<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-19-763-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Estimation of the natural background of phosphate in a lowland river using tidal marsh sediment cores</article-title><alt-title>Estimation of the natural background of phosphate in a lowland river</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Estimation of the natural background of phosphate in a lowland river}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{F. Lauryssen et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lauryssen</surname><given-names>Florian</given-names></name>
          <email>florian.lauryssen@kuleuven.be</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9701-5078</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Crombé</surname><given-names>Philippe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Maris</surname><given-names>Tom</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Van Maldegem</surname><given-names>Elliot</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Van de Broek</surname><given-names>Marijn</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6993-7825</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Temmerman</surname><given-names>Stijn</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Smolders</surname><given-names>Erik</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Division of Soil and Water Management, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Kasteelpark Arenberg 20 bus 2459, 3001 Leuven, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Archaeology, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 35, 9000, Ghent, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>University of Antwerp, Ecosystem Management Research Group, Campus Drie Eiken, D.C.120,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Sustainable Agroecosystems group, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Florian Lauryssen (florian.lauryssen@kuleuven.be)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>763</fpage><lpage>776</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e161">Elevated phosphate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations can harm the
ecological status in water by eutrophication. In the majority of surface
waters in lowland regions such as Flanders (Belgium), the local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels exceed the limits defined by environmental policy and fail to
decrease, despite decreasing total phosphorus (P) emissions. In order to
underpin the definition of current limits, this study was set up to
identify the pre-industrial background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in surface
water of the Scheldt River, a tidal river in Flanders. We used the
sedimentary records preserved in tidal marsh sediment cores as an archive
for reconstructing historical changes in surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For
sediment samples at sequential depths below the sediment surface, we dated
the time of sediment deposition and analysed the extractable sediment P. The
resulting time series of sediment P was linked to the time series of
measured surface water-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (data 1967–present). By
combining those datasets, the sorption characteristics of the sediment could
be described using a Langmuir-type sorption model. The calibrated sorption
model allowed us to estimate a pre-industrial background surface water
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, based on deeper sediment P that stabilized at
concentrations smaller than the modern. In three out of the four cores, the
sediment P peaked around 1980, coinciding with the surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The estimated pre-industrial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) background
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the Scheldt River water was 62 [57; 66 (95 % CI)] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. That concentration exceeds the previously
estimated natural background values in Flanders (15–35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and is about half of the prevailing limit in the Scheldt River
(120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the 1930s, river water
concentrations were estimated at 140 [128; 148] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, already exceeding the current limit. The method developed here
proved useful for reconstructing historical background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations of a lowland tidal river. A similar approach can apply to
other lowland tidal rivers to provide a scientific basis for local
catchment-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> backgrounds.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e398">Excess phosphorus (P) concentrations in surface waters is a global problem
(Azevedo
et al., 2015; Dodds and Smith, 2016; Elser et al., 2007). Eutrophication by
excess nutrients, including phosphate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrogen (N), can lead to
hypoxia, acidification, and harmful algal blooms
(Azevedo
et al., 2015; Correll, 1998; Watson et al., 2018). Therefore, limiting P
concentrations in the surface water is crucial to ensure a good ecological
status. Lowland river systems are at higher risk for eutrophication than
upland streams (Watson et al.,
2018). As a result, eutrophication of lowland rivers is on the international
agenda
(Jarvie
et al., 2006; Mainstone and Parr, 2002; Reynolds, 2000). This study focuses
on dissolved orthophosphate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), almost identical to the reactive<?pagebreak page764?> P
determined by a colour reaction. Other P forms present in surface water
include organic P fractions and P adsorbed to mineral colloids. Total P
(TP) refers to all P forms together. The environmental limits for P are expressed as reactive P (equated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-P limits), TP limits,
or both.</p>
      <p id="d1e434">The lowland rivers of densely populated regions do not achieve good water
quality mainly due to the excess of nutrients
(Bitschofsky
and Nausch, 2019; Huet, 1990; Van Der Molen et al., 1998; Van Puijenbroek et
al., 2014; Rönspieß et al., 2020; Schulz and Herzog, 2004). For
example, since 2004, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in Flemish waterways
has stabilized at 290 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. That concentration is
well above the limits varying between 70–140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
different river types (Smolders et al., 2017; VMM, 2018). Despite the
current net-zero P balance in agricultural soils in that region, the
situation has not improved since 2004 (VMM, 2017). The question
arises when or even whether these limits can be achieved.</p>
      <p id="d1e502">Since 2000, the European Union has regulated surface water quality with the
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (WFD), which does not prescribe limits
but provides a framework for local regulations. The WFD has identified a
high ecological status of a river if nutrient conditions remain within the
range associated with undisturbed conditions, i.e natural background levels
(European Commission, 2000). However, the definition of the
natural background has been subject to debate for many river basins
(Matschullat et al.,
2000; van Raaphorst et al., 2000). The natural background can be defined as
the situation (concentration range) found in the environment without any
human activity, reflecting only natural geochemical processes
(Laane, 1992; Reimann and Garrett,
2005). This definition implies that concentrations must be estimated before
human activity, which is not always feasible. Therefore, a pre-industrial
background can be defined instead, inferred from samples dating before the
industrial revolution (Reimann and Garrett,
2005). The pre-industrial background can logically be affected by
anthropogenic processes. Alternatively, natural background concentrations
can be estimated by sampling regions with an expected minimal anthropogenic
influence, i.e. reference lakes and rivers
(Cardoso et al., 2007).
Natural background concentrations have been established for different
chemical elements in rivers in Europe; however that did not include TP or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-P (Salminen et al.,
2005).</p>
      <p id="d1e516">For P in densely populated regions such as Flanders, the natural background
concentrations can only be inferred indirectly. Natural background TP
concentrations for Flanders were set at 15–35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, inferred from reference lakes sampled in central and Baltic states in
Europe (Cardoso et al.,
2007). However, the natural background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-P concentrations of lowland
rivers may be higher than those of upland rivers. For example, diatom
assemblages revealed natural eutrophic conditions in the Spree River in
Germany with TP concentrations of 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to recent
data of 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Schönfelder and
Steinberg, 2004; Zak et al., 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e594">Lowland rivers can be significantly loaded with P derived from the riverbed
sediment, defined as internal loading (Froelich, 1988). The
internal loading of P better explains temporal and spatial trends in river P
concentrations than the P emissions of the lowland river system of Flanders
(Smolders et al., 2017).
Biogeochemical processes in the sediment explain that result. Ferric iron
(Fe(III)) and aluminium oxyhydroxides have a high affinity for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anions and limit the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in solution
(Borggaard et al., 1990; Holtan et al.,
1988). However, anoxic conditions lead to the reductive dissolution of those
Fe(III) minerals, releasing the associated P to the overlying water when the
sediment is strongly reduced
(Baken
et al., 2015; van Dael et al., 2020). The small rivers and ditches in
lowland regions have a low water velocity and are nutrient-rich, leading to
anoxic conditions during summer and autumn. Those anoxic events explain the
typical summer peaks in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in small rivers. Moreover, regional
differences in sediment P <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe concentration ratios explain regional
differences in surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(Smolders et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e648">Sediment analysis is linked to surface water P and can be a valuable tool
for assessing historical river water quality. In surface waters, sediments
can serve as a sink or a source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, depending on the sediment
surface chemistry and water concentrations
(Froelich,
1988; House and Denison, 1998; Simpson et al., 2021; van der Zee et al.,
2007). For example, P storage on fine bed sediments can amount to 60 % of
a catchment nutrient budget
(Ballantine et al., 2009;
Svendsen and Kronvang, 1993). The essential processes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
adsorption and desorption from Fe oxyhydroxides, present in the suspended
matter or bed sediments
(Froelich,
1988; van Raaphorst and Kloosterhuis, 1994; van der Zee et al., 2007).
Sediment P concentrations can likely predict surface water P concentrations
and have been relevant for the long-term reconstruction of P in the
environment
(Wang
et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2005). For example, Boyle et al. (2015) used P
profiles from lake sediments in the UK to infer catchment P inputs over the
last 10 000 years and linked that to the historical evolution in population
density. Similarly, banded iron formations in deep oceanic waters allowed the
inference of oceanic P concentrations of over 2 billion years ago
(Bjerrum and Canfield, 2002). Likewise, the
sediments deposited by rivers or lakes react with surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
are deposited in regularly flooded areas. Thus, those sediments can serve as
an archive for reconstructing historical P emissions trends and provide
useful information on historical P concentrations in adjacent water bodies
(Birch et al., 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e684">In lowland rivers with tidal influence, like the Scheldt, vegetated tidal
marshes develop along the river banks. Tidal marshes directly adjacent to
tidal rivers are regularly flooded during high tides: these flooding events
deposit sediments and associated elements like P on the densely vegetated
marsh surface
(Friedrichs
and Perry, 2001; De Swart and<?pagebreak page765?> Zimmerman, 2009; Temmerman et al., 2004a). The
net accumulation of sediments increases the elevation of tidal marshes over
time (Temmerman et al., 2003a).
Therefore, researchers have used tidal marshes as sediment archives of
deposited substances other than P, such as organic carbon
(Van de Broek et al.,
2019) and silicon (Struyf et al.,
2007). However, it remains to be investigated to what extent P
concentrations measured in tidal marsh sediment archives can be used to
reconstruct historical changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the adjacent
estuary.</p>
      <p id="d1e698">This study tested and evaluated a methodology to estimate the pre-industrial
background water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations based on the analysis of tidal
marsh sediment. Those sediments had been deposited over multiple centuries
on the banks of Flanders' largest tidal river, the Scheldt.  Using sediment
analysis and a sorption model provided the first estimate of pre-industrial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in a large lowland river. First, we described the tidal
marsh sediment sorption characteristics by linking the P concentration of
tidal marsh sediments to historical measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Scheldt
River water. Those sorption characteristics allowed an estimation of
historical river water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. This estimate was based on
an analysis of sediments deposited in the 1800s or before industrialization.
The underlying assumption is that sediment P remains immobile and that the
sediment's depth profile reflects the historical trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
Scheldt River. Accordingly, we argue that the sediment P composition in
deeper sediment layers of tidal marshes provides an archive of the historic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of the adjacent river. A database containing
measurements of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the Scheldt River's surface
water (1967–current) verified this assumption. This study hypothesizes that
the previously estimated natural background P of this major lowland river is
larger than that estimated earlier for lakes (15–35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d1e816">Freshwater tidal marshes were sampled at four locations along the Scheldt
River (Fig. 1 and Table S1 in the Supplement). The Scheldt estuary is located in northern Belgium
and the southwestern Netherlands and flows into the North Sea. The river
basin of the Scheldt covers a large part of Flanders (71 %) and the
adjacent region of northern France; the total catchment area is
approximately 22 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The population living in the river basin is
about 10 million (Meire et al., 2005). The tidal
wave extends from the mouth (Vlissingen) to 160 km upstream near Ghent,
where sluices stop the tidal wave. The estuary's freshwater tidal zone
reaches from Ghent to Rupelmonde (Fig. 1). This research focused on
freshwater tidal marshes, i.e. located in this freshwater tidal zone of the
estuary. Brackish waters experience the mixing of seawater, making it
difficult to distinguish the anthropogenic sources from seawater influence.
Furthermore, saltwater in the North Sea has <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations about a
factor of 10 lower than fresh water in the Scheldt River
(Burson et al., 2016). This research was
focused on freshwater lowland river systems and the human influence on the
P concentrations; saltwater environments were beyond the scope of this
study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e843">Map of the Scheldt estuary: triangles indicate the locations of
the sampled tidal marshes. Old1 and Young1 were only 250 m apart, and on the
scale of the map, they overlap.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/19/763/2022/bg-19-763-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e852">Sediment accreting in tidal marshes originates from the deposition of
riverine suspended matter, including inorganic mineral sediment and organic
matter (Callaway et al., 1996). We
discriminate between old and young tidal marshes, hereafter referred to as
marshes. Old marshes have a higher elevation compared to young marshes. As a
general mechanism, young marsh surfaces accumulate sediments quickly and
increase their elevation asymptotically up to an equilibrium level, which is
around the mean high water level
(MHWL) (Pethick,
1981; Temmerman et al., 2003a). Temmerman et al. (2003a) defined an old
marsh as visible on topographic maps of Ferraris (1774–1777), so it was
formed before the 19th century
(Temmerman et al., 2003a).
Young marshes in the Scheldt estuary were formed more recently, by the
natural establishment of pioneer marsh vegetation on formerly bare tidal
mudflats, generally after 1944. During the last decades, the young marshes
had a surface elevation below MHWL. As a result, young marshes experienced
more frequent inundations and had larger sediment accretion rates than old
marshes. For example, between 1931 and 1951, young marshes accumulated at
rates of 1.6 to 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the elevation of old marshes
was very close to the yearly MHWL increase rate of 0.3 to 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the western Scheldt
(Temmerman et al., 2003a).</p>
      <p id="d1e890">This study analysed depth profiles of sediment cores originating from tidal
marshes along the freshwater Scheldt River. The analysis contained two old
and two young marshes, Old1, Old2, Young1, and Young2 (locations indicated<?pagebreak page766?> in
Fig. 1). The coordinates of sampling locations can be found in
Van de Broek et al.
(2018, 2016) and Sect. SI.I in the Supplement.
Marshes Old1 and Young1 originated from the tidal marsh named the Notelaer,
Old 2 from Grembergen, and Young2 from Mariekerke. Eight cores were analysed:
three replicate cores for both sites Old1 and Young 1 and one core for Old2
and Young2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{PO_{{4}}}$} concentration in surface waters}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in surface waters</title>
      <p id="d1e912">The Flanders Marine Institute (IMIS) provided surface water phosphate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) data measured colourimetrically on a filtered water sample and
total phosphorus (TP) by acid digestion and a segmented flow analyser.
Concentration data of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Scheldt River were available from 1967 to
2019, originating from different sources and compiled by the research
programme Onderzoek Milieu Effecten Sigmaplan (OMES). The OMES programme did
additional quality controls on the data (ECOBE – UA; The
Flemish Waterway, 2019). The different sources are described in
Sect. SI.V in the Supplement
(De Pauw, 2007; ECOBE – UAntwerpen, 2007; Institute for Hygiene en
Epidemiology (IHE), 2007; ECOBE-UA and De Vlaamse Waterweg, 2016;
Van Meel, 1958).</p>
      <p id="d1e937">The open-source software R (R Core Team, 2020) was used to compile
all available datasets for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> closest to the study sites (Temse) and
to calculate annual means by averaging all observations within a year. The
annual means of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were used to visualize the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the Scheldt River (Fig. 2). The emissions of P mainly originate from point
sources due to domestic loading (Billen et al.,
2005). As a result, the increasing surface water P concentration between
1950 and 1975 can be related to the rise in the number of households
connected to sewer systems. At first, no wastewater treatment was in place,
resulting in a sharp increase in nutrient loads to the river. However, since
1985, wastewater treatment has significantly improved the situation
(Billen et al., 2005).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e975">Concentrations of phosphate in the Scheldt River at Temse, annual
means and standard deviation (error bar) around the annual mean. Samples
were taken in Temse close to tidal marsh sites (data sources:
ECOBE-UA and De Vlaamse Waterweg,
2016; ECOBE – UAntwerpen, 2007; Institute voor Hygiëne en Epidemiologie
(IHE), 2007; Van Meel, 1958; De Pauw, 2007).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/19/763/2022/bg-19-763-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Sediment sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e992">The sediment samples used here had been collected during a previous study
about carbon sequestration in tidal marsh sediments in the Scheldt estuary
(Van de Broek et al.,
2018, 2016). Collection of undisturbed sediment
profiles on the tidal marshes took place between July and September 2016
(Old1, Young1, Old2, Young2; Fig. 1). Undisturbed sediment cores were taken
at each sampling location using a gauge auger (0.06 m diameter). The cores
were divided into subsamples with a 0.03 m interval. The sediment samples
were dried at a maximum temperature of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 48 h,
crushed, and sieved to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm grain size. Macroscopic vegetation
residues were removed manually using tweezers
(Van de Broek et al., 2018). Bulk density,
grain size distribution, and organic carbon (OC) content were analysed by Van
de Broek et al. (2018). We refer to Van de Broek et al. (2016, 2018) for further
sample collection and processing information.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Sediment analysis</title>
      <?pagebreak page767?><p id="d1e1025">The dried sediment samples were analysed for oxalate-extractable P, Fe, Al,
and Mn (P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Schwertmann, 1964). The preparation of extraction solution and dilutions
were made with ultrapure water (Milli-Q<sup>®</sup>), and all glassware
was acid-soaked overnight in a 1 % HCl acid bath to prevent P
contamination. That acid oxalate extractant, a mixture of ammonium oxalate
(0.2 M) and oxalic acid (0.2 M) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, targets poorly crystalline
oxyhydroxides of Fe, Al, and Mn and the associated P
(Schwertmann, 1964). Those poorly crystalline oxyhydroxides are
the most reactive due to their large specific surface area
(Hiemstra
et al., 2010). The extraction was done with 1 g of dry sediment in 50 mL
extraction solution over 2 h in an end-over-end shaker at
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (26 rpm). The suspension was filtered through a
0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> membrane filter (CHROMAFIL<sup>®</sup> Xtra PET – 45/25). Analytical
blanks, internal reference samples, and duplicate samples were included in
every batch to ensure the analysis's quality, purity, and reproducibility.
The extracts were diluted 20 times and measured by inductively coupled
plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The degree of P saturation
(DPS; %) was calculated as in Eq. (1). The DPS represents the extractable
(P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) ratio to the P sorption capacity of the sediment. This P sorption
capacity is estimated as half of the sum of oxalate Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
because not all the Fe and Al in the soil are available for P sorption with
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in molar units.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M69" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DPS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The DPS is expressed as a percentage and can be interpreted as the ratio of
sorption sites on the sediment occupied by P. Previous research used the DPS
to identify agricultural areas sensitive to phosphate leaching and showed a
good correlation with pore water P concentrations
(Breeuwsma
et al., 1995; Lookman et al., 1995; Schoumans and Chardon, 2015; Schoumans
and Groenendijk, 2000; van der Zee, 1988). The DPS relation for
porewater–soil systems was developed and verified by
van der Zee et al. (1990). Lexmond et al.
(1982) illustrated that the maximal sorbed P was about half the pool
available after a long-term precipitation experiment. Therefore, the factor
0.5 is an empirical value representing the soil's sorption capacity. The
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> primarily affects the maximum sorption capacity. So they
set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, even among soils, this parameter
varied between 0.3 and 0.6 (Lexmond et al., 1982). For
this research, low background concentrations are most important, so
maximal sorption occurring at high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is less relevant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Age–depth model</title>
      <p id="d1e1253">The sediment analysis and the surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data had to be linked
by a corresponding date and location to fit a sorption model. Therefore, an
age–depth model was used to calculate the time since deposition of each
sediment sample.
Temmerman
et al. (2004b, a) developed a time-stepping marsh sedimentation model
(MARSED). That model estimates sediment deposition rates and the resulting
evolution of the tidal marsh elevation in the Scheldt estuary. Hence, we
could use MARSED to determine the time since deposition of sediments
throughout the sampled sediment profiles. The MARSED model simulates the
tidal supply of suspended sediments and the settling to the marsh surface
during tidal inundation cycles integrated over the years. The model was
calibrated and validated against measured sediment deposition rates on the
Scheldt estuary tidal marshes from 1945 until 2002 (Temmerman et al., 2003a, 2004b). The empirical data on sediment deposition rates were derived from
radiometric and palaeoenvironmental dating of sediment cores at the exact
locations sampled for the present study
(Temmerman
et al., 2004a, b).</p>
      <p id="d1e1267">For our current study, we extrapolated the MARSED model simulations of
sediment accretion from 2002 until 2016, the sampling date of the sediment
cores (Van de Broek et al., 2018). However, simulations overestimated the
observed marsh surface elevation in 2016 by 25 cm for sampling location
Old1, 29 cm for Young1, 19 cm for Old2, and 8 cm for Young2 (observed by RTK
GPS surveying; Van de Broek et al., 2018; Poppelmonde, 2017). The
MARSED model was initially designed to simulate the overall sediment
accretion and surface elevation changes in tidal marshes in response to
sea-level rise scenarios, for which those errors were acceptable. In
contrast, the most important was the time of sediment deposition throughout
the sediment profile for the present study. Therefore, the original
age–depth relation calculated by MARSED was recalibrated using observed
age–depth points. The observed age–depth points originated from GPS
measurements of marsh elevation in 2016 (M. Van de Broek, unpublished data)
and previously published radiometric and palaeoenvironmental dating
(Temmerman et al., 2003, 2004). This rescaling procedure is explained in the
Supplement (Figs. S1–S4 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e1270">An approximate extrapolation procedure was used to estimate the sediment
deposition time from depths below the oldest measured age–depth points
(mentioned in the previous sentence). The observed age–depth points were
available from 1958 for sampling site Old1, 1947 for Young1, 1963 for Old2,
and 1968 for Young2 (Temmerman et al., 2004). This extrapolation procedure
could only be applied for old marshes, which were defined as marshes that
existed at least since the end of the 18th century (Temmerman et al., 2003a, 2004). Two sediment cores originated from old tidal marshes (Old1 and
Old2). Based on observed age–depth points, it has been proven that the old
marshes reached equilibrium with the MHWL before 1944. After 1944, the old
marshes have built up their elevation at a rate comparable to local MHWL
rise (Temmerman et al., 2003a).
Here, we assumed that also between 1800 and 1944 these old marshes accreted
at a rate comparable to the MHWL rise.</p>
      <p id="d1e1273">Historical tide gauge data of MHWL rise were available from 1901 for site
Old1 and 1930 for site Old2
(ScheldeMonitor Team and
VNSC, 2020; Temmerman et al., 2003a), and linear regression of the MHWL
against time was used to estimate the marsh surface elevation before 1944
(Figs. S6 and S7 in the Supplement). However, the dating accuracy will be lower going further back
in time. Furthermore, such extrapolation to earlier dates is not appropriate
for young marshes, as they were only formed after 1950 by pioneer vegetation
establishment on formerly bare mudflats (Temmerman et al., 2003a, 2004).
Those mudflat sediment profiles do not have continuous sedimentary records
as tidal marshes and are likely to be disturbed by erosion and sedimentation
alternations (Belliard et
al., 2019). Therefore, the sediment deposition time could not be
extrapolated for the young marsh sampling locations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Relating surface water {$\protect\chem{PO_{{4}}}$} with sediment P: the sediment--water model}?><title>Relating surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with sediment P: the sediment–water model</title>
      <p id="d1e1296">The age–depth model and linear regression of MHWL provided a deposition year
for each sediment sample. Thereby, the dataset of water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between
1967–2016 was linked to the sediment DPS for each core. The resulting
dataset contained all available surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> readings between
1967 and 2016, closest to the tidal marshes in Temse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1932</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a
corresponding DPS value. The DPS value of a sediment sample originates from
a specific layer of one sediment core or a mean DPS of the replicate
sediment samples. This dataset allowed us to fit a sorption model further
termed the<?pagebreak page768?> sediment–water model. Schoumans and Groenendijk (2000) presented
a Langmuir-type sorption model to predict <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration leaching
from a soil layer based on the DPS Eq. (2).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M80" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>DPS</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DPS</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] phosphate concentration in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, K the sorption
constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and DPS (degree of P saturation; %). This model
adequately described P sorption in soil across a wide range of pH values,
including the Scheldt River pH
(Schoumans
and Groenendijk, 2000; Warrinnier et al., 2018). The model relies on surface
complexation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe and Al oxyhydroxides in the sediment.
That complexation is determined by a chemical equilibrium between solid
(adsorbed) and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase
(Warrinnier et al., 2019).
The parameter K of existing soil models has been calibrated for the soil–pore
water system, and the sediment–water parameter (K) is unlikely equal.
Therefore, the model was calibrated by fitting parameter K (Eq. 2) on
sediment DPS measurements and recent Scheldt water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. As
a result, the fitted K value is adapted to the local geochemistry of tidal
marsh sediments and the surface water.</p>
      <p id="d1e1463">We explored 16 different scenarios to fit the sediment–water model Eq. (2).
These scenarios illustrate the statistical uncertainty surrounding the
estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. The model was fitted separately for each
site sediment core or on the combined replicate cores for Old1 and Young1
(Sect. SI.VI in the Supplement). Every sediment sample had between one and three replicates,
depending on the depth and the site. The average value of these replicates
was used or the individual replicate's DPS values. One sediment sample
covered several deposition years, so multiple <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations
corresponded with each sediment sample. Again, the average of all
corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> readings was taken, or all available values were used
separately. The combination of mean or individual DPS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resulted
in 16 models (Table S2 in the Supplement). For each of these, the parameter K was fitted by
non-linear least-squares regression with R using the Rstudio interface
(R Core Team, 2020; RStudio Team, 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Evaluation of model performance</title>
      <p id="d1e1518">The predictions of the sediment–water model were evaluated based on several
parameters: the residual standard error (RSE), the Nash–Sutcliffe model
efficiency (E), and the measured surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plotted against
predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2007 and 2016 (Table S2 and Fig. S10 in the Supplement).
Additionally, the percentage bias (PBIAS) was calculated for data points
between 2007 and 2016. The PBIAS measures the average tendency of the
simulated data to be larger or smaller than their observed counterparts.
That difference is expressed as a percentage of deviation from the
observations (Moriasi et
al., 1983; Eq. 3). The predictions of recent years are interesting to
evaluate the model's performance for two reasons. First, the most recent
surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are relatively low and more
representative of background concentrations. Second, the monitoring data
have a high temporal resolution, and the age–depth model is more accurate at
shallow depths.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M94" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>PBIAS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>obs</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sim</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>obs</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{History of surface water {$\protect\chem{PO_{{4}}}$} concentrations}?><title>History of surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e1644">The Scheldt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations varied greatly over the past decades,
with the peak in surface water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations between 1975 and 1985
(Fig. 2). In Temse, the annual mean concentrations rose from 410 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1967 and peaked in 1980 with 1570 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Between 1990 and 2003 concentrations decreased and
stabilized between 160 and 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Temse. The
current <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are a factor of 2 lower than in 1967 and almost a
factor of 10 lower than the peak in 1980 (Fig. 2 and Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1765">The sediment oxalate extractable P (P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and its degree of
phosphate saturation (DPS) of the top, bottom, and peak sediment layers at four
different tidal marsh locations. Top layers are the sediments closest to the
surface, peak layers had maximal P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and DPS, and bottom layers are
those sediments sampled at the largest depth. Values of P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and DPS are
means (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sediment samples, between top and
bottom (cm) depth.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Top–bottom (cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">DPS (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Old1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Top</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2300 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1200 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">130</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">36 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Peak</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27–57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5400 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1800 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">70 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bottom</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">147–180</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">540 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">110</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8500 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">750</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">660 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Young1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Top</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2700 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1200)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1400 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Peak</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27–57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8500 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">85 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bottom</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">129–144</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">910 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3900</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">650 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">40 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Old2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Top</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2800 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1700 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">45 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Peak</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54–69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2600 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">360</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">94 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bottom</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">132–147</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1700 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">620</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3900</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1700 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">43 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Young2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Top</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2700 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">410</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1300 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">240</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">23 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Peak</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48–63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">42 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1900 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">55 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bottom</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">144–183</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3200 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">110</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">34 000 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">770</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1400 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">31 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Sediment cores</title>
      <p id="d1e2762">The P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the sediments ranged between 370 and 13 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the DPS ranged between 13 % and 94 % (Table 1). In
all soil cores starting at the surface, the DPS and P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased with
depth and peaked at about 0.5 m below the surface (Figs. S7 and S8 in the Supplement). In
deeper (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) sediment layers, P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and DPS decreased and
stabilized for Old1, Young1, and Young2 (Table 1). Overall, the P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased by an average factor of 3.5 between the surface and the maximum
concentrations (Fig. S8 and Table 1). The sediments with these peak DPS values were
deposited between 1960 and 1985 in three of the four sediment cores (Fig. 2). Only the core Old2 peaked earlier (ca. 1940–1950). Most importantly for
this work, DPS for Old1 showed an apparent stabilization in deeper or older
layers, which indicated undisturbed sediment layers (Figs. 3 and S7).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2834">The degree of phosphate saturation (DPS) timeline based on four
tidal marsh sediment sites. Each dot represents a sediment analysis. The
year assigned to each sediment analysis was calculated with the age–depth
model. Before 1930, no model dates were available. Therefore a linear
regression of the MHWL was used to extrapolate the dates for the old
marshes. Dates before 1930 are increasingly uncertain going further back in
time. For young marshes, such extrapolation was not possible. The points
before the formation of the marshes are indicated with a question mark.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/19/763/2022/bg-19-763-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2843">Within the first metre, Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was stable in the three soil cores (Old1,
Young1, Old2) with concentrations around 20 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, except for
Young2 for which Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was a factor of 2 larger (Fig. S9 in the Supplement). For Young1 and
Young2, Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration decreased at depths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. For
Old1, Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a steady decline from 20 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the
surface to 10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the bottom of the profile (Fig. S9). The
Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations showed a similar trend as the P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, with an initial increase followed by a decrease with
depth. The strong correlations of Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> illustrate the positive effect of
Fe and Al oxyhydroxides on P sorption.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page769?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Sediment core selection</title>
      <p id="d1e3031">Under the assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not migrate, the tidal marsh
sediment cores can provide an archive for river water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Considering
P migration, it is crucial to evaluate the distance from a creek within the
tidal marsh. That distance is essential for two reasons. First, within 10 to
20 m of the creeks, the groundwater table fluctuates largely with the tides,
which can induce vertical P migration (Van Putte et al., 2020). Secondly,
sediment accretion is more difficult to predict at closer distances to the
creeks and can affect the age–depth relation (Temmerman et al., 2003b). The
distance from the sediment cores to the nearest creek was 21 m for Old1, 56 m for Young1, 35 m for Young2, and 5 m for Old2.</p>
      <p id="d1e3056">The assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not migrate may be most violated at Old2
and Young2. The profile of Old2 indicated P migration because it had a peak
of P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at an earlier date (1950) than was expected from surface water
data (1980) (Fig. 2). Consequently, Old2 was not taken up to interpret the
relation between DPS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For core Young2, deeper sediment layers
had a larger DPS than the surface layers (Table 2). Additionally, the age
estimation of sediments older than 1968 was impossible due to this tidal
marsh's young age. Furthermore, Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were a factor of 2
larger than the other cores (Fig. S9) and a factor of 2 larger than the
average sediment Fe concentration of the upper Scheldt basin (VMM, 2019).
The local enrichment in iron lowers the DPS values and makes the core less
representative of the average situation in the Scheldt. These observations
made Young2 inappropriate to fit the relation between DPS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3113">The predicted concentrations of phosphate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-P <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Scheldt River based on the degree of phosphate saturation
(DPS) in the sediment layers of marsh Old1, dating back to 1800
(pre-industrial), where DPS values stabilized with depth at 20 %. The
predicted concentration dated to 1930, where DPS stabilized at 36 %. The
PBIAS is the mean difference of simulated and observed data between 2007 and
2016, expressed as a percentage of the observed data. The conversion of DPS
to river phosphate concentration is based on the association of DPS with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-P. That association was calibrated to data from 1967–2016, thereby using
different sediment–water models; the details of models are in Table S2.
Model 3b (in italics) is proposed as the most accurate (see text).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model no.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">K (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) [95 % CI]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">Pre-industrial background </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PBIAS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1930</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(2007–2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[95 % CI]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[95 % CI]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">120 [110; 130]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">270 [245; 281]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51 [49; 54]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">120 [109; 122]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>3b</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">4.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">3.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>62</italic><italic>[57; 66]</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>140</italic><italic>[128; 148]</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3537">The two remaining soil cores, Old1 and Young1, originated from the same
tidal marsh area named “the Notelaer”, located near the city of Temse (Fig. 1). That marsh has been the topic of multiple studies on sediment<?pagebreak page770?> accretion
(Temmerman et al., 2004b, 2003a) and soil OC stocks (Van de Broek et al.,
2018, 2016). The sediment profiles of both Old1
and Young1 sites rise and fall in DPS comparable to dynamics in surface water
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Figs. 2 and 3). In deeper sediment layers, DPS and
P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stabilize below levels of recent deposits (Figs. S7 and S8). The time
series of Old1 displayed a DPS peak around 1960, indicating a shift of 20 years (Fig. 2). However, the core Old1 was taken up for the model fitting
because it dates back to 1800 at the deepest levels and is essential to
predict the background. Furthermore, the DPS concentrations stabilized
before 1920, indicating that P has not migrated to these depths, making it
suitable for background prediction. These observations suggested a
well-preserved P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ox</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and DPS profile, essential for the DPS–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
relation. Therefore, Old1 and Young1 are considered the best profiles for
applying the sediment–water model and interpretation of background
concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Sediment–water model fit</title>
      <p id="d1e3588">The sediment–water model Eq. (2) was fitted on DPS–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from the
different sediment cores (Table S2). Two observations were omitted because
the DPS values were too large (0.99–1.02) and produced artefacts in the
results. The Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency (E) ranged between 0.04 and
0.85 depending on the input data (Table S2; Nash and
Sutcliffe, 1970). The sediment–water model was fitted on each core's data
separately and combined data from Old1 and Young1, as they came from the
same tidal marsh location. The models fitted on data from sites Old2 and
Young2 were not considered as migration likely affected those cores (see Sect. 3.3).</p>
      <p id="d1e3602">The models fitted on an average DPS (across replicates) associated with
individual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> readings were considered most suitable (models 1b, 2b,
3b; Table S2). A single sediment sample analysis represents an average P
signal over the sediment's deposition period. However, the age–depth
relation can vary slightly due to the marsh surface elevation variation. By
taking an average DPS from replicate cores, the variation in the independent
variable was reduced. Furthermore, the prediction error increased in most
models by relating individual rather than mean DPS values with individual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements (Table S2). Models using unique DPS associated with
single <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data duplicated or even triplicated the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data,
artificially creating more degrees of freedom (model 1c, 2c, 3c; Table S2).
Using mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values artificially reduced the degrees of freedom,
compromising the model predictions by increasing RSE and widening confidence
intervals (models 1a, 2a, 3a; Table S2). The fitted parameter K (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for the different input datasets, with the 95 % confidence intervals
ranging between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
variation in parameter K for the various input datasets was larger than the
individual confidence limit variation (Table S2). Thus, the uncertainty was
more pronounced due to the variability in sediment samples than due to the
model fit.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Model performance</title>
      <p id="d1e3747">The sediment–water model performance was evaluated with several parameters
(RSE, PBIAS, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the actual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by predicted plots of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations over
the last decade. Those recent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are more comparable
to the background (Fig. S10 in the Supplement and Table 2; mean Temse [2007–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2016</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">170</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Model 3b was considered the most suitable for
predicting background concentrations. The PBIAS was the lowest for recent
observations for model 3b. The average tendency of simulated data compared
to the observations was only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, which is within the acceptable
range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Moriasi
et al., 1983). Model 2b had an underestimation of observed data of more than
28 %, and model 1b overestimated recent observations by more than 60 %.
Such an overestimation is unwanted for calculating the background, and
therefore, both were considered unsuitable (Table 2). The actual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by
predicted plots illustrates a similar message (Fig. S10). Based on these
observations, model 3b was<?pagebreak page771?> considered the best model, although the residual
standard error (RSE) was lower for model 2b (Table S2). The selected model
3b successfully reconstructs the rise and fall in surface water
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations based on the sediment characteristic DPS (Fig. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3876">Measured (grey crosses; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) and predicted (black points)
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-P concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Scheldt River in Temse.
The concentrations are calculated from the sediment phosphate saturation
(DPS) of the tidal marshes at Old1 and Young1, using sediment–water model
3b.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/19/763/2022/bg-19-763-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3922">Maxima of monitored and predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations coincide in time
and have a similar size (Fig. 4). For example, in 1973, the average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration predicted by the model was 1200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and measured concentrations were on average 1300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximal predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
was 2200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the maximal observed concentration was 3000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Predictions for recent years are within 15 %
of the observed data (e.g. 2015: model: 133 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
measured 155 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Between 1940 and 1990, the
modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations had more variation. Likewise, monitored
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data are spread more between 1967 and 1990 (Fig. 2). Before 1930,
modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations stabilized at levels below current
observations (Fig. 4).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Estimating background {$\protect\chem{PO_{{4}}}$} concentrations in the Scheldt River}?><title>Estimating background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the Scheldt River</title>
      <p id="d1e4185">The deepest sediment layers are most suitable for predicting background
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of the Scheldt River water. These layers are the
oldest and expected to have experienced the lowest impact of P additions
from anthropogenic sources. The Old1 marsh site was appropriate for this
purpose as it developed before 1774, before the industrial revolution in
Belgium. The average DPS for the bottom sediments, dated between 1800 and
1840, was 20 % for core Old1 (Table 1 and Fig. 2); these samples are
considered to represent the pre-industrial background. That DPS value
produced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of 62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
[95 % CI (57; 66)] for the pre-industrial background, using sediment–water
model 3b (Table 2). The sediment dated to 1930 had a DPS of 36 %. For that
value, the same sediment–water model predicted a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of
140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [95 % CI (128; 148)] (Table 2).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Pre-industrial background vs. ambient {$\protect\chem{PO_{{4}}}$} concentrations}?><title>Pre-industrial background vs. ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e4303">This work presents a novel approach to reconstruct background surface water
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in a tidal river using the DPS of adjacent tidal
marsh sediments. The background concentration is essential in the context of
developing local nutrient limits. The predicted pre-industrial background
concentration (62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table 2) is about half of
the current surface limit of the Scheldt (120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Flemish Government, 1995). Remarkably, the predicted
background concentrations are about a factor of 2 larger than the background
estimates of lake waters for Flanders today (15–35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Cardoso et al., 2007). That pre-industrial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
is about 3 times lower than the current concentration in the Scheldt.
For example, between 2007 and 2016, the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of the
Scheldt in Temse was 170 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, in the
1930s, the concentration was estimated at 140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and larger than current limits, at a time before widespread connection to
sewer systems, P-loaded detergents, and application of mineral fertilizers.</p>
      <p id="d1e4475">Those results suggest that the sediment internal loading triggered by summer
anoxia in lowland rivers contributes to larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations than
estimated before (see introduction). The summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak lasts about
5 months per year in Flanders and largely affects the rivers' mean P
concentrations (Smolders et al.,
2017). Summer anoxia can occur in eutrophic lakes or sometimes in
oligotrophic brown water lakes (Nürnberg, 1995).
Additionally, lowland rivers in Flanders are primarily groundwater-fed, and
73 % of streamflow can be attributed to base flow. The groundwater in
Belgium has a median P concentration between 150–320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Edmunds and Shand, 2009). Therefore, groundwater feeding
the river waters logically affects the river P concentrations. In contrast,
primarily rain-fed lakes will have lower P concentrations, with rain P
ranging between 1.5 and 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Migon and Sandroni,
1999).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Limitations of the model</title>
      <p id="d1e4552">Care needs to be taken with background extrapolations to ensure that
post-depositional processes have not modified the biogeochemical patterns
and that the area represents the area of interest (Reimann and Garrett,
2005). Several factors can obscure the reconstructed background
concentrations. First,<?pagebreak page772?> vertical migration of P can enrich deeper sediment
layers, causing an overestimation of the background. Second, the sediment
profiles at the tidal marshes are almost permanently saturated, so the
intrusion of P-rich groundwater could affect the P concentrations in the
tidal marsh sediment. Moreover, depending on the tidal marsh elevation,
periodic flooding occurs at an approximate range of 300–350 inundations per
year (Temmerman et al., 2003b). These
conditions could favour P migration due to the reductive dissolution of Fe
(oxy)hydroxides
(Baken
et al., 2015; van Dael et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e4555">Two cores with indications of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> migration were removed from the
analysis to address the issue (Old2 and Young2). These cores were identified
by the DPS age profile and considering the distance from the nearby creeks
(Figs. 2 and 1). Additionally, the DPS levels of the deepest sediment
layers were compared with layers at the surface. The surface layers had
lower DPS levels than the deepest layers for one core (Young 2). The two
remaining cores (Old1, Young1) had lower DPS levels in deeper sediment
layers (Fig. S7). More importantly, the modelled peak in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations based on the cores Old1 and Young1 were found within 2 years
of the monitored peak and had a similar magnitude (Fig. 4). The coinciding
peaks illustrate little migration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Old1 and Young1, thereby
justifying these cores as an archive for water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4602">The limited migration is also logical: at the average DPS of 90 % in
sediment showing at the peak, the sorption models predict that the
solid–liquid P concentration ratio is 2900 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the average K
value of models of Table 2. That solid–liquid ratio can be converted to a
dimensionless retardation factor representing the ratio of the distance
migrated by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the distance travelled by percolating
water. For example, the retardation was calculated to be 7500 with a bulk
density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>b) of 1.3, porosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.5, and a net vertical
annual water percolation of about 2 m. That retardation corresponds to
a net vertical P migration rate of 2.5 cm over 100 years, i.e. vanishingly
small (calculation details not shown).</p>
      <p id="d1e4647">Secondly, there is uncertainty on the age–depth estimation of the sampled
sediment profiles. The age–depth model is expected to be most reliable for
the Young1 sediment core, as it is based on a fitting of a modelled
age–depth relation to four observed age–depth points, while we only had two
observed age–depth points available for the other cores
(Temmerman et al.,
2004a). Additionally, observed age–depth points were not older than 1944.
Hence, the extrapolation of the age–depth model to periods before the older
available age–depth points is increasingly uncertain.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Pre-industrial and natural background values</title>
      <p id="d1e4658">The population increase between 1800 and 1930 can provide a first very
crude estimate of the population–DPS relation in the Scheldt basin. In 1800
the population in Belgium was around 3 million. Later, in 1930, this number
had more than doubled to 7 million (Vanhaute, 2003). A linear
relation between both suggests that the DPS is 8 % for the
pristine pre-anthropogenic environment, corresponding with a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of 19–41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. close to
what researchers have indicated for pristine lakes. Such predictions need to
be corroborated with older sediment observations and other archaeological
information. The Scheldt River is logically more aerated than smaller
lowland rivers where summer anoxia is naturally more present; i.e. the
pristine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-P values will be higher.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4720">Our study illustrated that tidal marsh sediments could evaluate
pre-industrial background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of the freshwater rivers
like the Scheldt River. A sediment assessment can record time-integrated
environmental events, providing useful spatial and temporal information. Our
data estimated the pre-industrial background concentration at 62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-P</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [95 % CI (57; 66)], about half of the environmental
limits set for surface waters in Flanders and neighbouring countries. Around
1930, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were only about 20 % lower than today, which is
a remarkably large concentration at a time before the massive application of
mineral fertilizers, with lower population density and limited connection to
sewer systems. The current <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations decreased 10 times
from the peak found 40 years ago, reflecting wastewater treatment efforts
and reducing diffuse P emission. It is also clear from this study that the
pristine, pre-anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-P concentrations in the Scheldt River
are well below the current ambient ones.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4798">The Supplement provides the sediment data analysis and age–depth model
results in csv format. In addition, results of surface water data are
available upon request at the IMIS (Flanders Marine Institute).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4801">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-763-2022-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-763-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4810">FL, ES, and PC designed the research. FL conducted the investigation process
and developed the methodology under supervision of ES. MVDB carried out the
fieldwork and conceptualized the use of the samples. ST provided the
methodology for the age–depth model and software. TM validated the use of
the surface water data. EVM and FL placed the results in perspective with
historical data. All the authors contributed to discussion and data
interpretations, review, and editing of the work.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4817">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4823">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4829">The results of this research greatly depended on the data
collected by the OMES-monitoring and The Flemish Waterway. Many years of
intensive data collection and quality assessment of the Scheldt River
resulted in a unique and valuable phosphate time series. We have the utmost
respect for their work and are thankful we could apply the dataset for this
research. We acknowledge Dries Grauwels and Kristin Coorevits for technical
assistance. We recognize the efforts from the anonymous reviewers for their
constructive comments on the work, which improved the quality of the result.
Finally, thanks to the Scheldt for providing this beautiful sediment archive
to travel back in time and explore environmental history.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4834">This research has been supported by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO), project identifier: G089319N.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4840">This paper was edited by Aninda Mazumdar and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Azevedo, L. B., Van Zelm, R., Leuven, R. S. E. W., Hendriks, A. J., and Huijbregts, M. A. J.: Combined ecological risks of nitrogen and phosphorus in European freshwaters, Environ. Pollut., 200, 85–92, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2015.02.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2015.02.011</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>Baken, S., Verbeeck, M., Verheyen, D., Diels, J., and Smolders, E.: Phosphorus losses from agricultural land to natural waters are reduced by immobilisation in iron-rich sediments of drainage ditches, Water Res., 71, 160–170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.008</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation>Ballantine, D. J., Walling, D. E., Collins, A. L., and Leeks, G. J. L.: The content and storage of phosphorus in fine-grained channel bed sediment in contrasting lowland agricultural catchments in the UK, Geoderma, 151, 141–149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.021</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Belliard, J. P., Silinski, A., Meire, D., Kolokythas, G., Levy, Y., Van Braeckel, A., Bouma, T. J., and Temmerman, S.: High-resolution bed level changes in relation to tidal and wave forcing on a narrow fringing macrotidal flat: Bridging intra-tidal, daily and seasonal sediment dynamics, Mar. Geol., 412, 123–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2019.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.margeo.2019.03.001</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>Billen, G., Garnier, J., and Rousseau, V.: Nutrient fluxes and water quality in the drainage network of the Scheldt basin over the last 50 years, Hydrobiologia, 540, 47–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-7103-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10750-004-7103-1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Birch, G. F., McCready, S., Long, E. R., Taylor, S. S., and Spyrakis, G.: Contaminant chemistry and toxicity of sediments in Sydney Harbour, Australia: Spatial extent and chemistry-toxicity relationships, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 363, 71–87, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps07445</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation>Bitschofsky, F. and Nausch, M.: Spatial and seasonal variations in phosphorus speciation along a river in a lowland catchment (Warnow, Germany), Sci. Total Environ., 657, 671–685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.12.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.12.009</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Bjerrum, C. J. and Canfield, D. E.: Ocean productivity before about 1.9 Gyr ago limited by phosphorus adsorption onto iron oxides, Nature, 417, 159–162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/417159a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/417159a</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Borggaard, O. K., Jdrgensen S. S., Moberg, J. P., and Raben-Lange, B.: Influence of organic matter on phosphate adsorption by aluminium and iron oxides in sandy soils, J. Soil Sci., 43, 3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00078.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00078.x</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Boyle, J. F., Chiverrell, R. C., Davies, H., and Alderson, D. M.: An approach to modelling the impact of prehistoric farming on Holocene landscape phosphorus dynamics, Holocene, 25, 203–214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683614556381" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1177/0959683614556381</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation> Breeuwsma, A., Reijerink, J. G. A., and Schoumans, O. F.: Impact of manure on accumulation and leaching of phosphate in areas of intensive livestock farming, in: Animal Waste and the Land-Water Interface (pp. 239–249), edited by:  Steele, K. F., Lewis Publishers,
ISBN 978-1566701891, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Burson, A., Stomp, M., Akil, L., Brussaard, C. P. D., and Huisman, J.: Unbalanced reduction of nutrient loads has created an offshore gradient from phosphorus to nitrogen limitation in the North Sea, Limnol. Oceanogr., 61, 869–888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/LNO.10257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/LNO.10257</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation> Callaway, J. C., Nyman, J. A., and DeLaune, R. D.: Sediment accretion in coastal wetlands: A review and a simulation model of processes, Curr. Top. Wetl. Biogeochem., 2, 2–23, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation> Cardoso, A. C., Solimini, A., Premazzi, G., Carvalho, L., Lyche, A., and Rekolainen, S.: Phosphorus reference concentrations in European lakes, Hydrobiologia, 584, 3–12, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>Correll, D. L.: The Role of Phosphorus in the Eutrophication of Receiving Waters: A Review, J. Environ. Qual., 27, 261–266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700020004x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700020004x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>De Pauw, C.: The environment and plankton of the
WesterScheldt estuary, Ghent, available at:
<uri>http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1390</uri> (last
access: 2 April 2020,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation>De Swart, H. E. and Zimmerman, J. T. F.: Morphodynamics of tidal inlet systems, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41, 203–229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165159</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>Dodds, W. K. and Smith, V. H.: Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in streams, Inland Waters, 6, 155–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-6.2.909" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5268/IW-6.2.909</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation>ECOBE-UA and De Vlaamse Waterweg: OMES: Monitoring
fysical-chemical water quality in the Zeeschelde, available at:
<uri>http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1069</uri> (last access: 28 September 2020), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>ECOBE – UA: The Flemish Waterway: OMES monitoring data
Zeeschelde since 1995, ECOBE – UA [data set], available at: <uri>http://vliz.be/</uri> (last access: 2 April 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>ECOBE – UAntwerpen: AZ monitoring water quality of the
Scheldt, available at:
<uri>http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1468</uri> (last access: 28 September 2020), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page774?><ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation> Edmunds, W. and Shand, P.: Natural groundwater quality, Blackwwell Publishing Ltd, ISBN 978-14051-5675-2, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation>Elser, J. J., Bracken, M. E. S., Cleland, E. E., Gruner, D. S., Harpole, W. S., Hillebrand, H., Ngai, J. T., Seabloom, E. W., Shurin, J. B., and Smith, J. E.: Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems, Ecol. Lett., 10, 1135–1142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 25?><mixed-citation>European Commission: Directive 2000/60/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a
framework for Community action in the field of water policy, available at: <uri>http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/60/oj</uri>
(last access: 28 September 2021),
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Flemish Government: VLAREM II, Vlarem II, EMIS Navig,
available at:
<uri>https://navigator.emis.vito.be/mijn-navigator?woId = 263</uri> (last
access: 23 December 2020), 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation> Friedrichs, C. T. and Perry, J. E.: Tidal Salt Marsh Morphodynamics: A Synthesis, J. Coastal Res., 27, 7–37, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>Froelich, P. N.: Kinetic control of dissolved phosphate in natural rivers and estuaries: A primer on the phosphate buffer mechanism1, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33, 649–668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4part2.0649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1988.33.4part2.0649</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>Hiemstra, T., Antelo, J., Rahnemaie, R., and van Riemsdijk, W. H.: Nanoparticles in natural systems I: The effective reactive surface area of the natural oxide fraction in field samples, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 74, 41–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.10.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2009.10.018</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>Holtan, H., Kamp-Nielsen, L., and Stuanes, A. O.: Phosphorus in soil, water and sediment: an overview, Hydrobiologia, 170, 19–34, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024896" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00024896</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>House, W. A. and Denison, F. H.: Phosphorus dynamics in a lowland river, Water Res., 32, 1819–1830, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00407-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00407-7</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation>Institute voor Hygiëne en Epidemiologie (IHE):
Scheldt water quality data, available at:
<uri>http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1438</uri> (last access: 28 September 2020), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Jarvie, H. P., Neal, C., and Withers, P. J. A.: Sewage-effluent phosphorus: A greater risk to river eutrophication than agricultural phosphorus?, Sci. Total Environ., 360, 246–253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.038</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>Laane, R. W. P. M.: Background concentrations of natural
compounds in rivers, sea water, atmosphere and mussels, The Hague,
available at:
<ext-link xlink:href="http://publicaties.minienm.nl/documenten/background-concentrations-of-natural-compounds-in-rivers-sea-wat">http://publicaties.minienm.nl/documenten/</ext-link> <ext-link xlink:href="http://publicaties.minienm.nl/documenten/background-concentrations-of-natural-compounds-in-rivers-sea-wat">background-concentrations-of-natural-compounds-in-rivers-sea-wat</ext-link>
(last access: 19 October 2020), 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Lexmond, T. M., Riemsdijk, W. H. van, and Haan,
F. A. M. de: Onderzoek naar fosfaat en koper in de bodem in het
bijzonder in gebieden met intensieve veehouderij, L. H., available
at:
<ext-link xlink:href="https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/onderzoek-naar-fosfaat-en-koper-in-de-bodem-in-het-bijzonder-in-g">https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/onderzoek-naar-</ext-link>
<ext-link xlink:href="https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/onderzoek-naar-fosfaat-en-koper-in-de-bodem-in-het-bijzonder-in-g">fosfaat-en-koper-in-de-bodem-in-het-bijzonder-in-g</ext-link>
(last access: 15 September 2021), 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>Lookman, R., Vandeweert, N., Merckx, R., and Vlassak, K.: Geostatistical assessment of the regional distribution of phosphate sorption capacity parameters (FeOX and AlOX) in northern Belgium, Geoderma, 66, 285–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)00084-N" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7061(94)00084-N</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 38?><mixed-citation>Mainstone, C. P. and Parr, W.: Phosphorus in rivers – Ecology and management, Sci. Total Environ., 282–283, 25–47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00937-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00937-8</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Matschullat, J., Ottenstein, R., and Reimann, C.: Geochemical background – Can we calculate it?, Environ. Geol., 39, 990–1000, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s002549900084" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s002549900084</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>Meire, P., Ysebaert, T., Van Damme, S., Van Den Bergh, E., Maris, T., and Struyf, E.: The Scheldt estuary: A description of a changing ecosystem, Hydrobiologia, 540, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-0896-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10750-005-0896-8</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>Migon, C. and Sandroni, V.: Phosphorus in rainwater: Partitioning inputs and impact on the surface coastal ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1160–1165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.4.1160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1999.44.4.1160</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L.: Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations, T. ASABE, 50, 885−-900, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13031/2013.23153</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation>Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>Nürnberg, G. K.: Quantifying anoxia in lakes, Limnol. Oceanogr., 40, 1100–1111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/LO.1995.40.6.1100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/LO.1995.40.6.1100</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 48?><mixed-citation>Pethick, J. S.: Long-term accretion rates on tidal salt marshes, J. Sediment. Petrol., 51, 571–577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7CDE-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1306/212F7CDE-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation> Poppelmonde, D.: Organic carbon dynamics in tidal marshes
of the Scheldt estuary A combined field and modelling approach, Master Thesis research, KU Leuven, VUB, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 51?><mixed-citation>R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, available at: <uri>https://www.r-project.org/</uri> (last access: 8 November 2021), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Reimann, C. and Garrett, R. G.: Geochemical background – Concept and reality, Sci. Total Environ., 350, 12–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.047</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation>Reynolds, C. S.: Phosphorus recycling in lakes: Evidence from large limnetic enclosures for the importance of shallow sediments, Freshwater Biol., 35, 623–645, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1996.tb01773.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2427.1996.tb01773.x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>Rönspieß, L., Dellwig, O., Lange, X., Nausch, G., and Schulz-Bull, D.: Spatial and seasonal phosphorus dynamics in a eutrophic estuary of the southern Baltic Sea, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 233, 106532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2019.106532" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.ECSS.2019.106532</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation>RStudio Team: RStudio: Integrated Development for R, available at: <uri>http://www.rstudio.com/</uri> (last access: 8 November 2021), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation> Salminen, R., Batista, M. J., Bidovec, M. D.,
Demetriades, A., De Vivo, B., De Vos, W., Duris, M., Gilucis, A.,
Gregorauskiene, V., Halamic, J., Heitzmann, P., Lima, A., Jordan,
G., Klaver, G., Klein, P., Lis, J., Locutura, J., Marsina, K.,
Mazreku, A., O'Connor, P. J., Olsson, S. Å., Ottesen, R.-T.,
Petersell, V., Plant, J. A., Reeder, S., Salpeteur, I.,
Sandström, H., Siewers, U., Steenfelt, A., and Tarvainen, T.:
Part 1 – Background information, methodology and maps, in: Geochemical Atlas of Europe, Espoo, Finland: Geological Survey of Finland, ISBN 951-690-913-2, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 59?><mixed-citation>ScheldeMonitor Team and Vlaams-Nederlandse Schelde Comissie (VNSC), research and monitoring: Data downloaded
from ScheldeMonitor: a data portal with information, da<?pagebreak page775?>ta and
products on the Scheldt Estuary, Data downloaded from ScheldeMonitor
a data portal with information, data Prod. Scheldt Estuary,
available at:
<uri>https://rshiny.scheldemonitor.org/waterniveauschelde/</uri> (last
access: 12 April 2021), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 60?><mixed-citation>Schönfelder, I. and Steinberg, C. E. W.: How did the
nutrient concentrations change in northeastern German lowland rivers
during the last four millennia? – A paleolimnological study of floodplain sediments, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät I, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18452/9393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18452/9393</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Schoumans, O. F. and Chardon, W. J.: Phosphate saturation degree and accumulation of phosphate in various soil types in The Netherlands, Geoderma, 237, 325–335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.08.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.08.015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation>Schoumans, O. F. and Groenendijk, P.: Modeling Soil Phosphorus Levels and Phosphorus Leaching from Agricultural Land in the Netherlands, J. Environ. Qual., 29, 111–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010014x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010014x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 63?><mixed-citation>Schulz, M. and Herzog, C.: The influence of sorption processes on the phosphorus mass balance in a eutrophic German lowland river, Water Air Soil Pollut., 155, 291–301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000026535.27164.56" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:WATE.0000026535.27164.56</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation>Schwertmann, U.: Differenzierung der Eisenoxide des Bodens durch Extraktion mit Ammoniumoxalat-Lösung, Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung, Düngung, Bodenkd., 105, 194–202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.3591050303" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jpln.3591050303</ext-link>, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation>Simpson, Z. P., McDowell, R. W., Condron, L. M., McDaniel, M. D., Jarvie, H. P., and Abell, J. M.: Sediment phosphorus buffering in streams at baseflow: A meta-analysis, J. Environ. Qual., 50, 287–311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/JEQ2.20202" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/JEQ2.20202</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 66?><mixed-citation>Smolders, E., Baetens, E., Verbeeck, M., Nawara, S., Diels, J., Verdievel, M., Peeters, B., De Cooman, W., and Baken, S.: Internal Loading and Redox Cycling of Sediment Iron Explain Reactive Phosphorus Concentrations in Lowland Rivers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2584–2592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04337</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation>Struyf, E., Temmerman, S., and Meire, P.: Dynamics of biogenic Si in freshwater tidal marshes: Si regeneration and retention in marsh sediments (Scheldt estuary), Biogeochemistry, 82, 41–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9051-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-006-9051-5</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation>Svendsen, L. M. and Kronvang, B.: Retention of nitrogen
and phosphorus in a Danish lowland river system: implications for
the export from the watershed, in: Developments in Hydrobiology, edited by: Martens, K., Nutr. Dyn. Retent. Land/Water
Ecotones Lowl. Temp. Lakes Rivers, Springer Publishing, 123–135,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1602-2_15" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-011-1602-2_15</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation>Temmerman, S., Govers, G., Meire, P., and Wartel, S.: Modelling long-term tidal marsh growth under changing tidal conditions and suspended sediment concentrations, Scheldt estuary, Belgium, Mar. Geol., 193, 151–169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00642-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00642-4</ext-link>, 2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 71?><mixed-citation>Temmerman, S., Govers, G., Wartel, S., and Meire, P.: Spatial and temporal factors controlling short-term sedimentation in a salt and freshwater tidal marsh, scheldt estuary, Belgium, SW Netherlands, Earth Surf. Proc. Land, 28, 739–755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.495" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.495</ext-link>, 2003b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>Temmerman, S., Govers, G., Wartel, S., and Meire, P.: Modelling estuarine variations in tidal marsh sedimentation: Response to changing sea level and suspended sediment concentrations, Mar. Geol., 212, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.021</ext-link>, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation>Temmerman, S., Govers, G., Meire, P., and Wartel, S.: Simulating the long-term development of levee-basin topography on tidal marshes, Geomorphology, 63, 39–55, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.03.004</ext-link>, 2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>van Dael, T., De Cooman, T., Verbeeck, M., and Smolders, E.: Sediment respiration contributes to phosphate release in lowland surface waters, Water Res., 168, 115168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115168" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2019.115168</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>Van de Broek, M., Temmerman, S., Merckx, R., and Govers, G.: Controls on soil organic carbon stocks in tidal marshes along an estuarine salinity gradient, Biogeosciences, 13, 6611–6624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-6611-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-6611-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>Van de Broek, M., Vandendriessche, C., Poppelmonde, D.,
Merckx, R., Temmerman, S., and Govers, G.: Long-term organic carbon
sequestration in tidal marsh sediments is dominated by old-aged
allochthonous inputs in a macrotidal estuary, Global Change Biol.,
24, 2497–2512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.14089</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Van de Broek, M., Baert, L., Temmerman, S., and Govers, G.: Soil organic carbon stocks in a tidal marsh landscape are dominated by human marsh embankment and subsequent marsh progradation, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 70, 338–349, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ejss.12739</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Van Der Molen, D. T., Portielje, R., Boers, P. C. M., and Lijklema, L.: Changes in sediment phosphorus as a result of eutrophication and oligotrophication in Lake Veluwe, The Netherlands, Water Res., 32, 3281–3288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00117-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00117-1</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 82?><mixed-citation>van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M.: Transport of reactive contaminants in heterogeneous soil systems, Doctoral thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands, available at: <uri>http://edepot.wur.nl/212029</uri> (last access: 14 July 2020),  1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 83?><mixed-citation>van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M., van Riemsdijk, W. H., and de Haan, F. A. M.: Het Protokol Fosfaatverzadigde Gronden, Research Report Wageningen university &amp; research, sub-department of Soil Qualtiy, available at:
<uri>https://edepot.wur.nl/394250</uri> (last access: 30 September 2020), 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 81?><mixed-citation>van der Zee, C., Roevros, N., and Chou, L.: Phosphorus speciation, transformation and retention in the Scheldt estuary (Belgium/The Netherlands) from the freshwater tidal limits to the North Sea, Mar. Chem., 106, 76–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.003</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Van Huet, H. J. W. J.: Phosphorus eutrophication research
in the lake district of south western Friesland, The
Netherlands. Preliminary results of abiotic studies, in: Developments in Hydrobiology, edited by: Martens, K., Trophic
Relationships Inl. Waters, Springer Publishing, 75–85, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0467-5_10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-009-0467-5_10</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation>Van Meel, L.: hydrobiology of the Sea-Scheldt near
Liefkenshoek, available at:
<uri>http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1412</uri>
(last access: 28 September 2020), 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>Van Puijenbroek, P. J. T. M., Cleij, P., and Visser, H.: Aggregated indices for trends in eutrophication of different types of fresh water in the Netherlands, Ecol. Indic., 36, 456–462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2013.08.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2013.08.022</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>Van Putte, N., Temmerman, S., Verreydt, G., Seuntjens, P., Maris, T., Heyndrickx, M., Boone, M., Joris, I., and Meire, P.: Groundwater dynamics in a restored tidal marsh are limited <?pagebreak page776?>by historical soil compaction, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 244, 106101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2019.02.006</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 52?><mixed-citation>van Raaphorst, W. and Kloosterhuis, H. T.: Phosphate sorption in superficial intertidal sediments, Mar. Chem., 48, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(94)90058-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4203(94)90058-2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation>van Raaphorst, W., de Jonge, V. N., Dijkhuizen, D., and
Frederiks, B.: Natural background concentrations of phosphorus and
nitrogen in the Dutch Wadden Sea, Rapp. voor Kust en Zee, Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ),
53 pp., available at: <uri>https://edepot.wur.nl/174247</uri> (last access: 24 December 2020), 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 74?><mixed-citation> Vanhaute, E.: En arbeid in België in de `lange negentiende eeuw', Bijdr. Meded. Geschied. Ned., 118, 153–178, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 75?><mixed-citation>VMM: Milieurapport Vlaanderen – Systeembalans 2017, available at: <uri>http://www.milieurapport.be/Upload/main/0_topicrapporten/361312_Systeembalans2017_nieuw.pdf</uri> (last access: 24 December 2020), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 75?><mixed-citation>VMM: Nutriënten – Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, available at: <uri>https://www.vmm.be/water/kwaliteit-waterlopen/chemie/nutrienten#section-0</uri> (last access: 10 February 2020), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 75?><mixed-citation>VMM: Fysisch-chemische kwaliteit oppervlaktewater 2018 – Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, available at: <uri>https://www.vmm.be/publicaties/fysisch-chemische-kwaliteit-oppervlaktewater-2018</uri> (last access: 27 February 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 76?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Shen, Z., Niu, J., and Liu, R.: Adsorption of phosphorus on sediments from the Three-Gorges Reservoir (China) and the relation with sediment compositions, J. Hazard. Mater., 162, 92–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.013</ext-link>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 77?><mixed-citation>Warrinnier, R., Goossens, T., Braun, S., Gustafsson, J. P., and Smolders, E.: Modelling heterogeneous phosphate sorption kinetics on iron oxyhydroxides and soil with a continuous distribution approach, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 69, 475–487, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12549" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ejss.12549</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 78?><mixed-citation>Warrinnier, R., Goossens, T., Amery, F., Vanden Nest, T., Verbeeck, M., and Smolders, E.: Investigation on the control of phosphate leaching by sorption and colloidal transport: Column studies and multi-surface complexation modelling, Appl. Geochem., 100, 371–379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.12.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.12.012</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 79?><mixed-citation>Watson, S. J., Cade-Menun, B. J., Needoba, J. A., and
Peterson, T. D.: Phosphorus Forms in Sediments of a River-Dominated
Estuary, Front. Mar. Sci., 5, 302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2018.00302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/FMARS.2018.00302</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 80?><mixed-citation>Zak, D., Kleeberg, A., and Hupfer, M.: Sulphate-mediated phosphorus mobilisation in riverine sediments at increasing sulphate concentration, River Spree, NE Germany, Biogeochemistry, 80, 109–119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-0003-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-006-0003-x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 84?><mixed-citation>Zhou, A., Tang, H., and Wang, D.: Phosphorus adsorption on natural sediments: Modeling and effects of pH and sediment composition, Water Res., 39, 1245–1254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.026</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Estimation of the natural background of phosphate in a lowland river using tidal marsh sediment cores</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Azevedo, L. B., Van Zelm, R., Leuven, R. S. E. W., Hendriks, A. J., and Huijbregts, M. A. J.: Combined ecological risks of nitrogen and phosphorus in European freshwaters, Environ. Pollut., 200, 85–92, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2015.02.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2015.02.011</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Baken, S., Verbeeck, M., Verheyen, D., Diels, J., and Smolders, E.: Phosphorus losses from agricultural land to natural waters are reduced by immobilisation in iron-rich sediments of drainage ditches, Water Res., 71, 160–170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.008</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Ballantine, D. J., Walling, D. E., Collins, A. L., and Leeks, G. J. L.: The content and storage of phosphorus in fine-grained channel bed sediment in contrasting lowland agricultural catchments in the UK, Geoderma, 151, 141–149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.021</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Belliard, J. P., Silinski, A., Meire, D., Kolokythas, G., Levy, Y., Van Braeckel, A., Bouma, T. J., and Temmerman, S.: High-resolution bed level changes in relation to tidal and wave forcing on a narrow fringing macrotidal flat: Bridging intra-tidal, daily and seasonal sediment dynamics, Mar. Geol., 412, 123–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2019.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2019.03.001</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation> Billen, G., Garnier, J., and Rousseau, V.: Nutrient fluxes and water quality in the drainage network of the Scheldt basin over the last 50 years, Hydrobiologia, 540, 47–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-7103-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-7103-1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation> Birch, G. F., McCready, S., Long, E. R., Taylor, S. S., and Spyrakis, G.: Contaminant chemistry and toxicity of sediments in Sydney Harbour, Australia: Spatial extent and chemistry-toxicity relationships, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 363, 71–87, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07445</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Bitschofsky, F. and Nausch, M.: Spatial and seasonal variations in phosphorus speciation along a river in a lowland catchment (Warnow, Germany), Sci. Total Environ., 657, 671–685, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.12.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.12.009</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Bjerrum, C. J. and Canfield, D. E.: Ocean productivity before about 1.9 Gyr ago limited by phosphorus adsorption onto iron oxides, Nature, 417, 159–162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/417159a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/417159a</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Borggaard, O. K., Jdrgensen S. S., Moberg, J. P., and Raben-Lange, B.: Influence of organic matter on phosphate adsorption by aluminium and iron oxides in sandy soils, J. Soil Sci., 43, 3, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00078.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00078.x</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Boyle, J. F., Chiverrell, R. C., Davies, H., and Alderson, D. M.: An approach to modelling the impact of prehistoric farming on Holocene landscape phosphorus dynamics, Holocene, 25, 203–214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683614556381" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683614556381</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Breeuwsma, A., Reijerink, J. G. A., and Schoumans, O. F.: Impact of manure on accumulation and leaching of phosphate in areas of intensive livestock farming, in: Animal Waste and the Land-Water Interface (pp. 239–249), edited by:  Steele, K. F., Lewis Publishers,
ISBN 978-1566701891, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Burson, A., Stomp, M., Akil, L., Brussaard, C. P. D., and Huisman, J.: Unbalanced reduction of nutrient loads has created an offshore gradient from phosphorus to nitrogen limitation in the North Sea, Limnol. Oceanogr., 61, 869–888, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/LNO.10257" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/LNO.10257</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Callaway, J. C., Nyman, J. A., and DeLaune, R. D.: Sediment accretion in coastal wetlands: A review and a simulation model of processes, Curr. Top. Wetl. Biogeochem., 2, 2–23, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation> Cardoso, A. C., Solimini, A., Premazzi, G., Carvalho, L., Lyche, A., and Rekolainen, S.: Phosphorus reference concentrations in European lakes, Hydrobiologia, 584, 3–12, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Correll, D. L.: The Role of Phosphorus in the Eutrophication of Receiving Waters: A Review, J. Environ. Qual., 27, 261–266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700020004x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700020004x</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> De Pauw, C.: The environment and plankton of the
WesterScheldt estuary, Ghent, available at:
<a href="http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1390" target="_blank"/> (last
access: 2 April 2020,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> De Swart, H. E. and Zimmerman, J. T. F.: Morphodynamics of tidal inlet systems, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41, 203–229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165159</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Dodds, W. K. and Smith, V. H.: Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in streams, Inland Waters, 6, 155–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-6.2.909" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-6.2.909</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> ECOBE-UA and De Vlaamse Waterweg: OMES: Monitoring
fysical-chemical water quality in the Zeeschelde, available at:
<a href="http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1069" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 September 2020), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> ECOBE – UA: The Flemish Waterway: OMES monitoring data
Zeeschelde since 1995, ECOBE – UA [data set], available at: <a href="http://vliz.be/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 April 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> ECOBE – UAntwerpen: AZ monitoring water quality of the
Scheldt, available at:
<a href="http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1468" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 September 2020), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Edmunds, W. and Shand, P.: Natural groundwater quality, Blackwwell Publishing Ltd, ISBN 978-14051-5675-2, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> Elser, J. J., Bracken, M. E. S., Cleland, E. E., Gruner, D. S., Harpole, W. S., Hillebrand, H., Ngai, J. T., Seabloom, E. W., Shurin, J. B., and Smith, J. E.: Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems, Ecol. Lett., 10, 1135–1142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> European Commission: Directive 2000/60/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a
framework for Community action in the field of water policy, available at: <a href="http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/60/oj" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 28 September 2021),
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> Flemish Government: VLAREM II, Vlarem II, EMIS Navig,
available at:
<a href="https://navigator.emis.vito.be/mijn-navigator?woId = 263" target="_blank"/> (last
access: 23 December 2020), 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Friedrichs, C. T. and Perry, J. E.: Tidal Salt Marsh Morphodynamics: A Synthesis, J. Coastal Res., 27, 7–37, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Froelich, P. N.: Kinetic control of dissolved phosphate in natural rivers and estuaries: A primer on the phosphate buffer mechanism1, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33, 649–668, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4part2.0649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4part2.0649</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation> Hiemstra, T., Antelo, J., Rahnemaie, R., and van Riemsdijk, W. H.: Nanoparticles in natural systems I: The effective reactive surface area of the natural oxide fraction in field samples, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 74, 41–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.10.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.10.018</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Holtan, H., Kamp-Nielsen, L., and Stuanes, A. O.: Phosphorus in soil, water and sediment: an overview, Hydrobiologia, 170, 19–34, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024896" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024896</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation> House, W. A. and Denison, F. H.: Phosphorus dynamics in a lowland river, Water Res., 32, 1819–1830, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00407-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00407-7</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation> Institute voor Hygiëne en Epidemiologie (IHE):
Scheldt water quality data, available at:
<a href="http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1438" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 September 2020), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation> Jarvie, H. P., Neal, C., and Withers, P. J. A.: Sewage-effluent phosphorus: A greater risk to river eutrophication than agricultural phosphorus?, Sci. Total Environ., 360, 246–253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.038</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation> Laane, R. W. P. M.: Background concentrations of natural
compounds in rivers, sea water, atmosphere and mussels, The Hague,
available at:
<a href="http://publicaties.minienm.nl/documenten/background-concentrations-of-natural-compounds-in-rivers-sea-wat" target="_blank">http://publicaties.minienm.nl/documenten/</a> <a href="http://publicaties.minienm.nl/documenten/background-concentrations-of-natural-compounds-in-rivers-sea-wat" target="_blank">background-concentrations-of-natural-compounds-in-rivers-sea-wat</a>
(last access: 19 October 2020), 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation> Lexmond, T. M., Riemsdijk, W. H. van, and Haan,
F. A. M. de: Onderzoek naar fosfaat en koper in de bodem in het
bijzonder in gebieden met intensieve veehouderij, L. H., available
at:
<a href="https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/onderzoek-naar-fosfaat-en-koper-in-de-bodem-in-het-bijzonder-in-g" target="_blank">https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/onderzoek-naar-</a>
<a href="https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/onderzoek-naar-fosfaat-en-koper-in-de-bodem-in-het-bijzonder-in-g" target="_blank">fosfaat-en-koper-in-de-bodem-in-het-bijzonder-in-g</a>
(last access: 15 September 2021), 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation> Lookman, R., Vandeweert, N., Merckx, R., and Vlassak, K.: Geostatistical assessment of the regional distribution of phosphate sorption capacity parameters (FeOX and AlOX) in northern Belgium, Geoderma, 66, 285–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)00084-N" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)00084-N</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> Mainstone, C. P. and Parr, W.: Phosphorus in rivers – Ecology and management, Sci. Total Environ., 282–283, 25–47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00937-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00937-8</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation> Matschullat, J., Ottenstein, R., and Reimann, C.: Geochemical background – Can we calculate it?, Environ. Geol., 39, 990–1000, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s002549900084" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s002549900084</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> Meire, P., Ysebaert, T., Van Damme, S., Van Den Bergh, E., Maris, T., and Struyf, E.: The Scheldt estuary: A description of a changing ecosystem, Hydrobiologia, 540, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-0896-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-0896-8</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation> Migon, C. and Sandroni, V.: Phosphorus in rainwater: Partitioning inputs and impact on the surface coastal ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1160–1165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.4.1160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.4.1160</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation> Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L.: Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations, T. ASABE, 50, 885−-900, <a href="https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation> Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation> Nürnberg, G. K.: Quantifying anoxia in lakes, Limnol. Oceanogr., 40, 1100–1111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/LO.1995.40.6.1100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/LO.1995.40.6.1100</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation> Pethick, J. S.: Long-term accretion rates on tidal salt marshes, J. Sediment. Petrol., 51, 571–577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7CDE-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7CDE-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation> Poppelmonde, D.: Organic carbon dynamics in tidal marshes
of the Scheldt estuary A combined field and modelling approach, Master Thesis research, KU Leuven, VUB, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation> R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, available at: <a href="https://www.r-project.org/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 8 November 2021), 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation> Reimann, C. and Garrett, R. G.: Geochemical background – Concept and reality, Sci. Total Environ., 350, 12–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.047</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation> Reynolds, C. S.: Phosphorus recycling in lakes: Evidence from large limnetic enclosures for the importance of shallow sediments, Freshwater Biol., 35, 623–645, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1996.tb01773.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1996.tb01773.x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Rönspieß, L., Dellwig, O., Lange, X., Nausch, G., and Schulz-Bull, D.: Spatial and seasonal phosphorus dynamics in a eutrophic estuary of the southern Baltic Sea, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 233, 106532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2019.106532" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2019.106532</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> RStudio Team: RStudio: Integrated Development for R, available at: <a href="http://www.rstudio.com/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 8 November 2021), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> Salminen, R., Batista, M. J., Bidovec, M. D.,
Demetriades, A., De Vivo, B., De Vos, W., Duris, M., Gilucis, A.,
Gregorauskiene, V., Halamic, J., Heitzmann, P., Lima, A., Jordan,
G., Klaver, G., Klein, P., Lis, J., Locutura, J., Marsina, K.,
Mazreku, A., O'Connor, P. J., Olsson, S. Å., Ottesen, R.-T.,
Petersell, V., Plant, J. A., Reeder, S., Salpeteur, I.,
Sandström, H., Siewers, U., Steenfelt, A., and Tarvainen, T.:
Part 1 – Background information, methodology and maps, in: Geochemical Atlas of Europe, Espoo, Finland: Geological Survey of Finland, ISBN 951-690-913-2, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> ScheldeMonitor Team and Vlaams-Nederlandse Schelde Comissie (VNSC), research and monitoring: Data downloaded
from ScheldeMonitor: a data portal with information, data and
products on the Scheldt Estuary, Data downloaded from ScheldeMonitor
a data portal with information, data Prod. Scheldt Estuary,
available at:
<a href="https://rshiny.scheldemonitor.org/waterniveauschelde/" target="_blank"/> (last
access: 12 April 2021), 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation> Schönfelder, I. and Steinberg, C. E. W.: How did the
nutrient concentrations change in northeastern German lowland rivers
during the last four millennia? – A paleolimnological study of floodplain sediments, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät I, <a href="https://doi.org/10.18452/9393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18452/9393</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Schoumans, O. F. and Chardon, W. J.: Phosphate saturation degree and accumulation of phosphate in various soil types in The Netherlands, Geoderma, 237, 325–335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.08.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.08.015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation> Schoumans, O. F. and Groenendijk, P.: Modeling Soil Phosphorus Levels and Phosphorus Leaching from Agricultural Land in the Netherlands, J. Environ. Qual., 29, 111–116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010014x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010014x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation> Schulz, M. and Herzog, C.: The influence of sorption processes on the phosphorus mass balance in a eutrophic German lowland river, Water Air Soil Pollut., 155, 291–301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000026535.27164.56" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000026535.27164.56</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation> Schwertmann, U.: Differenzierung der Eisenoxide des Bodens durch Extraktion mit Ammoniumoxalat-Lösung, Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung, Düngung, Bodenkd., 105, 194–202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.3591050303" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.3591050303</a>, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation> Simpson, Z. P., McDowell, R. W., Condron, L. M., McDaniel, M. D., Jarvie, H. P., and Abell, J. M.: Sediment phosphorus buffering in streams at baseflow: A meta-analysis, J. Environ. Qual., 50, 287–311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/JEQ2.20202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/JEQ2.20202</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation> Smolders, E., Baetens, E., Verbeeck, M., Nawara, S., Diels, J., Verdievel, M., Peeters, B., De Cooman, W., and Baken, S.: Internal Loading and Redox Cycling of Sediment Iron Explain Reactive Phosphorus Concentrations in Lowland Rivers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2584–2592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04337" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04337</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation> Struyf, E., Temmerman, S., and Meire, P.: Dynamics of biogenic Si in freshwater tidal marshes: Si regeneration and retention in marsh sediments (Scheldt estuary), Biogeochemistry, 82, 41–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9051-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9051-5</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> Svendsen, L. M. and Kronvang, B.: Retention of nitrogen
and phosphorus in a Danish lowland river system: implications for
the export from the watershed, in: Developments in Hydrobiology, edited by: Martens, K., Nutr. Dyn. Retent. Land/Water
Ecotones Lowl. Temp. Lakes Rivers, Springer Publishing, 123–135,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1602-2_15" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1602-2_15</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation> Temmerman, S., Govers, G., Meire, P., and Wartel, S.: Modelling long-term tidal marsh growth under changing tidal conditions and suspended sediment concentrations, Scheldt estuary, Belgium, Mar. Geol., 193, 151–169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00642-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00642-4</a>, 2003a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation> Temmerman, S., Govers, G., Wartel, S., and Meire, P.: Spatial and temporal factors controlling short-term sedimentation in a salt and freshwater tidal marsh, scheldt estuary, Belgium, SW Netherlands, Earth Surf. Proc. Land, 28, 739–755, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.495" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.495</a>, 2003b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation> Temmerman, S., Govers, G., Wartel, S., and Meire, P.: Modelling estuarine variations in tidal marsh sedimentation: Response to changing sea level and suspended sediment concentrations, Mar. Geol., 212, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.021</a>, 2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation> Temmerman, S., Govers, G., Meire, P., and Wartel, S.: Simulating the long-term development of levee-basin topography on tidal marshes, Geomorphology, 63, 39–55, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.03.004</a>, 2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation> van Dael, T., De Cooman, T., Verbeeck, M., and Smolders, E.: Sediment respiration contributes to phosphate release in lowland surface waters, Water Res., 168, 115168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115168" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115168</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation> Van de Broek, M., Temmerman, S., Merckx, R., and Govers, G.: Controls on soil organic carbon stocks in tidal marshes along an estuarine salinity gradient, Biogeosciences, 13, 6611–6624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-6611-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-6611-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation> Van de Broek, M., Vandendriessche, C., Poppelmonde, D.,
Merckx, R., Temmerman, S., and Govers, G.: Long-term organic carbon
sequestration in tidal marsh sediments is dominated by old-aged
allochthonous inputs in a macrotidal estuary, Global Change Biol.,
24, 2497–2512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14089</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation> Van de Broek, M., Baert, L., Temmerman, S., and Govers, G.: Soil organic carbon stocks in a tidal marsh landscape are dominated by human marsh embankment and subsequent marsh progradation, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 70, 338–349, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12739</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation> Van Der Molen, D. T., Portielje, R., Boers, P. C. M., and Lijklema, L.: Changes in sediment phosphorus as a result of eutrophication and oligotrophication in Lake Veluwe, The Netherlands, Water Res., 32, 3281–3288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00117-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00117-1</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation> van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M.: Transport of reactive contaminants in heterogeneous soil systems, Doctoral thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands, available at: <a href="http://edepot.wur.nl/212029" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 July 2020),  1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation> van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M., van Riemsdijk, W. H., and de Haan, F. A. M.: Het Protokol Fosfaatverzadigde Gronden, Research Report Wageningen university &amp; research, sub-department of Soil Qualtiy, available at:
<a href="https://edepot.wur.nl/394250" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 September 2020), 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation> van der Zee, C., Roevros, N., and Chou, L.: Phosphorus speciation, transformation and retention in the Scheldt estuary (Belgium/The Netherlands) from the freshwater tidal limits to the North Sea, Mar. Chem., 106, 76–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.003</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation> Van Huet, H. J. W. J.: Phosphorus eutrophication research
in the lake district of south western Friesland, The
Netherlands. Preliminary results of abiotic studies, in: Developments in Hydrobiology, edited by: Martens, K., Trophic
Relationships Inl. Waters, Springer Publishing, 75–85, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0467-5_10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0467-5_10</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation> Van Meel, L.: hydrobiology of the Sea-Scheldt near
Liefkenshoek, available at:
<a href="http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=dataset&amp;dasid=1412" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 28 September 2020), 1958.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation> Van Puijenbroek, P. J. T. M., Cleij, P., and Visser, H.: Aggregated indices for trends in eutrophication of different types of fresh water in the Netherlands, Ecol. Indic., 36, 456–462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2013.08.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2013.08.022</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Van Putte, N., Temmerman, S., Verreydt, G., Seuntjens, P., Maris, T., Heyndrickx, M., Boone, M., Joris, I., and Meire, P.: Groundwater dynamics in a restored tidal marsh are limited by historical soil compaction, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 244, 106101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.02.006</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation> van Raaphorst, W. and Kloosterhuis, H. T.: Phosphate sorption in superficial intertidal sediments, Mar. Chem., 48, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(94)90058-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(94)90058-2</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation> van Raaphorst, W., de Jonge, V. N., Dijkhuizen, D., and
Frederiks, B.: Natural background concentrations of phosphorus and
nitrogen in the Dutch Wadden Sea, Rapp. voor Kust en Zee, Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ),
53 pp., available at: <a href="https://edepot.wur.nl/174247" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 December 2020), 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation> Vanhaute, E.: En arbeid in België in de `lange negentiende eeuw', Bijdr. Meded. Geschied. Ned., 118, 153–178, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation> VMM: Milieurapport Vlaanderen – Systeembalans 2017, available at: <a href="http://www.milieurapport.be/Upload/main/0_topicrapporten/361312_Systeembalans2017_nieuw.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 December 2020), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
VMM: Nutriënten – Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, available at: <a href="https://www.vmm.be/water/kwaliteit-waterlopen/chemie/nutrienten#section-0" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 February 2020), 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
VMM: Fysisch-chemische kwaliteit oppervlaktewater 2018 – Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, available at: <a href="https://www.vmm.be/publicaties/fysisch-chemische-kwaliteit-oppervlaktewater-2018" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 February 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation> Wang, Y., Shen, Z., Niu, J., and Liu, R.: Adsorption of phosphorus on sediments from the Three-Gorges Reservoir (China) and the relation with sediment compositions, J. Hazard. Mater., 162, 92–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.013</a>, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation> Warrinnier, R., Goossens, T., Braun, S., Gustafsson, J. P., and Smolders, E.: Modelling heterogeneous phosphate sorption kinetics on iron oxyhydroxides and soil with a continuous distribution approach, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 69, 475–487, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12549" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12549</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation> Warrinnier, R., Goossens, T., Amery, F., Vanden Nest, T., Verbeeck, M., and Smolders, E.: Investigation on the control of phosphate leaching by sorption and colloidal transport: Column studies and multi-surface complexation modelling, Appl. Geochem., 100, 371–379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.12.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.12.012</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation> Watson, S. J., Cade-Menun, B. J., Needoba, J. A., and
Peterson, T. D.: Phosphorus Forms in Sediments of a River-Dominated
Estuary, Front. Mar. Sci., 5, 302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2018.00302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2018.00302</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation> Zak, D., Kleeberg, A., and Hupfer, M.: Sulphate-mediated phosphorus mobilisation in riverine sediments at increasing sulphate concentration, River Spree, NE Germany, Biogeochemistry, 80, 109–119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-0003-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-0003-x</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation> Zhou, A., Tang, H., and Wang, D.: Phosphorus adsorption on natural sediments: Modeling and effects of pH and sediment composition, Water Res., 39, 1245–1254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.026</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
