Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-2665-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-2665-2014
14 Feb 2014
 | 14 Feb 2014
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

On the apparent CO2 absorption by alkaline soils

X. Chen and W. F. Wang

Abstract. Alkaline soils in the Gubantonggut Desert were recently demonstrated socking away large quantities of CO2 in an abiotic form. This demands a better understanding of abiotic CO2 exchange in alkaline sites. Reaction of CO2 with the moisture or dew in the soil was conjectured as a potential mechanism. The main goal of this study is to determine the extent to which the dew deposition modulates Land–Atmosphere CO2 exchange at highly alkaline sites (pH ~ 10). Experiments were conducted at the most barren sites (canopy coverage < 5%) to cut down uncertainty. Dew quantities and soil CO2 fluxes were measured using a micro-lysimeters and an automated flux system (LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA), respectively. There is an evident increase of dew deposition in nocturnal colder temperatures and decrease in diurnal warmer temperatures. Variations of soil CO2 flux are almost contrary, but the increase in diurnal warmer temperatures is obscure. It was shown that the accumulation and evaporation of dew in the soil motivates the apparent absorption and release of CO2. It was demonstrated that dew amounts in the soil has an exponential relation with the part in Fc beyond explanations of the worldwide utilized Q10 model. Therefore dew deposition in highly alkaline soils exerted a potential CO2 sink and can partly explain the apparent CO2 absorption. This implied a crucial component in the net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) at alkaline sites which occupies approximately 5% of the Earth's land surface (7 million km). Further explorations for its mechanisms and representativeness over other arid climate systems have comprehensive perspectives in the quaternary research.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
X. Chen and W. F. Wang

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
X. Chen and W. F. Wang
X. Chen and W. F. Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 1,755 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,074 601 80 1,755 58 71
  • HTML: 1,074
  • PDF: 601
  • XML: 80
  • Total: 1,755
  • BibTeX: 58
  • EndNote: 71
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2014)

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Altmetrics