Articles | Volume 12, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2311-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2311-2015
Research article
 | 
17 Apr 2015
Research article |  | 17 Apr 2015

On the use of the post-closure methods uncertainty band to evaluate the performance of land surface models against eddy covariance flux data

J. Ingwersen, K. Imukova, P. Högy, and T. Streck

Viewed

Total article views: 2,721 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,396 1,013 312 2,721 113 138
  • HTML: 1,396
  • PDF: 1,013
  • XML: 312
  • Total: 2,721
  • BibTeX: 113
  • EndNote: 138
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Dec 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Dec 2014)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 02 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The energy balance of eddy covariance (EC) flux data is normally not closed. Therefore, EC flux data are usually post-closed, i.e. the measured turbulent fluxes are adjusted so as to close the energy balance. We propose to use in model evaluation the post-closure method uncertainty band (PUB) to account for the uncertainty in EC data originating from lacking energy balance closure. Working with only a single post-closing method might result in severe misinterpretations in model-data comparison.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint