<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-18-5447-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Modeling the marine chromium cycle: new constraints on global-scale
processes</article-title><alt-title>Modeling the marine chromium cycle</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Modeling the marine chromium cycle}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{F.~P\"{o}ppelmeier et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Pöppelmeier</surname><given-names>Frerk</given-names></name>
          <email>frerk.poeppelmeier@climate.unibe.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-2550</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Janssen</surname><given-names>David J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9091-8936</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Jaccard</surname><given-names>Samuel L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5793-0896</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Stocker</surname><given-names>Thomas F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Climate and Environmental Physics, Physics Institute, University of
Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Oeschger Center for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, 3012
Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, 3012 Bern,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Frerk Pöppelmeier
(frerk.poeppelmeier@climate.unibe.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>5447</fpage><lpage>5463</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>August</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day><month>August</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e129">Chromium (Cr) and its isotopes hold great promise as a
tracer of past oxygenation and marine biological activity due to the
contrasted chemical properties of its two main oxidation states, Cr(III) and
Cr(VI), and the associated isotope fractionation during redox
transformations. However, to date the marine Cr cycle remains poorly
constrained due to insufficient knowledge about sources and sinks and the
influence of biological activity on redox reactions. We therefore
implemented the two oxidation states of Cr in the Bern3D Earth system model
of intermediate complexity in order to gain an improved understanding on
the mechanisms that modulate the spatial distribution of Cr in the ocean.
Due to the computational efficiency of the Bern3D model we are able to
explore and constrain the range of a wide array of parameters. Our model
simulates vertical, meridional, and inter-basin Cr concentration gradients
in good agreement with observations. We find a mean ocean residence time of
Cr between 5 and 8 kyr and a benthic flux, emanating from sediment
surfaces, of 0.1–0.2 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, both in the range of previous
estimates. We further explore the origin of regional model–data mismatches
through a number of sensitivity experiments. These indicate that the benthic
Cr flux may be substantially lower in the Arctic than elsewhere. In
addition, we find that a refined representation of oxygen minimum zones and
their potential to reduce Cr yield Cr(III) concentrations and Cr removal
rates in these regions in much improved agreement with observational data.
Yet, further research is required to better understand the processes that
govern these critical regions for Cr cycling.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e165">The chromium (Cr) cycle at the Earth's surface has received continuous attention
throughout the past decades to gain better understanding on the mobility of
hexavalent Cr (Cr(VI)), a carcinogenic pollutant in the environment (e.g.,
Wang et al., 1997). More recently, research was further motivated by
technical advances in mass spectrometry that allow for robustly measuring
the stable isotopic composition of Cr (e.g., Bonnand et al., 2013; Moss and Boyle, 2019; Wei et al., 2020), the fractionation of which is linked to
redox transformations between its two main oxidation states Cr(III) and
Cr(VI) (Ellis et al., 2002; Joe-Wong et al., 2019; Wanner and Sonnenthal,
2013; Zink et al., 2010). This permitted the application of stable Cr
isotopes as a proxy for past changes in oceanic and atmospheric oxygenation
(e.g., Frei et al., 2009; Planavsky et al., 2014). Recent investigations
revealed that biologically mediated redox reactions may play an important
role in the marine Cr cycle (Huang et al., 2021; Janssen et al., 2020;
Semeniuk et al., 2016), and the isotopic ratios measured in marine sediments
may hence be potentially used for the reconstruction of past changes in
biological productivity.</p>
      <p id="d1e168">Yet, despite growing interest, the marine Cr cycle remains poorly
constrained (Wei et al., 2020). In particular, anthropogenic Cr
contaminations of rivers and coastal environments, insufficient knowledge
about the redox behavior of Cr in the open ocean, as well as in oxygen
minimum zones (OMZs) (Moos et al., 2020; Nasemann et al., 2020), and the
possibility of yet unrecognized Cr sources from sediments (Janssen et al.,
2021) complicate the understanding of the<?pagebreak page5448?> marine Cr cycle. This is also
reflected in divergent estimates of the mean residence time of Cr in the
ocean, which range from 2 to 40 kyr (McClain and Maher, 2016; Sirinawin et
al., 2000; Wei et al., 2018), further highlighting the lack of constraints
on source and sink apportionment.</p>
      <p id="d1e171">In the modern ocean, total dissolved Cr concentrations of unpolluted waters
typically range between 1 and 6 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., Jeandel and Minster,
1987; Nasemann et al., 2020) of which a majority (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %) is
generally found in the soluble Cr(VI) redox state. Reduction of Cr(VI) is
either induced in poorly oxygenated waters or catalyzed by Fe(II) and
organic matter in oxic waters (Janssen et al., 2020; Kieber and Helz, 1992).
As such, Cr(III) concentrations can account for the majority of total
dissolved Cr in OMZs (Huang et al., 2021; Rue et al., 1997) and may also be
elevated in high-productivity surface waters (e.g., Janssen et al., 2020).
Complexation with organic ligands may further increase its solubility (e.g.,
Yamazaki et al., 1980). Trivalent chromium is fairly particle reactive and
is thus rapidly removed from the dissolved phase via adsorption on sinking
particles with strong affinities for biological particles (Janssen et al.,
2020; Semeniuk et al., 2016; Wang et al., 1997). Hence, subsurface pelagic
Cr(III) concentrations away from OMZs are substantially lower than Cr(VI)
concentrations typically ranging between 0.0 and 0.3 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Janssen
et al., 2020). The redox behavior and the different particle affinities of
the two oxidation states therefore control the spatial distribution of Cr in
the oceans.</p>
      <p id="d1e205">Reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is accompanied by isotope fractionation,
resulting in an enrichment of light isotopes in the reduced phase (e.g.,
Ellis et al., 2002; Joe-Wong et al., 2019). Therefore, as redox cycling is
also known to control oceanic Cr distributions, isotopic fractionation
during Cr(VI) reduction and Cr(III) removal have been proposed to account
for the principal mechanisms that lead to the well-defined inverse
logarithmic relationship between the total dissolved Cr concentration and
its stable isotopic ratio (e.g., Janssen et al., 2020, 2021; Moos et al.,
2020; Nasemann et al., 2020; Scheiderich et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e209">Here, we implemented the marine Cr cycle, including the two oxidation
states, Cr(III) and Cr(VI), in the Bern3D Earth system model of intermediate
complexity (EMIC) to gain further understanding of the mechanisms
modulating its spatial distribution. Our model parametrization includes the
relatively well-defined sources of Cr to the ocean associated with dust and
river input, along with the recently characterized benthic flux (Janssen et
al., 2021). While hydrothermal and groundwater discharge may also provide Cr
to the ocean, they are neglected here due to their expected small
contribution to the marine Cr budget (Bonnand et al., 2013). Further, we
implemented redox transformations between both oxidation states. We exploit
the computational efficiency of the Bern3D model to explore a large range of
parameters in order to improve critical constraints on the marine Cr cycle.
We then conduct a number of sensitivity experiments aiming to investigate
the impact of different parametrizations  on OMZ Cr reduction and removal
pathways. The tightly constrained relationship between the dissolved Cr
concentration and the stable isotopic ratio could ultimately allow for
future model–data intercomparisons using marine sedimentary isotope data to
reflect past changes in the marine Cr cycle.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model description and experiments</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Bern3D model</title>
      <p id="d1e227">The Bern3D v2.0 EMIC (Roth et al., 2014) consists of a dynamic
geostrophic-frictional balance model (Edwards et al., 1998; Müller et
al., 2006) featuring an isopycnal diffusion scheme and Gent–McWilliams
parametrization for eddy-induced transport (Griffies, 1998). The horizontal
resolution comprises 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41 grid cells with 32 logarithmically
scaled depth layers. The ocean model is coupled to a single-layer
energy–moisture balance model on the same horizontal grid (Ritz et al.,
2011). Cloud cover and wind stress are prescribed from satellite re-analysis
data of monthly climatologies (ERA40; Kalnay et al., 1996). Biogeochemical
cycling is implemented as described by Parekh et al. (2008) and Tschumi et al. (2011). In brief, export production of particulate organic matter (POM),
calcium carbonate (CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and biogenic opal is computed from
prognostic equations considering new production of POM and dissolved organic
carbon as functions of light, iron, phosphate, and temperature as described
by Doney et al. (2006). Following the OCMIP-2 protocol, the euphotic zone
is set to 75 m below which particles are remineralized following global
uniform, exponential profiles for CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and opal and a power-law
profile based on Martin et al. (1987) for POM. The aeolian dust flux
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent latitude
and longitude) is prescribed based on Mahowald et al. (2006) and is not
remineralized in the water column. All simulations were performed under
pre-industrial boundary conditions corresponding to 1765 CE with greenhouse
gas concentrations set to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">722</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, and
N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 273 ppb (Köhler et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Chromium implementation</title>
      <p id="d1e344">We implemented both oxidation states, Cr(III) and Cr(VI), as independent
tracers subject to advection, diffusion, and convection. The total Cr
concentration, [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is defined as the sum of the concentrations of
both oxidation states.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M18" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          For most Cr sources to the ocean, constraints related to the relative
distribution of its chemical species are insufficient. We therefore
estimated speciation factors for each source based on available information
from the literature (Table 1) in order to derive the individual Cr(III) and
Cr(VI) source terms.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e389">Model parameters and their values for the control run (CTRL). The
rationale inherent to the input parameters is discussed in the text.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Symbol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CTRL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cr source, total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust source, total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mahowald et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cr concentration dust</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cr release from dust</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cr speciation dust (% Cr(III))</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Riverine source, total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.54  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Riverine flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Updated from McClain and Maher (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cr speciation rivers (% Cr(III))</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Estuarine Cr(III) removal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>Cr(III)</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Estuarine Cr(VI) removal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>Cr(VI)</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Riverine scaling</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Benthic source, total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.98  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Benthic flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.16 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cr speciation benthic flux (% Cr(III))</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle sinking velocity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1000 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface reduction scaling</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reduc</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OMZ reduction rate constant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OMZ threshold</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reduction rate constant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reduc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0026 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oxidation rate constant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>oxid</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reduc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.052 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface oxidation scaling</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>oxid</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page5449?><p id="d1e1150">In total, we consider three Cr sources to the ocean: mineral dust, rivers,
and a benthic source. The former two are well-constrained vectors of trace
metals to the ocean. Yet, during the past years it emerged that for a number
of trace metals benthic sources may also play an important role for their
respective oceanic inventories (e.g., rare earth elements, Jeandel, 2016;
Fe, Mn, and Co, Viera et al., 2019). A benthic Cr source has also been
invoked (Cranston, 1983; Jeandel and Minster, 1987), though quantitative
estimates of source magnitude are limited by sparse data and are approximate
at present (Janssen et al., 2021). Removal of Cr is thought to be controlled
by reversible scavenging, which describes the process of adsorption onto
sinking particles and subsequent release to the water column during particle
remineralization at depth ultimately leading to burial in the underlying
sediments.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Sources and sinks</title>
      <p id="d1e1161">Chromium release from mineral dust, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), is
considered to provide a relatively minor source of Cr to the ocean globally
(Goring-Harford et al., 2018; Jeandel and Minster, 1987), yet it may play a
relevant role regionally, associated with episodic dust plumes. Due to a lack
of constraints, we assume a globally uniform Cr dust concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 50 ppm, which is at the lower end of measured values for the
silicate Earth (Schoenberg et al., 2008), 2 % Cr release in the surface
ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and a speciation ratio between Cr(III) and Cr(VI)
of 50 % each (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We do not consider further release of Cr
from dust in the deeper water column. From these follows
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M71" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the height of the surface ocean layer.
Accordingly, the Cr(III) and Cr(VI) dust fluxes are

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M73" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>du</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              The riverine Cr source, S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), is prescribed based on
the database by McClain and Maher (2016) with updated and extended
observations from Guinoiseau et al. (2016), Skarbøvik et al. (2015), and
Wei et al. (2018), while rivers showing strong anthropogenic contamination
were removed (Supplement Sect. S1). Overall, detailed constraints related
to the speciation of the riverine sources are incomplete, and we hence
assume an initial Cr(III) to Cr(VI) ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Observations indicate that
a fraction of dissolved riverine Cr is removed in estuaries (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by flocculation processes (e.g., Campbell and Yeats, 1984; Mayer
and Schick, 1981; Shiller and Boyle, 1991). Yet, estimates for Cr(III) and
Cr(VI) removal rates vary widely (Goring-Harford et al., 2020; Mayer and
Schick, 1981; Morris, 1986), and some studies even indicate an increase in
total dissolved Cr with salinity (e.g.,<?pagebreak page5450?> Sun et al., 2019). Hence, we adopt a
simplified parametrization that is in general agreement with these estimates
and the overall chemical behavior of the scavenging-prone Cr(III) to be
removed by 80 % and the much more soluble Cr(VI) to be removed only by 20 %. Since our riverine database covers only rivers accounting for a
fraction of the global discharge, we uniformly scale all riverine fluxes by
a factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to compensate for the missing data. Arguably,
this over represents larger, well-studied rivers and thus skews the
distribution of riverine Cr fluxes to the oceans, but such a simplification is
consistent with the intermediate complexity of the Bern3D model. The
riverine Cr fluxes per unit volume, V(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), thus read

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M81" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ri</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              Finally, the third major source of Cr in the model is a benthic flux,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), emanating from all sediment–water interfaces.
Pore-water Cr data are limited (Brumsack and Gieskes, 1983; Shaw et al.,
1990), and currently, only one open ocean pore-water [Cr] profile exists
that quantifies the first-order magnitude of the flux (Janssen et al.,
2021). Hence, no inferences on the spatial variability in this source can be
made at this point. We therefore apply a globally uniform parametrization
for the benthic flux. Based on the pore-water investigations by Janssen et al. (2021), it is suggested that adsorbed Cr(III) is slowly oxidized back to
soluble Cr(VI) in the pore water, which accumulates and ultimately escapes
from the sediment due to the build up of a concentration gradient between
bottom and pore waters. We therefore assume that the majority (80 %) of
the benthic Cr flux is in the form of Cr(VI), which leads to

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M84" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) speciation.</p>
      <p id="d1e1890">The sole sink of Cr considered in the model relates to the removal and
export of Cr with sinking particles. The reversible scavenging scheme used
in the Bern3D model is described in detail by Rempfer et al. (2011) and
follows previous descriptions (Henderson et al., 1999; Marchal et al.,
2000). In brief, the scavenging efficiencies of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) to the
four different particles types <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, POM, biogenic opal,
lithogenics) are described by the particle affinity coefficients
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that determines the
solubility of the different ocean tracers. Removal rates are further shaped
by the particle concentration and the particle sinking velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), which
is considered globally uniform and constant (1000 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Particles
reaching the seafloor are fully remineralized, while the associated Cr is
removed from the model, ultimately balancing the source terms.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Internal cycling</title>
      <p id="d1e1963">Reversible scavenging not only prescribes Cr removal at the seafloor but
also modulates the redistribution of Cr within the water column. At shallow
depths reversible scavenging acts as a net sink, contributing to reduce the
dissolved Cr fraction, while it works as a net source at greater depths where
adsorbed Cr is released back into solution. The internal Cr cycling is
further influenced by redox reactions. A handful of studies investigated
redox reactions and pathways in controlled laboratory experiments, aiming to
determine reaction rate constants (e.g., Emerson et al., 1979; Pettine et
al., 1998, 2008). As a note of caution, these experiments were conducted
with substantially higher reactant concentrations than typically observed in
the modern ocean, and thus simple extrapolations to mean ocean
concentrations may not always be fully valid. We therefore consider these
reaction rates only as first-order approximations and further adjust them
during model tuning.</p>
      <p id="d1e1966">Divalent iron, Fe(II), which is produced by photochemical (e.g., Barbeau et
al., 2001) and biological processes (e.g., Maldonado and Price, 2001) in
surface waters, constitutes the main reductant for Cr (Pettine et al.,
1998). In order to reflect these surface-specific processes in the model, Cr
reduction is parameterized differently in the surface ocean compared to the
deep where photochemical and biologically mediated reactions are strongly
attenuated or likely absent. Thus, Cr(VI) reduction is increased in the
uppermost grid cells by a factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reduc</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the
deep ocean, and a dependency on POM export productivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>POM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative to its global maximum is introduced. While reaction
rates are dependent on the concentrations of the reactants, Fe(II) and other
potential reductants are not explicitly implemented in the model. Chromium
reduction in the model is thus solely controlled by the Cr(VI)
concentration as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reduc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reduc</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>POM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>POM,MAX</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reduc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the rate constant also used for the tuning, and for the deep ocean it is
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M98" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>deep</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reduc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            In the ocean interior, Cr reduction is also observed in oxygen minimum zones
(OMZs) (e.g., Cranston and Murray, 1978; Huang et al., 2021; Murray, 1983;
Rue et al., 1997), although data on reaction and removal rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
remain very sparse. We include this specific process in the model and
prescribe dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
as the threshold (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) below which Cr reduction is<?pagebreak page5451?> strongly
enhanced in the model (Moos et al., 2020; Nasemann et al., 2020).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M105" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.7}{8.7}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">for</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">else</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            On the other hand, Cr(III) is slowly oxidized back to Cr(VI) for instance by
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pettine et al., 2008). Hydrogen peroxide concentrations
decrease with depth due to photochemical production, atmospheric deposition
to surface waters, and subsequent decomposition (Kieber et al., 2001). We
therefore additionally introduce a surface scaling for the oxidation
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>oxid</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analogous to Eq. (9).

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M109" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>oxid</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>oxid</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E13"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>13</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>deep</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>oxid</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              Summing up all external sources into S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,z) and
combining the surface and deep ocean oxidation and reduction equations
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>deep</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the conservation equations
can be written as

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M115" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>14</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E15"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>15</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>III</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>VI</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where subscripts d and p indicate the dissolved and particulate phases,
respectively, and T corresponds to the physical transport and mixing
calculated in the model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Model tuning</title>
      <p id="d1e2812">To date the marine Cr cycle remains largely under-constrained, and hence a
number of model parameters are either unknown or estimated as first-order
approximations. We therefore tuned five different parameters, namely the
benthic flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the oxidation rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>oxi</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (related to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reduc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by a constant factor of 20, based on laboratory experiments;
Elderfield, 1970; Pettine et al., 1998, 2008), the OMZ reduction rate
constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OMZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and reference scavenging parameters for Cr(III) and
Cr(VI) (Table S1). The ratios of the affinities to the different particles
were held constant and are noted in Table S2. The relatively long residence
time of Cr in the ocean, estimated to range between 2 and 40 kyr (Campbell and
Yeats, 1981; Sirinawin et al., 2000), requires model integration times at
least on the same order of magnitude. This makes a systematic exploration of
the five-dimensional tuning parameter space challenging. We therefore employ
a Latin hypercube sampling approach, which significantly reduces the
required number of simulations while maintaining good coverage of the
parameter space. In total, we performed 500 tuning simulations each
integrated over 40 kyr. This was insufficient for all simulations to reach
equilibrium. We individually examined this small subset of simulations
which had not yet reached equilibrium after 40 kyr and found unrealistically
high Cr concentrations in all of them and therefore did not continue model
integration for these runs.</p>
      <p id="d1e2859">The model performance was evaluated by determining the mean absolute error
(MAE) of the modern seawater data and [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the closest model grid
cell (root mean squared errors are noted in Table S3). For this, we compiled
seawater measurements from the literature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">701</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table S2).
