52 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Groundwater controls on soil–environment variables and carbon risk in smallholder peatland agriculture of West Kalimantan, Indonesia R. Mahardika et al. https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2026.132.9773
2. Mapping the spatial transferability of knowledge-guided machine learning: Application to the prediction of drain flow fraction R. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178314
3. Hydrology of a cultivated peatland in Northern Finland and implications for management T. Pham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134461
4. Responses of methane emissions to global wetland restoration and influencing factors S. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110459
5. Wetter, but not wet enough—Limited greenhouse gas mitigation effects of subsurface irrigation and blocked ditches in an intensively cultivated grassland on fen peat S. Heller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110367
6. Impact of Drought Events on the Greenhouse Gas Balance of a Temperate Mire in the Biebrza Wetlands, Central Europe K. Fortuniak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030314
7. Wetter farming: raising water table and biochar for reduced GHG emissions while maintaining crop productivity in agricultural peatlands P. Jeewani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-025-00487-7
8. Monitoring Agricultural Land Use Intensity with Remote Sensing and Traits A. Lausch et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212233
9. Crediting peatland rewetting for carbon farming: some considerations amidst optimism J. Leifeld et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-025-10203-2
10. High contributions of anaerobic decomposition to greenhouse gas emissions of agriculturally used peatlands J. Boonman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117521
11. Developing a remote-sensing-based indicator for peat soil vertical displacement. A case study in the Biebrza Valley, Poland P. Ghezelayagh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112305
12. Effects of wetland disturbance on methane emissions and influential factors: A global meta-analysis of field studies S. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178325
13. Mapping temperate groundwater-dependent terrestrial ecosystems in Denmark D. Christiansen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136067
14. Assessing the impact of rewetting agricultural fen peat soil via open drain damming: an agrogeophysical approach D. O'Leary et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-151-2026
15. Natural Climate Protection through Peatland Rewetting: A Future for the Rathsbruch Peatland in Germany P. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050581
16. Identifying landscape hot and cold spots of soil greenhouse gas fluxes by combining field measurements and remote sensing data E. Gachibu Wangari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-5029-2023
17. Effects of converting cropland to grassland on greenhouse gas emissions from peat and organic-rich soils in temperate and boreal climates: a systematic review A. Holzknecht et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-024-00354-1
18. How effective and efficient is the generation of nature-based carbon removal quantified according to the regulation on carbon removal and carbon farming certification? An evaluation based on the example of a hypothetical agroforestry system in Baden-Württemberg C. Geier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101201
19. Combined water table and temperature dynamics control CO2 emission estimates from drained peatlands under rewetting and climate change scenarios T. Denager et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-441-2026
20. The timing of warming matters as much as its intensity for the annual carbon balance of a degraded raised bog N. Behrens et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-5071-2026
21. Reviews and syntheses: A scoping review evaluating the potential application of ecohydrological models for northern peatland restoration M. Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3143-2024
22. What makes Great Snipe stay? Developing hydrological indicators for successful habitat management of selected breeding sites of Gallinago media in Poland M. Grygoruk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126947
23. Detecting Spatial Patterns of Peatland Greenhouse Gas Sinks and Sources with Geospatial Environmental and Remote Sensing Data P. Christiani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-01965-7
24. Simulating ecosystem carbon dioxide fluxes and their associated influencing factors for a restored peatland H. He et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1355-2025
25. Hydrological Response to Rewetting of Drained Peatlands—A Case Study of Three Raised Bogs in Norway M. Stachowicz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010142
26. Catchment-based approach for water table management with irrigation for cultivated peatlands M. Läpikivi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109427
27. A trading market for uncertain carbon removal by land use in the EU I. Gren https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103127
28. Climate change mitigation potential of paludiculture in Finland: greenhouse gas emissions of abandoned organic croplands and peat substitution T. Myllyviita et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2365903
29. Issues of Peatland Restoration Across Scales: A Review and Meta-Analysis R. Kustina et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17162428
30. Restoring organic soils under agriculture: cost-effective portfolios in the context of European climate and biodiversity policies F. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae5fae
31. CO2 emissions of drained coastal peatlands in the Netherlands and potential emission reduction by water infiltration systems R. Aben et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4099-2024
32. Potential overestimation of carbon dioxide emissions from croplands on organic soils in cool temperate and boreal regions based on a case study from Norway J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03464-5
33. Redox potential is a robust indicator for decomposition processes in drained agricultural peat soils: A valuable tool in monitoring peatland wetting efforts J. Boonman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116728
34. Methodology for carbon credit calculation in the context of Ukraine and results of its application in Drevlyanskyi Nature Reserve (Zhytomyr Region) O. Оrlov https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.2001.868
35. Groundwater–CO2 emissions relationship in Dutch peatlands derived by machine learning using airborne and ground-based eddy covariance data L. van der Poel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3867-2025
36. Annual net CO2 fluxes from drained organic soils used for agriculture in the hemiboreal region of Europe A. Bārdule et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4241-2025
37. Effects of riparian wetland restoration and grazing on CH4 and CO2 exchange more than a decade after rewetting J. Kjær et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70185
38. Carbon dynamics of a controlled peatland rewetting experiment in the Norwegian boreal zone M. Bekken et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30836-2
39. Drivers and Annual Totals of Methane Emissions From Dutch Peatlands A. Buzacott et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17590
40. Underestimation of carbon dioxide emissions from organic-rich agricultural soils Z. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01459-8
41. Systematic review of the detection of subsurface drainage systems in agricultural fields using remote sensing systems A. Carlsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108892
42. Transparent automated CO2 flux chambers reveal spatial and temporal patterns of net carbon fluxes from managed peatlands J. Boonman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112121
43. The potential of reed canary grass and the importance of field heterogeneity for reducing GHG emissions in a rewetting fen peatland A. Rodriguez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-1053-2025
44. Estimating mean groundwater levels in peatlands using a Bayesian belief network approach with remote sensing data M. Stachowicz et al. https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.9939
45. Optimized wetland rewetting strategies can control methane, carbon dioxide, and oxygen responses to water table fluctuations B. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03163-7
46. Folgen und Perspektiven für eine klimaschonende Nutzung kohlenstoffreicher Böden in der Küstenregion Niedersachsens A. Krause & M. Paech https://doi.org/10.1007/s35152-025-2018-4
47. Drainage-constrained field-scale modelling of rewetting and regional CO2 ̶ CH4 emissions in lowland peatlands S. Andaryani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.182180
48. A full year of continuous net soil and ditch CO2, CH4, N2O fluxes, soil hydrology and meteorology for a drained fen in Denmark A. Nielsen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-33-2026
49. Environmental variables improve remote sensing-based water table monitoring in peatlands P. Christiani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.182017
50. Environmental controls and temporal trends of CO2 and CH4 emissions in a former cultivated peatland under rewetting J. Pullens et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111363
51. A First Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agricultural Peatlands in Canada: Evaluation of Climate Change Mitigation Potential M. Strack et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.925
52. Mapping peat depth using a portable gamma-ray sensor and terrain attributes T. Koganti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116672