<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-23-4463-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Combining microbial, isotopic and residence time data to characterize groundwater dynamics in a multi-layered aquifer system in Kurikka, western Finland</article-title><alt-title>Multitracer approach for characterizing groundwater in a complex aquifer system</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Purkamo</surname><given-names>Lotta</given-names></name>
          <email>lotta.purkamo@gtk.fi</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9428-6542</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ikonen</surname><given-names>Juuso</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7935-4631</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Pétré</surname><given-names>Marie-Amélie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Putkinen</surname><given-names>Niko</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Sültenfuss</surname><given-names>Jürgen</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3169-0422</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Myllyperkiö</surname><given-names>Minna</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hokajärvi</surname><given-names>Anna-Maria</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Pitkänen</surname><given-names>Tarja</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Miettinen</surname><given-names>Ilkka T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Geological Survey of Finland (GTK), Espoo, 02150, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>University of Bremen, Otto Hahn Allee 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Department of Public Health, Kuopio, 70210, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>University of Helsinki, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Helsinki, 00014, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>current address: BRGM – French Geological Survey,  45060 Orléans, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Lotta Purkamo (lotta.purkamo@gtk.fi)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>4463</fpage><lpage>4483</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Lotta Purkamo et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e184">Groundwater is a critical resource supplying nearly half of the world's drinking water. This study focuses on the Kurikka buried valley aquifer system in western Finland, characterized by complex hydrogeology dictated by the bedrock topography and sediment cover producing artesian conditions in deep aquifers. Using a multitracer approach, the study incorporates hydrogeochemical, isotopic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and microbial community analyses with residence time indicators (CFCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Groundwater samples collected from ten sites revealed differences in residence times, microbial diversity and community compositions, as well as large variation in the strontium and sulphur isotopic compositions. The bedrock groundwater sample revealed a more evolved water type, consistent with longer residence time, strong water-mineral interactions and typical deep subsurface bacterial members.  Groundwater from the superficial unconsolidated aquifers contained a modern water component (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 years) whereas the deeper buried valley aquifers were characterized by older waters. The information provided by this study is crucial for groundwater management during extensive extraction for municipal water supply.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e306">Groundwater provides an essential water supply worldwide. Almost half of all drinking water globally, 65 %–75 % in Europe (27 EU Member States) and 38 % in the US (Grönwall and Danert, 2020; Johnson et al., 2022, National Ground Water Association, 2025) originates from groundwater. In Finland, approximately 60 % of water distributed by waterworks is groundwater and the management of groundwater resources is crucial to the success of the water utilities producing good quality drinking water (Kløve et al., 2017).  To manage the groundwater resources sustainably, a significant understanding of the aquifer is essential. Hydrogeochemical investigations play a key role in characterizing hydrogeological systems and are commonly supported by multitracer approaches that integrate major ions, trace elements, stable water isotopes, and environmental tracers. Such approaches are widely used to constrain groundwater origin, flow paths, residence times, mixing and water/rock interactions (Cloutier et al., 2006; Jaunat et al., 2012; Pétré et al., 2016). However, despite the proven value of conventional hydrogeochemical tracers, uncertainties often remain in complex multiaquifer systems regarding hydraulic connectivity, inter-aquifer mixing, and interactions between unconsolidated sediments and fractured bedrock groundwater. These uncertainties can limit the ability to predict groundwater flow dynamics and sustainably manage groundwater abstraction.</p>
      <p id="d2e309">Buried valley aquifer systems are particularly challenging to characterize due to their complex geometry and heterogenous sedimentary architecture.  This is also the case in Kurikka, western Finland: the aquifer system investigated in this study hosts significant groundwater resources. The aquifer system has a complex groundwater recharge route originating from the high-standing areas west of the Kurikka buried valleys. From the recharge area, groundwater flows toward the buried valley aquifers, where the lowermost coarse-grained aquifer consists of the interplay between permeable sediments and fractured crystalline bedrock (Åberg et al., 2026). Despite previous hydrogeological investigations, flow paths and the degree of mixing between shallow (here up to 70 m) and deeper sediments (70–120 m) and the bedrock groundwater remain poorly understood, constituting a key knowledge gap for sustainable groundwater management in the area. To address these challenges, this study applies an expanded multitracer approach that integrates hydrogeochemical, isotopic, and groundwater age tracers, complemented with microbial community analyses.</p>
      <p id="d2e312">Stable water isotopes of hydrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are used to assess groundwater origin, recharge conditions and mixing processes (e.g., Åberg et al., 2025; Carreira and Marques, 2024; Ikonen et al., 2025; Luoma et al., 2024), while the measurement of strontium isotopes is used to determine the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio providing additional information about the water-rock interaction and source lithology (Kaislaniemi, 2011; Shand et al., 2009). Sulfur isotope composition, expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is commonly used as a tracer of sulfur sources and associated biogeochemical processes in groundwater systems reflecting specifically the biogeochemical processes (Harrison and Thode, 1958; Kaplan and Rittenberg, 1964; Onac et al., 2011; Samborska-Goik and Bottrell, 2025) and is applied here as an additional isotopic tracer. Groundwater residence times and flow dynamics are evaluated using a suite of environmental tracers, including tritium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and noble gases.  These tracers are useful because of their known input histories or predictable decay or accumulation in the subsurface, and have been widely applied across a range of hydrogeological contexts, including in bedrock aquifers (Åkesson et al., 2015; Cook and Solomon, 1997; Jaunat et al., 2012; Massmann et al., 2008; Mayer et al., 2014; Meyzonnat et al., 2023; Osenbrück et al., 2006; Visser et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d2e397">Although multitracer hydrogeochemical approaches are well established in hydrogeology, microbial information is still only rarely integrated into aquifer characterization studies. In recent years, microbial community analyses have emerged as a promising complementary tool for hydrogeology, with the potential to reflect subsurface conditions, hydraulic connectivity and geochemical environments (Ben Maamar et al., 2015). Groundwater as a dark and often oligotrophic environment with relatively stable temperature selects specific microbial communities compared to the aquatic ecosystems aboveground (Lee et al., 2018). Although advances in molecular biological methods have greatly improved the characterisation of groundwater microbial diversity, microbial community structure remains to be fully exploited in understanding the hydraulic connections in aquifers (Merino et al., 2022).  Integrating microbial data with hydrogeochemical and isotopic tracers may therefore provide novel insight into aquifer functioning.</p>
      <p id="d2e401">This study forms part of a larger hydrogeological research initiative, aimed at securing sufficient groundwater resources to support large-scale abstraction to meet the water demands of 150 000 residents and the industries in cities of Vaasa and Kurikka. The overarching objective of this study is to establish baseline hydrogeochemical and microbiological conditions that enable the monitoring of the evolution of the water system during operational stage of abstraction. Specifically, the research addresses the question of whether a combined multitracer hydrogeochemical and microbial community analysis approach improves the characterisation of groundwater origin, residence time, flow paths and connectivity in a complex buried valley aquifer system. We hypothesize that this multitracer approach in hydrogeochemistry combined with lesser used microbial community analysis provides additional constraints on groundwater connectivity and flow dynamics within complex multi-aquifer systems. Such information is critical for informed decisions about groundwater management and sustainable resource development.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Site description</title>
      <p id="d2e409">The study site is situated in the Southern Osthrobothnia region in western Finland, 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Bothnian Sea shore (Fig. 1). The groundwater system of the Kurikka buried valley is underlain by 1.88 Ga year-old Palaeoproterozoic metamorphosed granites, schists, and biotite paragneisses (Lahtinen et al., 2017; Ruuska et al., 2023). The early development of the Paleoproterozoic bedrock during the Svecofennian orogeny with crustal movements, shaped the Kurikka area and led to the formation of protovalleys.  Since then, the area has experienced a multi-stage burial-erosion development over a long period of time until it reached its current buried form (Hall et al., 2021).  Currently, this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> old and 70–120 m deep buried valley system is filled with highly variable Late Pleistocene sediments. In its most recent developmental stages, this region situated beneath the central sector of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet (FIS) during the Late Weichselian Glaciation (23 000–10 500 years BP; Stroeven et al., 2016) – which covered southern Finland and facilitated the preservation of pre-existing sediments through limited glacial erosion (Åberg et al., 2026) – remained largely unaffected. Specifically, the deepest sediments typically consist of deposits that have groundwater potential for municipal drinking water abstraction. </p>
      <p id="d2e435">The regional hydrogeology of the study area (240.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 1) is strongly controlled by bedrock topography. Topographical differences, together with silt-clay sediment and basal till on the topmost part of the sediment cover, produce an artesian character to the deep aquifers (Fig. 1).  Deep groundwater in the unconsolidated aquifers in the Kurikka aquifer system translates to a maximum depth of about 120 m from the land surface (Åberg et al., 2026). Groundwater in Finland mainly resides in shallow unconfined aquifers (Lahermo et al., 1990; Luoma et al., 2021), and the deepest aquifer in the multi-layered system in Kurikka is nominated deep in this context. Layer cake type of stratigraphy of the buried valley with alternating aquitards and aquifers is conceptually shown in the Fig. 1, but more detailed in Åberg et al.  (2026).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e451">Left, a geological map of the study area and groundwater sampling locations; right: general cross-section of the Paloluoma buried valley (modified from Rashid, 2022). Arrows in the map indicate potential groundwater flow paths. AF- and AT- refer to aquifer and aquitard, respectively in the cross-section. AT 3-4-5-6: till, AF3-4: fine sand, AF2: sandy gravel, AF5: coarse sand. See also Table 1. Vertical exaggeration: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and Methods</title>
      <p id="d2e479">In this multi-tracer study of the region, the sampling points were selected in each buried valley connected to the main Kyrönjoki Valley (Fig. 1).  Additionally, the study included a bedrock borehole (R56) located beneath the Paloluoma valley and a point further north (NOPPA15) in an adjacent valley reflecting a more superficial esker system.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e485">Details of the sampling sites in Kurikka multilayer aquifer system.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample ID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sampling date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Total depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Screen depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Aquifer code<sup>a</sup>/type</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">of the well, m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">interval, m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NOPPA 15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nenättömänluoma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.6–9.1; 10.6–13.6<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AF7A; Shallow unconsolidated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIHP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Paloluoma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">77.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50.9–76.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AF3A; Deep unconsolidated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIHP15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Paloluoma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">38.1–64.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AF3A; Deep unconsolidated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Paloluoma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">162<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no screen<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Not available; Bedrock</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LOHI30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lohiluoma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50.4–64.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AF3A; Deep unconsolidated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KUU19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Paloluoma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">49.5–72.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AF3A; Deep unconsolidated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HÄJY30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kyrönjoki main valley</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no screen<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AF3A; Deep unconsolidated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIETO17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kyrönjoki main valley</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">63.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.8–48.8; 49.8–60.8<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AF3A; Deep unconsolidated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HARJA10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kyrönjoki main valley</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.8–39.8; 41.8–51.8<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AF3A; Deep unconsolidated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HÄJY11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7 October 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Häjynluoma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39–59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AF4B; Deep unconsolidated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e488"><sup>a</sup> Described in more details in Åberg et al. (2026).<sup>b</sup> Two screens.   <sup>c</sup> Bedrock borehole, no screen in the sediment layers. Total length of borehole in the table. Drilled with 60° dip.<sup>d</sup> No screen. Observation well has a total depth of 17.4 m and is open at its base. Continuously overflowing.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Field parameter measurements, geochemical and isotope sampling and analyses</title>
      <p id="d2e878">The water samples were collected between 4 and 7 October in 2021. The groundwater wells (apart from those that were overflowing) were purged 1 d before sampling. The water levels were measured at non-overflowing wells before sampling. Groundwater was pumped from the wells using a submersible pump (Proactive SS-Monsoon XL, GWM Engineering, Kuopio, Finland) with pumping speed of 4–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The field measurements for temperature (T), dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, electrical conductivity (EC) and oxygen reduction potential (ORP) were recorded with YSI multi-parameter sonde (YSI EXO1) (YSI Inc. Yellow Springs, OH, US). Alkalinity was measured in the field with a HACH digital titrator (HACH Company, Loveland, CO, US) and a cartridge of sulphuric acid (1.600 N). The partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated with the software Diagrammes (Simler 2012) based on temperature, pH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. For hierarchical clustering, selected parameters (pH, EC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, DO and alkalinity) were used for calculating Euclidean distance matrix, and clustering was done with UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean) method in R with vegan, ggplot2 and ggdendro packages (Oksanen et al., 2025; de Vries and Ripley, 2024; Wickham et al., 2026). Water for hydrogeochemical analyses including isotopes was taken into the sample bottles immediately from the end of the pumping tube and the sample pretreatment, filtering and acidification, was performed in the field after sampling. Water samples for oxygen and hydrogen isotope analyses were collected without pretreatment and stored in 60 mL high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles. For isotopic analyses of strontium and sulphur groundwater was filtered with a 0.45 µm Ca–S filter into acid-washed 250 mL bottles and acidified with ultrapure 13.8 N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5 mL per sample bottle). Treated samples were kept cool during field work and transportation to the laboratory. The chemical parameters from the water samples were analysed by the Eurofins Labtium laboratory (Espoo, Finland).  Dissolved element concentrations were analysed with ICP-MS and anion concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Br</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, F, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ja <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with ion chromatography. The dissolved and total organic carbon (DOC, TOC) were also analysed at the Eurofins Labtium.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Isotope hydrogeochemistry analyses</title>
      <p id="d2e1017">The isotopic compositions of oxygen, hydrogen, strontium and sulphur from the water samples were analysed in the GTK research laboratory in Espoo, Finland. Sample waters for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses were filtered in the laboratory and analysed with a Picarro L2130i CRDS (Cavity Ring Down Spectroscopy) analyser. The measurement uncertainty for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis, a concentration-dependent amount of prefiltered and -acidified samples were evaporated to dryness and dissolved with ultrapure 3.2 N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for ion exchange. Strontium was eluted with ultrapure 0.05 N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> acid by 100 µL of Sr-specific resin (TrisKem Sr Resin, 50–100 µm). For the measurement, the samples were diluted to a Sr concentration of approx. 20 ppb (in ultrapure 2 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The analyses were carried out by using an Aridus 3 Desolvating system (DSN) with 50 µL PFA ConcentricFlow nebulizer and a Multi-Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS, Nu Instruments™) at low mass resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400). The isotopic measurements were performed in static mode using five faraday detectors, and 10 blocks of 6 integrations of approximately 8 s. The standard reference material NBS987, was used to monitor the precision and accuracy of the measurements at the beginning, and the end of every session and after every fifth sample. The obtained average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.710270 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.000066</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2 SD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is close to the reference value 0.710250 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2 SD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2306</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, GEOREM database, <uri>http://georem.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de/</uri>, last access: 30 April 2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e1234">Prior to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis, samples were eluted following the classic liquid column chromatography technique (Paris et al., 2013).  Based on the sulphur concentration, part of the filtered and acidified sample was evaporated to dryness and dissolved with ultrapure 0.25 % HCl.  Cations were removed with BioRad AG50X8 resin and samples were further diluted with ultrapure 2 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to approx. 0.25 ppm concentration.  Sodium was added to the samples (0.5 ppm) before the analysis to improve the sensitivity of sulphur (Yu et al., 2017). The analyses were carried out using an Aridus 3 Desolvating system (DSN) with 50 µL PFA ConcentricFlow nebulizer and a MC-ICP-MS (Nu Instruments™) at medium mass resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The S isotopic measurements were performed in static mode using three faraday detectors, and 3 blocks of 20 integrations of 8 s. The average value of the IAEA standard S-3 was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1 SD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) while the recommended values is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ( <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1 SD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Georem database, <uri>http://georem.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de/</uri>, last access: 30 April 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Residence time indicator sampling and analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1358">Atmospheric CFC concentrations increased since the late 1940 to early 1990 and are nearly stable in the atmosphere. During recharge these tracers are dissolved in the water and transported with the flow. The CFC concentrations in water depend not only on the time of recharge, but also on the recharge temperature of the water, additional dissolved air bubbles (so-called excess air) and degradation in anoxic environment. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been released decades later. Atmospheric concentrations are still increasing but are still much lower than for CFCs. Due to the very low solubility excess air affects the signal even more. Also, in granitic rocks, SF6 is produced by natural processes over long timescales.</p>
      <p id="d2e1372">The radioactive hydrogen isotope tritium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a half-live of 12.32 years is bound to the water molecule in precipitation.</p>
      <p id="d2e1387">Tritium concentrations in precipitation increased since the mid-1950s to about 1962 by 3 orders of magnitude compared to the natural concentrations in the northern hemisphere. Since 2010 concentrations are nearly back to natural levels (Cauquoin et al., 2024).  Tritium is a suitable tracer to detect water recharged since the late 1950s, which is called young water.</p>
      <p id="d2e1390">In combination with the decay product of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the light helium isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is possible to calculate the groundwater residence time without knowledge of the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input. The challenge is to separate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decay (tritiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from other He sources.  Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is dissolved in surface water according to the water temperature at recharge. The water can contain additional air bubbles (excess air) and depending on the rock matrix also terrigenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is produced by neutrons reacting with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Li</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which produces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and hence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The neutrons originate from U and Th decay and associated secondary reactions, and are accompanied by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced through the alpha decay of U and Th. Consequently, both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations can be elevated in old groundwater. The concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio depend on the rock matrix composition, and the release rate from the rock to the surrounding water body. This results in significant uncertainties in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of terrigenic He. Consequently, at high helium concentrations, the separation of tritiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is hindered. Tritiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tri</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is calculated as follows from the components: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tri</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>meas</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>equi</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>excess</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>terr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>meas</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: measured concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>equi</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: solubility equilibrium concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>excess</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: excess air concentration derived from Ne, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>terr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: terrigenic He concentration derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The uncertainties for each component add up to uncertainty for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tri</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  A detailed explanation on the different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions can be found in Kipfer et al. (2002). Samples of groundwater for CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses were collected in two tins, each holding a ground glass flask. The opened can and flask were placed in a bucket. Then, the pipe from the pump was placed to the bottom of the flask, which was rinsed multiple times until the bucket overflowed. After the flask was closed with a plug and secured with a clamp, the can container was closed with a circlip (underwater). CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were analysed by gas chromatography with an electron capture detector (GC-ECD) at Dr. Oster's trace substances laboratory (Wachenheim, Germany). Samples for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis were collected in 1 L HDPE bottle and stored in a cold room (5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) until analysis. Tritium was analysed at Hydroisotop GmbH (Germany) using liquid scintillation spectroscopy LSC after electrolytical enrichment (Perkin Elmer Quantulus GCT 6220). Tritium concentrations are reported in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> units (TU) with double standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TU</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.119</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Bq</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Samples for noble gases analyses were collected in duplicates in clamped-off copper tubes connected to the pumping line. Noble gases (helium isotopes and neon) were analysed at the Bremen Mass Spectrometric Facility according toSültenfuß et al. (2009).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Microbiological sampling and analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1899">Groundwater samples were retrieved for microbial community structure analysis. As groundwater is a naturally oligotrophic environment, the microbial cell numbers were estimated to be low. Therefore, to collect enough microbial biomass for DNA amplicon sequencing analysis, 65–183 L of groundwater from each groundwater well was filtered by a dead-end ultrafiltration method (DEUF) with a flow rate of 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using a sterile silicone tubing with an ultrafiltering cartridge (ASAHI Rexeed-25A, Asahi Kasei Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), according to Inkinen et al. (2019). Groundwater was pumped from the wells to a 20 L plastic canister sterilized with 70 % EtOH and flushed with the sampling fluid, from where the water was pumped through the DEUF capsule cartridge with a peristaltic pump. The flow-through was measured using a water meter and a 10 L bucket. DEUF-capsules were kept cool during field work and transportation to further handling the laboratory of water microbiology of the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio.</p>
      <p id="d2e1919">Microbial biomass was eluted from the DEUF-capsules in laboratory as described in Inkinen et al. (2019). The secondary concentration of DEUF-eluates (100–250 mL, corresponding to sample volume of 11–80 L) was conducted by filtration through Millipore Express PLUS membrane filters (pore size 0.22 µm, Merck KGaA. Darmstadt, Germany (Kauppinen et al., 2019) and stored in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before nucleic acid extraction. Total nucleic acids were extracted from the Express PLUS filters using Chemagic DNA Plant kit (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, USA) and Kingfisher device (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and DNA concentration was measured with a Qubit mini fluorometer using Qubit dsDNA HS assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as described in Inkinen et al. (2019).  Negative control samples of DEUF elution and DNA extraction were also included in the analysis. MiSeq amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria and archaea, and ITS1 region for fungi using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> paired end protocol was done in commercial laboratory (Eurofins Genomics Ltd., Konstanz, Germany). The primers used were 341F 5<sup>′</sup>CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3<sup>′</sup> (Herlemann et al., 2011) and 926R 5<sup>′</sup>-CCGYCAATTYMTTTRAGTTT-3<sup>′</sup> (Quince et al., 2011) (V3–V5) for bacteria, 340F 5<sup>′</sup>-CCCTAYGGGGYGCASCAG-3<sup>′</sup> (Gantner et al., 2011) and 806R 5<sup>′</sup>-GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT-3<sup>′</sup> (Apprill et al., 2015) (V3–V4) for archaea, and 5<sup>′</sup>-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3<sup>′</sup> and 5<sup>′</sup>-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3<sup>′</sup> for fungal ITS1 (White et al., 1990).  Negative controls did not produce amplicons.</p>
      <p id="d2e2064">Sequence reads were demultiplexed and primer sequences removed before analysis applying the DADA2 (v.1.30.0) pipeline in Rstudio using R version 4.3.2 (Callahan et al., 2016; R Core Team, 2024) for bacterial and archaeal amplicon sequence variant (ASV) detection.  When inspecting the sequence reads, reverse reads of both archaea and bacteria were of poor quality, generating issues in trimming and eventually merging the reads. Thus, the analysis was continued with just forward reads.  Reads were filtered using the following parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TruncLen</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">240</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>maxN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>maxEE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>truncQ</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This removed approximately 4 % of reads in each sample. Reads were dereplicated, sequence variants inferred from unique sequences from each sample, chimeras removed, and taxonomy assigned using Silva v. 138 taxonomy database (silva_nr99_v138.1_train_set.fa) (Quast et al., 2013; Yilmaz et al., 2014) for archaea and bacteria.</p>
      <p id="d2e2115">Fungal sequences were analysed using the ITS-specific variation of version 1.8 of the DADA2 workflow (Callahan et al., 2016). First, ITS primer sequences were detected, primer orientation was verified, and primers were cut from the sequences using Cutadapt tool (Martin, 2011). After quality trimming with parameters: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>maxN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>maxEE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>truncQ</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minLen</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>rm.phix</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TRUE</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, sequence variants were inferred from unique sequences from each sample, forward and reverse reads were merged, chimeras removed and taxonomy assigned using UNITE general FASTA release (sh_general_release_dynamic_04.04.2024.fasta) (Abarenkov et al., 2024) for fungi.</p>
      <p id="d2e2189">DADA2-treated sequence data were imported to phyloseq (v.1.46.0(McMurdie and Holmes, 2013) for data visualisation and statistical analyses in RStudio. Tools used in RStudio included vegan, ggplot2, dplyr, ampvis2, psadd and cowplot (Andersen et al., 2018; Oksanen et al., 2025; Wickham, 2016; Wickham et al., 2026; Wilke, 2025). Raw sequence data is deposited in NCBI's SRA under BioProject PRJNA1270735.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Field observations and hydrogeochemistry</title>
      <p id="d2e2208">Field parameters and the calculated partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are presented in Table 2. The unconsolidated aquifer groundwaters had an electrical conductivity ranging from 90–204 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a pH between 6.2 and 6.8, whereas the water from the bedrock borehole was more mineralized (EC 296 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and had a higher pH (8.4). Temperature range was 5.7–6.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and highest dissolved oxygen concentrations were measured at KUU19 and HÄJY30 (5,7 and 4,4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). The field data clustered the samples to three groups, R56 clustering clearly separate from the other sites. Oxidation-reduction potential varied significantly between the different samples from lowest in bedrock groundwater R56 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">254</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to highest in HÄJY11 and KUU19, corresponding to high dissolved oxygen concentrations in these samples.  Highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was measured from the bedrock groundwater (R56). Alkalinity varied from 23.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in KUU19 to 152 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in R56. In all groundwater samples representative of unconsolidated aquifer waters, log partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value in the dataset (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was observed in bedrock groundwater.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2446">Field measurement data of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), dissolved oxygen (DO), oxygen reduction potential (ORP), alkalinity (Alk), chloride concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the sampling sites and calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Clustering is based on the field measurements (in bold) and shows the average Euclidean dissimilarity between the samples.</p></caption>
  <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026-g01.png"/>
<table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e2484">* n.a.: Not available, laboratory measurements of chloride concentrations are reported in Table S1 in the Supplement.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2492">The major ions in groundwaters were Na (46.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in R56 to 4.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in HARJA10), Cl (25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in R56 to 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in MIHP6, see Table S1 for laboratory measurements), and Fe (31.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in HARJA10, below the detection limit of 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in HÄJY11 and KUU19 and 0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in MIHP6), and Ca, with highest concentrations in NOPPA15 and HÄJY30 (14.8 and 15.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) (Table S1). Highest sulphur and sulphate concentrations were detected from NOPPA15, and highest organic carbon concentrations were in HARJA10 groundwater (Table S1).</p>
      <p id="d2e2633">Groundwater types were defined and represented on a Piper diagram (Fig. 2) showing the proportion of major ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Piper, 1944, Simler 2012). Unconsolidated aquifer groundwater samples are of calcium-bicarbonate (Ca–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) type or mixed cations–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas groundwater collected from the bedrock borehole (R56) beneath the Paloluoma valley is classified as sodium-bicarbonate (Na–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) type, reflecting a more evolved groundwater. NOPPA15 has more chloride (7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than the other unconsolidated aquifer samples (1.7–5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and KUU19 has some nitrates (4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Table S1).</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2814">Piper diagram for the 10 groundwater samples collected in the study area.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Isotopic compositions of hydrogen and oxygen</title>
      <p id="d2e2831">The variation in the isotopic compositions of oxygen and hydrogen in the analysed water samples was small. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">88.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.63</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.22</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with the analytical uncertainty for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the Fig. 3 the weighted annual average from the south-western coastal site of Olkiluoto and the eastern Finnish city of Kuopio (GNIP database, IAEA), with similar latitude to the study site, are marked on the meteoric water line. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-excess values Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), calculated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, ranged from 9.6–10.8, indicating that the sampled waters are unevaporated and of meteoric origin. This is reinforced by the fact that the samples all plot on or near the meteoric water lines (Table 3 and Fig. 3).

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M180" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-excess</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3032">The isotopic analysis results and the calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-excess values together with the concentrations of strontium and sulphur in the water samples.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-excess</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SR (µg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NOPPA 15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.74535</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">101</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIHP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.74029</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">46.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIHP15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72133</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">82.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.73225</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">91.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LOHI30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.74159</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KUU19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75237</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HÄJY30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72832</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">107</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIETO17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.73679</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">70.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HARJA10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.73713</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HÄJY11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">88.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.73752</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">56.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3639">The isotopic compositions of oxygen and hydrogen from the water samples against the GMWL (Global Meteoric Water line) in red dashed line and the LMWL (Local Meteoric Water Line) in black. Olkiluoto weighted 8 year annual mean (<uri>https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/46/095/46095041.pdf</uri>, last access: 7 May 2025) and Kuopio GNIP, Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (<uri>https://www.iaea.org/services/networks/gnip</uri>, last access: 7 May 2025) as references.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Isotopic compositions of Sr and S</title>
      <p id="d2e3662">The isotopic compositions of strontium and sulphur in the water samples vary between 0.72133–0.75237 and 1.1 ‰–30.3 ‰ respectively (Table 3). The corresponding concentrations of Sr and S in the water samples vary between 38.3–107 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.1–5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively (Tables 3 and S1). Both elements show noticeable variation (Table 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Groundwater residence time indicators</title>
      <p id="d2e3709">The results of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, neon, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CFCs analyses are listed in Table 4. Samples NOPPA15, KUU19, HARJA10 and HÄJY11 had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations ranging from 1.6–4.8 TU, while samples MIHP6, MIETO17, MIHP15, R56, LOHI30 and HÄJY30, were below the detection limit of 0.6 TU (2-sigma) (Table 4). Tritium concentrations between 1.6 and 4.8 TU (NOPPA15, KUU19, HARJA10, HÄJY11) clearly show a modern component (0–60 years old). Assuming a decay-corrected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in precipitation to be near natural levels of 4–5 TU for Finland, then the HÄJY11 shows the presence of a modern component with significant dilution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> older <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free water. The absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicates sub-modern waters with ages exceeding 70 years. Due to the given detection limit this proportion of modern water cannot be significantly larger than 15 %. Hence, only the samples with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages is possible.</p>

<table-wrap id="T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3862">Summary of measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, calculated tritiogenic Helium 3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>trit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, calculated terrigenic Helium 4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ter</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), CFC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. The uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 20 %. Tritiogenic Helium 3 was determined with an altitude of the recharge area of 150 m and a recharge temperature of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>trit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>terr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ne</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ne</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CFC11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CFC12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ccSTP</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ccSTP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ccSTP</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NOPPA15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIHP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIHP15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−8</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−8</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−4</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−4</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LOHI30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KUU19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">107</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">230 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HÄJY30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−8</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIETO17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−8</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HARJA10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">140</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HÄJY11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−7</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e5522">The applicability of CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for groundwater residence time determination is very limited for this study. The CFCs data exhibit anomalous concentrations and variable CFC11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC12 ratios, indicating contamination or degradation processes. The data show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free waters do not contain any CFC11 or CFC12. This means that the sampling gear is not responsible for the extreme high CFC concentrations. Concentrations of CFC113 in all samples were at or below the detection limit and were therefore excluded from further analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e5556">All samples showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (18–2700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) well above solubility equilibrium with modern atmosphere (approx. 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating that the excessive groundwater concentrations derive from a local geogenic source, as frequently observed in Scandinavian groundwater systems (Åkesson et al., 2015). Consequently, CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers are unsuitable for groundwater age dating at this site. The data are nevertheless shown to illustrate the limitations of these methods under the studied conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e5615">Seven out of ten noble gas samples have been analysed in duplicates and provided identical results. Neon concentrations reveal abnormal excess air (more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ccSTP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which diminishes reliable age calculations based on noble gases. For the analysis of samples with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, the amount of gases was split to small units. This increased the uncertainty for Ne to about 1 % of the He concentration.</p>
      <p id="d2e5661">Samples with large excess air and non-detectable CFC concentration clearly state that the source of excess air does not result from ambient air, such as air penetration into the water during sampling. As typical groundwater recharge conditions are not expected to form this massive intrusion of excess air, the source remains unclear.</p>
      <p id="d2e5664">Nevertheless, He isotopes still give some insight on the age composition of the water. All samples show high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ccSTP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is equivalent to 4–2200 times the solubility equilibrium, indicating a significant source of terrigenic He. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free samples range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are significantly lower than the ratios typical of atmospheric or mantle He. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used for the terrigenic He component in the calculation of tritiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for samples with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Excess air is assumed to be free of tritiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4).  Both error sources result in an error for tritiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 25 %.  However, even with the large uncertainties the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages of NOPPA15, KUU19, HARJA10 and HÄJY11 are between 47 and 59 years (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These results suggest groundwater residence times substantially longer than 30 years. The presence of high radiogenic Helium 4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicates the presence of old groundwater (several thousand years old). The only bedrock borehole R56 has the highest radiogenic helium contents of all the wells.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e5928">Ratios of He isotopes vs. Ne<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>He ratios of all samples. The light blue line shows mixing of water equilibrated at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plus 30 % of excess air with terrigenic He that has a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The vertical offset from this line indicates tritiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Microbial communities</title>
      <p id="d2e6018">Bacterial 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was successful from HARJA10, HÄJY30, LOHI30, MIETO17, MIHP15, NOPPA15 and R56. Altogether 996 645 bacterial sequences were retrieved of these, and after quality filtering, denoising and chimera removal steps, 90 %–94 % of the reads were retained in each sample (Table S2). Altogether 71 different bacterial phyla were detected and ASVs belonging most prevalently to Patescibacteria, Verrucomicrobiota, Chloroflexi and Proteobacteria (Table S3 and Fig. S1a in the Supplement).  Bacterial communities were diverse and varied from borehole to borehole (Figs. 5A and S1a). NOPPA15 hosted the most diverse bacterial community according to Shannon index (H' 6.69), while MIHP15 and bedrock groundwater well R56 exhibited the lowest observed Shannon diversity (H' 3.63 and 2.91, respectively) (Fig. 5A and Table S2.). These communities were more similar with each other compared to other sites. Relatively most abundant bacterial ASVs detected from NOPPA15 affiliated with <italic>Gallionella</italic> (12 % relative abundance), <italic>Omnitropha</italic> (10 %) and several candidate genera of Patescibacteria phyla. The bedrock borehole water R56 hosted a bacterial community with abundant sulfate reducers such as Desulfovibrio (38 % relative abundance) in addition to <italic>Hydrogenophaga</italic> (11 %), <italic>Ferribacterium</italic> (9 %) and <italic>Acetobacterium</italic> (8 %). Of these, <italic>Hydrogenophaga</italic>-affiliating ASVs were either absent or found in very low abundance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in other samples.  <italic>Desulfovibrio</italic> and <italic>Acetobacterium</italic> ASVs were also most abundant in MIHP15 (57 % and 11 %, respectively). Sulfate reducing <italic>Desulfosporosinus</italic> was also most abundant in HÄJY30 (65 % of the bacterial community), together with <italic>Candidatus</italic> Omnitrophus (12 % relative abundance) and Patescibacteria-affiliating ASVs (altogether 7 % of total bacterial community). MIETO17 hosted almost as diverse bacterial community as NOPPA15 according to Shannon diversity index (H' 6.52).  Abundant ASVs in MIETO17 affiliated with Desulfobacterota (10 %), Dehalococcoidia (9 %), <italic>Rhodoferax</italic>, <italic>Omnitrophus</italic> and Patescibacteria (6 % relative abundance each), Nitrospirota (4 %) and Sva0485, recently named as <italic>Candidatus</italic> Acidulodesulfobacterales (Tan et al., 2019) (3 %). Most common ASVs in LOHI30 were <italic>Candidatus</italic> Omnitrophus (13 %), <italic>Ferribacterium</italic> (8 %), <italic>Acetobacterium</italic> (8 %), Dehalococcoidia (7 %), <italic>Rhodoferax</italic> (6 %), <italic>Desulfurivibrio</italic> (6 %), and <italic>Gallionella</italic> (4 %). Similarly, in HARJA10, <italic>Candidatus</italic> Omnitrophus was among the most dominant ASVs (13 % relative abundance) together with Desulfobacterota (16 %), Sva0485 (10 %) and Dehalococcoidia (8 %).</p>
      <p id="d2e6097">Archaeal 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was successful from HARJA10, HÄJY30, MIETO17, MIHP15, NOPPA15 and R56. In total 902 598 archaeal sequences were retrieved, and after quality control and chimera removal steps, 93 %–96 % of the reads were retained (Table S2). A total of 11 different archaeal phyla were identified, and most prevalent phyla were Nanoarchaeota, Micrarchaeota and Crenarchaeota (Table S3). NOPPA15 hosted the most diverse archaeal community (H' 5.97), similar to bacteria (Fig. 5B and Table S2). Most archaeal sequences were affiliated with Nanoarchaota phylum in NOPPA15, HÄJY30, MIETO17 and HARJA10, with ASVs belonging to <italic>Woesearcheales</italic> candidate order (74 %, 75 %, 54 %, 40 % relative abundances, respectively) (Figs. 5B and S1b). Bathyarchaea -affiliating archaeal ASVs were also relatively abundant in these samples. <italic>Candidatus</italic> Methanoperedens and <italic>Methanomassiliicoccales</italic>-affiliating ASVs were abundant in HARJA 10 (18 % and 7 % relative abundance, respectively), and in R56 (21 % and 6 %). R56 also had a 11 % relative abundance of <italic>Methanobacterium</italic>, in addition to abundant <italic>Woesearchales</italic> (23 %) and Bathyarchaeia (20 %). MIHP15 hosted the least diverse archaeal community (H' 2.05) that differed from other samples (Fig. 5B and Table S2).  <italic>Methanoregula</italic>, <italic>Methanobacterium</italic>, and <italic>Methanospirillum</italic>-affiliating ASVs were dominating the archaeal community in this borehole (50 %, 28 % and 12 % relative abundances, respectively).</p>
      <p id="d2e6125">Fungal ITS1 amplicon sequencing was successful from the same samples as archaea. Altogether 649 988 sequences were retrieved, but after rigorous quality filtering and chimera removal steps, on average only 41 % of sequences were kept (Table S2). This level was somewhat expected because of high natural length variability of fungal ITS amplicons and typically lower quality of reverse reads that are dropped from the analysis together with their forward pair. Filtering primarily removed low-quality reads and improved the accuracy of ASV inference. According to the Shannon index, the most diverse fungal community was observed in R56 (H' 4.04) and least diverse in MIHP15 (H' 2.22) (Fig. 5C and Table S2). Most of the detected fungal phyla belonged to either Ascomycota or Basidiomycota, and relatively most abundant ASVs affiliated with Cladosporium and <italic>Bulleribasidiaceae</italic> (Figs. 5C and S1c). In addition to these, R56 fungal community was composed of <italic>Claviceps</italic> and <italic>Rhodotorula</italic> (8 % and 6 % relative abundances). Fungal communities in NOPPA15, HÄJY30, MIHP15 and MIETO17 all had <italic>Filobasidium</italic>-affiliating ASVs (7 %, 9 %, 5 % and 13 % of the community, respectively). <italic>Itersonilia</italic> affiliating ASV was more typical to HÄJY30 (9 %) than to other samples, and <italic>Melanommataceae</italic>-affiliating ASV was most relatively most abundant in NOPPA15 (7 %). A large portion (57 %) of the fungal community in HARJA10 could not be identified beyond kingdom-level.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e6150">Groundwater microbial communities. Bar plots show the relative abundances of different <bold>(A)</bold> bacterial, <bold>(B)</bold> archaeal, and <bold>(C)</bold> fungal phyla and heatmaps represent 25 most abundant orders of    <bold>(A)</bold> bacteria, <bold>(B)</bold> archaea and <bold>(C)</bold> fungi.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e6188">Hydrogeological studies rely on the use of various tracers, most often field measurement data and laboratory analysis of hydrogeochemical parameters, i.e., major ion and trace element concentrations. Natural tracers have been expanded to include the use of different isotopes and microbial communities, in addition to groundwater age tracers such as dissolved gases (e.g., CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These techniques can be used to assess the physical, biological and chemical processes that take place in a hydrogeological setting (Divine and McDonnell, 2005).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>The origin and age of groundwater in Kurikka according to tested tracers</title>
      <p id="d2e6209">Classical hydrogeochemical and isotopic tracers provide the first-order framework for identifying groundwater origin, residence time and degree of mixing in the Kurikka aquifer system. Geochemistry of the sampled water provided initial information about the origin of groundwater in the complex aquifer system in Kurikka. The distinct EC values between unconsolidated aquifer groundwaters (90–204 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bedrock groundwater (296 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicate different mineralization levels. Higher EC in bedrock groundwater suggests more evolved water, indicating longer residence time allowing for mineral weathering influencing total dissolved solids (TDS).  Similarly, the higher pH in bedrock groundwater (8.4), compared to unconsolidated aquifer groundwater (6.2–6.8), is consistent with prolonged water-rock interaction in the bedrock environment and influence of silicate weathering (Frengstad et al., 2001). In deep bedrock environment in Finland, where fluids have retention times of tens of millions of years, groundwaters also have high TDS, EC and pH (Kietäväinen et al., 2013). Major ion composition provided similar characterization of groundwater types. Unconsolidated aquifer groundwater being calcium-bicarbonate (Ca–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or mixed cations–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> type, and bedrock groundwater being sodium-bicarbonate (Na–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) type, indicate different geochemical processes and sources. Often the presence of nitrates and higher chloride levels can indicate anthropogenic influences, such as agriculture, or recent recharge events in groundwater. However, the elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations observed in bedrock groundwater are more plausibly attributed to prolonged water–rock interaction, rather than anthropogenic inputs, as the relatively thick fine-grained silt layers overlying the Quaternary deposits limit downward transport from the surface (Åberg et al., 2026).</p>
      <p id="d2e6295">The partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) provides insight into groundwater interaction with soil-derived CO<sub>2</sub> during recharge (Clark 2015).  In water samples from unconsolidated aquifer groundwaters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values consistently exceeded atmospheric levels (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.0) indicating an open <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system conditions and equilibration with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced in the soil zone during infiltration (Appelo and Postma, 2004; Clark, 2015; Freeze and Cherry, 1979). This suggests active exchange between infiltrating groundwater and biologically driven <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the unsaturated zone, consistent with relatively shallow circulation and ongoing soil-water interaction. In contrast, the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in bedrock groundwater suggests closed-system conditions, where recharge waters are largely decoupled from the soil zone <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs, implying more restricted gas exchange and longer residence times.</p>
      <p id="d2e6438">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from the sampled waters lie on or near the meteoric water lines except for the R56 and MIHP15 samples, that plot, albeit very slightly, above the meteoric water lines.  Bedrock groundwater samples may plot above the meteoric water line in the case of prolonged water-rock interaction (Kietäväinen et al., 2013).  The longer residence time enables the chemical processes (e.g. silicate hydrolysis) in the water-rock interaction, that can fractionate the isotopic compositions of the water stable isotopes (Kietäväinen et al., 2013).  These processes may also explain the MIHP15 water sample plotting slightly above the meteoric water lines, since the MIHP15 well reaches the lowermost aquifer, and most likely has active hydraulic connections to the fractured bedrock below.</p>
      <p id="d2e6467">The local geology is dominated by crystalline silicate bedrock, including biotite paragneiss, granite, and diorite, which host Rb-bearing silicate minerals. Rubidium-87 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decays to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values may result from felsic mineralogy or silicate weathering that liberates radiogenic strontium inherited from the host rocks (Ikonen et al., 2025; Négrel et al., 2018). The isotopic compositions of strontium in the groundwater samples from the study site vary significantly. Although the bedrock in Kurikka is rich in Rb-bearing mica minerals (biotite and muscovite), which are potential sources of radiogenic strontium, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in the R56 bedrock groundwater sample was lower than in most unconsolidated aquifer water samples, except for HÄJY30 and MIHP15. This would suggest mixing with groundwater that is enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from a different mineralogical locality, or heterogeneity in the geochemistry of the aquifer system. A study conducted in Palmottu, southern Finland, an area with bedrock geology similar to that of Kurikka, reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranging between 0.71999 and 0.75079 in bedrock groundwater samples (Négrel et al., 2003). These values correspond not only to the bedrock groundwater sample R56 in Kurikka, but also to the other samples analysed in this study.  If there are hydraulic connections, the mixing of different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> end-member waters is the most likely explanation for the varying Sr isotopic compositions in the lower-most unconsolidated aquifer water samples.</p>
      <p id="d2e6584">In a plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus the reciprocal Sr concentration (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), binary mixing between end members forms a straight line (Fig. 6).  The two dotted lines (red and blue) represent binary mixing trends. The samples near the red dotted mixing line (MIHP15, HÄJY11, MIHP6 and KUU19), represent influence of the Paloluoma and Häjyluoma buried valley modern/young groundwater. The sample points MIHP15 and MIHP6 are located fairly near the Kyrönjoki valley, but the natural flow of groundwater in the Paloluoma valley towards south has a volume that overrides the influence of the larger Kyrönjoki valley groundwater in those sites (Fig. 1). The remaining samples on the blue mixing line (LOHI30, HARJA10 and MIETO17) represent the Kyrönjoki valley groundwater, central part of the buried valley aquifer system, where there is northbound groundwater flow (Fig. 1).  The mixing line does not clearly represent this south–north direction, due to hydraulic connections from the large watershed that exists west of LOHI30 (Åberg et al., 2026: Appendix A1; Fig. 3). The sample point NOPPA15 is located north of the buried valley site, and the water sample represents a different geological and geochemical environment representing topmost part of the shallow sedimentary sequence outside the buried valley aquifer system. Therefore, it is most unlikely that there is a hydraulic connection between NOPPA15 and the other sampling sites although it appears as a continuation of the blue mixing line (Fig. 6). R56 and HÄJY30 show non-conservative behaviour outside the two mixing lines. This is most likely explained by bedrock groundwater influence. While R56 is a bedrock groundwater well, HÄJY30 is situated in the most central part of the aquifer system on the bedrock fracture zone, where highly artesian groundwater with heavy outflow character may reflect bedrock groundwater influence creating an additional endmember to the three portrayed in the diagram.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e6622">On the left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values vs. the reciprocal of the Sr concentration with mixing lines (red and blue dotted lines) suggesting several endmembers. NOPPA15 is marked as belonging to a different geochemical environment due to the geology of the area and the characteristics of the groundwater well. Bedrock influence connects the two outliers R56 and HÄJY30. On the right the sulphur concentration vs. the isotopic composition of sulphur (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in permille. NOPPA15 marked again as representing a different system.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/4463/2026/bg-23-4463-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6663">As with the isotopic compositions of strontium the variation in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values is noticeable (1.1 ‰–30.3 ‰).  Microbial processes are the most important cause of fractionation for the sulphur isotopes (Canfield, 2001). Due to the microbial reduction of sulphate, the lighter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope is removed from the solution (Kaplan and Rittenberg, 1964). A noticeable fractionation of sulphur isotopes can be seen in the samples MIHP15, HÄJY30, HARJA10, R56 and LOHI30 with enriched <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The rest of the samples KUU19, MIETO17, MIHP6 and HÄJY11, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values 5.3 ‰–8.8 ‰), seem to reflect the atmospheric isotopic compositions of sulphur (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 ‰ to 10 ‰) (Clark and Fritz, 1997). In addition, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of NOPPA15 stands out, similarly to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a lower isotopic composition and higher sulphur and sulphate concentration to the rest of the samples (Fig. 6). This indicates a sulphur/sulphate source with minimal heavy isotope enrichment and agrees with the microbial community structure with low abundance of sulphate reducers (see Sect. 4.2.1 below). The oxidation-reduction potential in NOPPA15 was close to 0, so neither oxidation nor reduction reactions are strongly favoured. NOPPA15 water sample had a lighter isotopic composition of sulphur compared to the other samples, suggesting minimal influence from biological processes that typically fractionate sulphur. Furthermore, different mineralogy and water flow paths from the recharge site also probably play a part in the isotope geochemistry in the sampled water from NOPPA15. Thus, NOPPA15 stands out due to its location reflecting a context of a modern esker in the Nenättömänluoma valley (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p id="d2e6788">Residence time tracers show the presence of a modern water component in four unconsolidated aquifer groundwater locations. This is consistent with a less evolved water type and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values indicative of open-system conditions. In contrast, the only bedrock borehole R56 represents sub-modern water (probably some 10 000 years old, free of CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration), with a more evolved water type, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values reflecting a closed system. The elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in all samples complicates or prevents the evaluation of groundwater residence times and mixing proportions using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> technique (Shapiro et al., 1998).  When radiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is abundant, accurately separating the tritiogenic helium component becomes challenging and highly uncertain. The use of CFCs as tracers is constrained by their absence, localized contamination (e.g., NOPPA15, KUU19), or microbial degradation by sulphate-reducing microbes in the anoxic conditions of this environment (e.g., HARJA10) (Sonier et al., 1994).</p>
      <p id="d2e6904">All samples showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations well above solubility equilibrium with modern atmosphere. We concluded that the excessive concentrations are derived from a local natural geogenic source (presence of granite, granodiorite). Similarly, occurrences of extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values due to natural sources have also been reported in southern Sweden (Åkesson et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d2e6930">While hydrogeochemical parameters, water stable isotopes, strontium, sulfur isotopes and age tracers consistently distinguish between the unconsolidated aquifer and bedrock groundwater, they do not unambiguously resolve mixing proportions or hydraulic connectivity in the area. This ambiguity highlights the limitations of classical tracers alone in highly heterogeneous buried valley systems and motivates the integration of microbial community data, i.e., the microbial fingerprint.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Hydrogeochemistry is reflected in the microbial community structure of the groundwater</title>
      <p id="d2e6941">Microbial ecology analyses provide an independent and integrative line of evidence for residence times, groundwater redox conditions, and potential hydraulic connectivity. First, microbial diversity followed roughly the groundwater residence times, supporting the integration of microbial community analysis into a multitracer hydrogeological investigation.  Groundwaters with a significant modern recharge component and open system conditions generally hosted more diverse bacterial and archaeal communities, whereas older and chemically more evolved groundwaters, including the bedrock groundwater, showed lower prokaryotic diversity and dominance of taxa adapted to oligotrophic and energy-limited environments. This pattern is consistent with previous observations that older groundwaters provide fewer and less diverse energy substrates, thereby constraining the microbial diversity (Ben Maamar et al., 2015; Griebler and Lueders, 2009). Although all sampled groundwaters were significantly younger, the diversity indices were approximately at similar level with studies of significantly deeper and older groundwater samples from Fennoscandian bedrock (Kietäväinen et al., 2014; Purkamo et al., 2016). The bedrock groundwater well R56 also hosted a microbial community with a distinct member, <italic>Hydrogenophaga</italic>-affiliating bacteria, which have been detected previously from older groundwaters from Canada (Ruff et al., 2023) and millions of years old, deep drillhole fluids from Fennoscandian bedrock in Finland (e.g., Kietäväinen et al., 2014; Purkamo et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d2e6947">In contrast, fungal communities did not show a consistent relationship with groundwater residence time, suggesting differing ecological controls compared to prokaryotic communities.</p>
      <p id="d2e6950">Microbial community composition also supported interpretation derived from sulfur isotopes and redox-sensitive geochemical parameters. The analysis method used for analysing the isotopic composition of sulphur from the water samples converts all the sulphur components into sulphate as described in Paris et al. (2013), and sulphide was not analysed separately. With the prevailing conditions of low organic matter, dissolved oxygen levels 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or above, and at least in places high ORP, sulphur in groundwater most likely occurs mainly as sulphate. This supposition is backed by the fact that during field work no sampling site was reported as having the smell of sulphide. Sites with enriched <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (R56, HÄJY30, and MIHP15) hosted substantial populations of sulphate-reducers (e.g., <italic>Desulfovibrio</italic>, <italic>Desulfosporosinus</italic>, <italic>Desulfurivibrio</italic>) indicating active or past microbial sulfate reduction under reducing conditions (Fig. S2).  Conversely, groundwater from NOPPA15, characterised by oxic to weakly reducing conditions, low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and elevated sulfate concentrations, exhibited a low abundance of sulfate reducers, consistent with minimal sulfur isotope fractionation. The coherence between sulfur isotope fractionation and sulfate-reducing microbial abundance demonstrated that microbial data provide support for isotope-based interpretations and help distinguish between geochemical mixing and <italic>in situ</italic> biogeochemical transformation.</p>
      <p id="d2e7009">Microbes associated with iron cycling were detected in most of the samples, reflecting the prevalence of redox transitions in the aquifer system. The presence of both iron-reducing and iron-oxidizing taxa, including organisms capable of flexible metabolic strategies, like Rhodoferax (Kato and Ohkuma, 2021) or some Gallionellaceae (Hoover et al., 2023), suggests dynamic and spatially variable redox environments characteristic of buried valley aquifers. At HARJA10, high organic carbon availability appears to favour heterotrophic metabolisms and suppress chemolithoautotrophic iron oxidizers, such as <italic>Gallionella</italic>-type of bacteria using inorganic carbon for growth (Hallbeck and Pedersen, 2014). These observations suggest that iron cycling is locally controlled by carbon availability and redox heterogeneity rather than groundwater age alone.</p>
      <p id="d2e7016">Carbon cycling within the groundwater system in Kurikka appears to be primarily dominated by heterotrophic fermenters and mixotrophic microorganisms adapted to oligotrophic conditions. Heterotrophic fermenters affiliated with Candidatus <italic>Omnitrophus</italic> (phylum Omnitrophota, formerly OP3) were abundant across several sites, consistent with their frequent detection and high relative abundance in groundwater environments (Perez-Molphe-Montoya et al., 2022; Suominen et al., 2021; Williams et al., 2021). <italic>Omnitrophales</italic>-affiliating bacteria have been described as a type species from deep underground mine groundwaters (Momper et al., 2017), and are thought to play a central role in mediating carbon cycling, mostly relying on organic carbon fermentation. In addition, some Omnitrophota possess metabolic flexibility, including mixotrophy and ability to utilize the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway to carbon dioxide fixation and acetate production (Perez-Molphe-Montoya et al., 2022). A high relative abundance of <italic>Omnitrophus</italic> was also observed in samples with elevated Sr concentrations and detectable chromium concentrations is consistent with previous studies showing dominant <italic>Omnitrophales</italic> or <italic>Verrucomicrobiota</italic> in environments with enriched elevated concentrations of these trace metals (Bärenstrauch et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d2e7034">Patescibacteria-affiliating ASVs were prevalent in groundwater prokaryotic communities observed in this study, consistent with previous studies (Lyons et al., 2021; Schwab et al., 2017). Their streamlined genomes and limited biosynthetic capabilities suggest a primarily fermentative metabolism and strong dependence on metabolic interactions with other community members (Bärenstrauch et al., 2022; Chaudhari et al., 2021; Luef et al., 2015). The frequent co-occurrence of Patescibacteria, Omnitrophota and Nitrospirota, as was the case in the Kurikka aquifer system, indicates networking and potential syntrophic dependencies between these microbial components of the community, potentially facilitating organic carbon degradation and recycling under energy-limited conditions, as proposed in previous studies (Chaudhari et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d2e7037">Archaeal communities further reinforce the importance of fermentation-based carbon cycling in Kurikka groundwater. Archaeal assemblages were dominated by Woesearchaeales, which are commonly detected from groundwater environments and are believed to rely on fermentation-based metabolisms under anoxic conditions (Castelle et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2018). Similarly, other dominant group Bathyarchaeia, have been associated with complex organic matter degradation and fermentative lifestyle (Hou et al., 2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e7040">The combined dominance of fermentative bacteria and archaea, together with the presence of homoacetogenic microorganisms, indicates somewhat internally sustained carbon cycle within the aquifer system. Acetate produced through fermentation and homoacetogenesis can serve as a central intermediate, supporting not only heterotrophic microbes but also sulphate reducing community by providing a continuous source of suitable substrate for energy and growth (Lever, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d2e7043">Despite the limited understanding of fungal metabolic capabilities in groundwater systems (Retter et al., 2024), most taxa identified here belong to saprotrophic lineages that are typically adapted to oligotrophic conditions. It is likely that the fungal communities in Kurikka sites are originating from surface environments, as many taxa are associated with soil, plant litter or phyllosphere inputs (Retter et al., 2024) and are distinct from the deeper bedrock groundwater communities described previously (Purkamo et al., 2018; Sohlberg et al., 2015). The observation of microbial communities with versatile carbon metabolism strategies supports a subsurface carbon cycle capable of sustaining microbial activity in these energy-limited groundwater environments.</p>
      <p id="d2e7046">Nitrogen-cycling microorganisms, particularly Nitrospirae-related taxa, were detected mainly under hypoxic to anoxic conditions, and the detected Nitrospirota lineages here showed similarities with the findings of Mosley et al. (2024), showing that the majority of Nitrospirota genomes recovered from aquifers possess metabolic traits linked to anaerobic nitrogen and sulphur. Other recent studies highlight the importance of Nitrospirae in groundwater ecosystems and their diverse metabolic abilities (Mosley et al., 2024; Poghosyan et al., 2019; Schwab et al., 2017). The distribution of these taxa further reflects advanced, post-denitrification redox conditions and supports the interpretation that nitrogen transformations pathways in the aquifer are shaped primarily by oxygen availability and groundwater residence time.</p>
      <p id="d2e7050">Low biomass in groundwater samples resulted in very small amounts of recoverable DNA, which is the probable cause for unsuccessful retrieval of sequencing data from KUU19, MIHP6 and HÄJY11. Additionally, only bacterial community from LOHI30 could be retrieved. Archaea are typically less abundant in groundwater environments compared to bacteria, and with low amount of DNA to begin with here, sequencing has missed the archaea.  Similarly, the abundance of fungal cells in groundwaters might be much lower than bacteria, and additionally, fungi may also require more rigorous cell-disruption steps during extraction compared to prokaryotes, causing a reduced fungal DNA yield and unsuccessful sequencing here. In addition, the filters used here were not specifically designed for this purpose, so methodological limitations may have led to inefficient biomass elution and low final DNA recovery. One potential reason for low DNA recovery could also be organic compounds interfering with the DNA extraction, as we detected a brownish colour emerging to the filters while pumping the groundwater through.</p>
      <p id="d2e7053">Overall, microbial community structure provides mechanistic support for hydrogeochemical and isotopic interpretations and helps distinguish between groundwater mixing and in situ biogeochemical transformation in this complex buried valley aquifer system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Usability of tested tracers in complex aquifers</title>
      <p id="d2e7064">The tracers applied in this study provide valuable initial insights into the Kurikka buried valley aquifer system and demonstrate their potential for supporting further hydrogeological characterization, even though some limitations were identified. Despite the challenges brought by observation wells with long screens (12–30 m) and single-campaign sampling, the combination of isotopic, residence time and microbial approaches produced a broad and informative view of groundwater processes in a geologically complex setting.</p>
      <p id="d2e7067">Water stable isotopes proved effective in establishing that sampled groundwaters do not contain a surface water component. Their clear and consistent signatures form a robust baseline for tracing future hydraulic changes influenced by extensive groundwater extraction. Although spatial variability exists, strontium isotope signatures provide an important reference for identifying mixing of groundwaters in the Kurikka buried valley aquifer system as pumping tests continue and more sampling campaigns are carried out.</p>
      <p id="d2e7070">This single-campaign study excludes the seasonal changes in redox conditions that might affect the S isotopic compositions, or the seasonal changes in the isotopic compositions of water stable isotopes in precipitation. Furthermore, the sampling was done from only 10 locations. For a more complete hydrogeochemical assessment of the end-member compositions more sampling around the study area can be recommended and will be published as results of the additional hydrogeological investigations of the study area.</p>
      <p id="d2e7073">The applicability of different environmental tracers for groundwater age dating was assessed in this study. While CFCs, noble gases and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were rendered unreliable by tracer degradation, contamination, excess air and in-situ production process, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> method yielded robust age estimates for selected samples, despite elevated radiogenic helium concentrations. These results underline the need for site-specific tracer assessment and confirm that meaningful groundwater residence times can be derived even in complex hydrogeological settings. An advantage would be observation wells with short filter screen of for example <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Tritium with low detection limit, achievable with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ingrowth method, as well as radiocarbon emerge as promising options for improving residence time estimates and identification of old groundwater components in the system.</p>
      <p id="d2e7138">Microbial community profiling revealed differences between the sites.  However, many phyla and orders are shared among all sites, this taxonomic overlap limits their use as standalone tracers. Greater resolution might be achieved by examining lower taxonomic levels, and while partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing typically lacks species-level accuracy (Johnson et al., 2019), this can be circumvented by sequencing the whole 16S rRNA gene using long-read approaches. Specific taxa, such as <italic>Hydrogenophaga</italic>, show promise as indicators of specific environments like bedrock groundwater. The microbial community diversity also tracked well with groundwater age, supporting their use as complementary tracers of subsurface environments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions and Implications</title>
      <p id="d2e7153">This study highlighted the unique characteristics of deep groundwaters found in the buried valley aquifer system in Kurikka, focusing on combined isotopic, residence time and microbial tracer analyses. Together, these approaches provide a robust, first-order understanding of the groundwater system structure, connectivity and functioning prior to extensive groundwater extraction. The findings indicate that the groundwater in the Paloluoma Valley and Harjankylä in the Kyrönjoki Valley appear to be younger compared to the other areas in the Kyrönjoki Valley. This is attributed to the proximity of recharge areas, an important observation for groundwater management, as it indicates areas where the system may respond more rapidly to pumping and seasonal variations. Isotopic compositions of oxygen and hydrogen confirm that no surface water component is present in the groundwater samples. Strontium isotopes reflect local mineralogy and establish a reference for future mixing studies, assuming the pumping tests will influence the hydraulic connections in the aquifer system. Isotopic evidence suggests hydraulic connectivity between the lowermost aquifer and the underlying fractured bedrock. Although the extent of the fractured bedrock as a water reservoir remains unclear, the isotope data indicate that interactions between the two units are likely. The study shows that several environmental tracers for groundwater residence time determination fail under the investigated conditions. However, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> method remained applicable for samples with measurable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Groundwater residence time estimates indicate predominantly modern water. This further supports the interpretation that where mixing occurs between water from the bedrock surface and the lowermost unconsolidated aquifer, the groundwater flow within the fractured bedrock is likely relatively unrestricted.</p>
      <p id="d2e7192">The results demonstrate that groundwater microbial communities are diverse and vary distinctly between the studied sites along the aquifer system in Kurikka. The bedrock-related microbial community exhibits special features compared to the groundwaters from shallower unconsolidated aquifers. The site at a more superficial esker system with relatively young groundwater hosted the most diverse prokaryotic community, whereas bedrock with the oldest waters supported the lowest diversity. This age-dependent trend is consistent with geochemical expectations for deep, isolated groundwater environments.</p>
      <p id="d2e7195">Sulphur isotope compositions in the groundwater further reinforce the link between geochemistry and microbiology.</p>
      <p id="d2e7198">Because this study was conducted prior to large-scale groundwater extraction, the geochemical, isotopic, residence time and microbial data presented here form an essential baseline. Thus, each sampling site can serve as an endmember against which future changes can be evaluated.  Establishing these initial conditions is important for detecting shifts in e.g., geochemical pathways or microbial activity that may arise as the aquifer system responds to stress.</p>
      <p id="d2e7202">Although one of the aims of this study was to assess whether a combined multitracer approach could resolve hydraulic connectivity and flow dynamics within this complex buried valley system, the present dataset provides only preliminary indications rather than definitive evidence. Isotopic, microbial and sulphur-isotope patterns point to potential zones of interaction between aquifer units, but limitations in spatial coverage, well construction and temporal resolution prevent firm conclusions regarding flow paths or mixing processes. Instead, the results identify where such connections may exist and highlight which tracers are most promising for future high-resolution investigations. The multitracer framework establishes the methodological foundation for future studies designed to rigorously test this hypothesis under expanded sampling and pumping conditions. Although the dataset is limited, the results demonstrate that integrating microbial community structure with classical hydrogeochemical and isotopic tracers improves interpretation of groundwater connectivity and biogeochemical processes compared to using conventional tracers alone.</p>
      <p id="d2e7205">Further research is still required to clarify outstanding questions, including the extent of hydraulic conductivity between different parts of the aquifer and the fractured bedrock underneath, and its role as a potential flow path. Nonetheless, the insights gained here provide a foundation for understanding and managing groundwater resources. These results serve as key references for interpreting test pumping data and future investigations in the unique Kurikka buried valley aquifer system.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e7212">All data is available either in the publication, in its Supplement, or NCBI's SRA (<uri>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA1270735</uri>, NIH, 2026) under BioProject PRJNA1270735 (sequence data).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e7218">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-4463-2026-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-4463-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e7227">LP, JI and M-AP jointly conceptualized the idea, conducted the investigation, analysed the data and wrote and edited the original manuscript. NP took part in conceptualization, provided funding and resources and commented on the original manuscript. JS took part in investigation and participated in the revision of the manuscript. MM took part in investigation and commented on the original manuscript. A-MH took part in conceptualization, investigation and analysis of the data and writing and editing of the original manuscript.  TP provided resources and participated in conceptualization of the idea. ITM provided funding and resources and mentoring during idea conceptualization.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e7233">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e7240">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e7246">Arto Pullinen, Salla Valpola, Vaula Lukkarinen and Kim Wennman are thanked for their help during the fieldwork. Yann Lahaye, Mia Tiljander, Meiru Zhou and Katariina Issukka at the GTK laboratory, and the personnel of laboratory of water microbiology at THL are acknowledged for their contribution to laboratory analyses. Nina Hendriksson and Aleksi Tuunainen are thanked for the helpful comments and aid with the characteristics of groundwater wells.  Authors also thank the Kurikka Aquifer project consortium partners: Kurikan Vesihuolto Oy, Vaasan Vesi, and ELY Centre for South Ostrobothnia (EPOELY) for funding and resources for the project. We are also sincerely thankful to all private landowners who allowed access to the sampling sites. During the preparation of this manuscript the authors used Microsoft Copilot to improve language and readability. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e7252">This paper was edited by Mark Lever and reviewed by four anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Åberg, A. K., Korkka-Niemi, K., Åberg, S. C., and Rautio, A.: Application of 3D hydrogeochemistry and particle tracking in detecting groundwater flow patterns within an aapa mire–outwash plain system in a boreal environment at a mining development site, Appl. Geochem., 186, 106360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOCHEM.2025.106360" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.APGEOCHEM.2025.106360</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Åberg, A. K., Putkinen, N., Eyles, N., Davidila, J., and Malinowski, M.: 3D hydrostratigraphic architecture of a Late Pleistocene buried valley infill at Kurikka, west-central Finland, Quatern. Int., 755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2025.110080" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quaint.2025.110080</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Åkesson, M., Suckow, A., Visser, A., Sültenfuss, J., Laier, T., Purtschert, R., and Sparrenbom, C. J.: Constraining age distributions of groundwater from public supply wells in diverse hydrogeological settings in Scania, Sweden, J. Hydrol., 528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.022</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Abarenkov, K., Nilsson, R. H., Larsson, K. H., Taylor, A. F. S., May, T. W., Frøslev, T. G., Pawlowska, J., Lindahl, B., Põldmaa, K., Truong, C., Vu, D., Hosoya, T., Niskanen, T., Piirmann, T., Ivanov, F., Zirk, A., Peterson, M., Cheeke, T. E., Ishigami, Y., Jansson, A. T., Jeppesen, T. S., Kristiansson, E., Mikryukov, V., Miller, J. T., Oono, R., Ossandon, F. J., Paupério, J., Saar, I., Schigel, D., Suija, A., Tedersoo, L., and Kõljalg, U.: The UNITE database for molecular identification and taxonomic communication of fungi and other eukaryotes: sequences, taxa and classifications reconsidered, Nucleic Acids Res., 52, D791–D797, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKAD1039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/NAR/GKAD1039</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Andersen, K. S., Kirkegaard, R. H., Karst, S. M., and Albertsen, M.: ampvis2: an R package to analyse and visualise 16S rRNA amplicon data, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/299537" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1101/299537</ext-link>, 11 April 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Appelo, C. A. J. and Postma, D.: Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution, 2nd edn., Geochemistry, Groundw. Pollution, 1–649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439833544" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/9781439833544</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Apprill, A., McNally, S., Parsons, R., and Weber, L.: Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 75, 129–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01753" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/ame01753</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Ben Maamar, S., Aquilina, L., Quaiser, A., Pauwels, H., Michon-Coudouel, S., Vergnaud-Ayraud, V., Labasque, T., Roques, C., Abbott, B. W., and Dufresne, A.: Groundwater isolation governs chemistry and microbial community structure along hydrologic flowpaths, Front. Microbiol., 6, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01457" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2015.01457</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bärenstrauch, M., Vanhove, A. S., Allégra, S., Peuble, S., Gallice, F., Paran, F., Lavastre, V., and Girardot, F.: Microbial diversity and geochemistry of groundwater impacted by steel slag leachates, Sci. Total Environ., 843, 156987, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.156987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.156987</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., and Holmes, S. P.: DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data, Nat. Methods, 13, 581, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NMETH.3869" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NMETH.3869</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Canfield, D. E.: Biogeochemistry of sulfur isotopes, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.607</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Carreira, P. M. and Marques, J. M.: The Use of Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology, Water, 16, 914,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w16070914" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w16070914</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Castelle, C. J., Wrighton, K. C., Thomas, B. C., Hug, L. A., Brown, C. T., Wilkins, M. J., Frischkorn, K. R., Tringe, S. G., Singh, A., Markillie, L. M., Taylor, R. C., Williams, K. H., and Banfield, J. F.: Genomic expansion of domain archaea highlights roles for organisms from new phyla in anaerobic carbon cycling, Curr. Biol., 25, 690–701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.014</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cauquoin, A., Fourré, Landais, A., Okazaki, A., and Yoshimura, K.: Modeling Natural Tritium in Precipitation and its Dependence on Decadal Solar Activity Variations Using the Atmospheric General Circulation Model MIROC5-Iso, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039745" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JD039745</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Chaudhari, N. M., Overholt, W. A., Figueroa-Gonzalez, P. A., Taubert, M., Bornemann, T. L. V., Probst, A. J., Hölzer, M., Marz, M., and Küsel, K.: The economical lifestyle of CPR bacteria in groundwater allows little preference for environmental drivers, Environ. Microbiomes, 16, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-021-00395-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40793-021-00395-w</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Clark, I.: Groundwater geochemistry and isotopes, CRC press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, US, 438 p., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b18347" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/b18347</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Clark, I. and Fritz, P.: Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology, CRC press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, US, 328 p., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/B18347" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/B18347</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Cloutier, V., Lefebvre, R., Savard, M. M., Bourque, É., and Therrien, R.: Hydrogeochemistry and groundwater origin of the Basses-Laurentides sedimentary rock aquifer system, St. Lawrence Lowlands, Québec, Canada, Hydrogeol. J., 14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-005-0002-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-005-0002-3</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Cook, P. G. and Solomon, D. K.: Recent advances in dating young groundwater: Chlorofluorocarbons, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Hydrol., 191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03051-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03051-X</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>de Vries A. and Ripley, B. D.:   ggdendro: Create Dendrograms and Tree Diagrams Using “ggplot2”, R package version 0.2.0, <uri>https://andrie.github.io/ggdendro/</uri> (last access: 17 November 2025), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Divine, C. E. and McDonnell, J. J.: The future of applied tracers in hydrogeology, Hydrogeol. J., 13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0416-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-004-0416-3</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Freeze, R. A. and Cherry, J. A.: Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 604 p., ISBN 9780133653120, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Frengstad, B., Banks, D., and Siewers, U.: The chemistry of Norwegian groundwaters: IV. The pH-dependence of element concentrations in crystalline bedrock groundwaters, Sci. Total Environ., 277, 101–117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00867-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00867-6</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gantner, S., Andersson, A. F., Alonso-Sáez, L., and Bertilsson, S.: Novel primers for 16S rRNA-based archaeal community analyses in environmental samples, J. Microbiol. Meth., 84, 12–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.001</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Griebler, C. and Lueders, T.: Microbial biodiversity in groundwater ecosystems, Freshwater Biol., 54, 649–677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02013.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02013.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Grönwall, J. and Danert, K.: Regarding groundwater and drinkingwater access through a human rights lens: Self-Supply as a norm, Water (Switzerland), 12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020419" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w12020419</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hall, A. M., Putkinen, N., Hietala, S., Lindsberg, E., and Holma, M.: Ultra-slow cratonic denudation in Finland since 1.5 Ga indicated by tiered unconformities and impact structures, Precambrian Res., 352, 106000, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2020.106000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2020.106000</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hallbeck, L. and Pedersen, K.: The family Gallionellaceae, in: The Prokaryotes: Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, edited by: Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E. F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., and Thompson, F., Springer, Berlin, 853–858, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30197-1_398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-30197-1_398</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Harrison, A. G. and Thode, H. G.: Sulphur Isotope Abundances in Hydrocarbons and Source Rocks of Uinta Basin, Utah, Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. B., 42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c00-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1306/0bda5c00-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d</ext-link>, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Herlemann, D. P., Labrenz, M., Jürgens, K., Bertilsson, S., Waniek, J. J., and Andersson, A. F.: Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea, ISME J., 5, 1571–1579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.41" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2011.41</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hoover, R. L., Keffer, J. L., Polson, S. W., and Chan, C. S.: Gallionellaceae pangenomic analysis reveals insight into phylogeny, metabolic flexibility, and iron oxidation mechanisms, mSystems, 8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/MSYSTEMS.00038-23/SUPPL_FILE/MSYSTEMS.00038-23-S0002.XLSX" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/MSYSTEMS.00038-23/SUPPL_FILE/MSYSTEMS.00038-23-S0002.XLSX</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hou, J., Yang, C., and Wang, F.: Carbon metabolic versatility underpins Bathyarchaeia ecological significance across the global deep subsurface, ISME J., 19, 259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ISMEJO/WRAF259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/ISMEJO/WRAF259</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Ikonen, J., Rauhala, A., Tuomela, A., Postila, H., Kumpula, T., Korpelainen, P., Pietilä, R., Valta, R. O., Lerssi, J., Panttila, H., and Korkka-Niemi, K.: Combining UAS-TIR and GEM-2 Techniques for Focused Water Sampling and Isotope Geochemical Analysis at Two Mine Sites in Northern Finland, Mine Water Environ., 44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-024-01020-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10230-024-01020-1</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Inkinen, J., Jayaprakash, B., Siponen, S., Hokajärvi, A. M., Pursiainen, A., Ikonen, J., Ryzhikov, I., Täubel, M., Kauppinen, A., Paananen, J., Miettinen, I. T., Torvinen, E., Kolehmainen, M., and Pitkänen, T.: Active eukaryotes in drinking water distribution systems of ground and surface waterworks, Microbiome, 7, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/S40168-019-0715-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/S40168-019-0715-5</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Jaunat, J., Huneau, F., Dupuy, A., Celle-Jeanton, H., Vergnaud-Ayraud, V., Aquilina, L., Labasque, T., and Le Coustumer, P.: Hydrochemical data and groundwater dating to infer differential flowpaths through weathered profiles of a fractured aquifer, Appl. Geochem., 27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.06.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.06.009</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, J. S., Spakowicz, D. J., Hong, B. Y., Petersen, L. M., Demkowicz, P., Chen, L., Leopold, S. R., Hanson, B. M., Agresta, H. O., Gerstein, M., Sodergren, E., and Weinstock, G. M.: Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis, Nat. Commun., 101, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13036-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-13036-1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, T. D., Belitz, K., Kauffman, L. J., Watson, E., and Wilson, J. T.: Populations using public-supply groundwater in the conterminous U. S. 2010; Identifying the wells, hydrogeologic regions, and hydrogeologic mapping units, Sci. Total Environ., 806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150618</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kaislaniemi, L.: Estimating the distribution of strontium isotope ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Precambrian of Finland, Bull. Geol. Soc. Finl., 83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17741/bgsf/83.2.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17741/bgsf/83.2.002</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kaplan, I. R. and Rittenberg, S. C.: Microbiological fractionation of sulphur isotopes, J. Gen. Microbiol., 34, 195–212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-34-2-195" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1099/00221287-34-2-195</ext-link>, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Kato, S. and Ohkuma, M.: A Single Bacterium Capable of Oxidation and Reduction of Iron at Circumneutral pH, Microbiol. Spectr., 9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/SPECTRUM.00161-21/SUPPL_FILE/SPECTRUM00161-21_SUPP_1_SEQ4.PDF" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/SPECTRUM.00161-21/SUPPL_FILE/SPECTRUM00161-21_SUPP_1_SEQ4.PDF</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kauppinen, A., Pitkänen, T., Al-Hello, H., Maunula, L., Hokajärvi, A. M., Rimhanen-Finne, R., and Miettinen, I. T.: Two Drinking Water Outbreaks Caused by Wastewater Intrusion Including Sapovirus in Finland, Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 16, 4376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH16224376" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/IJERPH16224376</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Kietäväinen, R., Ahonen, L., Kukkonen, I. T., Hendriksson, N., Nyyssönen, M., and Itävaara, M.: Characterisation and isotopic evolution of saline waters of the Outokumpu Deep Drill Hole, Finland–Implications for water origin and deep terrestrial biosphere, Appl. Geochem., 32, 37–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.10.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.10.013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Kietäväinen, R., Ahonen, L., Kukkonen, I. T., Niedermann, S., Wiersberg, T., Kietäväinen, R., Ahonen, L., Kukkonen, I. T., Niedermann, S., Wiersberg, T., Kieta, R., Ahonen, L., Kukkonen, I. T., Niedermann, S., and Wiersberg, T.: Noble gas residence times of saline waters within crystalline bedrock, Outokumpu Deep Drill Hole, Finland, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 145, 159–174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.09.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2014.09.012</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Kipfer, R., Aeschbach-Hertig, W., Peeters, F., and Stute, M.: Noble gases in lakes and ground waters, Rev. Mineral Geochem., 47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2002.47.14" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2138/rmg.2002.47.14</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Kløve, B., Kvitsand, H. M. L., Pitkänen, T., Gunnarsdottir, M. J., Gaut, S., Gardarsson, S. M., Rossi, P. M., and Miettinen, I.: Overview of groundwater sources and water-supply systems, and associated microbial pollution, in Finland, Norway and Iceland, Hydrogeol. J., 25, 1033–1044, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1552-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-017-1552-x</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Lahermo, P., Ilmasti, M., Juntunen, R., and Taka, M.: The hydrogeochemical mapping of Finnish groundwater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Suomen geokemian atlas. Osa 1: Suomen pohjavesien hydrokemiallinen kartoitus, Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Espoo, 66 p., ISBN 9516903746, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Lahtinen, R., Huhma, H., Sipilä, P., and Vaarma, M.: Geochemistry, U–Pb geochronology and Sm–Nd data from the Paleoproterozoic Western Finland supersuite – A key component in the coupled Bothnian oroclines, Precambrian Res., 299, 264–281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2017.07.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2017.07.025</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Lee, J. H., Lee, B. J., and Unno, T.: Bacterial Communities in Ground-and Surface Water Mixing Zone Induced by Seasonal Heavy Extraction of Groundwater, Geomicrobiol. J., 35, 768–774, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2018.1468834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01490451.2018.1468834</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Lever, M. A.: Acetogenesis in the energy-starved deep biosphere – a paradox?, Front. Microbiol., 2, 284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00284" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2011.00284</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Li, M., Castelle, C. J., Probst, A. J., Zhou, Z., Pan, J., Liu, Y., Banfield, J. F., and Gu, J. D.: Insights into the ecology, evolution, and metabolism of the widespread Woesearchaeotal lineages, Microbiome, 6, 102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0488-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40168-018-0488-2</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Luef, B., Frischkorn, K. R., Wrighton, K. C., Holman, H. N., Birarda, G., Thomas, B. C., Singh, A., Williams, K. H., Siegerist, C. E., Tringe, S. G., Downing, K. H., Comolli, L. R., and Banfield, J. F.: Diverse uncultivated ultra-small bacterial cells in groundwater, Nat. Commun., 6, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms7372</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Luoma, S., Majaniemi, J., Pullinen, A., Mursu, J., and Virtasalo, J. J.: Geological and groundwater flow model of a submarine groundwater discharge site at Hanko (Finland), northern Baltic Sea, Hydrogeol. J., 29, 1279–1297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02313-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-021-02313-3</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Luoma, S., Okkonen, J., Korkka-Niemi, K., Hendriksson, N., and Paalijärvi, M.: Characterization of Groundwater Geochemistry in an Esker Aquifer in Western Finland Based on Three Years of Monitoring Data, Water (Switzerland), 16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w16223301</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Lyons, K. J., Hokajärvi, A.-M., Ikonen, J., Kauppinen, A., Miettinen, I. T., Pitkänen, T., Rossi, P. M., and Kujala, K.: Surface Water Intrusion, Land Use Impacts, and Bacterial Community Composition in  Shallow Groundwater Wells Supplying Potable Water in Sparsely Populated Areas of a Boreal Region, Microbiology Spectrum, 9, e00179-21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00179-21" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/Spectrum.00179-21</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Martin, M.: Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads,  EMBnet. J., 17, 10–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14806/EJ.17.1.200" ext-link-type="DOI">10.14806/EJ.17.1.200</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Massmann, G., Sültenfuß, J., Dünnbier, U., Knappe, A., Taute, T., and Pekdeger, A.: Investigation of groundwater residence times during bank filtration in Berlin: A multi-tracer approach, Hydrol. Process., 22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.6649</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Mayer, A., Sültenfuß, J., Travi, Y., Rebeix, R., Purtschert, R., Claude, C., Le Gal La Salle, C., Miche, H., and Conchetto, E.: A multi-tracer study of groundwater origin and transit-time in the aquifers of the Venice region (Italy), Appl. Geochem., 50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.10.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.10.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>McMurdie, P. J. and Holmes, S.: Phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data, PLoS One, 8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0061217</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Merino, N., Jackson, T. R., Campbell, J. H., Kersting, A. B., Sackett, J., Fisher, J. C., Bruckner, J. C., Zavarin, M., Hamilton-Brehm, S. D., and Moser, D. P.: Subsurface microbial communities as a tool for characterizing regional-scale groundwater flow, Sci. Total Environ., 842, 156768, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.156768" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.156768</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Meyzonnat, G., Musy, S., Corcho-Alvarado, J. A., Barbecot, F., Pinti, D. L., Purtschert, R., Lauzon, J. M., and McCormack, R.: Age distribution of groundwater in fractured aquifers of the St. Lawrence Lowlands (Canada) determined by environmental tracers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CFC-12, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Hydrogeol. J., 31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02671-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-023-02671-0</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Momper, L., Jungbluth, S. P., Lee, M. D., and Amend, J. P.: Energy and carbon metabolisms in a deep terrestrial subsurface fluid microbial community, ISME J., 11, 2319–2333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.94" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2017.94</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Mosley, O. E., Gios, E., and Handley, K. M.: Implications for nitrogen and sulphur cycles: phylogeny and niche-range of Nitrospirota in terrestrial aquifers, ISME Commun., 4, 47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ISMECO/YCAE047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/ISMECO/YCAE047</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>National Ground Water Association: <uri>https://www.ngwa.org/what-is-groundwater/About-groundwater</uri>, last access: 1 April 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Négrel, P., Casanova, J., Blomqvist, R., Kaija, J., and Frape, S.: Strontium isotopic characterization of the Palmottu hydrosystem (Finland): Water-rock interaction and geochemistry of groundwaters, Geofluids, 3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-8123.2003.00056.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1468-8123.2003.00056.x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Négrel, P., Pauwels, H., and Chabaux, F.: Characterizing multiple water-rock interactions in the critical zone through Sr-isotope tracing of surface and groundwater, Appl. Geochem. 93, 102–112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.04.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.04.006</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>NIH: SRA – PRJNA1270735, NIH [data set], <uri>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA1270735</uri> (last access: 2 July 2026),   2026</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Borman, T., Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., De Caceres, M., Durand, S., Evangelista, H. B. A., FitzJohn, R., Friendly, M., Furneaux, B., Hannigan, G., Hill, M. O., Lahti, L., Martino, C., McGlinn, D., Ouellette, M.-H., Ribeiro Cunha, E., Smith, T., Stier, A., Ter Braak, C. J. F., and Weedon, J.: vegan: Community Ecology Package (Version 2.8-0), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan" ext-link-type="DOI">10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan</ext-link>, 6 September 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Onac, B. P., Wynn, J. G., and Sumrall, J. B.: Tracing the sources of cave sulfates: A unique case from Cerna Valley, Romania, Chem. Geol., 288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.07.006</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Osenbrück, K., Fiedler, S., Knöller, K., Weise, S. M., Sültenfuß, J., Oster, H., and Strauch, G.: Timescales and development of groundwater pollution by nitrate in drinking water wells of the Jahna-Aue, Saxonia, Germany, Water Resour. Res., 42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004977" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006WR004977</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Paris, G., Sessions, A. L., Subhas, A. V., and Adkins, J. F.: MC-ICP-MS measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in small amounts of dissolved sulfate, Chem. Geol., 345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.02.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.02.022</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Perez-Molphe-Montoya, E., Küsel, K., Overholt, W. A., Will Overholt, C. A., and Schiller University Jena, F.: Redefining the phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of phylum Omnitrophota, Environ Microbiol., 24, 5437–5449, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1462-2920.16170</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Pétré, M.-A., Rivera, A., Lefebvre, R., Hendry, M. J., and Folnagy, A. J. B.: A unified hydrogeological conceptual model of the Milk River transboundary aquifer, traversing Alberta (Canada) and Montana (USA), Hydrogeol. J., 24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1433-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-016-1433-8</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Piper, A. M.: A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i006p00914" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/TR025i006p00914</ext-link>, 1944.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Poghosyan, L., Koch, H., Lavy, A., Frank, J., van Kessel, M. A. H. J., Jetten, M. S. M., Banfield, J. F., and Lücker, S.: Metagenomic recovery of two distinct comammox Nitrospira from the terrestrial subsurface, Environ. Microbiol., 21, 3627–3637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14691" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1462-2920.14691</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Purkamo, L., Bomberg, M., Nyyssönen, M., Kukkonen, I., Ahonen, L., Kietäväinen, R., and Itävaara, M.: Dissecting the deep biosphere: Retrieving authentic microbial communities from packer-isolated deep crystalline bedrock fracture zones, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 85, 324–337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12126" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1574-6941.12126</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Purkamo, L., Bomberg, M., Kietäväinen, R., Salavirta, H., Nyyssönen, M., Nuppunen-Puputti, M., Ahonen, L., Kukkonen, I., and Itävaara, M.: Microbial co-occurrence patterns in deep Precambrian bedrock fracture fluids, Biogeosciences, 13, 3091–3108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3091-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-3091-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Purkamo, L., Kietäväinen, R., Miettinen, H., Sohlberg, E., Kukkonen, I., Itävaara, M., and Bomberg, M.: Diversity and functionality of archaeal, bacterial and fungal communities in deep Archaean bedrock groundwater, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 94, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/femsec/fiy116</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., and Glöckner, F. O.: The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D590-6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nar/gks1219</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Quince, C., Lanzen, A., Davenport, R. J., and Turnbaugh, P. J.: Removing Noise From Pyrosequenced Amplicons, BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-38" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/1471-2105-12-38</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. <uri>https://www.R-project.org</uri> (last access: 15 May 2026), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Rashid, A. B.: Towards Quantifying Groundwater Resources of the Paloluoma Buried Bedrock Valley in Western Finland with Groundwater Modelling, Master of Science, University of Waterloo, <uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10012/18222</uri>  (last access: 15 May 2026), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Retter, A., Griebler, C., Nilsson, R. H., Haas, J., Birk, S., Breyer, E., Baltar, F., and Karwautz, C.: Metabarcoding reveals ecologically distinct fungal assemblages in river and groundwater along an Austrian alpine to lowland gradient, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 100, 139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/FEMSEC/FIAE139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/FEMSEC/FIAE139</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Ruff, S. E., Humez, P., de Angelis, I. H., Diao, M., Nightingale, M., Cho, S., Connors, L., Kuloyo, O. O., Seltzer, A., Bowman, S., Wankel, S. D., McClain, C. N., Mayer, B., and Strous, M.: Hydrogen and dark oxygen drive microbial productivity in diverse groundwater ecosystems, Nat. Commun., 141, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38523-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-38523-4</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Ruuska, E., Skyttä, P., Putkinen, N., and Valjus, T.: Contribution of bedrock structures to the bedrock surface topography and groundwater flow systems within deep glaciofluvial aquifers in Kurikka, Western Finland, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 48, 2039–2056, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ESP.5602" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ESP.5602</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Samborska-Goik, K. and Bottrell, S.: Bayesian modelling of sulphate isotopic composition in pristine, contaminated, and experimental environments for investigating microbial bacterial reduction, J. Hydrol., 652, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132662" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132662</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Schwab, V. F., Herrmann, M., Roth, V.-N., Gleixner, G., Lehmann, R., Pohnert, G., Trumbore, S., Küsel, K., and Totsche, K. U.: Functional diversity of microbial communities in pristine aquifers inferred by PLFA- and sequencing-based approaches, Biogeosciences, 14, 2697–2714, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2697-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-2697-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Shand, P., Darbyshire, D. P. F., Love, A. J., and Edmunds, W. M.: Sr isotopes in natural waters: Applications to source characterisation and water-rock interaction in contrasting landscapes, Appl. Geochem., 24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.12.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.12.011</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Shapiro, S. D., Rowe, G., Schlosser, P., Ludin, A., and Stute, M.: Tritium-helium 3 dating under complex conditions in hydraulically stressed areas of a buried-valley aquifer, Water Resour. Res., 34, 1165–1180,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR03322" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97WR03322</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Simler, R.: Software “Diagrammes,” Laboratoire d'Hydrologie d'Avignon, Université d'Avignon et pays du Vaucluse, France, <uri>https://terre-et-eau.univ-avignon.fr/equipements-de-terrain-et-de-laboratoire/logiciels</uri> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Sohlberg, E., Bomberg, M., Miettinen, H., Nyyssönen, M., Salavirta, H., Vikman, M., and Itävaara, M.: Revealing the unexplored fungal communities in deep groundwater of crystalline bedrock fracture zones in Olkiluoto, Finland, Front. Microbiol., 6, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00573" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2015.00573</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation> Sonier, D. N., Duran, N. L., and Smith, G. B.: Dechlorination of Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria from an Aquifer Contaminated with Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds, Appl. Environ. Microb., 60, 4567–4572, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Stroeven, A. P., Hättestrand, C., Kleman, J., Heyman, J., Fabel, D., Fredin, O., Goodfellow, B. W., Harbor, J. M., Jansen, J. D., Olsen, L., Caffee, M. W., Fink, D., Lundqvist, J., Rosqvist, G. C., Strömberg, B., and Jansson, K. N.: Deglaciation of Fennoscandia, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.016</ext-link>, 2016. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Tan, S., Liu, J., Fang, Y., Hedlund, B. P., Lian, Z. H., Huang, L. Y., Li, J. T., Huang, L. N., Li, W. J., Jiang, H. C., Dong, H. L., and Shu, W. S.: Insights into ecological role of a new deltaproteobacterial order Candidatus Acidulodesulfobacterales by metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, ISME J., 13, 2044–2057, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0415-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41396-019-0415-y</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Sültenfuß, J., Roether, W., and Rhein, M.: The Bremen mass spectrometric facility for the measurement of helium isotopes, neon, and tritium in water, Isot. Environ. Healt. S., 45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010902871929" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10256010902871929</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Suominen, S., Dombrowski, N., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and Villanueva, L.: A diverse uncultivated microbial community is responsible for organic matter degradation in the Black Sea sulphidic zone, Environ. Microbiol., 23, 2709–2728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14902" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1462-2920.14902</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Visser, A., Broers, H. P., Purtschert, R., Sültenfuß, J., and De Jonge, M.: Groundwater age distributions at a public drinking water supply well field derived from multiple age tracers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Water Resour. Res., 49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013WR014012</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. B., and Taylor, J. W.: Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics, in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, New York, edited by: Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J., and White, T. J., 315–322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Wickham, H.: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer Cham, 260 p., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., and Vaughan, D.: dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation (Version 1.2.0), <uri>https://dplyr.tidyverse.org</uri> (last access: 12 February 2026), 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Wilke, C. O.: cowplot: Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for “ggplot2”. R package version 1.2.0, <uri>https://wilkelab.org/cowplot/</uri>  (last access: 31 March 2025), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Williams, T. J., Allen, M. A., Berengut, J. F., and Cavicchioli, R.: Shedding Light on Microbial “Dark Matter”: Insights Into Novel Cloacimonadota and Omnitrophota From an Antarctic Lake, Front. Microbiol., 12, 741077, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.741077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2021.741077</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Yilmaz, P., Parfrey, L. W., Yarza, P., Gerken, J., Pruesse, E., Quast, C., Schweer, T., Peplies, J., Ludwig, W., and Glöckner, F. O.: The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D643–D648, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nar/gkt1209</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Yu, T. L., Wang, B. S., Shen, C. C., Wang, P. L., Yang, T. F., Burr, G. S., and Chen, Y. G.: Improved analytical techniques of sulfur isotopic composition in nanomole quantities by MC-ICP-MS, Anal. Chim. Acta, 988, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.08.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aca.2017.08.012</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J., Shi, Q., Fan, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., and Zhang, J.: Distinction between Cr and other heavy–metal–resistant bacteria involved in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>N cycling in contaminated soils of copper producing sites, J. Hazard. Mater., 402, 123454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2020.123454" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2020.123454</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Combining microbial, isotopic and residence time data to characterize groundwater dynamics in a multi-layered aquifer system in Kurikka, western Finland</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Åberg, A. K., Korkka-Niemi, K., Åberg, S. C., and Rautio, A.: Application of 3D hydrogeochemistry
and particle tracking in detecting groundwater flow patterns within an aapa mire–outwash plain system in a boreal
environment at a mining development site, Appl. Geochem., 186, 106360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOCHEM.2025.106360" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOCHEM.2025.106360</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Åberg, A. K., Putkinen, N., Eyles, N., Davidila, J., and Malinowski, M.: 3D hydrostratigraphic
architecture of a Late Pleistocene buried valley infill at Kurikka, west-central Finland, Quatern. Int., 755,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2025.110080" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2025.110080</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Åkesson, M., Suckow, A., Visser, A., Sültenfuss, J., Laier, T., Purtschert, R., and
Sparrenbom, C. J.: Constraining age distributions of groundwater from public supply wells in diverse hydrogeological
settings in Scania, Sweden, J. Hydrol., 528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.022</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Abarenkov, K., Nilsson, R. H., Larsson, K. H., Taylor, A. F. S., May, T. W., Frøslev, T. G.,
Pawlowska, J., Lindahl, B., Põldmaa, K., Truong, C., Vu, D., Hosoya, T., Niskanen, T., Piirmann, T., Ivanov, F.,
Zirk, A., Peterson, M., Cheeke, T. E., Ishigami, Y., Jansson, A. T., Jeppesen, T. S., Kristiansson, E., Mikryukov, V.,
Miller, J. T., Oono, R., Ossandon, F. J., Paupério, J., Saar, I., Schigel, D., Suija, A., Tedersoo, L., and
Kõljalg, U.: The UNITE database for molecular identification and taxonomic communication of fungi and other
eukaryotes: sequences, taxa and classifications reconsidered, Nucleic Acids Res., 52, D791–D797,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKAD1039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKAD1039</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Andersen, K. S., Kirkegaard, R. H., Karst, S. M., and Albertsen, M.: ampvis2: an R package to analyse and
visualise 16S rRNA amplicon data, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1101/299537" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1101/299537</a>, 11 April 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Appelo, C. A. J. and Postma, D.: Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution, 2nd edn., Geochemistry,
Groundw. Pollution, 1–649,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439833544" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439833544</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Apprill, A., McNally, S., Parsons, R., and Weber, L.: Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer
greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 75, 129–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01753" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01753</a>,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Ben Maamar, S., Aquilina, L., Quaiser, A., Pauwels, H., Michon-Coudouel, S., Vergnaud-Ayraud, V.,
Labasque, T., Roques, C., Abbott, B. W., and Dufresne, A.: Groundwater isolation governs chemistry and microbial
community structure along hydrologic flowpaths, Front. Microbiol., 6, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01457" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01457</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Bärenstrauch, M., Vanhove, A. S., Allégra, S., Peuble, S., Gallice, F., Paran, F., Lavastre, V., and
Girardot, F.: Microbial diversity and geochemistry of groundwater impacted by steel slag leachates, Sci. Total
Environ., 843, 156987, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.156987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.156987</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., and Holmes, S. P.: DADA2:
High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data, Nat. Methods, 13, 581, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NMETH.3869" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NMETH.3869</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Canfield, D. E.: Biogeochemistry of sulfur isotopes, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.607" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.607</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Carreira, P. M. and Marques, J. M.: The Use of Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology, Water, 16, 914,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w16070914" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w16070914</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Castelle, C. J., Wrighton, K. C., Thomas, B. C., Hug, L. A., Brown, C. T., Wilkins, M. J.,
Frischkorn, K. R., Tringe, S. G., Singh, A., Markillie, L. M., Taylor, R. C., Williams, K. H., and Banfield, J. F.:
Genomic expansion of domain archaea highlights roles for organisms from new phyla in anaerobic carbon cycling,
Curr. Biol., 25, 690–701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.014</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Cauquoin, A., Fourré, Landais, A., Okazaki, A., and Yoshimura, K.: Modeling Natural Tritium in
Precipitation and its Dependence on Decadal Solar Activity Variations Using the Atmospheric General Circulation Model
MIROC5-Iso, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039745" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039745</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       Chaudhari, N. M., Overholt, W. A., Figueroa-Gonzalez, P. A., Taubert, M., Bornemann, T. L. V.,
Probst, A. J., Hölzer, M., Marz, M., and Küsel, K.: The economical lifestyle of CPR bacteria in groundwater
allows little preference for environmental drivers, Environ. Microbiomes, 16, 1–18,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-021-00395-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-021-00395-w</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       Clark, I.: Groundwater geochemistry and isotopes, CRC press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton,
FL, US, 438 p., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b18347" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/b18347</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Clark, I. and Fritz, P.: Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology, CRC press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca
Raton, FL, US, 328 p., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/B18347" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/B18347</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Cloutier, V., Lefebvre, R., Savard, M. M., Bourque, É., and Therrien, R.: Hydrogeochemistry and
groundwater origin of the Basses-Laurentides sedimentary rock aquifer system, St. Lawrence Lowlands, Québec,
Canada, Hydrogeol. J., 14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-005-0002-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-005-0002-3</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Cook, P. G. and Solomon, D. K.: Recent advances in dating young groundwater: Chlorofluorocarbons,
<sup>3</sup>H∕<sup>3</sup>He and <sup>85</sup>Kr, J. Hydrol., 191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03051-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03051-X</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
de Vries A. and Ripley, B. D.:   ggdendro: Create Dendrograms and Tree Diagrams Using “ggplot2”, R package version 0.2.0, <a href="https://andrie.github.io/ggdendro/" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 17 November 2025), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Divine, C. E. and McDonnell, J. J.: The future of applied tracers in hydrogeology, Hydrogeol. J., 13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0416-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0416-3</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Freeze, R. A. and Cherry, J. A.: Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
604 p., ISBN 9780133653120, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Frengstad, B., Banks, D., and Siewers, U.: The chemistry of Norwegian groundwaters: IV. The pH-dependence
of element concentrations in crystalline bedrock groundwaters, Sci. Total Environ., 277, 101–117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00867-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00867-6</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Gantner, S., Andersson, A. F., Alonso-Sáez, L., and Bertilsson, S.: Novel primers for 16S rRNA-based
archaeal community analyses in environmental samples, J. Microbiol. Meth., 84, 12–18,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.001</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Griebler, C. and Lueders, T.: Microbial biodiversity in groundwater ecosystems, Freshwater Biol., 54,
649–677, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02013.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02013.x</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Grönwall, J. and Danert, K.: Regarding groundwater and drinkingwater access through a human rights
lens: Self-Supply as a norm, Water (Switzerland), 12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020419" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020419</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Hall, A. M., Putkinen, N., Hietala, S., Lindsberg, E., and Holma, M.: Ultra-slow cratonic denudation in
Finland since 1.5&thinsp;Ga indicated by tiered unconformities and impact structures, Precambrian Res., 352, 106000,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2020.106000" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2020.106000</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Hallbeck, L. and Pedersen, K.: The family Gallionellaceae, in: The Prokaryotes: Alphaproteobacteria and
Betaproteobacteria, edited by: Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E. F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., and Thompson, F., Springer,
Berlin, 853–858, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30197-1_398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30197-1_398</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Harrison, A. G. and Thode, H. G.: Sulphur Isotope Abundances in Hydrocarbons and Source Rocks of Uinta
Basin, Utah, Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. B., 42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c00-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c00-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d</a>, 1958.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Herlemann, D. P., Labrenz, M., Jürgens, K., Bertilsson, S., Waniek, J. J., and Andersson, A. F.:
Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000&thinsp;km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea, ISME J., 5, 1571–1579,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.41" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.41</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Hoover, R. L., Keffer, J. L., Polson, S. W., and Chan, C. S.: Gallionellaceae pangenomic analysis reveals
insight into phylogeny, metabolic flexibility, and iron oxidation mechanisms, mSystems, 8,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1128/MSYSTEMS.00038-23/SUPPL_FILE/MSYSTEMS.00038-23-S0002.XLSX" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1128/MSYSTEMS.00038-23/SUPPL_FILE/MSYSTEMS.00038-23-S0002.XLSX</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Hou, J., Yang, C., and Wang, F.: Carbon metabolic versatility underpins Bathyarchaeia ecological
significance across the global deep subsurface, ISME J., 19, 259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ISMEJO/WRAF259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/ISMEJO/WRAF259</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Ikonen, J., Rauhala, A., Tuomela, A., Postila, H., Kumpula, T., Korpelainen, P., Pietilä, R.,
Valta, R. O., Lerssi, J., Panttila, H., and Korkka-Niemi, K.: Combining UAS-TIR and GEM-2 Techniques for Focused Water
Sampling and Isotope Geochemical Analysis at Two Mine Sites in Northern Finland, Mine Water Environ., 44,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-024-01020-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-024-01020-1</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Inkinen, J., Jayaprakash, B., Siponen, S., Hokajärvi, A. M., Pursiainen, A., Ikonen, J., Ryzhikov, I.,
Täubel, M., Kauppinen, A., Paananen, J., Miettinen, I. T., Torvinen, E., Kolehmainen, M., and Pitkänen, T.:
Active eukaryotes in drinking water distribution systems of ground and surface waterworks, Microbiome, 7, 1–17,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/S40168-019-0715-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/S40168-019-0715-5</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Jaunat, J., Huneau, F., Dupuy, A., Celle-Jeanton, H., Vergnaud-Ayraud, V., Aquilina, L., Labasque, T., and
Le Coustumer, P.: Hydrochemical data and groundwater dating to infer differential flowpaths through weathered profiles
of a fractured aquifer, Appl. Geochem., 27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.06.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.06.009</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       Johnson, J. S., Spakowicz, D. J., Hong, B. Y., Petersen, L. M., Demkowicz, P., Chen, L., Leopold, S. R.,
Hanson, B. M., Agresta, H. O., Gerstein, M., Sodergren, E., and Weinstock, G. M.: Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene
sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis, Nat. Commun., 101, 1–11,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13036-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13036-1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Johnson, T. D., Belitz, K., Kauffman, L. J., Watson, E., and Wilson, J. T.: Populations using public-supply
groundwater in the conterminous U. S. 2010; Identifying the wells, hydrogeologic regions, and hydrogeologic mapping
units, Sci. Total Environ., 806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150618</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Kaislaniemi, L.: Estimating the distribution of strontium isotope ratios <sup>87</sup>Sr∕<sup>86</sup>Sr in the
Precambrian of Finland, Bull. Geol. Soc. Finl., 83, <a href="https://doi.org/10.17741/bgsf/83.2.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17741/bgsf/83.2.002</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Kaplan, I. R. and Rittenberg, S. C.: Microbiological fractionation of sulphur isotopes, J. Gen. Microbiol.,
34, 195–212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-34-2-195" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-34-2-195</a>, 1964.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       Kato, S. and Ohkuma, M.: A Single Bacterium Capable of Oxidation and Reduction of Iron at Circumneutral pH,
Microbiol. Spectr., 9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1128/SPECTRUM.00161-21/SUPPL_FILE/SPECTRUM00161-21_SUPP_1_SEQ4.PDF" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1128/SPECTRUM.00161-21/SUPPL_FILE/SPECTRUM00161-21_SUPP_1_SEQ4.PDF</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       Kauppinen, A., Pitkänen, T., Al-Hello, H., Maunula, L., Hokajärvi, A. M., Rimhanen-Finne, R., and
Miettinen, I. T.: Two Drinking Water Outbreaks Caused by Wastewater Intrusion Including Sapovirus in Finland,
Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 16, 4376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH16224376" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH16224376</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Kietäväinen, R., Ahonen, L., Kukkonen, I. T., Hendriksson, N., Nyyssönen, M., and
Itävaara, M.: Characterisation and isotopic evolution of saline waters of the Outokumpu Deep Drill Hole,
Finland–Implications for water origin and deep terrestrial biosphere, Appl. Geochem., 32, 37–51,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.10.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.10.013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Kietäväinen, R., Ahonen, L., Kukkonen, I. T., Niedermann, S., Wiersberg, T.,
Kietäväinen, R., Ahonen, L., Kukkonen, I. T., Niedermann, S., Wiersberg, T., Kieta, R., Ahonen, L.,
Kukkonen, I. T., Niedermann, S., and Wiersberg, T.: Noble gas residence times of saline waters within crystalline
bedrock, Outokumpu Deep Drill Hole, Finland, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 145, 159–174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.09.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.09.012</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Kipfer, R., Aeschbach-Hertig, W., Peeters, F., and Stute, M.: Noble gases in lakes and ground waters,
Rev. Mineral Geochem., 47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2002.47.14" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2002.47.14</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kløve, B., Kvitsand, H. M. L., Pitkänen, T., Gunnarsdottir, M. J., Gaut, S., Gardarsson, S. M.,
Rossi, P. M., and Miettinen, I.: Overview of groundwater sources and water-supply systems, and associated microbial
pollution, in Finland, Norway and Iceland, Hydrogeol. J., 25, 1033–1044, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1552-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1552-x</a>,  2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       Lahermo, P., Ilmasti, M., Juntunen, R., and Taka, M.: The hydrogeochemical mapping of Finnish groundwater  =  Suomen geokemian atlas. Osa 1: Suomen pohjavesien hydrokemiallinen kartoitus, Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Espoo, 66 p.,
ISBN 9516903746, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Lahtinen, R., Huhma, H., Sipilä, P., and Vaarma, M.: Geochemistry, U–Pb geochronology and Sm–Nd data
from the Paleoproterozoic Western Finland supersuite – A key component in the coupled Bothnian oroclines, Precambrian
Res., 299, 264–281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2017.07.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2017.07.025</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Lee, J. H., Lee, B. J., and Unno, T.: Bacterial Communities in Ground-and Surface Water Mixing Zone Induced
by Seasonal Heavy Extraction of Groundwater, Geomicrobiol. J., 35, 768–774,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2018.1468834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2018.1468834</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lever, M. A.: Acetogenesis in the energy-starved deep biosphere – a paradox?, Front. Microbiol., 2, 284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00284" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00284</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Li, M., Castelle, C. J., Probst, A. J., Zhou, Z., Pan, J., Liu, Y., Banfield, J. F., and Gu, J. D.: Insights into the ecology, evolution, and metabolism of the widespread Woesearchaeotal lineages, Microbiome, 6, 102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0488-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0488-2</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Luef, B., Frischkorn, K. R., Wrighton, K. C., Holman, H. N., Birarda, G., Thomas, B. C., Singh, A.,
Williams, K. H., Siegerist, C. E., Tringe, S. G., Downing, K. H., Comolli, L. R., and Banfield, J. F.: Diverse
uncultivated ultra-small bacterial cells in groundwater, Nat. Commun., 6, 1–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7372</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Luoma, S., Majaniemi, J., Pullinen, A., Mursu, J., and Virtasalo, J. J.: Geological and groundwater flow
model of a submarine groundwater discharge site at Hanko (Finland), northern Baltic Sea, Hydrogeol. J., 29,
1279–1297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02313-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02313-3</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
       Luoma, S., Okkonen, J., Korkka-Niemi, K., Hendriksson, N., and Paalijärvi, M.: Characterization of
Groundwater Geochemistry in an Esker Aquifer in Western Finland Based on Three Years of Monitoring Data, Water
(Switzerland), 16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223301</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lyons, K. J., Hokajärvi, A.-M., Ikonen, J., Kauppinen, A., Miettinen, I. T., Pitkänen, T., Rossi, P. M., and Kujala, K.: Surface Water Intrusion, Land Use Impacts, and Bacterial Community Composition in  Shallow Groundwater Wells Supplying Potable Water in Sparsely Populated Areas of a Boreal Region, Microbiology Spectrum, 9, e00179-21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00179-21" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00179-21</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martin, M.: Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads,  EMBnet. J., 17, 10–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.14806/EJ.17.1.200" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.14806/EJ.17.1.200</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Massmann, G., Sültenfuß, J., Dünnbier, U., Knappe, A., Taute, T., and Pekdeger, A.:
Investigation of groundwater residence times during bank filtration in Berlin: A multi-tracer approach,
Hydrol. Process., 22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6649</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Mayer, A., Sültenfuß, J., Travi, Y., Rebeix, R., Purtschert, R., Claude, C., Le Gal La Salle, C.,
Miche, H., and Conchetto, E.: A multi-tracer study of groundwater origin and transit-time in the aquifers of the
Venice region (Italy), Appl. Geochem., 50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.10.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.10.009</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       McMurdie, P. J. and Holmes, S.: Phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics
of Microbiome Census Data, PLoS One, 8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Merino, N., Jackson, T. R., Campbell, J. H., Kersting, A. B., Sackett, J., Fisher, J. C., Bruckner, J. C.,
Zavarin, M., Hamilton-Brehm, S. D., and Moser, D. P.: Subsurface microbial communities as a tool for characterizing
regional-scale groundwater flow, Sci. Total Environ., 842, 156768, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.156768" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.156768</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Meyzonnat, G., Musy, S., Corcho-Alvarado, J. A., Barbecot, F., Pinti, D. L., Purtschert, R., Lauzon, J. M.,
and McCormack, R.: Age distribution of groundwater in fractured aquifers of the St. Lawrence Lowlands (Canada)
determined by environmental tracers (<sup>3</sup>H∕<sup>3</sup>He, <sup>85</sup>Kr, SF<sub>6</sub>, CFC-12, <sup>14</sup>C),
Hydrogeol. J., 31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02671-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02671-0</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Momper, L., Jungbluth, S. P., Lee, M. D., and Amend, J. P.: Energy and carbon metabolisms in a deep
terrestrial subsurface fluid microbial community, ISME J., 11, 2319–2333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.94" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.94</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Mosley, O. E., Gios, E., and Handley, K. M.: Implications for nitrogen and sulphur cycles: phylogeny and
niche-range of Nitrospirota in terrestrial aquifers, ISME Commun., 4, 47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ISMECO/YCAE047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/ISMECO/YCAE047</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
National Ground Water Association: <a href="https://www.ngwa.org/what-is-groundwater/About-groundwater" target="_blank"/>, last
access: 1 April 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Négrel, P., Casanova, J., Blomqvist, R., Kaija, J., and Frape, S.: Strontium isotopic characterization
of the Palmottu hydrosystem (Finland): Water-rock interaction and geochemistry of groundwaters, Geofluids, 3,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-8123.2003.00056.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-8123.2003.00056.x</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
       Négrel, P., Pauwels, H., and Chabaux, F.: Characterizing multiple water-rock interactions in the
critical zone through Sr-isotope tracing of surface and groundwater, Appl. Geochem. 93, 102–112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.04.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.04.006</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
NIH: SRA – PRJNA1270735, NIH [data set], <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA1270735" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 July 2026),   2026

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B.,
Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Borman, T.,
Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., De Caceres, M., Durand, S., Evangelista, H. B. A., FitzJohn, R., Friendly, M.,
Furneaux, B., Hannigan, G., Hill, M. O., Lahti, L., Martino, C., McGlinn, D., Ouellette, M.-H., Ribeiro Cunha, E.,
Smith, T., Stier, A., Ter Braak, C. J. F., and Weedon, J.: vegan: Community Ecology Package (Version 2.8-0),
<a href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan</a>, 6 September 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
       Onac, B. P., Wynn, J. G., and Sumrall, J. B.: Tracing the sources of cave sulfates: A unique case from
Cerna Valley, Romania, Chem. Geol., 288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.07.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.07.006</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
       Osenbrück, K., Fiedler, S., Knöller, K., Weise, S. M., Sültenfuß, J., Oster, H., and
Strauch, G.: Timescales and development of groundwater pollution by nitrate in drinking water wells of the Jahna-Aue,
Saxonia, Germany, Water Resour. Res., 42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004977" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004977</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
       Paris, G., Sessions, A. L., Subhas, A. V., and Adkins, J. F.: MC-ICP-MS measurement of <i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S
and Δ<sup>33</sup>S in small amounts of dissolved sulfate, Chem. Geol., 345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.02.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.02.022</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Perez-Molphe-Montoya, E., Küsel, K., Overholt, W. A., Will Overholt, C. A., and Schiller University Jena, F.: Redefining the phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of phylum Omnitrophota, Environ Microbiol., 24, 5437–5449, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16170</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
       Pétré, M.-A., Rivera, A., Lefebvre, R., Hendry, M. J., and Folnagy, A. J. B.: A unified
hydrogeological conceptual model of the Milk River transboundary aquifer, traversing Alberta (Canada) and Montana
(USA), Hydrogeol. J., 24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1433-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1433-8</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
       Piper, A. M.: A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses, Eos
T. Am. Geophys. Un., 25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i006p00914" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i006p00914</a>, 1944.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
       Poghosyan, L., Koch, H., Lavy, A., Frank, J., van Kessel, M. A. H. J., Jetten, M. S. M., Banfield, J. F.,
and Lücker, S.: Metagenomic recovery of two distinct comammox Nitrospira from the terrestrial subsurface,
Environ. Microbiol., 21, 3627–3637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14691" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14691</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
       Purkamo, L., Bomberg, M., Nyyssönen, M., Kukkonen, I., Ahonen, L., Kietäväinen, R., and
Itävaara, M.: Dissecting the deep biosphere: Retrieving authentic microbial communities from packer-isolated deep
crystalline bedrock fracture zones, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 85, 324–337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12126" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12126</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
       Purkamo, L., Bomberg, M., Kietäväinen, R., Salavirta, H., Nyyssönen, M., Nuppunen-Puputti, M., Ahonen, L.,
Kukkonen, I., and Itävaara, M.: Microbial co-occurrence patterns in deep Precambrian bedrock fracture fluids,
Biogeosciences, 13, 3091–3108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3091-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3091-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
       Purkamo, L., Kietäväinen, R., Miettinen, H., Sohlberg, E., Kukkonen, I., Itävaara, M., and
Bomberg, M.: Diversity and functionality of archaeal, bacterial and fungal communities in deep Archaean bedrock
groundwater, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 94, 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy116</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
       Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., and
Glöckner, F. O.: The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools,
Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D590-6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
       Quince, C., Lanzen, A., Davenport, R. J., and Turnbaugh, P. J.: Removing Noise From Pyrosequenced
Amplicons, BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-38" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-38</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
<a href="https://www.R-project.org" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 May 2026), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rashid, A. B.: Towards Quantifying Groundwater Resources of the Paloluoma Buried Bedrock Valley in Western
Finland with Groundwater Modelling, Master of Science, University of Waterloo, <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/10012/18222" target="_blank"/>  (last access: 15 May 2026), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
       Retter, A., Griebler, C., Nilsson, R. H., Haas, J., Birk, S., Breyer, E., Baltar, F., and Karwautz, C.:
Metabarcoding reveals ecologically distinct fungal assemblages in river and groundwater along an Austrian alpine to
lowland gradient, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 100, 139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/FEMSEC/FIAE139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/FEMSEC/FIAE139</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
       Ruff, S. E., Humez, P., de Angelis, I. H., Diao, M., Nightingale, M., Cho, S., Connors, L., Kuloyo, O. O.,
Seltzer, A., Bowman, S., Wankel, S. D., McClain, C. N., Mayer, B., and Strous, M.: Hydrogen and dark oxygen drive
microbial productivity in diverse groundwater ecosystems, Nat. Commun., 141, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38523-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38523-4</a>,
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
       Ruuska, E., Skyttä, P., Putkinen, N., and Valjus, T.: Contribution of bedrock structures to the bedrock
surface topography and groundwater flow systems within deep glaciofluvial aquifers in Kurikka, Western Finland, Earth
Surf. Proc. Land., 48, 2039–2056, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ESP.5602" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ESP.5602</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
       Samborska-Goik, K. and Bottrell, S.: Bayesian modelling of sulphate isotopic composition in pristine,
contaminated, and experimental environments for investigating microbial bacterial reduction, J. Hydrol., 652,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132662" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132662</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
       Schwab, V. F., Herrmann, M., Roth, V.-N., Gleixner, G., Lehmann, R., Pohnert, G., Trumbore, S., Küsel, K.,
and Totsche, K. U.: Functional diversity of microbial communities in pristine aquifers inferred by PLFA- and
sequencing-based approaches, Biogeosciences, 14, 2697–2714, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2697-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2697-2017</a>, 2017. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
       Shand, P., Darbyshire, D. P. F., Love, A. J., and Edmunds, W. M.: Sr isotopes in natural waters:
Applications to source characterisation and water-rock interaction in contrasting landscapes, Appl. Geochem., 24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.12.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.12.011</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shapiro, S. D., Rowe, G., Schlosser, P., Ludin, A., and Stute, M.: Tritium-helium 3 dating under complex conditions in hydraulically stressed areas of a buried-valley aquifer, Water Resour. Res., 34, 1165–1180,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR03322" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR03322</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
       Simler, R.: Software “Diagrammes,” Laboratoire d'Hydrologie d'Avignon, Université d'Avignon et pays
du Vaucluse, France, <a href="https://terre-et-eau.univ-avignon.fr/equipements-de-terrain-et-de-laboratoire/logiciels" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 June 2026), 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
       Sohlberg, E., Bomberg, M., Miettinen, H., Nyyssönen, M., Salavirta, H., Vikman, M., and
Itävaara, M.: Revealing the unexplored fungal communities in deep groundwater of crystalline bedrock fracture
zones in Olkiluoto, Finland, Front. Microbiol., 6, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00573" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00573</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sonier, D. N., Duran, N. L., and Smith, G. B.: Dechlorination of Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria from an Aquifer Contaminated with Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds, Appl. Environ. Microb., 60, 4567–4572, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
       Stroeven, A. P., Hättestrand, C., Kleman, J., Heyman, J., Fabel, D., Fredin, O., Goodfellow, B. W.,
Harbor, J. M., Jansen, J. D., Olsen, L., Caffee, M. W., Fink, D., Lundqvist, J., Rosqvist, G. C., Strömberg, B.,
and Jansson, K. N.: Deglaciation of Fennoscandia, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.016</a>,
2016.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tan, S., Liu, J., Fang, Y., Hedlund, B. P., Lian, Z. H., Huang, L. Y., Li, J. T., Huang, L. N., Li, W. J., Jiang, H. C., Dong, H. L., and Shu, W. S.: Insights into ecological role of a new deltaproteobacterial order Candidatus Acidulodesulfobacterales by metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, ISME J., 13, 2044–2057, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0415-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0415-y</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
       Sültenfuß, J., Roether, W., and Rhein, M.: The Bremen mass spectrometric facility for the
measurement of helium isotopes, neon, and tritium in water, Isot. Environ. Healt. S., 45,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010902871929" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010902871929</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
       Suominen, S., Dombrowski, N., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and Villanueva, L.: A diverse uncultivated
microbial community is responsible for organic matter degradation in the Black Sea sulphidic zone,
Environ. Microbiol., 23, 2709–2728, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14902" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14902</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
       Visser, A., Broers, H. P., Purtschert, R., Sültenfuß, J., and De Jonge, M.: Groundwater age
distributions at a public drinking water supply well field derived from multiple age tracers (<sup>85</sup>Kr,
<sup>3</sup>H∕<sup>3</sup>He, and <sup>39</sup>Ar), Water Resour. Res., 49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014012</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
      
White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. B., and Taylor, J. W.: Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics, in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, New York, edited by: Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J., and White, T. J., 315–322,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
       Wickham, H.: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer Cham, 260 p., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
       Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., and Vaughan, D.: dplyr: A Grammar of Data
Manipulation (Version 1.2.0), <a href="https://dplyr.tidyverse.org" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 February 2026), 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
       Wilke, C. O.: cowplot: Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for “ggplot2”. R package version
1.2.0, <a href="https://wilkelab.org/cowplot/" target="_blank"/>  (last access: 31 March 2025), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
      
Williams, T. J., Allen, M. A., Berengut, J. F., and Cavicchioli, R.: Shedding Light on Microbial “Dark Matter”: Insights Into Novel Cloacimonadota and Omnitrophota From an Antarctic Lake, Front. Microbiol., 12, 741077,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.741077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.741077</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
       Yilmaz, P., Parfrey, L. W., Yarza, P., Gerken, J., Pruesse, E., Quast, C., Schweer, T., Peplies, J.,
Ludwig, W., and Glöckner, F. O.: The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks,
Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D643–D648, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1209</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
       Yu, T. L., Wang, B. S., Shen, C. C., Wang, P. L., Yang, T. F., Burr, G. S., and Chen, Y. G.: Improved
analytical techniques of sulfur isotopic composition in nanomole quantities by MC-ICP-MS, Anal. Chim. Acta, 988,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.08.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.08.012</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, J., Shi, Q., Fan, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., and Zhang, J.: Distinction between Cr and other
heavy–metal–resistant bacteria involved in C∕N cycling in contaminated soils of copper producing
sites, J. Hazard. Mater., 402, 123454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2020.123454" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2020.123454</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
