Journal cover Journal topic
Biogeosciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Volume 8, issue 12
Biogeosciences, 8, 3581–3591, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-3581-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Nitrogen and global change

Biogeosciences, 8, 3581–3591, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-3581-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 08 Dec 2011

Research article | 08 Dec 2011

The significance of nitrous oxide emission due to cropping of grain for biofuel production: a Swedish perspective

Å. Kasimir Klemedtsson1 and K. A. Smith2,3 Å. Kasimir Klemedtsson and K. A. Smith
  • 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 460, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 2Woodlands One, Pomeroy Villas, Totnes, Devon, TQ9 5BE, UK
  • 3School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN, UK

Abstract. The current regulations governing production of biofuels in the European Union require that they have to mitigate climate change, by producing >35% less greenhouse gases (GHG) than fossil fuels. There is a risk that this may not be achievable, since land use for crop production inevitably emits the potent GHG nitrous oxide (N2O), due to nitrogen fertilisation and cycling in the environment. We analyse first-generation biofuel production on agricultural land and conclude that efficient agricultural crop production resulting in a good harvest and low N2O emission can fulfil the EU standard, and is possible under certain conditions for the Swedish agricultural and bioethanol production systems. However, in years having low crop yields, and where cropping is on organic soils, total GHG emissions per unit of fuel produced can be even higher than those released by burning of fossil fuels. In general, the N2O emission size in Sweden and elsewhere in northern Europe is such that there is a >50% chance that the 35% saving requirement will not be met. Thus ecosystem N2O emissions have to be convincingly assessed. Here we compare Swedish emission data with values estimated by means of statistical models and by a global, top-down, approach; the measurements and the predictions often show higher values that would fail to meet the EU standard and thus prevent biofuel production development.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Final-revised paper
Preprint