Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-103-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-103-2025
Research article
 | 
09 Jan 2025
Research article |  | 09 Jan 2025

Aggregation of ice-nucleating macromolecules from Betula pendula pollen determines ice nucleation efficiency

Florian Wieland, Nadine Bothen, Ralph Schwidetzky, Teresa M. Seifried, Paul Bieber, Ulrich Pöschl, Konrad Meister, Mischa Bonn, Janine Fröhlich-Nowoisky, and Hinrich Grothe
Abstract

Various aerosols, including mineral dust, soot, and biological particles, can act as ice nuclei, initiating the freezing of supercooled cloud droplets. Cloud droplet freezing significantly impacts cloud properties and, consequently, weather and climate. Some biological ice nuclei exhibit exceptionally high nucleation temperatures close to 0 °C. Ice-nucleating macromolecules (INMs) found on pollen are typically not considered among the most active ice nuclei. Still, they can be highly abundant, especially for species such as Betula pendula, a widespread birch tree species in the boreal forest. Recent studies have shown that certain tree-derived INMs exhibit ice nucleation activity above 10 °C, suggesting they could play a more significant role in atmospheric processes than previously understood. Our study reveals that three distinct INM classes active at 8.7, 15.7, and 17.4 °C are present in B. pendula. Freeze drying and freeze–thaw cycles noticeably alter their ice nucleation capability, and the results of heat treatment, size, and chemical analysis indicate that INM classes correspond to size-varying aggregates, with larger aggregates nucleating ice at higher temperatures, in agreement with previous studies on fungal and bacterial ice nucleators. Our findings suggest that B. pendula INMs are potentially important for atmospheric ice nucleation because of their high prevalence and nucleation temperatures.

1 Introduction

Heterogeneous ice nucleation is a pivotal process in the Earth's atmosphere as it can influence the properties of clouds. Cloud droplets can be supercooled to 38 °C until ice forms homogeneously, but ice-nucleating particles (INPs) can trigger freezing at much higher temperatures. Thereby, INPs influence clouds and their properties, such as lifetime and precipitation. More than half of precipitation initiates via the ice phase of mixed-phase clouds (Lau and Wu, 2003). Therefore, accurate data on INPs, such as composition, concentration, and initial freezing temperatures, with many of these factors strongly depending on location and time of year, are crucial to understanding and accurately modeling their influence on Earth's climate. Various aerosol particles can function as INPs, but the specific properties and prerequisites for nucleating ice are poorly understood. This is particularly true for ice-nucleating primary biological aerosol particles (PBAPs), with certain types active in ice nucleation at relatively high subzero temperatures (above 10 °C).

Birch pollen is one of the most studied PBAPs and can induce heterogeneous ice nucleation around 15 °C (Diehl et al., 2001). In 2012, Pummer et al. (2012) found that extractable macromolecules outside the sporopollenin shell of birch pollen are the ice-nucleation-active substance (Pummer et al., 2012). Field and laboratory studies have shown that these ice-nucleating macromolecules (INMs) are highly abundant in alpine vegetation and originate not only from birch pollen but also from different surfaces of birch trees (Felgitsch et al., 2018; Seifried et al., 2020). During and after precipitation, these INMs were mobilized and aerosolized in high concentrations near mountain forests and above the canopy (Bieber et al., 2020; Seifried et al., 2021). These studies suggest a high abundance of birch INMs, but compared to other biological INPs, e.g., of bacterial or fungal origin, which can be active up to 2 °C (Corotto et al., 1986; Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2015; Pouleur et al., 1992), birch INMs have relatively low nucleation temperatures (15 °C). Birch INMs have been described as polysaccharides with a molecular weight of 100 and 300 kDa, starting heterogeneous ice nucleation at 15 °C (Dreischmeier et al., 2017; Pummer et al., 2012, 2015). Later studies showed that they exhibit typical protein properties (Burkart et al., 2021; Felgitsch et al., 2018; Tong et al., 2015), i.e., denaturation by heat and enzymes. It is still up for discussion whether pollen INMs are saccharides (Dreischmeier et al., 2017; Pummer et al., 2012), proteins (Felgitsch et al., 2018; Tong et al., 2015), or a combination of both. Spectroscopic results supported both findings, showing infrared bands representative of polysaccharides and amides and fluorescence signals associated with proteins (Burkart et al., 2021; Felgitsch et al., 2018; Pummer et al., 2013). Dreischmeier et al. (2017) verified the freezing activity of birch INMs at 15 °C and their saccharide nature, but the supplementary results show ice nucleation activity up to 6 °C, which was later attributed to the pollen grains rather than to the INMs (Dreischmeier, 2019). Murray et al. (2022) also reported high freezing temperatures from birch pollen (up to 7.7 °C) in large droplet volumes, attributed them to INMs, and hypothesized that freezing temperatures between 6 and 15 °C are due to large aggregates of smaller INMs. Dreischmeier et al. (2017) reached a similar conclusion regarding aggregates but in a different context. They suggested that INMs could be aggregates of smaller antifreeze polysaccharides. They based their conclusions on the findings of ice nucleation and antifreeze activity in boreal pollen, and both substances showed similar spectroscopic signals.

In this study, we focus on (i) the different subpopulations of pollen INMs and their freezing temperatures, (ii) what influences the ice nucleation activity, and (iii) how aggregation might be responsible for this behavior of birch INMs. We used two complementary ice nucleation assays to investigate the different subpopulations and initial freezing temperature differences. We show how simple and common laboratory sample-handling techniques can strongly influence the ice nucleation activity of pollen INMs. Combined with size measurements, we conclude that aggregation may be a critical property of birch INMs. Finally, we place our results in the context of previous studies and try to contribute to a deeper understanding of birch INMs and general knowledge of INMs produced by trees.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Sample preparation

Birch pollen from Betula pendula (silver birch) was obtained from Pharmallerga (CZ, Czech Republic). According to the distributor, the pollen was harvested by hand in March 2020 in České Budějovice, Czech Republic, hereafter referred to as pollen A, and in March 2019 in Galanta–Trnava–Senec, Slovakia, referred to as pollen B. The individual batches contained pollen from four growing sites (forest, park, land, roadside). All samples shown in the main text of the paper used pollen A. Some experiments were also replicated with pollen B, and these data are in the Supplement.

Birch pollen washing water (BPWW), containing birch pollen INMs, was prepared with ultrahigh-quality (UHQ) water. The UHQ water was prepared by autoclaving MilliQ water (18.2 MΩ cm) for 20 min at 120 °C, followed by filtration through a 0.1 µm sterile PES (polyether sulfone) vacuum filter (three times). Birch pollen and UHQ water were mixed to obtain a concentration of 50 mg birch pollen per milliliter of water. The pollen grains were extracted for 6 h, during which the mixture was occasionally shaken. The suspension was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 5 min at room temperature, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 µm syringe filter (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) to remove any pollen grains and their fragments from the sample. The obtained BPWW now only contains (macro-)molecular components. The BPWW was stored at 20 °C if not used immediately.

2.1.1 Sample treatment

BPWW was freeze-dried, freeze-thawed, and heat-treated. Before freeze drying, BPWW was stored at 80 °C for at least 15 min. BPWW was dried to a stable mass using an Alpha 2–4 LDplus (Christ, Germany), the duration of which varied according to the volume. Subsequently, water was added to obtain the same mass as before freeze drying. Freeze–thaw cycles are subsequent measurements with the ice nucleation assay, where the next measurement was started after all droplets were completely thawed. For heat treatments, aliquots of BPWW (between 750 and 1500 µL) were placed in a microtube (1.5 or 2 mL, Eppendorf), sealed with parafilm, and incubated at 40, 78, and 98 °C for 1 h or 24 h (Accublock™ Mini, Labnet International Inc. USA). After the specified duration, the samples were cooled to room temperature and analyzed on the same day.

2.1.2 Filtration

For INM size characterization, BPWW was filtered through centrifugal molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) filters with nominal cutoffs at 10, 30, 50, 100, and 300 kDa (Vivaspin© 15R/20, Sartorius). The filter material was polyether sulfone or Hydrosat© (HS) in the case of the 10 kDa filter. The BPWW was filtered at 3000 xg (times gravitational force) for 30 min at 4 °C. The filters were rinsed with UHQ water four times before sample filtration to avoid contamination. MWCO filters, typically used for protein concentration, have nominal cutoff masses that rely on molecular density and shape assumptions. Therefore, we avoid drawing direct conclusions about the INM mass or size and instead focus on the observed size trend.

2.1.3 Purification

Before chemical analysis, the INMs from BPWW were purified by ice-slide ice-affinity purification. Details of the purification method concept have been described elsewhere (Adar et al., 2018; Lukas et al., 2021; Marshall et al., 2016; Schwidetzky et al., 2023). In brief, the sample is continuously pumped to flow down a metal plate cooled by a cryostat to 3.5 °C. As the sample slowly flows down, an ice layer forms. About 800 mL BPWW was prepared and diluted with about 2075 mL of UHQ water to obtain a sufficient volume. The plate was not pre-cooled to avoid immediate freezing of the first droplets. After 1 h, the ice sheet was collected, frozen at 20 °C, and freeze-dried. The dry residue was used to prepare ice-affinity-purified BPWW by adding UHQ to a final concentration of 7.2 mg residue mL−1. Only one run was performed.

2.2 Measurements

2.2.1 Ice nucleation measurements

Two independent droplet-freezing assays were used to investigate the ice nucleation activity in immersion freezing mode. First was the twin-plate ice nucleation assay (TINA) (Kunert et al., 2018), and second was the Vienna optical droplet crystallization analyzer (VODCA) (Felgitsch et al., 2018; Pummer et al., 2012). Procedures for both setups can be found in the respective publications. The main differences are that the droplets are on a PCR tray in TINA, and in VODCA, the droplets are emulsified in a paraffin–lanolin oil mixture. TINA uses an IR camera, which measures the latent heat to detect freezing, while VODCA uses a light microscope to detect the difference in optical density (frozen droplets appear darker).

TINA analyzes 98 droplets of 3 µL each and up to eight samples simultaneously. In contrast, VODCA measures around 100 droplets ranging from 1.8 to 33.5 pL. As pL droplets are 6 orders of magnitude smaller than µL droplets, the probability of homogeneous and heterogeneous freezing events is much higher in µL droplets. Classical nucleation theory suggests that smaller droplets, such as those in VODCA, freeze at lower temperatures. The background freezing temperature in VODCA is around 34 °C, whereas with TINA, the background freezing of UHQ water has been measured between 20 and 30 °C; see Supplement Fig. S1. In addition, larger droplets contain more INMs than small droplets. Therefore, the probability of ice nucleation by high-temperature-active INMs (present only at low concentration) is increased in large droplets, as the most efficient INM nucleates the whole droplet. Consequently, VODCA and TINA can be considered complementary techniques: while TINA is better for low INM concentrations, VODCA allows measuring to characteristic freezing temperatures down to 34 °C.

Both methods give a list of freezing points per droplet. In the first step, the fraction of frozen droplets fice is calculated. Subsequently, the number of INMs active above a specific temperature Nm(T) can be estimated using Vali's formula (Vali, 1971). Detailed information on the evaluation of data for TINA (Kunert et al., 2018) and VODCA (Seifried et al., 2023) can be found elsewhere. TINA measurement uncertainty was calculated with Gaussian error propagation.

The two most significant differences are the cooling rate and the droplet size and shape. The cooling rates differ: 1 K min−1 for TINA and 10 K min−1 for VODCA. An intercomparison study of various ice nucleation assays showed good agreement of our pL assay with other ice nucleation assays (DeMott et al., 2018). But previous studies suggested that the cooling rate could influence the freezing temperature (Vali, 2014; Wright et al., 2013). For example, Vali (2014) suggests that a difference of a factor of 10 in cooling rate can approximately shift freezing temperatures by up to  2 °C.

Regarding differences in droplet size and shape, Miller et al. (2021) discussed these as a potential reason for the high background freezing temperature in µL assays in detail. Looking at heterogeneous freezing we refer to Kunert et al. (2018), where extensive comparisons to other ice nucleation assays are reported showing similar freezing temperatures and ice nuclei concentrations. A recent study by Bieber et al. (2024) suggests that B. pendula INMs trigger freezing within the bulk of the droplet rather than the surface, meaning these potential effects are most likely irrelevant to the investigated sample.

2.2.2 Dynamic light scattering

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was measured to obtain information about the hydrodynamic radius of particles suspended in our sample. Particle sizes are measured with a Nicomp 380 submicron particle sizer (Entegris, USA) with a fixed scattering angle of 90° and a laser wavelength of λ= 632.8 nm. DLS measurements were performed on undiluted ice-affinity-purified BPWW samples before and after heat treatment. More details can be found in Schwidetzky et al. (2020, 2021).

2.2.3 Circular dichroism spectroscopy

Circular dichroism (CD) determines information about chiral molecules in a sample, often used to investigate secondary structures of proteins. CD spectra were recorded using a J-1500 CD spectrometer (Jasco, USA). Samples were measured in a 350 µL quartz cuvette (Hellma Analytics, Germany) with a path length of 1 mm. Spectra were recorded at room temperature from 190 to 250 nm with a data pitch of 0.2 nm, a scan rate of 5 nm min−1, and a data integration time of 2 s. Samples were diluted about 1:5 (one part sample to five parts overall) with UHQ water. UHQ water was measured as the background. Spectra were background-subtracted and processed using JASCO's Spectra Manager Analysis program.

2.2.4 Fluorescence spectroscopy

Fluorescence spectroscopy detects the autofluorescence of BPWW, which can be assigned to various biological molecules, such as various proteins containing aromatic amino acids. Fluorescence excitation–emission maps (FEEMs) were recorded using an FSP920 spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments, UK) with an Xe900 xenon arc lamp (450 W) and an S900 single-photon photomultiplier. Samples were measured in a quartz glass cuvette (500 µL, Hellma Quartz; Suprasil©, Germany). Measurement parameters included a dwell time of 0.25 s and monochromator step widths of 5 nm (excitation and emission). First- and second-order excitation was prevented using an offset of 10 nm and a 295 nm low-pass filter.

2.2.5 Infrared spectroscopy

Vibrational spectroscopy, including infrared spectroscopy, records intermolecular and intramolecular vibrations, leading to chemical information such as functional groups. Thus, the biomolecules in our samples, e.g., proteins and saccharides, were assigned. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic measurements were recorded using a Vertex 80v (Bruker, Germany) with a liquid-nitrogen-cooled MCT (mercury cadmium telluride) detector. The spectrometer operates at a pressure of 2 mbar. The internal reflection element (IRE) in the attenuated total reflection (ATR) cell (GladiATR™, Pike Technologies, USA) was a diamond crystal. OPUS 6.5 software (Bruker, Germany) was used for evaluation and instrument control. The crystal surface was flushed with dry nitrogen. For each measurement, 128 scans were accumulated at a resolution of 0.5 cm−1. The IRE was coated with a thin layer of soluble sample components for measurement. Approximately 30 µL of the sample was pipetted onto the IRE and dried with a steady stream of dry nitrogen. Post-processing of the spectra included normalization and removal of the IRE signal between 1900 and 2350 cm−1.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Investigating Betula pendula INMs using two complementary ice nucleation assays

Figure 1a shows the ice nucleation activity of BPWW after freeze drying, measured with two complementary ice nucleation assays: (i) TINA, which measures 3 µL droplets (Kunert et al., 2018), hereafter referred to as the µL assay, and (ii) VODCA, which measures pL droplets, with an average volume of 8.2 pL (Pummer et al., 2012), hereafter referred to as the pL assay.

The results in Fig. 1a show the number of nucleation sites (Nm) per gram of pollen in BPWW. Three distinct INMs evolve in the Nm spectra, which can be recognized via the various rises and plateaus. Starting from the right, a sharp increase between 5.7 and 7 °C highlights the first INM. After a plateau from 7 to 14 °C, the second INM appears between 14 and 16 °C. The third INM follows immediately, triggering freezing between 16 and 19 °C, followed by a plateau until 34 °C. Hence, we can derive three distinct INM subpopulations with different efficiencies, which, from now on, we term as INM Classes A, B, and C, in the order of decreasing freezing temperatures. The measurements of the two assays overlap between 15 and 19 °C, but the pL-assay results show only Classes B and C, with Class B only being minimally visible. Class B is hard to distinguish from Class C INMs, as their activity overlaps. However, the distinct rise at 15 °C (Class B), prior to the rise at 19 °C (Class C) in the cumulative spectrum, is very reproducible in all our measurements, suggesting that Class B is not an artifact but indeed a separate class of INM.

We used the heterogeneous-underlying-based (HUB) stochastic optimization analysis (de Almeida Ribeiro et al., 2023) on the µL-assay data to better identify and characterize the underlying number of INM subpopulations (classes). Figure 1b shows the differential spectrum predicted by HUB from the optimized distribution of nucleation temperatures. The three INM classes in the differential spectrum are centered at the average freezing temperatures of 8.7 °C for Class A, 15.7 °C for Class B, and 17.4 °C for Class C. In the differential spectrum of the freeze-dried BPWW (Fig. 1b), Class C INMs represent more than 99.9 % of the active nucleation sites in pollen. Freeze drying of our sample increased the activity of Class A, an effect we show and discuss in Sect. 3.2.

From six independent BPWW samples, three each from pollen A and pollen B (see Sect. 2.1), we derive the concentration of the INM classes in untreated BPWW (see Fig. S2). Class A occurs with a concentration of Nm<103 g−1 (only detectable with the µL assay), Class B with a concentration of Nm 102 to  107 g−1, and Class C with a concentration of Nm 105 to  1011 g−1. This underscores that the overwhelming majority are Class C INMs. Several factors, such as the extraction process and the natural variability of biological samples, can cause these variations.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/103/2025/bg-22-103-2025-f01

Figure 1Freezing spectrum of birch pollen washing water (BPWW) with 50 mg of pollen per milliliter measured with two complementary ice nucleation assays. (a) Cumulative number Nm(T) of INMs per gram of Betula pendula pollen (pollen A, after freeze drying). Green circles show the measurement with the µL-droplet assay. Pink diamonds represent the measurement with the pL-droplet assay. The legend on the left shows the dilutions of the sample, e.g., 10−1, which corresponds to a 1:10 dilution. The graph shows three distinct average freezing temperatures at 8.7, 15.7, and 17.4 °C marked by the steep increase in the Nm spectra. The first hump (5.4 to 14 °C) is only measurable with the µL-droplet assay. The measurements overlap between 15 and 20 °C. (b) Number of INMs nm(T) analyzed with the heterogeneous-underlying-based (HUB) stochastic optimization analysis of de Almeida Riberio et al. (2023) to better identify and characterize the underlying number of INM subpopulations in pollen, performed on the µL-assay data from (a).

Download

The combination of two ice nucleation assays is beneficial for two reasons: (1) low-concentrated ice nuclei can be detected, and (2) measurement can be conducted down to about 34 °C. Due to the low concentration, Class A INMs are only detectable with the µL-droplet assay, while the pL assay allows us to conclude that no further classes of nucleators are present in the sample.

The ice nucleation activity is in agreement with previous studies. From the first study on the ice nucleation activity of B. pendula (Diehl et al., 2001) to the discovery of the INMs (Pummer et al., 2012), the freezing temperature was reported between 15 and 18 °C, which was also supported by other studies (Augustin et al., 2013; Burkart et al., 2021); some even find the two distinct species at 15 and 18 °C (Dreischmeier et al., 2017; O'Sullivan et al., 2015), which we now refer to as Classes B and C.

Ice nucleation activity at higher temperature has already been measured by Dreischmeier et al. (2017), who showed these highly efficient INMs in the Supplement to their paper; however, they did not discuss them, and only later in Dreischmeier's PhD thesis were they assigned to whole pollen grains rather than being INMs (Dreischmeier, 2019). More recently, Class A was mentioned in the context of cryopreservation in 100 µL volumes (Murray et al., 2022). The data presented here, for the first time, clearly show the complete Nm spectrum of B. pendula with three distinct INM classes with average freezing temperatures at 8.7, 15.4, and 17.4 °C. In addition, the fitting results (Fig. 1b) are in agreement with the assignment of the pollen INMs to the experimental data from Dreischmeier et al. (2017) and performed by de Almeida Ribeiro et al. (2023).

B. pendula INMs are often overlooked in terms of atmospheric relevance due to their low nucleation temperatures between 15 and 18 °C. Inorganic ice nuclei, e.g., mineral dust, are much more prevalent in this temperature range due to their high mass concentrations above the land surface. Naturally occurring ice nuclei with nucleation temperatures >10 °C are rare and dominated mainly by fungal and bacterial ice nuclei, which appear in low natural concentrations. We show that B. pendula pollen can contain highly efficient ice nuclei (Class A INMs) but at very low concentrations compared to the more common Class B and C INMs. However, studies have shown that INMs found on B. pendula pollen are across the whole tree (Felgitsch et al., 2018; Seifried et al., 2020). Considering the wide distribution of B. pendula in the boreal forest, we speculate that B. pendula INMs might influence the total population of ice nuclei above 10 °C near boreal forests. Understanding the emission, transmission, and nucleation mechanisms of ice nuclei active in this high-temperature regime is crucial because of their substantial influence on cloud micro-processes and subsequent impacts on weather and climate.

3.2 Effects of freeze drying, freeze–thaw cycles, and heat on ice nucleation activity

Upon establishing the presence of three distinct INM classes in B. pendula pollen, we explored their stability and response to various conditions: (a) freeze drying with subsequent hydration of the residue, (b) repeated freeze–thaw cycles, and (c) heat treatments. All experiments in this section were conducted with the sample from Fig. 1a. Replicates with other pollen can be found in the Supplement if indicated.

While Fig. 1a shows a freeze-dried sample to better identify the three INM classes, Fig. 2 compares the freeze-dried sample to the untreated sample to illustrate how freeze drying elevated Class A INMs. Freeze drying and subsequently hydrating the residue – while retaining the initial concentration of the INM sample – increases the concentration of Class A INMs, where Nm increased by factors between 10 and 400 within five replicates of this experiment (see Fig. S3). In contrast, Class B and C concentrations remained constant or decreased slightly by a factor of up to 5.

To the best of our knowledge, the impact of freeze drying on the ice nucleation activity has not been deliberately studied for biological ice nuclei. However, previous studies have regularly freeze-dried samples before ice nucleation measurements (Forbes et al., 2022; Lukas et al., 2021; O'Sullivan et al., 2015; Rangel-Alvarado et al., 2015; Schwidetzky et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2016). In particular, the widely studied Snomax® consists of freeze-dried fragments of Pseudomonas syringae.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/103/2025/bg-22-103-2025-f02

Figure 2Freeze drying increases the ice nucleation activity of birch pollen washing water (BPWW). Cumulative number Nm(T) of INMs per gram of Betula pendula pollen after freeze drying BPWW, dissolving in ultrahigh-quality (UHQ) water, and retaining the initial BPWW concentration (pollen A). The freeze-dried sample (solid circles) increased in ice nucleation activity compared to the untreated sample (hollow circles). Ice nucleation activity consistently increased in the four independent experiments (see the Supplement), but the increase varied. The legend on the right shows the dilutions of the sample, e.g., 10−1, which corresponds to a 1:10 dilution.

Download

Figure 3 shows that the Nm spectrum remained stable throughout 14 freeze–thaw cycles. Interestingly, at temperatures below 15 °C, there is a shift to higher concentrations of Class B INMs and an inverse effect on Class C INMs, both by a factor of  5.

Experiments of this type have been performed with different biological INMs, resulting in significant shifts in the freezing efficiency of bacterial ice nuclei (Polen et al., 2016) and much smaller effects on fungal and lichen INMs (Eufemio et al., 2023; Schwidetzky et al., 2023). While the ice-nucleation-active components of bacteria and fungi are proteins (Green and Warren, 1985; Schwidetzky et al., 2023), it is unknown for lichens and B. pendula. The contrasting responses of biological ice nucleators to freeze–thaw cycles highlight the complexity of their ice nucleation mechanisms and underline the importance of further studies.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/103/2025/bg-22-103-2025-f03

Figure 3Freeze–thaw cycles alter the ice nucleation activity of birch pollen washing water (BPWW) in lower-temperature regions. Cumulative number Nm(T) of INMs per gram of pollen after 14 freeze–thaw cycles (pollen A, after ice-affinity purification; e.g., the sample was also freeze-dried). The color gradient indicates the number of freeze–thaw cycles, with the colors increasing in darkness with each cycle, as indicated in the legend on the right. The figure shows the temperature range where the repeated freeze–thaw cycles have affected the ice nucleation activity. Each cycle increases ice nucleation activity at 15 °C and decreases it at 18 °C.

Download

Figure 4 shows the Nm spectra of heat-treated samples. Heat treatment at 40 °C for 1 h had a minor effect on Class A INMs, decreasing the concentration by about 10, while Classes B and C were unaffected. A 1 h heat treatment at 78 °C deactivates Class A, while B and C are slightly reduced. This effect is more pronounced when the temperature is increased to 98 °C and even more pronounced when the heat treatment duration is increased from 1 to 24 h. Heat treatment at 98 °C also decreases ice nucleation activity to a slightly lower temperature.

Although heat treatments at high temperatures are not relevant for ambient atmospheric processes, they provide valuable insight. Firstly, these treatments reveal a diverging response of the INM classes to heat, which raises further questions about possibly varying chemistry. Secondly, they are often used on field samples to determine whether the ice nuclei are of biological origin, as many biological molecules, particularly proteins, are heat-sensitive and can denature at high temperatures, losing their activity. Our data suggest that a simple heat treatment is insufficient to classify whether ice nuclei are of biological origin.

Previous studies on the thermal stability of birch INMs showed mixed results. Pummer et al. (2012) reported no change in ice nucleation activity after dry heating up to 111 °C for 1 h but a complete loss of activity after heating to 202 °C for 1 h (Pummer et al., 2012), but in their work the sample was dried before the heat treatment. Daily et al. (2022) also reported a loss of activity after dry heating to 250 °C for 4 h and no loss after a wet heat treatment at 100 °C for 30 min. Dreischmeier et al. (2017) used a wet heat treatment (as in our study) and showed a concentration-dependent effect. Heat treatment of 90 °C for 3 h resulted in a complete loss of activity in a less concentrated sample but had no impact on a 1000-fold more concentrated sample (Dreischmeier, 2019). This is consistent with our results from a dilution series, for which with higher treatment temperature and longer duration, fewer dilutions had to be measured until the sample froze homogeneously. Dreischmeier (2019) and Pummer et al. (2012) used pL assays, which did not allow them to measure Class A INMs. The measurement of a dilution series allowed us to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the thermal degradation process.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/103/2025/bg-22-103-2025-f04

Figure 4Heat treatment diminishes ice nucleation activity in birch pollen washing water (BPWW), especially at T>15 °C. Cumulative number Nm(T) of INMs per gram of Betula pendula pollen (pollen A, after freeze drying). INMs were ice-affinity-purified and then heated (40 °C – blue circles, 78 °C – yellow squares, 98 °C – red triangles) for 1 h (also 24 h for 98 °C, downward triangles), and the color gradients indicate dilutions. Heat effects depend on treatment temperature, duration, and freezing temperature. Ice nucleation activity >15 °C is reduced at a temperature of 40 °C, while ice nucleation activity <15 °C is only altered at temperatures of 98 °C.

Download

To summarize, this section investigated how ice nucleation activity of birch INMs can be influenced: (i) freeze drying increases Class A INM concentration, (ii) freeze–thaw cycles increase Class B and decrease Class C INM concentration, and (iii) heat treatments decrease INM concentration overall.

The data show how subtle changes in sample treatment can significantly alter the ice nucleation activity of birch INMs. While heat treatment is intended to change the activity of a sample, repeated freezing or freeze drying is usually an (un)intended step for or during sample preparation that can significantly impact the results. We suggest that in further studies, the steps of sample preparation, both in the lab and field studies, are documented in detail. Understanding how ice nucleation activity is affected can provide important insight into the stability and mechanisms of ice nuclei.

As introduced above, Murray et al. (2022) proposed that highly efficient birch INMs are likely to be large aggregates of smaller subunits. Aggregation could be the process interconnecting the three INM classes reported in our study if they are aggregates of varying sizes. The following section explores this hypothesis by examining size-selective filtrations and DLS measurements focusing on the size of the INM.

3.3 Investigations of INM size

INM sizes were assessed by (a) using size-selective filters and subsequently measuring ice nucleation activity and (b) measuring particle sizes by DLS of the heat-treated samples, which differed in INM concentration and freezing temperatures.

Figure 5 shows the Nm spectra of the filtrates from one filtration series out of four independent series (for simplicity). The full dataset is shown in Fig. S5. Generally, all samples showed low concentrations of Class A INMs, but we can still see that the 300 kDa filter does not affect the sample, whereas the 100 kDa removes all Class A INMs and decreases the concentration of Class B and C INMs. The < 50 and < 30 kDa fractions almost show no Class B INMs. Individual droplets in the < 50 kDa fractions froze above 15 °C due to this experiment's uncertainty. The < 10 kDa fraction shows almost exclusively Class C INMs, with single freezing events at higher temperatures. Hence, we confidently conclude that the ice nucleation activity in terms of Nm and freezing temperature decreased with decreasing pore sizes. This suggests the three INM classes are different in size, with Class A being the largest and Class C being the smallest.

Previous studies by Pummer et al. (2012) and Dreischmeier et al. (2017) employed MWCO filtrations and concluded that the INMs must be > 100 kDa, which is directly contradicted by our results. The discrepancy is due to the different droplet volumes since both studies used pL assays, which have a lower sensitivity than the µL assay used in this study. The data show that birch INMs are smaller than previously assumed.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/103/2025/bg-22-103-2025-f05

Figure 5Investigation of INM sizes by size-selective filtrates of birch pollen washing water (BPWW). Cumulative number Nm(T) of INMs per gram of Betula pendula pollen of the unfiltered sample (pollen A, untreated). BPWW was size-selectively-filtered with nominal filter sizes of 300, 100, 50, 30, and 10 kDa. The ice nucleation activity decreases with smaller filter sizes in concentration and initial freezing temperature. The colors increase in brightness with smaller cutoff sizes. Four independent experiments were performed (see the Supplement). Unfiltered sample refers to BPWW, which, during preparation, is filtered with a 220 nm filter.

Download

Figure 6 shows the hydrodynamic radius (Rh) of ice-affinity-purified (i.e., also freeze-dried) BPWW before and after heat treatment as measured by DLS. The radii range from  240 nm (non-heat-treated) to  280 nm (40 °C) down to  115 nm (98 °C, 1 h).

Correlating the radii with the freezing onset temperature (as measured with the µL assay shown in Fig. 4) shows that the non-heat-treated and 40 °C treated samples have larger radii and higher freezing onset temperatures of around 6 °C. In contrast, the 78 and 98 °C treated samples have smaller radii and lower freezing onset temperatures of around 15 °C. The freezing spectra in Fig. 4 show the non-heat-treated and 40 °C treated samples contain Class A INMs, while the 78 and 98 °C treated samples only contain small concentrations of Class B and mostly Class C INMs. The data evidently show that the higher the heat treatment temperature, the smaller the radii, directly correlating with lower freezing onset temperatures and INM classes.

One might note that DLS gives only a single particle size, while it is highly likely that there are different particle sizes within the sample. The largest particles are preferentially observed, as the intensity of light scattering is disproportionately affected by larger particles. Hence, the untreated sample has a radius similar to the sample treated at 40 °C but with a much larger uncertainty (calculated from four independent samples). The larger uncertainty is explained by the measurement principle of DLS, where the scattering signal is proportional to the sixth power of particle diameter, d6. Hence, the measurement uncertainty drastically increases in polydisperse systems containing a multitude of larger particles.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/103/2025/bg-22-103-2025-f06

Figure 6INM sizes determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) of heat-treated birch pollen washing water (BPWW) compared to freezing onset temperature Ton. The hydrodynamic radius Rh (nm) of particles in ice-affinity-purified BPWW (pollen A, after freeze drying), measured by DLS, shows a decline in the size of the largest particles with increasing heat treatment temperature. Along with it the freezing onset temperature of the undiluted sample decreased (freezing onset temperatures were determined from Fig. 4). Error bars were calculated using error propagation combining the measurement errors from multiple measurements. Untreated BPWW is plotted as heat-treated at 20 °C for practical purposes. Replication of the 40 °C heat treatment was not possible, and only one measurement was acquired for which a 10 % error was assumed.

Download

Figures 5 and 6 show that the larger INMs in our sample have higher freezing temperatures. In Fig. 5, filtering off larger particles results in lower nucleation temperatures, whereas in Fig. 6 larger particles directly correlate with higher freezing onset temperatures, derived from the loss of activity by heat treatment. While both measurements do not necessarily represent INM sizes, both experiments show the same trend: larger sizes correlate with higher freezing onset temperatures.

This supports the proposed idea that aggregation of INMs leads to higher nucleation temperatures (Murray et al., 2022) and correlates with INM classes. Former studies have investigated bacterial (Qiu et al., 2019) and fungal (Schwidetzky et al., 2023) ice nuclei, showing that aggregation of ice nuclei leads to higher ice nucleation temperatures. In our experiments, Class C exhibits the smallest size, Class B is larger, and Class A is the largest-sized INM subpopulation. In principle, aggregation ability should connect with the chemical nature of the ice nucleators. To investigate the molecular signature of the INMs, CD, fluorescence, and IR spectroscopy was utilized.

3.4 Chemical analysis of birch INMs

Initially, we employed fluorescence and infrared spectroscopy to analyze ice-affinity-purified BPWW, methods previously used by Pummer et al. (2013), Dreischmeier et al. (2017), and Burkart et al. (2021). First, fluorescence spectroscopy showed signals typical for aromatic amino acids, proving the presence of proteins (see Fig. S6). Second, infrared spectroscopy showed typical protein bands (amide I, II, III bands) and typical polysaccharide bands (sugar skeletal vibration and C–O–C glycosidic vibration); the entire spectrum can be seen in the Supplement in Fig. S7. These findings are consistent with existing literature and show proteinaceous and polysaccharidic signals.

Figure 7 shows the CD spectra of ice-affinity-purified BPWW before and after heat treatment. The maximum is at  185 nm, the minimum is at about 210 nm, and the signal increases until 250 nm. The signal of the heat-treated sample differs between 185 and 210 nm, suggesting a structural change from the proteins within the sample. With the CD spectrum of BPWW, the BeStSel tool is used to estimate the ratios of secondary structures to one other based on the CD spectra. The database comparison shows that BPWW has about 30 % beta sheets and 5 % alpha-helix structures. This is noteworthy since many of the highest active (in terms of freezing temperature) biological ice-nucleating proteins have considerable beta-sheet structures (Garnham et al., 2011; Kajava and Lindow, 1993; Lukas et al., 2021). However, other proteins are present in our sample, such as the Bet v allergens, which show varying quantities of beta-sheet structures (Gajhede et al., 1996; Kofler et al., 2012; Neudecker et al., 2004; Soh et al., 2017).

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/103/2025/bg-22-103-2025-f07

Figure 7Circular dichroism spectrum of birch pollen washing water (BPWW), untreated and heat-treated. The spectrum shows the signal of ice-affinity-purified BPWW (pollen A) non-heat-treated (black) and heat-treated (red), with a minimum molar ellipticity at  210 nm and a local maximum at  185 nm. The heat-treated signal differs mainly in the 185 to 210 nm region, indicating a structural change.

Download

Birch INMs were initially suggested to be composed of polysaccharides based on their high-temperature stability and various chemical and enzymatic experiments (Dreischmeier et al., 2017; Pummer et al., 2012, 2015). In contrast, studies focusing specifically on denaturing proteins and fluorescence spectroscopy suggest that proteins are at least involved in the ice nucleation activity of birch INMs (Burkart et al., 2021; Felgitsch, 2019; Tong et al., 2015). Burkart et al. (2021) also speculate that highly glycosylated proteins might be the ice-nucleation-active component. While our findings add weight to the theory of proteinaceous involvement in birch INMs, they also highlight the inherent complexity in deciphering the exact composition of birch INMs. This uncertainty presents a challenge for future research.

4 Conclusions

Our study re-examines the INMs of Betula pendula pollen, shedding new light on their complex ice nucleation capabilities. We identified three classes of INMs with average freezing temperatures of 8.7 °C (Class A), 15.4 °C (Class B), and 17.4 °C (Class C). The concentrations from Class A to C increase by multiple orders of magnitude. Combining two ice nucleation assays with different droplet sizes (3 µL – TINA; pL droplets – VODCA) allowed us to measure with high sensitivity and at temperatures down to 34 °C.

We evaluated physical influences on the ice nucleation activity of our samples. First, our results show that freeze drying increases the concentration of Class A INMs, allowing us to better identify this class, while the concentration of Classes B and C remains the same or decreases slightly. Second, repeated freeze–thaw cycles led to an increase in Class B and a decrease in Class C concentrations, both by a factor of 5, while Class A was unaffected. Third, heat reduces the concentration of all INMs. Class A INMs were completely inactivate after 1 h at 78 °C. Class B and C INMs decreased after 1 h at 98 °C, and after 24 h at 98 °C, only Class C INMs remained. This demonstrates how subtle (unintended) differences in sample treatment can significantly alter the ice nucleation activity of birch INMs.

Last, we focused on investigating the size and chemistry. Size-selective filtrations showed that the smaller the INMs, the lower the freezing temperature. DLS measurements of non-heat-treated and heat-treated INMs show a decrease in size with increasing heat treatment temperature, which correlates with a lower freezing onset temperature of the sample. Chemical analysis, including CD, fluorescence, and infrared spectroscopy, shows proteinaceous and polysaccharidic signals.

Most previous studies on birch INMs have only reported activity at 15 and 18 °C (Augustin et al., 2013; Diehl et al., 2001; Dreischmeier et al., 2017; O'Sullivan et al., 2015; Pummer et al., 2012), with one study reporting up to 6 °C (Murray et al., 2022). Our results confirm that INMs from B. pendula can induce heterogeneous freezing at temperatures at high subzero temperatures (up to 5.4 °C) and allow us to estimate the concentration of these highly efficient INMs. Furthermore, it allows field measurements to search for birch INMs in the atmosphere actively. Tree-based INMs are often overlooked as a source of atmospherically relevant ice nuclei of biological origin. However, studies on B. pendula and Pinus sylvestris, another tree species with pollen that contains INMs, have shown an abundance of INMs on trees' surfaces (Felgitsch et al., 2018; Seifried et al., 2020, 2023). These tree species are widespread in the boreal forest, making them an important reservoir of INMs, and could potentially be large emitters of INMs.

Based on our results, we hypothesize that the three found INM classes are aggregates of varying size, where the larger INMs have higher nucleation temperatures but, in turn, also occur in much smaller numbers. In terms of size, we show that Class A is bigger than Class B, which is bigger than Class C. We suggest that Class C INMs are the smallest aggregates or single units. A certain stable aggregate size of the subunits forms the Class B INMs, and Class A INMs are even larger. Class A INMs require specific prerequisites to form, and our results suggest that freeze drying can induce this process. At the same time, repeated freeze–thaw cycles seem to induce only minor aggregation of Class B. Heat leads to disassembly of the aggregates, and our results suggest that the larger the aggregates, the lower the temperature required for disassembly.

The current idea is that aggregation is essential for ice-nucleating molecules (especially of biological origin) and has been discussed in the context of ice-binding proteins (IBPs) from bacteria and insects (Burke and Lindow, 1990; Govindarajan and Lindow, 1988; Gurian-Sherman and Lindow, 1995; Kozloff et al., 1991). These proteins encompass antifreeze proteins (AFPs) and ice-nucleating proteins, each playing distinct roles in ice formation (Bar Dolev et al., 2016; DeVries and Wohlschlag, 1969). IBPs are characterized by motifs such as anchored clathrates and ice-like structures, typically found in beta-sheet formations (Graether and Jia, 2001; Hakim et al., 2013; Leinala et al., 2002; Liou et al., 2000). These motifs confer a high affinity for ice. AFPs utilize these motifs to inhibit ice growth by binding to ice crystals (Raymond and DeVries, 1977). In contrast, INPs, primarily studied in bacterial contexts, form larger aggregates (Burke and Lindow, 1990; Ling et al., 2018). These aggregates enhance the proteins' ice-nucleating capabilities, with larger aggregates correlating with higher nucleation temperatures (Qiu et al., 2019). The aggregation in bacterial ice nuclei is facilitated by specific protein sequences that enable aggregation (Burke and Lindow, 1990; Govindarajan and Lindow, 1988; Gurian-Sherman and Lindow, 1995; Lukas et al., 2022). A similar idea is proposed for fungal ice nuclei, which are also proteinaceous (Schwidetzky et al., 2023). For birch INMs, aggregation was initially suggested by Dreischmeier et al. (2017) and Murray et al. (2022). Our results also provide evidence that aggregation can cause higher nucleation temperatures, which correlates with the three separate INM classes we present. All previous studies linking aggregation and nucleation temperature are based on proteinaceous ice nucleators. However, the exact molecular composition of birch INMs remains elusive. Therefore, findings from bacterial or fungal ice nuclei cannot be directly transferred to pollen ice nuclei.

Nonetheless, our results indicate that aggregation leads to higher ice nucleation temperatures and is the link between the three INM classes, which poses further questions regarding (a) the reason for the discrete sizes of the aggregates, (b) the chemical composition of their subunits, and (c) how and why aggregates foster ice nucleation.

In all our results, we find three discrete INM classes that differ in size, the reason for which is not entirely clear. Still, the discreteness, rather than a continuous increase in size or nucleation temperature, is an intriguing effect that needs further investigation. A simple increase in INM surface leading to an increased number of nucleation sites on that aggregate could also explain the higher nucleation temperatures but not the observed discreteness unless the aggregates only form in discrete sizes. Another possible explanation could be a different nucleation mechanism enabled by an aggregate reaching a certain size.

According to our understanding, there are four central physical and chemical reasons for enhanced ice nucleation activity related to aggregates.

  • i.

    Water activity is a thermodynamic predictor of kinetic ice nucleation. It reveals a direct relationship with the water structure at the INM surface, allowing interpretation of the interaction between INMs and critical ice nuclei (Knopf and Alpert, 2023).

  • ii.

    Water in nano-sized confined geometries at the surface of INM aggregates can serve as the origin of ice formation, leading to stacking-disordered ice (Knopf and Alpert, 2023; Nandy et al., 2023).

  • iii.

    Amino acid TxT motifs, where T is threonine and x is a non-conserved amino acid, can order water molecules into a stacking-disordered ice structure attributed to chemical functional groups capable of hydrogen-bonding to water molecules composed of hydrophilic–hydrophobic patterns (Alsante et al., 2024; Qiu et al., 2019).

  • iv.

    The ice nucleation process releases latent heat, which is the kinetic energy of the water molecules of the liquid transformed into infrared radiation. Aggregates exhibit an enhanced number of degrees of freedom, allowing a more efficient uptake of kinetic energy and a broader emission of IR radiation.

Elucidating the chemistry and physics of the INM will help us further understand how they nucleate ice (Felgitsch et al., 2018; Seifried et al., 2020, 2023). In summary, our research contributes significant new insights into the nature and behavior of B. pendula INMs and underscores their potential as critical players in atmospheric ice nucleation processes. This understanding is crucial for refining weather and climate models, where the role of biological ice nucleators has been historically underappreciated.

Data availability

All data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-103-2025-supplement.

Author contributions

HG, JFN, KM, and TMS conceptualized the project. HG, JFN, and KM supervised FW. FW performed the experiments with the support of NB and RS. All authors discussed the results. FW prepared the manuscript with input and revisions from all co-authors.

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ellen H. G. Backus, Clara M. Saak, and Friederike Strahl from the Department of Physical Chemistry at the University of Vienna for valuable discussions and input. The authors also thank Rosemary Eufemio from Boise State University for her support with the HUB backward fitting of the ice nucleation data.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (grant no. 888109), by the TU Wien Bibliothek through its Open Access Funding Programme, and by the NSF (grant nos. NSF 2308172, 2116528).

Review statement

This paper was edited by Robert Rhew and reviewed by Gabor Vali and one anonymous referee.

References

Adar, C., Sirotinskaya, V., Bar Dolev, M., Friehmann, T., and Braslavsky, I.: Falling water ice affinity purification of ice-binding proteins, Sci. Rep., 8, 11046, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29312-x, 2018. 

Alsante, A. N., Thornton, D. C. O., and Brooks, S. D.: Effect of Aggregation and Molecular Size on the Ice Nucleation Efficiency of Proteins, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 4594–4605, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c06835, 2024. 

Augustin, S., Wex, H., Niedermeier, D., Pummer, B., Grothe, H., Hartmann, S., Tomsche, L., Clauss, T., Voigtländer, J., Ignatius, K., and Stratmann, F.: Immersion freezing of birch pollen washing water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10989–11003, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10989-2013, 2013. 

Bar Dolev, M., Braslavsky, I., and Davies, P. L.: Ice-binding proteins and their function, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 85, 515–542, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014546, 2016. 

Bieber, P. and Borduas-Dedekind, N.: High-speed cryo-microscopy reveals that ice-nucleating proteins of Pseudomonas syringae trigger freezing at hydrophobic interfaces, Sci. Adv., 10, eadn6606, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn6606, 2024. 

Bieber, P., Seifried, T. M., Burkart, J., Gratzl, J., Kasper-Giebl, A., Schmale, D. G., and Grothe, H.: A drone-based bioaerosol sampling system to monitor ice nucleation particles in the lower atmosphere, Remote Sens., 12, 552, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030552, 2020. 

Burkart, J., Gratzl, J., Seifried, T. M., Bieber, P., and Grothe, H.: Isolation of subpollen particles (SPPs) of birch: SPPs are potential carriers of ice nucleating macromolecules, Biogeosciences, 18, 5751–5765, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5751-2021, 2021. 

Burke, M. J. and Lindow, S. E.: Surface properties and size of the ice nucleation site in ice nucleation active bacteria: theoretical considerations, Cryobiology, 27, 80–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(90)90054-8, 1990. 

Corotto, L. V., Wolber, P. K., and Warren, G. J.: Ice nucleation activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens: mutagenesis, complementation analysis and identification of a gene product, EMBO J., 5, 231–236, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04203.x, 1986. 

Daily, M. I., Tarn, M. D., Whale, T. F., and Murray, B. J.: An evaluation of the heat test for the ice-nucleating ability of minerals and biological material, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2635–2665, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2635-2022, 2022. 

de Almeida Ribeiro, I., Meister, K., and Molinero, V.: HUB: a method to model and extract the distribution of ice nucleation temperatures from drop-freezing experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5623–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5623-2023, 2023. 

DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., Cziczo, D. J., Hiranuma, N., Petters, M. D., Petters, S. S., Belosi, F., Bingemer, H. G., Brooks, S. D., Budke, C., Burkert-Kohn, M., Collier, K. N., Danielczok, A., Eppers, O., Felgitsch, L., Garimella, S., Grothe, H., Herenz, P., Hill, T. C. J., Höhler, K., Kanji, Z. A., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Kristensen, T. B., Krüger, K., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T., Murray, B. J., Nicosia, A., O'Sullivan, D., Peckhaus, A., Polen, M. J., Price, H. C., Reicher, N., Rothenberg, D. A., Rudich, Y., Santachiara, G., Schiebel, T., Schrod, J., Seifried, T. M., Stratmann, F., Sullivan, R. C., Suski, K. J., Szakáll, M., Taylor, H. P., Ullrich, R., Vergara-Temprado, J., Wagner, R., Whale, T. F., Weber, D., Welti, A., Wilson, T. W., Wolf, M. J., and Zenker, J.: The Fifth International Workshop on Ice Nucleation phase 2 (FIN-02): laboratory intercomparison of ice nucleation measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6231–6257, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6231-2018, 2018. 

DeVries, A. L. and Wohlschlag, D. E.: Freezing Resistance in Some Antarctic Fishes, Science, 163, 1073–1075, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.163.3871.1073, 1969. 

Diehl, K., Quick, C., Matthias-Maser, S., Mitra, S. K., and Jaenicke, R.: The ice nucleating ability of pollen part I: laboratory studies in deposition and condensation freezing modes, Atmos. Res., 58, 75–87, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-8095(01)00091-6, 2001. 

Dreischmeier, K.: Heterogene eisnukleations- und antigefriereigenschaften von biomolekülen, Universität Bielefeld, PhD Thesis, https://doi.org/10.4119/unibi/2934018, 2019. 

Dreischmeier, K., Budke, C., Wiehemeier, L., Kottke, T., and Koop, T.: Boreal pollen contain ice-nucleating as well as ice-binding “antifreeze” polysaccharides, Sci. Rep., 7, 41890, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41890, 2017. 

Eufemio, R. J., de Almeida Ribeiro, I., Sformo, T. L., Laursen, G. A., Molinero, V., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Bonn, M., and Meister, K.: Lichen species across Alaska produce highly active and stable ice nucleators, Biogeosciences, 20, 2805–2812, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2805-2023, 2023. 

Felgitsch, L.: Ice nucleation activity of boreal plants with focus on birch trees, Wien, PhD Thesis, https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2019.23059, 2019. 

Felgitsch, L., Baloh, P., Burkart, J., Mayr, M., Momken, M. E., Seifried, T. M., Winkler, P., Schmale III, D. G., and Grothe, H.: Birch leaves and branches as a source of ice-nucleating macromolecules, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16063–16079, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16063-2018, 2018. 

Forbes, J., Bissoyi, A., Eickhoff, L., Reicher, N., Hansen, T., Bon, C. G., Walker, V. K., Koop, T., Rudich, Y., Braslavsky, I., and Davies, P. L.: Water-organizing motif continuity is critical for potent ice nucleation protein activity, Nat. Commun., 13, 5019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32469-9, 2022. 

Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Hill, T. C. J., Pummer, B. G., Yordanova, P., Franc, G. D., and Pöschl, U.: Ice nucleation activity in the widespread soil fungus Mortierella alpina, Biogeosciences, 12, 1057–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1057-2015, 2015. 

Gajhede, M., Osmark, P., Poulsen, F. M., Ipsen, H., Larsen, J. N., van Neerven, R. J. J., Schou, C., Løwenstein, H., and Spangfort, M. D.: X-ray and NMR structure of Bet v 1, the origin of birch pollen allergy, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 3, 1040–1045, https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb1296-1040, 1996. 

Garnham, C. P., Campbell, R. L., Walker, V. K., and Davies, P. L.: Novel dimeric β-helical model of an ice nucleation protein with bridged active sites, BMC Struct. Biol., 11, 36, https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-11-36, 2011. 

Govindarajan, A. G. and Lindow, S. E.: Size of bacterial ice-nucleation sites measured in situ by radiation inactivation analysis, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1334–1338, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.5.1334, 1988. 

Graether, S. P. and Jia, Z.: Modeling Pseudomonas syringae ice-nucleation protein as a β-helical protein, Biophys. J., 80, 1169–1173, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(01)76093-6, 2001. 

Green, R. L. and Warren, G. J.: Physical and functional repetition in a bacterial ice nucleation gene, Nature, 317, 645–648, https://doi.org/10.1038/317645a0, 1985. 

Gurian-Sherman, D. and Lindow, S. E.: Differential effects of growth temperature on ice nuclei active at different temperatures that are produced by cells of Pseudomonas syringae, Cryobiology, 32, 129–138, https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1995.1012, 1995. 

Hakim, A., Nguyen, J. B., Basu, K., Zhu, D. F., Thakral, D., Davies, P. L., Isaacs, F. J., Modis, Y., and Meng, W.: Crystal structure of an insect antifreeze protein and its implications for ice binding, J. Biol. Chem., 288, 12295–12304, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m113.450973, 2013. 

Kajava, A. V. and Lindow, S. E.: A model of the three-dimensional structure of ice nucleation proteins, J. Mol. Biol., 232, 709–717, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1993.1424, 1993. 

Knopf, D. A. and Alpert, P. A.: Atmospheric ice nucleation, Nat. Rev. Phys., 5, 203–217, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00570-7, 2023. 

Kofler, S., Asam, C., Eckhard, U., Wallner, M., Ferreira, F., and Brandstetter, H.: Crystallographically Mapped Ligand Binding Differs in High and Low IgE Binding Isoforms of Birch Pollen Allergen Bet v 1, J. Mol. Biol., 422, 109–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2012.05.016, 2012. 

Kozloff, L. M., Turner, M. A., and Arellano, F.: Formation of bacterial membrane ice-nucleating lipoglycoprotein complexes, J. Bacteriol., 173, 6528–6536, https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.20.6528-6536.1991, 1991. 

Kunert, A. T., Lamneck, M., Helleis, F., Pöschl, U., Pöhlker, M. L., and Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.: Twin-plate Ice Nucleation Assay (TINA) with infrared detection for high-throughput droplet freezing experiments with biological ice nuclei in laboratory and field samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6327–6337, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6327-2018, 2018. 

Lau, K. M. and Wu, H. T.: Warm rain processes over tropical oceans and climate implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2290, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl018567, 2003. 

Leinala, E. K., Davies, P. L., Doucet, D., Tyshenko, M. G., Walker, V. K., and Jia, Z.: A β-helical antifreeze protein isoform with increased activity: structural and functional insights, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 33349–33352, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m205575200, 2002. 

Ling, M. L., Wex, H., Grawe, S., Jakobsson, J., Löndahl, J., Hartmann, S., Finster, K., Boesen, T., and Šantl-Temkiv, T.: Effects of ice nucleation protein repeat number and oligomerization level on ice nucleation activity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 1802–1810, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jd027307, 2018. 

Liou, Y.-C., Tocilj, A., Davies, P. L., and Jia, Z.: Mimicry of ice structure by surface hydroxyls and water of a β-helix antifreeze protein, Nature, 406, 322–324, https://doi.org/10.1038/35018604, 2000. 

Lukas, M., Schwidetzky, R., Kunert, A. T., Backus, E. H. G., Pöschl, U., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Bonn, M., and Meister, K.: Interfacial water ordering is insufficient to explain ice-nucleating protein activity, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 12, 218–223, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03163, 2021. 

Lukas, M., Schwidetzky, R., Eufemio, R. J., Bonn, M., and Meister, K.: Toward understanding bacterial ice nucleation, J. Phys. Chem. B, 126, 1861–1867, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c09342, 2022. 

Marshall, C. J., Basu, K., and Davies, P. L.: Ice-shell purification of ice-binding proteins, Cryobiology, 72, 258–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.03.009, 2016. 

Miller, A. J., Brennan, K. P., Mignani, C., Wieder, J., David, R. O., and Borduas-Dedekind, N.: Development of the drop Freezing Ice Nuclei Counter (FINC), intercomparison of droplet freezing techniques, and use of soluble lignin as an atmospheric ice nucleation standard, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3131–3151, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3131-2021, 2021. 

Murray, K. A., Kinney, N. L. H., Griffiths, C. A., Hasan, M., Gibson, M. I., and Whale, T. F.: Pollen derived macromolecules serve as a new class of ice-nucleating cryoprotectants, Sci. Rep., 12, 12295, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15545-4, 2022. 

Nandy, L., Fenton, J. L., and Freedman, M. A.: Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation in Model Crystalline Porous Organic Polymers: Influence of Pore Size on Immersion Freezing, J. Phys. Chem. A, 127, 6300–6308, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c00071, 2023. 

Neudecker, P., Nerkamp, J., Eisenmann, A., Nourse, A., Lauber, T., Schweimer, K., Lehmann, K., Schwarzinger, S., Ferreira, F., and Rösch, P.: Solution Structure, Dynamics, and Hydrodynamics of the Calcium-bound Cross-reactive Birch Pollen Allergen Bet v 4 Reveal a Canonical Monomeric Two EF-Hand Assembly with a Regulatory Function, J. Mol. Biol., 336, 1141–1157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.070, 2004. 

O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Ross, J. F., Whale, T. F., Price, H. C., Atkinson, J. D., Umo, N. S., and Webb, M. E.: The relevance of nanoscale biological fragments for ice nucleation in clouds, Sci. Rep., 5, 8082, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08082, 2015. 

O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Ross, J. F., Whale, T. F., Price, H. C., Atkinson, J. D., Umo, N. S., and Webb, M. E.: The relevance of nanoscale biological fragments for ice nucleation in clouds, Sci. Rep., 5, 8082, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08082, 2015. 

Polen, M., Lawlis, E., and Sullivan, R. C.: The unstable ice nucleation properties of Snomax® bacterial particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 11666–11678, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025251, 2016. 

Pouleur, S., Richard, C., Martin, J., and Antoun, H.: Ice nucleation activity in Fusarium acuminatum and Fusarium avenaceum, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 2960–2964, https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.58.9.2960-2964.1992, 1992. 

Pummer, B. G., Bauer, H., Bernardi, J., Bleicher, S., and Grothe, H.: Suspendable macromolecules are responsible for ice nucleation activity of birch and conifer pollen, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2541–2550, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2541-2012, 2012. 

Pummer, B. G., Bauer, H., Bernardi, J., Chazallon, B., Facq, S., Lendl, B., Whitmore, K., and Grothe, H.: Chemistry and morphology of dried-up pollen suspension residues: Chemistry and morphology of pollen suspension residues, J. Raman Spectrosc., 44, 1654–1658, https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.4395, 2013. 

Pummer, B. G., Budke, C., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Niedermeier, D., Felgitsch, L., Kampf, C. J., Huber, R. G., Liedl, K. R., Loerting, T., Moschen, T., Schauperl, M., Tollinger, M., Morris, C. E., Wex, H., Grothe, H., Pöschl, U., Koop, T., and Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.: Ice nucleation by water-soluble macromolecules, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4077–4091, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015, 2015. 

Qiu, Y., Hudait, A., and Molinero, V.: How size and aggregation of ice-binding proteins control their ice nucleation efficiency, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 141, 7439–7452, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b01854, 2019. 

Rangel-Alvarado, R. B., Nazarenko, Y., and Ariya, P. A.: Snow-borne nanosized particles: abundance, distribution, composition, and significance in ice nucleation processes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 11760–11774, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023773, 2015. 

Raymond, J. A. and DeVries, A. L.: Adsorption inhibition as a mechanism of freezing resistance in polar fishes, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74, 2589–2593, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.6.2589, 1977. 

Schwidetzky, R., Kunert, A. T., Bonn, M., Pöschl, U., Ramløv, H., DeVries, A. L., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., and Meister, K.: Inhibition of bacterial ice nucleators is not an intrinsic property of antifreeze proteins, J. Phys. Chem. B, 124, 4889–4895, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c03001, 2020.  

Schwidetzky, R., Sun, Y., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Kunert, A. T., Bonn, M., and Meister, K.: Ice nucleation activity of perfluorinated organic acids, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 12, 3431–3435, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00604, 2021. 

Schwidetzky, R., de Almeida Ribeiro, I., Bothen, N., Backes, A. T., DeVries, A. L., Bonn, M., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Molinero, V., and Meister, K.: Functional aggregation of cell-free proteins enables fungal ice nucleation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 120, e2303243120, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2303243120, 2023. 

Seifried, T. M., Bieber, P., Felgitsch, L., Vlasich, J., Reyzek, F., Schmale III, D. G., and Grothe, H.: Surfaces of silver birch (Betula pendula) are sources of biological ice nuclei: in vivo and in situ investigations, Biogeosciences, 17, 5655–5667, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5655-2020, 2020. 

Seifried, T. M., Bieber, P., Kunert, A. T., Schmale, D. G., Whitmore, K., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., and Grothe, H.: Ice nucleation activity of alpine bioaerosol emitted in vicinity of a birch forest, Atmosphere, 12, 779, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060779, 2021. 

Seifried, T. M., Reyzek, F., Bieber, P., and Grothe, H.: Scots pines (Pinus sylvestris) as sources of biological ice-nucleating macromolecules (INMs), Atmosphere, 14, 266, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020266, 2023. 

Soh, W. T., Briza, P., Dall, E., Asam, C., Schubert, M., Huber, S., Aglas, L., Bohle, B., Ferreira, F., and Brandstetter, H.: Two Distinct Conformations in Bet v 2 Determine Its Proteolytic Resistance to Cathepsin S, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 18, 2156, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18102156, 2017. 

Tong, H.-J., Ouyang, B., Nikolovski, N., Lienhard, D. M., Pope, F. D., and Kalberer, M.: A new electrodynamic balance (EDB) design for low-temperature studies: application to immersion freezing of pollen extract bioaerosols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1183–1195, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1183-2015, 2015. 

Vali, G.: Quantitative evaluation of experimental results on the heterogeneous freezing nucleation of supercooled liquids, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 402–409, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0402:qeoera>2.0.co;2, 1971. 

Vali, G.: Interpretation of freezing nucleation experiments: singular and stochastic; sites and surfaces, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5271–5294, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014, 2014. 

Wright, T. P., Petters, M. D., Hader, J. D., Morton, T., and Holder, A. L.: Minimal cooling rate dependence of ice nuclei activity in the immersion mode, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 10535–10543, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50810, 2013. 

Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Ding, X., Cheng, L., Wang, L., Qian, H., Qi, X., and Song, C.: Purification and identification of antifreeze protein from cold-acclimated oat (Avena sativa L.) and the cryoprotective activities in ice cream, Food Bioprocess Tech., 9, 1746–1755, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-016-1750-x, 2016. 

Download
Short summary
Betula pendula is a widespread birch tree species containing ice nucleation agents that can trigger the freezing of cloud droplets and thereby alter the evolution of clouds. Our study identifies three distinct ice-nucleating macromolecule (INM) aggregates of varying size that can nucleate ice at temperatures up to –5.4°C. Our findings suggest that these vegetation-derived particles may influence atmospheric processes, weather, and climate more strongly than previously thought.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint