33 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Substrate spatial heterogeneity reduces soil microbial activity A. Shi et al. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108068
2. P3D-BRNS v1.0.0: a three-dimensional, multiphase, multicomponent, pore-scale reactive transport modelling package for simulating biogeochemical processes in subsurface environments A. Golparvar et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-881-2024
3. A holistic perspective on soil architecture is needed as a key to soil functions H. Vogel et al. 10.1111/ejss.13152
4. Soil pore network effects on the fate of nitrous oxide as influenced by soil compaction, depth and water potential M. Pulido-Moncada et al. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109536
5. A gap in nitrous oxide emission reporting complicates long-term climate mitigation S. Del Grosso et al. 10.1073/pnas.2200354119
6. Soil texture is a stronger driver of the maize rhizosphere microbiome and extracellular enzyme activities than soil depth or the presence of root hairs B. Yim et al. 10.1007/s11104-022-05618-8
7. Biophysical Controls on Soil Carbon Cycling in a Northern Hardwood Forest P. Hodgson et al. 10.1007/s10021-023-00890-w
8. Using field-measured soil N2O fluxes and laboratory scale parameterization of N2O/(N2O+N2) ratios to quantify field-scale soil N2 emissions R. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107904
9. N2 and N2O mitigation potential of replacing maize with the perennial biomass crop Silphium perfoliatum—An incubation study B. Kemmann et al. 10.1111/gcbb.12879
10. Carbon Availability and Nitrogen Mineralization Control Denitrification Rates and Product Stoichiometry during Initial Maize Litter Decomposition P. Rummel et al. 10.3390/app11115309
11. Distribution of Mn Oxidation States in Grassland Soils and Their Relationships with Soil Pores A. Kravchenko et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c05403
12. Opportunities and limits in imaging microorganisms and their activities in soil microhabitats C. Védère et al. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108807
13. Spatial substrate heterogeneity limits microbial growth as revealed by the joint experimental quantification and modeling of carbon and heat fluxes M. Endress et al. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109509
14. Drivers of Hot Spots and Hot Moments of Denitrification in Agricultural Systems J. Weitzman et al. 10.1029/2020JG006234
15. Effect of legume intercropping on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and CH<sub>4</sub> uptake during maize production in the Great Rift Valley, Ethiopia S. Raji & P. Dörsch 10.5194/bg-17-345-2020
16. Methodological progress in the measurement of agricultural greenhouse gases N. Mumu et al. 10.1080/17583004.2024.2366527
17. Moderate effects of distance to air-filled macropores on denitrification potentials in soils H. van Dijk et al. 10.1007/s00374-024-01864-3
18. Denitrification in soil as a function of oxygen availability at the microscale L. Rohe et al. 10.5194/bg-18-1185-2021
19. Land use impact on carbon mineralization in well aerated soils is mainly explained by variations of particulate organic matter rather than of soil structure S. Schlüter et al. 10.5194/soil-8-253-2022
20. Very fine roots differ among switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars and differentially affect soil pores and carbon processes J. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109610
21. Consider the Anoxic Microsite: Acknowledging and Appreciating Spatiotemporal Redox Heterogeneity in Soils and Sediments E. Lacroix et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00032
22. Contribution of decomposing plant roots to N2O emissions by water absorption K. Kim et al. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114506
23. Microplastic fibers affect dynamics and intensity of CO2 and N2O fluxes from soil differently M. Rillig et al. 10.1186/s43591-021-00004-0
24. Pore distances of particulate organic matter predict N2O emissions from intact soil at moist conditions P. Ortega-Ramírez et al. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116224
25. Pore‐scale modeling of microbial activity: What we have and what we need A. Golparvar et al. 10.1002/vzj2.20087
26. Comprehensive multi-gas study by means of fiber-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for the investigation of nitrogen cycle processes A. Blohm et al. 10.1039/D4AN00023D
27. Isotopic signals in an agricultural watershed suggest denitrification is locally intensive in riparian areas but extensive in upland soils W. Sigler et al. 10.1007/s10533-022-00898-9
28. Changes in soil pore structure generated by the root systems of maize, sorghum and switchgrass affect in situ N2O emissions and bacterial denitrification M. Lucas et al. 10.1007/s00374-023-01761-1
29. Approaches and concepts of modelling denitrification: increased process understanding using observational data can reduce uncertainties S. Del Grosso et al. 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.07.003
30. The anaerobic soil volume as a controlling factor of denitrification: a review S. Schlüter et al. 10.1007/s00374-024-01819-8
31. Contingent Effects of Liming on N2O-Emissions Driven by Autotrophic Nitrification S. Nadeem et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2020.598513
32. Building bottom‐up aggregate‐based models (ABMs) in soil systems with a view of aggregates as biogeochemical reactors B. Wang et al. 10.1111/gcb.14684
33. Increases in nitrogen use efficiency decrease nitrous oxide emissions but can penalize yield in sugarcane J. Chalco Vera et al. 10.1007/s10705-021-10180-3