<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-23-4037-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Revealing hidden oxygen variability in the North Pacific:  a two-decade analysis using GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub></article-title><alt-title>Revealing hidden oxygen variability in the North Pacific</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ishizu</surname><given-names>Miho</given-names></name>
          <email>mishizu@pusan.ac.kr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3035-7655</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Ogata</surname><given-names>Tomomichi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Center for Climate Physics, Institute for Basic Science, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Pusan National University, Tonghapgigyegwan Bldg 2 Busandaehak-ro, 63 beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Research Institute for Earth and Information Sciences, 3173-25 Showa-machi, Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0001, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Miho Ishizu (mishizu@pusan.ac.kr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>4037</fpage><lpage>4056</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>June</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Miho Ishizu</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e117">Oceanic dissolved oxygen concentrations are thought to be declining under ongoing global warming, yet their variability remains less well understood than that of physical parameters such as temperature and salinity, primarily due to the limited spatial and temporal coverage of oxygen observation. Here, we examine linear trends in potential temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen in the North Pacific over the past two decades (2004–2023), using the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>-v2.2 dataset (Version 4.4). We compare the diagnosed oxygen trends with those of physical parameters to reveal the spatial structure of recent changes. The oxygen trends inferred from GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> are broadly consistent with trends observed along ship-based hydrographic repeat lines. While basin-scale deoxygenation is evident, we also identify localized oxygen increases on specific density surfaces. By relating these patterns to the surrounding physical environment, we find that the spatial heterogeneity in oxygen trends is consistent with known oceanographic processes, including the southward retreat of the oxygen minimum layer and the northward migration of a front separating the subtropical and subarctic gyres. These results underscore the value of GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> data in linking physical variability to previously unrecognized biological and biogeochemical patterns in the ocean.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Institute for Basic Science</funding-source>
<award-id>IBS-R028-D1</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Japan Society for the Promotion of Science</funding-source>
<award-id>22H00176</award-id>
<award-id>26K07196</award-id>
<award-id>26K07251</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e158">Over recent decades, the global ocean has experienced a decline in its dissolved oxygen inventory, a trend projected to continue through the 21st century (Keeling et al., 2010; Breitburg et al., 2018; Stramma and Schmidtko, 2021; Limburg et al., 2020; Ito et al., 2017, 2024; Kolodziejczyk et al., 2024). This deoxygenation is driven in part by reduced ocean oxygen solubility under rising sea-surface temperatures, which promotes oxygen outgassing. In addition, enhanced stratification and a slowdown of ocean circulation under global warming can reduce interior ventilation and oxygen supply (Keeling et al., 2010; Bopp et al., 2013; Ito et al., 2017). Ocean oxygen loss can negatively affect aerobic marine organisms (Pörtner and Farrell, 2008; Sampaio et al., 2021), alter biogeochemical cycles, and potentially induce climate-relevant feedback (Berman-Frank et al., 2008). Historical deoxygenation has been inferred from globally distributed observations (Helm et al., 2011; Schmidtko et al., 2017; Ito et al., 2017; Takatani et al., 2012; Sasano et al., 2015; Lauvset et al., 2022), and Earth system models have been used to simulate both historical and future changes in ocean oxygen (Bopp et al., 2013; Kwiatkowski et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d2e161">Observed oxygen trends have traditionally been assessed using the discrete measurements of dissolved oxygen concentration (O<sub>2</sub>), typically obtained by Winkler titration (Winkler, 1888). These measurements are also used to calibrate electrode- and, more recently, optode-based oxygen sensors mounted on conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profilers (Helm et al., 2011; Schmidtko et al., 2017; Lauvset et al., 2022). Although programs such as WOCE, CLIVAR, and GO-SHIP have collected high-quality oxygen measurements globally, repeat occupation intervals are commonly on the order of a decade, limiting the ability to robustly quantify annual to seasonal variability. Higher-frequency ship-based observations exist in a few regions (Takatani et al., 2012; Sasano et al., 2015), but their spatial coverage is limited. Consequently, despite attempts to characterize basin-scale patterns (Ito et al., 2017; Stramma et al., 2020; Kolodziejczyk et al., 2024), observational constraints have hampered a spatially and temporally comprehensive understanding of dissolved oxygen variability and trends.</p>
      <p id="d2e173">Oxygen sensors were first deployed on Argo profiling floats in the mid-2000s. Since then, approximately 1800 oxygen-equipped floats have been deployed worldwide, substantially advancing the observational basis for assessing oxygen variability and trends (Sharp et al., 2023). The expansion toward a global biogeochemical (BGC) Argo network has improved sampling in regions that were previously sparsely observed (Claustre et al., 2020). In parallel, major progress has been made in calibration, adjustments, and quality control of oxygen measurements, including pre-deployment drift corrections (D'Asaro and McNeil, 2013; Johnson et al., 2015; Bittig and Körtzinger, 2015; Bushinsky et al., 2016; Drucker and Riser, 2016; Nicholson and Feen, 2017), climatology-based calibrations (Takeshita et al., 2013), in-air oxygen measurement calibrations (Körtzinger et al., 2005; Bittig and Körtzinger, 2015; Johnson et al., 2015; Bushinsky et al., 2016), post-deployment drift corrections (Johnson et al., 2017; Bittig et al., 2018a, b), and the standardized delayed-mode quality control procedures (Maurer et al., 2021). Together, these developments have reduced uncertainty and improved the consistency of optode-based [O<sub>2</sub>] measurements from Argo floats.</p>
      <p id="d2e185">To date, oxygen observations from Argo floats have been used primarily in regional process studies, including air-sea oxygen exchange (Wolf et al., 2018), upper-ocean primary production (Alkire et al., 2012; Estapa et al., 2019), biological pump efficiency (Johnson and Bif, 2021), and the dynamics of the oxygen minimum zone (Udaya Bhaskar et al., 2021). Recently, Sharp et al. (2023) produced a four-dimensional gridded [O<sub>2</sub>] product, GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> (Gridded Ocean Biogeochemistry from Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Oxygen). GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> is constructed using machine-learning methods trained on oxygen observations and designed to reconstruct spatial patterns, seasonal cycles, and decadal variability, particularly in regions where observational data gaps coincide with high background O<sub>2</sub> variability.</p>
      <p id="d2e225">In the North Pacific, several studies have documented heterogeneous oxygen trends. Using an objectively mapped monthly climatology of O<sub>2</sub> based on the World Ocean Database 2013 (WOD13) (Boyer et al., 2013), Ito et al. (2017) reported multidecadal variability and trends in dissolved O<sub>2</sub> in the surface-layer oxygen from 1958 to 2013. Sasano et al. (2015), using the high-frequency shipboard sections along the 137 and 165° E lines from 1987 to 2011, reported oxygen declines in the northern subtropical to subtropical-subarctic transition zones of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> at 25.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> at 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. They also identified a significant oxygen increase in the tropical Oxygen Minimum Layer (OML) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, highlighting pronounced spatial heterogeneity in oxygen trends. At broader scales, Stramma et al. (2020) analyzed historical bottle data and reported links between oxygen variability and climate modes such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and the North Pacific Gyre Oscillation (NPGO), although sparse sampling makes it difficult to robustly connect regional trends to physical mechanisms. Collectively, previous studies indicate that oxygen changes in the North Pacific can be strong, spatially non-uniform, and potentially driven by both circulation/ventilation changes and biologically mediated oxygen consumption (Sasano et al., 2015, 2018; Ito et al., 2017; 2024; Stramma et al., 2020; Kolodziejczyk et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e408">Because observational opportunities to quantify trends in dissolved oxygen – together with concomitant changes in temperature and salinity – remain limited, gridded products such as GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> are becoming increasingly valuable for basin-scale analyses. In this study, we use GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> to quantify linear trends in potential temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen in the North Pacific over 2004–2023 and examine how their trends are connected in both depth and density space. We further discuss the extent to which the diagnosed oxygen trends can be interpreted in terms of physical drivers, including surface warming, stratification changes, and circulation variability in the North Pacific.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> dataset</title>
      <p id="d2e454">We use GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>-v2.2 (Version 4.4), a four-dimensional, monthly gridded product of dissolved oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) in the ocean interior, generated using machine learning (ML) algorithms trained on both Argo float oxygen measurements and ship-based discrete observations (Sharp et al., 2023). GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> is mapped onto the temperature-salinity fields provided by the global Argo array (Roemmich and Gilson, 2009). The underlying oxygen training database combines ship-based measurements from GLODAPv2.2022 and Argo float data distributed through the Argo Global Data Assembly Centers, after quality control (Sharp et al., 2022, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25921/z72m-yz67" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25921/z72m-yz67</ext-link>).</p>
      <p id="d2e487">According to Sharp et al. (2023), the float data used in GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> were filtered to retain only delayed-mode adjusted profiles with quality flags of 1 (good), 2 (probably good), or 8 (interpolated/extrapolated) for pressure, temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen. Among all available float profiles, 51.4 % underwent quality control through comparison with climatological fields from the World Ocean Atlas (WOA) or the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Regional Sea Atlas (CARS). An additional 30.3 % were evaluated using atmospheric oxygen concentration measurements, and 7.0 % were quality controlled through comparison with in-water measurements (WOD, OMS assuming an oxygen zero, or deployment-time CTD profiles). A further 5.3 % were adjusted using in-situ optode calibration based on the method of Drucker and Riser (2016), 3.3 % were adjusted by other methods, 1.9 % were unclassified, and the remaining 0.9 % were not adjusted.</p>
      <p id="d2e499">The ML models predict O<sub>2</sub> using predictors that include absolute salinity, conservative temperature, potential density anomaly, hydrostatic pressure, bottom depth, and additional spatiotemporal covariates representing geographic, seasonal, and interannual variability. Biological processes are not explicitly parameterized in the ML framework; however spatiotemporal covariates can implicitly capture biological influences to some extent (Giglio et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d2e512">GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> is produced using two ML approaches: feed-forward networks (FNNs) and random forest regression (RFRs, (Breiman, 2001)). The final O<sub>2</sub> estimate at each grid point is taken as the mean of the FNN and RFR predictions. The dataset spans 2004–2023 at monthly resolution on a 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° latitude–longitude grid, covering 86 % of the global ocean area. The product is provided on 58 vertical levels from the surface to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. Sharp et al. (2023) reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % per decade decrease in the oxygen inventory of the upper 2000 m over 2004–2022. Full details of their data sources, processing, algorithm training, evaluation, and uncertainty estimation are given in Sharp et al. (2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Uncertainty estimates</title>
      <p id="d2e570">GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> provides an uncertainty estimate for each gridded O<sub>2</sub> value, constructed by combining independent uncertainty components in quadrature (Sharp et al., 2023):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">grid</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alg</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents measurement uncertainty of the underlying observations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">grid</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gridding uncertainty associated with representing a four-dimensional spatiotemporal volume by a single value, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alg</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the algorithmic uncertainty arising from the ML estimation. We use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to characterize uncertainty in O<sub>2</sub> and to propagate uncertainty into our oxygen trend estimates (Figs. 1–4). In most figures, we incorporate the mean uncertainty when estimating linear O<sub>2</sub> trends.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Vertical grid and interpolation for isopycnal analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e842">GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> is provided on a 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° horizontal grid with 58 depth levels: 2.5, 10, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 182.5, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300, 320, 340, 360, 380, 400, 420, 440, 462.5, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300, 1350, 1412.5, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900 and 1975 m. The enhanced near-surface vertical resolution is important for resolving strong gradients in temperature, salinity, density, and oxygen within the mixed layer (Kara et al., 2000).</p>
      <p id="d2e861">For analysis performed in density space, we interpolate the original depth-level data to 1 m vertical grid using cubic spline interpolation and then evaluate linear trends on a 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 m grid. This approach enables computation of trends as a function of latitude (1° bins) and potential density anomaly (0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins) (Figs. 4–7). To evaluate sensitivity to interpolation choices, we repeated the analysis using linear, shape-preserving cubic (PCHIP) interpolation and using coarser vertical grids (2   and 5 m). The resulting trend patterns show no material differences among interpolation methods (Figs. S1a, b and S2a, b in the Supplement). The 5 m grid cannot resolve densities lighter than 24.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at some latitudes; however, the main features are preserved across all tested resolutions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>OFES model output</title>
      <p id="d2e908">In Sect. 3.3.2, we additionally use output from the eddy-resolving OGCM for the Earth Simulator (OFES) (Masumoto et al., 2004; Masumoto, 2010; Sasaki et al., 2008) to examine the physical context of the diagnosed variability. OFES is based on the MOM3 (Pacanowski and Griffies, 2000) and uses a quasi-global domain spanning 75° S–75° N with 0.1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1° horizontal resolution and 54 vertical levels. The model was initialized from rest using the World Ocean Atlas 1998 (WOA98) (Boyer and Levitus, 1997), and spun up for 50 years using climatological forcing derived from NCEP-NCAR reanalysis (Kalnay et al., 1996). After spin-up, a hindcast experiment was conducted from 1950 to 2024 using daily NCEP-NCAR forcing. Here we analyze OFES output over 1950–2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>GODAS model output</title>
      <p id="d2e927">In Sect. 3.3.2, we also use temperature and salinity fields from the NCEP Global Ocean Data Assimilation System (GODAS) to complement our analysis. GODAS is a global ocean reanalysis system developed at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and is based on the Modular Ocean Model version 3 (Pacanowski and Griffies, 2000). The system assimilates surface temperature profiles, XBT data, moored buoy observations, and other in situ measurements using a three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) assimilation scheme (Behringer and Xue, 2004; Behringer, 2007). The GODAS reanalysis is provided on a 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° horizontal grid with enhanced meridional resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°) near the equator and includes 40 vertical levels. The reanalysis spans from 1980 to the present and is widely used for climate diagnostics and ocean variability studies. In this study, we analyze GODAS density fields over the period 2003–2024 by using temperature and salinity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Horizontal distributions of linear trends</title>
      <p id="d2e965">Figure 1 illustrates the horizontal and vertical distributions of linear trends in potential temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>), over 2004–2023. Positive trends in potential temperature are primarily confined to the surface layer above 200 m depth (Fig. 1a–c), with larger magnitudes at higher latitudes. In contrast, negative trends emerge below the surface in the eastern tropical area (180–120° W, 5–15° N) (Fig. 1b), extending westward and deepening with increasing depth (Fig. 1d–f). Below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, the spatial distributions of positive and negative temperature trends differ between the subarctic and subtropical gyres.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e989">Horizontal distributions of linear trends in potential temperature <bold>(a–g)</bold>, salinity <bold>(h–n)</bold>, and dissolved oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) <bold>(o–u)</bold> during the observational period at depths of 0, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 m, respectively. Hatched areas indicate statistically significant trends at the 95 % confidence level based on a Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test with effective degrees of freedom accounting for temporal autocorrelation. Trend significance was evaluated using a Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test with effective degrees of freedom accounting for lag-1 autocorrelation. Contours denote potential density at each depth. Labels for the potential density are shown only in the potential temperature sections. Corresponding distributions of the Robustness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), defined as the ratio of the trend magnitude to the dataset uncertainty in dissolved O<sub>2</sub> are presented in panels <bold>(v)</bold>–<bold>(bb)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1053">Salinity trends exhibit generally negative values throughout the surface layer (Fig. 1h–i), consistent with freshening. Localized positive salinity trends are detected in the Kuroshio–Oyashio transition area and the northwest Pacific (140–180° E, 20–50° N), as well as in the tropical region (120–170° E, 0–10° N). Additional positive trends are observed along the eastern boundary off California (130–199° W, 20–40° N). Below 200 m depth, salinity trends are weaker and broadly mirror the temperature (Fig. 1j–k). Notably, negative salinity trends are evident around the Alaska gyre (170–130° W, 40–55° N) (Fig. 1j–l), a pattern that differs from the corresponding temperature trends.</p>
      <p id="d2e1057">Negative trends in dissolved O<sub>2</sub> are widespread across the North Pacific and extend throughout much of the water column (Fig. 1o–u). Large negative trends are concentrated at higher latitudes near the surface, with their locations shifting systematically with depth. Particularly strong O<sub>2</sub> declines are observed along the northeastern boundary (140–130° W, 40–50° N) and within the southern subtropical region (10–25° N) on density surfaces between 25.2 and 26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to depths of approximately 200–600 m (Fig. 1q–s). In contrast, weak positive O<sub>2</sub> trends are detected below 200 m depth in the Kuroshio–Oyashio transition zone (130–150° E, 30–40° N), extending into deeper layers and spreading northeastward across the basin (Fig. 1r–u).</p>
      <p id="d2e1098">Positive O<sub>2</sub> trends are restricted to specific regions and depths: the tropical region at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m depth (Fig. 1p); the Alaska Gyre at 200–400 m depth (Fig. 1q–r); the western tropical region at 400–600 m depth (Fig. 1r–s); and the Kuroshio–Oyashio transition region at similar depths (Fig. 1r–s). When examined as a function of latitude, the magnitudes of negative O<sub>2</sub> trends do not depend monotonically on latitude alone. While surface-layer declines are strongest at high latitudes, the largest negative trends at intermediate depths (400–600 m) occur in the mid-latitude band (30–40° N). This depth-dependent latitudinal structure implies the importance of remote transports and the circulation-driven redistribution of oxygen, rather than purely local surface forcing. The underlying mechanisms are discussed further in Sect. 3.3.</p>
      <p id="d2e1129">The total uncertainty in dissolved O<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exhibits pronounced regional structure (Fig. 2a–g). Uncertainty is largest in the North Pacific north of 50° N and decreases toward lower latitudes. Relatively high uncertainty values are also evident in the surface layer, and within regions of strong density gradients in the eastern tropical Pacific [150–120° W, 10–30° N] at depths of 100–200 m (Fig. 2b–c). In general, uncertainty peaks near 100 m depth and decreases with increasing depth (Figs. 2 and  A14 in Sharp et al. (2023)). As shown by Sharp et al. (2023), regional variations in uncertainty are dominated by algorithmic uncertainty rather than measurement or gridding components (Eq. 1). Elevated algorithmic uncertainty in the northern Pacific above 50° N and along the western and eastern tropical margins below 20° N reflects sparse observational coverage in these regions (Fig. 1 in Sharp et al., 2023).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1168">Horizontal distributions of dataset uncertainty in dissolved O<sub>2</sub> <bold>(a–g)</bold> and vertical profiles of linear trends and uncertainty in dissolved O<sub>2</sub> by latitude <bold>(h–i)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1201">To assess whether regional trends exceed the dataset uncertainty, we computed the spatial distribution of Robustness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trend</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">over</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">two</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decades</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">uncertainty</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1v–bb). (Note: This diagnostic provides a heuristic measure of the relative strength of the trend compared to the local uncertainty, rather than a formal quantification of uncertainty propagation.) The results indicate that R exceeds or approaches high values in the eastern and western tropical zones, the Kuroshio Extension region, portions of the subpolar North Pacific, and along the 27.2–27.4  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> density surfaces at 800–1000 m depth. Based on this metric, larger oxygen trend magnitudes correspond to higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, more clearly distinguishable from the background uncertainty. Thus, in the upper ocean (2.5–100 m), trends are relatively robust in terms of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> metric, mainly in the northern North Pacific. At 200–400 m, robust signals appear both in the northern North Pacific and along the 25.2–26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces in the southern subtropical region, as well as in the eastern and western tropics. At 600–1000 m, the trends are robust within the subtropical gyre bounded by the 27.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface.</p>
      <p id="d2e1290">Compared with the previously reported historical horizontal distributions of dissolved O<sub>2</sub> reported by Ito et al. (2017) (Fig. 3 in Ito et al., 2017), our analysis shows a broader spatial extent of negative trends across the North Pacific. Whereas data gaps increase with depth in Ito et al. (2017), the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> product provides more spatially continuous coverage, yielding distributions that are consistent with surrounding regions. In addition, positive O<sub>2</sub> trends detected here in the Kuroshio–Oyashio transition zone and the northeastern North Pacific on density surfaces of 26.8–27.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1r) were not clearly evident in the earlier O<sub>2</sub> anomaly analysis. Similarly, the positive trends identified in the western tropical Pacific below 400 m depth (Fig. 1r–t) are stronger and more spatially coherent than those reported previously.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1342">Vertical sections showing linear trends in potential temperature <bold>(a, e)</bold>, salinity <bold>(b, f)</bold>, and dissolved O<sub>2</sub> <bold>(c, g)</bold> along the 137 and 165° E meridians, respectively. Black contour lines indicate the mean potential temperature <bold>(a, f)</bold>, salinity <bold>(b, g)</bold>, and dissolved oxygen <bold>(c, h)</bold> over the period 2004–2023, while green contour lines represent the mean potential density. Labels for the potential density are shown only in the robustness sections. Hatched areas indicate statistically significant trends at the 95 % confidence level based on a Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test with effective degrees of freedom accounting for temporal autocorrelation. Trend significance was evaluated using a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test with effective degrees of freedom accounting for lag-1 autocorrelation. Corresponding vertical sections of the mean uncertainty with the contours of the Robustness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in panels <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(h)</bold>. The contour intervals for thin and thick contours in <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(h)</bold> are 0.5 and 4.0, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1413">The positive O<sub>2</sub> trends coincide with regions of relatively low uncertainty values (Fig. 1p–s and w–z), suggesting that they represent relatively robust features that are better constrained by the high observation density of Argo profiling floats. Other regions exhibiting positive signals – the northeastern North Pacific with a density range of 26.8–27.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (170° E–150° W, 45–55° N, Fig. 1r) and the tropical western Pacific (130–170° E, 0–10° N, Fig. 1r–t) – also correspond to areas of low uncertainty (Fig. 1y–aa). Consequently, these signals may reflect possible regional reoxygenation superimposed on the basin-scale deoxygenation trend.</p>
      <p id="d2e1436">Some localized expansions of the trend patterns, particularly in the tropical eastern Pacific (e.g. 170–130° W, 0–20° N) may partly reflect regions of elevated uncertainty, occasionally exceeding 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<sup>−1</sup> (Figs. 1q–s; 4i). Such large uncertainties would likely arise from sparse observations and high background variability (Sharp et al., 2023). Additional bias may stem from sensor calibration limitations in Argo oxygen measurements, especially in oxycline regions where finite optode response times can introduce systematic errors (Bittig et al., 2014, 2018a, b). Despite these caveats, the spatial patterns of the diagnosed O<sub>2</sub> trends are generally smooth and coherent across the basin. Based on statistical significance testing, most trends are significant throughout the water column (Fig. 1o–u). Overall, despite the uncertainties associated with the various factors discussed above, the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> dataset provides an improved framework for diagnosing basin-scale oxygen variability and its physical drivers.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1479">Linear trends in potential temperature <bold>(a, e)</bold>, salinity <bold>(b, f)</bold>, and dissolved O<sub>2</sub> <bold>(c, g)</bold> on each isopycnal surface at intervals of 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated at every 1.0° of latitude in 137 and 165° E lines, respectively. Contour lines represent the mean values during the target observation periods, plotted at intervals of 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each 1° of latitude. Panels <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(h)</bold> show the corresponding vertical sections of mean uncertainty, along with contours of robustness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The contour intervals for thin and thick contours in <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(h)</bold> are 0.25 and 0.5, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Vertical sections and isopyncal density analysis of linear trends in 137 and 165° E lines</title>
      <p id="d2e1557">To facilitate direct comparison with historical ship-based observations, we examine vertical sections and isopycnal distributions of linear trends in potential temperature, salinity, and dissolved O<sub>2</sub> along the 137 and 165° E meridional sections (Fig. 3). Ogata and Nonaka (2020) analyzed salinity data from 20 years of shipboard observations along the 137° E line between 1997 and 2016, while Sasano et al. (2015) analyzed temperature, salinity, and dissolved O<sub>2</sub> data from 25 years of cruises along the 165° E line between 1987 and 2011.</p>
      <p id="d2e1578">Along both sections, large negative trends in potential temperature and salinity are concentrated along the 25.0–26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isopycnal surfaces, corresponding to potential temperatures of approximately 10–12° C and salinities of 34.4–34.5 (Fig. 3a, b, e, f). In contrast, the strongest negative trends in dissolved O<sub>2</sub> occur primarily along denser isopycnals between 26.0 and 27.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3c, g). This vertical separation indicates that the regions of pronounced oxygen decline are not co-located with those of temperature and salinity trends, implying distinct controlling mechanisms.</p>
      <p id="d2e1612">In addition to widespread oxygen declines, pronounced positive O<sub>2</sub> trends are detected south of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° N below 200 m depth along the 137° E line (Fig. 3c). These positive trends are located near the upper boundary of the oxygen minimum layer (OML). Comparison with the corresponding uncertainty distributions (Fig. 3d, h) shows that regions exhibiting positive or negative oxygen trends generally do not coincide with areas of elevated uncertainty, indicating that these signals are robust within the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> framework.</p>
      <p id="d2e1644">The distributions of linear trends on isopycnal surfaces further highlight differences among temperatures, salinity, and dissolved O<sub>2</sub> (Fig. 4). Trends in temperature and salinity are closely aligned, with warming accompanied by salinification and cooling accompanied by freshening (Fig. 4a–b, d–e). In the tropical region (5° S–5° N), distinct positive trends in both variables are evident over the density range of 22.0–26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, little systematic trend is detected in the salinity minimum region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34–34.1) within the density range of 26.5–27.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At higher latitudes (40–50° N), strong positive trends in both temperature and salinity are observed along the 26.0–27.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces (Fig. 4e).</p>
      <p id="d2e1704">Dissolved oxygen trends exhibit a markedly different structure. Although negative O<sub>2</sub> trends dominate overall, weak but coherent positive trends appear across the density range 23.0–26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in low-latitude regions (5° S–5° N). More pronounced positive O<sub>2</sub> trends are detected in the deeper density range of 26.0–27.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 5 and 10° N. Additional weak positive trends are observed between 10 and 20° N within the density range of 23.0–25.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along both the 137  and 165° E sections.</p>
      <p id="d2e1758">Compared with previous studies, the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>-based trends reveal both similarities and notable differences. The general characteristics of temperature and salinity trends are broadly consistent with those reported by Sasano et al. (2015), although the present results are spatially smoother, particularly for dissolved oxygen. This smoothness likely reflects the gridded nature of the dataset and the spatial regularization inherent in the machine-learning reconstruction. Along the 137° E section, the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> temperature and salinity fields exhibit a wider area of negative salinity trends within the density range 22.0–24.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than those reported by Ogata and Nonaka (2020) using OFES output.</p>
      <p id="d2e1790">Ship-based observations by Sasano et al. (2015) identified patchy positive trends in oxygen within the density range 24.5–27.5  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the regions (5–15° N and 6° S–1° N), as well as localized positive trends at greater depths. In contrast, the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> data reveal a broader, smoother, and more spatially coherent pattern of positive O<sub>2</sub> trend spanning 6° S to 5° N. At the same time, the present analysis more clearly delineates the core regions of negative oxygen trends between 5 and 15° N along the lower isopycnals (Fig. 3c, f), which are characteristic of the subtropical gyre. These differences underscore the complementary nature of ship-based observations and gridded reconstructions and highlight the advantage of GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> for resolving basin-scale and isopycnal-scale oxygen variability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Horizontal distribution of linear trends along isopycnal surfaces</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Potential temperature and salinity</title>
      <p id="d2e1846">The horizontal distributions of linear trends in potential temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen on specific isopycnal surfaces at 25.0, 26.0, and 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5) are illustrated to examine how these trends occur and how they are connected. These density surfaces correspond to the shallower density range of Subtropical Mode Water (STMW), the shallower densities of Central Mode Water (CMW) (Suga et al., 1997, 2004), and the representative density of North Pacific Intermediate Water (NPIW) (Nakamura et al., 2000a, b; Nakamura and Awaji, 2004; Yasuda, 2004), respectively. STMW is formed south of the Kuroshio Extension between 30–35° N and 130–170° E, and reaches depths of approximately 400 m in late winter. It then spreads toward the subtropical front through advection across the Kuroshio recirculation area. CMW is formed in the transition area of the central North Pacific and spreads eastward along the North Pacific Current before turning southward and westward in the subtropical gyre (Suga et al., 1997, 2004). In contrast, NPIW does not outcrop during its formation process. Its origin lies in Okhotsk Sea Mode Water, which forms through overturning driven by diapycnal upwelling and tidal mixing around the Kuril Islands (Nakamura et al., 2000a, b; Nakamura and Awaji, 2004; You, 2003; Yasuda, 2004) as well as double diffusions in the North Pacific (You, 2003).</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1862">Linear trends in <bold>(a)</bold> potential temperature (° yr<sup>−1</sup>), <bold>(b)</bold> salinity (1 yr<sup>−1</sup>), and <bold>(c)</bold> dissolved O<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) on each isopycnal surface at 25.0, 26.0, and 26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Contour lines represent geostrophic flow streamlines on 26.0 and 26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces, relative to 2000 m.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e1968">The linear trends on the 25.0, 26.0, and 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces show that positive and negative tendencies appear in characteristic locations and are generally aligned with the geostrophic streamlines (Fig. 5a–b, d–e, g–h). Although exceptions exist, such as weak positive trends (150–175° E, 20–30° N) (Fig. 5a–b), negative trends in potential temperature and salinity dominate in the western and central North Pacific on the 25.0 and 26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces (Fig. 5a–b, d–e). Conversely, positive trends in temperature and salinity are most prevalent in the northeastern and/or eastern regions of the basin along the geostrophic streamlines (Fig. 5a–b, d–e). These patterns suggest that waters subducted in the frontal region with reduced temperature and salinity originate mainly from the northeastern North Pacific and are advected southward along the subtropical circulation (Fig. 5a–b, d–e). Exceptions occur in parts of the northeastern basin (170–130° W, 40–60° N), where warmer and more saline waters influence the water masses sinking near the Alaska gyre and subsequently transported outside the subtropical gyre and along the California coast.</p>
      <p id="d2e1994">At 26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5g–h), large positive trends in temperature and salinity are found along the Kuril Islands, with moderate positive trends appearing on the eastern side of the basin, respectively. Waters at this density range (26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are not directly ventilated but are formed through diapycnal mixing processes (Nakamura et al., 2000a, b; Nakamura and Awaji, 2004; You, 2003; Yasuda, 2004) and through double diffusion such as salt fingering (You, 2003). Thus, the observed positive temperature and salinity trends at 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> likely reflect influences from changes occurring in the overlying layers (Fig. 5d–e and g–h).</p>
      <p id="d2e2030">A meridional northward shift of the outcrop line in the North Pacific associated with recent climate change has been documented in OFES analyses (Ogata and Nonaka, 2020) and in other observational, reanalysis, and eddy-resolving ocean hindcasts (Xu et al., 2022). Consistent with these studies, the present dataset exhibits clear northward migration of the 25.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outcrop lines (Fig. 6a), with the strong shifts occurring in the eastern basin between 150° E and 180° W (Fig. 6 and Table 1). The estimated northward shift rate at 0.004–0.09 ° yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2004 to 2023 is comparable to the value of 0.04 ° yr<sup>−1</sup> reported by Xu et al. (2022) for 1980 to 2018. Xu et al. (2022) further demonstrated that changes in the mixed layer and outcrop lines are tightly coupled with the northward migration of the North Pacific subtropical gyre and KE/OE fronts due to the poleward expansion of the Hadley cell, including the fact that the Kuroshio Extension and Oyashio Extension fronts, mode waters, and subtropical fronts evolve as a coherent system. These changes may also reflect the influence of anthropogenic warming, which has been linked to the poleward expansion of the Hadley circulation and the associated meridional shifts of oceanic fronts (Yang et al., 2020).</p>

      <fig id="F6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2081">Density contours of 25.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black), 26.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red), and 26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) in each dataset: <bold>(a)</bold> GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>, <bold>(b)</bold> OFES, and <bold>(c)</bold> GODAS. Solid lines indicate the mean March density contours for 2004–2009, while dashed lines represent those for 2019–2023.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2145">Northern shifts of the (outcrop) isopycnal latitudes (° yr<sup>−1</sup>) for 25.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold>, 26.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>, and 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold> in the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>, OFES, and GODAS datasets. The estimates are based on data from March of each year. For 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the northern shift is evaluated using the isopycnal depths corresponding to 182, 178, and 183 m in GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>, OFES, and GODAS, respectively.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(a)</bold> 25.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GOBAI-O<sub><bold>2</bold></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OFES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GODAS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">150° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0241</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0157</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0283</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">170° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0444</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0052</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0240</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">170° W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0684</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0871</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0481</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">150° W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0947</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0353</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0313</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">130° W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0420</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0471</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0121</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(b)</bold> 26.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OFES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GODAS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">150° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0368</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0766</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0358</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">170° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0436</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0305</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0508</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">170° W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0124</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1997</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1412</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(c)</bold> 26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GOBAI-O<sub><bold>2</bold></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OFES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GODAS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">150° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0371</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1980</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0046</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">170° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0338</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0217</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1637</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">170° W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0728</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0054</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0261</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2566">Such poleward displacements of frontal structures can help explain the negative temperature and salinity trends in the subtropical gyre, where less saline subarctic-origin waters are subducted and advected southward. The positive temperature and salinity trends occurring in the Alaska region (160–130° W, 30–60° N) (Fig. 5a–b and d–e) are likewise consistent with the direct surface warming. In contrast, the 26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> front exhibits primarily longitudinal, rather than meridional, shifts between 2004 and 2023 (Fig. 6), suggesting that the associated temperature and salinity changes arise mainly from direct surface warming and freshening, rather than from density-compensated shifts in water-mass distribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Dissolved oxygen</title>
      <p id="d2e2588">The linear trends in dissolved oxygen on the isopycnal surfaces at 25.0, 26.0, and 26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibit predominantly negative values across the North Pacific (Fig. 5c, f, and i), although their spatial distributions are not uniform. Large negative trends are concentrated in the northeastern and eastern regions and gradually decrease toward the west (Fig. 5c, f, and i). Exceptions occur mainly in the tropics, where notable positive trends are found in the western tropical areas on the 26.0 and 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces.</p>
      <p id="d2e2613">The temporal changes in dissolved oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) were decomposed following the method of Sasano et al. (2015). The processes underlying the oxygen tendency equations (Eqs. 2 and 3) are summarized below. We evaluated each contributing term and examined its relative importance for the dissolved O<sub>2</sub> trends. The total tendency of dissolved oxygen can be expressed as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M169" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            which can be rearranged as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M170" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ii</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iii</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iv</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vi</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2978">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, AOU (Apparent Oxygen Utilization). The term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the temporal change in the depth of the isopycnal surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the vertical gradient of the variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at that surface, averaged over the past 20 years. The net tendency term (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the net changes associated with a variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3084">By applying Eq. (3), the rate of O<sub>2</sub> change (term i), which is the rate of reconstructed O<sub>2</sub> data estimated from the linear regression analysis, on each isopycnal surface can be decomposed into contributions from: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3107">(term ii) vertical heave acting on the vertical O<sub>2</sub> gradient;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3120">(term iii) solubility effects due to temperature and salinity changes;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3124">(term iv) vertical heave acting on the solubility gradient;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3128">(term v) AOU changes related to air-sea disequilibrium, biological activities, and lateral circulation</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3132">(term vi) vertical heave acting on AOU gradients.</p></list-item></list> The derivation of Eqs. (2) and (3) follows Sasano et al. (2015) and is described in Appendix A. A schematic illustration of this decomposition is provided in Fig. S5.</p>
      <p id="d2e3137">Figure 7 shows the horizontal distributions of the magnitude of each term on 25.0, 26.0, and 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces. The results indicate that the prominent O<sub>2</sub> declines (Fig. 5c, f, i) arise from a combination of positive and negative contributions, with the dominant terms varying by latitude. In the high-latitude region around the Alaska Gyre (170–130° W, 40–60° N), the largest negative contributions are associated with the deepening of isopycnal surfaces (term ii) and the vertical heave acting on the AOU gradient (term vi) (Fig. 7f, j, k, o). Because the dissolved oxygen generally decreases with depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), deepening of isopycnal surfaces (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 8b–c) produces a negative contribution through vertical heave. Similarly, because AOU typically increases with depth, isopycnal deepening leads to an apparent increase in AOU, contributing negatively to dissolved O<sub>2</sub> via term (vi). In contrast, solubility-related changes (term iii) and net AOU tendencies (term v) act in opposite directions during this period (Fig. 7g–h, l–m). Taken together, these results are consistent with the strong negative O<sub>2</sub> trends observed in the Bering Sea on the 26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces (150° E–170° W, 50–60° N; Fig. 5f and i).</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3246">Horizontal distributions of the changing rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) of each factor contributing to the rate of O<sub>2</sub> change on 25.0, 26.0, and 26.8  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (1). The rate of O<sub>2</sub> change on each isopycnal surface is decomposed into the following components: (ii) the apparent contribution from vertical heave (deepening or shoaling) of isopycnal surfaces associated with warming and/or surface freshening; (iii) the contribution from changes in oxygen solubility (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) associated with temperature and salinity variations; (iv) the contribution from vertical heave acting on the background solubility gradient; (v) the contribution from net changes in apparent oxygen utilization (AOU) associated with air–sea disequilibrium, biological activity, and lateral advection and/or circulation; and (vi) the contribution from vertical heave acting on AOU gradients, independent of solubility changes. This decomposition is applied to the reconstructed dissolved oxygen fields obtained from linear regression analysis.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f07.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e3331">Depth difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the 5-year averaged data in March, 2004–2009 and 2018–2023 at 25.0, 26.0, and 26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The reconstructed O<sub>2</sub> data estimated from the linear regression analysis were used in this calculation. Positive and negative values indicate the deepening and shallowing, respectively, from the depth of each density in 2004–2023.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3367">In the subtropical and mid-latitudes (10–40° N), the O<sub>2</sub> decline is largely associated with AOU changes (term v) (Fig. 7d, i, and n). The relative weakening of the total O<sub>2</sub> decrease in the western North Pacific (Fig. 5c, f, i) coincides with positive contributions from vertical heave of isopycnal surfaces (term ii) (Fig. 7f and k). Additional positive trends arise from solubility-related effects (term iii) (Fig. 7b), and the vertical heave acting on the AOU gradient (term vi) (Figs. 7j and o and 8b–c).</p>
      <p id="d2e3388">In the mid-ocean between 170° E and 160° W, the positive O<sub>2</sub> tendencies transition to weakly negative values. In contrast, a pronounced band of positive trends is found zonally across the North Pacific Ocean between 30  and 50° N, primarily associated with the combined effects of terms (iii) and (v) (Fig. 7l, h–i, and m–n). This pattern may be related to the northward meridional shift of the subtropical and subarctic frontal zone under recent global warming (Ogata and Nonaka, 2020). Enhanced winter convection in this region may introduce nutrients into the surface layer, potentially increasing biological activity and AOU. In the NPIW formation region near the Kuril Islands, negative contributions from term (iii) are observed (Fig. 7l), suggesting weaker vertical mixing during the observational period, likely influenced by enhanced surface-layer stratification. This interpretation is supported by the positive trends in temperature and salinity observed in the winter subducted areas (Suga et al., 1997, 2004; Yasuda, 2004) (Fig. 5d–e, g–h).</p>
      <p id="d2e3401">In the western tropical Pacific, pronounced increases in dissolved O<sub>2</sub> are observed within the density range of 26.8–27.2  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 3c and g; 4c and g; 5c, f, and i), overlapping with the OML (Reid, 1997). Similar features have been reported by Sasano et al. (2015) and Takatani et al. (2012). Variability of the North Equatorial Counter Current (NECC) is likely relevant in this region. According to the study of Chen et al. (2016) based on the OFES outputs including a multidecadal variability (1960–2014), the NECC exhibits two distinct modes of variability: an interannual mode characterized by strengthening accompanied by southward migration, and an interdecadal mode marked by a gradual weakening, poleward migration, and broadening.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e3426">Anomaly of poleward and eastward velocity, potential temperature, and salinity in the OFES model outputs from 1950 to 2023 <bold>(a–d)</bold> and from 2004 to 2023 <bold>(e–h)</bold>, respectively, in the 137° E line. Contours of averaged values of poleward and eastward velocity, potential temperature, and salinity during the target period are also shown in each figure. Green contour lines in <bold>(c)</bold>–<bold>(d)</bold>, <bold>(g)</bold>–<bold>(h)</bold> indicate the average potential density of 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, during the target periods.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3465">The validity of time-varying signals in the western tropical Pacific in the OFES data has been demonstrated by Chen et al. (2016). We further examined the longer-term OFES data (1950–2023), as well, for poleward, eastward velocities, as well as potential temperature and salinity here (Fig. 9c, g). Positive temperature anomalies in 0–5° N occur above 250 m depth, while negative anomalies appear along the 26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface between 5–20° N, a similar pattern that is also evident in the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> data (Fig. 3a). A discrepancy is found in salinity trends: GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> shows negative trends along 26.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3b), whereas OFES exhibits positive trends (Fig. 9b, f), likely reflecting higher salinity at 200–600 m depth in OFES between 0 and 7° N (Fig. 10b, d).</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e3510">Averaged Potential Temperature <bold>(a, c)</bold> and salinity <bold>(b, d)</bold> in GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> from 2004 to 2023 and OFES data from 1950 to 2023, respectively, in the 137° E line.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F11"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e3537">Latitudinal distribution of averaged eastward <bold>(a)</bold> and poleward velocity <bold>(b)</bold> in the OFES data from 1964 to 1983, from 1984 to 2003, and from 2004 to 2023, respectively, in the 137° E line.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F12"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e3554">NCEP-NCAR wind-stress curl values zonally averaged from 137° E to 120° W from 1950 to 2023. A 13-month running-mean filter has been applied in time.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4037/2026/bg-23-4037-2026-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3563">Anomalies in poleward and eastward velocities (Figs. 9a–b, e–f and 11a–b) indicate enhanced poleward flow around 5° N above 200 m depth and a poleward shift of the eastward velocity core. These changes are consistent with the interdecadal mode of NECC variability described by Chen et al. (2016). The broadening of the NECC was less evident here, possibly because the present analysis uses raw velocity fields rather than isolating the second EOF modes. The wind-stress curl over the equatorial Pacific shows a persistent decrease and poleward expansion of negative values along the 0–10° N from 1950 to 2023 (Fig. 12).</p>
      <p id="d2e3566">The westward penetration of the OML is slow and occurs between two eastward-extending tongues of high O<sub>2</sub> water originating near the equator (Reid, 1997) (Fig. S6). The observed O<sub>2</sub> increase on the 26.8–27.2  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces (Figs. 3c, g and  4c, g) is consistent with a weakening and northward shift of the interdecadal NECC mode. The subsurface O<sub>2</sub> increase, particularly below 400 m depth (Fig. 1r–u), is therefore likely influenced by these circulation changes, potentially allowing higher-O<sub>2</sub> water to extend westward (Fig. S6). In addition, shoaling of isopycnal surfaces near the equator indicates a northward shift of the boundary between the tropical and subtropical gyres along 137° E line during the observational period.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion and Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e3627">The variability of dissolved oxygen in the North Pacific reflects the combined influences of global warming and climate variability. In this study, we used the four-dimensional GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> dataset, constructed using machine–learning methods applied to historical temperature, salinity, and oxygen observations from BGC-Argo floats and ship-based measurements – to examine linear trends in potential temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen over the past two decades (2004–2023). The linear trends are broadly consistent with findings from previous studies (Takatani et al., 2012; Sasano et al., 2015; Ogata and Nonaka, 2020), and we clarified how these trends vary spatially (Figs. 3 and 4).</p>
      <p id="d2e3639">An important outcome of this study is that GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>, being globally gridded, allows spatially continuous and smooth representations of trends, both horizontally and vertically, across the North Pacific. This provides a more spatially coherent representation than earlier datasets that relied solely on sparse ship-based observations. The horizontal trend patterns mapped on isopycnal surfaces (Fig. 5) show that dissolved oxygen exhibits a basin-scale decreasing trend. At the same time, several regions display locally increasing oxygen, including areas influenced by the meridional migration of subtropical and subpolar fronts (Fig. 4). The strong positive oxygen trends in the western equatorial region are consistent with a weakening of the second mode of the NECC variability. The decomposition analysis further illustrates how each physical component contributes to oxygen changes along isopycnal surfaces (Fig. 7).</p>
      <p id="d2e3651">Although many of the large-scale features identified here resemble those reported by Ito et al. (2017), our analysis reveals regional and isopycnal-scale structures that were previously unresolved. In particular, the positive oxygen trends in the Kuroshio–Oyashio Transition Zone, the northeastern North Pacific along the 26.8–27.0  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> density surfaces, and the enhanced subsurface O<sub>2</sub> increase in the tropical western Pacific below 400 m were not clearly distinguished in earlier O<sub>2</sub> anomaly studies. These improvements arise because GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> integrates high-frequency BGC-Argo oxygen observations with a spatially consistent mapping scheme, reducing observational gaps and sampling biases in dynamically active regions. This suggests that regional reoxygenation signals can coexist with large-scale deoxygenation, and highlights the importance of sustained BGC-Argo observations for detecting emerging changes in ocean biogeochemistry.</p>
      <p id="d2e3691">Recent work by Bushinsky et al. (2025) has reported the presence of a systematic negative bias (approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<sup>−1</sup>) in air-calibrated BGC-Argo oxygen measurements compared with ship-based reference profiles. This bias does not appear to be explicitly corrected in version 4.4 of GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>-v2.2 and may therefore influence the magnitude of the estimated oxygen trends–potentially enhancing negative trends or suppressing positive ones in regions with dense float sampling. However, as described in Sect. 2.1, a substantial fraction of these float data is subject to quality control through comparison with climatological fields derived from ship-based discrete observations, and only profiles with appropriate quality flags are retained and incorporated into the dataset development. While this filtering procedure likely mitigates a portion of the air-calibration bias, the extent to which residual bias remains in the reconstructed fields is not well quantified.</p>
      <p id="d2e3731">If present, such biases could also affect the apparent vertical structure of the oxycline. In the North Pacific, regions with high float density–such as the Kuroshio–Oyashio transition zone, the North American coastal region, and the vicinity of Hawaii–may be particularly affected (see Fig. 1 of Sharp et al., 2023). While a constant offset would not directly alter linear trend estimates, any time–varying bias associated with sensor behavior or sampling depth could introduce spurious trends. A quantitative evaluation is not feasible at present due to the lack of temporally continuous ship-based reference data at the spatial scales. This limitation should therefore be kept in mind when interpreting the O<sub>2</sub> trends reported here. Accordingly, the interpretation of the diagnosed O<sub>2</sub> trends should be made with caution, particularly in regions where float-based observations dominate.</p>
      <p id="d2e3752">It is also essential to recognize that GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> is a machine learning reconstruction derived from available temperature, salinity, and oxygen measurements. While this approach significantly enhances spatial coverage, the results should be interpreted cautiously. In particular, although the large-scale spatial patterns are broadly consistent across datasets, both the magnitude of trends and finer-scale spatial features may still be affected by unresolved observational and reconstruction uncertainties. Nevertheless, future work incorporating improved calibration of Argo oxygen sensors, expanded ship-based reference datasets, independent machine learning reconstructions (e.g., Ito et al., 2024), and comprehensive ocean reanalysis will be necessary to better constrain these uncertainties.</p>
      <p id="d2e3764">Different versions of the GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> product may yield different oxygen trend estimates because of methodological differences among releases. Therefore, some of the regional patterns discussed in this study may be sensitive to the specific GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> version used in the analysis. Future comparisons across multiple GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> versions and observational products would help further assess the robustness of the results.  The monthly mean climatological GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> dataset should include the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO; Stramma et al., 2020; Pozo Buil and Di Lorenzo, 2017) and the North Pacific Gyre Oscillation (NPGO; Stramma et al., 2020). This dataset, therefore, provides a valuable basis for examining how such climate variability influences dissolved oxygen through physical driving mechanisms. Investigating these relationships more explicitly will be an important direction for future research.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Essential concepts and derivations for Eqs. (2)–(3)</title>
      <p id="d2e3816">The essential concepts and derivations for Eqs. (2) and (3) were originally proposed by Takatani et al. (2012) and subsequently described in detail by Sasano et al. (2015). Here, we briefly summarize and follow their derivation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3819">When the temperature at a depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a result of increased ocean heat content, the density at that depth decreases from  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For simplicity, the vertical salinity profile is assumed to remain unchanged with time. As a consequence, the isopycnal surface of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deepens from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S5). If surface freshening occurs simultaneously due to a net freshwater input, both the density decreases at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (from  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the deepening of the isopycnal surface (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are enhanced. Because density is a function of temperature and salinity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the density of the isopycnal surface  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed as

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M248" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">before</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">warming</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">after</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">warming</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote salinity at depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the temperature at density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after warming. The depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined by satisfying Eqs. (A1) and (A2). In the region where salinity decreases with depth (e.g., above the salinity minimum layer of NPIW), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and therefore <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This implies that the potential temperature on an isopycnal surface effectively decreases as a consequence of warming, and that biogeochemical properties on the same isopycnal surface are also expected to change.</p>
      <p id="d2e4223">For a tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> whose vertical profile with respect to depth does not change with time (e.g., salinity; see Fig. S5c), the temporal change of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the potential density surface  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is attributed solely to the apparent change caused by the deepening of the isopycnal surface from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>A3</label><mml:math id="M264" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4322">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the temporal change of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> observed on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (gray arrows in Fig. S5), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical gradient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the depth (assumed to be time-invariant), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rate of deepening of the isopycnal surface  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The product <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the effect of isopycnal deepening (white arrows in Fig. S5), corresponding to the difference between the filled square and filled circle.</p>
      <p id="d2e4457">For a variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> whose vertical profile evolves with time while warming occurs simultaneously, the temporal change of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the density surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed as the sum of two components: the contribution due to the isopycnal deepening from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the net temporal change of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the time before and after warming:

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>A4</label><mml:math id="M282" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4602">To evaluate the net change (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (illustrated by the blue arrows of a difference in symbols between filled square and open square in Fig. S5), it is necessary to evaluate the contribution of the temporal change of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the isopycnal deepening and to subtract it from the change of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> observed at density  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For instance, the change of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. S5f is observed along the gray isopycnal surface (large white arrow), whereas the net change (large blue and pink arrows) is obtained as the difference between the observed change and the deepening effect.</p>
      <p id="d2e4663">The dissolved oxygen concentration O<sub>2</sub> can be expressed as:

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>A5</label><mml:math id="M289" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the oxygen saturation concentration (a function of temperature and salinity), and AOU is “apparent oxygen utilization”, representing the oxygen consumed by biological processes since subduction. Near the surface, AOU is typically small, and its contributions can be neglected.</p>
      <p id="d2e4715">Following Eq. (A4), the temporal change of O<sub>2</sub> on a given isopycnal surface at a fixed station is:

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>A6</label><mml:math id="M292" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4806">Similarly,

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>A7</label><mml:math id="M293" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        and

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>A8</label><mml:math id="M294" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4972">The term net is directly related to warming, because depends on temperature and salinity. If AOU does not change with time, that is, if changes in O<sub>2</sub> arise solely from changes in, then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows Eq. (A3) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If AOU varies with time, however, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows Eq. (A4) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as illustrated by the dashed gray line in Fig. S5g.</p>
      <p id="d2e5045">Because O<sub>2</sub> is defined by Eq. (A5), the net temporal change of O<sub>2</sub> on an isopycnal surface is

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>A9</label><mml:math id="M302" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e5141">Combining Eqs. (A6) and (A9), the total temporal change of O<sub>2</sub> on an isopycnal surface can be written as

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>A10</label><mml:math id="M304" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        which corresponds to Eq. (1) in the main text. Equation (A10) corresponds to an arrow in Fig. S5e, represented from left to right by the large gray arrow, white, blue, and pink arrows. The large blue arrow is identical to Fig. S5f, while the large pink arrow corresponds to Fig. S5g, but with its direction reversed. Finally, substituting Eqs. (A7) and (A8) into (A10)

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>A11</label><mml:math id="M305" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ii</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iii</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iv</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="substack"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vi</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        which corresponds to Eq. (2) in the main text. Note: The signs in terms (v) and (vi) in Eq. (3) are reversed relative to those in Eq. (A11) for convenience.</p>

<table-wrap id="TA1"><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d2e5504">The physical interpretation of each term in the oxygen tendency decomposition shown in Eqs. (3) and (A11) is summarized.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="3.7cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Term</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mathematical form</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Physical interpretation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(ii)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Vertical heave acting on the O<sub>2</sub> gradient</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(iii)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Solubility effect due to temperature and salinity changes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(iv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>z)(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>z/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>t)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Vertical heave acting on the solubility gradient</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(v)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>AOU<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AOU changes related to air–sea disequilibrium, biological activity and lateral circulation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(vi)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>AOU<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Vertical heave of the AOU gradient</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5763">GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub> data is available at <uri>https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.nodc:0259304</uri> (last access: 16 June 2026). Temperature and salinity are from Roemmich and Gilson (2009) Argo climatology (<uri>https://sio-argo.ucsd.edu/RG_Climatology.html</uri>, last access: 16 June 2026). The OFES, NCEP-NCAR, and GODAS data used in our study are obtained from APDRC, University of Hawaii (<uri>https://apdrc.soest.hawaii.edu/data/data.php</uri>, last access: 16 June 2026).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5784">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-4037-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-4037-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5793">MI designed the study, performed the analyses, and prepared all figures. MI wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. MI and TO contributed to the interpretation of the results. All authors contributed to improving the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5799">The contact author has declared that neither of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5805">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5811">Jonathan D. Sharp and the reviewers are acknowledged for providing comments that prompted significant improvements to this manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5816">This research was supported by the Institute for Basic Science South Korea (grant no. IBS-R028-D1) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Japan (JSPS) through Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant nos. 22H00176, 26K07196, and 26K07251).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5822">This paper was edited by Koji Suzuki and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alkire, M. B., D'Asaro, E., Lee, C., Perry, M. J., Gray, A., Cetinić, I., Briggs, N., Rehm, E., Kallin, E., Kaiser, J., and González-Posada, A.: Estimates of net community production and export using high-resolution, Lagrangian measurements of O<sub>2</sub>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and POC through the evolution of a spring diatom bloom in the North Atlantic, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 64, 157–174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2012.01.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2012.01.012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Behringer, D. W. and Xue, Y.: Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation system at NCEP: The Pacific Ocean, 8th Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface, AMS 84th Annual Meeting, Washington State Convention and Trade Center, Seattle, Washington, 11–15, <uri>https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/70720.pdf</uri> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Behringer, D. W.: The Global Ocean Data Assimilation System (GODAS) at NCEP, 11th Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface, San Antonio, TX, American Meteorological Society, 3.3, <uri>https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/119541.pdf</uri> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Berman-Frank, I., Chen, Y. B., Gao, Y., Fennel, K., Follows, M. J., Milligan, A. J., and Falkowski, P. G.: Feedbacks between the nitrogen, carbon and oxygen cycles, in: Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, Elsevier Inc., 1539–1563, ISBN 978-0-12-372522-6, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bittig, H. C., Fiedler, B., Scholz, R., Krahmann, G., and Körtzinger, A.: Time response of oxygen optodes on profiling platforms and its dependence on flow speed and temperature, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 12, 617–636, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.617" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lom.2014.12.617</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bittig, H. C. and Körtzinger, A.: Tackling Oxygen Optode Drift: Near-Surface and In-Air Oxygen Optode Measurements on a Float Provide an Accurate in Situ Reference, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 32, 1539–1553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00162.