Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 16, issue 23
Articles | Volume 16, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4661-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4661-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 23
Ideas and perspectives
 | 
09 Dec 2019
Ideas and perspectives |  | 09 Dec 2019

Ideas and perspectives: Proposed best practices for collaboration at cross-disciplinary observatories

Jason Philip Kaye, Susan L. Brantley, Jennifer Zan Williams, and the SSHCZO team

Viewed

Total article views: 6,209 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,514 2,627 68 6,209 91 115
  • HTML: 3,514
  • PDF: 2,627
  • XML: 68
  • Total: 6,209
  • BibTeX: 91
  • EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jul 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jul 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,209 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,899 with geography defined and 310 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 05 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Interdisciplinary teams can only capitalize on innovative ideas if members work well together through collegial and efficient use of field sites, instrumentation, samples, data, and model code. Thus, biogeoscience teams may benefit from developing a set of best practices for collaboration. We present one such example from a the Susquehanna Shale Hills critical zone observatory. Many of the themes from our example are universal, and they offer insights useful to other biogeoscience teams.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint