the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
21 Jan 2021
21 Jan 2021
Ideas and perspectives: Emerging contours of a dynamic exogenous kerogen cycle
- Biogeochemistry Research Center, Research Institute for Marine Resources Utilization, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, 237-0061 Yokosuka, Japan
- Biogeochemistry Research Center, Research Institute for Marine Resources Utilization, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, 237-0061 Yokosuka, Japan
Abstract. Growing evidence points to the dynamic role that kerogen is playing on Earth's surface in controlling atmospheric chemistry over geologic time. Although quantitative constraints on the weathering of kerogen remain loose, its changing weathering behavior modulated by the activity of glaciers suggest that this largest pool of reduced carbon on Earth may have played a key part in atmospheric CO2 variability across recent glacial-interglacial times and beyond. This work enunciates the possibility of kerogen oxidation as a major driver of atmospheric CO2 increase in the wake of glacial episodes. This hypothesis of centennial and millennial-timescale-relevance for this chemical weathering pathway is substantiated by several lines of independent evidence synthesized in this contribution including the timing of CO2 increase, CO2 isotopic composition (13C and 14C), seawater osmium record, kerogen oxidation kinetics, observations of kerogen reburial, and modeling results. The author hypothesizes that the deglaciation of kerogen-rich lithologies in western Canada contributed majorly to the characteristic deglacial increase in atmospheric CO2, which reached an inflection point ≤ 300 years after the Laurentide Ice Sheet retreated into the kerogen-poor Canadian Shield. To quantitatively constrain the contribution of kerogen oxidation to CO2 rise at glacial terminations, systematic studies on CO2 fluxes emanating from the weathering of different lithologies, oxidation kinetics of kerogen along glacial chronosequences, and high-resolution temporal changes in the aerial extent of glacially exposed lithological units are needed.
Thomas M. Blattmann
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on bg-2021-4', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Feb 2021
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-4/bg-2021-4-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Blattmann, 19 Apr 2021
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-4/bg-2021-4-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC4: 'Reply on AC1', Thomas Blattmann, 20 Apr 2021
As the full revised manuscript cannot be uploaded at this stage in the review process, I have included the first paragraph of the revised section 3 as referred to in the author response below:
Chemical weathering of silicates and carbonates as well as the burial and oxidation of organic matter exert fundamental control over atmospheric chemistry on Earth over geologic timescales (Berner et al., 1983; Berner, 1990: Hilton and West, 2020; Petsch, 2014). On modern-day Earth, carbon release and sinks from mineral-based weathering (i.e., silicates and carbonates via carbonic and sulfuric acids) and biogeochemical fluxes (i.e., organic matter burial and kerogen oxidation) stand in fine balance to one another with contrasting concoctions of these under different tectonosedimentary settings (e.g., Bufe et al., 2021; Hilton and West, 2020; Blattmann et al., 2019a; Horan et al., 2019). Deglaciation likely modulated silicate and carbonate weathering resulting in enhanced (temporary) drawdown of atmospheric CO2 (e.g., Tranter, 1996; Gibbs and Kump, 1996; Munhoven and François 1996; c.f., Schachtman et al., 2019). Glaciers have been invoked as agents for accelerating chemical weathering of carbonate and silicate minerals by increasing sediment yield and creating reactive substrate with high surface area (Torres et al., 2017; Vance et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2021), with carbonate weathering constituting a source of CO2 to the atmosphere when sulfuric acid, stemming from oxidized sulfide minerals, is involved (c.f., Torres et al., 2014; Kölling et al., 2019). In the following, the idea of glaciers producing reactive substrate susceptible to chemical weathering is reviewed and explored for kerogen.
-
AC4: 'Reply on AC1', Thomas Blattmann, 20 Apr 2021
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Blattmann, 19 Apr 2021
-
RC2: 'Comment on bg-2021-4', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Feb 2021
Review for Biogeosciences of “Ideas and Perspectives:Emerging contours of a dynamic exogenous kerogen cycle” by Thomas M Blattmann
Overview:
I found this a novel, interesting, and generally well-written paper that argues that weathering of kerogen-containing lithologies exposed at the surface after continental deglaciation may prove to be a significant source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, and one which is of particular significance in terms of climate forcing. Whilst the argument is supported more by calculations and logical arguments than it is by direct measurements and observations, I still found it fairly compelling – to the point that I am convinced that the idea is worth pursuing via in situ measurements and carefully designed and executed experiments. It is certainly worth publishing if only to give exposure to the idea and to stimulate discussion and field monitoring of natural carbon emissions from kerogen sources as well as to provoke detailed modelling of likely CO2 fluxes from kerogen sources on geologically and climatically relevant timescales (and detailed mapping (in time and space) of likely source regions for kerogen-derived greenhouse gas emissions). Some articulation of likely important source regions for such emissions would be a valuable contribution to the paper and the broader scientific discussion that it is likely to stimulate. It is certainly a paper that gave me a kick and made me challenge my prior assumptions and thinking about climate/greenhouse gas emission linkages.
On that basis I think it is worthy of publication, although, at the detailed level, I think the text needs a thorough edit. Below I have provided a set of suggestions that I hope might help with this.
Line by Line Review (i.e. suggested changes to the text that I think would improve it’s readability and clarity):
9: suggests that this largest pool
10: interglacial cycles and beyond
15: in western Canada contributed in a major way
25: subjected 150 PgC/kyr…..
26: of this geologically ancient carbon and other closely connected surficial carbon pools into the atmosphere (Hedges and Oakes, 1997)
30: compensatory roles
32: as physical erosion is followed by riverine transport
37: This contribution hypothesizes…..atmospheric CO2 increases during glacial terminations
42: and (4) the export of organic matter and carbonate from the surface waters of the oceans - Question – export to where?
43: During deglaciation
44-45: an increasingly voluminous terrestrial biosphere (but is it mass or volume that matters here?)………is inferred to have controlled an increase in the stable carbon isotope ratio of dissolved organic carbon in ocean waters.
46: carbon pools changing in size at the same time as stable carbon isotope fractionation occurs, as carbon is exchanged between pools such as the terrestrial biosphere and pedosphere (see also Zeng, 2003,2007)
47: In addition, during times of most rapid CO2 increase during transitions from glacial to interglacial periods, negative stable carbon isotope shifts in atmospheric CO2 occurred (Fig.3; Smith et al., 1999; Schmitt et al., 2012).
49: This is a strong indicator that respired organic carbon was acting as a direct source to the atmosphere (Bauska et al., 2016).
51: that was depleted in or devoid of radiocarbon………thereby limiting the potential contributions from a modern biospheric organic carbon source. BUT does it actually limit the contributions, or just their detectability?
53-54: deep ocean was the predominant source for carbon transferred to the atmosphere during glacial terminations
55-56: please explain what you mean by “requires a complex overlay of processes to reconcile”
58-59: suggest that the release, via kerogen oxidation, of CO2 to the atmosphere during deglaciation contradicts or complements the commonly held notions of a strictly increasing terrestrial organic carbon pool and major changes in CO2 exchange between the ocean and the atmosphere.
58-60: needs some supporting references
62: accumulated from….supports the idea that…..was more extensive
63: cold interludes in Earth history during which glacial erosion and ice rafting dominated (BUT – what did they dominate?)
64: reburial in high latitude glaciated regions…
66: kerogen cycle by keeping…..
69: frost shattering, together with the retreat of glaciers, exposes……thereby accelerating oxidation and the release of kerogen-derived CO2…….declines into an interglacial period.
73. Analogously, glaciers have also been invoked as agents for accelerating chemical weathering of carbonate and silicate minerals by increasing sediment yield and creating a reactive substrate with high surface area. Carbonate weathering can be a source of CO2 to the atmosphere when sulphuric acid is the solvent involved. (I assume this is a by product of sulphide mineral (pyrite) oxidation? Please clarify this)
77. direct conversion to CO2 leads to considerable….
78-79: This is a process by which CO2 can be injected directly into the atmosphere and impact glacial-interglacial cycles (Figure 2)
90: faster than those of the average Earth surface
95: also proposes the oxidation of overridden soil organic carbon during and after glaciation and calculates a 600 PgC release….
115: fluxes an order of magnitude greater than the global average
120-127: Are the kerogen oxidation and oceanic release mechanisms for CO2 increase mutually exclusive? You make it sound as though they are, but I’m not clear why that would be the case.
115: oxidation fluxes an order of magnitude greater than the global average can be sustained for millennia after deglaciation.
134: extending across much..
137: within the Province of Alberta
139: Cretaceous soils and the oil sands…….the latter enhanced by aerial exposure across palaeosurfaces
140: over tens of thousands
145: Laboratory incubations designed to simulate CO2 respiration from bituminous materials reveal fluxes that are markedly higher than those associated with oxidation of rock disseminated forms of kerogen (Table 1)
147-148: at rates 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than those reported for rock disseminated kerogen, and 3 orders of magnitude greater than the average for Earth‘s surface.
152: when temperatures of subaerially exposed outcrops of oil sands reach 60°C
153: experiments on bitumen
155-156: that investigated the oxidative decay of hydrocarbon fractions also suggest similarly high fluxes when scaled to natural systems, even though these studies were conducted over periods of only a few weeks
158: fluxes reported by Chang and Berner (1998,1999)…an underestimate
160: CO2 can be released under anaerobic conditions
162-163: what is meant by a super-carbon source terrain? Maybe useful to identify some specific examples
163: during glacial-interglacial transitions. This statement makes me wonder whether you have given any thought to what happens in interglacial-glacial transitions. Are you just assuming that overriding by ice shuts off exchanges between substrate and atmosphere – but would that necessarily preclude gas transfer through permeable substrates along the hydraulic potential gradient from thick ice in the interior to thin ice at the margins where gas could escape to the atmosphere?
164-5: Sheet had retreated…..and was exposing
167: <= 300 years after….Sheet advanced onto the Canadian Shield, suggesting reduced decay of…
170: Fennoscandian Ice Sheet
173: is chemically recalcitrant
175: was the most extensive element of the cryosphere that waxed and waned across the continents…….and, in conjunction with its lithological underpinning…2007),
178: estimates of CO2 fluxes…….and there is considerable uncertainty in our current state of knowledge
179-180: weathering studies that provide estimates of CO2 fluxes from bedrock-derived kerogen under relevant environmental conditions and over appropriate timescales are lacking
182: high resolution reconstructions of changes in land ice extent and the lithologies of bedrock and glacial till being exposed by glacial retreat can, in theory, quantitatively disentangle the contribution of kerogen-derived CO2 to the atmosphere during glacial-interglacial transitions
A question here – can isotopic fingerprinting methods distinguish between the kerogen-derived CO2and CO2 from other potential sources?
189-90: Also important are the bedrock lithology and regolith composition
192: increasingly suggests that…
194: increased the flux……..Over Earth’s history, on 109 year timescales the reburial efficiency of kerogen presumably varied….
198-199: O2 on 106 year timescales
200: to understand changes in atmospheric chemistry through geologic time…
201: the changing efficiency of the reburial of kerogen needs to be evaluated
204: geospatial variability in what ?
205: for quantifying, and establishing the importance of the reburial of kerogen in recent times, it’s utility diminishes quickly for strata that pre-date the Last Glacial Maximum owing to it’s radioactive decay.
210: isotopic shifts at the beginning of interglacials that are attributable to kerogen oxidation…………
211: consistent with the hypothesis presented here
216: the hypothesis presented proposes
218: the rate of decrease of 14C CO2 subsided……..mirrored by changes, during deglaciation, in the lithologies of the Canadian Shield that were exposed at the surface, which contain relatively minor amounts of reactive kerogen.
220-…The coincidence in time of global trends in atmospheric chemistry with spatiotemporal patterns in the distribution of freshly deglaciated terrain……suggests that a burst (or bursts) of respired CO2 contributed to the characteristic deglacial increase in atmospheric CO2.
224: soil and vegetation taking hold on the deglaciated landscape
228: patterns of glacial retreat that expose glacially ground, kerogen-rich or even bituminous parent material.
230: have been proposed to explain CO2 increases
232: retreat, and the oxidation of finely ground kerogen, provide……
234: such as the oxidation of subglacial paleosols and permafrost-bound organic carbon….and by volcanic emissions triggered by deglacial unloading of the lithosphere
243-4: accelerated oxidation of ancient terrestrial organic carbon at glacial terminations…
246-7: the hypothesis presented…
250: timescales, entirely….
252: exposed fresh weathering profiles….
255-6: and increased supplies of ground kerogen
268: provide a strong incentive
269: kerogen cycle in glacial-interglacial climate patterns
270-271: may provide an outlook for geological processes that is relevant today
271: (Steffen et al. 2018) is missing from the reference list
Figure 1 caption: showing the fixation of atmospheric CO2 by both terrestrial and marine primary productivity……..constitutes the total organic carbon burial into the endogenous kerogen pool.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Blattmann, 19 Apr 2021
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-4/bg-2021-4-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Blattmann, 19 Apr 2021
-
RC3: 'Comment on bg-2021-4', Anonymous Referee #3, 20 Mar 2021
This work hypothesizes that de-glaciation and weathering of kerogen-rich lithologies in western Canada made a major contribution to CO2 rise at glacial terminations by compiling and re-interpreting empirical evidence. I have several comments regarding the interpretation and methods of the manuscript, which I hope to help to improve the manuscript. I’d recommend revisions before acceptance for publication.
Major comments:
Comment 1: ‘kerogen’ should be clearly defined: how does this term compare to the other terms used in the relevant studies, for example, rock-derived organic carbon, and petrogenic carbon. Do those concepts overlap/differ or are they the same? Would organic carbon in metamorphic rocks also be termed ‘kerogen’?
Comment 2: it needs to acknowledge existing understandings/studies about carbon fluxes during glacial-interglacial time periods. What did previous work find/conclude about glacial terminations and CO2 rise? How does the kerogen weathering hypothesis in this manuscript differ from the previous studies? What were the magnitudes of other carbon fluxes during deglaciation (e.g. the carbon exchange between the atmosphere and ocean reservoirs) and how do those compare to the kerogen weathering flux?
Comment 3: there’s no detailed lithology/kerogen amount/kerogen weathering kinetics/kerogen 13C signal/topography information (e.g. maps or data compilation) about western Canada – all those variables are important and relevant to the total oxidation flux of kerogen, and need to be discussed.
Comment 4: over glacial-interglacial timescales, would weathering of aged soil organic carbon (with residence time of thousands to tens of thousands of years) play an important role for CO2? Was aged soil organic carbon considered a part of kerogen in this work? How did the aged soil carbon flux/pool compare to those of kerogen organic carbon?
Comment 5: it sounds like the exhumed kerogen was all delivered to the oceans and got buried in marine sediments during the interested timescale of deglaciation (e.g. Figure 1) – was this true? Sediment residence time in floodplains and sedimentary basins could reach tens of thousands of years – meaning some of the kerogen might not be delivered to the oceans during the deglaciation. Then, would the conditions in floodplains and sedimentary basins also influence kerogen carbon reburial efficiency? can add relevant discussions.
Title: can be more focused and straightforward – sth like ‘oxidation of kerogen contributed to CO2 rise at glacial terminations’
L25: please clarify how the 150 PgC/kyr was determined? uncertainties?
L30-35: should also introduce major thoughts of the causes of glacial terminations
L40-45: this carbon cycle framework is very incomplete – at least should put in silicate weathering, see more in Berner et al. (1983)
L100: Equation 2 is unclear…explain what Zeng (2003), Simmons et al. (2006), and Horan et al. (2017) have done? Where were those studies conducted? What did they find?
L125-130: how much did the 14C composition of the then atmosphere-ocean carbon reservoir change? Any comment on 13C?
L230-235: could expand a bit and discuss some existing mechanisms – their pros and cons?
L500 – Table 1: how did the laboratory experiment-based results translate to a flux of unit area? for example, bituminous coal and oil sands – how to convert the reaction kinetics results of several samples to fluxes over certain areas of landscapes?
L525: Figure 4 can be improved by displaying topography and lithology maps
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Thomas Blattmann, 19 Apr 2021
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-4/bg-2021-4-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC5: 'Reply on AC3', Thomas Blattmann, 20 Apr 2021
As the full revised manuscript cannot be uploaded at this stage in the review process, I have included the first paragraph of the revised section 3 as referred to in the author response below:
Chemical weathering of silicates and carbonates as well as the burial and oxidation of organic matter exert fundamental control over atmospheric chemistry on Earth over geologic timescales (Berner et al., 1983; Berner, 1990: Hilton and West, 2020; Petsch, 2014). On modern-day Earth, carbon release and sinks from mineral-based weathering (i.e., silicates and carbonates via carbonic and sulfuric acids) and biogeochemical fluxes (i.e., organic matter burial and kerogen oxidation) stand in fine balance to one another with contrasting concoctions of these under different tectonosedimentary settings (e.g., Bufe et al., 2021; Hilton and West, 2020; Blattmann et al., 2019a; Horan et al., 2019). Deglaciation likely modulated silicate and carbonate weathering resulting in enhanced (temporary) drawdown of atmospheric CO2 (e.g., Tranter, 1996; Gibbs and Kump, 1996; Munhoven and François 1996; c.f., Schachtman et al., 2019). Glaciers have been invoked as agents for accelerating chemical weathering of carbonate and silicate minerals by increasing sediment yield and creating reactive substrate with high surface area (Torres et al., 2017; Vance et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2021), with carbonate weathering constituting a source of CO2 to the atmosphere when sulfuric acid, stemming from oxidized sulfide minerals, is involved (c.f., Torres et al., 2014; Kölling et al., 2019). In the following, the idea of glaciers producing reactive substrate susceptible to chemical weathering is reviewed and explored for kerogen.
-
AC5: 'Reply on AC3', Thomas Blattmann, 20 Apr 2021
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Thomas Blattmann, 19 Apr 2021
Thomas M. Blattmann
Thomas M. Blattmann
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 558 | 190 | 20 | 768 | 5 | 4 |
- HTML: 558
- PDF: 190
- XML: 20
- Total: 768
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1