<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-20-911-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Sedimentary blue carbon dynamics based on chronosequential observations in a
tropical restored mangrove forest</article-title><alt-title>Sedimentary blue carbon dynamics based on chronosequential observations</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Sedimentary blue carbon dynamics based on chronosequential observations}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R. Ray et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>Raghab</given-names></name>
          <email>raghab.ray@gmail.com</email><email>raghab.ray@aori.u-tokyo.ac.jp</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-5225</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Suwa</surname><given-names>Rempei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Miyajima</surname><given-names>Toshihiro</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Munar</surname><given-names>Jeffrey</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Yoshikai</surname><given-names>Masaya</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-1074</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>San Diego-McGlone</surname><given-names>Maria Lourdes</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Nadaoka</surname><given-names>Kazuo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Philippines</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Raghab Ray (raghab.ray@gmail.com, raghab.ray@aori.u-tokyo.ac.jp)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>911</fpage><lpage>928</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>February</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Raghab Ray et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e157">Among the many ecosystem services provided by mangroves, the
sequestration of large amounts of organic carbon (OC) in marine ecosystems
(also known as “blue carbon”) has given these unique ecological environments
enormous global attention. While there are many studies on the blue carbon
potential of intact mangroves (i.e., naturally growing), there have been
very few studies on restored mangroves (i.e., planted). This study aims to
address this knowledge gap by examining the sediment development process
during the early colonization (rehabilitation) of mangroves in an OC-poor
estuary in Panay Island, Philippines. Based on source apportionment of
multiple end-members in the sedimentary organic matter, the contribution of
mangrove plant material was higher at the older sites compared to the
younger sites or bare sediments where there is a higher contribution of riverine
input. A clear increasing gradient according to mangrove development was
observed for bulk OC (0.06–3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), porewater OC
(292–2150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), sedimentary OC stocks (3.13–77.4 Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and OC loading per surface area (7–223 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The estimated carbon accumulation rates (6–33 mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) based
on chronosequence are within the global ranges and show an increasing
pattern with the age of mangroves. Hence, the sediments of relatively young
mangrove forests appear to be a significant potential C sink, and short-term
chronosequence-based observations can efficiently define the importance of
mangrove restoration programs as a potential carbon sequestration pathway.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page912?><p id="d1e268">The term “blue carbon” was first introduced more than a decade ago to
describe the large quantity of organic carbon (OC) present in shallow
coastal habitats like mangroves (Nellemann et al., 2009). Mangroves located
around tropical and subtropical coastal regions are known for storing
significant amounts of OC in the sediment and vegetation biomass. Out of the
typical total carbon stocks of 739 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28 Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in mangrove
ecosystems, sediment OC accounts for 73 %–79 % (down to 1 m depth), while
above- (AGB) and belowground root biomass (BGB) account for 14 %–15 % and
8 %–9 %, respectively (Alongi, 2020; Hatje et al., 2021; Walcker et al.,
2018). Mangrove sediment is the largest depository of OC, owing to their
efficiency in trapping suspended sediments and associated sedimentary
organic matter (SOM), high algal OM (benthic algae and phytoplankton), and
vascular plant-derived OM and low decomposition rates of SOM under anoxic
conditions in the sediment. A 0.5 to 3 m depth core generally represents
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 49 % to 98 % of ecosystem OC stocks (Donato et al., 2011),
and sediment depth in undisturbed mangrove forest sites can often exceed 3 m
(Elwin et al., 2019). High C sink capacity of mangroves makes them one of
the key ecosystems that have the potential to mitigate climate change by
capturing large amounts of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Howard et al., 2017).
However, there has been a rapid loss of mangroves due to land use and
deforestation that has resulted in the release of OC stored in the sediments
back into the atmosphere as CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Valiela et al., 2001). For instance,
the conversion of mangroves to aquaculture ponds, paddy fields, and
pastures, and the removal of mangrove trees have resulted in OC stocks per
unit area becoming one-eighth to half of the intact mangrove forests (Salmo et al.,
2013; Kauffman et al., 2017; Sharma et al., 2020). Therefore, the quantification
of blue C stocks and sequestration rates provides added value to mangrove
protection as an ecosystem service and serves as a useful management tool
when implementing plans for mangrove sustainability and productivity
(Sheehan et al., 2019). During the last 3 decades, several countries
have implemented mangrove rehabilitation and restoration programs
effectively to reverse mangrove forest cover loss. However, mangrove
restoration efforts such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest
Degradation (REDD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) have considered C emission loss only from aboveground
biomass (Pendleton et al., 2012). Countries like the Philippines have
started to address REDD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, loss of mangroves, and degradation of blue C
habitats through their policies and rehabilitation management plans. To
assess the effectiveness of such efforts, there should be a comparison
between the intact and restored mangrove forests in terms of sediment OC
stocks and accumulation rates. Restored mangrove forests are rarely explored
globally with some notable exceptions in the subtropical coastal regions of
China (Ren et al., 2010; Lunstrum and Chen, 2014; Wang et al., 2021) and
Vietnam (Van Hieu et al., 2017; Dung et al., 2016). In this study, an
evaluation based on a type of “natural experiment” or chronosequence (a.k.a.
“space-for-time-substitution” or SFT; Pickett, 1989) was conducted at a
relatively younger site (e.g., a mangrove ecopark in the Philippines)
wherein, to fulfill the conditions for chronosequence, all environmental and biological conditions of the experimental sites must be identical except for the age, and the species diversity must be low (Nilsson and Wilson, 1991; Walker
et al., 2010). The judicious use of chronosequential observation or SFT has
already advanced our understanding of short-term temporal dynamics of carbon
in naturally expanding mangroves (e.g., 66-year extent in Walcker et al.,
2018; 70-year extent in Kelleway et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e330">The capacity of nearshore vegetated habitats as blue carbon sink is
controlled by geophysical constraints such as sediment supply rate,
depositional conditions, and tidal elevation (Miyajima et al., 2017;
Jiménez-Arias et al., 2020). Based on chronosequential studies of
naturally occurring mangroves, OC accumulation in sediments increase with
tree age, and OC sources change spatially with mangrove development
(Lovelock et al., 2010; Marchand, 2017; Walcker et al., 2018). Most
of the OC stored in mangrove sediment changes at the spatial scale from
plant-derived OM at the interior mangrove sites to algal OM at the proximal
tidal flat (Gontharet et al., 2014; Prasad et al., 2017; Ray et al., 2018).
With the development of mangroves, higher vascular plant or mangrove-derived
OC sources may dominate the OM pool (Marchand et al., 2006). A significant
fraction of the mangrove-derived OC that has accumulated on top of the bare
sediment can be washed away to the nearshore waters by tidal action (Brown
et al., 2021; Ray et al., 2020). By considering bare sediments and old
growth mangrove stands as two extreme ends of a transect that consists of
mangroves with different ages, a systematic overview of the sedimentary blue
C dynamics can be captured for restored mangroves. The stable isotope ratio
of carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) is frequently used to evaluate the relative
contributions of end-member sources to the OM pool through mixing models with
either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N or C : N ratios (Ray and Shahraki, 2016; Sasmito et
al., 2020). The use of these biogeochemical controls on blue C dynamics has
rarely been reported for restored mangroves (e.g., <italic>Kandelia</italic>-dominated forest
reported by Van Hieu et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e358">In this study, we address the question of how chronosequential observations
in a restored mangrove forest could serve as a guide in achieving an improved
scientific understanding of C sources and stocks and could monitor the changes in
accumulation rates in the early development stage and adult stages. Here, we
hypothesize that restored mangroves increase sediment C storage in
accordance with the maturity of the vegetation. To test this, we (1) calculated the total OC (TOC), dissolved OC (DOC), and OC accumulation rate
along a chronosequence of restored mangrove forests located in the
Philippines and (2) examined how blue C varies with sedimentary geochemical
properties (OC, bulk density, specific surface area). Isotopic signatures
such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, which allows for an efficient provenance analysis
of SOM, were also examined. Additionally, particulate OC (POC) present in
the surface water was analyzed to assign different end-member sources in the
SOM pool (e.g., plant organ, riverine, and pelagic algae).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d1e387">Sampling was conducted in a planted mangrove forest, locally known as
Bakhawan Ecopark, located in Kalibo in Panay Island, central
Philippines, during the wet season (September 2018 and 2019) and dry season
(February 2019) (Fig. 1, 11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>43<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 122<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). The
Bakhawan Ecopark is the remnant area of a former deltaic mangrove at the
mouth of the Aklan River (Duncan et al., 2016). The Aklan River, which has a
drainage area of 852 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, flows into the northwestern coastal area of
Kalibo, continuously depositing sediment to form the alluvial plain down the
river. Sediments entrained by the longshore current formed sandbars, beach
ridges, and coalesced mouth bar deposits. To prevent damages by coastal
flooding, a large portion of the sea-facing mudflat was planted with 45 ha
of <italic>Rhizophora apiculata</italic> and 5 ha of <italic>Nypa fruticans</italic> in 1990 by a cooperative comprised of local families
(Kalibo Save the Mangroves Association or KASAMA). An additional 20 ha of
<italic>Rhizophora</italic> spp. were planted in 1993 (Primavera, 2004) for the purpose of<?pagebreak page913?> stabilizing
the shoreline, decreasing sedimentation offshore, and increasing fish stocks
and wood production (Department of Environment and Natural Resources or
DENR, Philippines). Insect damage to the plantation in 1997 was followed by
infilling of naturally recruited <italic>Avicennia marina</italic> and <italic>Sonneratia alba</italic>. The seafront area was replanted in
2006 with <italic>Rhizophora apiculata</italic> and subsequently recolonized naturally by <italic>A. marina and Sonneratia alba</italic> (Duncan et al.,
2016). New recruitment of both <italic>A. marina</italic> and <italic>R. apiculata</italic> took place on the mud bank in May/June 2019. The inland part of the ecopark is dominated by naturally growing
mangroves. The natural growth of mangrove trees and planting efforts since
the 1990s at the Aklan River mouth stabilized and enlarged the mangrove
forest by at least 627 % to a flourishing 121 ha today. Based on
remotely sensed data, it was found that the land area of the forest
increased by 52.4 % on average every 5 years since 1985 (Landicho et
al., 2018). The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations has
cited the Bakhawan mangroves for excellence in forest management (Cadaweng
and Aguirre, 2005).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e466">Map of the study area. Bare sediment (BS), pioneer mangrove (PM,
3 months), young mangrove (YM, 10 years), adult mangrove (AM, 20 years), and mature
mangrove (MM, 30 years). The circle shows the presence of a long-tailed sandbar between the
AM and YM site. The north-west inland part and bank of the Aklan River are
the dominant places for the naturally occurring mangroves.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e475">The tide in the Bakhawan Ecopark is semidiurnal microtidal with the highest
amplitude of around 2 m. The mangrove forest floor is fully inundated during
high tide. At the mouth of the Aklan River, water meanders along a small channel
between the sandbar and mangrove-lined coast. The climate of Aklan is
categorized as Type III (according to the Philippine Atmospheric,
Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration) with no pronounced
maximum rain period except for short dry periods of 1–3 months (December to
February or March to May). The rest of the year represents the wet season
with a total annual rainfall of 3200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 775 mm and a mean temperature of
27.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (2017–2018, JRA-55 Reanalysis).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Mangrove chronosequence</title>
      <p id="d1e502">Sediment sampling locations are different from each other in terms of
mangrove development, elevation from mean sea level, and inundation pattern.
Sediment sampling locations were categorized according to mangrove age;
these are bare sediments (BS, 0 years), pioneer mangroves (PM, 0.25 years), young
mangroves (YM, 10 years), adult mangroves (AM, 20 years), and mature mangroves (MM,
30 years). The ages of the mangroves are typically known from their plantation
period (Salmo et al., 2013). In this study, mangrove categories are partly
influenced by Fromard et al. (1998) who examined the chronosequential
sedimentary OC in naturally growing <italic>Avicennia</italic>-dominated mangroves in the French Guiana
muddy coast where PM were established on the seafront after stabilization of
mud banks or on the sandy offshore bar (height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 m), followed by
further maturation to younger stands (YM, height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 m). According to
Fromard et al. (1998), both PM and YM colonize rather unstable marine
clays/sands that are regularly flooded by tides. From the river mouth to
upstream, the stands (adult and mature) become older and taller (8–15 m,
<italic>Rhizophora</italic> spp. in French Guiana), phenomena that are linked to river dynamics rather than
tidal movement. In Bakhawan Ecopark, MM and AM sampling sites are farthest
away from the water areas, while BS and PM are closest to the sea (Fig. 1).
The center of the mangrove forest is dominated by AM, and the sea-facing edge
of the ecopark has decreasing mangrove age from MM to PM. Both BS and PM are
completely inundated during the high tide, while MM and AM are partly
inundated. There is a steep increment in elevation from seaward to landward
sampling sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.45 m; refer to Sect. 3). Seaward sites are
characterized by sandy sediments compared to silty/clay sediments at the
landward sites. <italic>Rhizophora apiculata</italic> is the dominant species at YM, AM, and MM, while mixed
mangroves (<italic>Avicennia</italic> and <italic>Rhizophora</italic> sp.) compose the PM. Between the two sites of bare sediments,
BS1, which is closer to YM, was sampled during the wet season, while BS2,
which is isolated from the mangrove sites, was sampled in the dry season,
(Fig. 1). Mean tree heights were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 3–4, 6–8, and 10–15 m for
PM, YM, AM, and MM, respectively (data not shown).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Sampling procedure</title>
      <p id="d1e563">The variables tested at each sampling site from BS to MM were sediment
thickness, coarse fraction, pH, oxidation reduction potential (ORP), bulk
density, specific surface area (SSA), concentrations and isotope ratios of
carbon and nitrogen, and porewater dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Sediment
thickness was measured at each site using a tool for cone penetration tests
(KS-159, Kansaikiki Inc.) (Yoshikai et al., 2021). Single cores were
collected at each site during low tide by manually pushing an Eijkelkamp
peat sampler (DIK-105A, 52 mm Ø, 50 cm length) into the sediment. A total
of eight cores were retrieved during the survey period with seasonal collections
obtained from BS, AM, and MM sites (dry and wet seasons, a total of six cores)
and from PM and YM sites (wet season, one core each). The GPS coordinates of
all sampling sites were recorded (Garmin MAP64s) to locate them again for
duplicate sampling in a different season. Immediately after sampling, each
core was sectioned into 2 cm intervals up to the first 10 and 5 cm
intervals beyond 10 cm depth. The total sample depths at BS, AM, and MM were
always 50 cm, while for PM and YM it was 20 and 25 cm, respectively. In situ pH
(NBS scale), temperature, and oxidation reduction potential (ORP,
Pt electrode) were recorded for each section using hand-held multiparameter
probes (HORIBA pH-conductivity sensors, WTW redox sensor). About 0.8–1 kg cores were collected from each site. Visible root material, decaying plant
matter, and dead wood were removed from the sediment sample in the field.
Within 3–4 h after collection, the sediment samples were kept in a
styrofoam box and brought to the laboratory for analysis of bulk density,
SSA, and concentrations and isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen.</p>
      <?pagebreak page914?><p id="d1e566">Additional sediment cores for porewater sampling were collected by inserting
a PVC corer manually at each site (6.5 cm inner diameter, 70 cm length). A
total of seven cores were retrieved during the study period (single core from
each site per season). Immediately after retrieval, the top and bottom ends
of the corer were closed using rubber caps. Rhizon tubes (Rhizosphere
Research Products) were inserted into the holes drilled at specified intervals
(0.5 cm interval until the first 4 cm, followed by 2 cm interval up to 10 cm,
and finally 5 cm interval up to the deepest layer). A Rhizon tube is a small
microporous polymer tube (2.5 mm diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size
of the membrane) connected to a plastic syringe (25 mL capacity) by a
standard Luer-lock connector. Around 8–10 mL of porewater was extracted in
about an hour. The salinity of the extracted porewater was measured using a
refractometer. Porewater was transferred to precombusted amber vials (20 mL) for DOC analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e587">Tidal water sampling was conducted along the salinity gradient (0 to 33) in
the Aklan River. For this study, three representative sites were chosen, the
upstream of the Aklan River and outer shore as potential end-member sources
of SOM and the river channel very close to the BS site during high tide. More
details of water sampling techniques can be found in the Supplement. A global tide prediction model (NAO.99b, Matsumoto et al., 2000)
was used to correct water depth data to the relative elevation at each site
from the mean sea level or m.s.l.</p>
      <p id="d1e590">In the laboratory, pre-weighed wet sediment subsamples were oven-dried at
60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 48 h to allow for the calculation of dry bulk density
(BD) and water content. For sediment subsampling, an open mouth plastic
syringe was used (2 cm inner diameter and 1.5 cm length). Bulk density (g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was determined as the dry sediment weight (g) divided by the
initial volume (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The rest of the wet sediment samples were
freeze-dried using a Benchtop Freeze Dry System (Labconco). The freeze-dried
samples were gently crushed using a mortar and pestle and passed through a
1 mm mesh stainless steel sieve to remove large gravel (referred to as the
coarse fraction). The sieved samples were stored in tightly capped glass
vials under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % relative humidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Chemical analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e641">The dried and homogenized sediment samples were subjected to acid treatment
to remove inorganic carbon. Approximately 1 g of dried sample was placed
into screw-capped glass tubes (10 mL), and 2.0 N hydrochloric acid (HCl)
solution was added dropwise until all the carbonate was converted to
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. After centrifugation for 15 min at 2000 rpm (g-force 760 g),
followed by washing with deionized water and decantation, the final residue
in the tube was dried at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C overnight. Once cooled, the dried
samples were weighed into a tin capsule (10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 mm), folded, and kept
temporarily in a 48-well microtiter plate until analysis.</p>
      <?pagebreak page915?><p id="d1e669"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The concentrations and isotope ratios of OC and total nitrogen (TN) in the
treated samples were determined simultaneously by EA-IRMS (FLASH 2000/Conflo
IV/DELTA V Advantage, ThermoFisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). Two
standard materials of different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N (2.5 ‰ to
5 ‰) values (SI Science Ltd., Saitama, Japan) were used
for calibration. The measured isotope ratios were presented using the
conventional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> notation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, in
permil) with Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite and atmospheric
N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as the reference materials. The instrumental analytical precision
was normally within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for the OC and TN concentrations and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N.</p>
      <p id="d1e797">Measurement of SSA of the sediment samples was performed by the multipoint
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method based on N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas adsorption under
reduced pressure (for details refer to Miyajima et al., 2017). Specific
surface area was measured only for BS, AM, and MM cores. The dried and
homogenized sediment samples were heated at 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 12 h
followed by calculation of weight loss on heating after 1 h. Between 0.5
and 2.0 g of the treated samples were weighed into glass flasks and
desiccated in vacuo at 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 3 h. Immediately after cooling,
a multipoint BET measurement was performed with N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) as the adsorbate using a BELSORP mini II (MicrotracBEL, Osaka,
Japan) surface area analyzer. The slope of the BET plot in the linear region
was used for estimating the SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Data analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e855">The results of the OC and TN concentrations and the SSA were expressed as
micromoles and square meters per unit dry weight of bulk sediment, respectively.
Carbon stocks (Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, top 50 cm, referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of each core at
the five sites were calculated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M59" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the C concentration (mass %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bulk density
(g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the sample, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm) is the length of the sample section
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as depth zero to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th). The amount of OC preserved per unit surface
area of sediment particles is referred to as OC loading (OC/SSA in micromole square meters; Mayer 1994).</p>
      <p id="d1e977">In a chronosequence study, it is common to apply a linear regression model
between mangrove age and C stocks and derive the slope, i.e., carbon
accumulation rate (CAR) (Alongi et al., 2004; Walcker et al., 2018), or
individually following the formula such as CAR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [(C stock of the stand) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (C stock of the previous stand)]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[(age of the stand) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (age of the
previous stand)] (Marchand, 2017). However, our results showed
best fit with the exponential function for the relationship
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">stock</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the constants determined from the best-fit exponential
relationship, and yr is the age of mangrove stands (years). Here we assume
that with the exponential increase of plants aboveground mass with early
mangrove growth, belowground root mass also increases, which contributes
significantly to OC accumulation with early mangrove development. However,
because the exact maturity stage of these mangroves is unknown, the typical
logistic curve equation that is otherwise used for matured forests was not
applied; instead, the best-fitted exponential trend was used. Based on the
exponential model, the slope was derived for the individual sample following
the equation
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M73" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Slope</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">or</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CAR</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dOC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Accordingly, CAR for the age class of mangroves (0.25, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and
30 years) was calculated and fitted with an exponential function following a
non-linear least square method using an <italic>nls</italic> function of the statistical software R
version 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2020). The 95 % confidence interval
for the fitted model was computed with a <italic>predFit</italic> function of an <italic>investr</italic> package. The
exponential model was compared with a simple linear regression model.</p>
      <p id="d1e1148">To evaluate the effects of sampling depth and stand types (i.e., chronology
based) on the TOC, porewater DOC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, and OC : TN
ratio of SOM, the general additive linear mixed model (GAM) was constructed
with a <italic>gam</italic> function in an R package (mgcv). Results from subsamples of each core
were used for the model (total core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8, subsamples used for analysis <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 92). Using the results of <italic>gam</italic>, ANOVA was used to evaluate the significance
of each variable with a significance level at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1206">For subsequent provenance analysis, a binary source mixing model was applied
(Parnell et al., 2010) based on the mean values of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, and C : N ratio of sediment samples from different depths
in each core. The samples obtained in different seasons were treated as
independent samples. In total, seven mean values were used for the analysis
of the Bayesian mix model using multiple R packages (RGtk2, Splancs). The
end-member sources of OM chosen for this study were the green leaf of
<italic>Rhizophora apiculata</italic>, particulate organic matter (POM) of marine and river water, and
microphytobenthos (MPB). Among these end-members except for POM, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, and OC : TN ratio for green leaf and MPB were
obtained from literature (refer to Table S1 in the Supplement). Although OC : TN values were
shown to be largely variable between green (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30) and
yellow/senescent leaves on the sediment floor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50) of
<italic>Rhizophora apiculata</italic>, their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values were the same (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (Nordhaus et al., 2017). For this similar reason the mangrove root was
also not considered; instead, the leaf singularly represented the
mangrove-derived OC source. Hence, it is reasonable for this study to choose
green leaves and avoid redundant increase of the number of end-members for
the model. Microphytobenthos located on the tidal flat between the<?pagebreak page916?> interface
of sea and land can also be variable depending on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of
dissolved inorganic carbon (photosynthesis substrate for MPB). This is
similar to the riverine settings in the French Guiana (“mixed MPB”
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, Ray et al., 2018), in contrast to the oceanic
setting in the Red Sea (“pure MPB” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, Shahraki et
al., 2014). The number of end-members was chosen carefully by keeping the
small standard deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and OC : TN within each
end-member and making sure the values are clearly separated with significant
differences from each other (ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We refrained from
considering a large number of end-members and omitted less important
end-members or treated some end-members with similar isotopic and elemental
compositions (e.g., plant parts such as leaf, root, litter) collectively.
Since there was no seagrass recorded at or around the sites, its potential
end-member contribution to the mangrove SOM was ignored. On the contrary,
although the isotopic composition of MPB and marine POM was not very
different, we selected MPB as end-member due to its visible presence on the
exposed tidal flat (BS2) during the low tide.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1359">Mangrove development with age is shown in Fig. 2a. Maximum elevation of 0.45 m from the m.s.l. was measured at MM, followed by AM and YM (0.35) and PM
(0.2) and BS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Mean porewater salinity and pH did not vary
significantly between the various stages of mangrove development, but
sediment temperature showed higher values at BS than at the vegetated sites
(Fig. 2b–d). ORP was recorded maximum at older sites (Fig. 2e). Sediment
thickness was higher in mangrove sediments (140–265 cm) than in the tidal flat
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm) (Fig. 2f). The fraction of coarse sand (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm
mesh size) tends to be higher seaward (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at BS, Fig. 2g).
Sediment bulk density at the top 50 cm increased with decreasing mangrove
age, tending to be maximum at BS (0.6 to 1.3 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 2h). Specific
surface area of the sediments varied from 9.8 to 21.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 2i, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the lowest value for the coarser bare sediment. A
consistent increment in sediment OC concentration, TOC : TN molar ratio (from
YM to MM), and porewater DOC was observed with mangrove development (Fig. 2j–l). The mean value of bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C became more negative (Fig. 2m), and the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N became more positive with mangrove age
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BS to 1.06 ‰ at AM,
figure not shown). Organic carbon (OC) stock was determined to be maximum at
the mature stand (93.5 Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and lowest at the bare sediment (3.13 Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 2n). Similar to the trend of OC stocks, OC loading varied widely
between 4 and 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2o), with mangrove sites
having higher OC loading than BS sites.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1545">Boxplot diagrams of physical and biogeochemical parameters in the
sediment subsamples according to mangrove development.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1554">Vertical profile of sediment OC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, specific surface area
(SSA) and OC loading, and porewater DOC on a seasonal basis are shown in
Figs. 3–5. Sediment surface values (0–10 cm) of porewater salinity, pH, and
ORP changed significantly with mangrove ages in both seasons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S1 in the Supplement), except for porewater salinity at the bare sediment during
the dry season. The deeper layers of each sediment core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm)
did not exhibit much variability in their properties. The minimum pH was
recorded at the top 10 cm depth of the mature mangroves in the wet season
(5.41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26). Vertical profiles of TOC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C showed
wider variations than the physicochemical properties (Fig. 3a–d). Notable
peaks for TOC were observed in mature mangroves and adult mangroves (around
20–25 cm). Total organic carbon and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in bare sediment
changed very little with depth, especially in the dry season. Significant
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molar ratios among the sediments from different depths
of MM and other sites were observed (Fig. 3e, f). At the non-vegetated sites
(BS), the ratios varied slightly with seasonal changes. The vertical profile
of SSA based on the values at three specific depths of each core showed a
mild decreasing trend from the surface to the deepest layer (50 cm) in both
dry and wet seasons (Fig. 4a, b). The depth-specific values of SSA were
always higher at the adult mangrove sites than at the other two sites (except
at 45–50 cm in the dry season). Similar to SSA, OC loading also decreased
with core depth, and mature mangroves exhibited maximum loading without
seasonality (Fig. 4c, d). All stages of mangrove development showed an
overall increase of DOC concentration with depth regardless of the seasons
(Fig. 5a, b). The DOC concentrations of deeper layers reached four to five
times higher than those of the upper sediment in the wet season and two to
three times higher in the dry season. For example, our data demonstrated a
change from 600 to around 4000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> DOC concentrations for
the adult mangrove in both the dry and wet season. A wide range in DOC of
128 to 920 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was also measured for the non-vegetated
bare sediment site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1675">Vertical profiles of sedimentary carbon properties during the wet and
dry season.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=193.47874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1686">Vertical distribution of sediment surface area and OC loading
during the wet and dry season.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1697">Vertical profiles of porewater DOC during the wet and dry season.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1706">Using the generalized additive model (GAM) as the basis, the results of
ANOVA for the main parameters showed significant dependence of TOC over
mangrove types (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Table 1). Porewater DOC varied significantly with
mangrove types (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The changes with depth as smooth term for TOC, DOC, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C based on the GAM are given in Fig. S2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1868">The significance of effects of type and depth to bulk TOC,
porewater DOC, bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
using ANOVA on the basis of the generalized additive model (GAM). In the
parameter of depth, the approximate significance of smooth term is shown.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Effect</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OC : TN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.005</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2039">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the five mangrove types were plotted with
the four end-member sources (river POM, marine POM, leaf, and MPB) to rectify
the sources of SOM (Fig. 6) and subsequently calculate the end-member
contribution to each type (Table 2, Fig. S3). Except for MPB and marine
POM, the relative contributions of mangrove leaf and river POM were
significantly different for each site (one-way ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value mangrove leaf <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value river POM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). At the bare sediments and
pioneer mangrove sites, river POM dominated the SOM pool with mean
contributions of 58 % and 43 %, respectively, whereas at the young<?pagebreak page917?> and
mature stands, mangrove leaf was the main potential contributor (53 % and
58 %, respectively). However, SOM remained more as a mixture of river POM
and leaf material (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) at the adult mangrove sites. The
contributions of benthic and pelagic algae as SOM sources were not very
significant for the entire mangrove sediment in the area studied.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2104">Contribution (%) of end-member sources to sediment organic
matter. POM: particulate organic matter, MPB: microphytobenthos, AM: adult
mangrove, MM: mature mangrove, PM: pioneer mangrove, and YM: young mangrove.
Bare sediment or BS was set as reference level. Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (mean at
95 % confidence level).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sampling site</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mangrove leaf (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Marine POM (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MPB (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">River POM (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 (45)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21 (67)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 (25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28 (92)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 (63)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 (59)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 (29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 (83)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">YM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 (77)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 (40)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 (18)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 (60)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 (64)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 (40)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 (16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 (68)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 (86)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 (31)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 (13)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 (66)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2386">Source identification of sedimentary organic matter using
end-member carbon stable isotope ratio and OC : TN.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2395">In the water part, results from three locations (upstream-channel-offshore)
showed salinity changing from 0 to 33, pH increasing from 7.6 to 8.1, and DO
(%) increasing from 89 % to 105 % to downstream (Table S2). Surface
water POC was 4–5-fold lower than the DOC in the upstream and channel water
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> versus 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and lowest in offshore water (10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-POC was highest in offshore water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰)
and lowest upstream (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Relevance of chronosequence approach</title>
      <p id="d1e2513">Several studies have relied on direct measurement of carbon accumulation
rates (CAR) by combining sedimentary C content and soil accumulation rates
estimated from radioisotopes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs, or natural markers
like volcanic ashes (Sanders et al., 2010). These CAR estimations are based
on the assumption that sediment and OC accumulation are in a steady state
during the period of accumulation/deposition. However, the “indirect way” or
the chronosequential theory assumes that the temporal variations in soil
properties in differently aged sites fall into the same time trajectory of OC
accumulation. This assumption requires a condition that these different
sites had experienced similar driving factors of OC accumulation processes
following tree growth after the restoration. While hydrological processes
such as hydroperiod and the tidal regime are considered important drivers of
OC accumulation, it is regarded that these<?pagebreak page918?> conditions do not vary largely
among the sites and have been relatively stable over the time window of
concern (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 years after restoration) given the same level of
ground elevations in the same forest. Also, given the significant fraction
of mangrove contribution to SOC (Table 2), the influence of C inputs from
external systems may not be a significant factor in shaping the OC
accumulation trajectories in the sites. Only the vegetation structures vary
significantly among sites, which may characterize the evolution of OC stocks
with forest age in our study site, the Bakhawan Ecopark (Fig. 7). In
addition, we consider that the AGB and BGB development in the sites follow a
similar trajectory given the same level of soil salinity (Fig. 2) – one of
the most important regulators of mangrove growth – and the same plantation
spacing and species. Therefore, it is reasonable to consider that the OC
accumulations in the differently aged sites also follow a similar time
trajectory, and thus Eq. (3) can be applied to estimate CAR in our study
site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2543"><bold>(a)</bold> The relationship between mangrove age (<italic>Age</italic>) and carbon stock,
where the curve was drawn based on an exponential function model in Eq. (2):
OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">171.07</mml:mn><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03558</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Age</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9873</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The gray band means 95 %
confidence interval. <bold>(b)</bold> The relationship between mangrove age and carbon
accumulation rate (CAR) on the basis of the exponential model (see Eq. 3).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=128.037402pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/20/911/2023/bg-20-911-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Sediment condition and organic matter</title>
      <p id="d1e2610">The results of dry bulk densities and granulometry (coarse fraction, SSA) of
the tidal flat and mangroves in Bakhawan Ecopark indicate that soils are
relatively homogeneous with fine-grained fractions relatively prevalent
towards mangroves at higher elevation (mainly towards AM), while
coarse-grained sands are more common on the tidal flat and younger mangroves
(BS and YM, PM) towards the shore (Fig. 2). Bulk densities (BD) at the
sampling sites (0.3–1.3 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were comparable with the reported BD
values across mangrove soils of the Indo-Pacific regions (0.20–0.92 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Donato et al., 2011), with sand fractions dominating the lower
intertidal zone. Specific surface area is primarily constrained by grain
size, and its vertical profile is presumably related to the finer upward
trend of sediment grain (Fig. 4a, c). The latter might have been a result of
the sediment-stabilizing function of mangroves or influenced by a weathering
process that transforms sand and silt fractions into clay fractions (Shen et
al., 2020). Furthermore, carbonate-bearing minerals can influence SSA more
on the tidal flat than the organic-rich mangrove sediments. Among the older
stands (MM and AM), higher SSA and sediment thickness and low BD at the
adult stands suggest the dominance of finer-grained clay material probably
because of the long-term deposition of the weathered minerals and the
narrow sandbar halfway down the ecopark (Fig. 1) that may have closed off
the older mangroves from higher wave energy and shifted the deposits of
finer grains. Total organic carbon is higher at the older sites than at the
younger ones due to fine-grained (silt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> clay) sediments that tend to have
higher TOC than coarse sands (Canfield, 1994). Fine-grained silt has larger
SSA that creates higher capacity to adsorb OM (Mayer, 1994).</p>
      <p id="d1e2644">Among the physicochemical properties, lower porewater salinity at the BS
than at the mangrove sites indicates greater dilution from the direct input of
river water, which becomes less with increasing elevation level inside the
forest floor (Fig. 2). On a temporal scale, the overall low porewater
salinity during the wet season is more likely linked to rainwater dilution
(350–450 mm in September, 75–150 mm in February; JRA-55 Reanalysis) and
elevated groundwater level. Because of the shading effect, surface sediment
temperatures at the mangrove-vegetated sites were lower than at the sun-exposed
BS or PM. The lowest recorded ORP at BS was due to reducing conditions that
prevailed through tidal water saturation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2647">It has been observed that mangrove sediments in the river-dominated estuary
accumulate a larger proportion of the mangrove-derived OM than those in the
tide-dominated estuaries/oceanic mangroves dominated by marine algae (e.g.,
Indonesian mangroves, Kusumaningtyas et al., 2019; Latin American, Gontharet
et al., 2014; Middle-East, Ray and Shahraki, 2016). In the microtidal
riverine setting of the Bakhawan Ecopark, OM input from land sources is more
dominant than marine sources at the mangrove sites (Fig. 6). The end-member
mixing model suggests that there is a clear gradient with respect to the
relative proportion of OM sources along the tidal flat–mangrove continuum
(Fig. S3).</p>
      <?pagebreak page920?><p id="d1e2650">Sediments from cores at the bare sediments and pioneering mangrove sites
show the predominance of OM probably derived from fluvial transport of
eroded organic material within the catchment. Upon transport into the
coastal area, fine sediment and POM accumulate at the calm shallow water
channel of the topographically lowest elevation zone, and consequently, the
longer inundation period facilitates sedimentation and deposition of the
suspended matter. Similar values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the surface water
POC upstream (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, Table S2) and sediment OC at the
bare sediments and pioneering mangroves (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰)
might reflect resuspended benthic algae as major sources of SOM. In a
companion study, other than the visible evidence of green algal patches, the
measured daytime CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake flux on the tidal flat contrasts with the
emission flux at the forested sites (influx at tidal flat: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, efflux at mangrove: 5–12 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Raghab Ray et al., unpublished data). The strikingly low OC : TN ratio at the surface sediments
and the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N suggest the presence of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixing
bacteria on the tidal flat during exposed tide conditions. The slightly
higher mangrove contribution to SOM in pioneering mangroves (up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 54 %) clearly indicates additional OM input from the small
growing plants along the channel.</p>
      <p id="d1e2785">At the topographically higher mangrove sites, greater contributions of
autochthonous sources (i.e., mangrove plant materials) are correlated with
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This is favored
by the relatively high bed elevation and decrease in submersion time,
promoting the retention of detrital OM on the sediment layer (shown as leaf
OM, Fig. S3). Although such evidence of greater plant input to SOM at
interior mangrove sites compared to mudflats is not new for intact forests
(Marchand et al., 2003; Sanders et al., 2010; Matos et al., 2020), this is
rare for restored mangroves considering an extended gradient from mudflat to
mangrove appearance (except in Vietnam; Van Hieu et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e2821">Terrestrial C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plants, like mangrove plant organs, have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of around
12 or higher (Prahl et al., 1980) and are N poor due to the dominance of
lignin and cellulose type of compounds. The significant positive correlation
between TOC and TN (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BS, PM, YM, and AM; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at MM, figure not shown) in the sediments indicates that the C and N in the
samples are predominantly associated with the organic pool. It is noteworthy
that such correlation is relatively poor at the mature stands. Although the
exact reason for this is unknown, the abundance of benthic animals during
another complementary experiment (burrow density at MM: 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55, YM:
70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 62, BS: 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 individual m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Raghab Ray et al., unpublished data)
might suggest intense bioturbation and sediment remobilization.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Vertical profile of organic carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e2917">The variation in OC content from the bottom to the top of sediment cores
also reflected the change in the proportion of mangrove-derived materials
and allochthonous (e.g., benthic algae) organic carbon sources in the
sediments and the mineralization of organic matter in the mangrove
sediments (Tue et al., 2011). The difference in the sediment physicochemical
and OC profile at the upper 50 cm of the layers may result from multiple
factors that promote OM decomposition, such as immediate exposure of litter
in the surface layers (e.g., managed <italic>Rhizophora</italic> in Malaysia, Ashton et al., 1999),
while coarse and fine roots contribute to carbon and nutrients at shallower
depths (reported down to 52 cm for 27-year-old planted <italic>Rhizophora</italic> in Vietnam; Arnaud et al.,
2021). Multiple mid-layer peaks of TOC are sometimes observed, which
presumably reflects the influence of root biomass (Fig. 3). This study
showed that root activity within the sediment column is essentially dominant
when comparing vegetated sites with bare sediments. Assuming a mixture of
algae (marine POM plus MPB, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and mangrove root/plant organ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) as two major end-member sources of
the sediment OM pool, provenance analysis confirms the maximum contribution
of roots at the<?pagebreak page921?> old stands (75 %–100 %) and minimum contribution at BS and
PM (52 %–72 %), corroborating the TOC peaks observed at different depths
(particularly between 10–25 cm, Fig. 3a, b). It has been shown in other
studies that root-derived carbon tends to be accumulated more efficiently as
aggregates in the SOM pool and contribute largely as a potential C source
(Xia et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e2983">Depth-wise patterns of OC were not much variable in both seasons (Fig. 3a,
b), suggesting a dominant OM source prevailing down the cores. Root exudates
like sugars and amino acids are suggested to be the main carbon source for
the localized microbes (Bouillon and Boschker 2006). As
mentioned in the previous section, bioturbation might play an important role
in carbon accumulation at the shallow sediment depth of the older stands
where maximum burrow densities were observed compared to the tidal flats and
younger mangrove sites. The role of burrowing crabs as a carbon sink has
also been reported at deeper soil layers of <italic>Avicennia</italic> stands in Kenya (40–80 cm,
Andreetta et al., 2014) where burrowing sesarmids provide a continuous
supply of fresh organic matter down the profile. In Kenya, greatest OC
concentration was measured where the crab population was maximum,
particularly at low tide when the presence of water with low oxygen
saturation covered the bottom of the burrows that avoided oxidation and
created an extension of the coastal marshes sediment–air interface favoring
greater OC (Smith et al., 1991).</p>
      <p id="d1e2989">The depth-wise relationships between sediment OC and porewater DOC are less
obvious (Figs. 3, 5). Porewater DOC varies disproportionally with OC. The
distinct feature of the vertical DOC profile is the non-uniform distribution of
concentration with mangrove age in contrast with the relatively uniform
profile at the bare sediments. Porewater DOC in non-vegetated sediments is
known to be primarily controlled by oxygen availability and the presence of
microphytobenthos that could drive porewater dynamics via OC leaching
compared to mangrove sediments. At the vegetated sites, fluorescence and
hydrophobic DOC with high molecular weights are known to drastically
increase in anoxic coastal porewaters (Komada et al., 2004; Marchand et al.,
2006). At the vegetated sites, porewater DOC showed higher concentrations
with depth that is most likely a reflection of the net effect of diagenesis,
subsurface transport, and partial control via root uptake and release. Low
surface DOC might be the reason for higher mixing and dilution with overlying
water with low DOC concentration (Table S2). Though the salinity profile is
not exactly like DOC, the salinity peaks at the subsurface depth, thereby
creating a uniform pattern followed at AM and MM. This may lead to the
hypothesis that water absorption by roots at the upper sediment may be
augmented by the presence of radial mangrove roots, leading to an increase of
salinity at some sites and gravitational percolation of salt water and DOC
to greater depths. However, unlike porewater salinity, which is lower in the
wet season than in the dry season due to rainwater dilution, DOC did not vary
seasonally in the adult mangrove and mature mangrove sites, suggesting
perennial source and retention in the sediment. Porewater profiles of
salinity and DOC in mangrove sediments are very rare in literature. One such
comprehensive dataset by Marchand et al. (2006) in the French Guiana
reported similar findings of higher DOC at greater depth with mangrove aging
but no direct correlation with other covariables. Like shown many years ago
by Marchand et al. (2006), the influence of mangrove productivity and root
activity on the DOC vertical profile may be evident also for this study;
however, detailed research is necessary to understand such relationships.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Increase of organic carbon with mangrove development</title>
      <p id="d1e3000">The average TOC concentration in the top 50 cm mangrove sediments (PM to MM)
in Bakhawan Ecopark is lower (2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than in the
Indo-Pacific regions (9.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Donato et al.,
2011) but comparable with the global mean (1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Kristensen, 2008) and other restored mangroves in SE Asia (e.g.,
2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Vietnam; Dung et al., 2016) and
China (4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Nam et al., 2016). The absence
of peat organic layer at the sampled sites and fast decomposition observed
in separate CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission measurements (benthic emission: 8 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nearly at the upper limit of global range 0.25
to 10.4 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Bouillon et al., 2008) are the possible
reasons behind such low to moderate OC in the sediments. Besides this, the
rapid flushing out of POC favored by the low-lying gentle elevation could
account for the OC-poor state of the system. Isotope evidence of POC further
indicates that it was sourced from the eroded mangrove soil composed of
litter debris (mean around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for salinity 0–25,
Table S1) coming from the upstream and mangrove sites that flush water away
via the channel to the offshore (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ at salinity
33) during ebb tide.</p>
      <p id="d1e3214">The present result shows that the development of restored mangrove forests
could improve sediment OC as indicated by a clear progression in sediment
TOC among the planted mangroves of different developmental stages leading
toward soil maturity. The accumulation of OC in the mangrove sediments may
be attributed to the increase in belowground root expansion with stand age
(Salmo et al., 2013). Because of restricted water exchange with seawater,
mature <italic>Rhizophora</italic> stands accumulate higher mangrove-derived material (leaf litter and
decomposing fine roots) than the young and pioneering stands, therefore
showing higher TOC. For the adult mangrove stands (AM), despite their
moderate biomass, oxic conditions (positive ORP) may have favored OM
decomposition in the wet season, resulting in lower TOC than at MM. Such
non-linear correlation of OC with mangrove chronosequence is in line with
other works in the restored (Lunstrum and Chen, 2014; Van Hieu et al., 2017)
and intact forests (Lovelock et al., 2010; Marchand, 2017).</p>
      <?pagebreak page922?><p id="d1e3220"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Like TOC concentration, OC stocks in sediments gradually increased with
chronosequence, which is consistent with other recent studies on mangrove
plantations (Lunstrum and Chen, 2014; Van Hieu et al., 2017; Wang et al.,
2021). Salmo et al. (2013) previously reported higher aboveground biomass
(AGB) in 17-year-old <italic>Rhizophora</italic> than in the 12-year-old stands (101.8 versus 51.4 Mg ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the Bakhawan Ecopark. Fine root production has also been found
to increase with AGB and contribute to sediment OC stocks more in mature
mangroves (Zhang et al., 2021). On a global basis, OC stocks are mostly
reported for sediment cores of 1 m depth. If the core depth is normalized to
50 cm, our results still give comparable estimates (3–77 Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
the limited assessments for the restored mangrove park (Table 3). Sediment
OC stock is largely dependent on vegetation biomass and the extent of litter
input. Salmo et al. (2013) reported that 17- and 18-year-old <italic>Rhizophora</italic> stands at the
Bakhawan Ecopark had 30 %–40 % lower AGB compared to natural mangroves
(150 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), while 50-year-old stands had similar AGB (132 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
with natural mangroves. At the Bakhawan Ecopark, OC stocks have been shown
to vary with distance to the seaward and landward edges (Kauffman et al.,
2011; Wang et al., 2013; Chatting et al., 2020) due to tidally driven
nutrient cycling, OM retention, and transport of allochthonous material.
River-dominated mangrove settings are known to transport high allochthonous
input and deposit mineral sediments that dilute OM and lower OC stocks than
marine settings where mangrove-derived OM increases carbon stocks in the
sediments (Jennerjahn, 2020). Another reason could be the sediment reworking
during restoration or plantation work that can mobilize OC at least from the
top 10 cm of the sediment. The rapid turnover may lead to a reduction in OC
stocks. From a more general perspective, sediment OC stocks depend on the
distribution of fine roots at the adult sites (Noguchi et al., 2020), and
roots generally have lower decomposition rates than leaves, favoring C
storage partly because of the composition that is relatively rich in
recalcitrant material such as suberin and lignin root-derived C (Rasse et
al., 2005).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3283">Comparative results on carbon stocks (Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
restored mangroves of known ages and organic carbon loading (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in mangroves with other marine settings.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="3cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="1cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="2.8cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="1.7cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="3.5cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Age (year)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dominant species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Soil C stock <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OC loading <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6" align="left">Philippines, Panay </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bakhawan EP <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Bare sediment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No vegetation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1–24.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4–58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pioneer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Avicennia marina</italic>, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Rhizophora</italic> spp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Young</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Rhizophora apiculata</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adult</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Rhizophora apiculata</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36.9–46.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42–148</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Rhizophora apiculata</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61.3–93.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">68–380</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Planted</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Rhizophora</italic> sp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">310–1140</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Toshihiro Miyajima <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(unpublished data)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Naturally recovered</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Avicennia rumphiana</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">57–640</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Toshihiro Miyajima <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(unpublished data)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North-central Vietnam</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Kandelia obovata</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54–84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Van Hieu et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pichavaram, India</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12–21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Rhizophora</italic> spp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41–94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Gnanamoorthy et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bhitarkanika, India</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Kandelia candel</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Bhomia et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sulawesi, Indonesia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Rhizophora apiculata</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">150–300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cameron et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Continental margin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40–80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mayer (1994)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetated marine <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>sediment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">56–67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Miyajima et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Floodplain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16–42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Goni et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3748">The increase in porewater DOC concentrations observed from the tidal flat to
pioneer mangroves and then to the older mangroves seems to reflect the
increasing pattern of bulk OC (Fig. 2j, l). Greater biomass, sediment TOC, and
porewater DOC concentration successively increased, the latter due to
greater leaching of the sizable SOM with age. A similar trend for bulk and
dissolved OC was observed in the naturally growing <italic>Avicennia</italic>-dominated mangroves in
the Amazonian coastline (Marchand et al., 2006). With the progression of
chronosequence, we may infer that the higher the biomass, the higher the
TOC and the higher the DOC concentrations in the shallow sediments.</p>
      <p id="d1e3754">Organic carbon preservation in marine sediments can be influenced by
physical factors such as the association of OC with the surface of sediment
mineral particles, also known as OC loading (Keil and Mayer, 2014).
Sediments with high SSA tend to be rich in clay, iron, and aluminum and store
greater amounts of OM than low-SSA soils due to intimate organomineral
association (Mayer, 1994). Therefore, OC loading can be considered a proxy
for blue carbon preservation and supply in the marine system, although there
has been no account of such result for mangroves worldwide. Our estimates of
OC loading for mangrove sediments and tidal flats (mean: 152 and 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are within the range of marine and coastal observations (Table 3) but are much lower than in high-altitude soils where mineral phases
are fully covered by rich OM with high OC percent (300–780 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 5 % to 10 %; Wagai et al., 2009). At the Bakhawan Ecopark, the
variability of OC loading between mangrove sediments and tidal flats can be
explained by the difference in the spatial extent of the individual sampled
sites. For example, when SSA is greater than 15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (at AM and
MM), a significant negative correlation was observed between OC and SSA
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, figure not shown), indicating
that the net accumulation rate of OC in these sites are not dependent on
mineral particles but on the mangrove-derived supply of OM. Whereas at BS
with mean SSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a quasi-significant positive
relationship between these two variables suggests the possible role of the
physical sorption of OC in the riverine sediment mineral matrices for
stabilization and sequestration of organic carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Therefore, the sediments in the mangroves do not share a common OC
sequestration mechanism as with the continental shelf and seagrass
sediments.</p>
      <p id="d1e3914">The burial of OC in the sediment strongly depends on many environmental
conditions such as mangrove forest productivity, deforestation and
degradation rate, sediment accretion, topography, tidal regime, and
bioturbation activities (Alongi, 2014; Pérez et al., 2018). Significant
exponential and/or linear increase of OC stocks with early mangrove age
(until YM) could be the result of a longer time duration since the early
colonization of plants (Fig. 7a). However, the correlation between the
standing stocks of sediment OC with aging at the adult/mature stands is
essentially not significant, indicating that the size of the sediment OC
pool at these two sites might be constrained by some biological or
geophysical factors. The rates of OC accumulation defined by their
respective slopes in the exponential curve (BS to MM) and linear curve (YM
to MM) at the individual sites of 50 cm depth (5.9–33 mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 15.93 mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, Fig. 7a, b) are
well within the ranges by chronosequential analysis of 1 m cores in restored
(12.7 mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Lunstrum and Chen, 2014), conserved (14 mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Pérez, et al., 2018), intact (6 to 40 mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Marchand, 2017), or encroaching mangroves (19 mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Kelleway et al., 2016). System-specific
variabilities such as sedimentation rate, decomposition rate, rate of
litterfall, and root production may cause such differences in CAR among the
reported mangroves. It is noted that OC percent reported for the mangrove soils
were on average 2 times higher than the<?pagebreak page923?> Bakhawan sites due to high
terrestrial inputs to this forest driven by historical land use changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e4063">Finally, it is important to highlight that the progression patterns of C
stocks and/or CAR with mangrove age are observed out of a total of seven cores
only, and the present dataset does not have enough numbers to test the
effects of many other variables to the relationship between C stocks, CAR,
and mangrove age. Such a relationship could be changed by environmental
factors such as topography, hydrodynamics, geomorphology, and biodiversity.
We also found a significant effect of soil depth on OC concentration (Table 1). However, as mentioned in Sect. 4.1, environmental variabilities like
hydrological processes do not vary largely among the sites and have been
relatively stable over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 years after restoration, and
biomass development follows a similar trajectory of soil salinity,
plantation spacing, and species richness. Therefore, the results or
conclusion of this study might not significantly change due to the lack of
replicates of sediment cores from the restored sites. Nonetheless,
acknowledging this as a limitation of the study, we further recommend that
several cores are required for drawing robust carbon and age relationships,
especially for regions where environmental variabilities can be significant
drivers of these relationships.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Implication of blue carbon chronosequence</title>
      <p id="d1e4082">There is a crucial need to improve the scientific understanding of blue C
dynamics and to develop an appropriate framework for blue C assessment and
monitoring mechanisms for future policy development. Achieving an improved
scientific understanding of C sources and stocks and monitoring the changes
in accumulation rate at the early development stage and adult stages of
mangrove stands would require practical tools and guidance to enable the
conduct of proper C analyses. In this study, the supply of OM from mangrove
vegetation, benthic algae, and upstream sediment transport are recognized as
controls of blue C at the mangrove sites and tidal flats. The impression of
more mangrove-derived C input is evident with mangrove development. Such
apportionment of OC sources at different mangrove stand ages should be
useful to improve our future knowledge on the origin of blue C in REDD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
accounting that is yet to register sedimentary OC within the reduced C
emission scheme<?pagebreak page924?> despite the sediment being recognized as the largest C pool
in the mangrove ecosystem (Duarte et al., 2013). Prior knowledge of the
sources and characteristics of OC (generally refractory or mangrove-derived
and labile or algal-derived) would be beneficial for fostering mangrove
plantation programs. Greater mangrove-derived OC accumulation with aging at
the Bakhawan Ecopark might suggest long-term storage of the refractory
fraction, hence an effective return to the REDD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> strategy.</p>
      <p id="d1e4099">Any attempt to quantify OC stocks and accumulation rates following a
plantation program should be well recorded in relevant carbon accounting
programs. For example, the Verified Carbon Standard Methodology (<uri>https://www.verra.org</uri>, last access: 2 December 2021) existing for mangrove restoration projects that are
certified under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) program of the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 2021) assumes
CAR for 0–20-year-old mangrove as 4 mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after plantation
(Lunstrum and Chen, 2014), which is 4 times lower than our chronosequence-based estimate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, linear slope for
YM to MM stands, figure not shown). For the Bakhawan Ecopark with mangrove
coverage of 121 ha, the total organic carbon stocks and accumulation rates
in the vegetated soil are estimated to be 2795–11 500 Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
72–304 Mg C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Carbon stocks in the aboveground
biomass were 2744–5499 Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the younger and adult sites
(derived from literature data by Salmo et al., 2013, using biomass to C
conversion factor of 45 % from IPCC, 2013). However, if the IPCC default
values are used to compute the total C stocks in the sediment and
aboveground biomass (386 and 92–192 Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively),
significant differences can be observed between the observed and computed
results (5009–10 454 and 46 700 Mg C ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). Considering
that the IPCC default values were derived from intact forest, while our
observed data were taken from restored sites, direct comparisons as such
have potential biases. Similar discrepancies are also present for emission
fluxes. In IPCC Tier 1, the default CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission factor from the tidal
flat was set to be 0, while for the planted/rehabilitated mangroves it was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (negative value meaning accumulation). The latter is
in line with the older mangroves at Bakhawan Ecopark but not with each
developmental stage. Such an assumption may lead to severely underestimated
actual blue carbon sink capacities of the mangroves, and consequently, carbon
emission values. Therefore, a differential yet steady trend of blue C
potential based on short-term chronosequence can help define the utility of
mangrove restoration efforts.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e4274">This study is a first attempt to apply a chronosequence (or space-for-time
substitution) approach to evaluate the distribution and accumulation rate of
carbon in a 30-year-old (maximum age) restored mangrove forest. From this
study, it is clearly seen that mangrove tree development coincided with
sediment OC concentration and accumulation, hence mangrove plantations are
expected to accelerate OC sequestration at the early plantation stage.
Source apportionment of sedimentary OM suggests higher contribution of
mangrove vegetation at higher elevations and riverine POM, as well as benthic
algae down in the tidal flat. The accumulation of OC in the sediment may be
attributed to the increases in belowground root expansion with stand age.
These chronosequence-based estimates of OC stocks and accumulation rates can
be useful references for setting up carbon accounting in
<italic>Rhizophora</italic>-dominated mangrove restoration projects.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4284">Data for this study have been deposited in a general data repository (<uri>https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22178636.v2</uri>, Ray, 2023).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4290">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-911-2023-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-911-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4299">RR designed the study and wrote first draft; RR, JM, TM, and MY sampled in the field and were involved in lab work and editing displays; RS reviewed the drafts and provided support in statistical analyses and data interpretation; TM, MLSDM, and KN provided lab support and reviewed and edited the drafts.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4305">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4311">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4317">We are grateful to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the
Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) through the Science and Technology
Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) program  for
financially supporting the project Comprehensive Assessment and
Conservation of Blue Carbon Ecosystems and their Services in the Coral
Triangle (Blue CARES). We thank Jesus Abad, John Michael Aguilar, Dominic Bautista, Bryan C. Hernandez, and Tsuyoshi Kanda for their assistance
during field surveys. We are grateful for the overall support given to the
project by the
University of the Philippines, Diliman, and Aklan State University. We are thankful to our Blue CARES colleague Charissa Ferrera for
the support in language edits. Finally, authors sincerely thank AE (Jack Middelburg) and the reviewers for their constructive<?pagebreak page925?> comments that have
greatly improved the revised version of the manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4322">This research has been supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency and the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (Comprehensive Assessment and Conservation of Blue Carbon Ecosystems and their Services in the Coral Triangle (grant no. Blue CARES)).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4329">This paper was edited by Jack Middelburg and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alongi, D. M.: Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests, Annu. Rev. Mar.
Sci., 6, 195–219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alongi, D. M.: Global Significance of Mangrove Blue Carbon in Climate Change
Mitigation, Sci, 2, 67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/sci2030067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/sci2030067</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alongi, D. M., Sasekumar, A., Chong, V. C., Pfitzner, J., Trott, L. A.,
Tirendi, F., Dixon, P., and Brunskill, G. J.: Sediment accumulation and
organic material flux in a managed mangrove ecosystem: estimates of
land–ocean–atmosphere exchange in peninsular Malaysia, Mar. Geol., 208,
383–402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2004.04.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.margeo.2004.04.016</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andreetta, A., Fusi, M., Cameldi, I., Cimò, F., Carnicelli, S., and
Cannicci, S.: Mangrove carbon sink, Do burrowing crabs contribute to
sediment carbon storage? Evidence from a Kenyan mangrove system, J. Sea
Res., 85, 524–533, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2013.08.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.seares.2013.08.010</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arnaud, M., Morris, P. J., and Baird, A. J.: Fine root production in a
chronosequence of mature reforested mangroves, New Phytol., 232, 1591–1602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17480" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.17480</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ashton, E. C., Hogarth, P. J., and Ormond, R.: Breakdown of mangrove leaf
litter in a managed mangrove forest in Peninsular Malaysia, Hydrobiologia,
413, 77–88, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bhomia, R. K., MacKenzie, R. A., Murdiyarso, D., Sasmito, S. D., and
Purbopuspito, J.: Impacts of land use on Indian mangrove forest carbon
stocks: implications for conservation and management, Ecol. Appl., 26,
1396e1408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/15-2143" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/15-2143</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bouillon, S. and Boschker, H. T. S.: Bacterial carbon sources in coastal sediments: a cross-system analysis based on stable isotope data of biomarkers, Biogeosciences, 3, 175–185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-175-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-3-175-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bouillon, S., Borges, A. V., Castañeda-Moya, E., Diele, K., Dittmar, T.,
Duke, N. C., Kristensen, E., Lee, S. Y., Marchand, C., Middelburg, J. J.,
Rivera-Monray, V. H., Smith III, T. J., and Twilley, R. R.: Mangrove production and
carbon sinks: a revision of global budget estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
22, GB2013,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB003052</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brown, D. R., Marotta, H., Peixoto, R. B., Enrich-Prast, A., Barroso, G. C., Soares, M. L. G., Machado, W., Pérez, A., Smoak, J. M., Sanders, L. M., Conrad, S., Sippo, J. Z., Santos, I. R., Maher, D. T., and Sanders, C. J.: Hypersaline tidal flats as important “blue carbon” systems: a case study from three ecosystems, Biogeosciences, 18, 2527–2538, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2527-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-18-2527-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cadaweng, E. A. and Aguirre, J. A. N.: Forest from the mud: the Kalibo
experience, in: In Search of Excellence: Exemplary Forest Management in Asia
and the Pacific, edited by: Durst, P. B., Brown, C., Tacio, H. D., and
Ishikawa,  M., Bangkok, Thailand, FAO, 39–48, ISBN 974-7946-68-8, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cameron, C., Hutley, L. B., Friess, D. A., and Brown, B.: Community structure
dynamics and carbon stock change of rehabilitated mangrove forests in
Sulawesi, Indonesia, Ecol. Appl., 29, e01810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/eap.1810</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canfield, D. E.: Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine
sediments, Chem. Geol., 114, 315–329,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)90061-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0009-2541(94)90061-2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chatting, M., LeVay, L., Walton, M., Skov, M. W., Kennedy, H., Wilson, S.,
and Al-Maslamani, I.: Mangrove carbon stocks and biomass partitioning in an
extreme environment, Estuar. Coast. Shelf. S., 244, 106940,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106940" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106940</ext-link>, 2020</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donato, D. C, Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto, S., Stidham, M., and
Kanninen, M.: Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics,
Nat. Geosci., 4, 293–297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1123</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dung, L. V., Tue, N. T., Nhuan, M. T., and Omori, K.: Carbon storage in a
restored Mangrove forest in Can Gio Mangrove Forest Park, Mekong Delta,
Vietnam, Forest Ecol. Manag., 380, 31–40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.032</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duarte, C. M., Losada, I. J., Hendriks, I. E., Mazarrasa, I., and Marbà,
N.: The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and
adaptation, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 961–968, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1970" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1970</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duncan, C., Primavera, J. H., Pettorelli, N., Thompson, J. R., Loma, R. J. A.,
and Koldewey, H. J.: Rehabilitating mangrove ecosystem services: A case study
on the relative benefits of abandoned pond reversion from Panay Island,
Philippines, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 109, 772–782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.049</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Elwin, A., Bukoski, J. J., Jintana, V., Robinson, E. J., and Clark, J. M.:
Preservation and recovery of mangrove ecosystem carbon stocks in abandoned
shrimp ponds, Sci. Rep., 9, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54893-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-54893-6</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fromard, F., Puig, H., Mougin, E., Marty, G., Betoulle, J. L., and Cadamuro, L.:
Structure, above-ground biomass and dynamics of mangrove ecosystems: new
data from French Guiana, Oecologia, 115, 39–53,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050489" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s004420050489</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gnanamoorthy, P., Selvam, V., Ramasubramanian, R., Chakraborty, S., Pramit,
D., and Karipot, A.: Soil organic carbon stock in natural and restored
mangrove forests in Pichavaram south-east coast of India, Indian J. Geo-Mar.
Sci., 48, 801–808, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gontharet, S., Mathieu, O., Lévêque, J., Milloux, M. J., Lesourd, S.,
Philippe, S., Caillaud, J., Gardel, A., Sarrazin, M., and Proisy, C.:
Distribution and sources of bulk organic matter (OM) on a tropical
intertidal mud bank in French Guiana from elemental and isotopic proxies,
Chem. Geol., 376, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.03.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.03.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goni, M. A., Moore, E., Kurtz, A., Portier, E., Alleau, Y., and Merrell, D.:
Organic matter compositions and loadings in soils and sediments along the
Fly River, Papu<?pagebreak page926?>a New Guinea, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 140, 275–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.034</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hatje, V., Masqué, P., Patire, V. F., Dórea, A., and Barros, F.: Blue
carbon stocks, accumulation rates, and associated spatial variability in
Brazilian mangroves, Limnol. Oceanogr., 66,  321–334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.11607</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Howard, J., Sutton-Grier, A., Herr, D., Kleypas, J., Landis, E., Mcleod, E.,
Pidgeon, E., and Simpson, S.: Clarifying the role of coastal and marine
systems in climate mitigation, Front. Ecol. Environ., 15, 42–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/fee.1451</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jennarjahn, T. C.: Relevance and magnitude of “Blue Carbon” storage in
mangrove sediments: Carbon accumulation rates vs. stocks, sources vs. sinks,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 247, 107027, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107027</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiménez-Arias, J. L., Morris, E., Rubio-de-Inglés, M. J., Peralta, G.,
García-Robledo, E., Corzo, A., and Papaspyrou, S.: Tidal elevation is
the key factor modulating burial rates and composition of organic matter in
a coastal wetland with multiple habitats, Sci. Total Environ.,
724, 138205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138205</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kauffman, J., Arifanti, V. B., Hernandez Trejo, H., del Carmen Jesús
García, M., Norfolk, J., Cifuentes, M., Hadriyanto, D., and Murdiyarso,
D.: The jumbo carbon footprint of a shrimp: carbon losses from mangrove
deforestation, Front. Ecol. Environ., 15, 183–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1482" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/fee.1482</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kauffman, J., Heider, C., Cole, T. G., Dwire, K. A., and Donato, D. C.:
Ecosystem carbon stocks of Micronesian mangrove forests, Wetlands, 31,
343–352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0148-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13157-011-0148-9</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kelleway, J. J., Saintilan, N., Macreadie, P. I., Skilbeck, C. G., Zawadzki, A.,
and Ralph, P. J.: Seventy years of continuous encroachment substantially
increases “blue carbon” capacity as mangroves replace intertidal salt
marshes, Glob. Change Biol., 22, 1097–1109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13158" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.13158</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keil, R. G. and Mayer, L. M.: Mineral matrices and organic matter, in:
Treatise on Geochemistry: Organic Geochemistry, 2nd Edn., Vol. 12, edited
by: Falkowski, P. G., Freeman, K. H., Holland, H., and Turekian, K., Elsevier,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 337–359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01024-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01024-X</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Komada, T., Reimers, C. E., Luther III, G. W., and Burdige, D. J.: Factors
affecting dissolved organic matter dynamics in mixed-redox to anoxic coastal
sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 68, 4099–4111, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kristensen, E.: Mangrove crabs as ecosystem engineers; with emphasis on
sediment processes, J. Sea Res., 59, 30–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2007.05.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.seares.2007.05.004</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kusumaningtyas, M. A., Hutahaeanc, A. A., Fischerd, H. W., Pérez-Mayod, M.,
Ransby, D., and Jennerjahn, T. C.: Variability in the organic carbon stocks,
sources, and accumulation rates of Indonesian mangrove ecosystems, Estuar.
Coast. Shelf S., 218, 310–323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.12.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2018.12.007</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Landicho, K. P., Blanco, A. C., Francisco, R. R., and Gatdula, N.: Google earth
engine-based assessment of expansion of Bakhawan Eco-Park using vegetation
and water indices derived from LANDSAT images, Proceedings Asian Conference
on Remote Sensing, 15–19 October 2018, Kuala Lumpur, p. 332,
<uri>https://a-a-r-s.org/proceeding/ACRS2018/ACRS 2018 PROCEEDING.pdf</uri> (last access: 28 February 2023), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lovelock, C. E., Sorrell, B. K., Hancock, N., Hua, Q., and Swales, A.:
Mangrove forest and soil development on a rapidly accreting shore in New
Zealand, Ecosystems, 13, 437–451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9329-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-010-9329-2</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lunstrum, A. and Chen, L.: Soil carbon stocks and accumulation in young
mangrove forests, Soil Biol. Biochem., 75, 223–232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.008</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marchand, C.: Soil carbon stocks and burial rates along a mangrove forest
chronosequence (French Guiana), Forest Ecol. Manag., 384, 92–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00134-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00134-8</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marchand, C., Lallier-Vergès, E., and Baltzer, F.: The composition of
sedimentary organic matter in relation to the dynamic features of a
mangrove-fringed coast in French Guiana, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 56,
119–130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00134-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00134-8</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marchand, C., Albéric, P., Lallier-Vergès, E., and Baltzer,
F.: Distribution and characteristics of dissolved organic matter in mangrove
sediment pore waters along the coastline of French Guiana, Biogeochemistry,
81, 59–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9030-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-006-9030-x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, K., Takanezawa, T., and Ooe, M.: Ocean tide models developed by
assimilating TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimeter Data into hydrodynamical model: a
global model and a regional model around Japan, J. Oceanogr., 56, 567–581,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matos, C. R., Berrêdo, J. F., Machado, W., Sanders, C. J., Metzger, E., and
Cohen, M. C.: Carbon and nutrient accumulation in tropical mangrove creeks,
Amazon region, Mar. Geol., 429, 106317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106317</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mayer, L. M.: Relationships between mineral surfaces and organic carbon
concentrations in soils and sediments, Chem. Geol., 114, 347–363,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10478" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10478</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miyajima, T., Hori, M., Hamaguchi, M., Shimabukuro, H., and Yoshida, G.:
Geophysical constraints for organic carbon sequestration capacity of Zostera
marina seagrass meadows and surrounding habitats, Limnol. Oceanogr., 62,
954–972, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10478" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10478</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nam, V. N., Sasmito, S. D., Murdiyarso, D., Purbopuspito, J., and MacKenzie,
R. A.: Carbon stocks in artificially and naturally regenerated mangrove
ecosystems in the Mekong Delta, Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 24, 231–244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9479-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11273-015-9479-2</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nellemann, C., Corcoran, E., Duarte, C. M., Valdés, L., De Young, C.,
Fonseca, L., and Grimsditch, G.: Blue carbon: a rapid response assessment,
United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal, ISBN 978-82-7701-060-1, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nilsson, C. and Wilson, S. D.: Convergence in plant community structure along
a disparate gradient: are lakeshores inverted mountainsides?,  Am.
Nat., 137, 774–790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/285193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/285193</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Noguchi, K., Poungparn, S., Umnouysin, S., Patanaponpaiboon, P., Duangnamol,
D., Yoneda, R., Utsugi, H., Sato, T., and Tabuchi, R.: Biomass and
Production Rates of Fine Roots in Two Mangrove Stands in Southern Thailand,
JARQ-Jpn. Agr. Res. Q., 54, 349–360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.54.349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6090/jarq.54.349</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nordhaus, I., Salewski, T., and Jennerjahn, T. C.: Interspecific variations
in mangrove leaf litter decomposition arerelated to labil<?pagebreak page927?>e nitrogenous
compounds, Estuar. Coast. Shelf. S., 192, 137–148,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.04.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2017.04.029</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Parnell, A. C., Inger, R., Bearhop, S., and Jackson, A. L.: Source partitioning
using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation, PloS One, 5,
e9672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009672" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0009672</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pendleton, L., Donato, D. C., Murray, B. C., Crooks, S., Jenkins, W. A.,
Sifleet, S., Craft, C., Fourqurean, J. W., Kauffman, J. B., Marbà, N., and
Megonigal, P.: Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion
and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems, PLoS One, 7, e43542,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043542" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0043542</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pérez, A., Libardoni, B. G., and Sanders, C. J.: Factors
influencing organic carbon accumulation in mangrove ecosystems, Biol.
Lett., 14, 20180237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsbl.2018.0237</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pickett, S. T. A.: Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term
studies, in: Long-term studies in ecology, edited by: Likens, G. E.,
Springer, 110–135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7358-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-1-4615-7358-6</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Prahl, F. G., Bennett, J. T., and Carpenter, R.: The early diagenesis of
aliphatic hydrocarbons and organic matter in sedimentary particulates from
Dabob Bay, Washington, Geochimic. Cosmochim. Ac., 44, 1967–1976, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prasad, M. B. K., Kumar, A., Ramanathan, A. L., and Datta, D. K.: Sources and
dynamics of sedimentary organic matter in Sundarban mangrove estuary from
Indo-Gangetic delta, Ecol. Process., 6, 8,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-017-0076-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s13717-017-0076-6</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Primavera, J. H., Sadaba, R. S., Lebata, M. J. H. L., and Altamirano, J. R. (Eds.):
Handbook of Mangroves in the Philippines – Panay, SEAFDEC Aquaculture
Department, Iloilo, Philippines, 106 pp., ISBN 9718511652, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rasse, D. P., Rumpel, C., and Dignac, M.-F.: Is soil carbon mostly root carbon?
Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation, Plant, 269, 341–356, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ray, R.:  Planted mangrove sediment carbon accumulation, figshare [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22178636.v2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6084/m9.figshare.22178636.v2</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ray, R. and Shahraki, M.:. Multiple sources driving the organic matter
dynamics in two contrasting tropical mangroves, Sci. Total
Environ., 571, 218–227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.157</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ray, R., Michaud, E., Aller, R. C., Vantrepotte, V., Gleixner, G., Walcker,
R., Devesa, J., Le Goff, M., Morvan, S., and Thouzeau, G.: The sources and
distribution of carbon (DOC, POC, DIC) in a mangrove dominated estuary
(French Guiana, South America), Biogeochemistry, 138, 297–321,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0447-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-018-0447-9</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ray, R., Thouzeau, G., Walcker, R., Vantrepotte, V., Morvan, S., Devesa, J.,
Le Goff, M., and Michaud, E.: Mangrove-derived organic and inorganic carbon
export to the Atlantic Ocean? Time series study in the Guianese estuarine
system, Latin America, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 125, e2020JG005739, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JG005739</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <uri>https://www.r-project.org/</uri> (last access: 28 February 2023), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ren, H., Chen, H., Li, Z., and Han, W.: Biomass accumulation and carbon
storage of four different aged Sonneratia apetala plantations in Southern
China, Plant. Soil, 327, 279–291, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0053-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-009-0053-7</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Salmo, S. G., Lovelock, C., and Duke, N. C.: Vegetation and soil
characteristics as indicators of restoration trajectories in restored
mangroves, Hydrobiologia, 720, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1617-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10750-013-1617-3</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sanders, C. J., Smoak, J. M., Naidu, A. S., Sanders, L. M., and Patchineelam,
S. R.: Organic carbon burial in a mangrove forest, margin and intertidal mud
flat, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 90, 168–172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.08.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2010.08.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sasmito, S. D., Kuzyakov, Y., and Lubis, A. A.: Organic carbon burial and
sources in soils of coastal mudflat and mangrove ecosystems, Catena, 187,
104414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104414" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.catena.2019.104414</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shahraki, M., Fry, B., Krumme, U., and Rixen, T.: Microphytobenthos sustain
fish food webs in intertidal arid habitats: a comparison between
mangrove-lined and un-vegetated creeks in the Persian Gulf, Estuar. Coast.
Shelf S., 149, 203–212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.08.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2014.08.017</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sharma, S., MacKenzie, R. A., Tieng, T., Soben, K., Tulyasuwan, N., Resanond,
A., Blate, G., and Litton, C. M.: The impacts of degradation, deforestation
and restoration on mangrove ecosystem carbon stocks across Cambodia, Sci.
Total Environ., 706, 135416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135416</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sheehan, L., Sherwood, E., Moyer, R. P., Radabaugh, K. R., and Simposon, S.:
Blue carbon: an additional driver for restoring and preserving ecological
services of coastal wetlands in Tampa Bay (Florida, USA), Wetlands, 39,
1317–1328, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01137-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13157-019-01137-y</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shen, H., Tu, Z., You, G., and Shi, X.: Grain Size and Pollen of Sediments in
Wanghu Lake (Central China) Linked to Hydro-Environmental Changes, Water,
12, 45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w12010045</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith III, T. J., Boto, K. G., Frusher, S. D., and Giddins, R. L.: Keystone
species and mangrove forest dynamics: the influence of burrowing by crabs on
soil nutrient status and forest productivity, Estuar. Coast. Shelf. S., 33,
419–432, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(91)90081-L" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0272-7714(91)90081-L</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tue, N. T., Dung, L. V., Nhuan, M. T., and Omori, K.: Carbon storage of a tropical
mangrove forest in Mui Ca Mau National Park, Vietnam, Catena, 121, 119–126,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change): CDM Methodology
Booklet, New York, United Nations, <uri>https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/documentation/meth_booklet.pdf</uri> (last access: 28 February 2023), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Valiela, I., Bowen, J. L., and York, J. K.: Mangrove forests: one of the
world's threatened major tropical environments, Bioscience, 51, 807–815,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0807:MFOOTW]2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0807:MFOOTW]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Hieu, P., Dung, L. V., Tai Tue, N., and Omori, K.: Will restored mangrove
forests enhance sediment organic carbon and ecosystem carbon storage?,
Regional Studies in Marine Science, 14, 43–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2017.05.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rsma.2017.05.003</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagai, R., Mayer, L. M., and Kitayama, K.: Extent and nature of organic
coverage of soil mineral surfaces assessed by a gas sorption approach,
Geoderma, 149, 152–160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.11.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.11.032</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Walcker, R., Gandois, L., Proisy, C., Corenblit, D., Mougin, É., Ray,
R., and Fromard, F.: Control of “blu<?pagebreak page928?>e carbon” storage by mangrove ageing:
evidence from a 66-year-chronosequence in French Guiana, Glob. Change Biol.,
24, 2325–2338, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.14100</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Walker, L. R., Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., and Clarkson, B. D.: The use
of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development,
J. Ecol., 98, 725–736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01664.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01664.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Guan, D., Peart, M. R., Chen, Y., and Peng, Y.: Ecosystem carbon
stocks of mangrove forest in Yingluo Bay, Guangdong Province of South China,
Forest Ecol. Manag., 310, 539–546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.045</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Yu, C., Singh, M., Guan, D., Xiong, Y., Zheng, R., and Xiao, R.:
Community structure and ecosystem carbon stock dynamics along a
chronosequence of mangrove plantations in China, Plant Soil, 464, 605–620,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04973-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-021-04973-2</ext-link>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Xia, M., Talhelm, A. F., and Pregitzer, K. S.: Fine roots are the dominant source of
recalcitrant plant litter in sugar maple-dominated northern hardwood
forests, New Phytol., 208, 715–726, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yoshikai, M., Nakamura, T., Suwa, R., Argamosa, R., Okamoto, T., Rollon, R.,
Basina, R., Primavera-Tirol, Y. H., Blanco, A. C., Adi, N. S., and Nadaoka, K.:
Scaling relations and substrate conditions controlling the complexity of
Rhizophora prop root system, Estuar. Coast Shelf S., 248, 107014,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107014</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Xiao, L., Guan, D., Chen, Y., Motelica-Heino, M., Peng, Y., and
Lee, S. Y.: The role of mangrove fine root production and decomposition on
soil organic carbon component ratios, Ecol. Indic., 125, 107525,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107525</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Sedimentary blue carbon dynamics based on chronosequential observations in a tropical restored mangrove forest</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alongi, D. M.: Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests, Annu. Rev. Mar.
Sci., 6, 195–219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alongi, D. M.: Global Significance of Mangrove Blue Carbon in Climate Change
Mitigation, Sci, 2, 67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/sci2030067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/sci2030067</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alongi, D. M., Sasekumar, A., Chong, V. C., Pfitzner, J., Trott, L. A.,
Tirendi, F., Dixon, P., and Brunskill, G. J.: Sediment accumulation and
organic material flux in a managed mangrove ecosystem: estimates of
land–ocean–atmosphere exchange in peninsular Malaysia, Mar. Geol., 208,
383–402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2004.04.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2004.04.016</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andreetta, A., Fusi, M., Cameldi, I., Cimò, F., Carnicelli, S., and
Cannicci, S.: Mangrove carbon sink, Do burrowing crabs contribute to
sediment carbon storage? Evidence from a Kenyan mangrove system, J. Sea
Res., 85, 524–533, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2013.08.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2013.08.010</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arnaud, M., Morris, P. J., and Baird, A. J.: Fine root production in a
chronosequence of mature reforested mangroves, New Phytol., 232, 1591–1602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17480" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17480</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ashton, E. C., Hogarth, P. J., and Ormond, R.: Breakdown of mangrove leaf
litter in a managed mangrove forest in Peninsular Malaysia, Hydrobiologia,
413, 77–88, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bhomia, R. K., MacKenzie, R. A., Murdiyarso, D., Sasmito, S. D., and
Purbopuspito, J.: Impacts of land use on Indian mangrove forest carbon
stocks: implications for conservation and management, Ecol. Appl., 26,
1396e1408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/15-2143" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/15-2143</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bouillon, S. and Boschker, H. T. S.: Bacterial carbon sources in coastal sediments: a cross-system analysis based on stable isotope data of biomarkers, Biogeosciences, 3, 175–185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-175-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-175-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bouillon, S., Borges, A. V., Castañeda-Moya, E., Diele, K., Dittmar, T.,
Duke, N. C., Kristensen, E., Lee, S. Y., Marchand, C., Middelburg, J. J.,
Rivera-Monray, V. H., Smith III, T. J., and Twilley, R. R.: Mangrove production and
carbon sinks: a revision of global budget estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
22, GB2013,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003052</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brown, D. R., Marotta, H., Peixoto, R. B., Enrich-Prast, A., Barroso, G. C., Soares, M. L. G., Machado, W., Pérez, A., Smoak, J. M., Sanders, L. M., Conrad, S., Sippo, J. Z., Santos, I. R., Maher, D. T., and Sanders, C. J.: Hypersaline tidal flats as important “blue carbon” systems: a case study from three ecosystems, Biogeosciences, 18, 2527–2538, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2527-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2527-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cadaweng, E. A. and Aguirre, J. A. N.: Forest from the mud: the Kalibo
experience, in: In Search of Excellence: Exemplary Forest Management in Asia
and the Pacific, edited by: Durst, P. B., Brown, C., Tacio, H. D., and
Ishikawa,  M., Bangkok, Thailand, FAO, 39–48, ISBN 974-7946-68-8, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cameron, C., Hutley, L. B., Friess, D. A., and Brown, B.: Community structure
dynamics and carbon stock change of rehabilitated mangrove forests in
Sulawesi, Indonesia, Ecol. Appl., 29, e01810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1810" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1810</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Canfield, D. E.: Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine
sediments, Chem. Geol., 114, 315–329,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)90061-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)90061-2</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chatting, M., LeVay, L., Walton, M., Skov, M. W., Kennedy, H., Wilson, S.,
and Al-Maslamani, I.: Mangrove carbon stocks and biomass partitioning in an
extreme environment, Estuar. Coast. Shelf. S., 244, 106940,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106940" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106940</a>, 2020

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Donato, D. C, Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto, S., Stidham, M., and
Kanninen, M.: Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics,
Nat. Geosci., 4, 293–297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dung, L. V., Tue, N. T., Nhuan, M. T., and Omori, K.: Carbon storage in a
restored Mangrove forest in Can Gio Mangrove Forest Park, Mekong Delta,
Vietnam, Forest Ecol. Manag., 380, 31–40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.032</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duarte, C. M., Losada, I. J., Hendriks, I. E., Mazarrasa, I., and Marbà,
N.: The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and
adaptation, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 961–968, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1970" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1970</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duncan, C., Primavera, J. H., Pettorelli, N., Thompson, J. R., Loma, R. J. A.,
and Koldewey, H. J.: Rehabilitating mangrove ecosystem services: A case study
on the relative benefits of abandoned pond reversion from Panay Island,
Philippines, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 109, 772–782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.049</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elwin, A., Bukoski, J. J., Jintana, V., Robinson, E. J., and Clark, J. M.:
Preservation and recovery of mangrove ecosystem carbon stocks in abandoned
shrimp ponds, Sci. Rep., 9, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54893-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54893-6</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fromard, F., Puig, H., Mougin, E., Marty, G., Betoulle, J. L., and Cadamuro, L.:
Structure, above-ground biomass and dynamics of mangrove ecosystems: new
data from French Guiana, Oecologia, 115, 39–53,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050489" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050489</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gnanamoorthy, P., Selvam, V., Ramasubramanian, R., Chakraborty, S., Pramit,
D., and Karipot, A.: Soil organic carbon stock in natural and restored
mangrove forests in Pichavaram south-east coast of India, Indian J. Geo-Mar.
Sci., 48, 801–808, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gontharet, S., Mathieu, O., Lévêque, J., Milloux, M. J., Lesourd, S.,
Philippe, S., Caillaud, J., Gardel, A., Sarrazin, M., and Proisy, C.:
Distribution and sources of bulk organic matter (OM) on a tropical
intertidal mud bank in French Guiana from elemental and isotopic proxies,
Chem. Geol., 376, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.03.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.03.009</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goni, M. A., Moore, E., Kurtz, A., Portier, E., Alleau, Y., and Merrell, D.:
Organic matter compositions and loadings in soils and sediments along the
Fly River, Papua New Guinea, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 140, 275–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.034</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hatje, V., Masqué, P., Patire, V. F., Dórea, A., and Barros, F.: Blue
carbon stocks, accumulation rates, and associated spatial variability in
Brazilian mangroves, Limnol. Oceanogr., 66,  321–334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11607" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11607</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Howard, J., Sutton-Grier, A., Herr, D., Kleypas, J., Landis, E., Mcleod, E.,
Pidgeon, E., and Simpson, S.: Clarifying the role of coastal and marine
systems in climate mitigation, Front. Ecol. Environ., 15, 42–50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1451</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jennarjahn, T. C.: Relevance and magnitude of “Blue Carbon” storage in
mangrove sediments: Carbon accumulation rates vs. stocks, sources vs. sinks,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 247, 107027, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107027</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiménez-Arias, J. L., Morris, E., Rubio-de-Inglés, M. J., Peralta, G.,
García-Robledo, E., Corzo, A., and Papaspyrou, S.: Tidal elevation is
the key factor modulating burial rates and composition of organic matter in
a coastal wetland with multiple habitats, Sci. Total Environ.,
724, 138205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138205</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kauffman, J., Arifanti, V. B., Hernandez Trejo, H., del Carmen Jesús
García, M., Norfolk, J., Cifuentes, M., Hadriyanto, D., and Murdiyarso,
D.: The jumbo carbon footprint of a shrimp: carbon losses from mangrove
deforestation, Front. Ecol. Environ., 15, 183–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1482" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1482</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kauffman, J., Heider, C., Cole, T. G., Dwire, K. A., and Donato, D. C.:
Ecosystem carbon stocks of Micronesian mangrove forests, Wetlands, 31,
343–352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0148-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0148-9</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kelleway, J. J., Saintilan, N., Macreadie, P. I., Skilbeck, C. G., Zawadzki, A.,
and Ralph, P. J.: Seventy years of continuous encroachment substantially
increases “blue carbon” capacity as mangroves replace intertidal salt
marshes, Glob. Change Biol., 22, 1097–1109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13158" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13158</a>,
2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keil, R. G. and Mayer, L. M.: Mineral matrices and organic matter, in:
Treatise on Geochemistry: Organic Geochemistry, 2nd Edn., Vol. 12, edited
by: Falkowski, P. G., Freeman, K. H., Holland, H., and Turekian, K., Elsevier,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 337–359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01024-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01024-X</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Komada, T., Reimers, C. E., Luther III, G. W., and Burdige, D. J.: Factors
affecting dissolved organic matter dynamics in mixed-redox to anoxic coastal
sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 68, 4099–4111, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kristensen, E.: Mangrove crabs as ecosystem engineers; with emphasis on
sediment processes, J. Sea Res., 59, 30–43, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2007.05.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2007.05.004</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kusumaningtyas, M. A., Hutahaeanc, A. A., Fischerd, H. W., Pérez-Mayod, M.,
Ransby, D., and Jennerjahn, T. C.: Variability in the organic carbon stocks,
sources, and accumulation rates of Indonesian mangrove ecosystems, Estuar.
Coast. Shelf S., 218, 310–323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.12.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.12.007</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Landicho, K. P., Blanco, A. C., Francisco, R. R., and Gatdula, N.: Google earth
engine-based assessment of expansion of Bakhawan Eco-Park using vegetation
and water indices derived from LANDSAT images, Proceedings Asian Conference
on Remote Sensing, 15–19 October 2018, Kuala Lumpur, p. 332,
<a href="https://a-a-r-s.org/proceeding/ACRS2018/ACRS 2018 PROCEEDING.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 February 2023), 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lovelock, C. E., Sorrell, B. K., Hancock, N., Hua, Q., and Swales, A.:
Mangrove forest and soil development on a rapidly accreting shore in New
Zealand, Ecosystems, 13, 437–451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9329-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9329-2</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lunstrum, A. and Chen, L.: Soil carbon stocks and accumulation in young
mangrove forests, Soil Biol. Biochem., 75, 223–232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.008</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marchand, C.: Soil carbon stocks and burial rates along a mangrove forest
chronosequence (French Guiana), Forest Ecol. Manag., 384, 92–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00134-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00134-8</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marchand, C., Lallier-Vergès, E., and Baltzer, F.: The composition of
sedimentary organic matter in relation to the dynamic features of a
mangrove-fringed coast in French Guiana, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 56,
119–130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00134-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00134-8</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marchand, C., Albéric, P., Lallier-Vergès, E., and Baltzer,
F.: Distribution and characteristics of dissolved organic matter in mangrove
sediment pore waters along the coastline of French Guiana, Biogeochemistry,
81, 59–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9030-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9030-x</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matsumoto, K., Takanezawa, T., and Ooe, M.: Ocean tide models developed by
assimilating TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimeter Data into hydrodynamical model: a
global model and a regional model around Japan, J. Oceanogr., 56, 567–581,
2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matos, C. R., Berrêdo, J. F., Machado, W., Sanders, C. J., Metzger, E., and
Cohen, M. C.: Carbon and nutrient accumulation in tropical mangrove creeks,
Amazon region, Mar. Geol., 429, 106317, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106317" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106317</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mayer, L. M.: Relationships between mineral surfaces and organic carbon
concentrations in soils and sediments, Chem. Geol., 114, 347–363,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10478" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10478</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miyajima, T., Hori, M., Hamaguchi, M., Shimabukuro, H., and Yoshida, G.:
Geophysical constraints for organic carbon sequestration capacity of Zostera
marina seagrass meadows and surrounding habitats, Limnol. Oceanogr., 62,
954–972, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10478" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10478</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nam, V. N., Sasmito, S. D., Murdiyarso, D., Purbopuspito, J., and MacKenzie,
R. A.: Carbon stocks in artificially and naturally regenerated mangrove
ecosystems in the Mekong Delta, Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 24, 231–244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9479-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9479-2</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nellemann, C., Corcoran, E., Duarte, C. M., Valdés, L., De Young, C.,
Fonseca, L., and Grimsditch, G.: Blue carbon: a rapid response assessment,
United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal, ISBN 978-82-7701-060-1, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nilsson, C. and Wilson, S. D.: Convergence in plant community structure along
a disparate gradient: are lakeshores inverted mountainsides?,  Am.
Nat., 137, 774–790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/285193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/285193</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Noguchi, K., Poungparn, S., Umnouysin, S., Patanaponpaiboon, P., Duangnamol,
D., Yoneda, R., Utsugi, H., Sato, T., and Tabuchi, R.: Biomass and
Production Rates of Fine Roots in Two Mangrove Stands in Southern Thailand,
JARQ-Jpn. Agr. Res. Q., 54, 349–360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.54.349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.54.349</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nordhaus, I., Salewski, T., and Jennerjahn, T. C.: Interspecific variations
in mangrove leaf litter decomposition arerelated to labile nitrogenous
compounds, Estuar. Coast. Shelf. S., 192, 137–148,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.04.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.04.029</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Parnell, A. C., Inger, R., Bearhop, S., and Jackson, A. L.: Source partitioning
using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation, PloS One, 5,
e9672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009672" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009672</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pendleton, L., Donato, D. C., Murray, B. C., Crooks, S., Jenkins, W. A.,
Sifleet, S., Craft, C., Fourqurean, J. W., Kauffman, J. B., Marbà, N., and
Megonigal, P.: Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion
and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems, PLoS One, 7, e43542,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043542" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043542</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez, A., Libardoni, B. G., and Sanders, C. J.: Factors
influencing organic carbon accumulation in mangrove ecosystems, Biol.
Lett., 14, 20180237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0237" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0237</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pickett, S. T. A.: Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term
studies, in: Long-term studies in ecology, edited by: Likens, G. E.,
Springer, 110–135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7358-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7358-6</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prahl, F. G., Bennett, J. T., and Carpenter, R.: The early diagenesis of
aliphatic hydrocarbons and organic matter in sedimentary particulates from
Dabob Bay, Washington, Geochimic. Cosmochim. Ac., 44, 1967–1976, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prasad, M. B. K., Kumar, A., Ramanathan, A. L., and Datta, D. K.: Sources and
dynamics of sedimentary organic matter in Sundarban mangrove estuary from
Indo-Gangetic delta, Ecol. Process., 6, 8,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-017-0076-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-017-0076-6</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Primavera, J. H., Sadaba, R. S., Lebata, M. J. H. L., and Altamirano, J. R. (Eds.):
Handbook of Mangroves in the Philippines – Panay, SEAFDEC Aquaculture
Department, Iloilo, Philippines, 106 pp., ISBN 9718511652, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rasse, D. P., Rumpel, C., and Dignac, M.-F.: Is soil carbon mostly root carbon?
Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation, Plant, 269, 341–356, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ray, R.:  Planted mangrove sediment carbon accumulation, figshare [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22178636.v2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22178636.v2</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ray, R. and Shahraki, M.:. Multiple sources driving the organic matter
dynamics in two contrasting tropical mangroves, Sci. Total
Environ., 571, 218–227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.157" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.157</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ray, R., Michaud, E., Aller, R. C., Vantrepotte, V., Gleixner, G., Walcker,
R., Devesa, J., Le Goff, M., Morvan, S., and Thouzeau, G.: The sources and
distribution of carbon (DOC, POC, DIC) in a mangrove dominated estuary
(French Guiana, South America), Biogeochemistry, 138, 297–321,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0447-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0447-9</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ray, R., Thouzeau, G., Walcker, R., Vantrepotte, V., Morvan, S., Devesa, J.,
Le Goff, M., and Michaud, E.: Mangrove-derived organic and inorganic carbon
export to the Atlantic Ocean? Time series study in the Guianese estuarine
system, Latin America, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 125, e2020JG005739, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005739</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <a href="https://www.r-project.org/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 February 2023), 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ren, H., Chen, H., Li, Z., and Han, W.: Biomass accumulation and carbon
storage of four different aged Sonneratia apetala plantations in Southern
China, Plant. Soil, 327, 279–291, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0053-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0053-7</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Salmo, S. G., Lovelock, C., and Duke, N. C.: Vegetation and soil
characteristics as indicators of restoration trajectories in restored
mangroves, Hydrobiologia, 720, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1617-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1617-3</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sanders, C. J., Smoak, J. M., Naidu, A. S., Sanders, L. M., and Patchineelam,
S. R.: Organic carbon burial in a mangrove forest, margin and intertidal mud
flat, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 90, 168–172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.08.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.08.013</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sasmito, S. D., Kuzyakov, Y., and Lubis, A. A.: Organic carbon burial and
sources in soils of coastal mudflat and mangrove ecosystems, Catena, 187,
104414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104414" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104414</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shahraki, M., Fry, B., Krumme, U., and Rixen, T.: Microphytobenthos sustain
fish food webs in intertidal arid habitats: a comparison between
mangrove-lined and un-vegetated creeks in the Persian Gulf, Estuar. Coast.
Shelf S., 149, 203–212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.08.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.08.017</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sharma, S., MacKenzie, R. A., Tieng, T., Soben, K., Tulyasuwan, N., Resanond,
A., Blate, G., and Litton, C. M.: The impacts of degradation, deforestation
and restoration on mangrove ecosystem carbon stocks across Cambodia, Sci.
Total Environ., 706, 135416, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135416" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135416</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sheehan, L., Sherwood, E., Moyer, R. P., Radabaugh, K. R., and Simposon, S.:
Blue carbon: an additional driver for restoring and preserving ecological
services of coastal wetlands in Tampa Bay (Florida, USA), Wetlands, 39,
1317–1328, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01137-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01137-y</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shen, H., Tu, Z., You, G., and Shi, X.: Grain Size and Pollen of Sediments in
Wanghu Lake (Central China) Linked to Hydro-Environmental Changes, Water,
12, 45, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010045</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith III, T. J., Boto, K. G., Frusher, S. D., and Giddins, R. L.: Keystone
species and mangrove forest dynamics: the influence of burrowing by crabs on
soil nutrient status and forest productivity, Estuar. Coast. Shelf. S., 33,
419–432, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(91)90081-L" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(91)90081-L</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tue, N. T., Dung, L. V., Nhuan, M. T., and Omori, K.: Carbon storage of a tropical
mangrove forest in Mui Ca Mau National Park, Vietnam, Catena, 121, 119–126,
2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change): CDM Methodology
Booklet, New York, United Nations, <a href="https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/documentation/meth_booklet.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 February 2023), 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Valiela, I., Bowen, J. L., and York, J. K.: Mangrove forests: one of the
world's threatened major tropical environments, Bioscience, 51, 807–815,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0807:MFOOTW]2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0807:MFOOTW]2.0.CO;2</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Hieu, P., Dung, L. V., Tai Tue, N., and Omori, K.: Will restored mangrove
forests enhance sediment organic carbon and ecosystem carbon storage?,
Regional Studies in Marine Science, 14, 43–52, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2017.05.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2017.05.003</a>,  2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wagai, R., Mayer, L. M., and Kitayama, K.: Extent and nature of organic
coverage of soil mineral surfaces assessed by a gas sorption approach,
Geoderma, 149, 152–160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.11.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.11.032</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walcker, R., Gandois, L., Proisy, C., Corenblit, D., Mougin, É., Ray,
R., and Fromard, F.: Control of “blue carbon” storage by mangrove ageing:
evidence from a 66-year-chronosequence in French Guiana, Glob. Change Biol.,
24, 2325–2338, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14100</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walker, L. R., Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., and Clarkson, B. D.: The use
of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development,
J. Ecol., 98, 725–736, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01664.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01664.x</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, G., Guan, D., Peart, M. R., Chen, Y., and Peng, Y.: Ecosystem carbon
stocks of mangrove forest in Yingluo Bay, Guangdong Province of South China,
Forest Ecol. Manag., 310, 539–546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.045</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, G., Yu, C., Singh, M., Guan, D., Xiong, Y., Zheng, R., and Xiao, R.:
Community structure and ecosystem carbon stock dynamics along a
chronosequence of mangrove plantations in China, Plant Soil, 464, 605–620,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04973-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04973-2</a>, 2021.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xia, M., Talhelm, A. F., and Pregitzer, K. S.: Fine roots are the dominant source of
recalcitrant plant litter in sugar maple-dominated northern hardwood
forests, New Phytol., 208, 715–726, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yoshikai, M., Nakamura, T., Suwa, R., Argamosa, R., Okamoto, T., Rollon, R.,
Basina, R., Primavera-Tirol, Y. H., Blanco, A. C., Adi, N. S., and Nadaoka, K.:
Scaling relations and substrate conditions controlling the complexity of
Rhizophora prop root system, Estuar. Coast Shelf S., 248, 107014,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107014</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Xiao, L., Guan, D., Chen, Y., Motelica-Heino, M., Peng, Y., and
Lee, S. Y.: The role of mangrove fine root production and decomposition on
soil organic carbon component ratios, Ecol. Indic., 125, 107525,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107525" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107525</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
