Articles | Volume 14, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3685-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3685-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Reviews and syntheses
| 
09 Aug 2017
Reviews and syntheses |
| 09 Aug 2017
Reviews and syntheses: An empirical spatiotemporal description of the global surface–atmosphere carbon fluxes: opportunities and data limitations
Jakob Zscheischler
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich,
Universitätstr. 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10,
07745 Jena, Germany
Miguel D. Mahecha
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10,
07745 Jena, Germany
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Deutscher
Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Michael Stifel Center Jena for Data-Driven and Simulation Science,
07743 Jena, Germany
Valerio Avitabile
Wageningen University & Research, Laboratory of Geo-Information
Science and Remote Sensing, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, the
Netherlands
Leonardo Calle
Institute on Ecosystems and Department of Ecology, Montana State
University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
Nuno Carvalhais
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10,
07745 Jena, Germany
CENSE, Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente,
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa,
Caparica, Portugal
Philippe Ciais
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement,
CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, 91191, Gif sur Yvette, France
Fabian Gans
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10,
07745 Jena, Germany
Nicolas Gruber
Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich,
Zurich, Switzerland
Jens Hartmann
Institute for Geology, CEN – Center for Earth System Research and
Sustainability, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 55, 20146 Hamburg,
Germany
Martin Herold
Wageningen University & Research, Laboratory of Geo-Information
Science and Remote Sensing, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, the
Netherlands
Kazuhito Ichii
Department of Environmental Geochemical Cycle Research, Agency for
Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan
Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for
Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Martin Jung
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10,
07745 Jena, Germany
Peter Landschützer
Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich,
Zurich, Switzerland
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstr. 53, Hamburg, Germany
Goulven G. Laruelle
Dept. Geoscience, Environment & Society (DGES), CP160/02,
Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Ronny Lauerwald
Dept. Geoscience, Environment & Society (DGES), CP160/02,
Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University
of Exeter, EX4 4QE Exeter, Devon, UK
Dario Papale
Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems
(DIBAF), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, 01100, Italy
Philippe Peylin
CENSE, Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente,
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa,
Caparica, Portugal
Benjamin Poulter
Institute on Ecosystems and Department of Ecology, Montana State
University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Biospheric Sciences Laboratory,
Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Deepak Ray
Institute on the Environment (IonE), University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
Pierre Regnier
Dept. Geoscience, Environment & Society (DGES), CP160/02,
Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Christian Rödenbeck
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10,
07745 Jena, Germany
Rosa M. Roman-Cuesta
Wageningen University & Research, Laboratory of Geo-Information
Science and Remote Sensing, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, the
Netherlands
Christopher Schwalm
Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth MA 02540, USA
Gianluca Tramontana
Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems
(DIBAF), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, 01100, Italy
Alexandra Tyukavina
Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College
Park, MD, USA
Riccardo Valentini
CMCC, Via A. Imperatore, 16, 73100, Lecce, Italy
Guido van der Werf
Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the
Netherlands
Tristram O. West
Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory, College Park, MD, USA
Julie E. Wolf
Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory, College Park, MD, USA
Markus Reichstein
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10,
07745 Jena, Germany
