<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-18-5035-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Effect of organic carbon addition on paddy soil organic carbon decomposition
under different irrigation regimes</article-title><alt-title>Effect of organic carbon addition on paddy soil organic carbon decomposition</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effect of organic carbon addition on paddy soil organic carbon decomposition}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H. Deroo et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Deroo</surname><given-names>Heleen</given-names></name>
          <email>heleen.deroo@ugent.be</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4487-0262</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Akter</surname><given-names>Masuda</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bodé</surname><given-names>Samuel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0258-6450</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mendoza</surname><given-names>Orly</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Haichao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Boeckx</surname><given-names>Pascal</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sleutel</surname><given-names>Steven</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Environment, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Isotope Bioscience laboratory, Department of Green Chemistry and
Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Soil Science Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur,
Bangladesh</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Heleen Deroo (heleen.deroo@ugent.be)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>18</issue>
      <fpage>5035</fpage><lpage>5051</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Heleen Deroo et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e149">Anaerobic decomposition of organic carbon (OC) in submerged rice
paddies is coupled to the reduction of alternative soil electron acceptors,
primarily Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. During reductive dissolution of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from
pedogenic oxides, previously adsorbed native soil organic carbon (SOC) could
be co-released into solution. Incorporation of crop residues could hence
indirectly, i.e. through the stimulation of microbially mediated Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
reduction, promote the loss of native SOC via enhanced dissolution and
subsequent mineralisation to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our aim was to estimate
the relevance of such a positive feedback during the degradation of added
OC, and to investigate the impact of irrigation management on this mechanism
and on priming effects on native SOC decomposition in general. In a six-week
pot experiment with rice plants, two Bangladeshi soils with contrasting SOC
to oxalate-extractable Fe (SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) ratios were kept under a regime of
alternate wetting and drying (AWD) or continuous flooding (CF), and were
either amended with maize shoots or not. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures of
dissolved organic C and emitted CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were used to infer the
decomposition of added maize shoots (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) versus native SOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). Addition of maize
residues stimulated the reduction of Fe as well as the dissolution of native
SOC, and the latter to a larger extent under CF, especially for the soil
with the highest SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. Estimated Fe-bound SOC contents denote
that stimulated SOC co-release during Fe reduction could explain this
positive priming effect on SOC dissolution after the addition of maize.
However, priming effects on SOC mineralisation to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
lower than for SOC dissolution, and were even negative under AWD for one
soil. Enhanced reductive dissolution of Fe-bound SOC upon exogenous OC
addition therefore does not necessarily lead to stimulated SOC
mineralisation. In addition, AWD irrigation was found to decrease the
above-mentioned priming effects.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e349">Anaerobiosis in flooded paddy fields thoroughly affects soil chemical
processes, as in the absence of oxygen, the decomposition of organic carbon (OC)
requires alternative terminal electron acceptors like manganese (Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
iron (Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), sulphate, acetate or carbon dioxide (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Anaerobic
reduction of the latter two electron acceptors, which also depends on the
production of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) as an electron donor, leads to the
production and emission of methane (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Kögel-Knabner et al.,
2010; Ponnamperuma, 1972). Obviously, irrigation management strongly affects
the prevalence of aerobic versus anaerobic OC decomposition. The impact of
irrigation management on soil processes is an extensively studied topic
because of the demand to grow rice more efficiently with less water
(Carrijo et al., 2017). In particular, the adoption of alternate
wetting and drying (AWD), a periodic drying and reflooding irrigation
practice, is increasingly promoted (Lampayan et al., 2015).
However, our understanding of how the alternation of redox conditions under
AWD irrigation affects the decomposition of native soil organic carbon (SOC)
and exogenous OC in comparison with more consistent anaerobic conditions is
still rather limited. This limited insight mainly stems from difficulties in
discerning native SOC and exogenous OC mineralisation based<?pagebreak page5036?> on soil gaseous
emissions. In upland soils, assessments usually rely on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
isotopic signatures of emitted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from C sources with distinct
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Hayes, 1983; Werth and Kuzyakov, 2010). However, in
submerged soils, emission of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> also needs to be accounted for. Since
most CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is emitted through rice plant aerenchyma
transport, a realistic experiment necessitates the presence of growing rice
plants, which further complicates the tracking of OC mineralisation in paddy
soils. It is then important to account for C isotope fractionation during
the OC decomposition process, mainly caused by the microbial community
discriminating for or against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In particular, during anaerobic
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, the shift in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is typically large and
moreover, production pathway-dependent (Conrad, 2005; Sugimoto and Wada,
1993; Schweizer et al., 1999; Werth and Kuzyakov, 2010; Conrad et al.,
2012). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of emitted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is on the other hand
influenced by CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption during hydrogenotrophic CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production (i.e. with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as substrate) and its partial storage
as dissolved bicarbonate and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a result, in the absence of oxygen, it
is much less straightforward to link the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of emissions to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the
original C substrate (Conrad et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e601">Furthermore, the incorporation of crop residues is a common practice in
paddy soil (Ponnamperuma, 1984; Mandal et al., 2004). It is known that
exogenous OC addition can modify the rate of SOC decomposition in upland
soils via so-called priming effects. Positive priming could for example
result from soil microbial growth upon the addition of fresh OC as an energy
source, resulting in the co-metabolism of biologically more recalcitrant SOC
(Kuzyakov et al., 2000; Blagodatskaya and Kuzyakov, 2008). Positive as
well as negative priming effects of OC addition on the dissolution of native SOC
and on its further mineralisation into CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have also been
reported for flooded paddy soils (Bertora et al., 2018; Conrad et al.,
2012; Ye et al., 2015; Ye and Horwath, 2017; Yuan et al., 2014), but again
these processes are much less well understood. Indeed, considering the
unique interlinkage between anaerobic microbial activity and redox reactions
with mineral soil oxidants, priming mechanisms could be quite different than
in upland soils. For example, Bertora et al. (2018) and
Ye and Horwath (2017) observed that rice straw addition enhances the
reductive dissolution of pedogenic Fe, and found indications that this in
turn led to a stimulated co-release of OC originating from the Fe-OC
complex. Pedogenic Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxides, hydroxides and oxyhydroxides (hereafter
collectively referred to as “Fe oxides”), which are often abundant in
tropical soils, are indeed relevant sorbents of SOC owing to their high
reactive specific surface area or through complexation (Wagai et al.,
2013; Chen et al., 2020; Kaiser and Guggenberger, 2000). Dissolution of OC
from these minerals following the establishment of anaerobic conditions
could thus be a considerable C-releasing process and may take place (i) by
desorption due to a pH increase, caused by the consumption of protons during
reduction reactions; or (ii) by co-release of sorbed OC along with reductive
dissolution of short-range-ordered Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> minerals such as ferrihydrite
and goethite (Grybos et al., 2009; Said-Pullicino et al., 2016). However,
it is still unknown whether such stimulated native SOC dissolution would in
turn significantly promote further conversion into CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This would seem plausible as DOC is assumed to be one of the most
bioavailable SOC fractions, especially under submerged conditions
(Marschner and Kalbitz, 2003; Said-Pullicino et al., 2016). The indirect
stimulation of SOC mineralisation by OC amendment through enhanced reduction
of Fe in paddy soil may furthermore be expected to depend on the water
regime, as this overridingly determines the extent of pedogenic Fe reduction
and increase in pH. Lastly, opposite to the co-dissolution of Fe and OC, DOC can
likewise be adsorbed onto or can co-precipitate with the newly formed
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxides as soon as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> again increases and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is
reoxidised (Sodano et al., 2017). Such C removal pathways might again
strongly depend on irrigation management.</p>
      <p id="d1e700">Our aim was to investigate how the addition of exogenous OC influences
the dissolution and mineralisation of native SOC in paddy soils in function of
water management, with particular attention to the role of the co-release of
Fe-bound SOC. To this end, patterns of DOC and the emission of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were compared in a six-week pot experiment with living rice plants
in a tropical greenhouse. Two common irrigation practices were compared,
i.e. the water-saving AWD practice next to continuous flooding (CF). We
hypothesised that maize shoot addition would result in positive priming of
native SOC mineralisation. This priming should be stronger under CF than
under AWD, owing to enhanced pedogenic Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction with stimulated
net co-release of Fe-bound native SOC. Maize shoots were used as an external OC
source, because of the contrast of their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> crop) with
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the native SOC (largely C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived due to long-term
rice cultivation) in both soils. A secondary aim was to see if the
proportion of SOC compared to pedogenic Fe, with the latter considered to be
the main pool of readily reducible Fe, interacts with the effect of OC
amendment on native SOC decomposition. Therefore, we compared two soils from
Bangladeshi young floodplain paddy fields that were specifically chosen for
their contrasting SOC to oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a proxy for
short-range-ordered Fe oxides that can be considered easily reducible;
Postma, 1993; van Bodegom et al., 2003) ratio. We expected a stronger
stimulation of native SOC release from the soil with the higher
SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Soils</title>
      <p id="d1e807">Two young floodplain paddy soils (from soil series Balina and Sonatala) from
northern Bangladesh were selected from<?pagebreak page5037?> a larger set of soils previously used
by Akter et al. (2018) and Kader et al. (2013). Per soil
series, the puddle layer soil (0–15 cm) of 15 locations within one field
was sampled and then bulked by means of a clean spade in May 2014, after
which the soil was stored in air-dried, ground and sieved form. Both soils
were selected based on their contrasting SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios with other
traits remaining largely similar (Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e822">Initial properties of the selected two paddy soil series and maize
shoots used in the soil incubation experiment.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Balina</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sonatala</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil texture<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Silty clay loam</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Silt loam</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil type<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mollic Haplaquept</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Aeric Haplaquept</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Yearly cropping pattern<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rice – fallow – fallow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Rice – fallow – rice</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC content (g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (‰)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (–)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pH-KCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pH-H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total N (g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N (mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N (mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C : N ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e825"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Data taken from Kader et al. (2013).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Oxalate-extractable Fe.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Data taken from Akter et al. (2018).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Ratio of SOC to oxalate-extractable Fe.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> pH-H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O by inserting a glass pH electrode in 1 : 5
soil–water extracts after 18 h equilibration.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Exchangeable mineral N determined in 1 M KCl extracts.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1300">X-ray diffraction analyses confirmed that both soils contained mica,
vermiculite, chlorite and kaolinite, and Sonatala also some crystalline
goethite (Kader et al., 2013). The presence of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in chlorite and
vermiculite was confirmed by Mössbauer spectroscopy (Akter
et al., 2018), but ferrihydrite and poorly crystalline goethite were the
main Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> pools in both soils.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Pot experiment</title>
      <p id="d1e1335">A six-week pot experiment with living rice plants was run in the tropical
greenhouse of the Faculty of Bioscience Engineering (Ghent University) in
Melle, Belgium, from 23 April to 4 June 2018. The mean ambient temperature
was 28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and the relative humidity was 82.2 %. PVC tubes
(diameter: 18.5 cm; height: 25.0 cm) were filled with soil from
either Balina (4.8 kg dry soil) or Sonatala (4.0 kg dry soil) until a height
of 17.5 cm, matching their respective bulk densities, and were subjected to
two contrasting irrigation treatments, as described below. Ground maize
shoots were mixed into the soil at a dose of 4 g dry mass kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil
(i.e. 1.90 g C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to three replicate pots per soil type and per
irrigation regime. Maize shoots had an OC content of 474.4 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and a total N content of
13.0 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Two replicate pots were installed as controls without
maize added, and two more replicates per irrigation and soil combination
received maize (same dose of 4 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) but had no living rice plants.
Macronutrients were added once as basal fertilisation to all pots as urea,
KCl and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, at doses of 60 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 40 kg K ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10 kg P ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Five 15 d-old rice
seedlings were transplanted to each pot in a single hill. These seedlings
were obtained by germinating rice seeds of BINA dhan14 (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.), a Bangladeshi
short-duration (maturity 120–130 d) dry season rice variety, and sowing
those in seeding beds that were kept saturated in the tropical greenhouse
for 15 d.</p>
      <p id="d1e1496">A standing water table of 2.5 cm was initially maintained in all pots by
adding demineralised water every one or two days to enable seedling
establishment. Starting from 11 d after transplanting (DAT), the two
different irrigation regimes were imposed. In pots under CF, the 2.5 cm
water table was maintained until the end of the experiment. Pots under AWD,
in contrast, were left to dry out until the water table dropped to between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm, after which they were reflooded until a 2 cm standing
water table was reached. Water table depths were monitored using a
perforated tube (diameter: 3 cm) that was permanently installed in the pots.
Soil drying was only due to evapotranspiration. Drying cycles took on
average 6 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) d and shortened towards the end of the experiment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Monitoring of biochemical soil parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e1537">The soil redox potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was measured manually daily or every two
days at 4 and 12 cm depth in eight pots with plants (i.e. 2 irrigation
treatments <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 soil series <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> with versus without maize). This was achieved
by connecting a redox mV meter (Paleo Terra, the Netherlands) to permanently
installed platinum (Pt) probes and one <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AgCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reference electrode
(Paleo Terra, the Netherlands) per pot, and expressed relative to the standard
hydrogen electrode. Soil pH was measured six times during the experiment in
every pot at about 2 cm depth by inserting a glass pH electrode into the
saturated soil.</p>
      <p id="d1e1579">To place CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux measurements in context, KCl-extractable
ammonium (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were determined at
the start of the experiment (0 DAT), and at 11, 23, 30 and 45 DAT. For this,
soil samples were taken by carefully inserting a tube (diameter: 1 cm) until
10 cm depth about four times at different locations near the side of each
PVC pot. Soil samples were then stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until analysis.
The contents of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were determined with a
continuous flow auto-analyser (Skalar, the Netherlands) after extracting
soil samples with 1 M KCl at a 1 : 5 ratio.</p>
      <p id="d1e1668">At the end of the experiment, the above- and below-ground biomass of the
rice plants was determined after drying at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for three days.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of SOC was determined before the experiment for solid
native SOC and maize, and after the experiment in SOC, with an EA-IRMS
(automated nitrogen carbon analyser – solids and liquids – coupled to a
SerCon 20-20 IRMS, Syscon Electronics, the Netherlands).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Soil solution sampling and analyses of Fe${}^{{2+}}$, Mn${}^{{2+}}$, DOC and $\delta^{{13}}$C-DOC}?><title>Soil solution sampling and analyses of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, DOC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-DOC</title>
      <?pagebreak page5038?><p id="d1e1735">To track dissolved Fe, Mn, Ca, Mg and DOC, soil solution samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mL
per pot) were taken ten times throughout the experiment. Solution samples
were collected by connecting a pre-evacuated 12 mL glass vial through a
needle, 2-way stopcock and extension tube to a porous MacroRhizon soil
moisture sampler (Rhizosphere Research Products, the Netherlands) that was
permanently installed in each pot in a vertical position until about 9 cm
depth. Solutions were analysed for their Fe, Mn, Ca and Mg concentrations by
ICP-OES (Thermo Scientific, Unites States) without filtration, after
acidifying the solutions with some drops of concentrated HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
redissolve precipitates. The sum of the molar concentrations of dissolved Fe
and the increment in dissolved Ca and Mg (compared to their initial level)
was taken as a proxy for total reduced Fe since Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolves easily,
but readily exchanges with Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on colloid surfaces
(Saeki, 2004). In the same samples, the DOC concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-DOC were measured by FIA-IRMS (flow injection analysis with
isotope ratio mass spectrometry, DELTA V Plus Advantage, Thermo Scientific,
United States) after dilution in 0.85 % H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, evacuation and
ultrasonication to remove carbonates and dissolved gases. To account for
small differences in soil to soil solution ratios, soil solution
concentrations of Fe equivalents and DOC were for each time point converted
to mmol dissolved Fe equivalents kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil and mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil,
respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Estimation of SOC bound to pedogenic Fe and its $\delta^{{13}}$C}?><title>Estimation of SOC bound to pedogenic Fe and its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C</title>
      <p id="d1e1870">We furthermore estimated the content and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signature of SOC
bound to weakly crystalline pedogenic Fe in the initial Balina and Sonatala
soils based on the release of SOC after reduction with hydroxylamine
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl), i.e. by assessing the change in OC content and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the solid soil samples with versus without NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl
treatment. In all samples, particulate organic matter was firstly removed
through ultrasonication at 60 J mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and subsequent wet sieving at 53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Sleutel et al., 2007). After drying the sieved suspensions,
0.8 g soil and 40 mL of a solution of 0.25 M NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl and 0.25 M HCl
were mixed in a 85 mL Nalgene centrifuge tube, similarly to Chao and
Zhou (1983). The tubes were then kept in a water bath at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for 30 min with regular stirring. After centrifuging at 1000 g for 15 min, the supernatant was decanted, and traces of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl and HCl
were removed by washing the residue soil three times with 40 mL
demineralised water. Samples without the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl treatment were
treated identically, but the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl solution was replaced by
demineralised water. Finally, all samples were dried for four days at 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, ground and analysed for their C content and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
by means of elemental analyser – isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA-IRMS),
i.e. an ANCA-SL (automated nitrogen carbon analyser – solids and liquids)
interfaced with a 20-22 IRMS (Sercon Ltd., United Kingdom). The content of
Fe-bound SOC was then estimated as the difference in SOC between treated
samples and samples without NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl treatment. Analogous to Keeling (1958), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of Fe-bound SOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-SOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated based on the following mass balance:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M164" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-SOC</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><?xmltex \hack{\textstyle}?><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-SOC</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">untreated</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mtext>-SOC</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">untreated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><?xmltex \hack{\textstyle}?><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-SOC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mtext>-SOC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mstyle><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mtext>-SOC</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">untreated</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mtext>-SOC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-SOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and [C]-SOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> refer respectively to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and C concentration of samples treated with
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-SOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">untreated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
[C]-SOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">untreated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to those of samples without NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Gaseous C fluxes</title>
      <p id="d1e2324">In order to estimate the decomposition of OC to gaseous CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
we measured emission fluxes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotopic signatures of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at ten different moments for pots under CF (most
frequently after the onset of the experiment) and at twenty-six moments for pots
under AWD (spread evenly over the course of the experiment). These extra
measurements were required to sufficiently capture changing emissions during
soil wetting and drying cycles. Gaseous efflux measurements were conducted
by connecting a cavity ring-down spectrometer (G2201-i CRDS isotopic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyser, Picarro, United States) in a loop to an opaque
PVC gas flux chamber (diameter: 18.5 cm; height: 25.0 cm) with an
internal battery-operated fan. For each measurement, this flux chamber was
secured onto the pots by<?pagebreak page5039?> means of a PVC connection ring (diameter: 18.5 cm; height: 16.0 cm), and the headspace accumulation of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as the evolution of their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (as
opposed to the initial headspace air) was recorded every 4 s during 12 min. The CRDS was calibrated using standard gases with known <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰. Starting from 28 DAT, an extra PVC extension ring
(diameter: 18.5 cm; height: 25.0 cm) was added to the chambers
because rice plants had outgrown the initial chamber.</p>
      <p id="d1e2462">CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes were determined as the slope of the
accumulating headspace CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations as a function of
time, and were converted into a mass-based unit (mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) by means of the ideal gas law. Based on the conservation of
mass, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of the emitted CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
determined as the intercept of the linear regression from the isotopic
signature of the headspace gas in function of the reciprocal of the
headspace concentration, also known as the Keeling plot method (Keeling,
1958). All <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were expressed relative to the
international VPDB (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite) standard as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(‰). When rice seedlings were young and pots were
flooded, a considerable part of the produced CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> appeared
to be transported to the atmosphere through ebullition. In those cases,
their accumulation in the headspace did not follow a linear course but was
stepwise, with alternating time intervals of high and low accumulation
rates, which were assumed to be dominated by ebullition versus by
plant-mediated transport and molecular diffusion, respectively. When this
was the case, additional C emission fluxes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures
were derived for shorter time intervals during which emissions were
dominated by ebullition or by plant-mediated transport and diffusion.</p>
      <p id="d1e2623">Average daily fluxes were estimated from the measured fluxes by accounting
for diurnal fluctuation of the actual temperature using a temperature
dependency model:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M202" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Relative correction daily rate</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) respectively represent the
average daily soil temperature and the temperature during measurement. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature coefficient was set to 3.1 for CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et
al., 2015; Wei et al., 2021; Hattori et al., 2001) and to 2.3 for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Huang et al., 2015; P. Zhou et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2007; Wei et al.,
2021). Overall, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C while
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 32.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, as gas efflux measurements
were always carried out around noon.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Source partitioning of gaseous and dissolved C</title>
      <p id="d1e2799">The fractions of emitted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from added maize
shoots (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus from native SOC (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were inferred from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures of emissions from (i) the “mixed pool” pots (to which
maize was added); (ii) control pots without maize added (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
as reference for the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived emission endmember); and (iii) a shorter
ancillary incubation with maize shoots as the only OC source (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as reference for the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived emission endmember) (see
Supplement). The latter two were used instead of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of respectively
native SOC and maize-C in order to account for isotopic fractionation during
microbial decomposition and emission of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Any effect of
the presence of rice plants (plant respiration or decomposition of plant
photosynthates to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is accounted for by the fact that
the control pots without maize added (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) contained rice plants
too. Based on the conservation of mass, the fraction of maize-derived
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is for example (Werth and Kuzyakov, 2010; Rochette and Flanagan,
1997; Hayes, 1983):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M238" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes derived from native SOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>SOC-derived</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>SOC-derived</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or maize (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>maize-derived</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>maize-derived</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the
mixed pots were then obtained by multiplying emissions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then, cumulative emissions of
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, maize-derived C and native SOC-derived C were
calculated.</p>
      <p id="d1e3488">We calculated a dimensionless priming effect (PE) coefficient of maize
addition on SOC-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission by comparing
SOC-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes with those from control pots
without maize (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Conrad et al., 2012). For example, relative priming of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission was defined as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M258" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>SOC-derived</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In addition, the fraction of DOC derived from maize (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DOC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated as well based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures of DOC
in amended pots (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-DOC), of control pots without amendment
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-DOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), of solid maize-C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and of solid SOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M268" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DOC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>C-DOC</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-DOC</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          DOC contents derived from SOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DOC</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SOC-derived</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in amended soils were
obtained by multiplying their total DOC contents with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DOC</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the relative priming effect of maize
addition on SOC-derived C dissolution was then calculated in an analogous
way to Eq. (4).</p>
      <p id="d1e3831">Because of the presence of rice plants, DOC contents as well as CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions originate not only from native SOC versus maize shoots,
but also from rice plant photosynthates. Having a similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
as SOC, rice plant-derived DOC, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> will contribute to
what is partitioned as SOC-derived C, leading to overestimation of SOC
decomposition. However, this contribution is believed to be very<?pagebreak page5040?> low in our
experiment considering the young age of the rice plants. An estimate of the
plant-derived DOC contents in our pots based on literature (Lu et
al., 2004; Nguyen, 2003) was as low as 14 mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil, with
therefore indeed low potential contributions to soil C emissions, in
agreement with observations of Yuan et al. (2012) at 41 d, and
comparison of our emissions from maize-amended pots with and without rice
plants. SOC-derived emission estimates based on isotopic mixing (Eq. 3) are
henceforth assumed to be derived from native SOC decomposition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS8">
  <label>2.8</label><title>Statistical analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e3902">Statistical tests were conducted with R 3.6.1 for Windows (R Core Team,
2019), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> taken as the default significance level. Mostly, results for
both soils (Balina and Sonatala) were analysed separately. The effect of
irrigation treatment (starting from 11 DAT in the case of time series) on
measured variables was assessed by two-way or three-way ANOVA or by
Kruskal-Wallis tests with irrigation treatment and maize amendment as
factors, and DAT as a third factor in the case of time series. In the case of
interaction between the irrigation management and maize amendment factors,
the tests were repeated for data from maize-amended versus control pots
separately. In the case of interaction with DAT, differences between irrigation
treatments were also assessed separately for individual points in time.
Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-tests or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were used to test the
significance of priming effects for dissolution (i.e. comparing averages
after integration over time from SOC-derived DOC in maize-amended and
unamended soil) as well as emission (i.e. comparing SOC-derived emissions
from maize-amended and unamended soil), to compare if dissolution and
emission priming effects differed from one another, and to test if the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> differed when emissions were
dominated versus not dominated by ebullition.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Redox potential and iron reduction</title>
      <p id="d1e3969">Within one to two weeks the soil redox potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) generally
decreased to ca. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mV (Fig. 1). The effect of the irrigation
treatment on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seemed to depend on both soil and addition of maize,
but temporary increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed upon soil drying. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was more responsive to wetting and drying at 4 cm than at 12 cm
depth. Maize addition did not particularly induce a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
irrespective of soil type, though it did stimulate reductive dissolution of
Fe (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both soils between 2 and 11 DAT) during the observed
initial increase in dissolved Fe equivalents (Fig. 2). Similar trends were
observed for Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (data not shown). When maize was added, Fe
concentrations after 11 DAT dropped to lower levels in the case of AWD compared
to CF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Balina and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Sonatala). In control
pots without maize shoots added, there was no significant effect of
irrigation treatment on the decrease in dissolved Fe.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e4098">After a general initial drop, the soil redox potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(values per replicate at 4 and 12 cm depth) depended to some extent on
the irrigation treatment in both paddy soils (Balina and Sonatala). Water
table fluctuations in the case of AWD are indicated in grey.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4120">Maize addition stimulated reductive dissolution of Fe (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error of three or two replicates, calculated as sum of
dissolved Fe and increments in dissolved Ca and Mg), and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
disappeared to a larger extent from the soil solution under AWD than under
CF in maize-amended pots. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values indicate the effect of maize addition
on the time series between 2 and 11 DAT, and the effect of irrigation
treatment in maize-amended pots on the time series between 16 and 42 DAT.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Exchangeable NH${}_{{4}}{}^{{+}}$, pH and rice plant biomass}?><title>Exchangeable NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH and rice plant biomass</title>
      <p id="d1e4176">Concentrations of exchangeable NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased until 11 DAT, partly
owing to the initial urea additions of 39 and 47 mg N kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to the Balina and Sonatala soils, respectively. Thereafter they
remained more or less constant (Fig. S2 in the Supplement). Overall,
exchangeable NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels reached in the Balina soil were about
double those for Sonatala. The effects of the presence of rice plants or
irrigation treatment were at times significant but tended to be small and
are not further discussed in detail. NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were mostly significantly higher with maize added than without, probably because
of net N mineralisation. Concentrations of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were always minor,
i.e. below 1 mg N kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (data not shown).</p>
      <p id="d1e4252">The soil solution pH of the Balina soil increased from an initial value of
6.1 to 6.8 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) after 17 DAT and then remained constant onwards
(Fig. S3). In the Sonatala soil, pH remained nearly constant
throughout (initially 6.9, then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> starting from 17 DAT).</p>
      <p id="d1e4277">After 42 d, rice plants had reached a height of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm, with an
above-ground dry biomass of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g per pot and a below-ground dry
biomass of 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 g per pot. There was no effect from soil type or
irrigation practice on the above-ground biomass. Below-ground biomass was
not affected by soil type either but was significantly higher for plants grown
under CF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g per pot) than under AWD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g per
pot) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Organic carbon dissolution</title>
      <?pagebreak page5042?><p id="d1e4356">Extremely high total DOC peaks were reached 1 to 2 weeks after submergence
in all treatments (maximally 1912 and 1329 mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil for
maize-amended Balina and Sonatala soils, respectively), which were also much
higher with maize added (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for time series until 11 DAT). Not
only maize-derived DOC (data not shown), but also enhanced dissolution of
native SOC caused these DOC peaks (Fig. 3). Over the course of the
experiment, SOC-derived DOC was indeed higher with maize added than without
in both soils, which was significant for Sonatala under CF (averaged
concentrations over the course of the season: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In other words,
there was a positive priming effect on SOC dissolution (i.e. stimulation)
during most of the incubation. This priming effect was irrespective of the
irrigation regime in the Balina soils (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while it was stronger
under CF than under AWD in the Sonatala soils (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) starting
from 16 DAT. Priming of SOC dissolution was also stronger for Sonatala than
for Balina (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Dissolution of maize-C was, in contrast, nearly
identical in both soils, with an average peak concentration of 811 mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 7 DAT, followed by a near-complete disappearance of
maize-derived DOC around 16 DAT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (data not
shown).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4468">Dissolution of native SOC (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error of three
or two replicates) was stimulated upon addition of maize, as it appears when
comparing with DOC in unamended pots (indicated in brown). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values of the
priming effect significance using average values per season (in the figure)
and of the irrigation treatment effect on the priming effect time series
starting from 16 DAT (below the figure) are indicated.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Gaseous carbon emission</title>
      <p id="d1e4499">Gaseous C emissions consisted on average of 31 % CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 69 % CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Irrigation management did not affect the cumulative C emissions
(CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and neither CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> nor CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
individually in the case of the Balina soil (Fig. 4). For the Sonatala
soil, however, the effect of irrigation depended on whether or not the soils
were amended with maize. With maize added, total gaseous C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) emissions were higher under CF than AWD, but CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions were not significantly affected. On the other hand, in unamended
Sonatala pots, total C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) emissions were
higher under AWD than under CF, while CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission was not
significantly different. CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were in general
higher with maize added than without (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Total gaseous C
emission was furthermore lower from the Sonatala than from the Balina soil (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In general, gaseous C emissions were similar with or without living
rice plants in pots with maize added (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Both the addition of maize
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the implementation of CF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) led to more
gaseous C emission via ebullition: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of C was emitted
through ebullition under CF compared to only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % under AWD.
With maize added, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of C was emitted via ebullition,
compared to only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for unamended control pots.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4779">Total cumulative C emissions (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error of three or
two replicates, represented by white bars) from maize-amended soils were two
to fourfold of those from unamended pots (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In addition,
relatively more C was emitted through ebullition under CF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and upon addition of maize shoots (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4831">In addition, the course of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes seemed linked to the
wetting and drying cycles under AWD (Fig. 5) as (i) more gaseous C was
emitted when the soils dried; (ii) most ebullition transport occurred when
the water table was at the soil surface, usually a few days before
rewetting; and (iii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures increased as
water tables declined.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4875">As this representative example (one replicate of the Balina soil
with maize shoots added and under AWD) shows, the progression of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission fluxes (shaded) and even their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
signature (black line) appear linked to the change in water table depth
under AWD. A distinction is made between emission fluxes dominated by
ebullition (dark grey shaded) versus by diffusion or plant transport (brown
shaded). Transport through ebullition was particularly considerable when
rice plants were juvenile.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4913">CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were clearly more enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C when
maize was added (Figs. 6 and S1), evidently indicating the
contribution of maize C decomposition. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased to a distinct maximum at 16 DAT (Balina) or 13 DAT (Sonatala)
(Fig. S1). In control pots without maize, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of emitted CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher for Sonatala than for Balina, in
line with the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of native SOC (Fig. 6).
Implementation of AWD to control pots resulted in higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
signatures of emitted C (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to CF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Isotopic fractionation took place during mineralisation of maize and native
SOC into CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 6 and S1). Lastly,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
was on average 2.62 ‰ and 3.45 ‰
higher when emissions were dominated by ebullition than when they were
dominated by plant transport and diffusion (data not shown).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5118">In the absence of maize, the overall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signature of C
emissions (values per replicate) was lower (i.e. less <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched)
under CF than under AWD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Source partitioning of emitted CO${}_{{2}}$ and CH${}_{{4}}$}?><title>Source partitioning of emitted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e5188">The fractions of maize-derived and SOC-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
calculated based on isotopic mixing, considering the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of
SOC and maize, and accounting for isotopic fractionation during
decomposition to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S1).
Surprisingly, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of emissions from an ancillary
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-reference incubation with only maize and no native SOC as OC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was usually lower (instead of higher) than from control pots with
no maize added (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. S1). The difference in isotopic
signature between maize and SOC was therefore not further reflected in a
likewise difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from both
sources. In addition, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was often higher than
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of both endmembers in the case of the maize-amended Balina
and Sonatala soils. For these reasons, the fraction of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
derived from maize (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) could unfortunately not be reliably deduced, in spite of the
high measurement frequency across the experiment. As a best estimate, we
therefore assumed that the contributions of emitted CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from maize
decomposition would equal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">maize</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. After about 16 DAT, this derived fraction of
maize-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased to about 100 % for most of the pots
(data not shown). The calculated cumulative maize-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions ranged between 1737 and 2757 mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, in most
cases exceeding the theoretical maximum of 1898 mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. the
amount of initially added maize. Therefore, in those cases we instead
consider complete degradation of all the initially added maize for further
calculation of cumulative SOC-derived C emissions, which seems reasonable
considering the complete disappearance of dissolved maize-C around 16 DAT
(Fig. 3), and the fact that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of SOC was not higher after
than before the experiment (Fig. 6).</p>
      <p id="d1e5487">The effect of maize addition on SOC-derived C emission was negligible in the
case of Balina, while for Sonatala, it depended on the irrigation treatment
(Fig. 7). CF irrigation led to a positive priming (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (i.e. stimulated
SOC-derived gaseous C emissions upon maize addition), whereas negative
priming on SOC-derived C emissions in maize-amended soil occurred under AWD
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In addition, priming on SOC-derived C emission was higher under
CF than AWD for Sonatala (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e5528">For the Sonatala soil, maize addition led to positive priming of
gaseous C (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) emission under CF and negative priming
under AWD. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values of the priming effect significance (in the figure) and
of the irrigation treatment effect on the priming effect (below the figure)
are indicated. Standard errors (three or two replicates) are indicated.
Fe-bound SOC levels (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error, estimated by means of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl) exceed the positive priming effect of Sonatala under CF, so
stimulated Fe-C dissolution and emission has the potential to explain this
priming.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Are Fe reduction and SOC dissolution linked?</title>
      <p id="d1e5609">With the onset of anaerobic conditions, exemplified by a decreasing soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1), there was a strong increase in dissolved Fe (Fig. 2),
which shows that part of the soil Fe was quickly reduced and dissolved.
At the same time, DOC concentrations increased rapidly until maxima at 11 DAT
(Balina) and at 4–7 DAT (Sonatala). The synchrony of OC<?pagebreak page5043?> dissolution and
Fe reduction patterns prompts the question of whether both processes are physically
linked. Said-Pullicino et al. (2016) suggested that observed DOC
increases could have been due to the co-release of OC during reductive
dissolution of Fe oxides. With an adapted NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl extraction
procedure, we estimated that the amount of C bound onto reducible Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
minerals was 1367 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Balina and 2000 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Sonatala
(Fig. 7), constituting approximately 9 % of SOC. Release of this
substantial Fe-bound SOC pool might have been a crucial source of DOC, but
other important C dissolution pathways need to be considered as well.
Firstly, a rise in pH upon soil reduction under anaerobic conditions can
lead to SOC desorption (Grybos et al., 2009) but this mechanism
was most likely unimportant here because of the initially high pH that did
not considerably change during the incubation, especially in the Sonatala
soil (Fig. S3). Secondly, rhizodeposition from rice plants can
also cause an increase in DOC (Said-Pullicino et al., 2016; Lu et al.,
2004). However, based on values from Lu et al. (2004) and Nguyen (2003), maximum DOC contents derived from rice plant photosynthates in our
soils are estimated to be around 14 mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil, which is again
limited since rice plants were juvenile during the experiment. Next to the
direct contribution of rhizodeposition, some root photosynthates (e.g.
oxalate and citric acid) can also indirectly increase DOC levels by
promoting the release of Fe-bound SOC in the rhizosphere through their
strong metal-complexing capacity (Keiluweit et al., 2015; Yu et al.,
2017). This mechanism was, however, likewise restricted here considering its
local impact and the juvenile age of the rice plants. Lastly, fermentation
of SOC and added maize into water-soluble organic metabolites must obviously
have largely contributed to the accumulation of DOC. As such, based on DOC
patterns alone it is not possible to unequivocally state that reductive
dissolution of Fe with co-release of Fe-bound OC drove DOC build-up.</p>
      <p id="d1e5688">The stable isotope approach then allowed to discriminate between SOC-derived
and maize-derived DOC. Maize addition roughly doubled dissolution of native
SOC (Fig. 3). Since also Fe reduction was stimulated upon the addition of
maize (Fig. 2), it seems likely that, next to<?pagebreak page5044?> stimulated SOC fermentation, promoted SOC co-release upon enhanced Fe reduction was indeed a potentially
important priming mechanism, in agreement with the observations of Ye
and Horwath (2017) and Bertora et al. (2018). Dissolution of all
Fe-bound SOC present might produce a DOC peak of approximately 584 mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Balina) or 854 mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sonatala), when roughly comparing
it to the DOC production and the DOC mineralisation kinetics of maize (where we
know that 1898 mg added maize-C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yielded a peak of 811 mg C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> maize-derived DOC). While just a tentative approximation, it
becomes clear that the magnitude of SOC-derived DOC peaks suffices to
explain the observed increment in SOC-derived DOC with maize added (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p id="d1e5739">Comparison of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of Fe-bound SOC and DOC could further
contribute to the quantification of DOC derived from pedogenic Fe. Attempts
to measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl extracts directly by means of
FIA-IRMS unfortunately failed owing to interference of the matrix, even
after trying to remove NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl and Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by oxidation and
precipitation. However, from the difference in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C before
and after NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl extraction, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of Fe-bound SOC
could be estimated indirectly with reasonable uncertainty, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for Balina and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰
for Sonatala. Apparently, Fe-C was a bit more depleted
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C than bulk SOC (Table 1). In control pots, with only Fe-bound SOC
and bulk SOC as C sources, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures of DOC were also
lower, supporting the assumption that DOC partly consists of released
Fe-bound C. To robustly derive the contribution of potentially enhanced
Fe-bound C release to stimulated SOC dissolution in maize-amended pots,
three-source partitioning with an additional contrast in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C next to
the existing variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be required (when rice
plants can be disregarded).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Extent of priming of SOC mineralisation as compared to SOC dissolution</title>
      <?pagebreak page5046?><p id="d1e5929">Our objective was then to more specifically assess whether the stimulated
SOC dissolution would be reflected in enhanced native SOC-derived
mineralisation to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. As it turns out, native SOC-derived
gaseous C (i.e. CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) emissions were not significantly
modified by the addition of maize in the Balina soil (Fig. 7). For Sonatala,
there was however positive priming (i.e. more SOC-derived C emissions in
soil with maize addition than in soil without) under CF irrigation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a negative priming under AWD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For the CF treatment, the
discussed stimulation of native SOC dissolution, probably partially by
enhanced co-release of Fe-bound SOC, may have promoted SOC mineralisation
upon maize addition. Yet, priming effect coefficients were overall larger
for dissolution than for gaseous C emission in Sonatala (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and not significantly for Balina (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 8), which suggests that
the enhanced SOC dissolution would not have resulted in a proportionate SOC
mineralisation. Hanke et al. (2013) likewise found that extra
solubilised C after paddy soil submergence did not cause a proportional rise
in gaseous C emissions. They assumed that the availability of alternative
terminal electron acceptors was limiting mineralisation. However, as SOC
mineralisation (indicated by SOC-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission) was
actually slower under AWD than under CF in the Sonatala soil, electron
acceptor availability must not really have limited priming of SOC-derived C
emission. It instead seems more likely that preferences of microorganisms
that decompose DOC explain the observed smaller priming of soil C emission
compared to dissolution. DOC-decomposing microorganisms must have preferred
the abundantly available maize-derived DOC at the expense of SOC-derived DOC
mineralisation in maize-amended soils. This hypothesis is supported by the
faster removal of maize-derived compared to SOC-derived DOC (data not
shown). Maize shoots and native SOC obviously differ in their biochemical
quality, where SOC in paddy soils is generally quite aromatic with an
accumulation of hardly degradable lignin components (Olk et al., 2002;
Z. Zhou et al., 2014). In fact, phenol accumulation in paddy soil in part
explains their larger topsoil OC content compared to upland counterparts
(Chen et al., 2021). The energy yield of oxidation of such reduced SOC
compounds (phenols and lipids) becomes low when coupled to Fe reduction
(Keiluweit et al., 2017), and therefore it is logical that
maize-derived DOC would have been preferred over SOC-derived DOC as a
microbial substrate. Lastly, enhanced Fe reduction might also abiotically
mediate positive priming of native SOC mineralisation through Fenton
reactions that lead to the production of reactive hydroxyl radicals
(Yu and Kuzyakov, 2021). However, as priming effect coefficients
for gaseous C emissions were low compared to those for dissolution (Fig. 8), and since the relative contribution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to gaseous C emissions
in maize-amended pots was lower than in control pots (Fig. 4), it seems
unlikely that the potentially enhanced production of hydroxyl radicals would
have played a considerable role in stimulating SOC decomposition in
maize-amended pots.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e6054">For Sonatala (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and not significantly for Balina
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the priming effect on gaseous C (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) emission
was lower than on SOC dissolution.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5035/2021/bg-18-5035-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Influence of irrigation management and soil type</title>
      <p id="d1e6120">Furthermore, we wanted to verify whether irrigation management plays a role
in the priming effect on SOC-derived dissolution and mineralisation. It is
of interest that the enhancement of SOC dissolution by maize addition was
stronger under CF than AWD, especially for the Sonatala soil (Fig. 3). Under
permanently flooded conditions, the addition of maize<?pagebreak page5047?> was probably more
effective in promoting anaerobic microbial fermentation resulting in
dissolution of SOC, as the biomass of anaerobes could grow under less
disturbed conditions than in the case of a regime with repeated soil drying. In addition, DOC may have been removed from soil solution through net association with Fe oxides to a higher extent under AWD because of net higher reoxidation of soil solution Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This irrigation treatment effect on DOC priming was also manifested in
higher priming on SOC emission under CF than AWD in the case of Sonatala (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 7). Furthermore, the decrease in priming effect was slightly
more pronounced for AWD than CF for Sonatala (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 8). The
negative priming of gaseous C emission under AWD in Sonatala was therefore
possibly not only due to a lesser stimulation of SOC-derived dissolution
under AWD than under CF. On top of that, the microbial community under AWD
might have been less adapted to anaerobic mineralisation than under CF,
resulting in an even larger preference for maize-derived than SOC-derived
DOC.</p>
      <p id="d1e6159">Furthermore, the effect of irrigation management on overall gaseous
emissions was rather limited, especially for Balina soil, and surprisingly
partially determined by ebullition. With no maize added, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was lower under CF than under AWD for Sonatala (Fig. 4). Indeed,
SOC mineralisation is often retarded under anaerobic conditions
(Kögel-Knabner et al., 2010; Sahrawat, 2004). However, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
effluxes were also surprisingly lower under CF, while the more reducing conditions compared to under AWD were expected to stimulate CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production (Jiang et al., 2019; Peyron et al., 2016). One cause for this
contrasting outcome may be the often considerable temporal storage of
produced CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in submerged CF pots. Indeed, transport of
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in paddy soils usually proceeds predominantly via rice
plant aerenchyma, whereas diffusion-based outgassing is retarded by
permanently standing water. With rice plants still juvenile and relatively
limited CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production in the unamended pots, it is thus
possible that a larger part of these gases was stored dissolved or as gas
bubbles in the CF pots. With AWD on the other hand, the capacity of the
standing water to store gases decreases as the water table goes
down regularly (Green, 2013; Tokida et al., 2013). Transport of the produced
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere was indeed clearly facilitated by
episodic flushes, e.g. through ebullition, when the water table decreased
(Fig. 5), in line with the observations of Yagi et al. (1996) and
Han et al. (2005). With maize added, on the other hand,
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was 53 % higher under CF than AWD in the case of
the Sonatala soil. The much faster production of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to in
unamended pots likely led to oversaturation of the dissolved CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pool,
resulting in less restricted CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission. For Balina, on the contrary,
the irrigation regime did not significantly affect CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission. This all in all low effect of water management on gaseous C
emissions in the Balina soil was in line with its limited impact on the
progression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 12 cm depth (Fig. 1), pH (Fig. S3)
and the fact that exchangeable NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (Fig. S2)
only differed during the final two weeks.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5048?><p id="d1e6365">Lastly, the contrast in Fe-bound SOC estimates between Sonatala and Balina
corresponded with the difference in their respective SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
(4.7 versus 1.7), and moreover with the higher SOC-derived DOC levels and
stronger priming of SOC dissolution in Sonatala compared to Balina.
Ye et al. (2016) found that a soil with less electron
acceptors gave rise to stronger priming on CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission in a laboratory
incubation under submerged conditions, which corresponds with our findings
on C (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) emission priming for the CF treatment. However,
the higher SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio cannot immediately explain the more
pronounced decrease in priming effect on C emission compared to dissolution
for Sonatala than for Balina (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), except if the DOC derived
from pedogenic Fe would be more recalcitrant, leading to a bigger preference
of DOC decomposers for maize-derived DOC. Soil type also influenced temporal
evolutions of biochemical parameters, but only to some extent. For Sonatala,
redox-related processes took place three to five days earlier than for
Balina, such as: (i) the initial decline of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1); (ii) the peak
in dissolved Fe (Fig. 2); (iii) the peak in DOC, in particular in
SOC-derived DOC (Fig. 3); and (iv) the “peak” in emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures (Fig. S1). This probably all
relates to the higher electron surplus (i.e. higher amount of electron donors
as compared to the main electron acceptor Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in combination with a
lower Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content for Sonatala, with its higher SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio,
resulting in a faster decrease in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Sonatala, it is likely
that microbes quickly needed to couple OC oxidation with the reduction of
alternative electron acceptors other than Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dropped
below the level enabling CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mV) after 4 d on
average for Sonatala while only after 9 d for Balina. In general, the
impact of irrigation management and maize residue addition on DOC release
and emissions seemed to depend on the soil type (in particular the
SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio), and soil type therefore seems to be an equally
important factor controlling the progression of reductive processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Using an isotope mass balance to infer native SOC mineralisation in paddy soils</title>
      <p id="d1e6566">Because of different types of isotopic fractionation, most importantly
caused by microbial discrimination for or against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C as a substrate,
source partitioning of gaseous emissions was not straightforward. Unlike the
results of Conrad et al. (2012) but in agreement with the
observations of Ye et al. (2016), isotopic fractionation was
different for maize than for SOC. For example, we observed a very consistent
initial enrichment in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over time until strikingly high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (Balina; 16 DAT) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (Sonatala; 13 DAT), with thereafter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
depletion (Figs. S1 and 5). As such trends were inexistent
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C evolutions are
likely the result of gradually changing dominant CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production
pathways. Indeed, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be produced with acetate, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or other
methylated compounds as precursors. Among any of these precursors, the
lowest fractionation (i.e. resulting in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the least negative
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) occurs with the acetate-dependent pathway, resulting in a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as high as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (relative to
VPDB) (Conrad, 2005). The even further enrichment of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the maize-amended plots can be explained by the higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of maize (Fig. 6). Another explanation for the constantly
changing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could be that the contributions of
various gas transport mechanisms and associated isotopic fractionation would
have changed over time. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased as water
tables declined during AWD cycles, particularly towards the end of the
experiment (Fig. 5). In the unamended pots, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was also higher under AWD than under CF (Fig. 6). Both
observations clearly suggest that change in transport fractionation affected
the evolving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
patterns. Interestingly, continuous CRDS-based recording of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C allowed to discern sudden ebullition
events over the course of a measurement. Emissions dominated by ebullition
indeed displayed higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but also higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures than emissions during which ebullition
appeared absent. The evolving contribution of diffusion and plant-mediated
versus ebullition transport throughout the experiment thus must have altered
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of emitted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the case of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
it is indeed well known that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotopic fractionation not
only takes place during plant-mediated transport (Zhang et al., 2014, 2015) but also during gas bubble formation (Zhang et
al., 2014). Our results suggest that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of emitted
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is also impacted by the contribution of ebullition transport. Using pots
without maize added, we quantified the overall isotopic fractionation
between SOC and SOC-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. We then also attempted to
quantify isotopic fractionation between maize-C and maize-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by means of an ancillary incubation experiment (Fig. S1), but this was only successful for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, maize
addition lifted the contribution of ebullition towards 56 % of all emitted
gaseous C compared to 37 % without maize. Because of that, the estimated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C-CH</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> used in Eq. (3) were perhaps not representative for the maize-amended
pots, since the proportion of ebullition transport was particularly large in
our experiment. However, decreasing ebullition by retarding mineralisation,
e.g. by lowering soil temperatures or by working with a less labile
substrate than the finely ground maize, would after all have but a limited
impact. To improve the source partitioning of emissions, the use of exogenous OC
with a more strongly contrasting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C would help the most, as
then the relative effect of isotopic fractionation declines.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e7161">Using a stable isotope approach, it was confirmed that the addition of
high-quality OC like maize shoots stimulates Fe reduction and dissolution of
native SOC. The synchrony of both processes suggests that priming of SOC
dissolution after addition of maize could result from increased net
co-release of OC during reductive dissolution of Fe oxides, next to enhanced
fermentation of native SOC to DOC. In support of this hypothesis, the pool
of Fe-bound C (1.3–2.0 g C kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), estimated by means of reduction
with NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl, was large enough to explain this. Moreover, we found
that maize addition stimulated SOC dissolution more strongly in the soil
with the highest SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and Fe-bound SOC content. However,
positive priming of SOC mineralisation into CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> only
occurred under CF in one out of the two investigated soils. Priming of SOC
dissolution therefore does not necessarily result in proportional priming of
native SOC-derived emissions, most likely owing to an overall preference of
microbes for maize-derived DOC in anaerobic conditions. However, it turned
out that it is particularly difficult to assess priming effects on native
SOC mineralisation in paddy soils, because source partitioning of C
emissions based on a stable isotope mass balance is inherently complicated
due to various isotopic fractionation effects. Nevertheless, our study
indicated that particularly in soil with a high SOC : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, the
addition of labile OC<?pagebreak page5049?> can result in substantial extra dissolution and
mineralisation of native SOC under CF irrigation, with a possible adverse
impact on the SOC balance in the longer term. The adoption of water-saving
irrigation can instead successfully decrease the stimulation of SOC dissolution
caused by OC addition and inhibit the positive priming of SOC mineralisation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e7233">The codes used in the preparation of this paper are available from the corresponding author upon request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e7239">The raw data obtained in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e7242">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5035-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5035-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e7251">SS, HD and PB designed the experiment, with input of MA. MA and SS selected and provided paddy soils from Bangladesh. HD, OM and HL conducted the incubation experiment with the support of MA. HD did the lab analyses with the support of SS, MA, OM and HL. SB and HD performed the dissolved organic C content and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C analyses, and SS, SB and HD developed and performed the procedure to quantify Fe-bound soil organic C. HD and SS conducted the data analyses and wrote the manuscript, with input from all other authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e7268">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e7274">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7280">We would like to genuinely thank the involved staff of the tropical greenhouse, the lab of the Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management (SoFer) group and the Isotope Bioscience Laboratory (ISOFYS) from Ghent University (Belgium).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e7285">This research has been supported by the European Research Area Network (ERA-Net) and the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) in the framework of the project “Greenhouse gas emissions from paddy rice soils under alternative irrigation management” (GreenRice) (grant no. GA.010.14N).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e7291">This paper was edited by Luo Yu and reviewed by Guanghui Yu and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Akter, M., Deroo, H., De Grave, E., Van Alboom, T., Kader, M. A., Pierreux,
S., Begum, M. A., Boeckx, P., and Sleutel, S.: Link between paddy soil
mineral nitrogen release and iron and manganese reduction examined in a rice
pot growth experiment, Geoderma, 326, 9–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.04.002</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bertora, C., Cucu, M. A., Lerda, C., Peyron, M., Bardi, L., Gorra, R.,
Sacco, D., Celi, L., and Said-Pullicino, D.: Dissolved organic carbon
cycling, methane emissions and related microbial populations in temperate
rice paddies with contrasting straw and water management, Agr.
Ecosyst. Environ., 265, 292–306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.004</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Blagodatskaya, Å. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Mechanisms of real and apparent priming
effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community
structure: critical review, Biol. Fert. Soils, 45, 115–131, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carrijo, D. R., Lundy, M. E., and Linquist, B. A.: Rice yields and water use
under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis, Field Crop
Res, 203, 173–180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chao, T. and Zhou, L.: Extraction techniques for selective dissolution of
amorphous iron oxides from soils and sediments, Soil Sci. Soc.
Am. J., 47, 225–232, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, C., Hall, S. J., Coward, E., and Thompson, A.: Iron-mediated organic
matter decomposition in humid soils can counteract protection, Nat.
Commun., 11, 2255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16071-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-020-16071-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Hu, Y., Xia, Y., Zheng, S., Ma, C., Rui, Y., He, H., Huang, D., Zhang, Z., and Ge, T.: Contrasting pathways of carbon sequestration in paddy and upland soils, Glob. Change Biol., 27, 2478–2490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.15595</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Conrad, R.: Quantification of methanogenic pathways using stable carbon
isotopic signatures: a review and a proposal, Org. Geochem., 36,
739–752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.09.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.09.006</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Conrad, R., Klose, M., Yuan, Q., Lu, Y., and Chidthaisong, A.: Stable carbon
isotope fractionation, carbon flux partitioning and priming effects in
anoxic soils during methanogenic degradation of straw and soil organic
matter, Soil Biol. Biochem., 49, 193–199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.030</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Green, S. M.: Ebullition of methane from rice paddies: the importance of
furthering understanding, Plant  Soil, 370, 31–34, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grybos, M., Davranche, M., Gruau, G., Petitjean, P., and Pédrot, M.:
Increasing pH drives organic matter solubilization from wetland soils under
reducing conditions, Geoderma, 154, 13–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.09.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.09.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Han, G. H., Yoshikoshi, H., Nagai, H., Yamada, T., Saito, M., Miyata, A.,
and Harazono, Y.: Concentration and carbon isotope profiles of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
paddy rice canopy: Isotopic evidence for changes in CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
pathways upon drainage, Chem. Geol., 218, 25–40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.01.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.01.024</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hanke, A., Cerli, C., Muhr, J., Borken, W., and Kalbitz, K.: Redox control
on carbon mineralization and dissolved organic matter along a chronosequence
of paddy soils, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 64, 476–487, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hattori, C., Ueki, A., Seto, T., and Ueki, K.: Seasonal variations in
temperature dependence of methane production in paddy soil, Microbes
Environ., 16, 227–233, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hayes, J. M.: Practice and principles of isotopic measurements in organic geochemistry, in: Organic Geochemistry of Contemporaneous and Ancient Sediments, edited by: Meinschein, W. G., Great Lakes Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Bloomington, Indiana, 5–31, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, S., Sun, Y., Yu, X., and Zhang, W.: Interactive effects of
temperature and moisture on CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production in a paddy soil
under long-term different fertilization regimes, Biol. Fert. Soils, 52,  285–294,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1075-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00374-015-1075-3</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, Y., Carrijo, D., Huang, S., Chen, J., Balaine, N., Zhang, W., van
Groenigen, K. J., and Linquist, B.: Water management to mitigate the global
warming potential of rice systems: A global meta-analysis, Field Crop. Res.,
234, 47–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.010</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kader, M., Sleutel, S., Begum, S. A., Moslehuddin, A. Z. M., and De Neve,
S.: Nitrogen mineralization in sub-tropical paddy soils in relation to soil
mineralogy, management, pH, carbon, nitrogen and iron contents, Eur.
J. Soil Sci., 64, 47–57, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaiser, K. and Guggenberger, G.: The role of DOM sorption to mineral
surfaces in the preservation of organic matter in soils, Org.
Geochem., 31, 711–725, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00046-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00046-2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Keeling, C. D.: The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric
carbon dioxide in rural areas, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 13, 322–334,
1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keiluweit, M., Bougoure, J. J., Nico, P. S., Pett-Ridge, J., Weber, P. K.,
and Kleber, M.: Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root
exudates, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 588–595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2580</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keiluweit, M., Wanzek, T., Kleber, M., Nico, P., and Fendorf, S.: Anaerobic
microsites have an unaccounted role in soil carbon stabilization, Nat.
Commun., 8, 1771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01406-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-017-01406-6</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kögel-Knabner, I., Amelung, W., Cao, Z., Fiedler, S., Frenzel, P., Jahn,
R., Kalbitz, K., Kölbl, A., and Schloter, M.: Biogeochemistry of paddy
soils, Geoderma, 157, 1–14, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kuzyakov, Y., Friedel, J., and Stahr, K.: Review of mechanisms and
quantification of priming effects, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32,
1485–1498, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lampayan, R. M., Rejesus, R. M., Singleton, G. R., and Bouman, B. A. M.:
Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for
irrigated lowland rice, Field Crop Res., 170, 95–108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.013</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, Y., Watanabe, A., and Kimura, M.: Contribution of plant photosynthates
to dissolved organic carbon in a flooded rice soil, Biogeochemistry, 71,
1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-3258-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-004-3258-0</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mandal, K. G., Misra, A. K., Hati, K. M., Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Ghosh, P.
K., and Mohanty, M.: Rice residue-management options and effects on soil
properties and crop productivity, J. Food Agr.
Environ., 2, 224–231, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marschner, B. and Kalbitz, K.: Controls of bioavailability and
biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in soils, Geoderma, 113,
211–235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00362-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00362-2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, C.: Rhizodeposition of organic C by plants: mechanisms and controls,
Agronomie, 23, 375–396, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Olk, D., Dancel, M., Moscoso, E., Jimenez, R., and Dayrit, F. M.:
Accumulation of lignin residues in organic matter fractions of lowland rice
soils: a pyrolysis-GC-MS study, Soil Sci., 167, 590–606, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peyron, M., Bertora, C., Pelissetti, S., Said-Pullicino, D., Celi, L.,
Miniotti, E., Romani, M., and Sacco, D.: Greenhouse gas emissions as
affected by different water management practices in temperate rice paddies,
Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 232, 17–28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.021</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ponnamperuma, F. N.: Straw as a source of nutrients for wetland rice, in: Organic Matter and Rice, edited by: Banta, S., International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, 117–136, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ponnamperuma, F. N.: The chemistry of submerged soils, Adv. Agron.,
24, 29–96, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Postma, D.: The reactivity of iron oxides in sediments: A kinetic approach,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 57, 5027–5034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(05)80015-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(05)80015-8</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at: <uri>https://www.R-project.org/</uri> (last access: 21 August 2021), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rochette, P. and Flanagan, L. B.: Quantifying rhizosphere respiration in a
corn crop under field conditions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
61, 466–474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100020014x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100020014x</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saeki, K.: Adsorption of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on silica, gibbsite, and
humic acids, Soil Sci., 169, 832–840, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sahrawat, K. L.: Organic matter accumulation in submerged soils, Adv.
Agron., 81, 170–203, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Said-Pullicino, D., Miniotti, E. F., Sodano, M., Bertora, C., Lerda, C.,
Chiaradia, E. A., Romani, M., De Maria, S. C., Sacco, D., and Celi, L.:
Linking dissolved organic carbon cycling to organic carbon fluxes in rice
paddies under different water management practices, Plant Soil, 401,
273–290, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schweizer, M., Fear, J., and Cadisch, G.: Isotopic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) fractionation
during plant residue decomposition and its implications for soil organic
matter studies, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 13, 1284–1290,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sleutel, S., Kader, M. A., Leinweber, P., D'Haene, K., and De Neve, S.:
Tillage management alters surface soil organic matter composition: a
pyrolysis mass spectroscopy study, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
71, 1620–1628, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sodano, M., Lerda, C., Nisticò, R., Martin, M., Magnacca, G., Celi, L., and Said-Pullicino, D.: Dissolved organic carbon retention by coprecipitation during the oxidation of ferrous iron, Geoderma, 307, 19–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.022</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sugimoto, A. and Wada, E.: Carbon isotopic composition of bacterial methane
in a soil incubation experiment: Contributions of acetate and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 57, 4015–4027, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tokida, T., Cheng, W., Adachi, M., Matsunami, T., Nakamura, H., Okada, M.,
and Hasegawa, T.: The contribution of entrapped gas bubbles to the soil
methane pool and their role in methane emission from rice paddy soil in
free-air [CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] enrichment and soil warming experiments, Plant Soil,
364, 131–143, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5051?><ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Bodegom, P. M., van Reeven, J., and Denier van der Gon, H. A. C.:
Prediction of reducible soil iron content from iron extraction data,
Biogeochemistry, 64, 231–245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024935107543" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1024935107543</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagai, R., Mayer, L. M., Kitayama, K., and Shirato, Y.: Association of
organic matter with iron and aluminum across a range of soils determined via
selective dissolution techniques coupled with dissolved nitrogen analysis,
Biogeochemistry, 112, 95–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9652-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-011-9652-5</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, C., Lai, D. Y. F., Tong, C., Wang, W., Huang, J., and Zeng, C.:
Variations in Temperature Sensitivity (Q<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Emission from a
Subtropical Estuarine Marsh in Southeast China, PloS one, 10, e0125227,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0125227</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wei, L., Zhu, Z., Liu, S., Xiao, M., Wang, J., Deng, Y., Wu, J., and Ge, T.: Temperature sensitivity (Q<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) of stable, primed and easily
available organic matter pools during decomposition in paddy soil, Appl.
Soil Ecol., 157, 103752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103752</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Werth, M. and Kuzyakov, Y.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C fractionation at the
root–microorganisms–soil interface: a review and outlook for partitioning
studies, Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 1372–1384, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Yagi, K., Tsuruta, H., Kanda, K. I., and Minami, K.: Effect of water
management on methane emission from a Japanese rice paddy field: Automated
methane monitoring, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 255–267, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ye, R. and Horwath, W. R.: Influence of rice straw on priming of soil C for
dissolved organic C and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, Plant  Soil, 417, 231–241,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3254-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-017-3254-5</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ye, R., Doane, T. A., Morris, J., and Horwath, W. R.: The effect of rice
straw on the priming of soil organic matter and methane production in peat
soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 81, 98–107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.007</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ye, R., Doane, T. A., and Horwath, W. R.: Comparison of isotope methods for
partitioning methane production and soil C priming effects during anaerobic
decomposition of rice residue in soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 95,
51–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.010</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, G. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Fenton chemistry and reactive oxygen species in
soil: Abiotic mechanisms of biotic processes, controls and consequences for
carbon and nutrient cycling, Earth-Sci. Rev., 214, 103525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103525</ext-link>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Yu, G., Xiao, J., Hu, S., Polizzotto, M. L., Zhao, F., McGrath, S. P., Li,
H., Ran, W., and Shen, Q.: Mineral availability as a key regulator of soil
carbon storage, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 4960–4969, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yuan, Q., Pump, J., and Conrad, R.: Partitioning of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production originating from rice straw, soil and root organic carbon in rice
microcosms, PloS one, 7, e49073, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0049073</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yuan, Q., Pump, J., and Conrad, R.: Straw application in paddy soil enhances methane production also from other carbon sources, Biogeosciences, 11, 237–246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-237-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-237-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Ji, Y., Liu, G., Ma, J., and Xu, H.: Carbon isotope fractionation
during CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transport in paddy fields, Sci. China Earth Sci., 57,
1664–1670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4879-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-014-4879-3</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Zhang, W., Yu, H., Ma, J., Xu, H., and Yagi, K.: Fraction of
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidized in paddy field measured by stable carbon isotopes, Plant
Soil, 389, 349–359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2365-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-014-2365-5</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Li, L., and Pan, G.: Topsoil organic carbon mineralization and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution of three paddy soils from South China and the temperature
dependence, J. Environ. Sci., 19, 319–326, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60052-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60052-7</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, P., Li, Y., Ren, X., Xiao, H. A., Tong, C., Ge, T., Brookes, P. C.,
Shen, J., and Wu, J.: Organic carbon mineralization responses to temperature
increases in subtropical paddy soils, J. Soil. Sediment., 14,
1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0781-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11368-013-0781-4</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, Z., Cao, X., Schmidt-Rohr, K., Olk, D. C., Zhuang, S., Zhou, J., Cao,
Z., and Mao, J.: Similarities in chemical composition of soil organic matter
across a millennia-old paddy soil chronosequence as revealed by advanced
solid-state NMR spectroscopy, Biol. Fert. Soils, 50, 571–581,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0875-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00374-013-0875-6</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Effect of organic carbon addition on paddy soil organic carbon decomposition under different irrigation regimes</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Anaerobic decomposition of organic carbon (OC) in submerged rice
paddies is coupled to the reduction of alternative soil electron acceptors,
primarily Fe<sup>3+</sup>. During reductive dissolution of Fe<sup>3+</sup> from
pedogenic oxides, previously adsorbed native soil organic carbon (SOC) could
be co-released into solution. Incorporation of crop residues could hence
indirectly, i.e. through the stimulation of microbially mediated Fe<sup>3+</sup>
reduction, promote the loss of native SOC via enhanced dissolution and
subsequent mineralisation to CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>. Our aim was to estimate
the relevance of such a positive feedback during the degradation of added
OC, and to investigate the impact of irrigation management on this mechanism
and on priming effects on native SOC decomposition in general. In a six-week
pot experiment with rice plants, two Bangladeshi soils with contrasting SOC
to oxalate-extractable Fe (SOC&thinsp;:&thinsp;Fe<sub>ox</sub>) ratios were kept under a regime of
alternate wetting and drying (AWD) or continuous flooding (CF), and were
either amended with maize shoots or not. The <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C signatures of
dissolved organic C and emitted CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> were used to infer the
decomposition of added maize shoots (<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C&thinsp; = &thinsp;−13.0&thinsp;‰) versus native SOC (<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C&thinsp; = &thinsp;−25.4&thinsp;‰ and −22.7&thinsp;‰). Addition of maize
residues stimulated the reduction of Fe as well as the dissolution of native
SOC, and the latter to a larger extent under CF, especially for the soil
with the highest SOC&thinsp;:&thinsp;Fe<sub>ox</sub> ratio. Estimated Fe-bound SOC contents denote
that stimulated SOC co-release during Fe reduction could explain this
positive priming effect on SOC dissolution after the addition of maize.
However, priming effects on SOC mineralisation to CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> were
lower than for SOC dissolution, and were even negative under AWD for one
soil. Enhanced reductive dissolution of Fe-bound SOC upon exogenous OC
addition therefore does not necessarily lead to stimulated SOC
mineralisation. In addition, AWD irrigation was found to decrease the
above-mentioned priming effects.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Akter, M., Deroo, H., De Grave, E., Van Alboom, T., Kader, M. A., Pierreux,
S., Begum, M. A., Boeckx, P., and Sleutel, S.: Link between paddy soil
mineral nitrogen release and iron and manganese reduction examined in a rice
pot growth experiment, Geoderma, 326, 9–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.04.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.04.002</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bertora, C., Cucu, M. A., Lerda, C., Peyron, M., Bardi, L., Gorra, R.,
Sacco, D., Celi, L., and Said-Pullicino, D.: Dissolved organic carbon
cycling, methane emissions and related microbial populations in temperate
rice paddies with contrasting straw and water management, Agr.
Ecosyst. Environ., 265, 292–306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.004</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Blagodatskaya, Å. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Mechanisms of real and apparent priming
effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community
structure: critical review, Biol. Fert. Soils, 45, 115–131, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Carrijo, D. R., Lundy, M. E., and Linquist, B. A.: Rice yields and water use
under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis, Field Crop
Res, 203, 173–180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chao, T. and Zhou, L.: Extraction techniques for selective dissolution of
amorphous iron oxides from soils and sediments, Soil Sci. Soc.
Am. J., 47, 225–232, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C., Hall, S. J., Coward, E., and Thompson, A.: Iron-mediated organic
matter decomposition in humid soils can counteract protection, Nat.
Commun., 11, 2255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16071-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16071-5</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, X., Hu, Y., Xia, Y., Zheng, S., Ma, C., Rui, Y., He, H., Huang, D., Zhang, Z., and Ge, T.: Contrasting pathways of carbon sequestration in paddy and upland soils, Glob. Change Biol., 27, 2478–2490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15595</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Conrad, R.: Quantification of methanogenic pathways using stable carbon
isotopic signatures: a review and a proposal, Org. Geochem., 36,
739–752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.09.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.09.006</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Conrad, R., Klose, M., Yuan, Q., Lu, Y., and Chidthaisong, A.: Stable carbon
isotope fractionation, carbon flux partitioning and priming effects in
anoxic soils during methanogenic degradation of straw and soil organic
matter, Soil Biol. Biochem., 49, 193–199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.030</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Green, S. M.: Ebullition of methane from rice paddies: the importance of
furthering understanding, Plant  Soil, 370, 31–34, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Grybos, M., Davranche, M., Gruau, G., Petitjean, P., and Pédrot, M.:
Increasing pH drives organic matter solubilization from wetland soils under
reducing conditions, Geoderma, 154, 13–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.09.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.09.001</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Han, G. H., Yoshikoshi, H., Nagai, H., Yamada, T., Saito, M., Miyata, A.,
and Harazono, Y.: Concentration and carbon isotope profiles of CH<sub>4</sub> in
paddy rice canopy: Isotopic evidence for changes in CH<sub>4</sub> emission
pathways upon drainage, Chem. Geol., 218, 25–40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.01.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.01.024</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hanke, A., Cerli, C., Muhr, J., Borken, W., and Kalbitz, K.: Redox control
on carbon mineralization and dissolved organic matter along a chronosequence
of paddy soils, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 64, 476–487, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Hattori, C., Ueki, A., Seto, T., and Ueki, K.: Seasonal variations in
temperature dependence of methane production in paddy soil, Microbes
Environ., 16, 227–233, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hayes, J. M.: Practice and principles of isotopic measurements in organic geochemistry, in: Organic Geochemistry of Contemporaneous and Ancient Sediments, edited by: Meinschein, W. G., Great Lakes Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Bloomington, Indiana, 5–31, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, S., Sun, Y., Yu, X., and Zhang, W.: Interactive effects of
temperature and moisture on CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> production in a paddy soil
under long-term different fertilization regimes, Biol. Fert. Soils, 52,  285–294,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1075-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1075-3</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, Y., Carrijo, D., Huang, S., Chen, J., Balaine, N., Zhang, W., van
Groenigen, K. J., and Linquist, B.: Water management to mitigate the global
warming potential of rice systems: A global meta-analysis, Field Crop. Res.,
234, 47–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.010</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Kader, M., Sleutel, S., Begum, S. A., Moslehuddin, A. Z. M., and De Neve,
S.: Nitrogen mineralization in sub-tropical paddy soils in relation to soil
mineralogy, management, pH, carbon, nitrogen and iron contents, Eur.
J. Soil Sci., 64, 47–57, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Kaiser, K. and Guggenberger, G.: The role of DOM sorption to mineral
surfaces in the preservation of organic matter in soils, Org.
Geochem., 31, 711–725, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00046-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00046-2</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Keeling, C. D.: The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric
carbon dioxide in rural areas, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 13, 322–334,
1958.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Keiluweit, M., Bougoure, J. J., Nico, P. S., Pett-Ridge, J., Weber, P. K.,
and Kleber, M.: Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root
exudates, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 588–595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2580" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2580</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Keiluweit, M., Wanzek, T., Kleber, M., Nico, P., and Fendorf, S.: Anaerobic
microsites have an unaccounted role in soil carbon stabilization, Nat.
Commun., 8, 1771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01406-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01406-6</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Kögel-Knabner, I., Amelung, W., Cao, Z., Fiedler, S., Frenzel, P., Jahn,
R., Kalbitz, K., Kölbl, A., and Schloter, M.: Biogeochemistry of paddy
soils, Geoderma, 157, 1–14, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kuzyakov, Y., Friedel, J., and Stahr, K.: Review of mechanisms and
quantification of priming effects, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32,
1485–1498, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Lampayan, R. M., Rejesus, R. M., Singleton, G. R., and Bouman, B. A. M.:
Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for
irrigated lowland rice, Field Crop Res., 170, 95–108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.013</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, Y., Watanabe, A., and Kimura, M.: Contribution of plant photosynthates
to dissolved organic carbon in a flooded rice soil, Biogeochemistry, 71,
1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-3258-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-3258-0</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Mandal, K. G., Misra, A. K., Hati, K. M., Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Ghosh, P.
K., and Mohanty, M.: Rice residue-management options and effects on soil
properties and crop productivity, J. Food Agr.
Environ., 2, 224–231, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Marschner, B. and Kalbitz, K.: Controls of bioavailability and
biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in soils, Geoderma, 113,
211–235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00362-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00362-2</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, C.: Rhizodeposition of organic C by plants: mechanisms and controls,
Agronomie, 23, 375–396, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Olk, D., Dancel, M., Moscoso, E., Jimenez, R., and Dayrit, F. M.:
Accumulation of lignin residues in organic matter fractions of lowland rice
soils: a pyrolysis-GC-MS study, Soil Sci., 167, 590–606, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Peyron, M., Bertora, C., Pelissetti, S., Said-Pullicino, D., Celi, L.,
Miniotti, E., Romani, M., and Sacco, D.: Greenhouse gas emissions as
affected by different water management practices in temperate rice paddies,
Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 232, 17–28, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.021</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Ponnamperuma, F. N.: Straw as a source of nutrients for wetland rice, in: Organic Matter and Rice, edited by: Banta, S., International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, 117–136, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ponnamperuma, F. N.: The chemistry of submerged soils, Adv. Agron.,
24, 29–96, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Postma, D.: The reactivity of iron oxides in sediments: A kinetic approach,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 57, 5027–5034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(05)80015-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(05)80015-8</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at: <a href="https://www.R-project.org/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 21 August 2021), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Rochette, P. and Flanagan, L. B.: Quantifying rhizosphere respiration in a
corn crop under field conditions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
61, 466–474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100020014x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100020014x</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Saeki, K.: Adsorption of Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup> on silica, gibbsite, and
humic acids, Soil Sci., 169, 832–840, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Sahrawat, K. L.: Organic matter accumulation in submerged soils, Adv.
Agron., 81, 170–203, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Said-Pullicino, D., Miniotti, E. F., Sodano, M., Bertora, C., Lerda, C.,
Chiaradia, E. A., Romani, M., De Maria, S. C., Sacco, D., and Celi, L.:
Linking dissolved organic carbon cycling to organic carbon fluxes in rice
paddies under different water management practices, Plant Soil, 401,
273–290, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Schweizer, M., Fear, J., and Cadisch, G.: Isotopic (<sup>13</sup>C) fractionation
during plant residue decomposition and its implications for soil organic
matter studies, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 13, 1284–1290,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Sleutel, S., Kader, M. A., Leinweber, P., D'Haene, K., and De Neve, S.:
Tillage management alters surface soil organic matter composition: a
pyrolysis mass spectroscopy study, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
71, 1620–1628, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Sodano, M., Lerda, C., Nisticò, R., Martin, M., Magnacca, G., Celi, L., and Said-Pullicino, D.: Dissolved organic carbon retention by coprecipitation during the oxidation of ferrous iron, Geoderma, 307, 19–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.022</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Sugimoto, A. and Wada, E.: Carbon isotopic composition of bacterial methane
in a soil incubation experiment: Contributions of acetate and
CO<sub>2</sub>&thinsp;∕&thinsp;H<sub>2</sub>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 57, 4015–4027, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Tokida, T., Cheng, W., Adachi, M., Matsunami, T., Nakamura, H., Okada, M.,
and Hasegawa, T.: The contribution of entrapped gas bubbles to the soil
methane pool and their role in methane emission from rice paddy soil in
free-air [CO<sub>2</sub>] enrichment and soil warming experiments, Plant Soil,
364, 131–143, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
van Bodegom, P. M., van Reeven, J., and Denier van der Gon, H. A. C.:
Prediction of reducible soil iron content from iron extraction data,
Biogeochemistry, 64, 231–245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024935107543" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024935107543</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Wagai, R., Mayer, L. M., Kitayama, K., and Shirato, Y.: Association of
organic matter with iron and aluminum across a range of soils determined via
selective dissolution techniques coupled with dissolved nitrogen analysis,
Biogeochemistry, 112, 95–109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9652-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9652-5</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C., Lai, D. Y. F., Tong, C., Wang, W., Huang, J., and Zeng, C.:
Variations in Temperature Sensitivity (Q<sub>10</sub>) of CH<sub>4</sub> Emission from a
Subtropical Estuarine Marsh in Southeast China, PloS one, 10, e0125227,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125227</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, L., Zhu, Z., Liu, S., Xiao, M., Wang, J., Deng, Y., Wu, J., and Ge, T.: Temperature sensitivity (Q<sub>10</sub>) of stable, primed and easily
available organic matter pools during decomposition in paddy soil, Appl.
Soil Ecol., 157, 103752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103752" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103752</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Werth, M. and Kuzyakov, Y.: <sup>13</sup>C fractionation at the
root–microorganisms–soil interface: a review and outlook for partitioning
studies, Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 1372–1384, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Yagi, K., Tsuruta, H., Kanda, K. I., and Minami, K.: Effect of water
management on methane emission from a Japanese rice paddy field: Automated
methane monitoring, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 255–267, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, R. and Horwath, W. R.: Influence of rice straw on priming of soil C for
dissolved organic C and CH<sub>4</sub> production, Plant  Soil, 417, 231–241,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3254-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3254-5</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, R., Doane, T. A., Morris, J., and Horwath, W. R.: The effect of rice
straw on the priming of soil organic matter and methane production in peat
soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 81, 98–107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.007</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, R., Doane, T. A., and Horwath, W. R.: Comparison of isotope methods for
partitioning methane production and soil C priming effects during anaerobic
decomposition of rice residue in soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 95,
51–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.010</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Fenton chemistry and reactive oxygen species in
soil: Abiotic mechanisms of biotic processes, controls and consequences for
carbon and nutrient cycling, Earth-Sci. Rev., 214, 103525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103525" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103525</a>, 2021.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G., Xiao, J., Hu, S., Polizzotto, M. L., Zhao, F., McGrath, S. P., Li,
H., Ran, W., and Shen, Q.: Mineral availability as a key regulator of soil
carbon storage, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 4960–4969, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, Q., Pump, J., and Conrad, R.: Partitioning of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>
production originating from rice straw, soil and root organic carbon in rice
microcosms, PloS one, 7, e49073, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049073</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, Q., Pump, J., and Conrad, R.: Straw application in paddy soil enhances methane production also from other carbon sources, Biogeosciences, 11, 237–246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-237-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-237-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, G., Ji, Y., Liu, G., Ma, J., and Xu, H.: Carbon isotope fractionation
during CH<sub>4</sub> transport in paddy fields, Sci. China Earth Sci., 57,
1664–1670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4879-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4879-3</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, G., Zhang, W., Yu, H., Ma, J., Xu, H., and Yagi, K.: Fraction of
CH<sub>4</sub> oxidized in paddy field measured by stable carbon isotopes, Plant
Soil, 389, 349–359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2365-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2365-5</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Li, L., and Pan, G.: Topsoil organic carbon mineralization and
CO<sub>2</sub> evolution of three paddy soils from South China and the temperature
dependence, J. Environ. Sci., 19, 319–326, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60052-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60052-7</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, P., Li, Y., Ren, X., Xiao, H. A., Tong, C., Ge, T., Brookes, P. C.,
Shen, J., and Wu, J.: Organic carbon mineralization responses to temperature
increases in subtropical paddy soils, J. Soil. Sediment., 14,
1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0781-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0781-4</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, Z., Cao, X., Schmidt-Rohr, K., Olk, D. C., Zhuang, S., Zhou, J., Cao,
Z., and Mao, J.: Similarities in chemical composition of soil organic matter
across a millennia-old paddy soil chronosequence as revealed by advanced
solid-state NMR spectroscopy, Biol. Fert. Soils, 50, 571–581,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0875-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0875-6</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
