<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-18-2539-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Impact of bottom trawling on sediment biogeochemistry:<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> a modelling approach</article-title><alt-title>Impact of bottom trawling on sediment biogeochemistry</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Impact of bottom trawling on sediment biogeochemistry}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{E.~De~Borger et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>De Borger</surname><given-names>Emil</given-names></name>
          <email>emil.de.borger@nioz.nl</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff1">
          <name><surname>Tiano</surname><given-names>Justin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-8077</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Braeckman</surname><given-names>Ulrike</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-6363</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Rijnsdorp</surname><given-names>Adriaan D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff1">
          <name><surname>Soetaert</surname><given-names>Karline</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Biology, Marine Biology Research
Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of
Estuarine and Delta Systems, Royal Netherlands Institute of Sea Research (NIOZ), Utrecht University, Korringaweg 7, P.O. Box
140, 4401 NT Yerseke, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Wageningen Marine Research, Wageningen University and Research,
IJmuiden, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Emil De Borger (emil.de.borger@nioz.nl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>2539</fpage><lpage>2557</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>August</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>September</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e133">Bottom trawling in shelf seas can occur more than 10 times per year for a
given location. This affects the benthic metabolism, through a mortality of
the macrofauna, resuspension of organic matter from the sediment, and
alterations of the physical sediment structure. However, the trawling
impacts on organic carbon mineralization and associated processes are not
well known. Using a modelling approach, the effects of increasing trawling
frequencies on early diagenesis were studied in five different sedimentary
environments, simulating the effects of a deeper-penetrating gear (e.g. a
tickler chain beam trawl) versus a shallower, more variable penetrating gear
(e.g. an electric pulse trawl). Trawling events strongly increased oxygen
and nitrate concentrations in surface sediment layers and led to
significantly lower amounts of ammonium (43 %–99 % reduction) and
organic carbon in the top 10 cm of the sediment (62 %–96 % reduction).
As a result, total mineralization rates in the sediment were decreased by up
to 28 %. The effect on different mineralization processes differed both
between sediment types and between trawling frequencies. The shallow-penetrating gear had a slightly smaller effect on benthic denitrification
than the deeper-penetrating gear, but there were no statistically different
results between gear types for all other parameters. Denitrification was
reduced by 69 % in a fine sandy sediment, whereas nitrogen removal nearly
doubled in a highly eutrophic mud. This suggests that even relatively low
penetration depths from bottom fishing gears generate significant
biogeochemical alterations. Physical organic carbon removal through
trawl-induced resuspension of sediments, exacerbated by a removal of
bioturbating macrofauna, was identified as the main cause of the changes in
the mineralization process.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e145">Bottom trawl fisheries provide for 23 % of global fish landings
(Cashion et al., 2018), with the vast
majority of this type of fishing taking place in productive coastal shelf
seas (Amoroso et
al., 2018). In bottom trawl fisheries, nets are dragged along the bottom
with the help of weighted devices such as otter boards, shoes, or beams,
while chains, ground ropes, and/or electrical stimuli are used to coerce fish
into the net. Bottom trawl gears penetrate the seafloor, up to 35 cm deep
for otter trawl boards and 10 cm deep for tickler chain rigged beam trawls,
depending on the gear specifics and the sediment type
(Paschen et al.,
2000; Lucchetti and Sala, 2012; Depestele et al., 2016). Hence, during a
trawling event, sediment is mixed down to a certain depth, and hydraulic
drag introduced by the moving gear can cause the erosion of an additional
sediment layer
(Depestele
et al., 2016, 2019; O'Neill and Summerbell, 2011; O'Neill and Ivanović,
2016). Sediment disturbances by bottom trawling occur on very large scales:
63 % of all North Sea sediments are trawled between 1 and more than 10 times per year (Eigaard
et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e148">Scientific literature is rich in studies showing the physical and ecological
alterations to the benthic environment caused by bottom trawling. Acute
impacts of bottom trawling include the homogenization of surface sediment
(Depestele
et<?pagebreak page2540?> al., 2019; Ferguson et al., 2020) and the removal of significant
proportions of benthic fauna
(Bergman
and Hup, 1992; Bergman and Van Santbrink, 2000; Tiano et al., 2020).
Consistent fishing pressure favours organisms with shorter life spans and/or
increasing resistance to trawling, while communities become depleted of
species with key functional roles
(Kaiser
et al., 2006; Hiddink et al., 2017; Sciberras et al., 2018). Both fining
(Trimmer et al., 2005) and coarsening
(Palanques
et al., 2014; Mengual et al., 2016) of the sediment have been attributed to
trawling, as well as chronic organic matter depletion
(Pusceddu et al., 2014; Paradis
et al., 2019). The effects of bottom trawling on biogeochemical dynamics,
however, remain relatively understudied. Trawling has been linked with
enhanced carbon mineralization rates due to organic matter priming (van de
Velde et al., 2018) and/or trawl-induced increases in organic material
(Polymenakou
et al., 2005; Pusceddu et al., 2005; Palanques et al., 2014; Sciberras et
al., 2016). These results seemingly contrast with findings of organic matter
depletion
(Mayer
et al., 1991; Brylinsky et al., 1994; Watling et al., 2001) and reduced
mineralization rates after acute trawling
(Tiano et al., 2019), highlighting
the lack of knowledge on this topic and the need for further investigation.</p>
      <p id="d1e151">Geochemical alterations impact the capacity of the sediment to recycle
organic matter back to bioavailable nutrients (i.e. the sediment
biogeochemistry). These are important processes in shallow coastal seas
where primary production is strongly dependent on nutrients regenerated in
the sediment
(Soetaert
and Middelburg, 2009; Provoost et al., 2013). Observed biogeochemical
changes caused by sediment resuspension can lead to the instantaneous
release of nutrients from the sediment into the water column
(Durrieu de
Madron et al., 2005), temporarily enhanced oxygen consumption
(Tiano et al., 2019) and increased
nutrient concentrations in the bottom water
(Riemann
and Hoffmann, 1991; Almroth et al., 2009; Couceiro et al., 2013).
Furthermore, trawling has been linked to an increase in the sediment
oxygenated layer depth
(Allen
and Clarke, 2007; Tiano et al., 2019) and a reduction of the denitrification
capacity of cohesive sediments (Ferguson et al.,
2020). It has been argued, based on in situ measurements, that the sediment
biogeochemistry in consistently disturbed sediments remains in a transient
state; i.e. the sediments are permanently recovering from a disturbance
event (Van De Velde et al., 2018). These effects can
potentially be mitigated with alternative fishing gears or modified gear
configurations; however, the effectiveness of which needs to be assessed.</p>
      <p id="d1e154">To reduce fishing impacts, alternative bottom trawl gears such as pulse
fishing gears are being investigated
(van
Marlen et al., 2014; McConnaughey et al., 2020). With pulse gears, the heavy
tickler chains are replaced by electrodes, which emit electrical pulses that
induce a cramping response in flatfish (Soetaert et al.,
2015b). This causes fish to become temporarily immobilized, allowing their
capture in a net which drags behind the electrodes. Pulse gears exhibit
lower penetration depths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %) than conventional beam
trawls (Depestele et al., 2019) and also erode less material into
suspension through hydrodynamic drag due to a reduced towing speed
(Rijnsdorp et al., 2020a). The lower penetration depth of the
pulse gear compared to standard tickler chain methods has been shown to
decrease the effects of bottom trawling on the sediment redox layer
(Depestele
et al., 2019) and on chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction
(Tiano et al., 2019), but it is
yet unclear how specific mineralization processes might be affected on
longer temporal scales.</p>
      <p id="d1e172">The aim of this study was to explore the possible impacts of bottom trawling
on the sediment carbon and nitrogen cycling for two gears with different
penetration depth distributions and with increasing trawling frequency. We
use a dynamic diagenetic model, to which trawling disturbances were added.
We parametrized the model for five locations in the North Sea, with
sediments ranging from coarse sands to fine mud. Our hypotheses were (1) that the effects of bottom trawling would differ depending on the
sedimentary environment and (2) that fishing gear with reduced sediment
penetration would incur less changes in biogeochemical cycling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model setup</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e197">To model the effects of bottom trawling on sediment biogeochemistry,
disturbance events were added to a dynamic implementation of the early
diagenesis model OMEXDIA
(Soetaert
et al., 1996a, b). This model describes the concentrations of organic
matter, oxygen, nitrate, ammonium, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and
oxygen demand units (ODUs, reduced reaction products of anoxic
mineralization). These are calculated on a 1D grid, with 100 layers
increasing in thickness, starting from 0.01 cm at the sediment water
interface (SWI) and extending up to a sediment depth of 100 cm. The incoming
flux of organic matter (detritus) consists of a labile, fast-decaying
fraction (FDET) and a semi-labile, slow-decaying fraction (SDET) and is
mineralized in either oxic mineralization, denitrification, or anoxic
mineralization (Table 1). With oxic mineralization
and denitrification, the consumption of oxygen and nitrate as terminal
acceptors is explicitly modelled (Table 1; Reactions R1,
R2). Anoxic mineralization processes with alternative oxidants such as
manganese oxides, iron oxides, sulfate, and organic matter are collected
into one process that produces oxygen demand units (ODUs) as reaction
products (Table 1; Reaction R3). ODU reoxidation and
nitrification, the biological oxidation of ammonia to nitrate, are two
additional processes that consume oxygen (Table 1;
Reactions R4, R5). Mineralization rates are dependent on carbon availability
(first-order kinetics) and oxidant availability (Michaelis–Menten<?pagebreak page2541?> type
kinetics) and are inhibited by concentrations of inhibiting solutes (e.g.
oxygen inhibits denitrification and anoxic mineralization). FDET, SDET,
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ODUs, and DIC are the seven state
variables from which the concentrations are modelled in every layer.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e236">Diagenetic reactions used in OMEXDIA. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the molar C : P
ratio and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the molar N : P ratio in organic matter per mole of phosphorus (for
Redfield stoichiometry, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Process</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reaction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oxic mineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(R1)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Denitrification</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(R2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Anoxic mineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> an oxidant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ODU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(R3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrification</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(R4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ODU oxidation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ODU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> an oxidant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(R5)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e954">Exchange of state variables between the different layers is caused by
advection (sediment accretion, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) or molecular diffusion (for solutes), as well as
bioturbation (for solids). The solute flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to molecular diffusion
and advection is described by Fick's first law (Fick, 1855),
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where the effective diffusion coefficient is estimated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the molecular diffusivity of the solute;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) the factor correcting for sediment
tortuosity (Boudreau, 1996); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the sediment
porosity, which was kept constant with depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the concentration of the
state variable. Molecular diffusion coefficients were calculated using
the R package marelac (Soetaert and Petzoldt, 2018). Bioturbation is
depth-dependent and assumes a constant biodiffusivity value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a
layer with thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Below this depth, bioturbation decreases
rapidly to zero, determined by the attenuation coefficient for bioturbation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coeff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M93" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">coeff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>Model parametrization</title>
      <p id="d1e1196">The model was parametrized for five different sedimentary settings in the
Southern North Sea (Fig. 1,
Table 2): a coarse sandy sediment (hereafter denoted
as “Coarse”) with a median grain size of 433 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m located on a
sandbank in the Belgian part of the North Sea (BPNS); two sediments with
intermediate grain sizes (216–220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) – one with a low nutrient load
situated on the Dogger Bank (FineL) and the other nearshore (BPNS) with a
comparatively high nutrient load (FineH); and finally two muddy sediments
with a high silt content (74 %–88 %) – one with a low nutrient load
situated offshore, on the Fladen Grounds (MudL), and one with a
comparatively high nutrient load, situated nearshore in the BPNS (MudH).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1218">Characteristics of the selected sites. Low and high nutrient
classification is based on relative differences in nutrient build-up for the
same sediment type (see Fig. S1 in Supplement). MGS, SD.1, and SD.9 are
median grain size and the boundaries of the 10th and 90th
percentile of the grain size respectively (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m). The percentages of sand
(63–1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and mud (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) are weight
percentages of a dried sediment sample sieved over a 1 mm sieve.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.98}[.98]?><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sediment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nutrients</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Lat</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Long</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">MGS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SD.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">SD.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Mud</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Source<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coarse sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.43483</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.809822</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">433 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">286 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">660 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fine sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">FineL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55.17374</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.161264</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">216 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">143 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">328 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">b</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">FineH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.1853</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.7013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">394 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mud</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MudL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58.20097</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.525871</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">148</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">b</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MudH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.2714</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.905033</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">208 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1255"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> a: Toussaint et al. (2021); b: De Borger et al. (2021).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1812">Sampling locations in the North Sea. Offshore stations MudL and
FineL sampled by De Borger et al. (2021), and nearshore stations (inset) in
the Belgian part of the North Sea sampled by Toussaint et al. (2021). Low (L)
nutrient content relative to high (H) nutrient content. Basemap: © Esri, depth raster by GEBCO Compilation Group (2020).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2539/2021/bg-18-2539-2021-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1822">Biogeochemical data from these stations were collected from box core samples
(30 cm i.d., 25–30 cm sediment height) in two separate sampling campaigns on
the North Sea, one in September 2017 (Coarse, FineH, MudH;
Toussaint et al., 2021) and the other in May–June 2018
(FineL, MudL:  De Borger et al., 2021).
From these box core samples, sediment characteristics and the distribution of
nutrients in the sediment were subsampled, and nutrient exchange rates
across the sediment–water interface were determined in incubation
experiments (see Sect. S1 in the Supplement for an
extensive description of the methodology used to derive this information).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2542?><p id="d1e1825">Model parameters included both measured concentrations in the bottom water,
as well as process rate parameters that were derived following a two-step
steady-state fitting procedure (Table 3). Using the
measured DIC flux as the upper boundary organic carbon input flux, the
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux and porewater profiles of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were first fitted manually by tweaking a limited set of model
parameters. The degradation rate of low degrading material (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Slow</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the
biodiffusivity constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)   were constrained by fitting NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles. Mechanistically, decreasing the bioturbation rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduces
the build-up of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with depth, increases the oxygen penetration
depth, and changes the shape of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile (deepening the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak). Whereas the degradation rate of the semi-labile
organic matter also impacts deep NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, it has a
larger effect on the shape of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile, with lower degradation
rates causing a more gradual build-up with sediment depth. Subsequently,
parameters affecting the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles
were tuned (the nitrification rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as denitrification constants <italic>ksNO3denit</italic> and
<italic>kinO2denit</italic>). Higher nitrification rates increase the build-up of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
increase concentrations of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, typically producing a nitrate
concentration peak within the oxic zone. The shape of the oxygen profiles
further constrained the oxidation rate of oxygen demanding units (ODUs)
and inhibition constants for anoxic mineralization (<italic>kinO2anox</italic>, <italic>kinNO3anox</italic>). Then followed an
automated constrained parameter fitting step using an optimization
algorithm. In this second step, the fitted parameters were allowed to vary
in a range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % around the manually fitted parameter values. Also
the DIC fluxes were refitted within a narrow range (0.98–1.02 of measured
value) to allow freedom to the fitting algorithm. A random-based
minimization algorithm (Price, 1977) implemented in the R
package FME (Soetaert and Petzoldt, 2010) was used.
This algorithm pseudo-randomly sampled the parameter space until the
parameter set was found, which returned the minimal model cost,
defined as the sum of variable costs (modelled – measured values), scaled
using the mean–standard deviation relation determined for each nutrient.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2067">Parameters used for modelling the different sediment types.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.80}[.80]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Unit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">FineL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">FineH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">MudL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">MudH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8"><bold>(a)</bold> Fitted parameters </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">wSed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Advection rate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">cm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pFast</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fast degrading fraction organic matter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pSlow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Slow degrading fraction organic matter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rFast</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Decay rate FDET</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rSlow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Decay rate SDET</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Db</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Biodiffusivity coefficient</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">biotdepth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mixed layer depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rnit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Max. nitrification rate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rODUox</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Max. ODU oxidation rate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ksO2oduox</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Half saturation, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in ODU oxidation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ksNO3denit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Half saturation, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in denitrification</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mmol NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">68.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">kinO2denit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Half saturation, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition of denitrification</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">82.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">57.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">86.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">77.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">kinNO3anox</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Half saturation, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition anoxic mineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mmol NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">kinO2anox</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Half saturation, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition anoxic mineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">91.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">57.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">95.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">42.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">75.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rCaPprod</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rate of CaP production</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rCaPdiss</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rate of CaP dissolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rFePadsorp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rate of FeP adsorption</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.094</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rFePdesorp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rate of FeP desorption</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8"><bold>(b)</bold> Measured parameters </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cflux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Carbon deposition flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">nmolC cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1354.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">810.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2994.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">848.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9025.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Porosity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3396">Using the steady-state condition as the initial condition, several time-variable
boundary conditions were imposed for the dynamic model simulations. A
sinusoidally varying detrital carbon deposition flux, with the model-derived
carbon flux (Cflux, Table 3) as the annual average and
imposing an amplitude of 1, was used as the upper boundary organic carbon
flux (Fig. 2a). The uniform amplitude of 1 for all sites was chosen to
simplify temporal variations between sites. This resulted in differing
organic carbon fluxes for each location. Additional time-variable boundary
conditions (daily bottom water concentrations of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as bottom water temperature)
were extracted from the Copernicus Marine Environmental Monitoring Service
implementation of the ERSEM model (European Regional Seas Ecosystem
Model, Butenschön et al., 2016;
Copernicus Marine Service Information, 2020) for each location.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3449"><bold>(a)</bold> Example of sinusoidal varying organic carbon deposition flux,
based on average DIC efflux measured by Toussaint et al. (2021) for the
Coarse sediment. <bold>(b)</bold> Simulated depletion of bioturbation, relative to the
maximum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis), with increasing trawling frequency (yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) in
fine sands. <bold>(c)</bold> Imposed mixing and erosion depths (cm),
for fine sandy and muddy sediments, for the two gear types (tickler chain
and pulse gear).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2539/2021/bg-18-2539-2021-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>2.1.3</label><title>Disturbance modelling</title>
      <p id="d1e3500">Trawling disturbances were modelled as events causing the instantaneous
removal of the surface layer due to hydraulic erosion
(Depestele et al., 2016), followed by the mixing
of a layer below that due to the actual gear penetration
(Fig. 3). The hydraulic
erosion was implemented as a reset of the sediment water interface (SWI) to
the depth of the eroded layer. The mixing was implemented as a
homogenization of solids (FDET, SDET) over the mixing depth
(Fig. 3a), whereas
solutes in the mixing depth (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, DIC)
were set equal to the bottom water concentration of the respective solute to
represent a complete flushing of the mixed layer with bottom water
(Fig. 3b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3538">Implementation of a trawling event, on sediment concentrations of
solids and liquids. Dotted grey lines: initial concentration profile; black
line: profile after the event. <bold>(a)</bold> Hydraulic erosion removes a layer of
sediment, moving the sediment–water interface (SWI) downward; the effect is
implemented similarly for solids and liquids. <bold>(b)</bold> Subsequent mixing of the
sediment homogenizes the solid concentration over the mixed layer depth,
whereas liquids are set to the overlying bottom water concentration
(BWconc). Depths of both impacts are defined in the text.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2539/2021/bg-18-2539-2021-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page2543?><p id="d1e3553">Modelled trawling events also caused an immediate reduction in bioturbation
rates, due to the mortality of benthic fauna after a trawl pass
(Fig. 2b). Benthic mortality is mostly dependent
on the total penetration depth of the gear
(Hiddink et al., 2017) but also varies
with habitat
(Pitcher et al.,
2017). The instantaneous reduction in bioturbation was included as a
proportional depletion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), dependent on the sediment type (lowest in coarse
sand, highest in mud) and the penetration depth
(Fig. 2c). It was calculated based on the total
gear penetration depth (TPD, i.e. the sum of the eroded layer depth and the
penetration depth, in cm) and the mud content (% mud, particles
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) of the sediment, as described in
Eq. (3) derived from
Sciberras et al. (2018).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M238" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TPD</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mud</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3616">The subsequent recovery of the bioturbation was modelled based on the
logistic growth equation (Eq. 4), with the recovery
rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) the inverse of the longevity of the species community, kept constant
at 0.04 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Rijnsdorp
et al., 2016; Hiddink et al., 2019).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M241" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3680">Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bioturbation rate (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the full
bioturbation rate for a species community at carrying capacity. The maximum
reduction of the bioturbation was set to 90 % to account for quasi-immediate recolonization of trawled sediment by scavengers
(Sciberras et al., 2018) and deeper
living species that can survive intense trawling activity
(Rijnsdorp et al., 2018).
Electrical pulses were assumed to not affect benthos mortality in addition
to the physical effects, since current available research shows very limited
to no increased mortality by electrical pulses when compared to control
situations
(ICES,
2020; van Marlen et al., 2009; Murray et al., 2016; Soetaert et al., 2015a,
2016).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e3730">The model description was implemented in R (R Core Team, 2020),
the concentration changes of simulated species due to transport were
calculated using the R package ReacTran (Soetaert and
Meysman, 2012), and the resulting system of differential equations was
solved using the deSolve package
(Soetaert et al., 2010).
Dynamic model simulations were initialized with a steady-state solution
calculated with annually averaged boundary conditions as input parameters,
using the R package rootSolve (Soetaert, 2009). This is necessary
to build up an organic carbon, ammonium, ODU, and DIC stock in the sediment
(Soetaert et al., 1996b). Dynamic
simulations were run for 15 years, with daily output, to generate sufficient
independence from starting conditions. Reported modelling results stem from
the last simulated year.</p>
      <p id="d1e3733">The frequency of the trawling events imposed ranged from 0 (the baseline) to
5 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on realistic values of bottom trawling intensities in the
North Sea
(Rijnsdorp, 1998; Eigaard et al., 2017). Events were distributed randomly
throughout the year, given the absence of a clear seasonal pattern in
trawling intensities (Rijnsdorp et al., 2020a). For each
trawling frequency and site, 30 model simulations were performed, each with
a different pair of penetration and erosion depths, generated from a
log-normal distribution of<?pagebreak page2544?> penetration depths. For the tickler chain trawl,
a log-normal distribution of penetration depths was generated given the
average values (95 % confidence limits) for sand and mud summarized by
Pitcher et al. (2017): 3.2 (1.5, 6.7) cm and 1.9 (1.0, 3.7) cm for
mud and sand respectively; the erosion depth was set to 22% of the
penetration depth. The penetration depths for the pulse gear were set to 50 % of the tickler gear: 1.6 (0.75, 3.38) cm and 0.95 (0.49, 1.83) cm for
mud and sand. The erosion depth for the pulse gear was set to 70 % of the
tickler gear (Fig. 2c;
Depestele
et al., 2016, 2019; Rijnsdorp et al., 2020b).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e3757">Linear models were constructed with selected model output variables to
analyse the effects of the different gear types, trawling frequency, and the
sedimentary context on the rates of the different mineralization processes
and on the total mineralization (the sum of the separate mineralization
processes). A normal distribution was adopted for the process responses. To
deal with heterogeneity of variances of the residuals (for all models) in
the linear models, a generalized least squares (GLS) structure was added
(Pinheiro and Bates, 2000;
Zuur et al., 2009; West et al., 2014), which allowed for unequal variances
among treatment combinations to be included as a variance structure
(Pinheiro and Bates, 2000; West et al., 2014). To
find the most suitable variance structure, models with different variance
structures were compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC) scores (Akaike, 1974) and
plots of fitted values and individual model terms versus the residuals
(Zuur et al., 2009). For all models, a variance
structure was selected that allowed for variances conditional on the
station and trawling frequency. This variance structure was of the form
sediment <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> frequency, using the varIdent function of the R package
nlme (Pinheiro et al., 2019). Subsequently the fixed model
component was optimized by manual stepwise selection, using the likelihood
ratio test and associated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values as validation for removing excess terms
(Zuur et al., 2009). During this step, the
philosophy was adopted to not include significant interaction terms
containing a certain variable when said variable was not significant by
itself. The minimal adequate model was represented using restricted maximum
likelihood estimation (REML, West et al., 2014). GLS
models were implemented using the R package nlme (Pinheiro
et al., 2019).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2545?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Baseline model simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e3791">Baseline model simulations (undisturbed) show the differences in organic
matter cycling between the chosen locations. In the coarse-sand station
(Coarse), the average total mineralization rate was 13.6 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with 89 % of this due to oxic mineralization and 6 % due to
anoxic mineralization, and 5 % was denitrified (see Table S2,
Supplement). The two muddy stations had either very high or very low total
mineralization rates (MudH: 82 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, MudL: 8.5 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and similar for the two fine sandy stations (FineH: 30 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, FineL: 8.1 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), related to
the difference in organic matter deposition between nearshore and offshore
locations (Table 3). Oxic mineralization dominated in FineL (oxic: 81 %,
anoxic: 12 %, denitrification: 6 %), FineH (oxic: 78 %, anoxic: 22 %,
denitrification: 0 %), and MudL (oxic: 72 %, anoxic: 18 %, denitrification: 10 %),
whereas the mineralization in the nearshore muddy station (MudH) was
dominated by anoxic processes (oxic: 27 %, anoxic: 68 %, denitrification: 5 %).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Impact on biota</title>
      <p id="d1e3923">Trawling-induced depletion of fauna substantially decreased average annual
bioturbation rates. Bioturbation decreased with increasing penetration depth
(Fig. 2b, c), resulting in the strongest decreases in
muddy sediment (MudL, MudH) and larger decreases in the deep-penetrating
gear versus the shallow-penetrating gear (Table 4).
In the Coarse sediment, the annually averaged bioturbation decreased
gradually, from 81 % of its original value at one trawl per year to 19 %
at five trawls per year in the tickler gear and 49 % at five trawls per year
for the pulse gear. For the fine (FineL, FineH) and muddy (MudL, MudH)
sediments the maximum depletion was reached after four (five for the shallow gear)
and two trawling events respectively.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3929">Percentage of bioturbation (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD) remaining after
sustained trawling activity at a given trawling frequency (yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), for
the different sediment types. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: deeply penetrating tickler gear, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: shallow-penetrating pulse gear.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Coarse </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Fine </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">Mud </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Nutrient and organic carbon distribution</title>
      <p id="d1e4403">With higher trawling frequencies, concentrations of oxygen and nitrate in
the sediment generally increased, whereas ammonium and organic carbon
contents were always reduced (Figs. 4,
5). The magnitude of concentration changes
was similar for both gear types (Table S1, Supplement shows the mean
percentage change relative to baseline concentrations reported). Increases
in oxygen (Fig. 4a–e) and nitrate
(Fig. 4f–j) concentrations were largest in the
oligotrophic stations FineL and MudL, where concentrations of oxygen in the
upper 5 cm increased 15–16 fold (respectively 1604 % and 1516 %), while nitrate
concentrations increased 9–19 fold (respectively 909 % and 1911 %) at the highest
trawling intensities (see Fig. S2 in Supplement for the range of nutrient
concentrations throughout the year). In contrast, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations initially decreased at MudH by 25 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 % maximally for
one to two trawls per year, before increasing by 52 % to 81 % (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and then increased by
123 % to 188 % (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at five trawls per year. Ammonium
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations decreased strongly in all sediments, with a
decrease of up to 69 % in Coarse; 68 % in MudH; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in FineL, FineH, and MudL (Fig. 4k–o, Table S1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4480">Annually averaged modelled concentrations (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
oxygen <bold>(a–e)</bold>, nitrate <bold>(f–j)</bold>, and ammonium <bold>(k–o)</bold> in the
different types of sediment used as the basis for the disturbance
simulations (columns). The black dotted line is the 0 trawl default, and the full and
dotted coloured lines are tickler and pulse gear respectively, with
increasing trawling frequencies as different colours.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2539/2021/bg-18-2539-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4512">Total organic carbon concentrations in the upper 10 cm of the
sediment (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the different stations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis on log scale).
Profiles represent the average profile per trawling intensity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for
the deep-penetrating gear (full) and shallow-penetrating gear (dotted
line). For station MudH a cutout of the first 0.5 cm is inflated to show
the displacement of OC to the surface.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2539/2021/bg-18-2539-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4553">Increasing the trawling frequency reduced the total amount of reactive
organic carbon (labile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> semi-labile, OC) in the sediment and reduced the
penetration depth of the OC (Fig. 5, Table S1).
Trawling frequencies of 3–5 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> led to near-total depletion of reactive
OC in all sediments in the upper 10 cm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % removed for
Coarse and FineH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for FineL, MudL, and MudH,
Fig. 5). The mean OC profiles for both gears at a
given frequency were often visually different (dotted vs. full lines on
Fig. 5), but the average concentrations over 10 cm
did not differ significantly. A redistribution of organic carbon was visible
in the upper centimetre of the sediment, where organic carbon concentrations were
higher in the impacted than in the baseline simulation (example in the
cutout of the top 5 mm shown for MudH, Fig. 5). In
FineL, MudL, and MudH the ratio of labile organic carbon (FDET) as a
proportion of the carbon pool (FDET <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SDET) increased between 25 % and 34 % (Fig. S3). This effect was only noticeable in the upper
0.2–0.5 cm; below this, depth values of this ratio in all trawling
frequencies converged to 0 due to the depletion of labile organic carbon.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Total mineralization rates</title>
      <p id="d1e4610">The trawling frequency had a significant negative impact on all studied
mineralization process rates (oxic, anoxic, denitrification) and on the
total organic carbon mineralization, as confirmed by the negative
coefficients in the GLS models (“Freq”, Table 5).
Changes in process rates also differed between the studied sediments, as
seen by the inclusion of an interaction term between the sediment type and
the trawling frequency (Freq : Sed). The sediment biogeochemical response to
increasing trawling frequency was often non-linear, warranting the inclusion
of a squared frequency term (Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The gear type was only included as
a significant explanatory variable in the model for denitrification, where
the deeper-penetrating gear (tickler) decreased denitrification rates more
than the shallow-penetrating gear (Table 5).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4625">Generalized least squares (GLS) models for the total
mineralization, oxic mineralization, anoxic mineralization, and
denitrification as a function of increasing trawling frequency (Freq and
Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the fishing gear type (Gear), and the sediment context (Sed)
and interactions between model terms Freq : Sed and Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : Sed.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="14cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Response variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Model</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total mineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Intercept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Sed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq : Sed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : Sed <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.93 Freq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55.05 S1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21.85 S2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.40 S3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21.48 S4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.62 Freq : S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.49 Freq : S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.31 Freq : S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.50 Freq : S4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.95 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oxic mineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Intercept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Sed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq : Sed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> e <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : Sed <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 Freq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21 S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.74 S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.28 S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.17 S4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.63 Freq : S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.58 Freq : S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.38 Freq : S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.91 Freq : S4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.90 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Anoxic mineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Intercept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Sed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq : Sed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : Sed<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.23 Freq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 51.14 S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.53 S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  5.67 S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.03 S4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.27 Freq : S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.80 Freq : S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.12 Freq : S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59 Freq : S4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.55 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  0.09Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Denitrification</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Intercept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Gear <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> d <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Sed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq : Sed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : Sed <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0034 Freq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00035 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00038 Tickler Gear <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.14 S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44 S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.55 S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.73 S4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.26 Freq : S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 Freq : S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 Freq : S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 Freq:S4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>:S1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 Freq<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : S4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e4646"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S1: MudH; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S2: FineL; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S3: Coarse; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S4: MudL.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6011">The total mineralization rate was impacted negatively in all cases, and
decreases ranged from 5 % for one trawl per year for MudL to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.9 % for
five trawls per year, for FineL (Fig. 6a–e, values
summarized in Supplement Table S2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e6024">Rates of total mineralization <bold>(a–e)</bold>, and the three main
mineralization processes (<bold>f–j</bold>: oxic; <bold>k–o</bold>: anoxic; <bold>p–t</bold>:
denitrification) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each gear type (blue
boxes: tickler gear; red boxes: pulse gear) and for increasing trawling
frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2539/2021/bg-18-2539-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6096">The change in oxic mineralization rates (base: 12.0, 23.3, 6.5, 6.1, and 23.1 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Coarse, FineL, FineH; MudL, and MudH respectively)
showed different patterns depending on the station
(Fig. 6f–j). For Coarse and FineH there was a
consistent decrease in oxic mineralization rates with increasing trawling
frequency, with maximum decreases at five trawls per year of 21 % and 23 % for the tickler gear<?pagebreak page2546?> and 21 % and 25 % for the pulse gear. In
contrast, for FineL and MudL oxic mineralization remained the same or
increased at a frequency of one trawl per year (8 % and 11 %), followed
by a decrease at higher trawling frequencies with maximal decreases of 15 % and 10 % at five trawls per year for the tickler gear; the values for
the pulse gear were similar (Fig. 6f–j). For
MudH, oxic mineralization increased by a maximum of 56 % at five trawls per year for both gears.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2548?><p id="d1e6123">Anoxic mineralization rates (base: 0.9, 1.0, 6.6, 1.5, and 57.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Coarse, FineL, FineH; MudL, and MudH respectively) were also affected
similarly by the two gear types and decreased for all stations, though with
differing magnitudes (Fig. 6k–l). The lowest
decrease was in the Coarse sediment, where the decrease in the anoxic
mineralization rate was similar for all trawling frequencies (range of 18 % to 25 %), and the highest decrease was modelled at MudL, where
anoxic rates decreased between 73 % and 83 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e6150">Denitrification rates (base: 0.6, 0.5, 0.1, 0.8, and 4.2 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for Coarse, FineL, FineH, MudL, and MudH respectively) decreased with
increasing trawling frequencies at all stations except MudH, with a maximum
reduction of 74 % (tickler) and 68 % (pulse) at FineL
(Fig. 6p–t). Trawling frequencies of 1–2 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> did not consistently alter denitrification for the Coarse sediment
and FineH and MudL. For the MudH trawls, denitrification rates increased by
50 % and 49 % towards five trawls per year for tickler and pulse gear
respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e6189">As a result of the changes to denitrification, the removal of reactive N
from the sediment changed. The sediments where denitrification decreased
most (FineL, MudL) had 35 % and 51 % of N produced by mineralization
removed by<?pagebreak page2549?> denitrification when undisturbed, and this reduced to 11 % and
45 % respectively for five trawls per year. For the Coarse sediment the
fraction of N removed increased from 26 % when undisturbed to 30 % for
one trawl per year and then decreased again to 25 %. In MudH more N was
removed as well, with a near doubling as a peak at five trawls per year (48 %, up from 26 % as the base).</p>
      <p id="d1e6192">All previous results represent average changes throughout the year, but
trawling also showed instantaneous effects, as illustrated by the decrease
in denitrification rates (to nearly 0 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) immediately
after a trawl events (Fig. 7).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6222">Nitrate concentrations (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the sediment for a
no-trawling simulation <bold>(a, d, g)</bold> and for three trawls per year <bold>(d, e, f)</bold>, and
associated annual denitrification rates (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, black lines indicate default (zero trawls per year) and red dotted lines indicate the trawling simulation).
Represented stations are Coarse <bold>(a–c)</bold>, FineL <bold>(d–f)</bold>, and MudH <bold>(g–i)</bold>.
Black vertical lines indicate when trawling events take place. ”Doy” indicates day of year.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2539/2021/bg-18-2539-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Relative changes</title>
      <p id="d1e6292">The relative contribution of the mineralization processes to the total
mineralization changed markedly between trawling frequencies and stations
(Fig. 8). In general, the proportion of oxic
mineralization increased (Fig. 8a–e) at the
expense of anoxic mineralization (Fig. 8f–j).
The largest changes occurred when switching from zero to one trawling event
yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and values remained stable from two events per year onwards. The
proportion of oxic mineralization increased most at MudH (tickler: 116 %,
pulse: 112 % for five trawls per year), and the smallest changes occurred at
Coarse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for both gears). The proportion of anoxic
mineralization, on the other hand, decreased in all simulations. The largest
changes were modelled at FineL and MudL (69 % and 78 % respectively)
and the smallest for Coarse and FineH (14 % and 18 % respectively). The
proportion of mineralization performed by denitrification decreased in FineL
and MudL (71 % and 10 %, five events per year), doubled at MudH (100 %), and remained practically the same for Coarse and FineH
(Fig. 8k–o).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e6319">Relative contributions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, as proportion) of the three main
mineralization processes (<bold>a–e</bold>: oxic; <bold>f–j</bold>: anoxic; <bold>f–o</bold>:
denitrification) to the total mineralization for each gear type (blue boxes:
tickler gear; red boxes: pulse gear) and for increasing trawling frequency
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/2539/2021/bg-18-2539-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Organic carbon depletion</title>
      <p id="d1e6380">Simulated trawling of the seafloor impacted the sediment biogeochemistry in
all environments and for all trawling frequencies. The amount of total
mineralizable carbon in the sediment consistently decreased with higher
trawl frequencies, but the changes in mineralization pathways differed from
case to case. The main drivers of the biogeochemical changes were found to
be the depletion of organic carbon (OC) in the sediment (i.e. the substrate
for mineralization itself), the redistribution of this OC nearer to the SWI
(Fig. 5), and the increasing oxygenation of the
sediment. With each trawl pass, a part of the organic-carbon-rich top layer
is removed (Fig. 5). This is associated with an
injection of oxidized reactants from the water column (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) deeper into the sediment and a homogenization of OC
concentrations in the mixed layer during the mixing phase. Simultaneously,
part of the benthos in the sediment is removed, often strongly decreasing
the bioturbation rate, affecting the rate at which organic matter is
distributed in the sediment (especially after multiple trawling events
yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 4). Sediment mixing alone could
potentially increase OC contents at the bottom of the mixing zone, but
successive trawling events, and the removal of bioturbators that can
transport OC far below the mixing zone, resulted in a redistribution of OC
closer to the sediment–water interface in all simulated sediments.</p>
      <p id="d1e6416">The fine sandy station with
low organic matter content (FineL), as well as both muddy stations (MudL, MudH), showed smaller decreases in surface organic carbon concentrations
compared to the eutrophic fine sandy (FineH) and Coarse sediments (Table S1), mainly because baseline bioturbation rates in the former were 3 orders
of magnitude larger (Table 3). As such, bioturbation
seems to cause an increased resistance to carbon loss by facilitating
transport to deeper layers, making it less vulnerable to surface
disturbances. While the physical OC depletion caused by the penetrating gear
is aggravated by the loss of bioturbating fauna in the sediment, this effect
is context-dependent as bioturbators show variable levels of resistance to
trawling (Hale et al., 2017; Tiano et al., 2020). Our modelled results
provide further evidence that surviving fauna help buffer and mitigate the
biogeochemical effects of trawling (Duplisea et
al., 2001). The comparison with the work of Duplisea et al. (2001) is in
fact remarkable, as Duplisea et al. (2001) used a food-web-based model to
investigate changes to carbon cycling, whereas a diagenetic model was used
in this work. Both are very different approaches, which  highlight both a shift to
more oxic mineralization and the importance of benthic fauna as a
stabilizing factor.  Tiano et
al. (2019) observed decreases in sedimentary Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper 1 cm
immediately after trawling of 41 % and 83 % for pulse and tickler gears
respectively. Also, organic matter (OM) depletion as a result of long-term fishing has been
reported, even at water depths beyond 500 m
(Martín
et al., 2014; Pusceddu et al., 2014; Paradis et al., 2019), where
comparisons between trawled and untrawled sites yielded a difference in OC
between 20 % and 60 %
(Paradis
et al., 2019), or 60 %–100 % of the daily input flux of organic carbon
was removed from sediments by trawling
(Pusceddu et al., 2014). In fact, these
deep-water sediments are particularly sensitive to trawling disturbances, a
concerning feature given the steady expansion of fishing practices into
deeper waters in recent decades
(Morato et al.,
2006; Puig et al., 2012; Watson and Morato, 2013). Deep-water species
communities are slow growing and thus recover slowly, organic matter
deposition rates are low, and the generally finer grained sediments found in
the deep are easily resuspended following a trawl passage
(Norse
et al., 2012; Mengual et al., 2016). All three of these factors increase the
impacts of trawling events on organic matter cycling in the model presented
in this work, and further modelling work could be useful to investigate the
potentially large impact that deep-sea habitat experience. There are also
studies reporting enhanced OC concentrations in trawled areas, in contrast
with our results
(Palanques
et al., 2014; Pusceddu et<?pagebreak page2550?> al., 2005; Sciberras et al., 2016), possibly due
to differing hydrodynamic and morphological conditions of the North Sea
compared to other areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e6426">The decrease in total mineralization rates may partly be offset by
redeposition of organic matter, which was not considered in our model. Not
all eroded organic matter stays in the water column, but a part resettles on
the sediments. How this redistribution occurs depends on the sediment type
and the local hydrodynamics, which determine the distance over which eroded
sediment particles are transported
(Le Bot et
al., 2010; Robinson et al., 2005). It can be expected that for coarser,
heavier sediments a fraction will be redeposited in the trawling track but
that for muddy sediments, lighter and rich in organic matter
(Mayer, 1994), eroded material remains in
suspension long enough to be transported elsewhere
(Palanques et al., 2014). In the North Sea,
suspended material is transported from the Southern Bight northward by
anticlockwise residual currents. Ultimately, the partially degraded
materials are deposited in the Skagerrak
(Dauwe et al., 1998). So given the
intensity, and the persistence with which vast areas of the southern North
Sea are trawled (e.g. total annual sediment mobilization by the Dutch
trawling fleet varied between 8 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg of sediment between 2010
and 2016, Rijnsdorp et al., 2020a), we expect that
trawling-induced sediment resuspension plays a significant role in the
northward transport and actively contributes to organic matter depletion in
southern areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Changes to mineralization pathways</title>
      <p id="d1e6452">Trawling activities generally caused strong increases in sedimentary oxygen
and nitrate availability and decreases in the ammonium content (Figs. 4, 7,
Table 3). Sediment
oxygenation increased both because of a direct injection of oxygen-rich
bottom water in deeper sediment layers during a trawling event and because
oxygen consumption by mineralization processes decreased as a result of
strong decreases in OC and ammonium. As a result of increased oxygen
availability, the importance of oxic mineralization generally increased with
trawling, whereas anoxic mineralization decreased
(Fig. 8).</p>
      <p id="d1e6455">The strongest increases in the proportion of oxic mineralization were modelled
for the sediment characterized by a high silt percentage and organic matter
load (MudH). These types of sediments also have a low permeability, high
mineralization rates, and a low oxygen penetration depth
(Braeckman et al., 2014), with a lesser
importance of oxic relative to anoxic mineralization in undisturbed
conditions. Fishing gears penetrate deepest in these muds and as such
provide oxygen to deeper layers, although this is consumed rapidly.
Van De Velde et al. (2018) found an increase in
mineralization rates of over 200 % after a disturbance event in muddy
sediments (from the same origin as MudH). This was attributed to multiple
possible factors, such as self-priming by mixing refractory with labile
organic matter, burial of phytoplankton in settling sediment, and the
introduction of oxygen<?pagebreak page2551?> to redox shuttle mechanisms. Our results show an
enhancement of total oxic mineralization at MudH but no increase in the
total mineralization rate, perhaps because the aforementioned processes were
not included in the used model.</p>
      <p id="d1e6458">The higher oxygen concentrations also had a clear inhibiting effect on
denitrification rates (Fig. 7). Denitrification in
coastal shelf sediments accounts for an estimated third of all nitrogen loss
in Earth's marine surfaces (Middelburg et al., 1996),
making these regions crucial to counteract nitrogen eutrophication
(Galloway
et al., 2004; Seitzinger et al., 2006). For all stations, trawling events
caused an instantaneous dip in denitrification rates, because of the
injection of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and removal of the electron acceptor (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
from the<?pagebreak page2552?> sediment, similar to the results of
van der Molen et al. (2013)
(Fig. 7, black vertical lines). However, a
discrepancy was noted between the biogeochemical impacts of trawling in
cohesive sediments with high organic matter concentrations versus sandier
and comparatively low nutrient sediments, consistent with literature
findings
(Polymenakou
et al., 2005; Van De Velde et al., 2018; Tiano et al., 2019). The coarsest
sandy sediments (Coarse) were by default deeply oxygenated
Fig. 4a–b), with denitrification maximally
inhibited by oxygen concentrations. Larger pore spaces in these sediments
allow for bottom water to penetrate more deeply into the sediment matrix,
bringing oxygen and other reactants into deeper sediment layers
(Huettel and Gust, 1992). Cohesive sediments
mostly lack such advective transport. As a result, oxygen often fuels rapid
mineralization in coarse-grained sediments
(Huettel and
Rusch, 2000; Ehrenhauss et al., 2004). The increasing trawling frequency in
coarse sediments thus had little effect on oxygen penetration, and nitrate
concentrations only marginally increased (Fig. 7a–b), resulting in minor changes to mineralization pathways such as
denitrification on average, although instantaneous effects could be
prominent (Fig. 7c). In oligotrophic finer
sediments (FineL, MudL), there was a massive increase in both oxygen and
nitrate concentrations as a result of trawling
(Fig. 7d–e). Whereas
increasing NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations would stimulate denitrification on
their own, the rise of oxygen concentrations strongly inhibited
denitrification, leading to a drop in denitrification rates throughout the
year (Fig. 7f). The more eutrophic fine sediment
FineH displayed a similar pattern of increased oxygenation mineralization as
the other fine sandy sites, but the already low baseline denitrification
rates did not decrease further. In the unperturbed simulation of MudH,
mineralization was predominantly anoxic (68 %), with denitrification
limited by NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability. Increasing the oxygenation in this
type of sediment caused the denitrification to double, by increasing the
nitrate availability (Fig. 7g–i).</p>
      <p id="d1e6506">Ferguson et al. (2020) found that denitrification
rates in Moreton Bay, Australia, were reduced between 11 % and 50 % within
3 h after a trawling event, and this rate decreased after successive
trawling events during the studied period. These decreases were attributed
to homogenization of the sediment, which removes oxic microniches created by
fauna and thus zones of intense coupled nitrification–denitrification
(Ferguson et al., 2020). Though the key role of
redox microniches is not directly investigated here, we acquired decreases
in denitrification rates in a similar range in all sediments apart from
MudH, especially when trawling frequencies increased.</p>
      <p id="d1e6510">Within the marine environment, shelf sediments are sites characterized by
high nutrient concentrations, therefore offering resilience against
reductions in nutrient loadings.
Soetaert and Middelburg (2009)
showed that storage of ammonium in sediments significantly delays the
response of shallow systems to oligotrophication, as the efflux of nitrogen
from the sediment will compensate for part of the losses in the water column.
The increased reduction of the ammonium concentrations with fishing
intensity will affect this buffering capacity of the sediment. The nitrogen
buffering capacity of the investigated sediments, representative for a large
fraction of North Sea sediments, was affected similarly by both gears.
Firstly, the stock of nitrogen (as NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the sediment was
directly affected by porewater flushing during trawling (with decreases
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in some cases, Fig. 7f).
Secondly, lower availability of reaction substrate (OC, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
decreased denitrification rates, reducing N removal to the atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Reducing gear disturbance of the seafloor</title>
      <p id="d1e6555">In our work the differences with respect to organic matter mineralization
dynamics between gear types with differing penetration depths (e.g. 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 cm vs. 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 cm in mud) mostly remained suggestive
rather than statistically conclusive. The fishing gear type was only
included as a significant predictor for the denitrification rates, with a
small coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.00038; Table 5). This is
because the freshly deposited stocks of organic carbon are present near the
sediment surface, and any gear that penetrates the sediment impacts this
layer, especially for multiple trawling events per year
(Fig. 5, Table 5). This indicates that only a thin
layer of surface sediment needs to be disturbed to generate significant
biogeochemical changes (Dounas et al.,
2005). Many biogeochemical processes are mediated by the dynamics of oxygen
near the sediment–water interface, which itself is influenced by the
composition and permeability of the sediment. A shift towards fining (an
increased proportion of finer grain size classes) has been described in
certain trawled areas, with expected consequences for sediment
biogeochemistry, such as an increased rate of sulfate reduction
(Trimmer et al., 2005). But the opposite occurs just as well
(Depestele
et al., 2019; Mengual et al., 2019; Tiano et al., 2019). In these cases
resuspended fine-grained material is exported away from the trawling site,
leaving a coarsened trawling track, with the results subtly different
between gear types
(Depestele
et al., 2019; Tiano et al., 2019). This means that the effects of fishing
gears on grain size sorting should be better characterized for various
sediment types to constrain the uncertainty around predictions of gear
impacts on sediment functioning.</p>
      <p id="d1e6579">This does not imply that the penetration depth is irrelevant. Other studies
have reported clear positive effects of reducing the penetrations depths of
fishing gears, such as decreased sediment mobilization and homogenization,
and reduced organic matter depletion
(Depestele
et al., 2019; Tiano et al., 2019). Conversely, assuming that the eroded
layer and the mixing depth scale with more deeply penetrating gears than
those tested here, the depletion effects should become more pronounced. In a
single trawling event more of the (reactive-carbon-rich) top sediment layer
would be removed,<?pagebreak page2553?> there would be a higher mortality of organisms, and more
of the nutrient build-up would be removed.</p>
      <p id="d1e6582">Aside from the penetration depth, the largest impacts occurred when increasing
the trawling frequency from zero to one trawling event per year, and the response
of mineralization processes to increased trawling frequency was often
non-linear, making them more difficult to predict. This would imply that
management strategies aimed at maintaining the ecosystem functions provided
by shelf sediments should be focused on spatial controls, bottom impact
quotas, and effort control of trawling gears that per definition require
contact with the bottom to catch commercially viable target species
(McConnaughey et al., 2020). An effective
strategy limits the impacted surface area and allows carbon stocks and
faunal communities in the sediment to recover from a disturbance, resulting
in the recovery of vital biogeochemical functions such as denitrification
and carbon burial. This includes technical adaptations to improve
catch efficiency. Whereas our study only focused on direct head-to-head
comparisons between the two gear types, pulse trawls are associated with
lower spatial footprints due to their relatively higher catch efficiencies
compared to beam trawls (Poos et al., 2020;
Rijnsdorp et al., 2020a, b; ICES, 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e6585">Shifting the fishing effort from peripheral areas to core fishing grounds
would also reduce the area where the top sediment layer is removed on a
regular basis, along with the associated reduction in mineralization of
organic matter. This can be achieved through time-restricted bottom
trawling, in which fishing grounds are closed off temporarily. Similarly,
areas with high denitrification rates, crucial for eutrophication mitigation,
can be closed to trawling completely, as done in other regions of the world
(Ferguson et al., 2020). Site-specific conditions
such as rates of biogeochemical recovery and sedimentation rates need to be
known to determine the resilience of ecosystems to trawling and to fine-tune
management plans (Paradis et al., 2021).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6598">With the addition of perturbation events to a model of early diagenesis, and
a description of faunal mortality and recovery, we simulated the effects of
increasing bottom trawling frequencies on sediment biogeochemistry. The
results showed that bottom trawl fisheries strongly impacted the sediment
biogeochemistry, and the magnitudes of the changes were dependent on the
sedimentary context and trawling frequency. Two types of fishing gears were
investigated. The exposed top sediment layer rich in organic matter was
targeted similarly by both fishing gears, resulting in a similar loss of
organic carbon, which was further exacerbated by the loss of bioturbating
fauna. A shift towards increasingly oxic mineralization at the cost of
anoxic mineralization was observed, driven by an often strongly increased
oxygen availability in the sediment. The removal of fixed nitrogen by
denitrification was not affected similarly in all sediments. Denitrification
increased in nearshore cohesive mud and decreased elsewhere, with highest
decreases in offshore sediments with lower carbon loads. Our modelling
results corroborate multiple patterns found in other studies and can serve
to interpret research and search for mitigation strategies. Trawling impacts
are hard to mitigate by only reducing the penetration depth of the gear, so
additional management strategies are needed to allow for partial or full
recovery of biogeochemical functions in between trawling events.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6605">Model code and instructions for producing similar output are available on a
GitHub repository (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4697277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4697277</ext-link>, De Borger
and Soetaert, 2021).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6614">Data used to calibrate the biogeochemical model stem from Toussaint et al. (2021) and De Borger et al. (2021), and data are available from these authors on request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6617">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2539-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2539-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6626">EDB, JT, KS, and ADR devised the study and contributed to the manuscript.
UB contributed to the manuscript. EDB collected field data used for the
model descriptions and performed the model simulations. KS developed the
dynamic modelling environment in R.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6632">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6638">Emil De Borger is a doctoral research fellow funded by the Belgian Science Policy
Office (BELSPO, contract BR/154/A1/FaCE-It). Justin Tiano is a doctoral research
fellow funded by the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) and the
Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV; grant/award
no. 1300021172). Ulrike Braeckman is a postdoctoral research fellow at Research
Foundation – Flanders (FWO, Belgium) (grant no. 1201720N). We thank Toussaint et
al. (2021) for the data needed to parametrize the nearshore sediments used in this
modelling exercise. The methodology conducted in this research will be used
for the BFIAT (Bottom Fishing Impact Assessment Tool) project funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) (grant no. 18523).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6643">This research has been supported by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (grant no. BR/154/A1/FaCE-It), the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (grant no. 1300021172), and the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (grant no. 1201720N).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6649">This paper was edited by Aninda Mazumdar and reviewed by Antonio Pusceddu and Sarah Paradis.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans.
Automat. Contr., 19, 716–723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allen, J. I. and Clarke, K. R.: Effects of demersal trawling on ecosystem functioning in the North Sea: A modelling study, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 336, 63–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps336063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps336063</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Almroth, E., Tengberg, A., Andersson, J. H., Pakhomova, S., and Hall, P. O.
J.: Effects of resuspension on benthic fluxes of oxygen, nutrients,
dissolved inorganic carbon, iron and manganese in the Gulf of Finland,
Baltic Sea, Cont. Shelf Res., 29, 807–818,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.12.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2008.12.011</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Amoroso, R. O., Pitcher, C. R., Rijnsdorp, A. D., McConnaughey, R. A.,
Parma, A. M., Suuronen, P., Eigaard, O. R., Bastardie, F., Hintzen, N. T.,
Althaus, F., Baird, S. J., Black, J., Buhl-Mortensen, L., Campbell, A. B.,
Catarino, R., Collie, J., Cowan, J. H., Durholtz, D., Engstrom, N.,
Fairweather, T. P., Fock, H. O., Ford, R., Gálvez, P. A., Gerritsen, H.,
Góngora, M. E., González, J. A., Hiddink, J. G., Hughes, K. M.,
Intelmann, S. S., Jenkins, C., Jonsson, P., Kainge, P., Kangas, M., Kathena,
J. N., Kavadas, S., Leslie, R. W., Lewise, S. G., Lundy, M., Makin, D.,
Martin, J., Mazor, T., Gonzalez-Mirelis, G., Newman, S. J., Papadopoulou,
N., Posen, P. E., Rochester, W., Russok, T., Salal, A., Semmens, J. M.,
Silvan, C., Tsoloso, A., Vanelslander, B., Wakefield, C. B., Wood, B. A.,
Hilborn, R., Kaiser, M. J., and Jennings, S.: Bottom trawl fishing footprints
on the world's continental shelves, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
115, E10275–E10282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802379115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1802379115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bergman, M. J. N. and Hup, M.: Direct effects of beamtrawling on macrofauna
in a sandy sediment in the southern north sea, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 49,
5–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.1.5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/49.1.5</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bergman, M. J. N. and Van Santbrink, J. W.: Mortality in megafaunal benthic
populations caused by trawl fisheries on the Dutch continental shelf in the
North Sea in 1994, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 57, 1321–1331,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0917" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1006/jmsc.2000.0917</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boudreau, B. P.: The diffusive tortuosity of fine-grained unlithified
sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 60, 3139–3142,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00158-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(96)00158-5</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Braeckman, U., Foshtomi, M. Y., Van Gansbeke, D., Meysman, F., Soetaert, K.,
Vincx, M., and Vanaverbeke, J.: Variable Importance of Macrofaunal Functional
Biodiversity for Biogeochemical Cycling in Temperate Coastal Sediments,
Ecosystems, 17, 720–737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9755-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-014-9755-7</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brylinsky, M., Gibson, J., and Gordon Jr., D. C.: Impacts of Flounder Trawls
on the Intertidal Habitat and Community of the Minas Basin, Bay of Fundy,
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51, 650–661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f94-066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/f94-066</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Butenschön, M., Clark, J., Aldridge, J. N., Icarus Allen, J., Artioli,
Y., Blackford, J., Bruggeman, J., Cazenave, P., Ciavatta, S., Kay, S.,
Lessin, G., Van Leeuwen, S., Van Der Molen, J., De Mora, L., Polimene, L.,
Sailley, S., Stephens, N., and Torres, R.: ERSEM 15.06: A generic model for
marine biogeochemistry and the ecosystem dynamics of the lower trophic
levels, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1293–1339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1293-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1293-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cashion, T., Al-Abdulrazzak, D., Belhabib, D., Derrick, B., Divovich, E.,
Moutopoulos, D. K., Noël, S. L., Palomares, M. L. D., Teh, L. C. L.,
Zeller, D., and Pauly, D.: Reconstructing global marine fishing gear use:
Catches and landed values by gear type and sector, Fish. Res., 206,
57–64, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.04.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fishres.2018.04.010</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Copernicus Marine Service Information: Atlantic- European North West
Shelf- Ocean Biogeochemistry Reanalysis, available at:
<uri>http://marine.copernicus.eu/services-portfolio/access-to-products/?option=com_csw&amp;view=details&amp;product_id=NORTHWESTSHELF_REANALYSIS_BIO_004_011</uri> (last access: 4 April 2020), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Couceiro, F., Fones, G. R., Thompson, C. E. L., Statham, P. J., Sivyer, D.
B., Parker, R., Kelly-Gerreyn, B. A., and Amos, C. L.: Impact of resuspension
of cohesive sediments at the Oyster Grounds (North Sea) on nutrient exchange
across the sediment-water interface, Biogeochemistry, 113, 37–52,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9710-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-012-9710-7</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dauwe, B., Herman, P. M. J., and Heip, C. H. R.: Community structure and
bioturbation potential of macrofauna at four North Sea stations with
contrasting food supply, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 173, 67–83,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps173067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps173067</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Borger, E. and Soetaert, K.: edeborger/Trawling_Biogeochemistry_BGS: Trawling disturbance model, Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4697277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4697277</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Borger, E., Braeckman, U., and Soetaert, K.: Rapid organic matter cycling
in North Sea sediments, Cont. Shelf Res., 214, 104327,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2020.104327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2020.104327</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Depestele, J., Ivanović, A., Degrendele, K., Esmaeili, M., Polet, H.,
Roche, M., Summerbell, K., Teal, L. R., Vanelslander, B., and O'Neill, F. G.:
Measuring and assessing the physical impact of beam trawling, ICES J. Mar.
Sci., 73, i15–i26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsv056</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Depestele, J., Degrendele, K., Esmaeili, M., Ivanovic, A., Kröger, S.,
O'Neill, F. G., Parker, R., Polet, H., Roche, M., Teal, L. R., Vanelslander,
B., and Rijnsdorp, A. D.: Comparison of mechanical disturbance in soft
sediments due to tickler-chain SumWing trawl vs. Electro-fitted PulseWing
trawl, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 76, 312–329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsy124</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dounas, C. G., Davies, I. M., Hayes, P. J., Arvanitidis, C. D., and Koulouri,
P. T.: The effect of different types of otter trawl ground rope on benthic
nutrient releases and sediment biogeochemistry, Benthic Habitats Eff. Fish.,
41, 539–544, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duplisea, D. E., Jennings, S., Malcolm, S. J., Parker, R., and Sivyer, D. B.:
Modelling potential impacts of bottom trawl fisheries on soft sediment
biogeochemistry in the North Sea, Geochem. Trans., 2, 112–117,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b108342b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b108342b</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Durrieu de Madron, X., Ferré, B., Le Corre, G., Grenz, C., Conan, P.,
Pujo-Pay, M., Buscail, R., and Bodiot, O.: Trawling-induced resuspension and
dispersal of muddy sediments and dissolved elements in the Gulf of Lion (NW
Mediterranean), Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 2387–2409,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.002</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ehrenhauss, S., Witte, U., Janssen, F., and Huettel, M.: Decomposition of
diatoms and nutrient dynamics i<?pagebreak page2555?>n permeable North Sea sediments, Cont. Shelf
Res., 24, 721–737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.01.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2004.01.002</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eigaard, O. R., Bastardie, F., Hintzen, N. T., Buhl-Mortensen, L.,
Buhl-Mortensen, P., Catarino, R., Dinesen, G. E., Egekvist, J., Fock, H. O.,
Geitner, K., Gerritsen, H. D., González, M. M., Jonsson, P., Kavadas,
S., Laffargue, P., Lundy, M., Gonzalez-Mirelis, G., Nielsen, J. R.,
Papadopoulou, N., Posen, P. E., Pulcinella, J., Russo, T., Sala, A., Silva,
C., Smith, C. J., Vanelslander, B., and Rijnsdorp, A. D.: The footprint of
bottom trawling in European waters: Distribution, intensity, and seabed
integrity, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 74, 847–865, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsw194</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ferguson, A. J. P., Oakes, J., and Eyre, B. D.: Bottom trawling reduces
benthic denitrification and has the potential to influence the global
nitrogen cycle, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett., 5, 237–245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lol2.10150</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fick, A.: Ueber Diffusion, Ann.   Phys.   Chem., 170, 59–86,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18551700105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/andp.18551700105</ext-link>, 1855.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R.
W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A.,
Holland, E. A., Karl, D. M., Michaels, A. F., Porter, J. H., Townsend, A. R.,
and Vorosmarty, C. J.: Nitrogen Cycles: Past, Present, and Future,
Biogeochemistry, 70, 153–226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>GEBCO Compilation Group: GEBCO 2020 Grid,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5285/a29c5465-b138-234d-e053-6c86abc040b9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5285/a29c5465-b138-234d-e053-6c86abc040b9</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hale, R., Godbold, J. A., Sciberras, M., Dwight, J., Wood, C., Hiddink, J. G., and Solan, M.: Mediation of macronutrients and carbon by post-disturbance shelf sea sediment communities, Biogeochemistry, 135, 121–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Sciberras, M., Szostek, C. L., Hughes, K. M.,
Ellis, N., Rijnsdorp, A. D., McConnaughey, R. A., Mazor, T., Hilborn, R.,
Collie, J. S., Pitcher, C. R., Amoroso, R. O., Parma, A. M., Suuronen, P.,
and Kaiser, M. J.: Global analysis of depletion and recovery of seabed biota
after bottom trawling disturbance, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114,
8301–8306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618858114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1618858114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Sciberras, M., Bolam, S. G., Cambiè, G.,
McConnaughey, R. A., Mazor, T., Hilborn, R., Collie, J. S., Pitcher, C. R.,
Parma, A. M., Suuronen, P., Kaiser, M. J., and Rijnsdorp, A. D.: Assessing
bottom trawling impacts based on the longevity of benthic invertebrates, J.
Appl. Ecol., 56, 1075–1084, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1365-2664.13278</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huettel, M. and Gust, G.: Impact of bioroughness on interfacial solute
exchange in permeable sediments, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 89, 253–267,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps089253" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps089253</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huettel, M. and Rusch, A.: Transport and degradation of phytoplankton in
permeable sediment, Limnol. Oceanogr., 45, 534–549,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0534" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0534</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ICES: Working Group on Electrical Trawling (WGELECTRA), ICES Sci. Reports/Rapp. Sci. du Ciem, 1, 87 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17895/ices.pub.5619</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaiser, M. J., Clarke, K. R., Hinz, H., Austen, M. C. V., Somerfield, P. J.,
and Karakassis, I.: Global analysis of response and recovery of benthic
biota to fishing, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 311, 1–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps311001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps311001</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Le Bot, S., Lafite, R., Fournier, M., Baltzer, A., and Desprez, M.:
Morphological and sedimentary impacts and recovery on a mixed sandy to
pebbly seabed exposed to marine aggregate extraction (Eastern English
Channel, France), Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 89, 221–233,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.06.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2010.06.012</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lucchetti, A. and Sala, A.: Impact and performance of mediterranean fishing
gear by side-scan sonar technology, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 69,
1806–1816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f2012-107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/f2012-107</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martín, J., Puig, P., Masqué, P., Palanques, A., and
Sánchez-Gómez, A.: Impact of bottom trawling on deep-sea sediment
properties along the flanks of a submarine canyon, PLoS One, 9, e104536,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104536" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0104536</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mayer, L. M.: Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in
continental shelf sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 1271–1284,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90381-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(94)90381-6</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mayer, L. M., Schick, D. F., Findlay, R. H., and Rice, D. L.: Effects of
commercial dragging on sedimentary organic matter, Mar. Environ. Res.,
31, 249–261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1136(91)90015-Z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0141-1136(91)90015-Z</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McConnaughey, R. A., Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Pitcher, C. R., Kaiser,
M. J., Suuronen, P., Sciberras, M., Rijnsdorp, A. D., Collie, J. S., Mazor,
T., Amoroso, R. O., Parma, A. M., and Hilborn, R.: Choosing best practices
for managing impacts of trawl fishing on seabed habitats and biota, Fish
Fish., 21, 319–337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12431" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/faf.12431</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mengual, B., Cayocca, F., Le Hir, P., Draye, R., Laffargue, P., Vincent, B.,
and Garlan, T.: Influence of bottom trawling on sediment resuspension in the
“Grande-Vasière” area (Bay of Biscay, France), Ocean Dyn., 66,
1181–1207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-016-0974-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10236-016-0974-7</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mengual, B., Le Hir, P., Cayocca, F. and Garlan, T.: Bottom trawling
contribution to the spatio-temporal variability of sediment fluxes on the
continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay (France), Mar. Geol., 414(May),
77–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2019.05.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.margeo.2019.05.009</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M. J., and Heip, C. H. R.:
Denitrification in marine sediments: A model study, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 10, 661–673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB02562" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96GB02562</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morato, T., Watson, R., Pitcher, T. J., and Pauly, D.: Fishing down the deep,
Fish Fish., 7, 24–34, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00205.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00205.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murray, F., Copland, P., Boulcott, P., Robertson, M., and Bailey, N.: Impacts
of electrofishing for razor clams (<italic>Ensis</italic> spp.) on benthic fauna, Fish. Res.,
174, 40–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.028</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Norse, E. A., Brooke, S., Cheung, W. W. L., Clark, M. R., Ekeland, I.,
Froese, R., Gjerde, K. M., Haedrich, R. L., Heppell, S. S., Morato, T.,
Morgan, L. E., Pauly, D., Sumaila, R., and Watson, R.: Sustainability of
deep-sea fisheries, Mar. Policy, 36, 307–320,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.06.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpol.2011.06.008</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Neill, F. G. and Ivanović, A.: The physical impact of towed demersal
fishing gears on soft sediments, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 73, i5–i14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsv125</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Neill, F. G. and Summerbell, K.: The mobilisation of sediment by demersal
otter trawls, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 62, 1088–1097,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.01.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.01.038</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Palanques, A., Puig, P., Guillén, J., Demestre, M., and Martín, J.:
Effects of bottom trawling on the Ebro continental shel<?pagebreak page2556?>f sedimentary system
