Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-1977-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-1977-2014
04 Feb 2014
 | 04 Feb 2014
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal BG but the revision was not accepted.

How well can we predict soil respiration with climate indicators, now and in the future?

C. T. Berridge, L. H. Hadju, and A. J. Dolman

Abstract. Soils contain the largest terrestrial store of carbon; three times greater than present atmospheric concentrations, whilst the annual soil-atmosphere exchange of carbon is an order of magnitude larger than all anthropogenic effluxes. Quantifying future pool sizes and fluxes is therefore sensitive to small methodological errors, yet unfortunately remains the second largest area of uncertainty in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections.

The flux of carbon from heterotrophic decomposition of soil organic matter is parameterized as a rate constant. This parameter is calculated from observed total soil carbon efflux and contemporaneously observed temperature and soil moisture. This metric is then used to simulate future rates of heterotrophic respiration, as driven by the projections of future climate- temperature and precipitation. We examine two underlying assumptions: how well current climate (mean temperature and precipitation) can account for contemporary soil respiration, and whether an observational parameter derived from this data will be valid in the future.

We find mean climate values to be of some use in capturing total soil respiration to the 95% confidence interval, but note an inability to distinguish between subtropical and Mediterranean fluxes, or wetland-grassland and wetland-forest fluxes.

Regarding the future, we present a collection of CO2 enrichment studies demonstrating a strong agreement in soil respiration response (a 25% increase) independent of changes in temperature and moisture, however these data are spatially limited to the northern mid-latitudes.

In order to "future-proof" simple statistical parameters used to calculate the output from heterotrophic soil respiration, we propose a correction factor derived from empirical observations, but note the spatial and temporal limitations.

In conclusion, there seems to be no sound basis to assume that models with the best fit to contemporary data will produce the best estimates of future fluxes, given the methods, future dynamics and the nature of the observational constraints. Only through long-term field observations and appropriate, perhaps novel, data collection can we improve statistical respiration modelling, without adding mechanistic details at a computational cost.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
C. T. Berridge, L. H. Hadju, and A. J. Dolman
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
C. T. Berridge, L. H. Hadju, and A. J. Dolman
C. T. Berridge, L. H. Hadju, and A. J. Dolman

Viewed

Total article views: 2,345 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,241 1,029 75 2,345 76 84
  • HTML: 1,241
  • PDF: 1,029
  • XML: 75
  • Total: 2,345
  • BibTeX: 76
  • EndNote: 84
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Feb 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Feb 2014)

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 05 Oct 2024
Download
Altmetrics