Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
Biogeosciences, 7, 1263–1269, 2010
Biogeosciences, 7, 1263–1269, 2010

  19 Apr 2010

19 Apr 2010

A comparison of the variability of biological nutrients against depth and potential density

J. While1,2 and K. Haines2 J. While and K. Haines
  • 1ESSC, Harry Pitt Building, 3 Earley Gate, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK
  • 2now at: Met Office, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB, UK

Abstract. The main biogeochemical nutrient distributions, along with ambient ocean temperature and the light field, control ocean biological productivity. Observations of nutrients are much sparser than physical observations of temperature and salinity, yet it is critical to validate biogeochemical models against these sparse observations if we are to successfully model biological variability and trends. Here we use data from the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study and the World Ocean Database 2005 to demonstrate quantitatively that over the entire globe a significant fraction of the temporal variability of phosphate, silicate and nitrate within the oceans is correlated with water density. The temporal variability of these nutrients as a function of depth is almost always greater than as a function of potential density, with he largest reductions in variability found within the main pycnocline. The greater nutrient variability as a function of depth occurs when dynamical processes vertically displace nutrient and density fields together on shorter timescales than biological adjustments. These results show that dynamical processes can have a significant impact on the instantaneous nutrient distributions. These processes must therefore be considered when modeling biogeochemical systems, when comparing such models with observations, or when assimilating data into such models.

Final-revised paper