(NW Mediterranean), Cont. Shelf Res., 72, 83–98,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.10.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2013.10.008</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paradis, S., Pusceddu, A., Masqué, P., Puig, P., Moccia, D., Russo, T., and Lo Iacono, C.: Organic matter contents and degradation in a highly trawled area during fresh particle inputs (Gulf of Castellammare, southwestern Mediterranean), Biogeosciences, 16, 4307–4320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4307-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-16-4307-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paradis, S., Goñi, M., Masqué, P., Durán, R., Arjona-Camas, M.,
Palanques, A., and Puig, P.: Persistence of Biogeochemical Alterations of
Deep-Sea Sediments by Bottom Trawling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl091279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020gl091279</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Paschen, M., Richter, U., and Köpnick, W.: Trawl Penetration in the
Seabed (TRAPESE), Final report Contract No. 96-006, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., and R Core Team:
{nlme}: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects
Models, available at: <uri>https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme</uri> (last access: 19 April 2021),
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pinheiro, J. C. and Bates, D. M.: Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS,
edited by: Chambers, J., Eddy, W., Hardle, W., Sheater, S., and Tierney, L.,
Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pitcher, C. R., Ellis, N., Jennings, S., Hiddink, J. G., Mazor, T., Kaiser,
M. J., Kangas, M. I., McConnaughey, R. A., Parma, A. M., Rijnsdorp, A. D.,
Suuronen, P., Collie, J. S., Amoroso, R., Hughes, K. M., and Hilborn, R.:
Estimating the sustainability of towed fishing-gear impacts on seabed
habitats: a simple quantitative risk assessment method applicable to
data-limited fisheries, Methods Ecol. Evol., 8, 472–480,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12705" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/2041-210X.12705</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Polymenakou, P. N., Pusceddu, A., Tselepides, A., Polychronaki, T.,
Giannakourou, A., Fiordelmondo, C., Hatziyanni, E., and Danovaro, R.: Benthic
microbial abundance and activities in an intensively trawled ecosystem
(Thermaikos Gulf, Aegean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 2570–2584,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.018</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Poos, J.-J., Hintzen, N. T., van Rijssel, J. C., and Rijnsdorp, A. D.:
Efficiency changes in bottom trawling for flatfish species as a result of
the replacement of mechanical stimulation by electric stimulation, edited by:
Pol, M., ICES J. Mar. Sci., 77, 2635–2645, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa126" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsaa126</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Price, W. L.: A controlled random search procedure for global optimisation,
Comput. J., 20, 367–370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/20.4.367" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/comjnl/20.4.367</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Provoost, P., Braeckman, U., Van Gansbeke, D., Moodley, L., Soetaert, K.,
Middelburg, J. J., and Vanaverbeke, J.: Modelling benthic oxygen consumption
and benthic-pelagic coupling at a shallow station in the southern North Sea,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 120, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.01.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2013.01.008</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Puig, P., Canals, M., Company, J. B., Martín, J., Amblas, D., Lastras,
G., Palanques, A., and Calafat, A. M.: Ploughing the deep sea floor, Nature,
489, 286–289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11410" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature11410</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pusceddu, A., Bianchelli, S., Martín, J., Puig, P., Palanques, A.,
Masqué, P., and Danovaro, R.: Chronic and intensive bottom trawling
impairs deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 111, 8861–8866, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405454111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1405454111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pusceddu, A., Fiordelmondo, C., Polymenakou, P., Polychronaki, T.,
Tselepides, A., and Danovaro, R.: Effects of bottom trawling on the quantity
and biochemical composition of organic matter in coastal marine sediments
(Thermaikos Gulf, northwestern Aegean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 25,
2491–2505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.013</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing,
available at: <uri>http://www.r-project.org/</uri> (last access: 19 April 2021), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Riemann, B. and Hoffmann, E.: Ecological consequences of dredging and bottom
trawling in the Limfjord, Denmark, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 69,
171–178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps069171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps069171</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rijnsdorp, A.: Micro-scale distribution of beam trawl effort in the southern
North Sea between 1993 and 1996 in relation to the trawling frequency of the
sea bed and the impact on benthic organisms, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 55,
403–419, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1997.0326" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1006/jmsc.1997.0326</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rijnsdorp, A. D., Bastardie, F., Bolam, S. G., Buhl-Mortensen, L., Eigaard,
O. R., Hamon, K. G., Hiddink, J. G., Hintzen, N. T., Ivanović, A.,
Kenny, A., Laffargue, P., Nielsen, J. R., O'Neill, F. G., Piet, G. J.,
Polet, H., Sala, A., Smith, C., van Denderen, P. D., van Kooten, T., and
Zengin, M.: Towards a framework for the quantitative assessment of trawling
impact on the seabed and benthic ecosystem, ICES J. Mar. Sci.,
73, i127–i138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsv207</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rijnsdorp, A. D., Bolam, S. G., Garcia, C., Hiddink, J. G., Hintzen, N. T.,
van Denderen, P. D., and van Kooten, T.: Estimating sensitivity of seabed
habitats to disturbance by bottom trawling based on the longevity of benthic
fauna, Ecol. Appl., 28, 1302–1312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1731" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/eap.1731</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rijnsdorp, A. D., Boute, P., Tiano, J., Lankheet, M., Soetaert, K.,
Beier, U., De Borger, E., and Hintzen, N.: The implications of a transition
from tickler chain beam trawl to electric pulse trawl on the sustainability
and ecosystem effects of the fishery for North Sea sole: an impact
assessment, IJmuiden, 108 pp., 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rijnsdorp, A. D., Depestele, J., Eigaard, O. R., Hintzen, N. T.,
Ivanović, A., Molenaar, P., O'Neill, F. G., Polet, H., Poos, J. J., and
van Kooten, T. : Mitigating seafloor disturbance of bottom trawl fisheries
for North Sea sole Solea solea by replacing mechanical with electrical
stimulation, PLoS One, 15, e0228528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228528" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0228528</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Robinson, J. E., Newell, R. C., Seiderer, L. J., and Simpson, N. M.: Impacts
of aggregate dredging on sediment composition and associated benthic fauna
at an offshore dredge site in the southern North Sea, Mar. Environ. Res.,
60, 51–68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2004.09.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marenvres.2004.09.001</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sciberras, M., Parker, R., Powell, C., Robertson, C., Kröger, S., Bolam,
S., and Geert Hiddink, J.: Impacts of bottom fishing on the sediment infaunal
community and biogeochemistry of cohesive and non-cohesive sediments,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 61, 2076–2089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10354</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sciberras, M., Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Szostek, C. L., Hughes, K. M.,
Kneafsey, B., Clarke, L. J., Ellis, N., Rijnsdorp, A. D., McConnaughey, R.
A., Hilborn, R., Collie, J. S., Pitcher, C. R., Amoroso, R. O., Parma, A.
M., Suuronen, P., and Kaiser, M. J.: Response of benthic fauna to
experimental bottom fishing: A global meta-analysis, Fish Fish., 19,
698–715, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12283" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/faf.12283</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2557?><ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J. K., Bouwman, A. F.,
Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C., and Van Drecht, G.: Denitrification
across landscapes and waterscapes: A synthesis, Ecol. Appl., 16,
2064–2090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:DALAWA]2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:DALAWA]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K.: rootSolve: Nonlinear root finding, equilibrium and
steady-state analysis of ordinary differential equations, available at: <uri>https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rootSolve</uri>, (last access: 19 April 2021),  2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K. and Meysman, F.: Reactive transport in aquatic ecosystems:
Rapid model prototyping in the open source software R, Environ. Model.
Softw., 32, 49–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.011</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K. and Middelburg, J. J.: Modeling eutrophication and
oligotrophication of shallow-water marine systems: The importance of
sediments under stratified and well-mixed conditions, Hydrobiologia, 629,
239–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9777-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10750-009-9777-x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K. and Petzoldt, T.: Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte
Carlo analysis in R Using PAckage FME, J. Stat. Softw., 33, 1–28,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i03" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18637/jss.v033.i03</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K. and Petzoldt, T.: marelac: Tools for Aquatic Sciences, available at: <uri>https://cran.r-project.org/package=marelac</uri> (last access: 19 April 2021), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M. J., and Middelburg, J. J.: A model of early
diagenetic processes from the shelf to abyssal depths, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 60, 1019–1040, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0</ext-link>, 1996a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M. J., and Middelburg, J. J.: Dynamic response of
deep-sea sediments to seasonal variations: A model, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
41, 1651–1668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1651</ext-link>, 1996b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K., Petzoldt, T., and Setzer, R. W.: Solving Differential Equations
in R: Package deSolve, J. Stat. Softw., 33, 1–25,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i09" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18637/jss.v033.i09</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, M., Chiers, K., Duchateau, L., Polet, H., Verschueren, B., and
Decostere, A.: Determining the safety range of electrical pulses for two
benthic invertebrates: brown shrimp  (<italic>Crangon crangon</italic> L.) and ragworm (<italic>Alitta virens</italic> S.), ICES J. Mar. Sci., 72, 973–980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsu176</ext-link>,
2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, M., Decostere, A., Polet, H., Verschueren, B., and Chiers, K.:
Electrotrawling: a promising alternative fishing technique warranting
further exploration, Fish Fish., 16, 104–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/faf.12047</ext-link>,
2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, M., Verschueren, B., Chiers, K., Duchateau, L., Polet, H., and
Decostere, A.: Laboratory Study of the Impact of Repetitive Electrical and
Mechanical Stimulation on Brown Shrimp Crangon crangon, Mar. Coast. Fish.,
8, 404–411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2016.1180333" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/19425120.2016.1180333</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tiano, J. C., Witbaard, R., Bergman, M. J. N., Van Rijswijk, P., Tramper,
A., Van Oevelen, D., Soetaert, K., and Degraer, S.: Acute impacts of bottom
trawl gears on benthic metabolism and nutrient cycling, ICES J. Mar. Sci.,
76, 1917–1930, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsz060</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tiano, J. C., van der Reijden, K. J., O'Flynn, S., Beauchard, O., van der
Ree, S., van der Wees, J., Ysebaert, T., and Soetaert, K.: Experimental
bottom trawling finds resilience in large-bodied infauna but vulnerability
for epifauna and juveniles in the Frisian Front, Mar. Environ. Res.,
159, 104964, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104964</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Toussaint, E., De Borger, E., Braeckman, U., De Backer, A., Soetaert, K., and
Vanaverbeke, J.: Faunal and environmental drivers of carbon and nitrogen
cycling along a permeability gradient in shallow North Sea sediments, Sci.
Total Environ., 767, 144994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144994" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144994</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trimmer, M., Petersen, J., Sivyer, D., Mills, C., Young, E., and Parker, E.:
Impact of long-term benthic trawl disturbance on sediment sorting and
biogeochemistry in the southern North Sea, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 298,
79–94, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps298079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps298079</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van der Molen, J., Aldridge, J. N., Coughlan, C., Parker, E. R., Stephens,
D., and Ruardij, P.: Modelling marine ecosystem response to climate change
and trawling in the North Sea, Biogeochemistry, 113, 213–236,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9763-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-012-9763-7</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van De Velde, S., Van Lancker, V., Hidalgo-Martinez, S., Berelson, W. M., and
Meysman, F. J. R.: Anthropogenic disturbance keeps the coastal seafloor
biogeochemistry in a transient state, Sci. Rep., 8,  5582,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23925-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-23925-y</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
van Marlen, B., de Haan, D., van Gool, A., and Burggraaf, D.: The effect of
pulse stimulation on marine biota – Research in relation to ICES advice –
Progress report on the effects on benthic invertebrates, Inst. Mar. Resour. Ecosyst. Stud. Rep., C103/09,  53, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Marlen, B., Wiegerinck, J. A. M., van Os-Koomen, E., and van Barneveld,
E.: Catch comparison of flatfish pulse trawls and a tickler chain beam
trawl, Fish. Res., 151, 57–69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fishres.2013.11.007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watling, L., Findlay, R. H., Mayer, L. M., and Schick, D. F.: Impact of a
scallop drag on the sediment chemistry, microbiota, and faunal assemblages
of a shallow subtidal marine benthic community, J. Sea Res., 46,
309–324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00083-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00083-1</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watson, R. A. and Morato, T.: Fishing down the deep: Accounting for
within-species changes in depth of fishing, Fish. Res., 140, 63–65,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.12.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fishres.2012.12.004</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>West, B. T., Welch, K. B., and Galecki, A. T.: Linear Mixed Models, Chapman
and Hall/CRC, London, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b17198" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/b17198</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., and Smith, G. M.:
Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, Springer New York,
New York, NY, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Impact of bottom trawling on sediment biogeochemistry: a modelling approach</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Bottom trawling in shelf seas can occur more than 10 times per year for a
given location. This affects the benthic metabolism, through a mortality of
the macrofauna, resuspension of organic matter from the sediment, and
alterations of the physical sediment structure. However, the trawling
impacts on organic carbon mineralization and associated processes are not
well known. Using a modelling approach, the effects of increasing trawling
frequencies on early diagenesis were studied in five different sedimentary
environments, simulating the effects of a deeper-penetrating gear (e.g. a
tickler chain beam trawl) versus a shallower, more variable penetrating gear
(e.g. an electric pulse trawl). Trawling events strongly increased oxygen
and nitrate concentrations in surface sediment layers and led to
significantly lower amounts of ammonium (43&thinsp;%–99&thinsp;% reduction) and
organic carbon in the top 10&thinsp;cm of the sediment (62&thinsp;%–96&thinsp;% reduction).
As a result, total mineralization rates in the sediment were decreased by up
to 28&thinsp;%. The effect on different mineralization processes differed both
between sediment types and between trawling frequencies. The shallow-penetrating gear had a slightly smaller effect on benthic denitrification
than the deeper-penetrating gear, but there were no statistically different
results between gear types for all other parameters. Denitrification was
reduced by 69&thinsp;% in a fine sandy sediment, whereas nitrogen removal nearly
doubled in a highly eutrophic mud. This suggests that even relatively low
penetration depths from bottom fishing gears generate significant
biogeochemical alterations. Physical organic carbon removal through
trawl-induced resuspension of sediments, exacerbated by a removal of
bioturbating macrofauna, was identified as the main cause of the changes in
the mineralization process.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans.
Automat. Contr., 19, 716–723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, J. I. and Clarke, K. R.: Effects of demersal trawling on ecosystem functioning in the North Sea: A modelling study, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 336, 63–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps336063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps336063</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Almroth, E., Tengberg, A., Andersson, J. H., Pakhomova, S., and Hall, P. O.
J.: Effects of resuspension on benthic fluxes of oxygen, nutrients,
dissolved inorganic carbon, iron and manganese in the Gulf of Finland,
Baltic Sea, Cont. Shelf Res., 29, 807–818,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.12.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.12.011</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Amoroso, R. O., Pitcher, C. R., Rijnsdorp, A. D., McConnaughey, R. A.,
Parma, A. M., Suuronen, P., Eigaard, O. R., Bastardie, F., Hintzen, N. T.,
Althaus, F., Baird, S. J., Black, J., Buhl-Mortensen, L., Campbell, A. B.,
Catarino, R., Collie, J., Cowan, J. H., Durholtz, D., Engstrom, N.,
Fairweather, T. P., Fock, H. O., Ford, R., Gálvez, P. A., Gerritsen, H.,
Góngora, M. E., González, J. A., Hiddink, J. G., Hughes, K. M.,
Intelmann, S. S., Jenkins, C., Jonsson, P., Kainge, P., Kangas, M., Kathena,
J. N., Kavadas, S., Leslie, R. W., Lewise, S. G., Lundy, M., Makin, D.,
Martin, J., Mazor, T., Gonzalez-Mirelis, G., Newman, S. J., Papadopoulou,
N., Posen, P. E., Rochester, W., Russok, T., Salal, A., Semmens, J. M.,
Silvan, C., Tsoloso, A., Vanelslander, B., Wakefield, C. B., Wood, B. A.,
Hilborn, R., Kaiser, M. J., and Jennings, S.: Bottom trawl fishing footprints
on the world's continental shelves, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
115, E10275–E10282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802379115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802379115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bergman, M. J. N. and Hup, M.: Direct effects of beamtrawling on macrofauna
in a sandy sediment in the southern north sea, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 49,
5–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.1.5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.1.5</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bergman, M. J. N. and Van Santbrink, J. W.: Mortality in megafaunal benthic
populations caused by trawl fisheries on the Dutch continental shelf in the
North Sea in 1994, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 57, 1321–1331,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0917" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0917</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boudreau, B. P.: The diffusive tortuosity of fine-grained unlithified
sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 60, 3139–3142,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00158-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00158-5</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Braeckman, U., Foshtomi, M. Y., Van Gansbeke, D., Meysman, F., Soetaert, K.,
Vincx, M., and Vanaverbeke, J.: Variable Importance of Macrofaunal Functional
Biodiversity for Biogeochemical Cycling in Temperate Coastal Sediments,
Ecosystems, 17, 720–737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9755-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9755-7</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brylinsky, M., Gibson, J., and Gordon Jr., D. C.: Impacts of Flounder Trawls
on the Intertidal Habitat and Community of the Minas Basin, Bay of Fundy,
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51, 650–661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f94-066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/f94-066</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Butenschön, M., Clark, J., Aldridge, J. N., Icarus Allen, J., Artioli,
Y., Blackford, J., Bruggeman, J., Cazenave, P., Ciavatta, S., Kay, S.,
Lessin, G., Van Leeuwen, S., Van Der Molen, J., De Mora, L., Polimene, L.,
Sailley, S., Stephens, N., and Torres, R.: ERSEM 15.06: A generic model for
marine biogeochemistry and the ecosystem dynamics of the lower trophic
levels, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1293–1339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1293-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1293-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cashion, T., Al-Abdulrazzak, D., Belhabib, D., Derrick, B., Divovich, E.,
Moutopoulos, D. K., Noël, S. L., Palomares, M. L. D., Teh, L. C. L.,
Zeller, D., and Pauly, D.: Reconstructing global marine fishing gear use:
Catches and landed values by gear type and sector, Fish. Res., 206,
57–64, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.04.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.04.010</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Copernicus Marine Service Information: Atlantic- European North West
Shelf- Ocean Biogeochemistry Reanalysis, available at:
<a href="http://marine.copernicus.eu/services-portfolio/access-to-products/?option=com_csw&amp;view=details&amp;product_id=NORTHWESTSHELF_REANALYSIS_BIO_004_011" target="_blank"/> (last access: 4 April 2020), 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Couceiro, F., Fones, G. R., Thompson, C. E. L., Statham, P. J., Sivyer, D.
B., Parker, R., Kelly-Gerreyn, B. A., and Amos, C. L.: Impact of resuspension
of cohesive sediments at the Oyster Grounds (North Sea) on nutrient exchange
across the sediment-water interface, Biogeochemistry, 113, 37–52,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9710-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9710-7</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B., Herman, P. M. J., and Heip, C. H. R.: Community structure and
bioturbation potential of macrofauna at four North Sea stations with
contrasting food supply, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 173, 67–83,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps173067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps173067</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
De Borger, E. and Soetaert, K.: edeborger/Trawling_Biogeochemistry_BGS: Trawling disturbance model, Zenodo, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4697277" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4697277</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
De Borger, E., Braeckman, U., and Soetaert, K.: Rapid organic matter cycling
in North Sea sediments, Cont. Shelf Res., 214, 104327,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2020.104327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2020.104327</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Depestele, J., Ivanović, A., Degrendele, K., Esmaeili, M., Polet, H.,
Roche, M., Summerbell, K., Teal, L. R., Vanelslander, B., and O'Neill, F. G.:
Measuring and assessing the physical impact of beam trawling, ICES J. Mar.
Sci., 73, i15–i26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv056</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Depestele, J., Degrendele, K., Esmaeili, M., Ivanovic, A., Kröger, S.,
O'Neill, F. G., Parker, R., Polet, H., Roche, M., Teal, L. R., Vanelslander,
B., and Rijnsdorp, A. D.: Comparison of mechanical disturbance in soft
sediments due to tickler-chain SumWing trawl vs. Electro-fitted PulseWing
trawl, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 76, 312–329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy124</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dounas, C. G., Davies, I. M., Hayes, P. J., Arvanitidis, C. D., and Koulouri,
P. T.: The effect of different types of otter trawl ground rope on benthic
nutrient releases and sediment biogeochemistry, Benthic Habitats Eff. Fish.,
41, 539–544, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Duplisea, D. E., Jennings, S., Malcolm, S. J., Parker, R., and Sivyer, D. B.:
Modelling potential impacts of bottom trawl fisheries on soft sediment
biogeochemistry in the North Sea, Geochem. Trans., 2, 112–117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b108342b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b108342b</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Durrieu de Madron, X., Ferré, B., Le Corre, G., Grenz, C., Conan, P.,
Pujo-Pay, M., Buscail, R., and Bodiot, O.: Trawling-induced resuspension and
dispersal of muddy sediments and dissolved elements in the Gulf of Lion (NW
Mediterranean), Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 2387–2409,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.002</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Ehrenhauss, S., Witte, U., Janssen, F., and Huettel, M.: Decomposition of
diatoms and nutrient dynamics in permeable North Sea sediments, Cont. Shelf
Res., 24, 721–737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.01.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.01.002</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Eigaard, O. R., Bastardie, F., Hintzen, N. T., Buhl-Mortensen, L.,
Buhl-Mortensen, P., Catarino, R., Dinesen, G. E., Egekvist, J., Fock, H. O.,
Geitner, K., Gerritsen, H. D., González, M. M., Jonsson, P., Kavadas,
S., Laffargue, P., Lundy, M., Gonzalez-Mirelis, G., Nielsen, J. R.,
Papadopoulou, N., Posen, P. E., Pulcinella, J., Russo, T., Sala, A., Silva,
C., Smith, C. J., Vanelslander, B., and Rijnsdorp, A. D.: The footprint of
bottom trawling in European waters: Distribution, intensity, and seabed
integrity, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 74, 847–865, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw194</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Ferguson, A. J. P., Oakes, J., and Eyre, B. D.: Bottom trawling reduces
benthic denitrification and has the potential to influence the global
nitrogen cycle, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett., 5, 237–245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10150</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fick, A.: Ueber Diffusion, Ann.   Phys.   Chem., 170, 59–86,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18551700105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18551700105</a>, 1855.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R.
W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A.,
Holland, E. A., Karl, D. M., Michaels, A. F., Porter, J. H., Townsend, A. R.,
and Vorosmarty, C. J.: Nitrogen Cycles: Past, Present, and Future,
Biogeochemistry, 70, 153–226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
GEBCO Compilation Group: GEBCO 2020 Grid,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5285/a29c5465-b138-234d-e053-6c86abc040b9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5285/a29c5465-b138-234d-e053-6c86abc040b9</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hale, R., Godbold, J. A., Sciberras, M., Dwight, J., Wood, C., Hiddink, J. G., and Solan, M.: Mediation of macronutrients and carbon by post-disturbance shelf sea sediment communities, Biogeochemistry, 135, 121–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Sciberras, M., Szostek, C. L., Hughes, K. M.,
Ellis, N., Rijnsdorp, A. D., McConnaughey, R. A., Mazor, T., Hilborn, R.,
Collie, J. S., Pitcher, C. R., Amoroso, R. O., Parma, A. M., Suuronen, P.,
and Kaiser, M. J.: Global analysis of depletion and recovery of seabed biota
after bottom trawling disturbance, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114,
8301–8306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618858114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618858114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Sciberras, M., Bolam, S. G., Cambiè, G.,
McConnaughey, R. A., Mazor, T., Hilborn, R., Collie, J. S., Pitcher, C. R.,
Parma, A. M., Suuronen, P., Kaiser, M. J., and Rijnsdorp, A. D.: Assessing
bottom trawling impacts based on the longevity of benthic invertebrates, J.
Appl. Ecol., 56, 1075–1084, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13278</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Huettel, M. and Gust, G.: Impact of bioroughness on interfacial solute
exchange in permeable sediments, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 89, 253–267,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps089253" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps089253</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Huettel, M. and Rusch, A.: Transport and degradation of phytoplankton in
permeable sediment, Limnol. Oceanogr., 45, 534–549,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0534" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0534</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
ICES: Working Group on Electrical Trawling (WGELECTRA), ICES Sci. Reports/Rapp. Sci. du Ciem, 1, 87 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5619</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kaiser, M. J., Clarke, K. R., Hinz, H., Austen, M. C. V., Somerfield, P. J.,
and Karakassis, I.: Global analysis of response and recovery of benthic
biota to fishing, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 311, 1–14,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps311001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps311001</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Le Bot, S., Lafite, R., Fournier, M., Baltzer, A., and Desprez, M.:
Morphological and sedimentary impacts and recovery on a mixed sandy to
pebbly seabed exposed to marine aggregate extraction (Eastern English
Channel, France), Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 89, 221–233,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.06.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.06.012</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lucchetti, A. and Sala, A.: Impact and performance of mediterranean fishing
gear by side-scan sonar technology, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 69,
1806–1816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f2012-107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/f2012-107</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Martín, J., Puig, P., Masqué, P., Palanques, A., and
Sánchez-Gómez, A.: Impact of bottom trawling on deep-sea sediment
properties along the flanks of a submarine canyon, PLoS One, 9, e104536,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104536" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104536</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M.: Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in
continental shelf sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 1271–1284,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90381-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90381-6</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M., Schick, D. F., Findlay, R. H., and Rice, D. L.: Effects of
commercial dragging on sedimentary organic matter, Mar. Environ. Res.,
31, 249–261, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1136(91)90015-Z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1136(91)90015-Z</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
McConnaughey, R. A., Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Pitcher, C. R., Kaiser,
M. J., Suuronen, P., Sciberras, M., Rijnsdorp, A. D., Collie, J. S., Mazor,
T., Amoroso, R. O., Parma, A. M., and Hilborn, R.: Choosing best practices
for managing impacts of trawl fishing on seabed habitats and biota, Fish
Fish., 21, 319–337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12431" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12431</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Mengual, B., Cayocca, F., Le Hir, P., Draye, R., Laffargue, P., Vincent, B.,
and Garlan, T.: Influence of bottom trawling on sediment resuspension in the
“Grande-Vasière” area (Bay of Biscay, France), Ocean Dyn., 66,
1181–1207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-016-0974-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-016-0974-7</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mengual, B., Le Hir, P., Cayocca, F. and Garlan, T.: Bottom trawling
contribution to the spatio-temporal variability of sediment fluxes on the
continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay (France), Mar. Geol., 414(May),
77–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2019.05.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2019.05.009</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M. J., and Heip, C. H. R.:
Denitrification in marine sediments: A model study, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 10, 661–673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB02562" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB02562</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Morato, T., Watson, R., Pitcher, T. J., and Pauly, D.: Fishing down the deep,
Fish Fish., 7, 24–34, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00205.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00205.x</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, F., Copland, P., Boulcott, P., Robertson, M., and Bailey, N.: Impacts
of electrofishing for razor clams (<i>Ensis</i> spp.) on benthic fauna, Fish. Res.,
174, 40–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.028</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Norse, E. A., Brooke, S., Cheung, W. W. L., Clark, M. R., Ekeland, I.,
Froese, R., Gjerde, K. M., Haedrich, R. L., Heppell, S. S., Morato, T.,
Morgan, L. E., Pauly, D., Sumaila, R., and Watson, R.: Sustainability of
deep-sea fisheries, Mar. Policy, 36, 307–320,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.06.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.06.008</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
O'Neill, F. G. and Ivanović, A.: The physical impact of towed demersal
fishing gears on soft sediments, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 73, i5–i14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv125" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv125</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
O'Neill, F. G. and Summerbell, K.: The mobilisation of sediment by demersal
otter trawls, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 62, 1088–1097,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.01.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.01.038</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Palanques, A., Puig, P., Guillén, J., Demestre, M., and Martín, J.:
Effects of bottom trawling on the Ebro continental shelf sedimentary system
(NW Mediterranean), Cont. Shelf Res., 72, 83–98,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.10.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.10.008</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Paradis, S., Pusceddu, A., Masqué, P., Puig, P., Moccia, D., Russo, T., and Lo Iacono, C.: Organic matter contents and degradation in a highly trawled area during fresh particle inputs (Gulf of Castellammare, southwestern Mediterranean), Biogeosciences, 16, 4307–4320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4307-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4307-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Paradis, S., Goñi, M., Masqué, P., Durán, R., Arjona-Camas, M.,
Palanques, A., and Puig, P.: Persistence of Biogeochemical Alterations of
Deep-Sea Sediments by Bottom Trawling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl091279" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl091279</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Paschen, M., Richter, U., and Köpnick, W.: Trawl Penetration in the
Seabed (TRAPESE), Final report Contract No. 96-006, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., and R Core Team:
{nlme}: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects
Models, available at: <a href="https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme" target="_blank"/> (last access: 19 April 2021),
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Pinheiro, J. C. and Bates, D. M.: Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS,
edited by: Chambers, J., Eddy, W., Hardle, W., Sheater, S., and Tierney, L.,
Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Pitcher, C. R., Ellis, N., Jennings, S., Hiddink, J. G., Mazor, T., Kaiser,
M. J., Kangas, M. I., McConnaughey, R. A., Parma, A. M., Rijnsdorp, A. D.,
Suuronen, P., Collie, J. S., Amoroso, R., Hughes, K. M., and Hilborn, R.:
Estimating the sustainability of towed fishing-gear impacts on seabed
habitats: a simple quantitative risk assessment method applicable to
data-limited fisheries, Methods Ecol. Evol., 8, 472–480,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12705" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12705</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Polymenakou, P. N., Pusceddu, A., Tselepides, A., Polychronaki, T.,
Giannakourou, A., Fiordelmondo, C., Hatziyanni, E., and Danovaro, R.: Benthic
microbial abundance and activities in an intensively trawled ecosystem
(Thermaikos Gulf, Aegean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 2570–2584,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.018</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Poos, J.-J., Hintzen, N. T., van Rijssel, J. C., and Rijnsdorp, A. D.:
Efficiency changes in bottom trawling for flatfish species as a result of
the replacement of mechanical stimulation by electric stimulation, edited by:
Pol, M., ICES J. Mar. Sci., 77, 2635–2645, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa126" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa126</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Price, W. L.: A controlled random search procedure for global optimisation,
Comput. J., 20, 367–370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/20.4.367" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/20.4.367</a>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Provoost, P., Braeckman, U., Van Gansbeke, D., Moodley, L., Soetaert, K.,
Middelburg, J. J., and Vanaverbeke, J.: Modelling benthic oxygen consumption
and benthic-pelagic coupling at a shallow station in the southern North Sea,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 120, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.01.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.01.008</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Puig, P., Canals, M., Company, J. B., Martín, J., Amblas, D., Lastras,
G., Palanques, A., and Calafat, A. M.: Ploughing the deep sea floor, Nature,
489, 286–289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11410" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11410</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Pusceddu, A., Bianchelli, S., Martín, J., Puig, P., Palanques, A.,
Masqué, P., and Danovaro, R.: Chronic and intensive bottom trawling
impairs deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 111, 8861–8866, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405454111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405454111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Pusceddu, A., Fiordelmondo, C., Polymenakou, P., Polychronaki, T.,
Tselepides, A., and Danovaro, R.: Effects of bottom trawling on the quantity
and biochemical composition of organic matter in coastal marine sediments
(Thermaikos Gulf, northwestern Aegean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 25,
2491–2505, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.013</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing,
available at: <a href="http://www.r-project.org/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 19 April 2021), 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Riemann, B. and Hoffmann, E.: Ecological consequences of dredging and bottom
trawling in the Limfjord, Denmark, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 69,
171–178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps069171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps069171</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Rijnsdorp, A.: Micro-scale distribution of beam trawl effort in the southern
North Sea between 1993 and 1996 in relation to the trawling frequency of the
sea bed and the impact on benthic organisms, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 55,
403–419, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1997.0326" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1997.0326</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Rijnsdorp, A. D., Bastardie, F., Bolam, S. G., Buhl-Mortensen, L., Eigaard,
O. R., Hamon, K. G., Hiddink, J. G., Hintzen, N. T., Ivanović, A.,
Kenny, A., Laffargue, P., Nielsen, J. R., O'Neill, F. G., Piet, G. J.,
Polet, H., Sala, A., Smith, C., van Denderen, P. D., van Kooten, T., and
Zengin, M.: Towards a framework for the quantitative assessment of trawling
impact on the seabed and benthic ecosystem, ICES J. Mar. Sci.,
73, i127–i138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv207</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Rijnsdorp, A. D., Bolam, S. G., Garcia, C., Hiddink, J. G., Hintzen, N. T.,
van Denderen, P. D., and van Kooten, T.: Estimating sensitivity of seabed
habitats to disturbance by bottom trawling based on the longevity of benthic
fauna, Ecol. Appl., 28, 1302–1312, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1731" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1731</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Rijnsdorp, A. D., Boute, P., Tiano, J., Lankheet, M., Soetaert, K.,
Beier, U., De Borger, E., and Hintzen, N.: The implications of a transition
from tickler chain beam trawl to electric pulse trawl on the sustainability
and ecosystem effects of the fishery for North Sea sole: an impact
assessment, IJmuiden, 108 pp., 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Rijnsdorp, A. D., Depestele, J., Eigaard, O. R., Hintzen, N. T.,
Ivanović, A., Molenaar, P., O'Neill, F. G., Polet, H., Poos, J. J., and
van Kooten, T. : Mitigating seafloor disturbance of bottom trawl fisheries
for North Sea sole Solea solea by replacing mechanical with electrical
stimulation, PLoS One, 15, e0228528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228528" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228528</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, J. E., Newell, R. C., Seiderer, L. J., and Simpson, N. M.: Impacts
of aggregate dredging on sediment composition and associated benthic fauna
at an offshore dredge site in the southern North Sea, Mar. Environ. Res.,
60, 51–68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2004.09.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2004.09.001</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Sciberras, M., Parker, R., Powell, C., Robertson, C., Kröger, S., Bolam,
S., and Geert Hiddink, J.: Impacts of bottom fishing on the sediment infaunal
community and biogeochemistry of cohesive and non-cohesive sediments,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 61, 2076–2089, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10354" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10354</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Sciberras, M., Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Szostek, C. L., Hughes, K. M.,
Kneafsey, B., Clarke, L. J., Ellis, N., Rijnsdorp, A. D., McConnaughey, R.
A., Hilborn, R., Collie, J. S., Pitcher, C. R., Amoroso, R. O., Parma, A.
M., Suuronen, P., and Kaiser, M. J.: Response of benthic fauna to
experimental bottom fishing: A global meta-analysis, Fish Fish., 19,
698–715, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12283" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12283</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J. K., Bouwman, A. F.,
Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C., and Van Drecht, G.: Denitrification
across landscapes and waterscapes: A synthesis, Ecol. Appl., 16,
2064–2090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:DALAWA]2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:DALAWA]2.0.CO;2</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K.: rootSolve: Nonlinear root finding, equilibrium and
steady-state analysis of ordinary differential equations, available at: <a href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rootSolve" target="_blank"/>, (last access: 19 April 2021),  2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K. and Meysman, F.: Reactive transport in aquatic ecosystems:
Rapid model prototyping in the open source software R, Environ. Model.
Softw., 32, 49–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.011</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K. and Middelburg, J. J.: Modeling eutrophication and
oligotrophication of shallow-water marine systems: The importance of
sediments under stratified and well-mixed conditions, Hydrobiologia, 629,
239–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9777-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9777-x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K. and Petzoldt, T.: Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte
Carlo analysis in R Using PAckage FME, J. Stat. Softw., 33, 1–28,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i03" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i03</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K. and Petzoldt, T.: marelac: Tools for Aquatic Sciences, available at: <a href="https://cran.r-project.org/package=marelac" target="_blank"/> (last access: 19 April 2021), 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M. J., and Middelburg, J. J.: A model of early
diagenetic processes from the shelf to abyssal depths, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 60, 1019–1040, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0</a>, 1996a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M. J., and Middelburg, J. J.: Dynamic response of
deep-sea sediments to seasonal variations: A model, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
41, 1651–1668, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1651" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1651</a>, 1996b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K., Petzoldt, T., and Setzer, R. W.: Solving Differential Equations
in R: Package deSolve, J. Stat. Softw., 33, 1–25,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i09" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i09</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, M., Chiers, K., Duchateau, L., Polet, H., Verschueren, B., and
Decostere, A.: Determining the safety range of electrical pulses for two
benthic invertebrates: brown shrimp  (<i>Crangon crangon</i> L.) and ragworm (<i>Alitta
virens</i> S.), ICES J. Mar. Sci., 72, 973–980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu176" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu176</a>,
2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, M., Decostere, A., Polet, H., Verschueren, B., and Chiers, K.:
Electrotrawling: a promising alternative fishing technique warranting
further exploration, Fish Fish., 16, 104–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12047</a>,
2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, M., Verschueren, B., Chiers, K., Duchateau, L., Polet, H., and
Decostere, A.: Laboratory Study of the Impact of Repetitive Electrical and
Mechanical Stimulation on Brown Shrimp Crangon crangon, Mar. Coast. Fish.,
8, 404–411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2016.1180333" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2016.1180333</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Tiano, J. C., Witbaard, R., Bergman, M. J. N., Van Rijswijk, P., Tramper,
A., Van Oevelen, D., Soetaert, K., and Degraer, S.: Acute impacts of bottom
trawl gears on benthic metabolism and nutrient cycling, ICES J. Mar. Sci.,
76, 1917–1930, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz060</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Tiano, J. C., van der Reijden, K. J., O'Flynn, S., Beauchard, O., van der
Ree, S., van der Wees, J., Ysebaert, T., and Soetaert, K.: Experimental
bottom trawling finds resilience in large-bodied infauna but vulnerability
for epifauna and juveniles in the Frisian Front, Mar. Environ. Res.,
159, 104964, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104964</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Toussaint, E., De Borger, E., Braeckman, U., De Backer, A., Soetaert, K., and
Vanaverbeke, J.: Faunal and environmental drivers of carbon and nitrogen
cycling along a permeability gradient in shallow North Sea sediments, Sci.
Total Environ., 767, 144994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144994" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144994</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Trimmer, M., Petersen, J., Sivyer, D., Mills, C., Young, E., and Parker, E.:
Impact of long-term benthic trawl disturbance on sediment sorting and
biogeochemistry in the southern North Sea, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 298,
79–94, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps298079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps298079</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
van der Molen, J., Aldridge, J. N., Coughlan, C., Parker, E. R., Stephens,
D., and Ruardij, P.: Modelling marine ecosystem response to climate change
and trawling in the North Sea, Biogeochemistry, 113, 213–236,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9763-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9763-7</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Van De Velde, S., Van Lancker, V., Hidalgo-Martinez, S., Berelson, W. M., and
Meysman, F. J. R.: Anthropogenic disturbance keeps the coastal seafloor
biogeochemistry in a transient state, Sci. Rep., 8,  5582,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23925-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23925-y</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
van Marlen, B., de Haan, D., van Gool, A., and Burggraaf, D.: The effect of
pulse stimulation on marine biota – Research in relation to ICES advice –
Progress report on the effects on benthic invertebrates, Inst. Mar. Resour. Ecosyst. Stud. Rep., C103/09,  53, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
van Marlen, B., Wiegerinck, J. A. M., van Os-Koomen, E., and van Barneveld,
E.: Catch comparison of flatfish pulse trawls and a tickler chain beam
trawl, Fish. Res., 151, 57–69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.11.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.11.007</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Watling, L., Findlay, R. H., Mayer, L. M., and Schick, D. F.: Impact of a
scallop drag on the sediment chemistry, microbiota, and faunal assemblages
of a shallow subtidal marine benthic community, J. Sea Res., 46,
309–324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00083-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00083-1</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, R. A. and Morato, T.: Fishing down the deep: Accounting for
within-species changes in depth of fishing, Fish. Res., 140, 63–65,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.12.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.12.004</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
West, B. T., Welch, K. B., and Galecki, A. T.: Linear Mixed Models, Chapman
and Hall/CRC, London, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b17198" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/b17198</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., and Smith, G. M.:
Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, Springer New York,
New York, NY, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