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00162.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bittig, H. C., Körtzinger, A., Neill, C., van Ooijen, E., Plant, J. N., Hahn, J., Johnson, K. S., Yang, B., Emerson, S. R., Krahmann, G., and Riser, S. C.: Oxygen Optode Sensors: Principle, Characterization, Calibration, and Application in the Ocean, Front. Mar. Sci., 4, 429, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00429" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2017.00429</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bittig, H. C., Steinhoff, T., Claustre, H., Fiedler, B., Williams, N. L., Sauzède, R., Körtzinger, A., and Gattuso, J.-P.: An Alternative to Static Climatologies: Robust Estimation of Open Ocean CO<sub>2</sub> Variables and Nutrient Concentrations From T, S, and O<sub>2</sub> Data Using Bayesian Neural Networks, Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 328, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2018.00328</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M., Halloran, P., Heinze, C., Ilyina, T., Séférian, R., Tjiputra, J., and Vichi, M.: Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 10, 6225–6245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Boyer, T. P. and Levitus, S.: Objective Analyses of Temperature and Salinity for the World Ocean on a 1/4° Grid, NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 11, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, <uri>https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/1069/noaa_1069_DS1.pdf</uri> (last access: 16 June 2026), 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O. K., Coleman, C., Garcia, H. E., Grodsky, A., Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., O'Brien, T. D., Paver, C. R., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Smolyar, I. V., and Zweng, M. M.: World Ocean Database 2013, NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 72, <uri>https://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/handle/11329/357</uri> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1010933404324</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Breitburg, D., Levin, L. A., Oschlies, A., Grégoire, M., Chavez, F. P., Conley, D. J., Garçon, V., Gilbert, D., Gutiérrez, D., Isensee, K., Jacinto, G. S., Limburg, K. E., Montes, I., Naqvi, S. W. A., Pitcher, G. C., Rabalais, N. N., Roman, M. R., Rose, K. A., Seibel, B. A., Telszewski, M., Yasuhara, M., and Zhang, J.: Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters, Science, 359, eaam7240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7240" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aam7240</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Bushinsky, S. M., Emerson, S. R., Riser, S. C., and Swift, D. D.: Accurate oxygen measurements on modified Argo floats using in situ air calibrations, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 14, 491–505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lom3.10107</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Bushinsky, S. M., Nachod, Z., Fassbender, A. J., Tamsitt, V., Takeshita, Y., and Williams, N.: Offset Between Profiling Float and Shipboard Oxygen Observations at Depth Imparts Bias on Float pH and Derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 39, e2024GB008185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GB008185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024GB008185</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Qiu, B., Du, Y., Chen, S., and Qi, Y.: Interannual and interdecadal variability of the North Equatorial Countercurrent in the Western Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 7743–7758, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012190" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JC012190</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Claustre, H., Johnson, K. S., and Takeshita, Y.: Observing the Global Ocean with Biogeochemical-Argo, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 12, 23–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010956</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>D'Asaro, E. A. and McNeil, C.: Calibration and Stability of Oxygen Sensors on Autonomous Floats, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 1896–1906, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00222.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00222.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Drucker, R. and Riser, S. C.: In situ phase-domain calibration of oxygen optodes on profiling floats, Meth. Oceanogr., 17, 296–318, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mio.2016.09.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.mio.2016.09.007</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Estapa, M. L., Feen, M. L., and Breves, E.: Direct observations of biological carbon export from profiling floats in the subtropical North Atlantic, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 33, 282–300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GB006098</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Giglio, D., Lyubchich, V., and Mazloff, M. R.: Estimating oxygen in the Southern Ocean using Argo temperature and salinity, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 4280–4297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JC013404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JC013404</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Helm, K. P., Bindoff, N. L., and Church, J. A.: Observed decreases in oxygen content of the global ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L23602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049513" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049513</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Ito, T., Minobe, S., Long, M. C., and Deutsch, C.: Upper ocean O<sub>2</sub> trends: 1958–2015, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 4214–4223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073613" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL073613</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Ito, T., Cervania, A., Cross, K., Ainchwar, S., and Delawalla, S.: Mapping dissolved oxygen concentrations by combining shipboard and Argo observations using machine learning algorithms, J. Geophys. Res.-Machine Learning and Computation, 1, e2024JH000272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JH000272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JH000272</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, K. S., Plant, J. N., Riser, S. C., and Gilbert, D.: Air oxygen calibration of oxygen optodes on a profiling float array, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 32, 2160–2172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0101.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0101.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, K. S., Plant, J. N., Coletti, L. J., Jannasch, H. W., Sakamoto, C. M., Riser, S. C., Swift, D. D., Williams, N. L., Boss, E., Haëntjens, N., Talley, L. D., Sarmiento, J. L., and Gruber, N.: Biogeochemical sensor performance in the SOCCOM profiling float array, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 6416–6436, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JC012838</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, K. S. and Bif, M. B.: Constraint on net primary productivity of the global ocean by Argo oxygen measurements, Nat. Geosci., 14, 769–774, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00807-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-021-00807-z</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Kara, A. B., Rochford, P. A., and Hurlburt, H. E.: An optimal definition for ocean mixed layer depth, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 105, 16803–16821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC900072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JC900072</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Keeling, R. F., Körtzinger, A., and Gruber, N.: Ocean deoxygenation in a warming world, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 2, 199–229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kolodziejczyk, N., Portela, E., Thierry, V., and Prigent, A.: ISASO2: recent trends and regional patterns of ocean dissolved oxygen change, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5191–5206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5191-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-16-5191-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Körtzinger, A., Schimanski, J., and Send, U.: High quality oxygen measurements from profiling floats: A promising new technique, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 22, 302–308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1701.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH1701.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kwiatkowski, L., Torres, O., Bopp, L., Aumont, O., Chamberlain, M., Christian, J. R., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M., Ilyina, T., John, J. G., Lenton, A., Li, H., Lovenduski, N. S., Orr, J. C., Palmieri, J., Santana-Falcón, Y., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Stock, C. A., Tagliabue, A., Takano, Y., Tjiputra, J., Toyama, K., Tsujino, H., Watanabe, M., Yamamoto, A., Yool, A., and Ziehn, T.: Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections, Biogeosciences, 17, 3439–3470, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lauvset, S. K., Lange, N., Tanhua, T., Bittig, H. C., Olsen, A., Kozyr, A., Alin, S., Álvarez, M., Azetsu-Scott, K., Barbero, L., Becker, S., Brown, P. J., Carter, B. R., da Cunha, L. C., Feely, R. A., Hoppema, M., Humphreys, M. P., Ishii, M., Jeansson, E., Jiang, L.-Q., Jones, S. D., Lo Monaco, C., Murata, A., Müller, J. D., Pérez, F. F., Pfeil, B., Schirnick, C., Steinfeldt, R., Suzuki, T., Tilbrook, B., Ulfsbo, A., Velo, A., Woosley, R. J., and Key, R. M.: GLODAPv2.2022: the latest version of the global interior ocean biogeochemical data product, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5543–5572, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5543-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-14-5543-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Li, C., Huang, J., Ding, L., Liu, X., Yu, H., and Huang, J.: Increasing escape of oxygen from oceans under climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL086345</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Limburg, K. E., Breitburg, D., Swaney, D. P., and Jacinto, G.: Ocean deoxygenation: A primer, One Earth, 2, 24–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.001</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Masumoto, Y., Sasaki, H., Kagimoto, T., Komori, N., Ishida, A., Sasai, Y., Miyama, T., Motoi, T., Mitsudera, H., Takahashi, K., and Sakuma, H.: A fifty-year eddy-resolving simulation of the world ocean: Preliminary outcomes of OFES (OGCM for the Earth Simulator), Journal of the Earth Simulator, 1, 35–56, <uri>https://www.jamstec.go.jp/es/jp/output/publication/journal/jes_vol.1/pdf/JES1-3.2-masumoto.pdf</uri> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Masumoto, Y.: Sharing the results of a high-resolution ocean general circulation model under a multi-discipline framework – a review of OFES activities, Ocean Dynam., 60, 633–652, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0297-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10236-010-0297-z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Maurer, T. L., Plant, J. N., and Johnson, K. S.: Delayed-mode quality control of oxygen, nitrate, and pH data on SOCCOM biogeochemical profiling floats, Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 683207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.683207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2021.683207</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Nakamura, T. and Awaji, T.: Tidally induced diapycnal mixing in the Kuril Straits and its role in water transformation and transport: A three-dimensional nonhydrostatic model experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109, C09015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JC001850</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Nakamura, T., Awaji, T., Hatayama, T., Akitomo, K., Takizawa, T., Kono, T., and Takahashi, M.: The generation of large-amplitude unsteady lee waves by subinertial K1 tidal flow: A possible vertical mixing mechanism in the Kuril Straits, J. Phys.  Oceanogr., 30, 1601–1621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030&lt;1601:TGOLAU&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030&lt;1601:TGOLAU&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Nakamura, T., Awaji, T., Hatayama, T., Akitomo, K., and Takizawa, T.: Tidal exchange through the Kuril Straits, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 1622–1644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030&lt;1622:TETTKS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030&lt;1622:TETTKS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Nicholson, D. P. and Feen, M. L.: Air calibration of an oxygen optode on an underwater glider, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 15, 495–502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10177" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lom3.10177</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Ogata, T. and Nonaka, M.: Mechanisms of long-term variability and recent trend of salinity along 137° E, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015290, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JC015290</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Pacanowski, R. C. and Griffies, S. M.: MOM 3.0 Manual, Technical Report 4, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, 680 pp., <uri>https://mom-ocean.github.io/assets/pdfs/MOM3_manual.pdf</uri> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pörtner, H. O. and Farrell, A. P.: Physiology and climate change, Science, 322, 690–692, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1163156</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Pozo Buil, M. and Di Lorenzo, E.: Decadal dynamics and predictability of oxygen and subsurface tracers in the California Current System, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 4204–4213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072931" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL072931</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. L.: On the total geostrophic circulation of the Pacific Ocean: flow patterns, tracers, and transports, Prog. Oceanogr., 39, 263–352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(97)00012-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0079-6611(97)00012-8</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Roemmich, D. and Gilson, J.: The 2004–2008 mean and annual cycle of temperature, salinity, and steric height in the global ocean from the Argo Program, Prog. Oceanogr., 82, 81–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Sampaio, E., Santos, C., Rosa, I. C., Ferreira, V., Pörtner, H.-O., Duarte, C. M., Levin, L. A., and Rosa, R.: Impacts of hypoxic events surpass those of future ocean warming and acidification, Nature Ecology &amp; Evolution, 5, 311–321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01370-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41559-020-01370-3</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Sasaki, H., Nonaka, M., Masumoto, Y., Sasai, Y., Uehara, H., and Sakuma, H.: An eddy-resolving hindcast simulation of the quasiglobal ocean from 1950 to 2003 on the Earth Simulator, in: High Resolution Numerical Modelling of the Atmosphere and Ocean, edited by: Hamilton, K. and Ohfuchi, W., Springer, New York, NY, 157–185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49791-4_10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-0-387-49791-4_10</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Sasano, D., Takatani, Y., Kosugi, N., Nakano, T., Midorikawa, T., and Ishii, M.: Multidecadal trends of oxygen and their controlling factors in the western North Pacific, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 935–956, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB005065</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Sasano, D., Takatani, Y., Kosugi, N., Nakano, T., Midorikawa, T., and Ishii, M.: Decline and bidecadal oscillations of dissolved oxygen in the Oyashio region and their propagation to the western North Pacific, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 909–931, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005876" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017GB005876</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Schmidtko, S., Stramma, L., and Visbeck, M.: Decline in global oceanic oxygen content during the past five decades, Nature, 542, 335–339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21399" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature21399</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sharp, J. D., Fassbender, A. J., Carter, B. R., Johnson, G. C., Schultz, C., and Dunne, J. P.: GOBAI-O2: A Global Gridded Monthly Dataset of Ocean Interior Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations Based on Shipboard and Autonomous Observations (NCEI Accession 0259304), NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25921/z72m-yz67" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25921/z72m-yz67</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Sharp, J. D., Fassbender, A. J., Carter, B. R., Johnson, G. C., Schultz, C., and Dunne, J. P.: GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>: temporally and spatially resolved fields of ocean interior dissolved oxygen over nearly 2 decades, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4481–4518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4481-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-15-4481-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Stramma, L., Schmidtko, S., Bograd, S. J., Ono, T., Ross, T., Sasano, D., and Whitney, F. A.: Trends and decadal oscillations of oxygen and nutrients at 50 to 300 m depth in the equatorial and North Pacific, Biogeosciences, 17, 813–831, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-813-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-813-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Stramma, L. and Schmidtko, S.: Tropical deoxygenation sites revisited to investigate oxygen and nutrient trends, Ocean Sci., 17, 833–847, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-833-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-17-833-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation> Suga, T., Takei, Y., and Hanawa, K.: Thermostad distribution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre: The central mode water and the subtropical mode water, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 140–152, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> Suga, T., Motoki, K., Aoki, Y., and Macdonald, A. M.: The North Pacific climatology of winter mixed layer and mode waters, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 3–22, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Takatani, Y., Sasano, D., Nakano, T., Midorikawa, T., and Ishii, M.: Decrease of dissolved oxygen after the mid-1980s in the western North Pacific subtropical gyre along the 137° E repeat section, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004227</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Takeshita, Y., Martz, T. R., Johnson, K. S., Plant, J. N., Gilbert, D., Riser, S. C., Neill, C., and Tilbrook, B.: A climatology-based quality control procedure for profiling float oxygen data, J. Geophys. Res-Oceans, 118, 5640–5650, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20399" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrc.20399</ext-link>, 2013. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Udaya Bhaskar, T. V. S., Sarma, V. V. S. S., and Pavan Kumar, J.: Potential mechanisms responsible for spatial variability in intensity and thickness of oxygen minimum zone in the Bay of Bengal, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 126, e2021JG006341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006341" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JG006341</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Winkler, L. W.: Die Bestimmung des im Wasser gelösten Sauerstoffes, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 21, 2843–2854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.188802102122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cber.188802102122</ext-link>, 1888.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Wolf, M. K., Hamme, R. C., Gilbert, D., Yashayaev, I., and Thierry, V.: Oxygen saturation surrounding deep water formation events in the Labrador Sea from Argo-O<sub>2</sub> data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 635–653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005829" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GB005829</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Wang, K., and Wu, B.: Weakening and poleward shifting of the North Pacific subtropical fronts from 1980 to 2018, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 52, 399–417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0170.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-21-0170.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Yang, H., Lohmann, G., Krebs-Kanzow, U., Ionita, M., Shi, X., Sidorenko, D., Gong, X., Chen, X., and Gowan, E. J.: Poleward shift of the major ocean gyres detected in a warming climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL085868</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Yasuda, I.: North Pacific Intermediate Water: Progress in SAGE (SubArctic Gyre Experiment) and related projects, J. Oceanogr., 60, 385–395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCE.0000038344.25081.42" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:JOCE.0000038344.25081.42</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>You, Y.: The pathway and circulation of North Pacific Intermediate Water, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2291, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018561</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Revealing hidden oxygen variability in the North Pacific:  a two-decade analysis using GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub></article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alkire, M. B., D'Asaro, E., Lee, C., Perry, M. J., Gray, A., Cetinić,
I., Briggs, N., Rehm, E., Kallin, E., Kaiser, J., and González-Posada,
A.: Estimates of net community production and export using high-resolution,
Lagrangian measurements of O<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, and POC through the evolution of a
spring diatom bloom in the North Atlantic, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 64, 157–174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2012.01.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2012.01.012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Behringer, D. W. and Xue, Y.: Evaluation of the global ocean data
assimilation system at NCEP: The Pacific Ocean, 8th Symposium on Integrated
Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface,
AMS 84th Annual Meeting, Washington State Convention and Trade Center,
Seattle, Washington, 11–15,
<a href="https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/70720.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Behringer, D. W.: The Global Ocean Data Assimilation System (GODAS) at NCEP,
11th Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for
Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface, San Antonio, TX, American
Meteorological Society, 3.3,
<a href="https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/119541.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berman-Frank, I., Chen, Y. B., Gao, Y., Fennel, K., Follows, M. J., Milligan, A. J., and Falkowski, P. G.: Feedbacks between the nitrogen, carbon and oxygen cycles, in: Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, Elsevier Inc., 1539–1563, ISBN 978-0-12-372522-6, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bittig, H. C., Fiedler, B., Scholz, R., Krahmann, G., and Körtzinger,
A.: Time response of oxygen optodes on profiling platforms and its
dependence on flow speed and temperature, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 12, 617–636, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.617" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.617</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bittig, H. C. and Körtzinger, A.: Tackling Oxygen Optode Drift:
Near-Surface and In-Air Oxygen Optode Measurements on a Float Provide an
Accurate in Situ Reference, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
32, 1539–1553, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00162.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00162.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bittig, H. C., Körtzinger, A., Neill, C., van Ooijen, E., Plant, J. N.,
Hahn, J., Johnson, K. S., Yang, B., Emerson, S. R., Krahmann, G., and Riser,
S. C.: Oxygen Optode Sensors: Principle, Characterization, Calibration, and
Application in the Ocean, Front. Mar. Sci., 4, 429,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00429" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00429</a>, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bittig, H. C., Steinhoff, T., Claustre, H., Fiedler, B., Williams, N. L., Sauzède, R., Körtzinger, A., and Gattuso, J.-P.: An Alternative to Static Climatologies:
Robust Estimation of Open Ocean CO<sub>2</sub> Variables and Nutrient Concentrations
From T, S, and O<sub>2</sub> Data Using Bayesian Neural Networks, Frontiers in Marine
Science, 5, 328, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00328</a>, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M., Halloran, P., Heinze, C., Ilyina, T., Séférian, R., Tjiputra, J., and Vichi, M.: Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 10, 6225–6245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boyer, T. P. and Levitus, S.: Objective Analyses of Temperature and Salinity
for the World Ocean on a 1/4° Grid, NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 11,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, <a href="https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/1069/noaa_1069_DS1.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 June 2026), 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O. K., Coleman, C., Garcia, H. E.,
Grodsky, A., Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., O'Brien, T. D., Paver, C.
R., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Smolyar, I. V., and Zweng, M. M.: World Ocean
Database 2013, NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 72,
<a href="https://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/handle/11329/357" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Breitburg, D., Levin, L. A., Oschlies, A., Grégoire, M., Chavez, F. P.,
Conley, D. J., Garçon, V., Gilbert, D., Gutiérrez, D., Isensee, K.,
Jacinto, G. S., Limburg, K. E., Montes, I., Naqvi, S. W. A., Pitcher, G. C.,
Rabalais, N. N., Roman, M. R., Rose, K. A., Seibel, B. A., Telszewski, M.,
Yasuhara, M., and Zhang, J.: Declining oxygen in the global ocean and
coastal waters, Science, 359, eaam7240,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7240" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7240</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bushinsky, S. M., Emerson, S. R., Riser, S. C., and Swift, D. D.: Accurate
oxygen measurements on modified Argo floats using in situ air calibrations,
Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 14, 491–505,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10107</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bushinsky, S. M., Nachod, Z., Fassbender, A. J., Tamsitt, V., Takeshita, Y.,
and Williams, N.: Offset Between Profiling Float and Shipboard Oxygen
Observations at Depth Imparts Bias on Float pH and Derived <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 39, e2024GB008185,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GB008185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GB008185</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, X., Qiu, B., Du, Y., Chen, S., and Qi, Y.: Interannual and
interdecadal variability of the North Equatorial Countercurrent in the
Western Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 7743–7758,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012190" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012190</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Claustre, H., Johnson, K. S., and Takeshita, Y.: Observing the Global Ocean
with Biogeochemical-Argo, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 12, 23–48,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010956" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010956</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
D'Asaro, E. A. and McNeil, C.: Calibration and Stability of Oxygen Sensors
on Autonomous Floats, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30,
1896–1906, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00222.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00222.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Drucker, R. and Riser, S. C.: In situ phase-domain calibration of oxygen
optodes on profiling floats, Meth. Oceanogr., 17, 296–318,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mio.2016.09.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mio.2016.09.007</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Estapa, M. L., Feen, M. L., and Breves, E.: Direct observations of
biological carbon export from profiling floats in the subtropical North
Atlantic, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 33, 282–300,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006098</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Giglio, D., Lyubchich, V., and Mazloff, M. R.: Estimating oxygen in the
Southern Ocean using Argo temperature and salinity, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 123, 4280–4297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JC013404" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JC013404</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Helm, K. P., Bindoff, N. L., and Church, J. A.: Observed decreases in oxygen
content of the global ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L23602,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049513" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049513</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ito, T., Minobe, S., Long, M. C., and Deutsch, C.: Upper ocean O<sub>2</sub> trends:
1958–2015, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 4214–4223,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073613" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073613</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ito, T., Cervania, A., Cross, K., Ainchwar, S., and Delawalla, S.: Mapping
dissolved oxygen concentrations by combining shipboard and Argo observations
using machine learning algorithms, J. Geophys. Res.-Machine
Learning and Computation, 1, e2024JH000272,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JH000272" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JH000272</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Johnson, K. S., Plant, J. N., Riser, S. C., and Gilbert, D.: Air oxygen
calibration of oxygen optodes on a profiling float array, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 32, 2160–2172,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0101.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0101.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Johnson, K. S., Plant, J. N., Coletti, L. J., Jannasch, H. W., Sakamoto, C.
M., Riser, S. C., Swift, D. D., Williams, N. L., Boss, E., Haëntjens,
N., Talley, L. D., Sarmiento, J. L., and Gruber, N.: Biogeochemical sensor
performance in the SOCCOM profiling float array, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 122, 6416–6436, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012838</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Johnson, K. S. and Bif, M. B.: Constraint on net primary productivity of the
global ocean by Argo oxygen measurements, Nat. Geosci., 14, 769–774,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00807-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00807-z</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
77, 437–471,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kara, A. B., Rochford, P. A., and Hurlburt, H. E.: An optimal definition for
ocean mixed layer depth, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 105,
16803–16821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC900072" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC900072</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keeling, R. F., Körtzinger, A., and Gruber, N.: Ocean deoxygenation in a
warming world, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 2, 199–229,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kolodziejczyk, N., Portela, E., Thierry, V., and Prigent, A.: ISASO2: recent trends and regional patterns of ocean dissolved oxygen change, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5191–5206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5191-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5191-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Körtzinger, A., Schimanski, J., and Send, U.: High quality oxygen
measurements from profiling floats: A promising new technique, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 22, 302–308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1701.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1701.1</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kwiatkowski, L., Torres, O., Bopp, L., Aumont, O., Chamberlain, M., Christian, J. R., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M., Ilyina, T., John, J. G., Lenton, A., Li, H., Lovenduski, N. S., Orr, J. C., Palmieri, J., Santana-Falcón, Y., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Stock, C. A., Tagliabue, A., Takano, Y., Tjiputra, J., Toyama, K., Tsujino, H., Watanabe, M., Yamamoto, A., Yool, A., and Ziehn, T.: Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections, Biogeosciences, 17, 3439–3470, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lauvset, S. K., Lange, N., Tanhua, T., Bittig, H. C., Olsen, A., Kozyr, A., Alin, S., Álvarez, M., Azetsu-Scott, K., Barbero, L., Becker, S., Brown, P. J., Carter, B. R., da Cunha, L. C., Feely, R. A., Hoppema, M., Humphreys, M. P., Ishii, M., Jeansson, E., Jiang, L.-Q., Jones, S. D., Lo Monaco, C., Murata, A., Müller, J. D., Pérez, F. F., Pfeil, B., Schirnick, C., Steinfeldt, R., Suzuki, T., Tilbrook, B., Ulfsbo, A., Velo, A., Woosley, R. J., and Key, R. M.: GLODAPv2.2022: the latest version of the global interior ocean biogeochemical data product, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5543–5572, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5543-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5543-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, C., Huang, J., Ding, L., Liu, X., Yu, H., and Huang, J.: Increasing
escape of oxygen from oceans under climate change, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 47, e2019GL086345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086345" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086345</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Limburg, K. E., Breitburg, D., Swaney, D. P., and Jacinto, G.: Ocean
deoxygenation: A primer, One Earth, 2, 24–29,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.001</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Masumoto, Y., Sasaki, H., Kagimoto, T., Komori, N., Ishida, A., Sasai, Y.,
Miyama, T., Motoi, T., Mitsudera, H., Takahashi, K., and Sakuma, H.: A
fifty-year eddy-resolving simulation of the world ocean: Preliminary
outcomes of OFES (OGCM for the Earth Simulator), Journal of the Earth
Simulator, 1, 35–56,
<a href="https://www.jamstec.go.jp/es/jp/output/publication/journal/jes_vol.1/pdf/JES1-3.2-masumoto.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Masumoto, Y.: Sharing the results of a high-resolution ocean general
circulation model under a multi-discipline framework – a review of OFES
activities, Ocean Dynam., 60, 633–652,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0297-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0297-z</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Maurer, T. L., Plant, J. N., and Johnson, K. S.: Delayed-mode quality
control of oxygen, nitrate, and pH data on SOCCOM biogeochemical profiling
floats, Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 683207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.683207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.683207</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nakamura, T. and Awaji, T.: Tidally induced diapycnal mixing in the Kuril
Straits and its role in water transformation and transport: A
three-dimensional nonhydrostatic model experiment, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 109, C09015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001850" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001850</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nakamura, T., Awaji, T., Hatayama, T., Akitomo, K., Takizawa, T., Kono, T.,
and Takahashi, M.: The generation of large-amplitude unsteady lee waves by
subinertial K1 tidal flow: A possible vertical mixing mechanism in the Kuril
Straits, J. Phys.  Oceanogr., 30, 1601–1621,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030&lt;1601:TGOLAU&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030&lt;1601:TGOLAU&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2000a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nakamura, T., Awaji, T., Hatayama, T., Akitomo, K., and Takizawa, T.: Tidal
exchange through the Kuril Straits, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30,
1622–1644,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030&lt;1622:TETTKS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030&lt;1622:TETTKS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2000b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nicholson, D. P. and Feen, M. L.: Air calibration of an oxygen optode on an
underwater glider, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 15, 495–502,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10177" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10177</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ogata, T. and Nonaka, M.: Mechanisms of long-term variability and recent
trend of salinity along 137°&thinsp;E, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015290, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015290" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015290</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pacanowski, R. C. and Griffies, S. M.: MOM 3.0 Manual, Technical Report 4,
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, 680 pp., <a href="https://mom-ocean.github.io/assets/pdfs/MOM3_manual.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pörtner, H. O. and Farrell, A. P.: Physiology and climate change,
Science, 322, 690–692, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163156</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pozo Buil, M. and Di Lorenzo, E.: Decadal dynamics and predictability of
oxygen and subsurface tracers in the California Current System, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 44, 4204–4213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072931" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072931</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Reid, J. L.: On the total geostrophic circulation of the Pacific Ocean: flow
patterns, tracers, and transports, Prog. Oceanogr., 39, 263–352,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(97)00012-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(97)00012-8</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roemmich, D. and Gilson, J.: The 2004–2008 mean and annual cycle of
temperature, salinity, and steric height in the global ocean from the Argo
Program, Prog. Oceanogr., 82, 81–100,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sampaio, E., Santos, C., Rosa, I. C., Ferreira, V., Pörtner, H.-O.,
Duarte, C. M., Levin, L. A., and Rosa, R.: Impacts of hypoxic events surpass
those of future ocean warming and acidification, Nature Ecology &amp;
Evolution, 5, 311–321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01370-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01370-3</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sasaki, H., Nonaka, M., Masumoto, Y., Sasai, Y., Uehara, H., and Sakuma, H.:
An eddy-resolving hindcast simulation of the quasiglobal ocean from 1950 to
2003 on the Earth Simulator, in: High Resolution Numerical Modelling of the
Atmosphere and Ocean, edited by: Hamilton, K. and Ohfuchi, W., Springer, New
York, NY, 157–185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49791-4_10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49791-4_10</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sasano, D., Takatani, Y., Kosugi, N., Nakano, T., Midorikawa, T., and Ishii,
M.: Multidecadal trends of oxygen and their controlling factors in the
western North Pacific, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 935–956,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005065</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sasano, D., Takatani, Y., Kosugi, N., Nakano, T., Midorikawa, T., and Ishii,
M.: Decline and bidecadal oscillations of dissolved oxygen in the Oyashio
region and their propagation to the western North Pacific, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 909–931, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005876" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005876</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmidtko, S., Stramma, L., and Visbeck, M.: Decline in global oceanic
oxygen content during the past five decades, Nature, 542, 335–339,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21399" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21399</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sharp, J. D., Fassbender, A. J., Carter, B. R., Johnson, G. C., Schultz, C.,
and Dunne, J. P.: GOBAI-O2: A Global Gridded Monthly Dataset of Ocean
Interior Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations Based on Shipboard and Autonomous
Observations (NCEI Accession 0259304), NOAA National Centers for
Environmental Information [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25921/z72m-yz67" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25921/z72m-yz67</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sharp, J. D., Fassbender, A. J., Carter, B. R., Johnson, G. C., Schultz, C., and Dunne, J. P.: GOBAI-O<sub>2</sub>: temporally and spatially resolved fields of ocean interior dissolved oxygen over nearly 2 decades, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4481–4518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4481-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4481-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stramma, L., Schmidtko, S., Bograd, S. J., Ono, T., Ross, T., Sasano, D., and Whitney, F. A.: Trends and decadal oscillations of oxygen and nutrients at 50 to 300&thinsp;m depth in the equatorial and North Pacific, Biogeosciences, 17, 813–831, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-813-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-813-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stramma, L. and Schmidtko, S.: Tropical deoxygenation sites revisited to investigate oxygen and nutrient trends, Ocean Sci., 17, 833–847, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-833-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-833-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Suga, T., Takei, Y., and Hanawa, K.: Thermostad distribution in the North
Pacific subtropical gyre: The central mode water and the subtropical mode
water, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 140–152,
1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Suga, T., Motoki, K., Aoki, Y., and Macdonald, A. M.: The North Pacific
climatology of winter mixed layer and mode waters, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 34, 3–22, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takatani, Y., Sasano, D., Nakano, T., Midorikawa, T., and Ishii, M.:
Decrease of dissolved oxygen after the mid-1980s in the western North
Pacific subtropical gyre along the 137°&thinsp;E repeat section, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004227</a>,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takeshita, Y., Martz, T. R., Johnson, K. S., Plant, J. N., Gilbert, D.,
Riser, S. C., Neill, C., and Tilbrook, B.: A climatology-based quality
control procedure for profiling float oxygen data, J. Geophys. Res-Oceans, 118, 5640–5650, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20399" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20399</a>, 2013.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Udaya Bhaskar, T. V. S., Sarma, V. V. S. S., and Pavan Kumar, J.: Potential
mechanisms responsible for spatial variability in intensity and thickness of
oxygen minimum zone in the Bay of Bengal, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 126, e2021JG006341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006341" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006341</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Winkler, L. W.: Die Bestimmung des im Wasser gelösten Sauerstoffes,
Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 21, 2843–2854,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.188802102122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.188802102122</a>, 1888.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wolf, M. K., Hamme, R. C., Gilbert, D., Yashayaev, I., and Thierry, V.:
Oxygen saturation surrounding deep water formation events in the Labrador
Sea from Argo-O<sub>2</sub> data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 635–653,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005829" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005829</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, L., Wang, K., and Wu, B.: Weakening and poleward shifting of the North
Pacific subtropical fronts from 1980 to 2018, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 52, 399–417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0170.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0170.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, H., Lohmann, G., Krebs-Kanzow, U., Ionita, M., Shi, X., Sidorenko, D.,
Gong, X., Chen, X., and Gowan, E. J.: Poleward shift of the major ocean
gyres detected in a warming climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2019GL085868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085868</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yasuda, I.: North Pacific Intermediate Water: Progress in SAGE (SubArctic
Gyre Experiment) and related projects, J. Oceanogr., 60,
385–395, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCE.0000038344.25081.42" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCE.0000038344.25081.42</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
You, Y.: The pathway and circulation of North Pacific Intermediate Water,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2291,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018561</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
