73 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Effects of paludiculture products on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural peatlands L. Lahtinen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106502
2. Evaluating temporal trade-offs in climate effects from carbon dioxide removal strategies across different metrics: a case study on wetland restoration S. Sartzetakis et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adeb9d
3. A Critical Review of the IUCN UK Peatland Programme’s “Burning and Peatlands” Position Statement M. Ashby✉ & A. Heinemeyer https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01400-1
4. Soiden ennallistamisen suoluonto-, vesistö-, ja ilmastovaikutukset. Vertaisarvioitu raportti. 10.17011/https://doi.org/10.17011/jyx/SLJ/2021/3b
5. Multiyear greenhouse gas balances at a rewetted temperate peatland D. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13325
6. Restoring tides to reduce methane emissions in impounded wetlands: A new and potent Blue Carbon climate change intervention K. Kroeger et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12138-4
7. Pros and Cons of Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Peatlands: Review of Possibilities L. Balode et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062260
8. The effects of Eriophorum vaginatum on N 2 O fluxes at a restored, extracted peatland M. Brummell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.006
9. Effects of riparian wetland restoration and grazing on CH4 and CO2 exchange more than a decade after rewetting J. Kjær et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70185
10. ORCHIDEE-PEAT (revision 4596), a model for northern peatland CO2, water, and energy fluxes on daily to annual scales C. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-497-2018
11. Carbon balance of a restored and cutover raised bog: implications for restoration and comparison to global trends M. Swenson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-713-2019
12. Complete annual CO2, CH4, and N2O balance of a temperate riparian wetland 12 years after rewetting T. Kandel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.12.019
13. Meta-analysis shows the impacts of ecological restoration on greenhouse gas emissions T. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46991-5
14. Rewetting drained forested peatlands: A cornerstone of Sweden’s climate change mitigation strategy H. Laudon et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02220-x
15. Cutover Peat Limits Methane Production Causing Low Emission at a Restored Peatland K. Nugent et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005909
16. Effects of wetland status changes on greenhouse gas emissions: A global meta-analysis K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108441
17. Methodology for carbon credit calculation in the context of Ukraine and results of its application in Drevlyanskyi Nature Reserve (Zhytomyr Region) O. Оrlov https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.2001.868
18. Annual emissions of CO2, CH4 and N2O from a temperate peat bog: Comparison of an undrained and four drained sites under permanent grass and arable crop rotations with cereals and potato T. Kandel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.021
19. Comparison of eddy covariance CO2 and CH4 fluxes from mined and recently rewetted sections in a northwestern German cutover bog D. Holl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2853-2020
20. Carbon Balance and Spatial Variability of CO2 and CH4 Fluxes in a Sphagnum-Dominated Peatland in a Temperate Climate B. D’Angelo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01411-y
21. Multi-scale temporal variation in methane emission from an alpine peatland on the Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and associated environmental controls H. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107616
22. High emissions of greenhouse gases from grasslands on peat and other organic soils B. Tiemeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13303
23. Plant rhizosphere oxidation reduces methane production and emission in rewetted peatlands S. Agethen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.07.006
24. Comparison of GHG emissions from annual crops in rotation on drained temperate agricultural peatland with production of reed canary grass in paludiculture using an LCA approach H. Thers et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17320
25. Multi‐year net ecosystem carbon balance of a restored peatland reveals a return to carbon sink K. Nugent et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14449
26. Peatland restoration is anticipated to provide climate change mitigation over all time-scales: a UK case-study X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae14bb
27. Changes in microbial community composition, activity, and greenhouse gas production upon inundation of drained iron-rich peat soils A. de Jong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107862
28. A 1-year greenhouse gas budget of a peatland exposed to long-term nutrient infiltration and altered hydrology: high carbon uptake and methane emission S. Berger et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7639-1
29. Harnessing the Low-Hanging Fruits: Rewetting Unmanaged Marginal Organic Soils to Achieve Maximal Greenhouse Gas Reduction H. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c12572
30. Controlled burning of peat before rewetting modifies soil chemistry and microbial dynamics to reduce short-term methane emissions S. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02336-8
31. Seasonal patterns of greenhouse gas emissions from a forest‐to‐bog restored site in northern Scotland: Influence of microtopography and vegetation on carbon dioxide and methane dynamics V. Mazzola et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13050
32. To graze or not to graze? Four years greenhouse gas balances and vegetation composition from a drained and a rewetted organic soil under grassland F. Renou-Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.011
33. Impact of water table level on annual carbon and greenhouse gas balances of a restored peat extraction area J. Järveoja et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2637-2016
34. Brackish Water Rewetting Enables Resilient Methane Suppression across Coastal Peatland Land Uses H. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c16715
35. Impact of Former Peat Extraction Field Afforestation on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Hemiboreal Region V. Samariks et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020184
36. Effect of plant functional type on methane dynamics in a restored minerotrophic peatland M. Strack et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2999-6
37. Optimized wetland rewetting strategies can control methane, carbon dioxide, and oxygen responses to water table fluctuations B. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03163-7
38. Effects of water level alteration on carbon cycling in peatlands Y. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2020.1806113
39. Impact of Water Table on Methane Emission Dynamics in Terrestrial Wetlands and Implications on Strategies for Wetland Management and Restoration T. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01634-7
40. Rewetting Offers Rapid Climate Benefits for Tropical and Agricultural Peatlands But Not for Forestry‐Drained Peatlands P. Ojanen & K. Minkkinen https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006503
41. Vegetation Composition and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes on Rewetted Milled Peatlands — Comparison with Undisturbed Bogs A. Purre & M. Ilomets https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01518-2
42. From Drainage to Rewetting—Soil Transformations in European Agricultural Peatlands: A Review M. Joel & B. Glina https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050586
43. Severe wildfire legacies suppress methane emissions after peatland rewetting S. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2026.100735
44. Effects of birch encroachment, water table and vegetation on methane emissions from peatland microforms in a rewetted bog C. Welpelo et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52349-0
45. Methane fluxes from a rewetted agricultural fen during two initial years of paludiculture T. Kandel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136670
46. Steady and ebullitive methane fluxes from active, restored and unrestored horticultural peatlands A. Bieniada & M. Strack https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106324
47. Temporal shifts in controls over methane emissions from a boreal bog M. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.07.002
48. Methane fluxes in boreal rewetted forested peatlands – back at natural levels R. Hautala et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2026.124072
49. Greenhouse Gas Exchange of a NW German Peatland, 18 Years After Rewetting C. Schaller et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005960
50. Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emission Fluxes Along Water Level Gradients in Littoral Zones of Constructed Surface Water Bodies in a Rewetted Extracted Peatland in Sweden S. Jordan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4010017
51. Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis T. Darusman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10046-9
52. Emissions of methane from northern peatlands: a review of management impacts and implications for future management options M. Abdalla et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2469
53. Predominance of methanogens over methanotrophs in rewetted fens characterized by high methane emissions X. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6519-2018
54. Use of the Gas Emission Site Type Method in the Evaluation of the CO2 Emissions in Raised Bogs R. Cieśliński & K. Kubiak-Wójcicka https://doi.org/10.3390/w16071069
55. Evaluating the carbon costs of UK blanket peatland restoration J. Brennand et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2025.2574026
56. Rewetting degraded peatlands for climate and biodiversity benefits: Results from two raised bogs F. Renou-Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.014
57. Carbon fluxes of an alpine peatland in Northern Italy J. Pullens et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.01.012
58. Sulfate deprivation triggers high methane production in a disturbed and rewetted coastal peatland F. Koebsch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1937-2019
59. Response of greenhouse gas fluxes to simulated water level management under contrasting climate scenarios in a peatland mesocosm study S. Salimi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127064
60. Carbon balance of rewetted and drained peat soils used for biomass production: a mesocosm study S. Karki et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12334
61. Rye cover crop incorporation and high watertable mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in cultivated peatland Y. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3390
62. Rewetting is not enough: Sphagnum transplants promote lowering of greenhouse‐gas emissions in peatlands R. Bou Melhem et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70224
63. Back to the Future: Restoring Northern Drained Forested Peatlands for Climate Change Mitigation D. Escobar et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.834371
64. Mapping the restoration of degraded peatland as a research area: A scientometric review S. Apori et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.942788
65. Effects of cover crops and nitrogen fertilizer on greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential in a potato cropping system S. Sadra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101256
66. The unexpected long period of elevated CH4 emissions from an inundated fen meadow ended only with the occurrence of cattail (Typha latifolia) D. Antonijević et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16713
67. Nitrous oxide emissions of undrained, forestry-drained, and rewetted boreal peatlands K. Minkkinen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118494
68. Greenhouse Gas Balance of Sphagnum Farming on Highly Decomposed Peat at Former Peat Extraction Sites J. Oestmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00659-z
69. Soiden ennallistamisen suoluonto-, vesistö-, ja ilmastovaikutukset. Vertaisarvioitu raportti. S. Kareksela et al. https://doi.org/10.17011/jyx/SLJ/2021/3b
70. Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas R. Tavares et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542018422019817
71. Effects of seasonal inundation on methane fluxes from forested freshwater wetlands K. Hondula et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1193
72. Effect of inundation on greenhouse gas emissions from temperate coastal wetland soils with different vegetation types in southern Australia C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142949
73. Comparative assessment of a restored and natural wetland using 13 C-DNA SIP reveals a higher potential for methane production in the restored wetland N. Hamovit et al. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02161-24