<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-22-7441-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Sediment heterogeneity shapes spatial variability of resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production</article-title><alt-title>Sediment heterogeneity shapes spatial variability</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bartl</surname><given-names>Ines</given-names></name>
          <email>ines.bartl@auckland.ac.nz</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-0887</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Thrush</surname><given-names>Simon</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Marine Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ines Bartl (ines.bartl@auckland.ac.nz)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>7441</fpage><lpage>7454</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Ines Bartl</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/7441/2025/bg-22-7441-2025.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/7441/2025/bg-22-7441-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/7441/2025/bg-22-7441-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/7441/2025/bg-22-7441-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e96">Demersal fishing is a major anthropogenic disturbance to marine sediments, with global implications for benthic carbon cycling and greenhouse gas emissions. Resuspension of sediment organic matter during bottom trawling enhances oxic mineralisation, converting stored organic carbon into aqueous CO<sub>2</sub> and reducing the long-term carbon storage potential of the seafloor. Sediment heterogeneity likely plays a role in the vulnerability of sedimentary organic carbon to resuspension, but spatial estimates CO<sub>2</sub> release from resuspended sediment rarely accounts for this heterogeneity. We conducted a large-scale survey in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand, to assess how sediment characteristics affect resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production (RCO<sub>2</sub>P). Using a resuspension assay at 57 sites, we quantified RCO<sub>2</sub>P accompanied by measurements of sediment grain size, organic matter content and quality, and phytopigments. Boosted regression tree analysis revealed that organic matter content has the strongest influence on RCO<sub>2</sub>P variability, followed by coarse grained sand content and water depth. Non-linear relationships with RCO<sub>2</sub>P further indicate context-dependent mechanisms controlling RCO<sub>2</sub>P and allowed for the identification of three clusters with differing levels of vulnerability to resuspension impacts and different environmental influences. Overall, risk of resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> release was moderate to very high in sediments with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 % organic matter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 % coarse grained sand, and at depths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 56 m, comprising 73 % of our sampling sites. Multiple “hotspot” locations were found in the Hauraki Gulf, likely driven by an interplay of organic matter bioavailability and hydrodynamic conditions. Our results demonstrate that accounting for sediment heterogeneity in resuspension impact assessments will create more realistic and ecologically relevant estimates of C vulnerability over regional scales to inform spatial fisheries management.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>George Mason Centre for the Natural Environment, University of Auckland</funding-source>
<award-id>4112 - 78045</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment</funding-source>
<award-id>UOAX2307</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e212">With the climate crisis progressing, humanity is in urgent need for undisturbed natural ecosystems to help stabilize the Earth's climate. Coastal and shelf seas hereby play a pivotal role by functioning as carbon (C) sinks as these highly productive systems build up large organic C stocks and high C burial rates in their sediments (Bianchi et al., 2018; Najjar et al., 2018). However, marine anthropogenic activities are a major disruption to the seafloor and its C sink functioning. The most prominent disturbance is demersal fishing whereby weighted gear is dragged over marine sediment to catch bottom-dwelling fish and benthic shellfish. Approximately 21.9 Gt of sediment are resuspended globally each year by this technique (Oberle et al., 2016), destroying benthic habitats and altering benthic C cycling processes (Bradshaw et al., 2021; Polymenakou et al., 2005; Pusceddu et al., 2005a; Thrush and Dayton, 2003).</p>
      <p id="d2e215">Benthic C cycling is controlled by complex interactions of physical, chemical and biological processes. For example, the interplay of hydrodynamics, light availability, temperature, oxygen exposure, pH, grain size, permeability, redox state and benthic community structure and activity (fauna, algae, microbes) all affect organic matter reactivity which eventually determines how much of the organic C is naturally mineralised or buried (Arndt et al., 2013; Burdige, 2007; Middelburg, 2018; Snelgrove et al., 2018). Sediment resuspension influences this interplay by mixing organic matter from a certain sediment layer into the water column, thereby likely removing any redox gradients or physical protections that preserved the organic matter (Burdige, 2007; Kleber et al., 2021; Mayer, 1994). As a result, the resuspended organic matter is a mixture of dissolved and particulate organic C of different concentrations, bioavailability, composition, and structure altering its overall reactivity (Arndt et al., 2013). Resuspension further changes the abiotic conditions, most prominently oxygen exposure which can alter degradation rates of refractory and labile organic matter (Hulthe et al., 1998). Also the response of microbial community structure and activity to resuspension and priming can alter organic C mineralisation (van Nugteren et al., 2009; Pusceddu et al., 2005b). As a result, sediment resuspension experiments often report higher mineralisation rates in resuspended than in undisturbed sediments (Almroth-Rosell et al., 2012a; Bartl et al., 2025; Polymenakou et al., 2005; Ståhlberg et al., 2006), suggesting that the resuspension impact on physical, chemical and biological drivers stimulates organic C mineralisation thus reducing the fraction of organic C that can be buried long-term.</p>
      <p id="d2e218">Based on the concept of resuspension stimulating organic C mineralisation, modelling studies estimated that bottom trawling causes a release of stored organic C as aqueous CO<sub>2</sub> of 1.7–493 t CO<sub>2</sub> km<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (Luisetti et al., 2019; Muñoz et al., 2023; Porz et al., 2024; Sala et al., 2021). Such estimates differ by up to two orders of magnitude as they rely on different first-order degradation rate constants and different assumptions about organic C lability. Different rate constants are applied across oceanic regions (Muñoz et al., 2023; Sala et al., 2021) or to C pools of varying lability (Porz et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2019), along with assumptions that either all organic C (Luisetti et al., 2019) or only the labile fraction (Atwood et al., 2024, Sala et al., 2021) is mineralised once resuspended. The used degradation constants and model assumptions have been critically debated around their applicability for spatially variable marine sediments (Atwood et al., 2023; Epstein et al., 2022; Hiddink et al., 2023). Marine sediments display large spatial diversity of sediment properties formed by physical, chemical and biological processes as well as their interactions (Holland and Elmore, 2008; Snelgrove et al., 2018). While varying sediment properties are known to influence undisturbed organic C mineralisation and burial, the resuspension impact on this process is less clear as experiments often use only one sediment type or compare sand vs. mud (Almroth et al., 2009; Almroth-Rosell et al., 2012b; Lønborg et al., 2024; Ståhlberg et al., 2006). Measuring resuspension effects across wider ranges of sediment properties, i.e. across sediment heterogeneity, will provide new and spatially detailed insights on potential impacts on the C storage function.</p>
      <p id="d2e263">To empirically quantify variability of resuspension impacts across sediment heterogeneity, we have recently developed a measure of C storage vulnerability through a resuspension assay (Bartl et al., 2025). The assay quantifies potential rates of resuspension-induced organic C mineralisation, and its simple design allows for high sampling resolution within one region. In this study, we conducted a survey in the Hauraki Gulf (New Zealand), a heterogeneous shelf system impacted by dredging and bottom trawling, where we applied the resuspension assay across 57 sites spanning wide ranges of sediment characteristics and water depths. Surface sediment grain size fractions, organic matter content and freshness, and phytopigments were used as indicators of sediment heterogeneity, and we analysed their influence on resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production using boosted regression tree modelling. Our results provide detailed insights into the relationships between sediment heterogeneity and sediment resuspension impacts on C storage, contributing to discussions around sustainable spatial management of demersal fisheries in shelf sea regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study site and sampling</title>
      <p id="d2e290">The Hauraki Gulf is a semi-enclosed, oligotrophic shelf sea up to 150 m deep, located in the northeast of New Zealand. Its seafloor comprises diverse volcanic and alluvial sediments ranging from coarse calcareous sand and gravel to fine sands and silts rich in clay (Manighetti and Carter, 1999). Water circulation and sediment transport are dominated by the south-eastward flowing East Auckland Current and strong tidal currents (Manighetti and Carter, 1999; Sharples, 1997; Zeldis et al., 2004). Terrestrial organic C input is limited and mainly confined to the Firth of Thames, while in the inner and outer Gulf, sediment organic matter derives from both terrestrial and marine sources (Sikes et al., 2009). Anthropogenic impacts have affected the Gulf for decades, including bottom trawling, dredging, and sand mining (Hauraki Gulf Forum, 2020, 2023). Bottom trawling generally occurs at depths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m (Fig. S1) wile commercial scallop dredging took place in shallower areas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m) but has been banned since 2022 (Hauraki Gulf Forum, 2020, 2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e307">In February and March 2024, 57 sites were sampled aboard the R/V <italic>Te Kaihōpara</italic> (Fig. 1). Sediments were collected using a HAPS corer (KC Denmark, 14 cm diameter), with three replicate cores taken per site. Subsamples from the surface sediment (0–3 cm) were collected for characterisation using acid-cleaned (10 % HCl) polypropylene syringes with cut-off tips, while paired small sediment cores were taken for the resuspension assay using acid-cleaned acrylic core liners (inner diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4 cm, height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 cm). Sediment samples for characterisation were immediately transferred to acid-cleaned polypropylene containers, kept on ice, and frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 °C at the end of each sampling day. The small intact cores were stored with open tops in dark seawater tanks at ambient bottom-water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 °C), and resuspension assay incubations were conducted within two hours of sampling.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e343">Study sites in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand (black dots). Coloured shading represents bathymetry. Map produced using Ocean Data View (Schlitzer, Reiner, Ocean Data View, <uri>https://odv.awi.de</uri>, last access: 19 November 2025, 2025).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/7441/2025/bg-22-7441-2025-f01.png"/>

        </fig>


</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Resuspension assay</title>
      <p id="d2e365">To quantify aqueous CO<sub>2</sub> production in resuspended sediments, we conducted resuspension assays following Bartl et al. (2025). The assay incubates undisturbed sediments in small cores and resuspended sediments in glass bottles, measuring temporal changes in oxygen concentration to determine sediment oxygen demand (SOD). For both treatments, the upper 3 cm of sediment – typically disturbed by trawling and dredging (Hiddink et al., 2017) – were incubated. Optimal sediment-to-water ratios to maintain oxic conditions were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for sandy sediments (250 mL bottles) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for muddy sediments (500 mL bottles). For the resuspension treatment, sediment was added to glass bottles pre-filled with filtered seawater and the sediment was resuspended by gentle inversion for 30 s. In both undisturbed cores and resuspension treatments, SOD (mmol m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) was calculated from oxygen concentrations measured at the start and end of the 4–6 h incubations (OXROB10 probe and FireSting GO2 meter, Pyroscience, Germany). Values were normalised to incubation time and sediment surface area. Linear decline in oxygen, a requirement for this calculation, was validated through preliminary tests (Bartl et al., 2025). At each site, three pairs of control cores and resuspension treatments were incubated in the dark at ambient bottom-water temperature, conditions were monitored with loggers (Hobo Pendants, USA). Incubations showing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % oxygen decrease between initial and final measurements, or before and after shaking, were discarded (Bartl et al., 2025). Organic C mineralisation to CO<sub>2</sub> was estimated from SOD using a respiratory quotient (RQ) of 0.9 for inner-shelf sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m depth) and 0.85 for outer-shelf sites (50–200 m; Jørgensen et al., 2022). Resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production (RCO2P) was calculated as the difference in CO<sub>2</sub> production between resuspended and undisturbed samples. The factor increase in CO<sub>2</sub> production was obtained by dividing resuspended values by undisturbed values. RCO2P serves as a proxy for the vulnerability of sediment organic C to severe resuspension, with higher RCO2P indicating greater vulnerability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Sediment characteristics</title>
      <p id="d2e484">Organic matter content was determined by loss on ignition, burning dried (60 °C for 7 d) sediments at 450 °C for four hours. For grain size analysis, sediments were digested with 10 % H2O2 for six weeks to remove organic matter, washed with deionised water, and dispersed in 5 % sodium hexametaphosphate before laser diffraction analysis using a Malvern Mastersizer-3000 (Malvern, UK). Four grain size classes were derived: coarse sand (500–2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), medium sand (250–500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), fine sand (63–250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), and mud (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m). This grouping reflects the bimodal grain size distributions observed in most samples while keeping the number of grain size factors for data analysis manageable. Shell hash and gravel were quantified by wet sieving and weighing two dried fractions: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 mm (shell hash and gravel) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 mm (remaining sediment). Phytopigments (chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and phaeophytin) were extracted from 1 g of homogenised, freeze-dried sediment using 3 mL of 90 % aqueous acetone over 24 h (Buffan-Dubau and Carman, 2000; Sun et al., 1991). Pigment absorbances were measured before and after acidification with a spectrophotometer (Duetta, Horiba Scientific), and concentrations were calculated following Lorenzen (1967). Chlorophyll a concentration was used as an indicator of algal biomass, while the ratio of organic matter content to total phytopigment concentration (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> phaeophytin) served to characterise short-term organic matter freshness (Miatta and Snelgrove, 2021). Total phytopigment concentration was used rather than Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> because both photosynthetic Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and its degradation product represents labile organic matter components (Pusceddu et al., 2010). Lower ratios indicate fresher, less degraded material.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Data analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e585">A total of 171 samples were analysed for each sediment characteristic alongside 171 resuspension assays. After quality assessment of the assay data (lost cores, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % oxygen decline, or large macrofauna), two sites (6 data points) and 21 additional data points were removed. Two Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were interpolated as the mean of the remaining site replicates, resulting in a complete dataset of 144 samples. To identify relationships between sediment heterogeneity and RCO2P, we applied supervised machine learning using boosted regression trees (BRT; (Friedman, 2001). BRTs are ensemble models that sequentially build decision trees, with each tree correcting errors from the previous iteration, improving predictive performance. They capture non-linear relationships and interactions, making them suitable for analysing complex ecological datasets while maintaining strong predictive power (Lucas, 2020; Rubbens et al., 2023). BRTs have been widely applied for predicting species distributions, fishing effort, ecosystem services (Cimino et al., 2020; Lohrer et al., 2020; Soykan et al., 2014) and linking biogeochemical variables to environmental factors (Panaïotis et al., 2025; Rijkenberg et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d2e602">Our dataset included the following variables indicative of sediment heterogeneity: water depth (Depth), shell hash and gravel content (S/G), coarse sand (C-Sand), medium sand (M-Sand), fine sand (F-Sand), mud (Mud), organic matter content (OM), and the organic matter-to-total phytopigment ratio (OM : Phyto). The response variable was resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production (RCO2P). Mud, M-Sand, and OM were highly collinear (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. S2). While multicollinearity does not affect BRT predictions, it complicates interpretation of feature importance and interactions (Boulesteix et al., 2012; Dormann et al., 2013; Lucas, 2020). We therefore excluded Mud and M-Sand, retaining OM as it is the substrate for C mineralisation. Replacement tests using Mud and M-Sand instead of OM produced similar BRT results (Table S1). To perform BRT the data set was split into a training set (75 % of the samples) and a testing set (25 % of the samples). Hyperparameters were tuned via grid search and 4-fold cross-validation: number of trees <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000, maximum depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, minimum samples per leaf <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, learning rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005, and subsampling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8. To ensure robustness, 50 BRT iterations were run. Model interpretation employed SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values to assess feature importance, interactions, and feature relationships to modelled RCO2P (Li, 2022; Lundberg et al., 2018; Lundberg and Lee, 2017). Mean absolute SHAP values were used to derive overall feature and interaction importance. SHAP dependence plots visualised how modelled RCO2P increased (positive SHAP values) or decreased (negative SHAP values) across feature values. Feature importance rankings and dependence plots were then used to identify clusters with differing RCO2P. Within each cluster, Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine relationships between features and RCO2P. All analyses were conducted in Python (v3.12.7) using the packages <italic>scikit-learn</italic> (v1.6.1; Pedregosa et al., 2011) and <italic>SHAP</italic> (v 0.47.1; Lundberg et al., 2020).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Distribution of sediment characteristics and resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production</title>
      <p id="d2e698">The sampled sites covered a wide range of sediment types and depths, with S/G, C-Sand, M-Sand, F-Sand, and Mud contents ranging from 0 %–40 %, 0 %–62 %, 1 %–54 %, 2 %–68 %, and 1 %–84 %, respectively. Grain size was spatially variable: coarser sediments dominated channels and areas around Hauturu (Fig. 2a–c; Fig. S3), while finer sands and mud prevailed near the main coast and at deeper outer-shelf sites (Figs. 2d,  S3). OM content ranged from 0.9 %–9.6 %, with highest values at outer-shelf sites and inner-shelf areas west of Coromandel Peninsula (Fig. 2e). OM freshness varied widely irrespective of OM content or water depth (OM : Phyto <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2–16.1; Fig. 2f). Algal biomass, indicated by Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, was mainly concentrated at shallow inner-shelf sites, reaching up to 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<sup>−1</sup> dw, but Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of 2–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<sup>−1</sup> were also detected at several sites deeper than 50 m, suggesting either microphytobenthos presence or substantial sedimentation of algal material (Fig. 2g). CO<sub>2</sub> production rates were 1.4–19.5 times higher in resuspended sediments than in undisturbed sediments (Fig. S4). RCO2P showed strong spatial variability (0.1–3.5 mmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), with elevated rates observed at multiple shallow and deep sites (Fig. 2h).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e807">Environmental features water depth <bold>(a)</bold>, shell hash/gravel <bold>(b)</bold>, coarse grained sand (500–2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, <bold>c</bold>), fine grained sand (63–250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, <bold>d</bold>), organic matter content <bold>(e)</bold>, ratio of organic matter and phytopigments <bold>(f)</bold>, and Chlorophyll a content <bold>(g)</bold> as well as resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production rates <bold>(h)</bold> in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. For better visualisation, data were spatially interpolated from the sampling sites (white dots) using DIVA in Ocean Data View (Schlitzer, Reiner, Ocean Data View, <uri>https://odv.awi.de</uri>, last access: 19 November 2025, 2025).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/7441/2025/bg-22-7441-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Most important features and relationships</title>
      <p id="d2e878">The 50 BRT model iterations performed well in predicting RCO2P, with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 and a root mean squared error of 0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 mmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>, indicating good performance for highly variable environmental data. OM was the most important feature, showing the highest mean absolute SHAP value and ranking first across all 50 model runs (Table 1). C-Sand was the second most important feature, with a mean absolute SHAP value 3.6 times lower than that of OM. Depth and F-Sand had similar SHAP importances (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1), consistently ranking third and fourth, while Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and S/G were least influential (Table 1). The most significant feature interactions were OM – C-Sand and OM – Depth, which had higher SHAP values than Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and S/G but remained lower than the top four individual features. Overall, RCO2P variability was primarily driven by the individual effects of OM, C-Sand, Depth, and F-Sand, with only minor contributions from interactions.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e964">Feature importance of individual features and interacting features based on mean absolute SHAP values. Higher values indicate higher influence of feature on modelled RCO2P. Values in brackets are the 95 % confidence intervals from the 50 model iterations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">individual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SHAP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Rank</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">interacting</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SHAP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">feature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">stability</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">features</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">interaction</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">importance</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">importance</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.47 (0.010)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0 (0.00)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C-Sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.061 (0.005)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C-Sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13 (0.008)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5 (0.23)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.056 (0.006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10 (0.008)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.6 (0.31)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">F-Sand <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.033 (0.003)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-Sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.09 (0.006)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.7 (0.29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> F-Sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.029 (0.003)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OM : Phyto</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.07 (0.006)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.6 (0.29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.025 (0.002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04 (0.003)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.1 (0.20)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">C-Sand <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.023 (0.002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S/G</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04 (0.005)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.5 (0.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Other interaction pairs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.023</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1253">SHAP dependence plots revealed predominantly non-linear relationships between modelled RCO2P and features (Fig. 3). Across the OM gradient, SHAP values shifted from negative to positive at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 % OM, indicating highest RCO2P in sediments containing 3 %–10 % OM (Fig. 3a). Similarly, sediments with C-Sand below 8 % and from depths of 56–100 m exhibited positive SHAP values, linking these conditions to higher RCO2P (Fig. 3b, c). Although less influential overall, F-Sand and OM : Phyto showed more linear relationships with RCO2P, with highest SHAP values at F-Sand <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 % and OM : Phyto <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.7, suggesting that greater CO<sub>2</sub> production corresponds to higher F-Sand content and fresher organic matter (Fig. 3d, e). No clear relationships were observed for Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or S/G (Fig. 3f, g).</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1296">Partial-dependence-plots showing the relationship between SHAP values and features organic matter <bold>(a)</bold>, coarser grained sand <bold>(b)</bold>, water depth <bold>(c)</bold>, finer grained sand <bold>(d)</bold>, organic matter freshness <bold>(e)</bold>, Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(f)</bold>, and shell hash/gravel <bold>(g)</bold>. Positive SHAP values reflect a positive contribution of the feature-value to model output, i.e. to higher RCO2P than average, and vice versa. Lowess smooth function was applied for each of the 50 model iterations and its mean and 95 % confidence interval are shown as dark blue solid line and light blue shading, respectively. The shape of the scatter shows non-linear relationships between SHAP values and features, with strong shifts (across SHAP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) at OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %, C-Sand <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 %, and Depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56 m.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/7441/2025/bg-22-7441-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Clusters with different levels of RCO2P and differing relationships</title>
      <p id="d2e1371">To visualise which sediment types are most vulnerable to CO<sub>2</sub> release upon resuspension, we produced scatter heat maps from the original dataset and used BRT results to identify clusters (Fig. 4, Table 2). Lowest RCO2P rates (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) occurred in sandier sediments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 % C-Sand, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 % F-Sand) with low organic matter content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %) and shallow depths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 56 m), forming a distinct OM-poor cluster (Fig. 4a, b). Sediments in this cluster are from the Colville and Jellicoe Channels and around Hauturu and show a low to moderate risk of CO<sub>2</sub> release (Fig. 2H, Table 2). RCO2P in the OM-poor cluster correlated positively with OM and F-Sand but negatively with C-Sand, indicating stronger resuspension-driven mineralisation where OM and finer fractions are higher (Fig. 4c). At depths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m, both OM and RCO2P were high and relatively uniform, with RCO2P about four times higher than in the OM-poor cluster (Table 2). This Deep-cluster showed a negative correlation between RCO2P and OM, and slightly higher rates at lower OM : Phyto ratios, reflecting fresher organic matter (Fig. 4e).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1461">Scatter heatmaps showing the resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production (RCO2P, colour gradient) over organic matter content and C-Sand <bold>(a)</bold>, and over organic matter content and water depth <bold>(b)</bold>. Light orange dashed lines represent the boundaries of the OM-poor cluster, the red dashed line for the Deep cluster, and the puple dashed lines for the Mixed cluster. The dotted lines in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> show the fit of the 90th quantile of RCO2P rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) along interactions of organic matter and C-Sand (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">270.08</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and organic matter and water depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.97</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.029</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Panels C-E show relationships of environmental variables with RCO2P in the OM-poor cluster <bold>(c)</bold>, the Mixed cluster <bold>(d)</bold>, and the Deep cluster <bold>(e)</bold>. Ranges and correlation coefficients are given in Table 2.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/7441/2025/bg-22-7441-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1641">Average (Avg), standard deviation (SD), ranges of environmental features and C storage vulnerability in the three clusters identified through BRT analysis. Pearson correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are provided for relationships of RCO2P and individual features in each cluster. Correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in bold are significant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, and in italic at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1. C storage vulnerability levels are based on RCO2P rates and the factor increase relative to CO<sub>2</sub> production from undisturbed sediments cores.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">Features </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">C storage vulnerability </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Metric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">C-Sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">F-Sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">OM : Phyto</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">RCO2P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">level</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">increase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OM-poor cluster</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Avg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">20.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">45.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">30.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">low –</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">1.0–3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.2–62.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">21.0–87.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">1.8–67.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.8–9.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">0.1–2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">1.4–12.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10">moderate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><bold>0.651</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.472</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.156</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><bold>0.516</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.258</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.264</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.062</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Deep cluster (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">22.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">9.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">High to</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">5.8–8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.0–7.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">100–140</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">14.3–32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">3.7–9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">1.2–2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">5.0–13.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10">very high</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.493</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.153</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.134</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.253</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.393</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.017</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.486</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.541</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.245</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.064</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mixed cluster</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Std</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">62.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">31.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">moderate to</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">3.0–9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">30.0–93.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">16.4–55.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">2.3–10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">0.8–3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">3.0–19.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10">very high</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">0.203</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.239</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.042</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.101</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.087</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.059</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.741</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.431</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.496</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2516">Mixed sediments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 % OM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 % C-Sand) from intermediate depths (56–100 m,) formed a Mixed cluster with RCO2P ranging from 0.8–3.5 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>, equivalent to 3–19.5 times higher CO<sub>2</sub> release than in undisturbed sediments (Fig. 4b, Table 2). No clear correlations were found here (Table 2, Fig. 4d). Within the Mixed cluster the highest 10 % of RCO2P values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) occurred along interactions between OM and C-Sand (C-Sand <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 270.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OM<sup>−2.93</sup>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.51, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003) and OM and Depth (Depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 87.45, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.32, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.029; Fig. 4a, b). Together, the Mixed and Deep cluster cover 73 % or the sampled sites and are moderately to very highly vulnerable to releasing CO<sub>2</sub> when disturbed (Table 2, Fig. 2h).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e2729">Our results show that resuspension of the 3-cm surface sediment strongly enhances organic C mineralisation producing up to 20 times more CO<sub>2</sub> compared to undisturbed surface sediments in the Hauraki Gulf. Sediment heterogeneity, based on organic matter content, sand content and water depth played an important role explaining the variability of resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production and their non-linear relationships indicate context-dependent controls and allowed us to identify three clusters with different levels of C storage vulnerabilities.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Spatial variability of resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production driven local environmental settings</title>
      <p id="d2e2767">The stimulation of organic C mineralisation through sediment resuspension can involve multiple physical, chemical and biological mechanisms (Hulthe et al., 1998; Kleber et al., 2021; van Nugteren et al., 2009; Pusceddu et al., 2005b) which in sum contribute to the RCO2P rates that we measured. While we expected variability of RCO2P due to sampling across substantial sediment heterogeneity, the extent of variability and the location of apparent hotspots was surprising. We found three clusters of C storage vulnerability in which RCO2P appears to be regulated by differing environmental conditions. Firstly, low to moderate vulnerability in the shallow, coarse-grained sediments around Hauturu and in the channels is likely linked to strong tidal and residual currents that winnow fine organic particles and/or naturally enhance organic matter turnover resulting in a smaller resuspension impact (Boudreau et al., 2001; Manighetti and Carter, 1999). The positive relationship of RCO2P with organic matter quantity and finer grained sand content suggests that substrate availability and strong (less F-Sand) vs. calm (more F-Sand) hydrodynamic conditions were controlling the magnitude of the resuspension impact in the OM-poor cluster. At the other end of the spectrum, deep, muddy, OM-rich sediments showed high to very high C storage vulnerability likely due to the consistently high pool of OM that accumulates in the deep outer shelf area of the Hauraki Gulf. Interestingly, here RCO2P was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % higher when OM was fresher, suggesting that quality of the resuspended organic matter influences mineralisation when the substrate is abundant.</p>
      <p id="d2e2777">We could not derive mechanistic explanations of RCO2P variability in the mixed sediment cluster based on our sediment data. This suggest that there may be other environmental variables that could explain the spatial variability of resuspension impacts in these sediments. Measures of organic matter quality or bioavailability are likely to influence RCO2P and may have been underrepresented in our set of features. While our use of simple and cost-effective proxies (e.g. loss-on-ignition OM and OM:Phytopigment ratio) enables broad applicability (Bartl et al., 2025) it may overlook important compositional nuances of OM. Incorporating additional measures, such as C : N ratios, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures, or n-alkane signatures (Sikes et al. 2009), may help resolve spatial RCO2P patterns. RCO2P variability could also be linked to the concentration and quality of dissolved organic matter that is resuspended with the sediment and can contain a considerable fraction of readily degradable compounds that could enhance microbial mineralisation (Kujawinski, 2011; Lengier et al., 2024; Reader et al., 2019). Lastly, the composition and activity of the microbial community and their response to being resuspended could influence RCO2P irrespective of the amount, composition or biochemical quality of organic matter (DesRosiers et al., 2022). On a broader scale, spatially variable OM supply from benthic or pelagic primary production or lateral transport by cross-shore bottom currents could also drive the spatial pattern of RCO2P in the Hauraki Gulf (Chang et al., 2003; Zeldis et al., 2004). Since we can only speculate about potential underlying mechanisms of resuspension impacts in the Mixed cluster, future targeted experiments on the role of organic matter bioavailability and the microbial response to resuspension in mixed sediment types will shed more light on underlying mechanisms of resuspension-induced organic C mineralisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Sediment heterogeneity as predictor of sediment C vulnerability?</title>
      <p id="d2e2799">Our BRT model explained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 58 % of variability in RCO2P forming a strong basis for using BRT models like ours to predict C storage vulnerability from spatial patterns of sediment characteristics. Sediment grain size and organic matter data often have high spatial resolution and thus represent useful surrogates to quantify large-scale sediment C vulnerability. Improving the performance of our BRT model to capture more of the currently unexplained variability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) can perhaps be achieved through integrating more nuanced features as discussed above (see Sect. 4.1). Additionally, history or intensity of trawling can influence both the long-term concentration and reactivity of OM as well as how it is mediated through benthic faunal communities (Hale et al., 2017; Pusceddu et al., 2014; Tiano et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2024). As a result, RCO2P could be partly driven by the sampling site's trawling disturbance history. However, incorporating a measure of historical disturbance frequency may only improve assessments if the data on trawling activity is collected at the resolution necessary to link it to local sampling coordinates. Compared to first-order model estimations that rely on assumptions of degradation constants and organic C lability (Atwood et al., 2024; Luisetti et al., 2019; Muñoz et al., 2023; Sala et al., 2021), predictions from a BRT model approach are based on empirical measurements of sediment characteristics, resuspension-induced organic C mineralisation rates and the relationships and interactions that they form. This makes it a powerful tool that integrates environmental variability making predictions more realistic and detailed at the regional scale offering opportunities for meaningful regulatory actions for trawling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Methodological considerations of resuspension assay quantifications</title>
      <p id="d2e2824">The resuspension assay provides a simple measure of oxic organic C mineralisation in the top 3 cm of sediment, offering insight into the vulnerability of seafloor C storage. Porz et al. (2024) used a similar approach in their model, defining sediment organic C vulnerability in the top 10 cm as the maximum potential oxic organic C remineralization rate. Their modelled oxic organic C remineralization rates (0.1–100 mmol C m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>) align with our empirical RCO2P measurements (2–88 mmol C m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>). Other experiments investigating the immediate impact of sediment resuspension reported mineralisation rates to be 1.1–4.7 times higher in resuspension treatments compared to controls (Almroth-Rosell et al., 2012a; Niemistö et al., 2018; Ståhlberg et al., 2006). This is comparable but at the lower end of the range of our measurements where RCO2P was 1.4–19.5 times higher in resuspended sediments. The difference may be attributable to a thicker sediment layer being resuspended in our assay (3 cm) compared to the other experiments (0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m to 1 cm) and the different methodological approaches (e.g. in situ chamber vs. bottle incubations). Overall, the comparability of out measurements to both model and experimental studies supports the assay's relevance for resuspension impact assessments.</p>
      <p id="d2e2883">Two methodological aspects of the assay need to be considered when linking the assay to trawling impacts and organic C mineralisation. Firstly, the assay determines potential CO<sub>2</sub> production after severe resuspension through shaking up sediment in a bottle and therefore may not reflect the true mechanical impact of individual trawling gear and trawling technique (O'Neill and Ivanović, 2016; Rijnsdorp et al., 2021). However, the high sampling frequency that is possible with the assay enhances our spatial understanding of sediment C vulnerability and thus where trawling would be most impactful. Secondly, the assay converts sediment oxygen demand to CO<sub>2</sub> production using respiratory quotients (see Sect. 2.2). This quantification may overestimate CO<sub>2</sub> production if reduced species are oxidised alongside organic C. We incubated the surface sediments from an oligotrophic system where oxygen and nitrate penetration depths (O<sub>2</sub>: 3–6 mm, nitrate: 12 mm) and total-to-diffusive oxygen uptake ratios (TOU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DOU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4) indicate strong macrofaunal influence on redox conditions and minimal accumulation of reduced species in both sandy and muddy sediments (30–128 m depth; Cheung et al., 2024). This aligns with findings of low acid volatile sulfide concentrations (AVS) in non-impacted Hauraki Gulf sediments (0–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol g<sup>−1</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to higher AVS levels in sediments impacted by a mussel farm (2–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol g<sup>−1</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Wilson and Vopel, 2015). Future use of the resuspension assay, particularly in more reduced or eutrophic sediments, should include a validation of the SOD approach by measuring changes dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> or DIC during the incubations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Seafloor protection based on C vulnerability</title>
      <p id="d2e3020">As our understanding of sediment C storage vulnerability grows, its integration into spatial management of demersal fisheries becomes inevitable. In the Hauraki Gulf, recent discussions on confining trawling pressures focused on protecting reef-forming species and habitats, while sediment C storage vulnerability was not considered (Bennion et al., 2024). Trawling remains allowed in areas deeper than 50 m (Bevin, 2025) which, based on our results, includes nearly all sediments with high to very high C vulnerability. This leaves Hauraki Gulf sediments at risk to lose their climate-stabilizing C storage function and will contribute to the green-house gas emission of the NZ fisheries industry. By integrating sediment heterogeneity and the resulting spatial variability of resuspension impacts, highly vulnerable areas can be identified and protected. In a recent modelling study, Porz et al. (2024) compared different seafloor protection scenarios in the North Sea and found that protection based on C vulnerability was most efficient for preserving organic carbon and maintaining benthic macrofauna biomass. This highlights that seafloor carbon protection generates benefits not only for organic C storage, but also for benthic species and habitats ultimately maintaining the undisturbed functioning of seafloor ecosystems.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e3033">The risk of CO<sub>2</sub> release from the sediment as a consequence of resuspension is not something we can ignore as we seek to limit emissions and meet climate obligations. Our findings show that the variability of resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> release is linked to sediment characteristics resulting in local environmental conditions controlling resuspension impacts. Using measures of sediment heterogeneity and the resuspension assay offers localised insight into where carbon storage is most vulnerable to disturbance, and where management efforts could be focused. Our results support the inclusion of seafloor carbon protection in regional planning, particularly in areas like the Hauraki Gulf where sediment heterogeneity and fishing pressure intersect. Moving forward, combining our empirical assessment with more nuanced data on organic matter quality, physical and biological organic matter inputs, and disturbance history will enhance our ability to estimate human impacts on the seafloor and sustain natural C sinks that contribute to global climate stabilisation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e3058">Sediment characteristics and resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production rates from the Hauraki Gulf are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.27948264" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17608/k6.auckland.27948264</ext-link> (Bartl and Thrush, 2025a). The code for the BRT model is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.29442407" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17608/k6.auckland.29442407</ext-link> (Bartl and Thrush, 2025b).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e3076">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-7441-2025-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-7441-2025-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e3086">SF and IB developed the resuspension assay and planned the campaign; IB conducted the sampling campaign. performed the measurements and analysed the data; IB wrote the manuscript draft; SF reviewed and edited the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e3092">The contact author has declared that neither of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e3098">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e3104">We thank Jen Hillman, Stefano Schenone, Paul Caiger, Simon Thomas, Samantha Ladewig, Li Yeoh, Keshav Chandran, Sophie Thomson, Caitlin Grosvenor, Eliana Ferretti, Andrew Reid, Alessandra Valim, and Alanta Loucks for their assistance during the field campaign. Special thanks go to captain Brady Doak for both his professional support and hospitality during the cruises. We thank the Faculty of Science Research Fellow Society for supporting this research by providing seeding funds and writing retreats.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e3109">This research has been supported by the George Mason Centre for the Natural Environment, University of Auckland (grant no. 4112 – 78045) and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (grant no. UOAX2307).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e3115">This paper was edited by Trisha Atwood and reviewed by Lucas Porz and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Almroth, E., Tengberg, A., Andersson, J. H., Pakhomova, S., and Hall, P. O. J.: Effects of resuspension on benthic fluxes of oxygen, nutrients, dissolved inorganic carbon, iron and manganese in the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea, Cont. Shelf Res., 29, 807–818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSR.2008.12.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.CSR.2008.12.011</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Almroth-Rosell, E., Tengberg, A., Andersson, S., Apler, A., and Hall, P. O. J.: Effects of simulated natural and massive resuspension on benthic oxygen, nutrient and dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes in Loch Creran, Scotland, J. Sea Res., 72, 38–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2012.04.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.seares.2012.04.012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Almroth-Rosell, E., Tengberg, A., Andersson, S., Apler, A., and Hall, P. O. J.: Effects of simulated natural and massive resuspension on benthic oxygen, nutrient and dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes in Loch Creran, Scotland, Journal of Sea Research, 72, 38–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2012.04.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.seares.2012.04.012</ext-link>, 2012b. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Arndt, S., Jørgensen, B. B., LaRowe, D. E., Middelburg, J. J., Pancost, R. D., and Regnier, P.: Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: A review and synthesis, Earth Sci. Rev., 123, 53–86, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2013.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2013.02.008</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Atwood, T. B., Sala, E., Mayorga, J., Bradley, D., Cabral, R. B., Auber, A., Cheung, W., Ferretti, F., Friedlander, A. M., Gaines, S. D., Garilao, C., Goodell, W., Halpern, B. S., Hinson, A., Kaschner, K., Kesner-Reyes, K., Leprieur, F., McGowan, J., Morgan, L. E., Mouillot, D., Palacios-Abrantes, J., Possingham, H. P., Rechberger, K. D., Worm, B., and Lubchenco, J.: Reply to: Quantifying the carbon benefits of ending bottom trawling, Nature, 617, 7960,   <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06015-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-023-06015-6</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Atwood, T. B., Romanou, A., DeVries, T., Lerner, P. E., Mayorga, J. S., Bradley, D., Cabral, R. B., Schmidt, G. A., and Sala, E.: Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and ocean acidification from bottom-trawling, Front. Mar. Sci., 10, 1125137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2023.1125137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/FMARS.2023.1125137</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bartl, I. and Thrush, S. F.: Resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production rates and sediment characteristics from the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand, The University of Auckland, Figshare [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.27948264.v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17608/k6.auckland.27948264.v1</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bartl, I. and Thrush, S. F.: Sediment heterogeneity shapes spatial variability of resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production – Boosted Regression Tree Model, The University of Auckland, Figshare [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.29442407.v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17608/k6.auckland.29442407.v1</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bartl, I., Evans, T., Hillman, J., and Thrush, S.: Simple assay quantifying sediment resuspension effects on marine carbon storage, Methods Ecol. Evol., 16, 309–316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14479" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/2041-210X.14479</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bennion, M., Brough, T., Leunissen, E., Morrison, M., Hillman, J. R., Rowden, A. A., Gordon, D. P., Kelly, M., Nelson, W., Tracey, D. M., Macpherson, D., Neill, K., Lohrer, A. M., and Lundquist, C. J.: Modelling spatial distributions of biogenic habitat-forming taxa to inform marine spatial planning, Aquat. Conserv., 34, e4079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/AQC.4079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/AQC.4079</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Bevin, A.: Hauraki Gulf bottom trawling corridor proposals chucked on ice, Newsroom, 14th May, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bianchi, T. S., Cui, X., Blair, N. E., Burdige, D. J., Eglinton, T. I., and Galy, V.: Centers of organic carbon burial and oxidation at the land-ocean interface, Org. Geochem., 115, 138–155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORGGEOCHEM.2017.09.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.ORGGEOCHEM.2017.09.008</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Boudreau, B. P., Huettel, M., Forster, S., Jahnke, R. A., McLachlan, A., Middelburg, J. J., Nielsen, P., Sansone, F., Taghon, G., Van Raaphorst, W., Webster, I., Weslawski, J. M., Wiberg, P., and Sundby, B.: Permeable marine sediments: Overturning an old paradigm, Eos, 82, 133–136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/EO082i011p00133-01" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/EO082i011p00133-01</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Boulesteix, A. L., Janitza, S., Kruppa, J., and König, I. R.: Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 2, 493–507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/WIDM.1072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/WIDM.1072</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Bradshaw, C., Jakobsson, M., Brüchert, V., Bonaglia, S., Mörth, C. M., Muchowski, J., Stranne, C., and Sköld, M.: Physical Disturbance by Bottom Trawling Suspends Particulate Matter and Alters Biogeochemical Processes on and Near the Seafloor, Front. Mar. Sci., 8, 1127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2021.683331" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/FMARS.2021.683331</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Buffan-Dubau, E. and Carman, K. R.: Extraction of benthic microalgal pigments for HPLC analyses, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 204, 293–297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/MEPS204293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/MEPS204293</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Burdige, D. J.: Preservation of Organic Matter in Marine Sediments: Controls, Mechanisms, and an Imbalance in Sediment Organic Carbon Budgets?, Chem. Rev., 467–485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050347q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr050347q</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Chang, F. H., Zeldis, J., Gall, M., and Hall, J.: Seasonal and spatial variation of phytoplankton assemblages, biomass and cell size from spring to summer across the north-eastern New Zealand continental shelf, J. Plankton Res., 25, 737–758, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/PLANKT/25.7.737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/PLANKT/25.7.737</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Cheung, H. L. S., Hillman, J. R., Pilditch, C. A., Savage, C., Santos, I. R., Glud, R. N., Nascimento, F. J. A., Thrush, S. F., and Bonaglia, S.: Denitrification, anammox, and DNRA in oligotrophic continental shelf sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 69, 621–637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/LNO.12512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/LNO.12512</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Cimino, M. A., Santora, J. A., Schroeder, I., Sydeman, W., Jacox, M. G., Hazen, E. L., and Bograd, S. J.: Essential krill species habitat resolved by seasonal upwelling and ocean circulation models within the large marine ecosystem of the California Current System, Ecography, 43, 1536–1549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ECOG.05204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ECOG.05204</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>DesRosiers, A., Gassama, N., Grosbois, C., and Lazar, C. S.: Laboratory-Controlled Experiments Reveal Microbial Community Shifts during Sediment Resuspension Events, Genes, 13, 1416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/genes13081416</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., Münkemüller, T., Mcclean, C., Osborne, P. E., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Skidmore, A. K., Zurell, D., and Lautenbach, S.: Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance, Ecography, 36, 27–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0587.2012.07348.X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/J.1600-0587.2012.07348.X</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Epstein, G., Middelburg, J. J., Hawkins, J. P., Norris, C. R., and Roberts, C. M.: The impact of mobile demersal fishing on carbon storage in seabed sediments, Glob. Change Biol., 28, 2875–2894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.16105</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Friedman, J. H.: Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine, Ann Stat, 29, 1189–1232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1214/AOS/1013203451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1214/AOS/1013203451</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hale, R., Godbold, J. A., Sciberras, M., Dwight, J., Wood, C., Hiddink, J. G., and Solan, M.: Mediation of macronutrients and carbon by post-disturbance shelf sea sediment communities, Biogeochemistry, 135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Hauraki Gulf Forum: State of our Gulf 2020 Hauraki Gulf/Tīkapa Moana/Te Moananui-ā-Toi State of the Environment Report 2020, ISBN: 978-1-98-858901-5, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Hauraki Gulf Forum: State of our Gulf 2023 Hauraki Gulf/Tīkapa Moana/Te Moananui-ā-Toi State of the Environment Report 2023, ISBN: 97-8-04-7368671-0, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Sciberras, M., Szostek, C. L., Hughes, K. M., Ellis, N., Rijnsdorp, A. D., McConnaughey, R. A., Mazor, T., Hilborn, R., Collie, J. S., Pitcher, C. R., Amoroso, R. O., Parma, A. M., Suuronen, P., and Kaiser, M. J.: Global analysis of depletion and recovery of seabed biota after bottom trawling disturbance, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 8301–8306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618858114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1618858114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hiddink, J. G., van de Velde, S. J., McConnaughey, R. A., De Borger, E., Tiano, J., Kaiser, M. J., Sweetman, A. K., and Sciberras, M.: Quantifying the carbon benefits of ending bottom trawling, Nature, 617, 7960, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06014-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-023-06014-7</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Holland, K. T. and Elmore, P. A.: A review of heterogeneous sediments in coastal environments, Earth Sci. Rev., 89, 116–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2008.03.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2008.03.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hulthe, G., Hulth, S., and Hall, P. O. J.: Effect of oxygen on degradation rate of refractory and labile organic matter in continental margin sediments, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 62, 1319–1328, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00044-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00044-1</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jørgensen, B. B., Wenzhöfer, F., Egger, M., and Glud, R. N.: Sediment oxygen consumption: Role in the global marine carbon cycle, Earth Sci. Rev., 228, 103987, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2022.103987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2022.103987</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kleber, M., Bourg, I. C., Coward, E. K., Hansel, C. M., Myneni, S. C. B., and Nunan, N.: Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter interface, Nat. Rev. Earth   Environ.,  2, 402–421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Kujawinski, E. B.: The impact of microbial metabolism on marine dissolved organic matter, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 3, 567–599, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081003</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Lengier, M., Koziorowska-Makuch, K., Szymczycha, B., and Kuliński, K.: Bioavailability and remineralization rates of sediment-derived dissolved organic carbon from a Baltic Sea depositional area, Front. Mar. Sci., 11, 1359563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2024.1359563/BIBTEX" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/FMARS.2024.1359563/BIBTEX</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z.: Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 96, 101845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2022.101845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2022.101845</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lohrer, A. M., Stephenson, F., Douglas, E. J., and Townsend, M.: Mapping the estuarine ecosystem service of pollutant removal using empirically validated boosted regression tree models, Ecological Applications, 30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/EAP.2105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/EAP.2105</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Lønborg, C., Markager, S., Herzog, S. D., Carreira, C., and Høgslund, S.: Impacts of anthropogenic resuspension on sediment organic matter: An experimental approach, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 310, 108981, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2024.108981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.ECSS.2024.108981</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lorenzen, C. J.: Determination of chlorophyll and Pheo-pigments: Spectrophotometric equations, Limnol. Oceanogr., 12, 343–346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/LO.1967.12.2.0343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/LO.1967.12.2.0343</ext-link>, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lucas, T. C. D.: A translucent box: interpretable machine learning in ecology, Ecol. Monogr., 90, e01422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ECM.1422" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ECM.1422</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Luisetti, T., Turner, R. K., Andrews, J. E., Jickells, T. D., Kröger, S., Diesing, M., Paltriguera, L., Johnson, M. T., Parker, E. R., Bakker, D. C. E., and Weston, K.: Quantifying and valuing carbon flows and stores in coastal and shelf ecosystems in the UK, Ecosyst. Serv., 35, 67–76, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2018.10.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.ECOSER.2018.10.013</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S.-I.: A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions, in: NIPS’17: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 4768–4777, <uri>https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3295222.3295230</uri>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G. G., and Lee, S.-I.: Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles, arXiv.org, <uri>https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1802.03888v3</uri> (last access: 26 November 2025), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., and Lee, S. I.: From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees, Nat. Mach. Intell., 2, 56–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/S42256-019-0138-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/S42256-019-0138-9</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Manighetti, B. and Carter, L.: Across-shelf sediment dispersal, Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand, Mar. Geol., 160, 271–300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(99)00024-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0025-3227(99)00024-9</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Mayer, L. M.: Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in continental shelf sediments, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 58, 1271–1284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90381-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(94)90381-6</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Miatta, M. and Snelgrove, P. V. R.: Sedimentary Organic Matter Shapes Macrofaunal Communities but Not Benthic Nutrient Fluxes in Contrasting Habitats Along the Northwest Atlantic Continental Margin, Front. Mar. Sci., 8, 756054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2021.756054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/FMARS.2021.756054</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Middelburg, J. J.: Reviews and syntheses: to the bottom of carbon processing at the seafloor, Biogeosciences, 15, 413–427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-413-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-413-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Muñoz, M., Reul, A., Guijarro, B., and Hidalgo, M.: Carbon footprint, economic benefits and sustainable fishing: Lessons for the future from the Western Mediterranean, Science of The Total Environment, 865, 160783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.160783" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.160783</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Najjar, R. G., Herrmann, M., Alexander, R., Boyer, E. W., Burdige, D. J., Butman, D., Cai, W. J., Canuel, E. A., Chen, R. F., Friedrichs, M. A. M., Feagin, R. A., Griffith, P. C., Hinson, A. L., Holmquist, J. R., Hu, X., Kemp, W. M., Kroeger, K. D., Mannino, A., McCallister, S. L., McGillis, W. R., Mulholland, M. R., Pilskaln, C. H., Salisbury, J., Signorini, S. R., St-Laurent, P., Tian, H., Tzortziou, M., Vlahos, P., Wang, Z. A., and Zimmerman, R. C.: Carbon Budget of Tidal Wetlands, Estuaries, and Shelf Waters of Eastern North America, Global Biogeochem Cycles, 32, 389–416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005790" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GB005790</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Niemistö, J., Kononets, M., Ekeroth, N., Tallberg, P., Tengberg, A., and Hall, P. O. J.: Benthic fluxes of oxygen and inorganic nutrients in the archipelago of Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea – Effects of sediment resuspension measured in situ, J. Sea Res., 135, 95–106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEARES.2018.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.SEARES.2018.02.006</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Oberle, F. K. J., Storlazzi, C. D., and Hanebuth, T. J. J.: What a drag: Quantifying the global impact of chronic bottom trawling on continental shelf sediment, Journal of Marine Systems, 159, 109–119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMARSYS.2015.12.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.JMARSYS.2015.12.007</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>O'Neill, F. G. and Ivanović, A.: The physical impact of towed demersal fishing gears on soft sediments, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73, i5–i14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ICESJMS/FSV125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/ICESJMS/FSV125</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Panaïotis, T., Wilson, J., and Cael, B. B.: A Machine Learning-Based Dissolved Organic Carbon Climatology,  Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2024GL112792,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112792" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024GL112792</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation> Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in   Python, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Polymenakou, P. N., Pusceddu, A., Tselepides, A., Polychronaki, T., Giannakourou, A., Fiordelmondo, C., Hatziyanni, E., and Danovaro, R.: Benthic microbial abundance and activities in an intensively trawled ecosystem (Thermaikos Gulf, Aegean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 2570–2584, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.018</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Porz, L., Zhang, W., Christiansen, N., Kossack, J., Daewel, U., and Schrum, C.: Quantification and mitigation of bottom-Trawling impacts on sedimentary organic carbon stocks in the North Sea, Biogeosciences, 21, 2547–2570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/BG-21-2547-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/BG-21-2547-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Pusceddu, A., Fiordelmondo, C., Polymenakou, P., Polychronaki, T., Tselepides, A., and Danovaro, R.: Effects of bottom trawling on the quantity and biochemical composition of organic matter in coastal marine sediments (Thermaikos Gulf, northwestern Aegean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 2491–2505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSR.2005.08.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.CSR.2005.08.013</ext-link>, 2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Pusceddu, A., Fiordelmondo, C., and Danovaro, R.: Sediment Resuspension Effects on the Benthic Microbial Loop in Experimental Microcosms, Microbial. Ecology, 50,   602–613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/S00248-005-5051-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/S00248-005-5051-6</ext-link>, 2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Pusceddu, A., Bianchelli, S., Canals, M., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Durrieu De Madron, X., Heussner, S., Lykousis, V., de Stigter, H., Trincardi, F., and Danovaro, R.: Organic matter in sediments of canyons and open slopes of the Portuguese, Catalan, Southern Adriatic and Cretan Sea margins, Deep-Sea Research Pt. I, 57, 441–457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSR.2009.11.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.DSR.2009.11.008</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Pusceddu, A., Bianchelli, S., Martín, J., Puig, P., Palanques, A., Masqué, P., and Danovaro, R.: Chronic and intensive bottom trawling impairs deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 8861–8866, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405454111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1405454111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Reader, H. E., Thoms, F., Voss, M., and Stedmon, C. A.: The Influence of Sediment-Derived Dissolved Organic Matter in the Vistula River Estuary/Gulf of Gdansk, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 124, 115–126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JG004658</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Rijkenberg, M. J. A., Langlois, R. J., Mills, M. M., Patey, M. D., Hill, P. G., Nielsdóttir, M. C., Compton, T. J., LaRoche, J., and Achterberg, E. P.: Environmental Forcing of Nitrogen Fixation in the Eastern Tropical and Sub-Tropical North Atlantic Ocean, PLoS One, 6, e28989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0028989" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0028989</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Rijnsdorp, A. D., Depestele, J., Molenaar, P., Eigaard, O. R., Ivanović, A., and O'Neill, F. G.: Sediment mobilization by bottom trawls: a model approach applied to the Dutch North Sea beam trawl fishery, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 78, 1574–1586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ICESJMS/FSAB029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/ICESJMS/FSAB029</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Rubbens, P., Brodie, S., Cordier, T., Destro Barcellos, D., Devos, P., Fernandes-Salvador, J. A., Fincham, J. I., Gomes, A., Handegard, N. O., Howell, K., Jamet, C., Kartveit, K. H., Moustahfid, H., Parcerisas, C., Politikos, D., Sauzède, R., Sokolova, M., Uusitalo, L., Van Den Bulcke, L., Van Helmond, A. T. M., Watson, J. T., Welch, H., Beltran-Perez, O., Chaffron, S., Greenberg, D. S., Kühn, B., Kiko, R., Lo, M., Lopes, R. M., Möller, K. O., Michaels, W., Pala, A., Romagnan, J. B., Schuchert, P., Seydi, V., Villasante, S., Malde, K., and Irisson, J. O.: Machine learning in marine ecology: an overview of techniques and applications, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 80, 1829–1853, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ICESJMS/FSAD100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/ICESJMS/FSAD100</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Sala, E., Mayorga, J., Bradley, D., Cabral, R. B., Atwood, T. B., Auber, A., Cheung, W., Costello, C., Ferretti, F., Friedlander, A. M., Gaines, S. D., Garilao, C., Goodell, W., Halpern, B. S., Hinson, A., Kaschner, K., Kesner-Reyes, K., Leprieur, F., McGowan, J., Morgan, L. E., Mouillot, D., Palacios-Abrantes, J., Possingham, H. P., Rechberger, K. D., Worm, B., and Lubchenco, J.: Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate, Nature, 592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Sharples, J.: Cross-shelf intrusion of subtropical water into the coastal zone of northeast New Zealand, Cont. Shelf Res., 17, 835–857, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(96)00060-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0278-4343(96)00060-X</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Sikes, E. L., Uhle, M. E., Nodder, S. D., and Howard, M. E.: Sources of organic matter in a coastal marine environment: Evidence from n-alkanes and their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C distributions in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand, Mar. Chem., 113, 149–163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARCHEM.2008.12.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.MARCHEM.2008.12.003</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Snelgrove, P. V. R., Soetaert, K., Solan, M., Thrush, S., Wei, C. L., Danovaro, R., Fulweiler, R. W., Kitazato, H., Ingole, B., Norkko, A., Parkes, R. J., and Volkenborn, N.: Global Carbon Cycling on a Heterogeneous Seafloor, Trends Ecol. Evol., 33, 96–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TREE.2017.11.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.TREE.2017.11.004</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Soykan, C. U., Eguchi, T., Kohin, S., and Dewar, H.: Prediction of fishing effort distributions using boosted regression trees, Ecological Applications, 24, 71–83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0826.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/12-0826.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Ståhlberg, C., Bastviken, D., Svensson, B. H., and Rahm, L.: Mineralisation of organic matter in coastal sediments at different frequency and duration of resuspension, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 70, 317–325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2006.06.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.ECSS.2006.06.022</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation> Sun, M., Aller, R. C., and Lee, C.: Early diagenesis of chlorophyll-a in Long Island Sound sediments: A measure of carbon flux and particle reworking, J. Mar. Res., 49, 379–401, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Thrush, S. F. and Dayton, P. K.: Disturbance to Marine Benthic Habitats by Trawling and Dredging: Implications for Marine Biodiversity, Annual Reviews, 33, 449–473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.ECOLSYS.33.010802.150515" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/ANNUREV.ECOLSYS.33.010802.150515</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Tiano, J. C., Depestele, J., Van Hoey, G., Fernandes, J., Van Rijswijk, P., and Soetaert, K.: Trawling effects on biogeochemical processes are mediated by fauna in high-energy biogenic-reef-inhabited coastal sediments, Biogeosciences, 19, 2583–2598, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2583-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-19-2583-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>van Nugteren, P., Moodley, L., Brummer, G. J., Heip, C. H. R., Herman, P. M. J., and Middelburg, J. J.: Seafloor ecosystem functioning: the importance of organic matter priming, Marine Biology, 156,  2277–2287, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/S00227-009-1255-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/S00227-009-1255-5</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, P. S. and Vopel, K.: Assessing the Sulfide Footprint of Mussel Farms with Sediment Profile Imagery: A New Zealand Trial, PLoS One, 10, e0129894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0129894" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0129894</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Zeldis, J. R., Walters, R. A., Greig, M. J. N., and Image, K.: Circulation over the northeastern New Zealand continental slope, shelf and adjacent Hauraki Gulf, during spring and summer, Cont. Shelf Res., 24, 543–561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSR.2003.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.CSR.2003.11.007</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, W., Wirtz, K., Daewel, U., Wrede, A., Kröncke, I., Kuhn, G., Neumann, A., Meyer, J., Ma, M., and Schrum, C.: The Budget of Macrobenthic Reworked Organic Carbon: A Modeling Case Study of the North Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 124, 1446–1471, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JG005109</ext-link>, 2019. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, W., Porz, L., Yilmaz, R., Wallmann, K., Spiegel, T., Neumann, A., Holtappels, M., Kasten, S., Kuhlmann, J., Ziebarth, N., Taylor, B., Ho-Hagemann, H. T. M., Bockelmann, F. D., Daewel, U., Bernhardt, L., and Schrum, C.: Long-term carbon storage in shelf sea sediments reduced by intensive bottom trawling, Nat. Geosci., 17, 1268–1276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/S41561-024-01581-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/S41561-024-01581-4</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Sediment heterogeneity shapes spatial variability of resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Almroth, E., Tengberg, A., Andersson, J. H., Pakhomova, S., and Hall, P. O.
J.: Effects of resuspension on benthic fluxes of oxygen, nutrients,
dissolved inorganic carbon, iron and manganese in the Gulf of Finland,
Baltic Sea, Cont. Shelf Res., 29, 807–818,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSR.2008.12.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSR.2008.12.011</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Almroth-Rosell, E., Tengberg, A., Andersson, S., Apler, A., and Hall, P. O.
J.: Effects of simulated natural and massive resuspension on benthic oxygen,
nutrient and dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes in Loch Creran, Scotland, J.
Sea Res., 72, 38–48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2012.04.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2012.04.012</a>, 2012a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Almroth-Rosell, E., Tengberg, A., Andersson, S., Apler, A., and Hall, P. O.
J.: Effects of simulated natural and massive resuspension on benthic oxygen,
nutrient and dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes in Loch Creran, Scotland, Journal of Sea Research, 72, 38–48,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2012.04.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2012.04.012</a>, 2012b.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arndt, S., Jørgensen, B. B., LaRowe, D. E., Middelburg, J. J., Pancost,
R. D., and Regnier, P.: Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in
marine sediments: A review and synthesis, Earth Sci. Rev., 123, 53–86,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2013.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2013.02.008</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Atwood, T. B., Sala, E., Mayorga, J., Bradley, D., Cabral, R. B., Auber, A.,
Cheung, W., Ferretti, F., Friedlander, A. M., Gaines, S. D., Garilao, C.,
Goodell, W., Halpern, B. S., Hinson, A., Kaschner, K., Kesner-Reyes, K.,
Leprieur, F., McGowan, J., Morgan, L. E., Mouillot, D., Palacios-Abrantes,
J., Possingham, H. P., Rechberger, K. D., Worm, B., and Lubchenco, J.: Reply
to: Quantifying the carbon benefits of ending bottom trawling, Nature,
617, 7960,   <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06015-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06015-6</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Atwood, T. B., Romanou, A., DeVries, T., Lerner, P. E., Mayorga, J. S.,
Bradley, D., Cabral, R. B., Schmidt, G. A., and Sala, E.: Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>
emissions and ocean acidification from bottom-trawling, Front. Mar. Sci., 10,
1125137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2023.1125137" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2023.1125137</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bartl, I. and Thrush, S. F.: Resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production rates and
sediment characteristics from the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand, The
University of Auckland, Figshare [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.27948264.v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.27948264.v1</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bartl, I. and Thrush, S. F.: Sediment heterogeneity shapes spatial
variability of resuspension-induced CO<sub>2</sub> production – Boosted Regression Tree
Model, The University of Auckland, Figshare [code],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.29442407.v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.29442407.v1</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bartl, I., Evans, T., Hillman, J., and Thrush, S.: Simple assay quantifying
sediment resuspension effects on marine carbon storage, Methods Ecol. Evol.,
16, 309–316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14479" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14479</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bennion, M., Brough, T., Leunissen, E., Morrison, M., Hillman, J. R.,
Rowden, A. A., Gordon, D. P., Kelly, M., Nelson, W., Tracey, D. M.,
Macpherson, D., Neill, K., Lohrer, A. M., and Lundquist, C. J.: Modelling
spatial distributions of biogenic habitat-forming taxa to inform marine
spatial planning, Aquat. Conserv., 34, e4079,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/AQC.4079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/AQC.4079</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bevin, A.: Hauraki Gulf bottom trawling corridor proposals chucked on ice, Newsroom, 14th May, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bianchi, T. S., Cui, X., Blair, N. E., Burdige, D. J., Eglinton, T. I., and
Galy, V.: Centers of organic carbon burial and oxidation at the land-ocean
interface, Org. Geochem., 115, 138–155,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORGGEOCHEM.2017.09.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORGGEOCHEM.2017.09.008</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boudreau, B. P., Huettel, M., Forster, S., Jahnke, R. A., McLachlan, A.,
Middelburg, J. J., Nielsen, P., Sansone, F., Taghon, G., Van Raaphorst, W.,
Webster, I., Weslawski, J. M., Wiberg, P., and Sundby, B.: Permeable marine
sediments: Overturning an old paradigm, Eos, 82, 133–136,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/EO082i011p00133-01" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/EO082i011p00133-01</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boulesteix, A. L., Janitza, S., Kruppa, J., and König, I. R.: Overview
of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on
computational biology and bioinformatics, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min.
Knowl. Discov., 2, 493–507, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/WIDM.1072" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/WIDM.1072</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bradshaw, C., Jakobsson, M., Brüchert, V., Bonaglia, S., Mörth, C.
M., Muchowski, J., Stranne, C., and Sköld, M.: Physical Disturbance by
Bottom Trawling Suspends Particulate Matter and Alters Biogeochemical
Processes on and Near the Seafloor, Front. Mar. Sci., 8, 1127,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2021.683331" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2021.683331</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buffan-Dubau, E. and Carman, K. R.: Extraction of benthic microalgal
pigments for HPLC analyses, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 204, 293–297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/MEPS204293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/MEPS204293</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burdige, D. J.: Preservation of Organic Matter in Marine Sediments:
Controls, Mechanisms, and an Imbalance in Sediment Organic Carbon Budgets?,
Chem. Rev., 467–485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050347q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050347q</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, F. H., Zeldis, J., Gall, M., and Hall, J.: Seasonal and spatial
variation of phytoplankton assemblages, biomass and cell size from spring to
summer across the north-eastern New Zealand continental shelf, J. Plankton
Res., 25, 737–758, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/PLANKT/25.7.737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/PLANKT/25.7.737</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheung, H. L. S., Hillman, J. R., Pilditch, C. A., Savage, C., Santos, I. R., Glud, R. N., Nascimento, F. J. A., Thrush, S. F., and Bonaglia, S.: Denitrification, anammox, and DNRA in oligotrophic continental shelf sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 69, 621–637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/LNO.12512" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/LNO.12512</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cimino, M. A., Santora, J. A., Schroeder, I., Sydeman, W., Jacox, M. G.,
Hazen, E. L., and Bograd, S. J.: Essential krill species habitat resolved by
seasonal upwelling and ocean circulation models within the large marine
ecosystem of the California Current System, Ecography, 43, 1536–1549,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ECOG.05204" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ECOG.05204</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
DesRosiers, A., Gassama, N., Grosbois, C., and Lazar, C. S.:
Laboratory-Controlled Experiments Reveal Microbial Community Shifts during
Sediment Resuspension Events, Genes, 13, 1416,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081416" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081416</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré,
G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J.,
Münkemüller, T., Mcclean, C., Osborne, P. E., Reineking, B.,
Schröder, B., Skidmore, A. K., Zurell, D., and Lautenbach, S.:
Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study
evaluating their performance, Ecography, 36, 27–46,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0587.2012.07348.X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0587.2012.07348.X</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Epstein, G., Middelburg, J. J., Hawkins, J. P., Norris, C. R., and Roberts, C. M.: The impact of mobile demersal fishing on carbon storage in seabed sediments, Glob. Change Biol., 28, 2875–2894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16105</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Friedman, J. H.: Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine,
Ann Stat, 29, 1189–1232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1214/AOS/1013203451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1214/AOS/1013203451</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hale, R., Godbold, J. A., Sciberras, M., Dwight, J., Wood, C., Hiddink, J.
G., and Solan, M.: Mediation of macronutrients and carbon by
post-disturbance shelf sea sediment communities, Biogeochemistry, 135,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hauraki Gulf Forum: State of our Gulf 2020 Hauraki Gulf/Tīkapa Moana/Te Moananui-ā-Toi State of the Environment Report 2020, ISBN: 978-1-98-858901-5, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hauraki Gulf Forum: State of our Gulf 2023 Hauraki Gulf/Tīkapa Moana/Te Moananui-ā-Toi State of the Environment Report 2023, ISBN: 97-8-04-7368671-0, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Sciberras, M., Szostek, C. L., Hughes, K. M.,
Ellis, N., Rijnsdorp, A. D., McConnaughey, R. A., Mazor, T., Hilborn, R.,
Collie, J. S., Pitcher, C. R., Amoroso, R. O., Parma, A. M., Suuronen, P.,
and Kaiser, M. J.: Global analysis of depletion and recovery of seabed biota
after bottom trawling disturbance, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114,
8301–8306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618858114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618858114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hiddink, J. G., van de Velde, S. J., McConnaughey, R. A., De Borger, E.,
Tiano, J., Kaiser, M. J., Sweetman, A. K., and Sciberras, M.: Quantifying
the carbon benefits of ending bottom trawling, Nature, 617, 7960, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06014-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06014-7</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Holland, K. T. and Elmore, P. A.: A review of heterogeneous sediments in
coastal environments, Earth Sci. Rev., 89, 116–134,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2008.03.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2008.03.003</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hulthe, G., Hulth, S., and Hall, P. O. J.: Effect of oxygen on degradation
rate of refractory and labile organic matter in continental margin
sediments, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 62, 1319–1328,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00044-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00044-1</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jørgensen, B. B., Wenzhöfer, F., Egger, M., and Glud, R. N.: Sediment
oxygen consumption: Role in the global marine carbon cycle, Earth Sci. Rev.,
228, 103987, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2022.103987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2022.103987</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kleber, M., Bourg, I. C., Coward, E. K., Hansel, C. M., Myneni, S. C. B., and Nunan, N.: Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter interface, Nat. Rev. Earth   Environ.,  2, 402–421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kujawinski, E. B.: The impact of microbial metabolism on marine dissolved organic matter, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 3, 567–599, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081003</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lengier, M., Koziorowska-Makuch, K., Szymczycha, B., and Kuliński, K.:
Bioavailability and remineralization rates of sediment-derived dissolved
organic carbon from a Baltic Sea depositional area, Front. Mar. Sci., 11,
1359563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2024.1359563/BIBTEX" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2024.1359563/BIBTEX</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Z.: Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local
interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost, Comput. Environ. Urban
Syst., 96, 101845, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2022.101845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2022.101845</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lohrer, A. M., Stephenson, F., Douglas, E. J., and Townsend, M.: Mapping the
estuarine ecosystem service of pollutant removal using empirically validated
boosted regression tree models, Ecological Applications, 30,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/EAP.2105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/EAP.2105</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lønborg, C., Markager, S., Herzog, S. D., Carreira, C., and Høgslund,
S.: Impacts of anthropogenic resuspension on sediment organic matter: An
experimental approach, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 310, 108981,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2024.108981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2024.108981</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lorenzen, C. J.: Determination of chlorophyll and Pheo-pigments:
Spectrophotometric equations, Limnol. Oceanogr., 12, 343–346,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/LO.1967.12.2.0343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/LO.1967.12.2.0343</a>, 1967.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lucas, T. C. D.: A translucent box: interpretable machine learning in
ecology, Ecol. Monogr., 90, e01422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ECM.1422" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ECM.1422</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luisetti, T., Turner, R. K., Andrews, J. E., Jickells, T. D., Kröger,
S., Diesing, M., Paltriguera, L., Johnson, M. T., Parker, E. R., Bakker, D.
C. E., and Weston, K.: Quantifying and valuing carbon flows and stores in
coastal and shelf ecosystems in the UK, Ecosyst. Serv., 35, 67–76,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2018.10.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2018.10.013</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S.-I.: A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions, in: NIPS’17: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 4768–4777, <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3295222.3295230" target="_blank"/>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G. G., and Lee, S.-I.: Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles, arXiv.org, <a href="https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1802.03888v3" target="_blank"/> (last access: 26 November 2025), 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B.,
Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., and Lee, S. I.: From local
explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees, Nat. Mach.
Intell., 2, 56–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/S42256-019-0138-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/S42256-019-0138-9</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Manighetti, B. and Carter, L.: Across-shelf sediment dispersal, Hauraki
Gulf, New Zealand, Mar. Geol., 160, 271–300,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(99)00024-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(99)00024-9</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mayer, L. M.: Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in
continental shelf sediments, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 58, 1271–1284,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90381-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90381-6</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miatta, M. and Snelgrove, P. V. R.: Sedimentary Organic Matter Shapes
Macrofaunal Communities but Not Benthic Nutrient Fluxes in Contrasting
Habitats Along the Northwest Atlantic Continental Margin, Front. Mar. Sci., 8,
756054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2021.756054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/FMARS.2021.756054</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Middelburg, J. J.: Reviews and syntheses: to the bottom of carbon processing
at the seafloor, Biogeosciences, 15, 413–427,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-413-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-413-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Muñoz, M., Reul, A., Guijarro, B., and Hidalgo, M.: Carbon footprint,
economic benefits and sustainable fishing: Lessons for the future from the
Western Mediterranean, Science of The Total Environment, 865, 160783,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.160783" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.160783</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Najjar, R. G., Herrmann, M., Alexander, R., Boyer, E. W., Burdige, D. J.,
Butman, D., Cai, W. J., Canuel, E. A., Chen, R. F., Friedrichs, M. A. M.,
Feagin, R. A., Griffith, P. C., Hinson, A. L., Holmquist, J. R., Hu, X.,
Kemp, W. M., Kroeger, K. D., Mannino, A., McCallister, S. L., McGillis, W.
R., Mulholland, M. R., Pilskaln, C. H., Salisbury, J., Signorini, S. R.,
St-Laurent, P., Tian, H., Tzortziou, M., Vlahos, P., Wang, Z. A., and
Zimmerman, R. C.: Carbon Budget of Tidal Wetlands, Estuaries, and Shelf
Waters of Eastern North America, Global Biogeochem Cycles, 32, 389–416,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005790" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005790</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niemistö, J., Kononets, M., Ekeroth, N., Tallberg, P., Tengberg, A., and
Hall, P. O. J.: Benthic fluxes of oxygen and inorganic nutrients in the
archipelago of Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea – Effects of sediment
resuspension measured in situ, J. Sea Res., 135, 95–106,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEARES.2018.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEARES.2018.02.006</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oberle, F. K. J., Storlazzi, C. D., and Hanebuth, T. J. J.: What a drag:
Quantifying the global impact of chronic bottom trawling on continental
shelf sediment, Journal of Marine Systems, 159, 109–119,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMARSYS.2015.12.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMARSYS.2015.12.007</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Neill, F. G. and Ivanović, A.: The physical impact of towed demersal
fishing gears on soft sediments, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73,
i5–i14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ICESJMS/FSV125" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/ICESJMS/FSV125</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Panaïotis, T., Wilson, J., and Cael, B. B.: A Machine Learning-Based
Dissolved Organic Carbon Climatology,  Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2024GL112792,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112792" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112792</a>,
2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel,
O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J.,
Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.:
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in   Python,
Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Polymenakou, P. N., Pusceddu, A., Tselepides, A., Polychronaki, T.,
Giannakourou, A., Fiordelmondo, C., Hatziyanni, E., and Danovaro, R.:
Benthic microbial abundance and activities in an intensively trawled
ecosystem (Thermaikos Gulf, Aegean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 2570–2584,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.018</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Porz, L., Zhang, W., Christiansen, N., Kossack, J., Daewel, U., and Schrum,
C.: Quantification and mitigation of bottom-Trawling impacts on sedimentary
organic carbon stocks in the North Sea, Biogeosciences, 21, 2547–2570,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/BG-21-2547-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/BG-21-2547-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pusceddu, A., Fiordelmondo, C., Polymenakou, P., Polychronaki, T.,
Tselepides, A., and Danovaro, R.: Effects of bottom trawling on the quantity
and biochemical composition of organic matter in coastal marine sediments
(Thermaikos Gulf, northwestern Aegean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 2491–2505,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSR.2005.08.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSR.2005.08.013</a>, 2005a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pusceddu, A., Fiordelmondo, C., and Danovaro, R.: Sediment Resuspension
Effects on the Benthic Microbial Loop in Experimental Microcosms, Microbial.
Ecology, 50,   602–613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/S00248-005-5051-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/S00248-005-5051-6</a>,
2005b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pusceddu, A., Bianchelli, S., Canals, M., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Durrieu De
Madron, X., Heussner, S., Lykousis, V., de Stigter, H., Trincardi, F., and
Danovaro, R.: Organic matter in sediments of canyons and open slopes of the
Portuguese, Catalan, Southern Adriatic and Cretan Sea margins, Deep-Sea
Research Pt. I, 57, 441–457,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSR.2009.11.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSR.2009.11.008</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pusceddu, A., Bianchelli, S., Martín, J., Puig, P., Palanques, A.,
Masqué, P., and Danovaro, R.: Chronic and intensive bottom trawling
impairs deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 111, 8861–8866, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405454111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405454111</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Reader, H. E., Thoms, F., Voss, M., and Stedmon, C. A.: The Influence of
Sediment-Derived Dissolved Organic Matter in the Vistula River Estuary/Gulf
of Gdansk, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 124, 115–126,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004658" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004658</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rijkenberg, M. J. A., Langlois, R. J., Mills, M. M., Patey, M. D., Hill, P.
G., Nielsdóttir, M. C., Compton, T. J., LaRoche, J., and Achterberg, E.
P.: Environmental Forcing of Nitrogen Fixation in the Eastern Tropical and
Sub-Tropical North Atlantic Ocean, PLoS One, 6, e28989,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0028989" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0028989</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rijnsdorp, A. D., Depestele, J., Molenaar, P., Eigaard, O. R., Ivanović,
A., and O'Neill, F. G.: Sediment mobilization by bottom trawls: a model
approach applied to the Dutch North Sea beam trawl fishery, ICES Journal of
Marine Science, 78, 1574–1586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ICESJMS/FSAB029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/ICESJMS/FSAB029</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rubbens, P., Brodie, S., Cordier, T., Destro Barcellos, D., Devos, P.,
Fernandes-Salvador, J. A., Fincham, J. I., Gomes, A., Handegard, N. O.,
Howell, K., Jamet, C., Kartveit, K. H., Moustahfid, H., Parcerisas, C.,
Politikos, D., Sauzède, R., Sokolova, M., Uusitalo, L., Van Den Bulcke,
L., Van Helmond, A. T. M., Watson, J. T., Welch, H., Beltran-Perez, O.,
Chaffron, S., Greenberg, D. S., Kühn, B., Kiko, R., Lo, M., Lopes, R.
M., Möller, K. O., Michaels, W., Pala, A., Romagnan, J. B., Schuchert,
P., Seydi, V., Villasante, S., Malde, K., and Irisson, J. O.: Machine
learning in marine ecology: an overview of techniques and applications, ICES
Journal of Marine Science, 80, 1829–1853,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ICESJMS/FSAD100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/ICESJMS/FSAD100</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sala, E., Mayorga, J., Bradley, D., Cabral, R. B., Atwood, T. B., Auber, A.,
Cheung, W., Costello, C., Ferretti, F., Friedlander, A. M., Gaines, S. D.,
Garilao, C., Goodell, W., Halpern, B. S., Hinson, A., Kaschner, K.,
Kesner-Reyes, K., Leprieur, F., McGowan, J., Morgan, L. E., Mouillot, D.,
Palacios-Abrantes, J., Possingham, H. P., Rechberger, K. D., Worm, B., and
Lubchenco, J.: Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and
climate, Nature, 592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sharples, J.: Cross-shelf intrusion of subtropical water into the coastal
zone of northeast New Zealand, Cont. Shelf Res., 17, 835–857,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(96)00060-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(96)00060-X</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sikes, E. L., Uhle, M. E., Nodder, S. D., and Howard, M. E.: Sources of
organic matter in a coastal marine environment: Evidence from n-alkanes and
their <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C distributions in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand, Mar. Chem.,
113, 149–163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARCHEM.2008.12.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARCHEM.2008.12.003</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Snelgrove, P. V. R., Soetaert, K., Solan, M., Thrush, S., Wei, C. L.,
Danovaro, R., Fulweiler, R. W., Kitazato, H., Ingole, B., Norkko, A.,
Parkes, R. J., and Volkenborn, N.: Global Carbon Cycling on a Heterogeneous
Seafloor, Trends Ecol. Evol., 33, 96–105,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TREE.2017.11.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TREE.2017.11.004</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Soykan, C. U., Eguchi, T., Kohin, S., and Dewar, H.: Prediction of fishing
effort distributions using boosted regression trees, Ecological
Applications, 24, 71–83, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0826.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0826.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ståhlberg, C., Bastviken, D., Svensson, B. H., and Rahm, L.:
Mineralisation of organic matter in coastal sediments at different frequency
and duration of resuspension, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 70, 317–325,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2006.06.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2006.06.022</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, M., Aller, R. C., and Lee, C.: Early diagenesis of chlorophyll-a in
Long Island Sound sediments: A measure of carbon flux and particle
reworking, J. Mar. Res., 49, 379–401, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thrush, S. F. and Dayton, P. K.: Disturbance to Marine Benthic Habitats by
Trawling and Dredging: Implications for Marine Biodiversity, Annual Reviews,
33, 449–473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.ECOLSYS.33.010802.150515" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.ECOLSYS.33.010802.150515</a>,
2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tiano, J. C., Depestele, J., Van Hoey, G., Fernandes, J., Van Rijswijk, P.,
and Soetaert, K.: Trawling effects on biogeochemical processes are mediated
by fauna in high-energy biogenic-reef-inhabited coastal sediments,
Biogeosciences, 19, 2583–2598, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2583-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2583-2022</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Nugteren, P., Moodley, L., Brummer, G. J., Heip, C. H. R., Herman, P. M.
J., and Middelburg, J. J.: Seafloor ecosystem functioning: the importance of
organic matter priming, Marine Biology, 156,  2277–2287,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/S00227-009-1255-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/S00227-009-1255-5</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilson, P. S. and Vopel, K.: Assessing the Sulfide Footprint of Mussel Farms
with Sediment Profile Imagery: A New Zealand Trial, PLoS One, 10, e0129894,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0129894" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0129894</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeldis, J. R., Walters, R. A., Greig, M. J. N., and Image, K.: Circulation
over the northeastern New Zealand continental slope, shelf and adjacent
Hauraki Gulf, during spring and summer, Cont. Shelf Res., 24, 543–561,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSR.2003.11.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSR.2003.11.007</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, W., Wirtz, K., Daewel, U., Wrede, A., Kröncke, I., Kuhn, G.,
Neumann, A., Meyer, J., Ma, M., and Schrum, C.: The Budget of Macrobenthic
Reworked Organic Carbon: A Modeling Case Study of the North Sea, J. Geophys.
Res.-Biogeo., 124, 1446–1471, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005109</a>, 2019.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, W., Porz, L., Yilmaz, R., Wallmann, K., Spiegel, T., Neumann, A.,
Holtappels, M., Kasten, S., Kuhlmann, J., Ziebarth, N., Taylor, B.,
Ho-Hagemann, H. T. M., Bockelmann, F. D., Daewel, U., Bernhardt, L., and
Schrum, C.: Long-term carbon storage in shelf sea sediments reduced by
intensive bottom trawling, Nat. Geosci., 17, 1268–1276,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/S41561-024-01581-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/S41561-024-01581-4</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
