<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-22-4627-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Organic soils can be CO<sub>2</sub> sinks in both drained and undrained hemiboreal peatland forests</article-title><alt-title>Organic soils can be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks in both drained and undrained hemiboreal peatland forests</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Butlers</surname><given-names>Aldis</given-names></name>
          <email>aldis.butlers@silava.lv</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-1716</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Laiho</surname><given-names>Raija</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7767-8520</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lazdiņš</surname><given-names>Andis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Schindler</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-8677</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Soosaar</surname><given-names>Kaido</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-6326</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Jauhiainen</surname><given-names>Jyrki</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bārdule</surname><given-names>Arta</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kamil-Sardar</surname><given-names>Muhammad</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Līcīte</surname><given-names>Ieva</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Samariks</surname><given-names>Valters</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9953-0455</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Haberl</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Vahter</surname><given-names>Hanna</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Čiuldienė</surname><given-names>Dovilė</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-3059</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Anttila</surname><given-names>Jani</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Armolaitis</surname><given-names>Kęstutis</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-2440</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Latvian State Forest Research Institute (Silava), Salaspils, 2169, Latvia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), P.O. Box 2, Helsinki 00791, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geography, University of Tartu, Tartu, 51014, Estonia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Michael Succow Foundation (partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre), 17489 Greifswald, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Silviculture and Ecology, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kėdainiai distr., 58344, Lithuania</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Aldis Butlers (aldis.butlers@silava.lv)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>18</issue>
      <fpage>4627</fpage><lpage>4647</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>4</day><month>March</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>March</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Aldis Butlers et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e259">Drainage of organic soils is associated with increasing soil carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) efflux, which is typically linked to losses in soil carbon (C) stock. In previous studies, drained organic forest soils have been reported as both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources depending on, e.g., soil nutrient and moisture regime. However, most of the earlier research was done in the boreal zone, and both the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and the impact of soil moisture regime on soil C stock are likely to vary across different climatic conditions and ecosystems, depending further on vegetation. A 2-year study was conducted in hemiboreal forest stands with nutrient-rich organic soil (including current and former peatlands) and a range of dominant tree species (black alder, birch, Norway spruce, Scots pine) in the Baltic states (Estonia (EE), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT)). In this study, we analyzed the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance of organic soil in drained (19) and undrained (7) sites. To assess the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance, soil respiration was measured along with the evaluation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx into the soil through aboveground (aGV) and belowground (bGV) litter. To characterize the sites and factors influencing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, we analyzed soil temperature, soil water table level (WTL), and physical and chemical parameters of soil and soil water. Irrespective of drainage status, the soils functioned as both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources. On average, a close-to-neutral soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was observed in drained sites dominated by black alder, birch, or Norway spruce, while drained Scots pine sites showed soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals with a mean rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In undrained birch- and spruce-dominated sites, soil functioned as a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the undrained black alder stands showed an uncertain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.47</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Variation in the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance was related to soil macronutrient concentrations and pH: forest types characterized by lower nutrient availability showed greater soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink. The reported soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance values may be used as regional emission factors (EFs).</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>LIFE programme</funding-source>
<award-id>LIFE18 CCM/LV/001158</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e703">Soil in peatlands, characterized by its high content of partially decomposed plant matter, is a major terrestrial organic carbon (C) stock, estimated to range from 504 to 3000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Scharlemann et al., 2014). Although northern peatlands make up only 2 %–4 % of the global land area, they contain a substantial amount of soil C, estimates ranging from around 500 to 1055 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Nichols and Peteet, 2019; Yu, 2012), highlighting the significance of these lands in the global C budget. About 28 % of the pristine (undrained) peatlands globally is inherently covered by forest (Zoltai and Martikainen, 1996), and those peatland forests in the boreal biome can accumulate C into the soil at similar rates to non-forested peatlands; the faster decomposition rates observed in peatland forests (Beaulne et al., 2021) can be compensated by higher litter inputs (Straková et al., 2010). To enhance tree growth, peatland drainage for forestry has been common in the past. Drainage facilitates oxygen access to deeper peat layers, thereby promoting tree root survival and function, but also the mineralization of organic matter and the release of C into the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Therefore, the conservation of organic soil C stocks in managed current and former peatlands has attracted attention in the context of climate change.</p>
      <p id="d2e739">The approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ha of forestry-drained organic soils in Europe has been estimated to emit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (European Environment Agency, 2023). Despite the temperate zone being characterized by wide climatic gradients, currently, only a single default emission factor (EF) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is available for the entire temperate zone, to which the Baltic states correspond according to the IPCC (Hiraishi et al., 2013). The EF was developed using study results from eight drained sites (Hiraishi et al., 2013), which were published in five articles (Von Arnold et al., 2005; Glenn et al., 1993; Minkkinen et al., 2007; Yamulki et al., 2013). These studies employed different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimation methods, complicating the comparability of the aggregated results (Jauhiainen, 2019, 2023). None of the sites are in the Baltic states. Given that the soil emissions in the boreal zone are smaller than in the temperate zone (Jauhiainen et al., 2023) and that Baltic states are situated in the hemiboreal vegetation zone (Ahti et al., 1968), in transition between the temperate and boreal zones, the IPCC's default temperate EF may not be suitable for application in this region. The same issue arises on a broader geographic scale, where the use of unharmonized country-specific and default EFs creates challenges in comparing the estimated emissions both within and across different countries and climate zones. Discrepancies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions between regions can be expected due not only to climate gradient (Ojanen et al., 2010) but also to site productivity (Janssens et al., 2001). While higher ecosystem productivity is associated with increased soil respiration rates (Janssens et al., 2001), it also facilitates higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx through litter (Krasnova et al., 2019). Therefore, EFs are most appropriately used when applied to areas with similar environmental conditions, rather than being limited by national boundaries or applied too broadly across diverse geographic regions.</p>
      <p id="d2e829">In the Baltic states (Estonia (EE), Latvia (LV), and Lithuania (LT)), organic soils (Eggleston et al., 2006) are current or former peatlands where a peat layer is still identifiable or, due to high decomposition, no longer meets the typical characteristics of peat. However, these soils by definition contain at least a 20 cm thick layer rich in organic matter (organic layer). In the region, the total area of drained organic forest soils is reported to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ha, with estimated emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Konstantinavičiūtė et al., 2023; Ministry of the Environment of Republic of Estonia, 2021; Skrebele et al., 2023). Thus, countries with a relatively small total land area but a substantial proportion of organic soil can have a considerable role in organic soil management. This underscores the importance of acquiring precise estimates of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from organic forest soils in this region. However, despite the Baltic states being located next to each other and thus expectedly showing similar soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from comparable sites and land uses, the emission estimation approach is currently not harmonized, as the countries use different EFs to estimate and report emissions (Konstantinavičiūtė et al., 2023; Ministry of the Environment of Republic of Estonia, 2021; Skrebele et al., 2023). According to the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories submissions of 2023, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions of drained organic forest soil in Estonia and Lithuania were estimated using the default EF provided by IPCC for the temperate zone (Calvo Buendia et al., 2019), while Latvia applied a country-specific EF. Due to similarities in biogeography, climate, and land-use practices, common EFs based on regionally representative congregated data could be a better option.</p>
      <p id="d2e919">A recent synthesis evaluated whether default IPCC EFs can be improved by compiling results from the most recent studies (Jauhiainen et al., 2023). Still, only modest and insignificant changes judging by confidence intervals (CIs) of IPCC EFs could be introduced for the temperate climate zone as a whole, due to limited data (Jauhiainen et al., 2023). Although the general driving factors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are known, the number and geographical representation of studies on drained soils, particularly in the temperate zone, remain too limited for the stratification of EFs based on local conditions. It is widely known that soil temperature is the primary factor influencing gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. However, while temperature can explain variations in emissions, it does not fully account for their magnitude. The extent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions is affected by soil properties (Basiliko et al., 2007), incorporating complex interactions between a soil's physical, chemical, and biological characteristics, including the impact of the litter quality (Berger et al., 2010). The recent synthesis confirmed that key factors influencing the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions include soil C concentration, carbon-to-nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ratio, and bulk density (BD), as well as stand type (Jauhiainen et al., 2023). However, the list likely remains quite incomplete, as individual studies in different site types using various methods can provide unharmonized results, making it difficult to identify the relationships influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. Varying and often insufficient reporting of study site conditions in previous studies (Jauhiainen, 2019) further hampers the ability to compile the results for effective synthesis and meta-analysis (Jauhiainen et al., 2023). This limitation may have hindered the identification of emission-impacting factors and the ability to quantify their relationships, underscoring the need for more localized studies to address these gaps, particularly in the hemiboreal vegetation zone which overlaps with the cool temperate moist climate zone (Calvo Buendia et al., 2019) – a subregion of temperate zone as defined by the IPCC.</p>
      <p id="d2e991">In the few studies on drained and undrained soil C or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance conducted in the Baltic states, using both chamber and soil inventory methods, findings have been inconsistent (Butlers et al., 2022; Lazdiņš et al., 2024; Bārdule et al., 2022). Drained organic soils have been identified as both C sinks and C sources, with no decisive conclusions reached regarding the factors driving such variation. Soil C loss of nutrient-rich organic soil has been identified using the soil inventory method (Lazdiņš et al., 2024) but not confirmed by the chamber method (Butlers et al., 2022; Bārdule et al., 2022), which, unlike the inventory method, targets the current situation (Jauhiainen et al., 2019). Given that nutrient-rich organic forest soils can make up to 72 % of total organic forest soils (Līcīte et al., 2019) and are associated with a higher risk of soil C loss, there is a need to enhance our understanding of the underlying drivers to improve the accuracy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance estimates in Baltic states. Therefore, studies using harmonized data collection methods are necessary, covering a variety of nutrient-rich forest soils, recording or monitoring essential environmental conditions, and accounting for both soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and influx from various litter sources.</p>
      <p id="d2e1027">This study aimed to quantify the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance in hemiboreal forests with nutrient-rich organic soil and different dominant tree species. The research was carried out in 26 forest stands with organic soil in Estonia (EE), Latvia (LV), and Lithuania (LT), including both undrained and drained sites, over 2 years. We analyzed soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx by tree fine roots, ground vegetation (GV; belowground (bGV) and aboveground (aGV)), and fine foliar litter. We examined factors contributing to soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance by directly or indirectly influencing soil processes, such as site type, dominant tree species, soil and soil water properties, and soil water table level (WTL). Mean annual soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance values were estimated for potential use as EFs. For this purpose, we also assessed whether the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes differed between countries. To facilitate the use of the results in future syntheses or meta-analyses, the data used for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance estimation have been openly published.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study sites</title>
      <p id="d2e1123">In total, 26 study sites (Fig. 1) were established in stands dominated by black alder (<italic>Alnus glutinosa</italic> (L.) Gärtner), birch (<italic>Betula pendula</italic> Roth, <italic>Betula pubescens</italic> Ehrh.), Scots pine (<italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic> L.), or Norway spruce (<italic>Picea abies</italic> (L.) Karst.) of different ages (Table S1 in the Supplement). The study sites included both drained (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and undrained (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) organic soils (Eggleston et al., 2006), with the organic layer thickness ranging from 27 cm to over 2 m, measured by a rod insertion. According to forest type classification, all sites were characterized as nutrient-rich based on ground vegetation and stand productivity (Bušs, 1981). Drained sites were represented by two site types: <italic>Oxalidosa turf. mel.</italic> (Oxalis), which has relatively higher nutrient availability (pH, macronutrients), and <italic>Myrtillosa turf. mel.</italic> (Myrtillus). Undrained sites were represented by the <italic>Dryopterioso–caricosa</italic> site type. Soil drainage status was determined based on the presence of drainage ditches within or along the respective forest compartment (a rectangular forest area of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> ha used as a management unit).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1199">Locations of the study sites. Points indicate the locations of study site clusters.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1208">Despite the greater variation in stand characteristics among the more numerous drained sites compared to the undrained sites, the two groups were overall comparable (Table 1). The mean stand age of both groups was 74 years, with a range of 26–162 years for drained and 44–96 years for undrained sites. Average basal areas in turn were 27 for drained and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for undrained sites, respectively. More information on stand characteristics, including mean WTL and coordinates, is provided in Table S1. The projective cover of the most common ground vegetation species in the study sites is presented in Table S2 in the Supplement. All comparisons will be done at group level, since pairwise comparison, even of closely located sites that belong to the same site type, is hampered by the inherent variation in soil characteristics (see Laiho and Pearson, 2016).</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1235">Range (minimum; maximum) of tree stand characteristics in the study sites.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col9">Dominant tree species </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" colsep="1">Black alder </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" colsep="1">Birch </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" colsep="1">Pine </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col9">Spruce </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Undrained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Drained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Undrained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Drained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Undrained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Drained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Undrained</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site count</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Age, years</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30; 80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44; 74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24; 45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">44; 61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60; 141</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">40; 162</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">81; 96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean height, m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13; 20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16; 28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13; 18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9; 20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12; 21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10; 23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">15; 20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean diameter, cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12; 21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16; 28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12; 22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8; 21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12; 22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10; 25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17; 21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Basal area, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26; 36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30; 36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15; 23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22; 23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17; 48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18; 36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">25; 42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1569">Both groups represent historically naturally forested lands that have undergone active forest management. While the exact time since drainage is unknown, active drainage of the forests was initiated in the mid-19th century and resumed in the mid-20th century. Drainage ditches were dug to depths of 0.8 to 1.2 m, with distances between them ranging from 100 to 400 m, and they are maintained to remain functional (Zālītis, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d2e1572">At each study site, three subplots (Fig. S1 in the Supplement) for data collection were selected, with a minimum distance of 30 m, in an area representing typical ecosystem characteristics of the floristically defined site type, as classified under the local forest site type system (Bušs, 1981). The subplots were arranged along a transect positioned perpendicular to the closest ditch in drained areas and perpendicular to stand border in undrained areas. In the drained sites, the first subplot was located about 20 m from the nearest drainage ditch. In the undrained sites, the first subplot was located at least 20 m from the forest border.</p>
      <p id="d2e1575">Empirical data were gathered from January 2021 to December 2022 in Estonia and Latvia and from July 2021 to June 2023 in Lithuania. The sites were visited monthly in Latvia and Lithuania and biweekly in Estonia. The meteorological conditions during the study were typical for the region (Table S3 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Respiration</title>
      <p id="d2e1586">Measurements of forest floor respiration, which we will hereafter refer to as total respiration (Rtot), included both soil heterotrophic respiration and autotrophic dark respiration of ground vegetation (above- and belowground), as well as tree roots extending to the measurement locations. Gas samples were collected from manual closed static dark (opaque) chambers (PVC, volume 0.0655 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as described in the literature (Hutchinson and Livingston, 1993) for subsequent laboratory analysis. Rtot monitoring included five to six monitoring locations, divided over three subplots, at each site. Ring-shaped chamber collars (area 0.196 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were permanently installed in the soil at a depth of 5 cm at least 1 month before the first sampling to avoid the installation effect on fluxes. Collar locations reflected local diversity in vegetation and potential WTL gradient at each subplot, and the encircled soil surface and vegetation were kept intact. Thus, the soil heterotrophic respiration component in Rtot includes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions caused by the decomposition of both fresh litter and soil organic matter.</p>
      <p id="d2e1622">Gas samples were collected by obtaining four air samples from a closed chamber into pre-evacuated (0.3 mbar) glass vials (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The air samples were taken from the chamber outlet, equipped with a valve attached in the sampling tube reaching approximately the center of the airspace. The air within the chamber was not artificially mixed during sampling. Air sampling was done by first removing the residual air left from the sampling tube (to avoid potential impact on the concentration readout) with a syringe; thereafter, the pre-evacuated glass vial was attached into the outlet. The first sample was taken immediately after attaching the chamber on the collar, and subsequent samples were taken at either 10-minute (Latvia) or 20-minute (Estonia and Lithuania) intervals over 30 or 60 min monitoring periods, respectively (Butlers et al., 2022; Vigricas et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e1636">The gas samples were analyzed using a Shimadzu GC-2015 gas chromatograph (Shimadzu USA Manufacturing, Inc., Canby, OR, USA) equipped with an electron capture detector (ECD). The uncertainty of the method used was estimated to be 20 ppm of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Magnusson et al., 2017). Linear regression was applied to relate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with the time elapsed since chamber closure for each measurement. Subsequently, the measurement data were screened to identify deviations from the recognized trend, considering the removal of measurements with identified errors. All measurements were discarded if the regression coefficient of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was less than 0.9 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), except for cases where the difference between the highest and lowest measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the chamber was less than the uncertainty of the method (specifically applicable during non-vegetation periods). Consequently, a small amount of data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) was discarded.</p>
      <p id="d2e1706">The data that met the quality criteria were used to determine the slope coefficient of the linear regression, which was then used to calculate the instantaneous Rtot according to the ideal gas law equation (Fuss and Hueppi, 2024):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M91" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Rtot</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>slope</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where Rtot is the instantaneous total respiration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molar mass of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-C, 12.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the universal gas constant, 8.314 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the assumption of air pressure inside the chamber, 101.300 Pa; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the air temperature in the chamber, K; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the chamber volume, 0.0655 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the slope is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration change over time, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and A is the collar area, 0.19625 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1934">We also conducted measurements of heterotrophic respiration (Rhet) for comparison, as described in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Environmental variables</title>
      <p id="d2e1945">Manual WTL measurements were carried out using nylon-mesh-coated perforated piezometer tubes (5 cm in diameter) installed down to a 140 cm depth in all subplots. Manual soil temperature measurements were done at depths of 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm in all subplots by a Comet data logger (COMET SYSTEM, s.r.o., 756 61 Roznov pod Radhostem, Czech Republic) equipped with Pt1000 temperature probes. All manual measurements were carried out at the same time as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux measurements. Continuous soil temperature measurements at depths of 10 and 40 cm were carried out at 30 min intervals in the centermost subplot (Maxim Integrated DS1922L2F, iButtonLink Technology, Whitewater, WI 53190 USA).</p>
      <p id="d2e1959">Once per month, soil water samples were collected from perforated tubes (7.5 cm in diameter) explicitly installed for water sampling for chemical analysis. Water chemical parameters including pH; electrical conductivity (EC); and concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total nitrogen (N), and nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and phosphate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ions were determined. Soil samples were taken down to a depth of 75 cm (0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, 40–50, 50–75 cm) at two locations in each subplot during the establishment of the study sites. Two separate sample sets were collected: one for the determination of bulk density and another for ash content and chemical parameters (pH; concentrations of total carbon (TC) and nitrogen (N); and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-extractable phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg)). The samples were collected with a volumetric 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cylinder (Cools and De Vos, 2010) at 10 cm intervals to a depth of 50 cm. Two additional samples were taken from soil depths of 50–75 and 75–100 cm with a soil auger. Soil samples collected for the determination of bulk density were oven-dried (105 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and weighed, while soil samples for chemical analyses were prepared by air-drying (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), sieving, and homogenizing (LVS ISO 11464:2006). Organic carbon (Corg) content was calculated by multiplying soil organic matter content derived from the ash content measurement result by a factor of 0.5, thus assuming that organic matter is 50 % Corg (Pribyl, 2010). All soil and water analyses were done in an ISO-17025-certified laboratory using ISO standard methods (Table S4 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Litter input</title>
      <p id="d2e2068">Annual litter inputs to be used in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance estimation were either measured (foliar litter) or estimated based on biomass components measured (ground vegetation, fine roots).</p>
      <p id="d2e2082">Foliar fine litter (fLF) was collected with conical litter traps (area 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) set 1 m above ground (Latvia, Lithuania) or with square mesh frames (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) placed on the ground (Estonia). In each study site, five replicate litter traps were placed in the centermost subplot of the transect. It included all fine fractions of litter, such as needles, leaves, and branches, with a diameter up to 1 cm and a length up to 10 cm. Branches with larger dimensions were collected from coarse woody litter (cLF) traps (square mesh frames, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) placed on the ground. The litter samples were collected from the traps once every 4 weeks. Due to the heterogenous nature and large dimensions of cLF, respective decomposition emissions could not be representatively included in Rtot measurements. Therefore, we considered only fLF to be the litter input source, and the cLF results are presented only as indicative of the site conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2136">Ground vegetation (GV) aboveground (aGV) and belowground (bGV) biomass samples were collected at the end of the growing season (August) in 2021 in five replicates per subplot, from square sampling locations with an area of 0.0625 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aboveground biomass was separated into herbaceous (aGV) species and dwarf shrubs. bGV biomass was collected from the top soil layer, extending down to 20–30 cm from the same location and area as aGV biomass. Herbaceous ground vegetation roots (bGV) were separated from tree and shrub roots by wet-sieving based on root morphological properties. We assumed that the measured herbaceous ground vegetation aboveground (aGV) and belowground (bGV) biomasses were equal to annual ground vegetation litter inputs. The contribution of shrub litter was thus not included but was assumed to be minor (see Table S5 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d2e2150">Moss biomass was measured by collecting samples from 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> square areas, with four replicates per subplot, and visually removing any dead parts. Collections were conducted concurrently with moss production (MP) sampling. MP samples in four replicates per subplot were collected by anchoring a square mesh (0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the moss at the end of the growing season and harvesting the moss biomass grown through the mesh by the end of the next growing season. However, including moss litter in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance estimation by aligning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx and efflux from areas with and without moss cover, without increasing uncertainty, would have required us to double the number of spatial replicates in chamber measurements. Therefore, we did not consider moss to be a litter source, which causes underestimation of litter inputs to a varying extent. The moss results are presented only as indicative of site conditions (see Table S5).</p>
      <p id="d2e2198">Tree fine-root production (FRP) was estimated with the ingrowth core method (Laiho et al., 2014; Bhuiyan et al., 2017). Five replicate ingrowth cores (cylindrical mesh bags with diameter 2.5 cm, mesh size 2 mm) per subplot, filled with soil collected from the subplot, were installed in autumn or spring and removed after two growing seasons. In the laboratory, the biomass of the ingrown fine roots was determined after wet-sieving, and ground vegetation roots were separated from tree roots by morphological properties. We assumed that tree fine-root biomass essentially did not change over the study years; thus we could assume that FRP equalled litter production. Since the ingrowth cores were removed from the soil after two growing seasons, the FRP estimate was calculated by dividing the fine-root biomass in the cores by 2 (Bhuiyan et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d2e2201">All litter and biomass samples were oven-dried (70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), weighed, and milled before further analysis. Chemical analyses were performed according to ISO standard methods (Table S4). To estimate the annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx to be used in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance estimation (Sect. 1.5), the estimated annual litter inputs on a unit area were transformed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx by using C content values measured for each component (Table 2).</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2250">Mean C and N content (% of dry matter) in foliar litter from trees and biomass components used for estimating other litter inputs. The values are means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation including both drained and undrained sites.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Element</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">aGV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">bGV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">FR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">fLF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">cLF</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">51.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e2260">aGV and bGV: above- and belowground biomass of herbaceous vegetation; FR: tree fine roots; M: moss; fLF: foliar fine litter; cLF: coarse woody litter.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Estimation of annual soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance</title>
      <p id="d2e2505">We estimated the annual soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance of the sites by combining annualized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx (Sect. 1.4) and efflux data. In exceptional cases where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx from a specific source was not estimated in certain countries, such as bGV and FRP in EE and FRP in some sites in LT and LV (Table S10 in the Supplement), we assumed the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx to be equivalent to the average results from sites with the same drainage status in the other countries. While we directly measured Rhet, we utilized the estimated Rhet derived from Rtot as the efflux value (marked from here onwards as Rhet<sup>′</sup>). Such an approach was necessary because, at all sites, our Rhet values were significantly higher (by mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than Rtot, which would be logically impossible if the conditions in the measurement locations were the same. This pattern was probably mostly due to the high and variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux from roots killed by the trenching, also noted in other studies (e.g., Hermans et al., 2022). This discrepancy could not be remedied with the root data at hand (for more details, please refer to the Supplement and Discussion).</p>
      <p id="d2e2630">To estimate annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux, at first, site-specific relationships between instantaneous Rtot fluxes and soil temperatures were established. To identify the best approach for expressing the relationship, we compared the suitability of exponential regression on untransformed data and linear regression on logarithmically or Box–Cox-transformed data. The performance of these models for flux data interpolation based on continuous soil temperature data was evaluated by using the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of prediction. It was found that the Box–Cox approach achieved the best conformity of flux data to a normal distribution and provided the best fit for the models. Previous studies also indicate that this method effectively addresses the typical underestimation of fluxes caused by their nonlinearity (Box and Cox, 1964; Liaw et al., 2021; Wutzler et al., 2020). Interpolation was performed by evaluating the relationship between Rtot and soil temperature (at 10 cm depth) measured at each study site and constructing site-specific linear regression equations (Table S6 in the Supplement) after applying Box–Cox transformation to the flux data for normalization (Box and Cox, 1964). This approach, compared to alternative methods, more successfully (lower RMSE of prediction) accounted for the exponential nature of the relationship between flux and temperature and prevented underestimation (Liaw et al., 2021; Wutzler et al., 2020). Hourly Rtot estimates were then formed by using the hourly recorded soil temperatures (logger data) for each study site. Consecutively, the site-specific annual Rtot estimate was calculated by summing the interpolated hourly emission estimates of the year.</p>
      <p id="d2e2644">We derived site-specific annual Rhet<sup>′</sup> from estimated annual Rtot empirically. To avoid potential bias introduced by using a single fixed factor, we instead used Eq. (2), accounting for the observed pattern of decreasing Rhet proportion as soil surface respiration (Rs) increases (Bond-Lamberty et al., 2004; Subke et al., 2006). The equation characterizes the relationship between Rs and Rhet and was created using results of previous studies (Jian et al., 2021) in the boreal zone (Fig. S2 in the Supplement). We assumed Rtot is equal to Rs, i.e., that aboveground autotrophic respiration has a minor role in Rtot (Hermans et al., 2022; Munir et al., 2017), and applied the equation to annual Rtot directly.

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M153" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Rhet</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Rtot</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2681">Neglecting aboveground autotrophic respiration leads to a minor overestimation of Rhet.</p>
      <p id="d2e2684">We will use the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sign to denote positive soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance (soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sign to denote net loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from soil to the atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e2743">Statistical analyses were performed and figures were prepared using the software R version 4.3.1 (packages “MASS”, “stats”, “nlme”, “Hmisc”, “lmerTest”, “lme4”, “vegan”, “pls”, and “caret”), using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the limit for statistical significance. The compliance of the data with the normal distribution was checked with the Shapiro–Wilk normality test and visually by density and quantile–quantile (Q–Q) plots. To calculate the uncertainty of the study results when combining multiple data sources, we used the root sum of the squares method to aggregate the individual uncertainties (95 % confidence interval). Therefore, for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx, for instance, we combined the uncertainties from various influx (fLF, GV, FRP) sources. The uncertainty of Eq. (2) used for the calculation of Rhet<sup>′</sup> was expressed as the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the corresponding regression model. The soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balances were calculated by summing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx and efflux for individual sites. The uncertainties of the averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balances, categorized by drainage status, country, site type, or dominant tree species, are expressed as standard error. Figures were prepared by using the packages “ggplot2”, “corplot”, and “ggbiplot”.</p>
      <p id="d2e2812">Correlations between the sample groups were expressed with the Pearson correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). We compared differences between two sample groups using pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum tests with continuity correction and adjusted the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values using Bonferroni correction. The method was used to compare soil parameters and instantaneous or annualized Rtot data segregated by site type, drainage status, country, or dominant tree species. In the same way, soil characteristics were compared between drained and undrained sites. Multivariate testing of flux and impacting factor relationships involved assessing the significance of these factors on the relationship between soil temperature and Rtot using mixed-effects linear models. For flux-impacting factors, we considered country, dominant tree species, drainage status, WTL, and a 30 cm WTL threshold distinguishing shallow and deep drainage in the IPCC guidelines. In this analysis, Box–Cox-transformed flux data were fitted to linear models using the study site as a random effect. In addition, multivariate relationships were observed through principal component analysis (PCA) to visualize covariation and seek observational confluences with the results of other analyses. To assess the contribution of influencing factors on the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance, redundancy analysis (RDA) and partial least-squares regression (PLSR) were conducted.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Soil and soil water characteristics</title>
      <p id="d2e2856">The organic layer depth ranged from 27 to 212 cm (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> cm) in the drained sites and from 100 to 230 cm (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">167</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> cm) in the undrained sites. Soil bulk density (0–30 cm depth) in the drained sites (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">314</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">215</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was characterized by both higher variation and higher mean density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to undrained sites (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">168</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Table S7 in the Supplement). Soil drainage status had no impact on Corg content in the 0–30 cm soil layer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, total mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">416</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">130</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, drained soils had a higher mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than the undrained soils (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>). A trend could be observed that undrained soils had higher nutrient concentrations and higher pH than the drained soils. Soil analysis confirmed that site types classified based on ground vegetation composition served as an indicator of nutrient availability (Fig. 2). In drained Oxalis sites, mean macronutrient concentrations in the 0–30 cm soil layer were higher compared to Myrtillus sites. Notably, N, Mg, Ca, and P showed statistically significant differences (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Additionally, soil pH values in the Oxalis sites were, on average, 1.89 units higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3136">Variation in soil chemical and physical properties at a soil depth of 0–30 cm. The clear box represents the drained sites, and the gray-shaded box represents the undrained sites. Data points represent individual subplots. The bottom and top edges of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, summarizing the interquartile range (IQR). The whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Black dots mark outliers. A red dot and a solid horizontal line in the box indicate mean and median values, respectively. Corg: organic carbon; N: total nitrogen. Site types: Dr, <italic>Dryopterioso–caricosa</italic>; Ox, <italic>Oxalidosa turf. mel</italic>.; My, <italic>Myrtillosa turf. mel</italic>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3166">The range of mean WTL over the study period was from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">112</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> cm) in the drained sites and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> cm) in the undrained sites, respectively. In the undrained sites, the WTL was mainly rather high (see interquartile range in Fig. 3) and had comparably smaller variation (mean standard deviation 16 cm) than in the drained sites (mean standard deviation 23 cm); however, in all sites except LTC108, WTLs below 30 cm were also observed (Fig. 4). In the undrained sites, the range of min–max WTL was from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> cm to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> cm, while the WTL in drained sites had a greater absolute variation ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> cm to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">104</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> cm.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3356">Yearly variation in soil water table level (WTL) in the study sites. The edges of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, encapsulating the interquartile range (IQR). The whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Black dots mark outliers. A red dot and a solid horizontal line indicate the average values of the date represented: mean and median, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3379">Variation in instantaneous total respiration (Rtot; <bold>a</bold>) and soil water table level (WTL; <bold>b</bold>) in the study sites. The bottom and top edges of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, summarizing the interquartile range (IQR). The whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Black dots mark outliers. A red dot and a solid horizontal line in the box indicate mean and median values, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3406">The concentrations of all measured chemical parameters in the soil water, except for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were, on average, higher in the drained sites (Fig. S3 in the Supplement). However, the results were highly variable (Table S8 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Instantaneous total respiration</title>
      <p id="d2e3432">In the drained sites, the mean instantaneous Rtot varied from 48 to 125 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and, in the undrained sites, it varied from 38 to 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4). In all sites combined, during the summer months (June, July, August), the interquartile range of Rtot varied from 111 to 198 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">160</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, during the winter (December, January, February), it ranged from 8 to 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relative standard deviations of the instantaneous Rtot in drained (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and undrained (106 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 %) sites were comparable. Although the study sites represented a broad soil WTL gradient, no significant impact of the site mean WTL on the mean instantaneous Rtot emission was observed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Furthermore, no significant correlations were found between instantaneous Rtot and soil water parameters.</p>
      <p id="d2e3748">The instantaneous Rtot in drained sites (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was overall higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than Rtot in undrained sites (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 5a).  Rtot was the lowest at undrained sites dominated by spruce and the highest at drained sites dominated by birch (Fig. 5b). Rtot was significantly different (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between coniferous forest sites with different dominant tree species and/or soil moisture regime, with Rtot ranging from a mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in undrained spruce forests to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in drained pine and spruce forests, respectively. In deciduous stands, the moisture regime and dominant tree species had less impact on the mean flux; Rtot was higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in drained birch stands (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">84</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than in undrained birch stands (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while, in alder stands, the mean Rtot was similar regardless of the soil moisture regime (total average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 5b). In drained coniferous and deciduous sites, on average, the mean Rtot was similar, but, in undrained sites, emissions in deciduous forests were about 40 % higher. Mean Rtot in sites with the same drainage status did not differ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between countries (Fig. S4g in the Supplement).</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4226">Mean instantaneous total respiration (Rtot) throughout the study period, categorized by drainage status <bold>(a)</bold> or dominant tree species and drainage status <bold>(b)</bold>. Error bars indicate the confidence interval. A shared letter indicates that differences are not significant.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4242">The impact of WTL is reflected in the mean Rtot, which was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when WTL was below 30 cm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when WTL was closer to soil surface. However, when evaluating the effect of WTL on Rtot variation in mixed-effects models predicting Rtot based on soil temperature, WTL was found to have an insignificant impact on Rtot variation. Similarly, the contribution of country and dominant tree species to Rtot prediction was marginal (Table S9 in the Supplement). The inclusion of dominant species provided minimal model improvement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>logLik</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while country effects captured some additional variability in Rtot. However, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to country variables was minor (from 0.77 to 0.78), indicating limited explanatory power.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Annual total respiration</title>
      <p id="d2e4409">Soil temperature at 10 cm depth (Fig. S5 in the Supplement) was used in constructing Rtot prediction models and for emission interpolation needed for annualizing Rtot. The 10 cm depth was chosen because it showed the strongest correlation between instantaneous Rtot and soil temperatures measured at different depths, with a mean Pearson correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> across the study sites. For the other soil depths (5, 20, 30, 40 cm), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>. Linear models developed using Box–Cox-transformed data provided the best Rtot prediction power. A lambda value of 0.3411 was used for all data transformations, as individual data transformations for each site resulted in comparatively less successful data normalization. With this approach, the RMSE of instantaneous Rtot predictions for individual sites decreased by an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %, compared to linear models with logarithmically transformed data or nonlinear models with untransformed data (Table S6).</p>
      <p id="d2e4512">Annualized Rtot indicated similar mutual relationships among the dominant tree species and drainage status categories of the study site as the instantaneous Rtot. Pooled estimated annual emissions from drained sites (overall mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.41</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and undrained sites (overall mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.75</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) differed significantly (Fig. 6a). However, when the data were further stratified by country, the differences were no longer statistically significant due to wider confidence intervals (Fig. S4h).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4633">Annualized total respiration (Rtot) in study sites stratified by drainage status <bold>(a)</bold> or dominant tree species <bold>(b)</bold>. Error bars indicate the confidence interval. A shared letter indicates that differences are not significant.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4649">When categorizing data according to drainage status and dominant tree species, fewer differences were found in the annualized Rtot than in the instantaneous Rtot (Fig. 6b). For instance, among the drained sites, the lowest mean annual Rtot was estimated for pine forests (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.23</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while, in spruce, birch, and alder forests, the means were similar (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.71</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Emissions from undrained soils in alder, birch, and spruce forests were similar to each other and lower than from drained sites, ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> in spruce forests to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.47</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.63</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in alder forests (overall mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.86</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e4880">The correlation between Rtot and WTL was low; however, a drainage status (drainage ditch presence) impact on Rtot is indicated by the PCA results, where undrained sites tend to have more similar characteristics, while drained sites show greater diversity concerning Rtot. However, clear covariation of dominant tree species and Rtot is not recognized by PCA (Figs. S6 and S7 in the Supplement). When comparing the chemical and physical properties of different soil layers with the estimated annual Rtot, along with the measured mean Rhet, the mean measured Rhet consistently showed a higher correlation with evaluated soil parameters (Fig. S8 in the Supplement). The only exception is Corg, for which no correlation was observed between Corg, Rtot, or Rhet in different soil layers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Excluding Corg, the other soil chemical parameters generally had a low to moderate correlation (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respiration. The highest correlation was with pH, K, Mg, and P (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and it was consistent across all evaluated soil layers, while the correlation with BD (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) tends to increase with deeper soil layers, reaching the highest correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in layer 20–30 cm. In addition, a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is associated with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Annual litter inputs</title>
      <p id="d2e5049">The estimated mean litter inputs at the subplot level were mostly similar between drained and undrained sites (Tables S10 and S11 in the Supplement), typically differing by less than 20 %. Only fLF and FRP tended to be considerably higher in the drained sites, with FRP even more than twice as high on average. Compared to undrained sites, bGV in drained sites was about 20 % higher on average, while aGV was about 20 % lower on average (Fig. 7). However, regardless of the soil drainage status, the proportion of aGV in the total GV biomass was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Table 3).</p>

      <fig id="F7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e5075">Variation in the biomass components used as litter input estimates. aGV and bGV: above- and belowground biomass of herbaceous vegetation; fLF: fine foliar litter (needles, leaves, fine woody litter); FRP: tree fine-root production. The bottom and top edges of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, summarizing the interquartile range (IQR). The whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Black dots mark outliers. A red dot and a solid horizontal line in the box indicate mean and median values, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e5099">Biomass (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CI, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dm</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) components used as litter input estimates, stratified by drainage status. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Category</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Undrained</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">aGV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">bGV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FRP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fLF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e5131">aGV and bGV: above- and belowground biomass of herbaceous vegetation, respectively; FRP: tree fine-root production; fLF: fine foliar litter (needles, leaves, fine woody litter).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e5292">Both bGV (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and FRP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) had a significant negative correlation with soil pH but a positive correlation with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in the 0–30 cm soil layer. Additionally, FRP had a significant negative correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the contents of N, Ca, and Mg in the soil. No explanatory factors for aGV could be identified. Moderate correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was found between stand age and fLF.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Annual soil carbon balance</title>
