<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\sloppy}?><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{coc-co-li-tho-pho-res}}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BGD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BGD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1810-6285</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bgd-12-675-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Inter- and intra-specific responses of coccolithophores to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced ocean acidification</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Inter- and intra-specific responses of coccolithophores}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D.~S.~Wang et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D. S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>N. H.</given-names></name>
          <email>yenh@ysfri.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>W. Q.</given-names></name>
          <email>wenqiwang@qau.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X. W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Miao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Guan</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Marine Science and Engineering College, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>*</label><institution>These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">N. H. Ye (yenh@ysfri.ac.cn) and W. Q. Wang (wenqiwang@qau.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>675</fpage><lpage>706</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>5</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Oceanic uptake of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
altering the seawater chemistry of the world's oceans with
consequences for marine bioregions, especially calcareous organisms
such as corals, foraminifera and coccolithophores. The
coccolithophores, one of the most abundant and widespread groups of
calcifying plankton, are responsible for a large proportion of modern
oceanic carbonate production. However, culture experiments examining
the response of coccolithophores to elevated CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> partial
pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) have mostly been based on investigations of
a single strain and have yielded contradictory results from different
experiments between and even within species. Here, four strains of the
coccolithophores <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> (<italic>E. huxleyi</italic>) and
<italic>Gephyrocapsa oceanica</italic> (<italic>G. oceanica</italic>), which contained
separately naked and calcifying strains, were investigated
simultaneously for the first time in a bubbling batch culture at four
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> grades ranging from approximately 380 to
2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We synchronously determined multiple
physiological parameters of four coccolithophore strains involving
growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen uptake, elemental compositions and
calcification efficiency in the process of cultivation. The results
did not show a uniform response from different strains to elevated
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> up to 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the naked strain
<italic>E. huxleyi</italic> (N-E) was seriously suppressed, in sharp contrast to the positive response of the different levels of
the other three algae. In addition, we fitted nitrogen uptake rate response curves relative to changing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
the four strains and applied kinetic constants from the response curves to further analyze the hypostatic difference among
different strains, which reflected the same variational trend of the four stains above vs. increasing CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
We determined that the responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification are inter- and intra-specific, and this
variation may cause changes to biodiversity and other ecosystem processes in the future ocean.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Phytoplankton plays a crucial role in the ocean's food webs and biogeochemical cycles (Falkowski, 2012). Coccolithophores, unicellular haptophyte algae whose cell surface is covered with small intracellularly produced calcite platelets, are currently one of the most abundant and widespread groups of calcifying plankton in the ocean (Langer et al., 2009;  Langer, 2013;  Lohbeck et al., 2014;  Young et al., 2014). Additionally, they are known to participate in the carbonate pump and play a crucial role in the carbon biogeochemical cycle;  coccolithophores are capable of forming great blooms, which are thought to have a feedback effect on global climate change (Hutchins, 2011;  Riebesell and Tortell, 2011;  Jin et al., 2013;  Beaufort et al., 2014). However, ocean acidification generated by the increase in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is inducing a decrease in the surface ocean pH (estimated to decrease by 0.5 and 0.7 units by 2100 and 2300, respectively) (Caldeira and Wickett, 2003;  IPCC, 2007;  Ross et al., 2011), while simultaneously altering the variety of dissolved carbonate (Beaufort et al., 2011).  These changes in the surface ocean have massive impacts on coccolithophores and the other calcifying species, which is presumed to affect communities and the overall ecosystem and to damage the marine environment (Turley et al., 2010;  Hoppe et al., 2011;  Sinutok et al., 2011;  Lohbeck et al., 2012;  Meier et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Many studies with laboratory cultures and large-scale semi-enclosed field cultures (mesocosms) have intensively studied the response of individual coccolithophores to ocean acidification over the last decade, which has resulted in conflicting reports (Young et al., 2014). As the first widely adopted concept, Riebesell et al. (2000) indicated that there was a clear reduction in calcification of coccolithophores with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, simultaneously accompanied by increasing particulate organic carbon (POC). Subsequent experiments conducted on a single culture strain of <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> also showed a decreasing calcification rate of this species due to ocean acidification but with non-uniform (increasing, decreasing or unaffected) POC production (Zondervan et al., 2002;  Sciandra et al., 2003;  Delille et al., 2005;  Feng et al., 2008;  Müller et al., 2010;  Hoppe et al., 2011). However, many other studies with strains of <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> continued to reveal conflicting results, which showed an increasing (Iglesias-Rodriguez et al., 2008;  Shi et al., 2009;  Jones et al., 2013) or insensitive calcification rate (Langer et al., 2009;  De Bodt et al., 2010;  Fiorini et al., 2011a).</p>
      <p>In addition, one culture strain of each of the calcifying coccolithophores (<italic>G. oceanica</italic>, <italic>Calcidiscus leptoporus</italic> and <italic>Coccolithus braarudii</italic>) studied by previous researchers also expressed a different response pattern. For example, the strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic> PC7/1 displayed a comparatively larger decrease in the rate (44.7 %) of calcification (Riebesell et al., 2000), while the strain <italic>Coccolithus braarudii</italic> 4762 showed slightly increasing calcification rates (Rickaby et al., 2010), and the strain <italic>Calcidiscus leptoporus</italic> AC370 displayed an insensitive response to elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fiorini et al., 2011a).  Considering this contradictory result, different strains or species of coccolithophores have been simultaneously tested (Langer et al., 2006, 2009;  Fiorini et al., 2011a).  Langer et al. (2009) noted that the sensitivity of different <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> strains used in every previous study of ocean acidification differed constitutionally, likely because of the existence of a genetic basis to intra-specific responses. However, different calcification or naked strains from different species (as in our research) have not been investigated in previous studies.</p>
      <p>With the inconformity in the observed ocean acidification effects on calcification, the accurate prediction of the fate of coccolithophores in an increasingly acidified ocean remains problematic. Additionally, the response of the cosmopolitan dominant species <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> to ocean acidification, based on short-term experiments, has been intensively studied, and the literature is rapidly expanding. Langer et al. (2006) indicated that a bias may be created for species and clones best adapted to modern <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and that questions on the universal validity of the observed responses may also be raised.  However, due to the reality that non-calcifying strains of coccolithophores play an important ecological role in the marine ecosystem, naked strain should not be ignored and have only recently gained greater attention (Kottmeier et al., 2014). Therefore, simultaneously testing a wider range of species, including different strains, and examining the long-term effects of increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels is needed.</p>
      <p>In this study, we performed a series of laboratory experiments that represent projections of the future ocean acidification and simultaneously used two cosmopolitan species of coccolithophore, <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> and <italic>G. oceanica</italic>, which are naked and calcifying strains, respectively, to examine elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 380 to 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Physiological parameters, such as algal growth, algal photosynthesis parameters, nitrogen assimilation, particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) production, particulate organic carbon (POC) production, particulate organic nitrogen (PON) production and the rates between particulate matter, were examined to assess the potential change of each strain of coccolithophore vs. different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. In addition, we fitted nitrogen uptake rate response curves relative to changing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for four strains and applied kinetic constants from the response curves to further analyze the hypostatic difference among the different strains. These results were intended to provide insight into the different effects of ocean acidification on different coccolithophores under similar conditions and were beneficial for assessing future changes in biodiversity and other ecological processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Algal materials and growth conditions</title>
      <p>Naked and calcifying cells of <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> (strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic>, abbreviated N-E;  strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic>, CS369, abbreviated C-E) and <italic>G. oceanica</italic> (strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic>, NIES-1318, abbreviated N-G;  strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic>, abbreviated C-G) were obtained from the Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute Microalgae Culture Center. Taxonomic relationships of the four coccolithophore strains are depicted in Fig. S1. The cells were cultured in filtered (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) natural seawater enriched with nitrate and phosphate to concentrations of 882 and 36.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and with metals and vitamins according to f/2 (Guillard and Ryther, 1962) at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 32 ‰ salinity. The cells were exposed to a light : dark cycle (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and saturating light (300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photons <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) provided by white fluorescent lighting in an incubator. The culturing was conducted in sterilized 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Erlenmeyer flasks containing 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of medium, and algae in the exponential growth phase were used for inoculation in the experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Experimental set up</title>
      <p>We conducted replicate experiments by bubbling cultures of four species of coccolithophores using air with different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial pressures and adopting a flask and tubing system manipulated in plant growth chambers (GXZ, Ruihua, Wuhan, China) similar to Xu et al. (2014). The experiments were prepared with monospecific cultures of the four species of coccolithophore and reached the exponential growth phase under the above-mentioned conditions. Three replicate cultures of 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of each coccolithophore were incubated with aeration of different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial pressures in a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chamber. All the experiments were generally similar in design.  Differences are shown in Table S1, and treatments were bubbled continuously with air containing different partial pressures of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to provide 380, 750, 1000 and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the medium. The culture medium typically became stable after 48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of bubbling and before the start of the experimental inoculation. In each experiment, triplicate flasks for each air-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixture were maintained without added cells as a blank.  The cell density and pH were monitored, respectively. Triplicate sampling for culture medium, chlorophyll (Chl) content, PIC, POC, DIC and alkalinity measurements were conducted at the sampling point.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Carbonate chemistry analyses</title>
      <p>The corresponding pH of the culture medium was monitored with a pH meter (Orion ROSS, Thermo Electron Corp., Beverly, MA, USA). The samples for total alkalinity (TA) measurements were immediately filtered using a Whatman GF/F and stored in sealed 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> borosilicate bottles at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until measured.  The TA value was obtained using the 848 Titrino plus automatic titrator (Metrohm, Riverview, FL, USA). Parameters for the seawater carbonate system within experiments were calculated using the CO2SYS Package based on the pH, temperature, salinity, and TA according to the method of Pelletier et al. (2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Growth determination</title>
      <p>An accurate cell count was obtained to estimate microalgal growth by manual counting with a hemocytometer under an optical microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The specific growth rate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was determined as follows: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the cell concentrations at initial time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and subsequent time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Chlorophyll fluorescence parameter and pigment analysis</title>
      <p>The photosynthetic characteristics of tested coccolithophores were simultaneously determined using the pulse–amplitude modulated method with a Dual-PAM-100 (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) connected to a PC running WinControl software. Before measurement, the samples were kept in the dark for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the original fluorescence (F) was determined under low light. A saturation light pulse was applied to obtain maximum fluorescence (Fm) in the dark-adapted samples. The Fm yield in the illuminated samples was denoted as Fm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Ft<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was the real-time fluorescence yield. The maximal PSII quantum yield (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Fv</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Fm</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated according to the following equation: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>fv</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Fm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Fm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Fm</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The effective PSII quantum yield was calculated as follows: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y(II)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Fm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Ft</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Fm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>To determine the pigment content, the cells were collected onto Whatman GF/F filters (25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at every sampling point and then extracted in 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 90 % acetone for 24 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in darkness. After centrifugation at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7000</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the supernatant was used for content analysis at room temperature. The content of the chlorophyll was spectrophotometrically determined using the method of Jeffrey and Humphrey (1975).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Determination of nitrogen uptake</title>
      <p>Water samples (5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the experiment were collected and filtered quickly using acetate cellulose
filters and then frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in polyethylene flasks for storage until analysis. Before
analysis, stored culture media samples were thawed to room temperature, and nitrate concentrations were analyzed
photometrically using an AutoAnalyzer (BRAN and LUEBBE AA3, Germany). Nitrogen uptake rates were calculated
as follows: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NUR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
where NUR is the nitrogen uptake rate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmol</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of nitrate cell<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>);  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are the nitrate concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the beginning and on the 7th day of the experiment,
respectively;  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of the water (in L);  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the cell number (ind);  and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
time interval (in days). Moreover, we used Michaelis–Menten (Michaelis and Menten, 1913;  Hutchins et al., 2013) rectangular hyperbolic saturation equation curves to fit <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response curves for the nitrogen uptake rates in each of the triplicate cultures and for each strain in each <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatment. The work was completed using OriginPro software, including the calculation of kinetic constants and curve correlation coefficients.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Element analysis of tissue carbon and nitrogen content</title>
      <p>The samples for element analysis were taken from each replicate, filtered onto pre-combusted (500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) Whatman GF/F filters (25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until analysis. Prior to analysis, the POC filters were fumed over HCl for 24 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to remove all inorganic carbon and then dried again. The filters were then packed in solvent-rinsed tin sample boats for analysis. The POC, PON and TPC (total particulate carbon) concentrations were determined sequentially with a Vario EL III automatic elemental analyzer (Elementar Analysensysteme Co., Germany).  The PIC concentration was calculated by the differences between TPC and POC, and the POC, PIC or PON production was calculated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>specific growth rate</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>cellular POC, PIC or PON content</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>pg</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cell</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS8">
  <title>Data analysis</title>
      <p>All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) 17.0
data processing system software, and the mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SD was calculated for each experiment. A one-way ANOVA was
used to analyze the significance of variance among treatments. The significance level was set at 0.05 for all tests unless otherwise stated.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Variation of the carbonate system in the experiment</title>
      <p>This experiment adopted a gas bubbling method to mimic seawater acidification
and monitored the shift in parameters of the seawater-carbonate system,
including pH, DIC, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, under
different treatments. Figure S2 and Table S1 in the Supplement present the
changes of seawater pH when culturing different isolates vs. different
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. The initial pH values corresponding to elevated
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 380, 750, 1000 and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. The experimental conditions set in this study were not exactly
the same as those expected in ocean acidification because seawater contains
buffers to induce changes in alkalinity. Some measurements required a large
biomass; therefore, cell density was also very high, leading to a variation
in the carbonate system. Moreover, although these shifts existed, a clear
difference in pH among the four gradient cultures was maintained throughout
the experiment. Therefore, the results are strongly supported and have
significant implications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Effect of seawater acidification on the growth of coccolithophores</title>
      <p>The effect of different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the growth of four coccolithophores in plant growth chambers is presented in Fig. 1. The cell concentration in all treatments increased gradually over time to a maximum, with a subsequent decline at the end of the experiment, and there was significant effect of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on cell concentration for every species. The C-E, N-E and N-G showed a positive response to gradually increased <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, while the cell concentration of the N-E was suppressed as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Algal cells grew exponentially in all treatments during the first 7 days, and the specific growth rate is presented in Fig. 1e–h. Increasing the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases the specific growth rate by approximately 53 % (the C-E), 36 % (the N-G) and 30 % (the C-G), respectively. However, when the bubbling <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration reached 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the specific growth rate increased by approximately 26 % for the N-E;  with a continuous rise to 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the ocean acidification decreased the specific growth rate of the N-E by 14 % compared to the control. Moreover, when a comparison was conducted between or within species, the variability of <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> (naked strain to calcifying strain: reducing by 14 % to increasing by 53 %) exceeded that of the species <italic>G. oceanica</italic> (naked strain to calcifying strain: increasing by 36 and 30 %, respectively) under different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Effect of ocean acidification on the photosynthetic activity of\hack{\\} coccolithophores}?><title>Effect of ocean acidification on the photosynthetic activity of<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> coccolithophores</title>
      <p>Figure 2 shows the effects of ocean acidification by increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the changes in the photosystem activity parameters, including <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Y(II), during the culture of coccolithophores. Both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Y(II) in all treatments showed a negative influence from increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the magnitude was different among the four species. With incubation time, every photosystem activity parameter of the four coccolithophores simultaneously reached a maximum value on the 7th day, before a subsequent decline till the end of experiment, except for the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of C-E (on the 10th day) and the N-E (continuous decline) for the 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sample point. As <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in plant growth chambers, significant suppression of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from ocean acidification occurred on the 7th, 4th, 13th, and 10th day for the N-E, C-E, N-G, and C-G, respectively, and of the Y(II) on the 4th, 13th, 13th, and 10th day, respectively. At the end of experiment, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was repressed by elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and decreased by 60, 45, 55, and 46 % and Y(II) also declined by 75, 69, 76, and 39 %, respectively, compared to the control. In addition, by comparison to the maximal Y(II) of N-E and N-G (under 380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, respectively), the maximal Y(II) of the C-E and C-G (under 380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, respectively) were significantly higher, while differences in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were not obvious among them.</p>
      <p>Figure 3 presents the effects of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions from 380 to 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the
intracellular chlorophyll content of different strains. After an initial value showing slight variation,
the chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> content of cells increased to maximum values on the 20th (N-E, C-E, N-G) and 7th day (C-G),
with a subsequent declining tendency until the final experiment (Fig. 3a–d). However, chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> displayed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> steady overall decline
over time (Fig. 3e–f). However, as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration increased from 380 to 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the chlorophyll content of every coccolithophore decreased in an orderly pattern (except for individual points in time that were presented differently) compared to 380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at each sampling time. Nevertheless, the results determined under 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions did not exhibit the same responses. During the 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment, the chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> content of the N-E with respect to cultivation time presented lower values than the 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at each sampling point.  However, for the C-E, N-G and C-G strains, as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the culture increased above 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the chlorophyll content tended to increase at each sampling point.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Effect of ocean acidification on the nitrogen uptake rate of\hack{\\} coccolithophores}?><title>Effect of ocean acidification on the nitrogen uptake rate of<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> coccolithophores</title>
      <p>The effect of ocean acidification on the nitrogen uptake rate of the four coccolithophores is displayed in Fig. 5. With increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration from 380 to 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the nitrogen uptake rate of strains all increased, by 48.2 % (N-E), 33.9 % (C-E), 41.6 %(N-G) and 34.3 % (C-G).  The maximum variation value (48.2 %, N-E) of the nitrogen uptake rate was nearly 1.5-fold larger than the minimum variation value (33.9 %, C-E). Moreover, the response of nitrogen uptake rates to increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in all the strains were closely described by a Michaelis–Menten curve fitting approach, and both half saturation constants (Km, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-saturated rates (Vmax, pmol N cell<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were obtained from the response curves. The maximum Km and Vmax value were 307.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 24.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cell<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from strain N-E, respectively, which were approximately 1.7-fold and 1.3-fold larger than the minimum values presented by strain C-E, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Effect of ocean acidification on element composition and the calcification rate of coccolithophores</title>
      <p>Figure 5 shows the production of POC and PON of the four species of coccolithophore on the 7th day in elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. Acidification by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment up to 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distinctly stimulated the production of POC and PON of coccolithophores except for N-E , whose increasing POC production under 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions exhibited a significant decline at the 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sample point, and the variations were enormous. For the C-E, N-G and C-G species, the POC production increased by approximately 101, 35 and 49 %, respectively, compared with the control, and the variation of the former reached 2.9 and 2.1-fold of the N-G and C-G, respectively. Moreover, over this range, PON production had a comparatively larger increase of 233 % (N-E), 289 % (C-E), 148 % (N-G) and 129 % (C-G) than controls. However, the changes of particle carbon and nitrogen production led to a decrease in the POC : PON for the four species by 76.6 % (N-E), 48.3 % (C-E), 45.7 % (N-G) and 34.9 % (C-G), with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation between 380 and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, the seawater acidification under 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also had a negative effect on PIC production, which decreased by 35.4 and 68.9 % for two calcification species, C-E and C-G, respectively, in comparison with the production value at 380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6). The C-G species presented a higher reduction ratio (approximately 1.9-fold) of PIC than the C-E when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased by 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Simultaneously, the ratio of PIC : POC for the two species also declined by 67.9 and 79.2 %.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>In this study, two species of the coccolithophores were used in the first experiment involving naked and calcifying strains, and their responses to elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration were investigated.  Simultaneously, kinetic constants from the fitted <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response curves regarding the nitrogen uptake rate were also applied to analyze and display the inherited variation of different coccolithophores. The N-E was seriously suppressed in comparison with the different levels of the positive response the other three strains when the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was elevated to 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We concluded that the sensitivity of coccolithophores to ocean acidification was strain- and species-specific, which may potentially affect future species distributions and abundances. We also speculated that ocean acidification may result in changes to biodiversity, trophic interactions, and other ecosystem processes in the future ocean.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Effect of the ocean acidification on the growth and photosynthetic performance of different strains of coccolithophores</title>
      <p>This study showed that a high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (increasing to 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) led to an increase in growth, except for N-E, whose growth declined at the 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sample point and whose specific growth rates were significantly reduced by approximately 7.61 % on the 7th day in comparison to the control (Fig. 1). However, before <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was elevated to 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the growth of N-E maintained an increasing state (Fig. 1a and e). Recently, Fiorini et al. (2011a) displayed similar results and showed an increasing growth trend of coccolithophores in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich water up to approximately 750 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Previous studies suggested that coccolithophores were carbon limited because of a comparatively less-efficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrating mechanism (CCM) caused by low activity for extracellular carbonic anhydrase in the present ocean (Herfort et al., 2002;  Trimborn et al., 2007;  Rokitta and Rost, 2012;  Jin et al., 2013).  Therefore, an increase in available <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by ocean acidification in seawater may accelerate the accumulation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the vicinity of Rubisco to offset the short supply and further promote coccolithophore carboxylation and growth (along with an increase in POC) (Barcelose Ramos et al., 2010;  Reinfelder, 2011;  Jin et al., 2013;  Kottmeier et al., 2014). In this study, we observed the increased growth of four strains including N-E (1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;  23 %), C-E (2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;  53 %), N-G (2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;  36 %) and C-G (2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;  30 %) (Fig. 1). However, every strain revealed different response capacities and strategies to the increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, N-E was also significantly and negatively affected, which tended to lead to bleaching as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value reached 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p>Recent studies reported that changes in extracellular pH could affect the activity of sensitive algal cells by upsetting the constant membrane potential balance and physiological parameters (Langer et al., 2006;  Taylor et al., 2011;  Rokitta et al., 2012).  Hence, the more sensitive alga N-E, relative to the other three stains, showed a negative response because of the overstepping of its tolerance ability and declined pH (7.48, 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table S1). Because coccolithophores are an abundant formal species, which have been characterized with a unique physiology and morphology (Westbroek et al., 1993;  Winter and Siesser, 1994;  Raven and Crawfurd, 2012), we propose that the observed differences in the response of coccolithophores to increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have a genetic basis.  Recently, Read et al. (2013) reported the first haptophyte reference genome (from <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> CCMP1516) and assumed that genome variability within this species complex seems to underpin its capacity to thrive in different habitats. The inherent difference in adaptive capacity from coccolithophores would contribute to an inherent discrepancy reaction in response to ocean acidification, similar to the specific response results in this study.</p>
      <p>However, algal photosynthesis (which is closely related to growth) that is evaluated by the activities of the photosystems and pigment content exerted a variable negative response with elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially for N-E, which tended to bleach early in the experiment (Figs. 2 and 3).  These results involving the activities of the photosystems revealed that cells remained “photosynthetically unhealthy” due to the effect on cell ion balance from declining pH (elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Langer et al., 2006), which induced a decreasing in chlorophyll content (Fig. 3). In particular, N-E was seriously affected in comparison to the other coccolithophores when ocean acidification reached the 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sample point, which showed exceeding maladjustment (Figs. 2a and 3a). Similar to the different responses in growth results with elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, algal photosynthesis also reflected an inherent difference in its reaction. For the whole ecosystem, for which a slight change in one part may affect the whole situation, the specific reaction of coccolithophores to ocean acidification would likely affect biodiversity and other ecological process (Orr et al., 2005;  Hendriks et al., 2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Effect of ocean acidification on the nitrogen uptake rate of different strains of coccolithophores</title>
      <p>Considering the effect of ocean acidification on nutrient uptake, we tested the nitrogen uptake efficiency of each strain under different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels and fitted nitrogen uptake rate response curves to changing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for further analysis at the 7th day sampling point. The results showed that the nitrogen uptake rate of all strains increased at the 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Fig. 4). The naked strains N-E and N-G exhibited a greater increase of 48.2 and 41.6 % (Fig. 4a and c), respectively, while the nitrogen uptake rate increased by 33.9 and 34.3 % in the calcifying strain C-E and C-G, respectively (Fig. 4b and d). Jin et al. (2013) reported that inorganic nitrogen uptake was enhanced in coccolithophores and that the gene for nitrate reductase in a diatom was upregulated under elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. In addition, disparities between strains also existed.</p>
      <p>Previous studies suggested that coccolithophore cells exerted a process of energy redistribution under ocean acidification conditions (Raven, 2011;  Beaufort et al., 2011), resulting in the release of extra ATP to preferentially support additional N uptake for the synthesis of more proteins (Jin et al., 2013).  However, calcifying cells, which need more energy input for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from calcification, because there is an outward transport to acidic seawater or neutralization (Suffrian et al., 2011;  Taylor et al., 2011;  Beaufort et al., 2011;  Stojkovic et al., 2013), absorbed substantially less nitrogen than naked strains for elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, the increasing PON production with elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined in this study also indirectly confirmed the energy redistribution preference for nitrogen uptake (Fig. 5b).</p>
      <p>The response curves of nitrogen uptake efficiency to changing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> confirmed the influencing behavior of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each of these coccolithophores. Kinetic rate constants (Km value), which were derived from curves, represented the enzyme affinity to the substrate, and when the Km value increased, the affinity became smaller (Michaelis and Menten, 1913).  Recently, Hutchins et al. (2013) documented strain-specific differences in the relationship between nitrogen fixation and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration through different kinetic constant analysis. In this study, N-E showed the maximum Km value, namely, the minimum affinity, compared with other three strains (differences also existed among them) (Fig. 4).  This result reflected the same trend with the other parametric measurements, such as growth rate, photosynthetic activity, etc., which indicated that N-E was seriously affected by elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, and inter- and intra-specific responses were also displayed. In addition, the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and hierarchical clustering multi-variate statistical analyses for the replicates of each of the four coccolithophore strains displayed obvious differences in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> responses (Fig. S3). Replicates of each of the four strains formed well-defined clusters through PCoA (Fig. S3a).  Moreover, independent hierarchical clustering of each replicate also showed the same serious groups, and this analysis revealed that the two calcifying strains were more similar to one another than they were to the two naked strains (Fig. S3b). These data analyses further highlighted the inter- and intra-specific variability in coccolithophore response to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced acidification.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Effect of ocean acidification on the elemental composition of different strains of coccolithophores</title>
      <p>Variations in the elemental stoichiometry of phytoplankton are known to have an effect on trophic interactions and ultimately exert an influence on marine nutrient biogeochemistry because the dietary value of prey for marine zooplankton varied with the POC to PON (C : N) ratio (Hutchins et al., 2009;  Anderson et al., 2013). In this study, we measured the ratios of C : N to assess whether the elemental composition of the organic material was additionally affected by changing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and we also explored the extent of the impact. According to the results, changes in the elemental composition of coccolithophores grown at 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been found (N-E, C-E, N-G and C-G), revealing a reduced C : N ratio (by approximately 76, 48, 45 and 35 %, respectively) (Fig. 5c). The ratio of N-E was affected greatly with respect to the other three isolates, and C-G was the least affected. In previous studies, similar variable ratios for coccolithophores based on an enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration were reported by Fiorini et al. (2011a, b) and Rickaby et al. (2010). These changes occurred with increasing POC (except for N-E at 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and PON production and under rising <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration between 380 and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5).</p>
      <p>It was also discovered that the incremental ratios of PON were higher than those of POC compared to the control groups with the ultimate proportion. We have discussed in the above section that the redistribution of energy resulted in more nitrogen absorption and increasing PON production with elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This preference advantage made the PON production exceed the POC production, even though differences existed in different strains, leading to different decreasing C : N ratios (Fig. 4c). Similar to previous research by Riebesell and Tortell (2011), the changes with which high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were associated with C : N ratios were highly species specific. Additionally, a variable proportion was also the embodiment of the inherited differences among different strains. In contrast, differences from current findings also exist, which show increased cellular C : N ratios with elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Feng et al., 2008;  De Bodt et al., 2010;  Kottmeier et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>The reasons for the opposite result may be a difference between the experimental settings, such as temperature, illumination intensity, and/or choice of algae strains. In addition, the final results exhibited a very interesting phenomenon, that is, that the reduced C : N ratios of the lost calcification strain were higher than those of the calcification strain in each species. The reason for the phenomenon is still unclear, but it was most likely associated with shell calcification. This part of the observed results indicated that the increased <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> affected algal C : N ratios and produced a diversity of effects on different coccolithophores. In addition, it will further influence grazing-selection pressure on phytoplankton and has many biogeochemical consequences (in particular implications for the export flux of carbon) (Iglesias-Rodriguez et al., 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Effect of the ocean acidification on the calcification efficiency of different strains of coccolithophores</title>
      <p>In the past few years, PIC production (calcification efficiency) has been widely investigated in coccolithophores to predict the impact of ocean acidification, and results show that the predominant response was a decreased rate of calcification when cells were grown at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels higher than those found today (380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or at least a decrease in PIC : POC (e.g., Zon-dervan et al., 2001;  Langer et al., 2006;  Muller et al., 2010;  Hoppe et al., 2011). In this research, the response regarding PIC was in agreement with the response already described in the above-mentioned tendency.  Namely, calcification species <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> and <italic>G. oceanica</italic> experienced a comparatively larger decrease in the rate of calcification of 35.4 and 68.9 %, respectively, between 380 and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the 7th day sampling point (Fig. 6). In comparison, <italic>G. oceanica</italic> was more vulnerable than <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> under ocean acidification, leading to an unbalanced ecological factor.  However, regarding lost calcification species in the experiment, the PIC production was nearly negligible because of the lost calcification ability to cover shells (not show).</p>
      <p>Recent studies with various organisms showed calcification to be largely controlled by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cal rather than by pH alone (Langer et al., 2006;  Trimborn, 2007), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cal was controlled by both [DIC] and pH (Iglesias-Rodriguez et al., 2008). When supersaturated surface seawater (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of calcium carbonate minerals (which was considered generally less than current ocean conditions, Feely et al., 2009) declined in saturation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) because of ocean acidification or other natural processes, carbonate biominerals in shells and skeletons may begin to dissolve (Feely et al., 2010).  The data in this study showed that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cal ranged from 7.76 (C-E) and 8.79 (C-G) at 380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 1.58 and 1.57 at 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S4), which were above the threshold at which dissolution occurs. Nevertheless, the results clearly revealed that PIC production (calcification efficiency) finally had declined in comparison with the control group (Fig. 6).</p>
      <p>From the results reported by Langer et al. (2009), the same phenomenon was also observed when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cal was above 1, and dissolution still occurred. To explain this phenomenon, we found that the pH values of the cultures incubated at 380 and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged between 8.81 and 7.62 on the 7th day (Table S1 and Fig. S2), and a shift in pH was caused by comparing blanks with cell physiology. These changes affected the photosynthetic health of cells, as discussed above, which implies that our pH conditions were not completely within the tolerance levels of cells. Bach et al. (2011) suggested that calcification is specifically responsive to the associated decrease in pH. Under elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> circumstances, coccolithophore calcification, which is a stringently controlled biological process (Mackinder et al., 2010), would be affected by a decreasing pH level.</p>
      <p>Recently, substantial physiological and molecular evidence has indicated that when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used for calcification (which produces <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and also maintains a cytosolic pH homeostasis near neutrality), the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> must be removed across the plasmalemma <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel (Suffrian et al., 2011;  Taylor et al., 2011) or neutralized in coccolithophores cells (Fabry et al., 2008;  Rokitta and Rost, 2012;  Stojkovic et al., 2013). To maintain the appropriate transplasmalemma electrical potential difference and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux, energy input is needed in the process of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport (Raven, 2011). When elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resulted in a low pH and/or [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] level in waters, this input was likely greater per unit calcification and led to decreased calcification rates (Raven et al., 2011;  Beaufort et al., 2011). Based on research of the adverse impact caused by increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coccolithophore calcification, which was associated closely with biogeochemical cycles, although we give a reasonable explanation for decreasing calcification, this explanation is only a small fraction of the truth.  Currently, the reasons for the impacts of ocean acidification on calcified coccolithophores still need further exploration.</p>
      <p>Through our research, different coccolithophores revealed synthetically inter- and intra-specific variability to cope with the threat from ocean acidification and showed a significantly different response derived from inherent heredity. With the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration gradual increasing, the original state maintained steadily by different coccolithophores would be changed on different levels. Thereby, potential changes in species distributions and abundances could propagate through multiple trophic levels of marine food webs. Although research into the long-term ecosystem impacts of ocean acidification is in its infancy, these results may indicate possible changes in biodiversity, trophic interactions, biogeochemical cycles, and other ecosystem processes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-675-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/bgd-12-675-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41306179), Special Scientific Research Funds for Central Nonprofit Institutes, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institutes (20603022012004), a project from Science and Technology Commission of Qingdao Shinan District (2012-5-008-SW), Shandong Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Restoration, Shandong Marine Fisheries Research Institute Grant (201213), Shandong Science and Technology plan project (2011GHY11528), the Hi-Tech Research and Development Program (863) of China (2012AA052103), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41176153,31200187), and Qingdao Municipal Science and Technology plan project (12-6-1-3-hy).</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. R., Hessen, D. O., Mitra, A., Mayor, D. J., and Yool, A.: Sensitivity of secondary production and export flux to choice of trophic transfer formulation in marine ecosystem models, J. Marine Syst., 125, 41–53, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bach, L. T., Riebesell, U., and Schulz, K. G.: Distinguishing between the effects of ocean acidification and ocean carbonation in the coccolithophore <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic>, Limnol. Oceanogr., 56, 2040–2050, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Barcelos e Ramos, J., Müller, M. N., and Riebesell, U.: Short-term response of the coccolithophore <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> to an abrupt change in seawater carbon dioxide concentrations, Biogeosciences, 7, 177–186,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-177-2010">10.5194/bg-7-177-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Beaufort, L., Probert, I., de Garidel-Thoron, T., Bendif, E. M., Ruiz-Pino, D., Metzl, N., Goyet, C., Buchet, N., Coupel, P., Grelaud, M., Rost, B., Rickaby, R. E. M., and de Vargas, C.:
Sensitivity of coccolithophores to carbonate chemistry and ocean acidification, Nature, 476, 80–83, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Beaufort, L., Barbarin, N., and Gally, Y.: Optical measurements to determine the thickness of calcite crystals and the mass of thin carbonate particles such as coccoliths, Nat. Protoc., 9, 633–642, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Caldeira, K. and Wickett, M. E.: Oceanography: anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH, Nature, 425, 365–365, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>De Bodt, C., Van Oostende, N., Harlay, J., Sabbe, K., and Chou, L.: Individual and interacting effects of <italic>p</italic>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and temperature on <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> calcification: study of the calcite production, the coccolith morphology and the coccosphere size, Biogeosciences, 7, 1401–1412,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1401-2010">10.5194/bg-7-1401-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Delille, B., Harlay, J., Zondervan, I., Jacquet, S., Chou, L., Wollast, R., and Gattuso, J. P.: Response of primary production and calcification to changes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during experimental
blooms of the coccolithophorid <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic>, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB2023, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002318" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002318</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fabry, V. J., Seibel, B. A., Feely, R. A., and Orr, J. C.: Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes, J. Conseil, 65, 414–432, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Falkowski, P.: Ocean science: the power of plankton, Nature, 483, 17–20, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Feely, R. A., Doney, S. C., and Cooley, S. R.: Ocean acidification: present conditions and future changes in a high-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
world, Oceanography, 22, 36–47, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Feely, R. A., Alin, S. R., Newton, J., Sabine, C. L., Warner, M., Devol, A., Krembs, C., and Maloy, C.: The combined effects of ocean acidification, mixing, and respiration on pH and carbonate saturation in an urbanized estuary, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 88, 442–449, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Warner, M. E., Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Fu, F.-X., Rose, J. M., and Hutchins, D. A. Interactive effects of increased <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, temperature and irradiance on the marine coccolithophore <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic> (<italic>Prymnesiophyceae</italic>), Eur. J. Phycol., 43, 87–98, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Fiorini, S., Middelburg, J. J., and Gattuso, J. P.: Testing the effects of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coccolithophores (<italic>prymnesiophyceae</italic>): comparison between haploid and diploid life stages, J. Phycol., 47, 1281–1291, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Fiorini, S., Middelburg, J. J., and Gattuso, J. P.: Effects of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial pressure and temperature on the coccolithophore <italic>Syracosphaera pulchra</italic>, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 64, 221–232, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hendriks, I. E., Duarte, C. M., and Álvarez, M.: Vulnerability of marine biodiversity to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis, Estuar. Coast Shelf S., 86, 157–164, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Herfort, L., Thake, B., and Roberts, J.: Acquisition and use of bicarbonate by <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic>, New Phytol., 156, 427–436, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Hoppe, C. J. M., Langer, G., and Rost, B.: <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic> shows identical responses to elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in TA and DIC manipulation, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 406, 54–62, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hutchins, D. A.: Oceanography: forecasting the rain ratio, Nature, 476, 41–42, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hutchins, D. A., Mulholland, M. R., and Fu, F.: Nutrient cycles and marine microbes in a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-enriched ocean, Oceanography, 22, 128–145, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hutchins, D. A., Fu, F. X., Webb, E. A., Walworth, N., and Tagliabue, A.: Taxon-specific response of marine nitrogen fixers to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations,  Nat. Geosci., 6, 790–795, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Iglesias-Rodriguez, M. D., Halloran, P. R., Rickaby, R. E. M., Hall, I. R., Colmenero-Hidalgo, E., Gittins, J. R., Green, D. R. H., Tyrrell, T., Gibbs, S. J., Dassow, P. V.,
Rehm, E., Armbrust, E. V., and Boessenkool, K. P.: :  Phytoplankton calcification in a high-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> world, Science, 320, 336–340, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Summary for policy makers, in: Climate Change 2007, the Physical Sciences Basis, Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth
Assessment Report of the IPCC, edited by: Solomon, S. et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–996, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Jeffrey, S. W. and Humphrey, G. F.: New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton, Biochem. Physiol. Pfl., 167, 191–194, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Jin, P., Gao, K., and Beardall, J.: Evolutionary responses of a coccolithophorid <italic>Gephyrocapsa oceanica</italic> to ocean acidification,  Evolution, 67, 1869–1878, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Jones, B. M., Iglesias-Rodríguez, M. D., Skipp, P. J., Edwards, R. J., Greaves, M. J.,
Young, J. R., Elderfield, H., and O'Connor, C. D.: :
Responses of the <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic> proteome to ocean acidification, PLoS One, 8, 1–13, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kottmeier, D. M., Rokitta, S. D., Tortell, P. D., and Rost, B.: Strong shift from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic> with acidification:
new approach unravels acclimation versus short-term pH effects,  Photosynth Res., 121, 1–11, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Langer, G.: Palaeontology: plankton in a greenhouse world, Nat. Geosci., 6, 164–165, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Langer, G., Geisen, M., Baumann, K. H., Klas, J., Riebesell, U., Thoms, S., Young, J. R.: Species-specific responses of
calcifying algae to changing seawater carbonate chemistry,  Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, Q09006, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GC001227</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Langer, G., Nehrke, G., Probert, I., Ly, J., and Ziveri, P.: Strain-specific responses of <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> to changing seawater carbonate chemistry, Biogeosciences, 6, 2637–2646,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2637-2009">10.5194/bg-6-2637-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lohbeck, K. T., Riebesell, U., and Reusch, T. B. H.: Adaptive evolution of a key phytoplankton species to ocean acidification, Nat. Geosci., 5, 346–351, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Lohbeck, K. T., Riebesell, U., and Reusch, T. B. H.: Gene expression changes in the coccolithophore <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic>
after 500 generations of selection to ocean acidification, P. Roy. Soc. Lond B. Bio., 281, 20140003,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspb.2014.0003</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mackinder, L., Wheeler, G., Schroeder, D., Riebesell, U., and Brownlee, C.: Molecular mechanisms underlying calcification in coccolithophores,  Geomicrobiol. J., 27, 585–595, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Meier, K. J. S., Beaufort, L., Heussner, S., and Ziveri, P.: The role of ocean acidification in <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> coccolith thinning in the Mediterranean Sea, Biogeosciences, 11, 2857–2869,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2857-2014">10.5194/bg-11-2857-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Michaelis, L. and Menten, M. L.: Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung, Biochem. Z., 49, 333–369, 1913.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Müller, M. N., Schulz, K. G., and Riebesell, U.: Effects of long-term high  CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure on two species of coccolithophores, Biogeosciences, 7, 1109–1116,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1109-2010">10.5194/bg-7-1109-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Orr, J. C., Fabry, V. J., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Doney, S. C., Feely, R. A., Gnanadesikan, A.,
Gruber, N., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Key, R. M., Lindsay, K., Maier-Reimer, E., Matear, R., Monfray, P.,
Mouchet, A., Najjar, R. G., Plattner, G. K., Rodgers, K. B., Sabine, C. L., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer, R.,
Slater, R. D., Totterdell, I. J., Weirig, M. F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A. : Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms,  Nature, 437, 681–686, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Pelletier, G., Lewis, E., Wallace, D.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sys.xls: A Calculator for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> System in Seawater for Microsoft Excel/VB A, Washington State Department of Ecology/Brookhaven National Laboratory, Olympia, WA/Upton, NY, USA, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Raven, J. A.: Effects on marine algae of changed seawater chemistry with increasing atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Biol. Environ., 11, 1–17, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Raven, J. A. and Crawfurd, K., Environmental controls on coccolithophore calcification, Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser., 470, 137–166, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Read, B. A., Kegel, J., Klute, M. J., Kuo, A., Lefebvre, S. C., Maumus, F., Mayer, C.,
Miller, J., Monier, A., Salamov, A., Young, J., Aguilar, M., Claverie, J. M., Frickenhaus, S.,
Gonzalez, K., Herman, E. K., Lin, Y. C., Napier, J., Ogata, H., Sarno, A. F., Shmutz, J.,
Schroeder, D., de Vargas, C., Verret, F., von Dassow, P., Valentin, K., de Peer, Y. V., Wheeler, G.,
Emiliania huxleyi Annotation Consortium, Dacks, J. B., Delwiche, C. F., Dyhrman, S. T., Glöckner, G.,
John, U., Richards, T., Worden, A. Z., Zhang, X. Y., and Grigoriev, I. V: Pan genome of the phytoplankton <italic>Emiliania</italic> underpins its global distribution,  Nature, 499, 209–213, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Reinfelder, J. R.: Carbon concentrating mechanisms in eukaryotic marine phytoplankton, Mar. Sci., 3, 291–315, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Rickaby, R. E. M., Henderiks, J., and Young, J. N.: Perturbing phytoplankton: response and isotopic fractionation with changing carbonate chemistry in two coccolithophore species, Clim. Past., 6, 771–785, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Riebesell, U. and Tortell, P. D.: Effects of ocean acidification on pelagic organisms and ecosystems, in: Ocean Acidification,
edited by: Gattuso, J. P. and Hanson, L., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 99–121, 2011</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Riebesell, U., Zondervan, I., Rost, B., Tortell, P. D., Zeebe, R. E., and Morel, F. M.: Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to increased atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  Nature, 407, 364–367, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Rokitta, S. D. and Rost, B.: Effects of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and their modulation by light in the life-cycle stages of the coccolithophore <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic>,  Limnol. Oceanogr., 57, 607–618, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Rokitta, S. D., John, U., and Rost, B.: Ocean acidification affects redoxbalance and ion-homeostasis in the life-cycle stages of <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic>, PLoS One, 7, e52212, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052212" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0052212</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Ross, P. M., Parker, L., O'Connor, W. A., and Bailey, E. A.: The impact of ocean acidification on reproduction, early development and settlement of marine organisms,  Water, 3, 1005–1030, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Sciandra, A., Harlay, J., Lefevre, D., Lemee, R., Rimmelin, P., Denis, M., and Gattuso, J. P.: Response of coccolithophorid <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic> to elevated partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under nitrogen limitation,  Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser., 261, 111–122, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Shi, D., Xu, Y., and Morel, F. M. M.: Effects of the pH/<italic>p</italic>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> control method on medium chemistry and phytoplankton growth, Biogeosciences, 6, 1199–1207,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1199-2009">10.5194/bg-6-1199-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Sinutok, S., Hill, R., Doblin, M. A., Wuhrer, R., and Ralph, P. J.: Warmer more acidic conditions cause decreased productivity and calcification in subtropical coral reef sediment-dwelling calcifiers, Limnol. Oceanogr., 56, 1200–1212, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Stojkovic, S., Beardall, J., and Matear, R.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-concentrating mechanisms in three Southern Hemisphere strains of <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic>, J. Phycol., 49, 670–679, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Suffrian, K., Schulz, K. G., Gutowska, M. A., Riebesell, U., and Bleich, M.: Cellular pH measurements in <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic> reveal pronounced membrane proton permeability, New Phytol., 190, 595–608, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, A. R., Chrachi, A., Wheeler, G., Goddard, H., and Brownlee, C.: A voltage-gated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel underlying pH homeostasis in calcifying coccolithophores, PloS Biol., 9, 14–16, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Trimborn, S., Langer, G., and Rost, B.: Effect of varying calcium concentrations and light intensities on calcification and photosynthesis in <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic>,  Limnol. Oceanogr., 52, 2285–2293, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Turley, C., Eby, M., Ridgwell, A. J., Schmidt, D. N., Findlay, H. S., Brownlee, C., Riebesell, U., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., and Gattuso, J. P.: :
The societal challenge of ocean acidification,  Mar. Pollut. Bull., 60, 787–792, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Winter, A. and Siesser, W. G.: Coccolithophores, in: Coccolithophores, edited by: Winter, A.,  William, G., and Siesser, W. G., Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK, 252 pp., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Winter, A., Henderiks, J., Beaufort, L., Rickaby, R. E., and Brown, C. W.: Poleward expansion of the coccolithophore <italic>Emiliania huxleiy</italic>, J. Plankton Res., 36, 316–325, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Xu, D., Wang, Y., Fan, X., Wang, D., Ye, N., Zhang, X., Mou, S., Guan, Z., and Zhuang, Z.: Long-term experiment on physiological responses to synergetic effects of ocean acidification and photoperiod in Antarctic sea ice algae <italic>Chlamydomonas</italic> sp. ICE- L,  Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 7738–7746, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Young, J. R., Poulton, A. J., and Tyrrell, T.: Morphology of <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> coccoliths on the northwestern European shelf – is there an influence of carbonate chemistry?, Biogeosciences, 11, 4771–4782,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4771-2014">10.5194/bg-11-4771-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Zondervan, I., Rost, B., and Riebesell, U.: Effect of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>PIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in the coccolithophore <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> grown under light-limiting conditions and different daylengths, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 27, 55–70, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>The growth curves <bold>(a–d)</bold> and specific growth rates <bold>(e–h)</bold> of the four species <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> <bold>(a, e)</bold>, <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> CS369 <bold>(b, f)</bold>, <italic>G. oceanica</italic> NIES-1318 <bold>(c, g)</bold>, and <italic>G. oceanica</italic> <bold>(d, h)</bold> for different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (380, 750, 1000, and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The vertical bars represent the SD (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). (N-E: naked strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic>;   C-E: calcifying strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> CS369;   N-G: naked strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic> NIES-1318;   C-G: calcifying strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic>.)</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015-f01.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F2"><caption><p>The effect of ocean acidification by increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the changes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a–d)</bold> and Y(II) <bold>(e–f)</bold> in the photosystem activity parameter during growth of the four species <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> <bold>(a, e)</bold>, <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> CS369 <bold>(b, f)</bold>, <italic>G. oceanica</italic> NIES-1318 <bold>(c, g)</bold>, and <italic>G. oceanica</italic> <bold>(d, h)</bold> for different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (380, 750, 1000, and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The vertical bars represent the SD (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). (N-E: naked strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic>;   C-E: calcifying strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> CS369;   N-G: naked strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic> NIES-1318;   C-G: calcifying strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic>.)</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015-f02.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F3"><caption><p>The change of chlorophyll content of the four species (<italic>E. huxleyi</italic> <bold>(a, e)</bold>, <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> CS369 <bold>(b, f)</bold>, <italic>G. oceanica</italic> NIES-1318 <bold>(c, g)</bold>, <italic>G. oceanica</italic> <bold>(d, h)</bold>) at elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions (380, 750, 1000, and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The vertical bars represent the SD (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). (N-E: naked strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic>;   C-E: calcifying strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> CS369;   N-G: naked strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic> NIES-1318;   C-G: calcifying strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic>.)</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015-f03.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Nitrogen uptake rate response curves relative to changing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for four <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> and <italic>G. oceanica</italic> strains. The best-fit hyperbolic saturation curves (solid lines) with 95 % confidence limits (dashed lines) for <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> (N-E; <bold>(a)</bold>, <italic>E. CS369</italic> (C-E;   <bold>(b)</bold>, <italic>G. NIES-1318</italic> (N-G;   <bold>(c)</bold> and <italic>G. oceanica</italic> (C-G;   <bold>(d)</bold> are also presented. The text on each board depicts the strain name, half-saturation constants (Km, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-saturated nitrogen uptake rate (Vmax, pmol N cell<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and curve fitting correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The symbols represent triplicate values.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015-f04.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Effect of seawater acidification by elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions (380, 750, 1000, and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on POC <bold>(a)</bold>, PON production <bold>(b)</bold> and POC : PON <bold>(c)</bold> of the four species (<italic>E. huxleyi</italic>, <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> CS369, <italic>G. oceanica</italic> NIES-1318, and <italic>G. oceanica</italic>). The vertical bars represent the SD (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). (N-E: naked strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic>;   C-E: calcifying strain <italic>E. huxleyi</italic> CS369;
N-G: naked strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic> NIES-1318;   C-G: calcifying strain <italic>G. oceanica</italic>.)</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015-f05.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Effect of seawater acidification by elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions (380, 750, 1000, and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on PIC production <bold>(a)</bold> and PIC : POC <bold>(b)</bold> of the calcifying species (<italic>E. huxleyi</italic>
CS369 and <italic>G. oceanica</italic>) on the 7th day. The vertical bars represent the SD (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/12/675/2015/bgd-12-675-2015-f06.png"/>

    </fig>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
