Articles | Volume 21, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4119-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4119-2024
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
20 Sep 2024
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 20 Sep 2024

Reply to Head's comment on “The Volyn biota (Ukraine) – indications of 1.5 Gyr old eukaryotes in 3D preservation, a spotlight on the `boring billion' ” by Franz et al. (2023)

Gerhard Franz, Vladimir Khomenko, Peter Lyckberg, Vsevolod Chournousenko, and Ulrich Struck

Viewed

Total article views: 3,064 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,058 594 412 3,064 190 217
  • HTML: 2,058
  • PDF: 594
  • XML: 412
  • Total: 3,064
  • BibTeX: 190
  • EndNote: 217
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,064 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,053 with geography defined and 11 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 05 Jun 2026
Short summary
The Volyn biota (Ukraine), previously assumed to be an extreme case of natural abiotic synthesis of organic matter, is more likely a diverse assemblage of fossils from the deep biosphere. Although contamination by modern organisms cannot completely be ruled out, it is unlikely, considering all aspects, i.e., their mode of occurrence in the deep biosphere, their fossilization and mature state of organic matter, their isotope signature, and their large morphological diversity.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint