<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-20-3053-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Influence of manganese cycling on alkalinity in the redox stratified water column of Chesapeake Bay</article-title><alt-title>Influence of manganese cycling on alkalinity</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Influence of manganese cycling on alkalinity}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Thibault de Chanvalon et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Thibault de Chanvalon</surname><given-names>Aubin</given-names></name>
          <email>aubin.thibault-de-chanvalon@univ-pau.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Luther</surname><given-names>George W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff6">
          <name><surname>Estes</surname><given-names>Emily R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-3827</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Necker</surname><given-names>Jennifer</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff7">
          <name><surname>Tebo</surname><given-names>Bradley M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>Jianzhong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Wei-Jun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>IPREM, E2S UPPA, CNRS, Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, Pau, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE 19958, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Division of Environmental and Biomolecular Systems, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Marine Resource Utilization in South China Sea, Hainan University, Haikou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>International Ocean Discovery Program, Texas A&amp;M University, College Station, Texas 77845-9547, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>a</label><institution>current address: Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1700, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Aubin Thibault de Chanvalon (aubin.thibault-de-chanvalon@univ-pau.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>31</day><month>July</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>3053</fpage><lpage>3071</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>May</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e178">The alkalinity dynamics in coastal environments play a crucial role in
controlling the global burial of carbonate minerals and the ocean's capacity
to sequester anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This study presents results from high
vertical resolution profiles obtained during two summers in the temperate
Chesapeake Bay estuary, enabling detailed investigation of carbonate
dynamics over salinity and redox gradients, along with measurement of the
speciation of most redox-sensitive elements. Under oxygen-rich conditions,
carbonate dissolution, primary production and aerobic respiration explain
the evolution of total alkalinity (TA) versus dissolved inorganic carbon
(DIC), once adjusted for fresh and oceanic water mixing. A significant
flooding event in 2018 promoted carbonate dissolution. In oxygen-depleted
waters, we observed a previously unreported 2.4 mol increase in DIC per 1 mol of TA production, which was consistent over the 2 years.
Stoichiometric changes suggest that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction followed by Mn
carbonate precipitation is responsible for this characteristic carbonate
signature, likely produced in sediment pore water and then transferred to
the water column along with other by-products of anoxic respiration at the
onset of summer. Our findings highlight the critical role of Mn in
alkalinity dynamics in the Chesapeake Bay and potentially other
river-dominated environments where it can limit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and promote sulfur burial.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Division of Ocean Sciences</funding-source>
<award-id>1558738</award-id>
<award-id>1558692</award-id>
<award-id>1756815</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e242">About 30 % of anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are rapidly trapped by
dissolution in the ocean as dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), which is
dominated by bicarbonate ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Friedlingstein
et al., 2019). At the century timescale, atmosphere–ocean exchanges result
in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment not associated with a cationic
enrichment, as measured by total alkalinity (TA). This is in contrast to
silicate or carbonate weathering, which preponderates at timescales of
thousands to millions of years and increases TA simultaneously with DIC
(Urey, 1952). This cationic deficiency corresponds with an
excess of proton release that can be tracked by an indicator such as TA
minus DIC (Xue and Cai, 2020) and
informs about the reduction of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> buffering capacity of seawater
(Gustafsson et al., 2019). The proton
excess is only balanced in the deep ocean by the production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from carbonate dissolution, a process named chemical carbonate compensation
(Boudreau et al., 2018). However, in shallow waters, that
accounts for two-thirds of global buried carbonate
(Smith and Mackenzie, 2016); carbonate
precipitation largely predominates over dissolution, and other localised
processes may constrain carbonate dynamics
(Borges et al.,
2006; Lohrenz et al., 2010). For example, some calcifying species may slow
down their carbonate precipitation in case of pH decrease (so-called
biological<?pagebreak page3054?> carbonate compensation; Boudreau et al., 2018).
As another example, in estuaries, the seasonality of river flow, temperature
and continental erosion modulates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution
(e.g. Su et al., 2020b), atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchanges
(e.g.
Borges et al., 2018), respiratory activity (e.g. Abril et al.,
2003) and transfer of carbonate particles
(Meybeck, 1987; Middelburg et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e332">The global trends of human migration towards littoral areas and global
warming favour eutrophication and a decrease in oxygen levels in coastal
water (Breitburg et al.,
2018; Rabalais et al., 2014). Sometimes driven by recurrent natural process
(e.g. Gupta et al., 2021), exceptional
events (e.g. Hulot et al., 2023),
stratification reinforced by global warming
(e.g. Meire et al., 2013) or
anthropogenic nutrient loading
(e.g.
Hagy et al., 2004; Carstensen et al., 2018), coastal deoxygenation enhanced
the possible build-up of anoxic conditions to build up as a permanent or
seasonal feature. In anoxic environments, the drivers of the carbonate cycle
change as the terminal electron acceptor for organic matter remineralisation
shifts from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to Mn oxides, Fe oxides and then sulfate. Notably, the
consumption of sulfate, followed by sulfur burial, produces an significant
alkalinity flux toward coastal waters, accounting for approximately 10 %
of the global alkalinity input to the ocean
(Middelburg et al., 2020). Fe and Mn oxides play a
critical role in sulfur burial, as they prevent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> regeneration
and lead to the production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or FeS instead
(Findlay et al., 2014; Avetisyan et
al., 2021), leaving a specific fingerprint in the TA and DIC effluxes.</p>
      <p id="d1e374">While TA controls the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> buffering capacity of the ocean, riverine
input of carbonate to the ocean is poorly constrained
(Middelburg et al., 2020), and only rare
publications take into account the estuarine transformations of the
carbonate species (e.g. Su et al., 2020a; Abril et
al., 2003) furthermore in the context of oxygen depletion (e.g.
Abril et al., 2004). To better constrain the carbonate cycle in oxygen-depleted estuaries, we sampled a stratified water column in the Chesapeake
Bay 11 times over two campaigns with a high vertical resolution (down to
10 cm). This protocol allows a precise description of carbonate dynamics
over a redox gradient along with the measurement of the speciation of most
redox-sensitive elements. Such sampling illustrates carbonate chemistry on
transitioning from oxygenated waters to waters devoid of oxygen, as usually
only encountered in sediments or in anoxic lakes or seas (e.g. the Black Sea). The
original observed changes of alkalinity versus dissolved inorganic carbon
changes are interpreted based on typical geochemical reactions occurring
along the redox gradient.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e404">During two sampling campaigns from 3 to 9 August 2017 and
28 July to 3 August 2018, 11 profile casts were conducted
in a single station in the Chesapeake Bay with a water depth of 25 m
(station 858; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58.54</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">076</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W). The
Susquehanna River is the main tributary of the bay representing on average
two-thirds of the fresh water input (Zhang
et al., 2015). Despite the similar season, the two campaigns occurred at very
different river flow, with about 850 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017 versus 8500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018 due to release of flood waters from the Conowingo
Dam. The August 2018 condition corresponds to flooding which occurs on
average every 3.5 years (return period of 3.5 years, USGS survey).</p>
      <p id="d1e481">Each CTD (conductivity, temperature, depth) cast was performed during low or high tide slack periods. An oxygen
sensor (Clark electrode, SBE Inc.; detection limit of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
fluorescence sensor (ECO-FL Fluorometer, WET Labs) were part of the CTD
Rosette to take measurements during sampling. Also, a submersible all-plastic pump profiler was attached with the pump near the sensor orifices,
allowing measurement and sampling at a resolution of a few centimetres over
25 m water depth. Water was pumped to the deck within 1 min, and water
passed through a flow through voltammetry system measuring
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn(II), Fe(II), organically complexed Fe(III), FeS clusters,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and polysulfides continuously (Hudson et
al., 2019). When redox interfaces were identified, samples were filtered
through an acetate cartridge filter (pore size 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for pH and
inorganic carbon parameters, which were processed onboard within a few hours
after sampling in order to conserve chemical speciation. The pump profiler
system was cleaned with deionised water (18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) onboard the deck of
the ship after deployment. No coating effects were observed with the pump
system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Discrete measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e546">For each sample, all redox species were determined in the through flow
voltammetry system using cyclic voltammetry with a 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter Au/Hg amalgam PEEK microelectrode prepared according to Luther et al. (2008)
connected to a DLK-60 electrochemical analyser from Analytical Instrument
Systems Inc. The detection limit of this method is 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for sulfide
and polysulfides. Discrete samples for the determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Fe and Mn species were filtered through nylon luer-lock syringe filters
(Millipore, 0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Iron was measured on both bulk and filtered
samples using the ferrozine method (Stookey, 1970): after HCl
acidification (for Fe(II)) and an optional reduction step (for
Fe(III)+Fe(II)) with hydroxylamine hydrochloric (final concentration 0.7 M
for 1 h), ammonium acetate (final concentration 0.5 M) and ferrozine
(final concentration 1 mM). Absorbance at 562 nm was read with a diode array
spectrophotometer (Hewlett<?pagebreak page3055?> Packard 8452B). Limit of detection is 100 nM for
Fe(II) and Fe(III) with a 1 cm cell. Shipboard nitrite determination was
performed using the method of Grasshoff (1983). To 25 mL of sample,
0.5 mL of 58 mM sulfanilamide in 10 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl and 0.5 mL of a 4 mM
N(1-naphthyl)ethylene diamine hydrochloride solution were added. Samples
with added reagents were shaken and left to sit for 15 min, followed by
UV–Vis analysis at 540 nm using a 10 cm cell to increase detection limits.
Calibration curves were constructed using sodium nitrite. Limit of detection
is 10 nM for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e620">Dissolved manganese was determined by displacement of a Cd(II)-porphyrin
complex with Mn(II) to form the Mn(II)-porphyrin complex (Ishii
et al., 1982). Mn(III) species were identified based on slower reactivity
with the Cd complex (Madison et al., 2011) as
modified in Thibault de Chanvalon and Luther (2019).
Alternatively, Mn(III) species were identified after HCl treatment (down to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) followed by filtration in order to flocculate and eliminate the
dissolved manganese bound to humic material by filtration
(Oldham et al., 2017b). Limit of detection is 50 nM for
Mn(II) and Mn(III) in a 1 cm cell. MnOx was measured on 20 mL samples of
suspended material retained on 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> filters by the Leucoberbelin
blue (LBB) method
(Jones
et al., 2019). Four millilitres of a reagent solution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LBB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>acetic acid</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM) react with the filter, and the absorbance is read at
624 nm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">KMnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to calibrate the LBB method, which allows the
calculation of the electron equivalents obtained from particulate MnOx.
Results are given as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equivalent, with a limit of detection of
0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an uncertainty below 5 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e720">The DIC samples were preserved in 250 mL borosilicate glass bottles
with 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution. The total alkalinity (TA) samples
were not poisoned to prevent HgS precipitation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release in anoxic
and low-salinity waters (Cai et al., 2017). Then TA was analysed by Gran
titration in an open-cell setting (AS-ALK2, Apollo SciTech) within 24 h of
collection (Cai et al., 2010). The DIC samples were measured by a
nondispersive infrared analyser (AS-C3, Apollo SciTech) within a week
(Huang et al., 2012). The precision for
DIC and TA was about 0.1 %. Both DIC and TA measurements were calibrated
against certified reference materials (CRMs Batch 163 and Batch 173 provided
by Andrew Dickson of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography). The pH
samples were measured onboard at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within 1 h of collection
using an Orion ROSS glass electrode and calibrated with NIST standard
buffers. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calcite saturation and TA were calculated from
measured DIC and pH via the CO2SYS program using Cai and Wang (1998) constants.
The measured TA was found to be highly correlated to the calculated TA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.995</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.998, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>slope</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.995</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.017 for the 2017 and 2018 campaign
respectively), and their difference was always below 45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an
average of 7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2017 and of 22.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2018. These
results suggest a low contribution of non-carbonate species (e.g. nitrite,
ammonium or organic matter; Cotovicz et al.,
2016), and measured TA was used for the interpretation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Models of biogeochemical process on TA and DIC</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Identification of biogeochemical processes from scatter plots</title>
      <p id="d1e851">This section identifies the required conditions to interpret a scatter plot
of two species in terms of chemical reaction stoichiometry: the “reaction-driven” approximation. In case of turbulent diffusion mixing (sometimes
called eddy diffusion) in only one direction (no lateral input), at steady
state, on a portion of space where occurs one chemical reaction, the changes
of concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, of two species can be described by Eq. (1)
(see Sect. A1 for more details):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M51" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the respective stoichiometric
coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the direction in the space and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> an unknown constant. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are concentrations of any elements produced or consumed during the
reaction and can be TA, DIC or a linear combination with salinity. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is null, Eq. (2) is valid and the data points would be distributed
along a straight line in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scatter plot.
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M61" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1026">Theoretically, Eq. (2) is valid in at least three cases. First, it is valid if the
contribution from one endmember is negligible compared to the timescale of
reactions, which corresponds also to a system with only one endmember.
Second, it is valid when the slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the endmembers
equals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is achieved, in particular,
if one endmember was previously generated from the other endmember by a
chemical reaction with similar stoichiometry. And third, it is valid when the two
endmembers have similar concentrations (see Sect. A2), as in this study
where the excess of TA (TAex) and the excess of DIC (DICex) are calculated
by linear combination with salinity to be equal to zero for the upstream and
downstream endmembers. Thus, if only one reaction occurs in between the
endmembers, the slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would correspond to the
stoichiometry of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The oceanic endmember
for both August campaigns was the one proposed by Su et al. (2020a). The
oceanic endmember varies mainly with the season (Cai et
al., 2020), and a maximal change of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in 5 % uncertainty
on the slope of the mixing line. For the upstream estuary, larger variations
exist mainly due to changes of river discharge and water temperature
(Meybeck, 2003; Joesoef et al., 2017), and a one-off
endmember has to be determined by fit with the in situ measurements at the
lowest measured salinity. Between the two campaigns, the upstream endmember
changed by 77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, generating 5 % of change on the slope (see Fig. A1). The upstream endmember is not a river endmember
(Su et al., 2020a) but corresponds to a salinity<?pagebreak page3056?> above
1.5, avoiding any interpretation for biological activity in the fresh water
part of the estuary
(Meybeck et al., 1988).
However, it corresponds to a larger water mass pool, less sensitive to short
term changes, with a residence time being higher than 240 d in the
Chesapeake upstream part (Du and Shen, 2016),
and thus is more likely to satisfy the condition of steady state.</p>
      <p id="d1e1118">The relative uncertainty on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is equal to the sum
of the relative uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TAex and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>DICex. Posing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TA as the change of TA measured, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the change of salinity and
sml_TA as the slope of the mixing line for TA, we have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sml_TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Uncertainty on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are negligible to the relative uncertainty of the
slope of the mixing line. Posing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the uncertainty on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we
get Eq. (3) that describes the fact that the uncertainty is much lower
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>DICex than on DICex because most of the error associated with the
calculation of the endmember is cancelled when calculating the difference of
DICex on two points with close salinity:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sml_TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sml_TA</mml:mtext></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sml_DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sml_DIC</mml:mtext></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1365">However, in a stratified water column, not just one but several successive
reactions occur, limiting the validity of Eq. (1) to each reactional
stratum. The general case is not straightforward to solve, but in the
particular case where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plot represents a straight line between
two endmembers with different concentrations, the previous discussion of
Eq. (2) indicates (second case) that one endmember would have been
previously generated from the second by a chemical reaction with similar
stoichiometry. Thus, the depths corresponding to the straight line define a
reactional stratum characterised by a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and delimitated by two local endmembers maintained in steady state
by chemical reactions with similar stoichiometry than the one that produced
them, i.e.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The local
endmembers should have been produced before the steady-state achievement by
a reaction of similar stoichiometry, but the reaction could have been faster
than the observed one or could have occurred in a different place, including
in the sediment.</p>
      <p id="d1e1431">Therefore, in a system defined between only two endmembers, away from
atmospheric exchanges, in case of turbulent diffusion mixing, at
steady state and with negligible lateral mixing, the reaction-driven
approximation allows us to interpret linear variations of TAex versus DICex
as a sum of biogeochemical reactions spread all over the water column that
can be broken into several reactional stratum. In each stratum, if the local
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is constant, it corresponds to the
apparent stoichiometry of a combination of the biogeochemical reactions
occurring in this stratum. In the case of multiple simultaneous reactions in
the same stratum, by posing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the stoichiometry of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th reaction concerning the reagent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the reaction rate of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th reaction, we obtain
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M90" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1529">To maintain a global reaction rate independent of the species, we have

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M91" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>so     </mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1603">Equation (4) indicates that the apparent stoichiometry in a given stratum
corresponds to the sum of the stoichiometric coefficients of each reaction
weighted by the relative rate of each reaction. Therefore, to estimate the
relative rate of each reaction to the observed local changes of TAex, DICex,
and AOU (apparent oxygen uptake) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a linear combination of reactions is calculated. This
combination has to fit three equations (one for each parameter), which allows a
maximum of three reactions to be used to solve the system. A limited number of
reactions is selected as candidates based on the discussion (see Table 1 and
Sects. 4.2 and 4.3). Then, the system is solved with the minimum possible
reactions, and the weighted coefficients, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are calculated.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1637">Summary of the main net reactions occurring among the different
zones of a redox gradient with reactants starting in equilibrium with the
atmosphere, adapted from Soetaert
et al. (2007). The calculations assume the Redfield ratio of the organic matter,
i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.156</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0094</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Redox zones describe
the different conditions required for completing the reaction.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="275pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Redox zones</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Net formula</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>DIC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oxic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Any</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oxic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NR-N2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Anoxic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NR-NH3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Anoxic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MnR-MnC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Anoxic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sulfidic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SR-SMnC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sulfidic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FeSR-FeS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sulfidic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeOOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SR-SFeS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sulfidic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeOOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SR-FeS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sulfidic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeOOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>TA changes indicated by the charge transfer during a reaction</title>
      <p id="d1e3404">The simplest way to calculate the TA changes induced by an individual
reaction is to look at charge transfer induced by the stoichiometry of the
given reaction. Indeed, the total alkalinity (TA) corresponds to the
quantity of acid added to titrate a solution down to pH 4.5
(Dickson, 1981). It can be described by
Eq. (5), with the example of HCl as an acid and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> any titrated base.
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M130" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <?pagebreak page3057?><p id="d1e3447">Assuming a complete reaction, the quantity of acid added is equal to the
negative charges initially present in the sample consumed plus the positive
charges added to the species initially present in the sample. Thus, the
total alkalinity corresponds to the loss of negative charges (or gain of
positive charges) for species initially present in the sample produced by
the pH change from the initial pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pHini to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Writing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the charges held by species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, initially present in the sample
at a given pH, we get Eq. (6):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M135" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pHini</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3531">However, the electroneutrality of water induces

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M136" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pHini</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>so     </mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3596">Equation (7) demonstrates that the total alkalinity is simply the sum of
charges that each species present in the sample would have at pH 4.5. From
Eq. (7), one can easily deduce the changes of alkalinity from any reaction
stoichiometry as soon as the charges of all species at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are known.
For example, for a 0.0020 M NaOH dissolution, its TA is 0.0020 M as at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M. For natural waters, most of the
time, the only acid/base species charged at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In that respect, whatever the
initial pH and the acid–base equilibrium of species in the sample is, the
sum of phosphate species will count negatively, and the sum of ammonium
species will count positively. Strictly speaking, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, acid species
with pKa between 2.5 and 6.5, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, would be
only partially titrated, and the charge equals their concentration multiplied
by a correction factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pKa</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but this correction
can be neglected to a first approximation. Equation (7) is equivalent to those
published in
Soetaert
et al. (2007) or Wolf-Gladrow et al. (2007), whose Eq. (32) can be refined
considering that

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M147" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TPO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TNH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">THF</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">THNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4029">However, Eq. (7) is more concise and more general. For example, in suboxic
water, specific species such as polysulfides (as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Rickard and Luther, 2007), and in highly productive environments,
carboxylic groups from DOC, can be easily added as soon as the bearing
charges at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are known.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Water column stratification</title>
      <p id="d1e4078">High-resolution profiles of salinity and temperature plotted in Fig. 1 show
the stratified water column at station 858. Carbonate and redox chemistry
are plotted against salinity in Fig. 2. These data result from the 11 CTD
casts performed over 1 week during each campaign and correspond to depths
ranging from 0.7 to 25 m. Plots against depth generate noisier
profiles and are shown in Fig. A2, while plots against salinity follow the
water masses. Despite the overall lower<?pagebreak page3058?> salinity due to a near-7-fold river
flow increase in 2018 than 2017 (5800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018 versus 850 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017), similar zonation of the water column occurred.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e4120">Superimposed salinity (in white) and temperature (in black)
profiles over the 11 casts for each campaign.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3053/2023/bg-20-3053-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4131">Superimposed carbonate and redox chemistry profiles of 11 casts
done in August 2017 and in August 2018 at station 858 of the Chesapeake
Bay.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3053/2023/bg-20-3053-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4141">A surface layer sampled only in 2018 is visible in the top 3 m depth (Fig. 1). It presents highly variable temperature and oxygen concentration and
oversaturation of p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2), indicating emission to the atmosphere.
Below, at 3 m depth, a subsurface layer (named primary production zone or PP
in Fig. 2) is characterised by a high amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (about or above
100 % saturation), high pH (about 8; 8.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017 and
7.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018) and high day-to-day temperature variation
(above 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between different days). The layer presents
relatively low p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (505 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017
and 770 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018), with minimal values at 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017 and 205 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018 which are below the atmospheric
p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 407 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Chen et al., 2020). This
signature corresponds to primary production (PP). Fluorescence (not shown)
correlates with pH as expected for primary production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Fluo</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mV</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018). DICex and TAex
reach their minimal value in the surface layer. While DICex minimum is
similar between the two campaigns (78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017
and 76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018); TAex minimum is much lower in
2017 (7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than in 2018 (48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e4508">Below, with increasing salinity, an important increase of p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
accompanying the decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH and temperature is visible. A
relatively invariable low oxygen zone (called ILO in Fig. 2) is here defined
by the salinity invariance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at about 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 2017 and 105 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 2018.
Other species are also relatively stable for this depth, such as p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at about 3250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 2017 and 2590 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 2018 and pH at about 7.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
2017 and 7.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 2018. Deeper, where the oxygen is not
detectable (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in absence of free
sulfide, the so-called anoxic zone corresponds to a pH minimum at 7.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), similar in 2017 and 2018, that generates a p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
maximum. The deepest layer is a sulfidic layer, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), in which the pH seems quite stable at 7.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 7.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 2017 and 2018 respectively.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations observed by Su et al. (2021) and during the
2018 cruise (data not shown) vary linearly with salinity (calcium excess
stays below 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or 10 % of total Ca). Assuming similar behaviour
in 2017, calculations show that the whole water column (except four samples
from the PP zone) is under saturated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cal</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to calcite in 2018, while undersaturation is only
valid below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017. The main changes between the two campaigns
correspond to a greater oxygen penetration in 2018, especially visible in
the ILO zone. Additionally, a surface layer (with salinity below 3) is
visible above the primary production zone in 2018 but is related to the more
superficial sampling in 2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Intermediate redox species</title>
      <p id="d1e4928">The development of the anoxic zone during summer
(Su et al., 2021) and the regularity of
this development over the years
(Sholkovitz
et al., 1992; Trouwborst et al., 2006; Lewis et al., 2007; Cai et al., 2017;
Oldham et al., 2017a) requires the presence of species able to rapidly
oxidise the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing upward and to reduce the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
downward. The three main redox couples known to play this role,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are described in Fig. 3 by the superimposition of
all cast results against salinity. Four representative casts are plotted in
Fig. A3. The primary production zone is depleted in dissolved Mn(II) and
Mn(III) and shows an average value for solid MnOx (0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In 2018,
iron speciation was investigated in the primary production zone, showing an
important iron pool (1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) dominated by solid
Fe(II) (95 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %). Below, in the ILO zone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches a
maximum plateau at 5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017 that is not
visible in 2018; MnOx dominates the Mn pool in the ILO zone with a
concentration of 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017 and 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018. Fe(II) represents only 49 %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 %,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the iron pool (for a total iron concentration of 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 2017, while it represents 87 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
iron pool in 2018 (for a total concentration of
1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Just below oxygen depletion, in the anoxic zone, MnOx reaches a
maximum (2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017 and 2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2018). During both campaigns, the sulfidic layer is
characterised by the absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and MnOx, while dissolved
manganese concentration increases up to 7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the iron pool increases to 5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. No Mn(III)
was detected with the porphyrin kinetics method
(Thibault de Chanvalon<?pagebreak page3059?> and Luther, 2019), but about
30 % of the total dissolved manganese flocculated after acidification down
to pH 1.5 when analysed in 2017, indicating the existence of Mn(III).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e5469">Mn, Fe and nitrite profiles built by superimposition of 11 casts
for each campaign.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3053/2023/bg-20-3053-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e5487">In terms of salinity, station 858 of the Chesapeake Bay shows very similar
water column zonation between summer 2017 and summer 2018, despite a 10-fold
difference in freshwater discharge rates (Figs. 1 and 2). Major features
are first, a surface layer characterised by intense atmospheric exchange
that was only sampled in 2018. Below, at about 3 m depth, there is a subsurface
layer associated with high primary production (PP zone) with high pH of about
8, oversaturation of dioxygen and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial pressure (down to 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Below, a low oxygen layer with invariant concentration of most
species surveyed (the invariant low oxygen (ILO) zone) is characterised by
significant nitrite accumulation in 2017 (Fig. 2), probably due to oxidation
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diffusing upward and/or produced by in situ remineralisation. This
feature is not visible in 2018 probably because the higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration in 2018 accelerates nitrite oxidation into nitrate and
prevents any significant accumulation. Below, the anoxic zone, with neither
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detectable, is characterised by an increase of MnOx
concentration and a pH minimum. This MnOx maximum can be explained by the
upward diffusing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is biologically oxidised by the downward
diffusing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, though at low, undetectable, concentration
(Clement et al., 2009). Additionally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be
oxidised by the nitrite or the nitrate (not measured) diffusing downward
(thermodynamically favourable, Luther, 2010). Compared to the ILO
zone, the anoxic MnOx maximum corresponds to an increase of 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
2017, while it is much more marked in 2018 with an increase of 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 3). This difference could come from a faster <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation
produced by the steeper oxygen gradient above the anoxic zone and by the
thinness of the anoxic layer in 2018. Finally, in the deeper sulfidic layer,
the MnOx disappearance corresponds to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases (Fig. 3)
according to the reduction of settling MnOx by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The concentration
increase of the manganese pool and of the iron pool with depth in the anoxic
and sulfidic layers probably results from important sedimentary efflux.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Validity of the reaction-driven approximation</title>
      <p id="d1e5669">The simultaneous and high-resolution sampling of multiple carbonate
parameters and redox species gives us the rare opportunity to investigate in
detail the interaction<?pagebreak page3060?> between carbonate species and redox-sensitive
elements. In the Chesapeake Bay, main changes of DIC and TA can be explained
by mixing between upstream and oceanic endmembers (Appendix, Fig. A1). This
“endmember-driven” interpretation leads to the calculation of an excess of
DIC and TA, DICex and TAex, relative to the mixing line, as shown in Fig. 4a.
At station 858, the steep gradient observed, for example the pH and
p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradients in the PP zone; the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradients
above the anoxic zone; and the Mn, Fe and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradients at depth,
suggest that ongoing in situ processes control the changes of concentrations
and dominate the time-dependent endmember variability or the mixing with an
unknown third endmember. Additionally, the TAex versus DICex plot (Fig. 4a)
shows steep changes of direction, such as in the case of straight lines between
local endmembers maintained by ongoing reactions, while a preponderance of
mixing would produce more progressive changes. Finally, at depth, Fig. 4a
shows a similar slope for both years studied (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) rather than a similar TAex and DICex concentration, which
reinforces the validity of the reaction-driven approximation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5743">Description of the TAex<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>DICex<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>AOU or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system. Panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold> and
<bold>(d)</bold> show samples measured along with interpretative slopes discussed
in the main text. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the theoretical slope of TAex<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>DICex from
combination of reactions presented in Table 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3053/2023/bg-20-3053-2023-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5799">Assuming (1) that mixing is efficiently described by vertical turbulent
diffusion mixing; (2) that the measured concentrations correspond to a steady
state – no changes observed over the 1 week sampling; (3) that no additional
endmember contributes significantly to the excess calculation, in particular
that the samples are isolated from atmospheric exchanges; and (4) that lateral
mixing is negligible, which is equivalent to the lateral invariance of the
system – as in the stratified water column of station 858, the reaction-driven approximation (Sect. 2.3.1) permits interpretation of the
concentration changes as a linear combination of the stoichiometry of
several chemical reactions (Eq. 5). The weighted coefficients of each
reaction are equal to the rate of each reaction relative to the sum of the
rate of all occurring reactions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 4). Accordingly,
this interpretation does not identify reactions with minor impact on the
carbonate cycle (Eq. 7) or reactions that cancelled each other later
during the journey. For example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TAex introduced by PP is
frequently cancelled by a similar amount or even higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TAex by AR.
The starting point corresponds to the upstream (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) endmember at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 4a shows a slight DICex enrichment at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which reflects a bias from the endmember calculation.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3061?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Identification of major reactions in oxygenated water column using $\Delta\text{TAex}/\Delta\text{DICex}/\Delta\text{AOU}$ signature}?><title>Identification of major reactions in oxygenated water column using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature</title>
      <p id="d1e5911">In oxygenated water, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis can be
supported and strengthened by looking also at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Fig. 4b) and establishing a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature for each water layer. Then, a linear
combination of up to three reactions can be fit to the observed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature. The main candidate reactions to
be combined are aerobic respiration (AR), primary production (whose overall
mass balance equation is here summarised as negative AR), carbonate
dissolution (CD) and nitrification of ammonium (Nit) as presented in Table 1
and in Fig. 4c. In 2017, the whole oxygenated zone, including the PP zone
and the ILO zone, is characterised by a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a and b), which corresponds to the occurrence of
only net aerobic respiration (AR) (theoretical values are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, see Table 1 and Fig. 4c).
Note (a) that “net aerobic respiration” indicates that primary production
is possible at a significant rate but slower than AR and (b) that this
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature indicates weak
nitrification following respiration. In case of full nitrification, the
theoretical slopes should be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.167</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as proposed by Zeebe and Wolf-Gladrow (2001). A
combination of 1 AR and 0.025 Nit (nitrification of 16 % of the produced
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) improves the modelled value to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relatively slow
nitrification can be explained by slow kinetics of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation,
with a half-life time estimated between a few days in estuaries
(Horrigan et al., 1990) to multiple
years in coastal environments (Heiss
and Fulweiler, 2016). As a comparison, other <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fates, such as
adsorption, lead to an ammonium half-life time of about a few minutes
(Alshameri et al., 2018) to a few hours
(Raaphorst and Malschaert, 1996)
depending on the concentration of fine particles. Additionally, algae are
known to use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as an N source
(Raven et al., 1992), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be directly assimilated by heterotrophic organisms.</p>
      <p id="d1e6185">In 2018, fresh water masses brought by the exceptional flood modified the
carbonate system equilibrium. First, a low-salinity layer with p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
1540 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overlays the primary production layer (Fig. 2), preventing
the uptake of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by primary production as was observed in 2016 (Chen et
al., 2020). Just below the surface layer, in the PP zone, the lock down of
atmospheric exchange by the low-salinity layer produces supersaturation of
trapped <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2). In Fig. 4a and b, this process translates into a
vertical distribution at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This original signature can be modelled
by the combination of simultaneous carbonate dissolution (CD), the water
column being undersaturated, and PP, no important turbidity was visible as
modelled by Cerco et al. (2013), in equal proportion (second line in Table 2); the carbonate dissolution buffers the DIC consumption by the PP. Note
that the ratio between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implicates an important
nitrate assimilation superior or equal to the amount of N required for the
PP, as modelised by negative nitrification in Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e6310">Linear combination of reactions from Table 1 that fit the observations (see text for details, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules are omitted).</p></caption>
  <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3053/2023/bg-20-3053-2023-g01.png"/>
<?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page3062?><p id="d1e6332">In 2018, below the PP zone down to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">240</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the beginning of
the ILO zone, the TAex increases significantly with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a and b), incompatible with AR.
To explain this signature, a contribution of CD superimposed on AR seems most
likely. A linear combination fitting leads to 0.5 CD for 1 AR (third line in
Table 2) and results in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. An explanation of its occurrence solely in 2018 could be the
increase in carbonate-rich suspended material at high flow conditions
(Su et al., 2021). Excess of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
compared to the mixing line with oceanic end member (not shown) indicates
that up to 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is produced in the oxygenated layer.
Deeper, in the ILO zone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a and b), which results mainly from AR (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with
the possible addition of CD and Nit, the exact signature being fitted for 0.54
CD and 0.46 Nit for 1 AR (fourth line in Table 2), as a continuum of AR
and CD relative rates from the overlaying layer. This important
nitrification is also in good agreement with the nitrification observed in
the PP zone during this campaign, the lack of nitrite build-up in the ILO
zone and the relatively high oxygen concentration (at 105 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the
ILO zone in 2018 which is able to sustain nitrification. Overall, our
results show that the higher river flow of 2018 increases carbonate
dissolution for the top 5–10 m water depth that is superimposed on primary
production or aerobic respiration. Additionally, in 2017 the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system indicates weak nitrification, while
in 2018 significant nitrification in the ILO and PP zones is suggested by
the reaction-driven approximation. The role of nitrification in
explaining TAex depletion is only hypothetical since no direct measurements
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were performed. In particular, TAex
depletion is particularly intense during high flow, high suspended particles
season and could be produced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> adsorption to the particles
rather than by nitrification.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Identification of major reactions in the anoxic water column using the
$\Delta\text{TAex}/\Delta\text{DICex}/\Delta{\protect\chem{H_{{2}}S}}$ signature}?><title>Identification of major reactions in the anoxic water column using the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature</title>
      <?pagebreak page3063?><p id="d1e6629">In the absence of oxygen, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
will be used for rates calculation. In the anoxic zone, the signature is
similar in summer 2017 and 2018 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The reaction-driven approximation of this
signature is more difficult than in oxidised water because more reactions
are known to occur simultaneously in the absence of oxygen. However, to fit with
the reaction-driven approximation, it is not necessary to describe each
reaction step but only the overall changes concerning the journey of a water
mass over different redox conditions resulting in a combined result or
reaction. This approach has recently been proposed for FeS burial by Hiscock
and Millero (2006),
Rassmann
et al. (2020) or Su et al. (2020b). A scenario combining sulfate reduction
(SR) is particularly attractive since SR represents the main carbon
remineralisation pathway in absence of oxygen. However, a combination of SR
with CD would result in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 1.15 and 2
(see Table 1 or Fig. 4c) and fails to reach the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of 2.4. Moreover, SR alone underestimates the importance of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation pathway that can consume all the alkalinity produced during SR.
For example, SR follow by oxygenated oxidation results in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature equal to AR only. In the
Chesapeake Bay, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation is critical since no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
measurable in the anoxic zone, while the gradient at the sediment–water
interface indicates high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sedimentary efflux (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e6808">Generalising these observations, recent efforts to build an alkalinity
budget on the global scale
(Hu and Cai, 2011;
Middelburg et al., 2020) highlight that the alkalinity produced by anaerobic
respiration corresponds to the uncharged species produced, mostly in solid
or gaseous phases. Indeed, the alkalinity changes produced during a natural
reaction equal the “charge transfer” from species having some charge at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to a species that would
lose its charges at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mainly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that is not counted
in the alkalinity calculation (see Eq. 12). Although correct, this
approach tends to neglect the roles of Fe and Mn oxides
(Middelburg et al., 2020) since their
transformation from (oxyhydr)oxides into sulfur or carbonate solid species
does not involve any charge transfer. When looking in detail at these
processes, the metal oxides are critical since they are the main <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation pathway that does not regenerate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but rather
produces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or FeS
(Findlay et al., 2014; Avetisyan et
al., 2021), which limits alkalinity consumption.</p>
      <p id="d1e6938">To build a pool of candidate reactions for the fitting, first, dissolved
species at too low a concentration (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
be a net reagent to affect the carbon cycle at steady state are not taken
into account. These species are usually recycled rapidly and hold the role of
catalyser or electron shuttle between other redox species and did not reach
10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the campaigns (Fig. 3). Second, many minerals are
expected to be at low concentration or thermodynamically not favoured, and
their associated reactions are neglected (e.g. iron phosphate, ferrous or
manganous oxide, metal sulfur clusters, MnS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, adsorption
processes, reverse weathering). Therefore, only aqueous species with
important stock concentrations (that can exceed 0.1 mM in anoxic water) are
taken into account, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
together with gaseous (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and main solid phases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
FeS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, FeOOH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Third, the combination of many
carbon remineralisation reactions with re-oxidation reactions or the net
result produces a net chemical equation equal to another remineralisation
reaction. As an example, the chemical equation of SR followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation with oxygen is equal to the equation of aerobic respiration: the
proposed model confounds both pathways because the resulting chemical
changes are similar.</p>
      <p id="d1e7146">Table 1 lists the resulting combined reactions, and the calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slopes are represented in Fig. 4c. For the anoxic zone,
the nitrate respiration can be associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production (NR-N2) or
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production (NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the manganese oxide respiration
produces carbonate precipitation (MnR-MnC). For the sulfidic zone, SR can
occur alone, producing a build-up of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, at a certain point,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gets significantly oxidised either by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which produces
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (SR-SMnC) or by FeOOH, producing FeS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(SR-SFeS) and ultimately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (SR-FeS2). Direct respiration of FeOOH is
also taken into account, but as the only final Fe product in the model is
FeS or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it has to be accompanied by some SR (FeSR-FeS).</p>
      <?pagebreak page3064?><p id="d1e7292">Figure 4c demonstrates that the slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be obtained for any reaction in combination with MnR-MnC.
Combinations without MnR-MnC, however, lead to a negative SR, whose overall
equation could be interpreted as a possible small participation of
anoxygenic phototrophic (purple) bacteria
(Findlay et al.,
2015, 2017), but are not considered further, as the amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
involved would be tiny. Therefore, in the absence of nitrate, oxygen and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, only a combination of MnR-MnC with SR-SMnC (producing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
fifth line in Table 2), SR-FeS (producing FeS, sixth line in Table 2)
or CD (releasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, seventh line in Table 2) gives the particularly
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.4. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was not measured during
our campaign, but it has been previously reported in this water column
(Findlay et al., 2014), and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced by SR-SMnC can
react with FeS to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All the three identified combinations
require a critical role of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since Fig. 3 does not indicate any
clear reaction for iron while the steep gradient of MnOx in proximity to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rich layer suggests reaction between MnOx and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
combination with SR-SMnC is the most likely (fifth line in Table 2).
Deeper, the vertical gradient of sulfide suggests that part of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
came by diffusion from the sediment's porewater (Fig. 2). The assumptions
required for the reaction-driven approximation are still valid as soon
as steady state is maintained by ongoing reactions, even if one of the local
endmembers has not been sampled, since it is probably located in the
sediment. In the presence of sulfide, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
2018 (Fig. 4a and d) and can be explained by the same combination of
reactions without complete oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from SR to take into
account the build-up of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Comparison with other studies</title>
      <p id="d1e7560">The high observed ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seems very
specific to the Chesapeake Bay. Moreover, the reaction-driven
interpretation can be applied to other published datasets for which the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system can be calculated (Table 3). In the water column, most of the available datasets are not suitable for
the reaction-driven approximation, since either they focus on surface
water where DIC and TA are strongly impacted by atmospheric exchange or the
water masses change too fast to consider that reactions dominate over water
mixing. However, porewater measured in the Gulf of Mexico has
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Hu et al., 2010), as expected when sulfate
reduction is associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation (SR reaction; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table 1). Similarly,
Hiscock and Millero (2006) report <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the western Black
Sea close to the SR signature. In the Baltic Sea sediment,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was reported
(Lukawska-Matuszewska,
2016), which is close to the expected signature in the case of important
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption by Fe oxides and consequent precipitation as pyrite
(SR-FeS2 reaction; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In Rhône river prodelta sediments, the reported
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be related to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature of FeSR-FeS (Table 1) that is expected in iron-rich
sediments, with high sedimentation rates preventing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in
the pore water (Rassmann et al.,
2020). In permeable, carbonate-rich sediments, the reported signature of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Hawaii sands is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ND</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Drupp et al., 2016). The
lack of salinity and oxygen datasets prevents further model fits, but the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is below 2.4. For oxygen-depleted data from the
whole Chesapeake Bay described in Su et al. (2020a), the signatures are
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the presence of oxygen
(typical signature of AR) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ND</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the absence of oxygen that could
correspond to NR-N2 or a combination of CD and Nit. Overall, this
bibliographic survey highlights the effectiveness of the reaction-driven
approximation to identify preponderant reactions controlling the carbon
cycle and puts into perspective the originality of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in the Chesapeake Bay.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e8068">Overview of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature observed in different environments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="100pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="110pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="70pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Publication</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sample type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Reaction-driven<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> interpretation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hu et al., 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gulf of Mexico sediment<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> (slope)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lukawska-Matuszewska, 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baltic Sea sediment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SR-FeS2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rassmann et al., 2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rhône prodelta sediment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">FeSR-FeS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cai and Wang, 1998</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Satilla estuary</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ND</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abril et al., 2003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Loire estuary</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Not applicable<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Drupp et al., 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oxygenated Hawaii carbonate<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> reef sands</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.86–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ND</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Not applicable<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Su et al., 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Chesapeake Bay water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Not applicable<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">column</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ND</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NR-N2 or CD+Nit</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hiscock and Millero,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Western Black Sea water<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> column</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e8099"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Lack of data on oxygen concentration prevent any interpretation.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Important air–water exchange prevents any reaction-driven approximation.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{3}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Local budget</title>
      <p id="d1e8713">While the reaction-driven approximation indicates a dominant role of the
SR-SMnC reaction, this possibility needs to be validated by looking at the
saturation state of rhodochrosite (the main <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral) and looking
at the mass budget between MnOx consumed and TAex produced. The rhodochrosite
saturation (Luo and Millero, 2003) is always below 0.3 in our
samples, which stands against the occurrence of in situ SR-SMnC reaction. When
inspecting the mass budget, the 88 to 155 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
required to produce the 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> TAex increase observed (Fig. 4a) is
1 order of magnitude higher than the observed MnOx or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration (Fig. 3). This mass budget discrepancy cannot be solved
by invoking suspended material, since the 88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would
require a suspended material concentration of about 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (assuming an average concentration of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of Mn),
which is again 1 or 2 orders of magnitude higher than the 0.01–0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> usually found in the Chesapeake Bay (Cerco
et al., 2013). However, a fast settling rate could satisfy and explain the
discrepancy between water and solid concentration. But another process
dephasing aqueous from solid reaction products is also possible at station
858, since the dissolved phase could have moved up, rather than the
particles settling down. In this case, the SR-SMnC reaction was not
happening only in the water column of the Chesapeake Bay, and part of the
TAex and DICex pool could have been produced in the sediment during the
previous year (e.g. Aller, 2014), then diffused out of
the sediment simultaneously with other reduced elements as the summer
begins. Indeed, many previous studies at station 858
(e.g. Sholkovitz et al., 1992) explained the seasonality of
anoxia with an upward move of the redox front from the sediments to bottom
waters during the start of summer. Important sedimentary efflux of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were still visible during both of our August
campaigns. Therefore, the 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> TA pool does not fit with the
ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the water column but rather with the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deposited in the sediment. The sedimentary solid Mn stock of the
Chesapeake Bay is particularly important, up to 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
station 858 (Sinex and Helz, 1981) compared to an average
value of 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the upper continental crust
(Rudnick and Gao, 2003). Indeed semi-enclosed basins are known to
concentrate manganese at the deeper sediment
(Thamdrup and
Dalsgaard, 2000; Lenstra et al., 2020). Recent investigations at a close
station (ET 5.1; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W) in the
Chesapeake Bay (Lenstra et al., 2021) report that
about 60 % of the surface sedimentary Mn pool is MnOx (acid ascorbic
extractable) and 25 % is Mn carbonate (1 M HCl extraction). Assuming a
porosity of 0.8 and a bulk solid density of 2.6, the sedimentary pool
corresponds to 35 mM of manganese, which largely exceeds the 88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
required to produce the 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> TAex increase. Therefore, the
Chesapeake Bay sediment is particularly rich in manganese and could host
important SR-SMnC reactions in the surface pore water, whose soluble products
diffuse up to the water column during summer and could bear with them the
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature observed.</p>
      <p id="d1e9035">The assumptions detailed in Sect. 4.1 permit the reaction-driven
approach to be reconsidered in regard to this sediment efflux scenario.
Indeed, the sediment efflux does not need to be considered as an additional
endmember; that<?pagebreak page3065?> would violate the third assumption, since its salinity and
the pore water concentrations results from the upstream and oceanic
endmembers superimposed to geochemical reactions. In Sect. 2.3.1, we point
out that Eq. (1) was valid in between each local endmember and that
the straight lines on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot between them
indicate that the local endmembers are maintained in steady state by a
chemical reaction with a similar stoichiometry. These results indicate that,
even if most of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was produced when the local endmembers were
localised in the sediment, (a) their migration does not alter the TAex<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>DICex
signature, and (b) the chemical reaction that produced them is still ongoing
at a sufficient rate to maintain a steady state characterised by the steep
changes of direction observed in Fig. 4a.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e9082">The reaction-driven approximation proposed in this study is a powerful
interpretative framework that can identify the major reactions controlling
the carbonate cycle. In the Chesapeake Bay, similar redox stratification can
support varying intensity of carbonate dissolution, absent as in 2017 or
important as in 2018. In 2018, the reaction-driven approximation also
suggests an important role of the N cycle to consume alkalinity, while in
2017, nitrification was limited to 16 % of the nitrogen mineralised. The
summer anoxia observed in the Chesapeake Bay is characterised by an
exceptionally high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.4 which has never been
reported in anoxic water columns or sediment pore waters. The reaction-driven approximation suggests that it comes from sulfate reduction with almost
complete hydrogen sulfide oxidation by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
precipitation. This interpretation is supported by the important manganese
dynamics observed in this and previous papers (Oldham et al., 2017a;
Sholkovitz et al., 1992; Trouwborst et al., 2006). However, most of the
reactions would have occurred in the sediment from which the components of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TAex</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DICex</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.4 diffused into the bottom water with
the redox front during the set-up of summer water column anoxia. Our study
demonstrates that the manganese cycle can have a strong impact on
alkalinity, as it prevents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and favours
sulfur burial.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title/>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>A1</label><title>Demonstration of Eq. (1)</title>
      <p id="d1e9187">First, Eq. (A1) describes the behaviour of a solute, in the case of
turbulent diffusion mixing, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the effective diffusion coefficient,
superimposed on a chemical reaction of rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as described
in Eq. (A2).

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M492" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e9307">Assuming steady state, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and applying Eq. (1) to two
different species sharing the same reactions at rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on each point and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we can express the rate of the
reaction as
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>A3</label><mml:math id="M496" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <?pagebreak page3066?><p id="d1e9431">Equation (A3) is also true for any linear combination of a solute with a
conservative element such as the salinity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
hence (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> any real)
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M500" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e9556">By integration of Eq. (A3) with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on a portion of space
where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is constant, it becomes Eq. (1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>A2</label><title>Validity of Eq. (2) when the two endmembers have similar
concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e9592">From Eq. (A3), and assuming that the rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be described by a
polynomial function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, any real coefficient, we obtain
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M506" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e9678">That can be solved analytically and gives the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.Ex3"><mml:math id="M507" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e9786">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the difference of concentration between the two
endmembers. With similar reasoning on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we find Eq. (1) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <label>A3</label><title>Additional figures</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e9848">Variation of total alkalinity (TA) during oceanic and river
mixing. Dashed lines represent the theoretical DIC and TA if only mixing
occurs.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3053/2023/bg-20-3053-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d1e9862">Superimposed carbonate and redox chemistry profiles over 11 casts
against depth.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3053/2023/bg-20-3053-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d1e9876">Examples of redox and metal chemistry profiles. Note that the
Fe(III)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe(III)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scales are zoomed in by 3 and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scale
is zoomed out by 100.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3053/2023/bg-20-3053-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e9921">The data used in this paper are available on request to the corresponding
author.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e9927">ATdC, ERE, JN, BMT and JS performed the data analysis. ATdC and JS processed the
data. ATdC, GWL, JS and WJC interpreted the results. GWL, BMT and WJC got the
funding. ATdC wrote the paper with contributions from all authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e9933">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{172.2mm}}?><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e9940">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9946">We gratefully acknowledge the support of the captain and crew of R/V <italic>Hugh R. Sharp</italic>.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <?pagebreak page3068?><p id="d1e9954">This research has been supported by the Division of Ocean Sciences (grant nos. 1558738, 1558692 and 1756815).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e9960">This paper was edited by Jack Middelburg and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Abril, G., Etcheber, H., Delille, B., Frankignoulle, M., and Borges, A. V.: Carbonate dissolution in the turbid and eutrophic Loire estuary, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 259, 129–138, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>Abril, G., Commarieu, M.-V., Maro, D., Fontugne, M., Guérin, F., and Etcheber, H.: A massive dissolved inorganic carbon release at spring tide in a highly turbid estuary: DIC at spring tide in a estuary, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L09316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019714" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL019714</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation> Aller, R. C.: 8.11 – Sedimentary Diagenesis, Depositional Environments, and Benthic Fluxes, in: Treatise on Geochemistry, 2nd edn., edited by: Turekian, H. D. H. K., Elsevier, Oxford, 293–334, ISBN 9780128182345, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Alshameri, A., He, H., Zhu, J., Xi, Y., Zhu, R., Ma, L., and Tao, Q.: Adsorption of ammonium by different natural clay minerals: Characterization, kinetics and adsorption isotherms, Appl. Clay Sci., 159, 83–93,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.007</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>Avetisyan, K., Zweig, I., Luther, G. W., and Kamyshny, A.: Kinetics and mechanism of polysulfides and elemental sulfur formation by a reaction between hydrogen sulfide and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 313, 21–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2021.08.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2021.08.022</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Borges, A. V., Schiettecatte, L.-S., Abril, G., Delille, B., and Gazeau, F.: Carbon dioxide in European coastal waters, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 70, 375–387,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.046</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation>Borges, A. V., Abril, G., and Bouillon, S.: Carbon dynamics and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outgassing in the Mekong delta, Biogeosciences, 15, 1093–1114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1093-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-1093-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Boudreau, B. P., Middelburg, J. J., and Luo, Y.: The role of calcification in carbonate compensation, Nat. Geosci., 11, 894–900,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0259-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0259-5</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Breitburg, D., Levin, L. A., Oschlies, A., Grégoire, M., Chavez, F. P., Conley, D. J., Garçon, V., Gilbert, D., Gutiérrez, D., Isensee, K., Jacinto, G. S., Limburg, K. E., Montes, I., Naqvi, S. W. A., Pitcher, G. C., Rabalais, N. N., Roman, M. R., Rose, K. A., Seibel, B. A., Telszewski, M., Yasuhara, M., and Zhang, J.: Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters, Science, 359, eaam7240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7240" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aam7240</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 125?><mixed-citation>
Cai, W.-J. and Wang, Y.: The chemistry, fluxes, and sources of carbon dioxide in the estuarine waters of the Satilla and Altamaha Rivers, Georgia, Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 657–668, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1998.43.4.0657, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 123?><mixed-citation>
Cai, W.-J., Hu, X., Huang, W.-J., Jiang, L.-Q., Wang, Y., Peng, T.-H., and Zhang, X.: Alkalinity distribution in the western North Atlantic Ocean margins, J. Geophys. Res., 115, C08014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005482, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Cai, W.-J., Huang, W.-J., Luther, G. W., Pierrot, D., Li, M., Testa, J., Xue, M., Joesoef, A., Mann, R., Brodeur, J., Xu, Y.-Y., Chen, B., Hussain, N., Waldbusser, G. G., Cornwell, J., and Kemp, W. M.: Redox reactions and weak buffering capacity lead to acidification in the Chesapeake Bay, Nat. Commun., 8, 369,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00417-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-017-00417-7</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>Cai, W.-J., Xu, Y.-Y., Feely, R. A., Wanninkhof, R., Jönsson, B., Alin, S. R., Barbero, L., Cross, J. N., Azetsu-Scott, K., Fassbender, A. J., Carter, B. R., Jiang, L.-Q., Pepin, P., Chen, B., Hussain, N., Reimer, J. J., Xue, L., Salisbury, J. E., Hernández-Ayón, J. M., Langdon, C., Li, Q., Sutton, A. J., Chen, C.-T. A., and Gledhill, D. K.: Controls on surface water carbonate chemistry along North American ocean margins, Nat. Commun., 11,  2691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16530-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-020-16530-z</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Carstensen, J., Chierici, M., Gustafsson, B. G., and Gustafsson, E.: Long-Term and Seasonal Trends in Estuarine and Coastal Carbonate Systems, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 497–513,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005781" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GB005781</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>Cerco, C. F., Kim, S.-C., and Noel, M. R.: Management modeling of suspended solids in the Chesapeake Bay, USA, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 116, 87–98,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.009</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Chen, B., Cai, W.-J., Brodeur, J. R., Hussain, N., Testa, J. M., Ni, W., and Li, Q.: Seasonal and spatial variability in surface p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and air–water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux in the Chesapeake Bay, Limnol. Oceanogr., 65, 3046–3065,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11573" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.11573</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation>Clement, B. G., Luther, G. W., and Tebo, B. M.: Rapid, oxygen-dependent microbial Mn(II) oxidation kinetics at sub-micromolar oxygen concentrations in the Black Sea suboxic zone, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73, 1878–1889,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.023</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>Cotovicz Jr., L. C., Libardoni, B. G., Brandini, N., Knoppers, B. A., and Abril, G.: Comparisons between real-Time P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements with indirect estimates in two contrasting Brazilian estuaries: The eutrophic guanabara bay (RJ) and the oligotrophic sao francisco River estuary (AL), Quim. Nova, 39, 1206–1214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20160145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21577/0100-4042.20160145</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>Dickson, A. G.: An exact definition of total alkalinity and a procedure for the estimation of alkalinity and total inorganic carbon from titration data, Deep-Sea Res., 28, 609–623,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(81)90121-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(81)90121-7</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>Drupp, P. S., De Carlo, E. H., and Mackenzie, F. T.: Porewater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–carbonic acid system chemistry in permeable carbonate reef sands, Mar. Chem., 185, 48–64,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2016.04.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2016.04.004</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>Du, J. and Shen, J.: Water residence time in Chesapeake Bay for 1980–2012, J. Marine Syst., 164, 101–111,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.08.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.08.011</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation> Findlay, A. J., Gartman, A., MacDonald, D. J., Hanson, T. E., Shaw, T. J., and Luther, G. W.: Distribution and size fractionation of elemental sulfur in aqueous environments: The Chesapeake Bay and Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 142, 334–348, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>Findlay, A. J., Bennett, A. J., Hanson, T. E., and Luther, G. W.: Light-Dependent Sulfide Oxidation in the Anoxic Zone of the Chesapeake Bay Can Be Explained by Small Populations of Phototrophic Bacteria, Appl. Environ. Microb., 81, 7560–7569,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02062-15" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/AEM.02062-15</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3069?><ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>Findlay, A. J., Di Toro, D. M., and Luther, G. W.: A model of phototrophic sulfide oxidation in a stratified estuary, Limnol. Oceanogr., 62, 1853–1867,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10539</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation>Friedlingstein, P., Jones, M. W., O'Sullivan, M., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., Le Quéré, C., Bakker, D. C. E., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Anthoni, P., Barbero, L., Bastos, A., Bastrikov, V., Becker, M., Bopp, L., Buitenhuis, E., Chandra, N., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Currie, K. I., Feely, R. A., Gehlen, M., Gilfillan, D., Gkritzalis, T., Goll, D. S., Gruber, N., Gutekunst, S., Harris, I., Haverd, V., Houghton, R. A., Hurtt, G., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Joetzjer, E., Kaplan, J. O., Kato, E., Klein Goldewijk, K., Korsbakken, J. I., Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi, D., Marland, G., McGuire, P. C., Melton, J. R., Metzl, N., Munro, D. R., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I., Neill, C., Omar, A. M., Ono, T., Peregon, A., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Rehder, G., Resplandy, L., Robertson, E., Rödenbeck, C., Séférian, R., Schwinger, J., Smith, N., Tans, P. P., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Tubiello, F. N., van der Werf, G. R., Wiltshire, A. J., and Zaehle, S.: Global Carbon Budget 2019, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1783–1838, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation> Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., and Ehrhardt, M.: Methods of seawater analysis, Third, Completely Revised and Extended Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 25?><mixed-citation>Gupta, G. V. M., Jyothibabu, R., Ramu, C. V., Reddy, A. Y., Balachandran, K. K., Sudheesh, V., Kumar, S., Chari, N. V. H. K., Bepari, K. F., Marathe, P. H., Reddy, B. B., and Vijayan, A. K.: The world's largest coastal deoxygenation zone is not anthropogenically driven, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 054009,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe9eb" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/abe9eb</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Gustafsson, E., Hagens, M., Sun, X., Reed, D. C., Humborg, C., Slomp, C. P., and Gustafsson, B. G.: Sedimentary alkalinity generation and long-term alkalinity development in the Baltic Sea, Biogeosciences, 16, 437–456, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-437-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-16-437-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation> Hagy, J. D., Boynton, W. R., Keefe, C. W., and Wood, K. V.: Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: Long-Term Change in Relation to Nutrient Loading and River Flow, Estuaries, 27, 634–658, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>Heiss, E. M. and Fulweiler, R. W.: Coastal water column ammonium and nitrite oxidation are decoupled in summer, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 178, 110–119,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2016.06.002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>Hiscock, W. T. and Millero, F. J.: Alkalinity of the anoxic waters in the Western Black Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 53, 1787–1801,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.05.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.05.020</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>Horrigan, S. G., Montoya, J. P., Nevins, J. L., McCarthy, J. J., Ducklow, H., Goericke, R., and Malone, T.: Nitrogenous nutrient transformations in the spring and fall in the Chesapeake Bay, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 30, 369–391,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(90)90004-B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0272-7714(90)90004-B</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Hu, X. and Cai, W.-J.: An assessment of ocean margin anaerobic processes on oceanic alkalinity budget, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25,   GB3003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003859</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Hu, X., Cai, W.-J., Wang, Y., Luo, S., and Guo, X.: Pore-water geochemistry of two contrasting brine-charged seep sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico continental slope, Mar. Chem., 118, 99–107,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.11.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2009.11.006</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation>Huang, W.-J., Wang, Y., and Cai, W.-J.: Assessment of sample storage techniques for total alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon in seawater, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 10, 711–717,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.711" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lom.2012.10.711</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Hudson, J. M., MacDonald, D. J., Estes, E. R., and Luther, G. W.: A durable and inexpensive pump profiler to monitor stratified water columns with high vertical resolution, Talanta, 199, 415–424,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.076</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>Hulot, V., Metzger, E., Thibault De Chanvalon, A., Mouret, A., Schmidt, S., Deflandre, B., Rigaud, S., Beneteau, E., Savoye, N., Souchu, P., Le Merrer, Y., and Maillet, G. M.: Impact of an exceptional winter flood on benthic oxygen and nutrient fluxes in a temperate macrotidal estuary: Potential consequences on summer deoxygenation, Front. Mar. Sci., 10, 1083377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1083377" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2023.1083377</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Ishii, H., Koh, H., and Satoh, K.: Spectrophotometric determination of manganese utilizing metal ion substitution in the
cadmium -<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> -tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphine complex, Anal. Chim. Acta, 136, 347–352, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>Joesoef, A., Kirchman, D. L., Sommerfield, C. K., and Cai, W.-J.: Seasonal variability of the inorganic carbon system in a large coastal plain estuary, Biogeosciences, 14, 4949–4963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4949-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-4949-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 38?><mixed-citation>Jones, M. R., Luther, G. W., Mucci, A., and Tebo, B. M.: Concentrations of reactive Mn(III)-L and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in estuarine and marine waters determined using spectrophotometry and the leuco base, leucoberbelin blue, Talanta, 200, 91–99,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.03.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.talanta.2019.03.026</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Lenstra, W. K., Séguret, M. J. M., Behrends, T., Groeneveld, R. K., Hermans, M., Witbaard, R., and Slomp, C. P.: Controls on the shuttling of manganese over the northwestern Black Sea shelf and its fate in the euxinic deep basin, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 273, 177–204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.01.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2020.01.031</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation> Lenstra, W. K., Klomp, R., Molema, F., Behrends, T., and Slomp, C. P.: A sequential extraction procedure for particulate manganese and its application to coastal marine sediments, Chem. Geol., 584, 120538, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120538, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>Lewis, B. L., Glazer, B. T., Montbriand, P. J., Luther, G. W., Nuzzio, D. B., Deering, T., Ma, S., and Theberge, S.: Short-term and interannual variability of redox-sensitive chemical parameters in hypoxic/anoxic bottom waters of the Chesapeake Bay, Mar. Chem., 105, 296–308,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2007.03.001</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>Lohrenz, S. E., Cai, W.-J., Chen, F., Chen, X., and Tuel, M.: Seasonal variability in air-sea fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a river-influenced coastal margin, J. Geophys. Res., 115, C10034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005608" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JC005608</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Lukawska-Matuszewska, K.: Contribution of non-carbonate inorganic and organic alkalinity to total measured alkalinity in pore waters in marine sediments (Gulf of Gdansk, S-E Baltic Sea), Mar. Chem., 186, 211–220,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2016.10.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2016.10.002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Luo, Y. and Millero, F. J.: Solubility of rhodochrosite (MnCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in NaCl solutions, J. Solut. Chem., 32, 405–416, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 120?><mixed-citation>
Luther, G. W., Glazer, B. T., Ma, S., Trouwborst, R. E., Moore, T. S., Metzger, E., Kraiya, C., Waite, T. J., Druschel, G., Sund<?pagebreak page3070?>by, B., Taillefert, M., Nuzzio, D. B., Shank, T. M., Lewis, B. L., and Brendel, P. J.: Use of voltammetric solid-state (micro)electrodes for studying biogeochemical processes: Laboratory measurements to real time measurements with an in situ electrochemical analyzer (ISEA), Mar. Chem., 108, 221–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.03.002, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation> Luther, G. W.: The role of one-and two-electron transfer reactions in forming thermodynamically unstable intermediates as barriers in multi-electron redox reactions, Aquat. Geochem., 16, 395–420, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>Madison, A. S., Tebo, B. M., and Luther, G. W.: Simultaneous determination of soluble manganese(III), manganese(II) and total manganese in natural (pore)waters, Talanta, 84, 374–381,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.01.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.talanta.2011.01.025</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Meire, L., Soetaert, K. E. R., and Meysman, F. J. R.: Impact of global change on coastal oxygen dynamics and risk of hypoxia, Biogeosciences, 10, 2633–2653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2633-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-2633-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 48?><mixed-citation> Meybeck, M.: Global chemical weathering of surficial rocks estimated from river dissolved loads, Am. J. Sci., 287, 401–428, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation> Meybeck, M.: Global occurrence of major elements in rivers, Treatise Geochem., 5, 605, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>Meybeck, M., Cauwet, G., Dessery, S., Somville, M., Gouleau, D., and Billen, G.: Nutrients (organic C, P, N, Si) in the eutrophic River Loire (France) and its estuary, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 27, 595–624,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(88)90071-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0272-7714(88)90071-6</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 51?><mixed-citation>Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., and Hagens, M.: Ocean Alkalinity, Buffering and Biogeochemical Processes, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000681,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000681" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019RG000681</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 52?><mixed-citation>Oldham, V. E., Jones, M. R., Tebo, B. M., and Luther, G. W.: Oxidative and reductive processes contributing to manganese cycling at oxic-anoxic interfaces, Mar. Chem., 195, 122–128,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2017.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2017.06.002</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation>Oldham, V. E., Miller, M. T., Jensen, L. T., and Luther, G. W.: Revisiting Mn and Fe removal in humic rich estuaries, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 209, 267–283,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2017.04.001</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Raaphorst, W. V. and Malschaert, J. F. P.: Ammonium adsorption in superficial North Sea sediments, Cont. Shelf Res., 16, 1415–1435,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(95)00081-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0278-4343(95)00081-X</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation> Rabalais, N. N., Cai, W.-J., Carstensen, J., Conley, D. J., Fry, B., Hu, X., Quiñones-Rivera, Z., Rosenberg, R., Slomp, C. P., Turner, R. E., Voss, M., Wissel, B., and Zhang, J.: Eutrophication-Driven Deoxygenation in the Coastal Ocean, Oceanography, 27, 172–183, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>Rassmann, J., Eitel, E. M., Lansard, B., Cathalot, C., Brandily, C., Taillefert, M., and Rabouille, C.: Benthic alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes in the Rhône River prodelta generated by decoupled aerobic and anaerobic processes, Biogeosciences, 17, 13–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-13-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-13-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation>Raven, J. A., Wollenweber, B., and Handley, L. L.: A comparison of ammonium and nitrate as nitrogen sources for photolithotrophs, New Phytol., 121, 19–32,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01088.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01088.x</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation>Rickard, D. and Luther, G. W.: Chemistry of Iron Sulfides, Chem. Rev., 107, 514–562,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0503658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr0503658</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 59?><mixed-citation> Rudnick, R. L. and Gao, S.: Composition of the continental crust, Treatise Geochem., 3, 1–64, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 60?><mixed-citation> Sholkovitz, E. R., Shaw, T. J., and Schneider, D. L.: The geochemistry of rare earth elements in the seasonally anoxic water column and porewaters of Chesapeake Bay, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 56, 3389–3402, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Sinex, S. A. and Helz, G. R.: Regional geochemistry of trace elements in Chesapeake Bay sediments, Environ. Geol., 3, 315–323,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02473521</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation>Smith, S. V. and Mackenzie, F. T.: The Role of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Reactions in the Contemporary Oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Cycle, Aquat. Geochem., 22, 153–175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10498-015-9282-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10498-015-9282-y</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 63?><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K., Hofmann, A. F., Middelburg, J. J., Meysman, F. J. R., and Greenwood, J.: The effect of biogeochemical processes on pH, Mar. Chem., 105, 30–51,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2006.12.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2006.12.012</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation> Stookey, L. L.: Ferrozine – a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron, Anal. Chem., 42, 779–781, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation>Su, J., Cai, W.-J., Brodeur, J., Chen, B., Hussain, N., Yao, Y., Ni, C., Testa, J. M., Li, M., Xie, X., Ni, W., Scaboo, K. M., Xu, Y., Cornwell, J., Gurbisz, C., Owens, M. S., Waldbusser, G. G., Dai, M., and Kemp, W. M.: Chesapeake Bay acidification buffered by spatially decoupled carbonate mineral cycling, Nat. Geosci., 13, 441–447,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0584-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-020-0584-3</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 66?><mixed-citation>Su, J., Cai, W.-J., Brodeur, J., Hussain, N., Chen, B., Testa, J. M., Scaboo, K. M., Jaisi, D. P., Li, Q., Dai, M., and Cornwell, J.: Source partitioning of oxygen-consuming organic matter in the hypoxic zone of the Chesapeake Bay, Limnol. Oceanogr., 65, 1801–1817,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11419" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.11419</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation>Su, J., Cai, W.-J., Testa, J. M., Brodeur, J. R., Chen, B., Scaboo, K. M., Li, M., Shen, C., Dolan, M., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., and Hussain, N.: Supply-controlled calcium carbonate dissolution decouples the seasonal dissolved oxygen and pH minima in Chesapeake Bay, Limnol. Oceanogr., 66, 3796–3810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11919" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.11919</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation>Thamdrup, B. and Dalsgaard, T.: The fate of ammonium in anoxic manganese oxide-rich marine sediment, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 64, 4157–4164,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00496-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00496-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation>Thibault de Chanvalon, A. and Luther, G. W.: Mn speciation at nanomolar concentrations with a porphyrin competitive ligand and UV–vis measurements, Talanta, 200, 15–21,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.069</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation>Trouwborst, R. E., Clement, B. G., Tebo, B. M., Glazer, B. T., and Luther, G. W.: Soluble Mn(III) in Suboxic Zones, Science, 313, 1955–1957,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132876" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1132876</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 71?><mixed-citation>Urey, H. C.: On the Early Chemical History of the Earth and the Origin of Life, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 38, 351–363,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.38.4.351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.38.4.351</ext-link>, 1952.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>Wolf-Gladrow, D. A., Zeebe, R. E., Klaas, C., Körtzinger, A., and Dickson, A. G.: Total alkalinity: The explicit conservative expression and its application to biogeochemical processes, Mar. Chem., 106, 287–300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.006</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation>Xue, L. and Cai, W.-J.: Total alkalinity minus dissolved inorganic carbon as a proxy for deciphering ocean acidification mechanisms, Mar. Chem., 222, 103791,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103791" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103791</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3071?><ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 74?><mixed-citation>Zeebe, R. E. and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in seawater: equilibrium, kinetics, isotopes, Gulf Professional Publishing, ISBN 0 444 50579 2, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 75?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Brady, D. C., Boynton, W. R., and Ball, W. P.: Long-Term Trends of Nutrients and Sediment from the Nontidal Chesapeake Watershed: An Assessment of Progress by River and Season, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 51, 1534–1555,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1752-1688.12327</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Influence of manganese cycling on alkalinity in the redox stratified water column of Chesapeake Bay</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Abril, G., Etcheber, H., Delille, B., Frankignoulle, M., and Borges, A. V.: Carbonate dissolution in the turbid and eutrophic Loire estuary, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 259, 129–138, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Abril, G., Commarieu, M.-V., Maro, D., Fontugne, M., Guérin, F., and Etcheber, H.: A massive dissolved inorganic carbon release at spring tide in a highly turbid estuary: DIC at spring tide in a estuary, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L09316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019714" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019714</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Aller, R. C.: 8.11 – Sedimentary Diagenesis, Depositional Environments, and Benthic Fluxes, in: Treatise on Geochemistry, 2nd edn., edited by: Turekian, H. D. H. K., Elsevier, Oxford, 293–334, ISBN 9780128182345, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Alshameri, A., He, H., Zhu, J., Xi, Y., Zhu, R., Ma, L., and Tao, Q.: Adsorption of ammonium by different natural clay minerals: Characterization, kinetics and adsorption isotherms, Appl. Clay Sci., 159, 83–93,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.007</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Avetisyan, K., Zweig, I., Luther, G. W., and Kamyshny, A.: Kinetics and mechanism of polysulfides and elemental sulfur formation by a reaction between hydrogen sulfide and <i>δ</i>-MnO<sub>2</sub>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 313, 21–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2021.08.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2021.08.022</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Borges, A. V., Schiettecatte, L.-S., Abril, G., Delille, B., and Gazeau, F.: Carbon dioxide in European coastal waters, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 70, 375–387,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.046</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Borges, A. V., Abril, G., and Bouillon, S.: Carbon dynamics and CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> outgassing in the Mekong delta, Biogeosciences, 15, 1093–1114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1093-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1093-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Boudreau, B. P., Middelburg, J. J., and Luo, Y.: The role of calcification in carbonate compensation, Nat. Geosci., 11, 894–900,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0259-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0259-5</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Breitburg, D., Levin, L. A., Oschlies, A., Grégoire, M., Chavez, F. P., Conley, D. J., Garçon, V., Gilbert, D., Gutiérrez, D., Isensee, K., Jacinto, G. S., Limburg, K. E., Montes, I., Naqvi, S. W. A., Pitcher, G. C., Rabalais, N. N., Roman, M. R., Rose, K. A., Seibel, B. A., Telszewski, M., Yasuhara, M., and Zhang, J.: Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters, Science, 359, eaam7240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7240" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7240</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, W.-J. and Wang, Y.: The chemistry, fluxes, and sources of carbon dioxide in the estuarine waters of the Satilla and Altamaha Rivers, Georgia, Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 657–668, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1998.43.4.0657, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, W.-J., Hu, X., Huang, W.-J., Jiang, L.-Q., Wang, Y., Peng, T.-H., and Zhang, X.: Alkalinity distribution in the western North Atlantic Ocean margins, J. Geophys. Res., 115, C08014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005482, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Cai, W.-J., Huang, W.-J., Luther, G. W., Pierrot, D., Li, M., Testa, J., Xue, M., Joesoef, A., Mann, R., Brodeur, J., Xu, Y.-Y., Chen, B., Hussain, N., Waldbusser, G. G., Cornwell, J., and Kemp, W. M.: Redox reactions and weak buffering capacity lead to acidification in the Chesapeake Bay, Nat. Commun., 8, 369,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00417-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00417-7</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Cai, W.-J., Xu, Y.-Y., Feely, R. A., Wanninkhof, R., Jönsson, B., Alin, S. R., Barbero, L., Cross, J. N., Azetsu-Scott, K., Fassbender, A. J., Carter, B. R., Jiang, L.-Q., Pepin, P., Chen, B., Hussain, N., Reimer, J. J., Xue, L., Salisbury, J. E., Hernández-Ayón, J. M., Langdon, C., Li, Q., Sutton, A. J., Chen, C.-T. A., and Gledhill, D. K.: Controls on surface water carbonate chemistry along North American ocean margins, Nat. Commun., 11,  2691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16530-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16530-z</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Carstensen, J., Chierici, M., Gustafsson, B. G., and Gustafsson, E.: Long-Term and Seasonal Trends in Estuarine and Coastal Carbonate Systems, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 497–513,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005781" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005781</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       Cerco, C. F., Kim, S.-C., and Noel, M. R.: Management modeling of suspended solids in the Chesapeake Bay, USA, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 116, 87–98,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.009</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, B., Cai, W.-J., Brodeur, J. R., Hussain, N., Testa, J. M., Ni, W., and Li, Q.: Seasonal and spatial variability in surface pCO<sub>2</sub> and air–water CO<sub>2</sub> flux in the Chesapeake Bay, Limnol. Oceanogr., 65, 3046–3065,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11573" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11573</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Clement, B. G., Luther, G. W., and Tebo, B. M.: Rapid, oxygen-dependent microbial Mn(II) oxidation kinetics at sub-micromolar oxygen concentrations in the Black Sea suboxic zone, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73, 1878–1889,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.023</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Cotovicz Jr., L. C., Libardoni, B. G., Brandini, N., Knoppers, B. A., and Abril, G.: Comparisons between real-Time PCO<sub>2</sub> measurements with indirect estimates in two contrasting Brazilian estuaries: The eutrophic guanabara bay (RJ) and the oligotrophic sao francisco River estuary (AL), Quim. Nova, 39, 1206–1214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20160145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20160145</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Dickson, A. G.: An exact definition of total alkalinity and a procedure for the estimation of alkalinity and total inorganic carbon from titration data, Deep-Sea Res., 28, 609–623,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(81)90121-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(81)90121-7</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       Drupp, P. S., De Carlo, E. H., and Mackenzie, F. T.: Porewater CO<sub>2</sub>–carbonic acid system chemistry in permeable carbonate reef sands, Mar. Chem., 185, 48–64,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2016.04.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2016.04.004</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Du, J. and Shen, J.: Water residence time in Chesapeake Bay for 1980–2012, J. Marine Syst., 164, 101–111,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.08.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.08.011</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Findlay, A. J., Gartman, A., MacDonald, D. J., Hanson, T. E., Shaw, T. J., and Luther, G. W.: Distribution and size fractionation of elemental sulfur in aqueous environments: The Chesapeake Bay and Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 142, 334–348, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Findlay, A. J., Bennett, A. J., Hanson, T. E., and Luther, G. W.: Light-Dependent Sulfide Oxidation in the Anoxic Zone of the Chesapeake Bay Can Be Explained by Small Populations of Phototrophic Bacteria, Appl. Environ. Microb., 81, 7560–7569,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02062-15" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02062-15</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Findlay, A. J., Di Toro, D. M., and Luther, G. W.: A model of phototrophic sulfide oxidation in a stratified estuary, Limnol. Oceanogr., 62, 1853–1867,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10539</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Friedlingstein, P., Jones, M. W., O'Sullivan, M., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., Le Quéré, C., Bakker, D. C. E., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Anthoni, P., Barbero, L., Bastos, A., Bastrikov, V., Becker, M., Bopp, L., Buitenhuis, E., Chandra, N., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Currie, K. I., Feely, R. A., Gehlen, M., Gilfillan, D., Gkritzalis, T., Goll, D. S., Gruber, N., Gutekunst, S., Harris, I., Haverd, V., Houghton, R. A., Hurtt, G., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Joetzjer, E., Kaplan, J. O., Kato, E., Klein Goldewijk, K., Korsbakken, J. I., Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi, D., Marland, G., McGuire, P. C., Melton, J. R., Metzl, N., Munro, D. R., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I., Neill, C., Omar, A. M., Ono, T., Peregon, A., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Rehder, G., Resplandy, L., Robertson, E., Rödenbeck, C., Séférian, R., Schwinger, J., Smith, N., Tans, P. P., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Tubiello, F. N., van der Werf, G. R., Wiltshire, A. J., and Zaehle, S.: Global Carbon Budget 2019, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1783–1838, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., and Ehrhardt, M.: Methods of seawater analysis, Third, Completely Revised and Extended Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Gupta, G. V. M., Jyothibabu, R., Ramu, C. V., Reddy, A. Y., Balachandran, K. K., Sudheesh, V., Kumar, S., Chari, N. V. H. K., Bepari, K. F., Marathe, P. H., Reddy, B. B., and Vijayan, A. K.: The world's largest coastal deoxygenation zone is not anthropogenically driven, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 054009,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe9eb" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe9eb</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Gustafsson, E., Hagens, M., Sun, X., Reed, D. C., Humborg, C., Slomp, C. P., and Gustafsson, B. G.: Sedimentary alkalinity generation and long-term alkalinity development in the Baltic Sea, Biogeosciences, 16, 437–456, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-437-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-437-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Hagy, J. D., Boynton, W. R., Keefe, C. W., and Wood, K. V.: Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: Long-Term Change in Relation to Nutrient Loading and River Flow, Estuaries, 27, 634–658, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Heiss, E. M. and Fulweiler, R. W.: Coastal water column ammonium and nitrite oxidation are decoupled in summer, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 178, 110–119,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.06.002</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Hiscock, W. T. and Millero, F. J.: Alkalinity of the anoxic waters in the Western Black Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 53, 1787–1801,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.05.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.05.020</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Horrigan, S. G., Montoya, J. P., Nevins, J. L., McCarthy, J. J., Ducklow, H., Goericke, R., and Malone, T.: Nitrogenous nutrient transformations in the spring and fall in the Chesapeake Bay, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 30, 369–391,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(90)90004-B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(90)90004-B</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Hu, X. and Cai, W.-J.: An assessment of ocean margin anaerobic processes on oceanic alkalinity budget, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25,   GB3003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003859" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003859</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Hu, X., Cai, W.-J., Wang, Y., Luo, S., and Guo, X.: Pore-water geochemistry of two contrasting brine-charged seep sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico continental slope, Mar. Chem., 118, 99–107,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.11.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.11.006</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Huang, W.-J., Wang, Y., and Cai, W.-J.: Assessment of sample storage techniques for total alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon in seawater, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 10, 711–717,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.711" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.711</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       Hudson, J. M., MacDonald, D. J., Estes, E. R., and Luther, G. W.: A durable and inexpensive pump profiler to monitor stratified water columns with high vertical resolution, Talanta, 199, 415–424,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.076</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Hulot, V., Metzger, E., Thibault De Chanvalon, A., Mouret, A., Schmidt, S., Deflandre, B., Rigaud, S., Beneteau, E., Savoye, N., Souchu, P., Le Merrer, Y., and Maillet, G. M.: Impact of an exceptional winter flood on benthic oxygen and nutrient fluxes in a temperate macrotidal estuary: Potential consequences on summer deoxygenation, Front. Mar. Sci., 10, 1083377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1083377" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1083377</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Ishii, H., Koh, H., and Satoh, K.: Spectrophotometric determination of manganese utilizing metal ion substitution in the
cadmium -<i>α</i>, <i>β</i>,-<i>γ</i>,<i>δ</i> -tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphine complex, Anal. Chim. Acta, 136, 347–352, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Joesoef, A., Kirchman, D. L., Sommerfield, C. K., and Cai, W.-J.: Seasonal variability of the inorganic carbon system in a large coastal plain estuary, Biogeosciences, 14, 4949–4963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4949-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4949-2017</a>, 2017. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       Jones, M. R., Luther, G. W., Mucci, A., and Tebo, B. M.: Concentrations of reactive Mn(III)-L and MnO<sub>2</sub> in estuarine and marine waters determined using spectrophotometry and the leuco base, leucoberbelin blue, Talanta, 200, 91–99,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.03.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.03.026</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       Lenstra, W. K., Séguret, M. J. M., Behrends, T., Groeneveld, R. K., Hermans, M., Witbaard, R., and Slomp, C. P.: Controls on the shuttling of manganese over the northwestern Black Sea shelf and its fate in the euxinic deep basin, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 273, 177–204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.01.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.01.031</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Lenstra, W. K., Klomp, R., Molema, F., Behrends, T., and Slomp, C. P.: A sequential extraction procedure for particulate manganese and its application to coastal marine sediments, Chem. Geol., 584, 120538, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120538, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Lewis, B. L., Glazer, B. T., Montbriand, P. J., Luther, G. W., Nuzzio, D. B., Deering, T., Ma, S., and Theberge, S.: Short-term and interannual variability of redox-sensitive chemical parameters in hypoxic/anoxic bottom waters of the Chesapeake Bay, Mar. Chem., 105, 296–308,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.03.001</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Lohrenz, S. E., Cai, W.-J., Chen, F., Chen, X., and Tuel, M.: Seasonal variability in air-sea fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> in a river-influenced coastal margin, J. Geophys. Res., 115, C10034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005608" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005608</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Lukawska-Matuszewska, K.: Contribution of non-carbonate inorganic and organic alkalinity to total measured alkalinity in pore waters in marine sediments (Gulf of Gdansk, S-E Baltic Sea), Mar. Chem., 186, 211–220,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2016.10.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2016.10.002</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       Luo, Y. and Millero, F. J.: Solubility of rhodochrosite (MnCO<sub>3</sub>) in NaCl solutions, J. Solut. Chem., 32, 405–416, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luther, G. W., Glazer, B. T., Ma, S., Trouwborst, R. E., Moore, T. S., Metzger, E., Kraiya, C., Waite, T. J., Druschel, G., Sundby, B., Taillefert, M., Nuzzio, D. B., Shank, T. M., Lewis, B. L., and Brendel, P. J.: Use of voltammetric solid-state (micro)electrodes for studying biogeochemical processes: Laboratory measurements to real time measurements with an in situ electrochemical analyzer (ISEA), Mar. Chem., 108, 221–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.03.002, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Luther, G. W.: The role of one-and two-electron transfer reactions in forming thermodynamically unstable intermediates as barriers in multi-electron redox reactions, Aquat. Geochem., 16, 395–420, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Madison, A. S., Tebo, B. M., and Luther, G. W.: Simultaneous determination of soluble manganese(III), manganese(II) and total manganese in natural (pore)waters, Talanta, 84, 374–381,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.01.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.01.025</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
       Meire, L., Soetaert, K. E. R., and Meysman, F. J. R.: Impact of global change on coastal oxygen dynamics and risk of hypoxia, Biogeosciences, 10, 2633–2653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2633-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2633-2013</a>, 2013. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Meybeck, M.: Global chemical weathering of surficial rocks estimated from river dissolved loads, Am. J. Sci., 287, 401–428, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Meybeck, M.: Global occurrence of major elements in rivers, Treatise Geochem., 5, 605, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
       Meybeck, M., Cauwet, G., Dessery, S., Somville, M., Gouleau, D., and Billen, G.: Nutrients (organic C, P, N, Si) in the eutrophic River Loire (France) and its estuary, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 27, 595–624,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(88)90071-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(88)90071-6</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., and Hagens, M.: Ocean Alkalinity, Buffering and Biogeochemical Processes, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000681,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000681" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000681</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       Oldham, V. E., Jones, M. R., Tebo, B. M., and Luther, G. W.: Oxidative and reductive processes contributing to manganese cycling at oxic-anoxic interfaces, Mar. Chem., 195, 122–128,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2017.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2017.06.002</a>, 2017a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Oldham, V. E., Miller, M. T., Jensen, L. T., and Luther, G. W.: Revisiting Mn and Fe removal in humic rich estuaries, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 209, 267–283,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.04.001</a>, 2017b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Raaphorst, W. V. and Malschaert, J. F. P.: Ammonium adsorption in superficial North Sea sediments, Cont. Shelf Res., 16, 1415–1435,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(95)00081-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(95)00081-X</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Rabalais, N. N., Cai, W.-J., Carstensen, J., Conley, D. J., Fry, B., Hu, X., Quiñones-Rivera, Z., Rosenberg, R., Slomp, C. P., Turner, R. E., Voss, M., Wissel, B., and Zhang, J.: Eutrophication-Driven Deoxygenation in the Coastal Ocean, Oceanography, 27, 172–183, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Rassmann, J., Eitel, E. M., Lansard, B., Cathalot, C., Brandily, C., Taillefert, M., and Rabouille, C.: Benthic alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes in the Rhône River prodelta generated by decoupled aerobic and anaerobic processes, Biogeosciences, 17, 13–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-13-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-13-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Raven, J. A., Wollenweber, B., and Handley, L. L.: A comparison of ammonium and nitrate as nitrogen sources for photolithotrophs, New Phytol., 121, 19–32,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01088.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01088.x</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Rickard, D. and Luther, G. W.: Chemistry of Iron Sulfides, Chem. Rev., 107, 514–562,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0503658" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0503658</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Rudnick, R. L. and Gao, S.: Composition of the continental crust, Treatise Geochem., 3, 1–64, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
       Sholkovitz, E. R., Shaw, T. J., and Schneider, D. L.: The geochemistry of rare earth elements in the seasonally anoxic water column and porewaters of Chesapeake Bay, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 56, 3389–3402, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Sinex, S. A. and Helz, G. R.: Regional geochemistry of trace elements in Chesapeake Bay sediments, Environ. Geol., 3, 315–323,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473521</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
       Smith, S. V. and Mackenzie, F. T.: The Role of CaCO<sub>3</sub> Reactions in the Contemporary Oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> Cycle, Aquat. Geochem., 22, 153–175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10498-015-9282-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10498-015-9282-y</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
       Soetaert, K., Hofmann, A. F., Middelburg, J. J., Meysman, F. J. R., and Greenwood, J.: The effect of biogeochemical processes on pH, Mar. Chem., 105, 30–51,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2006.12.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2006.12.012</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Stookey, L. L.: Ferrozine – a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron, Anal. Chem., 42, 779–781, 1970.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
       Su, J., Cai, W.-J., Brodeur, J., Chen, B., Hussain, N., Yao, Y., Ni, C., Testa, J. M., Li, M., Xie, X., Ni, W., Scaboo, K. M., Xu, Y., Cornwell, J., Gurbisz, C., Owens, M. S., Waldbusser, G. G., Dai, M., and Kemp, W. M.: Chesapeake Bay acidification buffered by spatially decoupled carbonate mineral cycling, Nat. Geosci., 13, 441–447,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0584-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0584-3</a>, 2020a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
       Su, J., Cai, W.-J., Brodeur, J., Hussain, N., Chen, B., Testa, J. M., Scaboo, K. M., Jaisi, D. P., Li, Q., Dai, M., and Cornwell, J.: Source partitioning of oxygen-consuming organic matter in the hypoxic zone of the Chesapeake Bay, Limnol. Oceanogr., 65, 1801–1817,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11419" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11419</a>, 2020b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
       Su, J., Cai, W.-J., Testa, J. M., Brodeur, J. R., Chen, B., Scaboo, K. M., Li, M., Shen, C., Dolan, M., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., and Hussain, N.: Supply-controlled calcium carbonate dissolution decouples the seasonal dissolved oxygen and pH minima in Chesapeake Bay, Limnol. Oceanogr., 66, 3796–3810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11919" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11919</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
       Thamdrup, B. and Dalsgaard, T.: The fate of ammonium in anoxic manganese oxide-rich marine sediment, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 64, 4157–4164,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00496-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00496-8</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
       Thibault de Chanvalon, A. and Luther, G. W.: Mn speciation at nanomolar concentrations with a porphyrin competitive ligand and UV–vis measurements, Talanta, 200, 15–21,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.069</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
       Trouwborst, R. E., Clement, B. G., Tebo, B. M., Glazer, B. T., and Luther, G. W.: Soluble Mn(III) in Suboxic Zones, Science, 313, 1955–1957,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132876" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132876</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
       Urey, H. C.: On the Early Chemical History of the Earth and the Origin of Life, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 38, 351–363,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.38.4.351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.38.4.351</a>, 1952.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
       Wolf-Gladrow, D. A., Zeebe, R. E., Klaas, C., Körtzinger, A., and Dickson, A. G.: Total alkalinity: The explicit conservative expression and its application to biogeochemical processes, Mar. Chem., 106, 287–300, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.006</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
       Xue, L. and Cai, W.-J.: Total alkalinity minus dissolved inorganic carbon as a proxy for deciphering ocean acidification mechanisms, Mar. Chem., 222, 103791,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103791" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103791</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
       Zeebe, R. E. and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: CO<sub>2</sub> in seawater: equilibrium, kinetics, isotopes, Gulf Professional Publishing, ISBN 0 444 50579 2, 2001.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, Q., Brady, D. C., Boynton, W. R., and Ball, W. P.: Long-Term Trends of Nutrients and Sediment from the Nontidal Chesapeake Watershed: An Assessment of Progress by River and Season, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 51, 1534–1555,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12327</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
