Articles | Volume 22, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-691-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-691-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Root growth dynamics and allocation as a response to rapid and local changes in soil moisture
Samuele Ceolin
Catchment and Eco-hydrology (CAT), Environmental Sensing and Modelling (ENVISION), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux, Luxembourg
Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Stanislaus J. Schymanski
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Catchment and Eco-hydrology (CAT), Environmental Sensing and Modelling (ENVISION), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux, Luxembourg
Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Dagmar van Dusschoten
Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Robert Koller
Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Julian Klaus
Department of Geography, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Valery Bessely Stanislas Kouassi, Blé Anouma Fhorest Yao, Gneneyougo Emile Soro, Albert Bi Tié Goula, Nelly Carine Kelome, and Julian Klaus
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-159, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-159, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Dams and reservoirs are crucial for water supply, energy, and farming in West Africa, but information about them is often inaccessible, incomplete, or inconsistent. We combined existing records with field observations to create the a harmonized dataset to date, with quality verified at the watershed scale. This work improves access to dam and reservoir information in West Africa, supporting research and investment planning for climate adaptation across the region.
Youri Rothfuss, Samuel Le Gall, Nicolas Brüggemann, Sharmin Jahan, Mathieu Javaux, Julian Klaus, Harry Vereecken, and Dagmar van Dusschoten
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1518, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1518, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
How plants cope with water stress is relevant when studying plant water sources in soil. We associated two techniques for measuring the content in water stable isotopes in the stem of sunflower plants and for locating where they take up water in a non-destructive manner. We highlight the role of stem water as a source of water to transpiration flux.
Johanna Bacher, Julian Klaus, Adam S. Ward, Jasmine Krause, Catalina Segura, and Clarissa Glaser
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 1523–1541, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1523-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1523-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding solute transport often relies on slug tracer experiments. These experiments are biassed toward capturing faster flow paths and miss longer timescales. We explore integrating a slug-injected tracer with naturally occurring radon to quantify flow paths across different timescales at the reach scale. We show that jointly calibrating a transient storage model with both tracers strengthens parameter constraints and improves solute transport estimates in future studies.
Ginevra Fabiani, Julian Klaus, and Daniele Penna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2683–2703, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2683-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2683-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
There is a limited understanding of the role that topography and climate play in tree water use. Through a cross-site comparison in Luxembourg and Italy, we investigated beech water use along slopes in different climates. Our findings indicate that in landscapes characterized by stronger hydraulic and climatic gradients there is greater spatial variation in tree physiological responses. This highlights how differing growing conditions across landscapes can lead to contrasting tree performances.
Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6289–6309, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6289-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6289-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for estimating the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. We found that a model that optimizes vegetation properties in response to changes in precipitation leads it to converge to a single curve. In contrast, models that assume no changes in vegetation start to deviate from a single curve. This implies that vegetation has a stabilizing role, bringing catchments back to equilibrium after changes in climate.
Enrico Bonanno, Günter Blöschl, and Julian Klaus
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6003–6028, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6003-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6003-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
There is an unclear understanding of which processes regulate the transport of water, solutes, and pollutants in streams. This is crucial since these processes control water quality in river networks. Compared to other approaches, we obtained clearer insights into the processes controlling solute transport in the investigated reach. This work highlights the risks of using uncertain results for interpreting the processes controlling water movement in streams.
Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4575–4585, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for the estimation of the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. The Budyko curve can be defined as a function of a wetness index or a dryness index. We found that differences can occur and that there is an uncertainty due to the different formulations.
César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez, Mauro Sulis, and Stanislaus Schymanski
Biogeosciences, 19, 3395–3423, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3395-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3395-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Vegetation relies on soil water reservoirs during dry periods. However, when this source is depleted, the plants may access water stored deeper in the rocks. This rock moisture contribution is usually omitted in large-scale models, which affects modeled plant water use during dry periods. Our study illustrates that including this additional source of water in the Community Land Model improves the model's ability to reproduce observed plant water use at seasonally dry sites.
Caitlyn A. Hall, Sheila M. Saia, Andrea L. Popp, Nilay Dogulu, Stanislaus J. Schymanski, Niels Drost, Tim van Emmerik, and Rolf Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 647–664, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Impactful open, accessible, reusable, and reproducible hydrologic research practices are being embraced by individuals and the community, but taking the plunge can seem overwhelming. We present the Open Hydrology Principles and Practical Guide to help hydrologists move toward open science, research, and education. We discuss the benefits and how hydrologists can overcome common challenges. We encourage all hydrologists to join the open science community (https://open-hydrology.github.io).
Remko C. Nijzink, Jason Beringer, Lindsay B. Hutley, and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 883–900, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-883-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-883-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Vegetation Optimality Model (VOM) is a coupled water–vegetation model that predicts vegetation properties rather than determines them based on observations. A range of updates to previous applications of the VOM has been made for increased generality and improved comparability with conventional models. This showed that there is a large effect on the simulated water and carbon fluxes caused by the assumption of deep groundwater tables and updated soil profiles in the model.
Remko C. Nijzink, Jason Beringer, Lindsay B. Hutley, and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 525–550, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-525-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-525-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most models that simulate water and carbon exchanges with the atmosphere rely on information about vegetation, but optimality models predict vegetation properties based on general principles. Here, we use the Vegetation Optimality Model (VOM) to predict vegetation behaviour at five savanna sites. The VOM overpredicted vegetation cover and carbon uptake during the wet seasons but also performed similarly to conventional models, showing that vegetation optimality is a promising approach.
Cited articles
Amenu, G. G. and Kumar, P.: A model for hydraulic redistribution incorporating coupled soil-root moisture transport, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 55–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-55-2008, 2008. a
Bauerle, T. L., Smart, D. R., Bauerle, W. L., Stockert, C., and Eissenstat, D. M.: Root foraging in response to heterogeneous soil moisture in two grapevines that differ in potential growth rate, New Phytol., 179, 857–866, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02489.x, 2008. a
Carvajal, M., Cooke, D., and Clarkson, D.: Responses of wheat plants to nutrient deprivation may involve the regulation of water-channel function, Planta, 199, 372–381, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195729, 1996. a
Ceolin, S.: MRI images and code for data analysis, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14236332, 2025. a
Chaves, M. and Davies, B.: Drought effects and water use efficiency: improving crop production in dry environments, Funct. Plant Biol., 37, iii, https://doi.org/10.1071/FPv37n2_FO, 2010. a
Daryanto, S., Wang, L., and Jacinthe, P.-A.: Global synthesis of drought effects on cereal, legume, tuber and root crops production: A review, Agr. Water Manage., 179, 18–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.022, 2017. a
Engels, C., Mollenkopf, M., and Marschner, H.: Effect of drying and rewetting the topsoil on root growth of maize and rape in different soil depths, Z. Pflanz. Bodenkunde, 157, 139–144, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19941570213, 1994. a, b, c, d
Eshel, A. and Beeckman, T. (Eds.): Plant Roots: The Hidden Half, 4th edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, ISBN 978-1-4398-4648-3, 2013. a
Farrant, J. M. and Hilhorst, H.: Crops for dry environments, Curr. Opin. Biotech., 74, 84–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.10.026, 2022. a
Fromm, H.: Root Plasticity in the Pursuit of Water, Plants, 8, 236, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8070236, 2019. a, b
Gallardo, M., Turner, N., and Ludwig, C.: Water relations, gas exchange and abscisic acid content of Lupinus cosentinii leaves in response to drying different proportions of the root system, J. Exp. Bot., 45, 909–918, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/45.7.909, 1994. a, b, c
Giehl, R. F. H. and von Wirén, N.: Hydropatterning – how roots test the waters, Science, 362, 1358–1359, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9375, 2018. a
Gorska, A., Ye, Q., Holbrook, N. M., and Zwieniecki, M. A.: Nitrate Control of Root Hydraulic Properties in Plants: Translating Local Information to Whole Plant Response, Plant Physiol., 148, 1159–1167, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.122499, 2008. a
Green, S. R. and Clothier, B. E.: Root water uptake by kiwifruit vines following partial wetting of the root zone, Plant Soil, 173, 317–328, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011470, 1995. a, b
Hayes, D. C. and Seastedt, T. R.: Root dynamics of tallgrass prairie in wet and dry years, Can. J. Botany, 65, 787–791, https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-105, 1987. a
Hodge, A.: The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients, New Phytol., 162, 9–24, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01015.x, 2004. a
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., Gérard-Marchant, P., Sheppard, K., Reddy, T., Weckesser, W., Abbasi, H., Gohlke, C., and Oliphant, T. E.: Array programming with NumPy, Nature, 585, 357–362, 2020.
Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Computing in science and engineering, 9.03, 90–95, 2007.
Hutchings, M. J., John, E. A., and Wijesinghe, D. K.: Toward understanding the consequences of soil heterogeneity for plant populations and communities, Ecology, 84, 2322–2334, 2003. a
Ishikawa-Sakurai, J., Hayashi, H., and Murai-Hatano, M.: Nitrogen availability affects hydraulic conductivity of rice roots, possibly through changes in aquaporin gene expression, Plant Soil, 379, 289–300, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2070-4, 2014. a
Jarvis, N. J.: Simple physics-based models of compensatory plant water uptake: concepts and eco-hydrological consequences, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3431–3446, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3431-2011, 2011. a, b
Karlova, R., Boer, D., Hayes, S., and Testerink, C.: Root plasticity under abiotic stress, Plant Physiol., 187, 1057–1070, 2021. a
Klaus, J., Monk, W. A., Zhang, L., and Hannah, D. M.: Ecohydrological interactions during drought, Ecohydrology, 15, e2456, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2456, 2022. a
Kühnhammer, K., Kübert, A., Brüggemann, N., Deseano Diaz, P., Dusschoten, D., Javaux, M., Merz, S., Vereecken, H., Dubbert, M., and Rothfuss, Y.: Investigating the root plasticity response of Centaurea jacea to soil water availability changes from isotopic analysis, New Phytol., nph.16352, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16352, 2020. a
Kulmatiski, A.: Water matching: an explanation for plant growth and coexistence in water-limited systems, Discover Soil, 1, 2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-024-00002-7, 2024. a
Majdi, H. and Andersson, P.: Fine Root Production and Turnover in a Norway Spruce Stand in Northern Sweden: Effects of Nitrogen and Water Manipulation, Ecosystems, 8, 191–199, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-004-0246-0, 2005. a
McKinney, W.: Data structures for statistical computing in Python, SciPy, Vol. 445. No. 1, 2010.
Müllers, Y., Postma, J. A., Poorter, H., and van Dusschoten, D.: Deep-water uptake under drought improved due to locally increased root conductivity in maize, but not in faba bean, Plant Cell Environ., 46, 2046–2060, https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14587, 2023. a
Nguyen, M. A., Larson, J. E., Blair, M. D., Hardwick, D. D., Khurana, N., Kim, J. S., Rosenfield, M. V., and Funk, J. L.: Rapid root responses of seedlings exposed to a postdrought water pulse, Am. J. Bot., 104, 1816–1824, https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1700282, 2017. a
Pardales, J. R. and Yamauchi, A.: Regulation of root development in sweetpotato and cassava by soil moisture during their establishment period, Plant Soil, 255, 201–208, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026160309816, 2003. a
Peek, M. S., Leffler, A. J., Hipps, L., Ivans, S., Ryel, R. J., and Caldwell, M. M.: Root turnover and relocation in the soil profile in response to seasonal soil water variation in a natural stand of Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma), Tree Physiol., 26, 1469–1476, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/26.11.1469, 2006. a
Pregitzer, K. S., Hendrick, R. L., and Fogel, R.: The demography of fine roots in response to patches of water and nitrogen, New Phytol., 125, 575–580, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03905.x, 1993. a, b
Saelim, S., Sdoodee, S., and Chiarawipa, R.: Monitoring seasonal fine root dynamics of Hevea brasiliensis clone RRIM 600 in Southern Thailand using minirhizotron technique, Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology, 41, 341–348, https://doi.org/10.14456/sjst-psu.2019.43, 2019. a
Schneider, H. M. and Lynch, J. P.: Should root plasticity be a crop breeding target?, Front. Plant Sci., 11, 546, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00546, 2020. a
Schwinning, S. and Ehleringer, J. R.: Water use trade-offs and optimal adaptations to pulse-driven arid ecosystems, J. Ecol., 89, 464–480, 2001. a
Schymanski, S. J.: Optimality as a Concept to Understand and Model Vegetation at Different Scales, Geography Compass, 2, 1580–1598, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00137.x, 2008. a
Schymanski, S. J., Sivapalan, M., Roderick, M. L., Beringer, J., and Hutley, L. B.: An optimality-based model of the coupled soil moisture and root dynamics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 913–932, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-913-2008, 2008. a, b
Stewart, A. M. and Frank, D. A.: Short sampling intervals reveal very rapid root turnover in a temperate grassland, Oecologia, 157, 453–458, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1088-9, 2008. a
Thomas, A.: Root water uptake under heterogeneous soil moisture conditions: an experimental study for unraveling compensatory root water uptake and hydraulic redistribution, Plant Soil, 475, 421–435, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04738-3, 2020. a
Tzohar, D., Moshelion, M., and Ben-Gal, A.: Compensatory hydraulic uptake of water by tomato due to variable root-zone salinity, Vadose Zone J., 20, e20161, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20161, 2021. a
van Dusschoten, D., Metzner, R., Kochs, J., Postma, J. A., Pflugfelder, D., Bühler, J., Schurr, U., and Jahnke, S.: Quantitative 3D Analysis of Plant Roots Growing in Soil Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Plant Physiol., 170, 1176–1188, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01388, 2016. a, b
van Dusschoten, D., Kochs, J., Kuppe, C., Sydoruk, V. A., Couvreur, V., Pflugfelder, D., and Postma, J. A.: Spatially resolved root water uptake determination using a precise soil water sensor, Plant Physiol., 184, 1221–1235, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.20.00488, 2020. a
Van Loon, A. F., Gleeson, T., Clark, J., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Stahl, K., Hannaford, J., Di Baldassarre, G., Teuling, A. J., Tallaksen, L. M., Uijlenhoet, R., Hannah, D. M., Sheffield, J., Svoboda, M., Verbeiren, B., Wagener, T., Rangecroft, S., Wanders, N., and Van Lanen, H. A. J.: Drought in the Anthropocene, Nat. Geosci., 9, 89–91, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2646, 2016. a
Van Vuuren, M., Robinson, D., and Griffiths, B.: Nutrient inflow and root proliferation during the exploitation of a temporally and spatially discrete source of nitrogen in soil, Plant Soil, 178, 185–192, 1996. a
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, İ., Feng, Y., Moore, E. W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E. A., Harris, C. R., Archibald, A. M., Ribeiro, A. H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., and SciPy 1.0 Contributors: SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nat. Methods, 17, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2, 2020. a
Wan, C., Yilmaz, I., and Sosebee, R. E.: Seasonal soil–water availability influences snakeweed root dynamics, J. Arid Environ., 51, 255–264, https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2001.0942, 2002. a
Wang, L., de Kroon, H., Bögemann, G. M., and Smits, A. J. M.: Partial Root Drying Effects on Biomass Production in Brassica napus and the Significance of Root Responses, Plant Soil, 276, 313–326, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-5085-z, 2005. a, b, c, d
Wang, P., Niu, G., Fang, Y., Wu, R., Yu, J., Yuan, G., Pozdniakov, S. P., and Scott, R. L.: Implementing Dynamic Root Optimization in Noah-MP for Simulating Phreatophytic Root Water Uptake, Water Resour. Res., 54, 1560–1575, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021061, 2018. a
Waskom, M. L.: Seaborn: statistical data visualization, Journal of Open Source Software, 6.60, 3021, 2021.
Zhang, B., Cadotte, M. W., Chen, S., Tan, X., You, C., Ren, T., Chen, M., Wang, S., Li, W., Chu, C., Jiang, L., Bai, Y., Huang, J., and Han, X.: Plants alter their vertical root distribution rather than biomass allocation in response to changing precipitation, Ecology, 100, e02828, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2828, 2019. a
Short summary
We investigated if and how roots of maize plants respond to multiple abrupt changes in soil moisture. We measured root lengths using a magnetic resonance imaging technique and calculated changes in growth rates after applying water pulses. The root growth rates increased in wetted soil layers within 48 hours and decreased in non-wetted layers, indicating fast adaptation of the root systems to moisture changes. Our findings could improve irrigation management and vegetation models.
We investigated if and how roots of maize plants respond to multiple abrupt changes in soil...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint