Remote sensing-based estimation of gross primary production in a subalpine grassland
- 1Remote Sensing of Environmental Dynamics Laboratory, DISAT, Università degli Studi Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- 2European Commission, DG-JRC, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Monitoring Agricultural Resources Unit, Ispra, VA, Italy
- 3European Commission, DG-JRC, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Climate Risk Management Unit, Ispra, VA, Italy
- 4Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell'Ambiente della Valle d'Aosta, Sez. Agenti Fisici, Aosta, Italy
- 5European Commission, DG-JRC, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Forest Resources and Climate Unit, Ispra, VA, Italy
- 6Plant Biology Department, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
Abstract. This study investigates the performances in a terrestrial ecosystem of gross primary production (GPP) estimation of a suite of spectral vegetation indexes (VIs) that can be computed from currently orbiting platforms. Vegetation indexes were computed from near-surface field spectroscopy measurements collected using an automatic system designed for high temporal frequency acquisition of spectral measurements in the visible near-infrared region. Spectral observations were collected for two consecutive years in Italy in a subalpine grassland equipped with an eddy covariance (EC) flux tower that provides continuous measurements of net ecosystem carbon dioxide (CO2) exchange (NEE) and the derived GPP.
Different VIs were calculated based on ESA-MERIS and NASA-MODIS spectral bands and correlated with biophysical (Leaf area index, LAI; fraction of photosynthetically active radiation intercepted by green vegetation, fIPARg), biochemical (chlorophyll concentration) and ecophysiological (green light-use efficiency, LUEg) canopy variables. In this study, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was the index best correlated with LAI and fIPARg (r = 0.90 and 0.95, respectively), the MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index (MTCI) with leaf chlorophyll content (r = 0.91) and the photochemical reflectance index (PRI551), computed as (R531-R551)/(R531+R551) with LUEg (r = 0.64).
Subsequently, these VIs were used to estimate GPP using different modelling solutions based on Monteith's light-use efficiency model describing the GPP as driven by the photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by green vegetation (APARg) and by the efficiency (ε) with which plants use the absorbed radiation to fix carbon via photosynthesis. Results show that GPP can be successfully modelled with a combination of VIs and meteorological data or VIs only. Vegetation indexes designed to be more sensitive to chlorophyll content explained most of the variability in GPP in the ecosystem investigated, characterised by a strong seasonal dynamic of GPP. Accuracy in GPP estimation slightly improves when taking into account high frequency modulations of GPP driven by incident PAR or modelling LUEg with the PRI in model formulation. Similar results were obtained for both measured daily VIs and VIs obtained as 16-day composite time series and then downscaled from the compositing period to daily scale (resampled data). However, the use of resampled data rather than measured daily input data decreases the accuracy of the total GPP estimation on an annual basis.