Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 17, issue 18
Articles | Volume 17, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4611-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4611-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 18
Research article
 | 
22 Sep 2020
Research article |  | 22 Sep 2020

Cryptic roles of tetrathionate in the sulfur cycle of marine sediments: microbial drivers and indicators

Subhrangshu Mandal, Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, Chayan Roy, Moidu Jameela Rameez, Jagannath Sarkar, Tarunendu Mapder, Svetlana Fernandes, Aditya Peketi, Aninda Mazumdar, and Wriddhiman Ghosh

Viewed

Total article views: 4,649 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,768 826 55 4,649 134 43 50
  • HTML: 3,768
  • PDF: 826
  • XML: 55
  • Total: 4,649
  • Supplement: 134
  • BibTeX: 43
  • EndNote: 50
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Dec 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,649 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,204 with geography defined and 445 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Potential roles of polythionates as key sulfur cycle intermediates are less appreciated, apparently because, in most of the natural environments, they do not accumulate to easily detectable levels. Our exploration of the eastern Arabian Sea sediment horizons revealed microbe-mediated production and redox transformations of tetrathionate to be important modules of the in situ sulfur cycle, even as high biotic and abiotic reactivity of this polythionate keeps it hidden from geochemical detection.
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint