<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-23-7327-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Different paths, same destination: similar benthic nitrogen cycling sustained by distinct biogeochemical mechanisms in artificialized coastal systems</article-title><alt-title>Different paths, same destination</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pascal</surname><given-names>Ludovic</given-names></name>
          <email>ludovic_pascal@uqar.ca</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9669-3336</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dansereau-Macias</surname><given-names>Éléonore</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Guay</surname><given-names>Carole-Anne</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Didier</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6176-4384</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Nozais</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Sirois</surname><given-names>Luc</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-5990</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zouaghi</surname><given-names>Faten</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chaillou</surname><given-names>Gwénaëlle</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4170-8852</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institut des sciences de la mer, Université du Québec à Rimouski, 310 Allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, QC, G5L 3A1, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Northern and Arctic Coastal Research Lab., Center for Northern Studies, Département de biologie, chimie et géographie, Université du Québec à Rimouski, 300 Allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, QC, G5L 3A1, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Département de biologie, chimie et géographie, Université du Québec à Rimouski, 300 Allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, QC, G5L 3A1, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ludovic Pascal (ludovic_pascal@uqar.ca)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>7327</fpage><lpage>7343</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>6</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Ludovic Pascal et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e162">Human activities are increasingly affecting coastal ecosystems, with shoreline stabilization structures becoming a prevalent response to sea-level rise and extreme climatic events. While these structures aim to protect coastal communities and infrastructures, their effects on ecosystem functioning, and particularly nitrogen cycling and its removal processes such as denitrification, remain poorly understood. To assess the ecological impacts of breakwater construction, we employed a space-for-time substitution approach to examine changes in sediment biogeochemistry, macrobenthic community structure, and nitrogen cycling in an intertidal salt marsh in the St. Lawrence Estuary, Canada. We measured benthic fluxes, denitrification rates, and macrofaunal assemblages at five locations: two landward of the breakwater (impacted sites), one situated immediately seaward of the breakwater (intermediate site) and two reference sites (one vegetated and one unvegetated outside the breakwater system). Landward sites exhibited finer sediment with higher organic carbon content compared to other sites and supported distinct macrobenthic communities dominated by opportunistic Oligochaetes, while reference sites were dominated by Molluscs and Crustaceans. The intermediate seaward site consistently resembled the unvegetated reference site across all variables measured at both sites, including sediment characteristics, oxygen dynamics and benthic fluxes, thereby showing reference-like conditions. Surprisingly, despite these substantial physical and biological changes, dark total benthic oxygen uptake, nitrate and ammonium benthic fluxes showed no consistent separation among impacted, intermediate, and reference sites, while benthic denitrification rates were comparable among the impacted and reference sites where they were measured. This functional similarity reflects an apparent functional convergence arising from distinct combinations of abiotic and biotic factors, including root-mediated rhizosphere oxygenation, macrofauna-mediated sediment irrigation, and contrasting reliance on internally produced versus water-column nitrate. However, this convergence might not apply to all ecosystem services offered by natural salt marshes and may depend on specific biological communities, emphasizing the importance of careful consideration in coastal management decisions.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Fonds de recherche du Québec</funding-source>
<award-id>https://doi.org/10.69777/281864</award-id>
<award-id>https://doi.org/10.69777/322485</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network</funding-source>
<award-id>PDF-25-2020</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Ministère des Transports</funding-source>
<award-id>none</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada</funding-source>
<award-id>DDG-2019-05993</award-id>
<award-id>RGPIN-2021-03333</award-id>
<award-id>RGPIN-2018-556538</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e174">Coastal areas provide essential ecological, economic, and social services. They host various ecosystems and support fisheries, aquaculture, recreational and cultural activities. Around 10 % of the global population lives in coastal areas less than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above sea-level, with coastal development rising in recent decades, a trend expected to continue (Neumann et al., 2015). However, these areas face significant threats from sea-level rise and shoreline erosion (Mentaschi et al., 2018). For instance, a global temperature rise of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above pre-industrial temperatures could lead to a global sea-level rise exceeding 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 2040 (Jevrejeva et al., 2016). The most common approach to these threats is shoreline hardening (Gittman et al., 2015) which involves the construction of rigid, engineered structures to stabilize shorelines and protect infrastructures. The main types of shorelines hardening structure include bulkheads, seawalls and breakwaters. Bulkheads are vertical walls typically deployed in environments with low to moderate hydrodynamic energy, built directly on the shoreline to retain soil and prevent land loss due to wave action. Seawalls are robust, vertical or sloped structures designed to protect the shoreline in high-energy environment by reflecting and/or dissipating wave energy and preventing coastal flooding and erosion. Breakwaters are offshore, barrier-like structures built nearly parallel to the coast to dissipate wave energy and reduce current velocity before the waves reach the shore. While effective at protecting human settlements, these structures artificialize coastal ecosystems by fundamentally modifying natural habitats, leading to significant socio-ecological changes such as loss of biodiversity and reduction of the intertidal habitat (Bernatchez and Fraser, 2012; Gittman et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e203">Salt marshes are important coastal ecosystems developing in low-energy shorelines, in temperate and cooler regions. They provide some of the most valuable ecosystem services (Barbier et al., 2011). Indeed, these intertidal habitats play a crucial role in coastal protection by stabilizing sediments, attenuating wave energy, and enhancing sediment deposition, thereby helping to mitigate coastal erosion (Duarte et al., 2013; Gedan et al., 2009). Due to their high productivity and the capacity to enhance sediment deposition, salt marshes contribute to long-term carbon sequestration (Duarte et al., 2013), provide habitat for numerous organisms (Barbier et al., 2011), and play a significant role in nutrient cycling, particularly by acting as nitrogen sinks (Sousa et al., 2008; Valiela and Cole, 2002). This function has gained increasing importance in recent decades with the rise of coastal eutrophication (Pascal et al., 2022; Rabalais et al., 2009). Eutrophication, the excessive supply of water bodies with organic matter (Nixon, 1998), largely driven by nitrogen enrichment, can lead to significant ecosystem degradation (Rabalais et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d2e206">In this context, understanding nitrogen removal processes in salt marshes is crucial when assessing the impacts of shoreline hardening on coastal ecosystem functioning (Sousa et al., 2008; Valiela and Cole, 2002). Shoreline hardening can alter sediment characteristics, hydrodynamic conditions, and benthic communities (Gittman et al., 2016), all of which influencing nitrogen cycling processes (Albert et al., 2021; Stief, 2013). Two key microbial processes drive nitrogen removal from soft-sediment systems. (i) Denitrification which involves the oxidation of organic carbon (OC) using nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as an electron acceptor under anaerobic conditions, resulting mainly in the production of dinitrogen gas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but can also release as nitrous oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a potent greenhouse gas, together with carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). (ii) Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox), produces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through the oxidation of ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) coupled to the reduction of nitrite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) although in many organic-rich coastal sediments its contribution can be smaller than that of heterotrophic denitrification (Dalsgaard et al., 2005; Devol, 2015). In addition to denitrification and anammox, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) can also occur, competing for nitrate and retaining nitrogen within the system.These processes are further influenced by benthic macrofauna, which play key roles in organic matter (OM) mineralization and nitrogen cycling through bioturbation (sensu Kristensen et al., 2012), enhancing solute exchanges and nutrient regeneration at the sediment-water interface (Pascal et al., 2016; Snelgrove et al., 2018). Therefore, alterations to coastal environments through shoreline hardening could significantly impact these nitrogen removal pathways, with potential consequences for coastal water quality and eutrophication mitigation. Given the vulnerability of salt marshes to such modification, understanding how nitrogen cycling is impacted is critical. Salt marshes face increasing threats worldwide (Mcowen et al., 2017) including shoreline hardening (Gedan et al., 2009) that can exceed 50 % of the total shoreline length in some regions (Bulleri and Chapman, 2010; Gittman et al., 2015). This extensive shoreline hardening contributes to a phenomenon known as coastal squeezing (Doody, 2013) where natural habitats are trapped between rising seas and hardened shoreline, resulting in habitat loss and degradation (Bernatchez and Quintin, 2016; Bozek and Burdick, 2005). Previous research on bulkhead implementation found no direct effects on nitrogen removal rates per unit area, but showed that these structures can reduce the overall nitrogen removal capacity of the ecosystem by decreasing the total area of salt marshes through coastal squeezing, rather than impacting nitrogen removal process rates (O'Meara et al., 2015). However, breakwaters differ from bulkheads as they are built offshore. When emergent and built with sufficient vertical distance between the crest of the breakwater and the high-tide level, breakwater create low-energy environments on their landward side (Wang et al., 2021). These conditions promote the sedimentation of fine, organic-rich particles (Gittman et al., 2016), which can substantially alter macrobenthic communities, and biogeochemical processes. Such changes may enhance favourable conditions for heterotrophic denitrification by increasing OC availability and the extent of anoxic sediment, potentially increasing nitrogen removal rates (Albert et al., 2021; Stief, 2013). Yet, the extent and underlying mechanisms of these impacts remain poorly understood, limiting our ability to predict how different shoreline hardening strategies will affect nitrogen removal processes and associated ecosystem services.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e298"><italic>Study site</italic>. <bold>(a)</bold> Location of the study area (open square) in the St. Lawrence system (©Stamen Design (CC BY 4.0)/©Stadia Maps; <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright">OpenStreetMap</ext-link>), <bold>(b)</bold> location of the study site (black rectangle) in the bay of Rivière-du-Loup (©Gouvernement du Québec (CC BY 4.0; MNRF, 2025)) and <bold>(c)</bold> aerial view of the sampling location around the breakwater (from Zouaghi et al., 2024) with saltmarsh areas highlighted by yellow contours. Reference sites: Vegetated Sediment (VS), and Unvegetated Sediment (US); Impacted sites: Southern area landward of the breakwater (LBWS), Northern area landward of the breakwater (LBWN); and Intermediate site: Seaward of the breakwater (SBW).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e321">This study aims to compare sediment biogeochemistry and nitrogen cycling across contrasting areas within an intertidal salt marsh seascape, including areas dominated by salt marsh vegetation, unvegetated sediments, and areas located directly seaward and landward of a breakwater. We hypothesize that the presence of the breakwater causes organic-rich sediment accumulation on its landward side, which alters macrobenthic community structure, increases the sediment oxygen demand and the rates of nitrogen removal processes compared to areas farther from the breakwater.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study site</title>
      <p id="d2e339">The St. Lawrence Estuary area (Québec, Canada) has already seen an accelerated sea-level rise since the early 1990s (Gibeault et al., 2016), with anticipated relative sea-level rise to 0.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 2100 (Savoie-Ferron et al., 2021), threatening infrastructure and human populations with erosion and flooding. As in many regions worldwide, coastal hardening has been implemented in response to these threats; recent estimates indicate that 10 % of the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence coastline is now artificialized by rigid structure (Sauvé et al., 2020). Among these, the Rivière-du-Loup embayment (47°50<sup>′</sup>29.30<sup>′′</sup> N, 69°33<sup>′</sup>11.84<sup>′′</sup> W; WSG 4), located on the south shore of the Upper St. Lawrence Estuary (Fig. 1), provides a representative example of coastal hardening.</p>
      <p id="d2e392">The Rivière-du-Loup embayment receives freshwater inputs from a river located in its northern part, with a mean annual discharge of 14.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (from 3.4 to 141.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mean annual concentrations of 2.7, 13.7 and 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (MELCCFP, 2026). This bay is covered by sea ice during winter and is characterized by a semi-diurnal tide with an amplitude between 0.5 and 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A salt marsh partially covers its intertidal area with cordgrass (<italic>Sporobolus alterniflorus</italic>, formerly known as <italic>Spartina alterniflora</italic>) in the high foreshore. The shoreline has experienced erosion rates ranging from 2.3 to 6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since 1984 (Dionne, 2007), endangering a major highway in addition to reducing the salt marsh area by approximately 62 750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zouaghi et al., 2024). In 2009, the Quebec Government implemented a 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-wide breakwater made of boulders to mitigate erosion. It was estimated that the construction of the breakwater per se induced a loss of 6318 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of salt marsh cover between 2009 and 2011 (Zouaghi et al., 2024). A distinctive feature of this breakwater is that the access path for its construction (perpendicular and towards the center of the breakwater; Fig. 1c) was never removed and now acts as a jetty that is only submerged during high tide events (Zouaghi et al., 2024). In 2010, following the implementation of the breakwater, a storm event coupled with high tides transported and deposited a substantial amount of sediment, which became trapped landward of the breakwater (Zouaghi et al., 2024).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Experimental design</title>
      <p id="d2e567">To assess the impacts of the breakwater structure on ecosystem functioning and nitrogen cycling, we adopted a space-for-time approach comparing sites with and without breakwater influence within the same coastal system. This approach assumes that spatial differences in biogeochemical processes and ecosystem functioning reflect the long-term impacts of the breakwater. Five sites were selected to assess how the breakwater affects sediment characteristics and biogeochemical processes within the intertidal zone (Fig. 1). Two unvegetated sites located landward of the breakwater, the southern (LBWS) and northern (LBWN) areas, were classified as “impacted”. Two other sites outside the breakwater, a vegetated (VS) and an unvegetated (US) sediment areas served as “reference” conditions. A site located seaward of the breakwater (SBW) was designated as “intermediate” to help to distinguish the breakwater's effects from natural environmental gradients between reference and impacted sites. We acknowledge however that the SBW site could also capture potential offshore effects of the breakwater.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Seawater, sediment and macrobenthic community sampling procedure</title>
      <p id="d2e578">The main sampling campaign was conducted in June 2021, at the beginning of the salt-marsh growing season following winter ice-cover breakup. An additional campaign was conducted in June 2022 to address the specific data gaps described below. This period was chosen because salt marsh plants are entering their active growth phase, during which root oxygen release and associated rhizosphere processes are expected to influence sediment nitrogen cycling (Koop-Jakobsen and Giblin, 2010; Zheng et al., 2016). Additionally, the relatively short leaf canopy at this stage allowed intact vegetated sediment cores to be incubated without clipping the aboveground shoots, thereby avoiding disturbance associated with shoot removal. Sea water temperature and salinity during sampling were similar between years: 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 19.6 in 2021 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 18.7 in 2022. A 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> volume of seawater was collected at high tide on the sampling day in the bay. This seawater was filtered on-site using a GF/F filter and aerated in an opaque container for later use. At each of the five sites, eight large sediment cores (10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of sediment and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of air headspace) were manually collected at low tide using transparent acrylic liners (30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long), with compaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The sediment surface was immediately capped with Styrofoam<sup>®</sup> to prevent disturbance during transport. Additionally, five small sediment cores (2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long) were collected at each site for analysis of surficial sediment characteristics (see Sect. 2.4), and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until analysis. Six of the eight large sediment cores were kept intact and immediately transported to the laboratory to assess total benthic fluxes. Of the two remaining cores, one was used to obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> microprofiles at the sediment-water interface and subsequently sliced for particle phase analysis, while the other was dedicated for porewater extraction. To assess macrobenthic community structure, sediment from three box corers (40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth) was collected at each site. This sediment was sieved through a 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mesh and preserved in a 4 % buffered formaldehyde solution for further analysis. Due to sampling failure at SBW, total benthic fluxes were assessed on only four sediment cores, and no isotope pairing incubation, porewater extraction, or macrofauna sampling were performed at this site. To address these data gaps, an additional campaign was conducted in June 2022 to obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> microprofiles at SBW and to provide a second measurement of selected sediment characteristics at all sites. All benthic flux and isotope-pairing incubations, porewater extractions, and macrofauna sampling were conducted in 2021. The sediment characteristics measured in both years showed consistent spatial patterns, supporting the temporal representativeness of the site comparisons (Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Characterization of the sediment</title>
      <p id="d2e786">Sediment characteristics were analyzed using samples from the top layer (0–0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the five small sediment cores collected at each location. One core was dedicated to measuring sediment grain size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), porosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and organic carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and total nitrogen (TN) contents, as well as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> natural isotope abundance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). From this core, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was assessed by laser diffraction (Malvern Instruments, 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limit) after OM digestion with hydrogen peroxide. Porosity was determined by measuring water loss after freeze-drying, corrected for sea salt content, using a dry sediment density of 2.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Prior to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses, inorganic carbon was removed by fuming of sediments in a closed container in the presence of an open beaker of concentrated HCl. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TNof the sediment were determined using an elemental analyzer (Carlo Erba NC2500), after which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured using a Micromass Isoprime 100 isotope ratio mass spectrometer coupled to an Elementar Vario MicroCube elemental analyzer. Carbon isotope ratios are reported using the delta notation, relative to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite standard. The remaining sediment from this first core, along with the other four cores, was used to determine the OM content via loss on ignition (LOI, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as the weight loss after combustion at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Due to storage failure, LOI was not assessed at US.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Oxygen and nutrient porewater concentrations</title>
      <p id="d2e986">A 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> volume of aerated seawater was gently added at the top of the two large cores dedicated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> microprofiles and porewater extraction and the overlying water was then aerated. The vertical oxygen concentration within the sediment was measured within an hour of sampling using Clark-type microelectrodes (OX100, Unisense with a repeatability better than 2 % as specified by the manufacturer) in one core. The core was maintained at in situ temperature (i.e., 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using ice packs and the overlying water was stirred and kept at 100 % of air saturation by gently bubbling it during all the following operations. For each location, we conducted five depth profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, randomly distributed within a single large sediment core. Microelectrodes were inserted into the sediment at 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals using a motor-driven micromanipulator (MU1, Pyroscience). The sediment surface was identified as the depth corresponding to the abrupt change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and was assigned a depth of 0. A two-point linear calibration of the electrodes was achieved from measurements of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of air bubbled overlying water (100 % saturation) and the anoxic zone of the sediment (0 %). Oxygen diffusive fluxes (DOU in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were computed from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient between 0 and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth below the sediment-water interface using Fick's first law of diffusion, as denoted in the following equation:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sediment porosity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the diffusion coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration gradient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1247">Oxygen penetration depth (OPD) was determined from the micro-profiles as the depth at which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % of the concentration at the sediment-water interface. Porewater extraction was performed on another large core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the core recovery) using CSS rhizons (Rhizosphere Research Products). Rhizons allow the extraction of porewater under a closed vacuum, minimizing the contact with atmospheric oxygen. After removing the overlying water to minimize potential contamination of surface porewater samples, Rhizons were horizontally inserted in the sediment core at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth. Porewater extraction was limited to 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per depth to reduce overlap between adjacent sampling volumes. Nevertheless, some overlap between the volumes sampled by neighbouring Rhizons cannot be excluded and may have smoothed concentration gradients in the uppermost centimetre. After extraction, porewater samples were stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until nutrient analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Reactive Fe oxyhydroxide concentrations</title>
      <p id="d2e1325">Following <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> microprofiling, the same large core was sectioned, and homogenized freeze-dried sediment from each depth interval was used for reactive Fe oxyhydroxide extractionusing a buffered ascorbate solution. The term “reactive” refers to the easily reducible fraction of Fe oxides, typically amorphous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxides (Hyacinthe et al., 2001; Kostka and Luther, 1994). The ascorbate reagent consisted of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of sodium citrate and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of sodium bicarbonate dissolved in 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of Nanopure<sup>®</sup> water, with 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of ascorbic acid added to reach pH 8 (Kostka and Luther, 1994). Approximately 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of ground, freeze-dried sediment was digested in 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the ascorbate reagent. After 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of shaking at room temperature, the sediment slurries were centrifuged, and a fraction of the supernatant was diluted with a 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution before Fe was analyzed using Microwave Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (4210 MP-AES, Agilent). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">asc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were corrected for sediment porosity and adjusted for salinity, with a measurement reproducibility better than 2 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Intact sediment core incubations and isotope pairing experiments</title>
      <p id="d2e1452">Six sediment cores were fitted with PVC lids equipped with a magnetic stirrer. Prior to the initial incubation, the overlying water in the sediment cores was carefully filled with previously collected and bubbled seawater, and the cores were left open and bubbled overnight for acclimation. The following day, the overlying water was completely replaced with fresh, previously collected and bubbled seawater, and left open while being gently bubbled with air for two hours before starting the experiment to restore initial oxygen and nutrient conditions. The dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was measured in real time using an optode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensor SP; PreSens with a repeatability better than 0.5 % as specified by the manufacturer) connected to a multichannel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> meter (OXY-10 SMA; PreSens) through optical fibre cables. Incubations were performed in the dark at the in situ water temperature (i.e., 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The incubation duration was adjusted so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation in the overlying water never dropped below 80 % of its initial value (typically between 1.5 and 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). During the incubations, discrete water samples were collected each hour, filtered (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for subsequent nutrient analyses. Water removed by sampling was automatically replaced with previously collected and bubbled seawater. Overall, cumulative volume of replacement waters corresponded to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % of the overlying water and its dilution effect was thus considered as negligible. After the initial incubation period, two thirds of the overlying water volume in each sediment core was replaced with freshly aerated site water to restore initial oxygen and nutrient conditions and minimize carry-over from the preceding flux incubation. The sediment cores were then left open, and the overlying water was gently bubbled with air for 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then, an initial water sample was extracted from the overlying water of all six sediment cores to determine the ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration before the addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stable isotope. A calculated volume of a 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution (99 % atom <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sigma-Aldrich) was then introduced into the overlying water of each core. For this tracer-addition experiment, the added volume was designed to achieve a nominal concentration equivalent to either 50 % or 100 % of the ambient concentration, with three cores per level. A 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pre-incubation period was implemented to ensure sufficient diffusion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the sediment nitrate reduction zone (Nielsen, 1992), including shallow rhizosphere and bioturbated layers. During this period, an air bubbling system was used to keep the overlying bottom-water homogeneously saturated with air, maintaining the in situ conditions. Following the pre-incubation, water samples were collected to determine the exact concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. Then, the incubations were performed as described above. Discrete water samples were collected using 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Exetainers, poisoned using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZnCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and analysed within a week for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. At the end of the incubations, the remaining water was mixed with the top 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the sediment column. From the slurry, 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of sample was transferred to an Exetainer to which 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZnCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were added for further <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis to assess DNRA rates.</p>
