the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Technical Note: n-Alkane lipid biomarkers in loess: post-sedimentary or syn-sedimentary?
Abstract. There is an ongoing discussion whether n-alkane biomarkers – and organic matter (OM) from loess in general – reflect a syn-sedimentary paleoenvironmental and paleoclimate signal or whether they are significantly a post-sedimentary feature contaminated by root-derived OM. We present first radiocarbon data for the n-alkane fraction of lipid extracts and for the first time luminescence ages for the Middle to Late Weichselian loess-paleosol sequence of Gleina in Saxony, Germany. Comparison of these biomarker ages with sedimentation ages as assessed by optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating shows that one n-alkane sample features a syn-sedimentary age (14C: 29.2 ± 1.4 kyr cal BP versus OSL: 27.3 ± 3.0 kyr). By contrast, the 14C ages derived from the other n-alkane samples are clearly younger (20.3 ± 0.7 kyr cal BP, 22.1 ± 0.7 kyr cal BP and 29.8 ± 1.4 kyr cal BP) than the corresponding OSL ages (26.6 ± 3.1 kyr, 32.0 ± 3.5 kyr and 45.6 ± 5.3 kyr). This finding suggests that a post-sedimentary n-alkane contamination presumably by roots has occurred.
In order to estimate the post-sedimentary n-alkane contamination more quantitatively, we applied a 14C mass balance calculation based on the measured pMC (percent modern carbon) values, the calculated syn-sedimentary pMC values and pMC values suspected to reflect likely time points of post-sedimentary contamination (current, modern, 3 kyr, 6 kyr and 9 kyr). Accordingly, current and modern root-contamination would account for up to 7%, a 3 kyr old root-contamination for up to 10%, and an Early and Middle Holocene root-contamination for up to 20% of the total sedimentary n-alkane pool.
We acknowledge and encourage that these first radiocarbon results need further confirmation both from other loess-paleosol sequences and for different biomarkers, e.g. carboxylic acids or alcohols as further lipid biomarkers.
- Preprint
(808 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(474 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf08e/cf08e471eb31ab8e7fafb1d845a6e182c8661e07" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f973d/f973d72f1cc61c03a6db358cea8eb74314226c0c" alt="Supplement"
-
RC C3014: 'Referee Comments to Author', Yoshito Chikaraishi, 07 Aug 2012
-
AC C3259: 'Reply to Referee Comments to Author, Yoshito Chikaraishi', Michael Zech, 16 Aug 2012
-
AC C3259: 'Reply to Referee Comments to Author, Yoshito Chikaraishi', Michael Zech, 16 Aug 2012
-
RC C3145: 'review #2', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Aug 2012
-
AC C3277: 'Reply to review #2, Anonymous Reviewer #2', Michael Zech, 16 Aug 2012
-
AC C3277: 'Reply to review #2, Anonymous Reviewer #2', Michael Zech, 16 Aug 2012
-
SC C3541: 'Critical comment on the Technical Note', Guido Wiesenberg, 24 Aug 2012
-
AC C3669: 'Reply to critical comment, Guido Wiesenberg', Michael Zech, 30 Aug 2012
-
AC C3669: 'Reply to critical comment, Guido Wiesenberg', Michael Zech, 30 Aug 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf08e/cf08e471eb31ab8e7fafb1d845a6e182c8661e07" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f973d/f973d72f1cc61c03a6db358cea8eb74314226c0c" alt="Supplement"
-
RC C3014: 'Referee Comments to Author', Yoshito Chikaraishi, 07 Aug 2012
-
AC C3259: 'Reply to Referee Comments to Author, Yoshito Chikaraishi', Michael Zech, 16 Aug 2012
-
AC C3259: 'Reply to Referee Comments to Author, Yoshito Chikaraishi', Michael Zech, 16 Aug 2012
-
RC C3145: 'review #2', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Aug 2012
-
AC C3277: 'Reply to review #2, Anonymous Reviewer #2', Michael Zech, 16 Aug 2012
-
AC C3277: 'Reply to review #2, Anonymous Reviewer #2', Michael Zech, 16 Aug 2012
-
SC C3541: 'Critical comment on the Technical Note', Guido Wiesenberg, 24 Aug 2012
-
AC C3669: 'Reply to critical comment, Guido Wiesenberg', Michael Zech, 30 Aug 2012
-
AC C3669: 'Reply to critical comment, Guido Wiesenberg', Michael Zech, 30 Aug 2012
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,064 | 1,150 | 100 | 4,314 | 73 | 59 |
- HTML: 3,064
- PDF: 1,150
- XML: 100
- Total: 4,314
- BibTeX: 73
- EndNote: 59
Cited
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Evaluation of bacterial glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether and 2H–18O biomarker proxies along a central European topsoil transect J. Hepp et al. 10.5194/bg-17-741-2020
- Reconstruction of the late Quaternary paleoenvironments of the Nussloch loess paleosol -- Response to comments by G. Wiesenberg and M. Gocke M. Zech et al. 10.1016/j.yqres.2012.12.010
- Comparative14C and OSL dating of loess-paleosol sequences to evaluate post-depositional contamination ofn-alkane biomarkers M. Zech et al. 10.1017/qua.2016.7