<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\sloppy}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BGD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BGD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1810-6285</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bgd-12-18185-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Estimation of nutrient contributions from the ocean across a river basin
using stable isotope analysis</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Estimation of nutrient contributions from the ocean}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K. Nakayama et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nakayama</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          <email>nakayama@phoenix.kobe-u.ac.jp</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-1045</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Maruya</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Matsumoto</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Komata</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Komai</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Kuwae</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3048-3368</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Civil Engineering, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Kyoto University,
Kyoto, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kitami Institute of
Technology, Kitami, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Biotechnology and Environmental Chemistry, Kitami
Institute of Technology, Kitami, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Coastal and Estuarine Environment Research Group, Port and Airport
Research Institute, Yokosuka, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">K. Nakayama (nakayama@phoenix.kobe-u.ac.jp)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>21</issue>
      <fpage>18185</fpage><lpage>18211</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Total nitrogen (TN), which consists of total particulate nitrogen (TPN) and
total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), is transported with not only in river
channels but also across the entire river basin, including via ground water
and migratory animals. In general, TPN export from an entire river basin to
the ocean is larger than TDN in a mountainous region. Since marine derived
nutrients (MDN) are hypothesized to be mainly transported as suspended
matters from the ground surface, it is necessary to investigate the
contribution of MDN to the forest floor (soils) in order to quantify the
true role of MDN at the river ecosystem scale. This study investigated TN
export from an entire river basin, and also we estimated the contribution of
pink (<italic>Oncorhynchus gorbuscha</italic>) and chum salmon (<italic>O. keta</italic>) to total oceanic nitrogen input across a river
basin. The maximum potential contribution of TN entering the river basin by
salmon was found to be 23.8 % relative to the total amount of TN exported
from the river basin. The contribution of particulate nitrogen based on
suspended sediment from the ocean to the river basin soils was 22.9 %
with SD of 3.6 % by using stable isotope analysis (SIA) of nitrogen
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>SIA is increasingly being used to examine connectivity in coastal
aquatic-terrestrial ecosystems, such as the input of MDN from the open ocean
to coastal and widely river ecosystems (Wyatt et al., 2010a, b, 2012). In the case of river ecosystems, the
transportation of nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, by migrating
fish results in enhancement of biofilms and planktonic productivity in river
systems (Juday et al., 1932;   Cederholm and Peterson, 1985;   Bilby et al.,
1996;   Gresh et al., 2000;   Chaloner et al., 2002;   Moore and Schindler, 2004;
Yanai and Kochi, 2005;   Levi and Tank, 2013). Most of those cases, many
terrestrial consumers like mammals, birds, fishes and insects have been
shown to play a large role in terms of providing MDN to watersheds
(Donaldson, 1966;   Ben-David et al., 1997a;   Hilderbrand et al., 1999;   Gende
et al., 2002;   Naiman et al., 2002;   Wilkinson et al., 2005;   Bartz and Naiman,
2005). Moreover, MDN inputs have been shown as important processes
controlling the productivity of ecosystem. For example, Merz and Moyle
(2006) found that the contribution of MDN to the foliar nitrogen of wine
grapes was about 18 to 25 %. Also, Hilderbrand et al. (1999) demonstrated
that trees and shrubs near spawning streams receive 24 to 26 % of the
foliar nitrogen from MDN, while Helfield and Naiman (2002) suggested that
15.5 to 17.8 % of spruce foliage nitrogen is provided from MDN. Thus,
isotopic methods as intrinsic geospatial tracer provided quantification of
cross-ecosystem transfer of nutrients. In particular, migrating fish, such
as salmon, have been found to be necessary for a sustainable nutrient-cycle
system due to their important role as nutrient transporters (Ben-David et al., 1998;   Wipfli et al., 1998;   Yanai and Kochi, 2005;   Gende et al., 2007;
Hocking and Reimchen, 2009;   Hocking and Reynolds, 2011). Additionally, MDN
has been demonstrated to be important not only for river ecosystems but also
potentially for upstream lakes (Kline et al., 1990, 1993;
Schindler et al., 2003).</p>
      <p>When we consider nutrient flux in a river flowing from the upstream end into
the ocean, the flux depends on nutrients supplied not only inside the river
itself but also from the entire river basin (Dutta and Nakayama, 2010;   Alam
and Dutta, 2012;<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Riggsbee et al., 2008). Also, particulate nutrient flux,
which is given from surface soils dominantly, is revealed to be larger than
dissolved nutrient generally in a mountainous region (Nakayama et al.,
2011). Cederholm et al. (1989) demonstrated that mammals and birds consume
migrating fish, which may result in the secondary dispersion of MDN across
the river basin associated with the movement of these consumers. Other
studies have revealed that mammals incorporate MDN from salmon, which may
subsequently lead to re-export to the ocean through river flows (Bilby et al., 1996;   Ben-David et al., 1997a, b;  Hilderbrand et al., 1999;   Szepanski et al., 1999;   Reimchen, 2000). However, the
contribution of MDN to surface soils, which may be transported from a river
basin to the ocean as suspended sediments, at the river basin scale has not
been adequately quantified in natural systems because of difficulty to show
those complex food web and accurate biomass.</p>
      <p>In this study we present the TN transport across an entire river basin to
the ocean, the potential contribution of TN from the ocean to a river basin
by salmon, and the contribution of MDN to surface soils in a river basin.
Integrated stable isotope researches in the geological, hydrological and
biological aspects allowed us to estimate nutrient budgets in natural river
basin and convinced us to conserve the ocean river connectivity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Geophysical setting</title>
      <p>Our target area, the Shiretoko Peninsula, was registered as a World Natural
Heritage area in July of 2005. Shiretoko is located at the southernmost
extent of drift ice and its ecological systems exhibit high biodiversity and
high rates of nutrient circulation, particularly due to runs of pink
(<italic>Oncorhynchus gorbuscha</italic>) and chum (<italic>O. keta</italic>) salmon from the Sea of Okhotsk. Potential runs of salmon
along the coast of Hokkaido in the Sea of Okhotsk have been estimated at
about 29 900 000 individuals a year (Hokkaido National Fisheries Research
Institute, Fisheries Research Agency, 2009), equivalent to 2590 tons of
total nitrogen. The size of the Okhotsk coastal region of Hokkaido is about
24 000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which corresponds to that the mean total nitrogen input
from the ocean is about 108 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if we assume that all
salmon run up rivers and the total nitrogen is distributed into the river
basins completely. Shiretoko is located on the northeast coast of Hokkaido,
Japan (approximately 43<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>57</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 44<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>21</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
144<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>58</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 145<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>23</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E), and has a width, length and
maximum altitude of about 15, 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1660 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Fig. 1).
The Rausu River basin was selected as a main study area because its
watershed is the largest in the region and it is considered a representative
watershed in the Shiretoko Peninsula. The watershed area, river length, and
the mean river slope are 32.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Because of
the steep slope, nutrient flux due to suspended sediments is larger than
dissolved nutrient flux in the Rausu River basin (Nakayama et al., 2011).
Field experiments were carried out over 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2008 to 2012. In order
to compare with the Rausu River basin, the field observation regarding
stable isotope analysis was also carried out in 2014 in the Rusa River
basin. The watershed area, river length, and the mean river slope are 9.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Fig. 1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Nitrogen from a river basin to the ocean</title>
      <p>TN, TDN and TPN were measured at St.0 around the river mouth from 2007 to
2009 in the Rausu River basin (Fig. 2). The nitrogen concentration of
filtered and non-filtered water samples were analyzed by the cadmium
reduction-colorimetric method. Annual TN and annual TDN exports to the ocean
were evaluated using the river discharge at St.0 with TDN-discharge and
TPN-discharge curves. The TDN-discharge and TPN-discharge curves were
produced using ten different peak discharge floods and base flow discharges.
As river discharge was not measured during the winter season from January to
March, a storage function method was applied to estimate river discharge
from 2008 to 2012 (Michael, 1978; Michael et al., 1979). The validity of the
storage function method was confirmed through comparison with the observed
river discharge from April to December.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Salmon runs </title>
      <p>To evaluate the contribution of salmon to soil organic matter (SOM), salmon
runs were investigated in the Rausu River. Salmon were caught at the river
mouth for artificial incubation and release, providing an estimate of the
number of salmon caught by the apparatus (Hokkaido National Fisheries
Research Institute, Fisheries Research Agency, 2009). The apparatus for
catching salmon consisted of lattice fence, which does not obstruct flood
flow or completely block the runs of salmon. Therefore, it was necessary to
quantify the capture rate of the apparatus in order to estimate the actual
volume of salmon runs. Field observations were conducted in the
Tokorohoronai River, which is located in the same region of Hokkaido and has
a custom to remove its apparatus before and after salmon run seasons,
allowing us to monitor the salmon escapement from the apparatus and the
salmon run under the open condition at the same place. The capture rate of
the apparatus was calculated with numbers of salmons passing the observation
point which has a channel section of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in width and 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in depth,
instead of the Rausu River because its river width (about 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is too wide
to cover the entire width. We used two infrared cameras (SM-AVIR-602S, Hero
Corp., Izumo, Japan) placed 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> above the river surface and recorded videos
in all day to monitor the individual salmon passing this 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> section. Videos
were taken from the 25  to 28   November (before removal of
the apparatus) and from the 4  to 7   December (after removal
of the apparatus) in 2013. The number of salmon runs was calculated as the
differences of the numbers of individuals running to upstream and those to
downstream at the observation point. No salmon were captured and tagged for
individual identification. There was no influence of rainfall during the
observation period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Stable isotope analysis</title>
      <p>MDN, such as nitrogen, are generally supplied from the ocean to surface
soils in a river basin as SOM, which includes feces of mammals, droppings of
birds, and the remains of salmon preyed upon by mammals, birds and insects.
To focus on the influence of SOM on particulate nitrogen in the river basin
soils, soil particles with diameter of less than 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after rinsing
in 1N-HCL solution were used in the analysis. Therefore, it cannot be
allowed to evaluate how much TN is exported from the river basin to the
ocean. However, TPN export from an entire river basin is revealed to be
larger than TDN in the Rausu River basin due to the steep slope (Nakayama et al., 2011). In general, some proportion of the nitrogen is reduced due to
denitrification, which indicates the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of soil
(Yamada et al., 1996). Wada et al. (1984) demonstrated that denitrification
seems to have a small effect on the variation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SOM
under aerobic conditions close to the groundsurface in the natural forest.
Rennie et al. (1976) revealed that isotope ratio of nitrogen is identical
with organic nitrogen in the natural forest, which suggests that
denitrification does not involve any isotope fractionations. Mckinley et al. (2013) also demonstrates that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of groundsurface soil is in
aerobic conditions in forests when water table is not close to the
groundsurface. Since our sampling was carried out within 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> thickness from
the groundsurface and groundsuface soil is not saturated due to the steep
slope, sampled SOM is considered to be under aerobic conditions. Therefore,
we made an attempt to estimate the contribution of MDN to SOM as a sequel to
an accumulation, which directly corresponds to the suspended sediments
transporting particulate nutrient through a river to the ocean, by sampling
surface soils across the Rausu River basin (Fig. 2). Surface soil samples
were taken at 12, 20 and 21 stations in 2008, 2009 and 2012, respectively.
In 2008, fewer samples were taken as we did not have permission to sample
surface soils in special protection zones. Surface soils were sampled from
three different points at each station in a volume of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (height <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> width <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> depth). Surface soil
sampling stations in 2012 are shown in Fig. 2. Since previous studies have
revealed that surface soil transport is related to the spatial distribution
of surface soil type, land-use type and vegetation (Ishida et al., 2010),
the location of each sampling station was selected by dividing the river
basin into 21 domains (sub-basin areas) that vary in soil type and
vegetation. The spatial distribution of surface soil type is divided into 6
categories. Although the spatial pattern in vegetation is complicated, the
vegetation can generally be categorized in terms of altitude. Since
Shiretoko is protected as natural World Heritage area, all areas studied are
classified as forest and have high vegetation cover. Stable isotope ratios
of carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were measured
using a Delta Plus Advantage mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron) coupled
with an elemental analyzer (Flash EA 1112, Thermo Electron) at the Port and
Airport Research Institute, Japan (Table 1 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of SOM). Stable isotope ratios are expressed in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> notation
as the deviation from standards in parts per thousand (‰) according to the following equation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>standard</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite and atmospheric nitrogen were used as the isotope
standards of carbon and nitrogen, respectively. The analytical precision in
the mass spectrometer system based on the standard deviation of the internal
reference (L-histidine) replicates was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The contribution of MDN to SOM in surface soils was evaluated by applying
a two source mixing model based on stable isotope analysis (SIA) of carbon
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Kline et al., 1998;
Moore and Semmens, 2008;  Hossler and Bauer, 2012). Three soil samples were
collected at each sampling station in order to account for small scale
variability in SOM (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Salmon tissue isotopes were
considered representative of the isotope composition of ocean productivity.
To isotopically characterize terrestrial productivity, we considered one
terrestrial end-members (sources): Soil Samples exhibiting the Lowest values
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (hereafter SSL), and thus assumed
to have the highest terrestrial contribution to SOM. SSL was collected close
to the top of the mountain, where MDN is not expected to influence isotope
values. Representative soil samples collected in the same river basin were
chosen because they have isotopically similar characteristics to the target
soil samples in this study.</p>
      <p>The contribution of MDN to SOM was evaluated using a two sources mixing
model based on the measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
average contribution in the Rausu River basin was computed using each
sub-basin area obtained from the Thiessen method.

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C_MDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C_LDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C_MDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>salmon</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C_LDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SSL</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>soil</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>N_MDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>N_LDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>N_MDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>salmon</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>N_LDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SSL</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>soil</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C_MDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C_LDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
contributions of MDN and land-derived nutrient (LDN) by carbon, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>salmon</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SSL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>soil</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the stable isotope ratios of carbon for salmon, SSL
and soil samples, respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>N_MDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>N_LDN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the contributions of MDN and LDN by nitrogen,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>salmon</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>SSL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>soil</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the stable isotope ratios of nitrogen for salmon, SSL
and soil samples, respectively.</p>
      <p>As bamboo grass (<italic>Sasa senanensis</italic>) is the dominant species in the study area, bamboo grass
was collected at 13 soil sampling points (St.1, St.2, St.3, St.4, St.7,
St.8, St.10, St.11, St.12, St.13, St.14, St.17, and St.21). Furthermore,
droppings of sea eagles (<italic>Haliaeetus</italic> spp.) and feces of brown bear (<italic>Ursus arctos</italic>), which are
typical migratory mammals and birds in Shiretoko, were collected to
investigate whether or not they include MDN and thus contribute to SOM.
Samples of feces and droppings for SIA analysis offer a major advantage,
i.e. no isotopic fractionation and thus ideal to use the stable isotope
values as a MDN tracer (Fry, 2006). Chum salmon tissues and droppings of sea
eagles were collected at the river mouth and feces of brown bear were
collected at St.14. The samples were pre-treated by rinsing with
chloroform-methanol solution (2 : 1) prior to SIA, to remove isotopically
fractionated metabolites, such Metabolites in the samples were removed by
urea and ammonium (Kuwae et al., 2008, 2012).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Estimation of nitrogen export to the ocean </title>
      <p>During 2007 to 2009 the concentration of TDN was observed to be constant,
0.090 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (SD 0.022 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), regardless of the discharge in the
Rausu River. In contrast, TPN was revealed to be a function of river
discharge (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Eq. 6) (Fig. 3). TPN showed a strong correlation
with suspended sediment (SS) concentrations, with SS concentration
increasing with increasing river discharge (Fig. 3). TPN was modeled by
using our field observation results, discharge and TPN as Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>).

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TPN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0032</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>1.771</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the river discharge (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>The validity of the storage function method model was confirmed using the
observed river discharge from April to September of 2009, which resulted in
a Coefficient of Determination (CoD) of 0.61. The reliability of the model
has been shown to be high enough for the analysis of river discharge when
the CoD is more than 0.6 (Dutta and Nakayama, 2010). Annual mean export of
TDN, TPN and TN from 2008 to 2012 were 5210, 14 750 and 19 960 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Since the size of the Rausu River
basin of Shiretoko is 32.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the annual mean exports of TDN, TPN and
TN per unit catchment area were 160, 454 and 614 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Table 2). The
average concentrations of TDN and TPN from 2008 to 2012 were 0.090 and 0.216 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which agrees with a previous study at the
site (Nakayama et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Contribution of salmon runs to nitrogen input from the ocean </title>
      <p>The average number of salmon passing the cameras in the Tokorohoronai River
during the 4 days while the apparatus for catching salmon was present was
0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average numbers for 4 days after the apparatus was
removed from the river was 0.61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, so the rate of capture of salmon
by the apparatus (CS) was estimated as 20 %: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.61</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn>0.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Since the field observations were conducted at the end of November and the
beginning of December after the peak of salmon runs, floods may damage the
apparatus for catching salmon and the estimated capture rate, 20 %, may
be underestimated. Therefore, we attempted to apply two different larger
rates of capture of salmon, 50 and 80 %, in order to show the
possible nutrient re-export from the ocean due to salmon runs.</p>
      <p>In the Rausu River of Shiretoko, the annual average numbers of salmon caught
by the apparatus at the river mouth were 3075 and 10 580 for chum and pink
salmon, respectively, from 2001 to 2009. By assuming that all apparatuses
have the same rate of capture, the potential for chum and pink salmon runs
can be estimated as 15 375 and 52 900 (CS 20 %), 6150 and 21 160 (CS 50 %), and 3844 and 13 225 (CS 80 %), respectively. The average weight of
chum and pink salmon are 3.3 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>respectively (Makiguchi et al.,
2007), with a nitrogen content of about 30.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Larkin and Slaney,
1997). Therefore, annual TN potentially transported by chum and pink salmon
is estimated to be 1542 and 3216 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CS 20 %), 617 and 1287 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CS 50 %), and 386 and 804 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CS 80 %), respectively. Finally, the annual TN
transported by chum and pink salmon per unit catchment area can be estimated
as 146 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CS 20 %), 59 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CS 50 %), and 37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CS 80 %), (SD 19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which corresponds to the contribution of TN by salmon, 23.8 %
(CS 20 %), 9.5 % (CS 50 %), and 6.0 % (CS 80 %), relative to
the annual outflow of TN per unit area (considered to be 100 %) (Table 2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Contribution of MDN to SOM in the Rausu River basin </title>
      <p>Both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SOM were lower than those of
salmons (Fig. 4). Interestingly, SSL has almost the same value of the mean
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of bamboo grass, which may suggest that bamboo grass can
be considered to be as LDN. The stable isotope ratios in sea eagle droppings
and brown bear feces were higher than LDN, indicating that sea eagles and
bears are also one of the transporter of MDN to SOM. In the case of multiple
food sources, feces and droppings are likely to be enriched in relatively
indigestible food sources, when compared with stomach contents or
assimilated materials (Sponheimer et al., 2003;   Kuwae et al., 2008). Therefore,
in the present study, feces and droppings are likely to be enriched in LDN
(e.g., plants) because LDN would be more indigestible than MDN (e.g.,
fishes). However, such an enrichment does not affect the qualitative
investigation, i.e., whether or not feces and droppings include MDN and thus
contribute to SOM. Since brown bears are previously thought to be the major
terrestrial consumer of spawning salmon, they may impact re-export of
nutrient from the ocean across the river basin, such as through release of
MDN-rich urine and feces (Hilderbrand et al., 1999). Rennie et al. (1976)
demonstrated that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is associated with soil organic matter,
which is given as leaf litters, droppings from birds, feces from animals and
so on. Also, Wada et al. (1984) revealed that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is almost
identical with organic nitrogen in natural forests. Therefore, it is
important to understand the influence of sea eagles and bears on
nutrient-cycle system. However, from Fig. 4, we cannot quantify the relative
contribution of sea eagles and bears to total MDN transport.</p>
      <p>The isotopic composition of salmon as representative of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 10.99 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>20.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SSL were <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>29.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. Therefore, the three year average estimate of the contribution
of MDN to SOM for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on the choice of terrestrial
isotope values was obtained e.g. 22.9 % (SD 3.6 %) by using a two
sources mixing model (Fig. 5). As the reference, the three year average
estimate of the contribution of MDN to SOM for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 17.7 % (SD 1.1 %) (Fig. 5). Since annual export of TPN per unit area from
the Rausu River basin to the ocean was 454 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, annual
re-export of TPN originally derived from the ocean is estimated to be
104 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>454</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>22.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (SD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>454</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the contribution of MDN to SOM (Fig. 5 and Table 2).</p>
      <p>Wada et al. (1984) demonstrated that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SOM in the forest
has significant variation in the surface soil, such as about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Jumonji in Chichibu and
at Mt. Shigayama, and about 1 to 5 ‰ at Memuro in the eastern Hokkaido. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of about 1 to 5 ‰ at Memuro was
obtained in the Hokkaido Agricultural Experimental Station, which is located
10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the center of Obihiro city where 150 000 people live. Therefore,
the values of about 1 to 5 ‰ at
Memuro are expected to include the influence of emission of anthropogenic
nitrogen. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in surface soil at Jumonji and at Mt. Shigayama may
support our assumption that the larger the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is, the higher
the contribution of MDN becomes. In order to confirm our assumption, we
carried out the similar field observation at the Rusa River basin (Fig. 6).
In the Rausu River, only a part of the area is registered as a special
protection zone of the Natural World Heritage region, but the whole area of
the Rusa River is covered by a special protection zone. The Rusa River basin
is thus considered as more protected and natural area as the Natural World
Heritage compared to the Rausu River. Therefore, the contribution of MDN is
expected to be larger in the Rusa River basin compared to the Rausu River
basin (Fig. 2). As a result, the spatial average of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
Rusa River basin was obtained as 1.1 ‰, which is 1.0 ‰ larger than the Rausu River basin. It may be thus
suggested that the higher value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SOM in surface soil
is associated with the contribution of MDN. However, it should be noted that
this value for MDN re-export is estimated without contribution of marine
derived TDN and thus should be considered the minimum annual MDN re-export
from the viewpoint of TN.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In recent decades, field experiments and stable isotope analyses have been
employed to understand the contribution of runs of salmon to river
ecosystems. In river ecosystems, runs of salmon are thought to play a large
role in the sustainability of nutrient circulation due to their contribution
to mammals that incorporate MDN and disperse it across the entire river
basin, with the MDN potentially re-exported to the ocean through river
flows. In previous studies, the input of TN from the ocean to river basin
ecosystems has been actively investigated, since it can control ecosystems
in which salmon run upstream for spawning, but the contribution of TN from
the ocean across an entire river basin has not been examined in detail. This
is despite the fact that waterfalls and the other obstacles, which inhibit
runs of salmon, are known to reduce the transport of MDN upstream.
Therefore, this study quantifies the role of salmon in transporting MDN
across an entire river basin of the Shiretoko World Natural Heritage area
using stable isotope analysis.</p>
      <p>Annual TN transport estimated for pink salmon was twice that for chum
salmon, which suggests that pink salmon play a greater role in the input of
TN across the Rausu River basin. The potential contribution of TN by salmon
was 23.8 % (CS 20 %), 9.5 % (CS 50 %), and 6.0 % (CS 80 %), while the contribution of MDN to SOM was 22.9 % (SD 3.6 %).
Therefore, the annual potential contribution of salmon to TN may be 146 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CS 20 %), 59 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CS 50 %),
and 37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CS 80 %), which provides valuable support
for an influence of MDN on the ecological systems across this river basin
(Table 2).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>K. Nakayama designed the field experiments and wrote most of the paper.
Also, K. Nakayama performed mixing model analysis. Also, Y. Maruya produced
the figures using the GIS technical input and carried out runoff analysis.
K. Komai helped the river discharge and nitrogen concentration analysis. M.
Komata, and K. Komai measured total nitrogen, dissolved total nitrogen and
particulate total nitrogen. K. Matsumoto carried out the field experiments
of salmon runs and conducted statistical analysis of stable isotopes. T.
Kuwae designed the field experiment regarding stable isotopes and carried
out stable isotope measurements. All authors read and commented on drafts of
this paper.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We wish to thank Tetsunori Inoue for helpful comments, and an anonymous
reviewers for their constructive comments, which have contributed to
a significant improvement of the manuscript. This work was supported by
a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (no. 24370016) from the Japan
Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Mitsui &amp; Co., Ltd.
Environment fund, and the Sumitomo foundation. The data for this paper are
available. Please contact to the corresponding author, Keisuke
Nakayama (keisuke_n@mui.biglobe.ne.jp).</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alam, M. J. and Dutta, D.: A process-based and distributed model for nutrient dynamics in river basin: development, testing and applications, Ecol. Model., 247, 112–124,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.031">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.031</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bartz, K. K. and Naiman, R. J.: Effects of salmon-borne nutrients on riparian soils and vegetation in Southwest Alaska, Ecosystems, 8, 529–545,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0064-z">10.1007/s10021-005-0064-z</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Ben-David, M., Flynn, R. W., and Schell, D. M.: Annual and seasonal changes in diets of martens: evidence from stable isotope analysis, Oecologia, 111, 280–291,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050236">10.1007/s004420050236</ext-link>, 1997a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Ben-David, M., Hanley, T. A., Klein, D. R., and Schell, D. M.: Seasonal changes in diets of coastal and riverine mink: the role of spawning Pacific salmon, Can. J. Zool., 75, 803–811,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z97-102">10.1139/z97-102</ext-link>, 1997b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Ben-David, M., Hanley, T. A., and Schell, D. M.: Fertilization of terrestrial vegetation by spawning Pacific salmon: the role of flooding and predator activity, Oikos, 83, 47–55, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bilby, R. E., Fransen, B. R., and Bisson, P. A.: Incorporation of nitrogen and carbon from spawning coho salmon into the trophic system of small streams: evidence from stable isotopes, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 53, 164–173,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f95-159">10.1139/f95-159</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cederholm, C. J. and Peterson, N. P.: The retention of coho salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus kisutch</italic>) carcasses by organic debris in small streams, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42, 1222–1225,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f85-150">10.1139/f85-150</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cederholm, C. J., Houston, D. B., Cole, D. I., and Scarlett, W. J.: Fate of coho salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus kisutch</italic>) carcasses in spawning streams, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 46, 1347–1355,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f89-173">10.1139/f89-173</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chaloner, D. T., Wipfli, M. S., and Caouette, J. P.: Mass loss and macroinvertebrate colonization of Pacific salmon carcasses in southeastern Alaskan streams, Freshwater Biol., 47, 263–273,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00804.x">10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00804.x</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Donaldson, J. R.: The phosphorus budget of Iliamna Lake, Alaska, as related to the cyclic abundance of sockeye salmon, Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Dutta, D. and Nakayama, K.: Impacts of Spatial data resolution in River flow Simulation by Physically Based Distributed Modeling Approach: a Case Study in Tsurumi River Basin, Japan, Hydrol. Process., 23, 534–545,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7183">10.1002/hyp.7183</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Fry, B. J.: Stable Isotope Ecology, Springer Verlag, New York, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Gende, S. M., Edwards, R. T., Willson, M. F., and Wipfli, M. S.: Pacific salmon in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, BioScience, 52, 917–928,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0917:PSIAAT]2.0.CO;2">10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0917:PSIAAT]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gende, S. M., Miller, A. E., and Hood, E.: The effects of salmon carcasses on soil nitrogen pools in a riparian forest of southeastern Alaska, Can. J. Forest Res., 37, 1194–1202,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X06-318">10.1139/X06-318</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Gresh, T., Lichatowich, J., and Schoonmaker, P.: An estimation of
historic and current levels of salmon production in the Northeast
Pacific ecosystem: evidence of a nutrient deficit in the freshwater
systems of the Pacific Northwest, Fisheries, 25, 15–21,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025&lt; 0015:AEOHAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025&lt; 0015:AEOHAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Helfield, J. M. and Naiman, R. J.: Salmon and alder as nitrogen sources to riparian forests in a boreal Alaskan watershed, Oecologia, 133, 573–582,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1070-x">10.1007/s00442-002-1070-x</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hilderbrand, G. V., Hanley, T. A., Robbins, C. T., and Schwartz, C. C.: Role of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in the flow of marine nitrogen into a terrestrial ecosystem, Oecologia, 121, 546–550,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050961">10.1007/s004420050961</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hocking, M. D. and Reimchen, T. E.: Salmon species, density and watershed size predict magnitude of marine enrichment in riparian food webs, Oikos, 118, 1307–1318, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hocking, M. D. and Reynolds, J. D.: Impacts of salmon on riparian plant diversity, Science, 331, 1609–1612,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1201079">10.1126/science.1201079</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hokkaido National Fisheries Research Institute, Fisheries Research
Agency, available at:
<uri>http://salmon.fra.affrc.go.jp/zousyoku/result/result.htm</uri> (last access: 24 October 2015),
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hossler, K. and Bauer, J. E.: Estimation of riverine carbon and organic matter source contributions using time-based isotope mixing models, J. Geophys. Res., 117, G03035,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JG001988">10.1029/2012JG001988</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Ishida, T., Nakayama, K., Okada, T., Maruya, Y., Onishi, K., and Omori, M.: Suspended sediment transport in a river basin estimated by chemical composition analysis, Hydrol. Res. Lett., 4, 55–59,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3178/hrl.4.55">10.3178/hrl.4.55</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Juday, C. W., Rich, H., Kemmerer, G. I., and Mann, A.: Limnological studies of Karluk Lake, Alaska, 1926–1930, Bull. US Bur. Fish., 47, 407–436, 1932.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Kline Jr., T. C., Goering, J. J., Mathisen, O. A., Poe, P. H., and Parker, P. L.: Recycling of elements transported upstream by runs of Pacific salmon: I. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evidence in Sashin Creek, southeastern Alaska, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 47, 136–144,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f90-014">10.1139/f90-014</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Kline Jr., T. C., Goering, J. J., Mathisen, O. A., Poe, P. H., Parker, P. L., and Scalan, R. S.: Recycling of elements transported upstream by runs of Pacific salmon: II. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evidence in the Kvichak River watershed, Bristol Bay, southwestern Alaska, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 50, 2350–2365,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f93-259">10.1139/f93-259</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Kline Jr., T. C., Wilson, W. J., and Goering, J. J.: Natural isotope indicators of fish migration at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55, 1494–1502,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f98-012">10.1139/f98-012</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kuwae, T., Beninger, P. G., Decottignies, P., Mathot, K. J., Lund, D. R., and Elner, R. W.: Biofilm grazing in a higher vertebrate: the Western Sandpiper, Calidris mauri, Ecology, 89, 599–606,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-1442.1">10.1890/07-1442.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kuwae, T., Miyoshi, E., Hosokawa, S., Ichimi, K., Hosoya, J., Amano, T., Moriya, T., Kondoh, M., Ydenberg, R. C., and Elner, R. W.: Variable and complex food web structures revealed by exploring missing trophic links between birds and biofilm, Ecol. Lett., 15, 347–356,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01744.x">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01744.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Larkin, G. A. and Slaney, P. A.: Implications of trends in
marine-derived nutrient influx to south coastal British Columbia
salmonid production, Can. J. For. Res., 22, 16–24,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1997)022&lt;0016:IOTIMN&gt;2.0.CO;2">10.1577/1548-8446(1997)022&lt;0016:IOTIMN&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Levi, P. S. and Tank, J. L.: Nonnative Pacific salmon alter hot spots of sediment nitrification in Great Lakes tributaries, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 436–444,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20044">10.1002/jgrg.20044</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Makiguchi, Y., Nii, H., Nakao, K., and Ueda, H.: Upstream migration of adult chum and pink salmon in the Shibetsu River, Hydrobiologia, 582, 43–54,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0555-8">10.1007/s10750-006-0555-8</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Mckinley, R., Radcliffe, D., and Mukundan, R.: A streamlined approache for sediment source fingerprinting in a Southern Piedmont watershed, USA, J. Soil. Sediment., 13, 1754–1769,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0723-1">10.1007/s11368-013-0723-1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Merz, J. E. and Moyle, P. B.: Salmon, wildlife, and wine:
marine-derived nutrients in human-dominated ecosystems of central
California, Ecol. Appl., 16, 999–1009,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0999:SWAWMN]2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0999:SWAWMN]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Michael, J. B.: A storage-routing model relating drainage basin hydrology and geomorphology, Water Resour. Res., 14, 921–928,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR014i005p00921">10.1029/WR014i005p00921</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Michael, J. B., Pilgrim, D. H., and Cordery, I.: A storage routing model based on catchment geomorphology, J. Hydrol., 42, 209–230,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(79)90048-9">10.1016/0022-1694(79)90048-9</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Moore, J. W. and Schindler, D. E.: Nutrient export from freshwater ecosystems by anadromous sockeye salmon (<italic>Oncorhynchus nerka</italic>), Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 61, 1582–1589,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/F04-103">10.1139/F04-103</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Moore, J. W. and Semmens, B. X.: Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models, Ecol. Lett., 11, 470–480,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01163.x">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01163.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Naiman, R. J., Bilby, R. R., Schindler, D. E., and Helfield, J. M.: Pacific salmon, nutrients, and the dynamics of freshwater and riparian ecosystems, Ecosystems, 5, 399–417,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0083-3">10.1007/s10021-001-0083-3</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Nakayama, K., Aynur, A., Nakaegawa, T., and Maruya, Y.: Evaluation of nutrient flux from Shiretoko into the ocean using MRI-GCM, Hydrol. Res. Lett., 5, 47–51,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3178/hrl.5.47">10.3178/hrl.5.47</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Reimchen, T. E.: Some ecological and evolutionary aspects of bear – salmon interactions in coastal British Columbia, Can. J. Zool., 78, 448–457,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z99-232">10.1139/z99-232</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Rennie, D. A., Paul, E. A., and Johns, L. E.: Natural nitrogen-15 abundance of soil and pland samples, Can. J. Soil Sci., 56, 43–50,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjss76-006">10.4141/cjss76-006</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Riggsbee, J. A., Orr, C. H., Leech, D. M., Doyle, M. W., and Wetzel, R. G.: Suspended sediments in river ecosystems: photochemical sources of dissolved organic carbon, dissolved organic nitrogen, and adsorptive removal of dissolved iron, J. Geophys. Res., 113, G03019,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000654">10.1029/2007JG000654</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Schindler, D. E., Scheuerell, M. D., Moore, J. W., Gende, S. M., Francis, and T. B., Palen, W. J.: Pacific salmon and the ecology of coastal ecosystems, Front. Ecol. Environ., 1, 31–37,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0031:PSATEO]2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0031:PSATEO]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Sponheimer, M., Robinson, T., Ayliffe, L., Passey, B., Roeder, B., Shipley, L., Lopez, E., Cerling, T., Dearing, D., and Ehleringer, J.: An experimental study of carbon-isotope fractionation between diet, hair, and feces of mammalian herbivores, Can. J. Zool., 81, 871–876,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/Z03-066">10.1139/Z03-066</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Szepanski, M. M., Ben-David, M., and Ballenberghe, V. V.: Assessment of anadromous salmon resources in the diet of the Alexander Archipelago wolf using stable isotope analysis, Oecologia, 120, 327–335,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050866">10.1007/s004420050866</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Wada, E., Imaizumi, R., and Takai, Y.: Natural abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N in soil organic matter with special reference to paddy soils in Japan: biogeochemical implications on the nitrogen cycle, Biochem. J., 18, 109–123, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Wilkinson, C. E., Hocking, M. D., and Reimchen, T. E.: Uptake of salmon-derived nitrogen by mosses and liverworts in Coastal British Columbia, Oikos, 108, 85–98, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Wipfli, M. S., Hudson, J., and Caouette, J.: Influence of salmon carcasses on stream productivity: response of biofilm and benthic macroinvertebrates in southeastern Alaska, USA, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55, 1503–1511,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-55-6-1503">10.1139/cjfas-55-6-1503</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Wyatt, A. S. J., Waite, A. M., and Humphries, S.: Variability in
isotope discrimination factors in coral reef fishes: Implications for
diet and food web reconstruction, PLoS ONE, 5, e13682, 10,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013682" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0013682</ext-link>, 2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wyatt, A. S. J., Lowe, R. J., Humphries, S., and Waite, A. M.: Particulate nutrient fluxes over a fringing coral reef: relevant scales of phytoplankton production and mechanisms of supply, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 405, 113–130,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps08508">10.3354/meps08508</ext-link>, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Wyatt, A. S. J., Falter, J. L., Lowe, R. J., Humphries, S., and Waite, A. M.: Oceanographic forcing of nutrient uptake and release over a fringing coral reef, Limnol. Oceanogr., 57, 401–419,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.2.0401">10.4319/lo.2012.57.2.0401</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Yamada, Y., Ueda, T., and Wada, E.: Distribution of carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios in the Yodo River watershed, Jpn. J. Limnol., 57, 4, 467–477, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Yanai, S. and Kochi, K.: Effects of salmon carcasses on experimental stream ecosystems in Hokkaido, Japan, Ecol. Res., 20, 471–480,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11284-005-0056-7">10.1007/s11284-005-0056-7</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

<table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T1"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SOM in the Rausu River
basin in 2012.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>28.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>29.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>29.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>28.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>26.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>29.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>29.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>29.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>28.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>28.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">St.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Summary of annual export and re-export of nitrogen per unit area.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="91.048819pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">N re-export </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="center">N export </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Salmon run (%)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MDN input (%)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">N <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TDN</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5210</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">160</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TPN</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14 750</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">454</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">104 (22.9)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="2">TN</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" morerows="2">19 960</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3" morerows="2">614</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CS 20 %, 146 (23.8)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="2">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CS 50 %, 59 (9.5)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CS 80 %, 37 (6.0)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Salmon run)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(N export).<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (N export) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (MDN contribution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>22.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Coastline around the Shiretoko Peninsula and the Rausu River basin. </p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015-f01.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F2"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Elevation of the Rausu River basin. Green circles indicate surface soil sampling stations in September of 2012. Red circles indicates a field observation station for discharge, TDN (total dissolved nitrogen) and TPN (total particulate nitrogen). <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sampling stations in 2012. <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sampling stations in 2012. </p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015-f02.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F3"><caption><p>River discharge, total particulate nitrogen and suspended sediment at the river mouth of Rausu River. <bold>(a)</bold> River discharge and concentration of total particulate nitrogen. <bold>(b)</bold> Concentration of suspended sediment and concentration of total particulate nitrogen. </p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015-f03.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F4"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of bamboo grass (<italic>Sasa senamnensis</italic>), SSL (Soil Samples exhibiting the Lowest values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N), soil samples, bear feces (<italic>Ursus arctos</italic>), salmon (<italic>Oncorhynshus keta</italic>), and sea eagles droppings (<italic>Haliaeetus</italic> spp.). The bars indicate the standard deviation. </p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015-f04.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Contribution of MDN (marine derived nitrogen) from the ocean to the Rausu River basin in 2008, 2009 and 2012 using the two sources mixing model. <bold>(a)</bold> Average contributions of MDN based on SSL (Soil Samples exhibiting the Lowest values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N were 22.9 %. <bold>(b)</bold> Average contributions of MDN based on SSL for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 17.7 %. </p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015-f05.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F6"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Elevation of the Rusa River basin. Green circles indicate surface soil sampling stations in September of 2012. <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sampling stations in 2014. <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sampling stations in 2014. </p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/18185/2015/bgd-12-18185-2015-f06.pdf"/>

    </fig>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
