BG Biogeosciences BG Biogeosciences 1726-4189 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/bg-7-1759-2010 Flow tilt angles near forest edges – Part 2: Lidar anemometry Dellwik E. 1 Mann J. 1 Bingöl F. 1 Wind Energy Division, Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Technical University of Denmark - DTU, P.O. Box 49, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark 26 05 2010 7 5 1759 1768 Copyright: © 2010 E. Dellwik et al. 2010 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/7/1759/2010/bg-7-1759-2010.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/7/1759/2010/bg-7-1759-2010.pdf

A novel way of estimating near-surface mean flow tilt angles from ground based Doppler lidar measurements is presented. The results are compared with traditional mast based in-situ sonic anemometry. The tilt angle assessed with the lidar is based on 10 or 30 min mean values of the velocity field from a conically scanning lidar. In this mode of measurement, the lidar beam is rotated in a circle by a prism with a fixed angle to the vertical at varying focus distances. By fitting a trigonometric function to the scans, the mean vertical velocity can be estimated. Lidar measurements from (1) a fetch-limited beech forest site taken at 48–175 m a.g.l. (above ground level), (2) a reference site in flat agricultural terrain and (3) a second reference site in complex terrain are presented. <br><br> The method to derive flow tilt angles and mean vertical velocities from lidar has several advantages compared to sonic anemometry; there is no flow distortion caused by the instrument itself, there are no temperature effects and the instrument misalignment can be corrected for by assuming zero tilt angle at high altitudes. Contrary to mast-based instruments, the lidar measures the wind field with the exact same alignment error at a multitude of heights. <br><br> Disadvantages with estimating vertical velocities from a lidar compared to mast-based measurements are potentially slightly increased levels of statistical errors due to limited sampling time, because the sampling is disjunct, and a requirement for homogeneous flow. The estimated mean vertical velocity is biased if the flow over the scanned circle is not homogeneous. It is demonstrated that the error on the mean vertical velocity due to flow inhomogeneity can be approximated by a function of the angle of the lidar beam to the vertical and the vertical gradient of the mean vertical velocity, whereas the error due to flow inhomogeneity on the horizontal mean wind speed is independent of the lidar beam angle. For the presented measurements over forest, it is evaluated that the systematic error due to the inhomogeneity of the flow is less than 0.2°. <br><br> The results of the vertical conical scans were promising, and yielded positive flow angles for a sector where the forest is fetch-limited. However, more data and analysis are needed for a complete evaluation of the lidar technique.

 References Bechmann, A., Berg, J., Courtney, M., Jørgensen, H., Mann, J., and Sørensensen, N.: The Bolund Experiment: Overview and Background, Tech. Rep. Risø-R-1658(EN), Risø DTU – National Laboratory for sustainable energy, 2009. Bingöl, F., Mann, J., and Foussekis, D.: Modeling conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain with WAsP Engineering, Meteorol. Z., 18, 189–195, 2009. Bingöl, F., Mann, J., and Larsen, G.: Lidar Measurements of Wake Dynamics Part I: One Dimensional Scanning, Wind Energy, 13, 51–61, 2010. Browning, K A. and Wexler, R.: The Determination of Kinematic Properties of a Wind Field Using Doppler Radar, J. Appl. Meteorol., 7, 105–113, 1968. Courtney, M., Wagner, R., and Lindelöw, P.: Testing and comparison of lidars for profile and turbulence measurements in wind energy, prefixhttp://stacks.iop.org/1755-1315/1/012021, last access: 20~May~2010, IOP~Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1, 012021, 14~pp., 2008. Davis, J C., Collier, C G., Davies, F., Pearson, G N., Burton, R., and Russell, A.: Doppler lidar observations of sensible heat flux and intercomparisons with a ground-based energy balance station and WRF model output, Meteorol. Z., 18, 155–162, 2009. Dellwik, E., Mann, J., and Larsen, K.: Flow tilt angles near forest edges - Part~1: Sonic anemometry, Biogeosciences, 7, 1745-1757, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1745-2010, 2010. Frisch, A S., Martner, B E., and Gibson, J S.: Measurement of the vertical flux of turbulent kinetic energy with a single Doppler radar, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 49, 331–337, 1989. Harris, M., Bryce, D J., Coffey, A S., Smith, D A., Birkemeyer, J., and Knopf, U.: Advance measurement of gusts by laser anemometry, 95, 1637–1647, 2007. Kindler, D., Oldroyd, A., Macaskill, A., and Finch, D.: An eight month test campaign of the Qinetiq ZephIR system: Preliminary results, Meteorol. Z., 16, 479–489, 2007. Lee, X.: On micormeteorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 91, 39–49, 1998. Lenschow, D H., Savic-Jovcic, V., and Stevens, B.: Divergence and Vorticity from Aircraft Air Motion Measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 2062–2072, 2007. Lothon, M., Lenschow, D H., and Mayor, S D.: Coherence and scale of vertical velocity in the convective boundary layer from a Doppler lidar, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 121, 521–536, 2006. Mann, J., Cariou, J.-P., Courtney, M S., Parmentier, R., Mikkelsen, T., Wagner, R., Lindelöw, P., Sjöholm, M., and Enevoldsen, K.: Comparison of 3D turbulence measurements using three staring wind lidars and a sonic anemometer, Meteorol. Z., 18, 135–140, 2009. Pena, A., Gryning, S., and Hasager, C.: Measurements and modelling of the wind speed profile in the marine atmospheric boundary layers, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 129, 479–495, 2008a. Pena, A., Hasager, C., Gryning, S., Antoniou, I., and Mikkelsen, T.: Offshore wind profiling using light detection and ranging measurements, Wind Energy, 12, 105–124, 2008b. Raupach, M., Finnigan, J., and Brunet, Y.: Coherent eddies and turbulent in vegetation canopies: the mixing layer analogy, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 78, 351–382, 1996. Siegman, A.: Lasers, University Science Books, 1256~pp., 1986. Sjöholm, M., Mikkelsen, T., Mann, J., Enevoldsen, K., and Courtney, M.: Time series analysis of continuous-wave coherent Doppler Lidar wind measurements, Meteorol. Z, 18, 281–287, 2009. Smith, D A., Harris, M., Coffey, A S., Mikkelsen, T., Jørgensen, H E., Mann, J., and Danielian, R.: Wind lidar evaluation at the Danish wind test site Høvsøre, Wind Energy, 9, 87–93, 2006. Sonnenschein, C M. and Horrigan, F A.: Signal-to-noise relationships for coaxial systems that heterodyne backscatter from atmosphere, Appl. Optics, 10, 1600, 1971.