Articles | Volume 13, issue 10
Biogeosciences, 13, 2959–2969, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2959-2016
Biogeosciences, 13, 2959–2969, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2959-2016

Research article 19 May 2016

Research article | 19 May 2016

Determination of the carbon budget of a pasture: effect of system boundaries and flux uncertainties

Raphael Felber1,2, Daniel Bretscher1, Andreas Münger3, Albrecht Neftel1, and Christof Ammann1 Raphael Felber et al.
  • 1Agroscope Research Station, Climate and Air Pollution, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 2ETH Zürich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 3Agroscope Research Station, Milk and Meat Production, Posieux, Switzerland

Abstract. Carbon (C) sequestration in the soil is considered as a potential important mechanism to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the agricultural sector. It can be quantified by the net ecosystem carbon budget (NECB) describing the change of soil C as the sum of all relevant import and export fluxes. NECB was investigated here in detail for an intensively grazed dairy pasture in Switzerland. Two budget approaches with different system boundaries were applied: NECBtot for system boundaries including the grazing cows and NECBpast for system boundaries excluding the cows. CO2 and CH4 exchange induced by soil/vegetation processes as well as direct emissions by the animals were derived from eddy covariance measurements. Other C fluxes were either measured (milk yield, concentrate feeding) or derived based on animal performance data (intake, excreta). For the investigated year, both approaches resulted in a small near-neutral C budget: NECBtot −27 ± 62 and NECBpast 23 ± 76 g C m−2 yr−1. The considerable uncertainties, depending on the approach, were mainly due to errors in the CO2 exchange or in the animal-related fluxes. The comparison of the NECB results with the annual exchange of other GHG revealed CH4 emissions from the cows to be the major contributor in terms of CO2 equivalents, but with much lower uncertainty compared to NECB. Although only 1 year of data limit the representativeness of the carbon budget results, they demonstrate the important contribution of the non-CO2 fluxes depending on the chosen system boundaries and the effect of their propagated uncertainty in an exemplary way. The simultaneous application and comparison of both NECB approaches provides a useful consistency check for the carbon budget determination and can help to identify and eliminate systematic errors.

Download
Short summary
We compare the carbon budget of a pasture using two different system boundaries: including and excluding grazing cows. We reveal the importance of non-CO2 fluxes as budget components depending on the chosen system boundaries and discuss the effect of their uncertainties. Budget components were directly measured or derived from cow related measured parameters like milk yield. The resulting carbon budgets of both approaches agree within the limits of uncertainty showing a near-neutral behavior.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint