<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-20-4651-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Single-species dinoflagellate cyst carbon isotope<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> fractionation in core-top sediments: environmental<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> controls, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dependency and proxy potential</article-title><alt-title>Single-species dinoflagellate cyst carbon isotope fractionation</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Single-species dinoflagellate cyst carbon isotope fractionation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~Frieling et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Frieling</surname><given-names>Joost</given-names></name>
          <email>joost.frieling@earth.ox.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-1625</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>van Roij</surname><given-names>Linda</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kleij</surname><given-names>Iris</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Reichart</surname><given-names>Gert-Jan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sluijs</surname><given-names>Appy</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2382-0215</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Princetonlaan 8, 3584CB Utrecht, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Ocean Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Landsdiep 4, 1797SZ 't Horntje, Texel, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3AN, Oxford, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Joost Frieling (joost.frieling@earth.ox.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>November</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>4651</fpage><lpage>4668</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>May</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7</day><month>September</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>October</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Joost Frieling et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e148">Sedimentary bulk organic matter and various molecular organic components exhibit strong CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent carbon isotope fractionation relative to dissolved inorganic carbon sources. This fractionation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has been employed as a proxy for paleo-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Yet, culture experiments indicate that CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is highly specific at genus and even species level, potentially hampering the use of bulk organic matter and non-species-specific organic compounds. In recent years, significant progress has been made towards a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy using controlled growth experiments with dinoflagellate species, also showing highly species-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. These values were, however, based on motile specimens, and it remains unknown whether these relations also hold for the organic-walled resting cysts (dinocysts) produced by these dinoflagellate species in their natural environment. We here analyze dinocysts isolated from core tops from the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea, representing several species (<italic>Spiniferites elongatus</italic>, <italic>S.</italic> (cf.) <italic>ramosus</italic>, <italic>S. mirabilis</italic>, <italic>Operculodinium centrocarpum</italic>  sensu Wall and Dale (1966) (hereafter referred to as <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic>) and <italic>Impagidinium aculeatum</italic>) using laser ablation–nano-combustion–gas-chromatography–isotope ratio mass spectrometry (LA/nC/GC-IRMS). We find that the dinocysts produced in the natural environment are all appreciably more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted compared to the cultured motile dinoflagellate cells, implying higher overall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and, moreover, exhibit large isotope variability. Where several species could be analyzed from a single location, we often record significant differences in isotopic variance and offsets in mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values between species, highlighting the importance of single-species carbon isotope analyses. The most geographically expanded dataset, based on <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic>, shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlates significantly with various environmental parameters. Importantly, <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> shows a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similar to other marine autotrophs, relative insensitivity at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is in line with active carbon-concentrating mechanisms at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, although we here cannot fully exclude that we partly underestimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values due to the relatively sparse sampling in that range. Finally, we use the relation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> to propose a first <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy based on a single dinocyst species.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>European Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>SPANC - Evolution and Variability of Climate Sensitivity and Polar Amplification during CeNozoic Warm Climates SPANC (771497)</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Aard- en Levenswetenschappen, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek</funding-source>
<award-id>ALWOP.223</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page4652?><p id="d1e467">Stable carbon isotope fractionation in marine autotrophs is governed for a large part by the carbon-fixing enzyme RuBisCO (e.g., Farquhar et al., 1989; Roeske and O'Leary, 1984), which implies most marine organic matter and therefore sedimentary marine organic matter is strongly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted with respect to the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) source (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (aq), HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with the stable carbon isotope composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) of organic matter ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰ (Freeman and Hayes, 1992). While many groups of marine autotrophs show clear CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent carbon isotope fractionation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the exact relation strongly varies between marine phytoplankton groups, genera and cell morphologies (Popp et al., 1998; Boller et al., 2011, 2015; Brandenburg et al., 2022). Still, because of the assumed CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dependency of RuBisCO fractionation, bulk marine organic matter and more specific organic compounds of marine autotrophs (e.g., lipids biomarkers) have been proposed and applied as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxies over the past decades (Freeman and Hayes, 1992; Naafs et al., 2016). The application of these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxies (e.g., Bijl et al., 2010; Pagani et al., 2011; Schoon et al., 2011; Witkowski et al., 2018) has provided constraints on past atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and earth system sensitivity beyond the ice core record (e.g., Pagani et al., 2010; PALAEOSENS, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e619">However, many of the organic compounds used for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reconstructions such as alkenones (e.g., Pagani, 2013), phytane (e.g., Witkowski et al., 2018), porphyrins (e.g., Freeman and Hayes, 1992) or bulk organic matter (e.g., Hayes et al., 1999) are not unique to a single species, genus and sometimes not even a group of organisms. This implies that reconstructions based on these compounds integrate interspecific differences in CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dependency, which complicates the interpretation of such proxy records. Secondly, even if specific compounds derive from a single species or genus, they intrinsically derive from a multitude of individual organisms, differing in shape and size, affecting isotopic fractionation and hence limiting the accuracy of such CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reconstructions.</p>
      <p id="d1e649">Part of the uncertainties and biases in carbon isotope fractionation can be circumvented if the carbon isotopic fractionation of individual fossils can be analyzed. In recent years, significant progress has been made towards a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy based on the stable carbon isotope fractionation in organic walled dinoflagellate cysts (Burkhardt et al., 1999; Hoins et al., 2015, 2016a, b; Wilkes et al., 2017). A fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 %) of modern dinoflagellates produces an organic resting cyst or dinocyst as an obligatory part of their lifecycle (Evitt, 1985). The organic resting cysts from autotrophic species have excellent preservation potential and are often highly oxidation-resistant (Zonneveld et al., 1997, 2019; Kodrans-Nsiah et al., 2008), and several ubiquitous extant genera and species, such as <italic>Spiniferites</italic> spp. and <italic>Operculodinium centrocarpum</italic>, have extremely long geological records (Fensome et al., 1996; Williams et al., 2004). The ecology and morphology of these long-ranging species seemingly remained unchanged for millions of years (Frieling and Sluijs, 2018). Most importantly, recent advances in methodology allow for analyses of species-specific single-cyst <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (van Roij et al., 2017; Sluijs et al., 2018). This presents the opportunity to quantify environmental controls on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of individual dinoflagellate cysts and hence species to assess the potential to obtain more accurate paleo-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates from sedimentary records.</p>
      <p id="d1e713">Controlled growth experiments across a range of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels representative of the last glacial (e.g., Barnola et al., 1987) and modern and future carbon emission scenarios (Eberlein et al., 2016; Hoins et al., 2016a,  b, 2015; IPCC, 2014; Rost et al., 2006; Van de Waal et al., 2013; Wilkes et al., 2017) showed species-specific CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for multiple dinoflagellate species. From these, the species <italic>Protoceratium reticulatum</italic> and <italic>Gonyaulax spinifera</italic> (Hoins et al., 2015, 2016a, 2016b) are of particular interest as these produce the organic cyst species <italic>Operculodinium centrocarpum</italic> sensu Wall and Dale (1966), hereafter referred to as <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic>, and <italic>Spiniferites</italic> (cf.) <italic>ramosus</italic>, hereafter referred to as <italic>S. ramosus</italic>, respectively (Head, 1996; Zonneveld et al., 2013). These cyst species have their first occurrences in the geological records around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 and 130 Ma (million years ago), for <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> and <italic>S. ramosus</italic>, respectively (Williams et al., 2004), thus providing the potential for deep-time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reconstructions.</p>
      <p id="d1e798">Before <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values based on dinocysts can be used for reconstructing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, several fundamental questions need to be addressed. Although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exerts a major control on dinocyst <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Sluijs et al., 2018), it remains uncertain whether the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> control on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of motile cells from controlled growth experiments can be translated to their cysts formed in the natural environment. In addition, potential offsets in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values between the motile cells and the cysts need to be established. This is especially important as the cell–cyst relations in carbon isotope ratios are not necessarily straightforward because bulk biomass such as cysts potentially deviates in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values from the various cell components and potentially not by a constant offset (e.g., Freeman, 2001; Hayes, 2001; Pancost and Pagani, 2006; Schouten et al., 1998; Van de Waal et al., 2013; Wilkes et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e902">We here present the first core-top data for single-species dinocysts to constrain the environmental controls on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We focus on the species <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> and compare this data, when possible, to several species of <italic>Spiniferites</italic> (<italic>S. ramosus</italic>, <italic>S. mirabilis</italic>, <italic>S. elongatus</italic>)  and <italic>Impagidinium aculeatum</italic>. The established environmental relations are subsequently evaluated using simple models converting carbon isotope fractionation in dinocysts into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the surface waters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Materials</title>
      <?pagebreak page4653?><p id="d1e966">The primary dataset is based on 34 core-top samples (Table 1, Fig. 1), collected from the North Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea, with a secondary dataset based on pre-industrial sample material spanning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0–1500 common era (CE) from ENAM9606 for the North Atlantic (Richter et al., 2009). The core-top samples encompass a substantial natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (aq) gradient because the rate of cooling of the North Atlantic Current exceeds that of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Mediterranean is close to or slightly above equilibrium with the atmosphere. Sample selection is further based on the dinocyst occurrence maps of Zonneveld et al. (2013), including only samples with an expected relative abundance of at least 10 %–20 % of the target species. Similarly, the coverage of environmental parameters such as sea surface temperature (SST), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and difference in environmental settings was maximized during sample selection. Existing ocean databases are used for obtaining the relevant environmental parameters (Table 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1036">Locations of samples with sufficient <italic>Operculodinium centrocarpum</italic> and/or <italic>Spiniferites</italic> spp for dinoflagellate cyst <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C analyses. Numbers correspond to localities listed in Table 1. Down-core data location (ENAM9606; 55.650<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 13.985<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) is marked by a gray dot (“E”) between core top nos. 2, 3 and 12.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e1088">Using standard palynological techniques (see, e.g., Brinkhuis et al., 2003), ca. 5–10 g freeze-dried sediment of the upper 1–2 cm of core material was processed for each sample. This involved dissolving carbonates and silicate components using strong acids (HCl 30 % and HF 38 %–40 %). After acid steps, residues were pH-neutralized and sieved using an ultrasonic bath and 250 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m nylon mesh sieves to remove large and small particles, respectively. Subsequently, samples were transferred to glass test tubes with demineralized water and centrifuged at 3200 rpm for 10 min to obtain an optimum concentrate of the sample material. Prior to dinocyst selection, samples were stored in 4 mL glass vials in demineralized water.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1102">Core localities, analyzed species, number of measurements and normality of the carbon isotope data. Number of measurements is given as the total number and, in parentheses, the number of  measurements used for environmental comparisons (see also results Sect. 3.4). Shapiro–Wilk (S–W) normality test on data: non-normal data distributions are indicated where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001; parentheses indicate the same for the data used for environmental comparisons. Site numbers correspond to those in Figs. 1 and 6a.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site number</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Core ID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Latitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">S–W normality</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NF2012-091</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37.977402<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.669403<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22 (21)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PE360-24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55.496231<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.800755<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24 (23)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PE360-45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55.539398<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.8453<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23 (16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NA87-02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">64.480003<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20 (14)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LCD13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">67.501282<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.069252<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25 (25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LCD10A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66.677437<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.179598<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29 (27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MedSea (MC-613)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35.8575<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.105556<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35 (35)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MedSea (MC-614)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35.8075<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.998056<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33 (32)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MedSea (MC-645)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">40.2175<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25.244167<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33 (23)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ENAM93-08bx</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59.501667<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.69<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38 (37)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. ramosus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33 (32)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ENAM94-13bx</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.249997<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.19<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">36 (33)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. elongatus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">34 (30)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. mirabilis</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13 (12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ENAM96-09bx</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57.159917<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39 (37)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. ramosus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 (29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ENAM97-04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52.410386<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">52 (50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. elongatus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23 (23)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. mirabilis</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38 (37)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Omex93-A2 bx</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.483<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 (29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. ramosus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13 (11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. elongatus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6 (6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. mirabilis</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18 (17)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PE275-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59.272369<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">34 (33)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. ramosus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">34 (30)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PE275-9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59.272369<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37 (36)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. ramosus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23 (22)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. elongatus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12 (10)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">T89-15bx</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.199372<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">36 (36)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>S. ramosus</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35 (34)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64PE428-1-1-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">47.079782<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.197305<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35 (33)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>I. aculeatum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 (29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64PE428-1-6-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.67917<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.930478<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>O. centrocarpum</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 (10)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2553">A micro-manipulator consisting of a Leica inverted microscope and a Narishige IM-9B micro-injector connected to a strung-out pipette was used to manually select individual dinocysts from a water droplet on a glass petri dish. Dinocyst selection followed a strict protocol, in which cyst morphology (primarily cyst shape and process length) was kept constant and the contribution of other organic particles was minimized. Specimens with darker coloration or amorphous organic matter adhering to the cyst or processes were avoided. In the case of <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic>, the morphological selection primarily involved selecting specimens of equal size and process length to avoid cysts that may be derived from different environments (e.g., Mertens et al., 2009). For <italic>Spiniferites</italic>, we were able to distinguish and separate three distinct morphological species in sufficient numbers: <italic>S. ramosus</italic>, <italic>S. elongatus</italic> and <italic>S. mirabilis</italic>. For all dinocyst species, the selected diameter excluding processes was in the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, except for <italic>S. mirabilis</italic> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), although constraining the exact size of each individual specimen was not feasible within the current analytical procedures. Stable carbon isotope analyses for individual samples are based on replicating the analyses of single of dinocysts, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 individual measurements being conducted to obtain a reasonably precise (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 ‰–0.4 ‰) sample average (van Roij et al., 2017). Given the size of the dinocysts used here (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m cyst diameter), three to seven specimens were required for each measurement, and hence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 cysts were required to obtain sample averages (Table 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e2643"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Dinocysts were placed on a 6 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>∅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nickel sample tray, after which an identical second tray is added on top and compressed to fixate the dinocysts. Before placement in the ablation chamber, approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of International Atomic Energy Agency CH-7 (IAEA-CH7) polyethylene standard (PE; certified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32.15 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 ‰; 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was added to the sample tray. Stable carbon isotope analyses of the dinocysts followed the procedures described in previous work (van Roij et al., 2017; Sluijs et al., 2018), utilizing the recently developed ablation–nano-combustion–gas-chromatography–isotope ratio mass spectrometry (LA/nC/GC-IRMS) method. Fragments resulting from deep-ultraviolet LA were carried using a continuous helium flow in 0.32 mm capillaries and oxidized in a combustion oven at 940 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The resultant CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was transported to a GC combustion interface, dried in a Nafion tube using a He counterflow and subsequently into a Thermo Fisher DeltaV Advantage IRMS for isotope analysis. Each analytical run included five standards with signal intensity above 4 Vs (ca. 40 ng C; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C precision better than 0.5 ‰) to allow calibrating to the Vienna Peedee Belemnite (VPDB) scale. Direct visual monitoring of the ablation process was used as initial quality assessment of each individual measurement.</p>
      <p id="d1e2732">To calculate the fractionation factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the dinocysts relative to dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) from which the dinocyst was produced, we take the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the modeled grid of Tagliabue and Bopp (2008). As many dinoflagellate species, including those that produce <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> and <italic>S. ramosus</italic> cysts, are able to utilize both HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which makes up the majority of DIC, and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for carbon fixation (Hoins et al., 2016a), we also compare the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and to overall seawater carbon partitioning.</p>
      <p id="d1e2838"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p-DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the latter the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of dissolved CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using the temperature-dependent fractionation between DIC and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mook et al., 1974). To evaluate the dominant contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C fractionation in dinocysts, we compare the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p-DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to measured and interpolated physicochemical parameters. We test a suite of parameters, [NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], [PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], [Si], alkalinity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SST and sea surface salinity (SSS), which are extracted using Ocean Data View (<uri>https://odv.awi.de/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020) from existing (gridded) datasets (Gouretski and Koltermann, 2004; Takahashi et al., 2014, 2016) (Supplement). Where possible, data are averaged over a grid of 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude and latitude around the sample position. This is both to reduce errors introduced by data scarcity and to account for potential lateral transport of dinocysts during sinking (Nooteboom et al., 2019). Carbonate chemistry is calculated using the R package seacarb (Gattuso et al., 2021), with alkalinity and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as input variables to calculate the other relevant parameters of the carbonate system: the relative contributions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (aq), HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., carbon speciation.</p>
      <p id="d1e3159">Ideally, all environmental parameters would be known for the different locations as would the time the dinoflagellates lived and encysted. This is, however, unfeasible because the dinocysts assemblage in core-top sediments (typically the upper 2 cm of sediment) integrates conditions over several centuries, assuming moderate to low average sediment accumulation rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) that generally characterize open-ocean settings such as examined here. We therefore apply a rough correction for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on the assumption that local air–sea gas exchange has remained similar, that equals the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rise between the sampling date and 1850 CE. The correction from actual measurements to “pre-industrial” conditions for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yields a substantial offset due to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 ppmv atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rise from 1850 CE to the average sampling date (ca. 2000 CE). As this correction is broadly similar for all sample localities, it has only a small impact on the overall pattern in the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data (Fig. 3). We employed a Monte Carlo simulation to assess the potential impact of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> correction by propagating (1) the 5 % analytical error in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values and adding 45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 ppm to reflect a normally distributed mixture of modern and pre-industrial conditions and (2) a resampled uncertainty derived from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2<?pagebreak page4654?></mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rise since pre-industrial times (1800–2000 CE). Both scenarios are set up to represent worst-case scenarios; a single error drawn from the error distribution is imposed on a sample basis and not a resampled average of the number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements within a sample, as that would reduce the error through averaging.</p>
      <p id="d1e3339">Changes in SST, SSS and nutrient concentrations are also expected, partly also by anthropogenic activity, but offsets in these parameters are generally subtle and more local compared to the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence would require site-specific reconstructions. Still, recent widespread eutrophication and enhanced productivity may impact the carbon isotope results through increased DIC uptake in algal blooms (i.e., counteracting the impact of enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, as eutrophication has mainly affected coastal areas (Hallegraeff, 1993; Anderson et al., 2002), this is expected to play a minor factor at our, mostly open marine, sample localities (Fig. 1). Lastly, long-term natural changes in nutrients, SSS and SST also occur, and it is currently not possible to fully filter out the various anthropogenic offsets. With the exception of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we hence assume all parameters (SST, SSS, nutrients) to have remained constant over the period the core-top samples represent.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Carbon yields from dinocyst analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e3407">Despite our pre-screening to include only samples with high relative abundances of the target species, some of the<?pagebreak page4655?> selected samples contained too few dinocysts or at too low an abundance relative to other organic particles (amorphous organic matter, plant debris, pollen, non-dinocyst marine palynomorphs etc.) to be used in our study. Ultimately, out of the initial core-top sample set of 34 samples, 19 were found suitable for species-specific dinocyst stable carbon isotope analyses (Table 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e3410">Typically, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 individual cysts were picked and analyzed for a total of 20–50 measurements, amounting to three to seven cysts per carbon isotope measurement. We calculate an average signal size of 0.2 Vs for a single cyst, which amounts to a carbon yield of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6–7 ng C per cyst (van<?pagebreak page4656?> Roij et al., 2017). Although the variability in signal intensity from individual measurements suggests there is substantial intra-sample (cyst–cyst) variability, no significant offsets in average carbon content per cyst were observed between samples, suggesting the average carbon content of the cysts within each of the analyzed populations is similar. <italic>Spiniferites mirabilis</italic> is the notable exception to this rule, as far fewer specimens of this species are needed for a single <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cyst</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement. Based on the signal intensity per specimen, we estimate that this larger cyst species contains twice the amount of C compared to <italic>S. ramosus</italic>, <italic>S. elongatus</italic> and <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Carbon isotope data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Signal intensity</title>
      <p id="d1e3475">The 949 individual core-top analyses range in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.5 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35.5 ‰ (all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C are relative to Vienna Peedee Belemnite (VPDB)), and the 137 down-core analyses range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.4 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.1 ‰. No relation was observed between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and signal size (Vs), except at the very low end (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 Vs) (Fig. 2), in line with earlier analyses (van Roij et al., 2017). In this low range, the median of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values rises from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28 ‰ below 0.1 Vs to values between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 ‰ above 0.2 Vs. In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 Vs range the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C averages of both the cysts and PE converge between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰, with substantial scatter. Poorer performance at such low C masses and signal intensities is expected, as these extremely small signal sizes and poor signal-to-noise ratio (below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) approach the limit of our method. Consequently, even a very minor contamination source would bias values and result in larger scatter, as is also apparent in the PE standard at a similar signal intensity (van Roij et al., 2017; Fig. 2). Due to a worsening signal-to-noise ratio, we find that a noticeable degree of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C biasing from a background C source within the system is likely to occur at signal intensities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Vs and is particularly pronounced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 Vs, and values for the standard and dinocysts converge around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27 ‰ in this range (Fig. 2a). A similar background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C value was also obtained after liquid nitrogen trapping (van Roij et al., 2017). The source of this C remains elusive. It is unlikely to be related to the ablation (etching) of the nickel plate or associated with the water used to pick samples from, as measured blanks for those result in much lower signal intensities and neither source would affect the measurements of the PE standard. Lastly, a significant contribution of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 ‰) appears unlikely due to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signature of the background signal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27 ‰). Though the origin of the background C remains unknown, we can use the trapping experiment to estimate the relevant background contribution (van Roij et al., 2017). We calculate the typical contribution is likely between 0.024 and 0.08 Vs, given a background C flux of 0.0008 Vs per second (van Roij et al., 2017) and a typical duration of measurements (30–50 s for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 s for PE standard).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3765">Signal intensity in volt seconds (Vs) versus carbon isotope value distribution within bins of 0.1 Vs. <bold>(a)</bold> The blue boxplots represent our new dinocyst <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and the gray boxplots represent the previously published data for the PE standard (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32.15 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 ‰; 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(b)</bold> Same as <bold>(a)</bold>. but for background-corrected values (see Sect. 3.2). The vertical black and red lines represent cut-off values for individual PE standard measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Vs; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 ng C; 0.5 ‰ precision) and individual cyst measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Vs; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 ng C), respectively. The width of each boxplot is square-root-scaled with the number of measurements in the respective bins. Note that several bins at the high end do not contain any data.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3864">Effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> corrections (see also Fig. 2 and Sect. 3.2).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3901">Before comparing our data with environmental variables, we therefore assess the impact of a very minor, but consistent, background contamination on the carbon isotope signal at low signal intensities (e.g., Fig. 2a). We find that a constant addition of ca. 0.04 Vs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 ng C) of a background C source with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27 ‰ can explain the positive skewing in the standard PE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Using a simple isotope endmember and mass balance mixing model to correct for skewing (Fig. 2b), we calculated an average deviation from the measured PE and dinocyst values for intensities below 0.2 Vs in the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The standard deviation of the data increases approximately 3-fold (Fig. 2b) compared to the raw measurement data below 0.2 Vs but remains virtually unchanged above 0.2 Vs, and the calculated deviation from the measured value is also much reduced above 0.2 Vs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3989">The data correction using our simple mixing model eliminates the skew towards <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27 ‰ at low signal intensities and removes signal size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C dependency below 0.2 Vs for both the isotopically homogeneous PE and the heterogeneous dinocyst data (Fig. 2a, b). This suggests that our method of bias correction is warranted, but the increased variability at very low intensities and lack of independent control on the exact size and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the background contamination imply that the data associated with the lowest signal intensities remain significantly less reliable. We therefore apply a conservative cut-off and use only corrected data with a signal size above 0.2 Vs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Skewed distributions and outlier omission</title>
      <p id="d1e4029">The drift-corrected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is non-normally distributed in many core-top samples and also in different species (Table 1, Fig. 4). Distributions tend to be tailed towards lower values, exaggerated by the presence of a small number of outlier values. This is not due to analytical error or otherwise directly related to low signal intensity as we used a 0.2 Vs cut-off to eliminate samples with potentially unreliable signal-to-noise ratios (see above), and a minor correction for background C addition was sufficient to eliminate skewing at low signal intensities. The absence of such signals in the down-core samples (Supplement Fig. S1) suggests that the outliers and skewing in the sampled core-top populations could represent a real signal.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4054">Carbon isotope measurements for multiple species; each panel represents a single sample after eliminating extremely small measurements sizes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 Vs), carrying out background correction and removing outliers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 interquartile range) (Sect. 3.2). Each box–whisker and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C distribution plot represents a set of measurements for a single species at their respective locality; note that tailing towards negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is common. Brackets above species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C populations indicate significant differences in means and variance for different species within a single sample.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4110">Based on typical deep-ocean sedimentation rates in the range of centimeters per kiloyear, the core-top samples are expected to contain a mixed assemblage of dinocysts produced mostly within the last centuries to millennia but could also include cysts produced during the last few decades that are likely affected by anthropogenic influences. It is particularly relevant to consider because a steep <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C decrease (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 ‰ since 1850 CE, of which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 ‰ occurs after 1950 CE) (Francey et al., 1999; Keeling et al., 2017) accompanies the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rise (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">130</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv since 1850 CE, of which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv after 1950 CE). So even if enhanced carbon isotope fractionation at higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Freeman and Hayes,<?pagebreak page4657?> 1992; Hoins et al., 2015; Brandenburg et al., 2022) did not play a role, the most recent specimens are likely to be impacted by decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4214">As age integration in the modern era may result in a mixture of cysts representing a range of environmental conditions, especially with respect to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is important to consider the potential age distribution of dinocysts before comparing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to environmental variables. In an ideal scenario, cysts produced after 1850 CE should be avoided in proxy-calibration efforts to eliminate a systematic bias towards the most recent times when atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was already elevated above pre-industrial Holocene background (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 280 ppmv). Because an accurate age correction for the Suess effect is technically unfeasible because the age distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements cannot be constrained, we illustrate the influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data treatment (Fig. 3) and use Monte Carlo simulations of different error distributions to test the potential impact of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> correction. We also compared both measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> around 1850 CE (see Sect. 2.2) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated using both our raw <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data after drift correction and removal of statistical outliers identified within the sample-specific single-species populations. This final step of data treatment removed positive and negative measurement outliers from the sample- and species-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C population (outside <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 IQR), after eliminating the extremely low-signal intensities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 Vs) and correcting for the drift induced by background C in the system.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4658?><p id="d1e4461">Altogether, out of a 949 core-top measurements, we omit 43 measurements with signals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 Vs and 24 statistical outliers, which leaves 882 individual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements: 560 for <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic>, 293 for <italic>Spiniferites</italic> (158 <italic>S. ramosus</italic>, 69 <italic>S. elongatus</italic> and 66 <italic>S. mirabilis</italic>) and 29 for <italic>I. aculeatum</italic>  (Table 1). Most of the 67 omitted measurements have comparatively low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and the resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the populations is close to statistically indistinguishable from a normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.1) or representative of a normal distribution (Table 1). Although the data treatment partly removed the negative skew on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution (Table 1), the combined effects of drift correction and outlier removal on sample and species-mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally small (Fig. 3). This is expected as drift correction averages only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 ‰, and the negative and positive outliers represent only a small percentage of the total measurements (Table 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e4592">Distinctly non-normally distributed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values were not previously observed in recent pollen and ancient dinocyst species analyzed with the same method (van Roij et al., 2016; Sluijs et al., 2018). The here presented down-core pre-industrial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a similar mean, variance and data distribution to the nearby core-top samples (Supplement  Fig. S1), suggesting that, at least for these nearby localities, the analyzed core-top specimens represent pre-industrial conditions. We find that an influence of the Suess effect and increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> impacts on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data is the most likely factor to explain the appearance of a small number of predominantly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted outliers and resulting (subtle) negative skewing of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C distributions (Fig. 4).</p>
      <p id="d1e4683">We use the background and outlier-corrected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data and compare these data with CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions prevalent around 1850 CE (Fig. 6) and explore the effects of age integration by propagating different error distributions representative of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> change since 1850 CE (Fig. 7b–d). For practical purposes, we assume all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> populations to be normally distributed for further statistical analyses. We then use the mean carbon isotope value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and signal intensity in volt seconds (Vs) of each sample. The standard error of the mean ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ‰ to 0.7 ‰ and depends primarily on the number of measurements in cases where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 30, in line with expected values based on replicate measurements of the PE standard (van Roij et al., 2017) (Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4796">Relation of standard error of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰) with the number of measurements and signal intensity (area in volt seconds (Vs)). Colors correspond to the various analyzed species.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Environmental parameters and correlation</title>
      <p id="d1e4834">The range of measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 ‰) far exceeds the variability in surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 ‰) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 ‰), implying the observed range likely reflects differences in fractionation related to changing uptake or leakage of different inorganic carbon phases (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Sharkey and Berry, 1985; Hoins et al., 2016a), and this hence determines most of the variability in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data. Here, we quantitatively assess fractionation as a function of several environmental parameters.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4968">Linear regression coefficients and significance for all samples where <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> was analyzed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as dependent variable.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coeff.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.603</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.447</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.66039</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01163</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41 263.663</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15 432.856</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.674</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0160</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.296</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">809.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7057.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.115</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.910</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0007741</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DIC (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5655.859</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6266.998</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.902</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.379</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.04572</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SST (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.16971</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06043</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.809</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0121</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3169</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SSS (psu, practical salinity unit)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6737</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3604</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.869</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0789</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1705</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.5131</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.1102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.613</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0182</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2865</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4484</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2493</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.798</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0899</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1599</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Si (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2553</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3298</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.774</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.449</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03405</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (mL L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.274</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.433</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.943</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0091</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3375</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALK (alkalinity, mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7621.253</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4712.178</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.617</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.124</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1334</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1850</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.024945</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007752</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.218</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.005050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3785</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e5638">As Table 2 but with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p-DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as dependent variable.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coeff.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.133</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.760</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.238</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.815</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00332</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19 589.987</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14 818.493</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.322</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.204</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09322</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6547.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5758.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.137</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.271</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07068</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DIC (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7803.835</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5086.841</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.534</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.143</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1216</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SST (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04959</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06068</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.817</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.425</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03781</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SSS (psu)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4043</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3201</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.263</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.224</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08579</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3993</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0318</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.181</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.254</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07581</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05666</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.22969</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.247</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.808</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.003567</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Si (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01925</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.28388</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.068</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.947</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0002703</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (mL L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.4385</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.951</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.355</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05051</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALK (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6754.843</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3956.586</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.707</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.106</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1464</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1850</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.010083</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007952</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.268</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.222</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0864</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{3}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6292">The simple (non-weighted) linear regressions show poor correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p-DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for all environmental parameters, and the correlations slightly improve when compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Tables 2, 3). However, none of the tested parameters individually explain the majority of the observed variance in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p-DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.38), despite high significance (low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values) of the regressions. The explained variance increases when polynomial regressions are applied. Several controlled growth experiments indeed show a non-linear response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the growth medium (Hoins et al., 2015), although the number of data points in such experiments limits full mathematical descriptions of the trends within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range of this field study. Here, a second-order polynomial (quadratic) regression achieves an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.74 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79 for the non-weighted and weighted versions, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e6505"><bold>(a)</bold> Sample-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> relative to pre-industrial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; numbers correspond to localities listed in Table 1. <bold>(b)</bold> Regression analyses for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (measured and corrected to pre-industrial values); the black line represents simple linear regression, the blue line represents  weighted linear regressions and the red line represents weighted quadratic regression. <bold>(c)</bold> Phosphate concentrations (PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(d)</bold> Nitrate concentrations (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(e)</bold> Fitted values illustrating the multiple-regression model performance using parameters <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> relative to measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(f)</bold> Fitted values using only pre-industrial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but applying a quadratic regression (red curve in panel <bold>b</bold>). Errors in panels <bold>(b)</bold>–<bold>(d)</bold> represent 5 % of the measured value and errors on the fitted values in panels <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold> represent propagated errors in both measurements and environmental variables (as shown in panel <bold>b</bold>–<bold>d</bold>) using Monte Carlo simulations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for regression models. Symbol size (top left corner of panel <bold>a</bold>) represents the number of measurements within each sample.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6714">Sensitivity tests on the potential effect of anthropogenic carbon emissions. <bold>(a)</bold> Effects of data treatment on the difference between measured and adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (same as Fig. 3). Open symbols indicate measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C; closed symbols represent data after eliminating small signals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 Vs) and outliers. Blue dots represent measured CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values and gray dots indicate the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> around 1850 CE. <bold>(b)</bold> Quadratic regression (red line in Fig. 6b) with propagated analytical error in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C only, using CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values around 1850 CE (gray filled symbols in panel <bold>a</bold>). <bold>(c)</bold> As in <bold>(b)</bold> but with the addition of a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 ppm error to reflect potential impact of anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in orange. Gray dots and curve of panel <bold>(b)</bold> are added as a comparison. <bold>(d)</bold> As in <bold>(b)</bold> but with the addition of a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase relative to pre-industrial values, sampled for the period 1800–2000 CE. Insets on the bottom right in panels <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show the combined error distributions imposed on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. All error bars in panels <bold>(b)</bold>–<bold>(d)</bold> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 2.5 %–97.5 % percentile ranges from Monte Carlo simulations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/4651/2023/bg-20-4651-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6967">It is conceivable that other environmental parameters also significantly contribute to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability (Fig. 6). For example, [PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], [NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribute significantly to a (linear) multiple-regression model, which takes the form of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are numerical constants. The multiple-regression model using these three parameters covers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 58 % of the variance in <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (not weighted) and 67 % when weighted to number of measurements per sample. Including more parameters, such as SST, oxygen concentrations or other carbonate system parameters, explains slightly more of the observed variance but does not significantly improve the model. The residual mean standard error (RSME) of the carbon–nitrogen–phosphorus (CNP)-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> multiple-regression model is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.45 ‰ while a linear regression with only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yields 1.7 ‰. Only weighted regressions are given here and reported ranges of the constants represent 1 standard error or equivalent percentiles in the case of Monte Carlo-simulated errors. These models have the following optimal formats: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e7179"><italic>Equation (1), linear.</italic><disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M535" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.031</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.008</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>(adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RSME <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 ‰) (Fig. 6b).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e7265"><italic>Equation (2a), quadratic (data without error propagation and only suitable for use</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">240</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>atm).</italic><?xmltex \setcounter{equation}{1}?><disp-formula id="Ch1.E2.3" content-type="subnumberedon"><label>2a</label><mml:math id="M540" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.055</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>(adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001, RSME <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.13 ‰) (Fig. 6b).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e7420"><italic>Equation (2b), quadratic (Monte Carlo-constrained errors – analytical for</italic>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>CO</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>and</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">p-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <italic>(Fig. 7b).</italic><disp-formula id="Ch1.E2.4" content-type="numbered"><label>2b</label><mml:math id="M548" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.6</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.045</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.045</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p></list-item><list-item>
      <?pagebreak page4660?><p id="d1e7576"><italic>Equation (2c), quadratic (as Eq. 2b with additional</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>ppm</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>CO</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>error) (Fig. 7c).</italic><disp-formula id="Ch1.E2.5" content-type="numbered"><label>2c</label><mml:math id="M552" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39.3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.058</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.076</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e7730"><italic>Equation (2d), quadratic (as 2b with resampled</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>CO</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>rise 1800–2000 CE) (Fig. 7d).</italic><disp-formula id="Ch1.E2.6" content-type="subnumberedoff"><label>2d</label><mml:math id="M555" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.8</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.061</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.084</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e7866"><italic>Equation (3a), multiple-regression linear (Fig. 6e).</italic><?xmltex \setcounter{equation}{2}?><disp-formula id="Ch1.E7.8" content-type="subnumberedon"><label>3a</label><mml:math id="M556" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.034</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.22</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>(adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001, RSME <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.45 ‰).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e8002"><italic>Equation (3b) adjusted for application in the paleo-domain.</italic><disp-formula id="Ch1.E7.9" content-type="subnumberedoff"><label>3b</label><mml:math id="M561" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.034</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.3</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e8085"><italic>Equation (4), multiple-regression linear.</italic><disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M562" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p-DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.025</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>(adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RSME <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.44 ‰).</p></list-item></list></p>
      <?pagebreak page4661?><p id="d1e8210">The two linear multiple-regression models are offset (Eqs. 3a and 4), primarily because of the carbon isotope fractionation between HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The slope with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> also varies slightly between the models for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p-DIC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the temperature-dependent fractionation between HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the slopes with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are indistinguishable. The quadratic regression seemingly better fits the variability observed in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to other (multiple) linear regressions and removes any structure in the residuals, potentially signaling a non-linear response in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The quadratic regression also indicates insensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">240</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm and should not be used below this value (Fig. 6b). The Monte Carlo simulations of scenarios where an additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty is imposed as a normally distributed mixture of pre-industrial and modern values, offsetting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 ppm (Fig. 7c, Eq. 2c), and a resampled uncertainty derived from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rise since pre-industrial times (Fig. 7d, Eq. 2d) shows that the parameters of the quadratic regression are fairly robust to these uncertainties (i.e., none of the parameters become insignificant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), although the absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values and errors increase.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Absolute values, comparison to marine organic matter</title>
      <p id="d1e8518">The recorded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range and absolute values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 ‰) correspond well with global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values previously reported for marine particulate organic matter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (e.g., Freeman and Hayes, 1992; Goericke and Fry, 1994) and modeled phytoplankton biomass (e.g., Magozzi et al., 2017; Tagliabue and Bopp, 2008). Consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are also within the expected range for general marine particulate organic matter. However, the intra-sample variance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> appears to be substantial, often spanning most of the full range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 ‰) observed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Some of the observed variability might be related to the limited analytical precision during measurements of the extremely small numbers of carbon of individual dinocysts. Fully constraining the contribution of this analytical uncertainty to the observed variance is, however, not possible because of unresolvable micrometer-scale heterogeneity in the PE standard (van Roij et al., 2017; Sluijs et al., 2018). In most cases, the variance in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is similar to that of the standard. Still, it is likely that some of the seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> differences are also recorded in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and that some additional inter-specimen <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C variance is present. This is to be expected since the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C populations from our integrated core-top samples span seasons and decades and thus also considerable variability in seawater properties and population change. In addition, growth-induced randomness and changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and DIC in the cell's microenvironment likely contributed to inter-specimen variability. Note that in our data inter-specimen variability is still underestimated because we analyzed three to seven specimens per ablation event, as single-cyst carbon yield (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 ng C) from these cyst-sizes approached the limit for reliable measurements (van Roij et al., 2016). We minimized potential influence of differences in cell size or shape through manual selection. We thus analyzed a population where the pre-selection of similar-sized cysts restricts the variance in cell surface area and volume, unlike biomarker-based proxies for which the cell size has to be reconstructed independently (Henderiks and Pagani, 2007; Stoll et al., 2019). This approach could reduce scatter in the relation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to environmental variables (Popp et al., 1998).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Cell–cyst offset</title>
      <p id="d1e8801">One of the striking differences between the here generated data and the existing culture experiments is that carbon isotope fractionation of dinocysts in the natural environment appears to be much larger than that of motile cells from controlled growth (dilute batch) experiments (Hoins et al., 2015, 2016b). We find average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranging between 13 ‰–20 ‰ and 23 ‰–29 ‰ with respect to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC. Cultured cells of <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> yielded not only a smaller overall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but also a smaller range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 ‰–12 ‰ and 18.5 ‰–20 ‰) across a larger CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient, implying the cysts have a much steeper fractionation slope with CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the motile cells. Despite these differences, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>Spiniferites</italic> species (<italic>S. ramosus</italic>, <italic>elongatus</italic> and  <italic>mirabilis</italic>) is often somewhat larger than for <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> (Fig. 4). This is consistent with culture experiments that showed larger CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dependency and overall slightly larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the motile species <italic>G. spinifera</italic> compared to <italic>P. reticulatum</italic>  (Hoins et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e8917">While the cultured single strains and dinoflagellate populations in nature may behave somewhat differently, we do not expect that this alone underlies such a marked offset between the motile cultured cells and natural cysts. Natural cysts and cultured cells seem consistently offset in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, although at present the exact amplitude of this offset cannot be determined. However, such an offset is in line with certain compounds in dinoflagellate cells being depleted in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C relative to the bulk biomass (Schouten et al., 1998; Wilkes et al., 2017). The organic-walled dinocysts consist of mostly aliphatic and aromatic compounds, forming a complex biopolymer referred to as dinosporin (de Leeuw et al., 2006; Versteegh et al., 2007, 2012). Depending on the biosynthetic pathway of the cyst material and the derivation or degradation of the original compounds, this may result in offsets in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values between cysts and the motile cells. A potential additional fractionation might be introduced during taphonomy and also later by the processing of sediments to concentrate the dinocysts from sediment samples. The sediment processing involves hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acids, which affects the more labile organic compounds. Last, it is conceivable that fractionation in the dilute batch experiments may be reduced by, e.g., higher-than-natural growth rates. This may be supported by chemostat culture experiments on <italic>Alexandrium tamarense</italic> (Wilkes et al., 2017), which show a (much) greater fractionation compared to the dilute batch experiments (Hoins et al., 2015). However, the enhanced fractionation recorded in chemostat experiments is likely an artifact of isotope equilibration times exceeding CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake rates  (Brandenburg et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022). The range of options cannot be narrowed down until cultured cysts are compared to their motile cells harvested<?pagebreak page4663?> from the same culture and treated with similar techniques as used for the sediments. Until these data become available, inferences on the origin and amplitude of the offsets between the cells and cysts of <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> and <italic>Spiniferites</italic> remain speculative.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Environmental controls on carbon isotope fractionation</title>
      <p id="d1e8978">Carbon isotope fractionation is determined by RuBisCO and several environmental parameters, dominantly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but also cell size and shape, growth rates, and nutrient or light regimes (e.g., Freeman and Hayes, 1992; Pagani, 2013; Popp et al., 1998; Stoll et al., 2019, and many others). In most cases, fractionation is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent, and consequently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in various groups and genera has been used as a paleo-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy (e.g., Freeman and Hayes, 1992; Pagani, 2013; Rae et al., 2021). We performed a broad-spectrum multiple-regression analysis to identify environmental factors that contribute significantly to dinocyst <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The most important parameter is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, in line with previous studies (Freeman and Hayes, 1992). A large part of the remaining variability can be attributed to growth rate and ultimately nutrient content, specifically nitrate and phosphate of the surface waters, in line with previous studies on phytoplankton and dinoflagellate carbon isotope fractionation (Popp et al., 1998; Hoins et al., 2016b; Wilkes et al., 2017; Wilkes and Pearson, 2019). We find that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are positively correlated, while NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are negatively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6c, d).</p>
      <p id="d1e9134">The inclusion of nutrient levels as environmental factors in the carbon isotope fractionation reduces the error in the fit between the measured and modeled fractionation. In<?pagebreak page4664?> the rare cases where paleo-nutrient concentrations are estimated, reconstructions usually cover only [PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], implying the [NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] in Eqs. (3a) and (4) has to be approximated from [PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]. As [PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and [NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] are generally well-correlated (typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] : [NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]; here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in ocean waters, this is relatively straightforward. For application in the paleo-domain, however, nutrient ([PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]) reconstructions may not be available or may be considered too unreliable to provide meaningful constraints. In specific cases where accurate paleo-[PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] estimates or large changes are reconstructed, Eq. (3b) may be applied, in which [NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] is substituted for [PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] at a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. However, unless there are clear changes in the nutrient regime or sufficient proxy constraints on the nutrient concentrations, we prefer a calibration based exclusively on carbon isotope fractionation and carbonate system parameters, including sea surface temperature to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to reconstruct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Influence of carbon-concentrating mechanisms: CO${}_{{2}}$ insensitivity}?><title>Influence of carbon-concentrating mechanisms: CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> insensitivity</title>
      <p id="d1e9406">As many phototrophs, including dinoflagellates, have mechanisms for concentrating CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> near the cell membrane, the sensitivity of carbon isotope fractionation to ambient CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is expected to diminish below a certain concentration (M. R. Badger, 2003; M. P. S. Badger, 2021; Stoll et al., 2019). This is particularly the case as dinoflagellates utilize type II RuBisCO, which has generally poorer performance compared to type I RuBisCO at low CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Giordano et al., 2005). Indeed, substantial activity of the carboxyl anhydrase (CA) enzyme, which facilitates the conversion of HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inside the cell or near the membrane, was observed in numerous dinoflagellate species, including <italic>Lingulodinium</italic>  (Lapointe et al., 2008), <italic>Symbiodinium</italic>  (Leggat et al., 1999) and the here analyzed <italic>Operculodinium</italic> (Ratti et al., 2007). Also, here we find a relatively low sensitivity at the lower end of the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scale. The lower CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values correspond to the northern-most locations, with trends below 240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm becoming somewhat obscured, at a minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> around 13 ‰ (Fig. 6b). However, part of this leveling of the proxy relationship may reflect the locally higher nutrient concentrations offsetting the higher CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Though growth rates have a clear influence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in algal groups (Burkhardt et al., 1999), including dinoflagellates (Wilkes et al., 2017), the dilute batch culturing experiments conducted with <italic>P. reticulatum</italic> showed no clear influence of growth rates on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see also Sect. 4.2). It is also conceivable that higher growth rates influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indirectly through, for example, seasonally enhanced CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown, resulting in higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values in the remaining DIC. This effect may be enhanced by the relatively short growing season at the high latitudes. However, in culture experiments at low CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with other dinoflagellate species, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C fractionation was higher under nutrient-limiting conditions than under replete conditions (Hoins et al., 2016b). Because of these confounding factors, the influence of carbon-concentrating mechanisms on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <italic>O. centrocarpum</italic> is difficult to gauge with the presently available data and would ideally be tested using high nutrient or very low CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4665?><p id="d1e9622"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Still, also in the relatively limited range the current ocean offers for testing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxies we have established a robust, albeit not overly sensitive, relation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and dinocyst <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Our cyst-based calibration yields more conservative and arguably more realistic absolute CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates and variability compared to available culture-based calibrations as it is based on the same compounds as will be analyzed in the paleo-domain. However, the low sensitivity at low CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> implies that, until better constraints become available, the proposed calibration is potentially less suitable for application across, for example, the Pleistocene glacial periods. Further, it is important to realize that the value of 240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm is based on the assumption that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relation originated from cysts that have not been affected by the Suess effect and thus represent a lower limit for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (in)sensitivity. While our data do not preclude fractionation smaller than the here observed minimum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 ‰) during low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> periods, increased sensitivity at higher CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> above (minimum) 240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability can be reconstructed with reasonable precision.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Challenges of age control and potential caveats associated with anthropogenic carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e9810">A topic that warrants specific attention is the potential impact of anthropogenic carbon emissions on shaping the relation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, we assume that our outlier analyses preferentially excluded samples that were significantly affected by anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and that, on average, the remainder of our core-top <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was not appreciably affected by either decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The similarity in pre-industrial down-core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DINO</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and that of three core-top localities in the North Atlantic corroborate the validity of this assumption locally, but these observations cannot be extrapolated to other regions. Unfortunately, sedimentation rates or other constraints for cyst production datums are not available. Further, if sedimentation rates were available for core-top localities, that would constitute an imperfect solution as it cannot provide the required dinocyst-specific age distribution needed to obtain an appropriate local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> correction to the datum of cyst production. This challenge may be unique to data such as those presented here, as studies on other substrates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-proxy potential either could not generate data for individual single-celled organisms or have avoided the issue through other means, such as culture experiments (e.g., Pagani et al., 2002; Henehan et al., 2013), approaches that have other drawbacks.</p>
      <p id="d1e9963">Although we have no constraints on the ages of the cysts analyzed here, we can provide a meaningful test of the potential uncertainty added by our assumption that cysts are representative of pre-industrial conditions (Eq. 2a, b). The two scenarios that we have explored through Monte Carlo simulations show that, depending on the error distribution imposed on the assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> used in the quadratic regressions (Eq. 2a, b), the fitted regression shifts towards higher values (Fig. 7c) and may be steeper (Fig. 7d). These error-propagation case studies illustrate that our proposed pre-industrial transfer function (Eq. 2a, b), if it does indeed contain a substantial proportion of very recent dinocysts, is likely to lead to underestimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and perhaps <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability when applied in the paleo-domain. Consequently, we recommend future studies target, for example, sediment trap collections and culture-derived dinocysts to validate the results obtained here.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Proxy potential, limitations and calibrations</title>
      <p id="d1e10025">Our new modern ocean single-species carbon isotope fractionation dataset shows promising trends with environmental variables, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and nutrients. The selection of individual cysts allows control of cell size and species, which reduces uncertainty in proxy calibration and application compared to approaches based on organic substrates, which inevitably integrate entire communities. Although this approach has clear benefits, it also poses a unique challenge as the impact of anthropogenic carbon emissions on individual single-celled organisms must be considered. Based on our analyses, we expect this to be a relatively minor factor. In a worst-case scenario, however, we find that, although a helpful simplification, the assumption that all dinocysts from the core-top samples represent pre-industrial conditions may lead to an underestimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and perhaps also <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability when applied as a proxy in the paleo-domain.</p>
      <p id="d1e10077">In addition, many of the challenges associated with other proxies based on organic substrates are encountered here as well. For example, like in cultures (Hoins et al., 2016b), we observed an impact of nutrients on carbon isotope fractionation, possibly related to differences in growth rates. Similarly, at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values sensitivity is reduced, possibly because of carbon-concentrating mechanisms involved in dinoflagellate C uptake, as observed in culturing experiments (e.g., Hoins et al., 2016a). Another remaining challenge is the observed difference between the cultured populations and cysts from the core-top sediments. This is a pronounced difference, not only in the absolute isotope fractionation values but also in the slope of the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity, which appears to be much larger for the cysts and requires attention in future culture studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e10105">The offset in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, combined with uncertainties in fractionation between the motile cells and dinocysts, implies that CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reconstructions using culture-based calibrations are more likely to overestimate past <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, the large spread in our data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 ‰ between high and low CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) suggests that, due to this high sensitivity in the cysts, the method is also suited to study population dynamics.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e10166">All newly generated data will be available via a permanent online repository (Mendeley data <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17632/z6285myxkm.2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17632/z6285myxkm.2</ext-link>, Frieling, 2023) upon publication.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e10172">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4651-2023-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4651-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e10181">AS and GJR designed the study. LvR, IK and JF processed samples, generated and analyzed data. JF wrote the original draft. AS and GJR reviewed and edited the paper. AS acquired funding for this study.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e10187">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e10193">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e10199">We thank Arnold van Dijk, Michiel Kienhuis and Helen de Waard (Utrecht University) for technical and analytical assistance. Appy Sluijs acknowledges funding from Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) no. ALWOP.223 and a European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator grant 771497 (SPANC). This work was carried out under the program of the Netherlands Earth System Science Centre (NESSC), financially supported by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their insightful and highly constructive comments and Steven Bouillon for editorial handling.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e10204">This research has been supported by the European Research Council, FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (SPANC (grant no. 771497)), and the Aard- en Levenswetenschappen, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (grant no. ALWOP.223).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e10210">This paper was edited by Steven Bouillon and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M., and Burkholder, J. M.: Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences, Estuaries, 25, 704–726, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02804901</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Badger, M.: The roles of carbonic anhydrases in photosynthetic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrating mechanisms, Photosynth. Res., 77, 83–94, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025821717773" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1025821717773</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Badger, M. P. S.: Alkenone isotopes show evidence of active carbon concentrating mechanisms in coccolithophores as aqueous carbon dioxide concentrations fall below 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Biogeosciences, 18, 1149–1160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1149-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-18-1149-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Barnola, J. M., Raynaud, D., Korotkevich, Y. S., and Lorius, C.: Vostok ice core provides 160,000-year record of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nature, 329, 408–414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/329408a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/329408a0</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bijl, P. K., Houben, A. J. P., Schouten, S., Bohaty, S. M., Sluijs, A., Reichart, G.-J., Damsté, J. S. S., and Brinkhuis, H.: Transient Middle Eocene Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Temperature Variations, Science, 330, 819–821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193654" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1193654</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boller, A. J., Thomas, P. J., Cavanaugh, C. M., and Scott, K. M.: Low stable carbon isotope fractionation by coccolithophore RubisCO, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 7200–7207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.031</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boller, A. J., Thomas, P. J., Cavanaugh, C. M., and Scott, K. M.: Isotopic discrimination and kinetic parameters of RubisCO from the marine bloom-forming diatom, Skeletonema costatum, Geobiology, 13, 33–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gbi.12112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brandenburg, K. M., Rost, B., Van De Waal, D. B., Hoins, M., and Sluijs, A.: Physiological control on carbon isotope fractionation in marine phytoplankton, Biogeosciences, 19, 3305–3315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3305-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-19-3305-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brinkhuis, H., Sengers, S., Sluijs, A., Warnaar, J., Williams, G. L., and Exon, N. F.: Latest Cretaceous to earliest Oligocene, and Quaternary dinoflagellates from ODP site 1172, East Tasman Plateau, in: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, scientific results, edited by: Exon, N. and Kennett, J. P., US Government Printing Office, College Station, Texas, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.189.106.2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2973/odp.proc.sr.189.106.2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Burkhardt, S., Riesebell, U., and Zondervan, I.: Effects of growth rate, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, and cell size on the stable carbon isotope fractionation in marine phytoplankton, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 63, 3729–3741, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>de Leeuw, J. W., Versteegh, G. J. M., and van Bergen, P. F.: Biomacromolecules of Algae and Plants and their Fossil Analogues, Plant Ecol., 182, 209–233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-9027-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11258-005-9027-x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eberlein, T., Van de Waal, D., Brandenburg, K., John, U., Voss, M., Achterberg, E., and Rost, B.: Interactive effects of ocean acidification and nitrogen limitation on two bloom-forming dinoflagellate species, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 543, 127–140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps11568</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Evitt, W. R.: Sporopollenin dinoflagellate cysts: their morphology and interpretation. Dallas, Texas: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation,  1–333, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., and Hubick, K. T.: Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 40, 503–537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Fensome, R. A., MacRae, R. A., Moldowan, J. M., Taylor, F. J. R., and Williams, G. L.: The early Mesozoic radiation of dinoflagellates, Paleobiology, 22, 329–338, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4667?><ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Francey, R. J., Allison, C. E., Etheridge, D. M., Trudinger, C. M., Enting, I. G., Leuenberger, M., Langenfelds, R. L., Michel, E., and Steele, L. P.: A 1000-year high precision record of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>13C in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Tellus B, 51, 170–193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-1-00005.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-1-00005.x</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Freeman, K. H.: Isotopic biogeochemistry of marine organic carbon, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 43, 579–605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.579</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Freeman, K. H. and Hayes, J. M.: Fractionation of carbon isotopes by phytoplankton and estimates of ancient CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 6, 185–198, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frieling, J.: Core-top carbon isotope measurements of dinoflagellate cysts, Mendeley Data [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17632/z6285myxkm.2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17632/z6285myxkm.2</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frieling, J. and Sluijs, A.: Towards quantitative environmental reconstructions from ancient non-analogue microfossil assemblages: Ecological preferences of Paleocene – Eocene dinoflagellates, Earth-Sci. Rev., 185, 956–973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.014</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gattuso, J. P., Epitalon, J. M., Lavigne, H., and Orr, J.: seacarb: seawater carbonate chemistry, R package version 3.3.0, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4600014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4600014</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Giordano, M., Beardall, J., and Raven, J. A.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Concentrating Mechanisms in Algae: Mechanisms, Environmental Modulation, and Evolution, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 56, 99–131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144052</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goericke, R. and Fry, B.: Variations of marine plankton <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C with latitude, temperature, and dissolved CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the world ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 8, 85–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93GB03272</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gouretski, V. V. and Koltermann, K. P.: WOCE Global Hydrographic Climatology, Berichte des Bundesamtes fur Seeschifffahrt und Hydrogr., 35, 52 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/GS51-V170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/GS51-V170</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hallegraeff, G. M.: A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase, Phycologia, 32, 79–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-32-2-79.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2216/i0031-8884-32-2-79.1</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hayes, J. M.: Fractionation of Carbon and Hydrogen Isotopes in Biosynthetic Processes, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 43, 225–277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.225" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.225</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hayes, J. M., Strauss, H., and Kaufman, A. J.: The abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in marine organic matter and isotopic fractionation in the global biogeochemical cycle of carbon during the past 800 Ma, Chem. Geol., 161, 103–125, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Head, M. J.: Modern dinoflagellate cysts and their biological affinities, Palynol. Princ. Appl., 3, 1197–1248, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Henderiks, J. and Pagani, M.: Refining ancient carbon dioxide estimates: Significance of coccolithophore cell size for alkenone-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> records, Paleoceanography, 22, PA3202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001399" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006PA001399</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Henehan, M. J., Rae, J. W. B., Foster, G. L., Erez, J., Prentice, K. C., Kucera, M., Bostock, H. C., Martínez-Botí, M. A., Milton, J. A., Wilson, P. A., Marshall, B. J., and Elliott, T.: Calibration of the boron isotope proxy in the planktonic foraminifera Globigerinoides ruber for use in palaeo-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reconstruction, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 364, 111–122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.029</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoins, M., Van de Waal, D. B., Eberlein, T., Reichart, G.-J., Rost, B., and Sluijs, A.: Stable carbon isotope fractionation of organic cyst-forming dinoflagellates: Evaluating the potential for a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 160, 267–276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.001</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoins, M., Eberlein, T., Van de Waal, D. B., Sluijs, A., Reichart, G.-J., and Rost, B.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent carbon isotope fractionation in dinoflagellates relates to their inorganic carbon fluxes, J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol., 481, 9–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jembe.2016.04.001</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoins, M., Eberlein, T., Großmann, C. H., Brandenburg, K., Reichart, G.-J., Rost, B., Sluijs, A., and Van de Waal, D. B.: Combined Effects of Ocean Acidification and Light or Nitrogen Availabilities on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C Fractionation in Marine Dinoflagellates, PLoS One, 11, e0154370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154370" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0154370</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> IPCC: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Core Writing Team, edited by: Pachauri, R. K. and Meyer, L. A., IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp., ISBN 978-92-9169-143-2, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keeling, R. F., Graven, H. D., Welp, L. R., Resplandy, L., Bi, J., Piper, S. C., Sun, Y., Bollenbacher, A. and Meijer, H. A. J.: Atmospheric evidence for a global secular increase in carbon isotopic discrimination of land photosynthesis, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 10361–10366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619240114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1619240114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Kodrans-Nsiah, M., De Lange, G. J., and Zonneveld, K. A. F.: A natural exposure experiment on short-term species-selective aerobic degradation of dinoflagellate cysts, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 152, 32–39, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lapointe, M., MacKenzie, T. D. B., and Morse, D.: An external <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-carbonic anhydrase in a free-living marine dinoflagellate may circumvent diffusion-limited carbon acquisition, Plant Physiol., 147, 1427–1436, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.117077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1104/pp.108.117077</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leggat, W., Badger, M. R., and Yellowlees, D.: Evidence for an inorganic carbon-concentrating mechanism in the symbiotic dinoflagellate <italic>Symbiodinium</italic> sp., Plant Physiol., 121, 1247–1255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.4.1247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1104/pp.121.4.1247</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Magozzi, S., Yool, A., Vander Zanden, H. B., Wunder, M. B., and Trueman, C. N.: Using ocean models to predict spatial and temporal variation in marine carbon isotopes, Ecosphere, 8, e01763, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1763" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ecs2.1763</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mertens, K. N., Ribeiro, S., Bouimetarhan, I., Caner, H., Combourieu Nebout, N., Dale, B., De Vernal, A., Ellegaard, M., Filipova, M., Godhe, A., Goubert, E., Grøsfjeld, K., Holzwarth, U., Kotthoff, U., Leroy, S. A. G., Londeix, L., Marret, F., Matsuoka, K., Mudie, P. J., Naudts, L., Peña-Manjarrez, J. L., Persson, A., Popescu, S. M., Pospelova, V., Sangiorgi, F., van der Meer, M. T. J., Vink, A., Zonneveld, K. A. F., Vercauteren, D., Vlassenbroeck, J., Louwye, S., Nebout, N. C., Dale, B., De Vernal, A., Ellegaard, M., Filipova, M., and Godhe, A.: Process length variation in cysts of a dinoflagellate, Lingulodinium machaerophorum, in surface sediments: investigating its potential as salinity proxy, Mar. Micropaleontol., 70, 54–69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2008.10.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marmicro.2008.10.004</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mook, W. G., Bommerson, J. C., and Staverman, W. H.: Carbon isotope fractionation between dissolved bicarbonate an<?pagebreak page4668?>d gaseous carbon dioxide, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 22, 169–176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(74)90078-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(74)90078-8</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Naafs, B. D. A., Castro, J. M., De Gea, G. A., Quijano, M. L., Schmidt, D. N., and Pancost, R. D.: Gradual and sustained carbon dioxide release during Aptian Oceanic Anoxic Event 1a, Nat. Geosci., 9, 135–139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2627" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2627</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nooteboom, P. D., Bijl, P. K., van Sebille, E., von der Heydt, A. S., and Dijkstra, H. A.: Transport bias by ocean currents in sedimentary microplankton assemblages: Implications for paleoceanographic reconstructions, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 34, 1178–1194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019PA003606</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pagani, M.: Biomarker-Based Inferences of Past Climate: The Alkenone <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Proxy, 2nd Edm., Elsevier Ltd.,  ISBN: 978-0-08-098300-4, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pagani, M., Freeman, K. H., Ohkouchi, N., and Caldeira, K.: Comparison of water column [CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] with sedimentary alkenone-based estimates: A test of the alkenone-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy, Paleoceanography, 17, 1069, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002PA000756" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002PA000756</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pagani, M., Liu, Z., LaRiviere, J., and Ravelo, A. C.: High Earth-system climate sensitivity determined from Pliocene carbon dioxide concentrations, Nat. Geosci., 3, 27–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo724" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo724</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pagani, M., Huber, M., Liu, Z., Bohaty, S. M., Henderiks, J., Sijp, W. P., Krishnan, S., and DeConto, R. M.: The Role of Carbon Dioxide During the Onset of Antarctic Glaciation, Science, 334, 1261–1265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203909" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1203909</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>PALAEOSENS: Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity, Nature, 491, 683–691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11574" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature11574</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pancost, R. D. and Pagani, M.: Controls on the carbon isotopic compositions of lipids in marine environments, Handb. Environ. Chem., 2, 209–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2_007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/698_2_007</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Popp, B. N., Laws, E. A., Bidigare, R. R., Dore, J. E., Hanson, K. L., and Wakeham, S. G.: Effect of Phytoplankton Cell Geometry on Carbon Isotopic Fractionation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 69–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00333-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00333-5</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rae, J. W. B., Zhang, Y. G., Liu, X., Foster, G. L., Stoll, H. M., and Whiteford, R. D. M.: Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Past 66 Million Years from Marine Archives, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 49, 599–631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-082420-063026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-earth-082420-063026</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ratti, S., Giordano, M., and Morse, D.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-concentrating mechanisms of the potentially toxic dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum (Dinophyceae, Gonyaulacales), J. Phycol., 43, 693–701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00368.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00368.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Richter, T. O., Peeters, F. J. C., and van Weering, T. C. E.: Late Holocene (0–2.4 ka BP) surface water temperature and salinity variability, Feni Drift, NE Atlantic Ocean, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 28, 1941–1955, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.04.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.04.008</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roeske, C. A. and O'Leary, M. H.: Carbon isotope effects on enzyme-catalyzed carboxylation of ribulose bisphosphate, Biochemistry, 23, 6275–6284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00320a058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/bi00320a058</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rost, B., Richter, K.-U., Riesebell, U., and Hansen, P. J.: Inorganic carbon acquisition in red tide dinoflagellates, Plant, Cell Environ., 29, 810–822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01450.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01450.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schoon, P. L., Sluijs, A., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and Schouten, S.: Stable carbon isotope patterns of marine biomarker lipids in the Arctic Ocean during Eocene Thermal Maximum 2, Paleoceanography, 26,  PA3215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010PA002028</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schouten, S., Klein Breteler, W. C., Blokker, P., Schogt, N., Rijpstra, W. I. C., Grice, K., Baas, M., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Biosynthetic effects on the stable carbon isotopic compositions of algal lipids: implications for deciphering the carbon isotopic biomarker record, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 1397–1406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00076-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00076-3</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sharkey, T. D. and Berry, J. A.: Carbon isotope fractionation of algae as influenced by an inducible CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrating mechanism, in: Inorganic carbon uptake by Aquatic Photosynthetic organisms, edited by: Lucas, W. J. and Berry, J. A.,  389–401, American Society of Plant Physiologists,  ISBN: 0 943088 05 4, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sluijs, A., van Roij, L., Frieling, J., Laks, J., and Reichart, G.-J.: Single-species dinoflagellate cyst carbon isotope ecology across the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Geology, 46, 79–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G39598.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G39598.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stoll, H. M., Guitian, J., Hernandez-Almeida, I., Mejia, L. M., Phelps, S., Polissar, P., Rosenthal, Y., Zhang, H., and Ziveri, P.: Upregulation of phytoplankton carbon concentrating mechanisms during low CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> glacial periods and implications for the phytoplankton <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 208, 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.01.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.01.012</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tagliabue, A. and Bopp, L.: Towards understanding global variability in ocean carbon-13, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB003037</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Chipman, D. W., Goddard, J. G., Ho, C., Newberger, T., Sweeney, C., and Munro, D. R.: Climatological distributions of pH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, total CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, alkalinity, and CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation in the global surface ocean, and temporal changes at selected locations, Mar. Chem., 164, 95–125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2014.06.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2014.06.004</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., and Kozyr, A.: Global Ocean Surface Water Partial Pressure of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Database: Measurements Performed During 1957–2015 (Version 2015), Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van de Waal, D. B., John, U., Ziveri, P., Reichart, G.-J., Hoins, M., Sluijs, A., and Rost, B.: Ocean Acidification Reduces Growth and Calcification in a Marine Dinoflagellate, PLoS One, 8, e65987, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0065987</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Roij, L., Sluijs, A., Laks, J. J., and Reichart, G.-J.: Stable carbon isotope analyses of ng quantities of particulate organic carbon (pollen) with laser ablation nano combustion gas chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometry, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 31, 47–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7769" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.7769</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Versteegh, G. J. M., Blokker, P., Marshall, C., and Pross, J.: Macromolecular composition of the dinoflagellate cyst Thalassiphora pelagica (Oligocene, SW Germany), Org. Geochem., 38, 1643–1656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2007.06.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2007.06.007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4669?><ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Versteegh, G. J. M., Blokker, P., Bogus, K., Harding, I. C., Lewis, J., Oltmanns, S., Rochon, A., and Zonneveld, K. A. F.: Infra red spectroscopy, flash pyrolysis, thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation (THM) in the presence of tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) of cultured and sediment-derived Lingulodinium polyedrum (Dinoflagellata) cyst walls, Org. Geochem., 43, 92–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.10.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.10.007</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wall, D. and Dale, B.: “Living fossils” in Western Atlantic plankton, Nature, 211, 1025–1026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/2111025a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/2111025a0</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wilkes, E. B. and Pearson, A.: A general model for carbon isotopes in red-lineage phytoplankton: Interplay between unidirectional processes and fractionation by RubisCO, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 265, 163–181, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.08.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2019.08.043</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wilkes, E. B., Carter, S. J., and Pearson, A.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> -dependent carbon isotope fractionation in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 212, 48–61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.05.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2017.05.037</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wilkes, E. B., Lee, R. B. Y., McClelland, H. L. O., Rickaby, R. E. M., and Pearson, A.: Carbon isotope ratios of coccolith–associated polysaccharides of Emiliania huxleyi as a function of growth rate and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, Org. Geochem., 119, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.02.006</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Williams, G. L., Brinkhuis, H., Pearce, M. A., Fensome, R. A., and Weegink, J. W.: Southern Ocean and global dinoflagellate cyst events compared: index events for the Late Cretaceous–Neogene, in Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Sci. Res.,   189,  1–98., 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Witkowski, C. R., Weijers, J. W. H., Blais, B., Schouten, S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Molecular fossils from phytoplankton reveal secular <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend over the Phanerozoic, Sci. Adv., 4, eaat4556, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4556" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aat4556</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Torres-Romero, I., and Stoll, H. M.: Re-examining extreme carbon isotope fractionation in the coccolithophore Ochrosphaera neapolitana, Nat. Commun., 13, 7606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35109-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-022-35109-4</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Zonneveld, K. A. F., Versteegh, G. J. M., and De Lange, G. J.: Preservation of organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts in different oxygen regimes: a 10,000 year natural experiment, Mar. Micropaleontol., 29, 393–405, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zonneveld, K. A. F., Marret, F., Versteegh, G. J. M., Bogus, K., Bonnet, S., Bouimetarhan, I., Crouch, E., de Vernal, A., Elshanawany, R., Edwards, L., Esper, O., Forke, S., Grøsfjeld, K., Henry, M., Holzwarth, U., Kielt, J.-F., Kim, S.-Y., Ladouceur, S., Ledu, D., Chen, L., Limoges, A., Londeix, L., Lu, S.-H., Mahmoud, M. S., Marino, G., Matsouka, K., Matthiessen, J., Mildenhal, D. C., Mudie, P., Neil, H. L., Pospelova, V., Qi, Y., Radi, T., Richerol, T., Rochon, A., Sangiorgi, F., Solignac, S., Turon, J.-L., Verleye, T., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., and Young, M.: Atlas of modern dinoflagellate cyst distribution based on 2405 data points, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 191, 1–197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.08.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.08.003</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zonneveld, K. A. F., Gray, D. D., Kuhn, G., and Versteegh, G. J. M.: Postdepositional aerobic and anaerobic particulate organic matter degradation succession reflected by dinoflagellate cysts: The Madeira Abyssal Plain revisited, Mar. Geol., 408, 87–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2018.11.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.margeo.2018.11.010</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Single-species dinoflagellate cyst carbon isotope fractionation in core-top sediments: environmental controls, CO<sub>2</sub> dependency and proxy potential</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M., and Burkholder, J. M.: Harmful algal blooms
and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences,
Estuaries, 25, 704–726, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804901</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Badger, M.: The roles of carbonic anhydrases in photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub>
concentrating mechanisms, Photosynth. Res., 77, 83–94,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025821717773" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025821717773</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Badger, M. P. S.: Alkenone isotopes show evidence of active carbon concentrating mechanisms in coccolithophores as aqueous carbon dioxide concentrations fall below 7&thinsp;µmol&thinsp;L<sup>−1</sup>, Biogeosciences, 18, 1149–1160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1149-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1149-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barnola, J. M., Raynaud, D., Korotkevich, Y. S., and Lorius, C.: Vostok ice
core provides 160,000-year record of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Nature, 329,
408–414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/329408a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/329408a0</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bijl, P. K., Houben, A. J. P., Schouten, S., Bohaty, S. M., Sluijs, A.,
Reichart, G.-J., Damsté, J. S. S., and Brinkhuis, H.: Transient Middle
Eocene Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and Temperature Variations, Science, 330,
819–821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193654" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193654</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boller, A. J., Thomas, P. J., Cavanaugh, C. M., and Scott, K. M.: Low stable
carbon isotope fractionation by coccolithophore RubisCO, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 75, 7200–7207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.031</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boller, A. J., Thomas, P. J., Cavanaugh, C. M., and Scott, K. M.: Isotopic
discrimination and kinetic parameters of RubisCO from the marine
bloom-forming diatom, Skeletonema costatum, Geobiology, 13, 33–43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12112</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brandenburg, K. M., Rost, B., Van De Waal, D. B., Hoins, M., and Sluijs, A.:
Physiological control on carbon isotope fractionation in marine
phytoplankton, Biogeosciences, 19, 3305–3315,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3305-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3305-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brinkhuis, H., Sengers, S., Sluijs, A., Warnaar, J., Williams, G. L., and
Exon, N. F.: Latest Cretaceous to earliest Oligocene, and Quaternary dinoflagellates from ODP site 1172, East Tasman
Plateau, in: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, scientific results, edited by: Exon, N. and Kennett, J. P., US
Government Printing Office, College Station, Texas, USA,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.189.106.2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.189.106.2003</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burkhardt, S., Riesebell, U., and Zondervan, I.: Effects of growth rate, CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, and cell size on the stable carbon isotope fractionation
in marine phytoplankton, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 63, 3729–3741, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
de Leeuw, J. W., Versteegh, G. J. M., and van Bergen, P. F.:
Biomacromolecules of Algae and Plants and their Fossil Analogues, Plant
Ecol., 182, 209–233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-9027-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-9027-x</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eberlein, T., Van de Waal, D., Brandenburg, K., John, U., Voss, M.,
Achterberg, E., and Rost, B.: Interactive effects of ocean acidification and
nitrogen limitation on two bloom-forming dinoflagellate species, Mar. Ecol.
Prog. Ser., 543, 127–140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11568" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11568</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Evitt, W. R.: Sporopollenin dinoflagellate cysts: their morphology and interpretation. Dallas, Texas: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation,  1–333, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., and Hubick, K. T.: Carbon Isotope
Discrimination and Photosynthesis, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol.
Biol., 40, 503–537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fensome, R. A., MacRae, R. A., Moldowan, J. M., Taylor, F. J. R., and
Williams, G. L.: The early Mesozoic radiation of dinoflagellates,
Paleobiology, 22, 329–338, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Francey, R. J., Allison, C. E., Etheridge, D. M., Trudinger, C. M., Enting,
I. G., Leuenberger, M., Langenfelds, R. L., Michel, E., and Steele, L. P.: A
1000-year high precision record of <i>δ</i>13C in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Tellus B, 51, 170–193,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-1-00005.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-1-00005.x</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Freeman, K. H.: Isotopic biogeochemistry of marine organic carbon, Rev.
Mineral. Geochem., 43, 579–605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.579" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.579</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Freeman, K. H. and Hayes, J. M.: Fractionation of carbon isotopes by
phytoplankton and estimates of ancient CO<sub>2</sub> levels, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 6, 185–198, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frieling, J.: Core-top carbon isotope measurements of dinoflagellate cysts, Mendeley Data [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.17632/z6285myxkm.2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17632/z6285myxkm.2</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frieling, J. and Sluijs, A.: Towards quantitative environmental
reconstructions from ancient non-analogue microfossil assemblages:
Ecological preferences of Paleocene – Eocene dinoflagellates, Earth-Sci.
Rev., 185, 956–973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.014</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gattuso, J. P., Epitalon, J. M., Lavigne, H., and Orr, J.: seacarb: seawater carbonate chemistry, R package version 3.3.0, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4600014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4600014</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Giordano, M., Beardall, J., and Raven, J. A.: CO<sub>2</sub> Concentrating Mechanisms in
Algae: Mechanisms, Environmental Modulation, and Evolution, Annu. Rev. Plant
Biol., 56, 99–131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144052</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goericke, R. and Fry, B.: Variations of marine plankton <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C with
latitude, temperature, and dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> in the world ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 8, 85–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03272" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03272</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gouretski, V. V. and Koltermann, K. P.: WOCE Global Hydrographic
Climatology, Berichte des Bundesamtes fur Seeschifffahrt und Hydrogr., 35, 52 pp.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/GS51-V170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/GS51-V170</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hallegraeff, G. M.: A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent
global increase, Phycologia, 32, 79–99,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-32-2-79.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-32-2-79.1</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hayes, J. M.: Fractionation of Carbon and Hydrogen Isotopes in Biosynthetic
Processes, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 43, 225–277,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.225" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.225</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hayes, J. M., Strauss, H., and Kaufman, A. J.: The abundance of <sup>13</sup>C in marine
organic matter and isotopic fractionation in the global biogeochemical cycle
of carbon during the past 800&thinsp;Ma, Chem. Geol., 161, 103–125, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Head, M. J.: Modern dinoflagellate cysts and their biological affinities,
Palynol. Princ. Appl., 3, 1197–1248, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Henderiks, J. and Pagani, M.: Refining ancient carbon dioxide estimates:
Significance of coccolithophore cell size for alkenone-based <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> records,
Paleoceanography, 22, PA3202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001399" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001399</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Henehan, M. J., Rae, J. W. B., Foster, G. L., Erez, J., Prentice, K. C.,
Kucera, M., Bostock, H. C., Martínez-Botí, M. A., Milton, J. A.,
Wilson, P. A., Marshall, B. J., and Elliott, T.: Calibration of the boron
isotope proxy in the planktonic foraminifera Globigerinoides ruber for use
in palaeo-CO<sub>2</sub> reconstruction, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 364, 111–122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.029</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoins, M., Van de Waal, D. B., Eberlein, T., Reichart, G.-J., Rost, B., and
Sluijs, A.: Stable carbon isotope fractionation of organic cyst-forming
dinoflagellates: Evaluating the potential for a CO<sub>2</sub> proxy, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 160, 267–276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.001</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoins, M., Eberlein, T., Van de Waal, D. B., Sluijs, A., Reichart, G.-J., and
Rost, B.: CO<sub>2</sub>-dependent carbon isotope fractionation in dinoflagellates
relates to their inorganic carbon fluxes, J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol., 481,
9–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.04.001</a>, 2016a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoins, M., Eberlein, T., Großmann, C. H., Brandenburg, K., Reichart,
G.-J., Rost, B., Sluijs, A., and Van de Waal, D. B.: Combined Effects of
Ocean Acidification and Light or Nitrogen Availabilities on <sup>13</sup>C
Fractionation in Marine Dinoflagellates, PLoS One, 11, e0154370,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154370" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154370</a>, 2016b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
IPCC: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups
I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, Core Writing Team, edited by: Pachauri, R. K. and Meyer, L. A., IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp., ISBN 978-92-9169-143-2, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keeling, R. F., Graven, H. D., Welp, L. R., Resplandy, L., Bi, J., Piper, S.
C., Sun, Y., Bollenbacher, A. and Meijer, H. A. J.: Atmospheric evidence for
a global secular increase in carbon isotopic discrimination of land
photosynthesis, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 10361–10366,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619240114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619240114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kodrans-Nsiah, M., De Lange, G. J., and Zonneveld, K. A. F.: A natural
exposure experiment on short-term species-selective aerobic degradation of
dinoflagellate cysts, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 152, 32–39, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lapointe, M., MacKenzie, T. D. B., and Morse, D.: An external <i>δ</i>-carbonic anhydrase in a free-living marine dinoflagellate may circumvent
diffusion-limited carbon acquisition, Plant Physiol., 147, 1427–1436,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.117077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.117077</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leggat, W., Badger, M. R., and Yellowlees, D.: Evidence for an inorganic
carbon-concentrating mechanism in the symbiotic dinoflagellate <i>Symbiodinium</i>
sp., Plant Physiol., 121, 1247–1255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.4.1247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.4.1247</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Magozzi, S., Yool, A., Vander Zanden, H. B., Wunder, M. B., and Trueman, C.
N.: Using ocean models to predict spatial and temporal variation in marine
carbon isotopes, Ecosphere, 8, e01763, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1763" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1763</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mertens, K. N., Ribeiro, S., Bouimetarhan, I., Caner, H., Combourieu Nebout,
N., Dale, B., De Vernal, A., Ellegaard, M., Filipova, M., Godhe, A.,
Goubert, E., Grøsfjeld, K., Holzwarth, U., Kotthoff, U., Leroy, S. A. G.,
Londeix, L., Marret, F., Matsuoka, K., Mudie, P. J., Naudts, L.,
Peña-Manjarrez, J. L., Persson, A., Popescu, S. M., Pospelova, V.,
Sangiorgi, F., van der Meer, M. T. J., Vink, A., Zonneveld, K. A. F.,
Vercauteren, D., Vlassenbroeck, J., Louwye, S., Nebout, N. C., Dale, B., De
Vernal, A., Ellegaard, M., Filipova, M., and Godhe, A.: Process length
variation in cysts of a dinoflagellate, Lingulodinium machaerophorum, in
surface sediments: investigating its potential as salinity proxy, Mar.
Micropaleontol., 70, 54–69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2008.10.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2008.10.004</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mook, W. G., Bommerson, J. C., and Staverman, W. H.: Carbon isotope
fractionation between dissolved bicarbonate and gaseous carbon dioxide,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 22, 169–176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(74)90078-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(74)90078-8</a>,
1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Naafs, B. D. A., Castro, J. M., De Gea, G. A., Quijano, M. L., Schmidt, D.
N., and Pancost, R. D.: Gradual and sustained carbon dioxide release during
Aptian Oceanic Anoxic Event 1a, Nat. Geosci., 9, 135–139,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2627" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2627</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nooteboom, P. D., Bijl, P. K., van Sebille, E., von der Heydt, A. S., and
Dijkstra, H. A.: Transport bias by ocean currents in sedimentary
microplankton assemblages: Implications for paleoceanographic
reconstructions, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 34, 1178–1194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003606" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003606</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pagani, M.: Biomarker-Based Inferences of Past Climate: The Alkenone <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>
Proxy, 2nd Edm., Elsevier Ltd.,  ISBN: 978-0-08-098300-4, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pagani, M., Freeman, K. H., Ohkouchi, N., and Caldeira, K.: Comparison of
water column [CO<sub>2 aq</sub>] with sedimentary alkenone-based estimates: A test
of the alkenone-CO<sub>2</sub> proxy, Paleoceanography, 17, 1069,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002PA000756" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002PA000756</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pagani, M., Liu, Z., LaRiviere, J., and Ravelo, A. C.: High Earth-system
climate sensitivity determined from Pliocene carbon dioxide concentrations,
Nat. Geosci., 3, 27–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo724" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo724</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pagani, M., Huber, M., Liu, Z., Bohaty, S. M., Henderiks, J., Sijp, W. P.,
Krishnan, S., and DeConto, R. M.: The Role of Carbon Dioxide During the Onset
of Antarctic Glaciation, Science, 334, 1261–1265,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203909" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203909</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
PALAEOSENS: Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity, Nature, 491,
683–691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11574" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11574</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pancost, R. D. and Pagani, M.: Controls on the carbon isotopic compositions
of lipids in marine environments, Handb. Environ. Chem., 2, 209–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2_007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2_007</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Popp, B. N., Laws, E. A., Bidigare, R. R., Dore, J. E., Hanson, K. L., and
Wakeham, S. G.: Effect of Phytoplankton Cell Geometry on Carbon Isotopic
Fractionation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 69–77,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00333-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00333-5</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rae, J. W. B., Zhang, Y. G., Liu, X., Foster, G. L., Stoll, H. M., and
Whiteford, R. D. M.: Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> over the Past 66 Million Years from
Marine Archives, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 49, 599–631,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-082420-063026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-082420-063026</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ratti, S., Giordano, M., and Morse, D.: CO<sub>2</sub>-concentrating mechanisms of the
potentially toxic dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum (Dinophyceae,
Gonyaulacales), J. Phycol., 43, 693–701,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00368.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00368.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Richter, T. O., Peeters, F. J. C., and van Weering, T. C. E.: Late Holocene
(0–2.4&thinsp;ka&thinsp;BP) surface water temperature and salinity variability, Feni Drift,
NE Atlantic Ocean, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 28, 1941–1955,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.04.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.04.008</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roeske, C. A. and O'Leary, M. H.: Carbon isotope effects on enzyme-catalyzed
carboxylation of ribulose bisphosphate, Biochemistry, 23, 6275–6284,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00320a058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00320a058</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rost, B., Richter, K.-U., Riesebell, U., and Hansen, P. J.: Inorganic carbon
acquisition in red tide dinoflagellates, Plant, Cell Environ., 29,
810–822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01450.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01450.x</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schoon, P. L., Sluijs, A., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and Schouten, S.:
Stable carbon isotope patterns of marine biomarker lipids in the Arctic
Ocean during Eocene Thermal Maximum 2, Paleoceanography, 26,  PA3215,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002028</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schouten, S., Klein Breteler, W. C., Blokker, P., Schogt, N., Rijpstra, W.
I. C., Grice, K., Baas, M., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Biosynthetic
effects on the stable carbon isotopic compositions of algal lipids:
implications for deciphering the carbon isotopic biomarker record, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 1397–1406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00076-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00076-3</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sharkey, T. D. and Berry, J. A.: Carbon isotope fractionation of algae as
influenced by an inducible CO<sub>2</sub> concentrating mechanism, in: Inorganic carbon
uptake by Aquatic Photosynthetic organisms, edited by: Lucas, W. J. and
Berry, J. A.,  389–401, American Society of Plant Physiologists,  ISBN: 0 943088 05 4, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sluijs, A., van Roij, L., Frieling, J., Laks, J., and Reichart, G.-J.:
Single-species dinoflagellate cyst carbon isotope ecology across the
Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Geology, 46, 79–82,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G39598.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G39598.1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stoll, H. M., Guitian, J., Hernandez-Almeida, I., Mejia, L. M., Phelps, S.,
Polissar, P., Rosenthal, Y., Zhang, H., and Ziveri, P.: Upregulation of
phytoplankton carbon concentrating mechanisms during low CO<sub>2</sub> glacial periods
and implications for the phytoplankton <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> proxy, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 208,
1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.01.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.01.012</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tagliabue, A. and Bopp, L.: Towards understanding global variability in
ocean carbon-13, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, 1–13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003037</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Chipman, D. W., Goddard, J. G., Ho, C.,
Newberger, T., Sweeney, C., and Munro, D. R.: Climatological distributions of
pH, <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, total CO<sub>2</sub>, alkalinity, and CaCO<sub>3</sub> saturation in the global surface
ocean, and temporal changes at selected locations, Mar. Chem., 164, 95–125,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2014.06.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2014.06.004</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., and Kozyr, A.: Global Ocean Surface Water
Partial Pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> Database: Measurements Performed During 1957–2015
(Version 2015), Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van de Waal, D. B., John, U., Ziveri, P., Reichart, G.-J., Hoins, M.,
Sluijs, A., and Rost, B.: Ocean Acidification Reduces Growth and
Calcification in a Marine Dinoflagellate, PLoS One, 8, e65987,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065987</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Roij, L., Sluijs, A., Laks, J. J., and Reichart, G.-J.: Stable carbon
isotope analyses of ng quantities of particulate organic carbon (pollen)
with laser ablation nano combustion gas chromatography isotope ratio mass
spectrometry, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 31, 47–58,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7769" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7769</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Versteegh, G. J. M., Blokker, P., Marshall, C., and Pross, J.: Macromolecular
composition of the dinoflagellate cyst Thalassiphora pelagica (Oligocene, SW
Germany), Org. Geochem., 38, 1643–1656,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2007.06.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2007.06.007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Versteegh, G. J. M., Blokker, P., Bogus, K., Harding, I. C., Lewis, J.,
Oltmanns, S., Rochon, A., and Zonneveld, K. A. F.: Infra red spectroscopy,
flash pyrolysis, thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation (THM) in the
presence of tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) of cultured and
sediment-derived Lingulodinium polyedrum (Dinoflagellata) cyst walls, Org.
Geochem., 43, 92–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.10.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.10.007</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wall, D. and Dale, B.: “Living fossils” in Western Atlantic plankton,
Nature, 211, 1025–1026,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/2111025a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/2111025a0</a>,
1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilkes, E. B. and Pearson, A.: A general model for carbon isotopes in
red-lineage phytoplankton: Interplay between unidirectional processes and
fractionation by RubisCO, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 265, 163–181,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.08.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.08.043</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilkes, E. B., Carter, S. J., and Pearson, A.: CO<sub>2</sub> -dependent carbon isotope
fractionation in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 212, 48–61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.05.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.05.037</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilkes, E. B., Lee, R. B. Y., McClelland, H. L. O., Rickaby, R. E. M., and
Pearson, A.: Carbon isotope ratios of coccolith–associated polysaccharides
of Emiliania huxleyi as a function of growth rate and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration,
Org. Geochem., 119, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.02.006</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Williams, G. L., Brinkhuis, H., Pearce, M. A., Fensome, R. A., and Weegink,
J. W.: Southern Ocean and global dinoflagellate cyst events compared: index
events for the Late Cretaceous–Neogene, in Proceedings of the Ocean
Drilling Program, Sci. Res.,   189,  1–98., 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Witkowski, C. R., Weijers, J. W. H., Blais, B., Schouten, S., and Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S.: Molecular fossils from phytoplankton reveal secular <i>P</i>CO<sub>2</sub>
trend over the Phanerozoic, Sci. Adv., 4, eaat4556,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4556" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4556</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, H., Torres-Romero, I., and Stoll, H. M.: Re-examining extreme carbon
isotope fractionation in the coccolithophore Ochrosphaera neapolitana, Nat.
Commun., 13, 7606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35109-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35109-4</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zonneveld, K. A. F., Versteegh, G. J. M., and De Lange, G. J.: Preservation
of organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts in different oxygen regimes: a 10,000
year natural experiment, Mar. Micropaleontol., 29, 393–405, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zonneveld, K. A. F., Marret, F., Versteegh, G. J. M., Bogus, K., Bonnet, S.,
Bouimetarhan, I., Crouch, E., de Vernal, A., Elshanawany, R., Edwards, L.,
Esper, O., Forke, S., Grøsfjeld, K., Henry, M., Holzwarth, U., Kielt,
J.-F., Kim, S.-Y., Ladouceur, S., Ledu, D., Chen, L., Limoges, A., Londeix,
L., Lu, S.-H., Mahmoud, M. S., Marino, G., Matsouka, K., Matthiessen, J.,
Mildenhal, D. C., Mudie, P., Neil, H. L., Pospelova, V., Qi, Y., Radi, T.,
Richerol, T., Rochon, A., Sangiorgi, F., Solignac, S., Turon, J.-L.,
Verleye, T., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., and Young, M.: Atlas of modern
dinoflagellate cyst distribution based on 2405 data points, Rev. Palaeobot.
Palynol., 191, 1–197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.08.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.08.003</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zonneveld, K. A. F., Gray, D. D., Kuhn, G., and Versteegh, G. J. M.:
Postdepositional aerobic and anaerobic particulate organic matter
degradation succession reflected by dinoflagellate cysts: The Madeira
Abyssal Plain revisited, Mar. Geol., 408, 87–109,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2018.11.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2018.11.010</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