Seawater Cr concentrations have been determined since the late 1970s
with increasing efforts in the past years and the recent integration in the
GEOTRACES initiative. Early seawater measurements were often performed using
unfiltered samples, which led to possible overestimation of dissolved Cr due
to particulate phases (Cranston, 1983). Yet, contamination during sample
processing may also pose a potential issue (e.g., see discussion in Nasemann
et al., 2020). Therefore, we performed a strict quality control and excluded
all data for which such concerns were mentioned in the original publications,
were identified in later studies, or exhibited inconsistencies such as
unrealistically large scatter within a depth profile (see Sect. S1). Finally, we
excluded data from coastal stations that were found to be affected by
anthropogenic Cr loading (e.g., Hirata et al., 2000; Shiller and Boyle,
1987) or otherwise controlled by localized processes not represented by the
resolution of the model, as well as studies in which quantitative comparisons
to the model results are limited by poor analytical precision. The final
global coverage of seawater Cr measurements is biased towards the top 1000 m
of the water column and the North Atlantic and North Pacific.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Sensitivity experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e2892">The Arctic Ocean experiences only limited water mass exchange with the
adjacent ocean basins via narrow straits. At the same time, it exhibits a
high sediment surface-to-ocean volume ratio. Both these circumstances
dramatically increase the impact of a benthic flux on the regional tracer
budget. Thus, in order to explore the relationship between the benthic flux
and the mean Arctic Cr concentration, we conducted an idealized experiment
in which we set the benthic flux of Cr to zero north of 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
(simulation NoArcticBFlux).</p>
      <p id="d1e2904">Further, due to data constraints, the model tuning was based solely on total
Cr concentrations, yet the internal redox cycling and the resulting
distribution between Cr(III) and Cr(VI) are also of crucial importance for the
potential applicability of Cr and its isotopes as a paleo-redox proxy. To
date, a relatively limited amount of information regarding open ocean Cr
speciation is available, yet observations suggest widespread Cr reduction in
OMZs below a threshold O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Goring-Harford et al., 2018;
Huang<?pagebreak page5452?> et al., 2021; Moos et al., 2020; Rue et al., 1997). In order to
explore the consequences of OMZ Cr reduction on the global Cr inventory, we
performed a number of idealized sensitivity experiments. As noted in Sect. 2.1, in our standard configuration POM remineralization is prescribed as a
globally uniform power-law profile (Martin et al., 1987). Even though total
export fluxes are in good agreement with observations using such
parametrization (Parekh et al., 2008), the POM remineralization in OMZs is
not adequately represented. Recently, Battaglia and Joos (2018) introduced a
new formulation in the Bern3D model that assigns POM remineralization to
aerobic or anaerobic pathways depending on the dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration. Both are defined as power-law profiles yet with different
remineralization length scales, yielding reduced remineralization rates
under anaerobic conditions (see Battaglia Battaglia and Joos, 2018 for details). We
therefore performed a set of sensitivity experiments in which we replaced the
globally uniform POM remineralization with the improved parametrization
introduced by Battaglia and Joos (2018) (simulation OMZrem).</p>
      <p id="d1e2925">In a third experiment, we investigated the impact of a substantially
stronger Cr reduction rate in OMZs as suggested by field observations (Huang
et al., 2021; Moos et al., 2020; Rue et al., 1997). For this simulation we
increased the OMZ reduction rate from 4 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
control run to 20 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> while also using the improved
two-pathway POM remineralization of Battaglia and Joos (2018) (simulation
OMZrem20). Finally, we performed an experiment with an even higher reduction
rate of 30 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (OMZrem30). All these experiments were
branched off from the fully equilibrated control (CTRL) run under
pre-industrial boundary conditions and are summarized in Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3005">Different model simulations. Parameters not listed here
were kept as in the control run (see Table 1). The mean absolute error (MAE)
was determined by comparing seawater observations to the model output at the
closest grid cell.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Run</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">POM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OMZ reduction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Benthic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MAE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">remineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTRL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Martin et al. (1987)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Globally uniform</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NoArcticBFlux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Martin et al. (1987)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Set to zero <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OMZrem</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Battaglia and Joos (2018)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Globally uniform</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OMZrem20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Battaglia and Joos (2018)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Globally uniform</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OMZrem30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Battaglia and Joos (2018)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Globally uniform</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3209"><bold>(a)</bold> Export fluxes of particulate organic matter (POM)
and <bold>(b)</bold> biogenic opal calculated in the biogeochemical model from
prognostic equations (Parekh et al., 2008). The distribution of calcium
carbonate (CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) production is the same as for POM but scaled by the
Redfield ratio and a Ca to P ratio of 0.3 in calcifiers. <bold>(c)</bold> Log10 of
the global dust flux estimated by Mahowald et al. (2006). The blue line
indicates the transect for the section plots of Fig. 5.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5447/2021/bg-18-5447-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Constraints on benthic flux and residence time of Cr</title>
      <p id="d1e3251">A wide array of estimates for the oceanic residence time of Cr exists
(defined as the total inventory divided by the sum of all source fluxes)
ranging from 2 to 40 kyr (McClain and Maher, 2016; Sirinawin et al.,
2000; Wei et al., 2018). In our parametrization, the mean ocean residence
time of Cr is strongly influenced by the magnitude of the newly introduced
benthic flux representing the largest source in nearly all runs of the
500-member tuning ensemble. From this tuning ensemble, we already obtain
first constraints on the magnitude of the benthic flux, as well as the mean
ocean residence time of Cr, as both converge towards low MAEs (Fig. 2). In
the ensemble, the best model–data agreement is achieved with benthic fluxes
in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, substantially lower
than the estimate from the Tasman Basin that suggested a benthic flux of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Janssen et al., 2021).
Overall, simulations with large benthic fluxes on the order of 1 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> produce either Cr concentrations that are too high or unrealistically strong vertical gradients (due to the large bottom source in
combination with strong particle scavenging that is required under such
conditions to balance the large benthic source flux). The clear trend in the
model–data misfit of the ensemble (Fig. 2a) indicates that reduced benthic
fluxes are a fairly robust result with the parametrization applied (i.e.,
globally uniform flux). Thus, we suspect that the benthic flux observed in
the Tasman Basin may not be fully representative of the global ocean seafloor. However, missing processes in the internal cycling of the model that
could be responsible for the mismatch cannot be fully excluded at this
point. Further, we note that we cannot distinguish whether the benthic Cr is
of authigenic or<?pagebreak page5453?> lithogenic origin in the model since we do not employ a
sediment module for the calculation of the pore-water chemistry. It is thus
possible that the benthic Cr is to some extent recycled primary Cr from dust
and rivers and not “new” Cr that is added to the marine reservoir from the
sediments. In that case, the ocean residence time of Cr would increase
proportionally to the fraction of recycled Cr of the benthic source. As
benthic sources account for approximately two-thirds of the total Cr source
in our model (Table 1), this would yield a maximal increase of approximately
a factor of 3 for our calculated residence times.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3336"><bold>(a, c)</bold> Model performance of the tuning ensemble
(calculated with the cost function of the mean absolute error, MAE – the
smaller the better) dependent on the benthic flux and <bold>(b, d)</bold> the
diagnosed mean residence time of dissolved Cr. Note the logarithmic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes
in <bold>(a, b)</bold>. <bold>(c, d)</bold> are zoom-ins of <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> and with
linear <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes. Red ellipses indicate the simulations that best fit the
observational data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5447/2021/bg-18-5447-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3377">The trend in the residence time versus model–data mismatch is somewhat less
distinct than that for the benthic flux (Fig. 2b), but it still clearly
converges towards the lower end of previous estimates. The simulations that
best fit the observational data all exhibit Cr residence times between 5 and
8 kyr (Fig. 2d). These relatively short residence times, compared to
previous upper-limit estimates, are to some degree expected considering that
benthic fluxes were either neglected or assumed to be fairly small in
previous studies (e.g., Reinhard et al., 2013) but are in contrast to the
dominant Cr source in our model simulations. Yet, previous lower-limit
estimates also did not include significant benthic sources but instead
included anthropogenically contaminated rivers with exceedingly high Cr
concentrations (e.g., the Panuco River; McClain and Maher, 2016), which are
not considered here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Model–data comparison of the control run</title>
      <p id="d1e3388">The tuning ensemble member that best fits the observational data of
dissolved Cr concentrations (defined as the control run) yields an MAE of
0.48 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A few other simulations performed virtually as well as
the control run, all of which exhibited similar values for the benthic flux
and the scavenging factors. However, the parameters that describe the
internal cycling (i.e., oxidation rate and OMZ reduction rate) exhibit a
wider spread among these simulations. This is related to the fact that our
tuning target was solely the total Cr concentration, and we did not consider
the individual oxidation states in assessing model performance due to
insufficient data coverage to achieve statistical significance. The
parameters of the control run are listed in Table 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3405"><bold>(a)</bold> Surface ocean total dissolved Cr
concentration simulated in the control run. Filled circles mark surface
seawater observations (top 40 m, equivalent to the height of the uppermost
grid cell) with colors on the same scale as background model data. Circles
with red edges are stations depicted in Fig. 6. <bold>(b)</bold> Same as
<bold>(a)</bold> but for Cr(III) concentrations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5447/2021/bg-18-5447-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3422">In the control run, the total flux of Cr entering the ocean amounts to
8.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with the smallest contribution from
dust (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %), followed by the riverine source
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 %), and by far the largest contribution from the
benthic flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 68 %) (Table 1). Even though the global
benthic flux of 0.16 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the control run is much
smaller than the first local estimate (Janssen et al., 2021), it still
dwarfs the combined contributions from dust and rivers. In contrast,
assuming both dust and river sources as in the control run but a benthic
flux comparable to the first local estimate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) would yield a benthic flux contribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 98 % and be about 50 times larger than the riverine
source. As previously noted by Janssen et al. (2021), it thus appears that
this first observational estimate for the benthic flux from the Tasman Basin
may not be fully representative of the global ocean, and further research
regarding<?pagebreak page5454?> the impacts of sediment composition, porosity, and bottom and
pore-water chemistry is required to better constrain this presumably
significant Cr source to the ocean.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Surface ocean</title>
      <p id="d1e3546">The surface ocean [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> simulated in the control run reveals a
distinct meridional gradient with the highest values of around 3.5 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the high latitudes decreasing equatorwards (Fig. 3). The lowest
surface [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is simulated in the high-productivity regions off the
coast of East Africa and the equatorial Indian Ocean, as well as in the
Mediterranean Sea. However, caution should be placed on the interpretation
of the simulated Cr concentrations in semi-enclosed basins such as the
Mediterranean Sea, which are poorly represented by the coarse spatial
resolution of the model. Overall, Cr is more strongly reduced in upwelling
regions, which together with the high particle concentrations associated
with high primary productivity (Fig. 1) promotes efficient scavenging.
Surface Cr concentrations are further impacted by large river systems with
high dissolved Cr concentrations such as the Congo River, the Yangtze, or
the Ganges–Brahmaputra, which produce elevated concentrations at their river
mouths.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3581"><bold>(a–c)</bold> Surface total Cr concentrations for
simulations CTRL and NoArcticBFlux, as well as the difference between both. The red
circle marks the location of station L1.1 of Scheiderich et al. (2015)
depicted in <bold>(d)</bold>. <bold>(d)</bold> [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depth transect from the
Arctic. Lines represent model output of simulations CTRL (black) and
NoArcticBFlux (blue) of the grid cells closest to station L1.1 (red
circles).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5447/2021/bg-18-5447-2021-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3607">The comparison of the control run to observational Cr data in the uppermost
40 m (height of the surface grid cell) shows good agreement overall. For
instance, the strong meridional gradient in the Southern Ocean described
above is also represented in a meridional transect from Antarctica to
southern Australia (Rickli et al., 2019). In contrast, open ocean low- to
mid-latitude surface Cr concentrations are slightly underestimated by the
model compared to seawater data. The largest model–data discrepancy is
observed in the Arctic Ocean where recent GEOTRACES data reveal remarkably
low surface Cr concentrations (Scheiderich et al., 2015), while simulated Cr
concentrations are substantially higher (Figs. 4d; S1).</p>
      <p id="d1e3611">These observed low surface Cr concentrations are accompanied by low
salinities indicating the influence of meltwater (Scheiderich et al., 2015).
The exceptionally low trace metal concentrations in meltwater (due to the
salt rejection during formation) may thus be responsible for the Arctic
model–data discrepancy. Additionally, in the Bern3D model primary
productivity is virtually absent in the Arctic mostly because the summer
blooms restricted to coastal environments and near the sea-ice edge cannot
be resolved in the model. Further, enhanced Cr reduction by Fe(II) that is
released from the organic-rich Arctic shelf sediments is not explicitly
implemented here. Thus, Arctic Cr removal by particle scavenging remains
extremely limited in the model. In combination with the sluggish exchange
with the other ocean basins and the benthic flux constantly adding Cr, this
produces elevated Arctic Cr concentrations in the model. We therefore
attribute this inadequacy in simulating Arctic Cr to the simplifications in
our description of the Cr cycle (e.g., the global uniform benthic flux,
which may be substantially smaller in the Arctic) and the relatively coarse
resolution of the model. We test the former attribution in a sensitivity
experiment (simulation NoArcticBFlux) by setting the benthic flux to zero
north of 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. Indeed, Arctic surface Cr concentrations are up to
0.5 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lower in simulation NoArcticBFlux compared to CRTL (Fig. 4). This suggests that the benthic flux has significant impact even on
surface concentrations in the semi-enclosed Arctic basin.</p>
      <p id="d1e3635">The surface distribution of Cr(III) (Fig. 3b) somewhat represents that
of the POM export productivity (Fig. 1). This is related to our choice of
parametrization that scales the surface Cr reduction rate with the POM
export (see Sect. 2.2). However, differences are apparent as spatial
variations are smaller for Cr(III) due to high removal rates by particle
scavenging in regions with high Cr reduction rates (i.e., high-productivity
regions).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3640"><bold>(a)</bold> Total dissolved Cr concentrations along
the transect marked in Fig. 1 from the North Pacific via the Southern Ocean
(SO) to the North Atlantic. Filled circles are seawater observations on the
same color scale as the model data. <bold>(b)</bold> Dissolved Cr(III)
distribution along the same transect as in <bold>(a)</bold>. <bold>(c)</bold> Calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cr distribution based on the global ocean array
assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ln([Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.86
(Janssen et al., 2021) compared to observational isotope ratio data. Only
observational seawater data close to the transect (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
are shown. Note the different y scales for the top 1 km.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5447/2021/bg-18-5447-2021-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3742">Seawater Cr(III) measurements are comparatively sparse, and reported data
are partly inconsistent presumably due to its high reactivity complicating
sample processing, standardization, and intercalibration, as well as the lack
of sample filtering in some studies (e.g., Connelly et al., 2006). Thus, a
model–data assessment is premature at the current stage. Nevertheless, the
North Pacific meridional gradient from the high-productivity region off the
coast of Alaska to the oligotrophic subtropical gyre by Janssen et al. (2020) is fairly well-represented in the control run. Yet, we reiterate that
the model tuning was not targeted at optimizing the Cr(III) distribution,
and a better representation of trivalent Cr in the<?pagebreak page5455?> model could most likely
be achieved with a better coverage of observational data and an improved
understanding of the Cr redox behavior in the ocean.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Deep ocean</title>
      <p id="d1e3753">The distribution of simulated deep ocean total Cr concentrations is
characterized by two pronounced and globally consistent features (Figs. 5,
6). First is an increase in Cr concentrations with depth that is smallest in
the Southern Ocean and northern North Atlantic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; top-to-bottom difference) and largest in the
North Pacific (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
only exception to this feature appears in the South Atlantic where Antarctic
Intermediate Water with fairly high total Cr concentrations overlays North
Atlantic Deep Water (NADW), characterized by generally lower dissolved Cr.
The second feature relates to the accumulation of Cr as water masses age,
with the lowest concentrations in waters dominated by newly formed NADW
([Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and gradually increasing towards the
North Pacific where deep waters exhibit total Cr concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3). Both these characteristics arise from the
reversible scavenging scheme resulting in the net downward transport of Cr
in combination with the benthic flux gradually increasing bottom water Cr
concentrations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3875">Comparisons between measured total Cr concentrations of
four seawater stations (circles) and simulated values of the control run at
the closest model grid cells (lines). North Atlantic station TPG 71 (Jeandel
and Minster, 1987), North Pacific station SAFe (Moos and Boyle, 2019), and
Southern Ocean stations at 46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (composite of IN2018V04 – Stn.
PS2, Janssen et al., 2021, and ACE Leg2 – Stn. 8, Rickli et al., 2019) and
60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (ACE Leg2 – Stn. 10, Rickli et al., 2019).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5447/2021/bg-18-5447-2021-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3902">On a global scale, observational [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data show very similar trends
as simulated by the Bern3D model. Differences between the model and
observations are mainly found in the Atlantic basin, where the model
generally overestimates total Cr concentrations (while surface
concentrations are underestimated as discussed above). Part of the Atlantic
model–data mismatch might be attributed to the model simulating
NADW that is too shallow due to deep water formation taking place too far south (Müller et
al., 2006). Thus, the extent of the low Cr concentration NADW endmember is
underestimated in the model. Further, as mentioned above, simulated Arctic
[Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is far too high compared to observations. This regional model
shortcoming is to some extent also propagated into the Atlantic as Arctic
water export through the Fram Strait contributes to the formation of NADW.
In simulation NoArcticBFlux, in which the benthic flux is set to zero at
latitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, Arctic deep ocean Cr concentrations
are up to 1 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lower compared to CTRL (Fig. 4d), which indeed
not only improves the model–data agreement in the Arctic but also in the
North Atlantic (Table 2). Thus, simulated Atlantic Cr concentrations could
be improved, for instance, by a revised representation of North Atlantic
deep water formation and a better understanding of regional differences in
the benthic flux.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3954">Eastern equatorial Pacific (7.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) <bold>(a)</bold> oxygen concentration for CTRL (i.e., globally
uniform POM remineralization) and the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent remineralization as
described by Battaglia et al. (2018) used for the sensitivity experiments.
<bold>(b)</bold> Total Cr and Cr(III) concentrations for CTRL and simulation
OMZrem. <bold>(c)</bold> Same as <bold>(b)</bold> but for simulations OMZrem20 and OMZrem30.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5447/2021/bg-18-5447-2021-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4003">In a simplified approach we also converted the simulated total Cr
concentration to stable isotopic ratios based on the global oceanic array
that exhibits a linear relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cr and
ln([Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 5). Here we use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ln([Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.86 based on Janssen et al. (2021). This also
allows us to compare the model results to seawater isotopic ratios that are
obtained independently of the Cr concentrations. Overall, the model–data
agreement for the isotopic ratios is comparable to [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating
that deviations from the global array due to different fractionation
processes, as suggested for instance for OMZs (Moos et al., 2020; Nasemann
et al., 2020), have limited impact in the<?pagebreak page5456?> open ocean. The Cr model
implementation employed here thus holds the promise of also being applicable to
investigations of sedimentary Cr stable isotopic data.</p>
      <p id="d1e4087">In contrast to the fairly variable surface Cr(III) concentrations, its
distribution below a water depth of 500 m exhibits remarkable homogeneous
values between 0.10 and 0.15 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout most of the
well-oxygenated global deep ocean (Fig. 5). Yet, reliable seawater data of
open ocean [Cr(III)] are too sparse for a reasonable global-scale model–data
comparison, and hence these model results should be taken cautiously.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4105">OMZ volumes and sediment area below OMZs, as well as
fraction of total Cr burial flux below OMZs. See Table 2 for more specific
information on the experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Run</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total (relative) volume</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Area fraction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sink fraction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Sink fraction/</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OMZ (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">([O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">([O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">area fraction</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTRL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.6 (0.93 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.37 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.84 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OMZrem</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.2 (0.75 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.87 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.63 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OMZrem20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.2 (0.75 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.87 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.76 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OMZrem30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.2 (0.75 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.87 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.46 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Improving the representation of Cr reduction in OMZs</title>
      <?pagebreak page5457?><p id="d1e4338">Oxygen minimum zones are thought to represent important environments where
Cr is removed from the ocean and deposited in the underlying sediments (Moos
et al., 2020; Rue et al., 1997) as they promote the reduction of soluble
Cr(VI) to scavenging-prone Cr(III). In the model, about one-fourth of the
entire Cr removal (calculated from the particulate concentrations of the
bottommost grid cells) takes place at the sediments below OMZs
(representing an area of 7.37 % of the seafloor; Table 3). Yet, the
simulated Cr(III) concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are
partly in disagreement with observed Cr(III) concentrations in OMZs that can
even exceed 1 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Huang et al., 2021; Moos et al., 2020; Rue et
al., 1997). We consider this to be the result of the model tuning not taking
into account the spatial distribution of Cr(III) due to the insufficient
data coverage. Generally, modeled Cr(III) concentrations are only slightly
elevated in OMZs (Fig. 7b) in contrast to observations that suggest strong
reduction rates and subsequent removal of Cr (e.g., Rue et al., 1997).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4374">Total Cr <bold>(a, d, g)</bold>, Cr(III) <bold>(b, e, h)</bold>, and
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations <bold>(c, f, i)</bold> along an east–west section at the
Equator for the control run <bold>(a–c)</bold>, simulation OMZrem <bold>(d–f)</bold>, and the
difference between both (OMZrem minus CTRL) <bold>(g–i)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/5447/2021/bg-18-5447-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4411">In a first sensitivity experiment (OMZrem) we therefore replaced the
globally uniform POM remineralization profile with the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent
parametrization introduced by Battaglia and Joos (2018) (see Sect. 2.3). This
reduces the horizontal expansion of OMZs in the model but at the same time
increases their vertical extent (see Fig. 7a). Consequently, the difference
in ocean volume where [O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is
relatively moderate with a decrease from 0.93 % in CTRL to 0.75 % of
the total volume with the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent remineralization (Fig. 8).
However, this is still an overestimation of the modern expansion of OMZs by
a factor of about 5 (see Bianchi et al., 2012). This is a persistent issue
with Earth system models of various complexity and is mostly related to
insufficient spatial resolution to adequately represent these highly dynamic
regions even with considerably better spatially resolved models (Cocco et
al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e4470">The greater vertical extent and the strongly attenuated particle
remineralization in the OMZs associated with the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent
parametrization has a profound impact on the vertical [Cr(III)] and
[Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles (illustrated for the eastern equatorial Pacific OMZ in
Fig. 7b). In the upper part of the OMZ, Cr(III) concentrations are lower
compared to CTRL due to the higher particle concentrations enhancing the
scavenging efficiency. In contrast, in the lower part (below 1 km) the
effect of the deepened OMZ promoting Cr reduction (local Cr(III) source)
dominates over the elevated particle concentrations associated with the
vertical expansion (local Cr(III) sink). Both the elevated particle
concentration in general and the greater vertical extent of the OMZ
increasing Cr reduction (integrated over the entire water column) lead to a
decrease in total Cr concentration throughout the water column, yet this
effect is most pronounced in the depth range of the OMZ.</p>
      <p id="d1e4491">Nevertheless, Cr(III) concentrations also remain lower in simulation OMZrem
than observations of OMZs indicate (of up to 1 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Huang et al.,
2021). We therefore performed two additional sensitivity experiments with
substantially increased OMZ reduction rates of 20 and 30 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (simulations OMZrem20, OMZrem30, respectively) (compared to 4 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in CTRL), including the parametrization of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent remineralization (Fig. 7c). For both these simulations,
Cr(III) concentrations are strongly elevated in OMZs, for instance, peaking
at 0.33 and 0.44 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the core of the eastern equatorial
Pacific OMZ for OMZrem20 and OMZrem30, respectively, compared to a maximum
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in CTRL. At the same time, the effect
of increased OMZ Cr reduction on [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> within OMZs is relatively
small with a minor decrease in concentrations in the top 1 km and only
slightly higher concentrations below. This redistribution in the water
column is a direct consequence of the higher Cr(III) concentrations
enhancing Cr downward transport and ultimately also removal. Globally this
results in 7 % and 12 % more Cr removal below OMZs for simulations OMZrem20
and OMZrem30, respectively, compared to OMZrem (Table 3). As such, the
higher OMZ reduction rates, together with the<?pagebreak page5458?> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent
remineralization, do indeed provide an improved representation of OMZ Cr
concentration characteristics (Cr(III) and Cr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) consistent with
observations (see Moos et al., 2020; Rue et al., 1997). However, it is
worthy of note that observations indicate that the Cr(III) maximum in OMZ
depth profiles is shifted toward shallower depths (Huang et al., 2021; Rue
et al., 1997) and not in the middle or bottom of the OMZ as simulated here.
