Lake mixing regime selects apparent methane oxidation kinetics of the methanotroph assemblage
- 1Department of Surface Waters – Research and Management, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland
- 2Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland
- These authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence: Magdalena J. Mayr (firstname.lastname@example.org)
In lakes, large amounts of methane are produced in anoxic sediments. Methane-oxidizing bacteria effectively convert this potent greenhouse gas into biomass and carbon dioxide. These bacteria are present throughout the water column, where methane concentrations can range from nanomolar to millimolar. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that methanotroph assemblages in a seasonally stratified freshwater lake are adapted to the contrasting methane concentrations in the epi- and hypolimnion. We further hypothesized that lake overturn would change the apparent methane oxidation kinetics as more methane becomes available in the epilimnion. In addition to the change in the methane oxidation kinetics, we investigated changes in the transcription of genes encoding methane monooxygenase, the enzyme responsible for the first step of methane oxidation, with metatranscriptomics. Using laboratory incubations of the natural microbial communities, we show that the half-saturation constant (Km) for methane – the methane concentration at which half the maximum methane oxidation rate is reached – was 20 times higher in the hypolimnion than in the epilimnion during stable stratification. During lake overturn, however, the kinetic constants in the epi- and hypolimnion converged along with a change in the transcriptionally active methanotroph assemblage. Conventional particulate methane monooxygenase appeared to be responsible for methane oxidation under different methane concentrations. Our results suggest that methane availability is one important factor for creating niches for methanotroph assemblages with well-adapted methane oxidation kinetics. This rapid selection and succession of adapted lacustrine methanotroph assemblages allowed the previously reported high removal efficiency of methane transported to the epilimnion to be maintained – even under rapidly changing conditions during lake overturn. Consequently, only a small fraction of methane stored in the anoxic hypolimnion is emitted to the atmosphere.
Lakes are an important source of greenhouse gases; methane is a major contributor to the climate impact of the greenhouse gas emissions from lakes (DelSontro et al., 2018). The oxidation of the strong greenhouse gas methane in freshwater lakes is mainly achieved by methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB), which have the unique ability to use methane as their sole carbon and energy source (Hanson and Hanson, 1996). In seasonally stratified lakes, large amounts of methane, which is produced as a final product of anaerobic organic matter degradation, can accumulate in the oxygen-depleted hypolimnion (Conrad, 2009; Steinsberger et al., 2017). Under stratified conditions, aerobic and sometimes anaerobic MOB oxidize this methane in the water column, thereby preventing diffusive outgassing (Bastviken et al., 2002; Graf et al., 2018; Mayr et al., 2020a). Lake overturn in autumn leads to mixing of the oxygen-rich surface layer with the methane-rich bottom water (Schubert et al., 2012). The simultaneous availability of oxygen and methane promotes the growth of MOB in the expanding epilimnion at the surface (Kankaala et al., 2007; Mayr et al., 2020b; Schubert et al., 2012; Zimmermann et al., 2019). The resulting increase in the methane oxidation capacity has been shown to be associated with a shift in the MOB assemblage in the epilimnion, which grows fast enough to prevent 90 % of the methane transported into the epilimnion from escaping to the atmosphere (Mayr et al., 2020b; Zimmermann et al., 2019).
In temperate, seasonally stratified lakes, the diverse MOB assemblage shows a clear vertical structure and succession during autumn overturn (Kojima et al., 2009; Mayr et al., 2020b). This suggests that mechanisms of spatial and temporal niche partitioning maintain diversity within this functional group (Mayr et al., 2020a). The differences in the methane and oxygen availability in the two water bodies above and below the oxycline likely place very different demands on the ecophysiology of the resident MOB assemblages. Although previous studies have shown great diversity and adaptability of methane oxidation kinetics (Baani and Liesack, 2008; Dunfield and Conrad, 2000; Lofton et al., 2014; Tveit et al., 2019), the role of different kinetic parameters in rapidly changing lake environments has not been studied systematically to date. Here, we hypothesized that apparent kinetic parameters of methane oxidation vary between the epi- and hypolimnion and that kinetic parameters vary seasonally along with the MOB assemblage, which would show that methane availability is a driver of apparent methane oxidation kinetics of the MOB assemblage. Further, the methane affinity of lacustrine MOB especially in the epilimnion has implications for the amount of methane outgassing during both stable stratification and lake overturn.
The first step of methane oxidation is mediated by the methane monooxygenase. Most MOB possess the copper-dependent particulate form of the methane monooxygenase (pMMO). Known isozymes of pMMO have been shown to exhibit different methane oxidation kinetics, including high-affinity variants that are even able to oxidize methane at atmospheric concentrations (Baani and Liesack, 2008; Dam et al., 2012). A subset of MOB encode the soluble MMO (sMMO) that has a lower methane affinity than pMMO and has been hypothesized to be used by MOB under high methane concentration conditions; this is due to the fact that MOB biomass is assumed to be higher under such conditions, leading to copper limitation and a switch to copper-free sMMO (Semrau et al., 2018). The abundance of the sMMO gene has been found to be low in Lake Rotsee (Guggenheim et al., 2019), but relative transcription between the epi- and hypolimnion has not been investigated so far.
In this study we conducted a combined kinetic and metatranscriptomic analysis in a small pre-alpine lake to test our hypothesis that MOB assemblages show distinct apparent methane oxidation kinetics in the methane-rich hypolimnion compared with the epilimnion, which has lower methane concentrations. Further, we examined the changes in apparent methane oxidation kinetics over time during lake overturn, as more methane becomes available in the epilimnion. To do so, we used laboratory incubations of the resident microbial community to measure methane oxidation rates and methane affinity combined with MOB cell counts. In parallel, we applied metatranscriptomics to characterize the MOB assemblage as well as genes and transcripts involved in the methane oxidation pathway, aiming to link observed changes in apparent methane oxidation kinetics to changes in the MOB population activity. Knowledge about the variability of kinetic parameters of methane oxidation is important to better understand the ecology and physiology of MOB in the environment. Further, our results will inform trait-based or process-based modeling approaches, because a single set of time and space invariant kinetic parameters may not reflect natural conditions adequately.
2.1 Study site and physicochemical lake profiling
Lake Rotsee is a small eutrophic lake in central Switzerland that is 2.5 km long, 200 m wide and has a maximum depth of 16 m. For more details, see Schubert et al. (2012). We profiled and sampled the water column during four campaigns in autumn 2017 at the deepest point of Lake Rotsee (47.072∘ N, 8.319∘ E). We measured profiles of temperature and pressure (depth) with a CTD (conductivity–temperature–depth) instrument (RBRmaestro, RBR, Canada). An oxygen microsensor (NTH-PSt1, PreSens, Germany) attached to the CTD measured profiles of oxygen concentrations.
2.2 3H–CH4 tracer technique
We used the radio 3H–CH4 tracer technique as described in Bussmann et al. (2015) and Steinle et al. (2015) to measure apparent methane oxidation rates and kinetics of the MOB assemblage above and below the oxycline. Similar measurements have been carried out by Lofton et al. (2014), who derived apparent methane oxidation kinetics from methane oxidation rates using 14C–CH4. We used the 3H–CH4 tracer technique because it is more sensitive than the 14C–CH4 technique and, therefore, allows shorter incubation times and rate determination at low CH4 concentrations. We added 200 µL of gaseous 3H–CH4∕N2 mixture (∼80 kBq, American Radiolabeled Chemicals, USA). The specific activity of 3H–CH4 is 0.74 TBq mmol−1; therefore, the 200 µL of gaseous 3H–CH4∕N2 mixture contained 108 pmol 3H–CH4. In comparison, the 500 µL gas bubble with the lowest concentration of unlabeled methane (see Sect. 2.3) contained 17 nmol CH4. We measured total and water fraction radioactivity in a liquid scintillation counter (Tri-Carb 1600CA, Packard, USA) by adding 1 mL of sample to 5 mL of Insta-Gel (PerkinElmer, Germany). From these activities, we calculated the methane oxidation rate (rMOX):
where t is time, [CH4] is the concentration of methane and activities (A) were corrected for fractional turnover in killed controls.
2.3 Apparent methane oxidation kinetics of microbial communities
We assumed that the dependence of the methane oxidation rate (rMOX) of the microbial community on the methane concentration can be described by a Monod kinetics:
where Vmax is the maximum methane oxidation rate, and Km is the half-saturation constant for methane. We use the term “affinity” as the inverse of the half-saturation constant: 1∕Km. We determined the two kinetic parameters in laboratory incubations of water samples from above and below the oxycline. We collected water from the two depths in 2 L Schott bottles and transported them to the lab dark and cooled. We stripped dissolved methane by bubbling air for 1 h. This also removed H2S from the sample which would otherwise reduce the sensitivity of the 3H–CH4 technique. For each depth, we prepared 60 mL incubations with 10 different methane concentrations and a killed control. We prepared incubations and controls in triplicates except for the first field campaign where we only prepared duplicates. By adding a 500 µL gas bubble from pre-diluted gas stocks we established methane concentrations of 0.4 to 60 µM. Gas stocks were prepared by evacuating and flushing 120 mL crimp-sealed serum vials with pure nitrogen gas five times and adding defined volumes of methane gas with gastight syringes. The killed controls were treated in the exact same way as the samples with the exception that we inhibited methane oxidation by adding 1 mL of ZnCl2 (50 % w∕v). To start the incubations, we added the 3H–CH4 tracer as described in the above section. After vigorous shaking for 1 min, we kept the incubations dark in a shaker operated at 100 rpm. We incubated both samples from above and below the oxycline at the temperature measured within the oxycline. Thus, while the determined kinetic parameters may differ from in situ values, this approach allows for a direct comparison of the two datasets. After 4 h, we stopped the incubations by adding 1 mL of ZnCl2 (50 % w∕v). We determined the methane oxidation rate in each incubation as described above. Except for the first sampling date, we measured each incubation replicate twice. This resulted in 594 measurements: 72 single measurements and 261 measurement duplicates. We averaged measurement replicates, resulting in 333 data points.
We used a non-linear least squares Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm to fit the Monod equation to the data. Outliers in the data were removed using the following criteria: for the replicates of each methane concentration we removed data points (1) with a water fraction radioactivity that was more than 2σ from the average water fraction radioactivity of all replicates, (2) which showed a water fraction radioactivity that was not more than 2σ from the background water fraction radioactivity, (3) for which we had less than two replicates after the removal of outliers, (4) with a resulting methane oxidation rate more than 2σ from the average methane oxidation rate of all replicates and (5) showing a methane oxidation rate that was higher than the methane oxidation rate measured for the replicates with the highest methane concentration. The 2σ approach is one recommended approach for outlier detection (e.g., Leys et al., 2013). Because we only had incubation duplicates for the first sampling date, it was not possible to detect outliers based on 2σ for this campaign and we included both values in the analysis. The average water fraction radioactivity of the killed controls was used as background radioactivity in the outlier detection procedure. In total, 221 data points were finally considered in the analysis (66 % of all data points without measurement replicates). For the five individual outlier criteria, the percentages of detected outliers are as follows: (1) 4 %, (2) 4 %, (3) 3 %, (4) 19 % and (5) 3 %. The high percentage of outliers for criteria 4 is related to the fact that methane oxidation rates are associated with a higher error than individual measurements because they are computed from multiple individual measurements.
The base value of the specific affinity a∘ is defined as the ratio . We approximated the mean and variance of the ratio of the two random variables with the known mean and variance using the Taylor expansions given in Stuart and Ord (2009).
2.4 Methane oxidation rates of the microbial community
We determined the methane oxidation rate of the natural microbial community in duplicate laboratory incubations of water samples from above and below the oxycline. We anaerobically filled water into 60 mL serum vials and crimp-sealed and transported them to the lab dark and cooled. For each depth, we prepared killed controls with 1 mL of ZnCl2 (50 % w∕v) in duplicates in the same way. We started the incubations by adding the 3H–CH4 tracer as described above. After vigorous shaking for 1 min, we kept the incubations dark in a shaker operated at 100 rpm at the temperature measured within the oxycline. After 4 h, we stopped the incubations by adding 1 mL of ZnCl2 (50 % w∕v).
2.5 Methane concentration measurement
We measured in situ methane concentrations in the water column using the headspace equilibration method. For each depth, we collected water samples in 120 mL crimp-sealed serum vials with a small amount of CuCl2 to stop biological activity. We measured methane concentrations in the headspace with a gas chromatograph (Agilent 6890N, USA) equipped with a Carboxen 1010 column (Supelco 10 m × 0.53 mm, USA) and flame ionization detector. Samples that exceeded the calibration range were diluted with N2 and measured again. We calculated dissolved methane concentrations according to Wiesenburg and Guinasso (1979).
2.6 Quantification of methanotroph cells
We investigated the abundance of aerobic methanotrophs by catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization following Pernthaler et al. (2002). We fixed water samples of 5 mL with 300 µL of sterile filtered (0.2 µm) formaldehyde (2.22 % v∕v final concentration) for 3–6 h on ice. We filtered the samples onto 0.2 µm Nuclepore track-etched polycarbonate membrane filters (Whatman, UK), which we dried and stored at −20 ∘C until further analysis. We permeabilized cells with lysozyme (10 mg mL−1) at 37 ∘C for 70 min, and we inactivated endogenous peroxidases with 10 mM HCl for 10 min at room temperature. To hybridize the filters, we used a hybridization buffer (Eller et al., 2001) containing HRP-labeled probes at 46 ∘C for 2.5 h. Furthermore, the buffer contained either a 1 : 1 : 1 mix of Mg84, Mg705 and Mg669 probes targeting methanotrophic Gammaproteobacteria or a Ma450 probe targeting methanotrophic Alphaproteobacteria (Eller et al., 2001). To amplify the fluorescent signals, we used the green-fluorescent Oregon Green 488 tyramide (OG) fluorochrome (1 µL mL−1) at 37 ∘C for 30 min. We counterstained hybridized cells with DAPI (20 µL of 1 µg mL−1 per filter) for 5 min. For microscopy, we used a 4 : 1 mix of Citifluor AF1 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) and VECTASHIELD (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA) as mountant. We used an inverted light microscope (Leica DMI6000 B, Germany) at a 1000-fold magnification to quantify MOB cell numbers. For each sample, we took 22 image pairs (DAPI and OG filters) of randomly selected fields of view (FOVs). To detect and count cells we used Daime 2.0 (Daims, 2009) digital microbial image analysis software.
2.7 Metagenome and metatranscriptome analysis
We collected lake water with a Niskin bottle and filtered 800–2300 mL on-site onto 0.2 µm pore size GTTP Isopore filters (Merck Millipore Ltd.). To keep the filtration time as short as possible (typically <10 min) and concurrently retrieve enough RNA for sequencing, a 142 mm diameter filter was used. To minimize sample perturbation the filtration device was connected directly to the Niskin bottle. The filters were preserved immediately on dry ice and stored at −80 ∘C until extraction. We did not apply prefiltration, because filamentous methanotrophs can reach lengths of >100 µm (Oswald et al., 2017). We extracted DNA and RNA with the Allprep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) and treated RNA with the rigorous option using the Turbo DNA-free kit (Invitrogen) to remove the remaining DNA. To increase the confidence in the measurement, a second filter of the January hypolimnion sample was extracted and sequenced separately. This replicate is shown as Jan (r). RNA yields from the October sampling were deemed insufficient for sequencing as no typical RNA bands were visible during quality control; therefore, these samples were omitted from metatranscriptome analysis. Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic 150 bp paired-end sequencing was carried out on a NovaSeq 6000 sequencer (Illumina) at Novogene (HK) company limited (Hong Kong SAR, China). Ribosomal RNA was depleted with a Ribo-Zero Magnetic Kit (Illumina) prior to sequencing. The co-assembly of metagenomic sequences alone yielded less pmoA as well as pmoB and pmoC sequences than expected, likely due to low coverage. Therefore, we combined predicted genes from both the metagenomic and the metatranscriptomic de novo assembly as described below. Due to low coverage of pmoA, pmoB and pmoC in the metagenome, we used the metagenome only in the assembly process. All further analyses relied on the metatranscriptome.
We removed the remaining ribosomal sequences from metatranscriptomic reads with sortMeRNA v2.1 (Kopylova et al., 2012) and performed quality filtering with Trimmomatic v0.35 (Bolger et al., 2014), resulting in 26.6 million–34 million high-quality reads. We co-assembled reads from seven metatranscriptomic libraries using MEGAHIT v1.1.3 (Li et al., 2015) with a final k-mer size of 141 and a minimum contig length of 200. This resulted in 2 166 829 contigs with an average of 672 bp and an N50 of 733 bp. For quality filtering of metagenomic reads we used PRINSEQ-lite v0.20.4 (Schmieder and Edwards, 2011) with dust filter (30) and a quality mean of 20, resulting in 31.1 million–37.1 million high-quality reads. Again, we performed a co-assembly using MEGAHIT of 10 metagenomes (including three October samples without corresponding metatranscriptome) with a final k-mer size of 121 and a minimum contig size of 300 bp (4 237 394 contigs, average 1008 bp and an N50 of 1250 bp). We measured one additional depth in October between the epi- and hypolimnion, which is included in the data repository but is not discussed here. We did not pursue the intermediate sample in later campaigns because we focused our effort on the epilimnion and hypolimnion (continuing with measurement triplicates). We did, however, use the metagenomics data from this sample for the assembly. Gene prediction for both co-assemblies was done with Prodigal v2.6.3 (setting: meta; Hyatt et al., 2010). After combining the predicted genes, CD-HIT-EST v4.6.6 (Li and Godzik, 2006) was used to remove very similar and duplicate (identity 0.99) predicted genes. Predicted genes shorter than 400 bp were removed with SeqKit v0.7.2 (Shen et al., 2016). Predicted genes encoding pMMO were annotated with Prokka v1.3 (Seemann, 2014) using the incorporated databases (metagenome option) and DIAMOND BLASTx v0.9.22 (e-value 10−6, Buchfink et al., 2014) against custom databases for pmoA, pmoB and pmoC. These custom databases included pxmABC, pmoCAB2 and pmoCAB from both alpha- and gammaproteobacterial genomes, which were extracted manually. The databases are provided in the Supplement (files S1–S3). Annotation was manually validated using alignments and the NCBI refseq_protein database (22 April 2019, O'Leary et al., 2016). pmoA, pmoB and pmoC variants summing to a cross-sample sum higher than 50 transcripts per million (TPM) were retained. Genes annotated as pmoA, pmoB and pmoC variants which were either not the expected gene (manual inspection) or shorter than 400 bp were removed. Genes encoding part of the soluble methane monooxygenase sMMO (mmoX, mmoY and mmoZ) were annotated with Prokka v1.3 using incorporated databases and the metagenome option. Paired-end metatranscriptomic reads were mapped to the predicted genes using BBMap v35.85 (Bushnell, 2014) at an identity of 0.99 without mapping of ambiguous reads and then converted with samtools v1.9 (Li et al., 2009) and counted with featureCounts (Liao et al., 2014) of the Subread v1.6.4 package (-p option). The count table was normalized within samples to transcripts per million (TPM, Wagner et al., 2012) by first dividing the counts by gene length; the result by gene was then divided by the sum of all results times one million. The TPM values (File S4) were used to produce the figures in R. The correspondence analysis (CA) was performed with the vegan (v2.5.6, Oksanen et al., 2019) R package (v3.5.2, R Core Team, 2018) based on the combined and square-root-transformed TPM values of pmoCAB data (scaling of 2).
All sequences were classified to the family level based on the NCBI refseq_protein database using BLASTx (O'Leary et al., 2016). Further classification was based on a pmoA phylogenetic tree (shown in the Supplement). pmoA amino acid sequences were derived with MEGA7 and aligned with Muscle (Kumar et al., 2016). A neighbor-joining tree was inferred using 10 000 bootstrap replications with the Poisson correction method based on 131 positions. Known cultivated or uncultivated groups were assigned at bootstrap values >0.7 and a protein similarity >94 %, corresponding to genus-level resolution according to Knief (2015). The pmoB and pmoC sequences were assigned to these groups if they originated from the same contig. For many sequences a more detailed taxonomic assignment than family was not possible; therefore, they were labeled “unclassified_type_Ia” and “unclassified_type_II”, respectively.
3.1 Environmental conditions during the autumn overturn
Lakes located in climatic zones with strong seasonal variability show seasonal vertical stratification of their water masses that is fundamental for all physical, chemical and biological processes occurring within them (Boehrer and Schultze, 2008). During the warm season, the increasing temperature at the lake surface establishes two physically and chemically different water masses in the lake: the epilimnion and the hypolimnion. The epilimnion at the surface is warmer, well-mixed and has a continuous supply of oxygen from the atmosphere and photosynthesis. In contrast, the colder and denser hypolimnion is physically separated from the epilimnion and generally shows diffusive gradients of dissolved substances. During the cold season, surface cooling leads to vertical mixing which gradually deepens the well-mixed surface layer and mixes hypolimnetic water into the surface layer. During this autumnal overturn period, both the temperature and chemistry of the surface water change and potentially create new ecological niches. In the following we label the water masses above and below the thermocline as the “epilimnion” and “hypolimnion”, respectively. Even though the hypolimnion exhibits considerable internal chemical gradients, previous work has shown that the MOB assemblage is fairly homogeneous throughout the hypolimnion (Mayr et al., 2020b). In January, the lake was completely mixed. To be consistent with the previous sampling campaigns, we still took two samples from different depths and refer to them as epilimnion and hypolimnion for convenience.
From October 2017 to January 2018 the epilimnion depth in Lake Rotsee gradually increased from 5.5 to 13.7 m (Fig. 1a–d). This process of vertical mixing continuously transferred methane that was stored below the thermocline into the epilimnion above. The gradual progression of the autumn overturn stimulates the growth of a distinct MOB assemblage in the epilimnion above the thermocline in response to an influx of methane from the hypolimnion as shown in previous work on Lake Rotsee (Mayr et al., 2020b; Zimmermann et al., 2019). Despite this continuous supply, measured methane concentrations above the thermocline remained below 1 µM (Fig. 1a–d, orange arrows). The low methane concentrations are an indication of intense methane oxidation by the growing MOB assemblage in the epilimnion. The oxygen concentration shifted from a 15 % oversaturation in October to a 67 % undersaturation in December (Fig. 1a–d). Aerobic methane oxidation likely contributed to the oxygen depletion in the epilimnion, which we substantiate with the following calculation: the stoichiometry of microbial methane oxidation is
where y is the carbon use efficiency, and designates MOB biomass. Based on theoretical considerations and experimental data, a carbon use efficiency of 0.4 has been reported (Leak and Dalton, 1986). This means that per mole of methane 1.6 mol of oxygen is used. The mixed layer depths for the four sampling campaigns are roughly 6, 10, 12 and 14 m, corresponding to respective mixed layer volumes of 2.5, 3.7, 4.1 and 4.3 GL in Lake Rotsee. Multiplying the measured methane oxidation rates in the epilimnion by these volumes results in a total methane oxidation of 600, 11 560, 11 800 and 200 mol d−1, respectively. Integrated over the time period of the four campaigns, this results in a total of 0.66 Mmol of methane that was oxidized with 1.1 Mmol of oxygen from the epilimnion. Considering an average volume of the mixed layer of 3.7 GL with an initial concentration of 340 µM (10.9 mg L−1) of oxygen, this would reduce the oxygen concentration by 180 to 160 µM or to about 5 mg L−1. Note that possible oxygen production and exchange with the atmosphere as well as additional oxygen sinks are not included in these considerations. In the hypolimnion oxygen concentrations were below the detection limit (20 nM; Kirf et al., 2014) from October to December. However, oxygen may be produced in the hypolimnion by phytoplankton (Brand et al., 2016; Oswald et al., 2015).
The two water bodies above and below the thermocline have distinct biogeochemical conditions posing very different demands on the ecophysiology of the MOB assemblage. The hypolimnion contained up to several hundred micromoles of methane per liter of water, but the flux of oxygen into the hypolimnion was limited due to stratification and low light levels for photosynthesis. In contrast, the epilimnion contained comparably high oxygen concentrations, but methane concentrations remained low as methane was supplied slowly and was rapidly diluted in the large volume of the epilimnion. In addition, the temperature of the epilimnion dropped from 16 to 5 ∘C, whereas the hypolimnion remained cold (5–8 ∘C). A previous study investigating 16S rRNA genes and pmoA transcripts indeed revealed niche differentiation of the MOB assemblage above and below the oxycline of Lake Rotsee with a shift in the MOB assemblage during the overturn (Mayr et al., 2020b).
3.2 Succession of kinetically different microbial communities
Along with the differences in the physical and chemical properties of the two water bodies, we observed a significant difference in the apparent methane oxidation kinetics of the MOB assemblages. From the methane oxidation rates shown in Fig. 1e–h, we derived the parameters of Monod kinetics (Fig. 2). In an attempt to measure methane kinetics under as standardized conditions as possible, we measured samples from both depths under equal temperature and oxygen conditions. This allowed us to compare the physiological traits of the MOB assemblages above and below the oxycline and to relate these results to the biogeochemical conditions. However, the parameters do not necessarily represent the effective in situ kinetics.
The curves describing the apparent methane oxidation kinetics of the MOB assemblages above and below the oxycline did not intersect (except at the origin) in October and November (Fig. 1e–g). This means that the MOB assemblage in the epilimnion showed both a higher affinity for methane (Fig. 2a) and a higher cell-specific maximum methane oxidation rate (Fig. 2b) than the assemblage below the oxycline. The fact that both the affinity and maximum rate are higher would intrinsically suggests that the assemblage in the epilimnion has a competitive advantage over the assemblage in the hypolimnion. This implies that there were likely additional mechanisms or traits, like adaptation to oxygen concentration or temperature (Hernandez et al., 2015; Trotsenko and Khmelenina, 2005), that prevented the epilimnetic MOB assemblage from invading the assemblage in the hypolimnion. We already have strong indications from our previous work that these factors are indeed important (Mayr et al., 2020a, b).
The methane affinity of the assemblage in the epilimnion was higher than the methane affinity of the assemblage in the hypolimnion, which is in line with the methane-deficient conditions in the epilimnion. Previously, starvation of methane has been shown to decrease the half-saturation constant (Km) in Methylocystis (Dunfield and Conrad, 2000); however, in contrast to this previous study, we did not observe a constant specific affinity between the epi- and hypolimnion, suggesting that adaptation rather than a starvation response was responsible for the observed low Km in the epilimnion. The pronounced difference in Km of the two assemblages in October, when the lake was still stratified, gradually converged during lake overturn from November to January (Fig. 2a). From October to January, the half-saturation constant for methane decreased from 15 to 2.7 µM for the hypolimnetic assemblage, but it increased from 0.7 to 1.2 µM in the epilimnion, with higher Km values in November and December (Fig. 2a). A table summarizing the measured apparent methane oxidation kinetics can be found in Table S1 in the Supplement. The Km values in the hypolimnion from October to December (15.2±7.1, 7.1±2.3, 6.1±1.7 µM) were comparable to the Km values of hypolimnion samples (1 m above sediment) in two shallow arctic lakes by Lofton et al. (2014). These authors measured values of 4.45±2.36 and 10.61±2.03 µM. Also in the same range, Km values of 5.5 and 44 µM were measured in the last meter above the sediment in a boreal lake (Liikanen et al., 2002), and similar values were found for lake sediments (Kuivila et al., 1988; Remsen et al., 1989). In contrast, the epilimnion Km in Lake Rotsee in October was 0.7±0.5 µM, which is far lower than Km values measured in previous studies on lacustrine systems, suggesting a well-adapted MOB assemblage with relatively high affinity in the epilimnion. Even higher affinities (0.056–0.186 µM) have been measured in soils (Dunfield et al., 1999), and a high-affinity Methylocystis strain has been found to have a Km of 0.11 µM (Baani and Liesack, 2008). Even when the lake overturn was ongoing in November and December, Km values in the epilimnion remained in the lower range of previously reported Km values (2.1±0.9, 3.3±0.9 µM), which underlines the adaptation of the MOB assemblage to the continuously lower methane concentrations in the epilimnion.
Thus, we concluded that MOB assemblages displayed a specific adaptation to the prevailing methane concentrations based on the fact that we observed a higher affinity (low Km) in the low-methane epilimnion compared with the methane-rich hypolimnion as long as stratification is present. That the Km values of the assemblage in the epilimnion do not match the in situ methane concentrations is not unexpected: in the mixed layer and under the assumption of a steady state, the flux of methane from the hypolimnion is balanced by the methane oxidation rate. Under these conditions, the in situ methane concentration depends on the half-saturation constant (Km) but should be lower than it (calculation in the Supplement). Per definition, the half-saturation constant is the substrate concentration where the growth rate is half the maximum growth rate. Even if the growth rate is only half the maximum growth rate, microbial methane oxidation continues, and methane concentrations decrease to values below the Km.
In contrast to the substrate affinity, the maximum cell-specific methane oxidation rate Vmax started at similar levels in the stratified lake (Fig. 2b). As methane entered the epilimnion in November, the cell-specific Vmax of the MOB assemblage in this layer was almost 15 times faster than the hypolimnion assemblage, which ensured a fast methane oxidation rate in the epilimnion during this critical phase. This critical phase has a large potential for methane outgassing to the atmosphere and, thus, is relevant with respect to the climate. As a consequence of the high methane oxidation rate, methane concentrations and emissions remain low (Zimmermann et al., 2019). Towards the end of the lake overturn, when the thermocline had moved to a depth of 15 m and the two MOB assemblages were most likely homogenized, methane oxidation rates decreased again. By contrast, the cell-specific methane oxidation rate in the hypolimnion remained rather constant throughout the overturn from November to December.
The specific affinity () is the initial slope of the hyperbolic Monod kinetics (Button et al., 2004) and is a pseudo-first-order rate constant for the methane oxidation rate at limiting methane concentrations. The specific methane affinity of the two communities again started out very differently and gradually converged to very similar kinetic properties (Fig. 2c). The convergence of the specific affinity in the epilimnion and in the hypolimnion was driven by changes of both the Km and Vmax of the respective MOB assemblages. The final convergence of the specific affinity of both assemblages is in good agreement with the fact that the two water masses become increasingly similar in terms of substrate availability and temperature towards the end of the lake overturn. Therefore, the emerging kinetic properties might be the result of a converging succession of the two MOB assemblages. The specific affinity measured for various methanotrophic bacteria are typically in the range of to L h−1 cell−1 (Dunfield and Conrad, 2000; Knief and Dunfield, 2005; Tveit et al., 2019) with a few examples where specific affinities of up to L h−1 cell−1 have been reported (Calhoun and King, 1997; Kolb et al., 2005). Thus, the specific affinities of – L h−1 cell−1 for the MOB assemblage in the hypolimnion were well within the range of these reported values. However, the MOB assemblage in the epilimnion showed much higher specific affinities, suggesting that these assemblages were well adapted to the very methane-limited conditions in the epilimnion.
Methanotroph cell counts suggest that both the MOB assemblage above and below the oxycline were actively growing over the course of the overturn (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). In the epilimnion the abundance of MOB increased from 0.1×105 to 2×105 cells mL−1 from October to December, below the oxycline the abundance increased from 0.8×105 to 1.2×105 cells mL−1. The methane oxidation rates of the MOB assemblage in the epilimnion were all below 50 % of Vmax from October to December. For the MOB assemblage in the hypolimnion, the methane oxidation rates were all above 67 % of Vmax. Even though we do not have enough data points to recognize specific trends, the clear differences in the percentage range suggests that the growth of the MOB assemblage in the epilimnion was generally methane limited during lake overturn, despite their higher methane affinity.
3.3 Dynamics of the MOB assemblage and variants of pMMO
Methane oxidation during lake overturn was performed by diverse assemblages of MOB that changed considerably over time, as determined by metatranscriptomic analysis (Fig. 3a–c). Thus, the reported apparent kinetics reflect composite properties of the respective assemblage. In line with previous lake studies (Biderre-Petit et al., 2011; Mayr et al., 2020a; Sundh et al., 2005), the majority of pmoCAB variants were associated with type Ia MOB (Fig. 3a, green, Gammaproteobacteria). Most of these could not be classified at lower taxonomic levels, but they group close to reference sequences from various different genera, e.g., Crenothrix, Methylobacter, Methylovulum and Aquatic_cluster_5 group (Fig. S2). However, one sequence variant could be classified as Lake_cluster_I which was abundant especially in “Nov” and “Dec” (Fig. 3a, b). In addition, one variant associated with Methyloparacoccus (type Ib, Gammaproteobacteria) and up to two variants affiliated with type II MOB (Alphaproteobacteria) were found (Fig. 3a) – the latter showed a low abundance and decreasing trend over time. Evidence for the presence or expression of previously described high-affinity pMMO (Baani and Liesack, 2008) was not found in the metagenomic or metatranscriptomic dataset. We detected sMMO genes (mmoXYZ), but transcription was very low (maximum of 6 TPM per sample, Table S2) compared with pMMO. This raises the question under which conditions MOB express sMMO. On the transcript and peptide level, the expression of this enzyme is often very low or undetectable under environmental conditions (Cheema et al., 2015; Dumont et al., 2013; Taubert et al., 2019). Our results suggest that conventional pMMO was the main enzyme responsible for methane oxidation under different methane concentrations and environmental conditions in the lake water column.
In November, and to a lesser degree in December, the composition of transcribed pmoCAB gene variants differed between the epi- and hypolimnion, with some variants (e.g., pmoA_8 and 10, pmoB_7 and 9, pmoC_9, 16, 22) being confined to the hypolimnion (Fig. 3a, b). In November and December the relative transcript abundance of pmoCAB was higher in the epilimnion, but the activity in the hypolimnion increased over time and was similar in both depths in January (Figs. 3c, S3c,d). The difference in gene transcription reflects changes in the transcriptionally active MOB assemblage, which may explain the observed differences in the apparent methane affinity (Fig. 3a). Notably, however, a prominent proportion of the pmoCAB gene variants transcribed in the epilimnion were also present in high relative abundance in the hypolimnion, which may reflect an increasing influence of the highly transcriptionally active epilimnion assemblage (Figs. 3b, c, S3) on the hypolimnion assemblage during lake overturn. Thus, a contribution of organisms present in different physiological states (e.g., starvation) to the difference in apparent kinetics cannot be ruled out by our data. Unfortunately, we lack information on the assemblage for the October sampling where the half-saturation constants differed most between the epi- and hypolimnion. However, based on observations of the overturn period the year before (Mayr et al., 2020b), it can be assumed that the two layers also harbored distinct MOB assemblages in October, likely with less species overlap.
Similar to observations made on MOB communities the year before (Mayr et al., 2020b), the pmoCAB transcript variants confined to the hypolimnion (e.g., pmoA_8) decreased over time and did not establish in the epilimnion (Figs. 3b, S3c, d). In January the pmoCAB composition became almost indistinguishable between the epilimnion and hypolimnion (Fig. 3a, b). At the same time their apparent kinetic properties became increasingly similar as well (Fig. 2), which is also in line with the advanced stage of the mixing processes (Fig. 1d). The replicate sample Jan (r) showed a very similar composition, providing confidence in the metatranscriptomic analysis, but also showed some variability concerning the summed TPM abundance of the pmoCAB variants (Fig. 3c). From December to January a strong shift in the MOB assemblage towards dominance of pmoA_1, pmoB_3 and pmoC_3 occurred (Fig. 3a, b). The shift of the MOB assemblage was accompanied by a drop in temperature and rise in oxygen, which are probable drivers of MOB succession in addition to methane availability (Hernandez et al., 2015; Oshkin et al., 2015; Trotsenko and Khmelenina, 2005). This did, however, not lead to much change in the methane affinity (Fig. 2), suggesting that different MOB assemblages can have similar methane affinities. Nevertheless, we hypothesize that the composition of pmoCAB rather than the summed TPM may be important for explaining the kinetic properties. With this shift, we also observed a decrease in Vmax per cell (Fig. 2b). In agreement with observations made the year before (Mayr et al., 2020b), we attribute the decrease in Vmax per cell to a shift from growth-oriented MOB dominating the bloom phase to a late-successional MOB assemblage adapted to cold temperatures. Overall, the metatranscriptomic analysis supports the hypothesis that the observed differences in apparent methane oxidation kinetic parameters between water layers and over time have a basis in compositional differences of the transcriptionally active MOB assemblages.
In Lake Rotsee, as in many other stratified lakes (Bastviken et al., 2004; Borrel et al., 2011), the high methane availability in the hypolimnion contrasts with low methane availability in the epilimnion. Therefore, we hypothesized that the resident MOB assemblages are adapted to the local conditions. Our field study revealed a high level of adaptation of the MOB assemblage: the Km was 20 times higher in the hypolimnion than in the epilimnion during stable stratification. Transcribed methane oxidation genes differed as well, indicating that methane affinity is one important trait structuring MOB assemblages in this system. The MOB assemblage and its apparent kinetic parameters adapted rapidly to changing conditions in the epilimnion. In October, the low epilimnion Km suggested an adaptation to low methane concentrations. During the autumn overturn, affinity decreased slightly but remained above hypolimnion values, reflecting persistently low methane concentrations that suggest methane-limited growth despite higher methane input. We observed increased Vmax in the epilimnion during November and December, ensuring a fast methane oxidation rate in this period with continuous transport of methane into the epilimnion. By contrast, in the hypolimnion methane concentrations during overturn exceeded the Km several-fold, suggesting that MOB growth was not limited by methane concentrations.
Our transcriptomic analysis revealed that the variations in the methane affinity were linked to transcribed, and thus likely expressed, pmoCAB variants. We also found that pMMO appeared to be the dominant methane monooxygenase throughout and found no evidence for shifts between sMMO and pMMO transcription as hypothesized previously (Semrau et al., 2018). Furthermore, we did not observe any of the previously described high-affinity pMMO variants, which suggests considerable, although currently unappreciated, variability in apparent pMMO kinetics. Further research is needed to obtain kinetic data on individual pMMO variants and to better understand the physiological basis of the apparent methane oxidation kinetics. The provided apparent kinetic parameters for lake MOB assemblages will inform future trait- or process-based models of the MOB assemblage and methane emissions. In summary, our work demonstrates that differential methane availability governed by lake mixing regimes created niches for MOB assemblages with well-adapted methane oxidation kinetics in Lake Rotsee – a mechanism that possibly applies to many seasonally stratified lakes in which the vertical structure and temporal succession of MOB may be similar.
Raw reads of the sequencing project were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive under project number PRJEB35558. Methane concentrations, scintillation counts, methane oxidation rates, estimated kinetic parameters and the identified nucleotide sequences encoding MMO are available at the EAWAG repository under https://doi.org/10.25678/0001fa (Mayr et al., 2019).
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4247-2020-supplement.
MJM and MZ contributed equally to this work. MJM, MZ and HB conceptualized the study, and MJM, MZ and JD carried out the investigation. MJM and MZ curated, analyzed and visualized the data. MJM and MZ wrote the original draft of the paper with contributions from BW, HB and JD. Funding was acquired by HB.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
We are grateful to Andreas Brand for his support and advice in the early stages of the project, and to Carsten Schubert, Serge Robert and Daniel Steiner for the possibility to use the equipment for radioisotope and methane measurement as well as their subsequent support. We are also grateful to Lea Steinle for sharing her expertise on how to handle the radiolabeled methane. We would like to thank Karin Beck and Patrick Kathriner for technical assistance during field work and laboratory analysis. We also acknowledge Feng Ju and Robert Niederdorfer for advice on the bioinformatics analysis. Sequencing data were analyzed in collaboration with the Genetic Diversity Centre (GDC) of ETH Zurich.
This research has been supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; grant no. CR23I3_156759), the ETH Zurich and Eawag.
This paper was edited by Tom J. Battin and reviewed by three anonymous referees.
Baani, M. and Liesack, W.: Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics are found in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 10203–10208, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702643105, 2008.
Bastviken, D., Ejlertsson, J., and Tranvik, L.: Measurement of methane oxidation in lakes: A comparison of methods, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3354–3361, https://doi.org/10.1021/es010311p, 2002.
Bastviken, D., Cole, J., Pace, M., and Tranvik, L.: Methane emissions from lakes: Dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002238, 2004.
Biderre-Petit, C., Jézéquel, D., Dugat-Bony, E., Lopes, F., Kuever, J., Borrel, G., Viollier, E., Fonty, G., and Peyret, P.: Identification of microbial communities involved in the methane cycle of a freshwater meromictic lake, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 77, 533–545, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01134.x, 2011.
Boehrer, B. and Schultze, M.: Stratification of lakes, Rev. Geophys., 46, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RG000210, 2008.
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., and Usadel, B.: Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data, Bioinformatics, 30, 2114–2120, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170, 2014.
Borrel, G., Jézéquel, D., Biderre-Petit, C., Morel-Desrosiers, N., Morel, J. P., Peyret, P., Fonty, G., and Lehours, A. C.: Production and consumption of methane in freshwater lake ecosystems, Res. Microbiol., 162, 833–847, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2011.06.004, 2011.
Brand, A., Bruderer, H., Oswald, K., Guggenheim, C., Schubert, C. J., and Wehrli, B.: Oxygenic primary production below the oxycline and its importance for redox dynamics, Aquat. Sci., 78, 727–741, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-016-0465-4, 2016.
Buchfink, B., Xie, C., and Huson, D. H.: Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND, Nat. Methods, 12, 59–60, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3176, 2014.
Bushnell, B.: BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner, available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1h3515gn (last access: 19 April 2019), 2014.
Bussmann, I., Matousu, A., Osudar, R., and Mau, S.: Assessment of the radio 3H-CH4 tracer technique to measure aerobic methane oxidation in the water column, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 13, 312–327, https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10027, 2015.
Button, D. K., Robertson, B., Gustafson, E., and Zhao, X.: Experimental and theoretical bases of specific affinity, a cytoarchitecture-based formulation of nutrient collection proposed to supercede the Michaelis-Menten paradigm of microbial kinetics, Appl. Environ. Microb., 70, 5511–5521, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.9.5511-5521.2004, 2004.
Calhoun, A. and King, G. M.: Regulation of root-associated methanotrophy by oxygen availability in the rhizosphere of two aquatic macrophytes, Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 3051–3058, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012444, 1997.
Cheema, S., Zeyer, J., and Henneberger, R.: Methanotrophic and methanogenic communities in swiss alpine fens dominated by Carex rostrata and Eriophorum angustifolium, Appl. Environ. Microb., 81, 5832–5844, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01519-15, 2015.
Conrad, R.: The global methane cycle: Recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved, Env. Microbiol. Rep., 1, 285–292, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00038.x, 2009.
Daims, H.: Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization and the daime image analysis program for the cultivation-independent quantification of microorganisms in environmental and medical samples, Cold Spring Harb. Protoc., 4, https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5253, 2009.
Dam, B., Dam, S., Kube, M., Reinhardt, R., and Liesack, W.: Complete genome sequence of Methylocystis sp. strain SC2, an aerobic methanotroph with high-affinity methane oxidation potential, J. Bacteriol., 194, 6008–6009, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01446-12, 2012.
DelSontro, T., Beaulieu, J. J., and Downing, J. A.: Greenhouse gas emissions from lakes and impoundments: Upscaling in the face of global change, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett., 3, 64–75, https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10073, 2018.
Dumont, M. G., Pommerenke, B., and Casper, P.: Using stable isotope probing to obtain a targeted metatranscriptome of aerobic methanotrophs in lake sediment, Env. Microbiol. Rep., 5, 757–764, https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12078, 2013.
Dunfield, P. F. and Conrad, R.: Starvation alters the apparent half-saturation constant for methane in the type II methanotroph Methylocystis strain LR1, Appl. Environ. Microb., 66, 4136–4138, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.9.4136-4138.2000, 2000.
Dunfield, P. F., Liesack, W., Henckel, T., Knowles, R., and Conrad, R.: High-affinity methane oxidation by a soil enrichment culture containing a type II methanotroph, Appl. Environ. Microb., 65, 1009–1014, https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2011.562327, 1999.
Eller, G., Stubner, S., and Frenzel, P.: Group-specific 16S rRNA targeted probes for the detection of type I and type II methanotrophs by fluorescence in situ hybridisation, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 198, 91–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1097(01)00130-6, 2001.
Graf, J. S., Mayr, M. J., Marchant, H. K., Tienken, D., Hach, P. F., Brand, A., Schubert, C. J., Kuypers, M. M. M., and Milucka, J.: Bloom of a denitrifying methanotroph, “Candidatus Methylomirabilis limnetica”, in a deep stratified lake, Environ. Microbiol., 20, 2598–2614, https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14285, 2018.
Guggenheim, C., Brand, A., Bürgmann, H., Sigg, L., and Wehrli, B.: Aerobic methane oxidation under copper scarcity in a stratified lake, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40642-2, 2019.
Hanson, R. S. and Hanson, T. E.: Methanotrophic bacteria, Microbiol. Rev., 60, 439–471, https://doi.org/10.1002/0471263397.env316, 1996.
Hernandez, M. E., Beck, D. A. C., Lidstrom, M. E., and Chistoserdova, L.: Oxygen availability is a major factor in determining the composition of microbial communities involved in methane oxidation, PeerJ, 3, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.801, 2015.
Hyatt, D., Chen, G.-L., LoCascio, P. F., Land, M. L., Larimer, F. W., and Hauser, L. J.: Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification, BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00348, 2010.
Kankaala, P., Taipale, S., Nykänen, H., and Jones, R. I.: Oxidation, efflux, and isotopic fractionation of methane during autumnal turnover in a polyhumic, boreal lake, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 112, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000336, 2007.
Kirf, M. K., Dinkel, C., Schubert, C. J., and Wehrli, B.: Submicromolar oxygen profiles at the oxic-anoxic boundary of temperate lakes, Aquat. Geochem., 20, 39–57, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10498-013-9206-7, 2014.
Knief, C.: Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker, Front. Microbiol., 6, 1–38, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01346, 2015.
Knief, C. and Dunfield, P. F.: Response and adaptation of different methanotrophic bacteria to low methane mixing ratios, Environ. Microbiol., 7, 1307–1317, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00814.x, 2005.
Kojima, H., Iwata, T., and Fukui, M.: DNA-based analysis of planktonic methanotrophs in a stratified lake, Freshwater Biol., 54, 1501–1509, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02199.x, 2009.
Kolb, S., Knief, C., Dunfield, P. F., and Conrad, R.: Abundance and activity of uncultured methanotrophic bacteria involved in the consumption of atmospheric methane in two forest soils, Environ. Microbiol., 7, 1150–1161, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00791.x, 2005.
Kopylova, E., Noé, L., and Touzet, H.: SortMeRNA: Fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data, Bioinformatics, 28, 3211–3217, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts611, 2012.
Kuivila, K. M., Murray, J. W., Devol, A. H., Lidstrom, M. E., and Reimers, C. E.: Methane cycling in the sediments of Lake Washington, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33, 571–581, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4.0571, 1988.
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., and Tamura, K.: MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets, Mol. Biol. Evol., 33, 1870–1874, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054, 2016.
Leak, D. J. and Dalton, H.: Growth yields of methanotrophs – 1. Effect of copper on the energetics of methane oxidation, Appl. Microbiol. Biot., 23, 470–476, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02346062, 1986.
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., and Licata, L.: Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 49, 764–766, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013, 2013.
Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K., and Lam, T. W.: MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph, Bioinformatics, 31, 1674–1676, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033, 2015.
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., and Durbin, R.: The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools, Bioinformatics, 25, 2078–2079, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352, 2009.
Li, W. and Godzik, A.: Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences, Bioinformatics, 22, 1658–1659, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158, 2006.
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K., and Shi, W.: FeatureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features, Bioinformatics, 30, 923–930, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656, 2014.
Liikanen, A., Huttunen, J. T., Valli, K., and Martikainen, P. J.: Methane cycling in the sediment and water column of mid-boreal hyper-eutrophic Lake Kevätön, Finland, Fund. Appl. Limnol., 154, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/154/2002/585, 2002.
Lofton, D. D., Whalen, S. C., and Hershey, A. E.: Effect of temperature on methane dynamics and evaluation of methane oxidation kinetics in shallow Arctic Alaskan lakes, Hydrobiologia, 721, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1663-x, 2014.
Mayr, M. J., Zimmermann, M., Dey, J., Wehrli, B., and Bürgmann, H.: Data for: Community methane-oxidation kinetics selected by lake mixing regime [Data set], Eawag Swiss Fed. Inst. Aquat. Sci. Technol., https://doi.org/10.25678/0001fa, 2019.
Mayr, M. J., Zimmermann, M., Guggenheim, C., Brand, A., and Bürgmann, H.: Niche partitioning of methane-oxidizing bacteria along the oxygen–methane counter gradient of stratified lakes, ISME J., 14, 274–287, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0515-8, 2020a.
Mayr, M. J., Zimmermann, M., Dey, J., Brand, A., Wehrli, B., and Bürgmann, H.: Growth and rapid succession of methanotrophs effectively limit methane release during lake overturn, Commun. Biol., 3, 108, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0838-z, 2020b.
O'Leary, N. A., Wright, M. W., Brister, J. R., Ciufo, S., Haddad, D., McVeigh, R., Rajput, B., Robbertse, B., Smith-White, B., Ako-Adjei, D., Astashyn, A., Badretdin, A., Bao, Y., Blinkova, O., Brover, V., Chetvernin, V., Choi, J., Cox, E., Ermolaeva, O., Farrell, C. M., Goldfarb, T., Gupta, T., Haft, D., Hatcher, E., Hlavina, W., Joardar, V. S., Kodali, V. K., Li, W., Maglott, D., Masterson, P., McGarvey, K. M., Murphy, M. R., O'Neill, K., Pujar, S., Rangwala, S. H., Rausch, D., Riddick, L. D., Schoch, C., Shkeda, A., Storz, S. S., Sun, H., Thibaud-Nissen, F., Tolstoy, I., Tully, R. E., Vatsan, A. R., Wallin, C., Webb, D., Wu, W., Landrum, M. J., Kimchi, A., Tatusova, T., DiCuccio, M., Kitts, P., Murphy, T. D., and Pruitt, K. D.: Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: Current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation, Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D733–D745, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1189, 2016.
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., and Wagner, H.: vegan: community ecology package 2.5-6, available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan, last access: 13 November 2019.
Oshkin, I. Y., Beck, D. A. C., Lamb, A. E., Tchesnokova, V., Benuska, G., Mctaggart, T. L., Kalyuzhnaya, M. G., Dedysh, S. N., Lidstrom, M. E., and Chistoserdova, L.: Methane-fed microbial microcosms show differential community dynamics and pinpoint taxa involved in communal response, ISME J., 9, 1119–1129, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.203, 2015.
Oswald, K., Milucka, J., Brand, A., Littmann, S., Wehrli, B., Kuypers, M. M. M., and Schubert, C. J.: Light-dependent aerobic methane oxidation reduces methane emissions from seasonally stratified lakes, PLoS One, 10, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132574, 2015.
Oswald, K., Graf, J. S., Littmann, S., Tienken, D., Brand, A., Wehrli, B., Albertsen, M., Daims, H., Wagner, M., Kuypers, M. M. M., Schubert, C. J., and Milucka, J.: Crenothrix are major methane consumers in stratified lakes, ISME J., 11, 2124–2140, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.77, 2017.
Pernthaler, A., Pernthaler, J., and Amann, R.: Fluorescence in situ hybridization and catalyzed reporter deposition for the identification of marine bacteria, Appl. Environ. Microb., 68, 3094–3101, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.6.3094-3101.2002, 2002.
R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing, available at: https://www.r-project.org (last access: 18 January 2019), 2018.
Remsen, C. C., Minnich, E. C., Stephens, R. S., Buchholz, L., and Lidstrom, M. E.: Methane oxidation in Lake Superior sediments, J. Great Lakes Res., 15, 141–146, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71468-4, 1989.
Schmieder, R. and Edwards, R.: Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets, Bioinformatics, 27, 863–864, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026, 2011.
Schubert, C. J., Diem, T., and Eugster, W.: Methane emissions from a small wind shielded lake determined by eddy covariance, flux chambers, anchored funnels, and boundary model calculations: A comparison, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 4515–4522, https://doi.org/10.1021/es203465x, 2012.
Seemann, T.: Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation, Bioinformatics, 30, 2068–2069, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153, 2014.
Semrau, J. D., DiSpirito, A. A., Gu, W., and Yoon, S.: Metals and methanotrophy, Appl. Environ. Microb., 84, 7–14, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02289-17, 2018.
Shen, W., Le, S., Li, Y., and Hu, F.: SeqKit: A cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation, PLoS One, 11, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163962, 2016.
Steinle, L., Graves, C. A., Treude, T., Ferré, B., Biastoch, A., Bussmann, I., Berndt, C., Krastel, S., James, R. H., Behrens, E., Böning, C. W., Greinert, J., Sapart, C. J., Scheinert, M., Sommer, S., Lehmann, M. F., and Niemann, H.: Water column methanotrophy controlled by a rapid oceanographic switch, Nat. Geosci., 8, 378–382, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2420, 2015.
Steinsberger, T., Schmid, M., Wüest, A., Schwefel, R., Wehrli, B., and Müller, B.: Organic carbon mass accumulation rate regulates the flux of reduced substances from the sediments of deep lakes, Biogeosciences, 14, 3275–3285, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3275-2017, 2017.
Stuart, A. and Ord, J. K.: Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics: Volume 1: Distribution Theory, Wiley, Chichester, 2009.
Sundh, I., Bastviken, D., and Tranvik, L. J.: Abundance, activity, and community structure of pelagic methane-oxidizing bacteria in temperate lakes, Appl. Environ. Microb., 71, 6746–6752, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.6746-6752.2005, 2005.
Taubert, M., Grob, C., Crombie, A., Howat, A. M., Burns, O. J., Weber, M., Lott, C., Kaster, A. K., Vollmers, J., Jehmlich, N., von Bergen, M., Chen, Y., and Murrell, J. C.: Communal metabolism by Methylococcaceae and Methylophilaceae is driving rapid aerobic methane oxidation in sediments of a shallow seep near Elba, Italy, Environ. Microbiol., 21, 3780–3795, https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14728, 2019.
Trotsenko, Y. A. and Khmelenina, V. N.: Aerobic methanotrophic bacteria of cold ecosystems, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 53, 15–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2005.02.010, 2005.
Tveit, A. T., Hestnes, A. G., Robinson, S. L., Schintlmeister, A., Dedysh, S. N., Jehmlich, N., Von Bergen, M., Herbold, C., Wagner, M., Richter, A., and Svenning, M. M.: Widespread soil bacterium that oxidizes atmospheric methane, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 8515–8524, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817812116, 2019.
Wagner, G. P., Kin, K., and Lynch, V. J.: Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples, Theory Biosci., 131, 281–285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-012-0162-3, 2012.
Wiesenburg, D. A. and Guinasso, N. L.: Equilibrium solubilities of methane, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen in water and sea water, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 24, 356–360, https://doi.org/10.1021/je60083a006, 1979.
Zimmermann, M., Mayr, M. J., Bouffard, D., Eugster, W., Steinsberger, T., Wehrli, B., Brand, A., and Bürgmann, H.: Lake overturn as a key driver for methane oxidation, bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/689182, 2019.