      <p id="d2e5390">The estimated Rhet<sup>′</sup> (Table S10) proportion of Rtot varied between 54 % and 71 % (mean 65 %). Consequently, the estimated annual gross C losses from drained soils in the form of Rhet<sup>′</sup> emissions ranged from 2.36 to 7.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.20</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>), while, for undrained soils, the range was from 1.63 to 4.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.00</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>). According to the RMSE of the model (Eq. 2, Fig. S2) prediction, the Rtot-to-Rhet<sup>′</sup> calculation introduced an uncertainty of approximately 0.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In drained and undrained sites, the total estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx ranged from 3.81 to 7.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.20</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 2.89 to 5.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.19</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively (Fig. 8). The uncertainties (relative CI) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and influx in both drained and undrained soils were relatively uniform, with a mean uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % for the estimated individual annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes. The largest source of uncertainty was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx in undrained soils (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %), while the uncertainty of individual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes in drained sites averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Fig. 8).</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e5809">Components of the estimated soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance (sum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> combined CI). Efflux is soil heterotrophic respiration (Rhet<sup>′</sup>) calculated from Rtot, and influx is the estimated litter input; both are expressed as C. Thus, efflux indicates soil C losses, and influx indicates soil C gains. aGV and bGV: above- and belowground biomass of herbaceous vegetation, respectively; fLF: fine foliar litter; FRP: tree fine-root production.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5845">The mean soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance during the study period was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the drained and undrained sites, respectively (Fig. 9a). These results indicate that long-term drainage reduced soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sequestration capacity by an average of 0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e5994">Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance (<bold>a–c</bold>: mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE) and impacting factors (<bold>d</bold>: PCA biplot). Positive values indicate soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals from the atmosphere. A: stand age; BA: basal area; BD: bulk density; C:N: ratio between organic carbon and nitrogen in soil; OLT: soil organic layer thickness; WTL: water table level; pH: soil pH value. K, Ca, Mg, P, OM, Corg, and N represent the content of potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, organic matter, organic carbon, and nitrogen, respectively, in the top 0–30 cm layer of soil. Site types: Dr, Dryopterioso–caricosa (undrained sites); Ox, Oxalidosa turf. mel. (drained); My, Myrtillosa turf. mel. (drained).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6086">The soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance stratified by dominant tree species (Fig. 9b) indicates that the drained sites were skewed towards <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals due to significantly higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals in pine stands. Pine sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) showed high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals with low uncertainty (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), in contrast to the other drained sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where the mean soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance was estimated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that soils in drained alder, birch, and spruce sites were near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equilibrium during the study period. The soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals identified for undrained birch and spruce stands (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were consistent, while, in alder stands, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.47</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was highly uncertain due to the number of sites being just two.</p>
      <p id="d2e6457">A trend in higher soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals was observed in site types associated with relatively lower nutrient availability (Fig. 9c). In Oxalis sites, the mean soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while, in Myrtillus sites, it was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, drained nutrient-richer soils were approximately at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equilibrium, whereas comparably nutrient-poorer soils acted as a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink. The observed tendency is supported by PCA (Fig. 9d) which indicates that higher soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals are associated with lower nutrient concentrations and pH levels. In addition, the PCA reveals that the risk of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source is reduced in stands with higher basal area and age and with a higher soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, which in our study likely reflects the variability in peat quality and decomposability under different vegetation types.</p>
      <p id="d2e6660">According to correlation analysis, soil parameters such as pH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, N, and P showed the strongest correlations with the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance (Fig. 10). Basal area was the tree stand characteristic with the strongest correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance, while, among the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux components, bGV demonstrated the most consistent role in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance. No meaningful relationship was identified between soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance and soil organic matter or C content, nor was it identified with the depth of the WTL or organic layer thickness.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e6733">Relationships between soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and impacting factors. Positive values indicate soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals. The figures include impacting factors showing the highest correlations found in the study dataset. Data points represent individual study sites.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6801">Soil nutrient availability as the factor affecting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance is confirmed by RDA and PLSR models. RDA and PLSR models (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) explained 78 % and 70 % of the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance variance, respectively. After excluding variables introducing multicollinearity, the models included WTL, organic layer thickness, pH, N, K, Ca, Mg, P, organic matter content of the soil, stand age, and basal area. The variables pH, K, and Mg showed significant contributions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the RDA model explaining the variation of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance. The variable N was not significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.087</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but was close to the threshold of significance. The PLSR model indicated that pH, K, Mg, and N explained 45 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance variance; however, the VIP (variable importance in projection) values for all potential explanatory variables were below 0.4, suggesting limited predictive power for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance with the current dataset.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance</title>
      <p id="d2e6924">The soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance of the studied drained and undrained organic forest soils fluctuated around equilibrium, demonstrating both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source dynamics. The reason for the uncertain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance in undrained alder stands could not be determined, as site characteristics were consistent with the patterns observed in other undrained sites showing soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals. However, we identified soil properties as the likely reasons for why the soil in drained pine stands showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals, in contrast to the C-neutral soils observed at other drained sites.</p>
      <p id="d2e6994">Although observing a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink in drained nutrient-rich soils may seem somewhat unexpected, given that these soils have generally been estimated to act on average as net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources in both boreal and temperate zones (Jauhiainen et al., 2023), it is not entirely novel. Both soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources have also been observed in earlier studies under a wide range of site conditions (e.g., Ojanen et al., 2013; Minkkinen et al., 2018; Bjarnadottir et al., 2021; Hermans et al., 2022). Many of the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink sites may be classified as nutrient-poor, but not all (e.g., Ojanen et al., 2013). In soil inventory studies carried out in Latvia, the soil C stocks of forestry-drained peatlands were found to be stable in all but the most nutrient-rich soil conditions, under which the C stock was reduced in the long term (Dubra et al., 2023; Lazdiņš et al., 2024). However, interpretation of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balances solely based on the nutrient status of a forest site should be approached with caution, as it is typically derived from indirect indicators such as vegetation or stand productivity, rather than a quantitative assessment of soil nutrient concentrations. Consequently, sites with variable conditions may be classified under a given nutrient status category. Similarly, drainage status does not guarantee specific WTL levels (Fig. 4). This may be the reason for varying findings on soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balances across studies that allegedly target the same soil type and drainage status; i.e. the category of drained, nutrient-rich soils may be too broad, encompassing varying nutrient and moisture regimes, which prevents the expectation of similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balances, especially in different climates. In our study, this aspect was evident, as the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance, regardless of drainage status, appeared to be influenced by the composition and relative proportions of the dominant tree species in combination with variation in soil nutrient conditions and organic matter quality, as indicated by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, across the study sites.</p>
      <p id="d2e7109">The soils at our study sites represented a wide range, from highly mineralized soils close to the threshold of organic soil definition (Hiraishi et al., 2013) to deep peat (Fig. 2). Similarly, the WTLs varied widely, with sites ranging from an average WTL close to the soil surface to depths exceeding 1 m (Fig. 4). However, no meaningful relationship was identified between WTL variation and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux or between mean WTL and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance. Also, soil C and organic matter contents, or the depth of the organic layer, were poor predictors of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance. The importance of these factors probably decreases over time since initial disturbance by drainage system implementation. Rhet has been found to decrease over time following drainage (Qiu et al., 2021), except for the initially wettest, waterlogged hollow surfaces (Munir et al., 2017). There are few long-term monitoring or chronosequence studies, but those suggest that the most intensive period of soil C loss following drainage is the first decade/decades (Hargreaves et al., 2003; Vanguelova et al., 2019). During that period, peat subsidence following drainage is also highest (Lukkala, 1949), and labile substances in peat, which, due to lowering WTL and peat subsidence, becomes exposed to oxic decomposition, are largely lost, leaving more decomposition-resistant substrates behind (e.g., Jayasekara et al., 2025). Simultaneously, major changes in litter inputs and their decomposability take place (Straková et al., 2010, 2012). Considering the long period since drainage of our sites, dating back to around 1 century ago and potentially even to the mid-19th century (Zālītis, 2012), the initially high soil C loss due to drainage-induced increase in gross soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions has likely been offset by enhanced biomass growth and the resulting increased litter inputs (Hommeltenberg et al., 2014). However, a comparison of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balances between drained and undrained sites still shows a negative impact of historical drainage (Table S11). To more accurately assess the impact of drainage on soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance and its evolution in time, long-term studies would be required.</p>
      <p id="d2e7180">Soil nutrient conditions explained the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balances better than WTL and soil C characteristics did. In our study, drained nutrient-rich soils were represented by the Oxalis (<italic>Oxalidosa turf. mel</italic>.) and Myrtillus (<italic>Myrtillosa turf. mel.</italic>) site types. All our drained birch and alder sites and most of the drained spruce sites belonged to the Oxalis site type, but most of the pine sites belonged to the Myrtillus site type. While the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance under the other species in drained sites was practically neutral during the study period, pine stands showed relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals. In the Myrtillus site type, nutrient concentrations were, on average, 1.5 to 5.4 times lower compared to Oxalis sites. In addition, Myrtillus sites had significantly lower pH levels and a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Fig. 2). The distinctive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance patterns between the site types suggest that, in addition to lower nutrient concentrations, increased soil acidity and differences in soil organic matter and litter input quality (decomposability) had a role in the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals in these sites. Previous studies have also reported a negative correlation between pH and soil C content (Zhou et al., 2019) and have linked soil acidification with increasing soil C stocks (Madsen et al., 2025; Marinos and Bernhardt, 2018). The relevance of soil chemical parameters in determining soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance was supported by RDA and PLSR analysis, revealing that soil pH and macronutrient concentrations were key parameters determining soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance. Both soil pH and macronutrient concentrations may be influenced by the tree species (Reich et al., 2005; Dawud et al., 2016). Conifers, especially Scots pine, are linked with lowered soil pH (Reich et al., 2005), which may be a way to engineer the ecosystem to its own favor, as Scots pine, unlike the other tree species found in our sites, can also thrive in nutrient-poor peatland forests (e.g., Ohlson, 1995). The soil acidification in coniferous stands can be attributed to litter quality (Reich et al., 2005; Brock et al., 2019). However, in undrained coniferous stands, soil pH was clearly higher compared to drained sites and similar to that of undrained broadleaf sites (Fig. 2). This is likely because undrained sites may receive more groundwater inputs that neutralize soil acidity than the drained sites. Our drained sites mostly had more acid soils than the undrained ones, a pattern that has previously been recorded for boreal drained peatland forests (Laiho and Laine, 1990). Apart from the reduced groundwater influence, the phenomenon has been explained by a reduction in soil buffering capacity resulting from leaching and tree uptake of base elements such as Ca and Mg and by increased oxidation of both organic and inorganic compounds following drainage, contributing to a gradual increase in soil acidity over time (Laine et al., 2006).</p>
      <p id="d2e7279">Among the drained sites, pine stands had the lowest mean soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux (Fig. 6b). Additionally, nutrient availability correlated negatively with belowground biomass (bGV, FRP), confirming previous observations that greater belowground biomass is associated with reduced nutrient availability (Zhang et al., 2024). Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux observed in Oxalis sites was consistent with the previous observations of higher organic matter decomposition rates typically observed in sites with high nutrient availability (Hiraishi et al., 2013; Shahbaz et al., 2022). However, an increased total soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx from litter was also observed in these sites during the study period, effectively offsetting soil C loss from Rhet. Another potential contributor to the positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance in drained soils was soil compaction induced by drainage, as the increased BD of drained soil was found to be associated with lower Rhet emissions. The reason may be reduced soil porosity limiting gas exchange between the soil and the atmosphere (Ball, 2013; Novara et al., 2012). Thus, while drained soil may be prone to a higher decomposition rate, flux-driving processes seem to be countered by increased soil compaction.</p>
      <p id="d2e7326">In any case, the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removals we estimated are uncertain and remain indicative, preventing a definitive conclusion that the soil functions as a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink. Some uncertainty in the results arises from the inherent variation in study sites categorized into different forest site types and drainage statuses; such variation is natural and cannot be considered erroneous (see, e.g., Westman and Laiho, 2003; Ojanen et al., 2010). However, based on the observed patterns, we consider site stratification by drainage status and site type to be an appropriate approach for interpreting soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance. This stratification captures key ecological differences that are relevant to C dynamics and supports meaningful comparisons across site conditions. The results obtained reflect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balances only for the study period, specific to the respective stands in their specific developmental stages and site conditions. They do not represent average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance over a longer time frame, such as an entire forest management cycle. In similar conditions, organic soils have been found to be a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source following regenerative felling (Butlers et al., 2022; Korkiakoski et al., 2023). Therefore, if the impact of management practices was considered, the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance would likely shift towards reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sequestration.</p>
      <p id="d2e7418">Our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance estimate does not include the impacts of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leaching and methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) emissions. DOC leaching occurs from both drained and undrained organic soils; however, in drained sites, related C losses can be increased by 0.43 to 0.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hiraishi et al., 2013). While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from drained organic soils, including emissions from drainage ditches in the temperate zone, are generally minor, averaging around 5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, C losses by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from undrained soils are highly variable and uncertain, ranging from 0 to 856 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hiraishi et al., 2013). Consequently, not accounting for DOC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when comparing the C balance of drained and undrained organic soils increases the uncertainty, while these impacts potentially offset each other.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission factors</title>
      <p id="d2e7598">The reported soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance values can be directly used as EFs (Table 4). Considering the lack of sufficient evidence for differences in drained soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux (Table S9) or balance (Fig. S4) between countries (see the Supplement), the use of regional soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> EFs is recommended over country-specific values. For example, the mean soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance for drained soils can be treated as an EF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which falls within the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> EFs of boreal forest organic soils reported by previous studies (Table 4, Fig. 11). The highest values observed in this study fall within the range reported in temperate-zone studies. The greater discrepancy with the temperate emission factors may be explained by the limited number of temperate studies available and their focus on a narrower range of site conditions compared to those represented in the Baltic countries.</p>

<table-wrap id="T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e7720">Organic soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of this study compared to those reported in previous studies. Values for the boreal and temperate zones are synthesized from the results of previous studies on nutrient-rich organic soils (Jauhiainen et al., 2023), while values for the hemiboreal zone reflect the EFs derived in this study. Abbreviations: NR – nutrient rich; NP – nutrient poor; Min and Max refer to the minimum and maximum values reported; CImin and CImax represent the lower and upper 95 % confidence limits for the mean; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – number of estimates.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Climate zone</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drainage status</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CImin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CImax</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Boreal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">103</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hemiboreal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Undrained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drained</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F11"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e8032">Organic soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission factors of this study compared to those reported in previous studies. Values for the boreal and temperate zones are synthesized from the results of previous studies on nutrient-rich organic soils (Jauhiainen et al., 2023), while values for the hemiboreal zone reflect the EFs derived in this study.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4627/2025/bg-22-4627-2025-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Total respiration</title>
      <p id="d2e8060">No significant differences in Rtot were observed between the countries, likely because the gradient in the mean air temperature from Estonia to Lithuania, ranging from 6.4 to 8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was not substantial enough to introduce distinguishable differences. Nevertheless, while temperature is generally recognized as a strong factor influencing soil respiration and its variation, it should not be regarded as the sole predictor of respiration. Relationships observed in one region may not directly apply to another, as differences in soil moisture (Jovani-Sancho et al., 2018) or nutrient status, as discussed earlier, can significantly alter the respiration dynamics. Similarly, no clear impact of dominant tree species on Rtot was found. This points to a minor role of dominant tree species in emissions. However, there is some evidence that emissions in undrained sites tended to be higher in deciduous stands, particularly alder stands, according to the measured instantaneous emissions. The enhanced soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux observed in the presence of alder can probably be attributed to the symbiotic nitrogen fixation associated with these trees (Warlo et al., 2019), which increases nitrogen availability in the soil. Nitrogen availability, in turn, can stimulate decomposition processes, leading to a higher rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release. However, we did not observe increased nitrogen levels in either the soil or the soil water of alder sites. Although statistically unconfirmed, a tendency can be noticed that, in drained sites, Rtot emissions tend to be higher in birch stands but lower in pine forests. Also, previous studies indicated that deciduous stands show higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Jauhiainen et al., 2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e8106">While it was found that both drainage status and WTL threshold above or below 30 cm can be used as a predictor of Rtot, a meaningful correlation between WTL and Rtot was not found. Furthermore, although the absolute variation in the WTL was higher in drained sites, the relative variation in both WTL level and Rtot was indifferent to the drainage status. The observations suggest that higher WTL conditions in undrained sites, while decreasing Rtot emissions, do not guarantee higher resilience to moisture regime disturbances, i.e., more stable emissions. The main reason is that the presence of drainage ditches is not the only factor constraining WTL both spatially and temporally, and, in undrained sites too, WTL frequently falls below 30 cm (Butlers et al., 2023), ensuring oxic conditions in soil layers containing labile organic matter. Furthermore, this typically happens in summer (Butlers et al., 2023), when increased temperatures further promote organic matter mineralization. The role of WTL dynamics is also reflected in PCA, showing higher dispersion of drained sites likely due to higher variation in WTL depths. This may be the reason complicating the quantification of relationships between Rtot and the affecting factors, especially in drained sites. The wide range of mean WTL measured at the drained sites also helps explain why Rtot at these sites is not necessarily significantly higher compared to undrained sites.</p>
      <p id="d2e8109">To achieve accurate Rtot annualization using data from periodic flux measurements, data interpolation through modeling approaches was applied. For Rtot interpolation, we compared nonlinear models and linear models after logarithmic or Box–Cox transformation. Both the advantages and shortcomings of these data transformation methods and modeling approaches have been reported in previous studies. (Box and Cox, 1964; Khomik et al., 2009; Liaw et al., 2021; Moulin et al., 2014; Wutzler et al., 2020; Yueqian, 2020). Although the bias in predicted annual Rtot varied among study sites, the overall impact of different flux modeling approaches on estimated mean annual Rtot of drained and undrained sites was minimal. Specifically, the mean bias of results obtained through the implementation of the Box–Cox transformation compared to other approaches was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %. Thus, while such an impact has been observed in previous studies, the skewing of results due to the annualization of respiration was not identified in our study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Soil heterotrophic respiration</title>
      <p id="d2e8144">We used an Rhet value derived from Rtot (Rhet<sup>′</sup>) as the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux. Rhet<sup>′</sup> was derived from Rtot empirically using the Rhet/Rs data from a large dataset (Jian et al., 2021), thereby reducing the effect of potential systematic and random errors in individual studies. Such empirical derivation of Rhet has been acknowledged to be an applicable approach and has been utilized in previous studies (Jauhiainen et al., 2019, 2023). To elaborate the recalculation model, we used Rhet and Rs values from the database (Jian et al., 2021) on forest soil flux in the boreal zone, as existing experience suggests that organic soil emissions in hemiboreal forests are more likely to align with boreal rather than temperate conditions (Bārdule et al., 2022; Butlers et al., 2022; Dubra et al., 2023; Jauhiainen et al., 2023; Krasnova et al., 2019; Lazdiņš et al., 2024). The choice of using only boreal data tends towards estimating higher Rhet<sup>′</sup>, compared to the use of temperate data, as illustrated in Fig. S2. This approach aimed to avoid the underestimation of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux. The mean share of Rhet acquired using boreal data was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> while using temperate data: 0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15, or around 10 % difference. Accordingly, the Rhet proportion values we applied were higher than the typically observed range of 0.5 to 0.6 (Bond-Lamberty et al., 2004; Hanson et al., 2000), demonstrating that our approach avoided underestimating Rhet.</p>
      <p id="d2e8225">The role of ground vegetation autotrophic respiration in Rtot increases with its biomass (Munir et al., 2017). Therefore, the risk of underestimating Rhet by using Rhet<sup>′</sup> is further reduced because the Rhet<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Rs ratio used to recalculate Rtot to Rhet<sup>′</sup> does not account for the impact of autotrophic respiration from aboveground vegetation; consequently, the approach tends to rather overestimate the Rhet. This aspect should be considered when assessing our results. When estimating the impact of historical drainage on the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance by comparing sites by drainage status, this bias was likely negligible because the mean ground vegetation biomass did not significantly differ between drained and undrained sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dm</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e8299">The applicability of the approach is supported by the comparability of the estimated Rhet<sup>′</sup> values with Rhet reported in previous studies (Bond-Lamberty and Thomson, 2010). We estimated Rhet<sup>′</sup> of drained soil to be a mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.20</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is slightly higher than the mean Rhet of forest organic soil found in the boreal zone (4.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Ojanen et al., 2010) and on a broader regional scale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.71</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Jian et al., 2021). When attempting to correct for the approximated overestimation of Rhet introduced by trenching (see the Supplement), the resulting mean Rhet would be 2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is considerably lower than the Rhet<sup>′</sup> values we used in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance estimates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Carbon influx by litter inputs</title>
      <p id="d2e8537">In the estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx, we considered data only for fLF, aGV, bGV, and FRP, excluding cLF, MP, and dwarf shrubs. This approach was chosen because the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions produced in the decomposition of these litter types were directly included in the measured Rtot. For instance, cLF due to its dimensions and scarce coverage could not be objectively included in chamber measurements. Furthermore, while fLF is relatively uniform in forest areas, the coverage of mosses and dwarf shrubs is not always so; therefore, it is necessary to know their area of projection to be included in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance estimation. One solution for incorporating the “missing” litter inputs would be to use modeling approaches (Alm et al., 2023). However, we did not attempt to include those litter sources in the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance estimation, as doing so would have introduced additional uncertainty. We estimated that annual moss production was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the average total moss biomass of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">matter</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dm</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured for moss patches in our sites. Thus, mosses could potentially provide annual litter inputs reaching up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dm</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if their cover was 100 %. The mean annual cLF was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dm</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the litter input estimates (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.70</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.43</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) used in the calculation of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance likely led to overestimated soil C loss. This highlights the need to consider all litter input components in further studies, even though that may clearly increase the workload.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e8827">Although all soils in our study sites were classified as nutrient-rich based on forest site type taxonomy, they included a wide variety, ranging from those near the threshold of organic soil definition to soils with deep peat layers. Consequently, the soils exhibited broad variability in pH, macronutrient concentrations, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. That in turn contributed to the observed behavior of the soils demonstrating both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source dynamics under both drained and undrained conditions. During the study period, drained soils under birch, black alder, and Norway spruce remained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-neutral, while, in pine stands, the soils were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks, presumably due to the significantly lower nutrient availability limiting mineralization of the organic matter. The disparity in soil nutrient conditions also explains why some undrained soils, characterized by relatively high nutrient availability, acted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources. These findings highlight the potential to improve predictions of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance by complementing the broad “nutrient-rich” soil classification, typically assigned using site vegetation as a proxy, with quantitative measurements of soil nutrient status.</p>
      <p id="d2e8909">The study provides a notable contribution through both the plot-level summary and raw data on soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx and efflux. The spatial coverage of the study sites, along with the variability in stand characteristics, soil properties, and water table level dynamics, provides input for synthesizing dynamic empirical soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance models that depend on drainage status, meteorological conditions, soil chemistry, and stand-related parameters. The reported soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance values can be directly used as emission factors. Additional research is still needed to expand the dataset for establishing robust quantitative relationships that can be used to reliably identify and predict whether organic soils function as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks or sources or remain in neutral balance, depending on site-specific conditions and annual weather variations.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8960">Data used for carbon balance estimations are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14968843" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14968843</ext-link> (Butlers, 2025).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e8967">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4627-2025-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4627-2025-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e8976">KS, JJ, RL, AL, and KA developed a harmonized methodology. AlB, DČ, TS, and MKS managed and processed the study data. AlB wrote the original draft, with significant reviewing contributions from RL. JJ, TS, ArB, IL, VS, HV, IL, AH, and JA provided critical reviews and edits to the article.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e8982">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e8988">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e8994">The research was conducted within the framework of the project “Demonstration of climate change mitigation potential of nutrient-rich organic soils in the Baltic states and Finland” (LIFE OrgBalt, LIFE18 CCM/LV/001158).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e8999">The preparation of the article was supported by the Latvia Council of Science national research program project “Forest4LV – Innovation in Forest Management and Value Chain for Latvia’s Growth: New Forest Services, Products and Technologies” (grant no. VPP-ZM-VRIIILA-2024/2-0002).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e9005">This paper was edited by Sara Vicca and reviewed by Jens-Arne Subke and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L., and Jalas, J.: Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe, Ann. Bot. Fenn., 5, 169–211, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Alm, J., Wall, A., Myllykangas, J.-P., Ojanen, P., Heikkinen, J., Henttonen, H. M., Laiho, R., Minkkinen, K., Tuomainen, T., and Mikola, J.: A new method for estimating carbon dioxide emissions from drained peatland forest soils for the greenhouse gas inventory of Finland, Biogeosciences, 20, 3827–3855, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3827-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-20-3827-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Ball, B. C.: Soil structure and greenhouse gas emissions: A synthesis of 20 years of experimentation, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 64, 357–373,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ejss.12013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bārdule, A., Gerra-Inohosa, L., Kļaviņš, I., Kļaviņa, Z., Bitenieks, K., Butlers, A., Lazdiņš, A., and Lībiete, Z.: Variation in the Mercury Concentrations and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Pristine and Managed Hemiboreal Peatlands, Land, 11, 1414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091414" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/land11091414</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Basiliko, N., Blodau, C., Roehm, C., Bengtson, P., and Moore, T. R.: Regulation of decomposition and methane dynamics across natural, commercially mined, and restored northern peatlands, Ecosystems, 10, 1148–1165,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9083-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-007-9083-2</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Beaulne, J., Garneau, M., Magnan, G., and Boucher, É.: Peat deposits store more carbon than trees in forested peatlands of the boreal biome, Sci. Rep., 11, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82004-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-021-82004-x</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Berger, T. W., Inselsbacher, E., and Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.: Carbon dioxide emissions of soils under pure and mixed stands of beech and spruce, affected by decomposing foliage litter mixtures, Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 986–997,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.020</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bhuiyan, R., Minkkinen, K., Helmisaari, H. S., Ojanen, P., Penttilä, T., and Laiho, R.: Estimating fine-root production by tree species and understorey functional groups in two contrasting peatland forests, Plant Soil, 412, 299–316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3070-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-016-3070-3</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bjarnadottir, B., Sungur, G. A., Sigurdsson, B. D., Kjartansson, B. T., Oskarsson, H., Oddsdottir, E. S., Gunnarsdottir, G. E., and Black, A.: Carbon and water balance of an afforested shallow drained peatland in Iceland, For. Ecol. Manage., 482, 118861, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118861" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118861</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bond-Lamberty, B. and Thomson, A.: A global database of soil respiration data, Biogeosciences, 7, 1915–1926, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1915-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-1915-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bond-Lamberty, B., Wang, C., and Gower, S. T.: A global relationship between the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration?, Glob. Chang. Biol., 10, 1756–1766,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00816.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00816.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R.: An Analysis of Transformations, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 26, 211–243,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x</ext-link>, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Brock, O., Kooijman, A., Nierop, K. G. J., Muys, B., Vancampenhout, K., and Jansen, B.: Disentangling the effects of parent material and litter input chemistry on molecular soil organic matter composition in converted forests in Western Europe, Org. Geochem., 134, 66–76, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Bušs, K.: Forest Ecology and Typology, Zinātne, Rīga, Latvija, 64 pp., <uri>https://dom.lndb.lv/data/obj/419599</uri> (last access: 9 September 2025), 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Butlers, A.: Appendix: Organic soil carbon balance in drained and undrained hemiboreal forests, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14968843" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14968843</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Butlers, A., Lazdiņš, A., Kalēja, S., and Bārdule, A.: Carbon Budget of Undrained and Drained Nutrient-Rich Organic Forest Soil, Forests, 13, 1790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111790" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/f13111790</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Butlers, A., Lazdiņš, A., Kalēja, S., Purviņa, D., Spalva, G., Saule, G., and Bārdule, A.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Emissions of Undrained and Drained Nutrient-Rich Organic Forest Soil, Forests, 14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/f14071390</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Calvo Buendia, E., Tanabe, K., Kranjc, A., Baasansuren, J., Fukuda, M., Ngarize, S., Osako, A., Pyrozhenko, Y., Shermanau, P., and Federici, S.: 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Switzerland, ISBN 978-4-88788-232-4, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Chin, M. Y., Lau, S. Y. L., Midot, F., Jee, M. S., Lo, M. L., Sangok, F. E., and Melling, L.: Root exclusion methods for partitioning of soil respiration: Review and methodological considerations, Pedosphere, 33, 683–699,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.01.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.01.015</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Comstedt, D., Boström, B., and Ekblad, A.: Autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration in a Norway spruce forest: Estimating the root decomposition and soil moisture effects in a trenching experiment, Biogeochemistry, 104, 121–132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9491-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-010-9491-9</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> Cools, N. and De Vos, B.: Sampling and analysis of soil, Manual Part X, in: Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests, 208, ISBN 978-3-86576-162-0, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Davidson, E. A. and Janssens, I. A.: Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04514" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature04514</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Dawud, S. M., Raulund-Rasmussen, K., Domisch, T., Finér, L., Jaroszewicz, B., and Vesterdal, L.: Is Tree Species Diversity or Species Identity the More Important Driver of Soil Carbon Stocks, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>N Ratio, and pH?, Ecosystems, 19, 645–660,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9958-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-016-9958-1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Denmead, O. T.: Approaches to measuring fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide between landscapes and the atmosphere, Plant Soil, 309, 5–24,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9599-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-008-9599-z</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Díaz-Pinés, E., Schindlbacher, A., Pfever, M., Jandl, R., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., and Rubio, A.: Root trenching: A useful tool to estimate autotrophic soil respiration? A case study in an austrian mountain forest, Eur. J. For. Res., 129, 101–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-008-0250-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10342-008-0250-6</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Dubra, S., Samariks, V., Līcīte, I., Butlers, A., Purviņa, D., Lupiķis, A., and Jansons, Ā.: Effects of Drainage on Carbon Stock in Hemiboreal Forests: Insights from a 54-Year Study, Sustainability, 15, 16622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416622" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/su152416622</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Eggleston, H., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., and Tanabe, K. (Eds.): 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES, Japan, ISBN 4-88788-032-4, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Epron, D.: Separating autotrophic and heterotrophic components of soil respiration: Lessons learned from trenching and related root-exclusion experiments, Soil Carbon Dyn. An Integr. Methodol., 157–168,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511711794.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511711794.009</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Estonian Environment Agency. Climate normals: <uri>https://www.ilmateenistus.ee/kliima/kliimanormid/sademed/?lang=en</uri>, last access: 25 April 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation> European Environment Agency: Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2021 and inventory report 2023, Copenhagen, EEA/PUBL/2023/044, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Fuss, R. and Hueppi, R.: Greenhouse Gas Flux Calculation from Chamber Measurements: R Package, <uri>https://git-dmz.thuenen.de/fuss/gasfluxes</uri> (last access: 14 October 2024), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation> Glenn, S., Heyes, A., and Moore, T.: Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from drained peat soils, Southern Quebec, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 7, 247–257, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hanson, P. J., Edwards, N. T., Garten, C. T., and Andrews, J. A.: Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations, Biogeochemistry, 48, 115–146,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006244819642" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1006244819642</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hargreaves, K. J., Milne, R., and Cannell, M. G. R.: Carbon balance of afforested peatland in Scotland, Forestry, 76, 299–317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/76.3.299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/forestry/76.3.299</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Hermans, R., McKenzie, R., Andersen, R., Teh, Y. A., Cowie, N., and Subke, J.-A.: Net soil carbon balance in afforested peatlands and separating autotrophic and heterotrophic soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effluxes, Biogeosciences, 19, 313–327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-313-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-19-313-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Tanabe, K., Srivastava, N., Fukuda, M., Troxler, T., and Jamsranjav, B.: 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands, IPCC, Switzerland, ISBN 978-92-9169-139-5, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Hommeltenberg, J., Schmid, H. P., Drösler, M., and Werle, P.: Can a bog drained for forestry be a stronger carbon sink than a natural bog forest?, Biogeosciences, 11, 3477–3493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3477-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-3477-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Hutchinson, G. L. and Livingston, G. P.: Use of chamber systems to measure trace gas fluxes, ASA Spec. Publ., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub55.c4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/asaspecpub55.c4</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Janssens, I. A., Lankreijer, H., Matteucci, G., Kowalski, A. S., Buchmann, N., Epron, D., Pilegaard, K., Kutsch, W., Longdoz, B., Grünwald, T., Montagnani, L., Dore, S., Rebmann, C., Moors, E. J., Grelle, A., Rannik, Ü., Morgenstern, K., Oltchev, S., Clement, R., Guomundsson, J., Minerbi, S., Berbigier, P., Ibrom, A., Moncrieff, J., Aubinet, M., Bernhofer, C., Jensen, N. O., Vesala, T., Granier, A., Schulze, E. D., Lindroth, A., Dolman, A. J., Jarvis, P. G., Ceulemans, R., and Valentini, R.: Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests, Glob. Chang. Biol., 7, 269–278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Jauhiainen, J.: Report on current situation – applied emission factors and projections of greenhouse gas emissions from organic soils, Salaspils, 65 pp.,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35701.93927" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13140/RG.2.2.35701.93927</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Jauhiainen, J., Alm, J., Bjarnadottir, B., Callesen, I., Christiansen, J. R., Clarke, N., Dalsgaard, L., He, H., Jordan, S., Kazanavičiūtė, V., Klemedtsson, L., Lauren, A., Lazdins, A., Lehtonen, A., Lohila, A., Lupikis, A., Mander, Ü., Minkkinen, K., Kasimir, Å., Olsson, M., Ojanen, P., Óskarsson, H., Sigurdsson, B. D., Søgaard, G., Soosaar, K., Vesterdal, L., and Laiho, R.: Reviews and syntheses: Greenhouse gas exchange data from drained organic forest soils – a review of current approaches and recommendations for future research, Biogeosciences, 16, 4687–4703, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4687-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-16-4687-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Jauhiainen, J., Heikkinen, J., Clarke, N., He, H., Dalsgaard, L., Minkkinen, K., Ojanen, P., Vesterdal, L., Alm, J., Butlers, A., Callesen, I., Jordan, S., Lohila, A., Mander, Ü., Óskarsson, H., Sigurdsson, B. D., Søgaard, G., Soosaar, K., Kasimir, Å., Bjarnadottir, B., Lazdins, A., and Laiho, R.: Reviews and syntheses: Greenhouse gas emissions from drained organic forest soils – synthesizing data for site-specific emission factors for boreal and cool temperate regions, Biogeosciences, 20, 4819–4839, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4819-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-20-4819-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Jayasekara, C., Leigh, C., Shimeta, J., Silvester, E., and Grover, S. P. P.: Effects of substrate quality, temperature, and water content on the decomposition of Sphagnum peat, Catena, 254, 108907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.catena.2025.108907</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Jian, J., Vargas, R., Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., Stell, E., Herrmann, V., Horn, M., Kholod, N., Manzon, J., Marchesi, R., Paredes, D., and Bond-Lamberty., B. P.: A Global Database of Soil Respiration Data, Version 5.0, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1827</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Jovani-Sancho, A. J., Cummins, T., and Byrne, K. A.: Soil respiration partitioning in afforested temperate peatlands, Biogeochemistry, 141, 1–21,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0496-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-018-0496-0</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Khomik, M., Altaf Arain, M., Liaw, K. L., and McCaughey, J. H.: Debut of a flexible model for simulating soil respiration-soil temperature relationship: Gamma model, J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences, 114, 1–11,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JG000851</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation> Konstantinavičiūtė, I., Byčenkienė, S., Kavšinė, A., Juška, R., Žiukelytė, I., Lenkaitis, R., Karlonienė, D., Politika, L., Mačiulskas, M., Armolaitis, K., Ozarinskienė, M., Matelytė, D., Merkelienė, J., Kairienė, E., and Šulinskas, K.: Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Lithuania, 1990–2021, Lithuania's national inventory report, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Korkiakoski, M., Ojanen, P., Tuovinen, J. P., Minkkinen, K., Nevalainen, O., Penttilä, T., Aurela, M., Laurila, T., and Lohila, A.: Partial cutting of a boreal nutrient-rich peatland forest causes radically less short-term on-site <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions than clear-cutting, Agric. For. Meteorol., 332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109361" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109361</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Krasnova, A., Kukumägi, M., Mander, Ü., Torga, R., Krasnov, D., Noe, S. M., Ostonen, I., Püttsepp, Ü., Killian, H., Uri, V., Lõhmus, K., Sõber, J., and Soosaar, K.: Carbon exchange in a hemiboreal mixed forest in relation to tree species composition, Agric. For. Meteorol., 275, 11–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2019.05.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2019.05.007</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Kutzbach, L., Schneider, J., Sachs, T., Giebels, M., Nykänen, H., Shurpali, N. J., Martikainen, P. J., Alm, J., and Wilmking, M.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux determination by closed-chamber methods can be seriously biased by inappropriate application of linear regression, Biogeosciences, 4, 1005–1025, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> Laiho, R. and Laine, J.: Post-drainage nutrient stores in peat, in: Biomass production and element fluxes in forested peatland ecosystems, edited by: Hånell, B., Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 81–91, ISBN 91-576-4458-6, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation> Laiho, R. and Pearson, M.: Surface peat and its dynamics following drainage – do they facilitate estimation of carbon losses with the C/ash method?, Mires and Peat, 17, 1–19,    2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Laiho, R., Bhuiyan, R., Straková, P., Mäkiranta, P., Badorek, T., and Penttilä, T.: Modified ingrowth core method plus infrared calibration models for estimating fine root production in peatlands, Plant Soil, 385, 311–327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2225-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-014-2225-3</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Laine, J., Laiho, R., Minkkinen, K., and Vasander, H.: Forestry and Boreal Peatlands, in: Boreal Peatland Ecosystems, Ecological Studies, vol. 188, edited by: Wieder, R. K. and Vitt, D. H., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31913-9_15" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-31913-9_15</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre. Climate normals: <uri>https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__ENV__GP__GPL/GPL010m</uri>, last access: 25 April 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Lazdiņš, A., Lupiķis, A., Polmanis, K., Bārdule, A., Butlers, A., and Kalēja, S.: Carbon stock changes of drained nutrient-rich organic forest soils in Latvia, Silva Fenn., 58, 1–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.22017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.14214/sf.22017</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Liaw, K. L., Khomik, M., and Arain, M. A.: Explaining the Shortcomings of Log-Transforming the Dependent Variable in Regression Models and Recommending a Better Alternative: Evidence From Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Emission Studies, J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences, 126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006238" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JG006238</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Līcīte, I., Lupiķis, A., Peters, J., Butlers, A., Armolaitis, K., Soosaar, K., Laiho, R., Čiuldienė, D., and Jauhiainen, J.: Report on the identified climate change mitigation targeted management practices on organic soils, Salaspils, 119 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11374.97608" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13140/RG.2.2.11374.97608</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service. Climate normals: <uri>https://www.meteo.lt/en/climate/lithuanian-climate/standard-climate-normals/</uri>, last access: 25 April 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Lukkala, O. J.: Soiden turvekerroksen painuminen ojituksen vaikutuksesta [The subsidence of the peat layer of bogs due to drainage], Commun. Inst. For. Fenn., 37, 1–67, <uri>http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-metla-201207171069</uri> (last access: 5 February 2025), 1949.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Madsen, R. L., Asplund, J., Nybakken, L., Biong, R., and Kj, O. J.: Harvesting history affects soil respiration and litterfall but not overall carbon balance in boreal Norway spruce forests, Forest Ecology and Management, 578, 122485,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122485" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122485</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation> Magnusson, B., Näykki, T., Hovind, H., Krysell, M., and Sahlin, E.: Handbook for Calculation of Measurement Uncertainty in Environmental Laboratories, Nordtest Report TR 537, 4th edn., 51, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Marinos, R. E. and Bernhardt, E. S.: Soil carbon losses due to higher pH offset vegetation gains due to calcium enrichment in an acid mitigation experiment, Ecology, 99, 2363–2373,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2478" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ecy.2478</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of the Environment of Republic of Estonia: Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Estonia 1990–2019, National Inventory Report Submission to the UNFCCC Secretariat, 1990–2021, <uri>https://kliimaministeerium.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2023-03/NIR_EST_1990-2021_15.03.2023.pdf</uri> (last acces: 15 October 2024), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation> Minkkinen, K., Laine, J., Shurpali, N. J., Mäkiranta, P., Alm, J., and Penttilä, T.: Heterotrophic soil respiration in forestry-drained peatlands, Boreal Environ. Res., 12, 115–126, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Minkkinen, K., Ojanen, P., Penttilä, T., Aurela, M., Laurila, T., Tuovinen, J.-P., and Lohila, A.: Persistent carbon sink at a boreal drained bog forest, Biogeosciences, 15, 3603–3624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3603-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-3603-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation> Moore, T. R., Trofymow, J. A., Taylor, B., Prescott, C., Camiré, C., Duschene, L., Fyles, J., Kozak, L., Kranabetter, M., Morrison, I., Siltanen, M., Smith, S., Titus, B., Visser, S., Wein, R., and Zoltai, S.: Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests, Glob. Chang. Biol., 5, 75–82, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Moulin, A. P., Glenn, A., Tenuta, M., Lobb, D. A., Dunmola, A. S., and Yapa, P.: Alternative transformations of nitrous oxide soil flux data to normal distributions, Can. J. Soil Sci., 94, 105–108,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS2013-008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4141/CJSS2013-008</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Munir, T. M., Khadka, B., Xu, B., and Strack, M.: Partitioning forest-floor respiration into source based emissions in a boreal forested bog: Responses to experimental drought, Forests, 8, 1–17,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f8030075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/f8030075</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Nakano, T., Sawamoto, T., Morishita, T., Inoue, G., and Hatano, R.: A comparison of regression methods for estimating soil-atmosphere diffusion gas fluxes by a closed-chamber technique, Soil Biol. Biochem., 36, 107–113,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.07.005</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Ngao, J., Longdoz, B., Granier, A., and Epron, D.: Estimation of autotrophic and heterotrophic components of soil respiration by trenching is sensitive to corrections for root decomposition and changes in soil water content, Plant Soil, 301, 99–110,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9425-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-007-9425-z</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Nichols, J. E. and Peteet, D. M.: Rapid expansion of northern peatlands and doubled estimate of carbon storage, Nat. Geosci., 12, 917–921,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0454-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-019-0454-z</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Nomura, K., Yamasaki, Y., Takada, A., Sago, Y., Yasutake, D., and Kitano, M.: A new method of evaluating gas fluxes in a closed chamber system with theoretical consideration for dynamic characteristics of a concentration sensor, Environ. Control Biol., 57, 53–59,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.57.53" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2525/ecb.57.53</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Novara, A., Armstrong, A., Gristina, L., Semple, K. T., and Quinton, J. N.: Effects of soil compaction, rain exposure and their interaction on soil carbon dioxide emission, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 37, 994–999,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3224</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Ohlson, M.: Growth and nutrient characteristics in bog and fen populations of Scots pine (<italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic>), Plant and Soil, 172, 235–245, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Ojanen, P., Minkkinen, K., Alm, J., and Penttilä, T.: Soil-atmosphere <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes in boreal forestry-drained peatlands, For. Ecol. Manage., 260, 411–421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.036</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Ojanen, P., Minkkinen, K., and Penttilä, T.: The current greenhouse gas impact of forestry-drained boreal peatlands, Forest Ecology and Management, 289, 201–208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.008</ext-link>, 2013</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Pribyl, D. W.: A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor, Geoderma, 156, 75–83,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Qiu, C., Ciais, P., Zhu, D., Guenet, B., Peng, S., Petrescu, A. M. R., Lauerwald, R., Makowski, D., Gallego-Sala, A. V., Charman, D. J., and Brewer, S. C.: Large historical carbon emissions from cultivated northern peatlands, Sci. Adv., 7, 1–10,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1332" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abf1332</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., Modrzynski, J., Mrozinski, P., Hobbie, S. E., Eissenstat, D. M., Chorover, J., Chadwick, O. A., Hale, C. M., and Tjoelker, M. G.: Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species, Ecology Letters, 8, 811–818,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00779.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00779.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Ryhti, K., Kulmala, L., Pumpanen, J., Isotalo, J., Pihlatie, M., Helmisaari, H. S., Leppälammi-Kujansuu, J., Kieloaho, A. J., Bäck, J., and Heinonsalo, J.: Partitioning of forest floor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions reveals the belowground interactions between different plant groups in a Scots pine stand in southern Finland, Agric. For. Meteorol., 297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108266</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Savage, K. E., Davidson, E. A., Abramoff, R. Z., Finzi, A. C., and Giasson, M. A.: Partitioning soil respiration: quantifying the artifacts of the trenching method, Biogeochemistry, 140, 53–63,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0472-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-018-0472-8</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Scharlemann, J. P. W., Tanner, E. V. J., Hiederer, R., and Kapos, V.: Global soil carbon: Understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool, Carbon Manag., 5, 81–91,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.77" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4155/cmt.13.77</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Shahbaz, M., Bengtson, P., Mertes, J. R., Kulessa, B., and Kljun, N.: Spatial heterogeneity of soil carbon exchanges and their drivers in a boreal forest, Sci. Total Environ., 831, 154876,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154876" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154876</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Silva, J. P., Lasso, A., Lubberding, H. J., Peña, M. R., and Gijzen, H. J.: Biases in greenhouse gases static chambers measurements in stabilization ponds: Comparison of flux estimation using linear and non-linear models, Atmos. Environ., 109, 130–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.068</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Skrebele, A., Treija, S., Lupkina, L., Cakars, I., Siņics, L., Lazdāne-Mihalko, J., Puļķe, A., Štelce, V., Klāvs, G., Gračkova, L., Bārdule, A., Butlers, A., Līcīte, I., Lazdiņš, A., Bērziņa, L., Gancone, A., and Dansone, B.: Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Latvia 1990–2021, Latvia`s National Inventory Report, Riga, <uri>https://videscentrs.lvgmc.lv/files/Klimats/SEG_emisiju_un_ETS_monitorings/Zinojums_par_klimatu/SEG_zinojums/2023/LV_NIR_15042023.pdf</uri> (last access: 15 October 2024), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Straková, P., Anttila, J., Spetz, P., Kitunen, V., Tapanila, T., and Laiho, R.: Litter quality and its response to water level drawdown in boreal peatlands at plant species and community level, Plant. Soil., 335, 501–520, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0447-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-010-0447-6</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Straková, P., Penttilä, T., Laine, J., and Laiho, R.: Disentangling direct and indirect effects of water table drawdown on above- and belowground plant litter decomposition: Consequences for accumulation of organic matter in boreal peatlands, Glob. Chang. Biol., 18, 322–335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02503.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02503.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Subke, J. A., Inglima, I., and Cotrufo, M. F.: Trends and methodological impacts in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux partitioning: A metaanalytical review, Glob. Chang. Biol., 12, 921–943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01117.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01117.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Vanguelova, E. I., Crow, P., Benham, S., Pitman, R., Forster, J., Eaton, E. L., and Morison, J. I. L.: Impact of Sitka spruce (<italic>Picea sitchensis</italic> (Bong.) Carr.) afforestation on the carbon stocks of peaty gley soils- A chronosequence study in the north of England, Forestry, 92, 242–252,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpz013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/forestry/cpz013</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Vigricas, E., Čiuldienė, D., Armolaitis, K., Valujeva, K., Laiho, R., Jauhiainen, J., Schindler, T., Bārdule, A., Lazdiņš, A., Butlers, A., Kazanavičiūtė, V., Belova, O., Kamil-Sardar, M., and Soosaar, K.: Total Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Efflux from Drained Terric Histosols, Plants, 13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/plants13010139</ext-link>, 2024. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Von Arnold, K., Nilsson, M., Hånell, B., Weslien, P., and Klemedtsson, L.: Fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from drained organic soils in deciduous forests, Soil Biol. Biochem., 37, 1059–1071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2004.11.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2004.11.004</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Warlo, H., von Wilpert, K., Lang, F., and Schack-Kirchner, H.: Black alder (<italic>Alnus glutinosa</italic> (L.) Gaertn.) on compacted skid trails: A trade-off between greenhouse gas fluxes and soil structure recovery?, Forests, 10,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/f10090726</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Westman, C. J. and Laiho, R.: Nutrient dynamics of drained peatland forests, Biogeochemistry, 63, 269–298,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023348806857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1023348806857</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Wutzler, T., Perez-Priego, O., Morris, K., El-Madany, T. S., and Migliavacca, M.: Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux errors are lognormally distributed – implications and guidance, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 9, 239–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-239-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gi-9-239-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Yamulki, S., Anderson, R., Peace, A., and Morison, J. I. L.: Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from an afforested lowland raised peatbog in Scotland: implications for drainage and restoration, Biogeosciences, 10, 1051–1065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1051-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-1051-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Z. C.: Northern peatland carbon stocks and dynamics: a review, Biogeosciences, 9, 4071–4085, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4071-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-4071-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Yueqian, M.: Analysis and modelling of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions within temperate coniferous and deciduous forests, McMaster University, 133 pp., <uri>http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26010</uri> (last access: 14 October 2024), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation> Zālītis, P.: Mežs un ūdens, Latvijas Valsts mežzinātnes institūts “Silava,” Salaspils, 356 pp., ISBN 978-9934-8016-6-2, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Yu, M., Zhang, R., Mi, Y., Xu, J., Jiang, R., and Gao, J.: Elevation Influences Belowground Biomass Proportion in Forests by Affecting Climatic Factors, Soil Nutrients and Key Leaf Traits, Plants, 13,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/plants13050674</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, W., Han, G., Liu, M., and Li, X.: Effects of soil pH and texture on soil carbon and nitrogen in soil profiles under different land uses in Mun River Basin, Northeast Thailand, PeerJ, 2019,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7717/peerj.7880</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Zoltai, S. C. and Martikainen, P. J.: Estimated extent of forested peatlands and their role in the global carbon cycle, For. Ecosyst. For. Manag. Glob. Carbon Cycle, I, 47–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61111-7_5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-61111-7_5</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Organic soils can be CO<sub>2</sub> sinks in both drained and undrained hemiboreal peatland forests</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L., and Jalas, J.:
Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe, Ann. Bot. Fenn., 5, 169–211, 1968.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Alm, J., Wall, A., Myllykangas, J.-P., Ojanen, P., Heikkinen, J., Henttonen, H. M., Laiho, R., Minkkinen, K., Tuomainen, T., and Mikola, J.:
A new method for estimating carbon dioxide emissions from drained peatland forest soils for the greenhouse gas inventory of Finland, Biogeosciences, 20, 3827–3855, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3827-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3827-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Ball, B. C.:
Soil structure and greenhouse gas emissions: A synthesis of 20 years of experimentation, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 64, 357–373,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Bārdule, A., Gerra-Inohosa, L., Kļaviņš, I., Kļaviņa, Z., Bitenieks, K., Butlers, A., Lazdiņš, A., and Lībiete, Z.:
Variation in the Mercury Concentrations and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Pristine and Managed Hemiboreal Peatlands, Land, 11, 1414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091414" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091414</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Basiliko, N., Blodau, C., Roehm, C., Bengtson, P., and Moore, T. R.:
Regulation of decomposition and methane dynamics across natural, commercially mined, and restored northern peatlands, Ecosystems, 10, 1148–1165,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9083-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9083-2</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Beaulne, J., Garneau, M., Magnan, G., and Boucher, É.:
Peat deposits store more carbon than trees in forested peatlands of the boreal biome, Sci. Rep., 11, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82004-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82004-x</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Berger, T. W., Inselsbacher, E., and Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.:
Carbon dioxide emissions of soils under pure and mixed stands of beech and spruce, affected by decomposing foliage litter mixtures, Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 986–997,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.020</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Bhuiyan, R., Minkkinen, K., Helmisaari, H. S., Ojanen, P., Penttilä, T., and Laiho, R.:
Estimating fine-root production by tree species and understorey functional groups in two contrasting peatland forests, Plant Soil, 412, 299–316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3070-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3070-3</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bjarnadottir, B., Sungur, G. A., Sigurdsson, B. D., Kjartansson, B. T., Oskarsson, H., Oddsdottir, E. S., Gunnarsdottir, G. E., and Black, A.: Carbon and water balance of an afforested shallow drained peatland in Iceland, For. Ecol. Manage., 482, 118861, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118861" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118861</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Bond-Lamberty, B. and Thomson, A.:
A global database of soil respiration data, Biogeosciences, 7, 1915–1926, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1915-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1915-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Bond-Lamberty, B., Wang, C., and Gower, S. T.:
A global relationship between the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration?, Glob. Chang. Biol., 10, 1756–1766,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00816.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00816.x</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R.:
An Analysis of Transformations, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 26, 211–243,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x</a>, 1964.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Brock, O., Kooijman, A., Nierop, K. G. J., Muys, B., Vancampenhout, K., and Jansen, B.:
Disentangling the effects of parent material and litter input chemistry on molecular soil organic matter composition in converted forests in Western Europe, Org. Geochem., 134, 66–76, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Bušs, K.:
Forest Ecology and Typology, Zinātne, Rīga, Latvija, 64 pp., <a href="https://dom.lndb.lv/data/obj/419599" target="_blank"/> (last access: 9 September 2025), 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Butlers, A.: Appendix: Organic soil carbon balance in drained and undrained hemiboreal forests, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14968843" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14968843</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       Butlers, A., Lazdiņš, A., Kalēja, S., and Bārdule, A.:
Carbon Budget of Undrained and Drained Nutrient-Rich Organic Forest Soil, Forests, 13, 1790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111790" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111790</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Butlers, A., Lazdiņš, A., Kalēja, S., Purviņa, D., Spalva, G., Saule, G., and Bārdule, A.:
CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O Emissions of Undrained and Drained Nutrient-Rich Organic Forest Soil, Forests, 14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071390" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071390</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Calvo Buendia, E., Tanabe, K., Kranjc, A., Baasansuren, J., Fukuda, M., Ngarize, S., Osako, A., Pyrozhenko, Y., Shermanau, P., and Federici, S.:
2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Switzerland, ISBN 978-4-88788-232-4, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Chin, M. Y., Lau, S. Y. L., Midot, F., Jee, M. S., Lo, M. L., Sangok, F. E., and Melling, L.:
Root exclusion methods for partitioning of soil respiration: Review and methodological considerations, Pedosphere, 33, 683–699,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.01.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.01.015</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       Comstedt, D., Boström, B., and Ekblad, A.:
Autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration in a Norway spruce forest: Estimating the root decomposition and soil moisture effects in a trenching experiment, Biogeochemistry, 104, 121–132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9491-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9491-9</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Cools, N. and De Vos, B.:
Sampling and analysis of soil, Manual Part X, in: Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests, 208, ISBN 978-3-86576-162-0, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Davidson, E. A. and Janssens, I. A.:
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04514" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04514</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Dawud, S. M., Raulund-Rasmussen, K., Domisch, T., Finér, L., Jaroszewicz, B., and Vesterdal, L.:
Is Tree Species Diversity or Species Identity the More Important Driver of Soil Carbon Stocks, C∕N Ratio, and pH?, Ecosystems, 19, 645–660,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9958-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9958-1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Denmead, O. T.:
Approaches to measuring fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide between landscapes and the atmosphere, Plant Soil, 309, 5–24,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9599-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9599-z</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Díaz-Pinés, E., Schindlbacher, A., Pfever, M., Jandl, R., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., and Rubio, A.:
Root trenching: A useful tool to estimate autotrophic soil respiration? A case study in an austrian mountain forest, Eur. J. For. Res., 129, 101–109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-008-0250-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-008-0250-6</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Dubra, S., Samariks, V., Līcīte, I., Butlers, A., Purviņa, D., Lupiķis, A., and Jansons, Ā.:
Effects of Drainage on Carbon Stock in Hemiboreal Forests: Insights from a 54-Year Study, Sustainability, 15, 16622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416622" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416622</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Eggleston, H., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., and Tanabe, K. (Eds.):
2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES, Japan, ISBN 4-88788-032-4, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Epron, D.:
Separating autotrophic and heterotrophic components of soil respiration: Lessons learned from trenching and related root-exclusion experiments, Soil Carbon Dyn. An Integr. Methodol., 157–168,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511711794.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511711794.009</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Estonian Environment Agency. Climate normals:
<a href="https://www.ilmateenistus.ee/kliima/kliimanormid/sademed/?lang=en" target="_blank"/>, last access: 25 April 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       European Environment Agency:
Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2021 and inventory report 2023, Copenhagen, EEA/PUBL/2023/044, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Fuss, R. and Hueppi, R.:
Greenhouse Gas Flux Calculation from Chamber Measurements: R Package, <a href="https://git-dmz.thuenen.de/fuss/gasfluxes" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 October 2024), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Glenn, S., Heyes, A., and Moore, T.:
Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from drained peat soils, Southern Quebec, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 7, 247–257, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Hanson, P. J., Edwards, N. T., Garten, C. T., and Andrews, J. A.:
Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations, Biogeochemistry, 48, 115–146,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006244819642" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006244819642</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hargreaves, K. J., Milne, R., and Cannell, M. G. R.: Carbon balance of afforested peatland in Scotland, Forestry, 76, 299–317, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/76.3.299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/76.3.299</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Hermans, R., McKenzie, R., Andersen, R., Teh, Y. A., Cowie, N., and Subke, J.-A.:
Net soil carbon balance in afforested peatlands and separating autotrophic and heterotrophic soil CO<sub>2</sub> effluxes, Biogeosciences, 19, 313–327, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-313-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-313-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Tanabe, K., Srivastava, N., Fukuda, M., Troxler, T., and Jamsranjav, B.:
2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands, IPCC, Switzerland, ISBN 978-92-9169-139-5, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Hommeltenberg, J., Schmid, H. P., Drösler, M., and Werle, P.:
Can a bog drained for forestry be a stronger carbon sink than a natural bog forest?, Biogeosciences, 11, 3477–3493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3477-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3477-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Hutchinson, G. L. and Livingston, G. P.:
Use of chamber systems to measure trace gas fluxes, ASA Spec. Publ., <a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub55.c4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub55.c4</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Janssens, I. A., Lankreijer, H., Matteucci, G., Kowalski, A. S., Buchmann, N., Epron, D., Pilegaard, K., Kutsch, W., Longdoz, B., Grünwald, T., Montagnani, L., Dore, S., Rebmann, C., Moors, E. J., Grelle, A., Rannik, Ü., Morgenstern, K., Oltchev, S., Clement, R., Guomundsson, J., Minerbi, S., Berbigier, P., Ibrom, A., Moncrieff, J., Aubinet, M., Bernhofer, C., Jensen, N. O., Vesala, T., Granier, A., Schulze, E. D., Lindroth, A., Dolman, A. J., Jarvis, P. G., Ceulemans, R., and Valentini, R.:
Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests, Glob. Chang. Biol., 7, 269–278, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       Jauhiainen, J.:
Report on current situation – applied emission factors and projections of greenhouse gas emissions from organic soils, Salaspils, 65 pp.,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35701.93927" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35701.93927</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       Jauhiainen, J., Alm, J., Bjarnadottir, B., Callesen, I., Christiansen, J. R., Clarke, N., Dalsgaard, L., He, H., Jordan, S., Kazanavičiūtė, V., Klemedtsson, L., Lauren, A., Lazdins, A., Lehtonen, A., Lohila, A., Lupikis, A., Mander, Ü., Minkkinen, K., Kasimir, Å., Olsson, M., Ojanen, P., Óskarsson, H., Sigurdsson, B. D., Søgaard, G., Soosaar, K., Vesterdal, L., and Laiho, R.:
Reviews and syntheses: Greenhouse gas exchange data from drained organic forest soils – a review of current approaches and recommendations for future research, Biogeosciences, 16, 4687–4703, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4687-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4687-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Jauhiainen, J., Heikkinen, J., Clarke, N., He, H., Dalsgaard, L., Minkkinen, K., Ojanen, P., Vesterdal, L., Alm, J., Butlers, A., Callesen, I., Jordan, S., Lohila, A., Mander, Ü., Óskarsson, H., Sigurdsson, B. D., Søgaard, G., Soosaar, K., Kasimir, Å., Bjarnadottir, B., Lazdins, A., and Laiho, R.:
Reviews and syntheses: Greenhouse gas emissions from drained organic forest soils – synthesizing data for site-specific emission factors for boreal and cool temperate regions, Biogeosciences, 20, 4819–4839, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4819-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4819-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jayasekara, C., Leigh, C., Shimeta, J., Silvester, E., and Grover, S. P. P.: Effects of substrate quality, temperature, and water content on the decomposition of Sphagnum peat, Catena, 254, 108907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108907</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Jian, J., Vargas, R., Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., Stell, E., Herrmann, V., Horn, M., Kholod, N., Manzon, J., Marchesi, R., Paredes, D., and Bond-Lamberty., B. P.:
A Global Database of Soil Respiration Data, Version 5.0, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1827</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Jovani-Sancho, A. J., Cummins, T., and Byrne, K. A.:
Soil respiration partitioning in afforested temperate peatlands, Biogeochemistry, 141, 1–21,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0496-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0496-0</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       Khomik, M., Altaf Arain, M., Liaw, K. L., and McCaughey, J. H.:
Debut of a flexible model for simulating soil respiration-soil temperature relationship: Gamma model, J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences, 114, 1–11,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000851</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Konstantinavičiūtė, I., Byčenkienė, S., Kavšinė, A., Juška, R., Žiukelytė, I., Lenkaitis, R., Karlonienė, D., Politika, L., Mačiulskas, M., Armolaitis, K., Ozarinskienė, M., Matelytė, D., Merkelienė, J., Kairienė, E., and Šulinskas, K.:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Lithuania, 1990–2021, Lithuania's national inventory report, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Korkiakoski, M., Ojanen, P., Tuovinen, J. P., Minkkinen, K., Nevalainen, O., Penttilä, T., Aurela, M., Laurila, T., and Lohila, A.:
Partial cutting of a boreal nutrient-rich peatland forest causes radically less short-term on-site CO<sub>2</sub> emissions than clear-cutting, Agric. For. Meteorol., 332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109361" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109361</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Krasnova, A., Kukumägi, M., Mander, Ü., Torga, R., Krasnov, D., Noe, S. M., Ostonen, I., Püttsepp, Ü., Killian, H., Uri, V., Lõhmus, K., Sõber, J., and Soosaar, K.:
Carbon exchange in a hemiboreal mixed forest in relation to tree species composition, Agric. For. Meteorol., 275, 11–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2019.05.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2019.05.007</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
       Kutzbach, L., Schneider, J., Sachs, T., Giebels, M., Nykänen, H., Shurpali, N. J., Martikainen, P. J., Alm, J., and Wilmking, M.:
CO<sub>2</sub> flux determination by closed-chamber methods can be seriously biased by inappropriate application of linear regression, Biogeosciences, 4, 1005–1025, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Laiho, R. and Laine, J.:
Post-drainage nutrient stores in peat, in: Biomass production and element fluxes in forested peatland ecosystems, edited by: Hånell, B., Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 81–91, ISBN 91-576-4458-6, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Laiho, R. and Pearson, M.:
Surface peat and its dynamics following drainage – do they facilitate estimation of carbon losses with the C/ash method?, Mires and Peat, 17, 1–19,    2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
       Laiho, R., Bhuiyan, R., Straková, P., Mäkiranta, P., Badorek, T., and Penttilä, T.:
Modified ingrowth core method plus infrared calibration models for estimating fine root production in peatlands, Plant Soil, 385, 311–327, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2225-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2225-3</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       Laine, J., Laiho, R., Minkkinen, K., and Vasander, H.:
Forestry and Boreal Peatlands, in: Boreal Peatland Ecosystems, Ecological Studies, vol. 188, edited by: Wieder, R. K. and Vitt, D. H., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31913-9_15" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31913-9_15</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre. Climate normals:
<a href="https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__ENV__GP__GPL/GPL010m" target="_blank"/>, last access: 25 April 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Lazdiņš, A., Lupiķis, A., Polmanis, K., Bārdule, A., Butlers, A., and Kalēja, S.:
Carbon stock changes of drained nutrient-rich organic forest soils in Latvia, Silva Fenn., 58, 1–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.22017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.22017</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Liaw, K. L., Khomik, M., and Arain, M. A.:
Explaining the Shortcomings of Log-Transforming the Dependent Variable in Regression Models and Recommending a Better Alternative: Evidence From Soil CO<sub>2</sub> Emission Studies, J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences, 126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006238" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006238</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Līcīte, I., Lupiķis, A., Peters, J., Butlers, A., Armolaitis, K., Soosaar, K., Laiho, R., Čiuldienė, D., and Jauhiainen, J.:
Report on the identified climate change mitigation targeted management practices on organic soils, Salaspils, 119 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11374.97608" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11374.97608</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service. Climate normals:
<a href="https://www.meteo.lt/en/climate/lithuanian-climate/standard-climate-normals/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 25 April 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lukkala, O. J.: Soiden turvekerroksen painuminen ojituksen vaikutuksesta [The subsidence of the peat layer of bogs due to drainage], Commun. Inst. For. Fenn., 37, 1–67, <a href="http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-metla-201207171069" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 February 2025), 1949.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Madsen, R. L., Asplund, J., Nybakken, L., Biong, R., and Kj, O. J.:
Harvesting history affects soil respiration and litterfall but not overall carbon balance in boreal Norway spruce forests, Forest Ecology and Management, 578, 122485,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122485" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122485</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Magnusson, B., Näykki, T., Hovind, H., Krysell, M., and Sahlin, E.:
Handbook for Calculation of Measurement Uncertainty in Environmental Laboratories, Nordtest Report TR 537, 4th edn., 51, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
       Marinos, R. E. and Bernhardt, E. S.:
Soil carbon losses due to higher pH offset vegetation gains due to calcium enrichment in an acid mitigation experiment, Ecology, 99, 2363–2373,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2478" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2478</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Ministry of the Environment of Republic of Estonia:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Estonia 1990–2019, National Inventory Report Submission to the UNFCCC Secretariat, 1990–2021, <a href="https://kliimaministeerium.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2023-03/NIR_EST_1990-2021_15.03.2023.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last acces: 15 October 2024), 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
       Minkkinen, K., Laine, J., Shurpali, N. J., Mäkiranta, P., Alm, J., and Penttilä, T.:
Heterotrophic soil respiration in forestry-drained peatlands, Boreal Environ. Res., 12, 115–126, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Minkkinen, K., Ojanen, P., Penttilä, T., Aurela, M., Laurila, T., Tuovinen, J.-P., and Lohila, A.: Persistent carbon sink at a boreal drained bog forest, Biogeosciences, 15, 3603–3624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3603-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3603-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Moore, T. R., Trofymow, J. A., Taylor, B., Prescott, C., Camiré, C., Duschene, L., Fyles, J., Kozak, L., Kranabetter, M., Morrison, I., Siltanen, M., Smith, S., Titus, B., Visser, S., Wein, R., and Zoltai, S.:
Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests, Glob. Chang. Biol., 5, 75–82, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
       Moulin, A. P., Glenn, A., Tenuta, M., Lobb, D. A., Dunmola, A. S., and Yapa, P.:
Alternative transformations of nitrous oxide soil flux data to normal distributions, Can. J. Soil Sci., 94, 105–108,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS2013-008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS2013-008</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
       Munir, T. M., Khadka, B., Xu, B., and Strack, M.:
Partitioning forest-floor respiration into source based emissions in a boreal forested bog: Responses to experimental drought, Forests, 8, 1–17,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f8030075" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/f8030075</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
       Nakano, T., Sawamoto, T., Morishita, T., Inoue, G., and Hatano, R.:
A comparison of regression methods for estimating soil-atmosphere diffusion gas fluxes by a closed-chamber technique, Soil Biol. Biochem., 36, 107–113,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.07.005</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
       Ngao, J., Longdoz, B., Granier, A., and Epron, D.:
Estimation of autotrophic and heterotrophic components of soil respiration by trenching is sensitive to corrections for root decomposition and changes in soil water content, Plant Soil, 301, 99–110,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9425-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9425-z</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
       Nichols, J. E. and Peteet, D. M.:
Rapid expansion of northern peatlands and doubled estimate of carbon storage, Nat. Geosci., 12, 917–921,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0454-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0454-z</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
       Nomura, K., Yamasaki, Y., Takada, A., Sago, Y., Yasutake, D., and Kitano, M.:
A new method of evaluating gas fluxes in a closed chamber system with theoretical consideration for dynamic characteristics of a concentration sensor, Environ. Control Biol., 57, 53–59,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.57.53" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.57.53</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
       Novara, A., Armstrong, A., Gristina, L., Semple, K. T., and Quinton, J. N.:
Effects of soil compaction, rain exposure and their interaction on soil carbon dioxide emission, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 37, 994–999,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3224</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
       Ohlson, M.:
Growth and nutrient characteristics in bog and fen populations of Scots pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris</i>), Plant and Soil, 172, 235–245, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
       Ojanen, P., Minkkinen, K., Alm, J., and Penttilä, T.:
Soil-atmosphere CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes in boreal forestry-drained peatlands, For. Ecol. Manage., 260, 411–421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.036</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ojanen, P., Minkkinen, K., and Penttilä, T.: The current greenhouse gas impact of forestry-drained boreal peatlands, Forest Ecology and Management, 289, 201–208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.008</a>, 2013

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
       Pribyl, D. W.:
A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor, Geoderma, 156, 75–83,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.003</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
       Qiu, C., Ciais, P., Zhu, D., Guenet, B., Peng, S., Petrescu, A. M. R., Lauerwald, R., Makowski, D., Gallego-Sala, A. V., Charman, D. J., and Brewer, S. C.:
Large historical carbon emissions from cultivated northern peatlands, Sci. Adv., 7, 1–10,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1332" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1332</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
       Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., Modrzynski, J., Mrozinski, P., Hobbie, S. E., Eissenstat, D. M., Chorover, J., Chadwick, O. A., Hale, C. M., and Tjoelker, M. G.:
Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species, Ecology Letters, 8, 811–818,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00779.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00779.x</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
       Ryhti, K., Kulmala, L., Pumpanen, J., Isotalo, J., Pihlatie, M., Helmisaari, H. S., Leppälammi-Kujansuu, J., Kieloaho, A. J., Bäck, J., and Heinonsalo, J.:
Partitioning of forest floor CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reveals the belowground interactions between different plant groups in a Scots pine stand in southern Finland, Agric. For. Meteorol., 297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108266</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
       Savage, K. E., Davidson, E. A., Abramoff, R. Z., Finzi, A. C., and Giasson, M. A.:
Partitioning soil respiration: quantifying the artifacts of the trenching method, Biogeochemistry, 140, 53–63,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0472-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0472-8</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
       Scharlemann, J. P. W., Tanner, E. V. J., Hiederer, R., and Kapos, V.:
Global soil carbon: Understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool, Carbon Manag., 5, 81–91,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.77" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.77</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
       Shahbaz, M., Bengtson, P., Mertes, J. R., Kulessa, B., and Kljun, N.:
Spatial heterogeneity of soil carbon exchanges and their drivers in a boreal forest, Sci. Total Environ., 831, 154876,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154876" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154876</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
       Silva, J. P., Lasso, A., Lubberding, H. J., Peña, M. R., and Gijzen, H. J.:
Biases in greenhouse gases static chambers measurements in stabilization ponds: Comparison of flux estimation using linear and non-linear models, Atmos. Environ., 109, 130–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.068</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
       Skrebele, A., Treija, S., Lupkina, L., Cakars, I., Siņics, L., Lazdāne-Mihalko, J., Puļķe, A., Štelce, V., Klāvs, G., Gračkova, L., Bārdule, A., Butlers, A., Līcīte, I., Lazdiņš, A., Bērziņa, L., Gancone, A., and Dansone, B.:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Latvia 1990–2021, Latvia`s National Inventory Report, Riga, <a href="https://videscentrs.lvgmc.lv/files/Klimats/SEG_emisiju_un_ETS_monitorings/Zinojums_par_klimatu/SEG_zinojums/2023/LV_NIR_15042023.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 October 2024), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Straková, P., Anttila, J., Spetz, P., Kitunen, V., Tapanila, T., and Laiho, R.: Litter quality and its response to water level drawdown in boreal peatlands at plant species and community level, Plant. Soil., 335, 501–520, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0447-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0447-6</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
       Straková, P., Penttilä, T., Laine, J., and Laiho, R.:
Disentangling direct and indirect effects of water table drawdown on above- and belowground plant litter decomposition: Consequences for accumulation of organic matter in boreal peatlands, Glob. Chang. Biol., 18, 322–335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02503.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02503.x</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
       Subke, J. A., Inglima, I., and Cotrufo, M. F.:
Trends and methodological impacts in soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux partitioning: A metaanalytical review, Glob. Chang. Biol., 12, 921–943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01117.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01117.x</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
       Vanguelova, E. I., Crow, P., Benham, S., Pitman, R., Forster, J., Eaton, E. L., and Morison, J. I. L.:
Impact of Sitka spruce (<i>Picea sitchensis</i> (Bong.) Carr.) afforestation on the carbon stocks of peaty gley soils- A chronosequence study in the north of England, Forestry, 92, 242–252,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpz013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpz013</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
       Vigricas, E., Čiuldienė, D., Armolaitis, K., Valujeva, K., Laiho, R., Jauhiainen, J., Schindler, T., Bārdule, A., Lazdiņš, A., Butlers, A., Kazanavičiūtė, V., Belova, O., Kamil-Sardar, M., and Soosaar, K.:
Total Soil CO<sub>2</sub> Efflux from Drained Terric Histosols, Plants, 13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010139</a>, 2024.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
       Von Arnold, K., Nilsson, M., Hånell, B., Weslien, P., and Klemedtsson, L.:
Fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O from drained organic soils in deciduous forests, Soil Biol. Biochem., 37, 1059–1071, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2004.11.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2004.11.004</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
       Warlo, H., von Wilpert, K., Lang, F., and Schack-Kirchner, H.:
Black alder (<i>Alnus glutinosa</i> (L.) Gaertn.) on compacted skid trails: A trade-off between greenhouse gas fluxes and soil structure recovery?, Forests, 10,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090726</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
       Westman, C. J. and Laiho, R.:
Nutrient dynamics of drained peatland forests, Biogeochemistry, 63, 269–298,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023348806857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023348806857</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
       Wutzler, T., Perez-Priego, O., Morris, K., El-Madany, T. S., and Migliavacca, M.:
Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux errors are lognormally distributed – implications and guidance, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 9, 239–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-239-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-239-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
       Yamulki, S., Anderson, R., Peace, A., and Morison, J. I. L.:
Soil CO<sub>2</sub> CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes from an afforested lowland raised peatbog in Scotland: implications for drainage and restoration, Biogeosciences, 10, 1051–1065, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1051-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1051-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
       Yu, Z. C.:
Northern peatland carbon stocks and dynamics: a review, Biogeosciences, 9, 4071–4085, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4071-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4071-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
       Yueqian, M.:
Analysis and modelling of soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions within temperate coniferous and deciduous forests, McMaster University, 133 pp., <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26010" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 October 2024), 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
       Zālītis, P.:
Mežs un ūdens, Latvijas Valsts mežzinātnes institūts “Silava,” Salaspils, 356 pp., ISBN 978-9934-8016-6-2, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Yu, M., Zhang, R., Mi, Y., Xu, J., Jiang, R., and Gao, J.:
Elevation Influences Belowground Biomass Proportion in Forests by Affecting Climatic Factors, Soil Nutrients and Key Leaf Traits, Plants, 13,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050674" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050674</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhou, W., Han, G., Liu, M., and Li, X.:
Effects of soil pH and texture on soil carbon and nitrogen in soil profiles under different land uses in Mun River Basin, Northeast Thailand, PeerJ, 2019,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7880</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
       Zoltai, S. C. and Martikainen, P. J.:
Estimated extent of forested peatlands and their role in the global carbon cycle, For. Ecosyst. For. Manag. Glob. Carbon Cycle, I, 47–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61111-7_5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61111-7_5</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
