Articles | Volume 18, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
Research article
 | 
12 May 2021
Research article |  | 12 May 2021

Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach

Fabienne Maignan, Camille Abadie, Marine Remaud, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Róisín Commane, Richard Wehr, J. Elliott Campbell, Sauveur Belviso, Stephen A. Montzka, Nina Raoult, Ulli Seibt, Yoichi P. Shiga, Nicolas Vuichard, Mary E. Whelan, and Philippe Peylin

Viewed

Total article views: 2,833 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,036 747 50 2,833 49 55
  • HTML: 2,036
  • PDF: 747
  • XML: 50
  • Total: 2,833
  • BibTeX: 49
  • EndNote: 55
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Nov 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Nov 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,833 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,530 with geography defined and 303 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 15 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
The assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by continental vegetation has been proposed as a proxy for gross primary production (GPP). Using a land surface and a transport model, we compare a mechanistic representation of the plant COS uptake (Berry et al., 2013) to the classical leaf relative uptake (LRU) approach linking GPP and vegetation COS fluxes. We show that at high temporal resolutions a mechanistic approach is mandatory, but at large scales the LRU approach compares similarly.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint