Articles | Volume 21, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3839-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3839-2024
Research article
 | 
29 Aug 2024
Research article |  | 29 Aug 2024

Anthropogenic carbon storage and its decadal changes in the Atlantic between 1990–2020

Reiner Steinfeldt, Monika Rhein, and Dagmar Kieke
Abstract

The Atlantic inventory of anthropogenic carbon (Cant) and its changes between 1990 and 2020 are investigated by applying the transit time distribution (TTD) method to anthropogenic tracer data. In contrast to previous TTD applications, here we take into account the admixture of old waters free of anthropogenic tracers. The greatest difference from other methods based on direct carbon observations is the higher Cant storage in the deep ocean. Estimations of the decadal Cant increase based on direct carbon observations yield in general a smaller share of Cant storage in the North Atlantic and a larger share in the South Atlantic compared to our results. Changes in oceanic circulation and/or ventilation have significant impacts on the Cant inventory on the regional scale. The enhanced upwelling of older water in the Southern Ocean and the variability in the convection depth in the Labrador Sea lead to deviations in the inferred Cant increase between 1990 and 2020 from the rate equivalent to a steady-state ocean. For the total Atlantic Cant inventory, however, decadal ventilation variability of individual water masses partially compensates for each other. In addition, its impact on the Cant storage is small due to the much higher flushing time for the whole Atlantic of the order of hundreds of years. The total Cant inventory increases from 43.0 ± 7.3 Pg C in 1990 to 68.2 ± 10.8  Pg C in 2020, almost in unison with the rising CO2 in the atmosphere. So far, ventilation changes have impacted the Cant concentrations only on the regional scale, especially in the subpolar North Atlantic and the Southern Ocean.

1 Introduction

The ocean is an important sink for anthropogenic carbon (Cant) emissions from, e.g., fossil fuel burning, cement production and land use change (Friedlingstein et al.2020). Over the industrial era, about 30 % of these emissions have been taken up by the ocean (Gruber et al.2019) (inferred from observations). Based on global biogeochemical models that meet observational constraints, Friedlingstein et al. (2020) find a slightly smaller ocean carbon uptake of about 25 % of the emissions over the last few decades. A decrease (< 5 % over the last few decades) in the fraction of the CO2 emissions taken up by the ocean is to be expected due to the decreasing buffer capacity of the oceanic waters. In addition, a slower oceanic circulation and mixing in a warming climate might reduce the uptake rate of surface waters for human-produced carbon (Heinze et al.2015). Future changes in the oceanic circulation may also alter the biological carbon pump and the storage of remineralized carbon (Heinze et al.2015).

The North Atlantic is the region with the highest column inventory of anthropogenic carbon (or the highest storage rates over the industrial era), both in models and in observations (Sabine et al.2004; Khatiwala et al.2013). It is also a region with large variability in water mass formation, especially for Labrador Sea Water (Kieke et al.2006; Rhein et al.2007; Yashayaev2007; Kieke and Yashayaev2015; Yashayaev and Loder2016). These changes in water mass formation/ventilation also have an impact on the inventories of Cant (Steinfeldt et al.2009; Pérez et al.2013; Rhein et al.2017), with relatively small Cant storage rates for periods with less intense convection, such as the 2000s (Raimondi et al.2021; Müller et al.2023). Our study also addresses these impacts. In particular, it comprises the time frame with deep and intense formation of Labrador Sea Water (1987–1995); the following period of weaker convection (1996–2013) (Kieke et al.2007; Yashayaev2007; Kieke and Yashayaev2015); and the recent reinvocation of deep-reaching convection since 2014, accompanied by an increase in Cant uptake and oxygen concentrations (Rhein et al.2017).

Cant in the ocean cannot be measured directly but has to be inferred by indirect techniques. One group of methods to calculate Cant concentrations is the so-called “back-calculation techniques” (e.g., ΔC, Gruber et al.1996; φCT0, Vázquez-Rodríguez et al.2009). These techniques rely on measurements of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), the assumed natural background concentration of DIC, and the DIC originating from both the remineralization of organic matter and the dissolution of calcium carbonate. Another technique is the extended multiple linear regression (eMLR) (Friis et al.2005). Here, observations at two different times of both DIC and auxiliary quantities, such as temperature, salinity, nutrients and oxygen, are needed, which allow us to build a regression for DIC based on the other variables. Using this method, the difference in Cant between the two dates can be determined but not the absolute value. Recently, Clement and Gruber (2018) developed an eMLR for C, i.e., the observed DIC excluding the carbon from remineralization of organic matter and dissolution of calcium carbonate. This eMLR(C) method has also been applied by Gruber et al. (2019) and Müller et al. (2023) to the observational data from the GLODAPv2 data set (Lauvset et al.2024).

Other methods do not rely on directly measured carbon data. Instead, they take advantage of anthropogenic tracers like CFCs and SF6 and lead to Cant distributions that are more compatible with these tracers. These methods are the transit time distribution (TTD) method (Hall et al.2002; Waugh et al.2006) and the Green function (GF) approach (Holzer and Hall2000; Khatiwala et al.2013). They consider Cant to be a passive tracer that is advected from the surface into the ocean interior. Thus, these methods do not require making assumptions about the biochemical involvement of carbon (the biological pump) as is necessary for the aforementioned methods. On the other hand, they need to make assumptions about the temporal evolution of Cant in the mixed layer of the ocean and the shape of the TTD or Green’s function. The TTD technique allows us to predict the Cant concentrations from older observations – under the assumption that the ocean is in steady state. In this way, it is possible to distinguish whether Cant changes between two time periods that (i) originate from the atmospheric CO2 increase or (ii) are caused by changes in the ocean circulation.

The different Cant calculation methods generally lead to inventory differences of the order of ± 10 %, both on the global scale (Khatiwala et al.2013) and along basinwide sections in the Atlantic (Vázquez-Rodríguez et al.2009). However, the vertical distribution of the inventory is different, with the ΔC method attributing a smaller fraction to the deep water masses (Vázquez-Rodríguez et al.2009). This also holds true for recently ventilated deep and bottom waters. On the regional scale, the inventory differences are larger, especially in the Southern Ocean (Vázquez-Rodríguez et al.2009). For the biogeochemical consequences of oceanic Cant storage, such as ocean acidification, not only is the total oceanic Cant uptake of importance, but also its local storage rates and the vertical distribution.

Here, we use a modified version of the TTD method to infer the inventories of Cant over the Atlantic from 70° S to 65° N for the years 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020. The method is mainly based on Steinfeldt et al. (2009) but additionally allows for the admixture of old waters free of anthropogenic tracers. The impact of this modification of the TTD method on the derived Cant concentrations is described. We then quantify the decadal Cant inventories and their changes and compare them with a steady-state ocean, where Cant solely changes due to the rising atmospheric CO2 concentration. This allows us to quantify the impact of changes in ocean ventilation and circulation on Cant, i.e., the main processes storing Cant in the ocean interior. We further discuss our results with respect to currently existing global studies and highlight and discuss prominent similarities and discrepancies.

2 Data and methods

2.1 Data and calculation of Cant distributions

We use anthropogenic tracers (CFC-12, CFC-11, CFC-113, tritium and SF6) to calculate transit time distributions (TTDs), from which the concentration of Cant is finally inferred. The data are mainly taken from the GLODAPv2.2023 data product released in 2023 (Lauvset et al.2024). The transient tracer data discussed here cover the period between 1982 and 2021. The GEOTRACES GA02 section from 2010/2011 (Schlitzer et al.2018) and data from North Atlantic cruises conducted over the period of 2017–2018 and not contained in this data product have also been added here (Table 1). The salinity and transient tracer data of these additional cruises have underwent similar bias control procedures to those in the GLODAPv2.2023 data product, and no offset could be detected.

(Steinfeldt et al.2023a)(Steinfeldt et al.2023b)

Table 1List of cruises used with transient tracer data not included in GLODAPv2.2023.

* Part of GEOTRACES section GA02.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Table 2Number of anthropogenic tracer samples used for the Cant calculation.

* CFC-113 and tritium are only used to calculate the ratio of Δ to the mean age Γ of the TTDs independently of time; see Sect. 2.3.1.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f01

Figure 1Location of ship stations with CFC-12 and/or CFC-11 data used for the Cant calculation for the 4 decades considered here. (a) 1982–1994, (b) 1995–2005, (c) 2006–2013, (d) 2014–2021. The grey-shaded area indicates the region for which gridded Cant data could be generated for the respective period. The thick black line following the Mid-Atlantic Ridge is used for separating the Atlantic Ocean into a western and eastern basin.

The data are grouped into four periods roughly centered around 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020. These time segments include the years 1982–1994, 1995–2005, 2006–2013 and 2014–2021 respectively. The periods are chosen to allow for a good data coverage of the Atlantic at least for the first three periods. For the 2014–2021 time frame, the data are sparse except for the North Atlantic. The main focus of the last period is to investigate the effect of the reinvocation of deep convection in the Labrador Sea (Yashayaev and Loder2016) on the Cant distribution. Table 2 shows the number of available tracer data for the four periods. The location of all profiles with CFC-12 and/or CFC-11 data for every decade is indicated in Fig. 1a–d. Tritium, CFC-113 and SF6 are colocated with CFC-11 and/or CFC-12 but have much fewer data points. They are mainly used to infer the shape of the TTD (see Sect. 2.3.1) for the whole time period.

For the isopycnal interpolation of salinity, potential temperature and anthropogenic carbon, at each profile mean values of 38 density layers are calculated. The boundaries of these density intervals are given in Table A1. For the upper layers (σθ), the potential density referenced to the surface is used, for the intermediate layers (σ1.5) 1500 dbar is used, and for the deep layers (σ4) 4000 dbar is used. At some locations, the deepest σθ layer is located below the upper σ1.5 layers. In this case, these upper σ1.5 layers remain empty. The same holds true for the transition between σ1.5 and σ4. A mean value for a density layer is only calculated if at least one data point is located within that density interval. Typically, the number of density levels for a deep-reaching profile is about 30. The layers with the lightest densities only exist at low latitudes, and the densest σ4 layers only exist in the Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) core and in the North Atlantic south of the Denmark Strait.

The isopycnal mean values are then mapped horizontally (i.e., isopycnally) on a regular grid (0.25° latitude ×0.5° longitude) from 70° S to 65° N and 80° W to 20° E. As the number of available samples from the water bottles is typically around 20 per profile, some density layers might not get assigned a mean value. As these “empty” layers change from profile to profile, there are still enough points for each density layer to perform the gridding procedure.

The gridding method is similar to that applied in Rhein et al. (2015); i.e., an objective mapping scheme is used, where the weighting factor decreases with distance r from the data points (exp (−r2)). An additional weighting factor proportional to exp(-(Δ(f/H))2) (f: Coriolis parameter, H: water depth, Δ(f/H): difference in f/H between grid point and data point), which results in a terrain-following interpolation, is only applied to the σ1.5 and σ4 density levels, as the upper lighter waters are less constrained by topography. The marginal seas such as the Mediterranean, Caribbean and North Sea are excluded from the gridded data.

Potential (σθ, σ1.5 and σ4) and neutral densities are vertically interpolated every 100 m and horizontally mapped in the same way as the other quantities. The gridded data of the potential densities are used to infer the thicknesses of the isopycnal layers. In addition to gridding the data for the 1982–1994, 1995–2005, 2006–2013 and 2014–2021 periods, all data from the whole 1982–2021 period are pooled together to produce climatologies for density, salinity, potential temperature and Cant. The gridded fields for the individual decades in some locations have gaps due to sparse input data (distance between grid point and data point > 4.5° or roughly 500 km, Fig. 1). This is not the case for the gridded climatological fields based on the entire data set. In these cases, the gaps of the respective decadal fields are filled by the values obtained from the climatology. For the 1982–1994 and 1995–2005 periods, about 10 % of the decadal gridded values are missing; for the 2006–2013 period, where the data gaps are larger, about 20 %; and for the 2014–2021 period, with the largest data gaps, less than 50 % (see Fig 1). The data coverage is still good in the North Atlantic but is the worst in the southern part and the northeastern subtropics. For this period, we fill the data gaps using data from the previous decade rather than the climatology. In this sense, the 2014–2021 Cant data are a temporal extrapolation of the 2006–2013 period, but potential changes, especially in the South Atlantic, might be underestimated. On the other hand, in the North Atlantic, where temporal variability of Labrador Sea Water (LSW) ventilation does occur, the data coverage is sufficient to reproduce these changes.

From the gridded data we compute column inventories for Cant. Therefore, the Cant concentrations for each isopycnal layer are multiplied by the density and layer thickness and then integrated vertically. This results in an inventory of Cant per square meter. In addition, Cant and salinity are studied along two meridional sections that represent zonal means over the western and eastern basins of the Atlantic. The separation line mainly follows the course of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (see Fig. 1). Selected isopycnals of neutral density γn and potential temperature θ from the climatological fields are also shown in the section plots to give a rough overview of the distribution/location of the main water masses as described below.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f02

Figure 2Zonal mean sections of salinity. (a) Western Atlantic basin, (b) eastern Atlantic basin. The contour lines show zonally averaged neutral density isopycnals γn (dark grey) and isotherms (light grey, θ = 0.0 °C and θ=-0.7°C, south of 50° S only) as boundaries of the main water masses. For abbreviations of water masses, see the text. Note the uneven spacing between contour intervals.

Download

2.2 Major water masses and their definitions

The distribution of Cant is inevitably linked to the spreading of the different water masses. We thus give a short overview of the major water masses in the Atlantic. The zonal mean salinity sections for the western and eastern Atlantic indicate the position of the main water masses (Fig. 2). The areas with high salinities reaching up to 400–600 m depth between 20–40° S and 20–40° N belong to the Subtropical Mode Waters (STMW). These are formed in the subtropical gyres by buoyancy loss and subduction (Talley1999). Further north in the eastern basin, the upper few hundred meters are covered by Subpolar Mode Water (SPMW) (Brambilla and Talley2008), which also has a relatively high salinity (> 35). The deeper region with salinities > 35.5 around 1000 m and 40° N in the eastern basin is dominated by the Mediterranean Outflow Water (MOW). As can be seen from the salinity distribution, this water mass penetrates further into the western basin and also mixes into the underlying North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW).

The low-salinity tongue at around 1000 m, stretching from 45° S–20° N, marks the Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW). This water mass is formed at the Subantarctic Front at about 45° S by ventilation of Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) formed in the southeastern Pacific and Drake Passage (McCartney1982). It even reaches the subpolar North Atlantic but loses its characteristic salinity minimum (Álvarez et al.2004).

The most prominent deep water mass is the North Atlantic Deep Water, which consists of different components, i.e., Labrador Sea Water (LSW), Iceland–Scotland Overflow Water (ISOW) and Denmark Strait Overflow Water (DSOW). The LSW is formed in the northwestern subpolar North Atlantic by deep convection, occasionally reaching 2000 m depth (Lazier et al.2023; Yashayaev2007; Kieke and Yashayaev2015). The salinity minimum associated with this newly formed LSW is clearly seen in Fig. 2a between 50 and 60° N. When spreading south- and eastward, the salinity of LSW increases due to mixing with surrounding more saline water masses, especially MOW.

The ISOW enters the subpolar North Atlantic via the Iceland–Scotland Ridge. It entrains ambient waters such as SPMW (Mauritzen et al.2005), which leads to the relatively high salinity of this water mass (see the salinity maximum in Fig. 2b at 60° N between 2000 and 3000 m depth). Further downstream, the ISOW also entrains fresher LSW (Dickson et al.2002), leading to a salinity decrease. Large parts of the ISOW enter the western basin mainly via the Charlie–Gibbs and Bight fracture zones (McCartney1992; Petit et al.2018), while a smaller part continues southward in the eastern basin (Fleischmann et al.2001).

The densest component of NADW is the DSOW. South of the Denmark Strait between Greenland and Iceland, this water spreads close to the bottom and entrains ambient waters (Jochumsen et al.2015). It is less saline than the ISOW above. Due to its high density and great depth (below ≈3500 m), it cannot enter the eastern Atlantic directly.

In the Southern Ocean, NADW succumbs to upwelling and is incorporated into the Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) (Iudicone et al.2008). The southernmost extension of CDW between the Antarctic continent and the Antarctic Circumpolar Current is called Warm Deep Water (WDW). This water also contains older deep water from the other oceans and more recently ventilated water from the Weddell Sea in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean (Klatt et al.2002).

The water mass close to the bottom with relatively low salinity is the Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW). In the Atlantic, AABW is formed in the Weddell Sea, including subsurface excursions of saline shelf water below the ice shelf and substantial entrainment of WDW when descending into the abyss. It leaves the Southern Ocean, guided by topography, and enters into the deep basins of the western Atlantic (Bullister et al.2013). Major pathways for deep and bottom waters to flow into the eastern basins are the Romanche Fracture Zone (Mercier and Morin1997) near the Equator and the Vema Fracture Zone at 11° N (Fischer et al.1996). This eastward penetration of AABW at the Equator is visible by a salinity minimum directly above the bottom. The intensified vertical mixing with the overlying DSOW as observed in the Romanche Fracture Zone (Mercier and Morin1997) makes the bottom waters of the eastern basin more saline than in the western part. At the same time, the temperature increases, and the density decreases. This altered AABW in the eastern basin is then called Lower Deep Water (LDW). The further salinity increase in the deep eastern Atlantic towards the northern boundary might be explained by intrusion of the densest part of ISOW. Nevertheless, the influence of AABW is still visible, e.g., by enhanced noble gas concentrations observed along 60° N, originating from the entrainment of subglacial meltwater from the Antarctic ice shelves (Rhein et al.2018).

South of the fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, at about 55° S, the densities of the deep water are considerably higher. There, the potential temperature θ is used to distinguish between Warm Deep Water (WDW; θ > 0 °C), Weddell Sea Deep Water (WSDW; 0 °C >θ>0.7 °C) and Weddell Sea Bottom Water (WSBW; θ<-0.7 °C; van Heuven et al.2011). WSBW, WSDW and WDW are precursor water masses of AABW.

The neutral density boundaries of some specific water masses are shown in all the figures of each section. We selected the boundaries according to the salinity distribution; i.e., the low-salinity tongue of the AAIW is comprised of the isopycnals γn = 27.0 and γn = 27.8 kg m−3. For the NADW components, we roughly follow the values given in Le Bras et al. (2017). Only for the density at the lower boundaries of LSW and ISOW do we use slightly denser isopycnals to better represent the salinity distribution. With the water mass boundaries shown in Fig. 2, the salinity minimum of the LSW in the northwestern Atlantic and the salinity maximum of the ISOW at the northern boundary of the eastern basin are completely contained in the respective water mass. For the boundary between DSOW and AABW, we chose the isopycnal γn = 28.16 kg m−3, almost following the isohaline S = 34.85. This leads to a northern boundary of AABW in the western basin at around 20° N. There are some extensions of AABW found further north, but they have mixed with the overlying DSOW and are thus more saline and also more enriched with anthropogenic tracers.

2.3 Anthropogenic carbon inferred from the TTD method

In this paper, we use a modified TTD method to infer the concentration of Cant. This is based on the method used in Steinfeldt et al. (2009). In addition, we explicitly allow for the admixture of old, tracer-free waters. This approach has been used before, e.g., in Steinfeldt and Rhein (2004), but there it was locally restricted to the deep western boundary current in the tropics and was not used to calculate anthropogenic carbon. Here, we introduce a new algorithm that allows us to assign the admixture of old water at any location.

2.3.1 The standard TTD method

First, we explain the standard TTD method by following the procedure in Hall et al. (2002). Due to the advective–diffusive nature of oceanic transport, the water in the ocean interior consists of fluid elements with different pathways and ages (time elapsed since the water parcel left the mixed layer). The distribution of these ages, τ, is described by the TTD function 𝒢. The concentration of any conservative property C(x,t) at location x in the ocean interior and time t, which can be a particular reference year tref, is then given by (Hall et al.2002)

(1) C ( x , t ref ) = 0 C 0 ( t ref - τ ) G ( x , t ref , τ ) d τ ,

where τ denotes the age of the water. C0(t) is the concentration history of the property in surface waters in the mixed layer. For upper water masses, we assume that C0(t) for CFCs and SF6 is in solubility equilibrium with the atmosphere. For deeper, denser waters, the saturation gradually decreases to 80 %. A detailed list of the saturation used for each density layer is given in the supporting information in Table A1. In Steinfeldt et al. (2009), the minimum saturation was chosen to be lower, i.e., 65 %. However, CFC concentrations measured close to the formation region of NADW tend to be larger than 65 % of the surface saturation (see Fig. B1), so the value for the minimum CFC saturation has been enlarged for all dense water data. According to Steinfeldt et al. (2009), the difference in the inferred Cant concentrations is about half the saturation difference; i.e., a saturation difference of 20 % leads to a Cant difference of about 10 %. For Cant, we use a time-independent carbon disequilibrium as in Waugh et al. (2006) and Steinfeldt et al. (2009). Cant(tref) is calculated as the difference between the carbon concentration at time tref and the preindustrial time (year 1800). If the carbon disequilibrium remains constant, it cancels out when calculating this difference. At the beginning of the industrial period, atmospheric CO2 increased by about 1 ppm per decade. This means an earlier or later start time for the beginning of the industrial period compared to 1800 would change the inferred Cant concentration by about 0.6 µmol kg−1 for the decades around 1800. As the Atlantic waters nowadays only contain a small fraction of water formed around the year 1800, the Cant difference arising from a slightly different definition of the industrial period almost vanishes.

Equation (1) is used to infer concentrations of anthropogenic carbon (Cant(x,t)) from the TTD functions G(x,t,τ). On the other hand, Eq. (1) allows us to infer the parameters of the TTD such that C(x,t) is the observed tracer concentration. To do so, a certain functional form of the TTD has to be assumed. Here, we apply an inverse Gaussian function as an approximation of the “real” TTD, as has been done in other studies (e.g., Hall et al.2002; Waugh et al.2006; Steinfeldt et al.2009). This function only depends on two parameters: the mean age (mean value of τ) Γ (the first moment associated with the advective tracer transfer) and the width Δ (the second moment, which is related to the dispersion or mixing on all relevant scales, including recirculation and admixtures or entrainment of older water):

(2) G ( τ , Γ , Δ ) = Γ 3 4 π Δ 2 τ 3 exp - Γ ( τ - Γ ) 2 4 Δ 2 τ .

In order to derive both parameters (Δ and Γ), simultaneous measurements of different anthropogenic tracers are needed (Hall et al.2002; Steinfeldt et al.2009; Smith et al.2011). As these are sparse, a fixed ratio of Δ/Γ is often used. This ratio is a measure of the importance of mixing (higher Δ/Γ values imply stronger mixing). Waugh et al. (2004) inferred a ratio of Δ/Γ=1 from tracer observations in the subpolar North Atlantic.

In an ideal case, if 𝒢 were the real TTD, the mean age Γ should be independent of the tracer from which it is inferred. Equation (1) then holds true for CFC-12, CFC-11, SF6 and any other tracer taken from the same water sample with identical TTD parameters. In reality, if Eq. (1) holds true for one tracer (e.g., CFC-12) with the regional Δ/Γ value, applying Eq. (1) with the same parameters of 𝒢 to another tracer (e.g., CFC-11) may result in deviations of the order of a few percent from the observed CFC-11 concentration. In this study, we preferentially use CFC-12-derived ages; we use CFC-11 only when CFC-12 is not available. The number of the considered age data points is given in Table 1. CFC-12 and CFC-11 are the most commonly measured tracers (Table 2). The advantage of CFC-12 is that it increased in the atmosphere before CFC-11 and, in recent years, shows a smaller decline (Fig. C1). For young waters, this decline leads to relatively large errors (from measurement uncertainties and an unknown mixed-layer saturation) in the age and inferred anthropogenic carbon (Tanhua et al.2008). Thus, for data after 2005 in the upper layers (0<σθ<27.6 kg m−3) with young water (central and intermediate waters) and relatively high SF6 concentrations, we use the SF6-based age estimate, if available. If CFC-12 is measured simultaneously, it is used for the calculation of the Δ/Γ ratio. In the subpolar Atlantic north of 45° N, the density range for using the SF6 age is expanded into the Labrador Sea Water, as here this water mass also has a relatively young age.

Steinfeldt et al. (2009) used pointwise TTDs with Δ/Γ ratios of 0.5, 1 or 2 for the subpolar to tropical Atlantic based on simultaneous observations of CFC-12/tritium and CFC-12/CFC-113. Here, we also make use of simultaneous measurements of CFC-12 and SF6 to infer the Δ/Γ ratio and also round it to the quantized values of 0.5, 1 or 2. Note that SF6 is not used at all in the deep and bottom waters, as the concentrations could still be enlarged from the remnants of artificial tracer release experiments in the 1990s in the Nordic Seas (Watson et al.1999; Tanhua et al.2005) and Brazil Basin (Polzin et al.1997). Tritium is only used north of 45° N. This excludes southern sources with lower surface tritium values. Including those would imply a spatial dependence of C0 in Eq. (1), which is not applied here.

As in Steinfeldt et al. (2009), the inferred Δ/Γ ratios are gridded for each isopycnal layer in the same way as the other data (see Sect. 2.1). Due to the limited number of tritium, CFC-113 and SF6 observations compared to CFC-12, the data from all 3 decades are combined, and any temporal change in the Δ/Γ ratio is not accounted for. The remaining data gaps of the gridded fields are filled with the standard value of Δ/Γ=1. The distribution of the resulting Δ/Γ ratios is shown in Fig. 3a and b for the western and eastern basins of the Atlantic. We find high ratios close to the maximum value of 2 at the surface and in the newly formed AAIW, NADW (LSW, ISOW, DSOW) and AABW. For the latter, the precursor water masses WSBW and WSDW directly north of Antarctica have a Δ/Γ ratio of approximately unity. Only the subtropical mode waters have Δ/Γ ratios below 1 near their formation region. Further downstream, the Δ/Γ ratio of the intermediate, deep and bottom waters decreases towards unity and even below, especially for LSW in the northeastern Atlantic.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f03

Figure 3(a–b) Zonal mean sections showing the Δ/Γ ratio inferred from simultaneous observations of different tracers. (c–d) Difference in zonal mean Cant concentrations calculated from a variable Δ/Γ ratio and from the constant ratio of Δ/Γ=1. The Cant fields are based on tracer data from the whole period (1982–2021), and the reference year is 2020. (e–f) Zonal mean sections of ΔtCantanom for a variable Δ/Γ ratio (Cant calculated for 2020 with data in 2020 minus Cant calculated for 2020 based on tracer data in 1990, i.e., Cant2020-Cant19902020). Contour lines are shown as in Fig. 2. For details, see the text. Note the uneven breaks in the color scale.

Download

The difference between the Cant concentrations based on the variable Δ/Γ ratio and the case that Δ/Γ=1 is depicted in Fig. 3c and d (here, the climatological Cant fields referenced to 2010 are used). In general, Δ/Γ>1 leads to smaller values and Δ/Γ<1 to larger values of the inferred Cant, as has also been found in He et al. (2018). The areas with Δ/Γ>1 dominate, but the basinwide reduction in the Cant inventory due to the variable Δ/Γ ratio is only of the order of 1 Pg C (Table 3), both for the North Atlantic and the South Atlantic. In the study by He et al. (2018), the best agreement between the directly modeled global Cant inventory and Cant inferred from the TTD method is for a mean Δ/Γ ratio of 1.2, which is similar to our results for the Atlantic.

Table 3Hemispheric and total Atlantic Cant inventories referenced to 2010 for three different methods: the standard TTD method (as used, e.g., in Waugh et al.2006), a variable Δ/Γ ratio (as used in Steinfeldt et al.2009), and the modified TTD method with both a variable Δ/Γ ratio and an explicit dilution factor f.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

One advantage of the TTD method is that it allows for choosing the reference year tref in Eq. (1). This makes it possible to group observations from several years to calculate Cant for a common reference year, as has been done here for CFC/SF6 data from 1982–1994, 1995–2005, 2006–2013 and 2014–2021 and using all data from 1982–2021. By varying tref in Eq. (1), the TTD method also allows us to make predictions for future tracer concentrations. If the TTD parameters have been determined from a tracer observation at time tobs, tref can be shifted into the future, and the concentration of any tracer can be inferred from Eq. (1) for this future time tref. The assumption underlying this prediction is that the TTD function 𝒢 remains the same, G(x,tobs,τ)=G(x,tref,τ); i.e., the ocean circulation and ventilation do not change. The increase in Cant in this case is thus only due to the rising atmospheric CO2. In particular, we use the tracer data from around 1990 (1982–1994) to predict Cant for the reference year 2020. These predicted Cant values are denoted by Cant19902020. This prediction can be compared with the case where Cant is inferred from data around the reference year. For example, Cant2020 means Cant is calculated from data between 2013–2021 and referenced to the year 2020. The difference, Cant2020-Cant19902020, can be interpreted as an anomaly in the Cant increase (or accumulation) between 1990 and 2020 due to changes in the oceanic circulation/ventilation (i.e., in the TTDs) and is thus denoted as ΔtCantanom, as in Gruber et al. (2019). These anomalies can also be inferred for the other decadal Cant increase rates, i.e., Cant2000-Cant19902000 and Cant2010-Cant20002010.

Figure 3e–f show the distribution of ΔtCantanom for the western and eastern basins for the Cant2020-Cant19902020 case. The Cant anomalies are discussed in detail in Sect. 3.3.2. Here, we only want to point out that in some cases large anomalies are found in the formation region of a water mass, e.g., for LSW and AAIW in the western Atlantic and, less pronounced, also in the eastern basin. The WSDW and AABW also exhibit large negative anomalies. Further downstream, in the equatorial region, the anomalies within LSW and AAIW are slightly smaller. This is to be expected, as away from the source region, waters from different vintages with different Cant anomalies mix. However, we also find strongly negative values of ΔtCantanom in the LDW in the eastern Atlantic, which is the oldest water mass and not in the direct export pathway of AABW and DSOW. In these old waters, a pronounced Cant anomaly should only occur for a pronounced longtime change in the ocean circulation and/or ventilation. But even then, the Cant accumulation anomaly should be smaller than in the regions with high Cant concentrations, like the water mass formation regions. Older waters contain a notable fraction with ages over 200 years (see the example in Table D1), i.e., Cant free waters, which cannot contribute to the Cant anomaly. We thus consider the strongly negative ΔtCantanom values in LDW as an artifact of the TTD parameterization in the form of a single inverse Gaussian function. In the next section we show how a modification of the TTD parameterization by including an additional dilution of young waters with old waters helps to overcome this artifact.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f04

Figure 4(a–d) Zonal mean sections showing the fraction f of young Cant-bearing water. (c–d) Difference in zonal mean Cant concentrations between the value calculated from a variable Δ/Γ ratio and no dilution and a variable Δ/Γ ratio with dilution. The Cant fields are based on tracer data from the whole period (1982–2021), and the reference year is 2020. (e–f) Zonal mean sections of ΔtCantanom for a variable Δ/Γ ratio (Cant calculated for 2020 with data in 2020 minus Cant calculated for 2020 based on tracer data in 1990, i.e., Cant2020-Cant19902020). Contour lines are shown as in Fig. 2. For details, see the text. Note the uneven breaks in the color scale.

Download

2.3.2 The modified TTD method with dilution

Steinfeldt and Rhein (2004) presented the foundation of the TTD method applied here by focusing on the Deep Western Boundary Current (DWBC) of the tropical Atlantic and investigating the NADW therein as a mixture of young and old water contributions. We apply the same principle here, but in contrast to the previous study, we extend this approach to the entire Atlantic Ocean.

(3) G = f G young + ( 1 - f ) G old

𝒢old is assumed to not contain CFCs and also no Cant; thus we do not need to consider it here. The additional parameter f describes the fraction of younger water and 1−f the dilution with old water. Eq. (1) then becomes

(4) C x , t ref = 0 C 0 t ref - τ f G young x , t ref , τ d τ .

The dilution of younger water with an old component can be interpreted as follows: in the North Atlantic, the younger water can be interpreted as NADW and the old water as admixtures of AABW or recirculated NADW. In the South Atlantic, young waters are AABW and AAIW, and the old water originates from NADW. We also introduce an age threshold below which the dilution case is excluded. This is chosen as Γyoung = 100 years. Mean ages younger than 100 years only occur in and close to water mass formation regions, where a dilution with waters free of anthropogenic tracers is unlikely. Thus it is guaranteed that for these relatively young waters, e.g., in the vicinity of water mass formation regions where the temporal variability might be high, only the no-dilution case is applied.

In order to determine f, Steinfeldt and Rhein (2004) used assumptions that are only valid in the DWBC. Here, we want to apply the dilution in any region, especially for old water like the LDW, far away from the DWBC. The method used to determine the fraction f is as follows: for f = 1, we calculate Cant as described above, with the Δ/Γ ratios determined from simultaneous observations of different transient tracers. In addition, we infer Cant for values of f of 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25 with Δ/Γ=1. These quantized values are chosen to limit the computational effort and obtain marked differences between the derived Cant concentrations. From the four sets of TTD parameters, four different Cant values are inferred.

At each grid point, from these four TTD parameterizations, one is chosen that minimizes the Cant differences between the climatology and the decadal values, i.e., min((Cant(1982-1994)1990-Cant(clim)1990)2+(Cant(1995-2005)2000-Cant(clim)2000)2+(Cant(2006-2013)2010-Cant(clim)2010)2+(Cant(2014-2021)2020-Cant(clim)2020)2), where, e.g., Cant(1982−1994)1990 means Cant referenced to 1990 inferred from the decadal data from 1982–1994, and Cant(clim)1990 means the climatological Cant value referenced to 1990. An example of the influence of varying the TTD parameters (Δ/Γ ratio, fraction f) on the shape of the TTD is given in Fig. D1.

The inferred fractions f are shown in Fig. 4a–b for the western and eastern basins. Close to the water mass formation regions, e.g., the subpolar North Atlantic, the waters are too young to allow for a dilution, so f is set to 1 there. The only exception is the WSDW, which has a dilution factor of about 0.5 adjacent to its formation region (the formation region itself at the Antarctic shelf is not considered here). A strong dilution with old waters (low f) is mainly found in the deep and bottom waters (AABW, LDW and DSOW south of 30° N). In these regions, the inferred Cant concentrations are remarkably smaller than for the case without dilution (see Fig. 4c–d) by up to 10 µmol kg−1. In general, the regions with f < 1 always show a reduction in Cant. For the North Atlantic, where the regions with f = 1 dominate, the basinwide Cant inventory is only reduced by 0.7 Pg C compared to the TTDs without dilution. For the South Atlantic, this reduction is larger (1.7 Pg C) (Table 3).

The introduction of the dilution f leads not only to smaller Cant concentrations, but also to a reduction in the amount of the Cant accumulation anomalies ΔtCantanom. A comparison between Figs. 3e–f and 4e–f shows that ΔtCantanom becomes less negative, especially in the waters of Antarctic origin (WSDW, AABW and LDW), where f < 1. On the other hand, the positive Cant anomalies in the NADW, especially the LSW, in the western tropical Atlantic hardly change; i.e., they are less dependent on the parameterization of the TTDs. In Sect. 3.3.2 we relate these Cant accumulation anomalies with observed changes in ocean ventilation. As the spuriously negative values of ΔtCantanom in the old deep waters are reduced by taking into account the dilution of young water with old water, we use the modified TTDs with dilution to compute the Atlantic Cant inventories. Another advantage of this TTD parameterization is that it reduces the relatively high Cant concentrations in the Southern Ocean that result from the standard TTD method when compared to other Cant calculation techniques (Waugh et al.2006; Vázquez-Rodríguez et al.2009; Khatiwala et al.2013).

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f05

Figure 5Expected increase rate (Inc) per year of CFC-12 for a concentration observed in the year 2000 as a function of the observed CFC-12 concentration itself and the fraction of young water. The increase is calculated from the TTDs inferred from the CFC-12 concentration in the year 2000, assuming a steady-state ocean. High CFC-12 concentrations are incompatible with low fractions of young water; thus, this area is left blank. For details, see the text.

Download

The strongly negative Cant accumulation anomalies, when using the standard TTDs, indicate that the water in 2020 is older than in 1990; thus Cant calculated from the age in 1990 with the reference year 2020 is larger than Cant derived from the age in 2020. Figure 5 shows that the CFC increase rate for a steady-state ocean (calculated from Eq. 1) CFC-12 in the year 2000 is smaller for smaller fractions f. If an observed CFC increase over time (around the year 2000) lags behind the expected value from Fig. 5, the water becomes older and vice versa. Thus the choice of the dilution factor f influences age changes inferred from observed temporal changes of the CFC-12 concentration. As a consequence, the magnitude of the Cant anomaly ΔtCantanom also differs between different TTD parameterizations.

2.3.3 Error estimation

The error in Cant is calculated similarly to Steinfeldt et al. (2009). The contributions of the interpolation/gridding error (3 %), the Cant disequilibrium (possible undersaturation) (20 %) and the CFC disequilibrium (5.5 %, including errors in the CFC measurements) are treated the same. The Cant uncertainty of 2.0 µ mol kg−1 in very old waters (Steinfeldt et al.2009) is considered to be a minimum error everywhere. If the CFC-12 concentration is below the typical detection limit of 0.005 pmol kg−1, the Cant concentration is set to zero. The error due to the TTD parameterization as an inverse Gaussian function compared to the real TTD is the maximum of the 20 % given in Steinfeldt et al. (2009) and the difference in Cant calculated with the standard TTD method and the case with dilution. In the model study by He et al. (2018), the error arising from a change in the Cant disequilibrium is relatively low (less than 10 % for all ocean regions), so our assumption might be an overestimation.

All these errors apply to the Cant value at each data point. For the gridded fields, the statistical errors decrease according to the degrees of freedom, whereas the systematic errors remain unchanged. The errors due to the shape of the TTD and the unknown Cant disequilibrium are assumed to be similar (or systematic) within one water mass, but they may vary between water masses. As there are about four different water mass classes (Central and Intermediate Water, LSW, Overflow Waters, and AABW), these errors are divided by 4=2 when the error for the total inventory is considered. The Cant error of 2.0 µmol kg−1 at low CFC concentrations can be regarded as cruise dependent. Most grid points are influenced by at least two cruises (e.g., a zonal and a meridional section). Thus, the error of 2.0 µmol kg−1 is divided by 2 for each grid point and by n for the whole inventory, where n denotes the number of cruises from which the gridded Cant data are inferred.

For inventory differences in Cant between times t1 and t2, the errors due to a change in Cant and CFC disequilibria and the errors due to uncertainties in the TTD shape only have to be applied to the portion of Cant that is added between t1 and t2. For the water formed prior to time t1, which is still present at time t2, these systematic errors mainly cancel each other out (Steinfeldt et al.2009).

When comparing the predicted Cant values for time t2 based on observations at t1 with the Cant values based directly on observations at t2, the error due to a change in the Cant disequilibrium is neglected. The reason is that here we are interested in the effect of a change in age on the Cant concentrations and not the effect of biogeochemical changes. Second, a change in the Cant disequilibrium would affect the Cant values for the prediction from observations at t1 and from more recent observations at t2 in a similar way.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Basinwide Cant distribution

The Cant concentration and inventories of the Atlantic between 70° S and 65° N are computed for the reference years 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020 from the decadal CFC/SF6 data. In addition, we use all data to calculate a quasi-climatological distribution of the Atlantic Cant inventories for the same reference years. All inventories and their uncertainties are listed in Table 4. The Atlantic inventory of about 58.0 ± 9.3 Pg C in 2010 makes up 37 ± 9 % of the global Cant storage (155 Pg C, best estimate in Khatiwala et al.2013), whereas the fractional areal cover of the parts of the Atlantic considered here is only about 22 %.

Table 4Atlantic Cant inventories in petagrams of carbon (Pg C) for reference years 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020 based on all tracer data and on tracer data from the decade centered around the reference year only.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f06

Figure 6Map of the climatological Cant column inventory referenced to 2020 based on all tracer data between 1982 and 2021. The thick line following the Mid-Atlantic Ridge indicates the boundary between the eastern and western basins. The dots indicate the locations of tracer samples used for the Cant calculation. Note the uneven spacing between contour intervals at the beginning and end of the color scale.

The climatological column inventory obtained from the extended TTD method is shown in Fig. 6. A tongue of high-Cant column inventories stretches southward from the Cant maximum in the northwestern Atlantic towards the Equator. This reflects the southward propagation of NADW, mainly within the DWBC (Rhein et al.2015). NADW is relatively high in Cant compared to the deep water masses of southern origin.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f07

Figure 7Zonal mean sections of Cant referenced to 2020 based on all tracer data between 1982 and 2021. (a) Western basin, (b) eastern basin. Contour lines are shown as in Fig. 2.

Download

The zonal mean sections for the eastern and western basins of the Atlantic, shown in Fig. 7, highlight the vertical Cant distribution and the contributions of the different water masses to the column inventory. Cant concentrations are high at the surface and in the central waters formed in the subtropical gyres. The maximum is found at the surface in the tropical/subtropical zone, where sea surface temperature (SST) is the highest. The reason is that the Cant equilibrium concentration increases with temperature and alkalinity. The subtropical gyres in particular show high values of salinity and also alkalinity (Lee et al.2006). The AAIW layer below forms a kind of transition zone between the Cant-rich mode waters above and the Cant-poor old deep waters below.

The most striking features in the deep waters are the elevated Cant concentrations in the North Atlantic (Fig. 7). They are the highest in the western basin in the LSW layer, as this water mass is directly formed here (see Sect. 2.2). The spreading time for DSOW from its origin in the Nordic Seas towards the Labrador Sea is about 5 years (Rhein et al.2015), resulting in lower Cant concentrations. The NADW component with the lowest Cant values is the ISOW, as this water mass has the longest travel time into the western Atlantic via the Charlie–Gibbs Fracture Zone (Smethie and Swift1989). The northeastern Atlantic generally exhibits smaller Cant values in the deep waters. The LSW is also present there but with lower concentrations due to the spreading time of around 5 years from the formation region in the Labrador Sea towards the European continent (Sy et al.1997; Yashayaev et al.2007). The ISOW in the eastern basin does not reach the bottom of the deep basin, and the DSOW is not able to cross the Mid-Atlantic Ridge towards the east in the North Atlantic, so the deepest waters in the eastern basin (LDW) are low in Cant. The southward spreading of NADW, mainly in the DWBC, leads to a tongue of enhanced Cant concentrations in the western basin, which extends south of the Equator. The slightly enhanced concentrations in the LSW and AABW in the eastern equatorial Atlantic are due to the import of deep water from the western basin (Rhein and Stramma2005).

In the deep South Atlantic, Cant in deep waters also decreases from west to east. The higher Cant concentrations in the west are due to the spreading of AABW, which propagates from the Weddell Sea northward into the deep basins of the western Atlantic (Orsi et al.1999). Another AABW branch continues eastward near 60° S. This branch can be seen in the enhanced Cant values in Fig. 7a. It is also identified in the prime meridian section in Huhn et al. (2013) by the deep CFC-12 maximum. The Cant concentrations in the AABW core are considerably smaller compared to NADW. Through the entrainment of old WDW (see Sect. 2.2), the transient tracer signal of AABW gets diluted, which explains the smaller Cant values.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f08

Figure 8Zonal mean sections of Cant referenced to 1994 from (a–b) the ΔC method (Sabine et al.2004), (c–d) the GF method (Khatiwala et al.2013) and (e–f) our TTD method. Contour lines are shown as in Fig. 2.

Download

To compare our results directly with other methods, Fig. 8 shows the Cant distributions in the western and eastern Atlantic from Sabine et al. (2004) (the ΔC method) and Khatiwala et al. (2013) (the Green function (GF) method). Here, all Cant values are referenced to 1994. For our TTD-derived Cant distribution we only use data from the first 2 decades (1982–2005) to have a data basis that is similar to that of the other studies. In the upper waters, the high Cant concentrations in the Northern East Atlantic Central Water between 40 and 60° N from the ΔC method are distinct. Besides this, all methods yield similar results. This is different for the deep waters. There, the pattern of the Cant distribution differs. The high Cant concentrations in the cores of DSOW (between 40 and 60° N) and AABW (around 60° S) in the western basin can only be found using the TTD method. For the ΔC method, Cant in the deep waters (ISOW, DSOW, LDW and AABW) is generally low and sometimes even has (unrealistic) negative values. For LSW, however, the results from the ΔC and TTD methods agree quite well. For this water mass, the GF method yields the highest concentration, especially in the western basin. Regarding the deeper water masses below the LSW, the results from the GF method are in between the ΔC and TTD values.

Overall, the improved TTD method used here leads to Cant distributions that are compatible with the spreading of the water masses. The low Cant values from the ΔC and GF methods in the recently formed DSOW and AABW are an unlikely scenario, as these water masses contain considerable amounts of CFCs (Smethie et al.2000; van Heuven et al.2011; Huhn et al.2013), which have been in the atmosphere for a shorter time than Cant.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f09

Figure 9Decadal changes (1990–2000, 2000–2010 and 2010–2020) in the Cant inventories for the North Atlantic (N. Atl.) and South (S. Atl.) Atlantic. The vertical black lines indicate the uncertainties. The horizontal colored lines show the inventory increase based on the Cant inventory from the beginning of the decadal period (1990, 2000 and 2010) and a steady-state ocean circulation.

Download

Woosley et al. (2016)Müller et al. (2023)

Table 5Decadal changes in Atlantic Cant inventories (ΔtCant, in Pg C). The inventory differences are obtained from the decadal-data-only inventories listed in Table 3. They are compared with the values given in Woosley et al. (2016) (based on the eMLR method, the Cant increase from 1990–2000 in Woosley et al.2016, is adopted from Wanninkhof et al.2010) and Müller et al. (2023) (eMLR(C) method), where the increase is calculated for the periods of 1994–2004 and 2004–2014).

a Value for the 1994–2004 period. b Value for the 2004–2014 period.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

3.2Cant increase between 1990–2020

The decadal changes in Cant inventories (ΔtCant) are depicted in Fig. 9 and given in Table 5 together with results from other studies. Our results show a continuous increase in ΔtCant over the 3 decades for both hemispheres. The North Atlantic shows higher Cant storage compared to the southern part. This difference is most pronounced for the first decade from 1990–2000.

The inferred Cant inventory changes from the other studies often show larger values of ΔtCant in the South Atlantic and smaller ones in the North Atlantic compared to our result. This is especially the case for the 1990–2000 period in Woosley et al. (2016) (1.9 ±0.4 Pg C compared to 4.2 ± 1.4 Pg C in our study). The results in Woosley et al. (2016) are based on the eMLR method, and the values for the period of 1990–2000 are adopted from Wanninkhof et al. (2010). There, the Cant change over the whole Atlantic is inferred from only one cruise, which, in the North Atlantic, is located in the eastern basin and hence does not cover the deep water formation areas in the Irminger and Labrador seas. This may introduce a bias into the results compared to our study. For the second period from 2000–2010, Woosley et al. (2016) use four cruises, also a small number compared to the number of cruises/data used in this study. Nevertheless, the agreement with Woosley et al. (2016) for the second decade is good (5.1 ± 1.6 Pg C vs. 4.4 ±0.9 Pg C). For the South Atlantic, the values in Woosley et al. (2016) are higher than ours, especially for the period of 1990–2000, but still agree within the error range.

By applying the eMLR(C) method to inorganic carbon observations obtained from the previous version of GLODAPv2, Müller et al. (2023) infer the increase in the Atlantic Cant inventory for the periods of 1994–2004 and 2004–2014. Unfortunately, these periods are shifted compared to ours by 4 years, which hampers direct comparison with our results. Due to the 4-year shift, the values in Müller et al. (2023) should be larger by about 8 % (see Sect. 3.3.2) if the ocean circulation were in a steady state. The most striking difference from our results is the decrease in ΔtCant in the North Atlantic between the periods of 1994–2004 and 2004–2014. As in Woosley et al. (2016), the study by Müller et al. (2023) also yields higher Cant storage rates in the South Atlantic compared to our results. Nevertheless, both Müller et al. (2023) and our results show a relatively large increase in this storage rate between the 1990s and 2000s.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f10

Figure 10Mean Cant storage rate (ΔtCant) for the decades between 1990 and 2020 based on decadal data. Left column – whole water column, right column – only deep and bottom water masses. (a, b) 1990–2000, (c, d) 2000–2010, (e, f) 2010–2020. Only areas with a water depth larger than 200 m are considered. Station locations for the first period (1982–1994 in a, b; 1995–2005 in c, d; and 2006–2013 in e, f) are marked in light grey, and those for the second period (1995–2005 in a, b; 2006–2013 in c, d; and 2014–2021 in e, f) are marked in black. Regions with differences smaller than the error range are stippled.

Table 6Cant accumulation anomalies for the Atlantic Ocean (ΔtCantanom), i.e., deviations between the Cant increase based on tracer data from the actual period and the predicted Cant increase based on tracer data from the previous period.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

3.2.1 Local Cant changes

We now discuss the decadal Cant changes between 1990 and 2020 in different regions/water masses of the Atlantic. Figure 10 shows the mean annual storage rates for the respective decades between 1990 and 2020 over the whole water column (Fig. 10a, c, e) and the deep and bottom water layers only (Fig. 10b, d, f), which comprise the σ1.5 and σ4 layers from Table A1. Figure E1 shows the same Cant changes as Fig. 10 but expressed as relative numbers. In Fig. 11 the changes in Cant concentrations in the western and eastern basins are depicted. The Cant increases shown in Figs. 10 and 11 reveal similar patterns to the Cant distribution in Figs. 6 and 7; i.e., the Cant increase over time is high when the Cant concentration is also high. The largest increase appears close to the surface and in the subtropical mode waters, and the NADW also contributes significantly to the Atlantic Cant storage. This becomes particularly evident when comparing the Cant increase for the whole water column (Fig. 10a, c and e) with that for the deep and bottom waters only (Fig. 10b, d and f): in the subpolar North Atlantic, where the deep water layer extends close to the surface, the Cant storage in deep and bottom waters alone is almost as large as for the total water column. The southward propagation of NADW in the western basin is reflected by a significant Cant increase that extends to 10° S and is most pronounced in the LSW layer (Fig. 11a, c and e). In the eastern basin, any noticeable spatial Cant increase in the younger NADW layer (LSW and ISOW) is limited to the region north of 30° N.

The deep and bottom waters in the Atlantic that are not influenced by younger NADW mainly show insignificant Cant changes. South of about 40°S, the AABW exhibits a Cant increase above the detection limit, at least in some places. These also contribute to the increase in the column inventory of the deep and bottom waters south of 40°S shown in Fig. 10f. The differences between the decadal Cant storage rates are discussed in more detail in Sect. 3.3 on decadal variability.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f11

Figure 11Zonal mean sections of Cant concentration changes (ΔtCant) based on decadal data for the periods between 1990 and 2010. (a, c, e) Western basin, (b, d, f) eastern basin, (a, b) 1990–2000, (c, d) 2000–2010, (e, f) 2010–2020. Regions with differences smaller than the error range are stippled. Contour lines are shown as in Fig. 2.

Download

3.2.2 Comparison of local Cant changes from the modified TTD method with dilution with other publications

We now compare our inferred local Cant changes in the Atlantic with other published results. For the subpolar North Atlantic, the area with the highest increase in Cant column inventory, Pérez et al. (2010) find similar storage rates (1.74 mol m2 yr−1 in the Irminger Sea and 1.88 mol m2 yr−1 in the Iceland Basin) to those shown in Fig. 10 but only from 1991–1997, where the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) was in a high phase. Afterwards, in the low-NAO period between 1997 and 2006, their rate is less than a quarter of the previous value (0.3–0.4 mol m2 yr−1). For the northeastern Atlantic, Pérez et al. (2010) also yield lower storage rates (0.72 mol m2 yr−1 for 1981–2006) compared to our analyses (> 1.0 mol m2 yr−1, Fig. 8a, c, d). In contrast to Pérez et al. (2010), our results are averaged over a larger region and also a longer time period (1 decade compared to 6 and 9 years in Pérez et al.2010, for the Irminger Sea and Iceland Basin), which may lead to a damping of sudden, regional changes in the Cant storage. However, the low Cant increase in Pérez et al. (2010) after 1997 also points to methodological differences between the φCT0 method used in Pérez et al. (2010) and the modified TTD method with dilution used here. One of these is that the φCT0 method takes into account changes in the ocean air–sea CO2 disequilibrium over time. On the other hand, a comparison of Fig. 11a and c indicates that in the 2000–2010 decade, the Cant storage in the deeper part of the LSW is indeed very small (due to a reduction in the convection depth). The other water masses, however, i.e., the Overflow Waters and the waters above 1000 m, do not show a decrease in the Cant uptake, in agreement with the ongoing renewal of these water masses. Thus, the small increase in the Cant column inventory after 1997 in Pérez et al. (2010) seems to be unrealistic. Directly within the Labrador Sea, Raimondi et al. (2021) find a mean storage rate of 1.8 mol m2 yr−1 for the 1986–2016 period. The largest rates occur at the end of the time series and the smallest between 2005 and 2010. This is in good agreement with our findings (see Fig. 10a, c and d, the western box between 50 and 60° N).

In the western South Atlantic, the Cant increase from our modified TTD method is similar to the results in Ríos et al. (2012) based on φCT0. The Cant storage is the highest in the Central Water, decreases downward with a minimum in the lower part of the NADW and shows some patches of significant Cant increase towards the AABW near the bottom, south of 50° S (Fig. 11c). In the Weddell Gyre along the prime meridian, van Heuven et al. (2011) also find significant Cant changes near the bottom. Applying the MLR method, they get an increase rate of 0.445 µmol kg−1 per decade, whereas the trend in the directly observed carbon data is 1.15 µmol kg−1 per decade. The latter compares well with our Cant increase of about 1–2 µmol kg−1 per decade (Fig. 11c), which is also supported by the study by Ríos et al. (2012), who yield a value of 0.15 µmol kg−1 yr−1. A full explanation for the discrepancy between the directly observed carbon increase and that derived from the MLR method is not provided by van Heuven et al. (2011). The comparison to our results supports their conclusion that the larger directly observed carbon trend could probably be ascribed primarily to the increase in Cant, although the reason for the lower trend in the MLR results remains unexplained.

Müller et al. (2023) find the highest increase in the Cant column inventory between 1994 and 2004 in the subtropical North Atlantic. The value of about 16 µmol m−2 per decade is similar to our findings (Fig. 10), but our maximum in the subpolar western North Atlantic does not appear there. One reason could be that the column inventory in Müller et al. (2023) does not take into account waters below 3000 m depth to avoid the imprint of errors from the eMLR(C) method. This implies that the Cant-rich DSOW core in the western subpolar North Atlantic is missing in that study. For the second period (2004–2014) considered in Müller et al. (2023), the maximum of the increase in the Cant column inventory is located in the western subtropical South Atlantic. The same holds true for the Cant increase estimated in Gruber et al. (2019) for the 1994–2007 period, also based on the eMLR(C) method. Our estimates of the Cant column inventory always have their maximum in the western North Atlantic, either between 40 and 50° N or between 50 and 60° N (Fig. 10a, c and e).

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f12

Figure 12Zonal mean sections of ΔtCantanom (Cant forecast based on tracer data from the first period minus Cant based on tracer data from the second period). (a, c, e) Western basin, (b, d, f) eastern basin, (a, b) 1990–2000, (c, d) 2000–2010, (e, f) 2010–2020. Regions with differences smaller than the error range are stippled. Contour lines are shown as in Fig. 2. Note the uneven spacing between contour intervals.

Download

In two recent studies by DeVries et al. (2023) and Pérez et al. (2024), the Cant storage between 1994 and 2007 from Gruber et al. (2019) is compared with results from global ocean biogeochemical models and the ocean data assimilation model OCIM. Both types of models have the maximum of the Cant storage in the subpolar North Atlantic and much smaller values than Gruber et al. (2019) in the subtropical South Atlantic. The spatial distribution of the modeled Cant storage in DeVries et al. (2023) and Pérez et al. (2024) is thus qualitatively in better agreement with our results than compared with Gruber et al. (2019) and Müller et al. (2023).

3.3 Decadal variability of Cant storage

As mentioned above, the TTD technique in general allows us to make predictions for Cant concentrations based on older observations if one assumes a steady-state ocean; i.e., the TTD 𝒢 remains constant with time. In this case, the Cant increase with time is solely due to the rising atmospheric CO2. The TTD method thus allows us to distinguish between the Cant variability generated by changes in oceanic circulation (which implies a change in the TTD) and the expected Cant increase with time that merely results from the atmospheric CO2 increase.

3.3.1 Evolution of Cant for a steady-state ocean

We first consider the effect of the rising atmospheric CO2 on the oceanic Cant concentrations. If the mixed-layer concentration of the tracer C0 increases exponentially with time, C0(t+Δt)=C0(t)exp(λΔt), then, following Eq. (1), the concentration of C in the ocean interior increases in the same way; i.e., C(x,t+Δt)=C(x,t)exp(λΔt). Steinfeldt et al. (2009) applied an exponential fit of Cant0(t) for the 1850–2003 time period and yielded a mean growing rate of 1.69 % yr−1. Note that the increase rate of the equilibrium surface concentration Cant0(t) is smaller by about 0.3 % yr−1 than the change in Cant in the atmosphere due to the nonlinear carbon chemistry. Small deviations of Cant0(t) from the exponential fit cause the exact Cant increase rate to depend on both the shape of the TTD (and thus the location) and the reference times for which Cant is calculated. Here, we do not extend the exponential fit of Cant0(t) towards 2020 but infer mean decadal increase rates from the Cant inventories in 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020 based on all CFC/SF6 data (values in Table 3). The resulting increase is 1.74 % yr−1 for the decade of 1990–2000, 1.73 % yr−1 for 2000–2010 and 1.68 % yr−1 for the last period of 2010–2020. All values are quite close to the result of 1.69 % yr−1 in Steinfeldt et al. (2009). Gruber et al. (2019) also inferred an expected Cant change based on the atmospheric CO2 increase and mean changes in the buffer factor and Cant disequilibrium. The resulting Cant change between 1994 and 2007 was 28 %, or 1.92 % yr−1. The higher value is probably because Gruber et al. (2019) considered only the atmospheric CO2 increase between 1994 and 2007, which is larger than a longer-term mean, as the CO2 growth rate has increased. However, the Cant increase in the older waters in the ocean interior reflects the smaller rise in atmospheric CO2 from earlier decades.

3.3.2 Deviations of Cant storage from a steady state

Here, we come back to the Cant accumulation anomalies ΔtCantanom that have been introduced in Sect. 2.3. The magnitude of these anomalies over the decades 1990–2000, 2000–2010 and 2010–2020 is presented in Table 6. It can also be inferred from Fig. 9 as the difference between the boxes and the horizontal colored lines, which show the Cant increase based on the decadal forecasts (e.g., Cant19902000-Cant1990). In the South Atlantic, ΔtCantanom is negative, especially for the 1990–2000 period. This implies a decrease in Cant storage due to changes in circulation and/or ventilation for the 1990–2000 decade compared to the period before 1990 and after 2000. Müller et al. (2023) also find a strong Cant increase over the South Atlantic from their first (1994–2004) to their second decade (2004–2014). All other numbers in Table 6 are not significantly different from 0. Thus, at least for the Atlantic as a whole, the Cant increase over the last 30 years is almost in agreement with the rising atmospheric CO2. On smaller regional scales, however, there are regions where ΔtCantanom is statistically significantly different from 0 (Fig. 12). In general, the local extrema of ΔtCantanom are about ± 5 µmol kg−1, the same magnitude as in Gruber et al. (2019).

The zonal mean section of the Cant accumulation anomaly obtained for the western Atlantic for the periods of 1990–2000, 2000–2010 and 2010–2020 (Fig. 12a, c and e) shows some areas with extreme values of ΔtCantanom that are similar for all three decadal periods. One is located in the South Atlantic within the AAIW; one in the tropics (20° S–20° N) above the AAIW; and one in the North Atlantic in the Central Water, LSW, ISOW and DSOW.

The Cant anomalies in the southwestern Atlantic are most pronounced over the first decade (1990–2000, Fig. 12a). They show negative values south of 40° S between 100 and 1000 m depth in the AAIW and positive anomalies directly south- and equatorward (south of 20° S) in a slightly shallower depth range within AAIW and the overlying SAMW. A similar structure has been inferred in Waugh et al. (2013) from transient tracer data for the southern parts of the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans. These authors ascribe the changes in ventilation to a strengthening and southward movement of the westerly wind belt. This leads to enhanced upwelling of older water with low Cant south of the polar front and increased northward Ekman transport and formation of mode waters (with high Cant) north of the front. A similar dipole in the upper 1000 m of the South Atlantic is also evident in the study of Gruber et al. (2019). Tanhua et al. (2017) also found large Cant storage in SAMW, at least between 1990 and 2005.

The second area with extreme values of ΔtCantanom in the tropical Atlantic is mainly restricted to the layer above 500 m (subtropical mode water). Positive and negative Cant accumulation anomalies alternate in latitudinal direction and between the decades. They could be a consequence of variable mode water formation in the subtropics. Such changes in the subtropical cell with enhanced production and southward transport of Cant-rich mode water have been inferred from an inverse model in DeVries et al. (2017) with enhanced production and equatorward transport of Cant-rich mode water in the 1990s. Unfortunately, the study in DeVries et al. (2017) ended in 2010, and the decades in which the data are grouped are shifted by 5 years compared to our study, thus prohibiting a direct comparison of the decadal results. In contrast to our results, Gruber et al. (2019) find negative Cant anomalies in the whole tropical Atlantic over the upper 1000 m.

The northernmost area with extreme values of ΔtCantanom is located north of 40° N in the subpolar North Atlantic, including the Labrador Sea (Fig. 12). This structure reflects the observed variability of convective activity in the Labrador Sea and the associated changes in LSW formation. An unprecedented deep-reaching convection formed a very dense mode of LSW from 1987 to 1994 (Yashayaev2007). During the following years, only lighter modes of LSW (Upper LSW, ULSW) have been formed (Stramma et al.2004; Kieke et al.2006; Yashayaev2007), whereas the pool of dense LSW (DLSW) has been exported from the formation region south- and eastward (Kieke et al.2007; Rhein et al.2015). These two processes are reflected in the positive ΔtCantanom for the 2000–2010 period around 1000 m (formation of ULSW modes) and the negative Cant anomalies between 1500 and 2000 m (export of DLSW) in Fig. 12c. This lack of Cant storage in the deeper part of the LSW between 2000 and 2010 is also visible in Fig. 11c.

In 2008, convection in the Labrador Sea exceeded a depth of 1600 m for the first time in years (Våge et al.2009) but without a great impact on the Cant and oxygen trends (Rhein et al.2017). In the study by Gruber et al. (2019), the Cant anomaly in the North Atlantic is negative down to a depth of  2500 m with the minimum in the upper  1000 m. Thus, a ULSW–DLSW dipole in Cant is not found there. Studies on the convection in the Labrador Sea indicate that at least the upper 500–1000 m of the water column has been convectively renewed every year since the 1990s (Yashayaev2007; Kieke and Yashayaev2015; Yashayaev and Loder2016), which makes a drastic decrease in the Cant storage in that depth range unlikely. Starting in 2014, deep-reaching convection in the Labrador Sea has re-emerged (Kieke and Yashayaev2015; Yashayaev and Loder2016). This is reflected by the positive Cant anomaly in the LSW in the northwestern Atlantic between 2010 and 2020. However, the density of this recently formed LSW is still smaller than the density of the LSW originating from the early 1990s (Yashayaev and Loder2016). Hence, the positive ΔtCantanom values do not reach the lower boundary of the LSW layer. The Irminger Sea has also been influenced by the enhanced deep convection in the subpolar northwestern Atlantic, and a large increase in Cant has been found there (Fröb et al.2016).

In the bottom waters north of 40° N (DSOW), there is an alternating pattern of negative and positive ΔtCantanom values (Fig. 12a, c and e). From 1965–2000, the overflow waters experienced a freshening trend lasting more than 3 decades (Dickson et al.2002). This long-term trend does not influence the Cant uptake of ISOW and DSOW, as no such signal is evident in Fig. 12. Annual fluctuations in salinity (and also temperature) for the DSOW particularly coincide with the long-term freshening trend (Yashayaev2007). These different vintages of DSOW might be the reason for the alternating minima and maxima in ΔtCantanom in the bottom waters north of 35° N.

In the northeastern Atlantic, the Cant accumulation anomaly in the LSW for the 2000–2010 period is similar to that in the northwestern part, although less pronounced. LSW is formed in the western Atlantic, and the ΔtCantanom of the newly formed LSW becomes diluted when the anomalies spread eastward. The recent positive ΔtCantanom value in LSW did not become prominent in the eastern North Atlantic until 2020.

Another small region with a Cant deficit is located within the deep and bottom waters (WSDW and AABW) of the southwestern Atlantic around 55° S between 1990 and 2000. This is the area where the newly formed deep water originating from the Weddell Sea is advected eastward (see above). This recently ventilated WSDW is relatively high in Cant (Fig. 7a) but only shows a small decadal increase (Fig. 12a), lacking the expected growth from the atmospheric CO2. This result is in agreement with Huhn et al. (2013), who also found an aging and ΔtCantanom deficit of AABW in the Weddell Sea. After 2000, this negative anomaly does not occur anymore, and the Cant increase in WSDW/AABW between 60 and 50° S is higher (Figs. 11c, e and 12c, e).

Negative Cant accumulation anomalies can also be found in the southeastern Atlantic between 2000 and 3000 m depth and from 45 to 25° S in the 1990–2000 period. As this negative anomaly is far away from the deep water formation regions, we have no clear explanation for this. One reason could be that the waters present in 1990 are still affected by the Weddell Polynya that occurred in the years 1974, 1975 and 1976 (Carsey1980) and are thus relatively high in Cant.

4 Summary and conclusions

We used a modified TTD method allowing for the admixture of old, Cant-free waters to access the Cant inventory of the Atlantic, its increase and its variability over the last 2 decades. In 1990, 43.0 ± 7.3 Pg C of Cant was stored in the whole Atlantic. Over the next 30 years, this amount increased to 68.2 ± 10.8 Pg C. This increase is mainly caused by the rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Changes in circulation/ventilation have a regional impact on the Cant concentrations but only a minor effect on the basinwide inventory.

The absolute Cant inventories seem to be similar across the most common methods, like the ΔC, TTD and GF methods, except for some subregions like the Southern Ocean, where the TTD method yields larger values. However, the incorporation of an explicit dilution into the TTD method leads to Cant concentrations that are smaller by more than 5 µmol kg−1 in parts of the WSDW and AABW compared to the TTD method without dilution, thus reducing the deviations from the other methods. Still, discrepancies between the different Cant calculation techniques occur in the vertical distribution of Cant, especially regarding the Cant fraction of the deep ocean. This has repercussions for the conclusions on how well and for how long Cant is stored in the ocean. Larger Cant storage in deep waters with a long turnover time compared to upper water masses will remove Cant from the atmosphere more enduringly.

Our Cant increments of 6.4 ± 2.8, 8.6 ± 3.4 and 10.2 ± 3.5 Pg C for the 3 decades are about 30 %–40 % of the global values of 2.0 ± 0.5, 2.1 ± 0.5 and 2.5 ± 0.6 Pg C yr−1 in Friedlingstein et al. (2020). The Atlantic area considered here constitutes 22 % of the global ocean area. The high Cant concentrations in the North Atlantic due to NADW formation lead to the high contribution of the Atlantic to the global Cant storage compared to its areal fraction.

The main discrepancy between this study and others using the eMLR (Woosley et al.2016) and eMLR(C) method (Gruber et al.2019; Müller et al.2023) is the regional distribution of the Cant change. Some of the differences can be explained by the inefficiency of the non-TTD methods in resolving the Cant changes in the deep ocean. In the global studies by Gruber et al. (2019) and Müller et al. (2023), the increase in the Cant column inventory in the Atlantic still exceeds that in the Pacific and Indian oceans, but the global maximum in the North Atlantic is missing. Applying our TTD method, we find a significant Cant increase in the overflow waters (ISOW and DSOW) in the North Atlantic, which contributes to the increase in the column inventory there. In contrast, in Woosley et al. (2016) the deep layers of the North Atlantic are found to be almost stagnant in Cant, and in Gruber et al. (2019) and Müller et al. (2023) the Cant increase below 3000 m depth is only considered for the total inventory, not for the Cant distribution. The significant increase in the Cant concentrations in ISOW and DSOW found in our study has not been reported before. Evident through the presence and temporal increase in CFCs in these overflow waters, it is unlikely that these waters have not contributed to the storage of Cant over the last 2 decades.

Moreover, the Cant accumulation anomaly due to a variable ocean circulation in Gruber et al. (2019) opposes our findings. In Gruber et al. (2019), this anomaly is mainly positive in the South Atlantic, except for the AAIW layer, and negative in the North Atlantic. In our study, the deep South Atlantic shows a slightly negative Cant accumulation anomaly, and in the North Atlantic, we find alternating patterns with a positive anomaly in ULSW and negative in DLSW between 2000 and 2010. Using the standard TTDs instead would lead to an even larger Cant deficit in the South Atlantic (see Figs. 3e and f and 4e and f) due to the higher “expected” CFC increase with time (Fig. 5).

The patterns of the Cant accumulation anomalies found here mainly follow the changes in water mass age and ventilation that have already been described in previous studies, e.g., for the Southern Ocean (Waugh et al.2013; Huhn et al.2013), and the changes in the convective activity in the Labrador Sea (Kieke et al.2007; Yashayaev2007; Yashayaev and Loder2016). All these studies are based on the variability of hydrographic properties and/or anthropogenic tracers. The large Cant accumulation anomaly in the old waters of the South Atlantic, as found in Gruber et al. (2019), is not reflected in hydrographic changes. On the one hand, the old part (prior to the CFC input into the atmosphere) of our TTDs is not well constrained; hence some unresolved temporal variability might exist. On the other hand, enhanced variability in old waters is unlikely, as property anomalies in the ocean are typically large near the water mass formation regions and decay downstream towards the old waters in the ocean interior.

The investigation of oceanic circulation and ventilation variability and its impact on anthropogenic carbon storage is important for understanding the mechanisms behind the recent variability in oceanic carbon uptake (DeVries et al.2019) and for estimating the future evolution of the oceanic carbon sink in a changing climate. Our results show that a decoupling of the atmospheric Cant increase and the increase in the Atlantic Cant storage has not yet been achieved by the observed decadal variability in water mass ventilation and circulation.

Appendix A: Isopycnal interpolation of profiles

The boundaries for the isopycnal interpolation of the single profiles, as described in the main text, are given in Table A1. For most of the cruises used here, CTD data (temperature and salinity data with a vertical resolution of 1 to 2 dbar) would also be available. However, we decided to retain the bottle data from GLODAPv2.2023 for salinity and potential temperature and to infer the layer thicknesses. One reason is that in GLODAP salinity and thus density are also quality controlled. We calculated the difference between the layer thicknesses inferred from CTD and bottle data for a cruise where both are available. The root-mean-square error of the layer thicknesses is about 40 m. If one assumes a maximal Cant difference over this depth range of about 20 µmol kg−1 (from Fig. 6), the difference in the Cant column inventory would be  40 m × 20 µmol kg−1× 1000 kg m−3= 0.8 mol m−2, which is about 1 % of the total Cant column inventory (see Fig. 5, between 30 and 180 mol m−2). The error in the layer thicknesses is randomly distributed (in some cases the layer with the higher Cant concentration is too thick; in other cases it is too thin). Due to the large number of profiles (> 1000), the total error is much smaller than 1 %.

Table A1Boundaries of density layers and assumed saturation for CFCs and SF6 in every layer.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Appendix B: CFC and SF6 saturation

The CFC and SF6 saturations assumed for the different density layers are given in Table A1. They decrease from 100 % in the upper waters to 80 % in deep waters. For most cruises, the surface is close to saturation, both for CFCs and for SF6. Hence, a saturation of 100 % for the upper layers seems to be reasonable. For the deep layers, the saturation of the surface waters at the time of deep water formation, i.e., late winter/early spring, needs to be known. However, most cruises from higher latitudes are from late spring until autumn, avoiding the severe winter conditions. In order to estimate the saturation of newly formed North Atlantic Deep Water, Fig. B1 shows the CFC-12 and SF6 data from the western subpolar North Atlantic (Labrador Sea and Irminger Sea respectively) below 500 m depth for 2 different years, expressed as saturation with respect to the solubility equilibrium. This has been calculated by using the observed potential temperature and salinity as well as the atmospheric tracer concentration from the year of observation. Waters with the highest saturation point to remnants from the last winter convection; waters with lower saturations are a mixture of recently ventilated and older water. This interpretation is different from that of Raimondi et al. (2021), where the mean tracer concentration in the core layer of newly formed LSW after convection is used to infer the saturation.

In 1994, mainly the denser mode of LSW had been ventilated, between σ1.5=34.65 and σ1.5=34.7 kg m−3. In 2013, the ventilation only reached densities above σ1.5=34.6 kg m−3. The highest saturations in the ventilated density range are between 80 % and 100 % for both years. The SF6 saturation in 2013 is only slightly below the values for CFC-12.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f13

Figure B1CFC-12 and SF6 data below 500 m from the Labrador Sea (years 1994 and 2013) and the Irminger Sea (years prior to and after 2000), expressed as saturation with respect to the actual solubility equilibrium. Also shown is the assumed tracer saturation and the error margin of ± 10 %.

Download

The overflow waters are not directly formed in the subpolar North Atlantic but originate from the Nordic Seas. However, they are modified after passing the Greenland–Scotland Ridge; e.g., the ISOW entrains Labrador Sea Water and Northeast Atlantic Water (LeBel et al.2008), and the DSOW entrains warm and saline Atlantic Water and fresher water from the East Greenland Current (Jochumsen et al.2015). The tracer saturation of the overflow waters (σ4 >45.8 kg m−3) in the Irminger Sea, downstream of the entrainment, is shown in Fig. B1 for data prior to and after the year 2000. The saturation is even higher for the earlier period, probably due to short-term variability of the properties of the overflow waters (Yashayaev2007; Jochumsen et al.2015). The maximum is around 80 %, but most data points have a smaller saturation. Note, however, that the Irminger Sea is located downstream of the formation area; hence the overflow waters there are not newly formed but have already been subject to aging and dilution, which reduces the apparent CFC saturation. In Fig. B1 the tracer saturation from Fig. A1 is also depicted, including the assumed error of 10 %. The saturation of 85 % for the major part of the LSW density range is identical to the value used in Kieke et al. (2006), Kieke et al. (2007) and Steinfeldt et al. (2009). For the DSOW, the applied saturation of 80 % is significantly larger than the 65 % from Steinfeldt et al. (2009) but close to the value of 75 % from Swift et al. (1980) and LeBel et al. (2008).

Appendix C: Temporal evolution of anthropogenic tracers

Figure C1 shows the concentration of CFC-11, CFC-12 and SF6 in the northern hemispheric atmosphere and tritium in North Atlantic surface waters as a function of time. The tritium curve for the North Atlantic from Dreisigacker and Roether (1978) is continued assuming radioactive decay after 1978. Atmospheric CFC and SF6 concentrations are adopted from Bullister (2015) and extrapolated linearly in time for the last 5 years.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f14

Figure C1Time history of CFC-11, CFC-12, SF6 and tritium for the Northern Hemisphere (the North Atlantic for tritium).

Download

Appendix D: Variation in TTD parameters

The effect of the choice of the TTD parameters on the shape of the TTD and the inferred Cant concentration is illustrated in Fig. D1 and Table C1. We assume a CFC-12 concentration of 0.4 pmol kg−1 observed in 2010, a CFC saturation of 0.85, a potential temperature of θ = 3 °C and a salinity of S = 34.9. Cant is calculated for the reference year 2010 and an alkalinity of 2308 µmol kg−1 (the value derived from Lee et al.2006, for the North Atlantic). The maximum of the TTD occurs at younger ages for Δ/Γ=2 compared to the case with Δ/Γ=1. This is a fairly common behavior; i.e., increasing the Δ/Γ ratio leads to a younger age of the mode of the TTD. Reducing the fraction of young water leads to an even younger mode, although in this case the Δ/Γ ratio is always chosen as 1. The younger the mode of the possible TTDs derived from a given CFC-12 concentration, the smaller the inferred Cant concentration (see Table D1).

The TTD 𝒢young for the young water in Fig. D1 only represents half of the water, as the fraction f in this example equals 0.5. To illustrate what the complete TTD might look like, we assume an old TTD 𝒢old with Γ =500 years and Δ =250 years. The sum of 𝒢young and 𝒢old is shown as the dashed line in Fig. D1. This choice of the parameters for 𝒢old is arbitrary, but it fulfills the condition that the inferred Cant concentration is small (< 0.5 µmol kg−1 in this case) and thus might be neglected. The sum of 𝒢young and 𝒢old only has one clear maximum. The mode of 𝒢old is much less pronounced than that of 𝒢young, so the complete TTD has a kind of saddle point around the mode of 𝒢old (250 years in the example in Fig. D1).

Table D1TTD parameters derived for a CFC-12 concentration of 0.4 pmol kg−1 in 2010, assuming a CFC saturation of 0.85, a potential temperature of θ = 3 °C and a salinity of S = 34.9. Cant is calculated for the reference year 2010 and an alkalinity of 2308 µmol kg−1 (the value derived from Lee et al., 2006, for the North Atlantic). Also given is the fraction of water older than 200 years.

* Values are for the young TTD component only.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f15

Figure D1TTDs derived from an observed CFC-12 concentration of 0.4 pmol kg−1 in 2010, a CFC saturation of 0.85, a potential temperature of θ = 3 °C and a salinity of S = 34.9. Shown are TTDs for f = 1, Δ/Γ=1 and Δ/Γ=2, as well as TTDs for f = 0.5 and Δ/Γ=1. For the latter case, an assumed old TTD with Γ =500 years and Δ =250 years is also added (dashed cyan line).

Download

Appendix E: Relative Cant change (ΔtCant) between 1990 and 2020

Figure E1 shows the relative increase in the Cant column inventory for the periods of 1990–2000, 2000–2010 and 2010–2020. In contrast, in Fig. 12 from the main text the absolute values of the Cant increase are shown. From the rising atmospheric CO2 concentration and a steady-state ocean, a decadal increase in the Cant inventory of about 19 % would be expected.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/3839/2024/bg-21-3839-2024-f16

Figure E1(a, c, e) Whole water column, (b, d, f) only deep and bottom water masses. (a, b) 1990–2000, (c, d) 2000–2010, (e, f) 2010–2020. Only areas with a water depth larger than 200 m are considered. Station locations for the first period (1982–1994 in a, b; 1995–2005 in c, d; and 2006–2013 in e, f) are marked in light grey, and those for the second period (1995–2005 in a, b; 2006–2013 in c, d; and 2014–2021 in e, f) are marked in black. Regions with differences smaller than the error range are stippled. Note the uneven spacing between contour intervals.

Author contributions

RS carried out the calculations of anthropogenic carbon and prepared the paper with contributions from both coauthors.

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.

Acknowledgements

We thank the captains, crews and scientific participants of the numerous research cruises whose data have contributed to this work. The cruises SUBPOLAR08, M82/2, M85/1, MSM21/2, MSM27, MSM28, MSM38, and MSM39 have been conducted in the framework of programs funded by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) (cooperative projects Nordatlantik and RACE (grant nos. 03F0443C, 03F0605C and 03F0651C to Monika Rhein)). Klaus Bulsiewicz (IUP at University of Bremen) measured the CFC and SF6 samples obtained from the cruises conducted by IUP Bremen.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (grant nos. 03F0443C, 03F0605C, and 03F0651C) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant nos. RH 25/36-1, RH 25/36-2 and RH 25/36-3).

The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the University of Bremen.

Review statement

This paper was edited by Peter Landschützer and reviewed by Jens Daniel Müller and one anonymous referee.

References

Álvarez, M., Pérez, F., Bryden, H. L., and Ríos, A.:. Physical and biogeochemical transports structure in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 109, C03027, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002015, 2004. a

Brambilla, E. and Talley, L. D.: Subpolar Mode Water in the northeastern Atlantic: 1. Averaged properties and mean circulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 113, C04025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC004062, 2008. a

Bullister, J., Rhein, M., and Mauritzen, C.: Deep Water Formation, in: Ocean Circulation and Climate – Observing and Modelling the Global Ocean, 2nd Edn., edited by: Siedler, G., Church, J., Gould, J., and Griffies, S., Academic Press, Oxford, ISBN 978-0-12-391851-2, 2013. a

Bullister, J. L.: Atmospheric Histories (1765–2015) for CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, CCl4, SF6 and N2O, NDP-095(2015), Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/otg.CFC_ATM_Hist_2015, 2015. a

Carsey, F. D.: Microwave observations of the Weddell Polynya, Mon. Weather Rev., 108, 2032–2044, 1980. a

Clement, D. and Gruber, N.: The eMLR(C) method to determine decadal changes in the global ocean storage of anthropogenic CO2, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 654–679, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005819, 2018. a

DeVries, T., Holzer, M., and Primeau, F.: Recent increase in oceanic carbon uptake driven by weaker upper-ocean overturning, Nature, 542, 215–218, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21068, 2017. a, b

DeVries, T., Le Quéré, C., Andrews, O., Berthet, S., Hauck, J., Ilyina, T., Landschützer, Lenton, A., Lima, I. D., Nowicki, M., Schwinger, J., and Roland Séférian, R.: Decadal trends in the ocean carbon sink, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 11646–11651, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900371116, 2019. a

DeVries, T., Yamamoto, K., Wanninkhof, R., Gruber, N., Hauck, J., Müller, J. D., Bopp, L., Carroll, D., Carter, B., Chau, T. T. T., Doney, S. C., Gehlen, M., Gloege, L., Gregor, L., Henson, S., Kim, J. H., Iida, Y., Ilyina, T., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Munro, D., Nissen, C., Patara, L., Pérez, F. F., Resplandy, L., Rodgers, K. B., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Sicardi, V., Terhaar, J., Triñanes, J., Tsujino, H., Watson, A., Yasunaka, S., and Zeng, J.: Magnitude, Trends, and Variability of the Global Ocean Carbon Sink From 1985 to 2018, Glob. Biogeochem. Cy., 37, e2023GB007780, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007780, 2023. a, b

Dickson, B., Yashayaev, I., Meincke, J., Turrell, B., Dye, S., and Holfort, J.: Rapid freshening of the deep North Atlantic Ocean over the past four decades, Nature, 416, 832–837, https://doi.org/10.1038/416832a 2002. a, b

Dreisigacker, E. and Roether, E.: Tritium and 99Sr in North Atlantic surface water, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 38, 301–312, 1978. a

Fischer, J., Rhein, M., Schott, F. and Stramma, L.: Deep water masses and transports in the Vema Fracture Zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 43, 1067–1074, https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(96)00044-1, 1996. a

Fleischmann, U., Hildebrandt, H., Putzka, A., and Bayer, R.: Transport of newly ventilated deep water from the Iceland Basin to the West European Basin, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 48, 1793–1819, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00107-2, 2001. a

Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., Le Quéré, C., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Arneth, A., Arora, V., Bates, N. R., Becker, M., Benoit-Cattin, A., Bittig, H. C., Bopp, L., Bultan, S., Chandra, N., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Evans, W., Florentie, L., Forster, P. M., Gasser, T., Gehlen, M., Gilfillan, D., Gkritzalis, T., Gregor, L., Gruber, N., Harris, I., Hartung, K., Haverd, V., Houghton, R. A., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Joetzjer, E., Kadono, K., Kato, E., Kitidis, V., Korsbakken, J. I., Landschützer, P., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S., Liu, Z., Lombardozzi, D., Marland, G., Metzl, N., Munro, D. R., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I., Niwa, Y., O'Brien, K., Ono, T., Palmer, P. I., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Resplandy, L., Robertson, E., Rödenbeck, C., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Skjelvan, I., Smith, A. J. P., Sutton, A. J., Tanhua, T., Tans, P. P., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., van der Werf, G., Vuichard, N., Walker, A. P., Wanninkhof, R., Watson, A. J., Willis, D., Wiltshire, A. J., Yuan, W., Yue, X., and Zaehle, S.: Global Carbon Budget 2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3269–3340, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020, 2020. a, b, c

Friis, K., Körtzinger, A., Pätsch, J., and Wallace, D.: On the temporal increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the subpolar North Atlantic, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 52, 681–698, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.11.017, 2005. a

Fröb, F., Olsen, A., Våge, K., Moore, G. W. K., Yashayaev, Y., Jeansson, E., and Rajasakaren, B.: Irminger Sea deep convection injects oxygen and anthropogenic carbon to the ocean interior, Nat. Commun., 7, 13244, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13244, 2016. a

Gruber, N., Sarmiento, J. L., and Stocker, T. F.: An improved method for detecting anthropogenic C2 in the oceans, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 809–837, https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB01608, 1996. a

Gruber, N., Clement, D., Carter, B. R., Feely, R. A., van Heuven, S., Hoppema, M., Ishii, M., Key, R. M., Kozyr, A., Lauvset, S. K., Lo Monaco, C., Mathis, J. T., Murata, A., Olsen, A., Pérez, F. F., Sabine, C. L., Tanhua, T., and Wanninkhof, R.: The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007, Science, 363, 1193–1199, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5153, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s

Hall, T. M., Haine, T. W. N., and Waugh, D. W.: Inferring the concentration of anthropogenic carbon in the ocean from tracers, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16(GB1131), https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001835, 2002. a, b, c, d, e

He, Y.-C., Tjiputra, J., Langehaug, H. R., Jeansson, E., Gao, Y., Schwinger, J., and Olsen, A.: A model-based evaluation of the inverse Gaussian transit-time distribution method for inferring anthropogenic carbon storage in the ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 123, 1777–1800, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013504, 2018. a, b, c

Heinze, C., Meyer, S., Goris, N., Anderson, L., Steinfeldt, R., Chang, N., Le Quéré, C., and Bakker, D. C. E.: The ocean carbon sink – impacts, vulnerabilities and challenges, Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 327–358, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-327-2015, 2015. a, b

Holzer, M. and Hall, T. M.: Transit-time and tracer age distributions in geophysical flows, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3539–3558, 2000. a

Huhn, O., Rhein, M., Hoppema, M., and van Heuven, S.: Decline of deep and bottom water ventilation and slowing down of anthropogenic carbon storage in the Weddell Sea, 1984–2011, Deep-Sea Res. PT. I, 76, 66–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2013.01.005, 2013. a, b, c, d

Iudicone, D., Speich, S., Gurvan, M., and Blanke, B.: The Global Conveyor Belt from a Southern Ocean Perspective, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 1401–1425, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JPO3525.1, 2008. a

Jochumsen, K., Köllner, M., Quadfasel, D., Dye, S., Rudels, B., and Valdimarsson, H.: On the origin and propagation of Denmark Strait overflow water anomalies in the Irminger Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 120, 1841–1855, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010397, 2015. a, b, c

Key, R. M., Kozyr, A., Sabine, C. L., Lee, K., Wanninkhof, R., Bullister, J. L., Feely, R. A., Millero, F. J., Mordy, C., and Peng, T.-H.: A global ocean carbon climatology: Results from Global Data Analysis Project (GLODAP), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB4031, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002247, 2004 (data set available at https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/oceans/glodap/GlopDV.html, last access: 26 February 2024). a

Khatiwala, S., Primeau, F., and Hall, T.: Reconstruction of the history of anthropogenic CO2 concentrations in the ocean, Nature, 462, 346–349, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08526, 2009 (data set available at http://kelvin.earth.ox.ac.uk/spk/Research/AnthropogenicCarbon/, last access: 26 February 2024). a

Khatiwala, S., Tanhua, T., Mikaloff Fletcher, S., Gerber, M., Doney, S. C., Graven, H. D., Gruber, N., McKinley, G. A., Murata, A., and Sabine, C. L: Global storage of anthropogenic carbon, Biogeosciences, 10, 2169–2191, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2169-2013, 2013. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h

Kieke, D., Rhein, M., Stramma, L., Smethie Jr., W. M., LeBel, D. A., and Zenk, W.: Changes in the CFC inventories and formation rates of Upper Labrador Sea Water, 1997–2001, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36, 64–86, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2814.1, 2006. a, b, c

Kieke, D., Rhein, M., Stramma, L., Smethie Jr., W. M., Bullister, J. L., and LeBel, D. A.: Changes in the pool of Labrador Sea Water in the subpolar North Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L06605, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028959, 2007. a, b, c, d

Kieke, D. and Yashayaev, I.: Studies of Labrador Sea Water formation and variability in the subpolar North Atlantic in the light of international partnership and collaboration, Prog. Oceanogr., 132, 220–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.12.010, 2015. a, b, c, d, e

Klatt, O., Roether, W., Hoppema, M., Bulsiewicz, K., Fleischmann, U., Rodehacke, C., Fahrbach, R., Weiss, R. F., and Bullister, J. L.: Repeated CFC sections at the Greenwich Meridian in the Weddell Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 107, 3030, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000731, 2002. a

Lauvset, S. K., Lange, N., Tanhua, T., Bittig, H. C., Olsen, A., Kozyr, A., Álvarez, M., Azetsu-Scott, K., Brown, P. J., Carter, B. R., Cotrim da Cunha, L., Hoppema, M., Humphreys, M. P., Ishii, M., Jeansson, E., Murata, A., Müller, J. D., Pérez, F. F., Schirnick, C., Steinfeldt, R., Suzuki, T., Ulfsbo, A., Velo, A., Woosley, R. J., and Key, R. M.: The annual update GLODAPv2.2023: the global interior ocean biogeochemical data product, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2047–2072, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2047-2024, 2024 (data set available at: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/data/oceans/ncei/ocads/data/0283442/, last access: 5 February 2024). a, b, c

Lazier, J., Hendry, R., Clarke, A., Yashayaev, I., and Rhines, P.: Convection and restratification in the Labrador Sea, 1990–2000, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 49, 1819–1835, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(02)00064-X, 2002. a

