Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-6-2913-2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-6-2913-2009
11 Mar 2009
 | 11 Mar 2009
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal BG but the revision was not accepted.

A comparison of CO2 fluxes via eddy covariance measurements with model predictions in a dominant subtropical forest ecosystem

J.-H. Yan, G.-Y. Zhou, Y.-L. Li, D.-Q. Zhang, D. Otieno, and J. Tenhunen

Abstract. CO2 fluxes were measured continuously for twelve months (2003) using eddy covariance technique at canopy layer in a dominant subtropical forest in South China. Our results showed that daytime maximum CO2 fluxes of the whole ecosystem varied from −15 to −20 μmol m−2 s−1. The peaks of CO2 fluxes appeared earlier than the peaks of solar radiation. Contribution of CO2 fluxes in a subtropical forest in the dry season was 53% of the annual total from the whole forest ecosystem. Daytime CO2 fluxes were very large in October, November and December, which was therefore an important stage for uptake of CO2 by the forest ecosystem from the atmosphere.

Using the estimates of biomass, soil carbon and parameters of leaf photosynthesis from other studies at the same forest, we ran a process-based model, CBM (stands for CSIRO Biosphere Model) for this site, and compared the predicted fluxes of CO2 with measurements. We obtained reasonable agreement. The mean difference between the simulated and measured daytime CO2 fluxes from the year-round (8249 records) was −0.2 μmol m−2 s−1 and implied well within measurement accuracy.

Based on estimates of forest ecosystem respiration, NEE was calculated −242 and −276 gCm−2 year−1 for measured and modelled, respectively. In previous study, NPP for this forest stand was 694 gCm−2 year−1 during 2003/04 and litterfall was 424 gCm−2 year−1. We therefore calculated NEE as −270 gCm−2 year−1 and very similar to the values obtained by measured and modelled CO2 fluxes in this study.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
J.-H. Yan, G.-Y. Zhou, Y.-L. Li, D.-Q. Zhang, D. Otieno, and J. Tenhunen
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
J.-H. Yan, G.-Y. Zhou, Y.-L. Li, D.-Q. Zhang, D. Otieno, and J. Tenhunen
J.-H. Yan, G.-Y. Zhou, Y.-L. Li, D.-Q. Zhang, D. Otieno, and J. Tenhunen

Viewed

Total article views: 1,279 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
713 471 95 1,279 54 43
  • HTML: 713
  • PDF: 471
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 1,279
  • BibTeX: 54
  • EndNote: 43
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 05 Sep 2024
Download
Altmetrics