Articles | Volume 18, issue 9
Biogeosciences, 18, 2917–2955, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
Biogeosciences, 18, 2917–2955, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
Research article
12 May 2021
Research article | 12 May 2021

Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach

Fabienne Maignan et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,886 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,386 482 18 1,886 26 29
  • HTML: 1,386
  • PDF: 482
  • XML: 18
  • Total: 1,886
  • BibTeX: 26
  • EndNote: 29
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Nov 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Nov 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,607 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,607 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 08 Aug 2022
Download
Short summary
The assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by continental vegetation has been proposed as a proxy for gross primary production (GPP). Using a land surface and a transport model, we compare a mechanistic representation of the plant COS uptake (Berry et al., 2013) to the classical leaf relative uptake (LRU) approach linking GPP and vegetation COS fluxes. We show that at high temporal resolutions a mechanistic approach is mandatory, but at large scales the LRU approach compares similarly.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint