Articles | Volume 18, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 May 2021
Research article |
| 12 May 2021
| 12 May 2021
Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach
Fabienne Maignan
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL,
CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Camille Abadie
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL,
CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Marine Remaud
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL,
CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Linda M. J. Kooijmans
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University and Research,
Wageningen, the Netherlands
Kukka-Maaria Kohonen
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)/Physics,
Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Róisín Commane
Dept. Earth & Environmental Sciences, Lamont-Doherty Earth
Observatory of Columbia University, New York, NY 10964, USA
Richard Wehr
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona,
Tucson, USA
J. Elliott Campbell
Sierra Nevada Research Institute, University of California, Merced,
California 95343, USA
Sauveur Belviso
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL,
CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Stephen A. Montzka
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Nina Raoult
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL,
CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Ulli Seibt
Dept of Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences, University of California
Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
Yoichi P. Shiga
Universities Space Research Association, Mountain View, CA, USA
Nicolas Vuichard
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL,
CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Mary E. Whelan
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New
Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
Philippe Peylin
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL,
CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Viewed
Total article views: 3,174 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Nov 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,300 | 795 | 79 | 3,174 | 71 | 77 |
- HTML: 2,300
- PDF: 795
- XML: 79
- Total: 3,174
- BibTeX: 71
- EndNote: 77
Total article views: 2,484 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 May 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,876 | 540 | 68 | 2,484 | 61 | 66 |
- HTML: 1,876
- PDF: 540
- XML: 68
- Total: 2,484
- BibTeX: 61
- EndNote: 66
Total article views: 690 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Nov 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 424 | 255 | 11 | 690 | 10 | 11 |
- HTML: 424
- PDF: 255
- XML: 11
- Total: 690
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,174 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,878 with geography defined
and 296 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,484 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,324 with geography defined
and 160 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 690 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 554 with geography defined
and 136 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
24 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sea animal colonies enhance carbonyl sulfide emissions from coastal Antarctic tundra W. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00990-4
- Remotely Sensed Carbonyl Sulfide Constrains Model Estimates of Amazon Primary Productivity J. Stinecipher et al. 10.1029/2021GL096802
- Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4) L. Kooijmans et al. 10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
- Long-term fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and their seasonality and interannual variability in a boreal forest T. Vesala et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2569-2022
- Ongoing Decline in the Atmospheric COS Seasonal Cycle Amplitude over Western Europe: Implications for Surface Fluxes S. Belviso et al. 10.3390/atmos13050812
- Spatial and seasonal variability in volatile organic sulfur compounds in seawater and the overlying atmosphere of the Bohai and Yellow seas J. Yu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-161-2024
- Restricted internal diffusion weakens transpiration–photosynthesis coupling during heatwaves: Evidence from leaf carbonyl sulphide exchange W. Sun et al. 10.1111/pce.14840
- Constraining the budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide using a 3-D chemical transport model M. Cartwright et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10035-2023
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Carbon and Water Fluxes of the Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Biome Constrained by Assimilating Ecosystem Carbonyl Sulfide Flux Observations C. Abadie et al. 10.1029/2023JG007407
- Variations of Carbonyl Sulfide During the Dry/Wet Seasons Over the Amazon X. Wang et al. 10.1029/2022GL101717
- Plant gross primary production, plant respiration and carbonyl sulfide emissions over the globe inferred by atmospheric inverse modelling M. Remaud et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2525-2022
- Quantifying and Reducing Uncertainty in Global Carbon Cycle Predictions: Lessons and Perspectives From 15 Years of Data Assimilation Studies With the ORCHIDEE Terrestrial Biosphere Model N. MacBean et al. 10.1029/2021GB007177
- Technical note: Novel estimates of the leaf relative uptake rate of carbonyl sulfide from optimality theory G. Wohlfahrt et al. 10.5194/bg-20-589-2023
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- Carbonyl sulfide (COS) emissions in two agroecosystems in central France S. Belviso et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0278584
- Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Simulating canopy carbonyl sulfide uptake of two forest stands through an improved ecosystem model and parameter optimization using an ensemble Kalman filter B. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110212
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Intercomparison of methods to estimate gross primary production based on CO2 and COS flux measurements K. Kohonen et al. 10.5194/bg-19-4067-2022
- Combined assimilation of NOAA surface and MIPAS satellite observations to constrain the global budget of carbonyl sulfide J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6047-2024
- Light and Water Conditions Co-Regulated Stomata and Leaf Relative Uptake Rate (LRU) during Photosynthesis and COS Assimilation: A Meta-Analysis P. Wang et al. 10.3390/su14052840
24 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sea animal colonies enhance carbonyl sulfide emissions from coastal Antarctic tundra W. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00990-4
- Remotely Sensed Carbonyl Sulfide Constrains Model Estimates of Amazon Primary Productivity J. Stinecipher et al. 10.1029/2021GL096802
- Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4) L. Kooijmans et al. 10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
- Long-term fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and their seasonality and interannual variability in a boreal forest T. Vesala et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2569-2022
- Ongoing Decline in the Atmospheric COS Seasonal Cycle Amplitude over Western Europe: Implications for Surface Fluxes S. Belviso et al. 10.3390/atmos13050812
- Spatial and seasonal variability in volatile organic sulfur compounds in seawater and the overlying atmosphere of the Bohai and Yellow seas J. Yu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-161-2024
- Restricted internal diffusion weakens transpiration–photosynthesis coupling during heatwaves: Evidence from leaf carbonyl sulphide exchange W. Sun et al. 10.1111/pce.14840
- Constraining the budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide using a 3-D chemical transport model M. Cartwright et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10035-2023
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Carbon and Water Fluxes of the Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Biome Constrained by Assimilating Ecosystem Carbonyl Sulfide Flux Observations C. Abadie et al. 10.1029/2023JG007407
- Variations of Carbonyl Sulfide During the Dry/Wet Seasons Over the Amazon X. Wang et al. 10.1029/2022GL101717
- Plant gross primary production, plant respiration and carbonyl sulfide emissions over the globe inferred by atmospheric inverse modelling M. Remaud et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2525-2022
- Quantifying and Reducing Uncertainty in Global Carbon Cycle Predictions: Lessons and Perspectives From 15 Years of Data Assimilation Studies With the ORCHIDEE Terrestrial Biosphere Model N. MacBean et al. 10.1029/2021GB007177
- Technical note: Novel estimates of the leaf relative uptake rate of carbonyl sulfide from optimality theory G. Wohlfahrt et al. 10.5194/bg-20-589-2023
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- Carbonyl sulfide (COS) emissions in two agroecosystems in central France S. Belviso et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0278584
- Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Simulating canopy carbonyl sulfide uptake of two forest stands through an improved ecosystem model and parameter optimization using an ensemble Kalman filter B. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110212
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Intercomparison of methods to estimate gross primary production based on CO2 and COS flux measurements K. Kohonen et al. 10.5194/bg-19-4067-2022
- Combined assimilation of NOAA surface and MIPAS satellite observations to constrain the global budget of carbonyl sulfide J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6047-2024
- Light and Water Conditions Co-Regulated Stomata and Leaf Relative Uptake Rate (LRU) during Photosynthesis and COS Assimilation: A Meta-Analysis P. Wang et al. 10.3390/su14052840
Latest update: 25 Dec 2024
Short summary
The assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by continental vegetation has been proposed as a proxy for gross primary production (GPP). Using a land surface and a transport model, we compare a mechanistic representation of the plant COS uptake (Berry et al., 2013) to the classical leaf relative uptake (LRU) approach linking GPP and vegetation COS fluxes. We show that at high temporal resolutions a mechanistic approach is mandatory, but at large scales the LRU approach compares similarly.
The assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by continental vegetation has been proposed as a...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint