Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1365-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1365-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
Research article
 | 
20 Mar 2017
Research article |  | 20 Mar 2017

Gas chromatography vs. quantum cascade laser-based N2O flux measurements using a novel chamber design

Christian Brümmer, Bjarne Lyshede, Dirk Lempio, Jean-Pierre Delorme, Jeremy J. Rüffer, Roland Fuß, Antje M. Moffat, Miriam Hurkuck, Andreas Ibrom, Per Ambus, Heinz Flessa, and Werner L. Kutsch

Viewed

Total article views: 5,082 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,828 2,017 237 5,082 507 190 226
  • HTML: 2,828
  • PDF: 2,017
  • XML: 237
  • Total: 5,082
  • Supplement: 507
  • BibTeX: 190
  • EndNote: 226
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2016)
Latest update: 09 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
We present a novel chamber design for measuring soil–atmosphere N2O fluxes and compare the performance of a commonly applied gas chromatography (GC) setup with laser-based (QCL) concentration detection. While GC was still a useful method for longer-term investigations, we found that closure times of 10 min and sampling every 5 s is sufficient when using a QCL system. Further, extremely low standard errors (< 2 % of flux value) were observed regardless of linear or exponential flux calculation.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint