 March 2021). All sequence data are available at the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA accession number
PRJEB23731).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2791">This article is part of the special issue “Atmospheric deposition in the low-nutrient–low-chlorophyll (LNLC) ocean: effects on marine life today and in the future (ACP/BG inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2794">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2107-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2107-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2803">BZ, MC and AE wrote the paper and contributed to the data analysis. BZ
participated in the sample treatment.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2809">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2815">We would like to thank the chief scientist, Cécile Guieu and Karine
Desboeufs, of the PEACETIME cruise on the RV <italic>Pourquoi pas?</italic>. We would also like to thank
the captain and crew of the <italic>Pourquoi pas?</italic> for technical assistance in the field. This work
is a contribution of the PEACETIME project
(<uri>http://peacetime-project.org</uri>, last access: 3 March 2021), a
joint initiative of the MERMEX and ChArMEx components supported by
CNRS-INSU, IFREMER, CEA, and Météo-France as part of the program
MISTRALS coordinated by INSU (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17600/17000300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17600/17000300</ext-link>).</p><p id="d1e2829">We thank Jon Roa for his help in analyzing the total combined carbohydrates
and Tania Klüver for analyzing the flow cytometry cell counts. We would
also like to thank ISOS (Kiel, Germany) for funding part of this work with
a PhD miniproposal grant.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2834">This research has been supported by the CNRS-INSU, IFREMER,
CEA,  Météo-France (<uri>https://doi.org/10.17600/17000300</uri>) and the Integrated
School of Ocean Sciences (PhD miniproposal).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The article processing charges for this open-access<?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?> publication were covered
by a Research<?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2851">This paper was edited by Christine Klaas and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Agogué, H., Casamayor, E. O., Bourrain, M., Obernosterer, I., Joux, F.,
Herndl, G. J., and Lebaron, P.: A survey on bacteria inhabiting the sea
surface microlayer of coastal ecosystems, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 54, 269–280,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2005.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.femsec.2005.04.002</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L., Passow, U., and Logan, B. E.: The abundance and significance of a class of large, transparent organic particles in the ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 40, 1131–1140, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation>
Amend, A., Burgaud, G., Cunliffe, M., Edgcomb, V. P., Ettinger, C. L., Gutierrez, M. H., Heitman, J., Hom, E. F. Y., Ianiri, G., Jones, A. C., Kagami, M., Picard, K. T., Quandt, C. A., Raghukumar, S., Riquelme, M., Stajich, J., Vargas-muñiz, J., Walker, A. K., Yarden, O., and Gladfelter, A. S.: Fungi in the Marine Environment: Open Questions and Unsolved Problems, MBio, 10, 1–15, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Apts, J. T. H. C. W.: Photosynthetic carbon reduction: high rates in the sea-surface microlayer, Mar. Biol., 101, 411–417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00428138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00428138</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>Azetsu-Scott, K. and Passow, U.: Ascending marine particles: Significance of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the upper ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 49, 741–748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.3.0741" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2004.49.3.0741</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Berrojalbiz, N., Dachs, J., Ojeda, M. J., Valle, M. C., Jiménez, J. C., Wollgast, J., Ghiani, M., Hanke, G., and Zaldivar, J. M.: Biogeochemical and physical controls on concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water and plankton of the Mediterranean and Black Seas, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003775</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation>Berrojalbiz, N., Dachs, J., Vento, S. Del, Jos, M., Valle, M. C., Castro-jim, J., Mariani, G., Wollgast, J., and Hanke, G.: Persistent Organic Pollutants in Mediterranean Seawater and Processes Affecting Their Accumulation in Plankton, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 4315–4322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103742w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es103742w</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Birolli, W. G., Santos, D. D. A., Alvarenga, N., and Garcia, A. C. F. S.: Biodegradation of anthracene and several PAHs by the marine-derived fungus <italic>Cladosporium</italic> sp. CBMAI 1237 Biodegradation of anthracene and several PAHs by the marine-derived fungus <italic>Cladosporium</italic> sp. CBMAI 1237, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 192, 525–533, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.023</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>
Bovio, E.: Marine fungi from sponges: biodiversity, chemodiversity and
biotechnological applications, Diss. Université Côte d'Azur, Università degli studi (Turin, Italy), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Callahan, B. J., Mcmurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J., and Holmes, S. P.: DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data, Nat. Methods, 13, 581–583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nmeth.3869</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2116?><ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>
Carlson, D.: The Early Diagenesis of Organic Matter: Reaction at the Air-Sea
Interface, in: Organic Geochemistry 1, 225–268, Springer, Boston, MA, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Carreto, J. I., Carignan, M. O., Daleo, G., and DeMarco, S. G.: Ocurrence of
mycosporine-like amino acids in the red-tide dinoflagellate Alexandrium
excavatum:uv-photoprotective compounds?, J. Plankton Res., 12, 909–921,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/12.5.909" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/plankt/12.5.909</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>
Chin, W.-C., Orellana, M. V., and Verdugo, P.: Spontaneous assembly of marine dissolved organic matter into polymer gels, Nature, 391, 568–572, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Chrismas, N. and Cunliffe, M.: Depth-dependent mycoplankton glycoside hydrolase gene activity in the open ocean – evidence from the Tara Oceans eukaryote metatranscriptomes, ISME J., 14, 2361–2365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0687-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41396-020-0687-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation>Comeau, A. M., Li, W. K. W., Tremblay, J. É., Carmack, E. C., and Lovejoy, C.: Arctic ocean microbial community structure before and after the 2007 record sea ice minimum, PLoS One, 6, e27492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027492" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0027492</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>Comeau, A. M., Douglas, G. M., and Langille, M. G. I.: Microbiome Helper: a Custom and Streamlined Workflow for Microbiome Research, mSystems, 2, e00127-16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00127-16" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/mSystems.00127-16</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>
Corzo, A., Morillo, J. A., and Rodriquez, S.: Production of transparent
exopolymer particles (TEP) in cultures of Chaetoceros calcitrans under
nitrogen limitation, Aquat. Mar. Ecol., 23, 63–72, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>Cunliffe, M. and Murrell, J. C.: The sea-surface microlayer is a gelatinous biofilm., ISME J., 3, 1001–1003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.69" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2009.69</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>Cunliffe, M. and Murrell, J. C.: Eukarya 18S rRNA gene diversity in the sea surface microlayer: implications for the structure of the neustonic microbial loop, ISME J., 4, 455–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2009.133</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation>Cunliffe, M. and Wurl, O.: Guide to best practices to study the ocean's surface, Plymouth, available at: <uri>https://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/bitstream/handle/11329/261/SCOR_GuideSeaSurface_2014.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</uri> (last access: 3 March 2021), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>Cunliffe, M., Engel, A., Frka, S., Gašparović, B., Guitart, C., Murrell, J. C., Salter, M., Stolle, C., Upstill-Goddard, R., and Wurl, O.: Sea surface microlayers: A unified physicochemical and biological perspective of the air-ocean interface, Prog. Oceanogr., 109, 104–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.08.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2012.08.004</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>Cunliffe, M., Hollingsworth, A., Bain, C., Sharma, V., and Taylor, J. D.: Algal polysaccharide utilisation by saprotrophic planktonic marine fungi, Fungal Ecol., 30, 135–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2017.08.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.funeco.2017.08.009</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation>
Desboeufs, K., Fu, F., Bressac, M., Tovar-Sánchez, A., Triquet, S., Doussin, J.-F., Giorio, C., Rodríguez-Romero, A., Wagener, T.,  Dulac, F., and Guieu, C.: Wet deposition in the remote western and central Mediterranean: A source of nutrients and trace metals for the marine biosphere?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., in preparation, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation>Durrieu de Madron, X., Guieu, C., Sempéré, R., Conan, P., Cossa, D., D'Ortenzio, F., Estournel, C., Gazeau, F., Rabouille, C., Stemmann, L., Bonnet, S., Diaz, F., Koubbi, P., Radakovitch, O., Babin, M., Baklouti, M., Bancon-Montigny, C., Belviso, S., Bensoussan, N., Bonsang, B., Bouloubassi, I., Brunet, C., Cadiou, J. F., Carlotti, F., Chami, M., Charmasson, S., Charrière, B., Dachs, J., Doxaran, D., Dutay, J. C., Elbaz-Poulichet, F., Eléaume, M., Eyrolles, F., Fernandez, C., Fowler, S., Francour, P., Gaertner, J. C., Galzin, R., Gasparini, S., Ghiglione, J. F., Gonzalez, J. L., Goyet, C., Guidi, L., Guizien, K., Heimbürger, L. E., Jacquet, S. H. M., Jeffrey, W. H., Joux, F., Le Hir, P., Leblanc, K., Lefèvre, D., Lejeusne, C., Lemé, R., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., Mallet, M., Méjanelle, L., Mélin, F., Mellon, C., Mérigot, B., Merle, P. L., Migon, C., Miller, W. L., Mortier, L., Mostajir, B., Mousseau, L., Moutin, T., Para, J., Pérez, T., Petrenko, A., Poggiale, J. C., Prieur, L., Pujo-Pay, M., Pulido-Villena, Raimbault, P., Rees, A. P., Ridame, C., Rontani, J. F., Ruiz Pino, D., Sicre, M. A., Taillandier, V., Tamburini, C., Tanaka, T., Taupier-Letage, I., Tedetti, M., Testor, P., Thébault, H., Thouvenin, B., Touratier, F., Tronczynski, J., Ulses, C., Van Wambeke, F., Vantrepotte, V., Vaz, S., and Verney, R.: Marine ecosystems' responses to climatic and anthropogenic forcings in the Mediterranean, Prog. Oceanogr., 91, 97–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.003</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 25a?><mixed-citation> Ekelund, N. G. A.: The Effects of UV-B Radiation on Dinoflagellates, J. Plant Physiol., 138, 274–278, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 25b?><mixed-citation>
Engel, A. and Händel, N.: A novel protocol for determining the concentration and composition of sugars in particulate and in high molecular weight dissolved organic matter (HMW-DOM) in seawater, Mar. Chem., 127, 180–191, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>
Elasri, M. O. and Miller, R. V: Study of the Response of a Biofilm Bacterial Community to UV Radiation Study of the Response of a Biofilm Bacterial Community to UV Radiation, Appl. Environ. Microb., 65, 2025–2031, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation>Engel, A.: The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the increase in apparent particle stickiness (alpha) during the decline of a diatom bloom, J. Plankton Res., 22, 485–497, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/22.3.485" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/plankt/22.3.485</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: Determination of marine gel particles, in: Practical Guidelines for the Analysis of Seawater, edited by: Wurl, O., CRC Press Taylor &amp; Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 125–142, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>Engel, A. and Galgani, L.: The organic sea-surface microlayer in the upwelling region off the coast of Peru and potential implications for air–sea exchange processes, Biogeosciences, 13, 989–1007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-989-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-989-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>Engel, A., Thoms, S., Riebesell, U., Rochelle-Newall, E., and Zondervan, I.:
Polysaccharide aggregation as a potential sink of marine dissolved organic
carbon, Nature, 428, 929–932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature02453</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Engel, A., Bange, H. W., Cunliffe, M., Burrows, S. M., Friedrichs, G.,
Galgani, L., Herrmann, H., Hertkorn, N., Johnson, M., Liss, P. S.,
Quinn, P. K., Schartau, M., Soloviev, A., Stolle, C., Upstill-Goddard, R. C.,
van Pinxteren, M., and Zäncker, B.: The Ocean's Vital Skin: Toward an
Integrated Understanding of the Sea Surface Microlayer, Front. Mar. Sci., 4,
165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00165" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2017.00165</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Fogg, G. E.: Some comments on picoplankton and its importance in the pelagic ecosystem, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 9, 33–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame009033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/ame009033</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 33a?><mixed-citation>Freney, E., Sellegri, K., Nicosia, A., Trueblood, J. T., Rinaldi, M., Williams, L. R., Prévôt, A. S. H., Thyssen, M., Grégori, <?pagebreak page2117?>G., Haëntjens, N., Dinasquet, J., Obernosterer, I., Van-Wambeke, F., Engel, A., Zäncker, B., Desboeufs, K., Asmi, E., Timmonen, H., and Guieu, C.: Mediterranean nascent sea spray organic aerosol and relationships with seawater biogeochemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-406" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2020-406</ext-link>, in review, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 33b?><mixed-citation>
Fu, F., Desboeufs, K.,  Triquet, S., Doussin, J.-F., Giorio, C.,  Formenti, P., Feron, A., Maisonneuve, F., and  Dulac, F.: Aerosol characterisation and quantification of trace element atmospheric dry deposition fluxes in remote Mediterranean Sea during PEACETIME cruise, Atmos. Chem. Phys., in preparation, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Garzoli, L., Gnavi, G., Tamma, F., Tosi, S., Varese, G. C., and Picco, A. M.: Sink or swim: Updated knowledge on marine fungi associated with wood substrates in the Mediterranean Sea and hints about their potential to remediate hydrocarbons, Prog. Oceanogr., 137, 140–148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.05.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2015.05.028</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>
Gladfelter, A. S., James, T. Y., and Amend, A. S.: Marine fungi, Curr. Biol., 29, R191–R195, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Gnavi, G., Garzoli, L., Poli, A., Prigione, V., Burgaud, G., and Varese, G. C.: The culturable mycobiota of Flabellia petiolata: First survey of marine fungi associated to a Mediterranean green alga, PLoS One, 12, 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175941" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0175941</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>Godhe, A., Asplund, M. E., Härnström, K., Saravanan, V., Tyagi, A., and Karunasagar, I.: Quantification of diatom and dinoflagellate biomasses in coastal marine seawater samples by real-time PCR, Appl. Environ. Microb., 74, 7174–7182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01298-08" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/AEM.01298-08</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 38?><mixed-citation>
Grossart, H.-P., Van den Wyngaert, S., Kagami, M., Wurzbacher, C., Cunliffe, M., and Rojas-Jimenez, K.: Fungi in aquatic ecosystems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 17, 339–354, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Guieu, C., D'Ortenzio, F., Dulac, F., Taillandier, V., Doglioli, A., Petrenko,
A., Barrillon, S., Mallet, M., Nabat, P., and Desboeufs, K.: Introduction:
Process studies at the air–sea interface after atmospheric deposition in the
Mediterranean Sea – objectives and strategy of the PEACETIME oceanographic
campaign (May–June 2017), Biogeosciences, 17, 5563–5585,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5563-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-5563-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation>Guo, L., Sui, Z., and Liu, Y.: Quantitative analysis of dinoflagellates and diatoms community via Miseq sequencing of actin gene and v9 region of 18S rDNA, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34709" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep34709</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>Häder, D.-P., Kumar, H. D., Smith, R. C., and Worrest, R. C.: Effects of solar UV radiation on aquatic ecosystems and interactions with climate change, Photochem. Photobio. S., 6, 267–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B700020K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B700020K</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>
Hardy, J. T. and Apts, C. W.: The sea-surface microlayer: phytoneuston productivity and effects of atmospheric particulate matter, Mar. Biol., 82, 293–300, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>
Hardy, J. T., Coley, J. A., Antrim, L. D., and Kiesser, S. L.: A hydrophobic large-volume sampler for collecting aquatic surface microlayers: characterization and comparison with the glass plate method, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 822–826, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>
Harvey, G.: Microlayer collection from the sea surface: a new method and intial results, Limnol. Oceanogr., 11, 608–613, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation>
Hassett, B. T., Borrego, E. T., Vonnahme, T. R., Rämä, T., Kolomiets, M. V., and Gradinger, R.: Arctic marine fungi: Biomass, functional genes, and putative ecological roles, ISME J., 13, 1484–1496, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>
Hassett, B. T., Vonnahme, T. R., Peng, X., and Jones, E. B. G.: Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi, Bot. Mar., 63, 121–139, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Jennings, M. K., Passow, U., Wozniak, A. S., and Hansell, D. A.: Distribution of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) across an organic carbon gradient in the western North Atlantic Ocean, Mar. Chem., 190, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2017.01.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2017.01.002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 48?><mixed-citation>Joux, F., Agogue, H., Obernosterer, I., Dupuy, C., Reinthaler, T., Herndl, G. J., and Lebaron, P.: Microbial community structure in the sea surface microlayer at two contrasting sites in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 42, 91–104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame042091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/ame042091</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation>Krom, M. D., Herut, B., and Mantoura, R. F. C.: Nutrient budget for the Eastern Mediterranean: Implications for phosphorus limitation, Limnol. Oceanogr., 49, 1582–1592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.5.1582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2004.49.5.1582</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>
Lepesteur, M., Martin, J. M., and Fleury, A.: A comparative study of d methods for phytoplank flow cytometry, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 93, 55–63, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 51?><mixed-citation>
Liss, P. S. and Duce, R. A.: The sea surface and global change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 52?><mixed-citation>Martin, J. M., Elbaz-Poulichet, F., Guieu, C., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., and Han, G.: River versus atmospheric input of material to the mediterranean sea: an overview, Mar. Chem., 28, 159–182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(89)90193-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4203(89)90193-X</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation>Marty, J. C., Chiavérini, J., Pizay, M. D., and Avril, B.: Seasonal and interannual dynamics of nutrients and phytoplankton pigments in the western Mediterranean Sea at the DYFAMED time-series station (1991–1999), Deep-Res. Pt. II, 49, 1965–1985, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00022-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00022-X</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Mermex Group, T., Durrieu de Madron, X., Guieu, C., Sempéré, R., Conan, P., Cossa, D., D'Ortenzio, F., Estournel, C., Gazeau, F., Rabouille, C., Stemmann, L., Bonnet, S., Diaz, F., Koubbi, P., Radakovitch, O., Babin, M., Baklouti, M., Bancon-Montigny, C., Belviso, S., Bensoussan, N., Bonsang, B., Bouloubassi, I., Brunet, C., Cadiou, J. F., Carlotti, F., Chami, M., Charmasson, S., Charrière, B., Dachs, J., Doxaran, D., Dutay, J. C., Elbaz-Poulichet, F., Eléaume, M., Eyrolles, F., Fernandez, C., Fowler, S., Francour, P., Gaertner, J. C., Galzin, R., Gasparini, S., Ghiglione, J. F., Gonzalez, J. L., Goyet, C., Guidi, L., Guizien, K., Heimbürger, L. E., Jacquet, S. H. M., Jeffrey, W. H., Joux, F., Le Hir, P., Leblanc, K., Lefèvre, D., Lejeusne, C., Lemé, R., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., Mallet, M., Méjanelle, L., Mélin, F., Mellon, C., Mérigot, B., Merle, P. L., Migon, C., Miller, W. L., Mortier, L., Mostajir, B., Mousseau, L., Moutin, T., Para, J., Pérez, T., Petrenko, A., Poggiale, J. C., Prieur, L., Pujo-Pay, M., Pulido-Villena, Raimbault, P., Rees, A. P., Ridame, C., Rontani, J. F., Ruiz Pino, D., Sicre, M. A., Taillandier, V., Tamburini, C., Tanaka, T., Taupier-Letage, I., Tedetti, M., Testor, P., Thébault, H., Thouvenin, B., Touratier, F., Tronczynski, J., Ulses, C., Van Wambeke, F., Vantrepotte, V., Vaz, S., and Verney, R.: Marine ecosystems' responses to climatic and anthropogenic forcings in the Mediterranean, Prog. Oceanogr., 91, 97–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.003</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation>
Mopper, K., Zhou, J., Ramana, K. S., Passow, U., Dam, H. G., and Drapeau, D. T.: The role of surface active carbohydratesin t<?pagebreak page2118?>he flocculation of a diatom bloom in a mesocosm, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 42, 43–73, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>
Naumann, E.: Über das Neuston des Süsswassers, Biol. Cent., 37,
98–106, 1917.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation>Obernosterer, I., Catala, P., Lami, R., Caparros, J., Ras, J., Bricaud, A., Dupuy, C., van Wambeke, F., and Lebaron, P.: Biochemical characteristics and bacterial community structure of the sea surface microlayer in the South Pacific Ocean, Biogeosciences, 5, 693–705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-693-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-5-693-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation>Ortega-Retuerta, E., Passow, U., Duarte, C. M., and Reche, I.: Effects of ultraviolet B radiation on (not so) transparent exopolymer particles, Biogeosciences, 6, 3071–3080, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-3071-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-3071-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 59?><mixed-citation>Passow, U.: Transparent Exopolymer Particles in Aquatic Environments, Prog. Oceanogr., 55, 287–333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(02)00138-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0079-6611(02)00138-6</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 60?><mixed-citation>Passow, U. and Alldredge, A. L.: Aggregation of a diatom bloom in a mesocosm: The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP), Deep-Res. Pt. II, 42, 99–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(95)00006-C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0967-0645(95)00006-C</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Ploug, H.: Cyanobacterial surface blooms formed by <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> sp. and Nodularia spumigena in the Baltic Sea: Small-scale fluxes, pH, and oxygen microenvironments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 914–921, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.0914" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.0914</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation>Pujo-Pay, M., Conan, P., Oriol, L., Cornet-Barthaux, V., Falco, C., Ghiglione, J.-F., Goyet, C., Moutin, T., and Prieur, L.: Integrated survey of elemental stoichiometry (C, N, P) from the western to eastern Mediterranean Sea, Biogeosciences, 8, 883–899, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-883-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-883-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 63?><mixed-citation>Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., and Glöckner, F. O.: The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, 590–596, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nar/gks1219</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienne, Austria, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation>
Reddaway, J. M. and Bigg, G. R.: Climatic change over the Mediterranean Sea and links to the more general atmospheric circulation, Int. J. Climatol., 16, 651–661, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 66?><mixed-citation>Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., and Eliceiri, K. W.: NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis, Nat. Methods, 9, 671–675, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nmeth.2089</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation>Sellegri, K., Nicosia, A., Freney, E., Uitz, J., Thyssen, M., Grégori, G., Engel, A., Zäncker, B., Haëntjens, N., Mas, S., Picard, D., Saint-Macary, A., Peltola, M., Rose, C., Trueblood, J., Lefevre, D., D'Anna, B., Desboeuf, K., Meskhidze, N., Guieu, C., and Law, C. S.: Surface ocean microbiota determine cloud precursors, Sci. Rep.-UK, 11, 281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78097-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-78097-5</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation>Sun, C.-C., Sperling, M., and Engel, A.: Effect of wind speed on the size distribution of gel particles in the sea surface microlayer: insights from a wind–wave channel experiment, Biogeosciences, 15, 3577–3589, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3577-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-3577-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation>Tanhua, T., Hainbucher, D., Schroeder, K., Cardin, V., Álvarez, M., and Civitarese, G.: The Mediterranean Sea system: a review and an introduction to the special issue, Ocean Sci., 9, 789–803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-789-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-9-789-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation>Taylor, J. D. and Cunliffe, M.: High-throughput sequencing reveals neustonic and planktonic microbial eukaryote diversity in coastal waters, J. Phycol., 50, 960–965, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12228" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/jpy.12228</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 71?><mixed-citation>Tovar-Sánchez, A., Rodríguez-Romero, A., Engel, A., Zäncker, B., Fu, F., Marañón, E., Pérez-Lorenzo, M., Bressac, M., Wagener, T., Triquet, S., Siour, G., Desboeufs, K., and Guieu, C.: Characterizing the surface microlayer in the Mediterranean Sea: trace metal concentrations and microbial plankton abundance, Biogeosciences, 17, 2349–2364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2349-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-2349-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>Trueblood, J. V., Nicosia, A., Engel, A., Zäncker, B., Rinaldi, M., Freney, E., Thyssen, M., Obernosterer, I., Dinasquet, J., Belosi, F., Tovar-Sánchez, A., Rodriguez-Romero, A., Santachiara, G., Guieu, C., and Sellegri, K.: A Two-Component Parameterization of Marine Ice Nucleating Particles Based on Seawater Biology and Sea Spray Aerosol Measurements in the Mediterranean Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-487" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2020-487</ext-link>, in review, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation>Upstill-Goddard, R. C., Frost, T., Henry, G. R., Franklin, M., Murrell, J. C., and Owens, N. J. P.: Bacterioneuston control of air-water methane exchange determined with a laboratory gas exchange tank, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GB002043</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 74?><mixed-citation>Verdugo, P., Alldredge, A. L., Azam, F., Kirchman, D. L., Passow, U., and Santschi, P. H.: The oceanic gel phase: A bridge in the DOM-POM continuum, Mar. Chem., 92, 67–85, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016046</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 75?><mixed-citation>Wietz, M., Wemheuer, B., Simon, H., Giebel, H. A., Seibt, M. A., Daniel, R., Brinkhoff, T., and Simon, M.: Bacterial community dynamics during polysaccharide degradation at contrasting sites in the Southern and Atlantic Oceans, Environ. Microbiol., 17, 3822–3831, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12842" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1462-2920.12842</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 76?><mixed-citation>Wikner, J. and Hagstrom, A.: Evidence for a tightly coupled nanoplanktonic predator-prey link regulating the bacterivores in the marine environment, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 50, 137–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps050137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps050137</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 77?><mixed-citation>
World Health Organization: The sea-surface microlayer and its role in global
change, WMO, Geneva, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 78?><mixed-citation>Wurl, O. and Holmes, M.: The gelatinous nature of the sea-surface microlayer, Mar. Chem., 110, 89–97, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.009</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 79?><mixed-citation>Wurl, O., Miller, L., Röttgers, R., and Vagle, S.: The distribution and fate of surface-active substances in the sea-surface microlayer and water column, Mar. Chem., 115, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.04.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2009.04.007</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 80?><mixed-citation>Zäncker, B., Bracher, A., Röttgers, R., and Engel, A.: Variations of the Organic Matter Composition in the Sea Surface Microlayer: A Comparison between Open Ocean, Coastal, and Upwelling Sites Off the Peruvian Coast, Front. Microbiol., 8, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02369</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 81?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z., Liu, L., Liu, C., and Cai, W.: Studies on the sea surface microlayer: II. The layer of sudden change of physical and chemical properties, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 264, 148–159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00390-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00390-4</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 82?><mixed-citation>
Zhou, J., Bruns, M. A., and Tiedje, J. M.: DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition, Appl. Environ. Microb., 62, 316–322, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Eukaryotic community composition in the sea surface microlayer across an east–west transect in the Mediterranean Sea</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The  sea surface microlayer (SML) represents the boundary layer at the air–sea
interface. Microbial eukaryotes in the SML potentially influence air–sea gas
exchange directly by taking up and producing gases and indirectly by
excreting and degrading organic matter, which may modify the viscoelastic
properties of the SML. However, little is known about the distribution of
microbial eukaryotes in the SML. We studied the composition of the microbial
community, transparent exopolymer particles and polysaccharides in the SML
during the PEACETIME cruise along a west–east transect in the Mediterranean
Sea, covering the western basin, Tyrrhenian Sea and Ionian Sea. At the
stations located in the Ionian Sea, fungi – likely of continental origin and
delivered by atmospheric deposition – were found in high relative abundances,
making up a significant proportion of the sequences recovered. Concomitantly,
bacterial and picophytoplankton counts decreased from west to east, while
transparent exopolymer particle (TEP) abundance and total carbohydrate (TCHO)
concentrations remained constant in all basins. Our results suggest that the
presence of substrates for fungi, such as <i>Cladosporium</i>, known to take up phytoplankton-derived polysaccharides, in combination with decreased
substrate competition by bacteria, might favor fungal dominance in the neuston
of the Ionian Sea and other low-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (LNLC) regions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agogué, H., Casamayor, E. O., Bourrain, M., Obernosterer, I., Joux, F.,
Herndl, G. J., and Lebaron, P.: A survey on bacteria inhabiting the sea
surface microlayer of coastal ecosystems, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 54, 269–280,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2005.04.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2005.04.002</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L., Passow, U., and Logan, B. E.: The abundance and significance of a class of large, transparent organic particles in the ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 40, 1131–1140, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Amend, A., Burgaud, G., Cunliffe, M., Edgcomb, V. P., Ettinger, C. L., Gutierrez, M. H., Heitman, J., Hom, E. F. Y., Ianiri, G., Jones, A. C., Kagami, M., Picard, K. T., Quandt, C. A., Raghukumar, S., Riquelme, M., Stajich, J., Vargas-muñiz, J., Walker, A. K., Yarden, O., and Gladfelter, A. S.: Fungi in the Marine Environment: Open Questions and Unsolved Problems, MBio, 10, 1–15, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Apts, J. T. H. C. W.: Photosynthetic carbon reduction: high rates in the sea-surface microlayer, Mar. Biol., 101, 411–417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00428138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00428138</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Azetsu-Scott, K. and Passow, U.: Ascending marine particles: Significance of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the upper ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 49, 741–748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.3.0741" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.3.0741</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Berrojalbiz, N., Dachs, J., Ojeda, M. J., Valle, M. C., Jiménez, J. C., Wollgast, J., Ghiani, M., Hanke, G., and Zaldivar, J. M.: Biogeochemical and physical controls on concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water and plankton of the Mediterranean and Black Seas, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003775" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003775</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Berrojalbiz, N., Dachs, J., Vento, S. Del, Jos, M., Valle, M. C., Castro-jim, J., Mariani, G., Wollgast, J., and Hanke, G.: Persistent Organic Pollutants in Mediterranean Seawater and Processes Affecting Their Accumulation in Plankton, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 4315–4322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103742w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es103742w</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Birolli, W. G., Santos, D. D. A., Alvarenga, N., and Garcia, A. C. F. S.: Biodegradation of anthracene and several PAHs by the marine-derived fungus <i>Cladosporium</i> sp. CBMAI 1237 Biodegradation of anthracene and several PAHs by the marine-derived fungus <i>Cladosporium</i> sp. CBMAI 1237, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 192, 525–533, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.023</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bovio, E.: Marine fungi from sponges: biodiversity, chemodiversity and
biotechnological applications, Diss. Université Côte d'Azur, Università degli studi (Turin, Italy), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Callahan, B. J., Mcmurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J., and Holmes, S. P.: DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data, Nat. Methods, 13, 581–583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Carlson, D.: The Early Diagenesis of Organic Matter: Reaction at the Air-Sea
Interface, in: Organic Geochemistry 1, 225–268, Springer, Boston, MA, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Carreto, J. I., Carignan, M. O., Daleo, G., and DeMarco, S. G.: Ocurrence of
mycosporine-like amino acids in the red-tide dinoflagellate Alexandrium
excavatum:uv-photoprotective compounds?, J. Plankton Res., 12, 909–921,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/12.5.909" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/12.5.909</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chin, W.-C., Orellana, M. V., and Verdugo, P.: Spontaneous assembly of marine dissolved organic matter into polymer gels, Nature, 391, 568–572, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chrismas, N. and Cunliffe, M.: Depth-dependent mycoplankton glycoside hydrolase gene activity in the open ocean – evidence from the Tara Oceans eukaryote metatranscriptomes, ISME J., 14, 2361–2365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0687-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0687-2</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Comeau, A. M., Li, W. K. W., Tremblay, J. É., Carmack, E. C., and Lovejoy, C.: Arctic ocean microbial community structure before and after the 2007 record sea ice minimum, PLoS One, 6, e27492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027492" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027492</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Comeau, A. M., Douglas, G. M., and Langille, M. G. I.: Microbiome Helper: a Custom and Streamlined Workflow for Microbiome Research, mSystems, 2, e00127-16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00127-16" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00127-16</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Corzo, A., Morillo, J. A., and Rodriquez, S.: Production of transparent
exopolymer particles (TEP) in cultures of Chaetoceros calcitrans under
nitrogen limitation, Aquat. Mar. Ecol., 23, 63–72, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cunliffe, M. and Murrell, J. C.: The sea-surface microlayer is a gelatinous biofilm., ISME J., 3, 1001–1003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.69" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.69</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Cunliffe, M. and Murrell, J. C.: Eukarya 18S rRNA gene diversity in the sea surface microlayer: implications for the structure of the neustonic microbial loop, ISME J., 4, 455–458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.133" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.133</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cunliffe, M. and Wurl, O.: Guide to best practices to study the ocean's surface, Plymouth, available at: <a href="https://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/bitstream/handle/11329/261/SCOR_GuideSeaSurface_2014.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y" target="_blank"/> (last access: 3 March 2021), 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Cunliffe, M., Engel, A., Frka, S., Gašparović, B., Guitart, C., Murrell, J. C., Salter, M., Stolle, C., Upstill-Goddard, R., and Wurl, O.: Sea surface microlayers: A unified physicochemical and biological perspective of the air-ocean interface, Prog. Oceanogr., 109, 104–116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.08.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.08.004</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Cunliffe, M., Hollingsworth, A., Bain, C., Sharma, V., and Taylor, J. D.: Algal polysaccharide utilisation by saprotrophic planktonic marine fungi, Fungal Ecol., 30, 135–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2017.08.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2017.08.009</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Desboeufs, K., Fu, F., Bressac, M., Tovar-Sánchez, A., Triquet, S., Doussin, J.-F., Giorio, C., Rodríguez-Romero, A., Wagener, T.,  Dulac, F., and Guieu, C.: Wet deposition in the remote western and central Mediterranean: A source of nutrients and trace metals for the marine biosphere?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., in preparation, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Durrieu de Madron, X., Guieu, C., Sempéré, R., Conan, P., Cossa, D., D'Ortenzio, F., Estournel, C., Gazeau, F., Rabouille, C., Stemmann, L., Bonnet, S., Diaz, F., Koubbi, P., Radakovitch, O., Babin, M., Baklouti, M., Bancon-Montigny, C., Belviso, S., Bensoussan, N., Bonsang, B., Bouloubassi, I., Brunet, C., Cadiou, J. F., Carlotti, F., Chami, M., Charmasson, S., Charrière, B., Dachs, J., Doxaran, D., Dutay, J. C., Elbaz-Poulichet, F., Eléaume, M., Eyrolles, F., Fernandez, C., Fowler, S., Francour, P., Gaertner, J. C., Galzin, R., Gasparini, S., Ghiglione, J. F., Gonzalez, J. L., Goyet, C., Guidi, L., Guizien, K., Heimbürger, L. E., Jacquet, S. H. M., Jeffrey, W. H., Joux, F., Le Hir, P., Leblanc, K., Lefèvre, D., Lejeusne, C., Lemé, R., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., Mallet, M., Méjanelle, L., Mélin, F., Mellon, C., Mérigot, B., Merle, P. L., Migon, C., Miller, W. L., Mortier, L., Mostajir, B., Mousseau, L., Moutin, T., Para, J., Pérez, T., Petrenko, A., Poggiale, J. C., Prieur, L., Pujo-Pay, M., Pulido-Villena, Raimbault, P., Rees, A. P., Ridame, C., Rontani, J. F., Ruiz Pino, D., Sicre, M. A., Taillandier, V., Tamburini, C., Tanaka, T., Taupier-Letage, I., Tedetti, M., Testor, P., Thébault, H., Thouvenin, B., Touratier, F., Tronczynski, J., Ulses, C., Van Wambeke, F., Vantrepotte, V., Vaz, S., and Verney, R.: Marine ecosystems' responses to climatic and anthropogenic forcings in the Mediterranean, Prog. Oceanogr., 91, 97–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.003</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> Ekelund, N. G. A.: The Effects of UV-B Radiation on Dinoflagellates, J. Plant Physiol., 138, 274–278, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A. and Händel, N.: A novel protocol for determining the concentration and composition of sugars in particulate and in high molecular weight dissolved organic matter (HMW-DOM) in seawater, Mar. Chem., 127, 180–191, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Elasri, M. O. and Miller, R. V: Study of the Response of a Biofilm Bacterial Community to UV Radiation Study of the Response of a Biofilm Bacterial Community to UV Radiation, Appl. Environ. Microb., 65, 2025–2031, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the increase in apparent particle stickiness (alpha) during the decline of a diatom bloom, J. Plankton Res., 22, 485–497, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/22.3.485" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/22.3.485</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: Determination of marine gel particles, in: Practical Guidelines for the Analysis of Seawater, edited by: Wurl, O., CRC Press Taylor &amp; Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 125–142, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A. and Galgani, L.: The organic sea-surface microlayer in the upwelling region off the coast of Peru and potential implications for air–sea exchange processes, Biogeosciences, 13, 989–1007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-989-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-989-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Thoms, S., Riebesell, U., Rochelle-Newall, E., and Zondervan, I.:
Polysaccharide aggregation as a potential sink of marine dissolved organic
carbon, Nature, 428, 929–932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02453</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Bange, H. W., Cunliffe, M., Burrows, S. M., Friedrichs, G.,
Galgani, L., Herrmann, H., Hertkorn, N., Johnson, M., Liss, P. S.,
Quinn, P. K., Schartau, M., Soloviev, A., Stolle, C., Upstill-Goddard, R. C.,
van Pinxteren, M., and Zäncker, B.: The Ocean's Vital Skin: Toward an
Integrated Understanding of the Sea Surface Microlayer, Front. Mar. Sci., 4,
165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00165" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00165</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Fogg, G. E.: Some comments on picoplankton and its importance in the pelagic ecosystem, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 9, 33–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame009033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/ame009033</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Freney, E., Sellegri, K., Nicosia, A., Trueblood, J. T., Rinaldi, M., Williams, L. R., Prévôt, A. S. H., Thyssen, M., Grégori, G., Haëntjens, N., Dinasquet, J., Obernosterer, I., Van-Wambeke, F., Engel, A., Zäncker, B., Desboeufs, K., Asmi, E., Timmonen, H., and Guieu, C.: Mediterranean nascent sea spray organic aerosol and relationships with seawater biogeochemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-406" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-406</a>, in review, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, F., Desboeufs, K.,  Triquet, S., Doussin, J.-F., Giorio, C.,  Formenti, P., Feron, A., Maisonneuve, F., and  Dulac, F.: Aerosol characterisation and quantification of trace element atmospheric dry deposition fluxes in remote Mediterranean Sea during PEACETIME cruise, Atmos. Chem. Phys., in preparation, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Garzoli, L., Gnavi, G., Tamma, F., Tosi, S., Varese, G. C., and Picco, A. M.: Sink or swim: Updated knowledge on marine fungi associated with wood substrates in the Mediterranean Sea and hints about their potential to remediate hydrocarbons, Prog. Oceanogr., 137, 140–148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.05.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.05.028</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Gladfelter, A. S., James, T. Y., and Amend, A. S.: Marine fungi, Curr. Biol., 29, R191–R195, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Gnavi, G., Garzoli, L., Poli, A., Prigione, V., Burgaud, G., and Varese, G. C.: The culturable mycobiota of Flabellia petiolata: First survey of marine fungi associated to a Mediterranean green alga, PLoS One, 12, 1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175941" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175941</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Godhe, A., Asplund, M. E., Härnström, K., Saravanan, V., Tyagi, A., and Karunasagar, I.: Quantification of diatom and dinoflagellate biomasses in coastal marine seawater samples by real-time PCR, Appl. Environ. Microb., 74, 7174–7182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01298-08" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01298-08</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Grossart, H.-P., Van den Wyngaert, S., Kagami, M., Wurzbacher, C., Cunliffe, M., and Rojas-Jimenez, K.: Fungi in aquatic ecosystems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 17, 339–354, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Guieu, C., D'Ortenzio, F., Dulac, F., Taillandier, V., Doglioli, A., Petrenko,
A., Barrillon, S., Mallet, M., Nabat, P., and Desboeufs, K.: Introduction:
Process studies at the air–sea interface after atmospheric deposition in the
Mediterranean Sea – objectives and strategy of the PEACETIME oceanographic
campaign (May–June 2017), Biogeosciences, 17, 5563–5585,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5563-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5563-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, L., Sui, Z., and Liu, Y.: Quantitative analysis of dinoflagellates and diatoms community via Miseq sequencing of actin gene and v9 region of 18S rDNA, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34709" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34709</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Häder, D.-P., Kumar, H. D., Smith, R. C., and Worrest, R. C.: Effects of solar UV radiation on aquatic ecosystems and interactions with climate change, Photochem. Photobio. S., 6, 267–285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B700020K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B700020K</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Hardy, J. T. and Apts, C. W.: The sea-surface microlayer: phytoneuston productivity and effects of atmospheric particulate matter, Mar. Biol., 82, 293–300, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Hardy, J. T., Coley, J. A., Antrim, L. D., and Kiesser, S. L.: A hydrophobic large-volume sampler for collecting aquatic surface microlayers: characterization and comparison with the glass plate method, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 822–826, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Harvey, G.: Microlayer collection from the sea surface: a new method and intial results, Limnol. Oceanogr., 11, 608–613, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Hassett, B. T., Borrego, E. T., Vonnahme, T. R., Rämä, T., Kolomiets, M. V., and Gradinger, R.: Arctic marine fungi: Biomass, functional genes, and putative ecological roles, ISME J., 13, 1484–1496, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Hassett, B. T., Vonnahme, T. R., Peng, X., and Jones, E. B. G.: Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi, Bot. Mar., 63, 121–139, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Jennings, M. K., Passow, U., Wozniak, A. S., and Hansell, D. A.: Distribution of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) across an organic carbon gradient in the western North Atlantic Ocean, Mar. Chem., 190, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2017.01.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2017.01.002</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Joux, F., Agogue, H., Obernosterer, I., Dupuy, C., Reinthaler, T., Herndl, G. J., and Lebaron, P.: Microbial community structure in the sea surface microlayer at two contrasting sites in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 42, 91–104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame042091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/ame042091</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Krom, M. D., Herut, B., and Mantoura, R. F. C.: Nutrient budget for the Eastern Mediterranean: Implications for phosphorus limitation, Limnol. Oceanogr., 49, 1582–1592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.5.1582" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.5.1582</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lepesteur, M., Martin, J. M., and Fleury, A.: A comparative study of d methods for phytoplank flow cytometry, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 93, 55–63, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Liss, P. S. and Duce, R. A.: The sea surface and global change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. M., Elbaz-Poulichet, F., Guieu, C., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., and Han, G.: River versus atmospheric input of material to the mediterranean sea: an overview, Mar. Chem., 28, 159–182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(89)90193-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(89)90193-X</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Marty, J. C., Chiavérini, J., Pizay, M. D., and Avril, B.: Seasonal and interannual dynamics of nutrients and phytoplankton pigments in the western Mediterranean Sea at the DYFAMED time-series station (1991–1999), Deep-Res. Pt. II, 49, 1965–1985, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00022-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00022-X</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Mermex Group, T., Durrieu de Madron, X., Guieu, C., Sempéré, R., Conan, P., Cossa, D., D'Ortenzio, F., Estournel, C., Gazeau, F., Rabouille, C., Stemmann, L., Bonnet, S., Diaz, F., Koubbi, P., Radakovitch, O., Babin, M., Baklouti, M., Bancon-Montigny, C., Belviso, S., Bensoussan, N., Bonsang, B., Bouloubassi, I., Brunet, C., Cadiou, J. F., Carlotti, F., Chami, M., Charmasson, S., Charrière, B., Dachs, J., Doxaran, D., Dutay, J. C., Elbaz-Poulichet, F., Eléaume, M., Eyrolles, F., Fernandez, C., Fowler, S., Francour, P., Gaertner, J. C., Galzin, R., Gasparini, S., Ghiglione, J. F., Gonzalez, J. L., Goyet, C., Guidi, L., Guizien, K., Heimbürger, L. E., Jacquet, S. H. M., Jeffrey, W. H., Joux, F., Le Hir, P., Leblanc, K., Lefèvre, D., Lejeusne, C., Lemé, R., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., Mallet, M., Méjanelle, L., Mélin, F., Mellon, C., Mérigot, B., Merle, P. L., Migon, C., Miller, W. L., Mortier, L., Mostajir, B., Mousseau, L., Moutin, T., Para, J., Pérez, T., Petrenko, A., Poggiale, J. C., Prieur, L., Pujo-Pay, M., Pulido-Villena, Raimbault, P., Rees, A. P., Ridame, C., Rontani, J. F., Ruiz Pino, D., Sicre, M. A., Taillandier, V., Tamburini, C., Tanaka, T., Taupier-Letage, I., Tedetti, M., Testor, P., Thébault, H., Thouvenin, B., Touratier, F., Tronczynski, J., Ulses, C., Van Wambeke, F., Vantrepotte, V., Vaz, S., and Verney, R.: Marine ecosystems' responses to climatic and anthropogenic forcings in the Mediterranean, Prog. Oceanogr., 91, 97–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.003</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Mopper, K., Zhou, J., Ramana, K. S., Passow, U., Dam, H. G., and Drapeau, D. T.: The role of surface active carbohydratesin the flocculation of a diatom bloom in a mesocosm, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 42, 43–73, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Naumann, E.: Über das Neuston des Süsswassers, Biol. Cent., 37,
98–106, 1917.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Obernosterer, I., Catala, P., Lami, R., Caparros, J., Ras, J., Bricaud, A., Dupuy, C., van Wambeke, F., and Lebaron, P.: Biochemical characteristics and bacterial community structure of the sea surface microlayer in the South Pacific Ocean, Biogeosciences, 5, 693–705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-693-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-693-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Ortega-Retuerta, E., Passow, U., Duarte, C. M., and Reche, I.: Effects of ultraviolet B radiation on (not so) transparent exopolymer particles, Biogeosciences, 6, 3071–3080, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-3071-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-3071-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U.: Transparent Exopolymer Particles in Aquatic Environments, Prog. Oceanogr., 55, 287–333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(02)00138-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(02)00138-6</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U. and Alldredge, A. L.: Aggregation of a diatom bloom in a mesocosm: The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP), Deep-Res. Pt. II, 42, 99–109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(95)00006-C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(95)00006-C</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H.: Cyanobacterial surface blooms formed by <i>Aphanizomenon</i> sp. and Nodularia spumigena in the Baltic Sea: Small-scale fluxes, pH, and oxygen microenvironments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 914–921, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.0914" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.0914</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Pujo-Pay, M., Conan, P., Oriol, L., Cornet-Barthaux, V., Falco, C., Ghiglione, J.-F., Goyet, C., Moutin, T., and Prieur, L.: Integrated survey of elemental stoichiometry (C, N, P) from the western to eastern Mediterranean Sea, Biogeosciences, 8, 883–899, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-883-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-883-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., and Glöckner, F. O.: The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, 590–596, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienne, Austria, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Reddaway, J. M. and Bigg, G. R.: Climatic change over the Mediterranean Sea and links to the more general atmospheric circulation, Int. J. Climatol., 16, 651–661, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., and Eliceiri, K. W.: NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis, Nat. Methods, 9, 671–675, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Sellegri, K., Nicosia, A., Freney, E., Uitz, J., Thyssen, M., Grégori, G., Engel, A., Zäncker, B., Haëntjens, N., Mas, S., Picard, D., Saint-Macary, A., Peltola, M., Rose, C., Trueblood, J., Lefevre, D., D'Anna, B., Desboeuf, K., Meskhidze, N., Guieu, C., and Law, C. S.: Surface ocean microbiota determine cloud precursors, Sci. Rep.-UK, 11, 281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78097-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78097-5</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, C.-C., Sperling, M., and Engel, A.: Effect of wind speed on the size distribution of gel particles in the sea surface microlayer: insights from a wind–wave channel experiment, Biogeosciences, 15, 3577–3589, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3577-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3577-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Tanhua, T., Hainbucher, D., Schroeder, K., Cardin, V., Álvarez, M., and Civitarese, G.: The Mediterranean Sea system: a review and an introduction to the special issue, Ocean Sci., 9, 789–803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-789-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-789-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, J. D. and Cunliffe, M.: High-throughput sequencing reveals neustonic and planktonic microbial eukaryote diversity in coastal waters, J. Phycol., 50, 960–965, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12228" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12228</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Tovar-Sánchez, A., Rodríguez-Romero, A., Engel, A., Zäncker, B., Fu, F., Marañón, E., Pérez-Lorenzo, M., Bressac, M., Wagener, T., Triquet, S., Siour, G., Desboeufs, K., and Guieu, C.: Characterizing the surface microlayer in the Mediterranean Sea: trace metal concentrations and microbial plankton abundance, Biogeosciences, 17, 2349–2364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2349-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2349-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Trueblood, J. V., Nicosia, A., Engel, A., Zäncker, B., Rinaldi, M., Freney, E., Thyssen, M., Obernosterer, I., Dinasquet, J., Belosi, F., Tovar-Sánchez, A., Rodriguez-Romero, A., Santachiara, G., Guieu, C., and Sellegri, K.: A Two-Component Parameterization of Marine Ice Nucleating Particles Based on Seawater Biology and Sea Spray Aerosol Measurements in the Mediterranean Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-487" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-487</a>, in review, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Upstill-Goddard, R. C., Frost, T., Henry, G. R., Franklin, M., Murrell, J. C., and Owens, N. J. P.: Bacterioneuston control of air-water methane exchange determined with a laboratory gas exchange tank, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002043</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Verdugo, P., Alldredge, A. L., Azam, F., Kirchman, D. L., Passow, U., and Santschi, P. H.: The oceanic gel phase: A bridge in the DOM-POM continuum, Mar. Chem., 92, 67–85, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016046</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Wietz, M., Wemheuer, B., Simon, H., Giebel, H. A., Seibt, M. A., Daniel, R., Brinkhoff, T., and Simon, M.: Bacterial community dynamics during polysaccharide degradation at contrasting sites in the Southern and Atlantic Oceans, Environ. Microbiol., 17, 3822–3831, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12842" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12842</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Wikner, J. and Hagstrom, A.: Evidence for a tightly coupled nanoplanktonic predator-prey link regulating the bacterivores in the marine environment, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 50, 137–145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps050137" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps050137</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
World Health Organization: The sea-surface microlayer and its role in global
change, WMO, Geneva, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Wurl, O. and Holmes, M.: The gelatinous nature of the sea-surface microlayer, Mar. Chem., 110, 89–97, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.009</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Wurl, O., Miller, L., Röttgers, R., and Vagle, S.: The distribution and fate of surface-active substances in the sea-surface microlayer and water column, Mar. Chem., 115, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.04.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.04.007</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Zäncker, B., Bracher, A., Röttgers, R., and Engel, A.: Variations of the Organic Matter Composition in the Sea Surface Microlayer: A Comparison between Open Ocean, Coastal, and Upwelling Sites Off the Peruvian Coast, Front. Microbiol., 8, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02369</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z., Liu, L., Liu, C., and Cai, W.: Studies on the sea surface microlayer: II. The layer of sudden change of physical and chemical properties, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 264, 148–159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00390-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00390-4</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, J., Bruns, M. A., and Tiedje, J. M.: DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition, Appl. Environ. Microb., 62, 316–322, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
