Fate of terrestrial organic carbon and associated CO<sub>2</sub> and CO emissions from two Southeast Asian estuaries

Müller, D.; Warneke, T.; Rixen, T.; Müller, M.; Mujahid, A.; Bange, H. W.; Notholt, J.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-691-2016

Articles | Volume 13, issue 3

https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-691-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-691-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 13, issue 3

Research article

|

04 Feb 2016

Research article |

| 04 Feb 2016

Fate of terrestrial organic carbon and associated CO₂ and CO emissions from two Southeast Asian estuaries

D. Müller, T. Warneke, T. Rixen, M. Müller, A. Mujahid, H. W. Bange, and J. Notholt

Download

Final revised paper (published on 04 Feb 2016)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 05 Jun 2015)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC C3206: 'Reviewer Comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Jun 2015
- AC C5220: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #1', Denise Mueller, 11 Sep 2015
RC C4131: 'review manuscript Müller et al .', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Aug 2015
- AC C5227: 'Response to Anonymous Referee #2', Denise Mueller, 11 Sep 2015

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Reconsider after major revisions (28 Sep 2015) by Minhan Dai

AR by Denise Müller-Dum on behalf of the Authors (28 Oct 2015) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (13 Nov 2015) by Minhan Dai

RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (17 Nov 2015)

Suggestions for revision or reasons for rejection

Review of paper submitted to Biogeosciences

Title: Fate of peat-derived carbon and associated CO2 and CO emissions from two Southeast Asian estuaries

Authors: Müller et al. [bg-2015-199]

General Comments
The authors present a revised manuscript which focuses on DOC, CO and CO2 observations in two Tropical estuaries in Malaysia. The authors have addressed my previous comments. The second reviewer’s main concerns centred on a) the absence of a discussion of upland DOC sources, b) the exclusion of CH4 data and c) neglecting the role of sediments in estuaries. These are valid points and have largely been addressed in the revised manuscript. I have a few comments to add to this discussion which the authors may want to address. I am satisfied that the revised manuscript has improved and recommend its publication in BG.
Specific Comments
a) Page 16, line 27: Regarding estuarine retention of C, I agree with the authors, but sediments may also be a source of DOC. For example, DOC may be released into the water during the respiration of POC which has previously settled out of the water column. This may explain the ‘apparent’ estuarine source of DOC.
b) Section 4.1.3: The diurnal pattern of CO clearly suggests photochemical production which has been shown before. The interpretation and discussion is sound, but could perhaps be a little more explicit. The reason why this decreases so dramatically with depth is related to the spectral attenuation of light in natural waters (highest in the UV) and the photochemical efficiency of the reaction (also highest in the UV) (e.g. Kitidis et al., 2011; Stubbins et al., 2011; Zafiriou et al., 2003). I would also advise the authors to be cautious with regards to the increase of DOM bioavailability following photochemical reactions - The evidence is really mixed for this. Photochemical reactions consume O2 and produce a number of highly reactive oxygen species (hydroxyl-, superoxide- and singlet-O2-radicals) (e.g. Kitidis et al., 2014). These are extremely toxic, but also short-lived, so that microbial incubations in irradiated water often show an ‘apparent’ decrease in bioavailability if inoculated straight away. On the other hand, if the irradiated water is allowed to stand for a few hours/days before inoculation, increased bioavailability may be observed. The result seems to depend on how long you let an irradiated sample stand before you add microbes (!), but this isn’t realistic in nature. I would advise the authors to offer this alternative to ‘enhanced bioavailability’.
c) Regarding CO2/CO unit discrepancy (reviewer 2 comment) – I agree with the authors decision to use different units for these gases, precisely in order to maintain consistency with the literature for each gas. Perhaps the authors could give one common unit in brackets where the other unit is used.
d) Regarding the weak correlation between O2/CO2 (reviewer 2 comment) – As the reviewer correctly suggests, one would expect an anti-correlation between these gases from respiration/photosynthesis. The authors correctly point out that this anti-correlation breaks down due to other processes’ involvement in CO2 (chemical reactions and advection). Whilst I agree with this response, it is important to also point out that CO2, as part of the carbonate system, is buffered by DIC (Dissolved Inorganic Carbon). CO2(g) is only 1-2% of DIC in seawater (depending on pH, Temp., salinity). Photosynthesis/respiration should give an anti-correlation, but any change in CO2 is buffered by the vast DIC reservoir. Unsurprisingly therefore, the correlation is weak at times. This “buffering” probably also contributes to the absence of diurnal CO2 cycles and the lack of an obvious relationship between temperature and fluxes. Off course if the pH is low, that the carbonate equilibrium will shift towards CO2(g) and the anti-correlation with O2 may be more obvious.
References:
1. Kitidis et al., 2011, Carbon monoxide emission from a Mauritanian upwelling filament, Marine Chemistry 127: 123–133
2. Kitidis et al., 2014, Oxygen photolysis in the Mauritanian upwelling: Implications for net community production, Limnol. Oceanogr., 59(2), 299–310
3. Stubbins et al., 2011. Carbon monoxide apparent quantum yields and photoproduction in the estuary Tyne. Biogeosciences 8, 703–713.
4. Zafiriou et al., 2003. Concordant estimates of oceanic carbon monoxide source and sink processes in the Pacific yield a balanced global “bluewater” CO budget. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17 (1).

Hide

RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (03 Jan 2016)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (04 Jan 2016) by Minhan Dai

AR by Denise Müller-Dum on behalf of the Authors (06 Jan 2016) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (14 Jan 2016) by Minhan Dai

AR by Denise Müller-Dum on behalf of the Authors (21 Jan 2016)

Download

Article (644 KB)
Full-text XML

Short summary

We studied organic carbon and the dissolved greenhouse gases carbon dioxide (CO2) and carbon monoxide (CO) in two estuaries in Sarawak, Malaysia, whose coast is covered by carbon-rich peatlands. The estuaries received terrestrial organic carbon from peat-draining tributaries. A large fraction was converted to CO2 and a minor fraction to CO. Both gases were released to the atmosphere. This shows how these estuaries function as efficient filters between land and ocean in this important region.

Fate of terrestrial organic carbon and associated CO2 and CO emissions from two Southeast Asian estuaries

Download

Interactive discussion

Peer-review completion

Fate of terrestrial organic carbon and associated CO₂ and CO emissions from two Southeast Asian estuaries