<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-18-55-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Deepening roots can enhance carbonate weathering by amplifying
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich recharge</article-title><alt-title>Deepening roots can enhance carbonate weathering</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Deepening roots can enhance carbonate weathering}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~Wen et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>Hang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Sullivan</surname><given-names>Pamela L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8780-8501</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Macpherson</surname><given-names>Gwendolyn L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Billings</surname><given-names>Sharon A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name>
          <email>lili@engr.psu.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1641-3710</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania
State University, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>University Park, PA 16802, United States</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Oregon State
University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045,
United States</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Kansas
Biological Survey, University of Kansas, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Lawrence, KS 66045, United States</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Li Li (lili@engr.psu.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>55</fpage><lpage>75</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Hang Wen et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e150">Carbonate weathering is essential in regulating atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and carbon cycle at the century timescale. Plant roots accelerate
weathering by elevating soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> via respiration. It however remains
poorly understood how and how much rooting characteristics (e.g., depth and
density distribution) modify flow paths and weathering. We address this
knowledge gap using field data from and reactive transport numerical
experiments at the Konza Prairie Biological Station (Konza), Kansas (USA), a
site where woody encroachment into grasslands is surmised to deepen roots.</p>
    <p id="d1e171">Results indicate that deepening roots can enhance weathering in two ways.
First, deepening roots can control thermodynamic limits of carbonate
dissolution by regulating how much CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transports vertical downward to
the deeper carbonate-rich zone. The base-case data and model from Konza
reveal that concentrations of Ca and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) are
regulated by soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> driven by the seasonal soil respiration. This
relationship can be encapsulated in equations derived in this work
describing the dependence of Ca and DIC on temperature and soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relationship can explain spring water Ca and DIC concentrations from  multiple carbonate-dominated catchments. Second, numerical
experiments show that roots control weathering rates by regulating recharge
(or vertical water fluxes) into the deeper carbonate zone and export
reaction products at dissolution equilibrium. The numerical experiments
explored the potential effects of partitioning 40 % of infiltrated water
to depth in woodlands compared to 5 % in grasslands. Soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data
suggest relatively similar soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution over depth, which in woodlands and grasslands leads only to 1 % to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 % difference in
weathering rates if flow partitioning was kept the same between the two land
covers. In contrast, deepening roots can enhance weathering by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 % to
200 % as infiltration rates increased from 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.7 m/a. Weathering rates in these cases however are more than an order of magnitude higher than a case without roots at
all, underscoring the essential role of roots in general. Numerical
experiments also indicate that weathering fronts in woodlands propagated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 times deeper compared to grasslands after 300 years at an
infiltration rate of 0.37 m/a. These differences in weathering fronts are
ultimately caused by the differences in the contact times of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-charged water with carbonate in the deep subsurface. Within the limitation of modeling exercises, these data and numerical experiments prompt the hypothesis that (1) deepening roots in woodlands can enhance carbonate weathering by promoting
recharge and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–carbonate contact in the deep
subsurface and (2) the hydrological impacts of rooting characteristics can
be more influential than those of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution in modulating
weathering rates. We call for colocated characterizations of roots,
subsurface structure, and soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, as well as their linkage to water
and water chemistry. These measurements will be essential to illuminate
feedback mechanisms of land cover changes, chemical weathering, global
carbon cycle, and climate.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page56?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e313">Carbonate weathering has long been considered negligible as a long-term
control of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.5 to 1 Ma; Berner and
Berner, 2012; Winnick and Maher, 2018). Recent studies, however, have
underscored its significance in controlling the global carbon cycle at the
century timescale that is relevant to modern climate change, owing to its
rapid dissolution, its fast response to perturbations, and the order-of-magnitude-higher carbon store in carbonate reservoirs compared to the
atmosphere (Gaillardet et al., 2019; Sullivan et al., 2019b). Carbonate weathering is
influenced by many factors, including temperature
(Romero-Mujalli et al., 2019b), hydrological regimes
(Romero-Mujalli et al., 2019a; Wen and Li, 2018), and soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations (Covington et al., 2015) arising from different
vegetation types (Calmels et al., 2014). Rapid alteration to any
of these factors, either human or climate induced, may change global
carbonate weathering fluxes and lead to a departure from the current global
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level. This is particularly important given that about
7 %–12 % of the Earth's continental area is carbonate based and about
25 % of the global population completely or partially depend on waters
from karst aquifers (Hartmann et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e343">Plant roots have long been recognized as a dominant biotic driver of
chemical weathering and the global carbon cycle (Berner, 1992; Beerling
et al., 1998; Brantley et al., 2017a). The growth of forests has been
documented to elevate soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and amplify dissolved inorganic carbon
(DIC) fluxes (Berner, 1997; Andrews and Schlesinger, 2001). Rooting
structure can influence weathering in two ways (Fig. 1). First, rooting systems
(e.g., grasslands, shrublands, and woodlands) may affect the distribution of soil
carbon (both organic and inorganic), microbe biomass, and soil respiration
(Drever, 1994; Jackson et al., 1996; Billings et al., 2018). The
relatively deep root distributions of shrublands compared to grasslands may
lead to deeper soil carbon profiles (Jackson et al., 1996; Jobbagy and
Jackson, 2000), which may help elevate the deep CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and acidity that
determine carbonate solubility and weathering rates.</p>
      <p id="d1e371">Second, plant roots may affect soil structure and hydrological processes.
Root trenching and etching can develop porosity (Mottershead et al.,
2003; Hasenmueller et al., 2017). Root death and decay can promote the
generation of macropores or, more specifically, biopores with connected
networks (Angers and Caron, 1998; Zhang et al., 2015). Root channels have
been estimated to account for about 70 % of the total described
macropores (Noguchi et al., 1997; Beven and Germann, 2013) and
for over 70 % of water fluxes through soils (Watson and
Luxmoore, 1986). In grasslands, the lateral, dense spread of roots in upper
soil layers promotes the formation of horizontally oriented macropores that
support near-surface lateral flow (Cheng et al., 2011).
Highly dense fine roots also increase the abundance of organic matter and
promote granular or sandy texture soil aggregates that facilitate
shallow, near-surface water flow (Oades, 1993; Nippert et al., 2012). In
contrast, in shrublands and forests, generally deeper and thicker roots tend
to promote a high abundance of macropores and high connectivity to the deep
subsurface (Canadell et al., 1996; Nardini et al., 2016), enhancing the
drainage of water to the depth (Pawlik et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e374">It is generally known that rooting characteristics vary among plant species
and are critical in regulating water budgets, flow paths, and storage
(Sadras, 2003; Nepstad et al., 1994; Jackson et al., 1996; Cheng et al.,
2011; Brunner et al., 2015; Fan et al., 2017). Existing studies however have
primarily focused on the role of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and organic acids (Drever,
1994; Lawrence et al., 2014; Gaillardet et al., 2019; Hauser et al., 2020).
Systematic studies on coupled effects of hydrological flow paths and soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution are missing, owing to the
limitation in data that detail rooting effects on flow partitioning and
complex hydrological–biogeochemical interactions (Li et al., 2020). Here we ask the following questions. How and to what degree do rooting characteristics influence carbonate
weathering when considering both flow partitioning and soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution? Which factor (flow partitioning or soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution)
predominantly controls weathering? We hypothesized that deepening roots in
woodlands enhance carbonate weathering by promoting CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-enriched recharge into the deep, carbonate-abundant subsurface (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e423">We tested the hypotheses by a series of numerical experiments of
reactive transport processes based on water chemistry data from an upland
watershed in the Konza Prairie Biological Station, a tallgrass prairie and
one of the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites in the US (Fig. S1, Macpherson and Sullivan, 2019b; Vero et al., 2018).
We used the calibrated model to carry out numerical experiments for two
end-members of vegetation covers, grasslands and woodlands, under
flow-partitioning conditions that are characteristic of their rooting
structure. These experiments differentiated the impacts of biogeochemical and
hydrological drivers and bracketed the range of their potential impacts on
weathering, thus providing insights on the missing quantitative link between
rooting structure and chemical weathering. We recognize that
rooting characteristics can have multiple influences on water flow paths and
the water budget, for example, via water uptake and transpiration (Sadras,
2003; Fan et al., 2017; Pierret et al., 2016). This study focuses primarily
on their potential influence via the alteration of hydrological flow paths.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e428">A conceptual diagram of hydro-biogeochemical interactions in the
grassland <bold>(a)</bold> and woodland <bold>(b)</bold>. The shallow and dense fine roots in the
grassland promote lateral macropore development and lateral water flow. In
contrast, the woodlands induce vertical macropore development that supports
vertical flow (recharge) into the deep, calcite-abundant subsurface compared
to the grassland. The gray color gradient reflects the calcite abundance
with more calcite in depth. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a unit of moles per year
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> flow
rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (m/a) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> species concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> cross-section area (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) represent mass fluxes from lateral flow (soil
water) and from vertical flow into groundwater, respectively. Soil water and
groundwater were assumed to eventually flow into stream, adding up to the total discharge (infiltration) rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page57?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Research site and data sources</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site description</title>
      <p id="d1e565">Details of the Konza site are in the Supplement and references therein. Here we provide brief information
relevant to this work. Konza is a mesic native grassland where
experimentally manipulated, long-term burning regimes have led to woody
encroachment in up to 70 % of the catchment area in some catchments. The
mean annual temperature and precipitation are 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 835 mm, respectively (Tsypin and Macpherson,
2012). The bedrock contains repeating Permian couplets of limestone (1–2 m
thick) and mudstone (2–4 m) (Macpherson et al.,
2008). The limestone is primarily calcite with traces of dolomite, while the
mudstone is dominated by illite, chlorite, and mixed layers of
chlorite–illite and chlorite–vermiculite, varying in abundance from major to
trace amounts. With an average thickness of 1–2 m in the lowlands, soils
mostly have carbonate less than 25 % (Macpherson
et al., 2008). Data suggest that the Konza landscape is undergoing a
hydrogeochemical transition that coincides with and may be driven by
woody encroachment. Parallel to these changes is a detectable decline in
streamflow and an increase in weathering rates (Macpherson and
Sullivan, 2019b) and groundwater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The concentration–discharge relationships have exhibited chemodynamic patterns
(i.e., solute concentrations are sensitive to changes in discharge) for
geogenic species (e.g., Mg and Na) in woody-encroached sites compared to
grass sites. Sullivan et al. (2019a) hypothesized that
concentration–discharge relationships may be affected by woody species with
deeper roots, which altered flow paths and mineral–water interactions
(Fig. 1). We focus on the upland watershed N04d in Konza (Fig. S1) that
has experienced a 4-year burning interval since 1990 and has seen
considerable woody encroachment and changes in hydrologic fluxes
(Sullivan et al., 2019a).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e603">Key reactions and kinetic and thermodynamic parameters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="250pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reaction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Standard</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Specific</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">enthalpy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/s)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">surface area</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, kJ/mol)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="left">Soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production through CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and dissolving into CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(0) CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(g)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(1) CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(2) CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(3) HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="left">Chemical weathering </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(4) CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(s) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>2HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.52<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(5)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> CaAl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Si<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(s) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>2Al</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SiO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.045</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(6)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> KAlSi<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(s) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(7)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Si<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(s) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>2Al</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e606"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were interpolated using the EQ3/6 database
(Wolery et al., 1990), except Reactions (1) and (4) (i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) concentrations were calculated through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) values were used as equilibrium constants in CrunchTope to describe how much
soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was available for weathering.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Calcite in the upper soil (above horizon B) is mixed with other minerals and
has small particle size (Macpherson and Sullivan, 2019b), is relatively
impure, and therefore has a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value than those at depth with
relatively pure calcite. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the impure calcite was
calibrated by fitting field data of Ca and alkalinity.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The kinetic rate parameters and specific surface areas were from Palandri
and Kharaka (2004), except Reaction (0). The kinetic rate constant of the
source CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) dissolution (i.e., soil respiration rate
constant, Reaction 0) was from Bengtson and Bengtsson (2007), Ahrens et al. (2015),
and Carey et al. (2016); the specific surface area was referred to that of soil
organic carbon (Pennell et al., 1995).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> These reactions were only used in the base-case model as they occurred in
upper soils in Konza. In the later numerical experiments, these reactions
were not included so as to focus on carbonate weathering.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Data sources</title>
      <p id="d1e1848">Daily total meteoric precipitation and evapotranspiration were
from the Konza data website (<uri>http://lter.konza.ksu.edu/data</uri>, last access: 22 November 2020). Wet chemistry deposition data were from the
National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP, <uri>http://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/</uri>, last access: 22 November 2020). Data used in this work include monthly data of soil gases
(at depths of  16, 84, and 152 cm from land surface), soil water (17 and 152 cm  from land surface), and groundwater (366 cm from land surface)
in 2009 and 2010 (Tsypin and
Macpherson, 2012) (Fig. 2a). The sampling points were about 30 m away from
the stream. More information on field and laboratory methods was included
in the Supplement.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page58?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Reactive transport modeling</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Base case: 1-D reactive transport model for the Konza grassland</title>
      <p id="d1e1874">A 1-D reactive transport model was developed using the code CrunchTope
(Steefel et al., 2015). The code solves
mass conservation equations integrating advective and diffusive/dispersive
transport and geochemical reactions. It has been extensively used in
understanding mineral dissolution, chemical weathering, and biogeochemical
reactions (e.g., Lawrence et al., 2014; Wen et al., 2016;
Deng et al., 2017). In this study, the base case had a
porosity of 0.48 and a depth of 366.0 cm at a resolution 1.0 cm. Soil
temperature was assumed to decrease linearly from 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at the
land surface to 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 366.0 cm, within typical ranges of field
measurements (Tsypin and Macpherson, 2012). Detailed setup of
domain, soil mineralogy, initial condition, and precipitation chemistry are
in the Supplement.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Representation of soil CO${}_{{2}}$}?><title>Representation of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e1911">The model does not explicitly simulate soil respiration (microbial
activities and root respiration) that produces soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Instead, it
approximates these processes by having a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source phase CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) that
continuously releases CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) and reproduced the observed soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels at a kinetic rate constant of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/s (Reactions 0–1 in Table 1). This value is at the low end of the reported soil
respiration rates (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/s)
(Bengtson and Bengtsson, 2007; Ahrens et al., 2015; Carey et al., 2016).
The dissolution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) into CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) follows Henry's law <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the equilibrium constant of Reaction (1), which equals to Henry's law
constant. The extent of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) dissolution was constrained by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was estimated using temperature-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (following the van 't Hoff equation in Eq. S1) and measured soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data at different horizons (Table 2). These <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were then linearly interpolated for individual grid blocks
in the model. Finally, these prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values were used as the equilibrium constants of the coupled Reactions (0–1) in
the form of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, such that the soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values at different depth were represented
(Sect. 4.1). In the base case, the soil profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was updated monthly based on the monthly soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
data (Table 2). More details about the implementation in CrunchTope are
included in the Supplement.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2265">Measured CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) at different depths and corresponding
estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="66pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1">Soil depth </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ways</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">obtained<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a,b,c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7" align="left">I. Grassland (Konza) cases  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Horizon A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Horizon AB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Horizon B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Groundwater</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(84 cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(152 cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(366 cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7" align="left">1. Base case with monthly CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) (%) and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) (mol/L) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">July</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Measured</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">August</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Measured</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">September</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Measured</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">October</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Measured</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">November</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Measured</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">January</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Measured</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">March</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Measured</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) (mol/L)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">July</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">August</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">September</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">October</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">November</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">January</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">March</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7" align="left">2. Numerical experiments with annual-average CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) (%) and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) (mol/L) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Measured</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.0) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.7) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7" align="left">II. Woodland cases (Calhoun site, South Carolina)  numerical experiments with annual-average CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) (%) and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) (mol/L) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(150 cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(300 cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(500 cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Measured</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2292"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Monthly measured soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data for the Konza grassland (base case)
were from Tsypin and Macpherson (2012); the
soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the grassland experiments was averaged from monthly measurements. More information on measurements at the
Konza grassland is detailed in the Supplement. The annual-average soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the woodland experiments was from the forested Calhoun site in South Carolina (Billings et al., 2018).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) values were estimated using Henry's law: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the temperature-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated
following Eq. (S1). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) values at different
soil depths were used to prescribe the available soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for chemical
weathering.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Soil temperature was estimated from the soil water and shallow
groundwater temperature (Tsypin and Macpherson, 2012; Billings et al.,
2018).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page59?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Reactions</title>
      <?pagebreak page60?><p id="d1e4225">In the model, the upper soil layers have
more anorthite (CaAl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Si</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(s)) and K-feldspar
(KAlSi<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(s)), and the deeper subsurface contains more
calcite (Table S1). The calcite volume increases from 0 % in the upper
soil layer to 10 % in the deep subsurface. Table 1 summarizes reactions
and thermodynamic and kinetic parameters. Soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases pore water
acidity (Reactions 0–2) and accelerates mineral dissolution (Reactions 3–6).
Silicate dissolution leads to the precipitation of clay (represented by
kaolinite in Reaction 7). These reactions were included in the base case to
reproduce field data. The kinetics follows the transition state theory (TST)
rate law (Plummer et al., 1978) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>kA</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mtext>IAP</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the kinetic rate constant (mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/s), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
mineral surface area per unit volume (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), IAP is the ion
activity product, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the equilibrium constant. The term
IAP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantifies the extent of disequilibrium: values close to 0
suggest far from equilibrium, whereas values close to 1.0 indicate close to
equilibrium. At Konza, calcite in the upper soil (above horizon B) is mixed with other minerals, has small particle size, and is considered impure (Macpherson and Sullivan, 2019a) and therefore has a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value than those at depth with relatively pure calcite. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of impure calcite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calibrated by fitting field data of Ca and alkalinity. To reproduce the observed soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
profile, the soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production rate (mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/a) at the domain
scale (calculated by the mass change in the solid phase CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) over
time) was assumed to increase with infiltration rates (Fig. S2). This is
consistent with field observations that soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production rate and
efflux may increase with rainfall in grassland and forest ecosystems
(Harper et al., 2005; Patrick et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2011; Vargas et
al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2013). For example, Zhou et al. (2009)
documented soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates increasing from 3.2 to 63.0 mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/a when the annual precipitation increased from 400 to 1200 mm.
Wu et al. (2011) showed that increasing
precipitation from 5 to 2148 mm enhanced soil respiration by 40 % and
that a global increase of 2 mm precipitation per decade may lead to an
increase of 3.8 mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/a for soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production. The simulated
soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates across different infiltration rates here
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1–10 mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/a shown in Fig. S2) were close to the
reported belowground net primary production (belowground NPP) of typical
ecosystems: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8–100 mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/a for grasslands
(Gill et al., 2002) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 –40 mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/a for woodlands
(Aragão et al., 2009).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4558">Physical and geochemical characteristics in numerical experiments.</p></caption>
  <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021-t03.png"/>
</table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Flow partitioning</title>
      <p id="d1e4574">Rainwater enters soil columns at
the annual infiltration rate of 0.37 m/a, estimated based on the difference
between measured precipitation (0.88 m/a) and evapotranspiration (0.51 m/a).
At 50 cm, a lateral flow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (soil water) exited the soil column to the
stream at 0.35 m/a. The rest recharged the deeper domain beyond 50 cm (to
the groundwater system) at 0.02 m/a (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % of
precipitation) and became groundwater (Fig. 1a), a conservative value
compared to 2 %–15 % reported in another study (Steward et
al., 2011). The groundwater flow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> eventually came out at 366.0 cm and
was assumed to enter the stream as part of discharge (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The flow field was implemented in CrunchTope using the “PUMP”
option.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>3.1.4</label><title>Calibration</title>
      <p id="d1e4635">We used monthly alkalinity and
Ca concentration data (Sect. 2.2) for model calibration. The
monthly Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) that quantified the residual
variance of modeling output compared to measurements was used for model
performance evaluation (Moriasi et al., 2007). NSE values
higher than 0.5 are considered acceptable.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Numerical experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e4647">Numerical experiments were set up for grasslands and
woodlands. The base case from Konza was used to represent grasslands: data from the Calhoun site (the Calhoun Critical Zone Observatory in South Carolina, USA) were used as representative for woody sites (Billings et al., 2018).
Grasslands are typically characterized by a high proportion of horizontal
macropores induced by dense, lateral-spread of roots mostly at depths less
than 0.8 m (Jackson et al., 1996; Frank et al., 2010). These
characteristics promote lateral flow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the shallow subsurface
(Fig. 1a). At Konza, over 90 % of grass roots were at the top 0.5 m,
leading to high hydrologic conductivity in top soils
(Nippert et al., 2012). In the woodland, a greater
proportion of deep roots enhances vertical macropore development
(Canadell et al., 1996; Nardini et al., 2016), reduces permeability
contrasts at different depths (Vergani and Graf, 2016), and is
thought to facilitate more vertical water flow to the depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). At the
Calhoun site, over 50 % of roots are in the top 0.5 m in woodlands, with
the rest penetrating deeper (Jackson et al., 1996; Eberbach, 2003;
Billings et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e4672">The experiments aimed to compare the general, averaged behaviors rather than
event-scale dynamics so the annual-average soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data and
corresponding prescribed CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) concentrations were used (Table 2).
The experiments focused on calcite weathering (Reactions 0–4) and excluded
silicate weathering reactions (Reactions 5–7). The
mineral-dissolution parameters from the base case were used for all
experiments. We compared the relative significance of the hydrological
(i.e., lateral versus vertical flow partitioning) vs. respiratory (i.e.,
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generation) influences of deepening roots. Though other potential
differences might be induced by deepening roots (e.g., water uptake, water
table, and transpiration) (Li, 2019) and influence weathering, we assumed they remain constant across the
grassland and woodland simulations to examine the relative influences of
flow path vs. CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generation on carbonate weathering.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Hydrological and biogeochemical differences in grasslands
and woodlands</title>
      <p id="d1e4718">Flow partitioning between lateral shallow flow and vertical
recharge flow is challenging to quantify and is subject to large
uncertainties under diverse climate, lithology, and land cover conditions.
The ratios of lateral flow in upper soils versus the total flow inferred
from a tracer study in a grassland vary from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 % to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 % (Weiler and Naef, 2003). Harman and
Cosans (2019) found that the lateral flow rate at upper soils over the
overall infiltration can vary between 50 % and 95 %. Deeper roots in
woodlands can increase deep soil permeability by over 1 order of magnitude
(Vergani and Graf, 2016). Assuming that the vertical, recharged flow
water ultimately leaves the watershed as baseflow, the ratio of the lateral
versus vertical flow has been reported with a wide range. In forests such as
Shale Hills in Pennsylvania and Coal Creek in Colorado, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 %–20 % of stream discharge is from groundwater, presumably recharged
by vertical flow (Li et al., 2017; Zhi et al., 2019). Values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated through base flow separation vary from 20 % to 90 % in forest/wood-dominated watersheds (Price, 2011), often
negatively correlating with the proportion of grasslands
(Mazvimavi et al., 2004).</p>
      <?pagebreak page61?><p id="d1e4772">Soil respiration rates can vary between 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/s in both grasslands and woodlands (Bengtson and Bengtsson,
2007; Ahrens et al., 2015; Carey et al., 2016). Soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels may
vary by 2–3 orders of magnitude depending on vegetation type and climate
conditions (Neff and Hooper, 2002; Breecker et al., 2010). Soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels are further complicated by their dependence on topographic
position, soil depth, and soil moisture, all of which determine the
magnitude of microbial and root activities and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diffusion
(Hasenmueller et al., 2015; Billings et al., 2018). There is however no
consistent evidence suggesting which land cover exhibits higher soil
respiration rate or soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level. Below we describe details of the
numerical experiments (Table 3) exploring the influence of hydrological
versus biogeochemical impacts of roots.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4847"><bold>(a)</bold> Schematic representation of sampling depths in the Konza
grassland; corresponding monthly dynamics of <bold>(b)</bold> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g), <bold>(c)</bold> alkalinity, <bold>(d)</bold> DIC, and <bold>(e)</bold> Ca concentrations. Lines
represent modeling outputs at the corresponding sampling depth of monthly
field measurements (dots), including soil water at horizons A (16 cm) and B (152 cm), as well as groundwater (366 cm). The lines of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) in panel <bold>(b)</bold> overlapped. Note that there are no DIC data so no
dots in panel <bold>(d)</bold>. The temporal trends of alkalinity, DIC, and Ca mirrored
those of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating its predominant control on weathering.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Three numerical scenarios</title>
      <p id="d1e4931">Each scenario in
Table 3 includes a grassland and woodland case, with their respective
profiles of calcite distribution and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kept the same (columns 3
and 4 in Table 3). The only difference in different scenarios is the flow
partitioning (column 5). Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the grassland (red line
in column 4) was set to reflect the annual average of the Konza site. Soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue line) in the woodland was set to reflect the annual average from the
forest-dominant Calhoun site (Billings et al., 2018).
In all scenarios, we assumed that grasslands and woodlands had the same
total CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) producing CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)
but differed in depth distributions. The CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) depth distribution was constrained by CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) field data (Table 2). The distribution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in grasslands is slightly steeper than that in the woodland, with higher
density of roots and more abundant CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the upper soils. Below the rooting depth, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was assumed to be smaller
(by 10 times) to represent the potential soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources from
microbial activities (Billings et al., 2018).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e5113">Simulated depth profiles of (A) calcite (vol %) and (B) soil
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production rate; (C) CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) (%), (D) DIC, and (E) Ca at
0.37 m/a; and (F) effluent Ca concentrations at different infiltration
rates. From top to bottom rows are Scenario 1 (Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
with flow partitioning, first row), Scenario 2 (Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with 100 % vertical flow, second row), and Scenario 3
(Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with 100 % lateral flow, last row). Red and
blue colors present grassland and woodland, respectively. Lines and empty
circles represent modeling outputs, while filled circles with error bar in C are the annual-average CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) data (in Table 2). Arrows in A indicate flow conditions. In F, soil water and groundwater refer to
concentrations at the lateral (50 cm) and vertical (366 cm) outlets,
respectively. Higher fractions of vertical flow in Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> led to higher stream Ca concentration compared to Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Scenario 2 and 3
without flow partitioning, stream Ca concentrations were similar. The
concentrations of DIC versus discharge are very similar to the Ca
concentrations in F.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5222">Scenario 1 considered flow partitioning (Table 3). With the large
permeability contrast of soil and bedrock (over 4 orders of magnitude) in
Konza (Macpherson, 1996), the Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) represents
an end-member case for the grassland. The woodland (Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) case was
set to have 60 % lateral flow and 40 % vertical flow into the deeper
subsurface. This groundwater percentage is at the high end of flow
partitioning and serves as an end-member case for woodlands (Vergani
and Graf, 2016). Scenarios 2 and 3 had no flow partitioning. Scenario 2 had
two cases with 100 % vertical flow via the bottom outlet (VF; Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>); Scenario 3 had two cases with 100 % horizontal flow
(HF; Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) via the shallow outlet at 50 cm. These
cases represent the end-member flow cases with 100 % lateral flow or 100 % vertical flow. In addition, because the two cases have the same flow
scheme, they enable the differentiation of effects of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution versus hydrology differences. All scenarios were run under
infiltration rates from 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.7 m/a (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m/d), the observed daily variation range at Konza. This was to
explore the role of flow regimes and identify conditions where the most and
least significant differences occur.</p>
      <p id="d1e5400">Each case was run until steady state, when concentrations at the domain
outlet became constant (within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %) over time. The time to reach
steady state varied from 0.1 to 30 a, depending on infiltration rates. The
lateral flux (soil water, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and vertical
fluxes (groundwater, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were calculated at 50
and 366 cm, in addition to total fluxes (weathering rates, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These
fluxes multiplied with unit cross-section area (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) convert into rates
in units<?pagebreak page62?> of moles per year (mol/a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Carbonate weathering over century timescales: soil
property evolution</title>
      <p id="d1e5511">To compare the propagation of weathering fronts over
longer timescales, we carried out two 300-year simulations for Scenario 1 with
flow partitioning under the base-case infiltration rate of 0.37 m/a (i.e.,
Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Table 3). During this long-term simulation,
we updated calcite volume, porosity, and permeability. The calcite volume
changes were updated in each time step based on corresponding mass changes,
which were used to update porosity. Permeability changes were updated based
on changes in local porosity following the Kozeny–Carman equation:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∅</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∅</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∅</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∅</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kozeny, 1927; Costa, 2006), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∅</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are permeability and porosity in grid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∅</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the initial permeability and porosity,
respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Quantification of weathering rates and their dependence on
CO${}_{{2}}$--carbonate contact}?><title>Quantification of weathering rates and their dependence on
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–carbonate contact</title>
      <?pagebreak page63?><p id="d1e5703">To quantify the overall weathering rates and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–carbonate contact in
each scenario, we used the framework from a previously developed upscaled
rate law for dissolution of spatially heterogeneously distributed minerals
(Wen and Li, 2018). The rate law says that three characteristic times are
important. The equilibrium time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the characteristic
timescale of mineral dissolution to reach equilibrium in a well-mixed
system. The residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., the timescale of advection,
quantifies the overall water contact time with the whole domain. It was
calculated by the product of domain length (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and porosity divided by the
overall infiltration rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
reactive transport time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantifies the water contact time
with calcite as influenced by both advection and diffusion/dispersion. The
upscaled rate law is as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M451" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>calcite</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>calcite</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the intrinsic rate constant measured for a mineral in a well-mixed
reactor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total surface area, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is domain length, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
geostatistical characteristics of spatial heterogeneity, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reactive time ratio quantifying the relative
magnitude of the water contact time with the whole domain versus the contact
time with the reacting mineral. This rate law consists of two parts: the
effective dissolution rates in homogeneous media represented by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the heterogeneity factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that quantifies effects of
preferential flow paths arising from heterogeneous distribution of minerals.
When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the water contact time with calcite
zone is small, meaning the water is replenished quickly compared to the
whole domain, leading to higher CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–carbonate interactions. In
contrast, a small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
reflects that water is replenished slowly in the reactive calcite zones, leading
to less CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–carbonate contact. These different timescales were
calculated for Scenario 1–3 based on the flow characteristics and
dissolution thermodynamics and kinetics, as detailed in the Supplement. Values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all experiments are
listed in Table S2. Note that numerical experiments in Scenario 1–3 focused
on the short-term scale, with negligible changes in the solid phase.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>The thermodynamics of carbonate dissolution: grassland at Konza as the
base-case scenario</title>
      <?pagebreak page64?><p id="d1e6137">The calibrated model reproduced the temporal dynamics with a Nash–Sutcliffe
efficiency (NSE) value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 and was considered satisfactory
(Fig. 2). Note that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis is inverted to display upper soils at the top
and deep soils at the bottom to be consistent with their subsurface position
shown in Fig. 2a. The measured CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) varied between 0.24 % and 7.30 % (Fig. 2b right axis), 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than the
atmospheric level of 0.04 %. The estimated CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) (Fig. 2b left
axis) generally increased with depth except in July and August when horizon
B was at peak concentration. The timing of the peaks and valleys varied in
different horizons. The CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) reached maxima in summer in soil
horizons A and B and decreased to less than 0.5 mM in winter and spring. The
groundwater CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) exhibited a delayed peak in September and October
and dampened seasonal variation compared to the soil horizons. The temporal
trends of alkalinity, DIC, and Ca in groundwater mirrored those of soil
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at their corresponding depths, indicating the predominate control
of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on carbonate weathering. The groundwater concentrations of
these species were also higher than soil concentrations. The simulated
groundwater DIC (approximately summation of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) and alkalinity) was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 times higher than that in upper soil (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 mM). The dissolved mineral volume was negligible for the simulation period
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Sensitivity analysis revealed that changes in flow
velocities influenced concentrations in horizon A where anorthite is the
dominating dissolving mineral (0–1.8 m); their effects are negligible in
horizon B and groundwater where fast-dissolving calcite rapidly approaches
equilibrium.</p>
      <p id="d1e6255">Several measurements/parameters were important in reproducing data. These include soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which determined the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) level and its
spatial variation, and equilibrium constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of calcite
dissolution. Imposition of monthly variations and depth distributions of
soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were essential to capture the variation of alkalinity and Ca
data at different horizons. The imposition of calcite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also
critical for reproducing Ca concentrations. Impurities were suggested to
affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of natural calcite by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0
(Macpherson and Sullivan, 2019a). Calcite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in upper soils had
to be reduced by a factor of 3.8 in the model to reproduce concentrations in
horizon A. The alkalinity and Ca concentrations were not sensitive to
kinetic parameters nor precipitation, because carbonate dissolution rapidly approaches equilibrium.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Numerical experiments: the significance of hydrological flow partitioning</title>
      <p id="d1e6345"><italic>Scenario 1 for hydro-biogeochemical effects with flow partitioning</italic>
(<italic>Wood</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>and Grass</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Figures 3A1–E1 show depth profiles of
calcite and soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates and steady-state concentrations
of reaction products. The soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production rate was highest in the upper soil
at around 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol/s and decreased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol/s at 366 cm (Fig. 3B1), consistent with the decline with soil depth
observed in natural systems. The CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) level (released from CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)) increased with depth due to lower efflux into the atmosphere in deeper zone and downward fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–charge water from
the upper soil (Fig. 3C1). Concentrations of reaction products (Ca, DIC)
were lower in the top 40 cm, reflecting the lower carbonate-mineral
background level, and higher at depths over 60 cm. The transition occurred
between 35 and 60 cm in the vicinity of the calcite–no-calcite interface at 55 cm, where concentrations of Ca and DIC increased abruptly until reaching
equilibrium. This thin transition was driven by fast calcite dissolution and
rapid approach to equilibrium, resulting in a short equilibrium distance.
The equilibrated DIC and Ca concentrations below 60 cm followed the similar
increasing trend of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) with depth in the deep zone (Fig. 3C1–E1).</p>
      <p id="d1e6474">Figure 3F1 shows that Ca concentrations in soil water (light color) were
lower than groundwater (dark color) and varied with infiltration rates. The
difference between soil water and groundwater Ca concentrations was
relatively small at low infiltration rates because both reached equilibrium
but diverged at high infiltration rates. Higher infiltration rates diluted
soil water but not as much for groundwater. As expected, concentrations in the stream water, a mixture of soil water and groundwater (solid line), were
in between these values but closely resembled soil water in the grassland.
In both cases, stream concentration decreased as infiltration increased,
indicating a dilution concentration–discharge relationship.</p>
      <p id="d1e6477"><italic>Scenario 2–3 for biogeochemical effects (without flow partitioning)</italic>.
Scenarios 2 and 3 were end-member cases that bracketed the range of rooting
effects. Calcite and soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were distributed the same way as their
corresponding flow partitioning (PF) cases (Table 3). The Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cases had
100 % flow going downward via the deeper calcite zone maximizing the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–water–calcite contact. In the Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cases
(Table 3), all water exited at 50 cm, bypassing the deeper calcite-abundant
zone and minimizing the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–water–calcite contact. Figure 3A2–F2 and
3A3–F3 show the VF (Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and HF (Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) cases, respectively. Similar to the flow partitioning cases, the concentrations of reaction products were low in the shallow zone and
increased over 10 times within a short distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 cm at the
depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 cm. The woodland cases increased slightly more
than the grassland cases because of the slightly steeper soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution (Fig. 3C2 and 3C3). Figure 3F2 indicates that the effluent Ca
concentrations were slightly higher in Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the high soil
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level at the bottom outlet. The Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case
almost had the same effluent Ca concentrations at the upper soil (Fig. 3F3).</p>
      <p id="d1e6643"><italic>Concentration–discharge relationship and weathering rates in all cases</italic>. The
VF cases had the highest effluent concentrations and weathering rates,
whereas the HF cases had lowest concentrations and weathering rates, and the
Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cases fell in between (Fig. 4a, b). This is
because the VF cases maximized the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–calcite contact with 100 % flow through the calcite zone, whereas the HF cases had minimum
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–calcite contact with most water bypassing the calcite zone (column 3–4
in Table 3). The Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cases allowed different extent
of contact prescribed by the amount of flow via the calcite zone. A case run
without soil respiration (i.e., no CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), not shown) indicated<?pagebreak page65?> that
Ca and DIC concentrations were more than an order of magnitude lower than
cases with soil respiration. In addition, the PF and HF cases generally
showed dilution patterns with concentration decreasing with infiltration
rates, as compared to the VF cases where a chemostatic pattern emerged with
almost no changes as infiltration rates vary. This is because in the VF cases
the concentrations mostly reached equilibrium concentration. In the PF and HF
cases, a large proportion of water flows through soils with negligible
calcite where the water moves away from equilibrium as
infiltration rates increase.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e6724"><bold>(a–b)</bold> Stream water Ca and DIC concentrations, and <bold>(c–d)</bold> stream
fluxes from all scenarios. Stream water was the overall effluent from soil
water and groundwater. The differences caused by hydrological differences
(VF, HF, and PF) were much larger than the differences within each pair with
the same flow partitioning, indicating significant hydrological impacts on
weathering.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6738">Although weathering rates generally increased with infiltration rates, the
woodland increased more (4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 2.4 mol/a in
Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The Ca fluxes in the VF cases (100 % vertical flow) were higher than flow partitioning
cases because they enabled maximum CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-charged water content with unweathered calcite at depth. Within each pair with the same flow pattern, the difference was mainly due to the distribution of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The difference in weathering fluxes was 1 %–12 % and 1 %–5 % between HF cases and VF cases, respectively, much smaller than differences between the PF cases. Comparing the HF and VF cases, differences in weathering fluxes were 73 % at
3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m/a and 721 % at 3.7 m/a, which is about 1–2 orders of magnitude higher than differences induced by soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution.
Between the Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cases, the differences were in the range of 17 %–207 % at the flow range of 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–3.7 m/a. The DIC fluxes showed similar trends.</p>
      <p id="d1e6854"><italic>Development of reaction fronts at the century scale</italic>. To explore the
longer-term effects, we ran the PF cases at 0.37 m/a for 300 years. More
water flowing vertically through abundant calcite zones in Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
resulted in faster weathering and a deeper reaction front at a depth of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 210 cm compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 cm in Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 5a). The depletion of calcite led to an increase in porosity (Fig. 5b), which was over 1 order of magnitude higher at the domain scale of the
woodland than that in the grassland (Fig. 5c). Permeability evolution had
a similar trend to porosity (not shown here). This indicates that if
deeper roots promoted more water into deeper soils, they would push reaction
fronts deeper and control the position where chemically unweathered
bedrock was transformed into weathered bedrock. At timescales longer than
century scale, calcite may become depleted, which ultimately reduces
weathering rates (White and Brantley, 2003) and lead to similar
weathering fronts in grasslands and woodlands.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e6893">Predicted soil profiles of <bold>(a)</bold> calcite volume change (calcite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> initial calcite volume – current calcite volume) and <bold>(b)</bold> porosity after 300 years; <bold>(c)</bold> predicted temporal evolution of domain-scale porosity in the
grassland and woodland. The infiltration rate is 0.37 m/a.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The regulation of weathering rates by CO${}_{{2}}$--carbonate contact time}?><title>The regulation of weathering rates by CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–carbonate contact time</title>
      <?pagebreak page66?><p id="d1e6936">Natural systems are characterized by preferential flow paths such that flow
distribution is not uniform in space. Weathering in such systems with
preferential flow in zones of differing reactivities has been shown to
hinge on the contact time between water and the reacting minerals instead of
all minerals that are present (Wen and Li, 2018) (Eq. 1). Here we
contextualize the weathering rates in different scenarios (symbols) with
predictions from an upscaled rate law developed by Wen and Li
(2018) that incorporates the effects of heterogeneities in flow paths (Fig. 6). The time ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> compares the domain
water contact time (or residence time) with the contact time with dissolving
calcite. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is total domain pore volume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water flow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is total reactive pore volume
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water fluxes passing through reactive zone <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Also
note that water passing through the reactive zone stays in the subsurface
longer, such that it is older water in general. The ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is therefore akin to the fraction of older water compared to the total water fraction. The older
water fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the counterpart of the young water fraction
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> discussed in the literature (Kirchner, 2016,
2019). In Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (open circles) where all
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-charged water flew through the deeper calcite zones,
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–calcite interactions reached maximum such that values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> approached 1.0, meaning all water
interacted with calcite. Under this condition, weathering rates were the
highest among all cases. In contrast, in Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (open
diamonds) where all CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-charged water bypassed the deeper calcite zone,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> can be 1–3 orders of magnitude lower, and
weathering rates were at their minima. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>
value in the water partitioning cases (Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, filled
circles) fell in between. At the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case with
deepening roots promoted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–water–calcite contact (i.e., larger
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>) and dissolved calcite at higher rates.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e7268">Calcite weathering rate as a function of the reactive time ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>, a proxy of the fraction of the older, reactive water
compared to the total water fluxes. Symbols are rates from
numerical experiments. Gray lines are predictions from the rate law equation
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wen and Li, 2018). Large to small dots and thick
to thin lines are for infiltration rates from 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m/a. The red filled stars represent the monthly rates in September (highest
soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and March (lowest soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the base case at
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.37) m/a; the black to gray dashed lines represent predictions
with increasing soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level (i.e., larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from Eq. (1). The gray filled star is for the case without soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. At any specific
infiltration rate or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the VF and HF cases bracket the two ends, whereas the PF cases fall in between. The Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case with deeper
roots enhanced the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–water–calcite contact (i.e., larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios), leading to higher calcite weathering rates
compared to grasslands. The differences of weathering rates induced by
different soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level were relatively small compared to those
hydrological changes induced by rooting depth.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e7447">The magnitude of the rate difference also depends on the overall flow rates (or
domain contact time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). At fast flow with small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(large symbols and thick lines in Fig. 6), flow partitioning has a larger
influence. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.47 years, the weathering rates in the VF
cases were more than an order of magnitude higher than those in the PF
cases. The weathering rate in the woodland was over 7 times that of the
grassland. In contrast, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 47 years, the rate differences
between grass and woody cases were less than 25 %, largely because the
dissolution has reached equilibrium. In the VF and HF cases where flow
conditions were the same, the soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution in grassland and
woodland differed only slightly, leading to similar values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> and weathering rates and indicating minimal impacts of
soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution. These rates from numerical experiments closely
follow the prediction from the upscaled reaction rate law (gray lines, Eq. 1). The rate law predicted that weathering rates increased from HF cases
with small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> values to VF cases where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad,r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> approached 1. It also showed that
weathering rates reached their maxima when all water flows through the reactive zone, i.e., when the fraction of older, reactive water is essentially
1.0.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e7573"><bold>(a)</bold> Ca and <bold>(b)</bold> DIC data from the literature (gray dots) and
prediction lines of Eqs. (2)–(3) at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (solid line) and 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(dashed line). Measured spring water concentrations are from carbonate-dominant
catchments in the literature: Abongwa and Atekwana (2015),
Lopez-Chicano et al. (2001), Moral et al. (2008),
Huang et al. (2015), Ozkul et al. (2010),
Dandurand et al. (1982), Calmels et al. (2014),
Kanduc et al. (2012), and Tsypin and Macpherson
(2012).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/18/55/2021/bg-18-55-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e7615">Because carbonate dissolution is thermodynamically controlled and transport
limited, the overall weathering rates depend on how much CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-charged
water flushes through the carbonate zone. This work indicates that deepening roots potentially enhance weathering rates in two ways. First, roots can control
thermodynamic limits of carbonate dissolution by regulating how much
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is transported downward and enters the carbonate-rich zone. In
fact, the base-case grassland data and model reveal that the concentrations
of Ca and DIC are regulated by seasonal fluctuation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and soil
respiration. Second, roots can control how much water fluxes
through the carbonate zone and export reaction products at equilibrium such
that more dissolution can occur. The numerical experiments indicate that
carbonate weathering at depth hinges on the recharge rate of delivery of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-enriched water. Deepening roots in woodlands that channel more
water into unweathered carbonate at depths can elevate weathering rates by more
than an order of magnitude compared to grasslands. Below we elaborate and
discuss these two messages.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The thermodynamics of carbonate weathering: control of temperature and
$p$CO${}_{{2}}$}?><title>The thermodynamics of carbonate weathering: control of temperature and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page67?><p id="d1e7684">The base-case data and simulation showed that calcite dissolution reaches
equilibrium rapidly and is thermodynamically controlled (Sect. 4.1), which
is generally well known and echoes observations from literature (Tsypin and Macpherson,
2012; Gaillardet et al., 2019). The extent of dissolution, or solubility
indicated in Ca and DIC concentrations, is determined by soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels that in turn hinge on ecosystem functioning and climate. In hot, dry
summer, soil respiration rates reach maxima in upper soil horizons
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks (Fig. 2). In wet and cold winter, soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
plummets, leading to much lower Ca and DIC concentrations. Based on
Reactions (0–4) (Table 1) and temperature dependence of equilibrium constants,
the following equations can be derived (detailed derivation in the Supplement) for
Ca and DIC concentrations in carbonate-dominated landscapes:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M608" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t,25</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">]</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.2}{9.2}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t,25</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">]</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>where</mml:mtext><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298.15</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are concentrations of Ca and DIC (mol/L); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is in units of atm;  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t,25</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total equilibrium constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the combined Reactions (1) and (4) at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the corresponding standard enthalpy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35.83 kJ/mol); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.98 kJ/mol)  are the equilibrium constant and standard
enthalpy of Reaction (1) (in Table 1); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas constant
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.314 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kJ/K/mol). Equations (2) and (3) imply that DIC and Ca
in upper soil water (0.2 m) are lower compared to groundwater (3.6 m) in the
base case at Konza, due to lower dissolved CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) at higher
temperature and higher diffusion rates in upper soil.</p>
      <p id="d1e8167">Equations (2) and (3) were tested with soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and spring water chemistry data from eight
carbonate-dominated catchments (Dandurand et al., 1982; Lopez-Chicano et
al., 2001; Moral et al., 2008; Ozkul et al., 2010; Kanduc et al., 2012;
Calmels et al., 2014; Abongwa and Atekwana, 2015; Huang et al., 2015) (also
see the Supplement for details). As shown in Fig. 7, spring water (representing
groundwater) DIC and Ca concentrations increase with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Equations (2)–(3)
can describe these data and DIC and Ca levels from numerical simulations
from this work (empty dots in Fig. 7). The lines of Eqs. (2)–(3) describe the
relationship at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the mean annual temperature, confirming the
thermodynamics control of carbonate dissolution by soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. The
equation lines closely predicted Ca and DIC under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and lower-pH
conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), because these conditions ensure the validity of
the assumption of negligible CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the derivation  of the equations. The presence
of cations and anions other than Ca and DIC can complicate the solution and
can bring significant variations of DIC and Ca concentrations under the same
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e8279">High temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) leads to lower DIC and Ca
concentrations by about 10 % due to the lower calcite and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
solubility at higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> also elevates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by enhancing soil
respiration. Various equations have been developed in literature to predict soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> based on
climate and ecosystem functioning indicators such as net primary production
(NPP) (Cerling, 1984; Goddéris et al., 2010; Romero-Mujalli et al.,
2019a). These equations can be used together with Eqs. (2–3) for the estimation
of Ca and DIC concentrations in carbonate-derived waters.
Gaillardet et al. (2019) showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can increase by 2
times with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increasing from 9 to 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, which can
elevate DIC and Ca concentrations over 50 %.
Macpherson et al. (2008) observed a 20 % increase in groundwater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Konza over a 15-year period and
suggested that increased soil respiration under warmer climate may have
elevated soil and groundwater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Zhi et al. (2020) showed that the stream concentrations of dissolved organic carbon, a product of soil respiration, tripled in warmer years as minimum average temperature approaches 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in a high elevation mountain. Hasenmueller et al. (2015) demonstrated topographic controls on soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca and DIC concentrations are an integrated
outcome of climate, soil respiration, subsurface structures, and
hydrological conditions.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page68?><sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Hydrological controls of root-enhanced carbonate weathering</title>
      <p id="d1e8460"><italic>Evidence from field data.</italic> Data in Konza show that although soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
peaks in summer, these peaks do not occur right away in deeper groundwater
until about 2 months later. Macpherson et al. (2008) and Tsypin and Macpherson (2012) contributed this lag time
to the water travel time from the soil to the groundwater aquifer. The calculation
of travel time based on depth difference in soil and groundwater sampling
location (214 cm) and average velocity (0.37 m/a) indicates that it will
take 7–8 months on average for water to reach deeper groundwater. The 2-month delay, much shorter than the estimated 7–8 months, suggests that
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-charged water may arrive at deeper zones via preferential flow facilitated by roots or other types of macropores such as large
conduits that are often observed in carbonate formations (Hartmann et al.,
2014; Husic et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e8490">The numerical experiments suggest that the root-relevant hydrology can play
an essential role in enhancing chemical weathering (Figs. 4 and 6). In
general, the hydrological enhancement of weathering rates also alludes to
the key connection between weathering and the transit (travel) time
distribution (McGuire and McDonnell, 2006; Sprenger et al., 2019). In
particular, water that routes through lateral paths is younger; water that
penetrates deeper is older. Figure 6 says that weathering rates increase
with increasing reactive water fraction, until reaching their maxima when
all water is in contact with reactive minerals. This aligns with
observations at Konza that woody-encroached watersheds exhibit higher Ca
fluxes in streams and supports the hypothesis that deeper roots can enhance
mineral–water interaction via deeper flow paths (Sullivan et al., 2019a).
Deepening roots can also enhance connectivity between shallow and deeper
zones, therefore reducing concentration contrasts between soil water and
groundwater. This can lead to more chemostatic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships as shown in
Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Fig. 4). These findings echo conclusions from Zhi et al. (2019) and Zhi and Li (2020) that chemistry differences in shallow
versus deeper waters regulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
relationships coming out of the 1-D modeling (Fig. 4) suggest that if flow
partitioning is the only difference between the grassland and woody
watersheds, a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship exhibiting dilution with negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values is
expected in the grassland. The Konza stream data in Sullivan et al. (2019a) however showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> slopes in grasslands (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in
woody-encroached lands (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.013</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are both close to zero (Figs. 7 and 8
in Sullivan et al., 2019a). The root influence on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship
therefore remains equivocal.</p>
      <p id="d1e8683"><italic>Limitations of the model.</italic> This discrepancy may suggest that catchment
features that are not represented in the simple 1-D model can influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
relationships. The model does not explicitly simulate how and to what degree
root distribution at depth alters flow pathways. Instead we focus on the
first-order principles of the hydrological ramification of roots. The numerical
experiments took general observations of rooting characteristics in
grasslands and woodlands and assumed that deepening roots in woodlands
promote higher flow partitioning into the deep subsurface (Canadell et al.,
1996; Nardini et al., 2016; Pawlik et al., 2016). In natural systems,
however, other factors can also influence flow partitioning. For example,
contrasts in flow-conducting properties (i.e., porosity and permeability) in
shallow and deep zones, physical and chemical heterogeneity in carbonate
distribution (Wen and Li, 2018; Salehikhoo and Li, 2015), connectivity between different
areas of the catchment in dry and wet times (Wen et al., 2020), and water
table and corresponding lateral flow depth associated with the rainfall
frequency and intensity (Li et al., 2017; Harman and Cosans, 2019). All
these factors may affect the water–calcite contact, leading to changes in
weathering rates (Fig. 6). In addition to the alterations of
hydrological flow paths, deepening roots may also affect the proportion of
plant water uptake or soil water loss through transpiration (Pierret et
al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2018), further modifying recharge into the deep
subsurface layers. For example, studies show that
woody species in semiarid places predominantly use deep subsurface water while grasses
predominantly use soil water from the upper soil layer (Ward et al.,
2013). Furthermore, shallower root distributions in grasslands may be more
efficient in using water from small rainfall events than forests with their
deeper root distributions (Mazzacavallo and Kulmatiski, 2015).
Other studies have also documented significant competition for water uptake
in upper soil layers among both woody and grass species (Scholes
and Archer, 1997). It remains inconclusive how these water uptake
characteristics are best represented in numerical experiments. These
processes are therefore not included at this point.</p>
      <p id="d1e8702">In addition, distributions of microbes and organic acids associated with
rooting structures vary with sites and seasons and root channels. Dry conditions may trigger calcite reprecipitation.
Microbial activities surrounding living and dead roots can also lead to
calcite precipitation and infilling of fractures and other macropores, as well as alter flow pathways (Lambers et al., 2009). Organic acids can
decrease soil water pH, increase mineral solubilities through organic–metal
complexations, and accelerate chemical weathering (Pittman and
Lewan, 2012; Lawrence et al., 2014). Their impacts on carbonate weathering
kinetics might be smaller (due to the fast kinetics) compared to their
alteration of calcite solubility in natural systems. Such processes further
complicate how to represent biogeochemical processes in models. Although we
do not explicitly simulate these competing processes, the model was constrained by the field data in
grasslands and woodland that have already integrated these effects in
natural systems. Indeed, the weathering rates can be understood as the net
weathering rates that are the net difference between dissolution and
reprecipitation. This is reflected in<?pagebreak page69?> lower carbonate weathering rates under
low infiltration (low flow) conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e8706"><italic>The need for root characterization.</italic> The data–model discrepancy
highlights the limitation of a simple model but also points to the need for
measurements. In fact, because carbonate weathering is transport limited and
depends largely on water flow via carbonate-rich zones, colocated
measurements of rooting characteristics, flow, and water chemistry at depth
are essential. Root measurements however rarely go deeper than 30 cm (Richter and Billings, 2015). Existing work exploring root
influence on weathering focused primarily on effects of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
root exudates (Drever, 1994; Lawrence et al., 2014; Gaillardet et al.,
2019). Although it is well known that roots play a paramount role in
modulating macropores and subsurface flow (Fan et al., 2017),
the interactions between root characteristics, flow partitioning, and
chemical weathering have remained poorly understood. Rooting characteristics
depend on climate, plant species, topography, soil properties, and geology
(Canadell et al., 1996; Mazvimavi et al., 2004; Price, 2011; Nardini et
al., 2016). Further studies are needed to characterize root distribution
beyond 30 cm, how they vary with intrinsic plant species and external
conditions, and how and to what extent they alter subsurface flow. The first
step could link rooting characteristics, including density and depth, to
soil properties and borrow insights from existing relationships between soil
properties and subsurface structure. For example, images of roots and pore
structures can be used to characterize the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of
fluxes (Renard and Allard, 2013). Geostatistical indices such as
permeability variance and correlation length can be used to quantify rooting
structure and relate to flow partitioning and mineral weathering via
numerical experiments (Wen and Li, 2017). The combination of
numerical reactive transport experiments built on realistic rooting
structure can help develop models for estimating the influence of
rooting dynamics on water and carbon cycles at the catchment scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Deepening roots enhance carbon fluxes into the deep subsurface: a potential
carbon sink?</title>
      <p id="d1e8728">Mounting evidence has shown that the terrestrial system has become a
stronger carbon sink in recent decades (Heimann and Reichstein, 2008),
potentially accounting for the missing carbon sink as large as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 Pg C/a in the global carbon budget (Houghton, 2007; Cole et al., 2007).
Although still much debated, recent studies have proposed the downward
transport of soil-respired CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC into groundwater aquifers in
deserts as a possible carbon sink in the global carbon cycle (Ma et al.,
2014; Li et al., 2015). Considering the longer residence time of DIC in
groundwater (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> years) than in the atmosphere
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> years; Archer and
Brovkin, 2008), groundwater may act as a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> storage sink. This work
indicated that deepening roots can potentially reroute DIC fluxes to deeper
groundwater storage. In particular, vegetation in dry places like deserts
often has deep roots (Gupta et al., 2020). In fact, plants are
known for growing deeper roots to tap groundwater during droughts
(Brunner et al., 2015). Deepening roots can enhance downward water
drainage (i.e., high vertical connectivity) to the depth and potentially
facilitate the transport of DIC fluxes into the deep subsurface. As the pace of
climate change accelerates, summer droughts are expected to intensify, which
can potentially channel more CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the deeper subsurface via
deepening roots.</p>
      <p id="d1e8809">With constraints from soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data, the simulated CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production
rates in Grass<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Wood<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are similarly at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 mol C/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/a under the infiltration rate of 0.37 m/a (Fig. S2). This is
at the low end of the belowground net production (NPP) estimations at the
Konza site (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0–30.0 mol C/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/a), assuming that
belowground NPP accounts for 50 % of the total NPP (Lett et
al., 2004; Knapp and Ojima, 2014). The simulations showed that in woodlands
the DIC downward fluxes can be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 times higher than those in
grasslands (Fig. 4). In other words, more soil-respired CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can
transport to groundwater and become stored there for centuries to millennia
before entering a stream. At the short timescale, this enhanced downward
transport will reduce CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> escape back into the atmosphere. This may
explain the observations at Konza that woody encroachment increased NPP;
however, soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux was significantly reduced compared to the open
grassland (Lett et al., 2004). Changing land cover (e.g., woody
encroachment and boreal forest creep) however is not the only mechanism for
a carbon sink (Stevens et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020). Older aged forests
also tend to have deepening roots and may act as the carbon sink
(Luyssaert et al., 2008), although this is not the case in
Konza.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e8925">This work aims to understand thermodynamic and hydrological control of
carbonate weathering driven by deepening roots. Field data and reactive
transport simulation for a grassland in the Konza Prairie LTER site suggest
that carbonate dissolution is thermodynamically controlled, and seasonal
changes in temperature and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drive variations of Ca and DIC
concentrations in soil water and groundwater. We derived equations based on
reaction thermodynamics (Eqs. 2–3) to estimate Ca and DIC as a function of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and temperature, which have been shown to be applicable in other
carbonate-dominated systems. The numerical experiments probed the potential
effects of deepening roots on weathering by channeling a higher proportion
of vertically downward flow (40 % of the total) into the deep subsurface with
abundant calcite. The results show that deeper penetration of roots and
higher vertical flow (recharge) enhanced CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–carbonate contact. At an
infiltration rate of 3.7 m/a, calcite weathering flux in woodlands was about 200 % higher than that in grasslands. At 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m/a, the
weathering flux in woodland was 17 % higher. The hydrological impacts<?pagebreak page70?> on
carbonate weathering were much higher than the biogeochemical
impacts via elevated soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> alone, underscoring the importance of rooting depth in weathering. The modeling demonstrates that weathering
rates depend on flow partitioning (the older water fraction that penetrates
deeper) and relative magnitude of water contact time in the deep carbonate
zone. At the century scale, with the higher proportion of vertical flow, the
deeper roots pushed the weathering fronts 2 times deeper and resulted in a
10-times greater increase in porosity and permeability. Broadly, this deeper
propagation of reaction fronts may accelerate rates of channel incision and
hillslope erosion (Lebedeva and Brantley, 2013; Brantley et al., 2017b)
and therefore speed up landscape evolution (Phillips, 2005).
It alludes to the importance of considering changes in subsurface
hydrological flows associated with shifts in vegetation types and
rooting characteristics. This is particularly relevant as we assess the
effects of climate change, land cover, and elevated atmosphere CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations on chemical weathering and carbon cycling.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e9011">All data used for model parameterization can be acquired from <uri>http://lter.konza.ksu.edu/data</uri> (last access: 22 November 2020, Macpherson, 2019). The input files necessary to reproduce the
results are available from the authors upon request by emailing lili@engr.psu.edu.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e9017">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-55-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-55-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e9026">HW, PS, and LL initiated the idea and designed the numerical
experiments. GLM and SB provided the field data. HW
ran the simulations, analyzed simulation results, and wrote the first draft
of the manuscript. All coauthors participated in editing the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e9032">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9038">We appreciate the assistance of the Konza Prairie
Biological Station and the field data provided by Misha Tsypin and Zachary Brecheisen.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e9043">This research has been supported by the National Science Foundation (grant nos. DEB-1440484, EAR–1331726, and EAR-1911960).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e9049">This paper was edited by Yakov Kuzyakov and reviewed by five anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abongwa, P. T. and Atekwana, E. A.: Controls on the chemical and isotopic
composition of carbonate springs during evolution to saturation with respect
to calcite, Chem. Geol., 404, 136–149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.024</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ahrens, B., Braakhekke, M. C., Guggenberger, G., Schrumpf, M., and
Reichstein, M.: Contribution of sorption, DOC transport and microbial
interactions to the 14C age of a soil organic carbon profile: Insights from
a calibrated process model, Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 390–402,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.008</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andrews, J. A. and Schlesinger, W. H.: Soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics, acidification,
and chemical weathering in a temperate forest with experimental CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
enrichment, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 149–162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gb001278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000gb001278</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Angers, D. A. and Caron, J.: Plant-induced changes in soil structure:
Processes and feedbacks, Biogeochemistry, 42, 55–72,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005944025343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1005944025343</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aragão, L. E. O. C., Malhi, Y., Metcalfe, D. B., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Jiménez, E., Navarrete, D., Almeida, S., Costa, A. C. L., Salinas, N., Phillips, O. L., Anderson, L. O., Alvarez, E., Baker, T. R., Goncalvez, P. H., Huamán-Ovalle, J., Mamani-Solórzano, M., Meir, P., Monteagudo, A., Patiño, S., Peñuela, M. C., Prieto, A., Quesada, C. A., Rozas-Dávila, A., Rudas, A., Silva Jr., J. A., and Vásquez, R.: Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils, Biogeosciences, 6, 2759–2778, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2759-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-2759-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Archer, D. and Brovkin, V.: The millennial atmospheric lifetime of
anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Clim. Change, 90, 283–297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9413-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-008-9413-1</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beerling, D. J., Chaloner, W. G., Woodward, F. I., and Berner, R. A.: The
carbon cycle and carbon dioxide over Phanerozoic time: the role of land
plants, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B, 353, 75–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.1998.0192</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bengtson, P. and Bengtsson, G.: Rapid turnover of DOC in temperate forests
accounts for increased CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production at elevated temperatures, Ecol.