Lebel, D. A., Smethie Jr., W. M., Rhein, M., Kieke, D., Fine, R. A., Bullister, J. L., Min, D. H., Roether, W., Weiss, R., Andrié, C., Smythe-Wright, D., and and Jones, E. P.: The formation rate of North Atlantic Deep Water and Eighteen Degree Water calculated from CFC-11 inventories observed during WOCE, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 55, 901–910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2008.03.009, 2008. a, b

Le Bras, I. A., Yashayaev, I., and Toole, J. M.: Tracking Labrador Sea Water property signals along the Deep Western Boundary Current, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 122, 5348–5366, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012921, 2017. a

Lee, K., Tong, L. T., Millero, F. J., Sabine, C. L., Dickson, A. G., Goyet, C., Park, G. H., Wanninkhof, R., Feely, R. A., and Key, R. M.: Global relationships of total alkalinity with salinity and temperature in surface waters of the world's oceans, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L19605, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027207, 2006. a, b

Mauritzen, C., Price, J., Sanford, T., and Torres, D.: Circulation and mixing in the Faroese Channels, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 52, 883–913, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.11.018, 2005. a

McCartney, M. S.: The subtropical recirculation of mode waters, J. Mar. Res., 40, 427–464, 1982. a

McCartney, M. S.: Recirculating components to the deep boundary current of the northern North Atlantic, Prog. Oceanogr., 29, 283–383, https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(92)90006-L, 1992. a

Mercier, H. and Morin, P.; Hydrography of the Romanche and Chain Fracture Zones, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 102, 10373–10389, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00229, 1997. a, b

Müller, J. D., Gruber, N., Carter, B., Feely, R., Ishii, M., Lange, N., Lauvset, S. K., Murata, A., Olsen, A., Pérez, F. F., Sabine, C., Tanhua, T., Wanninkhof, R., and Zhu, D.: Decadal Trends in the Oceanic Storage of Anthropogenic Carbon From 1994 to 2014, AGU Adv., 4, e2023AV000875, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV000875, 2023. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p

Orsi, A. H., Johnson, G. C., and Bullister, J. L.: Circulation, mixing, and production of Antarctic Bottom Water, Prog. Oceanogr., 43, 55–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(99)00004-X, 1999. a

Pérez, F. F., Vázquez-Rodríguez, M., Mercier, H., Velo, A., Lherminier, P., and Ríos, A. F.: Trends of anthropogenic CO2 storage in North Atlantic water masses, Biogeosciences, 7, 1789–1807, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1789-2010, 2010. a, b, c, d, e, f, g

Pérez, F. F., Mercier, H., Vázquez-Rodríguez, M., Lherminier, P., Velo, A., Pardo, P. C., Roson, G., and Ríos, A. F.: Atlantic Ocean CO2 uptake reduced by weakening of the meridional overturning circulation, Nat. Geosci., 6, 146–152, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1680, 2013. a

Pérez, F. F., Becker, M., Goris, N., Gehlen, M., López-Mozos, M., Tjiputra, J., Olsen, A., Müller, J. D., Huertas, I. E., Chau, T. T. T., Cainzos, V., Velo, A., Benard, G., Hauck, J., Gruber, N., and Wanninkhof, R.: An Assessment of CO2 Storage and Sea-Air Fluxes for the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea Between 1985 and 2018, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 38, e2023GB007862, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007862, 2024. a, b

Petit, T., Mercier, H., and Thierry, V.: First direct estimates of volume and water mass transports across the Reykjanes Ridge, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 123, 6703–6719, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013999, 2018. a

Polzin, K. L. Toole, J. M., Ledwell, J. R., and Schmitt, R. W.: Spatial variability of turbulent mixing in the abyssal ocean, Science, 276, 93–96, 1997. a

Raimondi, L., Tanhua, T., Azetsu-Scott, K., Yashayaev, I., and Wallace, D. W. R.: A 30 -Year Time Series of Transient Tracer-Based Estimates of Anthropogenic Carbon in the Central Labrador Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 126, e2020JC017092, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC017092, 2021. a, b, c

Rhein, M. and Stramma, L.: Seasonal fluctuations in the Deep Western Boundary Current around the eastern tip of Brazil, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 52, 1414–1428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2005.03.004, 2005. a

Rhein, M., Kieke, D., and Steinfeldt, R.: Ventilation of the Upper Labrador Sea Water, 2003–2005, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L06603, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028540, 2007. a

Rhein, M., Kieke, D., and Steinfeldt, R.: Advection of North Atlantic Deep Water from the Labrador Sea to the southern hemisphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 120, 2471–2487, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010605,2015. a, b, c, d

Rhein, M., Steinfeldt, R., Kieke, D., Stendardo, I., and Yashayaev, I.: Ventilation variability of Labrador Sea Water and its impact on oxygen and anthropogenic carbon, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 375, 20160321, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0321, 2017. a, b, c

Rhein, M., Steinfeldt, R., Huhn, O., Sültenfuß, J., and Breckenfelder, T.: Greenland subarine melt water observed in the Labrador and Irminger Sea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 10570–10578, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079110, 2018. a

Ríos, A. F., Velo, A., Pardo, P. C., Hoppema, M., and Pérez, F. F.: An update of anthropogenic CO2 storage rates in the western South Atlantic basin and the role of Antarctic Bottom Water, J. Mar. Sys., 94, 197–203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2011.11.023, 2012. a, b

Sabine, C. L., Feely, R. A., Gruber, N., Key, R. M., Lee, K., Bullister, J. L., R. Wanninkhof, Wong, C. S., Wallace, D. W. R., Tilbrook, B., Millero, F. J., Peng, T. H., Kozyr, A., Ono, T., and Rios, A. F: The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2, Nature, 305, 367–371, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097403, 2004. a, b, c, d

Schlitzer, R., Anderson, R. F., Dodas, E. M., Lohan, M., Geibert, W., Tagliabue, A., Bowie, A., Jeandel, C., Maldonado, M. T., Landing, W. M., Cockwell, D., Abadie, C., Abouchami, W., Achterberg, E. P., Agather, A., Aguliar-Islas, A., van Aken, H. M., Andersen, M., Archer, C., Auro, M., and Zurbrick, C.: The GEOTRACES Intermediate Data Product 2017, Chem. Geol., 493, 210–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.05.040, 2018 (data set available at https://www.bodc.ac.uk/geotraces/data/idp2017/, last access: 8 June 2020). a, b

Smethie Jr., W. M. and Swift, J. H.: The tritium:Krypton-85 age of Denmark Strait Overflow Water and Gibbs Fracture Zone Water just south of Denmark Strait, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 94, 8265–8275, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC094iC06p08265, 1989. a

Smethie W. M. Jr., Fine, R. A., Putzka, A., and Jones, E. P.: Tracing the flow of North Atlantic Deep Water using chlorofluorocarbons, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14297–14323, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC90027, 2000. a

Smith, J. N., McLaughlin, F. A., Smethie Jr., W. M., Moran, S. B., and Lepore, K.: Iodine‐129, 137Cs, and CFC‐11 tracer transit time distributions in the Arctic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C04024, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006471, 2011. a

Steinfeldt, R. and Rhein, M.: Spreading velocities and dilution of North Atlantic Deep Water in the tropical Atlantic based on CFC time series, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 109, C03046, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002050, 2004. a, b, c

Steinfeldt, R., Rhein, M., Bullister, J. L., and Tanhua, T.: Inventory changes in anthropogenic carbon from 1997–2003 in the Atlantic Ocean between 20° S and 65° N, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB3010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003311, 2009. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s

Steinfeldt, R., Kieke, D., Bulsiewicz, K., and Huhn, O.: Physical oceanography and anthropogenic tracers measured on water bottle samples during Maria S, Merian cruise MSM64, PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.962044, 2023a. a, b

Steinfeldt, R., Kieke, D., Bulsiewicz, K., Huhn, O., and Sültenfuß, J.: Physical oceanography, anthropogenic tracers and noble gases during Maria S, Merian cruise MSM73, PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.962113, 2023b. a, b

Stramma, L., Kieke, D., Rhein, M., Schott, F., Yashayaev, I., and Koltermann, K. P.: Deep Water changes at the western boundary of the subpolar North Atlantic during 1996 to 2001, Deep-Sea Res. Pt., I, 51, 1033–1056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.04.001, 2004. a

Swift, J. H., Aagaard, D., and Malmberg , S. V: The contribution of the Denmark Strait Overflow to the deep North Atlantic, Deep-Sea Res., 27, 29–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(80)90070-9, 1980. a

Sy, A., Rhein, M., Lazier, J. R. N., Koltermann, K. P., Meincke, J., Putzka, A., and Bersch, M.: Surprisingly rapid spreading of newly formed intermediate waters across the North Atlantic Ocean, Nature, 386, 675–679, 1997. a

Talley, L. D.: Some aspects of ocean heat transport by the shallow, intermediate and deep overturning circulations, in: Mechanisms of Global Climate Change at Millennial Time Scales, edited by: Clark, P. U., Webb, R. S., and Keigwin, L. D., ISBN: 9781118664742, https://doi.org/10.1029/GM112p0001, 1999. a

Tanhua, T., Bulsiewicz, K., and Rhein, M.: Spreading of Overflow Water from the Greenland to the Labrador Sea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L10605, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022700, 2005. a

Tanhua, T., Waugh, D. W., and Wallace, D. W. R.: Use of SF6 to estimate anthropogenic CO2 in the upper ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 113, C04037, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004416, 2008. a

Tanhua, T., Hoppema, M., Jones, E. M., Stöven, T., Hauck, J., Dávila, M. G., Santana-Casiano, M., Álvarez, M., and Strass, V. H.: Temporal changes in ventilation and the carbonate system in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 138, 26–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.10.004, 2017. a

van Heuven, S. M. A. C, Hoppema, M., Huhn, O., Slagter, H. A., and de Baar, H. J. W.: Direct observation of increasing CO2 in the Weddell Gyre along the Prime Meridian during 1973–2008, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 58, 2613–2635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2011.08.007, 2011.  a, b, c, d

Vázquez-Rodríguez, M. Touratier, F., Lo Monaco, C., Waugh, D. W., Padin, X. A., Bellerby, R. G. J., Goyet, C., Metzl, N., Ríos , A. F., and Pérez, F. F.: Anthropogenic carbon distributions in the Atlantic Ocean: data-based estimates from the Arctic to the Antarctic, Biogeosciences, 6, 439–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-439-2009, 2009. a, b, c, d, e

Våge, K., Pickart, R. S., Thierry, V., Reverdin, G., Lee, C. M., Petrie, B., Agnew, T. A., Wong, A., and Ribergaard, H. M.: Surprising return of deep convection to the subpolar North Atlantic Ocean in winter 2007–2008, Nat. Geosci., 2, 67–72, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo382, 2009. a

Wanninkhof, R., Doney, S. C., Bullister, J. L., Levine, N. M., Warner, M., and Gruber, N.: Detecting anthropogenic CO2 changes in the interior Atlantic Ocean between 1989 and 2005, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 115, C11028, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006251, 2010. a, b

Watson, A. J., Messias, M. J., Fogelqvist, E., Van Scoy, K. A., Johannessen, T., Oliver, K. I. C., Stevens, D. P., Rey, F., Tanhua, T., and Olsson, K. A.: Mixing and convection in the Greenland Sea from a tracer-release experiment, Nature, 401, 902–904, https://doi.org/10.1038/44807, 1999. a

Waugh, D. W., Haine, T. W. N., and Hall, T. M.: Transport times and anthropogenic carbon in the subpolar North Atlantic Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 1475–1491, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.06.011, 2004. a

Waugh, D. W., Hall, T. M., McNeil, I., Key, R., and Matear, R. J.: Anthropogenic CO2 in the oceans estimated using transit time distributions, Tellus B, 58, 376–389, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00222.x, 2006. a, b, c, d, e

Waugh, D. W., Primeau, F., DeVries, T., and Holzer, M.: Recent Changes in the Ventilation of the Southern Oceans, Science, 339, 568–570, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225411, 2013. a, b

Woosley, R. J., F. J. Millero, and Wanninkhof, R.: Rapid anthropogenic changes in CO2 and pH in the Atlantic Ocean: 2003–2014, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 70–90, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005248, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k

Yashayaev, I.: Hydrographic changes in the Labrador Sea, 1960–2005, Prog. Oceanogr., 73, 242–276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2007.04.015, 2007. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i

Yashayaev, I. and Loder, J. W.: Recurrent replenishment of Labrador Sea Water and associated decadal-scale variability, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 121, 8095–8114, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012046, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f

Yashayaev, I., van Aken, H. M., Holliday, N. P., and Bersch, M.: Transformation of the Labrador Sea Water in the subpolar North Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L22605, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031812, 2007. a

Download
Short summary
We calculate the amount of anthropogenic carbon (Cant) in the Atlantic for the years 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020. Cant is the carbon that is taken up by the ocean as a result of humanmade CO2 emissions. To determine the amount of Cant, we apply a technique that is based on the observations of other humanmade gases (e.g., chlorofluorocarbons). Regionally, changes in ocean ventilation have an impact on the storage of Cant. Overall, the increase in Cant is driven by the rising CO2 in the atmosphere.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint