Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-6-2863-2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-6-2863-2009
11 Mar 2009
 | 11 Mar 2009
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal BG. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Seasonal variation in ecosystem parameters derived from FLUXNET data

M. Groenendijk, M. K. van der Molen, and A. J. Dolman

Abstract. The carbon dioxide sink is in a complex way related to weather and climate. In order to better understand the relationship and feedbacks, we present a methodology to simulate observed carbon dioxide flux data with a simple vegetation model (5PM) with weekly varying model parameters. The model parameters explain the interaction between vegetation and seasonal climate more general than the flux data. Two parameters (Rref and E0) are related to ecosystem respiration and three parameters (Jm, α and λ) to photosynthesis and transpiration. We quantified the weekly variability of ecosystem parameters as a function of vegetation type and climate region.

After statistical quality checks 121 FLUXNET sites were available for analysis of the weekly varying model parameters. The simulations of these sites have high correlation coefficients (r2=0.6 to 0.8) between the observed and simulated carbon and water fluxes. With weekly parameters we determined average seasonal cycles for the different combinations of vegetation type and climate regions (PFTs). The variation between PFTs is large, which provides an excellent dataset to study the differences in ecosystem characteristics. In general we observed that needleleaf forests and grasslands in warmer climates have relatively constant parameter values during the year. Broadleaf forests in all climate regions have large seasonal variation for each of the five parameters. In boreal regions parameter values are always lower than in temperate regions. A large seasonality of the model parameters indicates a strong relation between vegetation and climate. This suggests that climate change will have the largest impact on the terrestrial carbon fluxes in boreal regions and for deciduous forests, and less for grasslands and evergreen forests.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
M. Groenendijk, M. K. van der Molen, and A. J. Dolman
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
M. Groenendijk, M. K. van der Molen, and A. J. Dolman
M. Groenendijk, M. K. van der Molen, and A. J. Dolman

Viewed

Total article views: 2,109 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
873 1,157 79 2,109 61 60
  • HTML: 873
  • PDF: 1,157
  • XML: 79
  • Total: 2,109
  • BibTeX: 61
  • EndNote: 60
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 05 Sep 2024
Download
Altmetrics