<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-20-3151-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>How well does ramped thermal oxidation quantify the age distribution of soil
carbon? Assessing thermal stability of<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> physically and chemically
fractionated soil organic matter</article-title><alt-title>Thermal fractionation of SOM fractions</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Thermal fractionation of SOM fractions}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~W.~Stoner et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Stoner</surname><given-names>Shane W.</given-names></name>
          <email>sstoner@bgc-jena.mpg.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-4587</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schrumpf</surname><given-names>Marion</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hoyt</surname><given-names>Alison</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Sierra</surname><given-names>Carlos A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0009-4169</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Doetterl</surname><given-names>Sebastian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0986-891X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Galy</surname><given-names>Valier</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0385-8443</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Trumbore</surname><given-names>Susan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-6202</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Biogeochemical Processes Department, Max Planck Institute for
Biogeochemistry, 07745 Jena,  Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich,
8092 Zurich,  Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,
Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Shane W. Stoner (sstoner@bgc-jena.mpg.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>August</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>3151</fpage><lpage>3163</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>July</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>September</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>May</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>May</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Shane W. Stoner et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3151/2023/bg-20-3151-2023.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3151/2023/bg-20-3151-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3151/2023/bg-20-3151-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3151/2023/bg-20-3151-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e166">Carbon (C) in soils persists on a range of timescales depending on physical,
chemical, and biological processes that interact with soil organic matter
(SOM) and affect its rate of decomposition. Together these processes
determine the age distribution of soil C. Most attempts to measure this age
distribution have relied on operationally defined fractions using properties
like density, aggregate stability, solubility, or chemical reactivity.
Recently, thermal fractionation, which relies on the activation energy
needed to combust SOM, has shown promise for separating young from old C by
applying increasing heat to decompose SOM. Here, we investigated radiocarbon
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of C released during thermal fractionation to link
activation energy to the age distribution of C in bulk soil and components
previously separated by density and chemical properties. While physically
and chemically isolated fractions had very distinct mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C values,
they contributed C across the full temperature range during thermal
analysis. Thus, each thermal fraction collected during combustion of bulk
soil integrates contributions from younger and older C derived from
components having different physical and chemical properties but the same
activation energy. Bulk soil and all density and chemical fractions released
progressively older and more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched C with increasing activation
energy, indicating that each operationally defined fraction itself was not
homogeneous but contained a mix of C with different ages and degrees of
microbial processing. Overall, we found that defining the full age
distribution of C in bulk soil is best quantified by first separating
particulate C prior to thermal fractionation of mineral-associated SOM. For
the Podzol analyzed here, thermal fractions confirmed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 % of the mineral-associated organic matter (MOM) had a relatively
narrow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C distribution, while 5 % was very low in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
likely reflected C from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 mm parent shale material in the soil
matrix. After first removing particulate C using density or size separation,
thermal fractionation can provide a rapid technique to study the age
structure of MOM and how it is influenced by different OM–mineral
interactions.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>European Research Council</funding-source>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e247">Soil organic matter (SOM) consists of a complex and diverse collection of
organic molecules containing C that can persist in soil for timescales
ranging from hours to millennia (Schuur et al., 2016). Plant tissue
chemistry, soil environmental conditions, soil mineral characteristics,
physical aggregation, and microbial communities have all been demonstrated
to impact the stability of SOM (Lehmann and Kleber, 2015; Basile-Doelsch et
al., 2020; Kleber et al., 2021). These factors collectively influence the
age of carbon (C) in SOM and the age of C in microbial respiration, making
it<?pagebreak page3152?> challenging to link the timescales of OM stabilization and
destabilization to the various mechanisms that allow C to persist in soils.</p>
      <p id="d1e250">The measurement of soil radiocarbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) has been used for decades to
describe mean SOM ages. However, the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C values measured on bulk
SOM integrate different pools and stabilization mechanisms and thereby
obscure critical information on the distribution of SOM age. By combining
timescales from years to millennia, the interpretation of bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
measurements is made more difficult due to the integration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C from both
natural sources affected by radioactive decay (natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, integrating
multiple centuries to millennia) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C produced by atomic weapons
(“bomb” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) that reflect short-term cycling (annual to century)
(Trumbore, 2000; Baisden and Canessa, 2013). Disentangling these signals is
complex and requires the integration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C data with models to
estimate SOM transit times and ages (Sierra et al., 2018; Metzler et al.,
2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e326">In an effort to better describe the distribution of age and cycling rates in
bulk SOM, a number of physical and chemical fractionation methods have been
developed to elucidate how the bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C can be broken into pools with
different amounts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C depending on physical or chemical
characteristics (Trumbore et al., 1990; Paul et al., 1997; Castanha et al.,
2008; Sollins et al., 2009; Lavallee et al., 2020). In particular, density
fractionation, a method that separates SOM associated with denser minerals
from low-density “free” particulate organic matter (FPOM), has demonstrated
success in distinguishing faster (low-density) from slower (mineral-associated) cycling C (Gregorich et al., 2006; Cotrufo et al., 2019; Heckman
et al., 2022). However, mineral-associated organic matter (MOM) fractions
themselves have been shown by many studies to be comprised of both faster
and slower cycling C as evidenced by the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C content after
chemical extraction or oxidation (examples include Anderson and Paul, 1984;
Balesdent, 1987; Trumbore and Zheng, 1996; Jagadamma et al., 2010; Schrumpf
et al., 2021) or from tracking bomb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C into mineral fractions
(examples include Trumbore, 1993; Torn et al., 1997; von Lützow et al.,
2007, and more recently Schrumpf et al., 2013; Rasmussen et al., 2018;
Heckman et al., 2018b). Despite their widespread use and demonstrated utility
for separating organic C by age as well as physical and chemical properties,
most fractionation methods consume significant laboratory time and resources
(Lavallee et al., 2020; Heckman et al., 2022). Further, some treatments,
such as dense sodium polytungstate solution, remove C that cannot be easily
recovered or analyzed for C or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C content, meaning that the isotopic
signature of removed C must be solved using mass balance constraints.</p>
      <p id="d1e374">Ramped pyrolysis/oxidation (RPO), or thermal fractionation, is a relatively
new method to functionally fractionate OM in sediments and soils (Rosenheim
et al., 2008; Plante et al., 2013; Hemingway et al., 2017). This process
applies increasing temperature of thermal decomposition as a proxy for the
activation energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) required to oxidize C, with the assumption that
this provides a comparable measure of its resistance to decomposition in the
soil environment. The result is a reproducible profile of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> released
as a function of increasing temperature (thermogram), from which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
distributions can be calculated (Hemingway et al., 2017). By collecting the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> released over specified intervals as temperatures are continuously
increased, “pools” of C with distinct thermal stability can be isolated,
collected, and analyzed isotopically (Rosenheim and Galy, 2012). Because all
C is released as CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is possible to characterize all of the C in a
sample rather than inferring losses from the analysis of the residual material.
A further advantage of such “thermal fractionation” is that it can be
compared with pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (py-GC/MS) of SOM to evaluate how the chemistry of
combusted SOM also changes with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Previous studies have shown that the
breakdown of lipids and polysaccharides releases C at lower temperatures,
while thermal decomposition of phenolic and aromatic compounds dominate at
higher temperatures (Quénéa et al., 2006; Grandy et al., 2009;
Sanderman and Grandy, 2020). Thus, thermal fractionation has the potential
to define the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (age) distribution of organic C and relate that to
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and chemistry of the OM in a soil sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e459">Several studies have investigated soils using oxidative thermal
fractionation (Plante et al., 2013; Grant et al., 2019; Hemingway et al.,
2019). Compared to sediments, where these methods have been more widely
applied, soil thermograms release a greater proportion of the total C over a
narrower temperature range and have lower variation in age across thermal
fractions (Hemingway et al., 2019). This may reflect a broader set of OM
sources in sediments that can include eroded soil containing very old and
highly processed C, as well as fresh material from aquatic organisms.</p>
      <p id="d1e462">Typically, C released from both sediments and soils by thermal oxidation
also increases in age with the temperature of combustion, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
confirming linkages between SOM persistence and the mechanisms of C
stabilization (Plante et al., 2011; González-Pérez et al., 2012).
However, different SOM stabilization mechanisms or local environments can
complicate the interpretation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–age relationships; for example, the
same chemical compound sorbed to different mineral substrates can have very
different activation energies (Feng and Simpson, 2008). Thermal oxidation of
OM not associated with minerals, such as dissolved organic C (DOC), oxidizes
at narrow but relatively high temperature ranges, possibly contributing
young C at high temperatures that would be mixed with C released from
mineral fractions at the same temperature (Grant et al., 2019; Hemingway et
al., 2019). Given the wide range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ages measured in various
physical and chemical fractions, as well as the potential for recycling of C in
soils through microbial processing, we expect some range of C age within
each bulk soil thermal fraction.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3153?><p id="d1e496">Here, we apply oxidative thermal fractionation to SOM previously separated
using physical (density) and chemical (extraction and oxidation) methods.
Using mass balance approaches, we describe the contribution of each fraction
to bulk soil thermograms and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures. We also present thermal
fractionation results using a commercially available instrument only
recently applied to characterize SOM thermal stability distributions (Natali
et al., 2020; Rennert and Herrmann, 2020, 2022). Our goals were (1) to determine
the degree to which the physically and chemically separated fractions
represent mixtures of OM with different activation energies and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
distributions, (2) to determine the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C distribution of C contained in
physically or chemically separated fractions, and (3) to assess the viability of
thermal fractionation as an alternative to more time intensive lab methods
in determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C distribution of SOM.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site description and density fractionation</title>
      <p id="d1e550">Soil material used in this study was sampled from a Podzol developed on
granitic parent material under spruce forest in central Germany (Schrumpf et
al., 2013, 2021). This soil was selected because it was already known to
have large differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C content between density fractions
(Schrumpf et al., 2021) and because of strong depth-dependent differences in
stabilization processes in Podzol A and B horizons (De Coninck, 1980).
Surface (0–10 cm) and subsoil (30–50 cm) samples were subjected to
laboratory fractionations described in detail by Schrumpf et al. (2013).
Briefly, soils first underwent density separation using dense sodium
polytungstate solution (SPT) (1.6 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Suspended OM was separated
from denser material that did not float using centrifugation. The floating
free particulate OM (FPOM) fraction was collected and rinsed to remove
remaining SPT solution. The sinking fraction was dispersed again in 1.6 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> solution, sonicated to disrupt aggregates, and then  centrifuged.
After centrifugation, floating material from the supernatant was collected,
rinsed, and designated as occluded particulate organic matter (OPOM). The
remaining dense material in the sediment was repeatedly rinsed to remove SPT
solution and is designated mineral-associated organic matter (MOM).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Chemical fractionation</title>
      <p id="d1e594">Two chemical fractionations were performed in parallel on the MOM fraction,
as described by Schrumpf et al. (2021). The first subsample was extracted
with NaF–NaOH  to solubilize and remove all potentially desorbable SOM
complexed with minerals through pH increase and competition with OH and F anions (Kaiser et al., 2007; Mikutta and Kaiser, 2011). Briefly, 125 mL of a
NaF–NaOH solution was added to 25 g MOM material, agitated overnight, and
centrifuged. The supernatant was extracted, and an additional 125 mL of
NaF–NaOH was added to repeat this process four times in total. Then, each
extraction was filtered through glass fiber filters and combined. The
remaining soil material was washed with deionized water and freeze-dried.</p>
      <p id="d1e597">The second chemically treated MOM underwent strong oxidation in heated
hydrogen peroxide (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to isolate the most resistant and oldest
OM (Helfrich et al., 2007; Jagadamma et al., 2010). In this
procedure, 60 mL H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was added to a mixture of 2 g MOM and 20 mL
deionized water. Samples were then heated and periodically stirred in a
50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C water bath for a total of 120 h. Samples were then
centrifuged, washed with deionized water, freeze-dried, and homogenized with
a ceramic ball mill.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Thermal fractionation and method development</title>
      <p id="d1e653">Oxidative thermal fractionation of bulk SOM and physically and chemically
separated fractions was performed using an Elementar soli TOC cube carbon
analyzer. Samples were not analyzed under pyrolytic conditions, as pyrolysis
can produce charring artifacts, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C distributions have been shown
to be comparable between operational modes (Williams et al., 2014; Grant et
al., 2019). The design of the instrument used is very similar to those used
in previous thermal fractionation publications (Rosenheim and Galy, 2012;
Bianchi et al., 2015). Primarily, it consists of two ovens in sequence, a
mechanical arm to hold and manipulate the sample container, and a
non-dispersive infrared analyzer (NDIR) to measure the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration in the gas exiting the ovens. The sample is introduced to the
first oven, which is heated at a constant rate under a constant flow of
carrier gas supplied through the sampler arm (78 % N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 22 %
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The second oven contains a Pt catalyst held at 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
that ensures all C released from the sample is oxidized to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
carrier gas then passes through a glass tube filled with brass wire at
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to remove HCl from acidified samples (note that no samples
were acidified in this experiment) followed by a glass tube containing
magnesium perchlorate to remove water vapor. Finally, the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
in the gas mixture is measured by the NDIR (DIN 19539).</p>
      <?pagebreak page3154?><p id="d1e729">Several additional procedures were required to adapt the use of the commercial
device for the collection of C released by thermal fractionation. Due to the
relatively large sample size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1g of dried soil or fraction)
required to collect small thermal fractions with sufficient C for
radiocarbon measurement, as well as the high flow rate of carrier gas in this
instrument, samples with high C content (such as standards or FPOM/OPOM
fractions) were diluted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % (by weight) C with
pre-combusted sand (1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 10 h) to prevent ignition and
charring during heating. An artificial soil standard was analyzed with
different sand dilutions to ensure that thermograms were not altered by
dilution with sand (Fig. S1). Further, the sample oven was designed for
rapid heating (up to 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and temperatures were
observed to be less stable at slower heating rates. To reduce the cycles of
on/off oven cycling while ensuring thermogram consistency (with sand
dilution), samples were heated at 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per minute.</p>
      <p id="d1e786">To collect CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for isotope analysis, a custom collection manifold was
attached to the instrument outflow port (Figs. S2–S4). The manifold consists
of parallel glass CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> traps submerged in LN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under vacuum. Exhaust
gas released within a desired temperature range (thermal fraction) flows
through a cold trap until the desired upper temperature is reached. Then,
the trap is closed and the next opened to collect the next CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction. This process is repeated for each thermal fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1 (first
thermal fraction) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (highest temperature thermal fraction); see Supplement
Tables S1 and S2). A vacuum pump together with a capillary restriction
upstream of the manifold was used to reduce the overall pressure in the
manifold system to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 mbar to improve cryotrapping efficiency and
to prevent condensation of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the LN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> traps.</p>
      <p id="d1e876">Traps with CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were subsequently transferred to a vacuum line
where the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was further purified (see below) and measured
volumetrically for comparison (calibration) of the NDIR CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis.
An aliquot was taken for analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C using a modified
GasBench inlet to a continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS; Wendeberg et al., 2013). In
addition to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we noticed that nitrogen oxide gasses (including
N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is dark blue when frozen) were visibly trapped. These
gasses are produced by the reaction of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at high
temperatures. As these, as well as S oxides that also freeze with CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at liquid nitrogen temperatures, can cause graphitization failure, we used
an additional purification procedure to remove them. An amount of sample
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> representing approximately 0.5 mg C was transferred cryogenically
and then sealed under vacuum in a pre-combusted borosilicate tube containing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 mg CuO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 mg Ag (Hemingway et al.,
2017) and baked at 525 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 1 h. Purified CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> released
after breaking this tube was graphitized using zinc reduction (Xu et al.,
2007) and measured at the Keck AMS lab at the University of California Irvine.
Resulting radiocarbon data are expressed as fraction modern (Fm).</p>
      <p id="d1e1015">Thermograms and activation energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were analyzed using the
open-source “rampedpyrox” Python package (Hemingway, 2017; Hemingway et
al., 2017). For each thermogram, a distributed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model derived from
time–temperature C-release data is solved inversely to produce a continuous
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). It assumes a finite set of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
components (thermal fractions) in order of increasing temperature, referred
to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is thermal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the highest temperature range
collected (Supplement Tables S1 and S2) in superposition to construct the bulk
soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution. Each of these components can thus be mathematically
assigned a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Here,
standard deviation describes the variance of distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or the
heterogeneity of the bonding environment within a thermal fraction or
sample rather than data variance. Thus, direct comparisons can be made
between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution within a thermal fraction and its isotopic composition.
However, it should be noted that such <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> descriptors derived from
thermograms are not necessarily comparable to other methods of measuring
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Feng and Simpson, 2008; Hemingway et al., 2019).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1196">We describe data on SOM decomposition as a function of temperature, modeled
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and isotopic signatures of thermal fractions within and between
density and chemical fractions and compare these to thermal fractionation of
the bulk soil. To our knowledge, this was the first thermal fractionation
procedure performed using a commercial C analyzer. Results on the
performance and reliability of this setup to demonstrate the viability of
this method for future researchers are presented in Supplement Text S1.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Thermograms and activation energy of physically and chemically
fractionated organic matter</title>
      <p id="d1e1217">We compared the thermograms and the isotopic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
signatures of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> released as a function of temperature for each
physical and chemical fraction individually and then compared the summed
contribution of each physical and chemical fraction to the bulk soil (for
density fractions) or MOM (for chemical fractions) to assess (1) the
behavior of each of the different fractions and (2) how much each fraction
contributes to the bulk thermogram at different temperature intervals.</p>
      <p id="d1e1247">All density and chemical fractions and bulk soil released 90 %–98 % of their
total C between 150 and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. No fraction had a unique thermal
signature (Fig. 1a, b), and the thermograms mostly overlapped, with some
C released across the whole temperature range of combustion. However,
differences were observed among density fraction thermograms. For
particulate fractions (FPOM and OPOM), C release displayed one or two muted
peaks and most of the C was oxidized between 250 and 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. MOM
and chemical residues released most of their C between 250 and
350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C but also released more C at temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C compared to FPOM and OPOM fractions. Since most bulk soil C
is in the MOM fraction (Table 1), thermograms for the bulk soil resemble
those of the MOM fractions in both depths (Fig. 1a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1295">Relative magnitudes of thermograms, as C released as a
function of temperature, with fractions scaled by their relative
contribution to the total C in each panel. <bold>(a)</bold> Bulk soil and
density fraction thermograms for 0–10  and 30–50 cm, respectively.
Density fraction (FPOM, OPOM, MOM) thermograms are scaled to their relative
contribution to total bulk soil C (Table 1). Dashed lines represent summed
thermograms of the three density fractions. Comparisons of summed and bulk
thermograms show good agreement and suggest that fractionation procedures do
not significantly alter the thermal stability of component fractions.
<bold>(b)</bold> Thermograms of MOM and chemical fractionation residues. The
differences between MOM and given chemical fraction thermograms represent the
thermal profile of C removed by the chemical treatment (NaF–NaOH or
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Chemical fraction residue thermograms are scaled to their
relative residual C content of the MOM fraction. <bold>(c)</bold> Proportional contribution of density fractions to bulk soil C released
across collection temperature range (colored fill). Solid black line
represents bulk soil thermogram to highlight total C release from bulk soil
at each temperature. Density fractions are cut off when C release is no
longer discernible from instrument IR-detector background.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3151/2023/bg-20-3151-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3155?><p id="d1e1332">Mean activation energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) estimated from thermograms of bulk soil and
fractions ranged from 133.5 to 137.8 kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in surface soil and 137.9
to 144.3 kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in subsoil (Table 1, Supplement Figs. S1 and S2,
Tables S1 and S2). Between depths, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was greater in subsoil
than surface soil on average by 5.2 kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, paired
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test) for all samples except NaF extraction residues, which showed no
difference. In subsoil, particulate fractions FPOM and OPOM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–6 kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than bulk soil and MOM but
showed little difference in surface soils. The standard deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a metric of bond strength heterogeneity, only varied with depth among
chemical fraction residues which were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5–6 kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
greater in subsoil, suggesting greater diversity of bonds in the subsoil
fractions (Hemingway et al., 2017). Thus, despite large differences in the
chemistry and relationship to mineral surfaces, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range was similar
across all chemical and physical fractions. It is puzzling that NaF and
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> residues had lower activation energies than might be
expected given that they represent the most “recalcitrant” C resistant to
harsh chemical treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Radiocarbon</title>
      <p id="d1e1516">The mean radiocarbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, expressed as Fm) differed for each density
or chemical residue fraction (Table 1). For a given soil depth, the FPOM had
the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C content, consisting mostly of C fixed since the 1960s
(Fm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0), while the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was in the residue after
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> treatment of the MOM. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the bulk soil and
each fraction decreased from the 0–10  to 30–50 cm depth, and the overall
pattern of Fm for the different physical and chemical fractions
(FPOM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> OPOM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> MOM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> NaF residue <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> residue) remained the same.</p>
      <p id="d1e1628">Within all fractions, the Fm of released CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stayed similar or declined
as the temperature increased (Fig. 2; temperatures of combustion are
converted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 3). In both Figs. 2 and 3, the large
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C between the other FPOM density and chemical
fractions far exceed the range of Fm released across temperatures during
combustion of the individual fractions. Indeed, as reported by Schrumpf et
al. (2021), much of the combusted C from MOM fractions had very similar
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures (small range of Fm), except for the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions of MOM and bulk soil.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1682">Thermograms with radiocarbon measurements: <bold>(a)</bold> 0–10 and
<bold>(b)</bold> 30–50 cm. Left-hand column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis values represent contribution to
the total (bulk soil) C. NaF Res. and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Res. panels are scaled in
proportion to their total C contribution to MOM. Color scale indicates the
fraction modern (Fm) of the C released in each temperature range; the scale
is doubled above Fm 1 to emphasize differences between post-bomb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(Fm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C that has undergone significant
radioactive decay (Fm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3151/2023/bg-20-3151-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1758">Radiocarbon (Fm) as a function of mean activation energy
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for C collected across different temperature intervals from
combustion of bulk soil, compared with those of combusted component density
and chemical fractions. Horizontal bars represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each thermal
fraction, which indicates the range of activation energies represented by a
given thermal fraction.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3151/2023/bg-20-3151-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1789">For the bulk soil and MOM fraction in the surface sample and FPOM fractions
at both depths, the C oxidized at the lowest temperature had Fm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, indicating that a portion of the C in the fraction was fixed mostly in
the last 60 years. For the FPOM fractions with Fm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values are not as simply related to the “age” of the C. For example, the most
recently fixed C could have lower values than the mean but so could older C
if that is a mixture of pre- and post-bomb C. For all samples other than
FPOM, the decline in Fm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C indicates a clear trend of increasing age
(decreasing Fm, indicating more time for radioactive decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
especially at temperatures above that where most C was released (Fig. 2).
The highest-temperature thermal fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mostly 450–800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C;
Supplement Tables S1 and S2) of surface bulk soil and MOM were similarly
depleted in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and much older than any other values measured (Fig. 2).</p>
      <?pagebreak page3156?><p id="d1e1863">In subsoils (30–50 cm), bomb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was found only in the FPOM fractions,
so the decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with energy was determined mostly by the much
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of C released at high temperatures (Fig. 3). All fractions
except the NaF residue (NAF Res.) increased in Fm from the C collected in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2 (and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>3 in bulk soil) temperature ranges (140–375 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C),
followed by decreases at increasingly higher temperatures. Excluding FPOM
and OPOM, all fractions decreased significantly in Fm in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the temperature range previous.</p>
      <p id="d1e1935">The chemical fractionation residues contained C with lower Fm than the
unextracted MOM at all temperature ranges except in the highest temperature
range collected. However, the highest temperature fraction collected for the
MOM was greater (505–750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) because insufficient C evolved
from the chemical fraction residues in this range (Fig. 3). Thermograms
for the chemical residues follow a similar pattern to those of MOM, with a
small amount of younger but chemically resistant C released at low
temperatures and much older C released in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As noted above, although the
chemical residues contained less than 30 % of the total MOM C (Table 1),
their thermograms were very similar. The very old <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thermal fractions in the
chemical residues represent only a small amount (1 %–4 %) of the total bulk
soil C (Supplement Tables S1 and S2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{$\delta^{{13}}$C}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C</title>
      <p id="d1e1988">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> released from SOM generally increased with
temperature in bulk soil and all fractions. The range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was the greatest (increasing by 4 ‰–5 ‰) for the chemical residues and smaller  (3 ‰–4 ‰) for the
density fractions. Across density fractions, the range of values and the
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C between different fractions was greater in
the deeper soil layer. Interestingly, the FPOM at 30–50 cm was more enriched
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C than OPOM. At high temperatures subsoil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C was
generally more enriched than surface soil.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Contributions of different physical fractions to the thermal
oxidation of bulk SOM </title>
      <p id="d1e2081">Thermograms (Fig. 1) demonstrate that C released by the bulk sample at all
temperatures contains C contributed from<?pagebreak page3157?> all physical and chemical
fractions. For example, of the bulk C released in the temperature range
where most C was released (250 to 325 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), FPOM and OPOM
contributed 9 % and 6 %, respectively, of total C released in surface
soil and 16 % and 8 % in subsoil (Table 1, Fig. 1a). However, at higher
temperature ranges, while the total C released was small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % of
the total C) the proportional contribution from FPOM and OPOM fractions
increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % in surface soil and 30 % in subsoil (Fig. 1c).</p>
      <p id="d1e2107">Thus, each thermal fraction from a combusted bulk soil contains C with a
broad range of Fm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, with variable contributions from the
different physically fractionated components. Figure 5 summarizes the Fm
distribution of C across the density and thermal fractions and emphasizes
that the difference in Fm between density fractions (especially FPOM versus
MOM) is greater than the range of Fm within any individual density fraction
(excluding a small amount of very old MOM) released as a function of
temperature or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5).</p>
      <p id="d1e2130">The measured distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for C released with increasing
temperature from the bulk soil clearly does not capture the contribution of
FPOM with high Fm because its young C is released across the same
temperature ranges as other density and chemical fractions (Figs. 1a, 1c, 3,
4). Thus, the surface soil age distribution misses the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 %
of total C in FPOM that has a much higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C signature than bulk soil;
instead, its contributions skew the bulk soil thermal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. 5,
wide bars in the middle of the distribution) higher than the separated MOM
thermal fractions (green). This difference is even more pronounced in the
subsoil.</p>
      <p id="d1e2167">With a sufficient number of thermal fractions at high temperatures, thermal
analysis of the bulk soil C captured the small percentage of C with very
depleted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures better than the chemical fractions that still
mixed younger and older constituents. In surface soil, bulk soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values (Fm 0.75) were comparable to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions of NaF Res. and
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Res. (Fm 0.76 and 0.78, respectively)  and represented
similar amounts of C (2.6 %, 2.7 %, and 3.0 % of total C,
respectively) (Supplement Table S1). Bulk subsoil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isolated older C (Fm 0.32,
5 % of total C) than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of NaF and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> residues (Fm 0.56,
8.1 % total C and Fm 0.41, 3.8 % total C, respectively), but
high-temperature samples were not collected for these fractions because of
low C yield (Supplement Table S2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2273">Summary information of bulk soil and fraction thermal
stability and isotopic compositions, including activation energy indices. Fm signifies fraction modern <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fraction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fraction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Whole</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Min</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">percent of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">fraction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">thermal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">thermal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">total C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Fm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Fm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–10 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bulk soil</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">134.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.997</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.048</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.751</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–10 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">133.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.080</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.067</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–10 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">135.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.992</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.040</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.968</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–10 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">85.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">133.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.985</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.037</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.728</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–10 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NaF Res.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">137.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.912</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.959</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.761</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–10 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Res.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">136.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.859</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.868</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.781</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30–50 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bulk soil</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">138.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.824</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.854</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.323</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30–50 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">141.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.087</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.085</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.064</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30–50 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">144.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.847</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.869</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.822</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30–50 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">76.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">137.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.786</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.791</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.230<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30–50 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NaF Res.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">137.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.713</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.798</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.562</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30–50 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Res.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">141.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.628</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.753</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.414</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2285"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Maximum and minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C content collected via thermal
fractionation within the sample.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Value calculated by mass balance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 Fm.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e2874">A main goal of this work is to compare the thermal oxidation profiles and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C age structures of thermally fractionated SOM with more frequently
applied physical (density) and chemical separation methods in a Podzol at
two depths. It is critical to find methods to quantify the age distribution
of C in SOM, both to relate its persistence to processes operating in soil
and to provide better constraints for testing models of soil C cycling.
While density and chemical fractions have proved useful, thermal
fractionation offers the advantages of being less expensive and allowing for
rapid analysis of the total sample C content. Based on our results, we
suggest that the separation of FPOM followed by thermal analysis provides the
best characterization of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (age) distribution of C in SOM.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Activation energy can predict age within a fraction but not
between fractions </title>
      <p id="d1e2902">Thermal fractionation of bulk soils and component physically and
chemically separated SOM fractions demonstrate that increased thermal
stability (i.e., higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is associated with lower radiocarbon
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) content (i.e., older C ages; Fig. 3) and more enriched <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
content (i.e., more microbially processed; Fig. 4). This supports the
general assumptions of thermal analysis, which is that older and more microbially
processed/degraded C will be released with increasing temperatures, even
among fractions like FPOM that are not associated with minerals (Plante et
al., 2009). Because there are large differences in Fm between the physically
and chemically separated fractions, C released with similar activation
energies (i.e., in a given thermal fraction of bulk soil) therefore can mix
C with a very different chemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C age.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2945"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C measured for each fraction as in Fig. 3. Low C content and limited sample material prevented data collection from
some fractions (MOM, NaF Res., H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Res. in subsoil). Right-hand
labels denote depth in centimeters.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3151/2023/bg-20-3151-2023-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2984">Comparison of the cumulative Fm distribution of C
released during thermal fractionation of bulk soil versus oxidation of
physically and chemically separated density fractions in the topsoil (<bold>a</bold>;
0–10 cm) and subsoil (<bold>b</bold>; 30–50 cm). The height of each histogram element
represents the Fm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, normalized to the overall bulk Fm value.
Effectively, values above 0 contain more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C than bulk soil, and values
below 0 contain less. The width of bars corresponds to the proportion of
total soil C in the fraction. The unfilled histogram elements (no color)
represent thermal fractions from the bulk soil, while the colored bars
represent the thermally fractionated FPOM, OPOM, and MOM fractions shown in
previous figures. Darker colors within a fraction correspond to higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions, and lighter colors reflect cooler/lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions. Both are ordered by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C content, with the  lowest on the left and highest on the right.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/3151/2023/bg-20-3151-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3158?><p id="d1e3050">For example, particulate fractions FPOM and OPOM that contain fresh plant
material, as well as microbial residues (Castanha et al., 2008; Angst et al.,
2021), release C across a similar temperature range as MOM. While presumably
“labile”, FPOM releases C between 300–500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, reflecting the
temperatures required to oxidize molecules like cellulose that make up plant
material (Dahiya and Rana, 2004; Plante et al., 2009). Despite a range of
activation energies, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures (Fig. 4), and high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1) all suggesting chemical diversity, FPOM in this soil is
all recent in origin (post-bomb, Fm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0; Fig. 3) and typically
breaks down within decades. Because of the temporal dynamics of the bomb
spike, an increase or decrease in Fm is more difficult to associate directly
to specific age for FPOM, and it is difficult to associate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> directly
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C values.</p>
      <p id="d1e3111">Mineral-associated organic matter (MOM) fractions demonstrated larger though
mostly overlapping ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but released <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched C above 165 kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 2–4). For most MOM
thermal fractions, Fm less than 1.0 reflects the loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C due to
radioactive decay and therefore indicates an increase in age. Thus, within a
given fraction there are predictable patterns of increasing age and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, as found in other studies (Leifeld and von
Lützow, 2014; Williams et al., 2018; Hemingway et al., 2019), these
patterns do not allow the prediction of age from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone, highlighting
fundamental differences in the processes controlling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
content, and age in each fraction. While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can either increase or
decrease over time as C transforms with decomposition and recycling, the age
of the involved C atoms can only increase.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Age structure of MOM</title>
      <p id="d1e3237">Both chemical and thermal fractionation methods for MOM indicate the
presence of two distinct components with very different Fm, one representing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 % of the C and having Fm similar to that of the bulk MOM
but decreasing in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as a small amount
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %) of much older C. In this Podzol, the main stabilization
mechanisms are likely the interactions between percolating dissolved organic
matter and pedogenic (oxy-)hydroxides that could explain the large amount of
relatively younger C (decades to centuries) removed by NaF and
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1b) that represents the largest thermal fraction of
the MOM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2). As shown by Schrumpf et al. (2021), the chemical extraction
and oxidation of MOM using NaF and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, removed C
that was slightly higher in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C concentration than the MOM overall,
leaving smaller but much older residues that resist destabilization. The
majority of MOM C removed through chemical fractionation had similar,
younger ages that could reflect SOM more weakly associated with mineral
surfaces, while the small proportion remaining could have been trapped
within the mineral structure (e.g., in clays on formation) or represent
elemental C. Both methods support the idea put forward by Schrumpf et al. (2021) that much of the MOM was cycling on decadal timescales, while a small
amount (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %) was much older (Fm 0.628). However,<?pagebreak page3159?> thermal
methods demonstrate that the 3 % of subsoil MOM oxidized at temperatures
greater than 505 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was even older (Fm 0.23; Fig. 3, Table A1).</p>
      <p id="d1e3344">While NaF and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> treatments removed younger C, combustion of the
residues showed that they still contained C with a range of activation
energies and ages. The chemical methods used here are believed to only
remove sorbed C that likely has higher Fm (i.e., is younger) than the
residue (Kaiser et al., 2007; Mikutta and Kaiser, 2011). These results are
somewhat puzzling, as particularly the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> treatment is expected
to remove all easily oxidizable C, leaving behind C that is either isolated
or highly “recalcitrant”. We therefore expected that the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
residue would not only be older but also on average have higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On
the contrary, there was actually proportionally less C in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both
residues compared to the unextracted MOM (Figs. 1, 3) such that the oldest
C in the residues was likely mixed with younger C. The observation that
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> residues had a range of activation energies and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ages
could indicate incomplete chemical oxidation or interaction of the OM
associated with dissolved pedogenic phases with the remaining mineral
phases. Alternatively, the presence of low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> material with very low
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C could reflect the incorporation of sedimentary shale parent material C
into microbial food webs with long-term stabilization of microbial residues
(Seifert et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e3472">Understanding the nature of the small amount of very old C found in MOM and
bulk soil and explaining the age and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C structure of the NaF
and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> residue thermal fractions require additional
information. One possibility is that the oldest C persists in the form of
charcoal (Cusack et al., 2012; Sanderman et al., 2016) or is derived from
the shale parent material of the Wetzstein site (Schrumpf et al., 2011;
Grant et al., 2023). Unpublished <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C data collected from the surface of
rock fragments found in the soil indicate a Fm of 0.27, similar to values
calculated for subsoil MOM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions (Table 1). The thermal alteration of
sedimentary parent material during metamorphosis could also explain the
chemical recalcitrance, heavier <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and higher activation
energies of this very old C. A second possibility is the presence of
non-crystalline minerals that are often correlated with the amount of very
old C found in soil (Huang et al., 2016; Khomo et al., 2017; Heckman et al.,
2018a). The investigated soils have moderate oxalate extractable Fe contents
of 9.2 (0–10 cm) and 17.4 (30–50 cm) g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Schrumpf et al., 2021). Dithionite extractable Fe concentrations
(including both crystalline and non-crystalline components) were 17 and 27.4 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. However, quantifying such effects would require
investigation of soils with varying amounts of non-crystalline minerals. A
third explanation of long SOM persistence is the stochastic nature of the
decomposition process. Available C is not uniformly decomposed, and some
substrate may persist in soil on much longer timescales (Bolin and Rodhe,
1973; Bosatta and Ågren, 1985; Sierra et al., 2018). Through random
chance associated with biological, chemical, and physical processes, a small
portion of total SOM remains in soil for centuries to millennia.<?pagebreak page3160?> Such
persistent C may be associated with the high activation energies measured
here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Suggested procedure for measuring the ${}^{{14}}$C distribution of organic C in bulk soils}?><title>Suggested procedure for measuring the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C distribution of organic C in bulk soils</title>
      <p id="d1e3578">The goal of any fractionation scheme for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C analysis is to provide
clearer delineation of C ages in soil, which integrates multiple types of
SOM and stabilization mechanisms. Combining operationally defined
fractionation methods can further isolate distinct pools of C with varying
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ages. Such age distributions can be used to constrain models of SOM
dynamics (Sierra et al., 2014; Metzler et al., 2018; Chanca et al., 2022)
and test hypotheses linking stabilization mechanisms with rates of C
cycling. Overall, Fig. 5 demonstrates that density fractionation alone
cannot quantify the age structure of bulk SOM, especially of MOM, while thermal
fractionation of bulk SOM fails to capture the youngest part of the age
distribution. This is because the youngest component of the soil C, the low-density FPOM, releases C across nearly the entire range of combustion
temperatures (Fig. 1c), making the C released from bulk soil at the lowest
temperature reflect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ages that are too old and the C released at
higher temperatures too young. At the highest temperatures, however, thermal
oxidation methods can isolate C even older than what can be found via
aggressive chemical extractions (Fig. 3). At the very highest temperatures,
the contributions of C from oxidation of FPOM and OPOM are relatively small
(Figs. 1c, 2) but may skew data with much younger C.</p>
      <p id="d1e3608">In order to best capture the age distribution of C in SOM, we therefore
recommend first separating the low-density fraction, then applying thermal
fractionation of the heavy fraction with attention to C liberated at very
high temperatures to constrain and describe the age structure of MOM. As
removal of the FPOM can also be accomplished using size separation, density
separation may not be necessary if the main goal is to remove relatively
fresh plant material (Castanha et al., 2008; Lavallee et al., 2020).
However, the presence of charcoal that would be removed by density but not
size could complicate the interpretation of thermal fractions, and further
work is needed to resolve this special circumstance.</p>
      <p id="d1e3611">Describing the distribution of ages in SOM is a powerful tool for testing
hypotheses about the timescales of different C stabilization mechanisms in
soils and for comparison with age distributions produced by
multi-compartment models (Metzler et al., 2018; Chanca et al., 2022). Our
results are for a single soil, a Podzol that likely has one major mechanism
for stabilizing C on mineral surfaces: interaction with pedogenic oxides. To
explore other mineral stabilization mechanisms and timescales, it would be
useful to compare thermograms and age distributions for soils with different
mineral composition – e.g., allophane, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> clays, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> clays, sands, and  mixed mineralogy soils. Additionally, a comparison with
temperature-resolved spectra (e.g., py-GC/MS; Sanderman and Grandy, 2020;
DRIFTS; Nkwain et al., 2018) that associate SOM chemistry with
thermal stability may help in determining the roles that OM chemistry and
mineralogy play in controlling C age and persistence in soil.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3648">Each density and chemical fraction contained a spectrum of SOM ages. FPOM
and OPOM displayed more homogeneous ages, while the MOM fraction displayed
two distinct age components in this Podzol, identified in both topsoil and
subsoil: likely the younger component that represents the majority of MOM
stabilized by association with pedogenic (oxy-)hydroxides, as well as the much older
component possibly inherited from shale parent material.</p>
      <p id="d1e3651">We conclude that thermal fractionation cannot completely replace standard
fractionation methods to connect SOM properties (e.g., activation energy) to
age distributions. Fresh FPOM contributes young C of homogenous age across
temperatures up to 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and thus dilutes the signal of older C
from other fractions. This method was effective at identifying multiple
stabilization timescales on the MOM fraction, suggesting complex dynamics
that may react across multiple timescales including those relevant to
climate and management change. We thus recommend separating and measuring
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of FPOM and then analyzing thermal fractions of MOM to help
distinguish faster- and slower-cycling mineral-associated components. This
additional fractionation helps us to go beyond using mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C values
towards characterizing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C distributions that can provide a more
comprehensive description of SOM cycling and potentially a more stringent
test for models. Further efforts are needed to explore the effects of
diverse mineral stabilization mechanisms on thermograms and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
distributions of MOM fractions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3703">Data sets used in this paper are available at Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7998659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7998659</ext-link>, Stoner, 2023).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3709">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3151-2023-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3151-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3718">SWS and ST designed, constructed, and tested method hardware and protocols.
Data were collected by SWS and analyzed by SWS and MS with input from all
authors. SWS led the writing of the manuscript with significant contribution
from ST and input from all authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3724">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3731">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3737">This work was funded by the European Research Council (Horizon 2020 Research
and Innovation Program; grant no. 695101; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Constraint) and the Max Planck
Society. We gratefully acknowledge our reviewers who helped improve the
manuscript. We thank  Axel Steinhof and   Xiaomei Xu for their
invaluable assistance in developing the equipment and methods used in this
study. We also thank the staff of the Max Planck Institute for
Biogeochemistry, UC Irvine, and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute for
their assistance in radiocarbon sampling and data preparation. Finally, we
thank the CarboEurope Project for access to the archived soils used in this
study.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3751">This research has been supported by the European Research Council, H2020 European Research Council (grant no. 695101).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?> publication were covered by the Max Planck Society.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3762">This paper was edited by Edzo Veldkamp and reviewed by Alain F. Plante and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, D. W. and Paul, E. A.: Organo-Mineral Complexes and Their Study by
Radiocarbon Dating, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48, 298–301,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800020014x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800020014x</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Angst, G., Mueller, K. E., Nierop, K. G. J., and Simpson, M. J.: Plant- or
microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil
organic matter, Soil Biol. Biochem., 156, 108189,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108189</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baisden, W. T. and Canessa, S.: Using 50 years of soil radiocarbon data to
identify optimal approaches for estimating soil carbon residence times, Nucl.
Instrum. Method. Phys. Res. B, 294, 588–592,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2012.06.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.nimb.2012.06.021</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Balesdent, J.: The turnover of soil organic fractions estimated by
radiocarbon dating, Sci. Total Environ., 62, 405–408,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(87)90528-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0048-9697(87)90528-6</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Basile-Doelsch, I., Balesdent, J., and Pellerin, S.: Reviews and syntheses:
The mechanisms underlying carbon storage in soil, Biogeosciences, 17,
5223–5242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5223-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-5223-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bianchi, T. S., Galy, V., Rosenheim, B. E., Shields, M., Cui, X., and Van
Metre, P.: Paleoreconstruction of organic carbon inputs to an oxbow lake in
the Mississippi River watershed: Effects of dam construction and land use
change on regional inputs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7983–7991,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL065595</ext-link>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bolin, B. and Rodhe, H.: A note on the concepts of age distribution and
transit time in natural reservoirs, Tellus, 25, 58–62,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1973.tb01594.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1973.tb01594.x</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bosatta, E. and Ågren, G. I.: Theoretical analysis of decomposition of
heterogeneous substrates, Soil Biol. Biochem., 17, 601–610,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90035-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0038-0717(85)90035-5</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Castanha, C., Trumbore, S., and Amundson, R.: Methods of separating soil
carbon pools affect the chemistry and turnover time of isolated fractions,
Radiocarbon, 50, 83–97, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200043381" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0033822200043381</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chanca, I., Trumbore, S., Macario, K., and Sierra, C. A.: Probability
Distributions of Radiocarbon in Open Linear Compartmental Systems at
Steady-State, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 127, 1–23,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006673" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JG006673</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cotrufo, M. F., Ranalli, M. G., Haddix, M. L., Six, J., and Lugato, E.: Soil
carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic
matter, Nat. Geosci., 12, 989–994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0484-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-019-0484-6</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cusack, D. F., Chadwick, O. A., Hockaday, W. C., and Vitousek, P. M.:
Mineralogical controls on soil black carbon preservation, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 26, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dahiya, J. B. and Rana, S.: Thermal degradation and morphological studies on
cotton cellulose modified with various arylphosphorodichloridites, Polym.
Int., 53, 995–1002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/pi.1500</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
De Coninck, F.: Major mechanisms in formation of spodic horizons, Geoderma,
24, 101–128, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, X. and Simpson, M. J.: Temperature responses of individual soil
organic matter components, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, 1–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000743" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JG000743</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>González-Pérez, J. A., Chabbi, A., de la Rosa, J. M., Rumpel, C.,
and González-Vila, F. J.: Evolution of organic matter in
lignite-containing sediments revealed by analytical pyrolysis (Py-GC-MS),
Org. Geochem., 53, 119–130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.08.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.08.001</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grandy, A. S., Strickland, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Bradford, M. A., and
Fierer, N.: The influence of microbial communities, management, and soil
texture on soil organic matter chemistry, Geoderma, 150, 278–286,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.007</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grant, K. E., Galy, V. V., Chadwick, O. A., and Derry, L. A.: Thermal
oxidation of carbon in organic matter rich volcanic soils: insights into SOC
age differentiation and mineral stabilization, Biogeochemistry, 144,
291–304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00586-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-019-00586-1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Grant, K. E., Hilton, R. G., and Galy, V.: Global patterns of radiocarbon
depletion in subsoil linked to rock-derived organic carbon, Geochem. Perspect.
Lett., 25, 36–40, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gregorich, E. G., Beare, M. H., McKim, U. F., and Skjemstad, J. O.: Chemical
and Biological Characteristics of Physically Uncomplexed Organic Matter,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 975–985,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2005.0116</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heckman, K., Lawrence, C. R., and Harden, J. W.: A sequential selective
dissolution method to quantify storage and stability of organic carbon
associated with Al and Fe hydroxide phases, Geoderma, 312, 24–35,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.043</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3162?><ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heckman, K., Throckmorton, H., Horwath, W., Swanston, C., and Rasmussen, C.:
Variation in the Molecular Structure and Radiocarbon Abundance of
Mineral-Associated Organic Matter across a Lithosequence of Forest Soils,
Soil Syst., 2, 36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2020036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/soilsystems2020036</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heckman, K., Hicks Pries, C. E., Lawrence, C. R., Rasmussen, C., Crow, S.
E., Hoyt, A. M., von Fromm, S. F., Shi, Z., Stoner, S., McGrath, C.,
Beem-Miller, J., Berhe, A. A., Blankinship, J. C., Keiluweit, M.,
Marín-Spiotta, E., Monroe, J. G., Plante, A. F., Schimel, J., Sierra,
C. A., Thompson, A., and Wagai, R.: Beyond bulk: Density fractions explain
heterogeneity in global soil carbon abundance and persistence, Glob. Change
Biol., 28, 1178–1196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.16023</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., Mikutta, R., Dreves, A., and Ludwig, B.:
Comparison of chemical fractionation methods for isolating stable soil
organic carbon pools, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 58, 1316–1329,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00926.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00926.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hemingway, J. D.: rampedpyrox: Open-source tools for thermoanalytical data
analysis,  <uri>https://github.com/FluvialSeds/rampedpyrox</uri> (last access: 20 June 2022), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hemingway, J. D., Rothman, D. H., Rosengard, S. Z., and Galy, V. V.:
Technical note: An inverse method to relate organic carbon reactivity to
isotope composition from serial oxidation, Biogeosciences, 14, 5099–5114,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5099-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-5099-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hemingway, J. D., Rothman, D. H., Grant, K. E., Rosengard, S. Z., Eglinton,
T. I., Derry, L. A., and Galy, V. V.: Mineral protection regulates long-term
global preservation of natural organic carbon, Nature, 570, 228–231,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1280-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-019-1280-6</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, X., Jiang, H., Li, Y., Ma, Y., Tang, H., Ran, W., and Shen, Q.: The
role of poorly crystalline iron oxides in the stability of soil
aggregate-associated organic carbon in a rice-wheat cropping system,
Geoderma, 279, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.011</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jagadamma, S., Lal, R., Ussiri, D. A. N., Trumbore, S. E., and Mestelan, S.:
Evaluation of structural chemistry and isotopic signatures of refractory
soil organic carbon fraction isolated by wet oxidation methods,
Biogeochemistry, 98, 29–44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9374-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-009-9374-0</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaiser, K., Mikutta, R., and Guggenberger, G.: Increased Stability of
Organic Matter Sorbed to Ferrihydrite and Goethite on Aging, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am. J., 71, 711–719,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2006.0189</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Khomo, L., Trumbore, S., Bern, C. R., and Chadwick, O. A.: Timescales of
carbon turnover in soils with mixed crystalline mineralogies, Soil, 3,
17–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-17-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/soil-3-17-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kleber, M., Bourg, I. C., Coward, E. K., Hansel, C. M., Myneni, S. C. B.,
and Nunan, N.: Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter
interface, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 0123456789,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lavallee, J. M., Soong, J. L., and Cotrufo, M. F.: Conceptualizing soil
organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address
global change in the 21st century, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 261–273,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.14859</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lehmann, J. and Kleber, M.: The contentious nature of soil organic matter,
Nature, 528, 60–68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature16069</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leifeld, J. and von Lützow, M.: Chemical and microbial activation
energies of soil organic matter decomposition, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 50,
147–153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0822-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00374-013-0822-6</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Metzler, H., Müller, M., and Sierra, C. A.: Transit-time and age
distributions for nonlinear time-dependent compartmental systems, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 1150–1155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705296115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1705296115</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mikutta, R. and Kaiser, K.: Organic matter bound to mineral surfaces:
Resistance to chemical and biological oxidation, Soil Biol. Biochem., 43,
1738–1741, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.012</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Natali, C., Bianchini, G., and Carlino, P.: Thermal stability of soil carbon
pools: Inferences on soil nature and evolution, Thermochim. Ac., 683,
178478,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2019.178478" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tca.2019.178478</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nkwain, F. N., Demyan, M. S., Rasche, F., Dignac, M. F., Schulz, E.,
Kätterer, T., Müller, T., and Cadisch, G.: Coupling pyrolysis with
mid-infrared spectroscopy (Py-MIRS) to fingerprint soil organic matter bulk
chemistry, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis., 133, 176–184,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.04.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaap.2018.04.004</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paul, E. A., Follett, R. F., Leavitt, S. W., Halvorson, A., Peterson, G. A.,
and Lyon, D. J.: Radiocarbon Dating for Determination of Soil Organic Matter
Pool Sizes and Dynamics, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61,
1058–1067, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040011x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040011x</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Plante, A. F., Fernández, J. M., and Leifeld, J.: Application of thermal
analysis techniques in soil science, Geoderma, 153, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.08.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.08.016</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Plante, A. F., Fernández, J. M., Haddix, M. L., Steinweg, J. M., and
Conant, R. T.: Biological, chemical and thermal indices of soil organic
matter stability in four grassland soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 1051–1058,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.024</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Plante, A. F., Beaupré, S. R., Roberts, M. L., and Baisden, T.:
Distribution of Radiocarbon Ages in Soil Organic Matter by Thermal
Fractionation, Radiocarbon, 55, 1077–1083,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200058215" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/s0033822200058215</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Quénéa, K., Derenne, S., González-Vila, F. J.,
González-Pérez, J. A., Mariotti, A., and Largeau, C.: Double-shot
pyrolysis of the non-hydrolysable organic fraction isolated from a sandy
forest soil (Landes de Gascogne, South-West France): Comparison with
classical Curie point pyrolysis, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis., 76, 271–279,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2005.12.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaap.2005.12.007</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rasmussen, C., Throckmorton, H., Liles, G., Heckman, K., Meding, S., and
Horwath, W. R.: Controls on soil organic carbon partitioning and
stabilization in the California Sierra Nevada, Soil Syst., 2, 1–18,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2030041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/soilsystems2030041</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rennert, T. and Herrmann, L.: Sea spray and land use effects on clay
minerals and organic matter of soils on machair (Harris, Scotland), Geoderma
Reg., 23, e00339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00339</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rennert, T. and Herrmann, L.: Thermal-gradient analysis of soil organic
matter using an elemental analyser – A tool for qualitative
characterization?, Geoderma, 425, 116085,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116085</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3163?><ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenheim, B. E. and Galy, V.: Direct measurement of riverine particulate
organic carbon age structure, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 1–6,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052883" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052883</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenheim, B. E., Day, M. B., Domack, E., Schrum, H., Benthien, A., and
Hayes, J. M.: Antarctic sediment chronology by programmed-temperature
pyrolysis: Methodology and data treatment, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 9, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GC001816</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sanderman, J. and Grandy, S. A.: Ramped thermal analysis for isolating
biologically meaningful soil organic matter fractions with distinct
residence times, Soil, 6, 131–144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-131-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/soil-6-131-2020</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sanderman, J., Baisden, W. T., and Fallon, S.: Redefining the inert organic
carbon pool, Soil Biol. Biochem., 92, 149–152,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.005</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schrumpf, M., Schulze, E. D., Kaiser, K., and Schumacher, J.: How accurately
can soil organic carbon stocks and stock changes be quantified by soil
inventories?, Biogeosciences, 8, 1193–1212,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1193-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-1193-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schrumpf, M., Kaiser, K., Guggenberger, G., Persson, T., Kögel-Knabner,
I., and Schulze, E. D.: Storage and stability of organic carbon in soils as
related to depth, occlusion within aggregates, and attachment to minerals,
Biogeosciences, 10, 1675–1691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1675-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-1675-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schrumpf, M., Kaiser, K., Mayer, A., Hempel, G., and Trumbore, S.: Age
distribution, extractability, and stability of mineral-bound organic carbon
in central European soils, Biogeosciences, 18, 1241–1257,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1241-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-18-1241-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schuur, E. A. G., Trumbore, S. E., and Druffel, E. R. M.: Radiocarbon and
Climate Change: Mechanisms, Appl. Laborat. Tech., 1, 1–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25643-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-319-25643-6</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seifert, A. G., Trumbore, S., Xu, X., Zhang, D., and Gleixner, G.: Variable
effects of plant colonization on black slate uptake into microbial PLFAs,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 106, 391–403,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.12.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2012.12.011</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sierra, C. A., Müller, M., and Trumbore, S. E.: Modeling radiocarbon
dynamics in soils: SoilR version 1.1, Geosci. Model. Dev., 7, 1919–1931,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1919-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-1919-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sierra, C. A., Hoyt, A. M., He, Y., and Trumbore, S. E.: Soil Organic Matter
Persistence as a Stochastic Process: Age and Transit Time Distributions of
Carbon in Soils, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 1574–1588,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GB005950</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sollins, P., Kramer, M. G., Swanston, C., Lajtha, K., Filley, T.,
Aufdenkampe, A. K., Wagai, R., and Bowden, R. D.: Sequential density
fractionation across soils of contrasting mineralogy: Evidence for both
microbial- and mineral-controlled soil organic matter stabilization,
Biogeochemistry, 96, 209–231, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9359-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-009-9359-z</ext-link>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stoner, S.: ShaneStoner/BGS_ThermalFractionation: Publication, v1.0, Zenodo [data set and code],
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7998659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7998659</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Torn, M. S., Trumbore, S. E., Chadwick, O. A., Vitousek, P. M., and
Hendricks, D. M.: Mineral control of soil organic carbon and storage and
turnover, Nature, 389, 3601–3603, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trumbore, S.: Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: Radiocarbon
constraints on belowground C dynamics, Ecol. Appl., 10,
399–411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0399:AOSOMA]2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0399:AOSOMA]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Trumbore, S. E.: Comparisons of carbon dynamics in tropical and temperate
soils using radiocarbon measurements, Measurement, 7, 275–290, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trumbore, S. E. and Zheng, S.: Comparison of fractionation methods for soil
organic matter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C analysis, Radiocarbon, 38, 219–229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200017598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0033822200017598</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trumbore, S. E., Bonani, G., and Wolfli, W.: The rates of carbon cycling in
several soils from AMS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C measurements of fractionated soil organic matter, in: Soils and the greenhouse effect, Vol. 23, 407–414,
John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, USA, 575 pp., ISBN 0-471-92358-8, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H.,
Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., and Marschner, B.: SOM fractionation methods:
Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 39, 2183–2207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wendeberg, M., Richter, J. M., Rothe, M., and Brand, W. A.: Jena Reference
Air Set (JRAS): A multi-point scale anchor for isotope measurements of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
air, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 817–822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-817-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-817-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Williams, E. K., Fogel, M. L., Berhe, A. A., and Plante, A. F.: Distinct
bioenergetic signatures in particulate versus mineral-associated soil
organic matter, Geoderma, 330, 107–116,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.024</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Trumbore, S. E., Zheng, S., Southon, J. R., McDuffee, K. E.,
Luttgen, M., and Liu, J. C.: Modifying a sealed tube zinc reduction method
for preparation of AMS graphite targets: Reducing background and attaining
high precision, Nucl. Instrum. Method. Phys. Res. B, 259, 320–329,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.175" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.175</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>How well does ramped thermal oxidation quantify the age distribution of soil carbon? Assessing thermal stability of physically and chemically fractionated soil organic matter</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, D. W. and Paul, E. A.: Organo-Mineral Complexes and Their Study by
Radiocarbon Dating, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48, 298–301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800020014x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800020014x</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Angst, G., Mueller, K. E., Nierop, K. G. J., and Simpson, M. J.: Plant- or
microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil
organic matter, Soil Biol. Biochem., 156, 108189,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108189" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108189</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baisden, W. T. and Canessa, S.: Using 50 years of soil radiocarbon data to
identify optimal approaches for estimating soil carbon residence times, Nucl.
Instrum. Method. Phys. Res. B, 294, 588–592,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2012.06.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2012.06.021</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Balesdent, J.: The turnover of soil organic fractions estimated by
radiocarbon dating, Sci. Total Environ., 62, 405–408,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(87)90528-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(87)90528-6</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Basile-Doelsch, I., Balesdent, J., and Pellerin, S.: Reviews and syntheses:
The mechanisms underlying carbon storage in soil, Biogeosciences, 17,
5223–5242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5223-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5223-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bianchi, T. S., Galy, V., Rosenheim, B. E., Shields, M., Cui, X., and Van
Metre, P.: Paleoreconstruction of organic carbon inputs to an oxbow lake in
the Mississippi River watershed: Effects of dam construction and land use
change on regional inputs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7983–7991,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065595</a>, 2015.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bolin, B. and Rodhe, H.: A note on the concepts of age distribution and
transit time in natural reservoirs, Tellus, 25, 58–62,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1973.tb01594.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1973.tb01594.x</a>, 1973.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bosatta, E. and Ågren, G. I.: Theoretical analysis of decomposition of
heterogeneous substrates, Soil Biol. Biochem., 17, 601–610,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90035-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90035-5</a>, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Castanha, C., Trumbore, S., and Amundson, R.: Methods of separating soil
carbon pools affect the chemistry and turnover time of isolated fractions,
Radiocarbon, 50, 83–97, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200043381" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200043381</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chanca, I., Trumbore, S., Macario, K., and Sierra, C. A.: Probability
Distributions of Radiocarbon in Open Linear Compartmental Systems at
Steady-State, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 127, 1–23,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006673" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006673</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cotrufo, M. F., Ranalli, M. G., Haddix, M. L., Six, J., and Lugato, E.: Soil
carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic
matter, Nat. Geosci., 12, 989–994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0484-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0484-6</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cusack, D. F., Chadwick, O. A., Hockaday, W. C., and Vitousek, P. M.:
Mineralogical controls on soil black carbon preservation, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 26, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004109</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dahiya, J. B. and Rana, S.: Thermal degradation and morphological studies on
cotton cellulose modified with various arylphosphorodichloridites, Polym.
Int., 53, 995–1002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1500" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1500</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Coninck, F.: Major mechanisms in formation of spodic horizons, Geoderma,
24, 101–128, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, X. and Simpson, M. J.: Temperature responses of individual soil
organic matter components, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, 1–14,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000743" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000743</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
González-Pérez, J. A., Chabbi, A., de la Rosa, J. M., Rumpel, C.,
and González-Vila, F. J.: Evolution of organic matter in
lignite-containing sediments revealed by analytical pyrolysis (Py-GC-MS),
Org. Geochem., 53, 119–130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.08.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.08.001</a>,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grandy, A. S., Strickland, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Bradford, M. A., and
Fierer, N.: The influence of microbial communities, management, and soil
texture on soil organic matter chemistry, Geoderma, 150, 278–286,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.007</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grant, K. E., Galy, V. V., Chadwick, O. A., and Derry, L. A.: Thermal
oxidation of carbon in organic matter rich volcanic soils: insights into SOC
age differentiation and mineral stabilization, Biogeochemistry, 144,
291–304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00586-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00586-1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grant, K. E., Hilton, R. G., and Galy, V.: Global patterns of radiocarbon
depletion in subsoil linked to rock-derived organic carbon, Geochem. Perspect.
Lett., 25, 36–40, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gregorich, E. G., Beare, M. H., McKim, U. F., and Skjemstad, J. O.: Chemical
and Biological Characteristics of Physically Uncomplexed Organic Matter,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 975–985,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0116</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heckman, K., Lawrence, C. R., and Harden, J. W.: A sequential selective
dissolution method to quantify storage and stability of organic carbon
associated with Al and Fe hydroxide phases, Geoderma, 312, 24–35,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.043</a>, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heckman, K., Throckmorton, H., Horwath, W., Swanston, C., and Rasmussen, C.:
Variation in the Molecular Structure and Radiocarbon Abundance of
Mineral-Associated Organic Matter across a Lithosequence of Forest Soils,
Soil Syst., 2, 36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2020036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2020036</a>, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heckman, K., Hicks Pries, C. E., Lawrence, C. R., Rasmussen, C., Crow, S.
E., Hoyt, A. M., von Fromm, S. F., Shi, Z., Stoner, S., McGrath, C.,
Beem-Miller, J., Berhe, A. A., Blankinship, J. C., Keiluweit, M.,
Marín-Spiotta, E., Monroe, J. G., Plante, A. F., Schimel, J., Sierra,
C. A., Thompson, A., and Wagai, R.: Beyond bulk: Density fractions explain
heterogeneity in global soil carbon abundance and persistence, Glob. Change
Biol., 28, 1178–1196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16023</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., Mikutta, R., Dreves, A., and Ludwig, B.:
Comparison of chemical fractionation methods for isolating stable soil
organic carbon pools, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 58, 1316–1329,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00926.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00926.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hemingway, J. D.: rampedpyrox: Open-source tools for thermoanalytical data
analysis,  <a href="https://github.com/FluvialSeds/rampedpyrox" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 June 2022), 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hemingway, J. D., Rothman, D. H., Rosengard, S. Z., and Galy, V. V.:
Technical note: An inverse method to relate organic carbon reactivity to
isotope composition from serial oxidation, Biogeosciences, 14, 5099–5114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5099-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5099-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hemingway, J. D., Rothman, D. H., Grant, K. E., Rosengard, S. Z., Eglinton,
T. I., Derry, L. A., and Galy, V. V.: Mineral protection regulates long-term
global preservation of natural organic carbon, Nature, 570, 228–231,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1280-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1280-6</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, X., Jiang, H., Li, Y., Ma, Y., Tang, H., Ran, W., and Shen, Q.: The
role of poorly crystalline iron oxides in the stability of soil
aggregate-associated organic carbon in a rice-wheat cropping system,
Geoderma, 279, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.011</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jagadamma, S., Lal, R., Ussiri, D. A. N., Trumbore, S. E., and Mestelan, S.:
Evaluation of structural chemistry and isotopic signatures of refractory
soil organic carbon fraction isolated by wet oxidation methods,
Biogeochemistry, 98, 29–44, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9374-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9374-0</a>,
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaiser, K., Mikutta, R., and Guggenberger, G.: Increased Stability of
Organic Matter Sorbed to Ferrihydrite and Goethite on Aging, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am. J., 71, 711–719,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0189" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0189</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khomo, L., Trumbore, S., Bern, C. R., and Chadwick, O. A.: Timescales of
carbon turnover in soils with mixed crystalline mineralogies, Soil, 3,
17–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-17-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-17-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kleber, M., Bourg, I. C., Coward, E. K., Hansel, C. M., Myneni, S. C. B.,
and Nunan, N.: Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter
interface, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 0123456789,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lavallee, J. M., Soong, J. L., and Cotrufo, M. F.: Conceptualizing soil
organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address
global change in the 21st century, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 261–273,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14859" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14859</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lehmann, J. and Kleber, M.: The contentious nature of soil organic matter,
Nature, 528, 60–68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leifeld, J. and von Lützow, M.: Chemical and microbial activation
energies of soil organic matter decomposition, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 50,
147–153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0822-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0822-6</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Metzler, H., Müller, M., and Sierra, C. A.: Transit-time and age
distributions for nonlinear time-dependent compartmental systems, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 1150–1155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705296115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705296115</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mikutta, R. and Kaiser, K.: Organic matter bound to mineral surfaces:
Resistance to chemical and biological oxidation, Soil Biol. Biochem., 43,
1738–1741, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.012</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Natali, C., Bianchini, G., and Carlino, P.: Thermal stability of soil carbon
pools: Inferences on soil nature and evolution, Thermochim. Ac., 683,
178478,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2019.178478" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2019.178478</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nkwain, F. N., Demyan, M. S., Rasche, F., Dignac, M. F., Schulz, E.,
Kätterer, T., Müller, T., and Cadisch, G.: Coupling pyrolysis with
mid-infrared spectroscopy (Py-MIRS) to fingerprint soil organic matter bulk
chemistry, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis., 133, 176–184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.04.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.04.004</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paul, E. A., Follett, R. F., Leavitt, S. W., Halvorson, A., Peterson, G. A.,
and Lyon, D. J.: Radiocarbon Dating for Determination of Soil Organic Matter
Pool Sizes and Dynamics, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61,
1058–1067, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040011x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040011x</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plante, A. F., Fernández, J. M., and Leifeld, J.: Application of thermal
analysis techniques in soil science, Geoderma, 153, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.08.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.08.016</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plante, A. F., Fernández, J. M., Haddix, M. L., Steinweg, J. M., and
Conant, R. T.: Biological, chemical and thermal indices of soil organic
matter stability in four grassland soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 1051–1058,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.024</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plante, A. F., Beaupré, S. R., Roberts, M. L., and Baisden, T.:
Distribution of Radiocarbon Ages in Soil Organic Matter by Thermal
Fractionation, Radiocarbon, 55, 1077–1083,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200058215" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200058215</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Quénéa, K., Derenne, S., González-Vila, F. J.,
González-Pérez, J. A., Mariotti, A., and Largeau, C.: Double-shot
pyrolysis of the non-hydrolysable organic fraction isolated from a sandy
forest soil (Landes de Gascogne, South-West France): Comparison with
classical Curie point pyrolysis, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis., 76, 271–279,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2005.12.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2005.12.007</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rasmussen, C., Throckmorton, H., Liles, G., Heckman, K., Meding, S., and
Horwath, W. R.: Controls on soil organic carbon partitioning and
stabilization in the California Sierra Nevada, Soil Syst., 2, 1–18,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2030041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2030041</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rennert, T. and Herrmann, L.: Sea spray and land use effects on clay
minerals and organic matter of soils on machair (Harris, Scotland), Geoderma
Reg., 23, e00339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00339</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rennert, T. and Herrmann, L.: Thermal-gradient analysis of soil organic
matter using an elemental analyser – A tool for qualitative
characterization?, Geoderma, 425, 116085,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116085</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rosenheim, B. E. and Galy, V.: Direct measurement of riverine particulate
organic carbon age structure, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 1–6,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052883" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052883</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rosenheim, B. E., Day, M. B., Domack, E., Schrum, H., Benthien, A., and
Hayes, J. M.: Antarctic sediment chronology by programmed-temperature
pyrolysis: Methodology and data treatment, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 9, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001816</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sanderman, J. and Grandy, S. A.: Ramped thermal analysis for isolating
biologically meaningful soil organic matter fractions with distinct
residence times, Soil, 6, 131–144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-131-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-131-2020</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sanderman, J., Baisden, W. T., and Fallon, S.: Redefining the inert organic
carbon pool, Soil Biol. Biochem., 92, 149–152,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.005</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schrumpf, M., Schulze, E. D., Kaiser, K., and Schumacher, J.: How accurately
can soil organic carbon stocks and stock changes be quantified by soil
inventories?, Biogeosciences, 8, 1193–1212,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1193-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1193-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schrumpf, M., Kaiser, K., Guggenberger, G., Persson, T., Kögel-Knabner,
I., and Schulze, E. D.: Storage and stability of organic carbon in soils as
related to depth, occlusion within aggregates, and attachment to minerals,
Biogeosciences, 10, 1675–1691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1675-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1675-2013</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schrumpf, M., Kaiser, K., Mayer, A., Hempel, G., and Trumbore, S.: Age
distribution, extractability, and stability of mineral-bound organic carbon
in central European soils, Biogeosciences, 18, 1241–1257,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1241-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1241-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schuur, E. A. G., Trumbore, S. E., and Druffel, E. R. M.: Radiocarbon and
Climate Change: Mechanisms, Appl. Laborat. Tech., 1, 1–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25643-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25643-6</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seifert, A. G., Trumbore, S., Xu, X., Zhang, D., and Gleixner, G.: Variable
effects of plant colonization on black slate uptake into microbial PLFAs,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 106, 391–403,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.12.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.12.011</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sierra, C. A., Müller, M., and Trumbore, S. E.: Modeling radiocarbon
dynamics in soils: SoilR version 1.1, Geosci. Model. Dev., 7, 1919–1931,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1919-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1919-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sierra, C. A., Hoyt, A. M., He, Y., and Trumbore, S. E.: Soil Organic Matter
Persistence as a Stochastic Process: Age and Transit Time Distributions of
Carbon in Soils, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 1574–1588,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005950" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005950</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sollins, P., Kramer, M. G., Swanston, C., Lajtha, K., Filley, T.,
Aufdenkampe, A. K., Wagai, R., and Bowden, R. D.: Sequential density
fractionation across soils of contrasting mineralogy: Evidence for both
microbial- and mineral-controlled soil organic matter stabilization,
Biogeochemistry, 96, 209–231, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9359-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9359-z</a>,
2009.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stoner, S.: ShaneStoner/BGS_ThermalFractionation: Publication, v1.0, Zenodo [data set and code],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7998659" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7998659</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Torn, M. S., Trumbore, S. E., Chadwick, O. A., Vitousek, P. M., and
Hendricks, D. M.: Mineral control of soil organic carbon and storage and
turnover, Nature, 389, 3601–3603, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trumbore, S.: Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: Radiocarbon
constraints on belowground C dynamics, Ecol. Appl., 10,
399–411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0399:AOSOMA]2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0399:AOSOMA]2.0.CO;2</a>,
2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trumbore, S. E.: Comparisons of carbon dynamics in tropical and temperate
soils using radiocarbon measurements, Measurement, 7, 275–290, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trumbore, S. E. and Zheng, S.: Comparison of fractionation methods for soil
organic matter <sup>14</sup>C analysis, Radiocarbon, 38, 219–229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200017598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200017598</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trumbore, S. E., Bonani, G., and Wolfli, W.: The rates of carbon cycling in
several soils from AMS<sup>14</sup>C measurements of fractionated soil organic matter, in: Soils and the greenhouse effect, Vol. 23, 407–414,
John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, USA, 575 pp., ISBN 0-471-92358-8, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H.,
Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., and Marschner, B.: SOM fractionation methods:
Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 39, 2183–2207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007</a>,
2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wendeberg, M., Richter, J. M., Rothe, M., and Brand, W. A.: Jena Reference
Air Set (JRAS): A multi-point scale anchor for isotope measurements of CO<sub>2</sub> in
air, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 817–822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-817-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-817-2013</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Williams, E. K., Fogel, M. L., Berhe, A. A., and Plante, A. F.: Distinct
bioenergetic signatures in particulate versus mineral-associated soil
organic matter, Geoderma, 330, 107–116,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.024</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, X., Trumbore, S. E., Zheng, S., Southon, J. R., McDuffee, K. E.,
Luttgen, M., and Liu, J. C.: Modifying a sealed tube zinc reduction method
for preparation of AMS graphite targets: Reducing background and attaining
high precision, Nucl. Instrum. Method. Phys. Res. B, 259, 320–329,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.175" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.175</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