Lett., 10, 783–790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01072.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01072.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Berner, E. K. and Berner, R. A.: Global environment: water, air, and
geochemical cycles, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berner, R. A.: Weathering, plants, and the long-term carbon cycle,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 56, 3225–3231,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(92)90300-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(92)90300-8</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berner, R. A.: Paleoclimate – The rise of plants and their effect on
weathering and atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Science, 276, 544–546,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5312.544" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.276.5312.544</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beven, K. and Germann, P.: Macropores and water flow in soils revisited,
Water Resour. Res., 49, 3071–3092, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wrcr.20156</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Billings, S. A., Hirmas, D., Sullivan, P. L., Lehmeier, C. A., Bagchi, S.,
Min, K., Brecheisen, Z., Hauser, E., Stair, R., Flournoy, R., and Richter,
D. D.: Loss of deep roots limits biogenic agents of soil development that
are only partially restored by decades of forest regeneration,
Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 34–53 , <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.287" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.287</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brantley, S. L., Eissenstat, D. M., Marshall, J. A., Godsey, S. E., Balogh-Brunstad, Z., Karwan, D. L., Papuga, S. A., Roering, J.<?pagebreak page71?>, Dawson, T. E., Evaristo, J., Chadwick, O., McDonnell, J. J., and Weathers, K. C.: Reviews and syntheses: on the roles trees play in building and plumbing the critical zone, Biogeosciences, 14, 5115–5142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5115-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-5115-2017</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brantley, S. L., Lebedeva, M. I., Balashov, V. N., Singha, K., Sullivan, P.
L., and Stinchcomb, G.: Toward a conceptual model relating chemical reaction
fronts to water flow paths in hills, Geomorphology, 277, 100–117,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.027</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Breecker, D. O., Sharp, Z. D., and McFadden, L. D.: Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations during ancient greenhouse climates were similar to those
predicted for AD 2100, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 576–580, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902323106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0902323106</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Brunner, I., Herzog, C., Dawes, M. A., Arend, M., and Sperisen, C.: How tree
roots respond to drought, Front. Plant Sci., 6, 547,
doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00547, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Calmels, D., Gaillardet, J., and Francois, L.: Sensitivity of carbonate
weathering to soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production by biological activity along a temperate
climate transect, Chem. Geol., 390, 74–86, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.10.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.10.010</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canadell, J., Jackson, R. B., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E.,
and Schulze, E. D.: Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global
scale, Oecologia, 108, 583–595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00329030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00329030</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carey, J. C., Tang, J. W., Templer, P. H., Kroeger, K. D., Crowther, T. W.,
Burton, A. J., Dukes, J. S., Emmett, B., Frey, S. D., Heskel, M. A., Jiang,
L., Machmuller, M. B., Mohan, J., Panetta, A. M., Reich, P. B., Reinsch, S.,
Wang, X., Allison, S. D., Bamminger, C., Bridgham, S., Collins, S. L., De
Dato, G., Eddy, W. C., Enquist, B. J., Estiarte, M., Harte, J., Henderson,
A., Johnson, B. R., Larsen, K. S., Luo, Y., Marhan, S., Melillo, J. M.,
Peuelas, J., Pfeifer-Meister, L., Poll, C., Rastetter, E., Reinmann, A. B.,
Reynolds, L. L., Schmidt, I. K., Shaver, G. R., Strong, A. L., Suseela, V.,
and Tietema, A.: Temperature response of soil respiration largely unaltered
with experimental warming, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13797–13802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160536511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.160536511</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cerling, T. E.: The stable isotopic composition of modern soil carbonate and
its relationship to climate, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 71, 229–240,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(84)90089-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821x(84)90089-x</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cheng, J. H., Zhang, H. J., Wang, W., Zhang, Y. Y., and Chen, Y. Z.: Changes
in Preferential Flow Path Distribution and Its Affecting Factors in
Southwest China, Soil Sci., 176, 652–660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31823554ef" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1097/SS.0b013e31823554ef</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J.,
Striegl, R. G., Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., Middelburg,
J. J., and Melack, J.: Plumbing the global carbon cycle: Integrating inland
waters into the terrestrial carbon budget, Ecosystems, 10, 171–184,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Costa, A.: Permeability relationship: A reexamination of the
Kozeny equation based on a fractal pore geometry assumption,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02318, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025134" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025134</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Covington, M. D., Gulley, J. D., and Gabrovsek, F.: Natural variations in
calcite dissolution rates in streams: Controls, implications, and open
questions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 2836–2843, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015gl063044</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dandurand, J. L., Gout, R., Hoefs, J., Menschel, G., Schott, J., and
Usdowski, E.: Kinetically controlled variations of major components and
carbon and oxygen isotopes in a calcite-precipitating spring, Chem. Geol., 36, 299–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(82)90053-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0009-2541(82)90053-5</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Deng, H., Voltolini, M., Molins, S., Steefel, C., DePaolo, D., Ajo-Franklin,
J., and Yang, L.: Alteration and Erosion of Rock Matrix Bordering a
Carbonate-Rich Shale Fracture, Environ. Sci. Tech., 51,
8861–8868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02063</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drever, J. I.: The effect of land plants on weathering rates of silicate
minerals, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 2325–2332,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90013-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(94)90013-2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eberbach, P. L.: The eco-hydrology of partly cleared, native ecosystems in
southern Australia: a review, Plant Soil, 257, 357–369,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027392703312" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1027392703312</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fan, Y., Miguez-Macho, G., Jobbagy, E. G., Jackson, R. B., and Otero-Casal,
C.: Hydrologic regulation of plant rooting depth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 10572–10577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712381114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1712381114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frank, D. A., Pontes, A. W., Maine, E. M., Caruana, J., Raina, R., Raina,
S., and Fridley, J. D.: Grassland root communities: species distributions
and how they are linked to aboveground abundance, Ecology, 91, 3201–3209,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1831.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/09-1831.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gaillardet, J., Calmels, D., Romero-Mujalli, G., Zakharova, E., and
Hartmann, J.: Global climate control on carbonate weathering intensity, Chem.
Geol., 527, 118762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.05.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.05.009</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gill, R. A., Kelly, R. H., Parton, W. J., Day, K. A., Jackson, R. B.,
Morgan, J. A., Scurlock, J. M. O., Tieszen, L. L., Castle, J. V., Ojima, D.
S., and Zhang, X. S.: Using simple environmental variables to estimate
below-ground productivity in grasslands, Global Ecol. Biogeogr.,
11, 79–86, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00267.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00267.x</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goddéris, Y., Williams, J. Z., Schott, J., Pollard, D., and Brantley, S.
L.: Time evolution of the mineralogical composition of Mississippi Valley
loess over the last 10 kyr: Climate and geochemical modeling, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 6357–6374, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.08.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2010.08.023</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gupta, A., Rico-Medina, A., and Cano-Delgado, A. I.: The physiology of plant
responses to drought, Science, 368, 266–269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7614" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aaz7614</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harman, C. J. and Cosans, C. L.: A low-dimensional model of bedrock
weathering and lateral flow coevolution in hillslopes: 2. Controls on
weathering and permeability profiles, drainage hydraulics, and solute export
pathways, Hydrol. Process., 33, 1168–1190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.13385</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harper, C. W., Blair, J. M., Fay, P. A., Knapp, A. K., and Carlisle, J. D.:
Increased rainfall variability and reduced rainfall amount decreases soil
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux in a grassland ecosystem, Global Change Biol., 11, 322–334,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00899.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00899.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hartmann, A., Goldscheider, N., Wagener, T., Lange, J., and Weiler, M.:
Karst water resources in a changing world: Review of hydrological modeling
approaches, Rev. Geophys., 52, 218–242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013RG000443</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page72?><ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hasenmueller, E. A., Jin, L. X., Stinchcomb, G. E., Lin, H., Brantley, S.
L., and Kaye, J. P.: Topographic controls on the depth distribution of soil
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in a small temperate watershed, Appl. Geochem., 63, 58–69,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.07.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hasenmueller, E. A., Gu, X., Weitzman, J. N., Adams, T. S., Stinchcomb, G.
E., Eissenstat, D. M., Drohan, P. J., Brantley, S. L., and Kaye, J. P.:
Weathering of rock to regolith: The activity of deep roots in bedrock
fractures, Geoderma, 300, 11–31, doi:/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.03.020,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hauser, E., Richter, D. D., Markewitz, D., Brecheisen, Z., and Billings, S.
A.: Persistent anthropogenic legacies structure depth dependence of
regenerating rooting systems and their functions, Biogeochemistry, 147,
259–275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-020-00641-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-020-00641-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heimann, M. and Reichstein, M.: Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and
climate feedbacks, Nature, 451, 289–292, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06591" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06591</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Houghton, R. A.: Balancing the global carbon budget, Annu. Rev. Earth
Pl. Sc., 35, 313–347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140057</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, F., Zhang, C. L., Xie, Y. C., Li, L., and Cao, J. H.: Inorganic
carbon flux and its source in the karst catchment of Maocun, Guilin, China,
Environ, Earth Sci, 74, 1079–1089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4478-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12665-015-4478-4</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Husic, A., Fox, J., Adams, E., Ford, W., Agouridis, C., Currens, J., and Backus, J.: Nitrate Pathways, Processes, and Timing in an Agricultural Karst System: Development and Application of a Numerical Model, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2079–2103, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E.,
and Schulze, E. D.: A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial
biomes, Oecologia, 108, 389–411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00333714" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00333714</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, H., Deng, Q., Zhou, G., Hui, D., Zhang, D., Liu, S., Chu, G., and Li, J.: Responses of soil respiration and its temperature/moisture sensitivity to precipitation in three subtropical forests in southern China, Biogeosciences, 10, 3963–3982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3963-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-3963-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jobbagy, E. G. and Jackson, R. B.: The vertical distribution of soil
organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation, Ecol.
Appl., 10, 423–436, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2641104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/2641104</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kanduc, T., Mori, N., Kocman, D., Stibilj, V., and Grassa, F.:
Hydrogeochemistry of Alpine springs from North Slovenia: Insights from
stable isotopes, Chem. Geol., 300, 40–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.01.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.01.012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirchner, J. W.: Aggregation in environmental systems – Part 1: Seasonal tracer cycles quantify young water fractions, but not mean transit times, in spatially heterogeneous catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 279–297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-279-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-279-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirchner, J. W.: Quantifying new water fractions and transit time distributions using ensemble hydrograph separation: theory and benchmark tests, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 303–349, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-303-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-23-303-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Knapp, A. and Ojima, D.: NPP Grassland: Konza Prairie, USA, 1984-1990, R1,
ORNL DAAC, https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/148, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kozeny, J.: Über kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden, Royal Academy of
Science, Vienna, 136, 271–306, 1927.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lambers, H., Mougel, C., Jaillard, B., and Hinsinger, P.: Plant-microbe-soil
interactions in the rhizosphere: an evolutionary perspective, Plant Soil, 321, 83–115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0042-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-009-0042-x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawrence, C., Harden, J., and Maher, K.: Modeling the influence of organic
acids on soil weathering, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 139, 487–507,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.003</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lebedeva, M. I. and Brantley, S. L.: Exploring geochemical controls on
weathering and erosion of convex hillslopes: beyond the empirical regolith
production function, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 38, 1793–1807,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3424" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3424</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lett, M. S., Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., and Blair, J. M.: Influence of
shrub encroachment on aboveground net primary productivity and carbon and
nitrogen pools in a mesic grassland, Can. J. Bot., 82, 1363–1370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/b04-088</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, L., Bao, C., Sullivan, P. L., Brantley, S., Shi, Y. N., and Duffy, C.:
Understanding watershed hydrogeochemistry: 2. Synchronized hydrological and
geochemical processes drive stream chemostatic behavior, Water Resour. Res.,
53, 2346–2367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016wr018935" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016wr018935</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Wang, Y. G., Houghton, R. A., and Tang, L. S.: Hidden carbon sink
beneath desert, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 5880–5887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl064222" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015gl064222</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, L.: Watershed reactive transport, in: Reviews in Mineralogy &amp; Geochemistry: Reactive transport in natural and engineered systems, edited by: Druhan, J. and Tournassat, C., Mineralogical Society of America, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2018.85.13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2138/rmg.2018.85.13</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, L., Sullivan, P. L., Benettin, P., Cirpka, O. A., Bishop, K., Brantley, S. L., Knapp, J. L. A., van Meerveld, I., Rinaldo, A., Seibert, J., Wen, H., and Kirchner, J. W.: Toward catchment hydro-biogeochemical theories, WIREs Water, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1495" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wat2.1495</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lopez-Chicano, M., Bouamama, M., Vallejos, A., and Pulido-Bosch, A.: Factors
which determine the hydrogeochemical behaviour of karstic springs. A case
study from the Betic Cordilleras, Spain, Appl. Geochem., 16, 1179–1192,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-2927(01)00012-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0883-2927(01)00012-9</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luyssaert, S., Schulze, E. D., Borner, A., Knohl, A., Hessenmoller, D., Law,
B. E., Ciais, P., and Grace, J.: Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks,
Nature, 455, 213–215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature07276</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, J., Liu, R., Tang, L.-S., Lan, Z.-D., and Li, Y.: A downward CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux seems to have nowhere to go, Biogeosciences, 11, 6251–6262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6251-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-6251-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Macpherson, G. L.: Hydrogeology of thin limestones: The Konza Prairie
Long-Term Ecological Research Site, Northeastern Kansas, J. Hydrol., 186,
191–228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03029-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03029-6</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Macpherson, G. L.: AGW01 Long-term measurement of groundwater physical and chemical properties from wells on watershed N04D at Konza Prairie, Environmental Data Initiative, available at:  <uri>http://lter.konza.ksu.edu/data</uri> (last access: 22 November 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Macpherson, G. L. and Sullivan, P. L.: Dust, impure calcite, and
phytoliths: Modeled alternative sources of chemical weathering solutes in
shallow groundwater, Chem. Geol., 527, 118871, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.007</ext-link>,
2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Macpherson, G. L. and Sullivan, P. L.: Watershed-scale chemical weathering in a merokarst terrain, northeastern Kansas, USA, Chem. Geol., 527, 118988,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.001</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page73?><ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Macpherson, G. L., Roberts, J. A., Blair, J. M., Townsend, M. A., Fowle, D.
A., and Beisner, K. R.: Increasing shallow groundwater CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and limestone
weathering, Konza Prairie, USA, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72,
5581–5599, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.004</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mazvimavi, D., Meijerink, A. M. J., and Stein, A.: Prediction of base flows
from basin characteristics: a case study from Zimbabwe, Hydrolog.
Sci. J., 49, 703–715,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.4.703.54428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1623/hysj.49.4.703.54428</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mazzacavallo, M. G. and Kulmatiski, A.: Modelling Water Uptake Provides a
New Perspective on Grass and Tree Coexistence, Plos One, 10, e0144300,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0144300</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McGuire, K. J. and McDonnell, J. J.: A review and evaluation of catchment
transit time modeling, J. Hydrol., 330, 543–563,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.020</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moral, F., Cruz-Sanjulian, J. J., and Olias, M.: Geochemical evolution of
groundwater in the carbonate aquifers of Sierra de Segura (Betic Cordillera,
southern Spain), J. Hydrol., 360, 281–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.012</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R.
D., and Veith, T. L.: Model evaluation guidelines for systematic
quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, T. Asabe, 50, 885–900, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13031/2013.23153</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mottershead, D. N., Baily, B., Collier, P., and Inkpen, R. J.:
Identification and quantification of weathering by plant roots, Build.
Environ., 38, 1235–1241, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00080-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00080-5</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nardini, A., Casolo, V., Dal Borgo, A., Savi, T., Stenni, B., Bertoncin, P.,
Zini, L., and McDowell, N. G.: Rooting depth, water relations and
non-structural carbohydrate dynamics in three woody angiosperms
differentially affected by an extreme summer drought, Plant Cell Environ., 39, 618–627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12646" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/pce.12646</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Neff, J. C. and Hooper, D. U.: Vegetation and climate controls on potential
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, DOC and DON production in northern latitude soils, Glob. Change Biol., 8, 872–884, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00517.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00517.x</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nepstad, D. C., Decarvalho, C. R., Davidson, E. A., Jipp, P. H., Lefebvre,
P. A., Negreiros, G. H., Dasilva, E. D., Stone, T. A., Trumbore, S. E., and
Vieira, S.: The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of
amazonian forests and pastures, Nature, 372, 666–669, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/372666a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/372666a0</ext-link>,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nippert, J. B., Wieme, R. A., Ocheltree, T. W., and Craine, J. M.: Root
characteristics of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> grasses limit reliance on deep soil water in
tallgrass prairie, Plant Soil, 355, 385–394, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1112-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-011-1112-4</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Noguchi, S., Tsuboyama, Y., Sidle, R. C., and Hosoda, I.: Spatially
distributed morphological characteristics of macropores in forest soils of
Hitachi Ohta Experimental Watershed, Japan, J. For. Res.-Jpn., 2,
207–215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02348317</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oades, J. M.: The role of biology in the formation, stabilization and
degradation of soil structure, Geoderma, 56, 377–400,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90123-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7061(93)90123-3</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ozkul, M., Gokgoz, A., and Horvatincic, N.: Depositional properties and
geochemistry of Holocene perched springline tufa deposits and associated
spring waters: a case study from the Denizli Province, Western Turkey, in:
Tufas and Speleothems: Unravelling the Microbial and Physical Controls,
edited by: Pedley, H. M. and Rogerson, M., Geological Society Special
Publication, London, UK, 245–262, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Palandri, J. L. and Kharaka, Y. K.: A compilation of rate parameters of
water-mineral interaction kinetics for application to geochemical modeling,
U. S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park CA, USA, 70 pp., 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Patrick, L., Cable, J., Potts, D., Ignace, D., Barron-Gafford, G., Griffith,
A., Alpert, H., Van Gestel, N., Robertson, T., Huxman, T. E., Zak, J., Loik,
M. E., and Tissue, D.: Effects of an increase in summer precipitation on
leaf, soil, and ecosystem fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O in a sotol grassland in Big Bend National Park, Texas, Oecologia, 151, 704–718,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0621-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00442-006-0621-y</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pawlik, L., Phillips, J. D., and Samonil, P.: Roots, rock, and regolith:
Biomechanical and biochemical weathering by trees and its impact on
hillslopes – A critical literature review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 159, 142–159,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pennell, K. D., Boyd, S. A., and Abriola, L. M.: Surface-area of soil
organic-matter reexamined, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 59,
1012–1018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040008x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040008x</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Phillips, J. D.: Weathering instability and landscape evolution,
Geomorphology, 67, 255–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.012</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pierret, A., Maeght, J. L., Clement, C., Montoroi, J. P., Hartmann, C., and
Gonkhamdee, S.: Understanding deep roots and their functions in ecosystems:
an advocacy for more unconventional research, Ann. Bot.-London, 118,
621–635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/aob/mcw130</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pittman, E. D. and Lewan, M. D.: Organic acids in geological processes,
Springer Science Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Plummer, L., Wigley, T., and Parkhurst, D.: The kinetics of calcite
dissolution in CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-water systems at 5 degrees to 60 degrees C and 0.0 to
1.0 atm CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Am, J, Sci,, 278, 179–216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.278.2.179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2475/ajs.278.2.179</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Price, K.: Effects of watershed topography, soils, land use, and climate on
baseflow hydrology in humid regions: A review, Prog. Phys.
Geog., 35, 465–492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311402714" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1177/0309133311402714</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Renard, P. and Allard, D.: Connectivity metrics for subsurface flow and
transport, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 168–196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.12.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.12.001</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Richter, D. D. and Billings, S. A.: `One physical system': Tansley's
ecosystem as Earth's critical zone, New Phytol., 206, 900–912,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13338" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.13338</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Romero-Mujalli, G., Hartmann, J., and Börker, J.: Temperature and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dependency of global carbonate weathering fluxes – Implications for future
carbonate weathering research, Chem. Geol., 527, 118874,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.010</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page74?><ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Romero-Mujalli, G., Hartmann, J., Börker, J., Gaillardet, J., and
Calmels, D.: Ecosystem controlled soil-rock pCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and carbonate
weathering – Constraints by temperature and soil water content, Chem. Geol.,
527, 118634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.030</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sadras, V. O.: Influence of size of rainfall events on water-driven
processes I. Water budget of wheat crops in south-eastern Australia, Aust.
J. Agric. Res., 54, 341–351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/ar02112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/ar02112</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Salehikhoo, F. and Li, L.: The role of magnesite spatial distribution patterns in determining dissolution rates: When do they matter?, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 155, 107–121, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scholes, R. J. and Archer, S. R.: Tree-grass interactions in savannas,
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 28, 517–544,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.517</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sprenger, M., Stumpp, C., Weiler, M., Aeschbach, W., Allen, S. T., Benettin,
P., Dubbert, M., Hartmann, A., Hrachowitz, M., Kirchner, J. W., McDonnell,
J. J., Orlowski, N., Penna, D., Pfahl, S., Rinderer, M., Rodriguez, N.,
Schmidt, M., and Werner, C.: The Demographics of Water: A Review of Water
Ages in the Critical Zone, Rev. Geophys., 57, 800–834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018rg000633" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018rg000633</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steefel, C. I., Appelo, C. A. J., Arora, B., Jacques, D., Kalbacher, T.,
Kolditz, O., Lagneau, V., Lichtner, P. C., Mayer, K. U., Meeussen, J. C. L.,
Molins, S., Moulton, D., Shao, H., Šimůnek, J., Spycher, N.,
Yabusaki, S. B., and Yeh, G. T.: Reactive transport codes for subsurface
environmental simulation, Computat. Geosci., 19, 445–478,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-014-9443-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10596-014-9443-x</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stevens, N., Lehmann, C. E. R., Murphy, B. P., and Durigan, G.: Savanna
woody encroachment is widespread across three continents, Glob. Change
Biol., 23, 235–244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13409" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.13409</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steward, D. R., Yang, X., Lauwo, S. Y., Staggenborg, S. A., Macpherson, G. L., and Welch, S. M.: From precipitation to groundwater baseflow in a native prairie ecosystem: a regional study of the Konza LTER in the Flint Hills of Kansas, USA, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3181–3194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3181-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-15-3181-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sullivan, P. L., Stops, M. W., Macpherson, G. L., Li, L., Hirmas, D. R., and
Dodds, W. K.: How landscape heterogeneity governs stream water
concentration-discharge behavior in carbonate terrains (Konza Prairie, USA),
Chem. Geol., 527, 118989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.002</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sullivan, P. L., Macpherson, G. L., Martin, J. B. and Price, R. M.: Evolution of carbonate and karst critical zones, Chem. Geol., 527, 119223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.06.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.06.023</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tsypin, M. and Macpherson, G. L.: The effect of precipitation events on
inorganic carbon in soil and shallow groundwater, Konza Prairie LTER Site,
NE Kansas, USA, Appl. Geochem., 27, 2356–2369,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.07.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.07.008</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vargas, R., Collins, S. L., Thomey, M. L., Johnson, J. E., Brown, R. F.,
Natvig, D. O., and Friggens, M. T.: Precipitation variability and fire
influence the temporal dynamics of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux in an arid grassland,
Glob. Change Biol., 18, 1401–1411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02628.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02628.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vero, S. E., Macpherson, G. L., Sullivan, P. L., Brookfield, A. E., Nippert, J. B., Kirk, M. F., Datta, S., and Kempton, P.: Developing a Conceptual Framework of Landscape and Hydrology on Tallgrass Prairie: A Critical Zone Approach, Vadose Zone Journal, 17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.03.0069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/vzj2017.03.0069</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vergani, C. and Graf, F.: Soil permeability, aggregate stability and root
growth: a pot experiment from a soil bioengineering perspective,
Ecohydrology, 9, 830–842, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1686" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/eco.1686</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Woodcock, C. E., Sonnentag, O., Keeling, R.
F., and Friedl, M. A.: Extensive land cover change across Arctic-Boreal
Northwestern North America from disturbance and climate forcing, Glob.
Change Biol., 26, 807–822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14804" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.14804</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ward, D., Wiegand, K., and Getzin, S.: Walter's two-layer hypothesis
revisited: back to the roots!, Oecologia, 172, 617–630,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2538-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00442-012-2538-y</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watson, K. W. and Luxmoore, R. J.: Estimating macroporosity in a forest
watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer, Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
J., 50, 578–582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007x</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weiler, M. and Naef, F.: An experimental tracer study of the role of
macropores in infiltration in grassland soils, Hydrol. Process., 17,
477–493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.1136</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wen, H. and Li, L.: An upscaled rate law for magnesite dissolution in
heterogeneous porous media, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 210, 289–305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.04.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2017.04.019</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wen, H. and Li, L.: An upscaled rate law for mineral dissolution in
heterogeneous media: The role of time and length scales, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 235, 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.04.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2018.04.024</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wen, H., Li, L., Crandall, D., and Hakala, A.: Where lower calcite abundance
creates more alteration: enhanced rock matrix diffusivity induced by
preferential dissolution, Energy Fuels, 30, 4197–4208,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02932" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02932</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wen, H., Perdrial, J., Abbott, B. W., Bernal, S., Dupas, R., Godsey, S. E., Harpold, A., Rizzo, D., Underwood, K., Adler, T., Sterle, G., and Li, L.: Temperature controls production but hydrology regulates export of dissolved organic carbon at the catchment scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 945–966, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-945-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-24-945-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>White, A. F. and Brantley, S. L.: The effect of time on the weathering of
silicate minerals: why do weathering rates differ in the laboratory and
field?, Chem. Geol., 202, 479–506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.03.001</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Winnick, M. J. and Maher, K.: Relationships between CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, thermodynamic
limits on silicate weathering, and the strength of the silicate weathering
feedback, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 485, 111–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.01.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2018.01.005</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wolery, T. J., Jackson, K. J., Bourcier, W. L., Bruton, C. J., Viani, B. E.,
Knauss, K. G., and Delany, J. M.: Current Status of the Eq3/6 Software
Package for Geochemical Modeling, Acs. Sym. Ser., 416, 104–116, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. T., Dijkstra, P., Koch, G. W., Penuelas, J., and Hungate, B. A.:
Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change:
a meta-analysis of experimental manipulation, Glob. Change Biol., 17,
927–942, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02302.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02302.x</ext-link>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. H., Niu, J. Z., Yu, X. X., Zhu, W. L., and Du, X. Q.: Effects of
fine root length density and root biomass on soil preferential flow in
forest ecosystems, For. Syst., 24, e012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015241-06048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5424/fs/2015241-06048</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhi, W., Li, L., Dong, W. M., Brown, W., Kaye, J., Steefel, C. I., and
Williams, K. H.: Distinct Source Water Chemistry Shapes Contrasting
Concentration – Discharge Patterns, Water Resour. Res., 55, 4233–4251,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr024257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018wr024257</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhi, W. and Li, L.: The Shallow and Deep Hypothesis: Subsurface Vertical
Chemical Contrasts Shape Nitrate Export Patterns from Different Land Uses,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 11915–11928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c01340</ext-link>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhi, W., Williams, K. H., Carroll, R. W. H., Brown, W., Dong, W., Kerins, D. and Li, L.: Significant stream chemistry response to temperature variations in a high-elevation mountain watershed, Communications Earth and Environment, 1, 43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00039-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-020-00039-w</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, X. H., Talley, M., and Luo, Y. Q.: Biomass, Litter, and Soil
Respiration Along a Precipitation Gradient in Southern Great Plains, USA,
Ecosystems, 12, 1369–1380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9296-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-009-9296-7</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, H., Zhang, L. M., and Garg, A.: Investigating plant
transpiration-induced soil suction affected by root morphology and root
depth, Comput. Geotech., 103, 26–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.06.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.06.019</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Deepening roots can enhance carbonate weathering by amplifying CO<sub>2</sub>-rich recharge</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Carbonate weathering is essential in regulating atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub> and carbon cycle at the century timescale. Plant roots accelerate
weathering by elevating soil CO<sub>2</sub> via respiration. It however remains
poorly understood how and how much rooting characteristics (e.g., depth and
density distribution) modify flow paths and weathering. We address this
knowledge gap using field data from and reactive transport numerical
experiments at the Konza Prairie Biological Station (Konza), Kansas (USA), a
site where woody encroachment into grasslands is surmised to deepen roots.</p><p>Results indicate that deepening roots can enhance weathering in two ways.
First, deepening roots can control thermodynamic limits of carbonate
dissolution by regulating how much CO<sub>2</sub> transports vertical downward to
the deeper carbonate-rich zone. The base-case data and model from Konza
reveal that concentrations of Ca and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) are
regulated by soil <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> driven by the seasonal soil respiration. This
relationship can be encapsulated in equations derived in this work
describing the dependence of Ca and DIC on temperature and soil CO<sub>2</sub>. The relationship can explain spring water Ca and DIC concentrations from  multiple carbonate-dominated catchments. Second, numerical
experiments show that roots control weathering rates by regulating recharge
(or vertical water fluxes) into the deeper carbonate zone and export
reaction products at dissolution equilibrium. The numerical experiments
explored the potential effects of partitioning 40&thinsp;% of infiltrated water
to depth in woodlands compared to 5&thinsp;% in grasslands. Soil CO<sub>2</sub> data
suggest relatively similar soil CO<sub>2</sub>
distribution over depth, which in woodlands and grasslands leads only to 1&thinsp;% to
 ∼ &thinsp;12&thinsp;% difference in
weathering rates if flow partitioning was kept the same between the two land
covers. In contrast, deepening roots can enhance weathering by  ∼ &thinsp;17&thinsp;% to
200&thinsp;% as infiltration rates increased from 3.7&thinsp; × &thinsp;10<sup>−2</sup> to 3.7&thinsp;m/a. Weathering rates in these cases however are more than an order of magnitude higher than a case without roots at
all, underscoring the essential role of roots in general. Numerical
experiments also indicate that weathering fronts in woodlands propagated
 &gt; &thinsp;2 times deeper compared to grasslands after 300 years at an
infiltration rate of 0.37&thinsp;m/a. These differences in weathering fronts are
ultimately caused by the differences in the contact times of CO<sub>2</sub>-charged water with carbonate in the deep subsurface. Within the limitation of modeling exercises, these data and numerical experiments prompt the hypothesis that (1) deepening roots in woodlands can enhance carbonate weathering by promoting
recharge and CO<sub>2</sub>–carbonate contact in the deep
subsurface and (2) the hydrological impacts of rooting characteristics can
be more influential than those of soil CO<sub>2</sub> distribution in modulating
weathering rates. We call for colocated characterizations of roots,
subsurface structure, and soil CO<sub>2</sub> levels, as well as their linkage to water
and water chemistry. These measurements will be essential to illuminate
feedback mechanisms of land cover changes, chemical weathering, global
carbon cycle, and climate.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abongwa, P. T. and Atekwana, E. A.: Controls on the chemical and isotopic
composition of carbonate springs during evolution to saturation with respect
to calcite, Chem. Geol., 404, 136–149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.024</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ahrens, B., Braakhekke, M. C., Guggenberger, G., Schrumpf, M., and
Reichstein, M.: Contribution of sorption, DOC transport and microbial
interactions to the 14C age of a soil organic carbon profile: Insights from
a calibrated process model, Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 390–402,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.008</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, J. A. and Schlesinger, W. H.: Soil CO<sub>2</sub> dynamics, acidification,
and chemical weathering in a temperate forest with experimental CO<sub>2</sub>
enrichment, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 149–162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gb001278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gb001278</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Angers, D. A. and Caron, J.: Plant-induced changes in soil structure:
Processes and feedbacks, Biogeochemistry, 42, 55–72,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005944025343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005944025343</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Aragão, L. E. O. C., Malhi, Y., Metcalfe, D. B., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Jiménez, E., Navarrete, D., Almeida, S., Costa, A. C. L., Salinas, N., Phillips, O. L., Anderson, L. O., Alvarez, E., Baker, T. R., Goncalvez, P. H., Huamán-Ovalle, J., Mamani-Solórzano, M., Meir, P., Monteagudo, A., Patiño, S., Peñuela, M. C., Prieto, A., Quesada, C. A., Rozas-Dávila, A., Rudas, A., Silva Jr., J. A., and Vásquez, R.: Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils, Biogeosciences, 6, 2759–2778, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2759-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2759-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D. and Brovkin, V.: The millennial atmospheric lifetime of
anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub>, Clim. Change, 90, 283–297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9413-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9413-1</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Beerling, D. J., Chaloner, W. G., Woodward, F. I., and Berner, R. A.: The
carbon cycle and carbon dioxide over Phanerozoic time: the role of land
plants, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B, 353, 75–82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0192</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bengtson, P. and Bengtsson, G.: Rapid turnover of DOC in temperate forests
accounts for increased CO<sub>2</sub> production at elevated temperatures, Ecol.
Lett., 10, 783–790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01072.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01072.x</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Berner, E. K. and Berner, R. A.: Global environment: water, air, and
geochemical cycles, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Berner, R. A.: Weathering, plants, and the long-term carbon cycle,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 56, 3225–3231,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(92)90300-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(92)90300-8</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Berner, R. A.: Paleoclimate – The rise of plants and their effect on
weathering and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Science, 276, 544–546,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5312.544" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5312.544</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Beven, K. and Germann, P.: Macropores and water flow in soils revisited,
Water Resour. Res., 49, 3071–3092, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20156</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Billings, S. A., Hirmas, D., Sullivan, P. L., Lehmeier, C. A., Bagchi, S.,
Min, K., Brecheisen, Z., Hauser, E., Stair, R., Flournoy, R., and Richter,
D. D.: Loss of deep roots limits biogenic agents of soil development that
are only partially restored by decades of forest regeneration,
Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 34–53 , <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.287" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.287</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Brantley, S. L., Eissenstat, D. M., Marshall, J. A., Godsey, S. E., Balogh-Brunstad, Z., Karwan, D. L., Papuga, S. A., Roering, J., Dawson, T. E., Evaristo, J., Chadwick, O., McDonnell, J. J., and Weathers, K. C.: Reviews and syntheses: on the roles trees play in building and plumbing the critical zone, Biogeosciences, 14, 5115–5142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5115-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5115-2017</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Brantley, S. L., Lebedeva, M. I., Balashov, V. N., Singha, K., Sullivan, P.
L., and Stinchcomb, G.: Toward a conceptual model relating chemical reaction
fronts to water flow paths in hills, Geomorphology, 277, 100–117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.027</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Breecker, D. O., Sharp, Z. D., and McFadden, L. D.: Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>
concentrations during ancient greenhouse climates were similar to those
predicted for AD 2100, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 576–580, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902323106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902323106</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Brunner, I., Herzog, C., Dawes, M. A., Arend, M., and Sperisen, C.: How tree
roots respond to drought, Front. Plant Sci., 6, 547,
doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00547, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Calmels, D., Gaillardet, J., and Francois, L.: Sensitivity of carbonate
weathering to soil CO<sub>2</sub> production by biological activity along a temperate
climate transect, Chem. Geol., 390, 74–86, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.10.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.10.010</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Canadell, J., Jackson, R. B., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E.,
and Schulze, E. D.: Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global
scale, Oecologia, 108, 583–595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00329030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00329030</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Carey, J. C., Tang, J. W., Templer, P. H., Kroeger, K. D., Crowther, T. W.,
Burton, A. J., Dukes, J. S., Emmett, B., Frey, S. D., Heskel, M. A., Jiang,
L., Machmuller, M. B., Mohan, J., Panetta, A. M., Reich, P. B., Reinsch, S.,
Wang, X., Allison, S. D., Bamminger, C., Bridgham, S., Collins, S. L., De
Dato, G., Eddy, W. C., Enquist, B. J., Estiarte, M., Harte, J., Henderson,
A., Johnson, B. R., Larsen, K. S., Luo, Y., Marhan, S., Melillo, J. M.,
Peuelas, J., Pfeifer-Meister, L., Poll, C., Rastetter, E., Reinmann, A. B.,
Reynolds, L. L., Schmidt, I. K., Shaver, G. R., Strong, A. L., Suseela, V.,
and Tietema, A.: Temperature response of soil respiration largely unaltered
with experimental warming, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13797–13802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160536511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160536511</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Cerling, T. E.: The stable isotopic composition of modern soil carbonate and
its relationship to climate, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 71, 229–240,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(84)90089-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(84)90089-x</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, J. H., Zhang, H. J., Wang, W., Zhang, Y. Y., and Chen, Y. Z.: Changes
in Preferential Flow Path Distribution and Its Affecting Factors in
Southwest China, Soil Sci., 176, 652–660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31823554ef" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31823554ef</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J.,
Striegl, R. G., Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., Middelburg,
J. J., and Melack, J.: Plumbing the global carbon cycle: Integrating inland
waters into the terrestrial carbon budget, Ecosystems, 10, 171–184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Costa, A.: Permeability relationship: A reexamination of the
Kozeny equation based on a fractal pore geometry assumption,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02318, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025134" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025134</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Covington, M. D., Gulley, J. D., and Gabrovsek, F.: Natural variations in
calcite dissolution rates in streams: Controls, implications, and open
questions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 2836–2843, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063044</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Dandurand, J. L., Gout, R., Hoefs, J., Menschel, G., Schott, J., and
Usdowski, E.: Kinetically controlled variations of major components and
carbon and oxygen isotopes in a calcite-precipitating spring, Chem. Geol., 36, 299–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(82)90053-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(82)90053-5</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Deng, H., Voltolini, M., Molins, S., Steefel, C., DePaolo, D., Ajo-Franklin,
J., and Yang, L.: Alteration and Erosion of Rock Matrix Bordering a
Carbonate-Rich Shale Fracture, Environ. Sci. Tech., 51,
8861–8868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02063</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Drever, J. I.: The effect of land plants on weathering rates of silicate
minerals, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 2325–2332,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90013-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90013-2</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Eberbach, P. L.: The eco-hydrology of partly cleared, native ecosystems in
southern Australia: a review, Plant Soil, 257, 357–369,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027392703312" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027392703312</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, Y., Miguez-Macho, G., Jobbagy, E. G., Jackson, R. B., and Otero-Casal,
C.: Hydrologic regulation of plant rooting depth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 10572–10577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712381114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712381114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Frank, D. A., Pontes, A. W., Maine, E. M., Caruana, J., Raina, R., Raina,
S., and Fridley, J. D.: Grassland root communities: species distributions
and how they are linked to aboveground abundance, Ecology, 91, 3201–3209,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1831.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1831.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gaillardet, J., Calmels, D., Romero-Mujalli, G., Zakharova, E., and
Hartmann, J.: Global climate control on carbonate weathering intensity, Chem.
Geol., 527, 118762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.05.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.05.009</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Gill, R. A., Kelly, R. H., Parton, W. J., Day, K. A., Jackson, R. B.,
Morgan, J. A., Scurlock, J. M. O., Tieszen, L. L., Castle, J. V., Ojima, D.
S., and Zhang, X. S.: Using simple environmental variables to estimate
below-ground productivity in grasslands, Global Ecol. Biogeogr.,
11, 79–86, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00267.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00267.x</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Goddéris, Y., Williams, J. Z., Schott, J., Pollard, D., and Brantley, S.
L.: Time evolution of the mineralogical composition of Mississippi Valley
loess over the last 10 kyr: Climate and geochemical modeling, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 6357–6374, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.08.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.08.023</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Gupta, A., Rico-Medina, A., and Cano-Delgado, A. I.: The physiology of plant
responses to drought, Science, 368, 266–269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7614" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7614</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Harman, C. J. and Cosans, C. L.: A low-dimensional model of bedrock
weathering and lateral flow coevolution in hillslopes: 2. Controls on
weathering and permeability profiles, drainage hydraulics, and solute export
pathways, Hydrol. Process., 33, 1168–1190, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13385</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Harper, C. W., Blair, J. M., Fay, P. A., Knapp, A. K., and Carlisle, J. D.:
Increased rainfall variability and reduced rainfall amount decreases soil
CO<sub>2</sub> flux in a grassland ecosystem, Global Change Biol., 11, 322–334,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00899.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00899.x</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Hartmann, A., Goldscheider, N., Wagener, T., Lange, J., and Weiler, M.:
Karst water resources in a changing world: Review of hydrological modeling
approaches, Rev. Geophys., 52, 218–242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000443" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000443</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Hasenmueller, E. A., Jin, L. X., Stinchcomb, G. E., Lin, H., Brantley, S.
L., and Kaye, J. P.: Topographic controls on the depth distribution of soil
CO<sub>2</sub> in a small temperate watershed, Appl. Geochem., 63, 58–69,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.07.005</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Hasenmueller, E. A., Gu, X., Weitzman, J. N., Adams, T. S., Stinchcomb, G.
E., Eissenstat, D. M., Drohan, P. J., Brantley, S. L., and Kaye, J. P.:
Weathering of rock to regolith: The activity of deep roots in bedrock
fractures, Geoderma, 300, 11–31, doi:/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.03.020,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Hauser, E., Richter, D. D., Markewitz, D., Brecheisen, Z., and Billings, S.
A.: Persistent anthropogenic legacies structure depth dependence of
regenerating rooting systems and their functions, Biogeochemistry, 147,
259–275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-020-00641-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-020-00641-2</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Heimann, M. and Reichstein, M.: Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and
climate feedbacks, Nature, 451, 289–292, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06591" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06591</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Houghton, R. A.: Balancing the global carbon budget, Annu. Rev. Earth
Pl. Sc., 35, 313–347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140057</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, F., Zhang, C. L., Xie, Y. C., Li, L., and Cao, J. H.: Inorganic
carbon flux and its source in the karst catchment of Maocun, Guilin, China,
Environ, Earth Sci, 74, 1079–1089, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4478-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4478-4</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Husic, A., Fox, J., Adams, E., Ford, W., Agouridis, C., Currens, J., and Backus, J.: Nitrate Pathways, Processes, and Timing in an Agricultural Karst System: Development and Application of a Numerical Model, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2079–2103, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E.,
and Schulze, E. D.: A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial
biomes, Oecologia, 108, 389–411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00333714" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00333714</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, H., Deng, Q., Zhou, G., Hui, D., Zhang, D., Liu, S., Chu, G., and Li, J.: Responses of soil respiration and its temperature/moisture sensitivity to precipitation in three subtropical forests in southern China, Biogeosciences, 10, 3963–3982, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3963-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3963-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Jobbagy, E. G. and Jackson, R. B.: The vertical distribution of soil
organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation, Ecol.
Appl., 10, 423–436, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2641104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/2641104</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Kanduc, T., Mori, N., Kocman, D., Stibilj, V., and Grassa, F.:
Hydrogeochemistry of Alpine springs from North Slovenia: Insights from
stable isotopes, Chem. Geol., 300, 40–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.01.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.01.012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchner, J. W.: Aggregation in environmental systems – Part 1: Seasonal tracer cycles quantify young water fractions, but not mean transit times, in spatially heterogeneous catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 279–297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-279-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-279-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchner, J. W.: Quantifying new water fractions and transit time distributions using ensemble hydrograph separation: theory and benchmark tests, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 303–349, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-303-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-303-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Knapp, A. and Ojima, D.: NPP Grassland: Konza Prairie, USA, 1984-1990, R1,
ORNL DAAC, https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/148, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Kozeny, J.: Über kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden, Royal Academy of
Science, Vienna, 136, 271–306, 1927.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Lambers, H., Mougel, C., Jaillard, B., and Hinsinger, P.: Plant-microbe-soil
interactions in the rhizosphere: an evolutionary perspective, Plant Soil, 321, 83–115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0042-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0042-x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, C., Harden, J., and Maher, K.: Modeling the influence of organic
acids on soil weathering, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 139, 487–507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.003</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Lebedeva, M. I. and Brantley, S. L.: Exploring geochemical controls on
weathering and erosion of convex hillslopes: beyond the empirical regolith
production function, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 38, 1793–1807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3424" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3424</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Lett, M. S., Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., and Blair, J. M.: Influence of
shrub encroachment on aboveground net primary productivity and carbon and
nitrogen pools in a mesic grassland, Can. J. Bot., 82, 1363–1370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-088" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-088</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Li, L., Bao, C., Sullivan, P. L., Brantley, S., Shi, Y. N., and Duffy, C.:
Understanding watershed hydrogeochemistry: 2. Synchronized hydrological and
geochemical processes drive stream chemostatic behavior, Water Resour. Res.,
53, 2346–2367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016wr018935" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016wr018935</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Wang, Y. G., Houghton, R. A., and Tang, L. S.: Hidden carbon sink
beneath desert, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 5880–5887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl064222" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl064222</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Li, L.: Watershed reactive transport, in: Reviews in Mineralogy &amp; Geochemistry: Reactive transport in natural and engineered systems, edited by: Druhan, J. and Tournassat, C., Mineralogical Society of America, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2018.85.13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2018.85.13</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Li, L., Sullivan, P. L., Benettin, P., Cirpka, O. A., Bishop, K., Brantley, S. L., Knapp, J. L. A., van Meerveld, I., Rinaldo, A., Seibert, J., Wen, H., and Kirchner, J. W.: Toward catchment hydro-biogeochemical theories, WIREs Water, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1495" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1495</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Lopez-Chicano, M., Bouamama, M., Vallejos, A., and Pulido-Bosch, A.: Factors
which determine the hydrogeochemical behaviour of karstic springs. A case
study from the Betic Cordilleras, Spain, Appl. Geochem., 16, 1179–1192,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-2927(01)00012-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-2927(01)00012-9</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Luyssaert, S., Schulze, E. D., Borner, A., Knohl, A., Hessenmoller, D., Law,
B. E., Ciais, P., and Grace, J.: Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks,
Nature, 455, 213–215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07276</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J., Liu, R., Tang, L.-S., Lan, Z.-D., and Li, Y.: A downward CO<sub>2</sub> flux seems to have nowhere to go, Biogeosciences, 11, 6251–6262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6251-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6251-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Macpherson, G. L.: Hydrogeology of thin limestones: The Konza Prairie
Long-Term Ecological Research Site, Northeastern Kansas, J. Hydrol., 186,
191–228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03029-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03029-6</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Macpherson, G. L.: AGW01 Long-term measurement of groundwater physical and chemical properties from wells on watershed N04D at Konza Prairie, Environmental Data Initiative, available at:  <a href="http://lter.konza.ksu.edu/data" target="_blank"/> (last access: 22 November 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Macpherson, G. L. and Sullivan, P. L.: Dust, impure calcite, and
phytoliths: Modeled alternative sources of chemical weathering solutes in
shallow groundwater, Chem. Geol., 527, 118871, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.007</a>,
2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Macpherson, G. L. and Sullivan, P. L.: Watershed-scale chemical weathering in a merokarst terrain, northeastern Kansas, USA, Chem. Geol., 527, 118988,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.001</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Macpherson, G. L., Roberts, J. A., Blair, J. M., Townsend, M. A., Fowle, D.
A., and Beisner, K. R.: Increasing shallow groundwater CO<sub>2</sub> and limestone
weathering, Konza Prairie, USA, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72,
5581–5599, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.004</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Mazvimavi, D., Meijerink, A. M. J., and Stein, A.: Prediction of base flows
from basin characteristics: a case study from Zimbabwe, Hydrolog.
Sci. J., 49, 703–715,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.4.703.54428" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.4.703.54428</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Mazzacavallo, M. G. and Kulmatiski, A.: Modelling Water Uptake Provides a
New Perspective on Grass and Tree Coexistence, Plos One, 10, e0144300,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144300" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144300</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
McGuire, K. J. and McDonnell, J. J.: A review and evaluation of catchment
transit time modeling, J. Hydrol., 330, 543–563,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.020</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Moral, F., Cruz-Sanjulian, J. J., and Olias, M.: Geochemical evolution of
groundwater in the carbonate aquifers of Sierra de Segura (Betic Cordillera,
southern Spain), J. Hydrol., 360, 281–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.012</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R.
D., and Veith, T. L.: Model evaluation guidelines for systematic
quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, T. Asabe, 50, 885–900, <a href="https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Mottershead, D. N., Baily, B., Collier, P., and Inkpen, R. J.:
Identification and quantification of weathering by plant roots, Build.
Environ., 38, 1235–1241, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00080-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00080-5</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Nardini, A., Casolo, V., Dal Borgo, A., Savi, T., Stenni, B., Bertoncin, P.,
Zini, L., and McDowell, N. G.: Rooting depth, water relations and
non-structural carbohydrate dynamics in three woody angiosperms
differentially affected by an extreme summer drought, Plant Cell Environ., 39, 618–627, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12646" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12646</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Neff, J. C. and Hooper, D. U.: Vegetation and climate controls on potential
CO<sub>2</sub>, DOC and DON production in northern latitude soils, Glob. Change Biol., 8, 872–884, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00517.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00517.x</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Nepstad, D. C., Decarvalho, C. R., Davidson, E. A., Jipp, P. H., Lefebvre,
P. A., Negreiros, G. H., Dasilva, E. D., Stone, T. A., Trumbore, S. E., and
Vieira, S.: The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of
amazonian forests and pastures, Nature, 372, 666–669, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/372666a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/372666a0</a>,
1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Nippert, J. B., Wieme, R. A., Ocheltree, T. W., and Craine, J. M.: Root
characteristics of C<sub>4</sub> grasses limit reliance on deep soil water in
tallgrass prairie, Plant Soil, 355, 385–394, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1112-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1112-4</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Noguchi, S., Tsuboyama, Y., Sidle, R. C., and Hosoda, I.: Spatially
distributed morphological characteristics of macropores in forest soils of
Hitachi Ohta Experimental Watershed, Japan, J. For. Res.-Jpn., 2,
207–215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348317" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348317</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Oades, J. M.: The role of biology in the formation, stabilization and
degradation of soil structure, Geoderma, 56, 377–400,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90123-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90123-3</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Ozkul, M., Gokgoz, A., and Horvatincic, N.: Depositional properties and
geochemistry of Holocene perched springline tufa deposits and associated
spring waters: a case study from the Denizli Province, Western Turkey, in:
Tufas and Speleothems: Unravelling the Microbial and Physical Controls,
edited by: Pedley, H. M. and Rogerson, M., Geological Society Special
Publication, London, UK, 245–262, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Palandri, J. L. and Kharaka, Y. K.: A compilation of rate parameters of
water-mineral interaction kinetics for application to geochemical modeling,
U. S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park CA, USA, 70 pp., 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Patrick, L., Cable, J., Potts, D., Ignace, D., Barron-Gafford, G., Griffith,
A., Alpert, H., Van Gestel, N., Robertson, T., Huxman, T. E., Zak, J., Loik,
M. E., and Tissue, D.: Effects of an increase in summer precipitation on
leaf, soil, and ecosystem fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O in a sotol grassland in Big Bend National Park, Texas, Oecologia, 151, 704–718,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0621-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0621-y</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Pawlik, L., Phillips, J. D., and Samonil, P.: Roots, rock, and regolith:
Biomechanical and biochemical weathering by trees and its impact on
hillslopes – A critical literature review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 159, 142–159,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.002</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Pennell, K. D., Boyd, S. A., and Abriola, L. M.: Surface-area of soil
organic-matter reexamined, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 59,
1012–1018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040008x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040008x</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, J. D.: Weathering instability and landscape evolution,
Geomorphology, 67, 255–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.012</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Pierret, A., Maeght, J. L., Clement, C., Montoroi, J. P., Hartmann, C., and
Gonkhamdee, S.: Understanding deep roots and their functions in ecosystems:
an advocacy for more unconventional research, Ann. Bot.-London, 118,
621–635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw130" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw130</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Pittman, E. D. and Lewan, M. D.: Organic acids in geological processes,
Springer Science Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Plummer, L., Wigley, T., and Parkhurst, D.: The kinetics of calcite
dissolution in CO<sub>2</sub>-water systems at 5 degrees to 60 degrees C and 0.0 to
1.0 atm CO<sub>2</sub>, Am, J, Sci,, 278, 179–216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.278.2.179" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.278.2.179</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Price, K.: Effects of watershed topography, soils, land use, and climate on
baseflow hydrology in humid regions: A review, Prog. Phys.
Geog., 35, 465–492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311402714" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311402714</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Renard, P. and Allard, D.: Connectivity metrics for subsurface flow and
transport, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 168–196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.12.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.12.001</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Richter, D. D. and Billings, S. A.: `One physical system': Tansley's
ecosystem as Earth's critical zone, New Phytol., 206, 900–912,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13338" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13338</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Romero-Mujalli, G., Hartmann, J., and Börker, J.: Temperature and CO<sub>2</sub>
dependency of global carbonate weathering fluxes – Implications for future
carbonate weathering research, Chem. Geol., 527, 118874,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.010</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Romero-Mujalli, G., Hartmann, J., Börker, J., Gaillardet, J., and
Calmels, D.: Ecosystem controlled soil-rock pCO<sub>2</sub> and carbonate
weathering – Constraints by temperature and soil water content, Chem. Geol.,
527, 118634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.030</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Sadras, V. O.: Influence of size of rainfall events on water-driven
processes I. Water budget of wheat crops in south-eastern Australia, Aust.
J. Agric. Res., 54, 341–351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/ar02112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/ar02112</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Salehikhoo, F. and Li, L.: The role of magnesite spatial distribution patterns in determining dissolution rates: When do they matter?, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 155, 107–121, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Scholes, R. J. and Archer, S. R.: Tree-grass interactions in savannas,
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 28, 517–544,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.517" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.517</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Sprenger, M., Stumpp, C., Weiler, M., Aeschbach, W., Allen, S. T., Benettin,
P., Dubbert, M., Hartmann, A., Hrachowitz, M., Kirchner, J. W., McDonnell,
J. J., Orlowski, N., Penna, D., Pfahl, S., Rinderer, M., Rodriguez, N.,
Schmidt, M., and Werner, C.: The Demographics of Water: A Review of Water
Ages in the Critical Zone, Rev. Geophys., 57, 800–834, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018rg000633" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018rg000633</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Steefel, C. I., Appelo, C. A. J., Arora, B., Jacques, D., Kalbacher, T.,
Kolditz, O., Lagneau, V., Lichtner, P. C., Mayer, K. U., Meeussen, J. C. L.,
Molins, S., Moulton, D., Shao, H., Šimůnek, J., Spycher, N.,
Yabusaki, S. B., and Yeh, G. T.: Reactive transport codes for subsurface
environmental simulation, Computat. Geosci., 19, 445–478,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-014-9443-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-014-9443-x</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Stevens, N., Lehmann, C. E. R., Murphy, B. P., and Durigan, G.: Savanna
woody encroachment is widespread across three continents, Glob. Change
Biol., 23, 235–244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13409" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13409</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Steward, D. R., Yang, X., Lauwo, S. Y., Staggenborg, S. A., Macpherson, G. L., and Welch, S. M.: From precipitation to groundwater baseflow in a native prairie ecosystem: a regional study of the Konza LTER in the Flint Hills of Kansas, USA, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3181–3194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3181-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3181-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, P. L., Stops, M. W., Macpherson, G. L., Li, L., Hirmas, D. R., and
Dodds, W. K.: How landscape heterogeneity governs stream water
concentration-discharge behavior in carbonate terrains (Konza Prairie, USA),
Chem. Geol., 527, 118989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.12.002</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, P. L., Macpherson, G. L., Martin, J. B. and Price, R. M.: Evolution of carbonate and karst critical zones, Chem. Geol., 527, 119223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.06.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.06.023</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Tsypin, M. and Macpherson, G. L.: The effect of precipitation events on
inorganic carbon in soil and shallow groundwater, Konza Prairie LTER Site,
NE Kansas, USA, Appl. Geochem., 27, 2356–2369,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.07.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.07.008</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Vargas, R., Collins, S. L., Thomey, M. L., Johnson, J. E., Brown, R. F.,
Natvig, D. O., and Friggens, M. T.: Precipitation variability and fire
influence the temporal dynamics of soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux in an arid grassland,
Glob. Change Biol., 18, 1401–1411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02628.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02628.x</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Vero, S. E., Macpherson, G. L., Sullivan, P. L., Brookfield, A. E., Nippert, J. B., Kirk, M. F., Datta, S., and Kempton, P.: Developing a Conceptual Framework of Landscape and Hydrology on Tallgrass Prairie: A Critical Zone Approach, Vadose Zone Journal, 17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.03.0069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.03.0069</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Vergani, C. and Graf, F.: Soil permeability, aggregate stability and root
growth: a pot experiment from a soil bioengineering perspective,
Ecohydrology, 9, 830–842, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1686" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1686</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Woodcock, C. E., Sonnentag, O., Keeling, R.
F., and Friedl, M. A.: Extensive land cover change across Arctic-Boreal
Northwestern North America from disturbance and climate forcing, Glob.
Change Biol., 26, 807–822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14804" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14804</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, D., Wiegand, K., and Getzin, S.: Walter's two-layer hypothesis
revisited: back to the roots!, Oecologia, 172, 617–630,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2538-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2538-y</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, K. W. and Luxmoore, R. J.: Estimating macroporosity in a forest
watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer, Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
J., 50, 578–582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007x</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Weiler, M. and Naef, F.: An experimental tracer study of the role of
macropores in infiltration in grassland soils, Hydrol. Process., 17,
477–493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1136</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, H. and Li, L.: An upscaled rate law for magnesite dissolution in
heterogeneous porous media, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 210, 289–305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.04.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.04.019</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, H. and Li, L.: An upscaled rate law for mineral dissolution in
heterogeneous media: The role of time and length scales, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 235, 1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.04.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.04.024</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, H., Li, L., Crandall, D., and Hakala, A.: Where lower calcite abundance
creates more alteration: enhanced rock matrix diffusivity induced by
preferential dissolution, Energy Fuels, 30, 4197–4208,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02932" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02932</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, H., Perdrial, J., Abbott, B. W., Bernal, S., Dupas, R., Godsey, S. E., Harpold, A., Rizzo, D., Underwood, K., Adler, T., Sterle, G., and Li, L.: Temperature controls production but hydrology regulates export of dissolved organic carbon at the catchment scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 945–966, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-945-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-945-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
White, A. F. and Brantley, S. L.: The effect of time on the weathering of
silicate minerals: why do weathering rates differ in the laboratory and
field?, Chem. Geol., 202, 479–506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.03.001</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Winnick, M. J. and Maher, K.: Relationships between CO<sub>2</sub>, thermodynamic
limits on silicate weathering, and the strength of the silicate weathering
feedback, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 485, 111–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.01.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.01.005</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Wolery, T. J., Jackson, K. J., Bourcier, W. L., Bruton, C. J., Viani, B. E.,
Knauss, K. G., and Delany, J. M.: Current Status of the Eq3/6 Software
Package for Geochemical Modeling, Acs. Sym. Ser., 416, 104–116, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z. T., Dijkstra, P., Koch, G. W., Penuelas, J., and Hungate, B. A.:
Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change:
a meta-analysis of experimental manipulation, Glob. Change Biol., 17,
927–942, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02302.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02302.x</a>, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. H., Niu, J. Z., Yu, X. X., Zhu, W. L., and Du, X. Q.: Effects of
fine root length density and root biomass on soil preferential flow in
forest ecosystems, For. Syst., 24, e012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015241-06048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015241-06048</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Zhi, W., Li, L., Dong, W. M., Brown, W., Kaye, J., Steefel, C. I., and
Williams, K. H.: Distinct Source Water Chemistry Shapes Contrasting
Concentration – Discharge Patterns, Water Resour. Res., 55, 4233–4251,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr024257" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr024257</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Zhi, W. and Li, L.: The Shallow and Deep Hypothesis: Subsurface Vertical
Chemical Contrasts Shape Nitrate Export Patterns from Different Land Uses,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 11915–11928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01340</a>, 2020.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Zhi, W., Williams, K. H., Carroll, R. W. H., Brown, W., Dong, W., Kerins, D. and Li, L.: Significant stream chemistry response to temperature variations in a high-elevation mountain watershed, Communications Earth and Environment, 1, 43, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00039-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00039-w</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, X. H., Talley, M., and Luo, Y. Q.: Biomass, Litter, and Soil
Respiration Along a Precipitation Gradient in Southern Great Plains, USA,
Ecosystems, 12, 1369–1380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9296-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9296-7</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, H., Zhang, L. M., and Garg, A.: Investigating plant
transpiration-induced soil suction affected by root morphology and root
depth, Comput. Geotech., 103, 26–31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.06.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.06.019</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
