Contextualizing time-series data: quantification of short-term regional variability in the San Pedro Channel using high-resolution in situ glider data
- 1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- anow at: Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
- bnow at: Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
- cnow at: Universities Space Research Association (USRA), Columbia, Maryland, USA
- dnow at: Marine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
- enow at: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
Correspondence: Naomi M. Levine (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Oceanic time series have been instrumental in providing an understanding of biological, physical, and chemical dynamics in the oceans and how these processes change over time. However, the extrapolation of these results to larger oceanographic regions requires an understanding and characterization of local versus regional drivers of variability. Here we use high-frequency spatial and temporal glider data to quantify variability at the coastal San Pedro Ocean Time-series (SPOT) site in the San Pedro Channel (SPC) and provide insight into the underlying oceanographic dynamics for the site. The dataset could be described by a combination of four water column profile types that typified active upwelling, a surface bloom, warm-stratified low-nutrient conditions, and a subsurface chlorophyll maximum. On weekly timescales, the SPOT station was on average representative of 64 % of profiles taken within the SPC. In general, shifts in water column profile characteristics at SPOT were also observed across the entire channel. On average, waters across the SPC were most similar to offshore profiles, suggesting that SPOT time series data would be more impacted by regional changes in circulation than local coastal events. These results indicate that high-resolution in situ glider deployments can be used to quantify major modes of variability and provide context for interpreting time series data, allowing for broader application of these datasets and greater integration into modeling efforts.
Time series sites have been invaluable for providing new insights into the biological, chemical, physical, and ecological processes that occur in the world's oceans. These sites provide in situ measurements that are critical for model development, validation, and ongoing improvement (Fasham et al., 1990; Doney et al., 1996, 2009; Spitz et al., 2001; Boyd and Doney, 2002; Moore et al., 2002; Dugdale et al., 2002). To date, a small number of open-ocean time series sites (e.g., Hawaii Ocean Time-series and Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study) have been heavily utilized by the oceanographic community while coastal time series (e.g., San Pedro Ocean Time-series), which are more cost effective to run and so more numerous, have typically been underutilized. One primary reason for this discrepancy is that the representativeness of these coastal sites to larger regions has been unclear. Characterizing fine-scale temporal and spatial variability at an individual site relative to a larger region is the first step in being able to leverage data from local time series sites to gain an understanding of larger-scale oceanographic dynamics.
Since most ship-based time series are sampled at a single fixed location approximately once per month, the overall dataset is assumed to represent the mean state of a given geographical region as it varies with seasonal and annual cycles. To determine the accuracy of this assumption and to allow for the extrapolation of coastal time series data to a larger region, high-resolution spatial and temporal monitoring of the physical and biological variability around these time series sites is required. Because of the limitations with traditional in situ approaches, satellite imagery is frequently used to characterize spatial and temporal variability, assuming a tight coupling between surface and subsurface variability (e.g., DiGiacomo and Holt, 2001; Kahru et al., 2009; Nezlin et al., 2012). However, for many coastal regions satellite observations may be insufficient for assessing the biological and environmental variability due to decoupling between surface and subsurface dynamics, the importance of fine spatial scale (< 1 km) variability, the presence of terrestrially derived chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM), and cloud contamination.
High-frequency in situ sampling with gliders can provide uninterrupted monitoring of the surface 100 to 1000 m vertically over tens of kilometers horizontally. These datasets provide both an understanding of kilometer-scale spatial and sub-monthly temporal dynamics and insight into the covariance between surface and subsurface dynamics, thereby aiding in the interpretation of satellite data. Here, we use an 8-month Slocum electric glider dataset from the San Pedro Channel (SPC) to investigate the representativeness of the coastal San Pedro Ocean Time-series (SPOT) site for the region. We demonstrate that high-frequency sampling can be used to generate a framework for understanding and quantifying spatial and temporal variability in a region and to gain a better understanding of the representative nature of a given time series location.
The SPOT station, which is located at 33∘33′00 N and 118∘24′00 W, sits in the SPC between Catalina Island and the Palos Verdes Peninsula where the water depth is approximately 900 m (Fig. 1). The SPC lies within the larger Southern California Bight (SCB), which extends from Point Conception to Mexico (Noble et al., 2009b). The Channel Islands and submarine canyons oceanographically define the SCB. Within the SCB, the Southern California Eddy is a dominant, persistent feature that generates poleward-flowing surface currents that break off from the California Current (Oey, 1999; Noble et al., 2009b; Dong et al., 2009). The SCB is characterized by strong seasonal variation, including a spring upwelling season and subsequent phytoplankton blooms. Within the SPC, however, local upwelling and post-upwelling bloom formation are less persistent or predictable than observed farther north. Post-upwelling blooms occur on the timescales of days to a couple of weeks and can be quickly followed by periods of very low surface chlorophyll (Supplement Fig. S1). The SPOT station has been sampled monthly for environmental and biological parameters since 1998. Microbial communities at SPOT have been found to be annually and seasonally predictable with reoccurring phylogenetic assemblages (Fuhrman et al., 2006; Steele et al., 2011; Chow et al., 2013, 2014). Daily sampling at this site has shown that dominant microbial taxa vary on much shorter timescales, indicating that monthly sampling may only represent a persistent background community (Needham et al., 2013; Needham and Fuhrman, 2016). Previous work has postulated that SPOT and the SPC is in general representative of the larger SCB based on local circulation patterns (e.g., Cullen and Eppley, 1981; Collins et al., 2011; Chow et al., 2013). However, the ability of monthly sampling at the SPOT site to capture variability within the SPC has not been quantified. Here we present a framework for using high-resolution glider data to quantify the main modes of variability in the channel and determine whether coarse-resolution (e.g., monthly) sampling at a single point location is sufficient for understanding oceanographic dynamics within a larger region. We use the SPOT time series site as the point location and the SPC as the larger region. We highlight how this approach can be applied to other datasets to generate new insight into the primary modes of variability.
2.1 Glider deployments
The physical and biological characteristics of the SPC were characterized using a Teledyne Webb G1 Slocum electric glider that was deployed from March through July of 2013 and 2014. The deployment period was selected in order to maximize the likelihood that both coastal and offshore processes would be captured in the dataset (Hayward and Venrick, 1998; Di Lorenzo, 2003; Mantyla et al., 2008; Schnetzer et al., 2013). The glider was deployed on a 28 km cross-channel path between Catalina Island and the Palos Verdes Peninsula (Fig. 1) and completed a single cross-channel pass every 1.5–2 days (average speed 1 km h−1). Data were collected between ∼3 and 90 m, with the exception of when the glider crossed the major shipping lanes where the glider was constrained to depths below 20 m to avoid damage or loss from ship traffic. Chlorophyll a fluorescence was measured by a WET Labs EcoPuck FL3 fluorometer, backscatter at wavelengths of 532, 660, and 880 nm was measured by a WET Labs EcoPuck BB3 sensor, and temperature, salinity, and pressure were measured with a Sea-Bird flow-through CTD. Vertical resolutions for the WET Labs pucks were approximately 0.3 m, while the vertical resolution for the Sea-Bird CTD was approximately 0.6 m. The glider was recovered every 3–4 weeks for cleaning, battery replacement, and recalibration using standard methods published in Cetinic et al. (2009).
2.2 Ancillary satellite data
Level 3 mapped MODIS Aqua daily 9 km photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) measurements were acquired from the NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group (https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/MODIS-Aqua/Mapped/Daily/9km/par/; last access: 14 February 2015). MODIS Aqua daily 1 km chlorophyll (ChlSat) data were acquired from NOAA CoastWatch West Coast Regional Node (http://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/coastwatch/CWBrowser.jsp; last access: 12 March 2015). These data were then matched geographically and temporally with the in situ glider data.
2.3 Glider data
Glider data were processed, calibrated, and quality controlled following Cetinic et al. (2009) and Seegers et al. (2015). To correct for current induced drift, the glider data from each 2-day transect were gridded onto an idealized glider transect with 500 m horizontal resolution and 1m vertical resolution that was approximately perpendicular to the mean flow and the coastline (Fig. 1). Only glider data within 5 km of the idealized transect were used in this analysis (Fig. 1). Each 500 m bin (N=62) corresponded approximately with a single downcast and upcast. Only profiles with data for > 85 % of the vertical bins were used for further analyses, thereby excluding partial profiles from under the shipping lanes. The remaining missing data (< 15 % of each profile) were filled using 2-D interpolation from all neighboring bins. A total of 557 profiles from 2013 and 1049 profiles from 2014 were accepted for further analyses. Of the 1606 final glider profiles, 1151 matching PAR measurements and 571 matching ChlSat measurements were available.
For each profile, the mixed-layer depth (MLD) was calculated as the depth at which the density change exceeded the equivalent of a 0.4 ∘C temperature drop relative to the density at 5 m (modified from Sprintall and Tomczak, 1992). The mixed-layer temperature (MLTemp) was calculated as the mean temperature within the mixed layer. The light field between 1 and 80 m was calculated for each glider profile following the regionally validated method described in Jacox et al. (2015). This method uses surface PAR measurements and in situ chlorophyll a profiles to calculate the diffuse attenuation coefficient at each depth. The euphotic depth, defined as the 1 % light level, was then calculated for each glider profile from these light profiles (Kirk, 1994). The glider-based euphotic depths were in good agreement with those collected from in situ PAR measurements during the concurrent Upwelling Regime In-Situ Ecosystem Efficiency study (Up.R.I.S.E.E.) cruises at the SPOT site (Haskell et al., 2016). We also calculated the first optical depth (OD1) for each glider profile as the depth in meters at which available PAR was equal to 1∕e of surface PAR after Gordon (1975) and Kirk (1994).
The temperature, salinity, and chlorophyll a data from each of the 1606 glider profiles were used to calculate secondary metrics that were used for statistical analyses. Specifically, maximum chlorophyll fluorescence (MaxCHL), depth of maximum chlorophyll fluorescence (zMaxChl), 70 m integrated chlorophyll (ChlInt70), depth of maximum backscatter (zMaxBB), maximum backscatter (MaxBB), and ratio of integrated chlorophyll in the top 70 m relative to the integrated chlorophyll in the top 20 m (ChlInt70Per20) were calculated. A value of 20 m was used to approximate the average MLD. A value of 70 m was chosen as the maximum depth of chlorophyll integration as it included the full euphotic depth for 99 % of the glider profiles from 2013 and 2014. In addition, we estimated from the ship-based SPOT time series data (2003–2011) that on average PAR at 70 m was 2.6 % of the surface value, with a maximum of 4.5 %. Finally, the depth of the 12.5 ∘C isotherm (z12p5) was used as a proxy for the top of the nutricline, which indicated nutrient-rich sub-thermocline waters in the SPC and within the CalCOFI region (Hayward and Venrick, 1998; Lucas et al., 2011). This relationship was confirmed for the SPOT site using ship-based nitrate and temperature data.
Depth profiles of primary production (PP(z)) were estimated after Jacox et al. (2015) as
where Chl (z) is the chlorophyll concentration (mg Chl m−3) from the glider profiles, and dirr is day length (h day−1). pB(z) is a regionally tuned and light-dependent carbon fixation rate in mg C mg Chl−1 h−1 that was calculated from PAR profiles as per Jacox et al. (2015). Integrated primary production over the euphotic depth and the OD1 were calculated for each glider profile. Integrated primary production estimates for SPOT were within the bounds of regional estimates (Jacox et al., 2015).
2.4 Principal component analysis (PCA)
Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to differentiate among the major water column profile types observed within the glider dataset. All glider profiles from 2013 and 2014 were combined into a single PCA after normalization and standardization of the profile characteristics as described above. A stepwise PCA was conducted to determine the relative influence of each of the secondary characteristics on total observed variance within the dataset. Based on this analysis, two characteristics (zMaxBB and MaxBB) were omitted from further PCA analyses as they did not strongly affect overall dataset variance or the resulting PCA distribution. In order to generate a framework for analyzing water mass variation at the site, results from the original PCA were used to select a subset of profiles that described end-member water column profile types (details of this selection are described in Sect. 3.2). A second PCA was then conducted using the subset of glider profiles (N=54) and the same set of secondary characteristics (referred to as a structured PCA). The remaining glider profiles (N=1552) were projected onto the structured PCA axes using the R software function proj. Confidence intervals of 95 % were calculated for each clustering in PCA space using the iso-contour of the Gaussian distribution after http://www.visiondummy.com/2014/04/draw-error-ellipse-representing-covariance-matrix/ (last access: 4 December 2014) and the R software function ggbiplot. In brief, the magnitude of ellipse axes was determined by the variance within each cluster, defined as the eigenvalues from the covariance matrix. The direction of the major axis was calculated from the eigenvector of the covariance matrix that corresponded to the largest eigenvalue. The loadings of the secondary characteristics onto the PCA axes were also calculated and plotted.
2.5 Comparison with time series measurements
To interpret the SPOT data (monthly sampling) within the context of the variability identified in the high-resolution glider dataset, we incorporated 12 years of available ship-based measurements at the site into our analysis. Specifically, profile characteristics (described above) were calculated for 64 ship-based SPOT profiles from 2000 to 2011. A total of 30 of these profiles fell between March and July, the months during which the gliders were in the water. An additional 21 profiles were calculated from the Up.R.I.S.E.E. ship-based cruises that occurred every 2 weeks during 2013 and 2014 (Haskell et al., 2016), with 14 profiles occurring between March and July. Though there was good coherence among temperature measurements across all three datasets, the chlorophyll fluorescence measurements from the 2000–2011 SPOT site cruises were considerably lower than the fluorescence measurements from both the in situ gliders and the ship-based Up.R.I.S.E.E. cruises from 2013 to 2014. We assumed this to be inter-instrument variation in fluorescence-to-chlorophyll ratio rather than changes in in situ chlorophyll concentration itself. To allow for projection onto the glider-derived structured PCA axes, the chlorophyll fluorescence data from 2000–2011 SPOT cruises were scaled so that the March through July mean chlorophyll fluorescence value was equal to the March through July mean chlorophyll fluorescence value from the 2013 to 2014 Up.R.I.S.E.E. cruises. As all SPOT chlorophyll a data were scaled together, this correction will not impact the relative distances between samples in PCA space but was necessary to allow for comparison to the glider data. The profile characteristics (MLD, MLTemp, z12p5, zMaxChl, maxCHL, chlInt70, and chlInt70Per20) for the 85 ship-based profiles were used to project these samples onto the structured PCA axes. Corresponding PC1 and PC2 values for all ship-based SPOT site profiles were then compared with glider profiles to assess interannual profile variability at the SPOT site.
3.1 Cross-channel oceanographic trends
Cross-channel comparisons of MLTemp, MLD, depth of the 12.5 ∘C isotherm (z12p5), ChlInt70, and integrated primary production within the euphotic zone were used to identify persistent oceanographic gradients across the transect (Fig. 2). Observed physical properties in both spring 2013 and spring 2014 displayed an onshore–offshore gradient, for which the onshore direction was defined as towards the Palos Verdes Peninsula (PV) and offshore was defined as towards Catalina Island. This gradient could be seen most clearly in the z12p5 data, in which there was a strong offshore tilt in the mean depth of this isotherm (Fig. 2c). This tilt is consistent with equatorward flow through the channel, which frequently occurs during the spring (Hickey et al., 2003; Noble et al., 2002), but could also have been amplified closest to shore with periods of active upwelling. Without sampling the surface data within the shipping lanes, it was not possible to determine the full profile behavior of locations between the coastal and mid-channel bins. However, subsurface glider temperature data showed that weakened stratification during early upwelling events often extended across the entire SPC (Fig. S4). These observations suggest that there is coherence across the shipping lanes during upwelling events.
Though the average depth of the cold, high-nutrient waters was shallowest close to shore, the cross-channel data for ChlInt70 displayed only a weak cross-channel gradient (Fig. 2d). Rather, ChlInt70 had fairly constant cross-channel values of about 100 mg Chl m−2. It is important to note that integrated chlorophyll alone cannot be used to assess the productivity of a location because it does not account for the vertical chlorophyll distribution and its overlap with the vertical light field. In fact, depth-integrated primary production displayed a much stronger an onshore–offshore gradient in both mean and variance than was observed for ChlInt70. As expected, the highest primary productivity was observed closest to the mainland with decreasing values observed across the channel away from coastal upwelling sites (Fig. 2e).
To compare cross-channel differences in water column profile characteristics, three bins were selected: bin 10 (near Catalina, n=41 profiles), bin 28 (SPOT, n=54 profiles), and bin 58 (near the mainland, n=34 profiles). When the variance at each location was taken into account, the MLD and integrated primary production (PP) for bins 10 and 28 were not significantly different from one another (two-sample t test, p value < 0.01), while bins 10 and 28 were both significantly different from bin 58 (two-sample t test, p < 0.01). MLTemp and ChlInt70 were not significantly different across all three bins. The mean depth of the 12.5∘ isotherm (z12p5) was significantly different for all three bins (two-sample t test, p < 0.01). These cross-channel analyses highlight high intra-bin temporal variability over the course of the deployments, especially for ChlInt70 and MLD (Fig. 2). The importance of this temporal and spatial pattern of variability for the SPC is twofold: (1) a monthly time series sampling scheme at SPOT may under-sample both biological and physical variability in the channel; however (2) given the similarity in variance across the SPC, with sufficient sampling, SPOT data could be representative of the average state of the SPC.
3.2 Dominant water column profile types
To identify dominant water column profile types within the SPC, the glider profiles were analyzed using an iterative PCA. First, a standard PCA was conducted using all glider profiles to identify overarching patterns within the data. This original PCA was used to identify four end-member profile types that were then used to generate a second PCA (structured PCA). The structured PCA provided clear separation among the end-member profile types and provided a useful framework for analyzing seasonal and interannual variability within the dataset.
The original PCA (all profiles) showed that most profiles were clustered together, with a small subset of cold, high-chlorophyll (nominally surface bloom) profiles driving much of the separation on both the first principal component (PC1) and second principal component (PC2) (Fig. 3a). Analysis of the PCA suggested that there were significant environmental and ecological differences (e.g., temperature, stratification, chlorophyll content) among profiles within the large cluster. Specifically, two end-members within this cluster were apparent: a cool, deep MLD, low-chlorophyll water column profile type and a warm, shallow MLD, low-surface-chlorophyll water column profile type. Based on the PCA, we defined three end-member water column profile types: (1) cool, high chlorophyll (CHC); (2) cool, low-chlorophyll (CLC); and (3) warm, subsurface high chlorophyll (WSHC). In addition, we identified a fourth unique end-member water column profile type based on our examination of the glider dataset and our understanding of the oceanography of the SPC. This fourth type represented an oligotrophic end-member with a warm, shallow MLD and low chlorophyll throughout the water column and was termed the warm and low chlorophyll type (WLC).
These four water column profile types are consistent with our understanding of oceanographic states of the region. Specifically, there are two primary physical dynamics that impact water column signatures in the SPC (Hickey, 1979; Kim et al., 2014; Noble et al., 2009b; Dong et al., 2009): (1) coastal upwelling and (2) the Southern California Eddy. Periodic coastal upwelling in the spring brings cool high-nutrient waters to the surface and triggers large surface blooms that extend from the coast into the channel. The CLC and CHC end-members represent the beginning and end of this process. In the late spring and early summer, seasonal heating and the spin-up of the Southern California Eddy bring warm low-nutrient waters into the SPC. These waters have a distinct signature that we identify here as WLC waters. The mechanism generating the fourth end-member profile type – WSHC – is less clear. There are two leading hypotheses: (1) these are either coastal surface blooms and/or elevated nitrate concentrations from coastal upwelling that have been advected along subsurface isopycnals out into the channel (e.g., Mitarai et al., 2009; Bialonski et al., 2016; Stukel et al., 2018) or (2) that internal waves result in isopycnal heave of nutrients into the euphotic zone, creating enhanced chlorophyll concentrations (e.g., Noble et al., 2009a, b; Lucas et al., 2011).
All instances of these four end-member profile types were identified in the full data using MLTemp, ChlInt70Per20, ChlInt70, z12p5, maxCHL, zMaxChl, and MLD criteria (Supplement Table S1). For end-member types 1–3, we started with the profiles identified in the original PCA and refined the criteria in order to isolate the most “pure” examples of these water mass profile types. Using our criteria, we identified 54 end-member profiles: 10 for type 1 (CHC), 12 for type 2 (CLC), 15 for type 3 (WSHC), and 17 for type 4 (WLC). Average temperature and chlorophyll profiles for all four end-member types are shown in Fig. 4. CLC profiles were characterized by MLTemp's that were cooler than 12.5 ∘C, a shallow chlorophyll maxima, and integrated chlorophyll that did not exceed 85 mg Chl m−2. The combination of these characteristics indicated that the deep, cold, nutrient-rich water had been recently advected into the surface mixed layer. CHC profiles were characterized by MLTemp's between 13 and 17 ∘C, MLDs deeper than 10 m, and ChlInt70 values above 150 mg Chl m−2. These characteristics indicate that upwelling had begun to relax, the 12.5 ∘C isotherm had returned to a depth of greater than 20 m, and a strong surface bloom was present. To clearly differentiate surface blooms from subsurface chlorophyll maxima, the integrated chlorophyll within the surface 20 m was directly compared to that within the top 70 m. Here we define surface blooms as those with at least 50 % of the total integrated chlorophyll within the top 20 m. Both WLC and WSHC profiles were characterized by high MLTemp, shallow MLD, and deep z12p5. WLC profiles were relatively oligotrophic and had values of ChlInt70 less than 80 mg Chl m−2 while WSHC profiles had values of ChlInt70 up to 142 mg Chl m−2 but with less than 5 % of integrated chlorophyll in the top 20 m of the profile.
To more efficiently differentiate profile characteristics and to better represent the observed variability within the glider profile types, we conducted a second PCA, which used only the 54 end-member profiles to define the PCA axes (hereafter referred to as the structured PCA). The structured PCA resulted in clear separation of the four end-member profile types and allowed for better overall separation of the glider profiles (Fig. 3b). Specifically, the percent of explained variance for PC1 increased from 40.5 % to 49.8 %, and the percent of explained variance for PC2 increased from 21.5 % to 32.7 %. More importantly, the structured PCA allowed for more meaningful separation of the glider profiles into oceanographically relevant states, allowing us to better understand and quantify the overall variance within the glider profile data. Movement along PC1 primarily described changes in temperature-based characteristics while movement along PC2 primarily described changes in chlorophyll-based characteristics (Figs. 3b and 4, S2). Specifically, PC1 was most positive when MLTemp was greater than 19 ∘C and the seasonal thermocline was strongly defined. PC2 was most negative when the chlorophyll maximum was most clearly defined and ChlInt70 was greater than 120 mg Chl m−2. To determine the relative contribution of the four water column profile types to the observed glider profiles, the 1606 final glider profiles were projected onto these end-member axes (Fig. 3b). As PC1 and PC2 explained similar amounts of variance within this dataset, smaller “distances” between profiles in PC coordinate space approximate similarity in profile features. As the four end-member water column profile types were selected to represent the end-member profile characteristics, one would anticipate that a monthly time series would, for the most part, capture intermediate states rather than these end members. Identifying these end-members both helps characterize the overall biological and physical variation seen in water column profiles within the SPC and provides a means for quantifying the influence of coastal (CLC, CHC) versus offshore (WLC, WSHC) waters in the channel.
3.3 Variability at the SPOT station
The glider profiles were analyzed within the structured PCA space with specific focus on temporal and spatial changes, as well as how the profiles taken at the SPOT site related to and varied from profiles from the rest of the SPC cross section. When all glider profiles were projected onto the PCA axes, 39.6 % fell within one of the end-member profile type clusters, as determined by 95 % confidence intervals (Table 1). Similarly, 37 % of the 54 SPOT glider profiles were associated with an end-member subgroup. Of the four end-member profiles, the offshore types (WLC, WSHC) were most prevalent, with 24.8 % of all glider profiles falling within the WSHC cluster and 12.1 % aligning with the WLC cluster. SPOT profiles followed a very similar trend, with 25.9 % of profiles falling within the WSHC cluster and 9.3 % of profiles aligning with the WLC cluster. The two coastal end members (CLC, CHC) were rare in the overall dataset as well as in the SPOT profiles themselves, with less than 4 % of all profiles associated with these coastal end-members. These results indicate that, for the majority of locations and times sampled during the spring and early summer of 2013 and 2014, water column profiles within the SPC most closely resembled offshore profiles. These results most likely underrepresent the overall coastal influence within the SPC due to the exclusion of data from within the shipping lanes that influenced 30 % of the transect and were located close to the coast (Fig. 1). However, these findings are consistent with previous research conducted at SPOT that indicated a general prevalence of open-ocean bacterial groups (Chow et al., 2013) and a notable scarcity of land-derived organic matter (Collins et al., 2011). It is important to note that since the general circulation in the SPC is parallel to the shore and perpendicular to the glider transect, many signatures observed in the dataset may be upstream processes that were advected into the study domain. While our end-member framework allows us to quantify the occurrence of upstream coastal signatures within the dataset and variability in water mass characteristics, we cannot distinguish between local and remote sources of these water masses. For example, we cannot determine if CLC waters upwelled within the SPC or whether they were upwelled near the Santa Barbara Channel or Point Dume and advected into the SPC. To improve detection of upstream influence within the SPC in future deployments, the glider transect would need to be adapted to incorporate alongshore movement as well as cross-channel travel.
To further investigate how changes in the SPOT profile characteristics were related to co-occurring changes in profile types across the channel, we looked at the relationship between all non-SPOT profiles and the corresponding SPOT profile. For this analysis, the PCA coordinate plane was divided into four quadrants representing low biomass and coastal dynamics (positive PC2, negative PC1), low biomass and offshore dynamics (positive PC2, positive PC1), high biomass and offshore dynamics (negative PC2, positive PC1), and high biomass with coastal dynamics (negative PC2, negative PC1) (Fig. 5). These four quadrants were then used to investigate the cross-channel distribution relative to the most recent SPOT profile. The majority of profiles (64 %) fell into the same PCA quadrant as the most recent SPOT profile, suggesting that the majority of the channel displayed similar profile characteristics and that the SPOT site in general captured across-channel variability. Broken down by profile type, SPOT profiles were most similar to co-occurring cross-channel profiles when SPOT displayed WSHC profile characteristics (78 % of cross-channel profiles in the same quadrant as the SPOT profile, Fig. 5d). SPOT profile characteristics coincided with 55 % of other profiles when exhibiting characteristics of WLC, 48 % when displaying CHC characteristics, and 33 % of the channel in the one instance in which the SPOT profile displayed more coastal physical CLC properties (Fig. 5). The sample distributions in each of these four cases were statistically different from one another (two-tailed t test, p < 0.01), indicating that the profile characteristics at the SPOT site were indicative of the state of the SPC as a whole. For example, when SPOT profiles showed the most coastal signatures (negative PC1) (Fig. 5a, c), no channel profiles were found to be representative of either the WLC or WSHC profile types. Conversely, during periods when SPOT profiles were most similar to offshore types (positive PC1) (Fig. 5b, d), no channel profiles were found to be representative of CHC profile types.
Due to seasonal variations in local upwelling and the spin-up of the Southern California Eddy, temporal dynamics and succession play an important role in driving regional productivity. To track the seasonal progression of water mass profile types for SPOT relative to more nearshore bins, the time series of profile characteristics for SPOT (bin 28) and coastal bins (55–62) were analyzed in PCA space (Figs. 6, S3). In April, both the nearshore and SPOT bins showed significant coastal influence with profile types with CLC and CHC signatures. During late April to early May of each deployment, the nearshore and SPOT bins collectively experienced a relative “crossover”, when the profiles shifted from some coastal influence to offshore-dominated characteristics. In June, both the nearshore and SPOT bins showed offshore influence with profile types with WLC and WSHC signatures. These results suggest cross-channel covariance and that profile variability in both mid-channel and nearshore locations was likely forced by the same oceanographic dynamics.
3.4 Surface to subsurface coherence
Our analyses indicate that subsurface chlorophyll maximum characteristics were a dominant profile type within the SPC (occurring ∼25 % of the time), and that these subsurface chlorophyll maxima (WSHC) may appear similar to offshore water intrusion (WLC) from surface characteristics alone. In this study, the subsurface chlorophyll maximum was on average only 5 m deeper than the particle maximum, determined using the backscatter maximum. The subsurface particle maxima observed within this study were consistent with previous regional findings (Cullen and Eppley, 1981). The close proximity between the particle and chlorophyll maxima suggests that these subsurface phytoplankton communities may contribute significantly to local primary production (Cullen and Eppley, 1981). While satellite surface chlorophyll estimates have been previously shown to align closely with in situ glider observations of nearshore surface blooms in the SPC, subsurface chlorophyll layers farther offshore were undetected by satellite retrievals (Seegers et al., 2015). Here, we used our framework to identify which oceanographic states for the SPOT site may be most susceptible to satellite misinterpretation.
The OD1 was calculated from satellite PAR and glider chlorophyll-based diffuse attenuation coefficients for PAR (Kirk, 1994; Jacox et al., 2015). This method provides a conservative estimate of OD1 by ignoring light attenuation caused by dissolved organic matter. Average OD1 for these deployments was 12.3 m while the average euphotic depth, as defined by the 1 % light level, was 38.3 m. This is consistent with in situ measurements of the euphotic depth from temporally overlapping cruises at the SPOT site that observed an average euphotic depth of 40 m (Haskell et al., 2016). Our estimates for the OD1 and first euphotic depth are also within the range of regional data collected during the CCE LTER process cruises from 2006–2008 (Mitchell, 2014). To investigate the potential bias in quantifying chlorophyll only over OD1, we compare glider estimates of chlorophyll and primary production integrated over the entire euphotic depth to glider estimates integrated over the OD1. Using glider data analyzed over different depth intervals provides an internally consistent dataset and eliminates other confounding factors that might impact the analysis. MODIS Aqua chlorophyll a data were also acquired and compared with the in situ glider data. However, a low correlation between glider and satellite integrated chlorophyll over OD1 was observed, which could be due to temporal and spatial mismatches among datasets, inaccurate CDOM corrections, poor atmospheric correction, and high subsurface biomass (Fig. S5).
Overall 87 % of integrated chlorophyll within the euphotic zone was located beneath the OD1 during the 2013 and 2014 deployments. This percentage increased to 92 % for samples with a significant subsurface chlorophyll maxima (i.e., WSHC) and decreased to 82 % for surface blooms (i.e., CHC). For these deployments, zMaxChl was generally at or below the 10 % light level, deepening with more oligotrophic conditions. As a result of these differences in subsurface chlorophyll profiles, integrated primary production over OD1 varied from 1.8 % to 71.3 % of integrated primary production over the entire euphotic zone. By analyzing glider profiles based on water column characteristics, we were able to identify profile types that may be more susceptible to the inherent bias in satellite data of only quantifying chlorophyll over the OD1. Specifically, for samples with CLC signatures (high PC2 values and low overall biomass), a significant correlation was observed between OD1 and total integrated chlorophyll (r2=0.55, p < 0.01) and between OD1 and total integrated primary production (r2=0.77, p < 0.01). This relationship weakened as surface biomass increased with no correlation observed between OD1 and total integrated chlorophyll for profiles falling within the CHC 95 % confidence interval cluster (p=0.62). While OD1 integrated primary production was still significantly correlated with total integrated primary production for CHC profiles (r2=0.36, p< 0.01), the slope of this relationship changed significantly from that observed for CLC profiles from 2.5 to 0.6 (Fig. 7). Similarly, profiles with offshore characteristics (WLC, WSHC) showed a correlation between OD1 and total integrated primary production (r2=0.34 and r2=0.31 respectively, p < 0.01) but with slopes of 1.6 and 1.3.
These results quantitatively illustrate differences in the relationship between surface properties (remote-sensing observable) and water column integrated properties. Moreover, we demonstrate that the relationship between OD1 integrated and euphotic zone integrated primary production shows large variations with water column profile type and that the relationship between surface and water column integrated values is more predictable for certain profile types than others. Our analysis suggests that the satellite observable vs. integrated euphotic zone chlorophyll mismatch may be particularly problematic for some cool, high-chlorophyll water mass types (nominally coastal blooms). This suggests that increased in situ sampling may be needed when these water mass types are present in order to accurately constrain estimates of biomass distributions and primary production. Oligotrophic profiles (WLC, WSHC) also present a challenge, with OD1 integrated primary production only explaining approximately a third of the variability in total integrated primary production. However, the presence of a pronounced subsurface chlorophyll maximum did not substantially change the relationship between OD1 integrated and euphotic zone integrated PP compared to oligotrophic samples with similar OD1 integrated chlorophyll but without the subsurface maximum. This analysis suggests that remote-sensing-based estimates of PP for WSHC profiles would not be more biased than WLC profiles.
3.5 Context for time series measurements
The PCA framework for quantifying variability within the SPC described above can be leveraged to provide context for the SPOT time series site measurements, which are made at a single location with monthly resolution. Figure 3b shows the projection of ship-based SPOT data from 2000 to 2011 and data from a set of Upwelling Regime In-Situ Ecosystem Efficiency study (Up.R.I.S.E.E.) cruises that occurred during the time of the glider deployments (2013–2014) onto the structured PCA axes. Ship-based measurements from March to July show a similar distribution of profile types as seen in the glider profiles, with most profiles showing an offshore signature (WLC, WSHC) (Table 1, Fig. S6). There was not a substantial difference between the distribution of ship-based profiles in March–July and the distribution for the full ship-based datasets. This suggests that there is not a significant seasonal shift in variability at the SPOT site and that the variability observed in the glider dataset may be relevant for the entire time series dataset.
The impact of sampling frequency on the observed profile characteristics at SPOT was tested by subsampling the glider dataset to evaluate the difference in ∼4-day (full glider dataset, N=54 profiles), 8-day (two datasets, N=27 profiles), 12-day (three datasets N=18 profiles), 16-day (four datasets N=14 profiles), 20-day (five datasets N=11 profiles), and 24-day (five datasets N=9 profiles) sampling schemes. The number of subsampled datasets varied as a result of subsampling a dataset of fixed length with 4-day sampling – for example only two unique datasets could be generated with 8-day subsampling from the original dataset with 4-day sampling. Differences in the mean and standard deviation of the low- versus high-frequency sampled datasets in PCA space were used to evaluate the impact of sampling frequency on estimates of the mean state at the SPOT site. As expected, less-frequent sampling resulted in more variability in the average water column profile characteristics, with 8-day sampling showing the most similarity to the full dataset (4-day sampling) (Fig. 8). There was not a noticeable difference among 12-day, 16-day, 20-day, and 24-day sampling (Fig. 8a). Overall, the differences among the six different sub-month sampling schemes were small compared to the observed spread in the full glider dataset (Fig. 8b). This analysis indicates that monthly sampling at the SPOT site may be sufficient to capture the majority of the observed variability in the SPC due to the strong offshore influence at the site, even during the upwelling season. However, as highlighted above (Sect. 3.3), monthly sampling will most likely underestimate the impact of infrequent events such as strong surface blooms and upwelled waters at the site. Similarly, a chance sampling of a rare event (e.g., upwelling or coastal bloom) might skew the estimated monthly state for SPOT given that these events appear to be short-lived at the SPOT site.
The structured PCA framework also allowed us to analyze interannual variability in water column characteristics at the SPOT site. While substantial interannual variability in profile characteristics was observed, as represented by changes in PC1 and PC2, the variability in water column profiles captured by the high-resolution gliders during the upwelling period (March–July) of 2013–2014 was comparable to the interannual and seasonal variability observed in monthly sampling at SPOT over 12 years (Fig. 9). Deviations from the mean state (e.g., 2000) could indicate anomalous oceanographic conditions or chance sampling of rare stochastic events (e.g., capturing a spring bloom event). Further analysis of the SPOT data within this context could potentially tease apart these two signals.
4.1 Regional application of SPOT data
This study identified four water column major profile types within the SPC during March through July of 2013 and 2014: cool low chlorophyll, cool high chlorophyll, warm low chlorophyll, and warm subsurface high chlorophyll. These four major water column profile types represented end-member oceanographic states that occurred within the SPC during consecutive glider deployments as a result of two primary physical drivers: coastal upwelling and the Southern California Eddy. The statistical analysis of these profile types allowed for the identification of temporal and spatial trends in local variability within the SPC and the contextualization of the SPOT station within the SPC. Our results highlight both the similarity between the SPOT station and offshore profiles (WLC, WSHC) and the similarity in water mass characteristics across the channel. This suggests that data collected at SPOT during monthly time series sampling should be representative of the SPC. As such, long-term ecological or physical trends identified within the SPOT time series data may be assumed to be applicable for the SPC and could give relevant insight into offshore regions within the Southern California Eddy as well. While infrequent events such as coastal upwelling and surface blooms do occasionally extend across the channel, our findings suggest that monthly sampling at SPOT will under-sample these biogeochemical fluctuations even during the coastally dominated early spring, which experiences the most coastal influence.
During this study, glider deployments were timed to sample only during the most dynamic months for the SPOT station. This sampling scheme may have missed some seasonal variability caused by non-upwelling-driven events, such as submesoscale eddies. However, our results suggest that a year-long sampling scheme would likely find similar relationships, given that the sampling occurred during the season when coastal processes (local upwelling) were most likely to occur but still concluded that SPOT was most representative of offshore water types. This is also supported by the similarity between variability in the glider dataset and the 12-year SPOT time series dataset, which consists of monthly measurements taken throughout the year. Building on these findings, and understanding the rarity of coastal events extending across the SPC, higher-frequency time series sampling at SPOT during the spring season could be used to better monitor the effects of nearshore processes on the physical and biological oceanography of the SPC. However, even sub-monthly sampling at SPOT may underestimate productivity and export within the SCB, as most of the observed upwelling signature occurred inshore of SPOT.
The offshore state of SPOT during this study also suggests that time series data collected at SPOT would be sensitive to climate-derived changes to major current patterns and wind patterns, but they may be relatively insensitive to local terrestrial changes such as decreased freshwater discharge or increased sedimentation. Within the SPC, the spin-up of the Southern California Eddy is a major driver of oceanographic change. We hypothesize that the eddy is the primary driver of the profile shift during late April and early May of 2013 and 2014 observed at both SPOT and nearshore locations. Utilizing our framework to identify transitions from coastally dominated to offshore-dominated profile types, the timing of the spin-up could be monitored historically or prospectively within ship-based sampling at the SPOT site.
4.2 Determining regional domains for time series sites
The framework developed here for studying the applicable domain for SPOT samples and the sensitivity of SPOT samples to regional oceanographic dynamics could easily be applied to other time series sites. The glider deployments in this study were designed to sample a dynamic period within the SPC with high spatial and high temporal frequency. These high-frequency samples enabled identification and statistical analysis of cross-channel covariance and response to local oceanographic events. In the case of the SPC, these events were upwelling and the subsequent surface bloom and the spin-up of the Southern California Eddy. While these dominant water column profile types will vary with oceanographic region, the same methodology could be applied to any region to provide context for a time series site. For example, at an open-ocean site such as the Bermuda Atlantic Time-Series site these features could include winter mixing and cyclonic or anticyclonic eddies. We have shown that high-frequency data can be used to identify the major regional modes and water column profile types, which can then be used to determine long-term trends within the time series site itself. These profile signatures allow for a more quantitative description of time series observations and therefore a more accurate method for detecting deviations and long-term trends within the time series. In the example of the SPOT station, increased nearshore upwelling or delayed spin-up of the Southern California Eddy would each increase the overall coastal signature of vertical profiles collected at SPOT. Historical ship-based vertical profiles as well as future profiles could be analyzed with reference to coastal and offshore signals in order to determine changes in the dominant oceanographic drivers over time.
In situ high-frequency regional data collection can contextualize time series sites and identify the major modes of regional variation. This not only allows for the data to be more accurately extrapolated to provide larger-scale estimates of critical dynamics such as primary production or carbon export, but also identifies the most crucial regional signals that would need to be correctly simulated to produce accurate regional modeling. In the case of the San Pedro Ocean Time-series (SPOT) station, this study identified four major regional water column profile types and suggests that time series samples collected monthly would in general be most representative of offshore profiles. Glider profile data from the SPC also indicate that integrated primary productivity of surface bloom profiles may be underestimated by satellite chlorophyll measurements, suggesting that accurate observation of regional dynamics within the SPC may require in situ sampling with increased resolution when these profile types are present. Finally, our analysis indicates that SPOT is primarily reflective of the offshore stratified environment and only rarely influenced by near-coastal processes such as upwelling. This suggests that long-term changes in the SPOT time series dataset are more likely to reflect larger-scale regional responses (e.g., climatic shifts) than local events (e.g., increased discharge into the Port of Los Angeles).
Without context for time series data, physical or temporal under-sampling at time series stations may mask local drivers of variability, making it difficult to accurately scale up local results to inform larger-scale analyses and modeling efforts. The methods described in this study can be applied to other coastal and oceanic time series sites in order to identify the major modes of local variability, the region represented by the time series data, and the sensitivity of the site to anthropogenic change. Better understanding of the spatial domain represented by global marine time series sites will aid in the extrapolation of local findings, in the improvement of regional modeling, and in the coupling of regional and global modeling efforts.
The dataset is available on the BCO-DMO repository under the following project http://bco-dmo.org/project/675313.
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6151-2018-supplement.
ET and NL designed the study, conducted the analyses, and wrote the paper. BJ, ET, MR, WH, XL, and BS designed the field campaign and collected the glider data. WH also contributed the UpRISEE data. All co-authors contributed to the paper.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This work was funded by NOAA ECOHAB, NSF-ChemOce (1260296 to Maria Prokopenko
and 1260692 to Dough Hammond), NSF-OCE 1323319, the University of Southern
California, a USC Provost Fellowship, the NSF graduate research fellowship
program, the Wrigley Institute for Environmental Sciences, and the King
Abdullah University of Science and Technology. We would like to acknowledge
the help of Carl Oberg, Nick Rollins, Alyssa Gellene, Ivona Cetinic, Arvind Pereira, Ray Arntz, Kyaa Heller, Dario Diehl, Troy Gunderson, Diane Kim, the Fuhrman lab, the
Sukhatme lab, the Caron lab, the Southern California Coastal Water Research
Project, the crew of the RV Yellowfin, and many others at USC who helped with
SPOT data collection and with glider deployment, recovery, and maintenance.
We would also like to acknowledge the constructive feedback of the two
Edited by: Tina Treude
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees
BCO-DMO: Project: Collaborative Research: Use of Triple Oxygen Isotopes and O2/Ar to constrain Net/Gross Oxygen Production during upwelling and non-upwelling periods in a Coastal Setting, available at: http://bco-dmo.org/project/675313, 2018.
Bialonski, S., Caron, D. A., Schloen, J., Feudel, U., Kantz, H., and Moorthi, S. D.: Contribution to the Themed Section: Scaling from individual lankton to marine ecosystems Phytoplankton dynamics in the Southern California Bight indicate a complex mixture of transport and biology, J. Plankton Res., 38, 1077–1091, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbv122, 2016.
Boyd, P. W. and Doney, S. C.: Modelling regional responses by marine pelagic ecosystems to global climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 53-1–53-4, 2002.
Cetinic, I., Toro-Farmer, G., Ragan, M., Oberg, C., and Jones, B. H.: Calibration procedure for Slocum glider deployed optical instruments, Optics Express, 17, 15420–15430, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.17.015420, 2009.
Chow, C. E. T., Sachdeva, R., Cram, J. A., Steele, J. A., Needham, D. M., Patel, A., Parada, A. E., and Fuhrman, J. A.: Temporal variability and coherence of euphotic zone bacterial communities over a decade in the Southern California Bight, ISME J., 7, 2259–2273, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.122, 2013.
Chow, C. E. T., Kim, D. Y., Sachdeva, R., Caron, D. A., and Fuhrman, J. A.: Top-down controls on bacterial community structure: microbial network analysis of bacteria, T4-like viruses and protists, ISME J., 8, 816–829, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.199, 2014.
Collins, L. E., Berelson, W., Hammond, D. E., Knapp, A., Schwartz, R., and Capone, D.: Particle fluxes in San Pedro Basin, California: A four-year record of sedimentation and physical forcing, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 58, 898–914, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2011.06.008, 2011.
Cullen, J. J. and Eppley, R. W.: Chlorophyll maximum layers of the Southern-California Bight and possible mechanisms of their formation and maintenance, Oceanol. Acta, 4, 23–32, 1981.
DiGiacomo, P. M. and Holt, B.: Satellite observations of small coastal ocean eddies in the Southern California Bight, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 106, 22521–22543, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc000728, 2001.
Di Lorenzo, E.: Seasonal dynamics of the surface circulation in the Southern California Current System, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 50, 2371–2388, 2003.
Doney, S. C., Glover, D. M., and Najjar, R. G.: A new coupled, one-dimensional biological-physical model for the upper ocean: Applications to the JGOFS Bermuda Atlantic time-series study (BATS) site, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 43, 591–624, https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(95)00104-2, 1996.
Doney, S. C., Lima, I., Moore, J. K., Lindsay, K., Behrenfeld, M. J., Westberry, T. K., Mahowald, N., Glover, D. M., and Takahashi, T.: Skill metrics for confronting global upper ocean ecosystem-biogeochemistry models against field and remote sensing data, J. Mar. Syst., 76, 95–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.05.015, 2009.
Dong, C. M., Idica, E. Y., and McWilliams, J. C.: Circulation and multiple-scale variability in the Southern California Bight, Prog. Oceanogr., 82, 168–190, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.005, 2009.
Dugdale, R. C., Barber, R. T., Chai, F., Peng, T. H., and Wilkerson, F. P.: One-dimensional ecosystem model of the equatorial Pacific upwelling system. Part II: sensitivity analysis and comparison with JGOFS EqPac data, Deep-Sea Res. Pt II, 49, 2747–2768, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0645(02)00056-5, 2002.
Fasham, M. J. R., Ducklow, H. W., and McKelvie, S. M.: A nitrogen-based model of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer, J. Mar. Res., 48, 591–639, 1990.
Fuhrman, J. A., Hewson, I., Schwalbach, M. S., Steele, J. A., Brown, M. V., and Naeem, S.: Annually reoccurring bacterial communities are predictable from ocean conditions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 13104–13109, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602399103, 2006.
Gordon, H. R. and McCluney, W. R.: Estimation of the Depth of Sunlight Penetration in the Sea for Remote Sensing, Appl. Optics, 14, 413–416, https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.14.000413, 1975.
Haskell, W. Z., Prokopenko, M. G., Hammond, D. E., Stanley, R. H. R., Berelson, W. M., Baronas, J. J., Fleming, J. C., and Aluwihare, L.: An organic carbon budget for coastal Southern California determined by estimates of vertical nutrient flux, net community production and export, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 116, 49–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.07.003, 2016.
Hayward, T. L. and Venrick, E. L.: Nearsurface pattern in the California Current: coupling between physical and biological structure, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 45, 1617–1638, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0645(98)80010-6, 1998.
Hickey, B. M.: The California Current system – hypotheses and facts, Prog. Oceanogr., 8, 191–279, 1979.
Hickey, B. M., Dobbins, E. L., and Allen, S. E.: Local and remote forcing of currents and temperature in the central Southern California Bight, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 108, 26-1–26-26, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000313, 2003.
Jacox, M. G., Edwards, C. A., Kahru, M., Rudnick, D. L., and Kudela, R. M.: The potential for improving remote primary productivity estimates through subsurface chlorophyll and irradiance measurement, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 112, 107–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.12.008, 2015.
Kahru, M., Kudela, R., Manzano-Sarabia, M., and Mitchell, B. G.: Trends in primary production in the California Current detected with satellite data, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 114, C02004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jc004979, 2009.
Kim, D. Y., Countway, P. D., Jones, A. C., Schnetzer, A., Yamashita, W., Tung, C., and Caron, D. A.: Monthly to interannual variability of microbial eukaryote assemblages at four depths in the eastern North Pacific, ISME J., 8, 515–530, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.173, 2014.
Kirk, J. T.: Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems, Cambridge university press, 3rd Edn., p. 24, 1994.
Lucas, A. J., Dupont, C. L., Tai, V., Largier, J. L., Palenik, B., and Franks, P. J. S.: The green ribbon: Multiscale physical control of phytoplankton productivity and community structure over a narrow continental shelf, Limnol. Oceanogr., 56, 611–626, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.2.0611, 2011.
Mantyla, A. W., Bograd, S. J., and Venrick, E. L.: Patterns and controls of chlorophyll-a and primary productivity cycles in the Southern California Bight, J. Marine Syst., 73, 48–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.08.001, 2008.
Mitarai, S., Siegel, D. A., Watson, J. R., Dong, C., and McWilliams, J. C.: Quantifying connectivity in the coastal ocean with application to the Southern California Bight, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 114, C10026, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jc005166, 2009.
Mitchell, B. G.: Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) at depths from 0 to 100 meters, expressed as percentage of surface PAR, measured aboard CCE LTER process cruises in the California current, 2006, 2007 and 2008., Environmental Data Initiative, 2014.
Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., Kleypas, J. A., Glover, D. M., and Fung, I. Y.: An intermediate complexity marine ecosystem model for the global domain, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49, 403–462, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0645(01)00108-4, 2002.
Needham, D. M. and Fuhrman, J. A.: Pronounced daily succession of phytoplankton, archaea and bacteria following a spring bloom, Nat. Microbiol., 1, 16005, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.5, 2016.
Needham, D. M., Chow, C. E. T., Cram, J. A., Sachdeva, R., Parada, A., and Fuhrman, J. A.: Short-term observations of marine bacterial and viral communities: patterns, connections and resilience, ISME J., 7, 1274–1285, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.19, 2013.
Nezlin, N. P., Sutula, M. A., Stumpf, R. P., and Sengupta, A.: Phytoplankton blooms detected by SeaWiFS along the central and southern California coast, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 117, 1–14, 2012.
Noble, M., Jones, B., Hamilton, P., Xu, J. P., Robertson, G., Rosenfeld, L., and Largier, J.: Cross-shelf transport into nearshore waters due to shoaling internal tides in San Pedro Bay, CA, Cont. Shelf Res., 29, 1768–1785, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2009.04.008, 2009a.
Noble, M. A., Rosenberger, K. J., Hamilton, P., and Xu, J. P.: Coastal ocean transport patterns in the central Southern California Bight, Earth Science in the Urban Ocean: the Southern California Continental Borderland, 454, 193–226, https://doi.org/10.1130/2009.2454(3.3), 2009b.
Noble, M. A., Ryan, H. F., and Wiberg, P. L.: The dynamics of subtidal poleward flows over a narrow continental shelf, Palos Verdes, CA, Cont. Shelf Res., 22, 923–944, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-4343(01)00112-1, 2002.
Oey, L. Y.: A forcing mechanism for the poleward flow off the southern California coast, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 104, 13529–13539, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jc900066, 1999.
Schnetzer, A., Jones, B. H., Schaffner, R. A., Cetinic, I., Fitzpatrick, E., Miller, P. E., Seubert, E. L., and Caron, D. A.: Coastal upwelling linked to toxic Pseudo-nitzschia australis blooms in Los Angeles coastal waters, J. Plankton Res., 35, 1080–1092, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt051, 2013.
Seegers, B. N., Birch, J. M., Marin, R., Scholin, C. A., Caron, D. A., Seubert, E. L., Howard, M. D. A., Robertson, G. L., and Jones, B. H.: Subsurface seeding of surface harmful algal blooms observed through the integration of autonomous gliders, moored environmental sample processors, and satellite remote sensing in southern California, Limnol. Oceanogr., 60, 754–764, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10082, 2015.
Spitz, Y. H., Moisan, J. R., and Abbott, M. R.: Configuring an ecosystem model using data from the Bermuda Atlantic Time Series (BATS), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 1733–1768, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0645(00)00159-4, 2001.
Sprintall, J. and Tomczak, M.: Evidence of the barrier layer in the surface-layer of the tropics, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 97, 7305–7316, https://doi.org/10.1029/92jc00407, 1992.
Steele, J. A., Countway, P. D., Xia, L., Vigil, P. D., Beman, J. M., Kim, D. Y., Chow, C.-E. T., Sachdeva, R., Jones, A. C., and Schwalbach, M. S.: Marine bacterial, archaeal and protistan association networks reveal ecological linkages, ISME J., 5, 1414–1425, 2011.
Stukel, M. R., Song, H., Goericke, R., and Miller, A. J.: The role of subduction and gravitational sinking in particle export, carbon sequestration, and the remineralization length scale in the California Current Ecosystem, Limnol. Oceanogr., 63, 363–383, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10636, 2018.