      <p id="d2e1834">For porewater sample, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (quantification limit 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (quantification limit 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (quantification limit 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (quantification limit 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations were analyzed using an autoanalyzer AA500 (Seal analytical) following Aminot et al. (2009). For water incubation samples, where sample volume was limited to avoid dilution due to replacement water, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined manually according to Hansen and Koroleff (1999), while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were analyzed by continuous flow analysis following Anderson (1979) both with measurements reproducibility better than 5 %. Analytical accuracy was assessed using certified reference materials (MOOS-4, NRC Canada).</p>
      <p id="d2e1981">The isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were completed within one week of collection using a membrane inlet mass spectrometer (MIMS, Bay Instruments) (Kana et al., 1994)following Kana et al. (2006). Calibration factors for standard sample were computed based on solubility equations (Hamme and Emerson, 2004). Analytical precision for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (coefficient of variation of five replicates standards) was consistently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 %. To quantify the production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the water samples were first gently bubbled with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to remove all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced during the incubation. The water samples were then treated with 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">KCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to desorb any particle-bound <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed by the addition of alkaline hypobromite iodine to oxidize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prior to analysis using MIMS as described in Yin et al. (2014).</p>
      <p id="d2e2216">The slope (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the linear regression of the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nutrients and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations over incubation duration was verified and used to compute benthic fluxes as follows:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M164" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mtext>benthic</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext> slope </mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mtext>benthic</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the flux across the sediment-water interface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of overlying water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface of the sediment-water interface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e2374">The validity of the original isotope pairing technique (Nielsen, 1992) was tested by checking the absence of increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the amount of added <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as the linear increase of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the amount of added <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Risgaard-Petersen et al., 2003). The tracer addition experiment provides no evidence of a substantial anammox contribution. DNRA was assessed independently from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in the terminal sediment slurry. Since no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production was detected DNRA was considered negligible. Both processes are therefore not considered further in the manuscript and denitrification rates, including the contributions supported by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the overlying water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced through sedimentary nitrification (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), were computed on the six sediment cores following Nielsen (1992).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS8">
  <label>2.8</label><title>Macrofauna identification</title>
      <p id="d2e2540">Macrofauna (epi- and infauna) was sorted and identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level (typically species level). Biomass (blotted wet mass; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0001 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was determined as well. Using this macrofauna dataset, total density, total biomass and species richness were calculated. In this study, we identified six biological traits characterized by multiple categories to describe the organisms' functional behaviors (Table 1). Taxa were assigned trait modalities using a standard fuzzy coding approach which allowed each taxon to represent multiple trait modalities and thus account for intraspecific variation. Scoring ranges from 0 to 3 were adopted with 0 corresponding to no affinity for a given trait modality, 1 and 2 reflecting a low and high affinity, respectively, and 3 an exclusive affinity. Information on trait expression for all taxa were extracted from Queiros et al. (2013) and Degen and Faulwetter (2019). When information was not available for a given taxon, information was obtained from that of closely related species at the nearest taxonomic level. The community trait expression in each sample was computed from the multiplication of the species density matrix by trait categories matrix.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2561">Biological traits. List of traits, trait categories and associated abbreviations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Trait</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Categories</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Abbreviation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Size</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">S_SMA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Small-medium (1–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">S_SMM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Medium (5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">S_MED</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Medium-large (10–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">S_MDL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mobility</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">M_LOW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Medium</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">M_MD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">M_HI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bioturbation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">None</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">B_NO</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface mixing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">B_SRM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Diffusive mixing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">B_DIF</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Environmental</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Epifauna</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P_EPI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">position</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Infauna</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P_IN</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Feeding Habit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Filter feeder</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">F_FIL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface deposit feeder</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">F_SRD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Subsurface deposit feeder</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">F_SBD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Predator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">F_PRE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Scavenger</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">F_SCA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS9">
  <label>2.9</label><title>Data analyses</title>
      <p id="d2e2827">Data analyses were performed using R software (R Core Team, 2024). Data values are given as means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD. First, linear models (lm function from <italic>stats</italic> package; R Core Team 2024) were fitted to test the effects of <italic>Site</italic> (fixed factor; five levels) on the total macrofauna density, biomass and species number, DOU, OPD, as well as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nutrients and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total benthic fluxes. Test assumptions were assessed for each model (plotQQunif function from <italic>DHARMa</italic> package; Hartig, 2026). Effect sizes were calculated as generalized eta squared (ges) to quantify the magnitude of <italic>Site</italic> effects, with ges values of 0.01, 0.06, and 0.14 representing small, medium, and large effects, respectively. Both p-values and effect sizes are reported (Table S2 in the Supplement) given the limited replication (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per site), which may affect statistical power. If a significant effect of the <italic>Site</italic> factor was observed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05), pairwise tests (Tukey contrast) were performed to characterize the differences between its levels. Second, macrofauna density data were transformed using Hellinger transformation. Sites were grouped using a hierarchical clustering analysis with a ward agglomeration method (hclust function from <italic>stat</italic> package; the number of clusters was determined using the HCPC function from <italic>FactoMineR</italic> package; Lê et al. 2008). Patterns of macrobenthic community assemblage were visualized using principal component analysis (PCA, RDA function from <italic>vegan</italic> package; Oksanen et al. 2022). In addition, the difference in macrobenthic community between clusters was tested using a multivariate analysis of variance (anova.cca function from <italic>vegan</italic> package). Finally, functional diversity was assessed using the dbFD function from the <italic>FD</italic> package (Laliberté and Legendre, 2010), computing functional richness (FRic) and functional evenness (FEve). Community-weighted mean trait values (CWM) were calculated and visualized using PCA as described above. Site effects on functional indices were tested using linear models as described above.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS10">
  <label>2.10</label><title>Methodological considerations</title>
      <p id="d2e2925">Sediment characteristics were measured with variable replication levels (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 5) due to analytical constraints. LOI was replicated five times, some parameters were duplicated, while others were measured once per station. The representativeness of these measurements is supported by two observations: (1) low variability among replicated measurements where available, and (2) strong consistency between highly replicated LOI values and corresponding Corg and TN measurements (Figs. S1 and S2).</p>
      <p id="d2e2940">Oxygen microprofiles and porewater nutrients were each measured on a separate single sediment core per location. This approach was chosen because biogeochemical heterogeneity of the sediment is often associated with microenvironments (Stockdale et al., 2009). Such approach is considered qualitatively robust (Bull and Taillefert, 2001). Nevertheless, since this sampling design may involve pseudo-replication, statistical results on these measurements should be interpreted cautiously. Measurement representativeness is supported by: (1) consistency among sediment characteristics, oxygen microprofiling, and porewater nutrient profiles measured in three independent cores per location, and (2) absence of large infauna in cores, limiting potential bias from bioturbation.</p>
      <p id="d2e2943">Our benthic flux incubations were conducted in the dark to standardize experimental conditions and ensure robust comparisons among sampling sites. This approach inherently excludes potential in situ effects of microphytobenthos or <italic>S. alterniflorus </italic>photosynthesis, both of which can significantly influence sediment oxygenation and nutrient uptake during daylight. However, in intertidal zones near breakwaters, high turbidity and suspended sediment loads, often limit light penetration and thereby reduce photosynthetic activity (Pratt et al., 2014). Moreover, belowground oxygen release by marsh roots correlates with photosynthesis but can persist in darkness (Koop-Jakobsen et al., 2018). As such, our dark incubations represent standardized dark benthic fluxes, under low-light conditions typical of these habitatsbut do not capture the full spectrum of benthic fluxes. Future studies combining dark and natural-light incubations would better characterize daytime flux dynamics, particularly where benthic primary producers receive substantial light during immersion. Denitrification rates were derived from the linear accumulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the overlying water, indicating consistent transfer of labelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the overlying water during the incubation. Because the terminal inventory of labelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolved in sediment porewaters was not quantified, we cannot exclude that some labelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced during the incubations had not reached the overlying water by the end of the experiment. Nevertheless, all incubations were conducted and analysed using the same standardized protocol, providing consistent measurements of labelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation across sites. Future studies could quantify the end point porewater inventory of labelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to assess its contribution to total production.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3039">Surficial Sediment characteristics. Median sediment grain size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), porosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, volume ratio), loss on ignition (LOI in %), organic carbon content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in %), total nitrogen content (TN, in %), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature (in ‰ vs. VPDB). Values are means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD with replication and sampling year (SY) indicated by superscripts (<sup>a</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SY: 2021–2022; <sup>b</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SY: 2021; none: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SY: 2021).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LOI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LBWN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.11<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LBWS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.13<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.89<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Sediment characteristics and biogeochemical properties</title>
      <p id="d2e3613">Among all sampling locations, surface sediments consisted of silty clay (Table 2). Overall, impacted sites (LBWN and LBWS) showed finer median grain size compared to reference sites (VS and UV). Correspondingly, sediment OC and TN contents tended to be higher in impacted sites, while VS exhibited the lowest OC and TN contents among sites. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures remained relatively uniform among all sites, suggesting a common mixture of terrestrial and marine carbon sources through the system. The intermediate sites (SBW) showed similar sediment characteristics to the two reference sites.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3634"><italic>Sediment biogeochemical propoerties.</italic> <bold>(a)</bold> Diffusive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (DOU) by the sediment and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> penetration depth (OPD).  <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration microprofile. <bold>(d)</bold> porewater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at each site (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with 5 pseudo replicates for DOU and OPD). <bold>(e)</bold> Solid-phase iron oxyhydroxide concentration at each site. Different letters indicate significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, Tuckey contrast) differences among the different levels of <italic>Site</italic> <bold>(a, b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3782">Vertical porewater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations showed contrasting dynamics among sites (Table S1 in the Supplement). DOU rates tended to be higher at impacted sites compared to intermediate and reference sites (Fig. 2a). Correspondingly, OPD were systematically shallower (Fig. 2b). Similarly, porewater nutrient distributions varied among sites (Fig. 2d). While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was near zero throughout the sediment column at all sites, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration consistently reached its peak at 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth, and then sharply decreased below the detection limit around 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deep in impacted sites and around 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deep in reference sites (Fig. 2d). The peak concentration was particularly high at VS. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration increased with depth with a larger increase at impacted sites compared to reference ones (Fig. 2d). The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration started from the sediment surface at impacted sites. In comparison, it started deeper (5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deep) at US and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was near zero along the sampled sediment column at VS (Fig. 2d). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a decreasing trend from the sediment surface to the bottom for LBWN and LBWS, no trend for US and an increase in the first 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> then a decrease for VS (Fig. 2e).</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3946"><italic>Univariate descriptors of macrofauna communities.</italic> Total biomass, density and species richness at the sampled sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per site). Different letters indicate significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, Tuckey contrast) differences among the different levels of <italic>Site</italic>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Macrobenthic community structure</title>
      <p id="d2e3994">A total of 2657 individuals from 12 samples (4 sites <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 replicates) were sorted, and 14 taxa were identified (Table S2). Total density, biomass and species richness significantly differed among sites (Table S1). However, these univariate metrics do not allow a clear separation between impacted and reference sites; comparisons must instead be made at the site level. Total densities tended to be higher at the sites LBWS than at LBWN, VS and US (Fig. 3). Total biomass was significantly lower at LBWN, LBWS and VS than at US. Finally, species richness was lower at LBWN than at LBWS, VS and US.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4006"><italic>Macrofauna community assemblages.</italic> <bold>(a)</bold> Hierarchical clustering and <bold>(b, c)</bold> principal component analyses (PCA) of Hellinger-transformed species densities. Panels show <bold>(b)</bold> scaling 1, and <bold>(c)</bold> scaling 2. Only variables representing at least 20 % of the total variation are shown. Abbreviations: MYA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>Mya</italic> sp.; MAC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>Macoma balthica</italic>; GAM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Gammarus spp.; OLI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Oligochaeta; GAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Gastropoda.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4071">Based on hierarchical clustering on species density, the sites could be separated into three groups (Fig. 4a). Cluster 1 included the impacted sites, cluster 2 corresponded to VS, and cluster 3 corresponded to the US. The statistical significance of these clusters was confirmed by MANOVA (Table S3 in the Supplement). The three clusters exhibited distinct macrofaunal assemblages (Fig. 4b and c). The impacted sites (cluster 1) were characterized by a high density of Oligochaetes and Polychaete <italic>Hediste diversicolor</italic>, while VS (cluster 2) were characterized by relatively high density of small body grazers (<italic>Gammarus</italic> spp. and Gastropods). US (cluster 3) were distinguished by a relatively high density of the bivalve <italic>Mya</italic> sp. Both clusters 2 and 3 showed notable densities of the bivalve <italic>Macoma balthica</italic> as compared to cluster 1. It is worth noting that while gathered in the same cluster, LBWS showed greater densities of <italic>H. diversicolor </italic>and Oligochaete than LBWN.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4092"><italic>Macrofauna community trait expression.</italic> <bold>(a)</bold> Functional richness (FRic) and <bold>(b)</bold> functional evenness (FEve); <bold>(c, d)</bold> PCA of community-weighted mean (CWM). Panels show <bold>(b)</bold> scaling 1, and <bold>(c)</bold> scaling 2. Only variables representing at least 20 % of the total variation are shown. See Table 1 for trait abbreviations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4118">Functional richness (FRic) differed significantly among sites (Table S1) and was higher at VS and US, intermediate at LBWS and lower at LBWN (Fig. 5a). Functional evenness (FEve) did not differ significantly among sites, although a large effect size (Table S1) suggests the functional evenness differences may exist but require greater sampling effort to confirm. Overall, FEve tended to be higher at LBWN, VS and US than at LBWS (Fig. 5b).</p>
      <p id="d2e4121">Beyond diversity metrics, the community-weighted mean trait composition revealed contrasting spatial patterns (Fig. 5c). Although LBWN and US differed markedly in species composition, they exhibited partial convergence in trait expression (Fig. 5d). US was characterized by larger, more mobile organisms dominated by filter-feeding, predatory and scavenger trait expressions, while LBWN showed a tendency toward this trait profile. In contrast, LBWS and VS maintained clear segregation in trait expression. VS was characterized by epifauna with minimal or surface-restricted bioturbation, while LBWS trait expression was dominated by small-bodied infaunal organisms characterized by subsurface deposit feeding and biodiffusive bioturbation.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4126"><italic>Benthic fluxes.</italic> <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) across the sediment-water interface. The dashed bar plots depict the denitrification of nitrate produced within the sediment through nitrification (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the percentage represents the proportion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> explained by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>. Different letters indicate significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, Tuckey contrast) differences among the different levels of <italic>Site</italic>. Note that positive values correspond to an uptake by the sediment, and negative values correspond to a release by the sediment. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per site except at SBW where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/7327/2026/bg-23-7327-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Benthic fluxes</title>
      <p id="d2e4344">Total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes differed significantly among sites (Table S1). Total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes were always negative, indicating an uptake by the sediment while positive total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux indicated a release by the sediment (Fig. 6a). Similarly to the macrobenthic community structure results, comparison should be made at the site level. Overall, all benthic fluxes followed the same pattern with higher fluxes at LBWS and VS than at LBWN, SBW and US (Fig. 5a). Total denitrification (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) also differed significantly among sites (Table S1). Similarly to benthic fluxes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was highest at sites VS and LBWS and lowest at sites LBWN and US (Fig. 6b). The contribution of sedimentary nitrification to total denitrification (coupled nitrification–denitrification; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was higher than 50 % at sites LBWN, LBWS and VS and lower than 10 % at site US.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Impact of breakwater construction on benthic habitats</title>
      <p id="d2e4471">Our study highlights marked alterations in surficial sediment characteristics, with impacted sites (i.e., LBWS and LBWN) accumulating finer and more organic-rich sediment than reference and intermediate sites. These observations are consistent with expectations for low-energy depositional environments landward of high-crested breakwaters (Da Silva et al., 2022; van Rijn, 2011; Wang et al., 2021). In contrast, sediments at the intermediate site (SBW) resembled those at the reference sites (i.e., US and VS), suggesting minimal breakwater influence in this area. The consistent sedimentary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature among sites suggested a shared origin of organic carbon, likely reflecting a mixture of terrestrial and marine inputs typical of intertidal zones. This homogeneity suggests that low-energy hydrodynamic conditions landward of the breakwater enhance deposition of fine, organic-rich particles without selective retention of organic matter from specific sources. Therefore, differences among sampled areas are driven by organic carbon quantity, not origin.</p>
      <p id="d2e4490">Geochemical measurements further support this pattern. Sediment cores from impacted sites showed up to 2.3 times higher diffusive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (DOU) and shallower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> penetration depth (OPD) than reference sites (Fig. 2a and b), consistent with enhanced organic carbon mineralization driven by higher organic carbon content (Glud, 2008). These results align well with our porewater nutrient profiles extracted from another sediment core. The decrease in porewater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration with depth in all sites indicates a consumption by by microbial processes within the sediment (Fig. 2d), consistent with our measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> benthic fluxes (Fig. 6). This consumption results from the denitrification process, which has been detected at all sites (Fig. 6). VS exhibited a subsurface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak, suggesting active nitrification consistent with rhizosphere oxygenation (Koop-Jakobsen et al., 2018), this pattern is consistent with the relatively high proportion of coupled nitrification–denitrification detected in incubation experiment. This interpretation is further corroborated by the solid-phase ascorbate extractable iron (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">asc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) profiles (Fig. 2e). At VS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">asc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase progressively from the surface to a peak at 3–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth, well below the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum (Fig. 2d), suggesting subsurface oxidation consistent with rhizosphere oxygenation. Although nitrification likely occurs within this oxygenated rhizosphere zone, the absence of a corresponding accumulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the depth of maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">asc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that newly produced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is rapidly consumed by denitrification in adjacent anoxic sediment, preventing its accumulation in porewater. (Koop-Jakobsen et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2016). The quicker <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption in the porewater of impacted sites in the upper four centimeters compared to six centimeters in reference sites suggests a more reduced condition in impacted sites. Similarly, deeper sediment layers in impacted sites exhibit greater increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to reference sites, indicating larger ammonification driven by their higher organic matter content, along with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release, typically associated with the reductive dissolution of iron-oxyhydroxides in anoxic sediment layers (Slomp, 2011). Consistently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">asc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>concentrations at impacted sites are highest at the sediment surface and decrease rapidly with depth (Fig. 2e). This indicates that aerobic processes, including nitrification, are restricted to the very surface of the sediment at these sites. Overall, these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nutrient profiles suggest more reduced conditions and greater nutrient accumulations in the sediment column in impacted sites compared to reference sites. Despite these changes in sedimentary conditions, denitrification rates were not substantially altered, suggesting that distinct sediment biogeochemical conditions can sustain similar nitrogen removal rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Impact of breakwater construction on macrobenthic community structure</title>
      <p id="d2e4725">Consistent with previous studies on the ecological impact of shoreline stabilization structure (Bulleri and Chapman, 2010; Dugan et al., 2018; Gittman et al., 2016), impacted sites exhibited distinct assemblages compared to reference sites. Impacted sites were notably dominated by high densities of small-bodied <italic>H. diversicolor</italic> and Oligochaetes, the former being tolerant to organic enrichment, and the latter considered opportunistic under such conditions and often associated with fine-grained, organic-rich sediments (Borja et al., 2000). Both <italic>H. diversicolor</italic> and Oligochaetes are significant bioturbators (Queirós et al., 2013) that influence sediment structure, biogeochemistry and microbial activity at the sediment-water interface (Kristensen et al., 2012). In contrast, reference sites supported less dense but more diverse communities in terms of species and function. Notably, US appeared to be colonized by larger organisms than VS, as suggested by species traits analysis (Fig. 5d) and the relatively low total density and high total biomass in US (Fig. 3). This difference may reflect the dense root and rhizome network of <italic>S. alterniflorus</italic> in VS, which could hamper the movement and burrowing of larger infauna (Pascal et al., 2020; van Wesenbeeck et al., 2007). The higher density of biodiffusive bioturbation at impacted sites, and particularly LBWS (Fig. 5c), suggests that some ecosystem processes, such as sediment oxygenation and nutrient regeneration, may persist despite habitat alteration. However, the lower biodiversity and functional richness and evenness, at these sites may limit functional redundancy thereby reducing the resilience of ecosystem functions to additional stressors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Potential convergence in ecosystem functioning</title>
      <p id="d2e4745">Despite marked differences in sediment characteristics, macrobenthic community structure and trait expression between impacted and reference sites (i.e., LBWN vs. US and particularly LBWS vs. VS), total benthic fluxes and denitrification rates remained similar. A similar convergence in process rates despite contrasting biological drivers has been reported in other benthic systems (Woodin et al., 2016). Here, however, it results from distinct mechanisms, namely root-driven oxygenation and bioturbation. These findings, derived from dark incubations, suggest that distinct benthic environments can yield similar functional outcomes regarding oxygen uptake, nutrient cycling and notably denitrification rates. Our measured denitrification rates ranging from 6 to 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fall within the range of reported denitrification rates for temperate intertidal mudflats and salt marshes (Hinshaw et al., 2017; Koch et al., 1992; Poulin et al., 2007; Sousa et al., 2012). Coupled nitrification–denitrification (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was the dominant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-removal pathway at impacted sites and VS, indicating that denitrification relies on locally produced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Conversely, at US, denitrification was primarily driven by water-column nitrate. The high density of subsurface bioturbators at LBWS (Fig. 5c) likely enhances oxygen and nutrient exchange at the sediment-water interface. The sediment irrigation enhances aerobic mineralisation of the OM, stimulates nitrification fuelling coupled nitrification–denitrification, a pattern supported by our isotope pairing results (Fig. 6). In VS, although macrofauna is present, bioturbation is absent or constrained to the sediment surface (Fig. 5c). However, as evidenced by the deep subsurface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">asc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak (Fig. 2e; Sect. 4.1), radial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss from <italic>S. alterniflora</italic> roots actively creates deep oxidized zones (Koop-Jakobsen et al., 2018). This rhizosphere oxygenation sustains subsurface nitrification, which is tightly coupled to denitrification, thereby achieving high denitrification rates similar to those driven by bioturbation at LBWS. By contrast, LBWN showed a trait expression tendency toward US that could yield similar benthic fluxes. The low denitrification rates at US likely reflect the relatively low organic carbon availability compared to impacted sites, which limits ammonium regeneration through organic matter mineralisation and consequently limits nitrate production through nitrification, thereby reducing coupled nitrification–denitrification. Moreover, macrofauna at US is dominated by a few large burrowers (e.g., <italic>Mya</italic> sp.) whose local influence may not be captured at the core scale, leading to low benthic fluxes. Interestingly, despite being both impacted sites and having similar sediment characteristics, LBWN and LBWS exhibited different ecosystem functions based on total benthic fluxes and denitrification rates. This most likely results from the higher density of macrobenthic organisms at LBWS than at LBWN, highlighting the critical role of macrobenthic community activity in shaping biogeochemical processes (Snelgrove et al., 2018). In the absence of dense bioturbators, the high organic carbon content at LBWN promotes reducing conditions at LBWN (Fig. 2d and e) that limit oxygen availability and thereby nitrification, ultimately restricting the nitrate supply available for denitrification. However, the factors driving the variation in macrobenthic community structure between these two areas remain elusive. The absence of a detectable breakwater effect on denitrification rates therefore does not reflect an absence of biogeochemical change, but rather a functional compensation mediated by distinct biological drivers at each site.</p>
      <p id="d2e4837">Placed in a broader context, although the impacts of coastal protection structures on benthic nitrogen cycling remain poorly documented, our results suggest that these effects are structure specific. Indeed, vertical, hard-engineered structures like seawalls induce coastal squeeze and habitat loss. This reduces the nitrogen-removal capacity at the scale of the seascape, even if unit-area denitrification rates remain unaffected (O'Meara et al., 2015). Conversely, in the present study, our offshore breakwater accumulates organic-rich sediment. This accumulation, associated with dense populations of bioturbators (e.g., <italic>H. diversicolor</italic>), sustains a bioirrigation pathway that functionally substitutes for the lost sediment oxygenation by roots. While this functional equivalence aligns with observations from nature-based protections like living shorelines (Onorevole et al., 2018; Schoell et al., 2023), our study shows that it can also occur in a completely different, fully artificial environment. Taken together, these results show that even in artificialized settings, nitrogen-removal processes can remain functionally equivalent, as long as biogeochemical mechanisms capable of coupling nitrification and denitrification are maintained. Whether such compensatory mechanisms occur in other artificialized systems will depend on local environmental conditions and biological assemblages.</p>
      <p id="d2e4843">From a coastal-management perspective, one of the main issues is whether areal benthic fluxes and denitrification rates measured in LBWS can offset, at the seascape level, the functional loss caused by salt marsh vegetation removal. LBWS area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is about three times larger than the vegetated area directly lost due to the breakwater implementation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As a first-order estimate, and assuming that the measured fluxes capture the whole area heterogeneity, LBWS could compensate for these specific functional capacity losses of that part of the salt marsh. However, it is worth noting that this area is still more than three times smaller than the total vegetated area lost due to combined erosion and breakwater implementation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 62 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) so any functional compensation remains only partial at the scale of the whole seascape.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e4911">Our study highlights the complex relationships between sediment characteristics, macrobenthic communities, and ecosystem functioning in coastal environments impacted by shoreline hardening structures. We observed that some ecosystem functions (i.e., benthic respiration, nutrient cycling, and denitrification rates) can be maintained through several combinations of abiotic and biotic factors. This finding reflects a convergence in ecosystem functioning that can arise from distinct underlying mechanisms. However, it is important to interpret these results carefully. While we observed functional similarities in specific ecosystem functions, natural coastal habitats provide an extensive collection of ecosystem functions and services (Friess et al., 2020; Gedan et al., 2009) that are far from being fully captured by our measurements. The observed functional convergence may contribute to the resilience of some ecosystem functions at the seascape level. However, these localized similarities do not mean that these functions are unaltered, as the underlying mechanisms are completely modified and potentially more vulnerable to additional environmental pressures. Furthermore, it does not imply that artificialized environments can sustain all ecosystem functions and services provided by natural habitats. These findings highlight the challenges in predicting and managing ecosystem responses to shoreline hardening, coastal squeeze and probably other coastal disturbances. It also emphasizes that physical, geochemical, and biological factors should be considered when assessing the functional impact of coastal development projects. Given the increasing pressures on coastal ecosystems (Halpern et al., 2019), future research should assess the ability of artificialized ecosystems to maintain their functions under multiple stressors and investigate their long-term stability under various climate change scenarios. Finally, broader ecological implications of apparent functional convergence in coastal ecosystems including potential cascading effects on higher trophic levels should be explored. This understanding will be crucial for developing more accurate predictive models and effective management strategies in the face of ongoing coastal development and climate change.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e4918">The data and code supporting this study are archived at the Observatoire global du Saint-Laurent (OGSL) and are accessible at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.26071/a974587e-583e-4a2c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.26071/a974587e-583e-4a2c</ext-link> (Pascal et al., 2026).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e4924">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7327-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7327-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e4934">LP: Conceptualization (lead), Methodology (lead), Investigation (lead), Formal analysis (lead), Visualization (lead), Writing –  Original Draft Preparation (lead), Writing –  Review and Editing (lead); EDM: Investigation (supporting), Formal analysis (supporting), Writing –  Review and Editing (supporting); CAG: Investigation (supporting), Formal analysis (supporting); DD: Funding acquisition (lead) , Writing –  Review and Editing (supporting); CN: Investigation (supporting), Funding acquisition (supporting), Supervision (equal), Writing –  Review and Editing (supporting); LS: Investigation (supporting), Funding acquisition (supporting), Writing –  Review and Editing (supporting); FZ: Investigation (supporting); GC: Conceptualization (supporting), Investigation (supporting), Funding acquisition (supporting), Supervision (equal), Writing –  Review and Editing (supporting).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e4940">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e4946">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e4952">We acknowledge that this research was conducted on the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territory of the Wolastoqiyik Wahsipekuk First Nation in the Rivière-du-Loup region (Québec, Canada). We thank Joannie Cool for her assistance and support during the sampling, Marie-Pomme Poissant and Eve Tremblay-Morel for their assistance in macrofauna identification and Eve Beaudet and Pascal Rioux for their assistance in nutrients analyses. We are grateful to the GEOTOP facilities (Light stable isotope geochemistry laboratory, UQAM, Montréal, QC, Canada) for the analyses of sediment characteristics.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e4957">This work was financially supported through multiple postdoctoral fellowships (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.69777/281864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.69777/281864</ext-link> and <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.69777/322485" ext-link-type="DOI">10.69777/322485</ext-link>) from FRQNT (<uri>https://ror.org/00w3qhf76</uri>, last access: 28 September 2026) and MEOPAR (grant number PDF-25-2020) to LP. Funding was also provided by the Ministry of Transportation and Sustainable Mobility of Quebec to DD and by NSERC Discovery Grant to CN (DDG-2019-05993), DD (RGPIN-2021-03333) and GC (RGPIN-2018-556538). This project is a contribution to the Québec-Océan scientific program (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.69777/309012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.69777/309012</ext-link>) and the Canada First Research Excellence Fund – Transforming Climate Action research program.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e4975">This paper was edited by Ji-Hyung Park and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Albert, S., Bonaglia, S., Stjärnkvist, N., Winder, M., Thamdrup, B., and Nascimento, F. J. A.: Influence of settling organic matter quantity and quality on benthic nitrogen cycling, Limnol. Oceanogr., 66, 1882–1895, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.11730</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aminot, A., Kérouel, R., and Coverly, S. C.: Nutrients in Seawater Using Segmented Flow Analysis, in: Practical Guidelines for the Analysis of Seawater,   CRC Press, 408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420073072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/9781420073072</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, L.: Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of nitrite and nitrate by flow injection analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta, 110, 123–128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83537-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83537-6</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Barbier, E. B., Hacker, S. D., Kennedy, C., Koch, E. W., Stier, A. C., and Silliman, B. R.: The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services, Ecol. Monogr., 81, 169–193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1510.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/10-1510.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bernatchez, P. and Fraser, C.: Evolution of Coastal Defence Structures and Consequences for Beach Width Trends, Québec, Canada, J. Coastal Res., 285, 1550–1566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00189.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00189.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bernatchez, P. and Quintin, C.: Potentiel de migration des écosystèmes côtiers meubles québécois de l'estuaire et du golfe du Saint-Laurent dans le contexte de la hausse appréhendée du niveau de la mer, natcan, 140, 91–104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7202/1036507ar" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7202/1036507ar</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Borja, A., Franco, J., and Pérez, V.: A Marine Biotic Index to Establish the Ecological Quality of Soft-Bottom Benthos Within European Estuarine and Coastal Environments, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 40, 1100–1114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00061-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00061-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bozek, C. M. and Burdick, D. M.: Impacts of Seawalls on Saltmarsh Plant Communities in the Great Bay Estuary, New Hampshire USA, Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 13, 553–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-5543-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11273-004-5543-z</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bull, D. C. and Taillefert, M.: Seasonal and topographic variations in porewaters of a southeastern USA salt marsh as revealed by voltammetric profiling, Geochem. T., 2, 104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/1467-4866-2-104</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bulleri, F. and Chapman, M. G.: The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments, J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 26–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01751.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01751.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Da Silva, R. F., Hansen, J. E., Rijnsdorp, D. P., Lowe, R. J., and Buckley, M. L.: The influence of submerged coastal structures on nearshore flows and wave runup, Coast. Eng., 177, 104194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104194</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Dalsgaard, T., Thamdrup, B., and Canfield, D. E.: Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) in the marine environment, Res. Microbiol., 156, 457–464, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Degen, R. and Faulwetter, S.: The Arctic Traits Database – a repository of Arctic benthic invertebrate traits, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 301–322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-301-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-11-301-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Devol, A. H.: Denitrification, Anammox, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Production in Marine Sediments, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 7, 403–423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135040</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Dionne, J.-C.: Érosion récente des marais intertidaux de l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent, Québec, Geogr. Phys. Quatern., 40, 307–323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7202/032651ar" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7202/032651ar</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Doody, J. P.: Coastal squeeze and managed realignment in southeast England, does it tell us anything about the future?, Ocean Coast. Manage., 79, 34–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.008</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Duarte, C. M., Losada, I. J., Hendriks, I. E., Mazarrasa, I., and Marbà, N.: The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 961–968, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1970" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1970</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Dugan, J. E., Emery, K. A., Alber, M., Alexander, C. R., Byers, J. E., Gehman, A. M., McLenaghan, N., and Sojka, S. E.: Generalizing Ecological Effects of Shoreline Armoring Across Soft Sediment Environments, Estuar. Coast., 41, 180–196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0254-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12237-017-0254-x</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Friess, D. A., Yando, E. S., Alemu I, J. B., Wong, L.-W., Soto, S. D., and Bhatia, N.: Ecosystem services and disservices of mangrove forests and salt marshes, in: Oceanography and Marine Biology, edited by: Hawkins, S. J., Allcock, A. L., Bates, A. E., Evans, A. J., Firth, L. B., McQuaid, C. D., Russell, B. D., Smith, I. P., Swearer, S. E., and Todd, P. A., CRC Press, 107–141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429351495-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/9780429351495-3</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gedan, K. B., Silliman, B. R., and Bertness, M. D.: Centuries of Human-Driven Change in Salt Marsh Ecosystems, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 117–141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163930" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163930</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gibeault, C., Neumeier, U., and Bernatchez, P.: Spatial and Temporal Sediment Dynamics in a Subarctic Salt Marsh (Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada), J. Coastal Res., 32, 1344–1361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00160.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00160.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Gittman, R. K., Fodrie, F. J., Popowich, A. M., Keller, D. A., Bruno, J. F., Currin, C. A., Peterson, C. H., and Piehler, M. F.: Engineering away our natural defenses: an analysis of shoreline hardening in the US, Frontiers Ecol. Environ., 13, 301–307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/150065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/150065</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gittman, R. K., Scyphers, S. B., Smith, C. S., Neylan, I. P., and Grabowski, J. H.: Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis, BioScience, 66, 763–773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/biosci/biw091</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Glud, R. N.: Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments, Mar. Biol. Res., 4, 243–289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000801888726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/17451000801888726</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Halpern, B. S., Frazier, M., Afflerbach, J., Lowndes, J. S., Micheli, F., O'Hara, C., Scarborough, C., and Selkoe, K. A.: Recent pace of change in human impact on the world's ocean, Sci. Rep., 9, 11609, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47201-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-47201-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hamme, R. C. and Emerson, S. R.: The solubility of neon, nitrogen and argon in distilled water and seawater, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 1517–1528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.06.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2004.06.009</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, H. P. and Koroleff, F.: Determination of nutrients, in: Methods of Seawater Analysis, edited by: Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., and Ehrhardt, M., Wiley, 159–228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527613984.ch10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9783527613984.ch10</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hartig, F.: DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models, R package version 0.5.0, CRAN, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.DHARMa" ext-link-type="DOI">10.32614/CRAN.package.DHARMa</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hinshaw, S. E., Tatariw, C., Flournoy, N., Kleinhuizen, A., Taylor, C., Sobecky, P. A., and Mortazavi, B.: Vegetation Loss Decreases Salt Marsh Denitrification Capacity: Implications for Marsh Erosion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 8245–8253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00618</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hyacinthe, C., Anschutz, P., Carbonel, P., Jouanneau, J.-M., and Jorissen, F. J.: Early diagenetic processes in the muddy sediments of the Bay of Biscay, Mar. Geol., 177, 111–128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(01)00127-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0025-3227(01)00127-X</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Jevrejeva, S., Jackson, L. P., Riva, R. E. M., Grinsted, A., and Moore, J. C.: Coastal sea level rise with warming above 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13342–13347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605312113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1605312113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kana, T. M., Darkangelo, Christina., Hunt, M. Duane., Oldham, J. B., Bennett, G. E., and Cornwell, J. C.: Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometer for Rapid High-Precision Determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Environmental Water Samples, Anal. Chem., 66, 4166–4170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00095a009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac00095a009</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kana, T. M., Cornwell, J. C., and Zhong, L.: Determination of denitrification in the Chesapeake Bay from measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation in bottom water, Estuar. Coast., 29, 222–231, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02781991" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02781991</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Koch, M. S., Maltby, E., Oliver, G. A., and Bakker, S. A.: Factors controlling denitrification rates of tidal mudflats and fringing salt marshes in south-west England, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 34, 471–485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(05)80118-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0272-7714(05)80118-0</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Koop-Jakobsen, K. and Giblin, A. E.: The effect of increased nitrate loading on nitrate reduction via denitrification and DNRA in salt marsh sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 789–802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.2.0789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2010.55.2.0789</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Koop-Jakobsen, K., Mueller, P., Meier, R. J., Liebsch, G., and Jensen, K.: Plant-Sediment Interactions in Salt Marshes – An Optode Imaging Study of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Gradients in the Rhizosphere, Front. Plant Sci., 9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fpls.2018.00541</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kostka, J. E. and Luther, G. W.: Partitioning and speciation of solid phase iron in saltmarsh sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 1701–1710, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90531-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(94)90531-2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kristensen, E., Penha-Lopes, G., Delefosse, M., Valdemarsen, T., Quintana, C., and Banta, G.: What is bioturbation? The need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 446, 285–302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09506" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps09506</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Laliberté, E. and Legendre, P.: A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, Ecology, 91, 299–305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/08-2244.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lê, S., Josse, J., and Husson, F.: FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis, J. Stat. Softw., 25, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18637/jss.v025.i01</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Mcowen, C., Weatherdon, L., Bochove, J.-W., Sullivan, E., Blyth, S., Zockler, C., Stanwell-Smith, D., Kingston, N., Martin, C., Spalding, M., and Fletcher, S.: A global map of saltmarshes, Biodiversity Data Journal, 5, e11764, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11764" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3897/BDJ.5.e11764</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>MELCCFP: Ministère de l'Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs, Hydrometric station 030240 (Rivière Rimouski), daily discharge data, Gouvernement du Québec, <uri>https://www.cehq.gouv.qc.ca/hydrometrie/</uri> (last access: 14 August 2026), 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Mentaschi, L., Vousdoukas, M. I., Pekel, J.-F., Voukouvalas, E., and Feyen, L.: Global long-term observations of coastal erosion and accretion, Sci. Rep., 8, 12876, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30904-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-30904-w</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>MNRF: Imagerie orthorectifiée du Québec, Ministère des ressources naturelles et des forêts, <uri>https://www.donneesquebec.ca/recherche/dataset/imagerie-orthorectifiee-du-quebec</uri> (last access: 15 June 2026), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A. T., Zimmermann, J., and Nicholls, R. J.: Future Coastal Population Growth and Exposure to Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Flooding – A Global Assessment, PLOS ONE, 10, e0118571, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118571" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0118571</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Nielsen, L. P.: Denitrification in sediment determined from nitrogen isotope pairing, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 86, 357–362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb04828.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb04828.x</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation> Nixon, S. W.: Enriching the sea to death, Sci. Am., 279, 48–53, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., De Caceres, M., Durand, S., Evangelista, H. B. A., FitzJohn, R., Friendly, M., Furneaux, B., Hannigan, G., Hill, M. O., Lahti, L., McGlinn, D., Ouellette, M.-H., Ribeiro Cunha, E., Smith, T., Stier, A., Ter Braak, C. J. F., and Weedon, J.: vegan: Community ecology package (R package version 2.7-6), CRAN, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan" ext-link-type="DOI">10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>O'Meara, T., Thompson, S. P., and Piehler, M. F.: Effects of shoreline hardening on nitrogen processing in estuarine marshes of the U. S. mid-Atlantic coast, Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 23, 385–394, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-014-9388-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11273-014-9388-9</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Onorevole, K. M., Thompson, S. P., and Piehler, M. F.: Living shorelines enhance nitrogen removal capacity over time, Ecol. Eng., 120, 238–248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.05.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.05.017</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Pascal, L., Maire, O., Volkenborn, N., Lecroart, P., Bichon, S., de Montaudouin, X., Grémare, A., and Deflandre, B.: Influence of the mud shrimp <italic>Upogebia pusilla</italic> (Decapoda: Gebiidea) on solute and porewater exchanges in an intertidal seagrass (<italic>Zostera noltei</italic>) meadow of Arcachon Bay: An experimental assessment, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 477, 69–79, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.01.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jembe.2016.01.008</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Pascal, L., Bernatchez, P., Chaillou, G., Nozais, C., Lapointe Saint-Pierre, M., and Archambault, P.: Sea ice increases benthic community heterogeneity in a seagrass landscape, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 243, 106898, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106898" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106898</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Pascal, L., Chaillou, G., Nozais, C., Cool, J., Bernatchez, P., Letourneux, K., and Archambault, P.: Benthos response to nutrient enrichment and functional consequences in coastal ecosystems, Mar. Environ. Res., 175, 105584, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105584</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Pascal, L., Dansereau-Macias, É., Didier, D., Nozais, C., Sirois, L., Zouaghi, F., and Chaillou, G.: Macrofauna, Sediment Characteristics, and Benthic Biogeochemical Fluxes Across a Coastal Breakwater System (Version v1), CIOOS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.26071/a974587e-583e-4a2c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.26071/a974587e-583e-4a2c</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Poulin, P., Pelletier, E., and Saint-Louis, R.: Seasonal variability of denitrification efficiency in northern salt marshes: An example from the St. Lawrence Estuary, Mar. Environ. Res., 63, 490–505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.12.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.12.003</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Pratt, D. R., Pilditch, C. A., Lohrer, A. M., and Thrush, S. F.: The effects of short-term increases in turbidity on sandflat microphytobenthic productivity and nutrient fluxes, J. Sea Res., 92, 170–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2013.07.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.seares.2013.07.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Queirós, A. M., Birchenough, S. N. R., Bremner, J., Godbold, J. A., Parker, R. E., Romero-Ramirez, A., Reiss, H., Solan, M., Somerfield, P. J., Colen, C. V., Hoey, G. V., and Widdicombe, S.: A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates, Ecol. Evol., 3, 3958–3985, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.769" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ece3.769</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <uri>https://www.R-project.org/</uri> (last access: 15 September 2026), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Díaz, R. J., and Justić, D.: Global change and eutrophication of coastal waters, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 66, 1528–1537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsp047</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Risgaard-Petersen, N., Nielsen, L. P., Rysgaard, S., Dalsgaard, T., and Meyer, R. L.: Application of the isotope pairing technique in sediments where anammox and denitrification coexist, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 1, 63–73, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2003.1.63" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lom.2003.1.63</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Sauvé, P., Bernatchez, P., and Glaus, M.: The role of the decision-making process on shoreline armoring: A case study in Quebec, Canada, Ocean Coast. Manage., 198, 105358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105358</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Savoie-Ferron, F., Drouet, M., Drejza, S., Fraser, C., Marie, G., and Bernatchez, P.: Modélisation de l'effet de la hausse du niveau de la mer sur les marais maritimes, Rapport remis au ministère de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, Chaire de recherche en géoscience côtière, Laboratoire de dynamique et de gestion intégrée des zones côtières, Université du Québec à Rimouski, <uri>https://ldgizc.uqar.ca/Web/docs/default-source/default-document-library/modelisationmaraismaritime_final631935a5fc7f4cfe9e19ff4fb79274e5.pdf?sfvrsn=6e502e29_2</uri> (last access: 16 February 2026), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Schoell, M., Ayvazian, S., Cobb, D., Grunden, D., Chintala, M., Gerber-Williams, A., Pimenta, A., Strobel, C., and Rocha, K.: Exploring the Use of Living Shorelines for Stabilization and Nutrient Mitigation in New England, Ecological Rest., 41, 84–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3368/er.41.2-3.84" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3368/er.41.2-3.84</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Slomp, C. P.: Phosphorus cycling in the estuarine and coastal zones, in: Treatise on estuarine and coastal science,   Elsevier, 201–229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-374711-2.00506-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/b978-0-12-374711-2.00506-4</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Snelgrove, P. V. R., Soetaert, K., Solan, M., Thrush, S., Wei, C.-L., Danovaro, R., Fulweiler, R. W., Kitazato, H., Ingole, B., Norkko, A., Parkes, R. J., and Volkenborn, N.: Global Carbon Cycling on a Heterogeneous Seafloor, Trends Ecol. Evol., 33, 96–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.004</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A., Lillebø, A., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Pardal, M., and Caçador, I.: Denitrification: an ecosystem service provided by salt marshes, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 448, 79–92, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09526" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps09526</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Sousa, A. I., Lillebø, A. I., Caçador, I., and Pardal, M. A.: Contribution of <italic>Spartina maritima</italic> to the reduction of eutrophication in estuarine systems, Environ. Pollut., 156, 628–635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.06.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2008.06.022</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Stief, P.: Stimulation of microbial nitrogen cycling in aquatic ecosystems by benthic macrofauna: mechanisms and environmental implications, Biogeosciences, 10, 7829–7846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7829-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-7829-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Stockdale, A., Davison, W., and Zhang, H.: Micro-scale biogeochemical heterogeneity in sediments: A review of available technology and observed evidence, Earth-Sci. Rev., 92, 81–97, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.11.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.11.003</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Valiela, I. and Cole, M. L.: Comparative Evidence that Salt Marshes and Mangroves May Protect Seagrass Meadows from Land-derived Nitrogen Loads, Ecosystems, 5, 92–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0058-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-001-0058-4</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>van Rijn, L. C.: Coastal erosion and control, Ocean Coast. Manage., 54, 867–887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.05.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.05.004</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>van Wesenbeeck, B. K., van de Koppel, J., Herman, P. M. J., Bakker, J. P., and Bouma, T. J.: Biomechanical warfare in ecology; negative interactions between species by habitat modification, Oikos, 116, 742–750, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15485.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15485.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Capurso, W., Chen, Q., Zhu, L., Niemoczynski, L., and Snedded, G.: Assessment of Wave Attenuation, Current Patterns, and Sediment Deposition and Erosion During Winter Storms by Living Shoreline Structures in Gandys Beach, New Jersey, U.S Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1040, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3133/ofr20211040</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Woodin, S. A., Volkenborn, N., Pilditch, C. A., Lohrer, A. M., Wethey, D. S., Hewitt, J. E., and Thrush, S. F.: Same pattern, different mechanism: Locking onto the role of key species in seafloor ecosystem process, Sci. Rep., 6, 26678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26678" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep26678</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Yin, G., Hou, L., Liu, M., Liu, Z., and Gardner, W. S.: A Novel Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometer Method to Measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Isotope-Enrichment Experiments in Aquatic Ecosystems, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 9555–9562, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es501261s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es501261s</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, Y., Hou, L., Liu, M., Yin, G., Gao, J., Jiang, X., Lin, X., Li, X., Yu, C., and Wang, R.: Community composition and activity of anaerobic ammonium oxidation bacteria in the rhizosphere of salt-marsh grass Spartina alterniflora, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 100, 8203–8212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7625-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00253-016-7625-2</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Zouaghi, F., Dansereau-Macias, E., Caulet, C., Dugas, S., Pascal, L., Chaillou, G., Sirois, L., Bernatchez, P., Nozais, C., Roberge, B., Noël, B., Bujold, É., and Didier, D.: Analyse, modélisation et suivi des interactions entre le briselames et la dynamique sédimentaire et végétale du marais le long de l'autoroute 20 à Rivière-du-Loup, CC26.1., Présenté au ministère des transports du Québec, Québec Transport, <uri>http://www.bv.transports.gouv.qc.ca/mono/1333285.pdf</uri> (last access: 14 October 2026), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Different paths, same destination: similar benthic nitrogen cycling sustained by distinct biogeochemical mechanisms in artificialized coastal systems</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Albert, S., Bonaglia, S., Stjärnkvist, N., Winder, M., Thamdrup, B., and Nascimento, F. J. A.:
Influence of settling organic matter quantity and quality on benthic nitrogen cycling, Limnol. Oceanogr., 66, 1882–1895, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11730" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11730</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aminot, A., Kérouel, R., and Coverly, S. C.:
Nutrients in Seawater Using Segmented Flow Analysis, in: Practical Guidelines for the Analysis of Seawater,   CRC Press, 408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420073072" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420073072</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, L.:
Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of nitrite and nitrate by flow injection analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta, 110, 123–128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83537-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83537-6</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barbier, E. B., Hacker, S. D., Kennedy, C., Koch, E. W., Stier, A. C., and Silliman, B. R.:
The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services, Ecol. Monogr., 81, 169–193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1510.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1510.1</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bernatchez, P. and Fraser, C.:
Evolution of Coastal Defence Structures and Consequences for Beach Width Trends, Québec, Canada, J. Coastal Res., 285, 1550–1566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00189.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00189.1</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bernatchez, P. and Quintin, C.:
Potentiel de migration des écosystèmes côtiers meubles québécois de l'estuaire et du golfe du Saint-Laurent dans le contexte de la hausse appréhendée du niveau de la mer, natcan, 140, 91–104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7202/1036507ar" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7202/1036507ar</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Borja, A., Franco, J., and Pérez, V.:
A Marine Biotic Index to Establish the Ecological Quality of Soft-Bottom Benthos Within European Estuarine and Coastal Environments, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 40, 1100–1114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00061-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00061-8</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bozek, C. M. and Burdick, D. M.:
Impacts of Seawalls on Saltmarsh Plant Communities in the Great Bay Estuary, New Hampshire USA, Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 13, 553–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-5543-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-5543-z</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bull, D. C. and Taillefert, M.:
Seasonal and topographic variations in porewaters of a southeastern USA salt marsh as revealed by voltammetric profiling, Geochem. T., 2, 104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-104</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bulleri, F. and Chapman, M. G.:
The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments, J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 26–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01751.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01751.x</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Da Silva, R. F., Hansen, J. E., Rijnsdorp, D. P., Lowe, R. J., and Buckley, M. L.:
The influence of submerged coastal structures on nearshore flows and wave runup, Coast. Eng., 177, 104194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104194</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dalsgaard, T., Thamdrup, B., and Canfield, D. E.:
Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) in the marine environment, Res. Microbiol., 156, 457–464, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Degen, R. and Faulwetter, S.:
The Arctic Traits Database – a repository of Arctic benthic invertebrate traits, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 301–322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-301-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-301-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Devol, A. H.:
Denitrification, Anammox, and N<sub>2</sub> Production in Marine Sediments, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 7, 403–423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135040</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dionne, J.-C.:
Érosion récente des marais intertidaux de l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent, Québec, Geogr. Phys. Quatern., 40, 307–323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7202/032651ar" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7202/032651ar</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Doody, J. P.:
Coastal squeeze and managed realignment in southeast England, does it tell us anything about the future?, Ocean Coast. Manage., 79, 34–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.008</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duarte, C. M., Losada, I. J., Hendriks, I. E., Mazarrasa, I., and Marbà, N.:
The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 961–968, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1970" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1970</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dugan, J. E., Emery, K. A., Alber, M., Alexander, C. R., Byers, J. E., Gehman, A. M., McLenaghan, N., and Sojka, S. E.:
Generalizing Ecological Effects of Shoreline Armoring Across Soft Sediment Environments, Estuar. Coast., 41, 180–196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0254-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0254-x</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Friess, D. A., Yando, E. S., Alemu I, J. B., Wong, L.-W., Soto, S. D., and Bhatia, N.:
Ecosystem services and disservices of mangrove forests and salt marshes, in: Oceanography and Marine Biology, edited by: Hawkins, S. J., Allcock, A. L., Bates, A. E., Evans, A. J., Firth, L. B., McQuaid, C. D., Russell, B. D., Smith, I. P., Swearer, S. E., and Todd, P. A., CRC Press, 107–141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429351495-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429351495-3</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gedan, K. B., Silliman, B. R., and Bertness, M. D.:
Centuries of Human-Driven Change in Salt Marsh Ecosystems, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 117–141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163930" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163930</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gibeault, C., Neumeier, U., and Bernatchez, P.:
Spatial and Temporal Sediment Dynamics in a Subarctic Salt Marsh (Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada), J. Coastal Res., 32, 1344–1361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00160.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00160.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gittman, R. K., Fodrie, F. J., Popowich, A. M., Keller, D. A., Bruno, J. F., Currin, C. A., Peterson, C. H., and Piehler, M. F.:
Engineering away our natural defenses: an analysis of shoreline hardening in the US, Frontiers Ecol. Environ., 13, 301–307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/150065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/150065</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gittman, R. K., Scyphers, S. B., Smith, C. S., Neylan, I. P., and Grabowski, J. H.:
Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis, BioScience, 66, 763–773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw091</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Glud, R. N.:
Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments, Mar. Biol. Res., 4, 243–289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000801888726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000801888726</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halpern, B. S., Frazier, M., Afflerbach, J., Lowndes, J. S., Micheli, F., O'Hara, C., Scarborough, C., and Selkoe, K. A.:
Recent pace of change in human impact on the world's ocean, Sci. Rep., 9, 11609, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47201-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47201-9</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hamme, R. C. and Emerson, S. R.:
The solubility of neon, nitrogen and argon in distilled water and seawater, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 1517–1528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.06.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.06.009</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hansen, H. P. and Koroleff, F.:
Determination of nutrients, in: Methods of Seawater Analysis, edited by: Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., and Ehrhardt, M., Wiley, 159–228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527613984.ch10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527613984.ch10</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hartig, F.: DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models, R package version 0.5.0, CRAN, <a href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.DHARMa" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.DHARMa</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hinshaw, S. E., Tatariw, C., Flournoy, N., Kleinhuizen, A., Taylor, C., Sobecky, P. A., and Mortazavi, B.:
Vegetation Loss Decreases Salt Marsh Denitrification Capacity: Implications for Marsh Erosion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 8245–8253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00618</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hyacinthe, C., Anschutz, P., Carbonel, P., Jouanneau, J.-M., and Jorissen, F. J.:
Early diagenetic processes in the muddy sediments of the Bay of Biscay, Mar. Geol., 177, 111–128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(01)00127-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(01)00127-X</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jevrejeva, S., Jackson, L. P., Riva, R. E. M., Grinsted, A., and Moore, J. C.:
Coastal sea level rise with warming above 2&thinsp;°C, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13342–13347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605312113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605312113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kana, T. M., Darkangelo, Christina., Hunt, M. Duane., Oldham, J. B., Bennett, G. E., and Cornwell, J. C.:
Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometer for Rapid High-Precision Determination of N<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>2</sub>, and Ar in Environmental Water Samples, Anal. Chem., 66, 4166–4170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00095a009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00095a009</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kana, T. M., Cornwell, J. C., and Zhong, L.:
Determination of denitrification in the Chesapeake Bay from measurements of N<sub>2</sub> accumulation in bottom water, Estuar. Coast., 29, 222–231, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02781991" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02781991</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koch, M. S., Maltby, E., Oliver, G. A., and Bakker, S. A.:
Factors controlling denitrification rates of tidal mudflats and fringing salt marshes in south-west England, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 34, 471–485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(05)80118-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(05)80118-0</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koop-Jakobsen, K. and Giblin, A. E.:
The effect of increased nitrate loading on nitrate reduction via denitrification and DNRA in salt marsh sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 789–802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.2.0789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.2.0789</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koop-Jakobsen, K., Mueller, P., Meier, R. J., Liebsch, G., and Jensen, K.:
Plant-Sediment Interactions in Salt Marshes – An Optode Imaging Study of O<sub>2</sub>, pH, and CO<sub>2</sub> Gradients in the Rhizosphere, Front. Plant Sci., 9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00541</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kostka, J. E. and Luther, G. W.:
Partitioning and speciation of solid phase iron in saltmarsh sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 1701–1710, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90531-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90531-2</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kristensen, E., Penha-Lopes, G., Delefosse, M., Valdemarsen, T., Quintana, C., and Banta, G.:
What is bioturbation? The need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 446, 285–302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09506" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09506</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laliberté, E. and Legendre, P.:
A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, Ecology, 91, 299–305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lê, S., Josse, J., and Husson, F.:
FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis, J. Stat. Softw., 25, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mcowen, C., Weatherdon, L., Bochove, J.-W., Sullivan, E., Blyth, S., Zockler, C., Stanwell-Smith, D., Kingston, N., Martin, C., Spalding, M., and Fletcher, S.:
A global map of saltmarshes, Biodiversity Data Journal, 5, e11764, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11764" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11764</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
MELCCFP:
Ministère de l'Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs, Hydrometric station 030240 (Rivière Rimouski), daily discharge data, Gouvernement du Québec, <a href="https://www.cehq.gouv.qc.ca/hydrometrie/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 August 2026), 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mentaschi, L., Vousdoukas, M. I., Pekel, J.-F., Voukouvalas, E., and Feyen, L.:
Global long-term observations of coastal erosion and accretion, Sci. Rep., 8, 12876, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30904-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30904-w</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
MNRF:
Imagerie orthorectifiée du Québec, Ministère des ressources naturelles et des forêts, <a href="https://www.donneesquebec.ca/recherche/dataset/imagerie-orthorectifiee-du-quebec" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 June 2026), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A. T., Zimmermann, J., and Nicholls, R. J.:
Future Coastal Population Growth and Exposure to Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Flooding – A Global Assessment, PLOS ONE, 10, e0118571, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118571" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118571</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nielsen, L. P.:
Denitrification in sediment determined from nitrogen isotope pairing, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 86, 357–362, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb04828.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb04828.x</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nixon, S. W.: Enriching the sea to death, Sci. Am., 279, 48–53, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., De Caceres, M., Durand, S., Evangelista, H. B. A., FitzJohn, R., Friendly, M., Furneaux, B., Hannigan, G., Hill, M. O., Lahti, L., McGlinn, D., Ouellette, M.-H., Ribeiro Cunha, E., Smith, T., Stier, A., Ter Braak, C. J. F., and Weedon, J.: vegan: Community ecology package (R package version 2.7-6), CRAN, <a href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Meara, T., Thompson, S. P., and Piehler, M. F.:
Effects of shoreline hardening on nitrogen processing in estuarine marshes of the U. S. mid-Atlantic coast, Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 23, 385–394, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-014-9388-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-014-9388-9</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Onorevole, K. M., Thompson, S. P., and Piehler, M. F.:
Living shorelines enhance nitrogen removal capacity over time, Ecol. Eng., 120, 238–248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.05.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.05.017</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pascal, L., Maire, O., Volkenborn, N., Lecroart, P., Bichon, S., de Montaudouin, X., Grémare, A., and Deflandre, B.:
Influence of the mud shrimp <i>Upogebia pusilla</i> (Decapoda: Gebiidea) on solute and porewater exchanges in an intertidal seagrass (<i>Zostera noltei</i>) meadow of Arcachon Bay: An experimental assessment, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 477, 69–79, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.01.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.01.008</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pascal, L., Bernatchez, P., Chaillou, G., Nozais, C., Lapointe Saint-Pierre, M., and Archambault, P.:
Sea ice increases benthic community heterogeneity in a seagrass landscape, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 243, 106898, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106898" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106898</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pascal, L., Chaillou, G., Nozais, C., Cool, J., Bernatchez, P., Letourneux, K., and Archambault, P.:
Benthos response to nutrient enrichment and functional consequences in coastal ecosystems, Mar. Environ. Res., 175, 105584, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105584" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105584</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pascal, L., Dansereau-Macias, É., Didier, D., Nozais, C., Sirois, L., Zouaghi, F., and Chaillou, G.: Macrofauna, Sediment Characteristics, and Benthic Biogeochemical Fluxes Across a Coastal Breakwater System (Version v1), CIOOS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.26071/a974587e-583e-4a2c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.26071/a974587e-583e-4a2c</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Poulin, P., Pelletier, E., and Saint-Louis, R.:
Seasonal variability of denitrification efficiency in northern salt marshes: An example from the St. Lawrence Estuary, Mar. Environ. Res., 63, 490–505, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.12.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.12.003</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pratt, D. R., Pilditch, C. A., Lohrer, A. M., and Thrush, S. F.:
The effects of short-term increases in turbidity on sandflat microphytobenthic productivity and nutrient fluxes, J. Sea Res., 92, 170–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2013.07.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2013.07.009</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Queirós, A. M., Birchenough, S. N. R., Bremner, J., Godbold, J. A., Parker, R. E., Romero-Ramirez, A., Reiss, H., Solan, M., Somerfield, P. J., Colen, C. V., Hoey, G. V., and Widdicombe, S.:
A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates, Ecol. Evol., 3, 3958–3985, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.769" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.769</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <a href="https://www.R-project.org/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 September 2026), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Díaz, R. J., and Justić, D.:
Global change and eutrophication of coastal waters, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 66, 1528–1537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp047</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Risgaard-Petersen, N., Nielsen, L. P., Rysgaard, S., Dalsgaard, T., and Meyer, R. L.:
Application of the isotope pairing technique in sediments where anammox and denitrification coexist, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 1, 63–73, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2003.1.63" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2003.1.63</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sauvé, P., Bernatchez, P., and Glaus, M.:
The role of the decision-making process on shoreline armoring: A case study in Quebec, Canada, Ocean Coast. Manage., 198, 105358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105358" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105358</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Savoie-Ferron, F., Drouet, M., Drejza, S., Fraser, C., Marie, G., and Bernatchez, P.:
Modélisation de l'effet de la hausse du niveau de la mer sur les marais maritimes, Rapport remis au ministère de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, Chaire de recherche en géoscience côtière, Laboratoire de dynamique et de gestion intégrée des zones côtières, Université du Québec à Rimouski, <a href="https://ldgizc.uqar.ca/Web/docs/default-source/default-document-library/modelisationmaraismaritime_final631935a5fc7f4cfe9e19ff4fb79274e5.pdf?sfvrsn=6e502e29_2" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 February 2026), 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schoell, M., Ayvazian, S., Cobb, D., Grunden, D., Chintala, M., Gerber-Williams, A., Pimenta, A., Strobel, C., and Rocha, K.:
Exploring the Use of Living Shorelines for Stabilization and Nutrient Mitigation in New England, Ecological Rest., 41, 84–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3368/er.41.2-3.84" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3368/er.41.2-3.84</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Slomp, C. P.:
Phosphorus cycling in the estuarine and coastal zones, in: Treatise on estuarine and coastal science,   Elsevier, 201–229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-374711-2.00506-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-374711-2.00506-4</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Snelgrove, P. V. R., Soetaert, K., Solan, M., Thrush, S., Wei, C.-L., Danovaro, R., Fulweiler, R. W., Kitazato, H., Ingole, B., Norkko, A., Parkes, R. J., and Volkenborn, N.:
Global Carbon Cycling on a Heterogeneous Seafloor, Trends Ecol. Evol., 33, 96–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.004</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sousa, A., Lillebø, A., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Pardal, M., and Caçador, I.:
Denitrification: an ecosystem service provided by salt marshes, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 448, 79–92, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09526" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09526</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sousa, A. I., Lillebø, A. I., Caçador, I., and Pardal, M. A.:
Contribution of <i>Spartina maritima</i> to the reduction of eutrophication in estuarine systems, Environ. Pollut., 156, 628–635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.06.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.06.022</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stief, P.:
Stimulation of microbial nitrogen cycling in aquatic ecosystems by benthic macrofauna: mechanisms and environmental implications, Biogeosciences, 10, 7829–7846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7829-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7829-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stockdale, A., Davison, W., and Zhang, H.:
Micro-scale biogeochemical heterogeneity in sediments: A review of available technology and observed evidence, Earth-Sci. Rev., 92, 81–97, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.11.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.11.003</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Valiela, I. and Cole, M. L.:
Comparative Evidence that Salt Marshes and Mangroves May Protect Seagrass Meadows from Land-derived Nitrogen Loads, Ecosystems, 5, 92–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0058-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0058-4</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Rijn, L. C.:
Coastal erosion and control, Ocean Coast. Manage., 54, 867–887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.05.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.05.004</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Wesenbeeck, B. K., van de Koppel, J., Herman, P. M. J., Bakker, J. P., and Bouma, T. J.:
Biomechanical warfare in ecology; negative interactions between species by habitat modification, Oikos, 116, 742–750, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15485.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15485.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, H., Capurso, W., Chen, Q., Zhu, L., Niemoczynski, L., and Snedded, G.:
Assessment of Wave Attenuation, Current Patterns, and Sediment Deposition and Erosion During Winter Storms by Living Shoreline Structures in Gandys Beach, New Jersey, U.S Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1040, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211040</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woodin, S. A., Volkenborn, N., Pilditch, C. A., Lohrer, A. M., Wethey, D. S., Hewitt, J. E., and Thrush, S. F.:
Same pattern, different mechanism: Locking onto the role of key species in seafloor ecosystem process, Sci. Rep., 6, 26678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26678" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26678</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yin, G., Hou, L., Liu, M., Liu, Z., and Gardner, W. S.:
A Novel Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometer Method to Measure <sup>15</sup>NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> for Isotope-Enrichment Experiments in Aquatic Ecosystems, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 9555–9562, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es501261s" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es501261s</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, Y., Hou, L., Liu, M., Yin, G., Gao, J., Jiang, X., Lin, X., Li, X., Yu, C., and Wang, R.:
Community composition and activity of anaerobic ammonium oxidation bacteria in the rhizosphere of salt-marsh grass Spartina alterniflora, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 100, 8203–8212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7625-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7625-2</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zouaghi, F., Dansereau-Macias, E., Caulet, C., Dugas, S., Pascal, L., Chaillou, G., Sirois, L., Bernatchez, P., Nozais, C., Roberge, B., Noël, B., Bujold, É., and Didier, D.:
Analyse, modélisation et suivi des interactions entre le briselames et la dynamique sédimentaire et végétale du marais le long de l'autoroute 20 à Rivière-du-Loup, CC26.1., Présenté au ministère des transports du Québec, Québec Transport, <a href="http://www.bv.transports.gouv.qc.ca/mono/1333285.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 October 2026), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