Thus, additional processes such as organic complexation, which stabilizes
Cr(III), or elevated Cr reduction at shallow depths might be at play in OMZs
that are not explicitly implemented here.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page5459?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Global- and regional-scale performance</title>
      <p id="d1e4639">This study describes the first implementation of the modern marine Cr cycle
and more specifically of the two oxidation states, Cr(III) and Cr(VI), into
an EMIC. We implemented three Cr sources, namely an aeolian, a riverine, and
a benthic flux, that are balanced by the removal associated with reversible
scavenging transferring particulate Cr to the sediment. The comparison of
our 500-member tuning ensemble to a comprehensive and quality-controlled
seawater database provides a best estimate for the mean ocean Cr residence
time between 5 and 8 kyr, which is at the lower end of previous first-order
approximations (Campbell and Yeats, 1984; Reinhard et al., 2013; Wang et
al., 2020). At the same time, we find that the best model–data agreement is
achieved with benthic fluxes in the order of 0.1 to 0.2 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, substantially lower than the first local estimates (Janssen et
al., 2021). Nevertheless, a benthic flux of such magnitude is substantially
larger than the aeolian and riverine source fluxes (for the control run: 68 % benthic, 29 % riverine, and 3 % aeolian).</p>
      <p id="d1e4666">Overall, the control run simulates the vertical, meridional, and inter-basin
[Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gradients in good agreement with observational data. Thus,
total Cr concentrations increase with depth, as well as with water mass age,
which leads to [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the deep
North Pacific. Similarly, the vertical gradient increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the North Atlantic to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the North Pacific. The only
major model–data mismatch is observed in the Arctic Ocean basin where
simulated concentrations are far too high compared to observations. We
attribute this to the poor spatial representation due to the coarse model
resolution and to the simplified benthic flux parametrization causing it to
have an impact that is too large on this semi-enclosed basin with a large sediment
surface area compared to its volume.</p>
      <p id="d1e4773">In contrast, the poor spatial data coverage of Cr(III) observations
precludes not only its incorporation in the tuning metric but also a robust
model–data assessment that can only be improved by more seawater
measurements. The only exception are OMZs that are fairly well-studied with
respect to Cr reduction and hence Cr(III) concentrations (e.g., Huang et
al., 2021; Moos et al., 2020; Murray et al., 1983; Rue et al., 1997). Yet,
as a consequence of not including Cr(III) in the tuning metric, its
representation in OMZs is somewhat deficient. We therefore performed three
sensitivity experiments to improve simulated Cr(III) concentrations in these
highly reducing regions. By introducing an O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent parametrization
of POM remineralization and a strongly increased OMZ reduction rate, we are
able to simulate high Cr(III) concentrations and elevated Cr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> removal
in OMZs that are in much improved agreement with observational data.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Limitations in simulating the marine Cr cycle</title>
      <p id="d1e4803">The fairly long mean ocean residence time of Cr puts serious constraints on
its implementation in Earth system models. In order to obtain an
equilibrated state of the marine Cr cycle, model integrations of several tens of thousands of years are required. This can currently only be achieved with highly
computationally efficient, coarse-resolution, intermediate complexity models
such as Bern3D. At the same time this limits the representation of the Cr
cycle as small-scale processes, for instance at coastal regions, can
inherently only be approximated in these models. Furthermore, because of the
scarcity of data, processes such as redox reactions, particle scavenging,
and sedimentary release of Cr remain critically under-constrained to date,
which contributes to substantial uncertainty in the understanding of the
marine Cr cycle and thus also impedes its robust implementation in models.
As a consequence, only large-scale features of the Cr distributions
presented here can be considered as robust. Future improvements in the
understanding of, for example, the spatial variability in the benthic flux or the Cr
behavior in OMZs, might however bolster our ability to also simulate
regional variations in better agreement with observations.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5460?><p id="d1e4806">One such more local, yet important, model–data discrepancy relates to the
simulated surface depletion of [Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that is most pronounced above
OMZs but not observed to the same extent in existing seawater profiles (see Figs. 6 and 7; Goring-Harford et al., 2018; Moos et al., 2020; Nasemann et
al., 2020). The reversible scavenging scheme linearly scales with the
particle concentration. From this follows that Cr removal is strongest in
the surface ocean where no remineralization takes place in the model
(euphotic zone) and in high-productivity regions that are also responsible
for OMZs. One possible explanation to account for the high particle
concentrations in these regions not leading to strong surface Cr depletions
in the real ocean could relate to complexation with organic ligands.
Complexation has been found to be an important process increasing the
solubility of a number of trace metals such as rare earth elements (Byrne
and Kim, 1990), Cu, Zn, Cd, and most notably Fe (Bruland and Lohan, 2003).
Similarly, investigations showed that Cr(III) readily binds with organic
ligands (Saad et al., 2017), in contrast to Cr(VI), which seems to be far
less affected by complexation (Richard and Bourg, 1991). The dominance of
Cr(VI) in oxygenated water therefore indicates that this process is unable
to fully explain the simulated surface Cr depletion. Instead, we speculate
that internal recycling processes in the mixed layer, not considered in our
reversible scavenging parametrization, might be responsible for the observed
relatively stable Cr concentrations in the uppermost water column. This
could also explain the depleted surface concentrations of other geochemical
tracers implemented in the Bern3D model that also make use of the same
reversible scavenging formulation (Nd: Pöppelmeier et al., 2020; Pa:
Rempfer et al., 2017).
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Future model applications</title>
      <p id="d1e4827">Despite the uncertainties persisting in the understanding of key processes
of the marine Cr cycle, the two main oxidation states of Cr were
successfully implemented in the coarse-resolution Bern3D model. This thus
provides us with a powerful tool to investigate the biogeochemical cycle of Cr
and its isotopes and their tight interconnection with past oceanic and
atmospheric oxygenation and biological productivity.</p>
      <p id="d1e4830">One main focus of future Cr modeling may encompass exploring the impact of
expanded OMZs on Cr removal rates. For such endeavors it may be valuable to
further improve the parametrization of OMZ-related processes, which should
be guided by, for example, new observations of the microbial influence on Cr
reduction, as recently suggested by Huang et al. (2021). Furthermore, the
Bern3D model is also well-suited for simulations over glacial–interglacial
cycles that involve drastic changes not only of the biogeochemistry but also
of the ocean circulation and their complex feedbacks.</p>
      <p id="d1e4833">Finally, past changes in the stable isotopic ratios associated with the
fractionation during redox transformations may also be successfully
extracted from ocean sediments in the future, which would allow for
(semi-)direct comparisons to the Bern3D model.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4842">Simulation outputs used for this study are available at
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4699993" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4699993</ext-link> (Pöppelmeier et al., 2021) or upon
request from the corresponding author. The seawater and riverine datasets of
Cr can be found in the Supplement of this article.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4848">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5447-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5447-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4857">FP, DJJ, and SLJ designed the study. FP developed and performed the model
simulations. DJJ and SLJ compiled the seawater and riverine datasets. FP
wrote the initial manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4863">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4869">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4875">Calculations were performed on
UBELIX, the high-performance computing cluster at the University of Bern.
This is TiPES contribution #117. We thank Jeemijn Scheen for fruitful
discussions. We are further grateful to Catherine Jeandel, Roger Francois,
Edward Boyle, and one anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the
manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4880">This research has been supported by the European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (grant no. SCrIPT (819139)), the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (grant no. 200020_172745), the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (grant no. 200020_200492), and the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (grant no. PP00P2_172915). Additional funding was also provided by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme grant TiPES (no. 820970).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4886">This paper was edited by Gwenaël Abril and reviewed by Edward Boyle, Roger Francois, Catherine Jeandel, and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Barbeau, K., Rue, E. L., Bruland, K. W., and Butler, A.: Photochemical
cycling of iron in the surface ocean mediated by microbial iron(III)-binding
ligands, Nature, 413, 409–413, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35096545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35096545</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Battaglia, G. and Joos, F.: Marine N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O Emissions From Nitrification and
Denitrification Constrained by Modern Observations and Projected in
Multimillennial Global Warming Simulations, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
32, 92–121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005671" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GB005671</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bianchi, D., Dunne, J. P., Sarmiento, J. L., and Galbraith, E. D.: Data-based
estimates of suboxia, denitrification, and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O production in the ocean
and their sensitivities to dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
26, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004209</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bonnand, P., James, R. H., Parkinson, I. J., Connelly, D. P., and Fairchild,
I. J.: The chromium isotopic composition of seawater and marine carbonates,
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 382, 10–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.09.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2013.09.001</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Brumsack, H. J. and Gieskes, J. M.: Interstital water trace-metal chemistry
of laminated sediments from the Gulf of California, Mexico, Mar. Chem., 14,
89–106, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Campbell, J. and Yeats, P.: Dissolved chromium in the northwest Atlantic
Ocean, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 53, 427–433,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(81)90047-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(81)90047-9</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Campbell, J. and Yeats, P.: Dissolved chromium in the St. Lawrence estuary,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 19, 513–522,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(84)90013-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0272-7714(84)90013-1</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cocco, V., Joos, F., Steinacher, M., Frölicher, T. L., Bopp, L., Dunne,
J., Gehlen, M., Heinze, C., Orr, J., Oschlies, A., Schneider, B.,
Segschneider, J., and Tjiputra, J.: Oxygen and indicators of stress for
marine life in multi-model global warming projections, Biogeosciences,
10, 1849–1868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1849-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-1849-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Connelly, D. P., Statham, P. J., and Knap, A. H.: Seasonal changes in
speciation of dissolved chromium in th<?pagebreak page5461?>e surface Sargasso Sea, Deep.-Res.
Pt I, 53, 1975–1988,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2006.09.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2006.09.005</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cranston, R. E.: Chromium in Cascadia Basin, northeast Pacific Ocean, Mar.
Chem., 13, 109–125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(83)90020-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4203(83)90020-8</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cranston, R. E. and Murray, J. W.: The determination of chromium species in
natural waters, Anal. Chim. Ac., 99, 275–282,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83568-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83568-6</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Doney, S. C., Lindsay, K., Fung, I., and John, J.: Natural variability in a
stable, 1000-yr global coupled climate-carbon cycle simulation, J. Climate,
19, 3033–3054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3783.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3783.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Edwards, N. R., Willmott, A. J., and Killworth, P. D.: On the role of
topography and wind stress on the stability of the thermohaline circulation,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 756–778, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0756:OTROTA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0756:OTROTA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Elderfield, H.: Chromium speciation in sea water, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.,
9, 10–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(70)90017-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(70)90017-8</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ellis, A. S., Johnson, T. M., and Bullen, T. D.: Chromium isotopes and the
fate of hexavalent chromium in the environment, Science, 295,
2060–2062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068368" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1068368</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Emerson, S., Cranston, R. E., and Liss, P. S.: Redox species in a reducing
fjord: equilibrium and kinetic considerations, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 26, 859–878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(79)90101-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(79)90101-8</ext-link>,
1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frei, R., Gaucher, C., Poulton, S. W., and Canfield, D. E.: Fluctuations in
Precambrian atmospheric oxygenation recorded by chromium isotopes, Nature,
461, 250–253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08266</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goring-Harford, H. J., Klar, J. K., Pearce, C. R., Connelly, D. P.,
Achterberg, E. P., and James, R. H.: Behaviour of chromium isotopes in the
eastern sub-tropical Atlantic Oxygen Minimum Zone, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
236, 41–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2018.03.004</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goring-Harford, H. J., Klar, J. K., Donald, H. K., Pearce, C. R., Connelly,
D. P., and James, R. H.: Behaviour of chromium and chromium isotopes during
estuarine mixing in the Beaulieu Estuary, UK, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 536,
116166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116166" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116166</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Griffies, S. M.: The Gent-McWilliams skew flux, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28,
831–841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0831:TGMSF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0831:TGMSF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guinoiseau, D., Bouchez, J., Gélabert, A., Louvat, P., Filizola, N., and
Benedetti, M. F.: The geochemical filter of large river confluences, Chem.
Geol., 441, 191–203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.08.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.08.009</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Henderson, G. M., Heinze, C., Anderson, R. F., and Winguth, A. M. E.: Global
distribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux to ocean sediments constrained by GCM
modelling, Deep.-Res. Pt. I, 46, 1861–1893,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(99)00030-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0637(99)00030-8</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hirata, S., Ishida, Y., Aihara, M., Honda, K., and Shikino, O.: Determination
of trace metals in seawater by on-line column preconcentration inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Ac., 438, 205–214,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00859-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00859-5</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, T., Moos, S. B., and Boyle, E. A.: Trivalent chromium isotopes in the
eastern tropical North Pacific oxygen deficient zone, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e1918605118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918605118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1918605118</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Janssen, D. J., Rickli, J., Abbott, A. N., Ellwood, M. J., Twining, B. S.,
Ohnemus, D. C., Nasemann, P., Gilliard, D., and Jaccard, S. L.: Release from
biogenic particles, benthic fluxes, and deep water circulation control Cr
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cr distributions in the ocean interior, Earth Planet.
Sci. Lett., 574, 117163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117163" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117163</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Janssen, D. J., Rickli, J., Quay, P. D., White, A. E., Nasemann, P., and
Jaccard, S. L.: Biological Control of Chromium Redox and Stable Isotope
Composition in the Surface Ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 34, e2019GB006397,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006397" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GB006397</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jeandel, C.: Overview of the mechanisms that could explain the “Boundary
Exchange” at the land-ocean contact, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 374, 20150287, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0287" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2015.0287</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jeandel, C. and Minster, J. F.: Chromium behavior in the ocean: Global
versus regional processes, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 1, 131–154,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GB001i002p00131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GB001i002p00131</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Joe-Wong, C., Weaver, K. L., Brown, S. T., and Maher, K.: Thermodynamic
controls on redox-driven kinetic stable isotope fractionation, Geochem.
Perspect. Lett., 10, 20–25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.1909" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7185/geochemlet.1909</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Wollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kieber, R. J., Cooper, W. J., Willey, J. D., and Avery, G. B.: Hydrogen
peroxide at the Bermuda Atlantic time series station, Part 1: Temporal
variability of atmospheric hydrogen peroxide and its influence on seawater
concentrations, J. Atmos. Chem., 39, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010738910358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1010738910358</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kieber, R. J. and Helz, G. R.: Indirect Photoreduction of Aqueous
Chromium(VI), Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 307–312,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00026a010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00026a010</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Köhler, P., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Schmitt, J., Stocker, T. F., and Fischer, H.: A 156 kyr smoothed history of the atmospheric greenhouse gases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and their radiative forcing, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 363–387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-363-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-363-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N. M., Muhs, D. R., Levis, S., Rasch, P. J., Yoshioka, M., Zender,
C. S., and Luo, C.: Change in atmospheric mineral aerosols in response to
climate: Last glacial period, preindustrial, modern, and doubled carbon
dioxide climates, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D10202,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006653" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006653</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Maldonado, M. T. and Price, N. M.: Reduction and transport of organically
bound iron by Thalassiosira oceanica (Bacillariophyceae), J. Phycol., 37,
298–310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037002298.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037002298.x</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marchal, O., Francois, R., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: Ocean thermohaline
circulation and sedimentary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">231</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pa/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th ratio, Paleoceanography,
15, 625–641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000PA000496" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000PA000496</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5462?><ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.: VERTEX:
carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 34, 267–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mayer, L. M. and Schick, L. L.: Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from
Estuarine Waters by Model Substrates and Natural Sediments, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 15, 1482–1484, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00094a009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00094a009</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McClain, C. N. and Maher, K.: Chromium fluxes and speciation in ultramafic
catchments and global rivers, Chem. Geol., 426, 135–157,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.01.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.01.021</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moos, S. B. and Boyle, E. A.: Determination of accurate and precise chromium
isotope ratios in seawater samples by MC-ICP-MS illustrated by analysis of
SAFe Station in the North Pacific Ocean, Chem. Geol., 511, 481–493,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.07.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.07.027</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moos, S. B., Boyle, E. A., Altabet, M. A., and Bourbonnais, A.: Investigating
the cycling of chromium in the oxygen deficient waters of the Eastern
Tropical North Pacific Ocean and the Santa Barbara Basin using stable
isotopes, Mar. Chem., 221, 103756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103756" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103756</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morris, A. W.: Removal of trace metals in the very low salinity region of
the Tamar Estuary, England, Sci. Total Environ., 49, 298–304,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(86)90245-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0048-9697(86)90245-7</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Müller, S. A., Joos, F., Edwards, N. R., and Stocker, T. F.: Water mass
distribution and ventilation time scales in a cost-efficient, three
dimensional ocean model, J. Climate, 19, 5479–5499,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3911.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3911.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murray, J. W., Spell, B., and Paul, B.: The contrasting geochemistry of
manganese and chromium in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, in Trace
Metals in Sea Water, 643–669., 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nasemann, P., Janssen, D. J., Rickli, J., Grasse, P., and Jaccard, S. L.:
Chromium reduction and associated stable isotope fractionation restricted to
anoxic shelf waters in the Peruvian Oxygen Minimum Zone, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 285, 207–224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.06.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2020.06.027</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Parekh, P., Joos, F., and Müller, S. A.: A modeling assessment of the
interplay between aeolian iron fluxes and iron-binding ligands in
controlling carbon dioxide fluctuations during Antarctic warm events,
Paleoceanography, 23, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007PA001531</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pettine, M., D'Ottone, L., Campanella, L., Millero, F. J., and Passino, R.:
The reduction of chromium (VI) by iron (II) in aqueous solutions, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 1509–1519, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00086-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00086-6</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pettine, M., Gennari, F., Campanella, L., and Millero, F. J.: The effect of
organic compounds in the oxidation kinetics of Cr(III) by H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72, 5692–5707, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.009</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Planavsky, N. J., Reinhard, C. T., Wang, X., Thomson, D., McGoldrick, P.,
Rainbird, R. H., Johnson, T., Fischer, W. W., and Lyons, T. W.: Low
mid-proterozoic atmospheric oxygen levels and the delayed rise of animals,
Science, 346, 635–638, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258410" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1258410</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pöppelmeier, F., Janssen, D. J., Jaccard, S. L., and Stocker, T. F.:
Modeling the marine chromium cycle: New constraints on global-scale
processes: Model output data, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4699993" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4699993</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pöppelmeier, F., Scheen, J., Blaser, P., Lippold, J., Gutjahr, M., and
Stocker, T. F.: Influence of elevated Nd fluxes on the northern Nd isotope
end member of the Atlantic during the early Holocene, Paleoceanogr.
Paleoclimatology, 35, e2020PA003973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020pa003973" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020pa003973</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rempfer, J., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., Dutay, J. C., and Siddall, M.:
Modelling Nd-isotopes with a coarse resolution ocean circulation model:
Sensitivities to model parameters and source/sink distributions, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 5927–5950, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.044</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rempfer, J., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., Lippold, J., and Jaccard, S. L.: New
insights into cycling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">231</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pa and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th in the Atlantic Ocean,
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 468, 27–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.03.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2017.03.027</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Richard, F. C. and Bourg, A. C. M.: Aqueous geochemistry of chromium: A
review, Water Res., 25, 807-816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(91)90160-R" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0043-1354(91)90160-R</ext-link>,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rickli, J., Janssen, D. J., Hassler, C., Ellwood, M. J., and Jaccard, S. L.:
Chromium biogeochemistry and stable isotope distribution in the Southern
Ocean, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 262, 188–206,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.07.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2019.07.033</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ritz, S. P., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: A coupled dynamical ocean-energy
balance atmosphere model for paleoclimate studies, J. Climate, 24,
349–375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3351.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010JCLI3351.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roth, R., Ritz, S. P., and Joos, F.: Burial-nutrient feedbacks amplify the sensitivity of atmospheric carbon dioxide to changes in organic matter remineralisation, Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 321–343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-321-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-5-321-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rue, E. L., Smith, G. J., Cutter, G. A., and Bruland, K. W.: The response of
trace element redox couples to suboxic conditions in the water column, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I., 44, 113–134,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00088-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00088-X</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saad, E. M., Wang, X., Planavsky, N. J., Reinhard, C. T., and Tang, Y.:
Redox-independent chromium isotope fractionation induced by ligand-promoted
dissolution, Nat. Commun., 8, 1590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01694-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-017-01694-y</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scheiderich, K., Amini, M., Holmden, C., and Francois, R.: Global variability
of chromium isotopes in seawater demonstrated by Pacific, Atlantic, and
Arctic Ocean samples, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 423, 87–97,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.04.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2015.04.030</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shiller, A. M. and Boyle, E. A.: Variability of dissolved trace metals in
the mississippi river, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 51, 3273–3277,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(87)90134-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(87)90134-7</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shiller, A. M. and Boyle, E. A.: Trace elements in the Mississippi River
Delta outflow region: Behavior at high discharge, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
55(, 3241–3251, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90486-O" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(91)90486-O</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schoenberg, R., Zink, S., Staubwasser, M., and von Blanckenburg, F.: The
stable Cr isotope inventory of solid Earth reservoirs determined by double
spike MC-ICP-MS, Chem. Geol., 249, 294–306,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.009</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Semeniuk, D. M., Maldonado, M. T., and Jaccard, S. L.: Chromium uptake and
adsorption in marine phytoplankton – Implications for the marine chromium
cycle, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 184, 41–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.021</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shaw, T. J., Gieskes, J. M., and Jahnke, R. A.: Early diagenesis in differing
depositional environments: The response o<?pagebreak page5463?>f transition metals in pore water,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 54, 1233–1246,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(90)90149-F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(90)90149-F</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sirinawin, W., Turner, D. R., and Westerlund, S.: Chromium (VI) distributions
in the Arctic and the Atlantic Oceans and a reassessment of the oceanic Cr
cycle, Mar. Chem., 71, 265–282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(00)00055-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0304-4203(00)00055-4</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Skarbøvik, E., Allan, I., Stalnacke, P., Hagen, A. G., Greipsland, I.,
Hogasen, T., Selvik, J. R., and Beldring, S.: Riverine Inputs and Direct
Discharges to Norwegian Coastal Waters – 2014,
available at: <uri>http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2379436</uri> (last access: 3 August 2021), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tschumi, T., Joos, F., Gehlen, M., and Heinze, C.: Deep ocean ventilation, carbon isotopes, marine sedimentation and the deglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rise, Clim. Past, 7, 771–800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-771-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-7-771-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vieira, L. H., Achterberg, E. P., Scholten, J., Beck, A. J., Liebetrau, V.,
Mills, M. M., and Arrigo, K. R.: Benthic fluxes of trace metals in the
Chukchi Sea and their transport into the Arctic Ocean, Mar. Chem., 208,
43–55, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2018.11.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2018.11.001</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, W. X., Griscom, S. B., and Fisher, N. S.: Bioavailability of Cr(III)
and Cr(VI) to marine mussels from solute and particulate pathways, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 31, 603–611, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es960574x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es960574x</ext-link>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wanner, C. and Sonnenthal, E. L.: Assessing the control on the effective
kinetic Cr isotope fractionation factor: A reactive transport modeling
approach, Chem. Geol., 337, 88–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.11.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.11.008</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wei, W., Frei, R., Chen, T. Y., Klaebe, R., Liu, H., Li, D., Wei, G. Y., and
Ling, H. F.: Marine ferromanganese oxide: A potentially important sink of
light chromium isotopes?, Chem. Geol., 495, 90–103,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.006</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wei, W., Klaebe, R., Ling, H. F., Huang, F., and Frei, R.: Biogeochemical
cycle of chromium isotopes at the modern Earth's surface and its
applications as a paleo-environment proxy, Chem. Geol., 541, 119570,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119570" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119570</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yamazaki, H., Gohda, S., and Nishikawa, Y.: Chemical Forms of Chromium in
Natural Water-Interaction of Chromium (III) and Humic Substances in Natural
Water-, J. Oceanogr. Soc. Japan, 35, 233–240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108928" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02108928</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zink, S., Schoenberg, R., and Staubwasser, M.: Isotopic fractionation and
reaction kinetics between Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in aqueous media, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 5729–5745, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.07.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2010.07.015</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Modeling the marine chromium cycle: new constraints on global-scale processes</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Chromium (Cr) and its isotopes hold great promise as a
tracer of past oxygenation and marine biological activity due to the
contrasted chemical properties of its two main oxidation states, Cr(III) and
Cr(VI), and the associated isotope fractionation during redox
transformations. However, to date the marine Cr cycle remains poorly
constrained due to insufficient knowledge about sources and sinks and the
influence of biological activity on redox reactions. We therefore
implemented the two oxidation states of Cr in the Bern3D Earth system model
of intermediate complexity in order to gain an improved understanding on
the mechanisms that modulate the spatial distribution of Cr in the ocean.
Due to the computational efficiency of the Bern3D model we are able to
explore and constrain the range of a wide array of parameters. Our model
simulates vertical, meridional, and inter-basin Cr concentration gradients
in good agreement with observations. We find a mean ocean residence time of
Cr between 5 and 8&thinsp;kyr and a benthic flux, emanating from sediment
surfaces, of 0.1–0.2&thinsp;nmol&thinsp;cm<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>, both in the range of previous
estimates. We further explore the origin of regional model–data mismatches
through a number of sensitivity experiments. These indicate that the benthic
Cr flux may be substantially lower in the Arctic than elsewhere. In
addition, we find that a refined representation of oxygen minimum zones and
their potential to reduce Cr yield Cr(III) concentrations and Cr removal
rates in these regions in much improved agreement with observational data.
Yet, further research is required to better understand the processes that
govern these critical regions for Cr cycling.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Barbeau, K., Rue, E. L., Bruland, K. W., and Butler, A.: Photochemical
cycling of iron in the surface ocean mediated by microbial iron(III)-binding
ligands, Nature, 413, 409–413, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35096545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/35096545</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Battaglia, G. and Joos, F.: Marine N<sub>2</sub>O Emissions From Nitrification and
Denitrification Constrained by Modern Observations and Projected in
Multimillennial Global Warming Simulations, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
32, 92–121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005671" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005671</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bianchi, D., Dunne, J. P., Sarmiento, J. L., and Galbraith, E. D.: Data-based
estimates of suboxia, denitrification, and N<sub>2</sub>O production in the ocean
and their sensitivities to dissolved O<sub>2</sub>, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
26, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004209</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bonnand, P., James, R. H., Parkinson, I. J., Connelly, D. P., and Fairchild,
I. J.: The chromium isotopic composition of seawater and marine carbonates,
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 382, 10–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.09.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.09.001</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Brumsack, H. J. and Gieskes, J. M.: Interstital water trace-metal chemistry
of laminated sediments from the Gulf of California, Mexico, Mar. Chem., 14,
89–106, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Campbell, J. and Yeats, P.: Dissolved chromium in the northwest Atlantic
Ocean, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 53, 427–433,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(81)90047-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(81)90047-9</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Campbell, J. and Yeats, P.: Dissolved chromium in the St. Lawrence estuary,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 19, 513–522,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(84)90013-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(84)90013-1</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cocco, V., Joos, F., Steinacher, M., Frölicher, T. L., Bopp, L., Dunne,
J., Gehlen, M., Heinze, C., Orr, J., Oschlies, A., Schneider, B.,
Segschneider, J., and Tjiputra, J.: Oxygen and indicators of stress for
marine life in multi-model global warming projections, Biogeosciences,
10, 1849–1868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1849-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1849-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Connelly, D. P., Statham, P. J., and Knap, A. H.: Seasonal changes in
speciation of dissolved chromium in the surface Sargasso Sea, Deep.-Res.
Pt I, 53, 1975–1988,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2006.09.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2006.09.005</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cranston, R. E.: Chromium in Cascadia Basin, northeast Pacific Ocean, Mar.
Chem., 13, 109–125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(83)90020-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(83)90020-8</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cranston, R. E. and Murray, J. W.: The determination of chromium species in
natural waters, Anal. Chim. Ac., 99, 275–282,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83568-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83568-6</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Doney, S. C., Lindsay, K., Fung, I., and John, J.: Natural variability in a
stable, 1000-yr global coupled climate-carbon cycle simulation, J. Climate,
19, 3033–3054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3783.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3783.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Edwards, N. R., Willmott, A. J., and Killworth, P. D.: On the role of
topography and wind stress on the stability of the thermohaline circulation,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 756–778, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0756:OTROTA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0756:OTROTA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Elderfield, H.: Chromium speciation in sea water, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.,
9, 10–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(70)90017-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(70)90017-8</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Ellis, A. S., Johnson, T. M., and Bullen, T. D.: Chromium isotopes and the
fate of hexavalent chromium in the environment, Science, 295,
2060–2062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068368" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068368</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Emerson, S., Cranston, R. E., and Liss, P. S.: Redox species in a reducing
fjord: equilibrium and kinetic considerations, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 26, 859–878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(79)90101-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(79)90101-8</a>,
1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Frei, R., Gaucher, C., Poulton, S. W., and Canfield, D. E.: Fluctuations in
Precambrian atmospheric oxygenation recorded by chromium isotopes, Nature,
461, 250–253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08266</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Goring-Harford, H. J., Klar, J. K., Pearce, C. R., Connelly, D. P.,
Achterberg, E. P., and James, R. H.: Behaviour of chromium isotopes in the
eastern sub-tropical Atlantic Oxygen Minimum Zone, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
236, 41–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.03.004</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Goring-Harford, H. J., Klar, J. K., Donald, H. K., Pearce, C. R., Connelly,
D. P., and James, R. H.: Behaviour of chromium and chromium isotopes during
estuarine mixing in the Beaulieu Estuary, UK, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 536,
116166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116166" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116166</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Griffies, S. M.: The Gent-McWilliams skew flux, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28,
831–841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0831:TGMSF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0831:TGMSF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Guinoiseau, D., Bouchez, J., Gélabert, A., Louvat, P., Filizola, N., and
Benedetti, M. F.: The geochemical filter of large river confluences, Chem.
Geol., 441, 191–203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.08.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.08.009</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Henderson, G. M., Heinze, C., Anderson, R. F., and Winguth, A. M. E.: Global
distribution of the <sup>230</sup>Th flux to ocean sediments constrained by GCM
modelling, Deep.-Res. Pt. I, 46, 1861–1893,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(99)00030-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(99)00030-8</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hirata, S., Ishida, Y., Aihara, M., Honda, K., and Shikino, O.: Determination
of trace metals in seawater by on-line column preconcentration inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Ac., 438, 205–214,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00859-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00859-5</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, T., Moos, S. B., and Boyle, E. A.: Trivalent chromium isotopes in the
eastern tropical North Pacific oxygen deficient zone, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e1918605118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918605118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918605118</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Janssen, D. J., Rickli, J., Abbott, A. N., Ellwood, M. J., Twining, B. S.,
Ohnemus, D. C., Nasemann, P., Gilliard, D., and Jaccard, S. L.: Release from
biogenic particles, benthic fluxes, and deep water circulation control Cr
and <i>δ</i><sup>53</sup>Cr distributions in the ocean interior, Earth Planet.
Sci. Lett., 574, 117163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117163" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117163</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Janssen, D. J., Rickli, J., Quay, P. D., White, A. E., Nasemann, P., and
Jaccard, S. L.: Biological Control of Chromium Redox and Stable Isotope
Composition in the Surface Ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 34, e2019GB006397,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006397" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006397</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Jeandel, C.: Overview of the mechanisms that could explain the “Boundary
Exchange” at the land-ocean contact, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 374, 20150287, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0287" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0287</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Jeandel, C. and Minster, J. F.: Chromium behavior in the ocean: Global
versus regional processes, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 1, 131–154,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GB001i002p00131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GB001i002p00131</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Joe-Wong, C., Weaver, K. L., Brown, S. T., and Maher, K.: Thermodynamic
controls on redox-driven kinetic stable isotope fractionation, Geochem.
Perspect. Lett., 10, 20–25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.1909" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.1909</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Wollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kieber, R. J., Cooper, W. J., Willey, J. D., and Avery, G. B.: Hydrogen
peroxide at the Bermuda Atlantic time series station, Part 1: Temporal
variability of atmospheric hydrogen peroxide and its influence on seawater
concentrations, J. Atmos. Chem., 39, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010738910358" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010738910358</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kieber, R. J. and Helz, G. R.: Indirect Photoreduction of Aqueous
Chromium(VI), Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 307–312,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00026a010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es00026a010</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Köhler, P., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Schmitt, J., Stocker, T. F., and Fischer, H.: A 156&thinsp;kyr smoothed history of the atmospheric greenhouse gases CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O and their radiative forcing, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 363–387, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-363-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-363-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Mahowald, N. M., Muhs, D. R., Levis, S., Rasch, P. J., Yoshioka, M., Zender,
C. S., and Luo, C.: Change in atmospheric mineral aerosols in response to
climate: Last glacial period, preindustrial, modern, and doubled carbon
dioxide climates, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D10202,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006653" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006653</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Maldonado, M. T. and Price, N. M.: Reduction and transport of organically
bound iron by Thalassiosira oceanica (Bacillariophyceae), J. Phycol., 37,
298–310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037002298.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037002298.x</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Marchal, O., Francois, R., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: Ocean thermohaline
circulation and sedimentary <sup>231</sup>Pa/<sup>230</sup>Th ratio, Paleoceanography,
15, 625–641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000PA000496" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000PA000496</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.: VERTEX:
carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 34, 267–285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M. and Schick, L. L.: Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from
Estuarine Waters by Model Substrates and Natural Sediments, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 15, 1482–1484, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00094a009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es00094a009</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
McClain, C. N. and Maher, K.: Chromium fluxes and speciation in ultramafic
catchments and global rivers, Chem. Geol., 426, 135–157,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.01.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.01.021</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Moos, S. B. and Boyle, E. A.: Determination of accurate and precise chromium
isotope ratios in seawater samples by MC-ICP-MS illustrated by analysis of
SAFe Station in the North Pacific Ocean, Chem. Geol., 511, 481–493,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.07.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.07.027</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Moos, S. B., Boyle, E. A., Altabet, M. A., and Bourbonnais, A.: Investigating
the cycling of chromium in the oxygen deficient waters of the Eastern
Tropical North Pacific Ocean and the Santa Barbara Basin using stable
isotopes, Mar. Chem., 221, 103756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103756" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103756</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Morris, A. W.: Removal of trace metals in the very low salinity region of
the Tamar Estuary, England, Sci. Total Environ., 49, 298–304,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(86)90245-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(86)90245-7</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, S. A., Joos, F., Edwards, N. R., and Stocker, T. F.: Water mass
distribution and ventilation time scales in a cost-efficient, three
dimensional ocean model, J. Climate, 19, 5479–5499,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3911.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3911.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, J. W., Spell, B., and Paul, B.: The contrasting geochemistry of
manganese and chromium in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, in Trace
Metals in Sea Water, 643–669., 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Nasemann, P., Janssen, D. J., Rickli, J., Grasse, P., and Jaccard, S. L.:
Chromium reduction and associated stable isotope fractionation restricted to
anoxic shelf waters in the Peruvian Oxygen Minimum Zone, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 285, 207–224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.06.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.06.027</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Parekh, P., Joos, F., and Müller, S. A.: A modeling assessment of the
interplay between aeolian iron fluxes and iron-binding ligands in
controlling carbon dioxide fluctuations during Antarctic warm events,
Paleoceanography, 23, 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001531</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Pettine, M., D'Ottone, L., Campanella, L., Millero, F. J., and Passino, R.:
The reduction of chromium (VI) by iron (II) in aqueous solutions, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 1509–1519, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00086-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00086-6</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Pettine, M., Gennari, F., Campanella, L., and Millero, F. J.: The effect of
organic compounds in the oxidation kinetics of Cr(III) by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72, 5692–5707, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.009</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Planavsky, N. J., Reinhard, C. T., Wang, X., Thomson, D., McGoldrick, P.,
Rainbird, R. H., Johnson, T., Fischer, W. W., and Lyons, T. W.: Low
mid-proterozoic atmospheric oxygen levels and the delayed rise of animals,
Science, 346, 635–638, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258410" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258410</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Pöppelmeier, F., Janssen, D. J., Jaccard, S. L., and Stocker, T. F.:
Modeling the marine chromium cycle: New constraints on global-scale
processes: Model output data, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4699993" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4699993</a>,
2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Pöppelmeier, F., Scheen, J., Blaser, P., Lippold, J., Gutjahr, M., and
Stocker, T. F.: Influence of elevated Nd fluxes on the northern Nd isotope
end member of the Atlantic during the early Holocene, Paleoceanogr.
Paleoclimatology, 35, e2020PA003973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020pa003973" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020pa003973</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Rempfer, J., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., Dutay, J. C., and Siddall, M.:
Modelling Nd-isotopes with a coarse resolution ocean circulation model:
Sensitivities to model parameters and source/sink distributions, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 5927–5950, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.044</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Rempfer, J., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., Lippold, J., and Jaccard, S. L.: New
insights into cycling of <sup>231</sup>Pa and <sup>230</sup>Th in the Atlantic Ocean,
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 468, 27–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.03.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.03.027</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Richard, F. C. and Bourg, A. C. M.: Aqueous geochemistry of chromium: A
review, Water Res., 25, 807-816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(91)90160-R" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(91)90160-R</a>,
1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Rickli, J., Janssen, D. J., Hassler, C., Ellwood, M. J., and Jaccard, S. L.:
Chromium biogeochemistry and stable isotope distribution in the Southern
Ocean, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 262, 188–206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.07.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.07.033</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Ritz, S. P., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: A coupled dynamical ocean-energy
balance atmosphere model for paleoclimate studies, J. Climate, 24,
349–375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3351.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3351.1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Roth, R., Ritz, S. P., and Joos, F.: Burial-nutrient feedbacks amplify the sensitivity of atmospheric carbon dioxide to changes in organic matter remineralisation, Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 321–343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-321-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-321-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Rue, E. L., Smith, G. J., Cutter, G. A., and Bruland, K. W.: The response of
trace element redox couples to suboxic conditions in the water column, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I., 44, 113–134,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00088-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00088-X</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Saad, E. M., Wang, X., Planavsky, N. J., Reinhard, C. T., and Tang, Y.:
Redox-independent chromium isotope fractionation induced by ligand-promoted
dissolution, Nat. Commun., 8, 1590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01694-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01694-y</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Scheiderich, K., Amini, M., Holmden, C., and Francois, R.: Global variability
of chromium isotopes in seawater demonstrated by Pacific, Atlantic, and
Arctic Ocean samples, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 423, 87–97,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.04.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.04.030</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Shiller, A. M. and Boyle, E. A.: Variability of dissolved trace metals in
the mississippi river, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 51, 3273–3277,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(87)90134-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(87)90134-7</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Shiller, A. M. and Boyle, E. A.: Trace elements in the Mississippi River
Delta outflow region: Behavior at high discharge, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
55(, 3241–3251, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90486-O" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90486-O</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Schoenberg, R., Zink, S., Staubwasser, M., and von Blanckenburg, F.: The
stable Cr isotope inventory of solid Earth reservoirs determined by double
spike MC-ICP-MS, Chem. Geol., 249, 294–306,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.009</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Semeniuk, D. M., Maldonado, M. T., and Jaccard, S. L.: Chromium uptake and
adsorption in marine phytoplankton – Implications for the marine chromium
cycle, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 184, 41–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.021</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Shaw, T. J., Gieskes, J. M., and Jahnke, R. A.: Early diagenesis in differing
depositional environments: The response of transition metals in pore water,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 54, 1233–1246,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(90)90149-F" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(90)90149-F</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Sirinawin, W., Turner, D. R., and Westerlund, S.: Chromium (VI) distributions
in the Arctic and the Atlantic Oceans and a reassessment of the oceanic Cr
cycle, Mar. Chem., 71, 265–282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(00)00055-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(00)00055-4</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Skarbøvik, E., Allan, I., Stalnacke, P., Hagen, A. G., Greipsland, I.,
Hogasen, T., Selvik, J. R., and Beldring, S.: Riverine Inputs and Direct
Discharges to Norwegian Coastal Waters – 2014,
available at: <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2379436" target="_blank"/> (last access: 3 August 2021), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tschumi, T., Joos, F., Gehlen, M., and Heinze, C.: Deep ocean ventilation, carbon isotopes, marine sedimentation and the deglacial CO<sub>2</sub> rise, Clim. Past, 7, 771–800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-771-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-771-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Vieira, L. H., Achterberg, E. P., Scholten, J., Beck, A. J., Liebetrau, V.,
Mills, M. M., and Arrigo, K. R.: Benthic fluxes of trace metals in the
Chukchi Sea and their transport into the Arctic Ocean, Mar. Chem., 208,
43–55, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2018.11.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2018.11.001</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, W. X., Griscom, S. B., and Fisher, N. S.: Bioavailability of Cr(III)
and Cr(VI) to marine mussels from solute and particulate pathways, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 31, 603–611, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es960574x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es960574x</a>, 1997.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wanner, C. and Sonnenthal, E. L.: Assessing the control on the effective
kinetic Cr isotope fractionation factor: A reactive transport modeling
approach, Chem. Geol., 337, 88–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.11.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.11.008</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, W., Frei, R., Chen, T. Y., Klaebe, R., Liu, H., Li, D., Wei, G. Y., and
Ling, H. F.: Marine ferromanganese oxide: A potentially important sink of
light chromium isotopes?, Chem. Geol., 495, 90–103,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.006</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, W., Klaebe, R., Ling, H. F., Huang, F., and Frei, R.: Biogeochemical
cycle of chromium isotopes at the modern Earth's surface and its
applications as a paleo-environment proxy, Chem. Geol., 541, 119570,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119570" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119570</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Yamazaki, H., Gohda, S., and Nishikawa, Y.: Chemical Forms of Chromium in
Natural Water-Interaction of Chromium (III) and Humic Substances in Natural
Water-, J. Oceanogr. Soc. Japan, 35, 233–240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108928" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108928</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Zink, S., Schoenberg, R., and Staubwasser, M.: Isotopic fractionation and
reaction kinetics between Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in aqueous media, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 5729–5745, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.07.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.07.015</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
