Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2022-72
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2022-72
 
23 Mar 2022
23 Mar 2022
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal BG.

Forest-atmosphere exchange of reactive nitrogen in a remote region – Part II: Modeling annual budgets

Pascal Wintjen1, Frederik Schrader1, Martijn Schaap2,3, Burkhard Beudert4, Richard Kranenburg2, and Christian Brümmer1 Pascal Wintjen et al.
  • 1Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Bundesallee 68, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
  • 2TNO, Climate Air and Sustainability, Utrecht, 3584 CB, The Netherlands
  • 3Institute of Meteorology, Freie Universität Berlin, 12165 Berlin, Germany
  • 4Bavarian Forest National Park, 94481, Grafenau, Germany

Abstract. To monitor the effect of current nitrogen emissions and mitigation strategies, total atmospheric nitrogen deposition to forests is commonly estimated using chemical transport models or canopy budget models in combination with throughfall measurements. Since flux measurements of reactive nitrogen (Nr) compounds are scarce, dry deposition process descriptions as well as the calculated flux estimates and annual budgets are subject to considerable uncertainties. In this study, we compared four different approaches to quantify annual dry deposition budgets of total reactive nitrogen (ΣNr) at a mixed forest site situated in the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany. Dry deposition budgets were quantified based on (I) 2.5 years of eddy-covariance flux measurements with the Total Reactive Atmospheric Nitrogen Converter (TRANC), (II) an in-situ application of the bidirectional inferential resistance scheme DEPAC (Deposition of Acidifying Compounds), here called DEPAC-1D, (III) a simulation with the chemical transport model LOTOS-EUROS (LOng Term Ozone Simulation – EURopean Operational Smog) v2.0 using DEPAC as dry deposition module, and (IV) a canopy budget technique (CBT).

Averaged annual ΣNr dry deposition estimates determined from TRANC measurements were 4.7 ± 0.2 and 4.3 ± 0.4 kg N ha-1 a-1 using DEPAC-1D only, and the Mean-Diurnal-Variation method in combination with DEPAC-1D as gap-filling approaches, respectively. DEPAC-1D modeled dry deposition, using concentrations and meteorological drivers measured at the site, was 5.8 ± < 0.1 kg N ha-1 a-1. In comparison to TRANC fluxes, DEPAC-1D estimates were systematically larger during summer, and in close agreement in winter. Modeled ΣNr deposition velocities (vd) of DEPAC-1D were found to increase with lower temperatures, higher relative humidity, and in the presence of wet leaf surfaces, in particular from May to September. This observation was in contradiction to TRANC-observed fluxes, leading to the conclusion that the parametrizations may need revision. LOTOS-EUROS modeled annual dry deposition was 6.5 ± 0.3 kg N ha-1 a-1 for the site-specific weighting of land-use classes within the site’s grid cell. LOTOS-EUROS showed substantial discrepancies to measured ΣNr deposition during spring and winter, which was related to an overestimation of ammonia concentrations within the grid cell. LOTOS-EUROS predicted an averaged ΣNr concentration of 5.0 ± 3.3 μg N m-3. Ammonia (NH3) contributed most to modeled ΣNr concentrations but the modeled NH3 concentrations were overestimated by a factor two to three compared to measured values. Annual deposition estimates were in the range of minimum and maximum estimates determined from CBT being at 3.8 ± 0.5 and 6.7 ± 0.3 kg N ha-1 a-1, respectively. By adding locally measured wet-only deposition, we estimated an annual total nitrogen deposition input between 11.5 and 14.8 kg N ha-1 a-1, which is at the upper end of the critical load ranges proposed for deciduous and coniferous forests.

In this work, we conducted one of the first comparisons of micrometeorological and ecological methods for estimating annual nitrogen dry deposition to a remote mixed forest.

Pascal Wintjen et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on bg-2022-72', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 May 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Pascal Wintjen, 10 Jun 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on bg-2022-72', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 May 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Pascal Wintjen, 10 Jun 2022

Pascal Wintjen et al.

Pascal Wintjen et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 366 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
285 64 17 366 14 3 7
  • HTML: 285
  • PDF: 64
  • XML: 17
  • Total: 366
  • Supplement: 14
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Mar 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 344 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 344 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Jul 2022
Download
Short summary
For the first time, we compared four methods for estimating annual dry deposition of total reactive nitrogen into a low polluted forest ecosystem. In our analysis we used 2.5 years of flux measurements, an in-situ modeling approach, a large-scale chemical transport model (CTM), and canopy budget models. Annual nitrogen dry deposition budgets ranged between 4.3 and 6.7 kg N ha-1 a-1 depending on the applied method.
Altmetrics