176 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Fine Resolution Imagery and LIDAR-Derived Canopy Heights Accurately Classify Land Cover with a Focus on Shrub/Sapling Cover in a Mountainous Landscape L. Bulluck et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061364
2. Towards monitoring the CO2 source–sink distribution over India via inverse modelling: quantifying the fine-scale spatiotemporal variability in the atmospheric CO2 mole fraction V. Thilakan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15287-2022
3. Tailored Algorithms for the Detection of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height from Common Automatic Lidars and Ceilometers (ALC) S. Kotthaus et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193259
4. How Much CO2 Is Taken Up by the European Terrestrial Biosphere? M. Reuter et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00310.1
5. Global evaluation of the Ecosystem Demography model (ED v3.0) L. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1971-2022
6. Disequilibrium of terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget caused by disturbance-induced emissions and non-CO2 carbon export flows: a global model assessment A. Ito https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-685-2019
7. Memory effects of climate and vegetation affecting net ecosystem CO2 fluxes in global forests S. Besnard et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211510
8. Direct high-precision radon quantification for interpreting high-frequency greenhouse gas measurements D. Kikaj et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-151-2025
9. Greenhouse gas flux measurements in wetlands D. Bastviken et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2026.101743
10. Ambiguity in the Land Use Component of Mitigation Contributions Toward the Paris Agreement Goals C. Fyson & M. Jeffery https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001190
11. Modelling sun-induced fluorescence for improved evaluation of forest carbon flux (GPP): Case study of tropical deciduous forest, India S. Sinha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109552
12. Spatio-Temporal Mapping of Multi-Satellite Observed Column Atmospheric CO2 Using Precision-Weighted Kriging Method Z. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030576
13. Using Space‐Based CO2 and NO2 Observations to Estimate Urban CO2 Emissions E. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037736
14. Where Has All the Carbon Gone? A. Denning https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-092010
15. Constraining activity and growth substrate of fungal decomposers via assimilation patterns of inorganic carbon and water into lipid biomarkers S. Jabinski et al. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02065-23
16. Analysis of the Information Content and Vertical Resolution of Ground-Based IR Spectroscopy for Determining the Vertical Structure of CO2 Y. Timofeev et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856021020093
17. Evaluating the consistency between OCO-2 and OCO-3 XCO2 estimates derived from the NASA ACOS version 10 retrieval algorithm T. Taylor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3173-2023
18. XCO2 Super-Resolution Reconstruction Based on Spatial Extreme Random Trees X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15040440
19. Efficient Optimization Method of the Meshed Return Plane Through Fusion of Convolutional Neural Network and Improved Particle Swarm Optimization J. Mei et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14051035
20. A low-cost modular data-acquisition system for monitoring biometeorological variables A. Castro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.08.010
21. Refining Spatial and Temporal XCO2 Characteristics Observed by Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 and Orbiting Carbon Observatory-3 Using Sentinel-5P Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument NO2 Observations in China K. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132456
22. Detection of Anthropogenic CO2 Emission Signatures with TanSat CO2 and with Copernicus Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) NO2 Measurements: First Results D. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2237-5
23. Monitoring fossil fuel CO2 emissions from co-emitted NO2 observed from space: progress, challenges, and future perspectives H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1922-x
24. Estimating CO2 Emissions from Large Scale Coal-Fired Power Plants Using OCO-2 Observations and Emission Inventories Y. Hu & Y. Shi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12070811
25. Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: A review A. Anav et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000483
26. Detecting regional patterns of changing CO 2 flux in Alaska N. Parazoo et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601085113
27. The Community Inversion Framework v1.0: a unified system for atmospheric inversion studies A. Berchet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5331-2021
28. Development of the WRF-CO2 4D-Var assimilation system v1.0 T. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1725-2018
29. Determination of dissolved inorganic carbon export and the controlling factors in small mountainous Rivers, Taiwan M. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134324
30. Extension of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) over the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East: the Nicosia site in Cyprus C. Rousogenous et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-565-2026
31. The benefits of investing into improved carbon flux monitoring J. Szolgayová et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1239672
32. On the impact of recent developments of the LMDz atmospheric general circulation model on the simulation of CO2 transport M. Remaud et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4489-2018
33. Brownian bridge-based speed imputation technique for truck energy consumption and emissions estimation X. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103546
34. Reviews and syntheses: An empirical spatiotemporal description of the global surface–atmosphere carbon fluxes: opportunities and data limitations J. Zscheischler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3685-2017
35. Quantitative analysis of spatiotemporal coverage and uncertainty decomposition in OCO-2/3 XCO2 across China L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120636
36. Assessing uncertainties and discrepancies in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions estimation in China: A comprehensive review H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107498
37. Observing terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle from space D. Schimel et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12822
38. Determining Both Tropospheric and Stratospheric СО2 Contents Using a Ground-Based IR Spectroscopic Method Y. Timofeyev et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433821020110
39. Terrestrial carbon sink observed from space: variation of growth rates and seasonal cycle amplitudes in response to interannual surface temperature variability O. Schneising et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-133-2014
40. Land-use and climate controls on aquatic carbon cycling and phototrophs in karst lakes of southwest China Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141738
41. PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis J. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.010
42. Anthropogenic CO2 monitoring satellite mission: the need for multi-angle polarimetric observations S. Rusli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1167-2021
43. Spatiotemporal patterns of the fossil-fuel CO2 signal in central Europe: results from a high-resolution atmospheric transport model Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14145-2017
44. Zooming-in for climate action—hyperlocal greenhouse gas data for mitigation action? M. Jungmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44168-022-00007-4
45. Towards monitoring localized CO2 emissions from space: co-located regional CO2 and NO2 enhancements observed by the OCO-2 and S5P satellites M. Reuter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9371-2019
46. IB-AGC: Annual 25 km global live biomass carbon product from SMOS L-band passive microwave vegetation optical depth X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05470-2
47. Novel quantification of regional fossil fuel CO2reductions during COVID-19 lockdowns using atmospheric oxygen measurements P. Pickers et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl9250
48. Regional impacts of COVID-19 on carbon dioxide detected worldwide from space B. Weir et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf9415
49. Strategic reserves in Oregon’s forests for biodiversity, water, and carbon to mitigate and adapt to climate change B. Law et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.1028401
50. The Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX): A test-bed for developing urban greenhouse gas emission measurements K. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.188
51. How to Integrate Experimental Research Approaches in Ecological and Environmental Studies: AnaEE France as an Example J. Clobert et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00043
52. Monitoring of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide over Pakistan Using Satellite Dataset N. An et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225882
53. A 33-Year NPP Monitoring Study in Southwest China by the Fusion of Multi-Source Remote Sensing and Station Data X. Guan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9101082
54. Multi-gas and multi-source comparisons of six land use emission datasets and AFOLU estimates in the Fifth Assessment Report, for the tropics for 2000–2005 R. Roman-Cuesta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5799-2016
55. 温室气体多平台遥感探测研究（特邀） 刘. Liu Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS251794
56. Integration of allometric equations in the water cloud model towards an improved retrieval of forest stem volume with L-band SAR data in Sweden M. Santoro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112235
57. Global land mapping of satellite-observed CO2 total columns using spatio-temporal geostatistics Z. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1156777
58. Enhancing interoperability to facilitate implementation of REDD+: case study of Mexico R. Vargas et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1285177
59. Plant ecophysiological processes in spectral profiles: perspective from a deciduous broadleaf forest H. Noda et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-021-01302-7
60. Multi-Source Remote Sensing Based Modeling of Vegetation Productivity in the Boreal: Issues & Opportunities R. Melser et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2023.2256895
61. Seasonal freeze-thaw processes controlled the carbon flux components of an alpine meadow ecosystem above 4000 m Y. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcar.2025.05.001
62. Response times of remote sensing measured sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, surface temperature and vegetation indices to evolving soil water limitation in a crop canopy A. Damm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.112957
63. Multiscale statistical analysis of thermal and non-thermal components of seawater pCO2 in the Western English Channel: scaling, time-reversibility, and dependence K. Robache & F. Schmitt https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-8093-2025
64. A biogenic CO2 flux adjustment scheme for the mitigation of large-scale biases in global atmospheric CO2 analyses and forecasts A. Agustí-Panareda et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10399-2016
65. A Cluster of CO2 Change Characteristics with GOSAT Observations for Viewing the Spatial Pattern of CO2 Emission and Absorption D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos6111695
66. Atmospheric gas-phase composition over the Indian Ocean S. Tegtmeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6625-2022
67. Assessing the Decadal Predictability of Land and Ocean Carbon Uptake R. Séférian et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076092
68. Methane cross-validation between three Fourier transform spectrometers: SCISAT ACE-FTS, GOSAT TANSO-FTS, and ground-based FTS measurements in the Canadian high Arctic G. Holl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1961-2016
69. Quantifying the effect of forest age in annual net forest carbon balance S. Besnard et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaeaeb
70. A segmentation algorithm for characterizing rise and fall segments in seasonal cycles: an application to XCO2 to estimate benchmarks and assess model bias L. Calle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2611-2019
71. About right: references in open-access EGU (European Geosciences Union) journals A. Pozzer https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-453-2021
72. NanoCarb hyperspectral sensor: on performance optimization and analysis for greenhouse gas monitoring from a constellation of small satellites S. Gousset et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-019-00273-9
73. Full-coverage and fine-scale spatiotemporal retrieval of XCO2 in China based on OCO-2 satellite observations Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103921
74. Extreme low air temperature and reduced moisture jointly inhibit respiration in alpine grassland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172039
75. On the potential of the ICOS atmospheric CO2 measurement network for estimating the biogenic CO2 budget of Europe N. Kadygrov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12765-2015
76. Incorporating heat and water stress into BIOME-BGC to simulate the impact of extreme climate events on subtropical coniferous forest NEP X. Teng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106784
77. Constraint of satellite CO2 retrieval on the global carbon cycle from a Chinese atmospheric inversion system Z. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-022-1036-7
78. Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes D. Bastviken et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac8fa9
79. 基于中国大气反演系统的卫星<bold>CO</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub>数据同化对全球碳收支的评估 哲. 金 et al. https://doi.org/10.1360/N072022-0123
80. Top–down assessment of the Asian carbon budget since the mid 1990s R. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10724
81. Ecophysiology and multivariate analysis for production of Tachigali vulgaris in Brazil: Influence of rainfall seasonality and fertilization P. Simões et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01611-8
82. Large Uncertainties in Urban‐Scale Carbon Emissions C. Gately & L. Hutyra https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027359
83. Independent data for transparent monitoring of greenhouse gas emissions from the land use sector – What do stakeholders think and need? E. Romijn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.016
84. Patterns of regional site index across a North American boreal forest gradient P. Montesano et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acdcab
85. Can a regional-scale reduction of atmospheric CO2 during the COVID-19 pandemic be detected from space? A case study for East China using satellite XCO2 retrievals M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2141-2021
86. The land-to-ocean loops of the global carbon cycle P. Regnier et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04339-9
87. Progress and Limitations in Forest Carbon Stock Estimation Using Remote Sensing Technologies: A Comprehensive Review W. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030449
88. Livestock grazing and biodiversity: Effects on CO2 exchange in semi-arid Karoo ecosystems, South Africa O. Rybchak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168517
89. Estimating global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions using satellite observations and machine learning methods F. Mustafa & M. Xu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121423
90. An intercomparison of oceanic methane and nitrous oxide measurements S. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5891-2018
91. Comparison between the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) and 4D‐Var in atmospheric CO2 flux inversion with the Goddard Earth Observing System‐Chem model and the observation impact diagnostics from the LETKF J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025100
92. A multi-decade record of high-quality fCO2 data in version 3 of the Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT) D. Bakker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-383-2016
93. Estimation of fossil-fuel CO2 emissions using satellite measurements of "proxy" species I. Konovalov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13509-2016
94. Using Multisource Data and Time Series Features to Construct a Global Terrestrial CO₂ Coverage by Deep Learning W. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3462589
95. Monitoring vegetation tipping elements with Moon-based SAR: wind-induced impacts of unstable scattering Y. Geng et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2026.2639890
96. Towards Robust Calculation of Interannual CO2 Growth Signal from TCCON (Total Carbon Column Observing Network) L. Labzovskii et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193868
97. Recent peat and carbon accumulation on changing permafrost landforms along the Mackenzie River valley, Northwest Territories, Canada P. Germain Chartrand et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace9ed
98. The physiological basis for estimating photosynthesis from Chla fluorescence J. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18045
99. Source Sector Attribution of CO2 Emissions Using an Urban CO/CO2 Bayesian Inversion System B. Nathan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029231
100. Control of carbon dioxide exchange fluxes by rainfall and biological carbon pump in karst river–lake systems C. Lai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173486
101. OCO‐2 Satellite‐Imposed Constraints on Terrestrial Biospheric CO2 Fluxes Over South Asia S. Philip et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035035
102. Toward spectrally truthful models for gap-filling soil respiration and methane fluxes. A case study in coastal forested wetlands in North Carolina B. Mitra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110038
103. Fungi present distinguishable isotopic signals in their lipids when grown on glycolytic versus tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates S. Jabinski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3127-2025
104. Developing a common globally applicable method for optical remote sensing of ecosystem light use efficiency K. Huemmrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.05.009
105. Performance Assessment of Spatial Interpolation Methods for the Estimation of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide in the Wider Geographic Extent M. Uddin & K. Czajkowski https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-022-00105-1
106. Reviews and syntheses: guiding the evolution of the observing system for the carbon cycle through quantitative network design T. Kaminski & P. Rayner https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4755-2017
107. Global estimates of gap-free and fine-scale CO2 concentrations during 2014–2020 from satellite and reanalysis data L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108057
108. Natural Variability and Anthropogenic Trends in the Ocean Carbon Sink G. McKinley et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060529
109. Multivariate anomaly detection for Earth observations: a comparison of algorithms and feature extraction techniques M. Flach et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-677-2017
110. Constraining size-dependence of vegetation respiration rates A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61239-0
111. Global estimation of above-ground biomass from spaceborne C-band scatterometer observations aided by LiDAR metrics of vegetation structure M. Santoro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113114
112. Using Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) column CO2 retrievals to rapidly detect and estimate biospheric surface carbon flux anomalies A. Feldman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1545-2023
113. Reviews and syntheses: Systematic Earth observations for use in terrestrial carbon cycle data assimilation systems M. Scholze et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3401-2017
114. Navigating Earth’s biogeochemical dynamics: Integrating elemental cycles, anthropogenic pressures and planetary boundaries V. Slaveykova https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1643879
115. Carbon emissions from land cover change in Central Vietnam V. Avitabile et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2016.1254009
116. Carbon gas flux to and from inland waters: support for a global observation network T. Harmon https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-020-00623-1
117. The potential of Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 data to reduce the uncertainties in CO2 surface fluxes over Australia using a variational assimilation scheme Y. Villalobos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8473-2020
118. Mapping global forest age from forest inventories, biomass and climate data S. Besnard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4881-2021
119. A comprehensive land-surface vegetation model for multi-stream data assimilation, D&B v1.0 W. Knorr et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2137-2025
120. Can We Detect Urban‐Scale CO2 Emission Changes Within Medium‐Sized Cities? D. Mallia et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038686
121. Effects of fire and CO2 on biogeography and primary production in glacial and modern climates M. Martin Calvo & I. Prentice https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13485
122. Geostationary Emission Explorer for Europe (G3E): mission concept and initial performance assessment A. Butz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4719-2015
123. Embedding and slicing of intact in situ collected marine snow C. Flintrop et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10251
124. XCO2 retrieval for GOSAT and GOSAT-2 based on the FOCAL algorithm S. Noël et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3837-2021
125. Erosion of organic carbon from the Andes and its effects on ecosystem carbon dioxide balance K. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003615
126. Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives S. Piao et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14884
127. Distribution Characteristics and Main Influencing Factors of Organic Carbon in Sediments of Spartina Alterniflora Wetlands along the Northern Jiangsu Coast, China A. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060741
128. A review of the major drivers of the terrestrial carbon uptake: model-based assessments, consensus, and uncertainties T. Tharammal et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3012
129. Distribution of Methane Plumes on Cascadia Margin and Implications for the Landward Limit of Methane Hydrate Stability S. Merle et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.531714
130. A Modeling Framework of Atmospheric CO2 in the Mediterranean Marseille Coastal City Area, France B. Nathan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15101193
131. Spatial Modeling: an Approach for Estimating the Effect of Industrial Emissions on the Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide M. Uddin & N. Reid https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09532-z
132. The global forest above-ground biomass pool for 2010 estimated from high-resolution satellite observations M. Santoro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3927-2021
133. Ecosystem functional diversity and the representativeness of environmental networks across the conterminous United States S. Villarreal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.07.016
134. Optimizing CO2 Concentrations and Emissions Based on the WRF-Chem Model Integrated with the 3DVAR and EAKF Methods W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010174
135. Satellite-derived methane hotspot emission estimates using a fast data-driven method M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5751-2017
136. Soil organic matter and CO2 fluxes in small tropical watersheds under forest and cacao agroforestry E. Costa et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200550
137. Machine learning-based prediction of ambient CO2 and CH4 concentrations with high temporal resolution in Seoul metropolitan area S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126362
138. The Niwot Ridge Subalpine Forest US-NR1 AmeriFlux site – Part 1: Data acquisition and site record-keeping S. Burns et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-451-2016
139. Spatiotemporal Evolution of XCO2 in East Asia (2016–2024) Across Different Climate Zones Based on GOSAT and OCO-2 Data Fusion Z. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18071004
140. A Data-Driven Assessment of Biosphere-Atmosphere Interaction Impact on Seasonal Cycle Patterns of XCO2 Using GOSAT and MODIS Observations Z. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030251
141. Gaps in network infrastructure limit our understanding of biogenic methane emissions for the United States S. Malone et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2507-2022
142. Methods for Measuring Carbon Dioxide Uptake and Permanence: Review and Implications for Macroalgae Aquaculture D. Rose & L. Hemery https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11010175
143. Observation and integrated Earth-system science: A roadmap for 2016–2025 A. Simmons et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.008
144. Soil Greenhouse Gas Fluxes Following Conversion of Tropical Forests to Fertilizer-Based Sugarcane Systems in Northwestern Uganda J. Tamale et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3967094
145. Development of Low-Cost Soil Flux Chamber for CO2 Release Measurement R. Verma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26051602
146. Interpreting continuous in-situ observations of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in the urban port area of Rotterdam I. Super et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.08.008
147. In situ observations of greenhouse gases over Europe during the CoMet 1.0 campaign aboard the HALO aircraft M. Gałkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1525-2021
148. Assessment of the Influence of Instrument Parameters on the Detection Accuracy of Greenhouse-Gases Absorption Spectrometer-2 (GAS-2) S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14091418
149. Improved light and temperature responses for light-use-efficiency-based GPP models I. McCallum et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6577-2013
150. Designing optimal greenhouse gas observing networks that consider performance and cost D. Lucas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-121-2015
151. The EUropeanisation of Research Infrastructure Policy K. Cramer & N. Rüffin https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09544-0
152. Sources of Uncertainty in Regional and Global Terrestrial CO2 Exchange Estimates A. Bastos et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006393
153. Experiments on Soil Microcosms for The Assessment of Greenhouse Gases Fluxes from Different Land Uses in Laboratory Conditions L. Laslo et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202458901005
154. Development of an economical, autonomous pHstat system for culturing phytoplankton under steady state or dynamic conditions R. Golda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2017.03.007
155. Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Niño J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5690
156. Global satellite observations of column-averaged carbon dioxide and methane: The GHG-CCI XCO2 and XCH4 CRDP3 data set M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.027
157. Matching high resolution satellite data and flux tower footprints improves their agreement in photosynthesis estimates J. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108878
158. EUROSPEC: at the interface between remote-sensing and ecosystem CO2 flux measurements in Europe A. Porcar-Castell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6103-2015
159. Evaluation of CarbonTracker's Inverse Estimates of North American Net Ecosystem Exchange of CO2 From Different Observing Systems Using ACT‐America Airborne Observations Y. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034406
160. Earth’s Climate History from 4.5 Billion Years to One Minute J. Lin & T. Qian https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2022.2082914
161. Making the case for an International Decade of Radiocarbon T. Eglinton et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0081
162. Methane Feedbacks to the Global Climate System in a Warmer World J. Dean et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000559
163. The CO2 Human Emissions (CHE) Project: First Steps Towards a European Operational Capacity to Monitor Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions G. Balsamo et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2021.707247
164. Future Weakening of the ENSO Ocean Carbon Buffer Under Anthropogenic Forcing E. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094021
165. The CarboCount CH sites: characterization of a dense greenhouse gas observation network B. Oney et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11147-2015
166. Carbon Monitoring Satellite (CarbonSat): assessment of atmospheric CO2 and CH4 retrieval errors by error parameterization M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3477-2013
167. The Space Carbon Observatory (SCARBO) concept: assessment of XCO2 and XCH4 retrieval performance M. Dogniaux et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4835-2022
168. A data-driven estimate of litterfall and forest carbon turnover and the drivers of their inter-annual variabilities in forest ecosystems across China X. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153341
169. Accounting for the vertical distribution of emissions in atmospheric CO2 simulations D. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4541-2019
170. Consistent evaluation of ACOS-GOSAT, BESD-SCIAMACHY, CarbonTracker, and MACC through comparisons to TCCON S. Kulawik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-683-2016
171. Comparison of Stratospheric CO2 Measurements by Ground- and Satellite-Based Methods A. Nikitenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856022040145
172. Soil greenhouse gas fluxes following conversion of tropical forests to fertilizer-based sugarcane systems in northwestern Uganda J. Tamale et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.107953
173. Partitioning carbon dioxide emissions from soil organic matter and urea in warm and cold cropping seasons M. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101995
174. How Well Do We Understand the Land‐Ocean‐Atmosphere Carbon Cycle? D. Crisp et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021RG000736
175. Advancing Concession-Scale Carbon Stock Prediction in Oil Palm Using Machine Learning and Multi-Sensor Satellite Indices A. Noviyanto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15010012
176. An Approach to Predicting Urban Carbon Stock Using a Self-Attention Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Network Model: A Case Study in Wuhan Urban Circle Z. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234372