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Deutscher
Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Michael Stifel Center Jena for Data-Driven and Simulation Science,
07743 Jena, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 7,959 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Oct 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,436 | 2,320 | 203 | 7,959 | 553 | 163 | 218 |
- HTML: 5,436
- PDF: 2,320
- XML: 203
- Total: 7,959
- Supplement: 553
- BibTeX: 163
- EndNote: 218
Total article views: 6,643 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Aug 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,485 | 1,981 | 177 | 6,643 | 346 | 154 | 183 |
- HTML: 4,485
- PDF: 1,981
- XML: 177
- Total: 6,643
- Supplement: 346
- BibTeX: 154
- EndNote: 183
Total article views: 1,316 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Oct 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 951 | 339 | 26 | 1,316 | 207 | 9 | 35 |
- HTML: 951
- PDF: 339
- XML: 26
- Total: 1,316
- Supplement: 207
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 35
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 7,959 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 7,568 with geography defined
and 391 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 6,643 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,256 with geography defined
and 387 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,316 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,312 with geography defined
and 4 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
56 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Deep-sea living (stained) benthic foraminifera from the continental slope and São Paulo Plateau, Santos Basin (SW Atlantic): ecological insights B. Araújo et al. 10.1590/2675-2824071.22080bda
- Climate drivers of the terrestrial carbon cycle variability in Europe G. Messori et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1ac0
- Bridge to the future: Important lessons from 20 years of ecosystem observations made by the OzFlux network J. Beringer et al. 10.1111/gcb.16141
- Global Carbon Budget 2018 C. Le Quéré et al. 10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018
- Magnitude and drivers of integrated fluvial network greenhouse gas emissions across the boreal landscape in Québec R. Hutchins et al. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115556
- Definitions and methods to estimate regional land carbon fluxes for the second phase of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Project (RECCAP-2) P. Ciais et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-1289-2022
- Comparing national greenhouse gas budgets reported in UNFCCC inventories against atmospheric inversions Z. Deng et al. 10.5194/essd-14-1639-2022
- Global Carbon Budget 2020 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
- Investigating Terrestrial Carbon Uptake Over India Using Multimodel Simulations of Gross Primary Productivity and Satellite‐Based Biophysical Product G. Uchale et al. 10.1029/2023JG007468
- Influence of Stream‐Subsurface Exchange Flux and Bacterial Biofilms on Oxygen Consumption Under Nutrient‐Rich Conditions N. De Falco et al. 10.1029/2017JG004372
- A uniform <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> climatology combining open and coastal oceans P. Landschützer et al. 10.5194/essd-12-2537-2020
- Global Carbon Budget 2022 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
- Accelerated mobilization of organic carbon from retrogressive thaw slumps on the northern Taymyr Peninsula P. Bernhard et al. 10.5194/tc-16-2819-2022
- Memory effects of climate and vegetation affecting net ecosystem CO2 fluxes in global forests S. Besnard et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0211510
- Ensemble modelling of carbon fluxes in grasslands and croplands R. Sándor et al. 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107791
- How Does Health Uncertainty Impact Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Union Economies? A Blessing in Disguise S. Ali & M. Anser 10.1007/s41742-023-00530-0
- Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties A. Virkkala et al. 10.1111/gcb.15659
- BESSv2.0: A satellite-based and coupled-process model for quantifying long-term global land–atmosphere fluxes B. Li et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113696
- Quantifying the effect of forest age in annual net forest carbon balance S. Besnard et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aaeaeb
- Dynamic common correlated effects of pandemic uncertainty on environmental quality: fresh insights from East-Asia and Pacific countries Z. Liu et al. 10.1007/s11869-022-01164-5
- The key role of forest disturbance in reconciling estimates of the northern carbon sink M. O’Sullivan et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01827-4
- Parameter uncertainty dominates C-cycle forecast errors over most of Brazil for the 21st century T. Smallman et al. 10.5194/esd-12-1191-2021
- Inland Water Greenhouse Gas Budgets for RECCAP2: 1. State‐Of‐The‐Art of Global Scale Assessments R. Lauerwald et al. 10.1029/2022GB007657
- Global Carbon Budget 2017 C. Le Quéré et al. 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018
- Adjustments to SIF Aid the Interpretation of Drought Responses at the Caatinga of Northeast Brazil E. Bontempo et al. 10.3390/rs12193264
- Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe: synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach M. Jung et al. 10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020
- Assessing the Decadal Predictability of Land and Ocean Carbon Uptake R. Séférian et al. 10.1002/2017GL076092
- Global trends in land-atmosphere CO<SUB>2</SUB> exchange fluxes: an analysis of a flux measurement dataset and comparison with terrestrial model simulations A. ITO 10.2480/agrmet.D-21-00015
- Mapping global forest age from forest inventories, biomass and climate data S. Besnard et al. 10.5194/essd-13-4881-2021
- Flood-driven CO2 emissions from adjacent North Carolina estuaries during Hurricane Joaquin (2015) B. Van Dam et al. 10.1016/j.marchem.2018.10.001
- Disequilibrium of terrestrial ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> budget caused by disturbance-induced emissions and non-CO<sub>2</sub> carbon export flows: a global model assessment A. Ito 10.5194/esd-10-685-2019
- X-BASE: the first terrestrial carbon and water flux products from an extended data-driven scaling framework, FLUXCOM-X J. Nelson et al. 10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024
- Atmospheric CO2 Exchange of a Small Mountain Lake: Limitations of Eddy Covariance and Boundary Layer Modeling Methods in Complex Terrain K. Scholz et al. 10.1029/2021JG006286
- Increasing riverine export of dissolved organic carbon from China Y. Yan et al. 10.1111/gcb.16819
- Uncertainty in the global oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake induced by wind forcing: quantification and spatial analysis A. Roobaert et al. 10.5194/bg-15-1701-2018
- Modelling carbon sources and sinks in terrestrial vegetation S. Fatichi et al. 10.1111/nph.15451
- Using satellite imagery to estimate CO2 partial pressure and exchange with the atmosphere in the Songhua River C. Xiong et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131074
- Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes D. Bastviken et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8fa9
- Biomass estimation from simulated GEDI, ICESat-2 and NISAR across environmental gradients in Sonoma County, California L. Duncanson et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111779
- State of the science in reconciling top‐down and bottom‐up approaches for terrestrial CO2 budget M. Kondo et al. 10.1111/gcb.14917
- The consolidated European synthesis of CO2emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2020 M. McGrath et al. 10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023
- Carbon exchange in an Amazon forest: from hours to years M. Hayek et al. 10.5194/bg-15-4833-2018
- Application of System Dynamic Modelling for Evaluation of Carbon Mitigation Strategies in Cement Industries: A Comparative Overview of the Current State of the Art A. Kunche & B. Mielczarek 10.3390/en14051464
- How Simulations of the Land Carbon Sink Are Biased by Ignoring Fluvial Carbon Transfers: A Case Study for the Amazon Basin R. Lauerwald et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.009
- Sources of Uncertainty in Regional and Global Terrestrial CO2 Exchange Estimates A. Bastos et al. 10.1029/2019GB006393
- Global changes alter the amount and composition of land carbon deliveries to European rivers and seas H. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s43247-022-00575-7
- Global Carbon Budget 2023 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023
- Asymmetric impact of pandemics-related uncertainty on CO2 emissions: evidence from top-10 polluted countries L. Chang et al. 10.1007/s00477-022-02248-5
- Evaluation of the relationship between biomass of living (stained) benthic foraminifera and particulate organic matter vertical flux in an oligotrophic region, Campos Basin, southeastern Brazilian continental margin T. Vicente et al. 10.1016/j.seares.2021.102110
- Global Carbon Budget 2021 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
- Upscaled diurnal cycles of land–atmosphere fluxes: a new global half-hourly data product P. Bodesheim et al. 10.5194/essd-10-1327-2018
- Global Carbon Budget 2019 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
- Beyond carbon flux partitioning: Carbon allocation and nonstructural carbon dynamics inferred from continuous fluxes G. Miao et al. 10.1002/eap.2655
- A global surface CO2 flux dataset (2015–2022) inferred from OCO-2 retrievals using the GONGGA inversion system Z. Jin et al. 10.5194/essd-16-2857-2024
- СОВРЕМЕННОЕ СОКРАЩЕНИЕ СТОКА УГЛЕРОДА В?ЛЕСА РОССИИ, "Доклады Академии наук" Д. Замолодчиков et al. 10.7868/S0869565217300259
- Coverage of high biomass forests by the ESA BIOMASS mission under defense restrictions J. Carreiras et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.003
54 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Deep-sea living (stained) benthic foraminifera from the continental slope and São Paulo Plateau, Santos Basin (SW Atlantic): ecological insights B. Araújo et al. 10.1590/2675-2824071.22080bda
- Climate drivers of the terrestrial carbon cycle variability in Europe G. Messori et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1ac0
- Bridge to the future: Important lessons from 20 years of ecosystem observations made by the OzFlux network J. Beringer et al. 10.1111/gcb.16141
- Global Carbon Budget 2018 C. Le Quéré et al. 10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018
- Magnitude and drivers of integrated fluvial network greenhouse gas emissions across the boreal landscape in Québec R. Hutchins et al. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115556
- Definitions and methods to estimate regional land carbon fluxes for the second phase of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Project (RECCAP-2) P. Ciais et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-1289-2022
- Comparing national greenhouse gas budgets reported in UNFCCC inventories against atmospheric inversions Z. Deng et al. 10.5194/essd-14-1639-2022
- Global Carbon Budget 2020 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
- Investigating Terrestrial Carbon Uptake Over India Using Multimodel Simulations of Gross Primary Productivity and Satellite‐Based Biophysical Product G. Uchale et al. 10.1029/2023JG007468
- Influence of Stream‐Subsurface Exchange Flux and Bacterial Biofilms on Oxygen Consumption Under Nutrient‐Rich Conditions N. De Falco et al. 10.1029/2017JG004372
- A uniform <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> climatology combining open and coastal oceans P. Landschützer et al. 10.5194/essd-12-2537-2020
- Global Carbon Budget 2022 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
- Accelerated mobilization of organic carbon from retrogressive thaw slumps on the northern Taymyr Peninsula P. Bernhard et al. 10.5194/tc-16-2819-2022
- Memory effects of climate and vegetation affecting net ecosystem CO2 fluxes in global forests S. Besnard et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0211510
- Ensemble modelling of carbon fluxes in grasslands and croplands R. Sándor et al. 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107791
- How Does Health Uncertainty Impact Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Union Economies? A Blessing in Disguise S. Ali & M. Anser 10.1007/s41742-023-00530-0
- Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties A. Virkkala et al. 10.1111/gcb.15659
- BESSv2.0: A satellite-based and coupled-process model for quantifying long-term global land–atmosphere fluxes B. Li et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113696
- Quantifying the effect of forest age in annual net forest carbon balance S. Besnard et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aaeaeb
- Dynamic common correlated effects of pandemic uncertainty on environmental quality: fresh insights from East-Asia and Pacific countries Z. Liu et al. 10.1007/s11869-022-01164-5
- The key role of forest disturbance in reconciling estimates of the northern carbon sink M. O’Sullivan et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01827-4
- Parameter uncertainty dominates C-cycle forecast errors over most of Brazil for the 21st century T. Smallman et al. 10.5194/esd-12-1191-2021
- Inland Water Greenhouse Gas Budgets for RECCAP2: 1. State‐Of‐The‐Art of Global Scale Assessments R. Lauerwald et al. 10.1029/2022GB007657
- Global Carbon Budget 2017 C. Le Quéré et al. 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018
- Adjustments to SIF Aid the Interpretation of Drought Responses at the Caatinga of Northeast Brazil E. Bontempo et al. 10.3390/rs12193264
- Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe: synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach M. Jung et al. 10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020
- Assessing the Decadal Predictability of Land and Ocean Carbon Uptake R. Séférian et al. 10.1002/2017GL076092
- Global trends in land-atmosphere CO<SUB>2</SUB> exchange fluxes: an analysis of a flux measurement dataset and comparison with terrestrial model simulations A. ITO 10.2480/agrmet.D-21-00015
- Mapping global forest age from forest inventories, biomass and climate data S. Besnard et al. 10.5194/essd-13-4881-2021
- Flood-driven CO2 emissions from adjacent North Carolina estuaries during Hurricane Joaquin (2015) B. Van Dam et al. 10.1016/j.marchem.2018.10.001
- Disequilibrium of terrestrial ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> budget caused by disturbance-induced emissions and non-CO<sub>2</sub> carbon export flows: a global model assessment A. Ito 10.5194/esd-10-685-2019
- X-BASE: the first terrestrial carbon and water flux products from an extended data-driven scaling framework, FLUXCOM-X J. Nelson et al. 10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024
- Atmospheric CO2 Exchange of a Small Mountain Lake: Limitations of Eddy Covariance and Boundary Layer Modeling Methods in Complex Terrain K. Scholz et al. 10.1029/2021JG006286
- Increasing riverine export of dissolved organic carbon from China Y. Yan et al. 10.1111/gcb.16819
- Uncertainty in the global oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake induced by wind forcing: quantification and spatial analysis A. Roobaert et al. 10.5194/bg-15-1701-2018
- Modelling carbon sources and sinks in terrestrial vegetation S. Fatichi et al. 10.1111/nph.15451
- Using satellite imagery to estimate CO2 partial pressure and exchange with the atmosphere in the Songhua River C. Xiong et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131074
- Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes D. Bastviken et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8fa9
- Biomass estimation from simulated GEDI, ICESat-2 and NISAR across environmental gradients in Sonoma County, California L. Duncanson et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111779
- State of the science in reconciling top‐down and bottom‐up approaches for terrestrial CO2 budget M. Kondo et al. 10.1111/gcb.14917
- The consolidated European synthesis of CO2emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2020 M. McGrath et al. 10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023
- Carbon exchange in an Amazon forest: from hours to years M. Hayek et al. 10.5194/bg-15-4833-2018
- Application of System Dynamic Modelling for Evaluation of Carbon Mitigation Strategies in Cement Industries: A Comparative Overview of the Current State of the Art A. Kunche & B. Mielczarek 10.3390/en14051464
- How Simulations of the Land Carbon Sink Are Biased by Ignoring Fluvial Carbon Transfers: A Case Study for the Amazon Basin R. Lauerwald et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.009
- Sources of Uncertainty in Regional and Global Terrestrial CO2 Exchange Estimates A. Bastos et al. 10.1029/2019GB006393
- Global changes alter the amount and composition of land carbon deliveries to European rivers and seas H. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s43247-022-00575-7
- Global Carbon Budget 2023 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023
- Asymmetric impact of pandemics-related uncertainty on CO2 emissions: evidence from top-10 polluted countries L. Chang et al. 10.1007/s00477-022-02248-5
- Evaluation of the relationship between biomass of living (stained) benthic foraminifera and particulate organic matter vertical flux in an oligotrophic region, Campos Basin, southeastern Brazilian continental margin T. Vicente et al. 10.1016/j.seares.2021.102110
- Global Carbon Budget 2021 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
- Upscaled diurnal cycles of land–atmosphere fluxes: a new global half-hourly data product P. Bodesheim et al. 10.5194/essd-10-1327-2018
- Global Carbon Budget 2019 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
- Beyond carbon flux partitioning: Carbon allocation and nonstructural carbon dynamics inferred from continuous fluxes G. Miao et al. 10.1002/eap.2655
- A global surface CO2 flux dataset (2015–2022) inferred from OCO-2 retrievals using the GONGGA inversion system Z. Jin et al. 10.5194/essd-16-2857-2024
Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Short summary
Here we synthesize a wide range of global spatiotemporal observational data on carbon exchanges between the Earth surface and the atmosphere. A key challenge was to consistently combining observational products of terrestrial and aquatic surfaces. Our primary goal is to identify today’s key uncertainties and observational shortcomings that would need to be addressed in future measurement campaigns or expansions of in situ observatories.
Here we synthesize a wide range of global spatiotemporal observational data on carbon exchanges...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint