Articles | Volume 16, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1111-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1111-2019
Research article
 | 
19 Mar 2019
Research article |  | 19 Mar 2019

Source partitioning of H2O and CO2 fluxes based on high-frequency eddy covariance data: a comparison between study sites

Anne Klosterhalfen, Alexander Graf, Nicolas Brüggemann, Clemens Drüe, Odilia Esser, María P. González-Dugo, Günther Heinemann, Cor M. J. Jacobs, Matthias Mauder, Arnold F. Moene, Patrizia Ney, Thomas Pütz, Corinna Rebmann, Mario Ramos Rodríguez, Todd M. Scanlon, Marius Schmidt, Rainer Steinbrecher, Christoph K. Thomas, Veronika Valler, Matthias J. Zeeman, and Harry Vereecken

Viewed

Total article views: 3,535 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,170 1,296 69 3,535 366 66 83
  • HTML: 2,170
  • PDF: 1,296
  • XML: 69
  • Total: 3,535
  • Supplement: 366
  • BibTeX: 66
  • EndNote: 83
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Nov 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,535 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,267 with geography defined and 268 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
To obtain magnitudes of flux components of H2O and CO2 (e.g., transpiration, soil respiration), we applied source partitioning approaches after Scanlon and Kustas (2010) and after Thomas et al. (2008) to high-frequency eddy covariance measurements of 12 study sites covering various ecosystems (croplands, grasslands, and forests) in different climatic regions. We analyzed the interrelations among turbulence, site characteristics, and the performance of both partitioning methods.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint