<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-20-2013-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Partitioning of carbon export in the euphotic zone of the oligotrophic South
China Sea</article-title><alt-title>Partitioning of carbon export in the euphotic zone of the oligotrophic South China Sea</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Partitioning of carbon export in the euphotic zone of the oligotrophic South China Sea}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. Ma et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Yifan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Kuanbo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Weifang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Junhui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Jin-Yu Terence</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2066-0375</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Dai</surname><given-names>Minhan</given-names></name>
          <email>mdai@xmu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0550-0701</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean
and Earth Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Minhan Dai (mdai@xmu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>2013</fpage><lpage>2030</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>September</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>April</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>April</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Yifan Ma et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e127">We conducted samplings of total and particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, along
with particulate organic carbon (POC), in the summer of 2017 to examine
nutrient-dependent structures of export productivity within the euphotic
zone (Ez) of the oligotrophic basin of the South China Sea (SCS). Nitrate
concentrations throughout the study area were below detection limits in the
nutrient-depleted layer (NDL) above the nutricline, while they sharply
increased with depth in the nutrient-replete layer (NRL) across the
nutricline until the base of the Ez. Based on our vertical profilings of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibria, this study estimated for the first time
POC export fluxes both out of the NDL and at the horizon of the Ez base.
The total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th deficit relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U was determined in the NDL at
all study sites. By contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th was mostly in equilibrium with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U in the NRL, except at the northernmost station, SEATS (SouthEast Asian Time-series Study; 18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th deficit was also observed in the NRL. By
combining 1D steady-state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, we
derived vertical patterns of POC export fluxes. The POC export fluxes at
station SEATS were 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the NDL base,
accounting for approximately half of that at the base of the Ez. For the
rest of the sampling sites, the POC export fluxes at the NDL base (averaged
at 2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were comparable with those at
the base of the Ez (1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting
rapid export of POC out of the NDL. This finding fundamentally changes our
traditional view that the NDL, being depleted in nutrients, would not be a
net exporter of POC. Furthermore, our results revealed a significant
positive correlation between POC export fluxes at the NDL base and the
potential of subsurface nutrient supplies, indicated by nutricline depth and
nutrient concentrations obtained from both in situ measurements and numerical
modeling. POC export fluxes (averaged at 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the NDL base at stations with shallow nutriclines and high
levels of subsurface nutrients approximately doubled those (averaged at
1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at other stations. We subsequently
used a two-endmember mixing model based on the mass and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N isotopic
balances to evaluate the relative contribution of different sources of new
nitrogen that support the observed particle export at stations SEATS and
SS1, located respectively in the northern and southern basin of the SCS with
different hydrological features. We showed that more than 50 % of the
particle flux out of the NDL was supported by nitrate sources likely
supplied from depth and associated with episodic intrusions other than
atmospheric deposition and nitrogen fixation. However, the exact mechanisms
and pathways for subsurface nutrients to support the export production from
the NDL merit additional careful and dedicated studies.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>41890800</award-id>
<award-id>42188102</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e427">The marine biological carbon pump (BCP) plays a central role in
sequestrating atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, thereby mitigating human-induced climate
change. Despite great efforts that have been devoted to studying the BCP,
there remain critical knowledge gaps in terms of its structure, function and
efficiency (Siegel et al., 2021). Recently, the EXPORTS (EXport Processes in
the Ocean from RemoTe Sensing) program has implemented comprehensive
experiments which examine export flux pathways, plankton community
composition, food web processes and biogeochemical properties of<?pagebreak page2014?> the
ecosystem to achieve an improved understanding of export fluxes and the BCP
(Siegel et al., 2016, 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e439">Among other factors, depth-dependent particle export at different horizons
within the euphotic zone (Ez), and how these exports are sustained by
different nutrient sources, remains largely unknown. Most previous studies
have treated the Ez as a single box and chose a fixed depth (e.g., 100 or
150 m) as the export horizon (Benitez-Nelson et al., 2001; Cai et al., 2015;
Zhou et al., 2020a). A recent study has suggested that using a fixed depth
instead of the in situ Ez depth as the export horizon would lead to the magnitude
of global POC export flux being underestimated by a factor of 2 (Buesseler
et al., 2020a). In the oligotrophic oceans, permanent stratification limits
nutrient supply from depth; the Ez thus could be divided into the following two-layer
structure based on nutrient concentrations: (1) the nutrient-depleted layer
(NDL) between the ocean surface and the top of the nutricline and (2) the nutrient-replete layer (NRL) between the nutricline and the base of the Ez
(Du et al., 2017). Conventional concepts suggest that regenerated nutrients
predominantly support biological productivity in the NDL, where export
production is limited due to the absence of new nutrient supplies (Eppley
and Peterson, 1979; Goldman, 1984). Meanwhile, Coale and Bruland (1987)
noticed the layered structure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U disequilibria in the Ez,
composed of an upper oligotrophic layer characterized by low new-production
values and low net scavenging and a subsurface eutrophic layer with higher new-production values, and they suggested that new production rather than total
primary production determined the scavenging of the reactive elements such
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th. Cai et al. (2008) also observed variable particle-scavenging
rates in the upper euphotic zone (above 50 m) but consistently lower rates
in the lower euphotic zone (between 50 and 100 m) in the oligotrophic South China Sea (SCS).
With increasing high-resolution samplings, such partitionings of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-based particle scavenging were frequently observable in
oligotrophic ecosystems (Buesseler et al., 2009; Umhau et al., 2019; Zhou et
al., 2020a; Stukel et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e478">Along with the increasing attention on BCP in the oligotrophic ecosystems,
some observations have, however, indicated that particles sourced from surface
waters with extremely low nutrient concentrations may substantially
contribute to the downward fluxes at depth. Scharek et al. (1999) observed
that the diatom–diazotroph assemblages (<italic>Hemiaulus hauckii</italic>  contained <italic>Richelia</italic>-type endosymbionts with
heterocysts) in the surface nutrient-deficient mixed layer dominated
downward particle fluxes collected by a sediment trap at 150 m depth at the
oligotrophic station ALOHA (A Long-term Oligotrophic Habitat Assessment; 22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 158<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). Liu et al. (2007)
observed consistent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values between sediment trap
samples collected at 100 m and suspended particles in the upper 20 m in the
SCS basin, likely suggesting that the trapped particles
predominantly originated from the surface (i.e., 20 m). The ecosystem
in nutrient-depleted surface waters may therefore play an important role in
carbon export. Different pathways to introduce new nutrients have been
suggested to support the carbon export from the NDL; for example, high rates
of nitrogen fixation in the NDL could support 26 %–47 % of the particle
fluxes at station ALOHA (Böttjer et al., 2017). In addition, episodic
eddy events that uplift the nutricline and deliver deep stocks of nutrients
to the NDL might also contribute to POC export from the upper ocean (Johnson
et al., 2010). Nevertheless, it remains unclear how the different nutrient
supplies to the surface waters affect the downward POC export flux at the NDL
and Ez horizons.</p>
      <p id="d1e535">The semi-enclosed SCS, the largest marginal sea in the
North Pacific Ocean, is characterized by an oligotrophic basin due to
intensive stratification (Du et al., 2017). Several previous studies
quantified the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-based POC export flux and explored the mechanisms
controlling export in the SCS. Seasonally, POC export fluxes are elevated in
winter, driven by the deepening of the mixed layer and nutrient supply from
depth (Zhou et al., 2020a). Spatially, Cai et al. (2015) found that POC
export fluxes decreased with distance offshore in the northern SCS due to
reduced POC stocks. Mesoscale processes can also promote POC export by
pumping nutrient-replete waters from depth into the Ez (Zhou et al., 2013,
2020b). Regardless, POC export fluxes at different export horizons, and the
sources of new nutrients that support export, remain understudied in the
oligotrophic SCS.</p>
      <p id="d1e548">In this study, we conducted samplings of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th at a reasonably high
depth resolution in the Ez during the summer of 2017 to examine the
structure of export productivity partitioning in the SCS basin. We
calculated POC export fluxes based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th from both the NDL and Ez.
Based on trap-derived masses and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N isotopic balances, we estimated
the relative contributions of different nutrient sources to export fluxes
within the two-layer nutrient-based structure in the SCS at two stations
with different hydrological features. Moreover, we related POC export fluxes
from the two layers to their different biogeochemical forcings (especially
the depth of the nutricline and the subsurface nutrient concentrations) to
examine the controlling factors that potentially regulate POC export flux in
the oligotrophic SCS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sample collection</title>
      <p id="d1e593">Ship-based sampling was conducted from 5 to 27 June 2017 on
the R/V Tan <italic>Kah Kee</italic> in the SCS basin (Fig. 1 and Table 1) under the umbrella
of the CHOICE-C II project (Carbon Cycle in the South China Sea:
budget, controls and global implications). We visited two mega stations
(SEATS and SS1) and nine regular stations during the cruise. The in situ observation
at station SEATS was conducted before a typhoon (Merbok) which potentially
affected the biogeochemistry of<?pagebreak page2015?> the region, and the remaining stations were
visited after the typhoon (listed in Table 1). To examine the spatial
variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, we sampled four closely clustered stations (H01,
H06, H08 and H11) around station SS1. Seawater samples were collected using
12 or 10 L Niskin bottles attached to a Sea-Bird 911
conductivity–temperature–depth (CTD) profiler.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e610">Map of the South China Sea (SCS) with sampling stations during
June 2017. Yellow diamonds denote mega stations (SEATS and SS1) where
high-resolution sampling was conducted at a 10 m interval in the euphotic
zone; red circles denote regular stations where samples were collected at
typical sampling depths of 5, 25, 50, 75 and 100 m. The general circulation
pattern (adapted from Liu et al., 2016) is also shown. The dominant summer
currents are denoted by dashed black arrows. The dashed dark-blue line
denotes the path of the typhoon Merbok (generated at the southeastern part of
the SCS on 9 June 2017).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e622">Sampling logs and site information along with the accessed
parameters and their utilizations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="1.2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="1.4cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="1.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Arriving time</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{1.2cm}?><oasis:entry colname="col3" morerows="1">Latitude <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N]</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{1.4cm}?><oasis:entry colname="col4" morerows="1">Longitude <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E]</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{1.5cm}?><oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="1">Bottom <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> depth [m]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" colsep="1">Parameters </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col9">Data utilizations </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[UTC+8]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Total</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Trap</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Partitioning</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Nutrient</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">POC flux</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">source</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">estimate</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">diagnosis</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEATS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7 Jun 2017, 00:06</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3907</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11 Jun 2017, 23:55</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4205</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SS1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 Jun 2017, 20:08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4107</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H06</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 Jun 2017, 02:28</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4289</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 Jun 2017, 07:51</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4063</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 Jun 2017, 23:41</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4139</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21 Jun 2017, 05:18</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">115.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4297</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22 Jun 2017, 11:43</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">113.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2537</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23 Jun 2017, 04:40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">113.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4313</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 Jun 2017, 03:05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4079</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 Jun 2017, 21:42</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">117.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3947</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>√</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e625"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Sampling station might be influenced by the typhoon event
passing through the South China Sea. Station A1 was visited right after the
typhoon Merbok, which was generated on 9 June 2017 at 13.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
119.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E in the southern South China Sea. Merbok landed on 12 June at 27.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 117.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1281">At the mega stations, high-vertical-resolution water samples were taken at a
depth interval of 10 m within the Ez. For regular stations, lower-resolution
(5, 25, 50, 75 and 100 m) samples were collected. Seawater volumes of 4 and 8 L were collected for total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th and particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
analysis, respectively. Samples were collected using acid-cleaned 4 L
fluorinated bottles and filtered onto quartz microfiber (QMA) filters (25 mm
diameter, 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size). An amount of 500 mL of seawater was also collected for
nutrient analysis from the Niskin bottles. Ancillary parameters, including
potential temperature, salinity and fluorescence, were accessed using a
Sea-Bird CTD sensor. We calibrated the sensor-derived fluorescence with the
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from discrete samples using the equation Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.855 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> fluorescence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">139</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. S1 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e1385">In addition, we deployed an array of floating sediment traps for 72 h at
50, 100 and 200 m at both mega stations, SEATS and SS1, to collect sinking
particles during the survey. Retrieval of the trap at station SS1 was
precluded by unfavorable sea conditions. Consequently, we utilized sediment
trap data acquired during a 53 h deployment in July 2019. Our choice of
alternative data collection is unlikely to engender bias in our analysis, as
evidenced by the limited interannual variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N signals of
sinking particles obtained from sediment traps (see details in Sect. 3.5).
At each depth of stations SEATS and SS1, 12 cylindrical acrylic tubes (with
a height of 50 cm and diameter of 10 cm) were assembled for different
biogeochemical measurements. Before deployment, the tubes were filled with
prefiltered surface seawater, and NaCl was added to supersaturation. After
recovery, the tubes were stored at temperatures under 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until the particles settled
to the bottom. After removing the overlying supernatant, the particles were
prefiltered through Nitex filters (120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size) to remove the
visible zooplankton and were then collected on QMA filters (1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore
size) for elemental and isotopic analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{234}}$Th analysis}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1439">The small-volume (4 L) MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> co-precipitation method was used for the
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th analysis (Benitez-Nelson et al., 2001; Cai et al., 2006).
The efficiency of thorium precipitation was monitored by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th. In
detail, the seawater samples were acidified after collection and spiked with
200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th (17.38 dpm mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). After an 8 h period to
allow equilibration between samples and tracers, the pH of seawater was
raised to 8.05–8.20 using NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O before 0.375 mL
KMnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (3.0 g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 0.20 mL MnCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (8.0 g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
added. The MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precipitates were collected for a total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th analysis. The particles filtered for particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th from the seawater samples
on a QMA filter (25 mm, 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) were dried in the oven overnight under
45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The filters were then packed with Teflon rings and disks
(diameter of 23.5 cm, produced by RISØ National Laboratory, Denmark)
covered by aluminum foil (density: 6.45 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Mylar film. A gas-flow-proportional low-level RISØ beta counter (model GM-25-5) was used for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th counting. The first count was carried out immediately after the
samples were set up, and the second count was carried out after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> months for the background measurement. All <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th samples were counted
for 1000 min each time. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th recoveries were determined by inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Agilent 7700x). The average of
all the recoveries was 88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 % (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
range 73 %–98 %). All <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th data were recovery- and decay-corrected to
the sampling time. The uncertainties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th data were propagated from
the counting error, uncertainty from recovery and detection efficiency. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U activity was estimated by the following equation assuming
conservative behavior with respect to salinity (Owens et al., 2011):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M122" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0786</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.314</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2016?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{POC, PN and $\delta^{{15}}$N${}_{\mathrm{PN}}$ analyses}?><title>POC, PN and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e1782">Upon <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th counting, the particulate samples were carefully removed
from the disks and placed in glass dishes. Subsequently, the filters were
dried at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 24 h after adding 0.4 mL of HCl (1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to remove inorganic carbon. POC and particulate nitrogen (PN)
concentrations were determined by an elemental analyzer-isotope ratio mass
spectrometer (EA-IRMS) system (EA: vario PYRO cube; IRMS: Isoprime 100).
At station SS1, we conducted 10 replicate POC samplings at 5, 100 and 200 m
water depth to investigate the precision of bottle-collected POC. Our
results show that the standard deviations of our analyses were better than
13 %, which agrees well with the result from the JGOFS cookbook (Knap et
al., 1996). The errors were included in the subsequent calculation of POC
export fluxes. The particles from the sediment traps were treated the same
as the suspended particles. The C and N contents and the isotopes of sinking
particles were also analyzed by EA-IRMS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>The depth of the euphotic zone</title>
      <p id="d1e1831">The euphotic zone depth (Zeu or the Ez base, in m) is defined optically,
based on Wu et al. (2021), as the depth where the usable solar radiation
(USR) equals 0.9 % of the surface USR, which is close to the depth where
the photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) equals 0.5 % of the PAR
value at the sea surface. In situ Zeu during the cruise was obtained from profiling
PAR data recorded by the optical sensor (Biospherical QCP2300-HP) on the
CTD.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Nutrient analysis and nutricline depth</title>
      <p id="d1e1843">Nutrients were analyzed on board using a Four-channel Continuous Flow
Technicon AA3 Auto-Analyzer (Bran-Lube GmbH). The detection limits for both
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (nitrate plus nitrite – termed as dissolved inorganic nitrogen, DIN)
and dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) were 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
top of the nutricline in this study was defined as the depth at which the
DIN concentration reached 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dore and Karl, 1996; Winn
et al., 1995). The layers above and below to the base of Ez were defined
as the as NDL and NRL, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{234}}$Th scavenging model}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th scavenging model</title>
      <p id="d1e1915">The mass balance for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th in seawater can be described using Eq. (1)
(Buesseler et al., 1992):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M136" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th scavenging flux at the export
horizon. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U and
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th activities, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th decay constant
(0.02876 d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is discussed below, is the term for physical
effects, including advection and diffusion.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2017?><p id="d1e2083">For particle export from the Ez, the deficit of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th relative to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U is integrated with depth to evaluate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes. Under the
assumption of a steady state (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and no physical transport (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th export flux
from the Ez (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is integrated by Eq. (3) (as shown in
Fig. 2):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M154" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Similarly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th export flux from the base of the NDL,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is estimated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M157" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          However, the assumption of no physical transport needs to be verified before
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux is calculated. In this study, the physical transport is
estimated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M159" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the zonal, meridional and upwelling velocities,
respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th activity
gradients from west to east, south to north and upward. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are diffusivities from west to east, south to north and upward,
respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> are the second derivatives of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th activity
distributions (Benitez-Nelson et al., 2001; Cai et al., 2008; Buesseler et
al., 2020b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2656">Schematic of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th model under the two-layer nutrient
structure. The terms are defined in Eqs. (2)–(4) and (7)–(9).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2675">To better constrain the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux in the SCS basin, we estimated the
horizontal and vertical transports of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th at the station SS1. The
climatological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from modeling results (Gan et al.,
2016) were applied to the equation to evaluate the impacts of vertical
advection and diffusion on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux. The vertical transport
fluxes were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
the bases of the NDL and Ez, respectively, which can be considered to be negligible
(less than 10 %) compared to the vertical scavenging flux at the station SS1. This was in agreement with Cai et al. (2008), who also showed that the
vertical term could be neglected for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux estimation in the SCS
basin.</p>
      <p id="d1e2792">The apparent diffusivity around station SS1 is estimated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Okubo, 1971) from empirically
derived oceanic-diffusion diagrams, and we simplified the horizontal
diffusive term in Eq. (5) based on Benitez-Nelson et al. (2000) as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M189" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtable rowspacing="5.690551pt" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diffusion</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Th-H11</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Th-SS1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Th-H01</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Th-H08</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Th-SS1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Th-H06</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the distance between the stations to
evaluate the influences of physical terms (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the distance
between stations H01 and H11; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the distance between stations
H06 and H08). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were equal to 18 km in this study.
Thus, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux derived from horizontal diffusion was
considerably low (approximately 0.1 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3055">The in situ horizontal current velocities at station SS1 from the acoustic Doppler
current profiler (ADCP) exhibited a wide range from 0.01 to 0.3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper 200 m. Since these current velocities were measured
instantaneously and since their timescales did not match those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 d), we applied model-derived time-integrated data
(3-month average) to the equation instead. The model-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
ranged from 0.007 to 0.2 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper 100 m. Based on
those velocities, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux from horizontal transport was about
15 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux estimated using the steady-state model in the
upper 100 m, which is consistent with previous studies in oligotrophic
ecosystems (e.g., Cai et al., 2008; Buesseler et al., 2020b). Thus, a
1D model assumption is applicable in this study for the subsequent
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux estimation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>POC export flux calculation</title>
      <p id="d1e3148">In this study, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived POC export flux was calculated using
the following equations:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M209" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PTh</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PTh</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ez</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux, particulate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and POC flux at the Ez base, respectively;
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M215" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PTh</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PTh</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDL</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux, particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio and POC export flux at the NDL base, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e3380">Sediment-trap-derived POC export fluxes were calculated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M221" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Trap</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Measured</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TrapTube</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where POC is the concentration of organic carbon on the particles collected
by the traps, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the duration of trap deployments, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TrapTube</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the area of the trap tube.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2018?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Environmental settings</title>
      <p id="d1e3460">The profiles of temperature and salinity reveal distinctive hydrological
features between stations in the SCS basin (Fig. 3). The surface mixed-layer
depth (MLD, defined as the depth where the potential density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by 0.03 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the value at the sea
surface; Cornec et al., 2021) at stations SEATS, A1, A2 and C1 was shallower
(20–39 m) than at other stations (MDL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 m; Table 2 and Fig. 3).
The shallower MLD and isoclines (i.e., thermocline and halocline) might
indicate upward displacement of waters at those stations. Du et al. (2021)
attributed such vertical shifts in isoclines to mesoscale processes or basin-scale circulation. Indeed, most of these stations (SEATS, A1 and C1) were
under the influence of eddies during the sampling periods, as revealed by the
sea level anomaly (SLA) map (Fig. S2 in the Supplement); modeling results indicate stations
C1 and A2 were impacted by cold water sourced from the southwestern SCS
basin and  derived from upwelling off the coast of Vietnam (Fig. S3 in the Supplement) (Gan et al.,
2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3495">Vertical profiles of temperature <bold>(a)</bold>, salinity <bold>(b)</bold>, dissolved
inorganic nitrogen (nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nitrite; DIN) <bold>(c)</bold> and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(d)</bold>. The MLD (red
dash), interpolated depth of DIN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (top of
nutricline, yellow dash) and subsurface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum (SCM, green dash) are
also shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3568">Surface mixed-layer depths (MLDs), export horizon depths, 1D steady-state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and POC fluxes at
stations in the upper oligotrophic South China Sea basin during June 2017. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.93}[.93]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>MLD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NDL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ez</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">POC export</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">POC export</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">@ NDL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">@ Ez</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">ratio @ NDL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">@ Ez</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">flux @ NDL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">flux @ Ez</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[m]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[m]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[m]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol C dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol C dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEATS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">362 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">522 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">598 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">602 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">603 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">585 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">624 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">839 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">204 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">267 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SS1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">111</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">613 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">631 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">361 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">421 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">106</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">376 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">462 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">106</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">360 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">393 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">115</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">439 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">462 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">107</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">351 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3595"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The MLD is defined as the depth where the potential density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases by 0.03 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to values at the sea surface
(Cornec et al., 2021).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The NDL base, or the top of <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> the nutricline, was interpolated to the
depth where DIN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the DIN distribution
near the SCM.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The Ez base is estimated to be the depth where PAR is 0.5 % <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> of the
PAR value at the sea surface.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4843">As shown in Fig. 3c, nutrients were depleted in surface waters until the top
of the nutriclines, where concentrations started to rapidly increase. The
depth profiles also show a clear relationship between nutriclines and
subsurface nutrient concentrations. The four stations (i.e., stations SEATS,
C1, A1 and A2) with shallower nutriclines correspond well with higher
subsurface nutrient concentrations. For example, DIN concentrations at 125 m
in these four sites ranged from 13.1 to 17.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaged at
14.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; in contrast, DIN concentrations at the
same depth in other sites with deeper nutriclines ranged from 6.5 to 12.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaged at 8.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4943">Integrated inventories of DIN <bold>(a)</bold> and DIP <bold>(b)</bold> in both the NDL
(black) and Ez (gray). Also shown are the partitioned Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stocks <bold>(c)</bold>,
integrated partitioned <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes <bold>(d)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived POC
export fluxes <bold>(e)</bold>. The high and low nutrient inventories correspond to
shallow and deep nutriclines <bold>(a)</bold> (dotted line, NDL base), respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4996">The partitioned nutrient inventories (i.e., nutrient inventories within the
NDL and Ez) also showed such a trend (Fig. 4a, b). The average
Ez inventory of DIN was 196 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at stations with
shallow nutriclines compared to 29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at other
stations, and the average inventory of PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (DIP) in the Ez at
stations with shallow nutriclines was 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 mmol P m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compared
to an average of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 mmol P m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at other stations. The pattern
of nutrient inventories across stations possibly results from vertical water
displacement induced by horizontal divergence at the mesoscale and/or basin
scale (Du et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e5091">Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the four stations with shallower nutriclines were
consistently enhanced in response to elevated nutrient levels, resulting in
shallower depths of subsurface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima (SCM; Fig. 3d) relative to other
stations (55–80 m vs. 85–108 m). Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories at these stations with high
nutrient inventories (23.6–52.2 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, average 29.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.8 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were significantly higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than at others
stations (8.0–22.8 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, average 14.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 4c).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{234}}$Th and POC variability}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th and POC variability</title>
      <p id="d1e5208">Variations of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> versus depth are shown in Fig. 5. The
activities of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th ranged from 1.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 to 2.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an average of 2.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31 dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 5), and all stations displayed similar patterns. Generally,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th was deficient relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U in the upper Ez and was in
equilibrium or excess at the base of and/or below the Ez. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th deficit
peaked within the NDL and largely diminished in the NRL, implying that a large
amount of particle removal occurred in the NDL but that low export or high
remineralization occurred in the NRL. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th activity minimum (1.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) appeared at a depth of 25 m at station A1 (one of stations
characterized by a shallow MLD and nutricline). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th activity at the
stations surrounding station SS1 showed little spatial variability: the
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th activity were less than 0.1 dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the
same depth.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5383">Depth profiles of DIN (open blue circle – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th activity (black dot – dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U activity
(black dash – dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (gray line – mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in the South China Sea basin. The defined export horizons of the NDL base
(blue dash) and the Ez base (yellow dash) are also shown. The deficit of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U was the most pronounced in the province
where DIN was too low to be detected.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5492">Particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th ranged from 0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (with an average of 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 6). At most stations, the profiles of particulate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th shared similar depth patterns with Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the maximum values
appearing in the subsurface water, while at stations H01 and H06,
particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th generally increased with depth in the upper 100 m
and showed little station-to-station variability. The maximum of particulate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th appearing at both the surface and subsurface at station B2 suggested
complicated biogeochemistry of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th on particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5621">Profiles of POC (black dots – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and particulate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th activity (PTh, open circles – dpm L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at all stations
sampled in the South China Sea basin in June 2017. The bases of both the NDL
(dashed blue line) and the Ez (dashed yellow line) are also shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5671">POC concentrations ranged from 0.83 to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (with an average of 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Fig. 6). At most stations, the POC concentration was low (with an average of
1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in surface water and generally increased
with depth until it reached its maximum at the SCM layer, and then it decreased
again with depth. However, at some stations (i.e., C1, B2), there were POC
peaks that appeared in both the surface water and the SCM layer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Water-column-integrated and sediment-trap-derived ${}^{{234}}$Th fluxes}?><title>Water-column-integrated and sediment-trap-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes</title>
      <p id="d1e5779">Calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at different export horizons (i.e., the NDL and Ez
base) are shown in both Table 2 and Fig. 4d. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at the Ez
base mostly ranged from 267 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 69 to 839 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 59 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at the NDL base ranged from 204 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 to
624 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which accounts for 69 %–100 % of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at the Ez base. We found that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes
remained rather low, mostly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, during our
study, which was close to the threshold for the validity of the steady-state
assumption, as shown in many prior studies (e.g., Savoye et al., 2006;
Resplandy et al., 2012). The sea surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> also indicated that no bloom
was observed during the survey in June 2017 (Fig. S4 in the Supplement), suggesting that the
study area retained its biogeochemistry under the steady-state condition.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2020?><p id="d1e5946"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at the Ez base were within the range of 62–1365 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, similar to those found in prior studies in the SCS basin
(e.g., Cai et al., 2008, 2015; Zhou et al., 2013,
2020a). Given that our high-vertical-resolution sampling mode was only
applied to stations SEATS and SS1, we estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at the Ez
base by reducing the vertical resolution to a 25 m interval so as to be
consistent with other stations. This exercise resulted in values of
490 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 and 655 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 71 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, for
stations SEATS and SS1 compared to 522 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 and 631 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under the high-resolution sampling mode. The
low-resolution sampling thus might induce an uncertainty of less than 6 %
for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux. However, high-resolution sampling is essential in
order to examine the partitioning of carbon export in the upper water
column, especially for the oligotrophic ocean characteristic of low export
fluxes.</p>
      <p id="d1e6077">Based on the high-resolution total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th pattern at stations SEATS and
SS1, we first determined the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th deficit in the NDL, showing
substantial particle scavenging and POC export at the NDL base at both
stations, and we subsequently found similar patterns at the rest of stations
where we estimated the partitioning in POC export fluxes.</p>
      <p id="d1e6099">Besides the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U disequilibrium method, sediment-trap-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at SEATS were 589 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the NDL base (50 m), representing over 50 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th
flux, and 830 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> near the Ez base (100 m). The
trap-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes were higher, but within a factor of 2, than the
fluxes derived from bottle-sampled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th (362 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 50 m and 471 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 46 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 m) at both
export horizons. Although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at the base of the NDL had
rarely been quantified in prior studies, we estimated the
particle-scavenging rate at the corresponding export horizon with the
historical data of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th. Our recalculation using these literature data
showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at the NDL base averaged 349 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 296 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with limited spatial and temporal variations in
the oligotrophic SCS. This is also consistent with the fact that these prior
measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th shared similarities in terms of activities in the NDL (Cai
et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2020a). Nevertheless, the partitioning in
particle fluxes between the NDL and Ez, based on both techniques employed in
this study, is similar, which further supports that our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U-disequilibrium-based fluxes are representative.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{POC/^{{234}}Th}$} ratios based on bottle filtration and sediment traps}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios based on bottle filtration and sediment traps</title>
      <p id="d1e6404">Bottle-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles in the Ez are shown in Fig. 7. They
ranged from 2.6 to 15.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (with an average of 5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), peaked in the upper 25 m and generally
decreased with depth at all stations. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences between
most stations gradually diminished with depth and converged near 4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the base of the Ez. The decreasing pattern of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was not observed at stations SEATS and H11 (as noted in Fig. 7a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6542">Water column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios from bottle filtration, with
the averages (black dots with dashed line) at each sampling depth plotted
against depth <bold>(a)</bold>. Also shown are the bottle- and trap-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (bar with white stripes) at the bottom of the NDL (black), the
base of the euphotic zone (light gray) and fixed 100 m depth (dark gray) <bold>(b)</bold>. Generally, the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased as depth
increased and converged around 4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the Ez
base. No significant variability (within a factor of 2) was found between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios derived from bottle and trap samples accessed at the same
sampling depths at station SEATS.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6645"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios from sediment traps were only measured at station
SEATS and were 4.7 and 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 50 and 100 m,
respectively (Fig. 7b). These values are comparable with the bottle-derived
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios from the same site as that sampled  during the cruise.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{$\delta^{{15}}$N${}_{\mathrm{PN}}$ from sediment traps}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from sediment traps</title>
      <p id="d1e6726">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the trap samples varied between
2.6 ‰ to 6.7 ‰ in the upper 200 m at
stations SEATS and<?pagebreak page2021?> SS1, showing an increasing trend with depth.
Specifically, the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.6 ‰ was observed at 50 m within the NDL, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased to 4.7 ‰ at the Ez base
(about 100 m). Below the Ez, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value
increased to 6.7 ‰ at 200 m at station SEATS. A similar
pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was also found at station SS1, with
the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 4.1 ‰ at 50 m, an intermediate value of 5.8 ‰ at 100 m and the
highest value of 6.0 ‰ at 200 m. The observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values at both stations were comparable to previous
results (3.3 ‰–7.3 ‰) from sinking particles collected by
sediment traps in the upper 500 m around station SEATS (Kao et al., 2012;
Yang et al., 2017). Yang et al. (2017) found a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
value of 4.9 ‰ at 100 m at station SEATS, which was very
consistent with our observation at the same depth at station SEATS. These
results suggest that interannual variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
from the upper ocean in the SCS may be limited, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value at station SS1 from the cruise in 2019 could be
comparable to that in this campaign. We thus diagnose the nutrient sources
of sinking particles at stations with different environmental settings
without focusing on temporal variability.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{234}}$Th fluxes at the NDL and Ez bases}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes at the NDL and Ez bases</title>
      <?pagebreak page2022?><p id="d1e6957">The particle flux at the NDL base was comparable (88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 %) to that
at the Ez base. This vertical structure indicates that the NDL base should
be a hotspot for particle scavenging. The trap-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes
(589 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 50 m and 830 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 m) were slightly higher compared to bottle-derived
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes (362 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 50 m and
471 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 46 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 m). The higher trap-derived
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes might possibly be related to incomplete removal of
zooplankton (Buesseler et al., 2020b). In addition, the discrepancy in
between could be due to the difference in their timescales (Umhau et al.,
2019). Regardless of the differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th flux estimations from the
separate methods, the similar vertical partitioning from both bottle- and
trap-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes indicated substantial particle scavenging at
the bases of both the NDL and Ez in the oligotrophic SCS.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2023?><p id="d1e7139">It is also interesting to note that, at stations with higher nutrient
inventories, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes (362 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34–624 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, average 547 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 107 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the NDL base, and
522 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45–839 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 59 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, average 637 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the Ez base) are significantly higher (by
approximately 100–200 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than those at other stations (210 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38–520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, average 359 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the NDL base, and 204 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57–613 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, average 427 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 105 dpm m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the Ez
base; Fig. 4d). This regional pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes might result from
differences in nutrient distributions, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th has thus far been an
indispensable tool to trace biogenic particle scavenging (Ceballos-Romero et
al., 2022, and references therein). Whether these high and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th
fluxes would respectively drive similar POC export fluxes at stations with
high and low nutrient inventories remains to be determined.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{POC/^{{234}}Th}$} ratio and ${}^{{234}}$Th-derived POC fluxes in the SCS basin}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived POC fluxes in the SCS basin</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Variability in bottle- and trap-derived {$\protect\chem{POC/^{{234}}Th}$} ratios}?><title>Variability in bottle- and trap-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e7538">Determining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios on particles at the export horizons is
essential for converting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes to POC export fluxes.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios can, however, vary by 3 orders of magnitude between
different regions, depths, seasons and even particle sizes (Buesseler et
al., 2006; Puigcorbé et al., 2020). The variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
possibly due to the combined effect of particle generation, aggregation,
remineralization and particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th decay (Cai et al., 2006). As
shown in Fig. 7a, water column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios decreased gradually
with depth and varied within 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> below 50 m. This
decreasing tendency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios was highly consistent with
results from prior studies conducted in tropical–subtropical oligotrophic
ecosystems despite differing sampling devices (Puigcorbé et al., 2020).
The maximum ratio with the highest variability was observed in the upper 25 m, at a depth where primary production usually peaks in oligotrophic
ecosystems (Xie et al., 2018; Buesseler et al., 2020b). Even though
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios determined from bottle filtration were variable in
prior studies, they are strongly coupled to ratios from sediment traps
(Gustafsson et al., 2013), which are considered to represent the ratio on
sinking particles. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios based on bottle filtration and
sediment traps in this study were also compared to each other at the same
depth at station SEATS. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were 4.2 and 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on trap samples at 50 and 100 m, similarly to bottle-filtration-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 and 3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 55 and 100 m, respectively). Besides bottle- and
trap-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio on large-sized
particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m and assumed to be sinking particles;
Buesseler et al., 2006) retrieved from in situ pumping also decreased with depth at
station SEATS (Cai et al., 2006) and converged to a narrow range from 1.8 to
4.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 m in the SCS basin (Chen, 2008). We thus
confirmed that the bottle-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was comparable with those
derived from sinking particles accessed from traps or in situ pumps. This is
consistent with prior studies showing that POC export fluxes based on bottle
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were comparable with trap POC fluxes (e.g., Zhou et al.,
2020a). Due to a lack of trap or pump deployment at all sites, and
considering the similarity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios using different
methodologies, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios based on bottle filtration were used
for POC flux estimation.</p>
      <p id="d1e7900"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios at the Ez base varied from 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 to
8.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (averaged at 4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 7b), which is comparable with previously published results
(e.g., 1.6 to 5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaged at 4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the SCS basin (Cai et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2013, 2020a). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios at the NDL base were generally higher
than those at the Ez base, ranging from 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 to 8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (averaged at 5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2024?><p id="d1e8104">We found that variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios was insignificant between
stations with shallow and deep nutriclines. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio at the
NDL base ranged from 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 to 7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9, averaged at 6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at stations with shallow nutriclines (i.e., stations
SEATS, C1, A1 and A2), which was slightly higher than the values at other
sites (ranging from 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 to 8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1, averaged at 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). On the other hand, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios at the
Ez base ranged from 2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 to 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7, averaged at 4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at stations with shallow nutriclines, which was
like the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios at other sites (ranging from 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 to
8.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1, averaged at 4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol dpm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
relatively low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the NDL base at stations with deep
nutriclines may be explained by higher particle remineralization rates with
increasing depth. Based on similar ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th fluxes and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, the estimated POC export fluxes in this study were
consistent with prior studies in the SCS basin (Cai et al., 2015; Zhou et
al., 2020a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>POC export fluxes at different export horizons</title>
      <p id="d1e8382">POC export fluxes were estimated after combining the partitioned <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th
fluxes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived POC export fluxes
ranged from 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 to 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the
base of the Ez and from 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 to 4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the base of the NDL (Fig. 4e and Table 2). POC export fluxes
estimated in this study are of the same order of magnitude as previous
estimates in the SCS basin (Zhou et al., 2013, 2020a; Cai et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e8495">To assess the POC export flux using different methods, we compared
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th- and trap-derived POC export fluxes at station SEATS. POC export
fluxes were comparable near the Ez base (2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 and 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th- and trap-derived POC export fluxes, respectively).
However, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived POC export flux of 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was slightly lower than the trap-derived POC export flux
(2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 50 m at station SEATS. The
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived POC export flux at 50 m may indicate potential
contamination by organics in the traps (e.g., swimmers) that would result in
higher measured POC fluxes in the oligotrophic SCS basin. A recent study of
the EXPORTS program found that swimmers could increase the measured POC
export flux by a factor of 2 in the traps (Estapa et al., 2021). Although slight
disagreement between different methods was often noted and difficult to
assign causes (Hung and Gong, 2007; Stewart et al., 2007; Lampitt et al.,
2008; Haskell et al., 2013; Buesseler et al., 2020b), we clearly found
substantial POC export fluxes at the NDL base that were comparable to those
at the Ez base in the SCS. A recent study based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th and sediment
traps in the oligotrophic Gulf of Mexico also found particle production
dominates in the upper Ez (0–60 m), where nutrients are depleted (Stukel et
al., 2022). The results above conflict with previous knowledge suggesting
that POC export flux from the nutrient-depleted mixed layer is extremely low
(Coale and Bruland, 1987). The substantial POC export flux at the NDL base
was highly correlated to the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory, an index of biomass in the
corresponding layer (Fig. 8a). In this regard, the sources of new nutrients
that support the relatively high biomass in the NDL and drive the POC export
fluxes at the NDL base in the SCS basin need to be constrained.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e8654">Relationship between POC export flux at the NDL base (black dots)
and Ez base (gray dots) vs. Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold>, DIN <bold>(b)</bold> and DIP inventories <bold>(c)</bold> in the
corresponding layers. Also plotted are the relationships between the depth
of the top of the nutricline <bold>(d)</bold> and DIN and DIP concentrations in
subsurface water at 100, 125 and 150 m versus partitioning POC export fluxes <bold>(e–j)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/2013/2023/bg-20-2013-2023-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Diagnosis of nutrient sources supporting particle export in the
oligotrophic SCS</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>4.3.1</label><title>Correlation between POC export flux and subsurface nutrient
concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e8704">To diagnose the nutrient sources that support POC export fluxes at different
export horizons, we examined the relationship between partitioned POC export
fluxes and nutrient inventories in corresponding layers. Nutrient stocks
might regulate POC export fluxes at the Ez base based on their positive
correlation (Fig. 8b, c). However, a poor relationship between POC
export fluxes at the NDL base and nutrient inventories in the NDL was found,
which suggests that the in situ nutrients in the NDL interior are insufficient to
support the POC export from this horizon.</p>
      <p id="d1e8707">Other external nutrient sources must thus influence POC export flux in the
nutrient-deleted ecosystems. Episodic events (e.g., eddies and typhoons)
that can transport subsurface nutrients into nutrient-deficient regimes have
been confirmed in other oligotrophic ocean regions (Johnson et al., 2010;
Zhou et al., 2020b). Mesoscale eddies can pump subsurface nutrient-rich
waters into the upper Ez and enhance surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> based on a long-term
dataset of the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly corresponding to eddy properties (e.g., SLA,
amplitude and eddy rotation speed) in the oligotrophic SCS (He et al.,
2016). Besides Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, POC concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th deficits relative to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U were also significantly enhanced in the upper 25 m by impacts from
cyclonic eddies in the oligotrophic SCS, where the nutrient concentrations
were observed to be quite low (Zhou et al., 2020b). This enhancement of
biomass would be amplified by the interplay of typhoons and cyclonic eddies
(Liu et al., 2019). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N isotopic results also indicate that subsurface
nitrate is an important external nutrient impacting export production (Yang
et al., 2017). The nutrients from underlying waters may thus play an
important role in supporting POC export from the NDL.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2026?><p id="d1e8759">As the potential availability of subsurface nutrients was determined by the
depth of the nutricline and the nutrient concentration in subsurface waters
(Mouriño-Carballido et al., 2021), we
examined relationships between partitioned POC export fluxes and the depth
of the top of the nutricline and subsurface DIN and DIP concentrations
below the Ez at 100, 125 and 150 m, where biological uptake might be
negligible (Fig. 8d–j). The moderately positive correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the depth of the top of the nutricline and
POC export fluxes at the NDL base (Fig. 8d) suggests that shallower
nutriclines could indeed facilitate subsurface nutrient intrusion into the
upper Ez and subsequently stimulate higher POC export fluxes in the upper
nutrient-depleted ecosystems. Besides the nutricline, POC export fluxes at
the NDL base were also correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with DIN and DIP
concentrations in the subsurface water near or below the Ez base (Fig. 8e–j). The positive relationship thus suggests that POC export fluxes in the
upper nutrient-depleted Ez are also highly associated with subsurface
nutrient levels. It is also noteworthy that the timescale of ship-based
nutrients data is instantaneous, which may differ from the timescale of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th method (weeks to months). Consequently, the correlations between
in situ nutrients and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived POC fluxes may be misinterpreted by the
difference in timescales. To further investigate the correlations between
nutrients and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived POC fluxes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived POC fluxes
were also related to the model-derived monthly average of nutrients (i.e.,
DIN concentration and the depth of nutricline; Du et al., 2021) during
summer (Fig. S5 in the Supplement). The correlations between the two parameters were shown to be
statistically significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), again implying the importance
of nutrient modulation to export fluxes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>4.3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Nutrient sources diagnosed via ${}^{{15}}$N isotopic mass balance}?><title>Nutrient sources diagnosed via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N isotopic mass balance</title>
      <p id="d1e8871">As the timescale of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U disequilibrium was not
instantaneous, any episodic intrusion events before sampling
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 d) could be recorded. Due to the limited Kuroshio
intrusion into the SCS basin during the summer and the extremely low levels of
nutrients in the surface Kuroshio current (Du et al., 2013), the lateral
transport of nutrients by Kuroshio could be neglected over the study area.
Thus, we assume that air-derived nitrogen (i.e., nitrogen fixation and
atmospheric nitrogen deposition) and upwelled nitrate are the major sources
of new N supporting PN-corresponding POC export out of the NDL and at the Ez
base. Using a two-endmember mixing model based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N isotopic
balance (Kao et al., 2012; Böttjer et al., 2017), we can evaluate the
relative contribution of these two plausible sources of new N to support the
particle export at sites SEATS and SS1 using the following equations:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M702" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Air</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the
fraction of PN export contributed by upwelled DIN from the subsurface and by
air-derived nitrogen from nitrogen fixation and atmospheric nitrogen
deposition, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the endmembers of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N for
subsurface DIN and air-derived N, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is chosen as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ by
considering the influences of both nitrogen fixation and atmospheric
nitrogen deposition following Yang et al. (2022). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of subsurface DIN in the SCS basin are
found to be unchanged spatially and temporally, with an average of
4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 ‰ at 100 m (Yang et al., 2017, 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e9157"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated to be about 59 %–67 % at the NDL base
and 86 %–98 % at the Ez base at station SEATS. The proportion was higher
(84 %–96 %) at 50 m within the NDL and nearly 100 % at 100 m close to the
Ez base at station SS1. The differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
NDL are likely related to the relative contributions of nutrient sources.
Little variability in the regional nitrogen fixation rate suggests that
differences in nitrogen fixation would not lead to such a discrete pattern
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near the NDL base between sites, except when
influenced by Kuroshio waters (Lu et al., 2018). However, Gao et al. (2020)
clarified the spatial variation of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the
SCS basin, showing that the aerosol NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at station SEATS
was nearly twice that at station SS1, which is relatively far away from the
continent. In addition, three anti-cyclonic eddies (Fig. S6 in the Supplement) influenced the
water surrounding station SS1 before our visit in this region. In this
regard, the relatively elevated contribution of subsurface DIN at station
SS1 might be attributed to the decrease in atmospheric nitrogen deposition
and event-driven subsurface DIN intrusion. Despite the variability of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between stations, our results suggested a major
contribution of subsurface DIN in the SCS basin based on the isotopic
balance. These estimates indicate that POC export fluxes supported by
subsurface DIN are sufficient and even more important than those supported
by nitrogen fixation and atmospheric nitrogen deposition at the base of the NDL,
where the DIN concentration is usually below detection. To validate our
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-based estimates, we compared the reported fluxes of nitrogen
fixation and atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the SCS basin to the
measured PN fluxes from the sediment trap at 50 m (about 2.8 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.42 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 6.6 in
sinking particles) at station SEATS in this study. The average nitrogen
fixation rate was 0.06 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kao et al., 2012; Chen et
al., 2014), and the atmospheric nitrogen deposition flux was 0.14 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Yang et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2014). The contribution
of nitrogen fixation and atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the measured PN
flux at 50 m is estimated to be 48 %, suggesting that 52 % of PN flux at
this depth is supported by subsurface nitrate. The derived
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on mass balance is slightly lower than that
obtained from the isotopic balance at the NDL base (59 %–67 %). This might
be due to an overestimation of the nitrogen fixation rate and the flux of
atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the mass balance model. For example, the
nitrogen fixation rate used is observed in the northeastern SCS, where the
Kuroshio intrudes frequently (Kao et al., 2012). Higher rates of nitrogen
fixation were detected in the Kuroshio-influenced waters compared to those
in the northern basin (e.g., at station SEATS; Lu et al., 2019). Similarly,
the observed flux of atmospheric nitrogen deposition at Dongsha Island,
which is close to mainland China, is likely higher than that at station SEATS. Despite uncertainties, the two independent estimates both suggest a
substantial role of subsurface nitrate in supporting particle export out of
the NDL base. Furthermore, the differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
both stations SEATS and SS1 gradually disappeared with increasing depth
because the new nutrients were predominantly sourced from the nutrient-rich
subsurface waters near the base of the Ez. This enhanced<?pagebreak page2027?> contribution of
subsurface nutrients is consistent with results from prior studies (Kao et
al., 2012; Yang et al., 2017) that subsurface nutrients contribute to more
than 90 % of the export production at the Ez base in the SCS basin.</p>
      <p id="d1e9388">Taken together, we thus hypothesize that the episodic event-driven nutrient
upwelling from the subsurface to the surface nutrient-depleted ecosystem
stimulates the growth of planktonic organisms and elevates the particle-scavenging rate in the oligotrophic SCS, which could be reflected in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, whose activities integrate the impacts of processes occurring
over several months. It is also worthwhile considering the influences of
mesoscale and sub-mesoscale processes in the SCS basin. Prior studies showed
the concurrence of the vertical transport of particles supported by locally
uplifted nutrients and the horizontal transport of particles supported by
the nutrients trapped in eddies (Wang et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2021). In
this study, we found enhanced POC export fluxes at stations with high
nutrient inventories and inferred that the POC export fluxes might also be
supported by nutrients from the subsurface waters based on the signal of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, our current study was unable to diagnose
the pathways of nutrients fueling the primary and export production, which
need further studies.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e9427">With the aid of high-depth-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th sampling, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th and
POC fluxes at both the NDL and Ez bases were estimated in the oligotrophic
SCS basin during the summer of 2017. Although DIN was exhausted in the
NDL, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-based POC export fluxes at the NDL base were estimated to
be 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 to 4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
comparable to those at the Ez base (1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 to 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The relationship between POC export flux and nutrients
was diagnosed: spatially, the POC export flux at the Ez base was elevated at
stations with shallow nutriclines, corresponding to high nutrient
inventories (1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 to 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
relative to stations with low nutrient inventories (1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 to
2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). More than 50 % of the
relatively high particle export occurring at the NDL base was verified by
N isotopes to be supported by DIN from the subsurface. It thus indicated
that other pathways (e.g., episodic events) might be important for nutrient
intrusion into the Ez. The higher POC export flux resulted from
shallow-nutricline-derived higher-nutrient stocks and biomass in the Ez. We
thus hypothesize that subsurface nutrients might act as the primary
regulator of POC export fluxes at both the Ez and NDL bases on a seasonal
timescale. The reduced export flux against the background of higher surface
temperature and stronger stratification further implies that sea surface
warming might lower the efficiency of the BCP.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e9617">All data accessed from in situ observations (i.e., temperature, salinity,
fluorescence-based Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, POC and nutrients) are available at the National Science Data Bank (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.02782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.57760/sciencedb.02782</ext-link>, Ma and Dai, 2023). The speeds of the horizontal water current from
May to August 2017 and 2019 were obtained from the Copernicus Marine
Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48670/moi-00148</ext-link>, Satellite observations, 2020). The vertical speeds of water current and
diffusivity  were derived from the China Sea Multi-Scale Ocean Modeling System
(CMOMS, Gan et al., 2016).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e9642">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2013-2023-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2013-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e9651">All authors were involved in the writing of the paper and approved
the final submitted paper. YM and MD were major
contributors to the study's conception, data analysis and drafting of the
paper. KZ, WC and JC contributed significantly
to cruise design, sample collections and/or data acquisition. JYTY contributed substantially to isotopic data acquisition and analysis.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e9657">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e9663">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9669">We thank Xianghui Guo, Peng Cheng and Yuyuan Xie, who led the cruise as chief scientists, as well as Bangqing Huang, who, with his group, assisted with the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data analysis. Zhongwei Yuan,
Lifang Wang and Tao Huang are thanked for the nutrient sampling and analysis.
Silin Ni and Liguo Guo are thanked for helping with the collection of
particulate samples. Qing Li and Li Tian are also thanked for the beta and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses, respectively. Yangyang Zhao, Zhongwei Yuan and Chuanjun Du
are thanked for their valuable comments. We are grateful to the crew of the
R/V <italic>Tan Kah Kee</italic> along with its staff for their help during the cruise. Yifan Ma was
supported by a PhD fellowship from the State Key Laboratory of Marine
Environmental Science, Xiamen University.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e9696">This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
through grant nos. 41890800 and 42188102 and by the National Basic Research
Program of China (973 Program) through grant no. 2015CB954000.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e9702">This paper was edited by Aninda Mazumdar and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Buesseler, K. O., and Crossin, G.: Upper ocean carbon
export, horizontal transport, and vertical eddy diffusivity in the
southwestern Gulf of Maine, Cont. Shelf Res., 20, 707–736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00093-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00093-X</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Buesseler, K. O., Van Der Loeff, M., Andrews, J.,
Ball, L., Crossin, G., and Charette, M.: Testing a new small-volume technique
for determining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th in seawater, J. Radioanal. Nucl.
Ch., 248, 795–799, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010621618652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1010621618652</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Böttjer, D., Dore, J. E., Karl, D. M., Letelier, R. M., Mahaffey, C.,
Wilson, S. T., Zehr, J., and Church, M. J.: Temporal variability of nitrogen
fixation and particulate nitrogen export at Station ALOHA, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
62, 200–216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10386</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buesseler, K. O., Bacon, M. P., Cochran, J. K., and Livingston, H. D.: Carbon
and nitrogen export during the JGOFS North Atlantic Bloom experiment
estimated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U disequilibria, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 39,
1115–1137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(92)90060-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(92)90060-7</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buesseler, K. O., Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Moran, S., Burd, A., Charette, M.,
Cochran, J. K., Coppola, L., Fisher, N., Fowler, S., and Gardner, W.: An
assessment of particulate organic carbon to thorium-234 ratios in the ocean
and their impact on the application of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th as a POC flux proxy, Mar.
Chem., 100, 213–233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.013</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buesseler, K. O., Pike, S., Maiti, K., Lamborg, C. H., Siegel, D. A., and
Trull, T. W.: Thorium-234 as a tracer of spatial, temporal and vertical
variability in particle flux in the North Pacific, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 56,
1143–1167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buesseler, K. O.,
Boyd, P. W., Black, E. E., and Siegel, D. A.: Metrics that matter for assessing
the ocean biological carbon pump, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 201918114,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918114117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1918114117</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buesseler, K. O., Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Roca-Martí, M., Wyatt, A. M.,
Resplandy, L., Clevenger, S. J., Drysdale, J. A., Estapa, M. L., Pike, S., and
Umhau, B. P.: High-resolution spatial and temporal measurements of
particulate organic carbon flux using thorium-234 in the northeast Pacific
Ocean during the EXport Processes in the Ocean from RemoTe Sensing field
campaign, Elementa, 8, 30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.2020.030</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cai, P., Dai, M., Chen, W., Tang, T., and Zhou, K.: On the importance of the
decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th in determining size-fractionated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio on
marine particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027792" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL027792</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cai, P., Chen, W., Dai, M., Wan, Z., Wang, D., Li, Q., Tang, T., and Lv, D.: A
high-resolution study of particle export in the southern South China Sea
based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U disequilibrium, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113,
C04019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004268" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JC004268</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cai, P., Zhao, D., Wang, L., Huang, B., and Dai, M.: Role of particle stock and
phytoplankton community structure in regulating particulate organic carbon
export in a large marginal sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 2063–2095,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010432" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010432</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ceballos-Romero, E., Buesseler, K. O., and Villa-Alfageme, M.: Revisiting five decades of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th data: a comprehensive global oceanic compilation, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2639–2679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2639-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-14-2639-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chen, W. F.: On the export fluxes, seasonality and controls of particulate organic carbon in the Northern South China Sea, Ph.D. thesis, Xiamen University, China, 152 pp., 2008</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y.-L. L., Chen, H.-Y., Lin, Y.-H., Yong, T.-C., Taniuchi, Y., and Tuo,
S.-H.: The relative contributions of unicellular and filamentous diazotrophs
to N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in the South China Sea and the upstream Kuroshio,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 85, 56–71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2013.11.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2013.11.006</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coale, K. H. and Bruland, K. W.: Oceanic stratified euphotic zone as elucidated
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U disequilibria, Limnol. Oceanogr., 32, 189–200,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1987.32.1.0189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1987.32.1.0189</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cornec, M., Laxenaire, R., Speich, S., and Claustre, H.: Impact of mesoscale
eddies on deep chlorophyll maxima, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093470,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093470" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL093470</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dore, J. E. and Karl, D. M.: Nitrite distributions and dynamics at Station
ALOHA, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 43, 385–402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(95)00105-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0967-0645(95)00105-0</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Du, C., Liu, Z., Dai, M., Kao, S.-J., Cao, Z., Zhang, Y., Huang, T., Wang, L., and Li, Y.: Impact of the Kuroshio intrusion on the nutrient inventory in the upper northern South China Sea: insights from an isopycnal mixing model, Biogeosciences, 10, 6419–6432, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6419-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6419-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Du, C., Liu, Z., Kao, S. J., and Dai, M.: Diapycnal Fluxes of Nutrients in an
Oligotrophic Oceanic Regime: The South China Sea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44,
11510–11518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074921" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL074921</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Du, C., He, R., Liu, Z., Huang, T., Wang, L., Yuan, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, Z., and
Dai, M.: Climatology of nutrient distributions in the South China Sea based
on a large data set derived from a new algorithm, Prog. Oceanogr., 195,
102586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102586</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eppley, R. W. and Peterson, B. J.: Particulate organic matter flux and
planktonic new production in the deep ocean, Nature, 282, 677–680,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/282677a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/282677a0</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Estapa, M., Buesseler, K., Durkin, C. A., Omand, M., Benitez-Nelson, C. R.,
Roca-Martí, M., Breves, E., Kelly, R., and Pike, S.: Biogenic sinking
particle fluxes and sediment trap collection efficiency at Ocean Station
Papa, Elementa, 9, 00122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.2020.00122</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gan, J., Liu, Z., and Liang, L.: Numerical modeling of intrinsically and
extrinsically forced seasonal circulation in the China Seas: A kinematic
study, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 4697–4715, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011800" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JC011800</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Wang, L., Guo, X., Xu, Y., and Luo, L.: Atmospheric wet and dry
deposition of dissolved inorganic nitrogen to the South China Sea, Sci.
China  Earth Sci., 63, 1339–1352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9612-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-019-9612-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goldman, J. C.: Oceanic Nutrient Cycles, in: Flows of Energy and Materials in Marine Ecosystems: Theory and Practice, edited by: Fasham, M. J. R., Springer US, Boston, MA, 137–170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0387-0_6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-1-4757-0387-0_6</ext-link>, 1984</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gustafsson, Ö., Gelting, J., Andersson, P., Larsson, U., and Roos, P.: An
assessment of upper ocean carbon and nitrogen export fluxes on the boreal
continental shelf: A 3-year study in the open Baltic Sea comparing sediment
traps, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th proxy<?pagebreak page2029?>, nutrient, and oxygen budgets, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 11, 495–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2013.11.495" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lom.2013.11.495</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haskell II, W. Z., Berelson, W. M., Hammond, D. E., and Capone, D. G.: Particle
sinking dynamics and POC fluxes in the Eastern Tropical South Pacific based
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th budgets and sediment trap deployments, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
81, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2013.07.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2013.07.001</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>He, Q., Zhan, H., Cai, S., and Li, Z.: Eddy effects on surface chlorophyll in
the northern South China Sea: Mechanism investigation and temporal
variability analysis, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 112, 25–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2016.03.004</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hung, C. C. and Gong, G. C.: Export flux of POC in the main stream of the
Kuroshio, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L18606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030236" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030236</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Johnson, K. S., Riser, S. C., and Karl, D. M.: Nitrate supply from deep to
near-surface waters of the North Pacific subtropical gyre, Nature, 465,
1062–1065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature09170</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kao, S. J., Terence Yang, J. Y., Liu, K. K., Dai, M., Chou, W. C., Lin, H.
L., and Ren, H.: Isotope constraints on particulate nitrogen source and dynamics
in the upper water column of the oligotrophic South China Sea, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2033, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004091</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, T. W., Lee, K., Duce, R., and Liss, P.: Impact of atmospheric nitrogen
deposition on phytoplankton productivity in the South China Sea, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 3156–3162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL059665</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knap, A., Michaels, A., Close, A., Ducklow, H., and Dickson, A. J.: Protocols
for the joint global ocean flux study (JGOFS) core measurements, Reprint of
the IOC Manuals Guides No. 29, UNESCO, 19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25607/OBP-1443</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lampitt, R. S., Boorman, B., Lucas, M. L., Salter, I., Sanders, R., Saw, K.,
Seeyave, S., Thomalla, S. J., and Turnewitsch, R.: Particle export from the
euphotic zone: Estimates using a novel drifting sediment trap, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th
and new production, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 55, 1484–1502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2008.07.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2008.07.002</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, K.-K., Kao, S.-J., Wen, L.-S., and Chen, K.-L.: Carbon and nitrogen
isotopic compositions of particulate organic matter and biogeochemical
processes in the eutrophic Danshuei Estuary in northern Taiwan, Sci. Total
Environ., 382, 103–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.019</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Tang, D., and Evgeny, M.: Chlorophyll concentration response to the
typhoon wind-pump induced upper ocean processes considering air–sea heat
exchange, Remote Sens., 11, 1825–1847, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151825" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs11151825</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, Z., Zhao, Y., Colin, C., Stattegger, K., Wiesner, M. G., Huh, C.-A.,
Zhang, Y., Li, X., Sompongchaiyakul, P., You, C.-F., Huang, C.-Y., Liu, J.
T., Siringan, F. P., Le, K. P., Sathiamurthy, E., Hantoro, W. S., Liu, J.,
Tuo, S., Zhao, S., Zhou, S., He, Z., Wang, Y., Bunsomboonsakul, S., and Li, Y.:
Source-to-sink transport processes of fluvial sediments in the South China
Sea, Earth-Sci. Rev., 153, 238–273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.005</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, Y., Wen, Z., Shi, D., Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Bonnet, S., Li, Y., Tian, J., and Kao, S.-J.: Effect of light on N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and net nitrogen release of Trichodesmium in a field study, Biogeosciences, 15, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-1-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, Y. Y., Wen, Z. Z., Shi, D. L., Lin, W. F., Bonnet, S., Dai, M. H., and
Kao, S. J.: Biogeography of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation influenced by the western
boundary current intrusion in the South China Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
124, 6983–6996, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014781" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JC014781</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, Y. F. and Dai, M. H.: Vertical distribution of total and particulate 234Th, particulate organic carbon (POC) and nutrients with their physical forcings (temperature, salinity, fluorescence-based Chl a), Science Data Bank [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.02782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.57760/sciencedb.02782</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, W. T.,
Xiu, P., Chai, F., Ran, L. H., Wiesner, M. G., Xi, J. Y., Yan, Y. W., and Fredj, E.:
Impact of mesoscale eddies on the source funnel of sediment trap
measurements in the South China Sea, Prog. Oceanogr., 194,  102566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102566" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102566</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mouriño-Carballido, B., Otero Ferrer, J. L., Fernández Castro, B.,
Marañón, E., Blazquez Maseda, M., Aguiar-González, B.,
Chouciño, P., Graña, R., Moreira-Coello, V., and Villamaña, M.:
Magnitude of nitrate turbulent diffusion in contrasting marine environments.
Sci. Rep., 11, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97731-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-021-97731-4</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Okubo, A.: Oceanic diffusion diagrams, Deep-Sea Res., 18, 789–802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(71)90046-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0011-7471(71)90046-5</ext-link>, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Owens, S. A., Buesseler, K. O., and Sims, K.: Re-evaluating the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U-salinity relationship in seawater: Implications for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th disequilibrium method, Mar. Chem., 127, 31–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2011.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2011.07.005</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Puigcorbé, V., Masqué, P., and Le Moigne, F. A. C.: Global database of ratios of particulate organic carbon to thorium-234 in the ocean: improving estimates of the biological carbon pump, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1267–1285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1267-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-12-1267-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Resplandy, L., Martin, A. P., Le Moigne, F., Martin, P., Aquilina, A.,
Mémery, L., Lévy, M., and Sanders, R.: How does dynamical spatial
variability impact <inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-derived estimates of organic export?, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. I, 68, 24–45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2012.05.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2012.05.015</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Savoye, N., Benitez-Nelson, C., Burd, A. B., Cochran, J. K., Charette, M.,
Buesseler, K. O., Jackson, G. A., Roy-Barman, M., Schmidt, S., and Elskens, M.:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th sorption and export models in the water column: A review, Mar.
Chem., 100, 234–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.014</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scharek, R., Tupas, L. M., and Karl, D. M.: Diatom fluxes to the deep sea in the
oligotrophic North Pacific gyre at Station ALOHA, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 182,
55–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps182055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps182055</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Siegel, D. A., Buesseler, K. O., Behrenfeld, M. J., Benitez-Nelson, C. R.,
Emmanuel, B., Brzezinski, M. A., Adrian, B., Carlson, C. A., D'Asaro, E. A., and
Doney, S. C.: Prediction of the Export and Fate of Global Ocean Net Primary
Production: The EXPORTS Science Plan, Front. Mar. Sci., 3, 22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2016.00022</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Siegel, D. A., Cetinić, I., Graff, J. R., Lee, C. M., Nelson, N., Perry,
M. J., Ramos, I. S., Steinberg, D. K., Buesseler, K., and Hamme, R.: An
operational overview of the EXport Processes in the Ocean from RemoTe
Sensing (EXPORTS) Northeast Pacific field deployment, Elementa, 9, 00107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2016.00022</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2030?><ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Satellite observations: Global Ocean Gridded L 4 Sea Surface Heights And Derived Variables Reprocessed 1993 Ongoing, CMS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48670/moi-00148</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stewart, G., Cochran, J., Miquel, J., Masqué, P., Szlosek, J., Baena, A.
R., Fowler, S., Gasser, B., and Hirschberg, D.: Comparing POC export from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Po</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibria with estimates
from sediment traps in the northwest Mediterranean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 54,
1549–1570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.06.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2007.06.005</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stukel, M. R., Kelly, T. B., Landry, M. R., Selph, K. E., and Swalethorp, R.:
Sinking carbon, nitrogen, and pigment flux within and beneath the euphotic
zone in the oligotrophic, open-ocean Gulf of Mexico, J. Plankton Res., 44,  711–727,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbab001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/plankt/fbab001</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Umhau, B. P., Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Close, H. G., Hannides, C. C., Motta,
L., Popp, B. N., Blum, J. D., and Drazen, J. C.: Seasonal and spatial changes in
carbon and nitrogen fluxes estimated using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U
disequilibria in the North Pacific tropical and subtropical gyre, Mar. Chem.,
217, 103705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103705" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103705</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Huang, B. Q., Laws, E. A.,  Zhou, K. B., Liu,  X., Xie,  Y. Y., and Dai, M. H.: Anticyclonic Eddy Edge Effects on Phytoplankton Communities and
Particle Export in the Northern South China Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 7632–7650, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017jc013623" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017jc013623</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Winn, C. D., Campbell, L., Christian, J. R., Letelier, R. M., Hebel, D. V.,
Dore, J. E., Fujieki, L., and Karl, D. M.: Seasonal variability in the
phytoplankton community of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 9, 605–620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GB02149" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GB02149</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, J., Lee, Z., Xie, Y., Goes, J., and Huang, B.: Reconciling between optical
and Biological determinants of the euphotic zone depth, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016874, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016874" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JC016874</ext-link>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, Y., Laws, E. A., Yang, L., and Huang, B.: Diel patterns of variable
fluorescence and carbon fixation of picocyanobacteria
<italic>Prochlorococcus</italic>-dominated phytoplankton in the South China Sea basin, Front. Microbiol.,
9, 1589–1604, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01589" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01589</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, J.-Y. T., Hsu, S.-C., Dai, M. H., Hsiao, S. S.-Y., and Kao, S.-J.: Isotopic composition of water-soluble nitrate in bulk atmospheric deposition at Dongsha Island: sources and implications of external N supply to the northern South China Sea, Biogeosciences, 11, 1833–1846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1833-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-1833-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, J. Y. T., Kao, S. J., Dai, M., Yan, X., and Lin, H. L.: Examining N
cycling in the northern South China Sea from N isotopic signals in nitrate
and particulate phases, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 2118–2136,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JG003618</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, J. Y. T., Tang, J. M., Kang, S., Dai, M., Kao, S. J., Yan, X., Xu, M.
N., and Du, C.: Comparison of nitrate isotopes between the South China Sea and
western North Pacific Ocean: Insights into biogeochemical signals and water
exchange, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, e2021JC018304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC018304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JC018304</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, K., Dai, M., Kao, S.-J., Wang, L., Xiu, P., Chai, F., Tian, J., and Liu,
Y.: Apparent enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-based particle export associated with
anticyclonic eddies, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 381, 198–209,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.07.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2013.07.039</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, K., Dai, M., Maiti, K., Chen, W., and Xie, Y.: Impact of physical and
biogeochemical forcing on particle export in the South China Sea, Prog. Oceanogr., 187, 102403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102403" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102403</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, K., Dai, M., Xiu, P., Wang, L., Hu, J., and Benitez-Nelson, C. R.:
Transient enhancement and decoupling of carbon and opal export in cyclonic
eddies, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2020JC016372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JC016372</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Partitioning of carbon export in the euphotic zone of the oligotrophic South China Sea</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Buesseler, K. O., and Crossin, G.: Upper ocean carbon
export, horizontal transport, and vertical eddy diffusivity in the
southwestern Gulf of Maine, Cont. Shelf Res., 20, 707–736, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00093-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00093-X</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Buesseler, K. O., Van Der Loeff, M., Andrews, J.,
Ball, L., Crossin, G., and Charette, M.: Testing a new small-volume technique
for determining <sup>234</sup>Th in seawater, J. Radioanal. Nucl.
Ch., 248, 795–799, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010621618652" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010621618652</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Böttjer, D., Dore, J. E., Karl, D. M., Letelier, R. M., Mahaffey, C.,
Wilson, S. T., Zehr, J., and Church, M. J.: Temporal variability of nitrogen
fixation and particulate nitrogen export at Station ALOHA, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
62, 200–216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10386</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buesseler, K. O., Bacon, M. P., Cochran, J. K., and Livingston, H. D.: Carbon
and nitrogen export during the JGOFS North Atlantic Bloom experiment
estimated from <sup>234</sup>Th&thinsp;:&thinsp;<sup>238</sup>U disequilibria, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 39,
1115–1137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(92)90060-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(92)90060-7</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buesseler, K. O., Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Moran, S., Burd, A., Charette, M.,
Cochran, J. K., Coppola, L., Fisher, N., Fowler, S., and Gardner, W.: An
assessment of particulate organic carbon to thorium-234 ratios in the ocean
and their impact on the application of <sup>234</sup>Th as a POC flux proxy, Mar.
Chem., 100, 213–233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.013</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buesseler, K. O., Pike, S., Maiti, K., Lamborg, C. H., Siegel, D. A., and
Trull, T. W.: Thorium-234 as a tracer of spatial, temporal and vertical
variability in particle flux in the North Pacific, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 56,
1143–1167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.001</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buesseler, K. O.,
Boyd, P. W., Black, E. E., and Siegel, D. A.: Metrics that matter for assessing
the ocean biological carbon pump, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 201918114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918114117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918114117</a>, 2020a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buesseler, K. O., Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Roca-Martí, M., Wyatt, A. M.,
Resplandy, L., Clevenger, S. J., Drysdale, J. A., Estapa, M. L., Pike, S., and
Umhau, B. P.: High-resolution spatial and temporal measurements of
particulate organic carbon flux using thorium-234 in the northeast Pacific
Ocean during the EXport Processes in the Ocean from RemoTe Sensing field
campaign, Elementa, 8, 30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.030</a>, 2020b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, P., Dai, M., Chen, W., Tang, T., and Zhou, K.: On the importance of the
decay of <sup>234</sup>Th in determining size-fractionated C∕<sup>234</sup>Th ratio on
marine particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027792" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027792</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, P., Chen, W., Dai, M., Wan, Z., Wang, D., Li, Q., Tang, T., and Lv, D.: A
high-resolution study of particle export in the southern South China Sea
based on <sup>234</sup>Th&thinsp;:&thinsp;<sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113,
C04019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004268" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004268</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, P., Zhao, D., Wang, L., Huang, B., and Dai, M.: Role of particle stock and
phytoplankton community structure in regulating particulate organic carbon
export in a large marginal sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 2063–2095,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010432" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010432</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ceballos-Romero, E., Buesseler, K. O., and Villa-Alfageme, M.: Revisiting five decades of <sup>234</sup>Th data: a comprehensive global oceanic compilation, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2639–2679, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2639-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2639-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, W. F.: On the export fluxes, seasonality and controls of particulate organic carbon in the Northern South China Sea, Ph.D. thesis, Xiamen University, China, 152 pp., 2008

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Y.-L. L., Chen, H.-Y., Lin, Y.-H., Yong, T.-C., Taniuchi, Y., and Tuo,
S.-H.: The relative contributions of unicellular and filamentous diazotrophs
to N<sub>2</sub> fixation in the South China Sea and the upstream Kuroshio,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 85, 56–71, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2013.11.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2013.11.006</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Coale, K. H. and Bruland, K. W.: Oceanic stratified euphotic zone as elucidated
by <sup>234</sup>Th&thinsp;:&thinsp;<sup>238</sup>U disequilibria, Limnol. Oceanogr., 32, 189–200,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1987.32.1.0189" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1987.32.1.0189</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cornec, M., Laxenaire, R., Speich, S., and Claustre, H.: Impact of mesoscale
eddies on deep chlorophyll maxima, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093470,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093470" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093470</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dore, J. E. and Karl, D. M.: Nitrite distributions and dynamics at Station
ALOHA, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 43, 385–402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(95)00105-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(95)00105-0</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Du, C., Liu, Z., Dai, M., Kao, S.-J., Cao, Z., Zhang, Y., Huang, T., Wang, L., and Li, Y.: Impact of the Kuroshio intrusion on the nutrient inventory in the upper northern South China Sea: insights from an isopycnal mixing model, Biogeosciences, 10, 6419–6432, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6419-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6419-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Du, C., Liu, Z., Kao, S. J., and Dai, M.: Diapycnal Fluxes of Nutrients in an
Oligotrophic Oceanic Regime: The South China Sea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44,
11510–11518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074921" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074921</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Du, C., He, R., Liu, Z., Huang, T., Wang, L., Yuan, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, Z., and
Dai, M.: Climatology of nutrient distributions in the South China Sea based
on a large data set derived from a new algorithm, Prog. Oceanogr., 195,
102586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102586" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102586</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eppley, R. W. and Peterson, B. J.: Particulate organic matter flux and
planktonic new production in the deep ocean, Nature, 282, 677–680,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/282677a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/282677a0</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Estapa, M., Buesseler, K., Durkin, C. A., Omand, M., Benitez-Nelson, C. R.,
Roca-Martí, M., Breves, E., Kelly, R., and Pike, S.: Biogenic sinking
particle fluxes and sediment trap collection efficiency at Ocean Station
Papa, Elementa, 9, 00122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00122</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gan, J., Liu, Z., and Liang, L.: Numerical modeling of intrinsically and
extrinsically forced seasonal circulation in the China Seas: A kinematic
study, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 4697–4715, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011800" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011800</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gao, Y., Wang, L., Guo, X., Xu, Y., and Luo, L.: Atmospheric wet and dry
deposition of dissolved inorganic nitrogen to the South China Sea, Sci.
China  Earth Sci., 63, 1339–1352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9612-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9612-2</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goldman, J. C.: Oceanic Nutrient Cycles, in: Flows of Energy and Materials in Marine Ecosystems: Theory and Practice, edited by: Fasham, M. J. R., Springer US, Boston, MA, 137–170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0387-0_6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0387-0_6</a>, 1984

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gustafsson, Ö., Gelting, J., Andersson, P., Larsson, U., and Roos, P.: An
assessment of upper ocean carbon and nitrogen export fluxes on the boreal
continental shelf: A 3-year study in the open Baltic Sea comparing sediment
traps, <sup>234</sup>Th proxy, nutrient, and oxygen budgets, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 11, 495–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2013.11.495" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2013.11.495</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haskell II, W. Z., Berelson, W. M., Hammond, D. E., and Capone, D. G.: Particle
sinking dynamics and POC fluxes in the Eastern Tropical South Pacific based
on <sup>234</sup>Th budgets and sediment trap deployments, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
81, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2013.07.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2013.07.001</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Q., Zhan, H., Cai, S., and Li, Z.: Eddy effects on surface chlorophyll in
the northern South China Sea: Mechanism investigation and temporal
variability analysis, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 112, 25–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.03.004</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hung, C. C. and Gong, G. C.: Export flux of POC in the main stream of the
Kuroshio, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L18606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030236" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030236</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Johnson, K. S., Riser, S. C., and Karl, D. M.: Nitrate supply from deep to
near-surface waters of the North Pacific subtropical gyre, Nature, 465,
1062–1065, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09170</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kao, S. J., Terence Yang, J. Y., Liu, K. K., Dai, M., Chou, W. C., Lin, H.
L., and Ren, H.: Isotope constraints on particulate nitrogen source and dynamics
in the upper water column of the oligotrophic South China Sea, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2033, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004091</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, T. W., Lee, K., Duce, R., and Liss, P.: Impact of atmospheric nitrogen
deposition on phytoplankton productivity in the South China Sea, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 3156–3162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059665" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059665</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Knap, A., Michaels, A., Close, A., Ducklow, H., and Dickson, A. J.: Protocols
for the joint global ocean flux study (JGOFS) core measurements, Reprint of
the IOC Manuals Guides No. 29, UNESCO, 19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1443" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1443</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lampitt, R. S., Boorman, B., Lucas, M. L., Salter, I., Sanders, R., Saw, K.,
Seeyave, S., Thomalla, S. J., and Turnewitsch, R.: Particle export from the
euphotic zone: Estimates using a novel drifting sediment trap, <sup>234</sup>Th
and new production, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 55, 1484–1502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2008.07.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2008.07.002</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, K.-K., Kao, S.-J., Wen, L.-S., and Chen, K.-L.: Carbon and nitrogen
isotopic compositions of particulate organic matter and biogeochemical
processes in the eutrophic Danshuei Estuary in northern Taiwan, Sci. Total
Environ., 382, 103–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.019</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., Tang, D., and Evgeny, M.: Chlorophyll concentration response to the
typhoon wind-pump induced upper ocean processes considering air–sea heat
exchange, Remote Sens., 11, 1825–1847, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151825" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151825</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Z., Zhao, Y., Colin, C., Stattegger, K., Wiesner, M. G., Huh, C.-A.,
Zhang, Y., Li, X., Sompongchaiyakul, P., You, C.-F., Huang, C.-Y., Liu, J.
T., Siringan, F. P., Le, K. P., Sathiamurthy, E., Hantoro, W. S., Liu, J.,
Tuo, S., Zhao, S., Zhou, S., He, Z., Wang, Y., Bunsomboonsakul, S., and Li, Y.:
Source-to-sink transport processes of fluvial sediments in the South China
Sea, Earth-Sci. Rev., 153, 238–273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.005</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, Y., Wen, Z., Shi, D., Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Bonnet, S., Li, Y., Tian, J., and Kao, S.-J.: Effect of light on N<sub>2</sub> fixation and net nitrogen release of Trichodesmium in a field study, Biogeosciences, 15, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, Y. Y., Wen, Z. Z., Shi, D. L., Lin, W. F., Bonnet, S., Dai, M. H., and
Kao, S. J.: Biogeography of N<sub>2</sub> fixation influenced by the western
boundary current intrusion in the South China Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
124, 6983–6996, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014781" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014781</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, Y. F. and Dai, M. H.: Vertical distribution of total and particulate 234Th, particulate organic carbon (POC) and nutrients with their physical forcings (temperature, salinity, fluorescence-based Chl a), Science Data Bank [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.02782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.02782</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, W. T.,
Xiu, P., Chai, F., Ran, L. H., Wiesner, M. G., Xi, J. Y., Yan, Y. W., and Fredj, E.:
Impact of mesoscale eddies on the source funnel of sediment trap
measurements in the South China Sea, Prog. Oceanogr., 194,  102566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102566" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102566</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mouriño-Carballido, B., Otero Ferrer, J. L., Fernández Castro, B.,
Marañón, E., Blazquez Maseda, M., Aguiar-González, B.,
Chouciño, P., Graña, R., Moreira-Coello, V., and Villamaña, M.:
Magnitude of nitrate turbulent diffusion in contrasting marine environments.
Sci. Rep., 11, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97731-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97731-4</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Okubo, A.: Oceanic diffusion diagrams, Deep-Sea Res., 18, 789–802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(71)90046-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(71)90046-5</a>, 1971.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Owens, S. A., Buesseler, K. O., and Sims, K.: Re-evaluating the
<sup>238</sup>U-salinity relationship in seawater: Implications for the
<sup>238</sup>U-<sup>234</sup>Th disequilibrium method, Mar. Chem., 127, 31–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2011.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2011.07.005</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Puigcorbé, V., Masqué, P., and Le Moigne, F. A. C.: Global database of ratios of particulate organic carbon to thorium-234 in the ocean: improving estimates of the biological carbon pump, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1267–1285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1267-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1267-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Resplandy, L., Martin, A. P., Le Moigne, F., Martin, P., Aquilina, A.,
Mémery, L., Lévy, M., and Sanders, R.: How does dynamical spatial
variability impact <sup>234</sup>Th-derived estimates of organic export?, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. I, 68, 24–45, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2012.05.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2012.05.015</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Savoye, N., Benitez-Nelson, C., Burd, A. B., Cochran, J. K., Charette, M.,
Buesseler, K. O., Jackson, G. A., Roy-Barman, M., Schmidt, S., and Elskens, M.:
<sup>234</sup>Th sorption and export models in the water column: A review, Mar.
Chem., 100, 234–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.014</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scharek, R., Tupas, L. M., and Karl, D. M.: Diatom fluxes to the deep sea in the
oligotrophic North Pacific gyre at Station ALOHA, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 182,
55–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps182055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps182055</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Siegel, D. A., Buesseler, K. O., Behrenfeld, M. J., Benitez-Nelson, C. R.,
Emmanuel, B., Brzezinski, M. A., Adrian, B., Carlson, C. A., D'Asaro, E. A., and
Doney, S. C.: Prediction of the Export and Fate of Global Ocean Net Primary
Production: The EXPORTS Science Plan, Front. Mar. Sci., 3, 22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00022</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Siegel, D. A., Cetinić, I., Graff, J. R., Lee, C. M., Nelson, N., Perry,
M. J., Ramos, I. S., Steinberg, D. K., Buesseler, K., and Hamme, R.: An
operational overview of the EXport Processes in the Ocean from RemoTe
Sensing (EXPORTS) Northeast Pacific field deployment, Elementa, 9, 00107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00022</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Satellite observations: Global Ocean Gridded L 4 Sea Surface Heights And Derived Variables Reprocessed 1993 Ongoing, CMS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00148" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00148</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stewart, G., Cochran, J., Miquel, J., Masqué, P., Szlosek, J., Baena, A.
R., Fowler, S., Gasser, B., and Hirschberg, D.: Comparing POC export from
<sup>234</sup>Th∕<sup>238</sup>U and <sup>210</sup>Po∕<sup>210</sup>Pb disequilibria with estimates
from sediment traps in the northwest Mediterranean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 54,
1549–1570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.06.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.06.005</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stukel, M. R., Kelly, T. B., Landry, M. R., Selph, K. E., and Swalethorp, R.:
Sinking carbon, nitrogen, and pigment flux within and beneath the euphotic
zone in the oligotrophic, open-ocean Gulf of Mexico, J. Plankton Res., 44,  711–727,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbab001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbab001</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Umhau, B. P., Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Close, H. G., Hannides, C. C., Motta,
L., Popp, B. N., Blum, J. D., and Drazen, J. C.: Seasonal and spatial changes in
carbon and nitrogen fluxes estimated using <sup>234</sup>Th&thinsp;:&thinsp;<sup>238</sup>U
disequilibria in the North Pacific tropical and subtropical gyre, Mar. Chem.,
217, 103705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103705" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103705</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, L., Huang, B. Q., Laws, E. A.,  Zhou, K. B., Liu,  X., Xie,  Y. Y., and Dai, M. H.: Anticyclonic Eddy Edge Effects on Phytoplankton Communities and
Particle Export in the Northern South China Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 7632–7650, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017jc013623" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017jc013623</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Winn, C. D., Campbell, L., Christian, J. R., Letelier, R. M., Hebel, D. V.,
Dore, J. E., Fujieki, L., and Karl, D. M.: Seasonal variability in the
phytoplankton community of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 9, 605–620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GB02149" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95GB02149</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, J., Lee, Z., Xie, Y., Goes, J., and Huang, B.: Reconciling between optical
and Biological determinants of the euphotic zone depth, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016874, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016874" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016874</a>, 2021.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xie, Y., Laws, E. A., Yang, L., and Huang, B.: Diel patterns of variable
fluorescence and carbon fixation of picocyanobacteria
<i>Prochlorococcus</i>-dominated phytoplankton in the South China Sea basin, Front. Microbiol.,
9, 1589–1604, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01589" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01589</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, J.-Y. T., Hsu, S.-C., Dai, M. H., Hsiao, S. S.-Y., and Kao, S.-J.: Isotopic composition of water-soluble nitrate in bulk atmospheric deposition at Dongsha Island: sources and implications of external N supply to the northern South China Sea, Biogeosciences, 11, 1833–1846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1833-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1833-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, J. Y. T., Kao, S. J., Dai, M., Yan, X., and Lin, H. L.: Examining N
cycling in the northern South China Sea from N isotopic signals in nitrate
and particulate phases, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 2118–2136,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003618</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, J. Y. T., Tang, J. M., Kang, S., Dai, M., Kao, S. J., Yan, X., Xu, M.
N., and Du, C.: Comparison of nitrate isotopes between the South China Sea and
western North Pacific Ocean: Insights into biogeochemical signals and water
exchange, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, e2021JC018304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC018304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC018304</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, K., Dai, M., Kao, S.-J., Wang, L., Xiu, P., Chai, F., Tian, J., and Liu,
Y.: Apparent enhancement of <sup>234</sup>Th-based particle export associated with
anticyclonic eddies, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 381, 198–209,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.07.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.07.039</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, K., Dai, M., Maiti, K., Chen, W., and Xie, Y.: Impact of physical and
biogeochemical forcing on particle export in the South China Sea, Prog. Oceanogr., 187, 102403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102403" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102403</a>, 2020a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, K., Dai, M., Xiu, P., Wang, L., Hu, J., and Benitez-Nelson, C. R.:
Transient enhancement and decoupling of carbon and opal export in cyclonic
eddies, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2020JC016372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016372</a>, 2020b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
