Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 20, issue 16
Articles | Volume 20, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3539-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3539-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 20, issue 16
Research article
 | 
23 Aug 2023
Research article |  | 23 Aug 2023

Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide inferred from tower and mobile atmospheric observations in the Netherlands

Alessandro Zanchetta, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Steven van Heuven, Andrea Scifo, Hubertus A. Scheeren, Ivan Mammarella, Ute Karstens, Jin Ma, Maarten Krol, and Huilin Chen

Viewed

Total article views: 2,931 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,198 616 117 2,931 173 108 147
  • HTML: 2,198
  • PDF: 616
  • XML: 117
  • Total: 2,931
  • Supplement: 173
  • BibTeX: 108
  • EndNote: 147
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,931 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,915 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 28 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Carbonyl sulfide (COS) has been suggested as a tool to estimate carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake by plants during photosynthesis. However, understanding its sources and sinks is critical to preventing biases in this estimate. Combining observations and models, this study proves that regional sources occasionally influence the measurements at the 60 m tall Lutjewad tower (1 m a.s.l.; 53°24′ N, 6°21′ E) in the Netherlands. Moreover, it estimates nighttime COS fluxes to be −3.0 ± 2.6 pmol m−2 s−1.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint